XML 36 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
A summary of annual minimum contractual obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2018 is as follows:
Fiscal Year Ending March 31,
 
Software
Development
and Licensing
 
Marketing
 
Operating
Leases
 
Purchase
Obligations
 
Convertible
Notes Interest
 
Convertible
Notes
 
Total
2019
 
$
116,242

 
$
49,725

 
$
39,113

 
$
21,549

 
$
20

 
$
8,160

 
$
234,809

2020
 
53,534

 
4,060

 
29,620

 
7,046

 

 

 
94,260

2021
 
28,999

 
13,480

 
23,092

 
1,629

 

 

 
67,200

2022
 
21,748

 
3,773

 
21,665

 

 

 

 
47,186

2023
 
6,250

 
3,500

 
19,571

 

 

 

 
29,321

Thereafter
 
5,250

 

 
62,476

 

 

 

 
67,726

Total
 
$
232,023

 
$
74,538

 
$
195,537

 
$
30,224

 
$
20

 
$
8,160

 
$
540,502


Software Development and Licensing Agreements:    We make payments to third-party software developers that include contractual payments to developers under several software development agreements that expire at various times through January 2022. Our aggregate outstanding software development commitments assume satisfactory performance by third-party software developers. We also have licensing commitments that primarily consist of obligations to holders of intellectual property rights for use of their trademarks, copyrights, technology or other intellectual property rights in the development of our products.
Marketing Agreements:    We have certain minimum marketing support commitments where we commit to spend specified amounts related to marketing our products. Marketing commitments expire at various times through December 2022 and primarily reflect our agreements with major sports leagues and players' associations.
Operating Leases:    Our offices are occupied under non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various times through December 2032. We also lease certain furniture, equipment and automobiles under non-cancelable leases expiring through March 2021. Some of the leases have fixed rent increases and also include inducements to enter into the lease. The effect of such amounts are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the related lease term. Rent expense amounted to $25,301, $19,545 and $18,032 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Purchase obligations:    These obligations are primarily related to agreements to purchase services that are enforceable and legally binding on the Company that specifies all significant terms, including fixed, minimum or variable pricing provisions; and the approximate timing of the transactions, expiring at various times through September 2021.
Employee Savings Plans:    For our United States employees we maintain a 401(k) retirement savings plan and trust. Our 401(k) plan is offered to all eligible employees and participants may make voluntary contributions. We also have various pension plans for our non-U.S. employees, some of which are required by local laws, and allow or require Company contributions. Employer contributions under all defined contribution and pension plans during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $9,592, $8,018 and $8,348, respectively.
Legal and Other Proceedings:    We are, or may become, subject to demands and claims (including intellectual property claims) and are involved in routine litigation in the ordinary course of business which we do not believe to be material to our business or financial condition or results of operations. We have appropriately accrued amounts related to certain of these claims and legal and other proceedings. While it is reasonably possible that a loss may be incurred in excess of the amounts accrued in our financial statements, we believe that such losses, unless otherwise disclosed, would not be material.
On April 11, 2016, we filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking, among other things, a judicial declaration that Leslie Benzies, the former president of one of our subsidiaries with whom we had been in ongoing discussions regarding his separation of employment, is not entitled to any minimum allocation or financial parity with any other person under the applicable royalty plan. We believe we will prevail in this matter, although there can be no assurance of the outcome. On April 12, 2016, Mr. Benzies filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County against us, and certain of our subsidiaries and employees. We removed this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, but the case was subsequently remanded to state court. The complaint claims damages of at least $150,000 and contains allegations of breach of fiduciary duty; fraudulent inducement and fraudulent concealment; aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; breach of various contracts; breach of implied duty of good faith and fair dealing; tortious interference with contract; unjust enrichment; reformation; constructive trust; declaration of rights; constructive discharge; defamation and fraud. We have asserted counterclaims for breach of contract, theft of trade secrets, and misappropriation.
As a result of amended pleadings, motion practice and appeals to date, twelve of Mr. Benzies’ claims have been dismissed, leaving only six remaining claims: breach of various contracts, constructive discharge, breach of implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, and tortious interference with contract. Our federal court action has been stayed pending the conclusion of the state court action. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to the remaining claims, and we intend to vigorously defend against them and to pursue our counterclaims.
We have accrued what we believe to be an adequate amount for this matter, which amounts are classified as Business reorganization within Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Note 20 - Business Reorganization). We do not believe that the ultimate outcome of such litigation, even if in excess of our current accrual, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.