10-Q

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

o Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from _______ to ________

Commission file number: 001-12935

DENBURY RESOURCES INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	20-0467835
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
5320 Legacy Drive, Plano, TX	75024
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (972) 673-2000

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes þ     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes þ    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filerþ	Accelerated filero	Non-accelerated filero	Smaller reporting companyo
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at October 31, 2012
Common Stock, $.001 par value	386,996,454

Denbury Resources Inc.

Table of Contents

		Page
	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011	3
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011	4
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011	5
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011	6
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	40
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	42
	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	43
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	43
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	43
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	43
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	43
Item 5.	Other Information	44
Item 6.	Exhibits	45
	Signatures	46
	Exhibit 3(a)
	Exhibit 10(a)
	Exhibit 31(a)
	Exhibit 31(b)
	Exhibit 32

- 2 -

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Denbury Resources Inc.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except par value and share data)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	24,034		$	18,693
Accrued production receivable		290,805			294,689
Trade and other receivables, net		149,096			164,446
Short-term investments		—			86,682
Derivative assets		16,820			47,402
Deferred tax assets		18,168			50,156
Other current assets		9,845			22,045
Total current assets		508,768			684,113
Property and equipment
Oil and natural gas properties (using full cost accounting)
Proved		8,230,939			7,026,579
Unevaluated		807,064			1,157,106
CO2 properties		687,890			596,003
Pipelines and plants		1,933,807			1,701,756
Other property and equipment		402,908			157,674
Less accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization, and impairment		(3,080,957	)		(2,627,493	)
Net property and equipment		8,981,651			8,011,625
Derivative assets		12,820			29
Goodwill		1,363,547			1,236,318
Other assets		239,160			252,339
Total assets	$	11,105,946		$	10,184,424
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	403,396		$	429,336
Oil and gas production payable		200,184			197,092
Derivative liabilities		2,395			26,523
Current maturities of long-term debt		36,635			8,316
Total current liabilities		642,610			661,267
Long-term liabilities
Long-term debt, net of current portion		3,038,865			2,669,729
Asset retirement obligations		88,189			88,726
Derivative liabilities		1,999			18,872
Deferred taxes		2,095,850			1,918,576
Other liabilities		19,213			20,756
Total long-term liabilities		5,244,116			4,716,659
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.001 par value, 600,000,000 shares authorized; 405,399,728 and 402,946,070 shares issued, respectively		405			403
Paid-in capital in excess of par		3,132,342			3,090,374
Retained earnings		2,320,174			1,909,475
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(366	)		(418	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 16,282,108 and 13,965,673 shares, respectively		(233,335	)		(193,336	)
Total stockholders' equity		5,219,220			4,806,498
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	11,105,946		$	10,184,424

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 3 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2012		2011			2012			2011
Revenues and other income
Oil, natural gas, and related product sales	$	588,156	$	565,523		$	1,813,798		$	1,662,814
CO2 sales and transportation fees		7,160		6,541			19,256			16,808
Interest income and other income		5,055		4,441			14,214			12,445
Total revenues and other income		600,371		576,505			1,847,268			1,692,067
Expenses
Lease operating expenses		130,485		133,285			392,960			383,167
Marketing expenses		14,728		6,416			37,776			17,989
CO2 discovery and operating expenses		1,176		1,250			8,443			4,889
Taxes other than income		40,012		36,180			122,518			108,295
General and administrative		38,198		26,613			109,631			97,641
Interest, net of amounts capitalized of $19,437, $17,853, $57,357 and $42,004, respectively		37,827		37,617			115,745			128,643
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization		136,935		101,978			390,119			299,067
Derivatives expense (income)		61,631		(210,154	)		(32,203	)		(212,308	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		—		—			—			16,131
Impairment of assets		—		—			17,515			—
Other expenses		—		—			23,272			4,377
Total expenses		460,992		133,185			1,185,776			847,891
Income before income taxes		139,379		443,320			661,492			844,176
Income tax provision		54,012		167,650			250,793			323,450
Net income	$	85,367	$	275,670		$	410,699		$	520,726
Net income per common share – basic	$	0.22	$	0.69		$	1.06		$	1.31
Net income per common share – diluted	$	0.22	$	0.68		$	1.05		$	1.29
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic		387,512		399,040			387,015			398,371
Diluted		390,909		403,311			390,854			403,575

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 4 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Operations

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2012		2011			2012		2011
Net income	$	85,367	$	275,670		$	410,699	$	520,726
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax:
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax benefit of $2,420 and $4,244, respectively		—		(3,949	)		—		(6,925	)
Interest rate lock derivative contracts reclassified to income, net of tax of $11, $11, $32 and $32, respectively		17		17			52		52
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		17		(3,932	)		52		(6,873	)
Comprehensive income	$	85,384	$	271,738		$	410,751	$	513,853

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 5 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	410,699		$	520,726
Adjustments needed to reconcile to net cash flow provided by operations:
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization		390,119			299,067
Deferred income taxes		216,959			317,601
Stock-based compensation		22,662			27,520
Noncash fair value derivative adjustments		(19,757	)		(217,008	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		—			16,131
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts		11,021			13,280
Impairment of assets		17,515			—
Other, net		15,087			(4,340	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued production receivable		3,221			(45,017	)
Trade and other receivables		11,010			(38,607	)
Other current and long-term assets		8,218			(11,587	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(30,127	)		(65,407	)
Oil and natural gas production payable		5,014			40,819
Other liabilities		(35,515	)		(14,086	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,026,126			839,092
Cash flows from investing activities:
Oil and natural gas capital expenditures		(848,618	)		(741,256	)
Acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties		(155,636	)		(34,291	)
Cash paid in Riley Ridge acquisition		—			(199,233	)
CO2 capital expenditures		(93,945	)		(62,546	)
Pipelines and plants capital expenditures		(231,459	)		(142,406	)
Purchases of other assets		(18,666	)		(25,211	)
Net proceeds from sales of oil and natural gas properties and equipment		33,973			47,598
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments		83,545			—
Other		(7,166	)		(907	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(1,237,972	)		(1,158,252	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Bank repayments		(970,000	)		(255,000	)
Bank borrowings		1,210,000			365,000
Repayment of senior subordinated notes		—			(525,000	)
Premium paid on repayment of senior subordinated notes		—			(13,137	)
Net proceeds from issuance of senior subordinated notes		—			400,000
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		12,579			12,348
Costs of debt financing		(17	)		(13,104	)
Common stock repurchase program		(16,747	)		—
Other		(18,628	)		(9,453	)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		217,187			(38,346	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		5,341			(357,506	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		18,693			381,869
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	24,034		$	24,363

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 6 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

Organization and Nature of Operations

Denbury Resources Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a growing independent oil and natural gas company.  We are the largest combined oil and natural gas producer in both Mississippi and Montana, own the largest reserves of CO2 used for tertiary oil recovery east of the Mississippi River, and hold significant operating acreage in the Rocky Mountain and Gulf Coast regions.  Our goal is to increase the value of our acquired properties through a combination of exploitation, drilling and proven engineering extraction practices, with our most significant emphasis on our CO2 tertiary recovery operations.

Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Denbury Resources Inc. and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements.  These financial statements and the notes thereto should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.  Unless indicated otherwise or the context requires, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Company,” or “Denbury,” refer to Denbury Resources Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Accounting measurements at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at year-end and the results of operations for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year.  In management’s opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of our consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2012, our consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and our consolidated cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Certain prior period items have been reclassified to make the classification consistent with the classification in the most recent quarter.  On the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, “Taxes other than income” is a new line item and includes (i) oil and natural gas ad valorem taxes, which were reclassified from “Lease operating expenses,” (ii) franchise taxes and property taxes on buildings, which were reclassified from “General and administrative,” (iii) oil and natural gas production taxes, which were reclassified from “Production taxes and marketing expenses” used in prior reports and (iv) CO2 property ad valorem and production taxes, which were classified from “CO2 discovery and operating expenses.”  Such reclassifications had no impact on our reported total expenses or net income.

Net Income per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income per common share is calculated in the same manner, but includes the effect of potentially dilutive securities.  Potentially dilutive securities consist of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), nonvested restricted stock, and nonvested performance equity awards.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no adjustments to net income for purposes of calculating diluted net income per common share.  

- 7 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average shares used in the basic and diluted net income per common share calculations for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
In thousands	2012		2011		2012		2011
Basic weighted average common shares		387,512		399,040		387,015		398,371
Potentially dilutive securities:
Stock options and SARs		2,302		2,954		2,759		3,818
Performance equity awards		78		41		75		22
Restricted stock		1,017		1,276		1,005		1,364
Diluted weighted average common shares		390,909		403,311		390,854		403,575

Basic weighted average common shares excludes 3.6 million and 3.7 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and 3.4 million and 3.5 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, of nonvested restricted stock.  As these restricted shares vest or become retirement eligible, they will be included in the shares outstanding used to calculate basic net income per common share (although all restricted stock is issued and outstanding upon grant).  For purposes of calculating diluted weighted average common shares, the nonvested restricted stock is included in the computation using the treasury stock method, with the deemed proceeds equal to the average unrecognized compensation during the period, adjusted for any estimated future tax consequences recognized directly in equity.

The following securities could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future, but were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as their effect would have been antidilutive:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
In thousands	2012		2011		2012		2011
Stock options and SARs		5,375		4,731		4,140		3,108
Restricted stock		69		139		63		56

Short-Term Investments

Short-term investments are available-for-sale securities recorded at fair value with any unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2011, short-term investments consisted entirely of our investment in Vanguard Natural Resources LLC (“Vanguard”) common units obtained as partial consideration for the sale of our interests in Encore Energy Partners LP to a subsidiary of Vanguard on December 31, 2010.  We received distributions of $1.8 million and $5.3 million on the Vanguard common units we owned during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, which are included in “Interest income and other income” on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.  During January 2012, the Company sold its investment in Vanguard for cash consideration of $83.5 million, net of related transaction fees.  The Company recognized a pretax loss on the sale of $3.1 million, which is included in “Other expenses” on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

- 8 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Goodwill

The following table summarizes the changes in Denbury’s goodwill for the period indicated:

	Nine Months Ended
In thousands	September 30, 2012
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,236,318
Goodwill related to the acquisition of interests in Thompson Field(1)		127,229
Balance, end of period	$	1,363,547

(1) See Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures, for additional information regarding goodwill associated with Thompson Field.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Comprehensive Income.  In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”).  ASU 2011-05 requires the presentation of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements.  ASU 2011-05 was effective for Denbury beginning January 1, 2012.  Since ASU 2011-05 only amended presentation requirements, it did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value.  In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”).  ASU 2011-04 amends the Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification (“FASC”) Fair Value Measurements topic by providing a consistent definition and measurement of fair value, as well as similar disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards.  ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles, clarifies the application of existing fair value measurements and expands the fair value disclosure requirements, particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements.  ASU 2011-04 was effective for Denbury beginning January 1, 2012.  The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, but did require additional disclosures.  See Note 6, Fair Value Measurements.

Note 2. Acquisitions and Divestitures

Pending Exchange Transaction

On September 19, 2012, we entered into a definitive exchange agreement with Exxon Mobil Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary XTO Energy Inc. (collectively, “ExxonMobil”) to sell ExxonMobil our Bakken area assets in North Dakota and Montana in exchange for total consideration consisting of $1.6 billion cash (subject to closing adjustments), and ExxonMobil’s operating interests in the Webster Field in Texas and the Hartzog Draw Field in Wyoming (the “Pending Exchange Transaction”).  The Pending Exchange Transaction is expected to close around the end of November 2012 with an effective date of July 1, 2012 and is subject to customary closing conditions, including satisfactory completion of customary title and environmental due diligence.  The cash portion of the sales price is subject to adjustments for revenues and costs of the respective assets from the effective date to the closing date.  The Pending Exchange Transaction agreement contains termination rights for both parties, including such rights based on the failure to close the transaction by January 31, 2013.

- 9 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Acquisitions

June 2012 Acquisition of Reserves in the Gulf Coast region at Thompson Field

In June 2012, we acquired a nearly 100% working interest and 84.7% net revenue interest in Thompson Field for $366.2 million after preliminary closing adjustments.  The field is located approximately 18 miles west of Hastings Field, which is an enhanced oil recovery (“EOR”) field that Denbury is currently flooding with CO2, and is the current terminus of the Green Pipeline which transports CO2 from the Jackson Dome, located near Jackson, Mississippi.  Thompson Field is similar to Hastings Field, producing oil from the Frio zone at similar depths, and is also expected to be an ideal candidate for a CO2 flood.  Under the terms of the Thompson Field acquisition agreement, the seller will retain approximately a 5% gross revenue interest (less severance taxes) once average monthly oil production exceeds 3,000 Bbls/d after the initiation of CO2 injection.

This acquisition meets the definition of a business under the FASC Business Combinations topic.  As such, Denbury estimated the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of June 1, 2012, the closing date of the acquisition.  The FASC Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (often referred to as the “exit price”).  The fair value measurement is based on the assumptions of market participants and not those of the reporting entity.  Therefore, entity-specific assumptions should not impact the measurement of fair value unless those assumptions are consistent with market participant views.

In applying these accounting principles, Denbury estimated the fair value of the assets acquired less liabilities assumed on the acquisition date to be approximately $238.9 million.  This measurement resulted in the recognition of goodwill of approximately $127.2 million, which represents the excess of the cash paid to acquire the field over the acquisition date estimated fair value.  This resultant goodwill is due primarily to two factors.  The first factor is the decrease in average NYMEX oil futures prices between the date of signing the purchase agreement on April 24, 2012 and closing the purchase on June 1, 2012.  The second factor is the fair value assigned to the estimated oil reserves recoverable through a CO2 EOR project.  By building an 18-mile extension of the Green Pipeline, Denbury will have access to its CO2 reserves at Jackson Dome, one of the few known significant natural sources of CO2 in the United States, and the largest known source east of the Mississippi River, allowing Denbury to carry out CO2 EOR activities in this field at a lower cost than other market participants.  However, the FASC Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures does not allow entity-specific assumptions in the measurement of fair value.  Therefore, we estimated the fair value of the oil reserves recoverable through CO2 EOR using a higher estimated cost of CO2 to other market participants, which lowers the discounted net revenue stream used in making the fair value estimate related to this field.

The fair value of Thompson Field assets acquired and liabilities assumed was based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which FASC Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic defines as Level 3 inputs.  Key assumptions include (1) NYMEX oil futures prices (this input is observable), (2) estimated quantities of oil reserves, (3) projections of future rates of production, (4) timing and amount of estimated future development and operating costs, (5) projected cost of CO2 to a market participant, (6) projected recovery factors, and (7) risk-adjusted discount rates.  The fair value of the oil and natural gas properties was determined using a risk-adjusted after-tax discounted cash flow analysis.  Denbury applies full cost accounting rules, and all of the goodwill is deductible for tax purposes as property cost.  

- 10 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table presents a summary of the preliminary fair value of the Thompson Field assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

In thousands
Consideration:
Cash payment(1)	$	366,178
Less:  Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:(2)
Oil and natural gas properties
Proved		232,467
Unevaluated		4,151
Pipelines and plants		2,000
Other assets		3,637
Asset retirement obligations		(3,306	)
		238,949
Goodwill	$	127,229

(1)	See Divestitures below for additional information regarding restricted cash and the like-kind exchange transaction utilized to fund the purchase.
(2)	Fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is preliminary, pending final closing adjustments and further evaluation of reserves and asset retirement obligations.

August 2011 Acquisition of Reserves in Rocky Mountain Region at Riley Ridge

In August 2011, we acquired the remaining 57.5% working interest in the Riley Ridge Federal Unit (“Riley Ridge”), located in the LaBarge Field of southwestern Wyoming.  Riley Ridge contains natural gas resources, as well as helium and CO2 resources.  The purchase included a 57.5% interest in a gas plant which will separate the helium and natural gas from the commingled gas stream, and interests in certain surrounding properties.  We previously acquired the other 42.5% interest in Riley Ridge and the gas plant in October 2010.  The purchase price for the August 2011 acquisition was approximately $214.8 million after closing adjustments, including a $15.0 million deferred payment to be made at the time the Riley Ridge gas plant is operational and meets specific performance conditions.  The gas plant is currently undergoing readiness testing, and we expect it to become operational in mid-2013.

The August 2011 acquisition of Riley Ridge meets the definition of a business under the FASC Business Combinations topic.  The fair values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the August 2011 acquisition have been finalized and no adjustments have been made to fair value amounts previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011.

Pro Forma Information

Based on the immateriality of revenues and expenses related to the combined acquisitions of Thompson and Riley Ridge during the periods presented, pro forma information has not been disclosed.

- 11 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Divestitures

In February 2012, we completed the sale of certain non-core assets primarily located in central and southern Mississippi and in southern Louisiana for $155.0 million to a privately held entity in which a member of our Board of Directors serves as chairman of the board, in a sale for which there was a competing bid contained in a multi-property purchase proposal.  We realized net proceeds of $141.8 million, after final closing adjustments.  The sale had an effective date of December 1, 2011 and consequently, operating revenues of $13.5 million after the effective date, net of capital and lease operating expenditures, along with any other purchase price adjustments, were adjustments to the selling price.

In April 2012, we completed the sale of certain non-operated assets in the Paradox Basin of Utah for $75.0 million.  The sale had an effective date of January 1, 2012 and proceeds received after consideration of final closing adjustments totaled $68.5 million.  Closing adjustments included operating net revenues after January 1, 2012, net of capital and lease operating expenditures, along with other purchase price adjustments.

We did not record a gain or loss on either of the above sales of properties in accordance with the full cost method of accounting.

Of the proceeds from these property sales before final closing adjustments, $212.5 million was paid directly to a qualified intermediary and later released to fund a portion of the acquisition cost of Thompson Field (see June 2012 Acquisition of Reserves in the Gulf Coast region at Thompson Field above).  Since the $212.5 million in cash proceeds was paid to a qualified intermediary in order to enable a like-kind exchange transaction for federal income tax purposes, this amount is not reflected as a receipt of cash from the sale of oil and natural gas properties and equipment, nor as a cash payment to purchase oil and natural gas properties in the investing activity in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

Note 3. Long-Term Debt

The following table shows the components of our long-term debt:

	September 30,			December 31,
In thousands	2012			2011
Bank Credit Facility	$	625,000		$	385,000
9½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016, including premium of $9,802 and $11,854, respectively		234,722			236,774
9¾% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016, including discount of $14,640 and $17,854, respectively		411,710			408,496
8¼% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2020		996,273			996,273
6⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021		400,000			400,000
Other Subordinated Notes, including premium of $27 and $33, respectively		3,834			3,840
NEJD Pipeline financing		160,684			163,677
Free State Pipeline financing		77,830			79,597
Capital lease obligations		165,447			4,388
Total		3,075,500			2,678,045
Less current obligations		(36,635	)		(8,316	)
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	3,038,865		$	2,669,729

The parent company, Denbury Resources Inc. (“DRI”), is the sole issuer of all of our outstanding senior subordinated notes.  DRI has no independent assets or operations.  Certain of DRI’s subsidiaries guarantee our debt.  Each such subsidiary guarantor is 100% owned by DRI, and the guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several obligations of the subsidiary guarantors.  Any subsidiaries of DRI other than the subsidiary guarantors are minor subsidiaries.

- 12 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Bank Credit Facility

In March 2010, we entered into a $1.6 billion revolving credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, and other lenders party thereto (as amended the “Bank Credit Agreement”).  Availability under the Bank Credit Agreement is subject to a borrowing base, which is redetermined semi-annually on or prior to May 1 and November 1 of each year, and is subject to requested special redeterminations.  In September 2012, the banks reaffirmed our borrowing base of $1.6 billion; our next semi-annual redetermination is scheduled to occur on or around May 1, 2013.  The borrowing base is adjusted at the banks’ discretion and is based in part upon certain external factors over which we have no control.  The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the credit facility, evidenced by the Bank Credit Agreement (the “Bank Credit Facility”) was 2.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  We incur a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Bank Credit Facility of either 0.375% or 0.5%, based on the ratio of outstanding borrowings under the Bank Credit Facility to the borrowing base.  The Bank Credit Agreement is scheduled to mature in May 2016.

In November 2012, we entered into the Ninth Amendment to the Bank Credit Agreement (the “Ninth Amendment”) pursuant to which certain provisions of the Bank Credit Agreement were amended to, among other things (i) permit the sale of the Bakken area assets (without any change in our borrowing base), and (ii) increase the amount of distributions Denbury may make to its equity holders, including the repurchase of our common stock and/or the making of cash dividends with respect thereto, from an aggregate amount of $500 million up to an aggregate amount of $1.2 billion during the term of the Bank Credit Agreement, subject, in the case of such distributions, to certain existing restrictions and conditions, including the absence of any default or borrowing base deficiency, availability of no less than 25% of the borrowing base and compliance with all financial covenants, in each case on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such distribution.  The Ninth Amendment also provided a limited waiver of any oil hedging noncompliance that may occur as a result of the Pending Exchange Transaction during the period commencing on the closing date of the Pending Exchange Transaction and continuing through and including December 31, 2013.

In July 2012, we entered into the Eighth Amendment to the Bank Credit Agreement (the “Eighth Amendment”) permitting the Company to incur capital lease obligations in an aggregate amount outstanding at any time not to exceed $300 million.  The Bank Credit Agreement permits the Company to incur up to $40 million of other unsecured debt, and prior to the effectiveness of the Eighth Amendment capital leases would have been captured in this permitted debt basket.   The Bank Credit Agreement was amended concurrent with the Company’s change in classification of equipment leases from operating to capital in the second quarter of 2012 (see Capital Leases below), and the Eighth Amendment included the granting by the lenders of a waiver of any applicable violations of the provisions of the Bank Credit Agreement resulting from such correction and the Company’s recording of its equipment leases as debt.  In April 2012, we entered into the Seventh Amendment to the Bank Credit Agreement (the “Seventh Amendment”).  Under the Seventh Amendment, we increased the amount of additional permitted subordinated debt (other than refinancing debt) from $300.0 million to $650.0 million.

6⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021

In February 2011, we issued $400.0 million of 6⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021 (“2021 Notes”). The 2021 Notes, which carry a coupon rate of 6.375%, were sold at par. The net proceeds of $393.0 million were used to repurchase a portion of our outstanding 2013 Notes and 2015 Notes (see Redemption of our 2013 and 2015 Notes below).

Redemption of our 2013 and 2015 Notes

Pursuant to cash tender offers, during March 2011, we repurchased $169.6 million in principal of our 7½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (“2013 Notes”) at 100.625% of par, and $220.9 million in principal of our 7½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 (“2015 Notes”) at 104.125% of par.  We called the remaining 2013 Notes and 2015 Notes, repurchasing all of the remaining outstanding 2015 Notes ($79.1 million) at 103.75% of par on March 21, 2011 and all of the remaining outstanding 2013 Notes ($55.4 million) at par on April 1, 2011.  We recognized a $16.1 million loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 associated with the debt repurchases, which is included in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations under the caption “Loss on early extinguishment of debt.”

- 13 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Capital Lease Obligations

During the second quarter of 2012, we corrected the accounting for our equipment leases from operating leases to capital leases to comply with ASC Topic 840, Leases as a result of the consideration of nonperformance-related default covenants included in our equipment lease agreements.  We recorded a cumulative adjustment to establish the capital lease assets as “Other property and equipment” ($155.6 million) and the capital lease obligations as “Long-term debt” ($138.9 million) and “Current maturities of long-term debt” ($25.1 million) on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  We also recognized the cumulative pre-tax impact of $8.4 million ($5.2 million after tax) as “Other expenses” on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  Because the amounts involved were not material to the Company’s financial statements in any individual prior period, and the cumulative impact is not material to the estimated results of operations for the year ending December 31, 2012, we recorded the cumulative effect of correcting these items during the second quarter of 2012.

Note 4.  Stockholders’ Equity

Stock Repurchase Program

In October 2011, we commenced a common stock repurchase program for up to $500 million of Denbury common stock, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.  The program has no pre-established ending date, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time.  We are not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or specific number of shares of our common stock under the program.

During the third quarter of 2012, we repurchased 2,493,435 shares of Denbury common stock for $41.1 million, or $16.48 per share, and in October 2012, we repurchased an additional 2,133,910 shares for $34.9 million, or $16.35 per share.  Since commencement of the share repurchase program in October 2011, we have purchased a total of 18,739,955 shares of Denbury common stock for $271.2 million and thus are authorized to spend an additional $228.8 million under this repurchase program.  We account for treasury stock using the cost method and include treasury stock as a component of stockholders’ equity.

Note 5.  Derivative Instruments

We do not apply hedge accounting treatment to our oil and natural gas derivative contracts; therefore, the changes in the fair values of these instruments are recognized in income in the period of change.  These fair value changes, along with the cash settlements of expired contracts, are shown under “Derivatives expense (income)” in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We enter into various oil and natural gas derivative contracts to provide an economic hedge of our exposure to commodity price risk associated with anticipated future oil and natural gas production.  We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.  These contracts have consisted of price floors, collars and fixed price swaps.  The production that we hedge has varied from year to year depending on our levels of debt and financial strength and expectation of future commodity prices.  We currently employ a strategy to hedge a portion of our forecasted production approximately 12 to 18 months in advance, as we believe it is important to protect our future cash flow to provide a level of assurance for our capital spending in those future periods in light of current worldwide economic uncertainties and commodity price volatility.

We manage and control market and counterparty credit risk through established internal control procedures that are reviewed on an ongoing basis.  We attempt to minimize credit risk exposure to counterparties through formal credit policies, monitoring procedures, and diversification.  We only enter into commodity derivative contracts with parties that are lenders under our Bank Credit Agreement.

- 14 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The following is a summary of “Derivatives expense (income)” included in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
In thousands	2012			2011			2012			2011
Oil
Payment on settlements of derivative contracts	$	641		$	1,857		$	9,580		$	23,857
Fair value adjustments to derivative contracts – expense (income)		60,726			(205,355	)		(37,752	)		(225,485	)
Total derivatives expense (income) – oil		61,367			(203,498	)		(28,172	)		(201,628	)
Natural Gas
Receipt on settlements of derivative contracts		(6,910	)		(6,427	)		(21,941	)		(19,073	)
Fair value adjustments to derivative contracts – expense (income)		7,174			(229	)		17,910			8,393
Total derivatives expense (income) – natural gas		264			(6,656	)		(4,031	)		(10,680	)
Derivatives expense (income)	$	61,631		$	(210,154	)	$	(32,203	)	$	(212,308	)

Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments

The following tables present outstanding commodity derivative contracts with respect to future production as of September 30, 2012:

				Contract Prices(2)
		Type of				Weighted Average Price
Year	Months	Contract	Volume(1)		Range	Swap		Floor		Ceiling
Oil Contracts:
2012	Oct – Dec	Swap	625	$	80.28 – 81.75	$	81.04	$	—	$	—
		Collar	53,000		80.00 – 140.65		—		80.00		128.57
		Put	625		65.00 – 65.00		—		65.00		—
	Total Oct – Dec 2012		54,250
2013	Jan – Mar	Collar	55,000	$	70.00 – 113.00	$	—	$	78.91	$	108.01
	Apr – June	Collar	56,000		75.00 – 121.50		—		79.64		108.61
	July – Sept	Collar	56,000		75.00 – 133.10		—		79.64		109.15
	Oct – Dec	Collar	54,000		80.00 – 127.50		—		80.00		117.53
2014	Jan – Mar	Collar	46,000	$	80.00 – 104.50	$	—	$	80.00	$	103.13
	Apr – June	Collar	46,000		80.00 – 104.50		—		80.00		103.13
Natural Gas Contracts:
2012	Oct – Dec	Swap	20,000	$	6.30 – 6.85	$	6.53	$	—	$	—

(1)	Contract volumes are stated in Bbl/d and MMBtu/d for oil and natural gas contracts, respectively.
(2)	Contract prices are stated in $/Bbl and $/MMBtu for oil and natural gas contracts, respectively.

- 15 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

During the third quarter of 2012, we restructured most of our oil derivative collar contracts for the first three quarters of 2013 to increase the weighted average floor price to approximately $80 per Bbl and decrease the weighted average ceiling price.  These updated contracts are reflected in the table above.

Additional Disclosures about Derivative Instruments

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had derivative financial instruments recorded in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:

		Estimated Fair Value
		Asset (Liability)
		September 30,			December 31,
Type of Contract	Balance Sheet Location	2012			2011
		In thousands
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Derivative asset
Crude oil contracts	Derivative assets – current	$	10,780		$	23,452
Natural gas contracts	Derivative assets – current		6,040			23,950
Crude oil contracts	Derivative assets – long-term		12,820			29
Derivative liability
Crude oil contracts	Derivative liabilities – current		(1,680	)		(22,610	)
Deferred premiums(1)	Derivative liabilities – current		(715	)		(3,913	)
Crude oil contracts	Derivative liabilities – long-term		(1,999	)		(18,702	)
Deferred premiums(1)	Derivative liabilities – long-term		—			(170	)
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	25,246		$	2,036

(1) Deferred premiums payable relate to various oil floor contracts and are payable on a monthly basis through January 2013.

Note 6.  Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price).  We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique.  These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable.  We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best available information.  Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  We are able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs.  The FASC establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

• Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

- 16 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

• Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date.  Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies.  Instruments in this category include non-exchange-traded oil and natural gas derivatives that are based on NYMEX pricing.  The Company’s costless-collars are valued using the Black-Scholes model, an industry standard option valuation model, that takes into account inputs such as contractual prices for the underlying instruments, including maturity, quoted forward prices for commodities, interest rates, volatility factors and credit worthiness, as well as other relevant economic measures.  Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.

• Level 3 – Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources.  These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.  Instruments in this category include non-exchange-traded natural gas derivatives swaps that are based on regional pricing other than NYMEX (i.e., Houston Ship Channel).  The Company’s basis swaps are estimated using discounted cash flow calculations based upon forward commodity price curves.  Significant increases or decreases in forward commodity price curves would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.

We adjust the valuations from the valuation model for nonperformance risk, using our estimate of the counterparty’s credit quality for asset positions and Denbury’s credit quality for liability positions.  Denbury uses multiple sources of third-party credit data in determining counterparty nonperformance risk, including credit default swaps.

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of the periods indicated:

	Fair Value Measurements Using:
In thousands	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
September 30, 2012
Assets
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts	$	—	$	23,600		$	6,040	$	29,640
Liabilities
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts		—		(3,679	)		—		(3,679	)
Total	$	—	$	19,921		$	6,040	$	25,961
December 31, 2011
Assets
Short-term investments	$	86,682	$	—		$	—	$	86,682
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts		—		23,481			23,950		47,431
Liabilities
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts		—		(41,312	)		—		(41,312	)
Total	$	86,682	$	(17,831	)	$	23,950	$	92,801

Since we do not use hedge accounting for our commodity derivative contracts, any gains and losses on our assets and liabilities are included in “Derivatives expense (income)” in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

- 17 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of our Level 3 assets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
In thousands	2012			2011			2012			2011
Balance, beginning of period	$	13,214		$	6,638		$	23,950		$	16,478
Unrealized gains (losses) on commodity derivative contracts included in earnings		(264	)		1,717			4,031			(5,359	)
Receipts on settlement of commodity derivative contracts		(6,910	)		(1,378	)		(21,941	)		(4,142	)
Balance, end of period	$	6,040		$	6,977		$	6,040		$	6,977

We utilize an income approach to value our natural gas swap arrangements, generally the industry standard valuation technique for a commodity swap contract.  We obtain and ensure the appropriateness of the natural gas forward pricing curve, the most significant input to the calculation, and the fair value estimate is prepared and reviewed on a quarterly basis.

The following table details fair value inputs related to our Level 3 natural gas financial measurements:

In thousands		Fair Value at 9/30/2012		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range
Natural gas derivative contracts		$	6,040	Discounted Cash Flow	Forward commodity price curve	(a)
(a)	The derivative instruments detailed in this category include non-exchange-traded natural gas derivatives swaps that are valued based on regional pricing other than NYMEX.  The regional pricing sources utilized for these instruments include the following (forward pricing ranges represent the high and low price expected to be received within the settlement period):
	Pricing Index		Settlement Period		Forward Pricing Range
	TETCO M1		10/1/2012 – 12/31/2012		$2.92/MMBtu – $3.55/MMBtu
	Houston Ship Channel		10/1/2012 – 12/31/2012		$2.98/MMBtu – $3.56/MMBtu
	Natural Gas – Midcontinent		10/1/2012 – 12/31/2012		$2.77/MMBtu – $3.53/MMBtu

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

As of December 31, 2011, we had invested a total of $13.8 million in the preferred stock of Faustina Hydrogen Products LLC, a company created to develop a proposed gasification plant from which CO2 would be produced as a byproduct and used by Denbury in its tertiary oil operations.  The investment was recorded at cost, together with a $1.3 million receivable for accrued dividends receivable.  The developer of the proposed plant was soliciting other potential investors for the project, and as of December 31, 2011, a third-party was actively engaged in due diligence.  During 2012, a key investor and participant in the project announced its intent to abandon its investment in the proposed plant.  As a result, due diligence by the potential third party investor ceased.  Absent the key investor, we believe it is unlikely the plant will be constructed, and therefore, it is also unlikely our investment will generate future cash flows.  Accordingly, we recorded a $15.1 million impairment charge for this investment during the first quarter of 2012, which is classified as “Impairment of assets” in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  The inputs used to determine fair

- 18 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

value of the investment included the projected future cash flows of the plant and risk-adjusted rate of return that we estimated would be used by a market participant in valuing the asset.  These inputs are unobservable within the marketplace and therefore considered Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.  However, as there are currently no expected future cash flows associated with the plant, the preferred stock was determined to have no value.

Other Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of our Bank Credit Facility approximates fair value, as it is subject to short-term floating interest rates that approximate the rates available to us for those periods.  The fair values of our senior subordinated notes are based on quoted market prices.  The estimated fair value of our senior subordinated notes as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is $2,260.0 million and $2,253.2 million, respectively.  The fair value hierarchy for long-term debt is primarily Level 1 (quoted prices for identical assets in active markets).  We have other financial instruments consisting primarily of cash, cash equivalents, short-term receivables and payables that approximate fair value due to the nature of the instrument and the relatively short maturities.

Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies

We are involved in various lawsuits, claims and other regulatory proceedings incidental to our businesses.  While we currently believe that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties.  If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our net income in the period in which the ruling occurs.  We provide accruals for litigation and claims if we determine that a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.  We are also subject to audits for sales and use taxes and severance taxes in the various states in which we operate, and from time to time receive assessments for potential taxes that we may owe.

Note 8. Related Party

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we purchased $4.5 million and $9.7 million, respectively of oil produced by a privately-held entity of which a member of our Board of Directors serves as chairman of the board.  The oil purchased under this agreement is related to the non-core assets in central and southern Mississippi and in southern Louisiana (see further discussion in Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures) sold to this same entity in February 2012.  The oil purchased under this agreement is part of a typical commercial transaction that would be entered into with a third party and is later blended with other oil and sold by Denbury to an unrelated third party.  The purchase of oil is classified as “Marketing expenses” and the subsequent sale is included in “Interest income and other income” on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.  We are under no continuing obligation to purchase oil under this agreement.

Note 9. Subsequent Event

During November 2012, we entered into an amendment to our Bank Credit Agreement (see Note 3, Long-Term Debt).

- 19 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-K”), along with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Form 10-K.  Any terms used but not defined herein have the same meaning given to them in the Form 10-K.  Our discussion and analysis includes forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties and should be read in conjunction with Risk Factors under Item 1A of Part II of this report, along with Forward-Looking Information at the end of this Item 2 for information about the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different than our forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a growing independent oil and natural gas company.  We are the largest combined oil and natural gas producer in both Mississippi and Montana, own the largest CO2 reserves used for tertiary oil recovery east of the Mississippi River, and hold significant operating acreage in the Rocky Mountain and Gulf Coast regions.  Our goal is to increase the value of acquired properties through a combination of exploitation, drilling and proven engineering extraction practices, with the most significant emphasis on our CO2 tertiary recovery operations.

Operating Highlights

We recognized net income of $85.4 million, or $0.22 per basic common share, during the third quarter of 2012 compared to net income of $275.7 million, or $0.69 per basic common share, during the third quarter of 2011.  This decrease in net income between the two periods is primarily attributable to a $273.5 million ($169.6 million after-tax) non-cash change in the fair value of the Company’s commodity derivative contracts in the most recent quarter compared to the prior year third quarter, slightly offset by a 4% increase in oil and natural gas revenues due to higher production.

During the third quarter of 2012, our oil and natural gas production, which was 93% oil, averaged 72,776 BOE/d compared to 66,830 BOE/d produced during the third quarter of 2011.  This 9% increase in production is primarily attributable to production increases in our tertiary oil fields and Bakken area assets, the latter of which are currently under contract to be sold, partially offset by normal declines in most of our other non-tertiary properties and a reduction from non-core properties sold in 2012 (see Pending Exchange Transaction and Sale of Non-Core Assets – First Half 2012 below).  After adjusting quarterly production in both periods to exclude production from non-core properties which have been sold in 2012 and the planned Bakken area assets sale, production in the third quarter of 2012 increased 4% over production in the comparable prior year quarter and decreased 1% sequentially over levels in the second quarter of 2012.  Our tertiary oil production averaged 34,786 Bbls/d during the third quarter of 2012, an increase of 12% over the 31,091 Bbls/d produced during the third quarter of 2011 and a decrease of 1% compared to second quarter 2012 levels.  The slight decrease in sequential quarterly tertiary oil production between the second and third quarters of 2012 was principally due to shutting-in production at several fields due to Hurricane Isaac in late August.  Production related to our Bakken area assets currently under contract to be sold averaged 16,651 BOE/d during the third quarter of 2012, an increase of 59% over production of 10,461 BOE/d during the third quarter of 2011 and an increase of 8% over second quarter 2012 levels.  On an aggregate basis, sequential quarterly production was up slightly between the second and third quarters of 2012 principally due to a full quarter of production from Thompson Field (see Acquisition of Thompson Field – Second Quarter 2012 below) offset by required production shut-ins for Hurricane Isaac in late August.  See Results of Operations – CO2 Operations and Results of Operations – Operating Results – Production for more information.

- 20 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our average realized oil price received per barrel, excluding the impact of commodity derivative contracts, decreased 4% to $93.09 per Bbl during the third quarter of 2012, compared to $96.85 per Bbl during the third quarter of 2011.  This decrease in realized oil prices was generally due to price changes in the markets in which we sell our crude oil, as NYMEX oil prices actually increased 3% between the respective third quarters of 2012 and 2011.  Our average oil price differential compared to NYMEX prices was a positive $0.80 per Bbl in the third quarter of 2012 compared to a positive $7.25 per Bbl in the third quarter of 2011.  See Results of Operations – Oil and Natural Gas Revenues below for more information on our oil prices received and differentials to NYMEX prices.

Pending Exchange Transaction

On September 19, 2012, we entered into a definitive exchange agreement with Exxon Mobil Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary XTO Energy Inc. (collectively, “ExxonMobil”) to sell ExxonMobil our Bakken assets in North Dakota and Montana in exchange for total consideration consisting of $1.6 billion in cash (subject to closing adjustments), and ExxonMobil’s operating interests in the Webster Field in Texas and the Hartzog Draw Field in Wyoming (the “Pending Exchange Transaction”).  The Pending Exchange Transaction is currently expected to close around the end of November 2012, with an effective date of July 1, 2012, and is subject to customary closing conditions, including satisfactory completion of customary title and environmental due diligence.  The cash portion of the sales price is subject to adjustments for revenues and costs of the respective assets from the effective date to the closing date.  We do not expect to record a gain or loss for financial statement purposes on the sale of the Bakken area assets in accordance with the full cost method of accounting, nor do we expect to record a reduction in goodwill in conjunction with the sale of the Bakken area assets.  The Pending Exchange Transaction agreement contains termination rights for both parties, including such rights based on the failure to close the transaction by January 31, 2013.

Upon closing of the Pending Exchange Transaction, we would acquire a nearly 100% working interest and nearly 80% net revenue interest in the Webster Field located in southeastern Texas.  Webster Field is similar to our Hastings and Thompson fields, producing oil from the Frio zone at similar depths, and is believed to be a potential candidate for CO2 flooding.  Webster Field is located approximately eight miles northeast of our Hastings CO2 flood and the Green Pipeline, which transports CO2 from our source in Mississippi.

With respect to the Hartzog Draw Field, we would acquire an 83% working interest and 71% net revenue interest in the oil producing Shannon Sandstone zone and a 67% working interest and 53% net revenue interest in the natural gas producing Big George Coal zone.  Hartzog Draw Field is a potential candidate for CO2 flooding and is located approximately 12 miles from the Greencore pipeline which, upon scheduled completion in 2012, will transport CO2 from our source near Lost Cabin, Wyoming to Bell Creek Field in Montana.

The Company intends to structure the acquisition of interests in Webster and Hartzog Draw fields and the sale of our Bakken area assets as a like-kind exchange transaction for federal income tax purposes.  Assuming no other qualifying purchases are made, we anticipate after-tax proceeds from the transaction (without giving effect to closing adjustments) will be approximately $1.1 billion.  The Company is continuing to seek possible acquisitions in which proceeds from the Pending Exchange Transaction could be utilized in a like-kind exchange transaction to reduce the amount of federal income tax payable due to the transaction.

In addition, we have agreed to negotiate in good faith with ExxonMobil to reach an agreement on, and if agreed upon, execute a definitive document for, our potential purchase from ExxonMobil of either (i) an interest in CO2 reserves in their LaBarge Field in southwestern Wyoming or (ii) incremental CO2 from that field (the “LaBarge Transaction”).  The LaBarge Transaction is subject to our ability to reach mutually agreeable terms and conditions regarding the purchase with ExxonMobil.

- 21 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Acquisition of Thompson Field – Second Quarter 2012

In June 2012, we acquired a nearly 100% working interest and 84.7% net revenue interest in Thompson Field for $366.2 million after preliminary closing adjustments.  The field is located approximately 18 miles west of Denbury’s Hastings Field which is currently being flooded with CO2, and which is the current terminus of the Green Pipeline which transports CO2 from Denbury’s source in Jackson Dome, Mississippi.  Thompson Field is similar to Hastings Field, producing oil from the Frio zone at similar depths, and is also expected to be an ideal candidate for a CO2 flood.  Under the terms of the agreement, after the initiation of CO2 injection, the seller will retain approximately a 5% gross revenue interest (less severance taxes) once average monthly oil production exceeds 3,000 Bbls/d.  We funded the purchase principally with cash proceeds from property sales earlier this year and the remainder from borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Sale of Non-Core Assets – First Half 2012

On April 9, 2012, we completed the sale of certain non-operated assets in the Paradox Basin of Utah for $75.0 million.  The sale had an effective date of January 1, 2012, and proceeds realized after final closing adjustments totaled $68.5 million.  On February 29, 2012, we completed the sale of certain non-core assets primarily located in central and southern Mississippi and in southern Louisiana for $155.0 million.  We realized net proceeds of $141.8 million, after final closing adjustments.  We structured the sale of our non-core assets and the purchase of Thompson Field as a like-kind exchange transaction for federal income tax purposes and anticipate deferral of a majority of the taxable gain recognized on the sale of the non-core assets.  We did not record a gain or loss on either sale in accordance with the full cost method of accounting.

Sale of Investment in Vanguard Natural Resources LLC – First Quarter 2012

On January 19, 2012, we sold our investment in Vanguard Natural Resources LLC (“Vanguard”) common units for cash consideration of $83.5 million, net of related transaction fees.  In connection with the sale, during the first quarter of 2012, we recorded a pretax $3.1 million loss which is classified as “Other expenses” in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.  The $3.1 million represents the difference between the net proceeds received from the sale and the carrying amount of the investment at December 31, 2011.

Addition of Proved Oil and Natural Gas Reserves

During the first nine months of 2012, we added 85.3 MMBOE of estimated proved reserves, including tertiary oil reserves of 42.6 MMBbls at Hastings Field and 14.1 MMBbls at Oyster Bayou Field based on these fields’ responses to CO2 injections, 16.3 MMBOE due to further development in the Bakken, and 12.3 MMBOE of acquired reserves at Thompson Field.  These increases were partially offset by the disposition of 12.7 MMBOE of reserves associated with the sale of non-core assets above.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

We currently project that our 2012 capital budget will be $1.5 billion, which excludes estimated equipment leases ($75 million), acquisitions, capitalized interest and start-up costs associated with our new tertiary floods.  Our current 2012 capital budget includes the following:

·   $430 million allocated for tertiary oil field expenditures;

·   $480 million for development of our Bakken properties;

·   $290 million for pipeline construction;

·   $200 million to be spent on CO2sources; and

·   $100 million to be spent in all other areas.

- 22 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Based on oil and natural gas prices in early November 2012 and our current production forecasts, we estimate that our 2012 capital budget (including capitalized interest and tertiary start-up costs) will be approximately $200 to $300 million greater than our 2012 anticipated cash flow from operations.  We plan to fund any shortfall between our cash flow from operations and our capital spending with proceeds from our asset sales and borrowings under our bank credit facility.

During the first nine months of 2012, we incurred capital expenditures of approximately $1.1 billion, net of equipment lease recoveries of $35.1 million.  Additionally, we have capitalized interest and tertiary start-up costs which are not included in the above mentioned amounts.  See additional detail on our expenditures in the table below under Capital Expenditure Summary.  Our original estimate of completing $75 million of equipment sale leasebacks in 2012 to finance a portion of our capital spending was based on an expectation that our Riley Ridge facility would be operational in 2012.  As we now estimate that Riley Ridge will not be operational until mid-2013, we currently project that our equipment sale leasebacks in 2012 will total less than $40 million.

We continually monitor our capital spending and anticipated cash flows and believe that we can adjust our capital spending up or down depending on cash flows; however, any such reduction in capital spending could reduce our anticipated production levels in future years.  We currently do not anticipate any material changes to our 2012 capital spending plans.  For 2013, we will attempt to match our capital spending within a close range of projected cash flow from operations.  As a result of the Pending Exchange Transaction above, we may have up to $1.1 billion of incremental cash if we are not able to consummate any additional asset purchases that would qualify under a like-kind exchange transaction.  We would plan to use any such excess cash in a variety of ways, which among other things, could include paying down our debt or funding our capital development program.  Additionally, we may choose to repurchase additional shares of common stock.

For 2012 and certain future years, we have contracted for certain capital expenditures; therefore, we cannot eliminate all of our capital commitments without penalties (refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Capital Resources and Liquidity – Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements – Commitments and Obligations in the Form 10-K).  In addition to the potential flexibility in our capital spending plans, as of September 30, 2012, we had approximately $1.0 billion of unused availability under our bank credit facility and have oil price floors in place through mid-2014 (see Note 5, Derivative Instruments, to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), which together should provide us with adequate liquidity and flexibility to meet our near-term capital spending plans if oil prices were to decrease significantly.  Also, as part of the Pending Exchange Transaction, our banking syndicate has approved the transaction and our borrowing base remains unchanged at $1.6 billion.  We currently believe we could increase the borrowing base under our bank credit facility above the current $1.6 billion level if we desired to do so.

- 23 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Capital Expenditure Summary

The following table of capital expenditures includes accrued capital for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
In thousands	2012			2011
Capital expenditures by project:
Tertiary oil fields	$	340,698		$	380,029
Bakken		338,242			297,640
CO2 pipelines		114,738			81,335
CO2 sources (1)		186,836			75,209
Other areas		114,478			167,167
Capital expenditures before acquisitions and capitalized interest		1,094,992			1,001,380
Less: recoveries from sale/leaseback transactions		(35,102	)		(42,582	)
Net capital expenditures excluding acquisitions and capitalized interest		1,059,890			958,798
Acquisitions:
Property acquisitions (2)		369,580			34,291
Consideration for August 2011 Riley Ridge acquisition		—			214,554
Capitalized interest		57,357			42,004
Capital expenditures, net of sale/leaseback transactions	$	1,486,827		$	1,249,647

(1)	Includes capital expenditures related to the Riley Ridge gas plant.
(2)	Includes capital expenditures of $212.5 million that are not reflected as an Investing Activity on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows due to the movement of proceeds through a qualified intermediary.  See Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2012 were funded with $1,026.1 million of cash flow from operations, $210.3 million of net proceeds (after final closing adjustments) from non-core oil and natural gas asset divestitures, $83.5 million of proceeds from the sale of our investment in Vanguard common units and the remainder with borrowings under our bank credit facility.  Our capital expenditures, excluding the Riley Ridge acquisition, for the first nine months of 2011 were funded with $839.1 million of cash flow from operations and the remainder with cash on hand at the beginning of the period.

- 24 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Share Repurchase Program

We have an ongoing share repurchase program under which $500 million of share repurchases is authorized.  During the third quarter of 2012, we repurchased 2,493,435 shares of Denbury common stock for $41.1 million, or $16.48 per share, and in October 2012, we repurchased an additional 2,133,910 shares of Denbury common stock for $34.9 million, or $16.35 per share.  Since the commencement of the share repurchase program in October 2011, we have purchased a total of 18,739,955 shares of Denbury common stock (approximately 5% of Denbury’s outstanding common stock as of September 30, 2011) for $271.2 million, or $14.47 per share, and thus are authorized to spend an additional $228.8 million under this repurchase program.  The November 2012 amendments to our bank credit facility expanded the dollar amount of common stock we are permitted to purchase from an aggregate of $500 million to an amount of up to $1.2 billion (see Note 3, Long-Term Debt), giving us the flexibility to more easily expand the size of our repurchase program beyond the $500 million currently approved by our Board of Directors.  Whether we make any share repurchases during the remainder of 2012 will be determined based on various parameters; therefore, it is uncertain whether or not we will make additional repurchases of Denbury common stock under this program in the remainder of 2012.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Our obligations that are not currently recorded on our balance sheet consist of various obligations for development and exploratory expenditures arising from purchase agreements, our capital expenditure program, or other transactions common to our industry.  In addition, in order to recover our proved undeveloped reserves, we must also fund the associated future development costs as forecasted in our proved reserve reports.  Our derivative contracts, which are recorded at fair value in our balance sheets, are discussed in Notes 5 and 6 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our commitments and obligations consist of those detailed as of December 31, 2011 in the Form 10-K, subject to the correction in the classification of our equipment leases from operating to capital (see Note 3, Long-Term Debt), and subject to the change in future development costs due to the planned Bakken area assets sale (see Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures – Pending Exchange Transaction) under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements – Commitments and Obligations.

Results of Operations

CO2 Operations

Our focus on CO2 operations is the primary strategy of our business and operations.  We believe there are significant additional oil reserves and production that can be obtained through the use of CO2, and we have outlined certain of this estimated potential in our Form 10-K and other public disclosures.  In addition to its long-term effect, our focus on these types of operations impacts certain trends in our current and near-term operating results.  Please refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the section entitled CO2 Operations contained in our Form 10-K for further information regarding these matters.

- 25 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

CO2 Source Fields.  During the third quarter of 2012, our CO2 production at Jackson Dome averaged 1,036 MMcf/d, compared to an average of 1,001 MMcf/d produced during the third quarter of 2011 and 915 MMcf/d produced during the second quarter of 2012.  We used 90% of this production, or 937 MMcf/d, in our tertiary operations during the third quarter of 2012, and sold the balance to our industrial customers or to Genesis Energy, L.P. pursuant to our volumetric production payment contracts.  Refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Capital Resources and Liquidity – Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements – Commitments and Obligations in our Form 10-K for further discussion of our CO2 delivery obligations.  With the acquisition of Thompson Field in 2012 and the pending acquisition of Webster Field (see Pending Exchange Transaction above), we will likely need to develop some of our probable and possible CO2 reserves at Jackson Dome so that we have sufficient proved reserves to flood newly acquired fields.  We anticipate an ongoing exploration and development program at Jackson Dome designed to increase both the CO2 production rate and proved reserves that will be available to us until substantial anthropogenic sources are developed, which is currently expected to first occur several years in the future.  At December 31, 2011, our proven CO2 reserves at Jackson Dome were approximately 6.7 Tcf on a gross working interest basis, of which Denbury’s net revenue interest was approximately 5.3 Tcf, and include reserves dedicated to volumetric production payments of 84.7 Bcf.

We spent approximately $0.27 per Mcf to produce and pay royalties and taxes for the CO2 we utilize in our tertiary floods during the first nine months of 2012, including $0.28 during the first quarter of 2012, $0.29 per Mcf during the second quarter of 2012, and $0.25 per Mcf during the third quarter of 2012.  These rates have remained relatively consistent with the $0.26 per Mcf spent during the first nine months of 2011 and $0.24 per Mcf cost during the third quarter of 2011.  Our estimated cost of CO2, after inclusion of depreciation and amortization expense related to the CO2 production but excluding depreciation of our CO2 pipelines, was $0.32 per Mcf and $0.33 per Mcf during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $0.30 per Mcf and $0.26 per Mcf during the same periods in 2011.

- 26 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Tertiary Production. The following table summarizes our tertiary oil production and tertiary lease operating expense per barrel for each quarter in 2011 and the first, second, and third quarters of 2012:

	Average Daily Production (Bbls/d)
	First		Second		Third		Fourth		First		Second		Third
	Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter
Tertiary Oil Field	2011		2011		2011		2011		2012		2012		2012
Phase 1:
Brookhaven		3,664		3,213		3,030		3,121		3,014		2,779		2,460
McComb area		2,161		1,983		2,005		1,843		1,746		1,902		1,769
Mallalieu area		2,925		2,646		2,620		2,587		2,585		2,461		2,181
Other		3,290		3,196		2,879		2,749		2,500		2,444		2,060
Phase 2:
Heidelberg		3,374		3,548		3,141		3,728		3,583		3,823		3,716
Eucutta		3,247		3,114		2,985		3,139		3,090		2,870		2,782
Soso		2,582		2,317		2,331		2,162		2,063		1,947		1,923
Martinville		500		416		453		481		551		480		476
Phase 3:
Tinsley		6,567		6,990		7,075		6,338		7,297		8,168		8,153
Phase 4:
Cranfield		991		1,085		1,214		1,200		1,152		1,094		1,119
Phase 5:
Delhi		1,524		2,263		3,358		3,778		4,181		4,023		3,813
Phase 7:(1)
Hastings		—		—		—		—		618		1,913		2,794
Phase 8:
Oyster Bayou		—		—		—		18		877		1,304		1,540
Total tertiary oil production (Bbl/d)		30,825		30,771		31,091		31,144		33,257		35,208		34,786
Tertiary lease operating expense per Bbl	$	24.93	$	22.87	$	24.91	$	23.59	$	26.74	$	22.95	$	23.50

(1) As of September 30, 2012, we did not have any tertiary production from our fields in Phase 6, Citronelle Field, which will require an extension to the Free State CO2 Pipeline or another pipeline, depending on the ultimate CO2 source for this field, the timing of which is uncertain.

Oil production from our tertiary operations increased 12% to an average of 34,786 Bbls/d during the third quarter of 2012 compared to third quarter 2011 tertiary production levels, primarily due to production growth in response to continued expansion of the tertiary floods in Heidelberg, Tinsley and Delhi fields and production at our Oyster Bayou and Hastings CO2 fields, which experienced their initial tertiary production response in late December 2011 and early January 2012, respectively.  Offsetting third quarter production gains were production shut-ins due to Hurricane Isaac and declines in our more mature Phase 1 and Phase 2 fields.

- 27 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our tertiary oil production during the third quarter of 2012 decreased 422 Bbls/d compared to second quarter 2012 levels primarily as a result of Hurricane Isaac, which required us to temporarily shut-in production for several days in our Phase 1 and Phase 4 properties, and expected declines in our more mature fields in Phase 1 and Phase 2.  These decreases were partially offset by continued increased production at our Hastings and Oyster Bayou fields.  We expect our tertiary oil production to return to an upward trend in the fourth quarter, driven primarily by recent increases in Delhi Field.  In October 2012, we estimate that our tertiary production averaged around 36,000 Bbls/d.

The production growth rate at a tertiary flood can vary from quarter to quarter as a tertiary field’s production may increase rapidly when wells respond to the CO2, plateau temporarily, and then resume its growth as additional areas of the field are developed.  During a tertiary flood life cycle, facility capacity is increased from time to time, which occasionally requires temporary shutdowns during installation, thereby causing temporary declines in production.  We also find it difficult to precisely predict when any given well will respond to the injected CO2, as the CO2 seldom travels through the rock consistently due to heterogeneity in the oil-bearing formations.  We find all of these fluctuations to be normal, and generally expect oil production at a tertiary field to increase over time until the entire field is developed, albeit sometimes in inconsistent patterns.  Specifically, production at Tinsley Field increased rapidly during the first two quarters of 2012 after the field was re-pressurized late in 2011, and then remained steady during the third quarter of 2012 as production declines in older wells were offset by production increases in newly drilled wells.

During the third quarter of 2012, operating costs for our tertiary properties averaged $23.50 per Bbl, a 6% decrease from an average of $24.91 per Bbl during the third quarter of 2011 (although tertiary operating expenses increased 6% on an absolute basis) and only a slight increase from an average of $22.95 during the second quarter of 2012.  The decrease in tertiary operating costs per barrel in the third quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 is due to the 12% increase in tertiary production, which more than offset the higher total tertiary operating expenses resulting from the increase in the number of our active tertiary floods due to our new tertiary floods at Hastings and Oyster Bayou fields.  For any specific field, we expect our tertiary lease operating expense per barrel to be high initially, as we experienced early in 2012 with our Oyster Bayou and Hastings floods, and then decrease as production increases, ultimately leveling off until production begins to decline in the later life of the field, when lease operating expense per barrel will again increase.

- 28 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Operating Results

Certain of our operating results and statistics for the comparative third quarters and first nine months of 2012 and 2011 are included in the following table:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
In thousands, except per share and unit data	2012			2011			2012			2011
Operating results
Net income	$	85,367		$	275,670		$	410,699		$	520,726
Net income per common share – basic		0.22			0.69			1.06			1.31
Net income per common share – diluted		0.22			0.68			1.05			1.29
Net cash provided by operating activities		293,506			315,739			1,026,126			839,092
Average daily production volumes
Bbls/d		67,655			61,984			67,331			60,007
Mcf/d		30,724			29,079			29,318			30,736
BOE/d(1)		72,776			66,830			72,217			65,129
Operating revenues
Oil sales	$	579,429		$	552,281		$	1,790,326		$	1,621,047
Natural gas sales		8,727			13,242			23,472			41,767
Total oil and natural gas sales	$	588,156		$	565,523		$	1,813,798		$	1,662,814
Commodity derivative contracts(2)
Cash receipt (payment) on settlement of commodity derivative contracts	$	6,269		$	4,570		$	12,361		$	(4,784	)
Non-cash fair value adjustment income (expense)		(67,900	)		205,584			19,842			217,092
Total income (expense) from commodity derivative contracts	$	(61,631	)	$	210,154		$	32,203		$	212,308
Unit prices – excluding impact of derivative settlements
Oil price per Bbl	$	93.09		$	96.85		$	97.04		$	98.95
Natural gas price per Mcf		3.09			4.95			2.92			4.98
Unit prices – including impact of derivative settlements(2)
Oil price per Bbl	$	92.99		$	96.52		$	96.52		$	97.50
Natural gas price per Mcf		5.53			7.35			5.65			7.25
Oil and natural gas operating expenses
Lease operating expenses	$	130,485		$	133,285		$	392,960		$	383,167
Marketing expenses		14,728			6,416			37,776			17,989
Taxes other than income(3)		40,012			36,180			122,518			108,295
Oil and natural gas operating revenues and expenses per BOE(1)
Oil and natural gas revenues	$	87.84		$	91.98		$	91.66		$	93.52
Lease operating expenses		19.49			21.68			19.86			21.55
Marketing expenses, net of third party purchases		1.52			1.04			1.48			1.01
Taxes other than income(4)		5.98			5.88			6.19			6.09
Non-tertiary CO2 revenues and expenses:
CO2 sales and transportation fees	$	7,160		$	6,541		$	19,256		$	16,808
CO2 discovery and operating expenses(5)		(1,176	)		(1,250	)		(8,443	)		(4,889	)
CO2 revenue and expenses, net	$	5,984		$	5,291		$	10,813		$	11,919

(1) Barrel of oil equivalent using the ratio of one barrel of oil to six Mcf of natural gas ("BOE").  

- 29 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(2)	See also Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk below for information concerning the Company's derivative transactions.
(3)	Includes ad valorem, production and franchise taxes.
(4)	Includes $0.39, $0.37, $0.39 and $0.34, respectively, of franchise and other taxes not related to our oil and gas producing assets.
(5)	Includes $4.8 million of exploratory drilling costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  We incurred no exploratory drilling costs during the three months ended September 30, 2012 nor the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.

- 30 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Total Production

Average daily production by area for each of the four quarters of 2011 and for the first, second, and third quarters of 2012 is shown below:

	Average Daily Production (BOE/d)
	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter		First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter
Operating Area	2011		2011		2011		2011		2012		2012		2012
Gulf Coast region:
Tertiary oil fields		30,825		30,771		31,091		31,144		33,257		35,208		34,786
Non-tertiary fields:
Mississippi		5,930		5,642		5,636		4,746		4,573		4,095		3,401
Texas		4,371		4,202		4,096		3,868		3,674		4,573		5,173
Louisiana		511		454		47		141		191		189		144
Alabama and other		1,020		1,079		1,064		1,031		1,090		1,117		993
Total Gulf Coast region		42,657		42,148		41,934		40,930		42,785		45,182		44,497
Rocky Mountain region:
Cedar Creek Anticline		9,163		8,925		8,930		8,858		8,496		8,535		8,490
Bell Creek		890		936		889		840		859		816		777
Other		2,134		2,147		2,204		2,135		2,404		2,314		2,361
Total Rocky Mountain region		12,187		12,008		12,023		11,833		11,759		11,665		11,628
Production excluding properties disposed or to be disposed		54,844		54,156		53,957		52,763		54,544		56,847		56,125
Properties disposed or to be disposed:
Bakken area assets (1)		6,207		8,172		10,461		12,141		15,226		15,433		16,651
Gulf Coast assets (2)		1,918		1,901		1,732		1,677		1,054		—		—
Paradox assets (3)		635		690		680		653		708		57		—
Total Production		63,604		64,919		66,830		67,234		71,532		72,337		72,776

(1)	Includes production from certain Bakken area assets pending sale around the end of November 2012.
(2)	Includes production from certain non-core Gulf Coast assets sold in late February 2012.
(3)	Includes production from certain non-operated assets in the Greater Aneth Field in the Paradox Basin of Utah sold in April 2012.

- 31 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our production (excluding properties disposed or to be disposed) during the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased 4% or 2,168 BOE/d over the 2011 comparable period production levels, and increased from 54,316 BOE/d during the first nine months of 2011 to 55,840 BOE/d during the first nine months of 2012 (a 3% increase).  These increases were primarily due to production increases from our tertiary oil fields (see a discussion of our tertiary operations in CO2 Operations above) and the June 2012 acquisition of the Thompson Field, offset by normal declines in most of our other non-tertiary properties.  Total production increased 9% between the third quarters of 2011 and 2012, and includes production related to the Bakken area assets (pending sale), certain non-core Gulf Coast assets sold in February 2012 and non-operated assets in the Greater Aneth Field in the Paradox Basin of Utah sold in April 2012.  On a year-to-date basis, total production increased 11% between the first nine months of 2011 and 2012.

Bakken area production increased 59% and 90% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2011 primarily due to the acceleration of our drilling activities in the latter half of 2011 in that area.  During the latter half of 2011, we operated as many as seven drilling rigs in the Bakken, decreasing to six operated drilling rigs by the end of 2011.  We have currently reduced the rig count in the Bakken to four, which has slowed the rate of production growth.  During the first nine months of 2012, we completed 31 operated wells in the Bakken which had initial production during the period.

Our production during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 93% oil, which remained consistent with oil production of 93% and 92% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.  Excluding Bakken area assets pending sale, our total production during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was estimated to be 95% oil.

Oil and Natural Gas Revenues

Our oil and natural gas revenues increased 4% and 9% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2011.  The increase in both periods is related to increases in production, partially offset by reductions in commodity prices.  Changes in oil and natural gas revenues, excluding any impact of our commodity derivative contracts, are reflected in the following table:

			Three Months Ended			Nine Months Ended
			September 30,			September 30,
			2012 vs. 2011			2012 vs. 2011
In thousands			Increase (Decrease) in Revenues		Percentage Increase (Decrease) in Revenues	Increase (Decrease) in Revenues		Percentage Increase (Decrease) in Revenues
Change in oil and natural gas revenues due to:
	Increase in production		$	50,317	9%	$	187,707	11%
	Decrease in commodity prices			(27,684)	-5%		(36,723)	-2%
		Total increase in oil and natural gas revenues	$	22,633	4%	$	150,984	9%

- 32 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Excluding any impact of our commodity derivative contracts, our net realized commodity prices and NYMEX differentials were as follows during the first, second, and third quarters and the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	March 31,						June 30,					September 30,				September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011		2012		2011		2012		2011
Net Realized Prices:
Oil price per Bbl	$	102.52		$	93.67		$	95.63		$	106.30	$	93.09	$	96.85	$	97.04	$	98.95
Natural gas price per Mcf		3.84			4.81			1.87			5.16		3.09		4.95		2.92		4.98
Price per BOE		97.32			88.42			89.96			100.06		87.84		91.98		91.66		93.52
NYMEX Differentials:
Oil per Bbl	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.59	)	$	2.14		$	3.72	$	0.80	$	7.25	$	0.84	$	3.49
Natural gas per Mcf		1.32			0.61			(0.49	)		0.78		0.20		0.89		0.33		0.77

As reflected in the table above, our net realized oil prices decreased 4% in the third quarter of 2012 compared to those received during the third quarter of 2011.  Company-wide oil price differentials in the third quarter of 2012 were $0.80 per Bbl above NYMEX, compared to an average differential of $7.25 per Bbl above NYMEX in the third quarter of 2011 and $2.14 per Bbl above NYMEX in the second quarter of 2012.  The net differential realized by the Company is primarily impacted by positive differentials in the Gulf Coast region, offset by unfavorable differentials in the Rocky Mountain region, each of which is discussed in further detail below.

The Company received favorable NYMEX differentials in the Gulf Coast region during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, primarily due to the favorable differential for crude oil sold under Light Louisiana Sweet (“LLS”) index prices.  This LLS-to-NYMEX differential averaged a positive $15.05 per Bbl on a trade-month basis for the third quarter of 2012, compared to a positive $18.90 per Bbl differential in the third quarter of 2011 and a positive $12.55 and $18.14 per Bbl differential in the first and second quarters of 2012.  During the third quarter of 2012, the Company sold approximately 39% of its crude oil at prices based on the LLS index price, approximately 22% at prices partially tied to the LLS index price, and the balance at prices based on various other indexes tied to NYMEX prices, primarily in the Rocky Mountain region.  Prices received in a regional market can differ from NYMEX pricing due to a variety of reasons, including supply and/or demand factors and location differentials.  NYMEX pricing, which has long been a benchmark price that reflects the economics in the U.S. midcontinent market, has been influenced in the recent past by significant increases in supply.  Alternatively, the LLS market is reflective of market economics in the Gulf Coast region, where both foreign and domestic oil is bought and sold, and correlates more closely to global oil prices.  While this differential is significant in the pricing for our oil production, other market and contractual factors may prevent us from realizing the full differential.  As indicated by the above variations, the LLS-to-NYMEX differential is volatile and has been at historically high levels in recent periods, which may not continue.

Unfavorable NYMEX differentials in the Rocky Mountain region are largely impacted by oil production from our Bakken area assets which are under contract to be sold.  The realized oil prices for these properties averaged $16.34 per Bbl below NYMEX in the third quarter of 2012, compared to an average differential of $5.66 per Bbl below NYMEX in the third quarter of 2011 and $20.08 per Bbl below NYMEX in the second quarter of 2012.  Oil in the Bakken region sold at a significant discount during the first nine months of 2012 due to increased production in the area coupled with limited transportation infrastructure.  Transportation infrastructure in the region improved throughout the third quarter of 2012 and we expect our oil differentials there to likewise improve during the fourth quarter of 2012.  Excluding these Bakken area assets under contract to be sold, Company-wide differentials were estimated to be $5.43 above NYMEX in the third quarter of 2012, compared to an average differential of $9.59 per Bbl above NYMEX in the third quarter of 2011 and $7.69 above NYMEX in the second quarter of 2012.

- 33 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Commodity Derivative Contracts

The following tables summarize the impact our commodity derivative contracts had on our operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011		2012			2011
In thousands	Oil Derivative Contracts						Natural Gas Derivative Contracts					Total Commodity Derivative Contracts
Non-cash fair value gain (loss)	$	(60,726	)	$	205,355		$	(7,174	)	$	229	$	(67,900	)	$	205,584
Cash settlement receipts (payments)		(641	)		(1,857	)		6,910			6,427		6,269			4,570
Total	$	(61,367	)	$	203,498		$	(264	)	$	6,656	$	(61,631	)	$	210,154

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2012		2011
In thousands	Oil Derivative Contracts						Natural Gas Derivative Contracts						Total Commodity Derivative Contracts
Non-cash fair value gain (loss)	$	37,752		$	225,485		$	(17,910	)	$	(8,393	)	$	19,842	$	217,092
Cash settlement receipts (payments)		(9,580	)		(23,857	)		21,941			19,073			12,361		(4,784	)
Total	$	28,172		$	201,628		$	4,031		$	10,680		$	32,203	$	212,308

Changes in commodity prices and the expiration of contracts cause fluctuations in the estimated fair value of our commodity derivative contracts.  Because we do not utilize hedge accounting for our commodity derivative contracts, the changes in fair value of these contracts, as outlined above, are recognized currently in the income statement.  See Notes 5 and 6 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our commodity derivative contracts.

During the third quarter of 2012, we restructured most of our oil derivative collar contracts in the first three quarters of 2013 to increase the weighted average floor price to approximately $80 per Bbl and decrease the weighted average ceiling price.  See Note 5 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of our current derivative positions.

Production Expenses

Lease operating expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2012 of $130.5 million decreased $2.8 million (2%) compared to lease operating expenses in the same period in 2011, which change consisted of a 6% increase in operating expense of our tertiary oil properties offset by an 11% decrease in non-tertiary operating expense.  Lease operating expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 of $393.0 million increased $9.8 million (3%) compared to lease operating expenses in the same period in 2011, consisting of a 12% increase in our tertiary operating expense offset by a 9% decrease in non-tertiary operating expense.  See discussion of tertiary operating expenses above under CO2 Operations.  The decrease in non-tertiary operating expense during both comparable periods is primarily due to the divestiture of certain non-core assets located in central and southern Mississippi, southern Louisiana, and in the Paradox Basin of Utah during the first and second quarters of 2012, offset by incremental lease operating expense related to our acquisition of Thompson Field during the second quarter of 2012.

- 34 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Lease operating expense averaged $19.49 and $19.86 per BOE for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of 10% and 8% compared to $21.68 and $21.55 per BOE, respectively, for the same periods in 2011.  The lower operating expenses per BOE during both comparative periods were largely driven by our non-tertiary properties and are primarily due to increased production related to our Bakken area assets under contract to be sold, which have lower operating costs than our other properties, and the sale of certain non-core assets during the first half of 2012, which had a higher operating cost per BOE compared to the average of our other properties.  Our tertiary operating costs, which have historically been higher than our Company-wide operating costs, averaged $23.50 and $24.35 per Bbl during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $24.91 and $24.24 per Bbl for the same periods in 2011.  See CO2 Operations for a more detailed discussion of our tertiary operating costs.  Excluding lease operating expenses for the Bakken area assets pending sale, lease operating expenses were estimated to be $23.79 and $23.99 per BOE for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $24.88 and $23.86 per BOE, respectively, for the same periods in 2011.

Taxes other than income, which includes ad valorem, production and franchise taxes, averaged $5.98 and $6.19 per BOE for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, which remained consistent with $5.88 and $6.09 per BOE for the same periods in 2011.  Excluding Bakken area assets pending sale, taxes other than income were estimated to be $5.67 and $5.94 per BOE for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $5.51 and $5.84 per BOE in the same periods in 2011.

General and Administrative Expenses (“G&A”)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
In thousands, except per BOE data and employees	2012			2011			2012			2011
Administrative costs	$	76,192		$	56,661		$	221,991		$	183,605
Stock-based compensation		9,247			11,154			29,205			32,178
Operator labor and overhead recovery charges		(34,659	)		(32,166	)		(104,665	)		(92,859	)
Capitalized exploration and development costs		(12,582	)		(9,036	)		(36,900	)		(25,283	)
Net G&A expense	$	38,198		$	26,613		$	109,631		$	97,641
G&A per BOE:
Administrative costs, net	$	4.70		$	2.88		$	4.50		$	4.07
Stock-based compensation, net		1.01			1.45			1.04			1.42
Net G&A expense	$	5.71		$	4.33		$	5.54		$	5.49
Employees as of September 30		1,423			1,274

Net G&A expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased on both an absolute dollar and per BOE basis compared to levels in the same periods in 2011, as the increases in administrative costs exceeded the increase in operator labor and overhead recovery charges and capitalized exploration and developments costs.  The 32% and 1% increase in net G&A expense per BOE between the two periods was further impacted by higher production.

Administrative costs increased $19.5 million (34%) and $38.4 million (21%) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2011.  The increase between the comparative three and nine month periods was primarily due to higher compensation-related costs resulting both from an increase in headcount (12%) and salaries, and lower bonus expense in the prior year periods caused by a reduction in our accrued employee bonuses during the three months ended September 30, 2011, partially offset by additional compensation in the 2011 periods related to the resignation of an officer.  Gross stock-based compensation was also higher in the 2011 periods, due in part to the resignation of the officer’s position.

- 35 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our well operating agreements allow us, when we are the operator, to charge a well with a specified overhead rate during the drilling phase and also to charge a monthly fixed overhead rate for each producing well.  As a result of additional operated wells and drilling activities, additional tertiary operations and increased compensation expense, the amount we recovered as operator labor and overhead charges increased by 8% and 13% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2011.  Capitalized exploration and development costs also increased between the periods, primarily due to increased compensation costs subject to capitalization.

Interest and Financing Expenses
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
In thousands, except per BOE data and interest rates	2012			2011			2012			2011
Cash interest expense	$	53,569		$	51,540		$	161,978		$	156,255
Non-cash interest expense		3,695			3,930			11,124			14,392
Less: capitalized interest		(19,437	)		(17,853	)		(57,357	)		(42,004	)
Interest expense	$	37,827		$	37,617		$	115,745		$	128,643
Interest income and other income	$	5,055		$	4,441		$	14,214		$	12,445
Net cash interest expense and other income per BOE (1)	$	4.34		$	4.80		$	4.57		$	5.79
Average debt outstanding	$	3,073,450		$	2,426,820		$	2,874,146		$	2,415,193
Average interest rate (2)		7.0	%		8.5	%		7.5	%		8.6	%

(1)	Cash interest expense less capitalized interest less interest and other income on BOE basis.
(2)	Includes commitment fees but excludes debt issue costs and amortization of discount and premium.

Cash interest expense increased $2.0 million (4%) and $5.7 million (4%) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2011.  The reduction in the average interest rate is primarily a result of increased borrowings under our bank credit facility, which carries rates lower than that of our senior subordinated notes.  The increase in capitalized interest between the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2012 relates primarily to incremental capitalized interest on the Riley Ridge plant and Greencore pipeline construction projects.

Depletion, Depreciation, and Amortization ("DD&A")
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
In thousands, except per BOE data	2012		2011		2012		2011
Depletion and depreciation of oil and natural gas properties	$	112,617	$	90,241	$	328,952	$	264,288
Depletion and depreciation of CO2 properties		5,829		4,625		16,365		13,803
Asset retirement obligations		1,992		1,456		5,516		4,715
Depreciation of other fixed assets		16,497		5,656		39,286		16,261
Total DD&A	$	136,935	$	101,978	$	390,119	$	299,067
DD&A per BOE:
Oil and natural gas properties	$	17.12	$	14.91	$	16.90	$	15.13
CO2 and other fixed assets		3.33		1.68		2.82		1.69
Total DD&A cost per BOE	$	20.45	$	16.59	$	19.72	$	16.82

- 36 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We adjust our DD&A rate each quarter for significant changes in our estimates of oil and natural gas reserves and costs.  As such, our DD&A rate has changed significantly over time, and it may continue to change in the future.  During the first nine months of 2012, we added estimated proved reserves of 42.6 MMBOE at Hastings Field, 12.0 MMBOE in the Bakken and 12.3 MMBOE associated with our acquisition of Thompson Field.  These additions were offset by a 12.7 MMBOE reduction in estimated proved reserves due to the sale of certain non-core assets in central and southern Mississippi and southern Louisiana and in the Paradox Basin of Utah.  In conjunction with the recognition of proved reserves at Hastings Field, we transferred $222.5 million from Unevaluated Properties to Proved properties on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Depletion and depreciation of oil and natural gas properties increased 25% and 24% on an absolute-dollar basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and 15% and 12% on a per-BOE basis during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2011, primarily due to higher finding costs per barrel and upward revisions in estimated future development costs associated with the Bakken capital program.  The increase in DD&A on an absolute-dollar basis was further impacted by increases in production volumes.  On a sequential quarterly basis, DD&A per BOE for oil and natural gas properties remained relatively stable, increasing only 1%.  We expect DD&A cost per BOE to decrease prospectively after the Pending Exchange Transaction is closed due to the reduction in capitalized costs subject to depletion.  Upon closing of the Pending Exchange Transaction, the majority of the proceeds received in the sale of the Bakken area assets would be recorded as a reduction to the full cost pool as we do not expect to record a gain or loss for financial statement purposes on the sale of the Bakken area assets in accordance with the full cost method of accounting.

The increase in depreciation of other fixed assets is primarily due to incremental pipeline depreciation and the change in classification of our equipment leases from operating to capital during the second quarter of 2012.

Under full cost accounting rules, we are required each quarter to perform a ceiling test calculation.  We did not have a ceiling test write-down at September 30, 2012; however, if oil and natural gas prices were to decrease significantly in subsequent periods, we may be required to record write-downs under the full cost pool ceiling test in the future.  The possibility and amount of any future write-down is difficult to predict, and will depend, in part, upon oil and natural gas prices, the incremental proved reserves that may be added each period, revisions to previous reserve estimates and future capital expenditures, as well as additional capital spent.

Impairment of Assets

We recognized $17.5 million of impairment charges during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily related to our investment in Faustina Hydrogen Products LLC, an entity created to develop a proposed plant from which we would offtake CO2.  See Note 6, Fair Value Measurements, to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income Taxes
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
In thousands, except per BOE amounts and tax rates	2012			2011			2012			2011
Current income tax expense (benefit)	$	4,342		$	(5,331	)	$	33,834		$	5,849
Deferred income tax expense		49,670			172,981			216,959			317,601
Total income tax expense	$	54,012		$	167,650		$	250,793		$	323,450
Average income tax expense per BOE	$	8.07		$	27.27		$	12.67		$	18.19
Effective tax rate		38.8	%		37.8	%		37.9	%		38.3	%

Our income taxes are based on an estimated statutory rate of approximately 38%.  Our effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2012 was slightly higher compared to our statutory rate, primarily due to the recognition of additional tax expense in our 2011 tax returns in excess of estimated expense included in our tax provision at December 31, 2011.

- 37 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

As of September 30, 2012, after finalization of our 2011 tax return, we had an estimated $61.4 million of enhanced oil recovery credits to carry forward related to our tertiary operations, and $36.9 million of alternative minimum tax credits that can be utilized to reduce our current income taxes during 2012 or future years, but cannot be used to offset alternative minimum tax.  The enhanced oil recovery credits do not begin to expire until 2022.  Since the ability to earn additional enhanced oil recovery credits is based upon the level of oil prices, we do not currently expect to earn additional enhanced oil recovery credits unless oil prices were to significantly deteriorate.

Per BOE Data

The following table summarizes our cash flow, DD&A, and results of operations on a per BOE basis for the comparative periods.  Each of the individual components is discussed above.

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
Per BOE data	2012			2011			2012			2011
Oil and natural gas revenues	$	87.84		$	91.98		$	91.66		$	93.52
Gain on settlements of derivative contracts		0.93			0.74			0.63			(0.27	)
Lease operating expenses		(19.49	)		(21.68	)		(19.86	)		(21.55	)
Production and ad valorem taxes		(5.59	)		(5.51	)		(5.80	)		(5.75	)
Marketing expenses, net of third party purchases		(1.52	)		(1.04	)		(1.48	)		(1.01	)
Production netback		62.17			64.49			65.15			64.94
CO2 sales, net of operating expenses		0.89			0.86			0.54			0.67
General and administrative expenses		(5.71	)		(4.33	)		(5.54	)		(5.49	)
Net cash interest expense and other income		(4.34	)		(4.80	)		(4.57	)		(5.79	)
Other		(0.70	)		1.96			(1.79	)		0.38
Changes in assets and liabilities relating to operations		(8.47	)		(6.83	)		(1.93	)		(7.52	)
Cash flow from operations		43.84			51.35			51.86			47.19
DD&A		(20.45	)		(16.59	)		(19.72	)		(16.82	)
Deferred income taxes		(7.42	)		(28.13	)		(10.96	)		(17.86	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		—			—			—			(0.91	)
Non-cash commodity derivative adjustments		(10.13	)		33.44			1.00			12.21
Impairment of assets		—			—			(0.89	)		—
Other non-cash items		6.91			4.77			(0.53	)		5.48
Net income	$	12.75		$	44.84		$	20.76		$	29.29

Critical Accounting Policies

For additional discussion of our critical accounting policies, which remain unchanged, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Form 10-K.

- 38 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Information

The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts, including, but not limited to, statements found in the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, are forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve a number of risks and uncertainties.  Such forward-looking statements may be or may concern, among other things, forecasted cash flows and capital expenditures, drilling activity or methods including the timing and location thereof, pending or planned acquisitions or dispositions, development activities, timing of CO2 injections and initial production responses thereto, cost savings, production rates and volumes or forecasts thereof, hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, CO2 reserves, helium reserves, potential reserves, percentages of recoverable original oil in place, hydrocarbon prices, pricing or cost assumptions based on current and projected oil and gas prices, cost and availability of equipment and services, liquidity, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, regulatory matters, prospective legislation affecting the oil and gas industry, mark-to-market values, competition, long-term forecasts of production, finding costs, rates of return, estimated costs, changes in costs, future capital expenditures and overall economics and other variables surrounding our operations and future plans. Such forward-looking statements generally are accompanied by words such as “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “projected,” “should,” “assume,” “believe,” “may,” or other words that convey, or are intended to convey, the uncertainty of future events or outcomes.  Such forward-looking information is based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, and assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could significantly and adversely affect current plans, anticipated actions, the timing of such actions and the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.  As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from expectations, estimates or assumptions expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company.  Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are fluctuations in worldwide oil prices or in U.S. oil and/or natural gas prices and consequently in the prices received or demand for the Company’s oil and natural gas; levels of future capital expenditures; effects of our indebtedness; success of our risk management techniques; inaccurate cost estimates; availability of and fluctuations in the prices of goods and services; the uncertainty of drilling results; operating hazards; disruption of operations and damages from hurricanes, tropical storms, or forest fires; acquisition risks; requirements for capital or its availability; conditions in the worldwide financial and credit markets; general economic conditions; competition; government regulations, including tax and environmental; and unexpected delays, as well as the risks and uncertainties inherent in oil and gas drilling and production activities or that are otherwise discussed in this quarterly report, including, without limitation, the portions referenced above, and the uncertainties set forth from time to time in the Company’s other public reports, filings and public statements including, without limitation, the Form 10-K.

- 39 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Long-term Debt and Interest Rate Sensitivity

We finance some of our acquisitions and other expenditures with fixed and variable-rate debt.  Our bank credit agreement and our senior subordinated notes do not have any triggers or covenants regarding our debt ratings with rating agencies.  Borrowings on our bank credit facility, which bear interest at variable rates, expose us to market risk related to changes in interest rates.  As of September 30, 2012, our borrowings on our bank credit facility were $625.0 million, with a weighted average interest rate of 2.0%.  At this level of variable-rate debt, an increase or decrease of 10% in interest rates would have an immaterial effect on our interest expense.

The following table presents the principal balances of our debt, by maturity date, as of September 30, 2012:

In thousands, except percentages	2014		2015		2016		2017		2020		2021
Variable rate debt:
Bank Credit Facility (weighted average interest rate of 2.00% at September 30, 2012)	$	—	$	—	$	625,000	$	—	$	—	$	—
Fixed rate debt:
9½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016		—		—		224,920		—		—		—
9¾% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016		—		—		426,350		—		—		—
8¼% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2020		—		—		—		—		996,273		—
6⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021		—		—		—		—		—		400,000
Other Subordinated Notes		1,072		485		—		2,250		—		—

Commodity Derivative Contracts and Commodity Price Sensitivity

From time to time, we enter into oil and natural gas derivative contracts to provide an economic hedge of our exposure to commodity price risk associated with anticipated future oil and natural gas production.  We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.  These contracts have consisted of price floors, collars and fixed price swaps.  The production that we hedge has varied from year to year, depending on our levels of debt and financial strength and expectation of future commodity prices.  We currently employ a strategy to hedge a portion of our forecasted production approximately 12 to 18 months in the future from the current quarter, as we believe it is important to protect our future cash flow for a short period of time in order to give us time to adjust to commodity price fluctuations, particularly since many of our expenditures have long lead times.  See Notes 5 and 6to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our commodity derivative contracts.

All of the mark-to-market valuations used for our oil and natural gas derivatives are provided by external sources.  We manage and control market and counterparty credit risk through established internal control procedures that are reviewed on an ongoing basis.  We attempt to minimize credit risk exposure to counterparties through formal credit policies, monitoring procedures and diversification.  We only enter into commodity derivative contracts with parties that are lenders under our bank credit agreement.  We have included an estimate of nonperformance risk in the fair value measurement of our oil and natural gas derivative contracts, which we have measured for nonperformance risk based upon credit default swaps or credit spreads.

For accounting purposes, we do not apply hedge accounting to our commodity derivative contracts.  This means that any changes in the fair value of these derivative contracts will be charged to earnings on a quarterly basis instead of charging the effective portion to other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion to earnings.

- 40 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

At September 30, 2012, our commodity derivative contracts were recorded at their fair value, which was a net asset of approximately $26.0 million (excluding $0.7 million of deferred premiums that we are obligated to pay for our derivative contracts, which payments are not subject to changes in commodity prices), a change of approximately $19.9 million from the $6.1 million fair value net asset recorded at December 31, 2011 (excluding $4.1 million of deferred premiums).  This change is primarily related to changes in oil futures prices between December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012.

Based on NYMEX crude oil and natural gas futures prices as of September 30, 2012, and assuming both a 10% increase and decrease thereon, we would expect to make or receive payments on our crude oil and natural gas derivative contracts as seen in the following table:

	Receipt / (Payment)
In thousands	Crude Oil Derivative Contracts			Natural Gas Derivative Contracts
Based on:
NYMEX futures prices as of September 30, 2012	$	(664	)	$	6,073
10% increase in prices		(1,393	)		5,478
10% decrease in prices		(131	)		6,665

- 41 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.  Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2012, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that information that is required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Evaluation of Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company determined that, during the third quarter of fiscal 2012, there were no changes in its internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

- 42 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Information with respect to legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Information with respect to the risk factors has been incorporated by reference from Item 1A of the Form 10-K.  There have been no material changes to the risk factors since the filing of the Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table summarizes purchases of our common stock during the third quarter of 2012:

						Approximate Dollar
					Total Number of	Value of Shares
		Total			Shares Purchased	that May Yet Be
		Number of	Average		as Part of Publicly	Purchased Under the
		Shares	Price Paid		Announced Plans or	Plans or Programs
Month		Purchased	per Share		Programs	(in millions)
July 2012		4,378	$	14.62	—	$	—
August 2012		15,468		15.63	—		—
September 2012		2,503,765		16.48	2,493,435		263.7 (1)
	Total	2,523,611		16.47	2,493,435	$	263.7

(1)   Amounts shown do not give effect to the repurchase of an additional 2,133,910 shares of Denbury common stock in October 2012 under the share repurchase program for $34.9 million, or $16.35 per share.  From the time the $500 million share repurchase program commenced in October 2011 through October 2012, we have purchased a total of $271.2 million of common stock under the program, and thus are authorized to spend an additional $228.8 million under this repurchase program.

Other than purchases made under our stock repurchase program, all other stock purchases during the third quarter of 2012 were made in connection with delivery by our employees of shares to us to satisfy their tax withholding requirements related to the vesting of restricted shares and the exercise of stock appreciation rights.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None

- 43 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Item 5. Other Information

On November 2, 2012, we entered into the Ninth Amendment to the Bank Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and other lenders party thereto (the “Ninth Amendment”) pursuant to which certain provisions of the Bank Credit Agreement were amended to, among other things (i) permit the sale of the Bakken area assets, and (ii) increase the amount of distributions Denbury may make to its equity holders, including the repurchase of our common stock and/or the making of cash dividends with respect thereto, from an aggregate amount of $500 million up to an aggregate amount of $1.2 billion during the term of the Bank Credit Agreement, subject, in the case of such distributions, to certain existing restrictions and conditions, including the absence of any default or borrowing base deficiency, availability of no less than 25% of the borrowing base and compliance with all financial covenants, in each case on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such distribution.  The Ninth Amendment also provided a limited waiver of any oil hedging noncompliance that may occur as a result of the Pending Exchange Transaction during the period commencing on the closing date of the Pending Exchange Transaction and continuing through and including December 31, 2013.

The foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Ninth Amendment, which is attached as Exhibit 10(a) to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference.

- 44 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit	Description
2(a)	Exchange Agreement by and among Denbury Onshore, LLC, XTO Energy Inc., and Exxon Mobil Corporation dated as of September 19, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 of our Form 8-K filed on September 25, 2012).
3(a)*	Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Denbury Resources Inc.
3(b)	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Denbury Resources Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 of our Form 8-K filed on May 21, 2012).
10(a)*	Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 9, 2010, dated as of November 2, 2012, among Denbury Resources Inc., as Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the financial institutions party thereto.
31(a)*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31(b)*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101*	Interactive Data Files.

* Included herewith.

- 45 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	DENBURY RESOURCES INC.
Date: November 8, 2012	/s/ Mark C. Allen
	Mark C. Allen
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 8, 2012	/s/ Alan Rhoades
	Alan Rhoades
	Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

- 46 -

Denbury Resources Inc.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit	Description
2(a)	Exchange Agreement by and among Denbury Onshore, LLC, XTO Energy Inc., and Exxon Mobil Corporation dated as of September 19, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 of our Form 8-K filed on September 25, 2012).
3(a)*	Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Denbury Resources Inc.
3(b)	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Denbury Resources Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 of our Form 8-K filed on May 21, 2012).
10(a)*	Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 9, 2010, dated as of November 2, 2012, among Denbury Resources Inc., as Borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the financial institutions party thereto.
31(a)*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31(b)*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101*	Interactive Data Files.

* Included herewith.

- 47 -

EX-3.A

Exhibit 3(a)

SECOND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

DENBURY RESOURCES INC.

Pursuant to Section 245 of the

General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

Denbury Resources Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), hereby certifies as follows:

1.The name of the corporation is Denbury Resources Inc.  The Corporation was originally incorporated under the name Denbury Holdings, Inc. The date of filing of its original certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware was December 19, 2003.

2.This Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation restates and integrates, but does not further amend, the provisions of the Corporation’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as heretofore amended, and there is no discrepancy between this Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the provisions of the Corporation’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, except that this Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation omits the provisions of the original certificate of incorporation that named the initial Board of Directors of the Corporation, as permitted by Section 245(c) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

3.This Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been adopted and approved in accordance with Section 245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

4.The certificate of incorporation of the Corporation, as heretofore amended, is hereby restated to read in its entirety as follows:

ARTICLE I

NAME

The name of the corporation is Denbury Resources Inc. (the “Corporation”).

ARTICLE II

REGISTERED OFFICE AND AGENT

The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, County of New Castle.  The name of the registered agent of the Corporation at such address is The Corporation Trust Company.

ARTICLE III

PURPOSES AND STOCKHOLDER LIABILITY

(a)Purposes.  The nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or promoted by the Corporation is to engage in any lawful business, act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the DGCL.

(b)Stockholder Liability.  The private property of the stockholders shall not be subject to the payment of corporate debts to any extent whatsoever.

ARTICLE IV

AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK

The aggregate number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 625,000,000 shares, consisting of:  (i) 600,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), and (ii) 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”).  Shares of any class of capital stock of the Corporation may be issued for such consideration and for such corporate purposes as the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board of Directors”) may from time to time determine.  Each share of Common Stock shall be entitled to one vote.

A.Preferred Stock.  The Preferred Stock may be divided into and issued from time to time in one or more series as may be fixed and determined by the Board of Directors.  The relative rights and preferences of the Preferred Stock of each series shall be such as shall be stated in any resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors setting forth the designation of the series and fixing and determining the relative rights and preferences thereof (a “Directors’ Resolution”).  The Board of Directors is hereby authorized to fix and determine the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other rights, including, without limitation, voting powers, full or limited, preferential rights to receive dividends or assets upon liquidation, rights of conversion or exchange into Common Stock, Preferred Stock of any series or other securities, any right of the Corporation to exchange or convert shares into Common Stock, Preferred Stock of any series or other securities, or redemption provision or sinking fund provisions, as between series and as between the Preferred Stock or any series thereof and the Common Stock, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, if any, all as shall be stated in a Directors’ Resolution, and the shares of Preferred Stock or any series thereof may have full or limited voting powers, or be without voting powers, all as shall be stated in the Directors’ Resolution.  Except where otherwise set forth in the Directors’ Resolution providing for the issuance of any series of Preferred Stock, the number of shares comprising such series may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares then outstanding) from time to time by like action of the Board of Directors.  The shares of Preferred Stock of any one series shall be identical with the other shares in the same series in all respects except as to the dates from and after which dividends thereon shall cumulate, if cumulative.

B.Reacquired Shares of Preferred Stock.  Shares of any series of any Preferred Stock that have been redeemed (whether through the operation of a sinking fund or otherwise), purchased by the Corporation, or which, if convertible or exchangeable, have been converted into, or exchanged for, shares of stock of any other class or classes or any evidences of indebtedness shall have the status of authorized and unissued shares of Preferred Stock and may be reissued as a part of the series of which they were originally a part or may be reclassified and reissued as part of a new series of Preferred Stock or as part of any other series of Preferred Stock, all subject to the conditions or restrictions on issuance set forth in the Directors’ Resolution providing for the issuance of any series of Preferred Stock and to any filing required by law.

C.Increase in Authorized Preferred Stock.  The number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock may be increased or decreased by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the stock of the Corporation entitled to vote without the separate vote of holders of Preferred Stock as a class.

ARTICLE V

EXISTENCE

The existence of the Corporation is to be perpetual.

ARTICLE VI

NO PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS

No stockholder shall be entitled, as a matter of right, to subscribe for or acquire additional, unissued or treasury shares of any class of capital stock of the Corporation whether now or hereafter authorized, or any bonds, debentures or other securities convertible into, or carrying a right to subscribe to or acquire such shares, but any shares or other securities convertible into, or carrying a right to subscribe to or acquire such shares may be issued or disposed of by the Board of Directors to such persons and on such terms as in its discretion it shall deem advisable.

ARTICLE VII

NO CUMULATIVE VOTING

At each election of directors, every stockholder entitled to vote at such election shall have the right to vote in person or by proxy the number of shares owned by him for as many persons as there are directors to be elected and for whose election he has a right to vote.  No stockholder shall have the right to cumulate his votes in any election of directors.

ARTICLE VIII

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

A.Powers.  The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of the Board of Directors.  In addition to the authority and powers conferred upon the Board of Directors by the DGCL or by the other provisions of this Certificate of Incorporation (this  “Certificate of Incorporation”), the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and empowered to exercise all such powers and do all such acts and things as may be exercised or done by the Corporation, subject to the provisions of the DGCL, this Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation (the “Bylaws”); provided, however, that no Bylaws hereafter adopted by the stockholders of the Corporation, or any amendments thereto, shall invalidate any prior act of the Board of Directors that would have been valid if such Bylaws or amendment had not been adopted.

B.Number, Election and Terms.  The number of directors which shall constitute the whole Board of Directors shall be fixed from time to time by the members of the Board of Directors then in office subject to Section D(2) of this Article VIII.  Each director shall hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and shall serve until his successor shall have been duly elected and qualified or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.  Election of directors need not be by written ballot.

C.Bylaws.  Subject to Section D(3) of this Article VIII, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws, or adopt new Bylaws, without any action on the part of the stockholders, except as may be otherwise provided by applicable law or the Bylaws.

ARTICLE IX

INDEMNIFICATION

A.Mandatory Indemnification.  Each person who at any time is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, and is threatened to be or is made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, arbitrative or investigative (a “Proceeding”), by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, partner, venturer, proprietor, member, employee, trustee, agent or similar functionary of another domestic or foreign corporation, partnership, joint venture, sole proprietorship, trust, employee benefit plan or other for-profit or non-profit enterprise, whether the basis of a Proceeding is an alleged action in such person’s official capacity or in another capacity while holding such office, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Corporation to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL, or any other applicable law as may from time to time be in effect (but, in the case of any amendment to such law or enactment of new law, only to the extent that such amendment or enactment permits the Corporation to provide broader indemnification rights than such law prior to such amendment or enactment permitted the Corporation to provide), against all expense, liability and loss (including, without limitation, court costs and attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, excise taxes or penalties, and amounts paid or to be paid in settlement) actually and reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection with a Proceeding, and such indemnification shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer of the Corporation or a director, officer, partner, venturer, proprietor, member, employee, trustee, agent or similar functionary of another domestic or foreign corporation,  partnership, joint venture, sole proprietorship, trust, employee benefit plan or other for-profit or non-profit enterprise, and shall inure to the benefit of such person’s heirs,  executors and administrators.  The Corporation’s obligations under this Section A include, but are not limited to, the convening of any meeting, and the consideration of any matter thereby, required by statute in order to determine the eligibility of any person for indemnification.

B.Advancement of Expenses.  Expenses incurred by a director or officer of the Corporation in defending a Proceeding shall be paid by the Corporation in advance of the final disposition of such Proceeding to the fullest extent permitted by, and only in compliance with, the DGCL or any other applicable laws as may from time to time be in effect, including, without limitation, any provision of the DGCL which requires, as a condition precedent to such expense advancement, the delivery to the Corporation of an undertaking, by or on behalf of such director or officer, to repay all amounts so advanced if it shall ultimately be determined that such director or officer is not entitled to be indemnified under Section A of this Article IX or otherwise.  Repayments of all amounts so advanced shall be upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the Corporation’s Board of Directors deems appropriate.

C.Vesting.  The Corporation’s obligation to indemnify and to prepay expenses under Sections A and B of this Article IX shall arise, and all rights granted to the Corporation’s directors and officers hereunder shall vest, at the time of the occurrence of the transaction or event to which a Proceeding relates, or at the time that the action or conduct to which such Proceeding relates was first taken or engaged in (or omitted to be taken or engaged in), regardless of when such Proceeding is first threatened, commenced or completed.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws, no action taken by the Corporation, either by amendment of this Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws or otherwise, shall diminish or adversely affect any rights to indemnification or prepayment of expenses granted under Sections A and B of this Article IX which shall have become vested as aforesaid prior to the date that such amendment or other corporate action is effective or taken, whichever is later.

D.Enforcement.  If a claim under Section A or Section B or both Sections A and B of this Article IX is not paid in full by the Corporation within thirty (30) days after a written claim has been received by the Corporation, the claimant may at any time thereafter bring suit in a court of competent jurisdiction against the Corporation to recover the unpaid amount of the claim and, if successful in whole or in part, the claimant shall also be entitled to be paid the expense of prosecuting such claim, including attorneys’ fees.  It shall be a defense to any such suit (other than a suit brought to enforce a claim for expenses incurred in defending any Proceeding in advance of its final disposition where the required undertaking, if any is required, has been tendered to the Corporation) that the claimant has not met the standards of conduct which make it permissible under the DGCL or other applicable law to indemnify the claimant for the amount claimed, but the burden of proving such defense shall be on the Corporation.  The failure of the Corporation (including its Board of Directors, independent legal counsel, or stockholders) to have made a determination prior to the commencement of such suit as to whether indemnification is proper in the circumstances based upon the applicable standard of conduct set forth in the DGCL or other applicable law shall neither be a defense to the action nor create a presumption that the claimant has not met the applicable standard of conduct.  The termination of any Proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation, and, with respect to any criminal Proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

E.Nonexclusive.  The indemnification provided by this Article IX shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification may be entitled under any statute, bylaw, other provisions of this Certificate of Incorporation, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in such person’s official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office.

F.Permissive Indemnification.  The rights to indemnification and prepayment of expenses which are conferred to the Corporation’s directors and officers by Sections A and B of this Article IX may be conferred upon any employee or agent of the Corporation if, and to the extent, authorized by the Board of Directors.

G.Insurance.  The Corporation shall have power to purchase and maintain insurance, at its expense, on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, partner, venturer,  proprietor,  member, employee,  trustee, agent or similar functionary of another domestic or foreign corporation, partnership, joint venture, sole proprietorship, trust, employee benefit plan or other for-profit or non-profit enterprise against any expense, liability or loss asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such person’s status as such, whether or not the Corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the provisions of this Article IX, the Corporation’s Bylaws, the DGCL or other applicable law.

H.Implementing Arrangements.  Without limiting the power of the Corporation to procure or maintain insurance or other arrangement on behalf of any of the persons as described in Section G of this Article IX, the Corporation may, for the benefit of persons eligible for indemnification by the Corporation, (i) create a trust fund, (ii) establish any form of self-insurance, (iii) secure its indemnity obligation by grant of a security interest or other lien on the assets of the Corporation, or (iv) establish a letter of credit, guaranty or surety arrangement.

ARTICLE X

LIMITED DIRECTOR LIABILITY

No director of the Corporation  shall be personally liable to the Corporation or to its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, provided that this Article X shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a director: (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL, as it may hereafter be amended from time to time, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

If the DGCL is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, as so amended.  No amendment to or repeal of this Article X will apply to, or have any effect on, the liability or alleged liability of any director of the Corporation for or with respect to any acts or omissions of the director occurring prior to such amendment or repeal.

ARTICLE XI

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS WITH INTERESTED STOCKHOLDERS

The Corporation shall not be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL.

ARTICLE XII

INSPECTION RIGHTS OF BONDHOLDERS

The holders of any bonds, debentures or other obligations issued or to be issued by the Corporation shall have the same right of inspection of the Corporation’s books, accounts and other records which the stockholders of Corporation have.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Denbury Resources Inc. has caused this Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be executed by James S. Matthews, its Secretary, on this 21st day of August, 2012.

DENBURY RESOURCES INC.

/s/ James S. Matthews

By:           James S. Matthews

Title:           Secretary

EX-10.A

Exhibit 10(a)

NINTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

This Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement (this “Ninth Amendment”) is entered into as of November 2, 2012 (the “Ninth Amendment Effective Date”), by and among Denbury Resources Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (“Administrative Agent”), and the financial institutions parties hereto as Banks (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Executing Banks”, and each individually, an “Executing Bank”).

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, Borrower, Administrative Agent, the other agents party thereto and Banks are parties to that certain Credit Agreement dated as of March 9, 2010 (the “Credit Agreement”) (unless otherwise defined herein, all terms used herein with their initial letter capitalized shall have the meaning given such terms in the Credit Agreement, including, to the extent applicable, after giving effect to the amendments set forth in Section 1 of this Ninth Amendment);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Credit Agreement, Banks have made a Revolving Loan to Borrower and provided certain other credit accommodations to Borrower;

WHEREAS, Borrower has advised Administrative Agent and Banks that pursuant to that certain Exchange Agreement dated as of September 19, 2012 by and among Onshore, XTO Energy Inc. (“XTO Energy”) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (collectively, with XTO Energy, “XTO”), Onshore has agreed to transfer certain of its Mineral Interests located in the oil and gas field commonly referred to as the Bakken Shale (and defined as the “DRI Assets” in such Exchange Agreement) to XTO in exchange for certain Mineral Interests and cash consideration (such transaction, the “Bakken Exchange”);

WHEREAS, Borrower has further advised Administrative Agent and Banks that the loss of oil production as a result of the Bakken Exchange may cause the Credit Parties to have (a) hedged more than 100% of the reasonably anticipated projected production from Proved Mineral Interests of oil which would be prohibited by Section 9.11(a)(i) of the Credit Agreement, and (b) total production of oil that is less than the aggregate amount of oil which is the subject of Oil and Gas Hedge Transactions which would be prohibited by Section 9.11(b)(i) of the Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Temporary Potential Oil Hedging Noncompliance”), in each case during the period commencing on the effective date of the Bakken Exchange and continuing through and including December 31, 2013 (such period, the “Specified Period”), which Temporary Potential Oil Hedging Noncompliance would also be prohibited by Section 9.17 of the Credit Agreement;

WHEREAS, Borrower has requested that Banks (a) amend certain terms of the Credit Agreement to (i) permit the Bakken Exchange and (ii) make certain other changes thereto as more specifically described herein, and (b) provide a limited waiver of any Temporary Potential Oil Hedging Noncompliance that may occur during the Specified Period; and

WHEREAS, subject to and upon the terms and conditions set forth herein, Executing Banks have agreed to Borrower’s requests and to enter into this Ninth Amendment;

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and confessed, Borrower, Administrative Agent and Executing Banks hereby agree as follows:

Section 1.Amendments to Credit Agreement.  In reliance on the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained in this Ninth Amendment, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions precedent set forth in Section 4 hereof, the Credit Agreement shall be amended effective as of the Ninth Amendment Effective Date in the manner provided in this Section 1.

1.1Additional Definitions.  Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement shall be amended to add thereto in alphabetical order the following definitions of “Bakken Assets”, “Bakken Exchange Agreement”, “Ninth Amendment” and “Ninth Amendment Effective Date”  which shall read in full as follows:

- 1 -

“Bakken Assets” means the “DRI Assets” as defined in and to be sold pursuant to the Bakken Exchange Agreement.

“Bakken Exchange Agreement” means that certain Exchange Agreement dated as of September 19, 2012, by and among Onshore, XTO Energy Inc. and Exxon Mobil Corporation, as amended, supplemented or modified from time to time to the extent permitted by Section 9.6.

“Ninth Amendment” means that certain Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of November 2, 2012 among Borrower, Administrative Agent and Banks party thereto.

“Ninth Amendment Effective Date” means November 2, 2012.

1.2Amendment to Definitions.  The definitions of “Authorized Officer” and “Loan Papers” contained in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement shall be amended and restated to read in full as follows:

“Authorized Officer” means, as to any Person, its Chief Executive Officer, its President, its Chief Financial Officer, its Chief Operating Officer, its General Counsel, its Chief Accounting Officer, any of its Vice Presidents, its Treasurer, its corporate Secretary or any of its Assistant Secretaries.

“Loan Papers” means this Agreement, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Third Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, the Sixth Amendment, the Seventh Amendment, the Eighth Amendment, the Ninth Amendment, the Notes, each Facility Guarantee which may now or hereafter be executed, each Borrower Pledge Agreement which may now or hereafter be executed, each Subsidiary Pledge Agreement which may now or hereafter be executed, all Mortgages now or at any time hereafter delivered pursuant to Section 5.1, and all other certificates, documents or instruments delivered in connection with this Agreement, as the foregoing may be amended from time to time.

1.3Amendment to Restricted Payments Provision.  Section 9.2(j) of the Credit Agreement shall be amended to delete the reference to “$500,000,000” contained therein and insert in lieu thereof a reference to “$1,200,000,000”.

1.4Amendment to Asset Dispositions Provision.  Section 9.5 of the Credit Agreement shall be amended to (a) delete the word “and” at the end of clause (i), (b) replace the period at the end of clause (j) with “; and” and (c) add new clause (k) immediately after clause (j), to read in full as follows:

(k)           the sale of the Bakken Assets pursuant to the Bakken Exchange Agreement, provided, that:

(i)           no Default or Event of Default exists or would exist after giving effect to such sale;

(ii)           the Outstanding Credit at the time of such sale does not exceed the Borrowing Base at such time; and

(iii)           the sale of the Bakken Assets pursuant to the Bakken Exchange Agreement is consummated no later than the earlier of (A) the date on which the Scheduled Redetermination scheduled for on or about May 1, 2013 becomes effective or (B) the first date, if any, following the Ninth Amendment Effective Date on which a Special Redetermination requested by the Borrower becomes effective.

1.5Amendment to Restricted Amendments Provision.  Section 9.6 of the Credit Agreement shall be amended to add the following sentence to the end thereof:

In addition, Borrower will not, nor will Borrower permit any other Credit Party to, enter into or permit any modification or amendment of the Bakken Exchange Agreement that would result in the addition of Borrowing Base Properties being sold pursuant thereto with a value, individually or in the aggregate, that is deemed material by the Administrative Agent in its reasonable discretion.

- 2 -

Section 2.Omnibus Amendment to Loan Papers.  Notwithstanding anything in any Loan Paper to the contrary, (a) in no event shall the defined terms “Collateral”, “Mortgaged Property” or any similar defined term describing any interest in any asset or property pledged by any Credit Party pursuant to the Loan Papers to secure the Obligations include any Building (as defined in the applicable Flood Insurance Regulations) or Manufactured (Mobile) Home (as defined in the applicable Flood Insurance Regulations) and (b) no Building or Manufactured (Mobile) Home shall be subject to any Lien created by any Loan Paper.  As used herein, “Flood Insurance Regulations” means (i) the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 as now or hereafter in effect or any successor statute thereto, (ii) the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 as now or hereafter in effect or any successor statute thereto, (iii) the National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 (amending 42 USC § 4001, et seq.), as the same may be amended or recodified from time to time, and (iv) the Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2004 and any regulations promulgated thereunder.

Section 3.Limited Waiver.  In reliance on the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained in this Ninth Amendment, and subject to the satisfaction (or waiver) of the conditions precedent set forth in Section 4 hereof, Banks hereby consent to any Temporary Potential Oil Hedging Noncompliance during the Specified Period; provided, that Borrower will not, nor will Borrower permit any other Credit Party to, enter into any Hedge Transaction for oil during the Specified Period unless such Hedge Transaction, together with any other existing Hedge Transactions for oil, will not cause a violation of Sections 9.11 and 9.17 of the Credit Agreement.  Borrower acknowledges and agrees that the limited waiver set forth in this Section 3 is limited solely to Sections 9.11(a)(i), 9.11(b)(i) and 9.17 of the Credit Agreement and applies solely with respect to any Temporary Potential Oil Hedging Noncompliance which may occur during the Specified Period as a direct result of the loss of oil production from the Bakken Exchange.  The limited waiver set forth in this Section 3 is a limited, one-time waiver, and nothing contained herein shall obligate Administrative Agent or Banks to grant any additional or future waiver with respect to, or in connection with, any provisions of the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Paper.

Section 4.Conditions Precedent to Amendment.  Subject to the satisfaction (or waiver) of the following conditions, the amendments to the Credit Agreement contained in Section 1 hereof and the limited waiver provided in Section 3 hereof shall be effective on the Ninth Amendment Effective Date:

4.1Counterparts.  Administrative Agent shall have received counterparts hereof duly executed by Borrower and Majority Banks and acknowledged by each Restricted Subsidiary (or, in the case of any party as to which an executed counterpart shall not have been received, telegraphic, electronic, telecopy, or other written confirmation from such party of execution of a counterpart hereof by such party).

4.2Bakken Exchange Agreement.  Administrative Agent shall have received a copy of the Bakken Exchange Agreement, together with all attachments, exhibits and schedules thereto, certified by an Authorized Officer of Borrower as true, correct and complete as of the Ninth Amendment Effective Date.

4.3No Default; No Borrowing Base Deficiency.  After giving effect to the amendments set forth in Section 1 and Section 2 hereof, no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred which is continuing, and no Borrowing Base Deficiency then exists.

4.4Other Documents.  Administrative Agent shall have been provided with such documents, instruments and agreements, and Borrower shall have taken such actions, in each case as Administrative Agent may reasonably require in connection with this Ninth Amendment and the transactions contemplated hereby.

Section 5.Representations and Warranties.  To induce Executing Banks and Administrative Agent to enter into this Ninth Amendment, Borrower hereby represents and warrants to Banks and Administrative Agent as follows on the Ninth Amendment Effective Date:

5.1Reaffirm Existing Representations and Warranties.  After giving effect to the amendments set forth in Section 1 and Section 2 hereof, each representation and warranty of Borrower contained in the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Papers is true and correct in all material respects on the Ninth Amendment Effective Date, except that any representation or warranty that is qualified by “material” or “Material Adverse Effect” references therein shall be true and correct in all respects.

- 3 -

5.2Due Authorization; No Conflict.  The execution, delivery and performance by Borrower of this Ninth Amendment are within Borrower’s corporate or organizational powers, have been duly authorized by all necessary action, require no action by or in respect of, or filing with, any governmental body, agency or official and do not violate or constitute a default under any provision of applicable law or any Material Agreement binding upon Borrower or any other Credit Party or result in the creation or imposition of any Lien upon any of the assets of Borrower or any other Credit Party other than Liens securing the Obligations.

5.3Validity and Enforceability.  This Ninth Amendment constitutes the valid and binding obligation of Borrower enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as (a) the enforceability thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws affecting creditor’s rights generally, and (b) the availability of equitable remedies may be limited by equitable principles of general application.

5.4No Defense.  Borrower acknowledges that Borrower has no defense to (a) Borrower’s obligation to pay the Obligations when due, or (b) the validity, enforceability or binding effect against Borrower of the Credit Agreement or any of the other Loan Papers or any Liens intended to be created thereby.

Section 6.Miscellaneous.

6.1No Waivers.  No failure or delay on the part of Administrative Agent or Banks to exercise any right or remedy under the Credit Agreement, any other Loan Papers or applicable law shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right or remedy preclude any other or further exercise of any right or remedy, all of which are cumulative and may be exercised without notice except to the extent notice is expressly required (and has not been waived) under the Credit Agreement, the other Loan Papers and applicable law.

6.2Reaffirmation of Loan Papers.  Any and all of the terms and provisions of the Credit Agreement and the Loan Papers shall, except as amended and modified hereby, remain in full force and effect.  Except as provided in Section 2 hereof, the amendments contemplated hereby shall not limit or impair any Liens securing the Obligations, each of which are hereby ratified, affirmed and extended to secure the Obligations.

6.3Legal Expenses.  Borrower hereby agrees to pay on demand all reasonable fees and expenses of counsel to Administrative Agent incurred by Administrative Agent in connection with the preparation, negotiation and execution of this Ninth Amendment and all related documents.

6.4Parties in Interest.  All of the terms and provisions of this Ninth Amendment shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

6.5Counterparts.  This Ninth Amendment may be executed in counterparts (including, without limitation, by electronic signature), and all parties need not execute the same counterpart; however, no party shall be bound by this Ninth Amendment until Borrower, Majority Banks and each Restricted Subsidiary have executed a counterpart.  Facsimiles and counterparts executed by electronic signature shall be effective as originals.

6.6Complete Agreement.  THIS NINTH AMENDMENT, THE CREDIT AGREEMENT AND THE OTHER LOAN PAPERS REPRESENT THE FINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND MAY NOT BE CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS OR ORAL AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES.  THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN OR AMONG THE PARTIES.

6.7Headings.  The headings, captions and arrangements used in this Ninth Amendment are, unless specified otherwise, for convenience only and shall not be deemed to limit, amplify or modify the terms of this Ninth Amendment, nor affect the meaning thereof.

- 4 -

6.8Governing Law.  THIS NINTH AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Ninth Amendment to be duly executed by their respective authorized officers on the date and year first above written.

[Signature Pages to Follow]

- 5 -

BORROWER:
DENBURY RESOURCES INC., a Delaware corporation
By:	/s/ James S. Matthews
	James S. Matthews, Vice President and General Counsel

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

Each of the undersigned (i) consent and agree to this Ninth Amendment, and (ii) agree that the Loan Papers to which it is a party shall remain in full force and effect and shall continue to be the legal, valid and binding obligation of such Person, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms.

DENBURY GATHERING & MARKETING, INC., a Delaware corporation
By:	/s/ James S. Matthews
	James S. Matthews, Vice President and General Counsel

DENBURY HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation (f/k/a Denbury Encore Holdings Inc.)
By:	/s/ James S. Matthews
	James S. Matthews, Vice President and General Counsel

DENBURY OPERATING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation (f/k/a EAP Properties, Inc. and successor-by-merger to a previous “Denbury Operating Company”)
By:	/s/ James S. Matthews
	James S. Matthews, Vice President and General Counsel

DENBURY ONSHORE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
By:	/s/ James S. Matthews
	James S. Matthews, Vice President and General Counsel

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

DENBURY PIPELINE HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
By:	/s/ James S. Matthews
	James S. Matthews, Vice President and General Counsel

DENBURY GREEN PIPELINE-TEXAS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
By:	/s/ James S. Matthews
	James S. Matthews, Vice President and General Counsel

DENBURY GULF COAST PIPELINES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
By:	/s/ James S. Matthews
	James S. Matthews, Vice President and General Counsel

GREENCORE PIPELINE COMPANY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
By:	/s/ James S. Matthews
	James S. Matthews, Vice President and General Counsel

DENBURY AIR, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (f/k/a EAP Operating, LLC)
By:	/s/ James S. Matthews
	James S. Matthews, Vice President and General Counsel

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT/BANK:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Administrative Agent and a Bank
By:	/s/ Mark E. Olson
	Mark E. Olson, Authorized Officer

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
By:	/s/ Margaret Niekrash
Name:	Margaret Niekrash
Title:	Vice President

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
By:	/s/ Tom K. Martin
Name:	Tom K. Martin
Title:	Director

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
By:	/s/ Terry Donovan
Name:	Terry Donovan
Title:	Managing Director

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
By:	/s/ Doreen Barr
Name:	Doreen Barr
Title:	Director

By:	/s/ Michael D. Spaight
Name:	Michael D. Spaight
Title:	Associate

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
By:	/s/ Jay T. Sartain
Name:	Jay T. Sartain
Title:	Authorized Signatory

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
By:	/s/ Irja R. Otsa
Name:	Irja R. Otsa
Title:	Associate Director

By:	/s/ Joselin Fernandes
Name:	Joselin Fernandes
Title:	Associate Director

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
UNION BANK, N.A.
By:	/s/ David Carter
Name:	David Carter
Title:	Investment Banking Officer

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
CREDIT AGRICOLE CORPORATE AND INVESTMENT BANK (f/k/a CALYON NEW YORK BRANCH)
By:	/s/ Dixon Schultz
Name:	Dixon Schultz
Title:	Managing Director

By:	/s/ Sharada Manne
Name:	Sharada Manne
Title:	Managing Director

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
BANK OF SCOTLAND plc
By:	/s/ Julia R. Franklin
Name:	Julia R. Franklin
Title:	Vice President

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
COMPASS BANK
By:	/s/ Umar Hassan
Name:	Umar Hassan
Title:	Vice President

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, formerly known as Capital One, N.A.
By:	/s/ Peter Shen
Name:	Peter Shen
Title:	Vice President

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
COMERICA BANK
By:	/s/ John S. Lesikar
Name:	John S. Lesikar
Title:	Vice President

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
ING CAPITAL LLC
By:	/s/ Charles Hall
Name:	Charles Hall
Title:	Managing Director

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
SUNTRUST BANK
By:	/s/ Yann Pirio
Name:	Yann Pirio
Title:	Director

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
CIBC, INC.
By:	/s/ Trudy Nelson
Name:	Trudy Nelson
Title:	Authorized Signatory

By:	/s/ Richard Antl
Name:	Richard Antl
Title:	Authorized Signatory

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By:	/s/ Chulley Bogle
Name:	Chulley Bogle
Title:	Vice President

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By:	/s/ Daria Mahoney
Name:	Daria Mahoney
Title:	Vice President

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
SUMITOMO MITSUI BANKING CORPORATION
By:	/s/ Shuji Yabe
Name:	Shuji Yabe
Title:	Managing Director

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
FIFTH THIRD BANK
By:	/s/ Richard C. Butler
Name:	Richard C. Butler
Title:	Senior Vice President

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
COMERICA BANK, successor by merger with STERLING BANK,  a Texas banking association, as a Lender
By:	/s/ John Lesikar
Name:	John Lesikar
Title:	Vice President

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

BANKS:
GOLDMAN SACHS LENDING PARTNERS LLC
By:	/s/ Jennifer Dokish
Name:	Jennifer Dokish
Title:	Authorized Signatory

[Signature Page]

Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement

Denbury Resources Inc.

EX-31.A

Exhibit 31(a)

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Phil Rykhoek, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Denbury Resources Inc. (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

November 8, 2012	/s/ Phil Rykhoek
	Phil Rykhoek
	Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.B

Exhibit 31(b)

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark C. Allen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Denbury Resources Inc. (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

November 8, 2012	/s/ Mark C. Allen
	Mark C. Allen
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Assistant Secretary

EX-32

Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the “Report”) of Denbury Resources Inc. (“Denbury”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2012, each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of Denbury, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Denbury.

Dated: November 8, 2012	/s/ Phil Rykhoek
	Phil Rykhoek
	Chief Executive Officer
Dated: November 8, 2012	/s/ Mark C. Allen
	Mark C. Allen
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Assistant Secretary

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Quantitative Information About Level 3 Instruments) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Derivative Assets (Liabilities), at Fair Value, Net	$ 25,961,000
Income Approach Valuation Technique [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Derivative Assets (Liabilities), at Fair Value, Net	6,040,000
Fair Value Measurements Valuation Techniques	Discounted Cash Flow
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Derivative Assets (Liabilities), at Fair Value, Net	$ 6,040,000
Tetco M1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Derivative Settlement Period Date Range Start	10/1/2012
Derivative Settlement Period Date Range End	12/31/2012
Tetco M1 [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Pricing Index	TETCO M1
Tetco M1 [Member] | Maximum [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Forward Pricing Range	3.55
Tetco M1 [Member] | Minimum [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Forward Pricing Range	2.92
Houston Ship Channel [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Derivative Settlement Period Date Range Start	10/1/2012
Derivative Settlement Period Date Range End	12/31/2012
Houston Ship Channel [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Pricing Index	Houston Ship Channel
Houston Ship Channel [Member] | Maximum [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Forward Pricing Range	3.56
Houston Ship Channel [Member] | Minimum [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Forward Pricing Range	2.98
Natural Gas Midcontinent [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Derivative Settlement Period Date Range Start	10/1/2012
Derivative Settlement Period Date Range End	12/31/2012
Natural Gas Midcontinent [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Pricing Index	Natural Gas – Midcontinent
Natural Gas Midcontinent [Member] | Maximum [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Forward Pricing Range	3.53
Natural Gas Midcontinent [Member] | Minimum [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis, Valuation Techniques [Line Items]
Forward Pricing Range	2.77

XML

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Summary of Derivative Income/Expense) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Derivatives expense (income)	$ 61,631,000	$ (210,154,000)	$ (32,203,000)	$ (212,308,000)
Crude Oil Contracts [Member]
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Payment (receipt) on settlements of derivative contracts	641,000	1,857,000	9,580,000	23,857,000
Fair value adjustments to derivative contracts - expense (income)	60,726,000	(205,355,000)	(37,752,000)	(225,485,000)
Total derivatives expense (income) - oil & natural gas	61,367,000	(203,498,000)	(28,172,000)	(201,628,000)
Natural Gas Contracts [Member]
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Payment (receipt) on settlements of derivative contracts	(6,910,000)	(6,427,000)	(21,941,000)	(19,073,000)
Fair value adjustments to derivative contracts - expense (income)	7,174,000	(229,000)	17,910,000	8,393,000
Total derivatives expense (income) - oil & natural gas	$ 264,000	$ (6,656,000)	$ (4,031,000)	$ (10,680,000)

XML

Basis of Presentation (Anti-dilutive Securities Excluded From Diluted Net EPS) (Details)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Stock Option And Stock Appreciation Rights [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share, Total	5,375,000	4,731,000	4,140,000	3,108,000
Restricted stock [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share, Total	69,000	139,000	63,000	56,000

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Fair Value Heirarchy Table) (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Short-term investments		$ 86,682,000
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts	29,640,000	47,431,000
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts	(3,679,000)	(41,312,000)
Total		92,801,000
Total	25,961,000
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) [Member]
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Short-term investments		86,682,000
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts	0	0
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts	0	0
Total		86,682,000
Total	0
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Short-term investments		0
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts	23,600,000	23,481,000
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts	(3,679,000)	(41,312,000)
Total		(17,831,000)
Total	19,921,000
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Recurring And Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Short-term investments		0
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts	6,040,000	23,950,000
Oil and natural gas derivative contracts	0	0
Total		23,950,000
Total	$ 6,040,000

XML

Basis of Presentation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

Organization and Nature of Operations

Denbury Resources Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a growing independent oil and natural gas company. We are the largest combined oil and natural gas producer in both Mississippi and Montana, own the largest reserves of CO2 used for tertiary oil recovery east of the Mississippi River, and hold significant operating acreage in the RockyMountain and GulfCoast regions. Our goal is to increase the value of our acquired properties through a combination of exploitation, drilling and proven engineering extraction practices, with our most significant emphasis on our CO2 tertiary recovery operations.

Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Denbury Resources Inc. and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements. These financial statements and the notes thereto should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Unless indicated otherwise or the context requires, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Company,” or “Denbury,” refer to Denbury Resources Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Accounting measurements at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at year-end and the results of operations for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year. In management's opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of our consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2012,ourconsolidated results of operations for thethree and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and our consolidated cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Certain prior period items have been reclassified to make the classification consistent with the classification in the most recent quarter. On the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and ninemonths ended September 30, 2011, “Taxes other than income”is a new line item and includes (i) oil and natural gas ad valorem taxes, which were reclassified from “Lease operating expenses,”(ii) franchise taxes and property taxes on buildings, which were reclassified from “General and administrative,” (iii) oil and natural gas production taxes, which were reclassified from “Production taxes and marketing expenses” used in prior reports and (iv) CO2 property ad valorem and production taxes, which were classified from “CO2 discovery and operating expenses.” Such reclassifications had no impact on our reported total expenses or net income.

Net Income per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is calculated in the same manner, but includes the effect of potentially dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities consist of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), nonvested restricted stock, and nonvested performance equity awards. For thethree and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no adjustments to net income for purposes of calculating diluted net income per common share. The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average shares used in the basic and diluted net income per common share calculations for the periods indicated:

		Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
		September 30,		September 30,
In thousands		2012	2011	2012	2011
Basic weighted average common shares		387,512	399,040	387,015	398,371
Potentially dilutive securities:
	Stock options and SARs	2,302	2,954	2,759	3,818
	Performance equity awards	78	41	75	22
	Restricted stock	1,017	1,276	1,005	1,364
Diluted weighted average common shares		390,909	403,311	390,854	403,575

Basic weighted average common shares excludes 3.6million and 3.7million sharesfor the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012, respectively, and 3.4 million and 3.5 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, of nonvested restricted stock. As these restricted shares vest or become retirement eligible, they will be included in the shares outstanding used to calculate basic net income per common share (although all restricted stock is issued and outstanding upon grant). For purposes of calculating diluted weighted average common shares, the nonvested restricted stock is included in the computation using the treasury stock method, with the deemed proceeds equal to the average unrecognized compensation during the period, adjusted for any estimated future tax consequences recognized directly in equity.

The following securities could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future, but were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as their effect would have been antidilutive:

	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,
In thousands	2012	2011	2012	2011
Stock options and SARs	5,375	4,731	4,140	3,108
Restricted stock	69	139	63	56

Short-Term Investments

Short-term investments are available-for-sale securities recorded at fair value with any unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2011, short-term investments consisted entirely of our investment in Vanguard Natural Resources LLC (“Vanguard”) common units obtained as partial consideration for the sale of our interests in Encore Energy Partners LP to a subsidiary of Vanguard on December 31, 2010. We received distributions of $1.8millionand $5.3 million on the Vanguard common units we owned during the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2011, respectively, which are included in “Interest income and other income” on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. During January 2012, the Company sold its investment in Vanguard for cash consideration of $83.5 million, net of related transaction fees. The Company recognized a pretax loss on the sale of $3.1million, which is included in “Other expenses” on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012.

Goodwill

The following table summarizes the changes in Denbury's goodwill for the period indicated:

		Nine Months Ended
In thousands		September 30, 2012
Balance, beginning of period		$	1,236,318
	Goodwill related to the acquisition of interests in Thompson Field(1)		127,229
Balance, end of period		$	1,363,547
(1)	See Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures, for additional information regarding goodwill associated with Thompson Field.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 requires the presentation of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 was effective for Denbury beginning January 1, 2012. Since ASU 2011-05 only amended presentation requirements, it did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value. In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 amends the Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification (“FASC”) Fair Value Measurements topic by providing a consistent definition and measurement of fair value, as well as similar disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles, clarifies the application of existing fair value measurements and expands the fair value disclosure requirements, particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 was effective for Denbury beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, but did require additional disclosures. See Note 6, Fair Value Measurements.

XML

Acquisitions and Divestitures (Thompson Field PPA) (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 01, 2012
Business Combination, Consideration Transferred [Abstract]
Cash payment	$ 366,178,000
Thompson Field Purchase Price Allocation
Oil and natural gas properties	236,618,000
Pipelines and plants	2,000,000
Other assets	3,637,000
Asset retirement obligations	(3,306,000)
Business Acquisition, Purchase Price Allocation, Assets Acquired Less (Liabilities Assumed)	238,949,000
Business Acquisition, Purchase Price Allocation, Goodwill Amount	127,229,000
Proved Properties [Member]
Thompson Field Purchase Price Allocation
Oil and natural gas properties	232,467,000
Unevaluated Properties [Member]
Thompson Field Purchase Price Allocation
Oil and natural gas properties	$ 4,151,000

XML

Acquisitions and Divestitures (Details Textuals) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended					1 Months Ended			3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Jun. 01, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012 Petro Harvester [Member]	Mar. 31, 2012 Petro Harvester [Member]	Feb. 29, 2012 Petro Harvester [Member] Petro Harvester Gulf Coast Holdings Llc [Member]	Aug. 31, 2011 Riley Ridge Phase 2 [Member]	Jun. 01, 2012 Thompson Field [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Paradox Basin [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Bakken Exchange Agreement [Member]	Oct. 31, 2010 Riley Ridge Phase 1 [Member]
Acquisitions and Divestitures (Textuals) [Abstract]
Working interest in business acquisition								57.50%				42.50%
Ownership Interest								57.50%				42.50%
Net proceeds from sales of oil and natural gas properties and equipment		$ 33,973,000	$ 47,598,000				$ 141,800,000			$ 68,500,000
Deferred Riley Ridge acquisition consideration								15,000,000
Pre Adjusted Proceeds From Sale Of Oil And Natural Gas Properties							155,000,000			75,000,000
Business Acquisition, Cost of Acquired Entity, Cash Paid				366,178,000
Effective Date Of Transaction						Dec. 01, 2011			Jun. 01, 2012	Jan. 01, 2012	Jul. 01, 2012
Net working interest acquired in purchase of oil and natural gas properties									nearly 100%
Net revenue interest acquired in purchase of oil and natural gas properties									84.70%
Net Revenue Interest Retained By Seller									5.00%
Oil Production Threshold									3,000
Business Acquisition Purchase Price Allocation Assets Acquired Less Liabilities Assumed				238,949,000
Business Acquisition Goodwill Acquired				127,229,000
Proceeds used in a like-kind exchange	212,500,000
Operating Revenues Net of Capital and Lease Operating Expense Between Effective Date and Closing Date of Sale Transaction					13,500,000
Business Acquisition, Cost of Acquired Entity, Purchase Price								214,800,000
Anticipated Pre Adjusted Cash Proceeds From Sale Of Oil And Natural Gas Properties		$ 1,600,000,000

XML

Long-Term Debt (Components of Long-Term Debt) (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Bank Credit Facility	$ 625,000,000	$ 385,000,000
Capital Lease Obligations	165,447,000	4,388,000
Total	3,075,500,000	2,678,045,000
Less current obligations	(36,635,000)	(8,316,000)
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations	3,038,865,000	2,669,729,000
9.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior Subordinated Notes	234,722,000	236,774,000
Including premium of	9,802,000	11,854,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	9.50%
9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior Subordinated Notes	411,710,000	408,496,000
Including discount of	14,640,000	17,854,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	9.75%
6 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2021 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior Subordinated Notes	400,000,000	400,000,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	6.375%
8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2020 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior Subordinated Notes	996,273,000	996,273,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	8.25%
Other Subordinated Notes [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Senior Subordinated Notes	3,834,000	3,840,000
Including premium of	27,000	33,000
NEJD Financing [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Financing Lease Obligations	160,684,000	163,677,000
Free State Financing [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Financing Lease Obligations	$ 77,830,000	$ 79,597,000

XML

Long Term Debt (Details Textuals) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	1 Months Ended			3 Months Ended			9 Months Ended					9 Months Ended			9 Months Ended		1 Months Ended			3 Months Ended	1 Months Ended
	Nov. 06, 2012	Jul. 31, 2012	Apr. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2010	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 14, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012 Pre-tax [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Post-tax [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Equipment [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Minimum [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Maximum [Member]	Mar. 31, 2011 7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 [Member] Extinguishment One [Member]	Apr. 30, 2011 7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 [Member] Extinguishment Two [Member]	Mar. 31, 2011 7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 [Member] Extinguishment One [Member]	Mar. 21, 2011 7.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 [Member] Extinguishment Two [Member]	Feb. 28, 2011 6 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2021 [Member]
$1.6 Billion Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract]
Initiation date of Bank Credit Facility				Mar. 31, 2010
Borrowing Base of Denbury credit facility				$ 1,600,000,000						$ 1,600,000,000
Maturity date of Denbury Credit Facility					May 31, 2016
Commitment fee on Bank Credit Facility								We incur a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Bank Credit Facility of either 0.375% or 0.5%, based on the ratio of outstanding borrowings under the Bank Credit Facility to the borrowing base.
Weighted average interest rate on Bank Credit Facility								2.00%
Line of Credit Facility, Unused Capacity, Commitment Fee Percentage																0.375%	0.50%
Description of amendment to Bank Credit Facility	In November 2012, we entered into the Ninth Amendment to the Bank Credit Agreement (the “Ninth Amendment”) pursuant to which certain provisions of the Bank Credit Agreement were amended to, among other things (i) permit the sale of the Bakken area assets (without any change in our borrowing base), and (ii) increase the amount of distributions Denbury may make to its equity holders, including the repurchase of our common stock and/or the making of cash dividends with respect thereto, from an aggregate amount of $500 million up to an aggregate amount of $1.2 billion during the term of the Bank Credit Agreement, subject, in the case of such distributions, to certain existing restrictions and conditions, including the absence of any default or borrowing base deficiency, availability of no less than 25% of the borrowing base and compliance with all financial covenants, in each case on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such distribution. The Ninth Amendment also provided a limited waiver of any oil hedging noncompliance that may occur as a result of the Pending Exchange Transaction during the period commencing on the closing date of the Pending Exchange Transaction and continuing through and including December 31, 2013.	In July 2012, we entered into the Eighth Amendment to the Bank Credit Agreement (the “Eighth Amendment”) permitting the Company to incur capital lease obligations in an aggregate amount outstanding at any time not to exceed $300 million. The Bank Credit Agreement permits the Company to incur up to $40 million of other unsecured debt, and prior to the effectiveness of the Eighth Amendment capital leases would have been captured in this permitted debt basket. The Bank Credit Agreement was amended concurrent with the Company’s change in classification of equipment leases from operating to capital in the second quarter of 2012 (see Capital Leases below), and the Eighth Amendment included the granting by the lenders of a waiver of any applicable violations of the provisions of the Bank Credit Agreement resulting from such correction and the Company’s recording of its equipment leases as debt.	Under the Seventh Amendment, we increased the amount of additional permitted subordinated debt (other than refinancing debt) from $300.0 million to $650.0 million.
Permissable amount of common stock repurchases	1,200,000,000				500,000,000			500,000,000
Permissable amount of additional subordinated debt			650,000,000								300,000,000
Permissable amount of capital lease obligations		300,000,000
Permissable amount of other unsecured debt		40,000,000
Long Term Debt (Textuals) [Abstract]
Interest in guarantor subsidiaries					100.00%			100.00%
Face Value of Notes Issued																						400,000,000
Selling Price Of Debt Instrument																						100.00%
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated long term debt, net of commissions and fees																						393,000,000
Principal amount of notes for which cash tender offers commenced																						400,000,000
Capital Lease Obligations [Abstract]
Other property and equipment related to capital lease adjustment					402,908,000			402,908,000				157,674,000			155,600,000
Capital Lease Obligations Noncurrent															138,900,000
Capital Lease Obligations, Current															25,100,000
Immaterial Error Correction						During the second quarter of 2012, we corrected the accounting for our equipment leases from operating leases to capital leases to comply with ASC Topic 840, Leases as a result of the consideration of nonperformance-related default covenants included in our equipment lease agreements. We recorded a cumulative adjustment to establish the capital lease assets as “Other property and equipment” ($155.6 million) and the capital lease obligations as “Long-term debt” ($138.9 million) and “Current maturities of long-term debt” ($25.1 million) on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We also recognized the cumulative pre-tax impact of $8.4 million ($5.2 million after tax) as “Other expenses” on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Because the amounts involved were not material to the Company’s financial statements in any individual prior period, and the cumulative impact is not material to the estimated results of operations for the year ending December 31, 2012, we recorded the cumulative effect of correcting these items during the second quarter of 2012.
Reclassification of leases													8,400,000	5,200,000
Extinguishment of Debt [Line Items]
Amount of debt repaid or repurchased																		169,600,000	55,400,000	220,900,000	79,100,000
Percentage of par at which debt was repurchased																		100.625%	100.00%	104.125%	103.75%
Loss on early extinguishment of debt					$ 0		$ 0	$ 0	$ 16,131,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$ 410,699,000	$ 520,726,000
Adjustments needed to reconcile to net cash flow provided by operations
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization	390,119,000	299,067,000
Deferred income taxes	216,959,000	317,601,000
Stock-based compensation	22,662,000	27,520,000
Noncash fair value derivative adjustments	(19,757,000)	(217,008,000)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	0	16,131,000
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts	11,021,000	13,280,000
Impairment of assets	17,515,000	0
Other, net	15,087,000	(4,340,000)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued production receivable	3,221,000	(45,017,000)
Trade and other receivables	11,010,000	(38,607,000)
Other current and long-term assets	8,218,000	(11,587,000)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(30,127,000)	(65,407,000)
Oil and natural gas production payable	5,014,000	40,819,000
Other liabilities	(35,515,000)	(14,086,000)
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,026,126,000	839,092,000
Cash flows from investing activities
Oil and natural gas capital expenditures	(848,618,000)	(741,256,000)
Acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties	(155,636,000)	(34,291,000)
Cash paid in Riley Ridge acquisition	0	(199,233,000)
CO2 capital expenditures	(93,945,000)	(62,546,000)
Pipelines and plants capital expenditures	(231,459,000)	(142,406,000)
Purchases of other assets	(18,666,000)	(25,211,000)
Net proceeds from sales of oil and natural gas properties and equipment	33,973,000	47,598,000
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments	83,545,000	0
Other	(7,166,000)	(907,000)
Net cash used for investing activities	(1,237,972,000)	(1,158,252,000)
Cash flows from financing activities
Bank repayments	(970,000,000)	(255,000,000)
Bank borrowings	1,210,000,000	365,000,000
Repayment of senior subordinated notes	0	(525,000,000)
Premium paid on repayment of senior subordinated notes	0	(13,137,000)
Net proceeds from issuance of senior subordinated notes	0	400,000,000
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock	12,579,000	12,348,000
Costs of debt financing	(17,000)	(13,104,000)
Common stock repurchase program	(16,747,000)	0
Other	(18,628,000)	(9,453,000)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities	217,187,000	(38,346,000)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	5,341,000	(357,506,000)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	18,693,000	381,869,000
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 24,034,000	$ 24,363,000

XML

Stockholders' Equity (Details Textuals) (USD $) In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	13 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Oct. 31, 2012
Stockholders Equity Note [Abstract]
Stock Repurchase Program, Authorized Amount		$ 500.00
Treasury Stock Shares Acquired	2,133,910		2,493,435	18,739,955
Treasury Stock Value Acquired Cost Method	34.9		41.1	271.2
Treasury Stock Acquired Average Cost Per Share	$ 16.35		$ 16.48
Stock Repurchase Program Remaining Authorized Repurchase Amount	$ 228.8

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details Textuals) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended			3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011	Mar. 31, 2012 Faustina Investment Impairment [Member]
Fair Value Measurements (details) [Abstract]
Long-term Debt, Fair Value	$ 2,260,000,000		$ 2,260,000,000		$ 2,253,200,000
Held-to-maturity Securities, Debt Maturities, Net Carrying Amount					13,800,000
Accrued dividends receivable					1,300,000
Components Of Impairment Nonoperating [Line Items]
Other Asset Impairment Charges	$ 0	$ 0	$ 17,515,000	$ 0		$ 15,100,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 24,034,000	$ 18,693,000
Accrued production receivable	290,805,000	294,689,000
Trade and other receivables, net	149,096,000	164,446,000
Short-term investments	0	86,682,000
Derivative assets	16,820,000	47,402,000
Deferred tax assets	18,168,000	50,156,000
Other current assets	9,845,000	22,045,000
Total current assets	508,768,000	684,113,000
Oil and natural gas properties (using full cost accounting)
Proved	8,230,939,000	7,026,579,000
Unevaluated	807,064,000	1,157,106,000
CO2 properties	687,890,000	596,003,000
Pipelines and plants	1,933,807,000	1,701,756,000
Other property and equipment	402,908,000	157,674,000
Less accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization, and impairment	(3,080,957,000)	(2,627,493,000)
Net property and equipment	8,981,651,000	8,011,625,000
Derivative assets	12,820,000	29,000
Goodwill	1,363,547,000	1,236,318,000
Other assets	239,160,000	252,339,000
Total assets	11,105,946,000	10,184,424,000
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	403,396,000	429,336,000
Oil and gas production payable	200,184,000	197,092,000
Derivative liabilities	2,395,000	26,523,000
Current maturities of long-term debt	36,635,000	8,316,000
Total current liabilities	642,610,000	661,267,000
Long-term liabilities
Long-term debt, net of current portion	3,038,865,000	2,669,729,000
Asset retirement obligations	88,189,000	88,726,000
Derivative liabilities	1,999,000	18,872,000
Deferred taxes	2,095,850,000	1,918,576,000
Other liabilities	19,213,000	20,756,000
Total long-term liabilities	5,244,116,000	4,716,659,000
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding	0	0
Common stock, $.001 par value, 600,000,000 shares authorized; 405,399,728 and 402,946,070 shares issued, respectively	405,000	403,000
Paid-in capital in excess of par	3,132,342,000	3,090,374,000
Retained earnings	2,320,174,000	1,909,475,000
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(366,000)	(418,000)
Treasury stock, at cost, 16,282,108 and 13,965,673 shares, respectively	(233,335,000)	(193,336,000)
Total stockholders' equity	5,219,220,000	4,806,498,000
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 11,105,946,000	$ 10,184,424,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Operations (unaudited) [Abstract]
Net income	$ 85,367,000	$ 275,670,000	$ 410,699,000	$ 520,726,000
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax:
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $2,420 and $4,244, respectively	0	(3,949,000)	0	(6,925,000)
Interest rate lock derivative contracts reclassified to income, net of tax of $11, $11, $32 and $32, respectively	17,000	17,000	52,000	52,000
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	17,000	(3,932,000)	52,000	(6,873,000)
Comprehensive income	$ 85,384,000	$ 271,738,000	$ 410,751,000	$ 513,853,000

XML

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Derivatives By Balance Sheet Location) (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Derivative financial instruments in Balance Sheet
Derivative Assets, Current	$ 16,820,000	$ 47,402,000
Derivative Assets, Noncurrent	12,820,000	29,000
Derivative Liabilities, Current	2,395,000	26,523,000
Derivative Liabilities, Noncurrent	1,999,000	18,872,000
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative financial instruments in Balance Sheet
Derivative, Fair Value, Net	25,246,000	2,036,000
Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative financial instruments in Balance Sheet
Derivative Assets, Current	10,780,000	23,452,000
Derivative Assets, Noncurrent	12,820,000	29,000
Derivative Liabilities, Current	(1,680,000)	(22,610,000)
Derivative Liabilities, Noncurrent	(1,999,000)	(18,702,000)
Natural Gas Contracts [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative financial instruments in Balance Sheet
Derivative Assets, Current	6,040,000	23,950,000
Deferred Premiums [Member] | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative financial instruments in Balance Sheet
Derivative Liabilities, Current	(715,000)	(3,913,000)
Derivative Liabilities, Noncurrent	$ 0	$ (170,000)

XML

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Tables) [Abstract]

Commodity derivative expense (income), included in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

The following is a summary of “Derivatives expense (income)” included in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:

				Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
				September 30,				September 30,
In thousands				2012		2011		2012		2011
Oil
	Payment on settlements of derivative contracts			$	641	$	1,857	$	9,580	$	23,857
	Fair value adjustments to derivative contracts – expense (income)				60,726		(205,355)		(37,752)		(225,485)
		Total derivatives expense (income) – oil			61,367		(203,498)		(28,172)		(201,628)
Natural Gas
	Receipt on settlements of derivative contracts				(6,910)		(6,427)		(21,941)		(19,073)
	Fair value adjustments to derivative contracts – expense (income)				7,174		(229)		17,910		8,393
		Total derivatives expense (income) – natural gas			264		(6,656)		(4,031)		(10,680)
			Derivatives expense (income)	$	61,631	$	(210,154)	$	(32,203)	$	(212,308)

Commodity derivative contracts not classified as hedging instruments

The following tables presentoutstanding commodity derivative contracts with respect to future production as of September 30, 2012:

					Contract Prices(2)
			Type of				Weighted Average Price
Year		Months	Contract	Volume(1)		Range	Swap		Floor		Ceiling
Oil Contracts:
2012		Oct – Dec	Swap	625	$	80.28 – 81.75	$	81.04	$	—	$	—
			Collar	53,000		80.00 – 140.65		—		80.00		128.57
			Put	625		65.00 – 65.00		—		65.00		—
		Total Oct – Dec 2012		54,250
2013		Jan – Mar	Collar	55,000	$	70.00 – 113.00	$	—	$	78.91	$	108.01
		Apr – June	Collar	56,000		75.00 – 121.50		—		79.64		108.61
		July – Sept	Collar	56,000		75.00 – 133.10		—		79.64		109.15
		Oct – Dec	Collar	54,000		80.00 – 127.50		—		80.00		117.53
2014		Jan – Mar	Collar	46,000	$	80.00 – 104.50	$	—	$	80.00	$	103.13
		Apr – June	Collar	46,000		80.00 – 104.50		—		80.00		103.13
Natural Gas Contracts:
2012		Oct – Dec	Swap	20,000	$	6.30 – 6.85	$	6.53	$	—	$	—
(1)	Contract volumes are stated in Bbl/d and MMBtu/d for oil and natural gas contracts, respectively.
(2)	Contract prices are stated in $/Bbl and $/MMBtu for oil and natural gas contracts, respectively.

Derivative financial instruments included in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

At September 30,2012 and December 31, 2011, we had derivative financial instruments recorded in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:

					Estimated Fair Value
					Asset (Liability)
					September 30,		December 31,
Type of Contract				Balance Sheet Location	2012		2011
					In thousands
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
	Derivative asset
		Crude oil contracts		Derivative assets – current	$	10,780	$	23,452
		Natural gas contracts		Derivative assets – current		6,040		23,950
		Crude oil contracts		Derivative assets – long-term		12,820		29
	Derivative liability
		Crude oil contracts		Derivative liabilities – current		(1,680)		(22,610)
		Deferred premiums(1)		Derivative liabilities – current		(715)		(3,913)
		Crude oil contracts		Derivative liabilities – long-term		(1,999)		(18,702)
		Deferred premiums(1)		Derivative liabilities – long-term		—		(170)
			Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	25,246	$	2,036
(1)		Deferred premiums payable relate to various oil floor contracts and are payable on a monthly basis through January 2013.

XML

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Details Textuals) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2012
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Textuals) [Abstract]
Derivative Weighted Average Floor Price Restructured Collars	$ 80

XML

Basis of Presentation (Reconciliation of Weighted Average Shares Table) (Details)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Weighted average shares used in the basic and diluted net income per common share
Weighted average common shares - basic	387,512,000	399,040,000	387,015,000	398,371,000
Potentially dilutive securities:
Performance equity Awards	78,000	41,000	75,000	22,000
Weighted average common shares - diluted	390,909,000	403,311,000	390,854,000	403,575,000
Stock Option And Stock Appreciation Rights [Member]
Potentially dilutive securities:
Stock options, SARs, and Restricted stock	2,302,000	2,954,000	2,759,000	3,818,000
Restricted stock [Member]
Potentially dilutive securities:
Stock options, SARs, and Restricted stock	1,017,000	1,276,000	1,005,000	1,364,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Operations (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax:
Tax effect of changes in value on available-for-sale securities	$ 0	$ 2,420,000	$ 0	$ 4,244,000
Tax for interest rate lock derivative contracts reclassified to income	$ 11,000	$ 11,000	$ 32,000	$ 32,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, shares authorized (actual number)	25,000,000	25,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued (actual number)	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding (actual number)	0	0
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized (actual number)	600,000,000	600,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (actual number)	405,399,728	402,946,070
Treasury stock, shares (actual number)	16,282,108	13,965,673

XML

Subsequent Events

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

Note 9. Subsequent Event

During November 2012, we entered into an amendment to our Bank Credit Agreement (see Note 3, Long-Term Debt).

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Oct. 31, 2012
Document And Company Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Denbury Resources Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0000945764
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2012
Amendment Flag	false
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		386,996,454

XML

Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Policy Text Block [Abstract]

Organization and Nature of Operations

Denbury Resources Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a growing independent oil and natural gas company. We are the largest combined oil and natural gas producer in both Mississippi and Montana, own the largest reserves of CO2 used for tertiary oil recovery east of the Mississippi River, and hold significant operating acreage in the RockyMountain and GulfCoast regions. Our goal is to increase the value of our acquired properties through a combination of exploitation, drilling and proven engineering extraction practices, with our most significant emphasis on our CO2 tertiary recovery operations.

Interim Financial Statements - Basis of Accounting

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Denbury Resources Inc. and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements. These financial statements and the notes thereto should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Unless indicated otherwise or the context requires, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Company,” or “Denbury,” refer to Denbury Resources Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Interim Financial Statements - Use of Estimates

Accounting measurements at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at year-end and the results of operations for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year. In management's opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of our consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2012,ourconsolidated results of operations for thethree and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and our consolidated cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Net Income Per Common Share

Net Income per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is calculated in the same manner, but includes the effect of potentially dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities consist of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), nonvested restricted stock, and nonvested performance equity awards. For thethree and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no adjustments to net income for purposes of calculating diluted net income per common share.

Basic weighted average common shares excludes 3.6million and 3.7million sharesfor the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012, respectively, and 3.4 million and 3.5 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, of nonvested restricted stock. As these restricted shares vest or become retirement eligible, they will be included in the shares outstanding used to calculate basic net income per common share (although all restricted stock is issued and outstanding upon grant). For purposes of calculating diluted weighted average common shares, the nonvested restricted stock is included in the computation using the treasury stock method, with the deemed proceeds equal to the average unrecognized compensation during the period, adjusted for any estimated future tax consequences recognized directly in equity.

Short-term Investments

Short-Term Investments

Short-term investments are available-for-sale securities recorded at fair value with any unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2011, short-term investments consisted entirely of our investment in Vanguard Natural Resources LLC (“Vanguard”) common units obtained as partial consideration for the sale of our interests in Encore Energy Partners LP to a subsidiary of Vanguard on December 31, 2010. We received distributions of $1.8millionand $5.3 million on the Vanguard common units we owned during the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2011, respectively, which are included in “Interest income and other income” on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. During January 2012, the Company sold its investment in Vanguard for cash consideration of $83.5 million, net of related transaction fees. The Company recognized a pretax loss on the sale of $3.1million, which is included in “Other expenses” on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 requires the presentation of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 was effective for Denbury beginning January 1, 2012. Since ASU 2011-05 only amended presentation requirements, it did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value. In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 amends the Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification (“FASC”) Fair Value Measurements topic by providing a consistent definition and measurement of fair value, as well as similar disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles, clarifies the application of existing fair value measurements and expands the fair value disclosure requirements, particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 was effective for Denbury beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, but did require additional disclosures. See Note 6, Fair Value Measurements.

Derivatives, Policy

We do not apply hedge accounting treatment to our oil and natural gas derivative contracts; therefore, the changes in the fair values of these instruments are recognized in income in the period of change. These fair value changes, along with the cash settlements of expired contracts, are shown under “Derivatives expense (income)” in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We enter into various oil and natural gas derivative contracts to provide an economic hedge of our exposure to commodity price risk associated with anticipated future oil and natural gas production. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. These contracts have consisted of price floors, collars and fixed price swaps. The production that we hedge has varied from year to year depending on our levels of debt and financial strength and expectation of future commodity prices. We currently employ a strategy to hedge a portion of our forecasted production approximately 12 to 18 monthsin advance, as we believe it is important to protect our future cash flow to provide a level of assurance for our capital spending in those future periods in light of current worldwide economic uncertainties and commodity price volatility.

We manage and control market and counterparty credit risk through established internal control procedures that are reviewed on an ongoing basis. We attempt to minimize credit risk exposure to counterparties through formal credit policies, monitoring procedures, and diversification. We only enter into commodity derivative contracts with parties that are lenders under our BankCredit Agreement.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable. We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We are able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. The FASC establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

•Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

•Level 2 –Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. Instruments in this category include non-exchange-traded oil and natural gas derivatives that are based on NYMEX pricing. The Company's costless-collars are valued using the Black-Scholes model, an industry standard option valuation model, that takes into account inputs such as contractual prices for the underlying instruments, including maturity, quoted forward prices for commodities, interest rates, volatility factors and credit worthiness, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.

•Level 3 –Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management's best estimate of fair value. Instruments in this category include non-exchange-traded natural gas derivatives swaps that are based on regional pricing other than NYMEX (i.e., HoustonShip Channel). The Company's basis swaps are estimated using discounted cash flow calculations based upon forward commodity price curves.Significant increases or decreases in forward commodity price curves would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.

We adjust the valuations from the valuation model for nonperformance risk, using our estimate of the counterparty's credit quality for asset positions and Denbury's credit quality for liability positions. Denbury uses multiple sources of third-party credit data in determining counterparty nonperformance risk, including credit default swaps.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Revenues and other income
Oil, natural gas, and related product sales	$ 588,156,000	$ 565,523,000	$ 1,813,798,000	$ 1,662,814,000
CO2 sales and transportation fees	7,160,000	6,541,000	19,256,000	16,808,000
Interest income and other income	5,055,000	4,441,000	14,214,000	12,445,000
Total revenues and other income	600,371,000	576,505,000	1,847,268,000	1,692,067,000
Expenses
Lease operating expenses	130,485,000	133,285,000	392,960,000	383,167,000
Marketing expenses	14,728,000	6,416,000	37,776,000	17,989,000
CO2 discovery and operating expenses	1,176,000	1,250,000	8,443,000	4,889,000
Taxes other than income	40,012,000	36,180,000	122,518,000	108,295,000
General and administrative	38,198,000	26,613,000	109,631,000	97,641,000
Interest, net of amounts capitalized of $19,437, $17,853, $57,357 and $42,004, respectively	37,827,000	37,617,000	115,745,000	128,643,000
Depletion, depreciation, and amortization	136,935,000	101,978,000	390,119,000	299,067,000
Derivatives expense (income)	61,631,000	(210,154,000)	(32,203,000)	(212,308,000)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	0	0	0	16,131,000
Impairment of assets	0	0	17,515,000	0
Other expenses	0	0	23,272,000	4,377,000
Total expenses	460,992,000	133,185,000	1,185,776,000	847,891,000
Income before income taxes	139,379,000	443,320,000	661,492,000	844,176,000
Income Tax Provision	54,012,000	167,650,000	250,793,000	323,450,000
Net income	$ 85,367,000	$ 275,670,000	$ 410,699,000	$ 520,726,000
Net income per common share - basic	$ 0.22	$ 0.69	$ 1.06	$ 1.31
Net income per common share - diluted	$ 0.22	$ 0.68	$ 1.05	$ 1.29
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic	387,512,000	399,040,000	387,015,000	398,371,000
Diluted	390,909,000	403,311,000	390,854,000	403,575,000

XML

Stockholders' Equity

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Stockholders Equity Note [Abstract]

Stockholders Equity

Note 4. Stockholders' Equity

Stock Repurchase Program

In October 2011, we commenced a common stock repurchase program for up to $500 million of Denbury common stock, as approved by the Company's Board of Directors. The program has no pre-established ending date, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. We are not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or specific number of shares of our common stock under the program.

During the third quarter of 2012, we repurchased 2,493,435 shares of Denbury common stock for $41.1 million, or $16.48 per share, and in October 2012, we repurchased an additional 2,133,910 shares for $34.9 million, or $16.35 per share. Since commencement of the share repurchase program in October 2011, we have purchased a total of 18,739,955 shares of Denbury common stock for $271.2 million and thus are authorized to spend an additional $228.8million under this repurchase program.We account for treasury stock using the cost method and include treasury stock as a component of stockholders' equity.

XML

Long-Term Debt

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Long-Term Debt

Note 3. Long-Term Debt

The following table shows the components of ourlong-term debt:

			September 30,		December 31,
In thousands			2012		2011
Bank Credit Facility			$	625,000	$	385,000
9½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016, including premium of $9,802 and $11,854, respectively				234,722		236,774
9¾% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016, including discount of $14,640 and $17,854, respectively				411,710		408,496
8¼% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2020				996,273		996,273
6⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021				400,000		400,000
Other Subordinated Notes, including premium of $27 and $33, respectively				3,834		3,840
NEJD Pipeline financing				160,684		163,677
Free State Pipeline financing				77,830		79,597
Capital lease obligations				165,447		4,388
	Total			3,075,500		2,678,045
		Less current obligations		(36,635)		(8,316)
	Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		$	3,038,865	$	2,669,729

The parent company, Denbury Resources Inc. (“DRI”), is the sole issuer of all of our outstanding senior subordinated notes. DRI has no independent assets or operations. Certain of DRI's subsidiaries guarantee our debt. Each such subsidiary guarantor is 100% owned by DRI, and the guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several obligations of the subsidiary guarantors. Any subsidiaries of DRI other than the subsidiary guarantors are minor subsidiaries.

Bank Credit Facility

In March 2010, we entered into a $1.6 billion revolving credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.as administrative agent, and other lenders party thereto (as amended the “Bank Credit Agreement”). Availability under the Bank Credit Agreement is subject to a borrowing base, which is redetermined semi-annually on or prior to May 1 and November 1 of each year,and is subject to requested special redeterminations. In September2012, the banks reaffirmed our borrowing base of $1.6 billion; our next semi-annual redetermination is scheduled to occur on or around May 1, 2013. The borrowing base is adjusted at the banks' discretion and is based in part upon certain external factors over which we have no control. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the credit facility, evidenced by the Bank Credit Agreement (the “Bank Credit Facility”) was 2.0% for the nine months endedSeptember 30,2012.We incur a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Bank Credit Facilityof either 0.375% or 0.5%, based on the ratio of outstanding borrowings under the Bank Credit Facility to the borrowing base. The Bank Credit Agreementis scheduled to mature in May 2016.

In November 2012, we entered into the Ninth Amendment to the Bank Credit Agreement (the “Ninth Amendment”) pursuant to which certain provisions of the Bank Credit Agreement were amended to, among other things (i) permit the sale of the Bakken area assets (without any change in our borrowing base), and (ii) increase the amount of distributions Denbury may make to its equity holders, including the repurchase of our common stock and/or the making of cash dividends with respect thereto, from an aggregate amount of $500 million up to an aggregate amount of $1.2 billion during the term of the Bank Credit Agreement, subject, in the case of such distributions, to certain existing restrictions and conditions, including the absence of any default or borrowing base deficiency, availability of no less than 25% of the borrowing base and compliance with all financial covenants, in each case on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any such distribution. The Ninth Amendment also provided a limited waiver of any oil hedging noncompliance that may occur as a result of the Pending Exchange Transaction during the period commencing on the closing date of the Pending Exchange Transaction and continuing through and including December 31, 2013.

In July 2012, we entered into the Eighth Amendment to the Bank Credit Agreement (the “Eighth Amendment”) permitting the Company to incur capital lease obligations in an aggregate amount outstanding at any time not to exceed $300 million. The Bank Credit Agreement permits the Company to incur up to $40 million of other unsecured debt, and prior to the effectiveness of the Eighth Amendment capital leases would have been captured in this permitted debt basket. The Bank Credit Agreement was amended concurrent with the Company's change in classification of equipment leases from operating to capital in the second quarter of 2012 (see Capital Leases below), and the Eighth Amendment included the granting by the lenders of a waiver of any applicable violations of the provisions of the Bank Credit Agreement resulting from such correction and the Company'srecording of its equipment leases as debt.In April 2012, we entered into the Seventh Amendment to the Bank Credit Agreement (the “Seventh Amendment”). Under the Seventh Amendment, we increased the amount of additional permitted subordinated debt (other than refinancing debt) from $300.0 million to $650.0 million.

6⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021

In February 2011, we issued $400.0 million of 6⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021 (“2021 Notes”). The 2021 Notes, which carry a coupon rate of 6.375%, were sold at par. The net proceeds of $393.0 million were used to repurchase a portion of our outstanding 2013 Notes and 2015 Notes (see Redemption of our 2013 and 2015 Notesbelow).

Redemption of our 2013 and 2015 Notes

Pursuant to cash tender offers, during March 2011, we repurchased $169.6 million in principal of our 7½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (“2013 Notes”)at 100.625% of par, and $220.9 million in principal of our 7½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 (“2015 Notes”) at 104.125% of par. We called the remaining 2013 Notes and 2015 Notes, repurchasing all of the remaining outstanding 2015 Notes ($79.1 million) at 103.75% of par on March 21, 2011 and all of the remaining outstanding 2013 Notes ($55.4 million) at par on April 1, 2011. We recognized a $16.1 million loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 associated with the debt repurchases, which isincluded in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations under the caption “Loss on early extinguishment of debt.”

Capital Lease Obligations

During the second quarter of 2012, wecorrected the accounting forour equipment leases from operating leases to capital leases to comply with ASC Topic 840, Leases as a result of the consideration of nonperformance-related default covenants included in our equipment lease agreements. We recorded a cumulative adjustment to establish the capital lease assets as “Other property and equipment” ($155.6 million) and the capital lease obligations as “Long-term debt” ($138.9 million) and “Current maturities of long-term debt” ($25.1 million) on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We also recognized the cumulative pre-tax impact of $8.4 million ($5.2 million after tax) as “Other expenses” on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Because the amounts involved were not material to the Company's financial statements in any individual prior period, and the cumulative impact is not material to the estimated results of operations for the year ending December 31, 2012, we recorded the cumulative effect of correcting these items during the second quarter of 2012.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Abstract]

Fair value hierarchy of financial assets and liabilities

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of the periods indicated:

			Fair Value Measurements Using:
					Significant
			Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
			in Active		Observable		Unobservable
			Markets		Inputs		Inputs
In thousands			(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
September 30, 2012
Assets
	Oil and natural gas derivative contracts		$	—	$	23,600	$	6,040	$	29,640
Liabilities
	Oil and natural gas derivative contracts			—		(3,679)		—		(3,679)
		Total	$	—	$	19,921	$	6,040	$	25,961
December 31, 2011
Assets
	Short-term investments		$	86,682	$	—	$	—	$	86,682
	Oil and natural gas derivative contracts			—		23,481		23,950		47,431
Liabilities
	Oil and natural gas derivative contracts			—		(41,312)		—		(41,312)
		Total	$	86,682	$	(17,831)	$	23,950	$	92,801

The changes in the fair value of Denbury's Level 3 assets and liabilities

The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of ourLevel 3 assets for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
In thousands		2012		2011		2012		2011
Balance, beginning of period		$	13,214	$	6,638	$	23,950	$	16,478
	Unrealized gains (losses) on commodity derivative contracts included in earnings		(264)		1,717		4,031		(5,359)
	Receipts on settlement of commodity derivative contracts		(6,910)		(1,378)		(21,941)		(4,142)
Balance, end of period		$	6,040	$	6,977	$	6,040	$	6,977

Quantitative valuation techniques for assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis (Level 3)

The following table details fair value inputs related to our Level 3 natural gas financial measurements:

In thousands		Fair Value at 9/30/2012		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range
Natural gas derivative contracts		$	6,040	Discounted Cash Flow	Forward commodity price curve	(a)
(a)	The derivative instruments detailed in this category include non-exchange-traded natural gas derivatives swaps that are valued based on regional pricing other than NYMEX. The regional pricing sources utilized for these instruments include the following (forward pricing ranges represent the high and low price expected to be received within the settlement period):
	Pricing Index		Settlement Period		Forward Pricing Range
	TETCO M1		10/1/2012 – 12/31/2012		$2.92/MMBtu – $3.55/MMBtu
	Houston Ship Channel		10/1/2012 – 12/31/2012		$2.98/MMBtu – $3.56/MMBtu
	Natural Gas – Midcontinent		10/1/2012 – 12/31/2012		$2.77/MMBtu – $3.53/MMBtu

XML

Basis of Presentation (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Basis of Presentation (Tables) [Abstract]

Weighted average shares used in the basic and diluted net income per common share

The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average shares used in the basic and diluted net income per common share calculations for the periods indicated:

		Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
		September 30,		September 30,
In thousands		2012	2011	2012	2011
Basic weighted average common shares		387,512	399,040	387,015	398,371
Potentially dilutive securities:
	Stock options and SARs	2,302	2,954	2,759	3,818
	Performance equity awards	78	41	75	22
	Restricted stock	1,017	1,276	1,005	1,364
Diluted weighted average common shares		390,909	403,311	390,854	403,575

Anti-dilutive securities excluded from computation of diluted net earnings per share

The following securities could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future, but were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as their effect would have been antidilutive:

	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,
In thousands	2012	2011	2012	2011
Stock options and SARs	5,375	4,731	4,140	3,108
Restricted stock	69	139	63	56

Schedule of Goodwill

The following table summarizes the changes in Denbury's goodwill for the period indicated:

		Nine Months Ended
In thousands		September 30, 2012
Balance, beginning of period		$	1,236,318
	Goodwill related to the acquisition of interests in Thompson Field(1)		127,229
Balance, end of period		$	1,363,547
(1)	See Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures, for additional information regarding goodwill associated with Thompson Field.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies

We are involved in various lawsuits, claims and other regulatory proceedings incidental to our businesses. While we currently believe that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our net income in the period in which the ruling occurs. We provide accruals for litigation and claims if we determine that a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We are also subject to audits for sales and use taxes and severance taxes in the various states in which we operate, and from time to time receive assessments for potential taxes that we may owe.

XML

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities [Abstract]

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Note 5. Derivative Instruments

We do not apply hedge accounting treatment to our oil and natural gas derivative contracts; therefore, the changes in the fair values of these instruments are recognized in income in the period of change. These fair value changes, along with the cash settlements of expired contracts, are shown under “Derivatives expense (income)” in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We enter into various oil and natural gas derivative contracts to provide an economic hedge of our exposure to commodity price risk associated with anticipated future oil and natural gas production. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. These contracts have consisted of price floors, collars and fixed price swaps. The production that we hedge has varied from year to year depending on our levels of debt and financial strength and expectation of future commodity prices. We currently employ a strategy to hedge a portion of our forecasted production approximately 12 to 18 monthsin advance, as we believe it is important to protect our future cash flow to provide a level of assurance for our capital spending in those future periods in light of current worldwide economic uncertainties and commodity price volatility.

We manage and control market and counterparty credit risk through established internal control procedures that are reviewed on an ongoing basis. We attempt to minimize credit risk exposure to counterparties through formal credit policies, monitoring procedures, and diversification. We only enter into commodity derivative contracts with parties that are lenders under our BankCredit Agreement.

The following is a summary of “Derivatives expense (income)” included in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:

				Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
				September 30,				September 30,
In thousands				2012		2011		2012		2011
Oil
	Payment on settlements of derivative contracts			$	641	$	1,857	$	9,580	$	23,857
	Fair value adjustments to derivative contracts – expense (income)				60,726		(205,355)		(37,752)		(225,485)
		Total derivatives expense (income) – oil			61,367		(203,498)		(28,172)		(201,628)
Natural Gas
	Receipt on settlements of derivative contracts				(6,910)		(6,427)		(21,941)		(19,073)
	Fair value adjustments to derivative contracts – expense (income)				7,174		(229)		17,910		8,393
		Total derivatives expense (income) – natural gas			264		(6,656)		(4,031)		(10,680)
			Derivatives expense (income)	$	61,631	$	(210,154)	$	(32,203)	$	(212,308)

Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments

The following tables presentoutstanding commodity derivative contracts with respect to future production as of September 30, 2012:

					Contract Prices(2)
			Type of				Weighted Average Price
Year		Months	Contract	Volume(1)		Range	Swap		Floor		Ceiling
Oil Contracts:
2012		Oct – Dec	Swap	625	$	80.28 – 81.75	$	81.04	$	—	$	—
			Collar	53,000		80.00 – 140.65		—		80.00		128.57
			Put	625		65.00 – 65.00		—		65.00		—
		Total Oct – Dec 2012		54,250
2013		Jan – Mar	Collar	55,000	$	70.00 – 113.00	$	—	$	78.91	$	108.01
		Apr – June	Collar	56,000		75.00 – 121.50		—		79.64		108.61
		July – Sept	Collar	56,000		75.00 – 133.10		—		79.64		109.15
		Oct – Dec	Collar	54,000		80.00 – 127.50		—		80.00		117.53
2014		Jan – Mar	Collar	46,000	$	80.00 – 104.50	$	—	$	80.00	$	103.13
		Apr – June	Collar	46,000		80.00 – 104.50		—		80.00		103.13
Natural Gas Contracts:
2012		Oct – Dec	Swap	20,000	$	6.30 – 6.85	$	6.53	$	—	$	—
(1)	Contract volumes are stated in Bbl/d and MMBtu/d for oil and natural gas contracts, respectively.
(2)	Contract prices are stated in $/Bbl and $/MMBtu for oil and natural gas contracts, respectively.

During the third quarter of 2012, we restructured most of our oil derivative collar contracts for the first three quarters of 2013 to increase the weighted average floor price to approximately $80 per Bbl and decrease the weighted average ceiling price. These updated contracts are reflected in the table above.

Additional Disclosures about Derivative Instruments

At September 30,2012 and December 31, 2011, we had derivative financial instruments recorded in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:

					Estimated Fair Value
					Asset (Liability)
					September 30,		December 31,
Type of Contract				Balance Sheet Location	2012		2011
					In thousands
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
	Derivative asset
		Crude oil contracts		Derivative assets – current	$	10,780	$	23,452
		Natural gas contracts		Derivative assets – current		6,040		23,950
		Crude oil contracts		Derivative assets – long-term		12,820		29
	Derivative liability
		Crude oil contracts		Derivative liabilities – current		(1,680)		(22,610)
		Deferred premiums(1)		Derivative liabilities – current		(715)		(3,913)
		Crude oil contracts		Derivative liabilities – long-term		(1,999)		(18,702)
		Deferred premiums(1)		Derivative liabilities – long-term		—		(170)
			Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	25,246	$	2,036
(1)		Deferred premiums payable relate to various oil floor contracts and are payable on a monthly basis through January 2013.

XML

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable. We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We are able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. The FASC establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

•Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

•Level 2 –Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. Instruments in this category include non-exchange-traded oil and natural gas derivatives that are based on NYMEX pricing. The Company's costless-collars are valued using the Black-Scholes model, an industry standard option valuation model, that takes into account inputs such as contractual prices for the underlying instruments, including maturity, quoted forward prices for commodities, interest rates, volatility factors and credit worthiness, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.

•Level 3 –Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management's best estimate of fair value. Instruments in this category include non-exchange-traded natural gas derivatives swaps that are based on regional pricing other than NYMEX (i.e., HoustonShip Channel). The Company's basis swaps are estimated using discounted cash flow calculations based upon forward commodity price curves.Significant increases or decreases in forward commodity price curves would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.

We adjust the valuations from the valuation model for nonperformance risk, using our estimate of the counterparty's credit quality for asset positions and Denbury's credit quality for liability positions. Denbury uses multiple sources of third-party credit data in determining counterparty nonperformance risk, including credit default swaps.

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of the periods indicated:

			Fair Value Measurements Using:
					Significant
			Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
			in Active		Observable		Unobservable
			Markets		Inputs		Inputs
In thousands			(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
September 30, 2012
Assets
	Oil and natural gas derivative contracts		$	—	$	23,600	$	6,040	$	29,640
Liabilities
	Oil and natural gas derivative contracts			—		(3,679)		—		(3,679)
		Total	$	—	$	19,921	$	6,040	$	25,961
December 31, 2011
Assets
	Short-term investments		$	86,682	$	—	$	—	$	86,682
	Oil and natural gas derivative contracts			—		23,481		23,950		47,431
Liabilities
	Oil and natural gas derivative contracts			—		(41,312)		—		(41,312)
		Total	$	86,682	$	(17,831)	$	23,950	$	92,801

Since we do not use hedge accounting for our commodity derivative contracts, any gains and losses on our assets and liabilities are included in “Derivatives expense (income)” in the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of ourLevel 3 assets for the three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2012 and 2011:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
In thousands		2012		2011		2012		2011
Balance, beginning of period		$	13,214	$	6,638	$	23,950	$	16,478
	Unrealized gains (losses) on commodity derivative contracts included in earnings		(264)		1,717		4,031		(5,359)
	Receipts on settlement of commodity derivative contracts		(6,910)		(1,378)		(21,941)		(4,142)
Balance, end of period		$	6,040	$	6,977	$	6,040	$	6,977

We utilize an income approach to value our natural gas swap arrangements, generally the industry standard valuation technique for a commodity swap contract. We obtain and ensure the appropriateness of the natural gas forward pricing curve, the most significant input to the calculation, and the fair value estimate is prepared and reviewed on a quarterly basis.

The following table details fair value inputs related to our Level 3 natural gas financial measurements:

In thousands		Fair Value at 9/30/2012		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range
Natural gas derivative contracts		$	6,040	Discounted Cash Flow	Forward commodity price curve	(a)
(a)	The derivative instruments detailed in this category include non-exchange-traded natural gas derivatives swaps that are valued based on regional pricing other than NYMEX. The regional pricing sources utilized for these instruments include the following (forward pricing ranges represent the high and low price expected to be received within the settlement period):
	Pricing Index		Settlement Period		Forward Pricing Range
	TETCO M1		10/1/2012 – 12/31/2012		$2.92/MMBtu – $3.55/MMBtu
	Houston Ship Channel		10/1/2012 – 12/31/2012		$2.98/MMBtu – $3.56/MMBtu
	Natural Gas – Midcontinent		10/1/2012 – 12/31/2012		$2.77/MMBtu – $3.53/MMBtu

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

As of December 31, 2011, we had invested a total of $13.8 million in the preferred stock of Faustina Hydrogen Products LLC, a company created to develop a proposed gasification plant from which CO2 would be produced as a byproduct and used by Denbury in its tertiary oil operations. The investment was recorded at cost, together with a $1.3 million receivable for accrued dividends receivable. The developer of the proposed plant was soliciting other potential investors for the project, and as of December 31, 2011, a third-party was actively engaged in due diligence.  During 2012, a key investor and participant in the project announced its intent to abandon its investment in the proposed plant. As a result, due diligence by the potential third party investor ceased. Absent the key investor, we believe it is unlikely the plant will be constructed, and therefore, it is also unlikely our investment will generate future cash flows. Accordingly, we recorded a $15.1 million impairment charge for this investment during the first quarter of 2012, which is classified as “Impairment of assets” in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The inputs used to determine fair value of the investment included the projected future cash flows of the plant and risk-adjusted rate of return that we estimated would be used by a market participant in valuing the asset. These inputs are unobservable within the marketplace and therefore considered Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. However, as there are currently no expected future cash flows associated with the plant, the preferred stock was determined to have no value.

Other Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of our Bank Credit Facility approximates fair value, as it is subject to short-term floating interest rates that approximate the rates available to us for those periods. The fair values of our senior subordinated notes are based on quoted market prices. The estimated fair value of our senior subordinated notes as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is $2,260.0 million and $2,253.2 million, respectively. The fair value hierarchy for long-term debt is primarily Level 1 (quoted prices for identical assets in active markets). We have other financial instruments consisting primarily of cash, cash equivalents, short-term receivables and payables that approximate fair value due to the nature of the instrument and the relatively short maturities.

XML

Related Party Transactions

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions

Note 8. Related Party

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we purchased $4.5 million and $9.7 million, respectively of oil produced bya privately-held entity of which a member of our Board of Directors serves as chairman of the board. The oil purchased under this agreement is related to the non-core assets in central and southern Mississippi and in southern Louisiana (see further discussion in Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures) sold to this same entity in February 2012. The oil purchased under this agreement is part of a typical commercial transaction that would be entered into with a third party and is later blended with other oil and sold by Denbury to an unrelated third party. The purchase of oil is classified as “Marketing expenses” and the subsequent sale is included in “Interest income and other income” on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We are under no continuing obligation to purchase oil under this agreement.

XML

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Oil and Natural Gas Commodity Derivatives Outstanding) (Details)	Sep. 30, 2012
Year 2012 [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Volume per Day	54,250
Year 2012 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Swap price	0
Floor price	80.00
Ceiling price	128.57
Volume per Day	53,000
Year 2012 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	140.65
Year 2012 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	80.00
Year 2012 [Member] | Swap [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Swap price	81.04
Floor price	0
Ceiling price	0
Volume per Day	625
Year 2012 [Member] | Swap [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	81.75
Year 2012 [Member] | Swap [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	80.28
Year 2012 [Member] | Swap [Member] | Natural Gas Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Swap price	6.53
Floor price	0
Ceiling price	0
Volume per Day	20,000
Year 2012 [Member] | Swap [Member] | Natural Gas Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	6.85
Year 2012 [Member] | Swap [Member] | Natural Gas Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	6.30
Year 2012 [Member] | Put Option [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Swap price	0
Floor price	65.00
Ceiling price	0
Volume per Day	625
Year 2012 [Member] | Put Option [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	65.00
Year 2012 [Member] | Put Option [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	65.00
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q1 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Swap price	0
Floor price	78.91
Ceiling price	108.01
Volume per Day	55,000
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q1 [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	113.00
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q1 [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	70.00
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q2 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Swap price	0
Floor price	79.64
Ceiling price	108.61
Volume per Day	56,000
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q2 [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	121.50
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q2 [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	75.00
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q3 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Swap price	0
Floor price	79.64
Ceiling price	109.15
Volume per Day	56,000
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q3 [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	133.10
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q3 [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	75.00
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Swap price	0
Floor price	80.00
Ceiling price	117.53
Volume per Day	54,000
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	127.50
Year 2013 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q4 [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	80.00
Year 2014 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q1 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Swap price	0
Floor price	80.00
Ceiling price	103.13
Volume per Day	46,000
Year 2014 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q1 [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	104.5
Year 2014 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q1 [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	80
Year 2014 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q2 [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Swap price	0
Floor price	80.00
Ceiling price	103.13
Volume per Day	46,000
Year 2014 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q2 [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	104.5
Year 2014 [Member] | Collars [Member] | Crude Oil Contracts [Member] | Q2 [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Commodity Derivative Contracts Not Classified as Hedging Instruments
Derivative Price Range	80

XML

Long-Term Debt (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Components of Long-Term Debt

The following table shows the components of ourlong-term debt:

			September 30,		December 31,
In thousands			2012		2011
Bank Credit Facility			$	625,000	$	385,000
9½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016, including premium of $9,802 and $11,854, respectively				234,722		236,774
9¾% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016, including discount of $14,640 and $17,854, respectively				411,710		408,496
8¼% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2020				996,273		996,273
6⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021				400,000		400,000
Other Subordinated Notes, including premium of $27 and $33, respectively				3,834		3,840
NEJD Pipeline financing				160,684		163,677
Free State Pipeline financing				77,830		79,597
Capital lease obligations				165,447		4,388
	Total			3,075,500		2,678,045
		Less current obligations		(36,635)		(8,316)
	Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		$	3,038,865	$	2,669,729

XML

Basis of Presentation (Schedule of Goodwill) (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012
Goodwill Roll Forward
Balance, beginning of period	$ 1,236,318,000
Goodwill acquired during period	127,229,000
Balance, end of period	$ 1,363,547,000

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details Textuals) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Oil purchases	$ 4.5	$ 9.7
Related Party Transaction, Description of Transaction		The oil purchased under this agreement is related to the non-core assets in central and southern Mississippi and in southern Louisiana (see further discussion in Note 2, Acquisitions and Divestitures) sold to this same entity in February 2012. The oil purchased under this agreement is part of a typical commercial transaction that would be entered into with a third party and is later blended with other oil and sold by Denbury to an unrelated third party. The purchase of oil is classified as “Marketing expenses” and the subsequent sale is included in “Interest income and other income” on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We are under no continuing obligation to purchase oil under this agreement.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Expenses
Interest capitalized	$ 19,437,000	$ 17,853,000	$ 57,357,000	$ 42,004,000

XML

Acquisitions and Divestitures

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Acquisitions and Divestitures [Abstract]

Acquisitions and Divestitures

Note 2. Acquisitions and Divestitures

Pending Exchange Transaction

On September 19, 2012, we entered into a definitive exchange agreement with ExxonMobil Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary XTO Energy Inc. (collectively, “ExxonMobil”) to sell ExxonMobil our Bakken area assets in North Dakota and Montana in exchange for total consideration consisting of $1.6 billion cash (subject to closing adjustments), and ExxonMobil's operating interests in the Webster Field in Texas and the Hartzog Draw Field in Wyoming (the “Pending Exchange Transaction”). The Pending Exchange Transaction is expected to close around the end of November 2012 with an effective date of July 1, 2012 and is subject to customary closing conditions, including satisfactory completion of customary title and environmental due diligence. The cash portion of the sales price is subject to adjustments for revenues and costs of the respective assets from the effective date to the closing date. The Pending Exchange Transaction agreement contains termination rights for both parties, including such rights based on the failure to close the transaction by January 31, 2013.

Acquisitions

June 2012 Acquisition of Reserves in the Gulf Coast region at Thompson Field

In June 2012, we acquired a nearly 100% working interest and 84.7% net revenue interest in Thompson Field for $366.2 million after preliminary closing adjustments.  The field is located approximately 18 miles west of Hastings Field, which is an enhanced oil recovery (“EOR”) field that Denbury is currently flooding with CO2, and is the current terminus of the Green Pipeline which transports CO2 from the Jackson Dome, located near Jackson, Mississippi.Thompson Field is similar to Hastings Field, producing oil from the Frio zone at similar depths, and is also expected to be an ideal candidate for a CO2 flood. Under the terms of the Thompson Field acquisition agreement, the seller will retain approximately a 5% gross revenue interest (less severance taxes)once average monthly oil production exceeds 3,000Bbls/d after the initiation of CO2 injection.

This acquisition meets the definition of a business under the FASC Business Combinations topic. As such, Denbury estimated the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of June 1, 2012, the closing date of the acquisition. The FASC Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (often referred to as the “exit price”). The fair value measurement is based on the assumptions of market participants and not those of the reporting entity. Therefore, entity-specific assumptions should not impact the measurement of fair value unless those assumptions are consistent with market participant views.

In applying these accounting principles, Denbury estimated the fair value of the assets acquired less liabilities assumed on the acquisition date to be approximately $238.9million. This measurement resulted in the recognition of goodwill of approximately $127.2million, whichrepresents the excess of the cash paid to acquire the field over the acquisition date estimated fair value. This resultant goodwill is due primarily to two factors.The first factor is the decrease in average NYMEX oil futures prices between the date of signing the purchase agreement on April 24, 2012 and closing the purchase onJune 1, 2012. The second factor is the fair value assigned to the estimated oil reserves recoverable through a CO2EOR project. By building an 18-mile extension of the Green Pipeline, Denbury will haveaccess to its CO2reserves at Jackson Dome, one of the few known significant natural sources of CO2 in the United States, and the largest known source east of the Mississippi River, allowing Denbury to carry out CO2 EOR activities in this field at a lower cost than other market participants. However, the FASC Fair Value Measurements and Disclosuresdoes not allow entity-specific assumptions in the measurement of fair value. Therefore, we estimated the fair value of the oil reserves recoverable through CO2 EOR using a higher estimated cost of CO2 to other market participants, which lowers the discounted net revenue stream used in making the fair value estimate related to this field.

The fair value of Thompson Field assets acquired and liabilities assumed was based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which FASC Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic defines as Level 3 inputs. Key assumptions include (1) NYMEX oil futures prices (this input is observable), (2) estimated quantities of oil reserves, (3) projections of future rates of production, (4) timing and amount of estimated future development and operating costs, (5) projected cost of CO2 to a market participant, (6) projected recovery factors, and (7) risk-adjusted discount rates. The fair value of the oil and natural gas properties was determined using a risk-adjusted after-tax discounted cash flow analysis. Denbury applies full cost accounting rules, and all of the goodwill is deductible for tax purposes as property cost. The following table presents a summary of the preliminary fair value of the Thompson Field assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

In thousands
Consideration:
	Cash payment(1)		$	366,178
Less: Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:(2)
	Oil and natural gas properties
		Proved		232,467
		Unevaluated		4,151
	Pipelines and plants			2,000
	Other assets			3,637
	Asset retirement obligations			(3,306)
				238,949
Goodwill			$	127,229
(1)		See Divestitures below for additional information regarding restricted cash and the like-kind exchange transaction utilized to fund the purchase.
(2)		Fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is preliminary, pending final closing adjustments and further evaluation of reserves and asset retirement obligations.

August 2011 Acquisition of Reservesin Rocky Mountain Region at Riley Ridge

InAugust 2011, we acquired the remaining 57.5% working interest in the Riley Ridge Federal Unit (“Riley Ridge”), located in the LaBarge Field of southwestern Wyoming.RileyRidge contains natural gas resources, as well as helium and CO2resources. The purchase included a57.5% interest in a gas plant which will separate the helium and natural gas from the commingled gas stream, and interests in certain surrounding properties.We previously acquired the other 42.5% interest in RileyRidge and the gas plant in October 2010. The purchase price for the August 2011 acquisition was approximately $214.8 million after closing adjustments, including a $15.0 million deferred payment to be made at the time the Riley Ridge gas plant is operational and meets specific performance conditions. The gas plant is currently undergoing readiness testing, and we expect it to become operational in mid-2013.

The August 2011 acquisition of Riley Ridge meets the definition of a business under the FASC Business Combinations topic. The fair values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the August 2011 acquisition have been finalized and no adjustments have been made to fair value amounts previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011.

Pro Forma Information

Based on the immateriality of revenues and expenses related to the combined acquisitions of Thompson and Riley Ridge during the periods presented, pro forma information has not been disclosed.

Divestitures

In February 2012, we completed the sale of certain non-core assets primarily located in central and southern Mississippi and in southern Louisiana for $155.0 million to a privately held entity in which a member of our Board of Directors serves as chairman of the board, in a sale for which there was a competing bid contained in a multi-property purchase proposal.We realized net proceeds of $141.8 million, after final closing adjustments. The sale had an effective date of December 1, 2011 and consequently, operating revenues of $13.5 million after the effective date, net ofcapital and lease operating expenditures, along with any other purchase price adjustments, were adjustments to the selling price.

In April 2012, we completed the sale of certain non-operated assets in the Paradox Basin of Utah for $75.0 million. The sale had an effective date of January 1, 2012 and proceeds received after consideration of final closing adjustments totaled $68.5 million. Closing adjustments included operating net revenues after January 1, 2012, net of capital and lease operating expenditures, along with other purchase price adjustments.

We did not record a gain or loss on either of the above sales of properties in accordance with the full cost method of accounting.

Of the proceeds from these property sales before final closing adjustments, $212.5 million waspaid directly to a qualified intermediary and later released to fund a portion of the acquisition cost of Thompson Field (see June 2012 Acquisition of Reserves in the Gulf Coast region at Thompson Field above). Since the $212.5 million in cash proceeds was paid to a qualified intermediary in order to enable a like-kind exchange transaction for federal income tax purposes, this amount is not reflected as a receipt of cash from the sale of oil and natural gas properties and equipment, nor as a cash payment to purchase oil and natural gas properties in the investing activity in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

XML

Basis of Presentation (Details Textuals) (USD $) Share data in Millions, unless otherwise specified	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Basis of Presentation (Textuals) [Abstract]
Weighted average common shares - basic restricted stock		3.6	3.4	3.7	3.5
Distribution on Vanguard common units			$ 1,800,000		$ 5,300,000
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments	83,545,000			83,545,000	0
Loss on sale of Vanguard securities				$ 3,100,000

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Recurring Level 3 Rollforward) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis, Unobservable Input Reconciliation [Abstract]
Balance, beginning of period	$ 13,214,000	$ 6,638,000	$ 23,950,000	$ 16,478,000
Unrealized gains (losses) on commodity derivative contracts included in earnings	(264,000)	1,717,000	4,031,000	(5,359,000)
Receipts on settlement of commodity derivative contracts	(6,910,000)	(1,378,000)	(21,941,000)	(4,142,000)
Balance, end of period	$ 6,040,000	$ 6,977,000	$ 6,040,000	$ 6,977,000

XML

Acquisitions and Divestitures (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Acquisitions and Divestitures (Tables) [Abstract]

Schedule of Business Acquisitions, Thompson Field

In thousands
Consideration:
	Cash payment(1)		$	366,178
Less: Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:(2)
	Oil and natural gas properties
		Proved		232,467
		Unevaluated		4,151
	Pipelines and plants			2,000
	Other assets			3,637
	Asset retirement obligations			(3,306)
				238,949
Goodwill			$	127,229
(1)		See Divestitures below for additional information regarding restricted cash and the like-kind exchange transaction utilized to fund the purchase.
(2)		Fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is preliminary, pending final closing adjustments and further evaluation of reserves and asset retirement obligations.