XML 43 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commodity Derivative Contracts
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commodity Derivative Contracts
Note 5. Commodity Derivative Contracts

We do not apply hedge accounting treatment to our oil and natural gas derivative contracts; therefore, the changes in the fair values of these instruments are recognized in income in the period of change.  These fair value changes, along with the cash settlements of expired contracts, are shown under "Commodity derivatives expense (income)" in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

From time to time, we enter into various oil and natural gas derivative contracts to provide an economic hedge of our exposure to commodity price risk associated with anticipated future oil and natural gas production. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. These contracts have consisted of price floors, collars, three-way collars, fixed-price swaps and fixed-price swaps enhanced with a sold put. The production that we hedge has varied from year to year depending on our levels of debt and financial strength and expectation of future commodity prices. We currently employ a strategy to hedge a portion of our forecasted production approximately 18 months to two years in the future from the current quarter, as we believe it is important to protect our future cash flow to provide a level of assurance for our capital spending and dividends in those future periods in light of current worldwide economic uncertainties and commodity price volatility.

We manage and control market and counterparty credit risk through established internal control procedures that are reviewed on an ongoing basis.  We attempt to minimize credit risk exposure to counterparties through formal credit policies, monitoring procedures, and diversification, and all of our commodity derivative contracts are with parties that are lenders under our Bank Credit Agreement. As of June 30, 2014, all of our outstanding derivative contracts were subject to enforceable master netting arrangements whereby payables on those contracts can be offset against receivables from separate derivative contracts with the same counterparty. It is our policy to classify derivative assets and liabilities on a gross basis on our balance sheets, even if the contracts are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements.

The following table summarizes our commodity derivative contracts as of June 30, 2014, none of which are classified as hedging instruments in accordance with the FASC Derivatives and Hedging topic:
Months
 
Index Price
 
Volume (2)
 
Contract Prices (1)
Range (3)
 
Weighted Average Price
Swap
 
Sold Put
 
Floor
 
Ceiling
Oil Contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014 Fixed-Price Swaps
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
July – Sept
 
NYMEX
 
58,000
 
$
90.00
93.50

 
$
92.52

 
$

 
$

 
$

Oct – Dec
 
NYMEX
 
58,000
 
 
90.00
93.50

 
92.52

 

 

 

2015 Enhanced Swaps (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jan – Mar
 
NYMEX
 
14,000
 
$
90.00
90.30

 
$
90.06

 
$
65.21

 
$

 
$

Jan – Mar
 
LLS
 
16,000
 
 
93.20
94.00

 
93.63

 
68.00

 

 

Apr – June
 
NYMEX
 
8,000
 
 
90.00
90.00

 
90.00

 
65.75

 

 

Apr – June
 
LLS
 
16,000
 
 
93.20
94.00

 
93.65

 
68.00

 

 

July – Sept
 
NYMEX
 
10,000
 
 
90.00
90.10

 
90.02

 
65.30

 

 

July – Sept
 
LLS
 
16,000
 
 
93.20
94.00

 
93.65

 
68.00

 

 

Oct – Dec
 
NYMEX
 
10,000
 
 
91.15
94.00

 
92.18

 
68.00

 

 

Oct – Dec
 
LLS
 
8,000
 
 
93.80
96.50

 
94.94

 
68.00

 

 

2015 Collars
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jan – Mar
 
NYMEX
 
24,000
 
$
80.00
100.90

 
$

 
$

 
$
80.00

 
$
96.75

Jan – Mar
 
LLS
 
4,000
 
 
85.00
102.20

 

 

 
85.00

 
102.10

Apr – June
 
NYMEX
 
30,000
 
 
80.00
95.25

 

 

 
80.00

 
94.72

Apr – June
 
LLS
 
4,000
 
 
85.00
102.50

 

 

 
85.00

 
101.75

July – Sept
 
NYMEX
 
28,000
 
 
80.00
95.25

 

 

 
80.00

 
95.05

July – Sept
 
LLS
 
4,000
 
 
85.00
100.00

 

 

 
85.00

 
99.50

2015 Three-Way Collars (5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Oct – Dec
 
NYMEX
 
8,000
 
$
85.00
102.00

 
$

 
$
68.00

 
$
85.00

 
$
98.50

Oct – Dec
 
LLS
 
8,000
 
 
88.00
104.25

 

 
68.00

 
88.00

 
100.99

2016 Enhanced Swaps (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jan – Mar
 
NYMEX
 
6,000
 
$
92.65
92.65

 
$
92.65

 
$
68.00

 
$

 
$

Jan – Mar
 
LLS
 
6,000
 
 
94.85
95.45

 
95.18

 
68.00

 

 

2016 Three-Way Collars
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jan – Mar
 
NYMEX
 
6,000
 
$
85.00
99.50

 
$

 
$
68.00

 
$
85.00

 
$
99.50

Jan – Mar
 
LLS
 
4,000
 
 
88.00
102.00

 

 
68.00

 
88.00

 
101.58

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural Gas Contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014 Collars
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
July – Dec
 
NYMEX
 
14,000
 
$
4.00
4.47

 
$

 
$

 
$
4.00

 
$
4.45

2015 Collars
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jan – Dec
 
NYMEX
 
8,000
 
$
4.00
4.53

 
$

 
$

 
$
4.00

 
$
4.51



(1)
Contract prices are stated in $/Bbl and $/MMBtu for oil and natural gas contracts, respectively.
(2)
Contract volumes are stated in Bbls/d and MMBtus/d for oil and natural gas contracts, respectively.
(3)
Ranges presented for fixed-price swaps and enhanced swaps represent the lowest and highest fixed prices of all open contracts for the period presented. For collars and three-way collars, ranges represent the lowest floor price and highest ceiling price for all open contracts for the period presented.
(4)
An enhanced swap is a fixed-price swap contract combined with a sold put feature (at a lower price) with the same counterparty. The value associated with the sold put is used to increase or enhance the fixed price of the swap. At the contract settlement date, (1) if the index price is higher than the swap price, we pay the counterparty the difference between the index price and swap price for the contracted volumes, (2) if the index price is lower than the swap price but at or above the sold put price, the counterparty pays us the difference between the index price and the swap price for the contracted volumes, and (3) if the index price is lower than the sold put price, the counterparty pays us the difference between the swap price and the sold put price for the contracted volumes.
(5)
A three-way collar is a costless collar contract combined with a sold put feature (at a lower price) with the same counterparty. The value received for the sold put is used to enhance the contracted floor and ceiling price of the related collar. At the contract settlement date, (1) if the index price is higher than the ceiling price, we pay the counterparty the difference between the index price and ceiling price for the contracted volumes, (2) if the index price is between the floor and ceiling price, no settlements occur, (3) if the index price is lower than the floor price but at or above the sold put price, the counterparty pays us the difference between the index price and the floor price for the contracted volumes, and (4) if the index price is lower than the sold put price, the counterparty pays us the difference between the floor price and the sold put price for the contracted volumes.