-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, Hew5zGGEqkHrjmkM/lPKK/AMorhevpyhtoaypADhqr4Ufjuf8UOn20c5Fqzqyseo EOrTO3Yo/2p+tF7N/euQNw== 0000950129-05-011058.txt : 20051117 0000950129-05-011058.hdr.sgml : 20051117 20051114180501 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950129-05-011058 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20050930 FILED AS OF DATE: 20051114 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20051114 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: BELL INDUSTRIES INC /NEW/ CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000945489 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: WHOLESALE-ELECTRONIC PARTS & EQUIPMENT, NEC [5065] IRS NUMBER: 952039211 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-11471 FILM NUMBER: 051203676 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1960 E GRAND AVENUE SUITE 560 CITY: EL SEGUNDO STATE: CA ZIP: 90245 BUSINESS PHONE: 3105632355 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1960 E GRAND AVENUE SUITE 560 CITY: EL SEGUDON STATE: CA ZIP: 90245 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: CALIFORNIA BELL INDUSTRIES INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19950519 10-Q 1 a14477e10vq.htm BELL INDUSTRIES, INC. - SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 e10vq
 

 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
Commission file number 1-11471
Bell Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
     
California   95-2039211
     
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
1960 E. Grand Avenue, Suite 560,
El Segundo, California
 
90245
     
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 563-2355
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES R NO £
     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
YES £ NO R
     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES £ NO R
     As of the close of business on November 8, 2005, there were 8,460,224 outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock.
 
 

 


 

BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
         
    Page  
       
       
    3  
    4  
    5  
    6  
    9  
    15  
    15  
       
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  
    16  

2


 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
                                 
    Three months ended     Nine months ended  
    September 30     September 30  
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
Net revenues
                               
Products
  $ 31,424     $ 32,300     $ 82,804     $ 94,645  
Services
    7,772       7,190       22,438       23,091  
 
                       
 
    39,196       39,490       105,242       117,736  
 
                       
 
                               
Costs and expenses
                               
Cost of products sold
    25,436       26,445       65,684       77,833  
Cost of services provided
    6,185       5,687       18,032       18,419  
Selling and administrative
    6,905       6,980       20,628       21,002  
Interest, net
    (93 )     (39 )     (181 )     (107 )
Special items
    325       700       325       700  
 
                       
 
    38,758       39,773       104,488       117,847  
 
                       
 
                               
Income (loss) before income taxes
    438       (283 )     754       (111 )
Income tax expense
    15       31       60       75  
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 423     $ (314 )   $ 694     $ (186 )
 
                       
 
                               
Share and Per Share Data:
                               
Basic
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ .05     $ (.04 )   $ .08     $ (.02 )
 
                       
Weighted average common shares
    8,460       8,378       8,458       8,375  
 
                       
Diluted
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ .05     $ (.04 )   $ .08     $ (.02 )
 
                       
Weighted average common shares
    8,479       8,378       8,502       8,375  
 
                       
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

3


 

BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)
                 
    September 30     December 31  
    2005     2004  
    Unaudited          
ASSETS
               
Current assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 11,955     $ 10,801  
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $801 and $727
    15,680       11,455  
Inventories
    10,181       14,364  
Prepaid expenses and other
    2,235       1,813  
 
           
Total current assets
    40,051       38,433  
Fixed assets, net
    3,137       3,139  
Other assets
    3,374       3,617  
 
           
 
  $ 46,562     $ 45,189  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities
               
Accounts payable
  $ 11,363     $ 11,170  
Accrued liabilities and payroll
    8,827       8,178  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    20,190       19,348  
 
           
Deferred compensation, environmental matters and other
    4,807       5,025  
 
           
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock
               
Authorized — 1,000,000 shares, outstanding — none
               
Common stock
               
Authorized — 35,000,000 shares, outstanding — 8,460,224 and 8,437,724 shares
    32,600       32,545  
Accumulated deficit
    (11,035 )     (11,729 )
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
    21,565       20,816  
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
           
 
  $ 46,562     $ 45,189  
 
           
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

4


 

BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
                 
    Nine months ended  
    September 30  
    2005     2004  
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income (loss)
  $ 694     $ (186 )
Depreciation and amortization
    980       1,308  
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
    151       115  
Changes in assets and liabilities
    (315 )     (2,011 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    1,510       (774 )
 
           
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchases of fixed assets and other
    (411 )     (362 )
 
           
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Employee stock plans
    55       27  
 
           
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    1,154       (1,109 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    10,801       12,203  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 11,955     $ 11,094  
 
           
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
  $ (4,299 )   $ 1,559  
Inventories
    4,183       731  
Accounts payable
    193       (3,309 )
Accrued liabilities and other
    (392 )     (992 )
 
           
Net change
  $ (315 )   $ (2,011 )
 
           
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

5


 

BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accounting Principles
The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. These financial statements have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for such periods. However, these results are not necessarily indicative of results for any other interim period or for the full year. The accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 has been derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP.
Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Management believes that the disclosure included in the accompanying interim financial statements and footnotes are adequate to make the information not misleading, but the disclosure contained herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Special Items
During the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded a special pre-tax charge totaling $325,000 in connection with a severance agreement for a former executive. Substantially all costs related to this charge were paid in October 2005. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, the Company recorded a special pre-tax charge totaling $700,000 in connection with an employment agreement for another former executive. Substantially all costs related to this charge were paid in October 2004.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs, consisting primarily of freight paid to carriers, Company-owned delivery vehicle expenses and payroll related costs incurred in connection with storing, moving, preparing, and delivering products totaled approximately $1.0 million and $2.8 million during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and $1.1 million and $3.0 million during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004. These costs are included within selling and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations.
Floor Plan Arrangements
The Company finances certain inventory purchases in its Technology Solutions business unit through floor plan arrangements with two finance companies. At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company had outstanding floor plan obligations of approximately $100,000 and $2.2 million, respectively, which are classified within accounts payable.
Accrued Liabilities
The Company accrues for liabilities associated with disposed businesses, including amounts related to legal, environmental and contractual matters. Accrued liabilities include approximately $3.5 million and $4.3 million of amounts attributable to disposed businesses at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company, from time to time, grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to certain employees and directors with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair value of the shares at the date of grant. The Company accounts for stock option grants in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations, and, accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense for the stock option grants as the exercise price of all options granted is equal to or greater than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per share, for each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, if the Company had applied the fair value method as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (dollars in thousands):

6


 

                                 
    Three months ended     Nine months ended  
    September 30     September 30  
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
Net income (loss), as reported
  $ 423     $ (314 )   $ 694     $ (186 )
Compensation expense as determined under SFAS No. 123
    (34 )     (45 )     (66 )     (112 )
 
                       
Pro forma net income (loss)
  $ 389     $ (359 )   $ 628     $ (298 )
 
                       
Net income (loss) per share
                               
Basic and diluted — as reported
  $ .05     $ (.04 )   $ .08     $ (.02 )
 
                       
Basic and diluted — pro forma
  $ .05     $ (.04 )   $ .07     $ (.04 )
 
                       
Per Share Data
Basic earnings per share data are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share data are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of common shares potentially issuable for dilutive securities such as stock options and warrants. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding for each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 is set forth in the following table (in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended     Nine months ended  
    September 30     September 30  
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    8,460       8,378       8,458       8,375  
Potentially dilutive stock options
    19       82       44       90  
Anti-dilutive stock options due to net loss in period
            (82 )             (90 )
 
                       
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    8,479       8,378       8,502       8,375  
 
                       
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) revises SFAS No. 123 and APB No. 25 and related interpretations. SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) requires compensation cost relating to all share-based payments to employees to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005 either on a retroactive or a prospective basis. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement recognition. In April 2005, the SEC adopted a rule that delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) to the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently estimating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) and has not yet selected the method of adoption.
Environmental Matters
Reserves for environmental matters primarily relate to the cost of monitoring and remediation efforts, which commenced in 1998, at a former leased facility site of the Company’s electronics circuit board manufacturing business (“ESD”). ESD was closed in the early 1990s. At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, ESD estimated future remediation and related costs totaled approximately $2.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively. At September 30, 2005, approximately $800,000 (estimated current portion) is included in accrued liabilities and $2.0 million (estimated non-current portion) is included in deferred compensation, environmental matters and other in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet. At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the estimated future amounts to be recovered from insurance totaled $2.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively. At September 30, 2005, approximately $1.2 million (estimated current portion) is included in prepaid expenses and other and $1.1 million (estimated non-current portion) is included in other assets in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet.

7


 

Litigation
Williams Electronic Games litigation: In May 1997, Williams Electronics Games, Inc. (“Williams”) filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (“US District Court”) against a former Williams employee and several other defendants alleging common law fraud and several other infractions related to Williams’ purchase of electronic components at purportedly inflated prices from various electronics distributors under purported kickback arrangements during the period from 1991 to 1996. In May 1998, Williams filed an amended complaint adding several new defendants, including Milgray Electronics, Inc., a publicly traded New York corporation (“Milgray”), which was acquired by the Company in a stock purchase completed in January 1997. The complaint sought an accounting and restitution representing alleged damages as a result of the infractions. The Company has not been named in any complaint and was not a party to the alleged infractions. The Company, as the successor company to Milgray, has vigorously defended the case on several grounds and continues to assert that Milgray did not defraud Williams, and that Williams suffered no damages as electronic components were purchased by Williams at prevailing market prices.
The case proceeded to trial, which commenced and ended in March 2002, with a jury verdict resulting in Milgray having no liability to Williams. In July 2002, Williams appealed the jury verdict and, in April 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit (“US Appellate Court”) rendered its decision. The US Appellate Court concluded that jury instructions issued by the US District Court were in error and the case was ordered for retrial of Williams’ fraud and restitution claims. The case was remanded to the US District Court and a new judge was assigned. In September 2005, the US District Court entered its order declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Williams’ claims and dismissing Williams’ case without prejudice. The US District Court noted in its order that Williams could pursue its claims in Illinois State Courts. In October 2005, Williams filed a Notice of Appeal to the US Appellate Court from the judgment of dismissal entered by the US District Court. Williams’ claim for compensatory damages is approximately $8.7 million, not including an additional claim of $4.8 million for pre-judgment interest. While the Company cannot predict the outcome of this litigation, a final judgment favorable to Williams could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Management intends to continue a vigorous defense.
Other litigation: The Company is involved in other litigation, which is incidental to its current and discontinued businesses. The resolution of the other litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
Business Segment Information
The Company has three reportable business segments: Technology Solutions, a provider of integrated technology solutions: Recreational Products, a distributor of replacement parts and accessories for recreational and other leisure-time vehicles; and Electronic Components, a specialty manufacturer and seller of standard and custom magnetic products.
The following summarizes financial information for the Company’s reportable segments (in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended     Nine months ended  
    September 30     September 30  
    2005     2004     2005     2004  
Net revenues
                               
Technology Solutions
                               
Products
  $ 17,182     $ 18,629     $ 39,305     $ 50,530  
Services
    7,772       7,190       22,438       23,091  
 
                       
 
    24,954       25,819       61,743       73,621  
Recreational Products
    12,122       11,878       37,433       38,049  
Electronic Components
    2,120       1,793       6,066       6,066  
 
                       
 
  $ 39,196     $ 39,490     $ 105,242     $ 117,736  
 
                       
Operating income (loss)
                               
Technology Solutions
  $ 418     $ 177     $ (42 )   $ (311 )
Recreational Products
    478       432       1,530       1,540  
Electronic Components
    468       335       1,403       1,237  
Corporate costs
    (694 )     (566 )     (1,993 )     (1,984 )
Special items
    (325 )     (700 )     (325 )     (700 )
 
                       
 
    345       (322 )     573       (218 )
Interest, net
    93       39       181       107  
Income tax expense
    (15 )     (31 )     (60 )     (75 )
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 423     $ (314 )   $ 694     $ (186 )
 
                       

8


 

Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement
During July 2005, the Company’s largest client, Philip Morris USA, a subsidiary of the Altria Group, Inc., indicated its intention to terminate certain outsourcing and product sales provided by the Company to a new vendor on or before the contract termination date of April 2006. During September 2005, written notification was received that terminates the enterprise service desk services portion of the engagement, effective April 1, 2006. We are awaiting final details of the transition, including the timing of the transition of the other contractual portions of the engagement. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the portion of the engagement covered by this contractual relationship generated approximately $5.9 million in services revenue and $3.5 million in product revenues. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, services revenues from this portion of the engagement totaled approximately $6.2 million and product revenues amounted to approximately $9.2 million, of which approximately $6.4 million was related to a large product deployment engagement.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the consolidated condensed financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, within the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and within other filings with the SEC. This discussion and analysis includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding, among other things, our plans, strategies and prospects, both business and financial. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many of the forward looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report may be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “will,” “may,” and “estimated,” among others. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make in this Quarterly Report are set forth below, are set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and are set forth in other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Critical Accounting Policies
In the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, the critical accounting policies were identified which affect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in preparing the consolidated financial statements. These policies have not changed from those previously disclosed.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) revises SFAS No. 123 and APB No. 25 and related interpretations. SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) requires compensation cost relating to all share-based payments to employees to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005 either on a retroactive or a prospective basis. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement recognition. In April 2005, the SEC adopted a rule that delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) to the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently estimating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) and has not yet selected the method of adoption.
Results of Operations
The Note to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements under the heading titled “Business Segment Information” includes a tabular summary of results of operations by business segment for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
Net revenues
Net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005 decreased slightly to $39.2 million from $39.5 million in 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, net revenues decreased 10.6% to $105.2 million from $117.7 million in 2004. Net revenues are further discussed in “Technology Solutions,” “Recreational Products,” and “Electronic Components,” below.

9


 

Operating income (loss)
Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2005 totaled $345,000, including a special pre-tax charge totaling $325,000. This compared to an operating loss in 2004 of $322,000, including a special pre-tax charge totaling $700,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, operating income totaled $573,000, including the $325,000 charge. This compared to an operating loss of $218,000 in 2004, including the $700,000 charge. Operating results are further discussed in “Technology Solutions,” “Recreational Products,” and “Electronic Components,” below.
Corporate costs
Corporate costs for the three months ended September 30, 2005 increased 22.6% to $694,000 from $566,000 in 2004. For each of the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, corporate costs totaled approximately $2.0 million. The increase in corporate costs for the three months ended September 30, 2005 is primarily attributable to amounts collected during the three months ended September 30, 2004 on a fully reserved note receivable related to a previously sold business.
Special items
During the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded a special pre-tax charge totaling $325,000 in connection with a severance agreement with a former executive. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, the Company recorded a special pre-tax charge totaling $700,000 in connection with an employment agreement for another former executive.
Interest, net
Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2005 increased to $93,000 from $39,000 in 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, net interest income increased to $181,000 from $107,000 in 2004. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to higher average cash balances and higher interest rates during the three months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the corresponding period in 2004.
Technology Solutions
Technology Solutions revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005 decreased 3.4% to $25.0 million from $25.8 million in 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, Technology Solutions revenues decreased $11.9 million to $61.7 million from $73.6 million in 2004. Product revenues for three months ended September 30, 2005 decreased 7.8% to $17.2 million from $18.6 million in 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, product revenues decreased 22.2% to $39.3 million from $50.5 million in 2004. The decrease in product revenues is primarily attributable to a large product deployment engagement for a major account during the second and third quarters of 2004 that was not repeated this year and the continued market pressure due to direct sales models, intense price competition and extended technology purchasing cycles. Gross margin percentage increased on product sales for both the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2004 due to stronger margins from education accounts and the lower overall margin percentage on the large product deployment engagement during 2004. Services revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005 increased 8.1% to $7.8 million from $7.2 million in 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, services revenues decreased 2.8% to $22.4 million from $23.1 million in 2004. The increase in services revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2005 is attributable to an increase of approximately $1.3 million in reverse logistics and depot repair business from new and existing engagements offset by approximately $300,000 related to the ending of a help desk engagement in the current year first quarter and other net decreases in services revenues totaling approximately $400,000. The decrease in services revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 is attributable to the ending of the help desk engagement and the ending of an outsourcing engagement in 2004. Decreases in services revenues from these engagement totaling approximately $2.1 million was offset by approximately $1.4 million in net increases in services revenues from new and expanded engagements. Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2005 increased 136.2% to $418,000 from $177,000 in 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, operating loss decreased to $42,000 from $311,000 in 2004. The improvement in operating results is primarily attributable to cost containment efforts and related reductions in administrative expenses and the revenue increase in reverse logistics and depot repair business.
During July 2005, the Company’s largest client, Philip Morris USA, a subsidiary of the Altria Group, Inc., indicated its intention to terminate certain outsourcing and product sales provided by the Company to a new vendor on or before the contract termination date of April 2006. During September 2005, written notification was received that terminates the enterprise service desk services portion of the engagement, effective April 1, 2006. We are awaiting final details of the transition, including the timing of the transition of the other contractual portions of the engagement. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the portion of the engagement covered by this contractual relationship generated approximately $5.9 million in services revenue and $3.5 million in product revenues. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, services revenues from this portion of the engagement totaled approximately $6.2 million and product revenues amounted to approximately $9.2 million, of which approximately $6.4 million was related to the large product deployment engagement mentioned above.

10


 

Recreational Products
Recreational Products revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005 increased slightly to $12.1 million from $11.9 million in 2004, while operating income increased to $478,000 from $432,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, Recreational Products revenues decreased slightly to $37.4 million from $38.0 million, and operating income was $1.5 million in both periods. Slight increases in sales of marine, snow, cycle and ATV products during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were offset by a decrease in sales of recreational vehicle products.
Electronic Components
Electronic Components revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005 increased 18.2% to $2.1 million from $1.8 million in 2004, and operating income increased 39.7% to $468,000 from $335,000. Electronic Components revenues totaled $6.1 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, and operating income increased 13.4% to $1.4 million in 2005 from $1.2 million in 2004. An increase in stocking package sales to certain large customers contributed to the overall increase in sales during the three months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the prior year.
Cost of products sold
As a percentage of product revenues, cost of products sold for the three months ended September 30, 2005 decreased to 80.9% from 81.9% in 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, this percentage decreased to 79.3% from 82.2%. These decreases are primarily attributable to the stronger margins from the Technology Solutions education account base during 2005 coupled with the non-recurrence of lower margins achieved on the large product deployment engagement during 2004.
Cost of services provided
As a percentage of services revenues, cost of services provided for the three months ended September 30, 2004 increased to 79.6% from 79.1% in 2004 at the Technology Solutions business unit. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, this percentage increased to 80.4% from 79.8% in 2004. These increases are primarily attributable to slightly lower margins on increased revenues from reverse logistics and depot repair business during the three months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the prior year and the $1.1 million decrease in services revenues during the first quarter of 2005 which resulted in relatively higher payroll related service delivery costs.
Selling and administrative expenses
As a percentage of revenues, selling and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2005 decreased slightly to 17.6% from 17.7% in 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, this percentage increased to 19.6% from 17.8%. The increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 is primarily attributable to the overall decrease in revenues at the Technology Solutions business unit and the existence of certain fixed expenses. While total selling and administrative expenses decreased nearly $400,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2005, these expenses as a percentage of sales increased because of the overall decrease in sales during the period.
Income tax
Income tax expense totaled $15,000 and $31,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, income tax expense totaled $60,000 and $75,000, respectively. These amounts primarily relate to state taxes. As of September 30, 2005, the Company continues to record a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax asset balances.
Net income (loss)
Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2005 totaled $423,000, including the $325,000 pre-tax special charge described above, compared to a net loss in the corresponding prior year period of $314,000, including the $700,000 pre-tax special charge described above. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, net income totaled $694,000, including the $325,000 pre-tax special charge, compared to a net loss of $186,000 in the corresponding prior year period, including the $700,000 pre-tax special charge. These changes in net income (loss) resulted from the factors described above.

11


 

Changes in Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Selected financial data are set forth in the following tables (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
                 
    September 30   December 31
    2005   2004
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 11,955     $ 10,801  
Working capital
  $ 19,861     $ 19,085  
Current ratio
    2.0:1       2.0:1  
Long-term liabilities to total capitalization
    18.2 %     19.4 %
Shareholders’ equity per share
  $ 2.55     $ 2.47  
                 
    Three months ended
September 30
    2005   2004
 
               
Days’ sales in receivables
    41       43  
Days’ sales in inventories
    29       29  
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $774,000 for the comparable prior year period. The cash provided by operating activities during 2005 reflects decreased inventory levels offset by increased accounts receivable. The decrease in inventory is primarily attributable to reduced inventory levels at the Recreational Products business unit. The increase in account receivable is primarily attributable to higher sales during September 2005 as compared to December 2004. The cash used in operating activities during 2004 reflects decreased accounts payable, partially offset by decreased accounts receivable. The changes in accounts payable and accounts receivable relate primarily to the timing of payment and receipts.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $411,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to $362,000 in 2004. Purchases of technology related products and other fixed assets totaled $411,000 and $528,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Proceeds on a note receivable from a business sold in 1999 totaled $166,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $55,000 and $27,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which represented proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options.
The Company believes that it has sufficient cash resources for the foreseeable future to support requirements for its operations and commitments through available cash and cash generated by operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
There have been no material changes to the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

12


 

Factors That May Affect Future Results of Operations
In addition to other information contained in this report, we are subject to the following risks, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations in the future.
We face certain significant risks related to the currently pending Williams litigation and from other potential litigation that could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We have been engaged in ongoing litigation in connection with our 1997 purchase of Milgray, which was named as a defendant by the plaintiff, Williams, in an action alleging common law fraud and other infractions related to Williams’ purchase of electronic components at allegedly inflated prices from 1991 to 1996. Although the outcome of this litigation cannot be predicted, an adverse verdict could have a materially adverse effect on us. The defense of this lawsuit has required a significant amount of our management’s time and attention and, even if we prevail in defending this lawsuit, we will incur additional legal and related expenses. The disruptive effect and expense of this litigation could adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations. We also may become subject to other litigation in the future.
Our previously owned businesses subject us to potential environmental liabilities, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental statutes, ordinances and regulations relating to disposal of certain toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous substances and wastes used or generated in connection with previously owned businesses. Such laws may impose liability without regard to whether we knew of, or caused, the release of such hazardous substances. Although we establish reserves for specifically identified potential environmental liabilities, which reserves we believe to be adequate, there may be potential undisclosed environmental liabilities or liability in excess of the amounts reserved. Compliance with these environmental laws could require us to incur substantial expenses.
We rely on a limited number of hardware and software vendors to supply us with products in our technology solutions business and the loss of our ability to rely upon any of those vendors, or to obtain their products in the future would adversely affect our results of operations.
Our technology solutions business is heavily dependent on our relationships with leading hardware and software vendors and on our status as an authorized service provider. Although we are currently authorized to service the products of many industry-leading hardware and software vendors, we may not be able to maintain our relationships, or attract new relationships, with the computer hardware and software vendors that may be necessary for our technology solutions business. Since we rely upon our vendor relationships as a marketing tool, any change in these relationships could adversely affect our results of operations while we seek to establish alternative relationships with other vendors. In general, our authorization agreements with vendors include termination provisions, some of which are immediate, and we cannot predict whether vendors will continue to authorize us as an approved service provider. In addition, we cannot predict whether those vendors will authorize us as an approved service provider for new products, which they may introduce. Any impairment of these vendor relationships, or the loss of authorization as an approved service provider, could adversely affect our ability to provide the products and services which our technology solutions business requires and harm our competitive position. In addition, significant product supply shortages have resulted from time to time because manufacturers have been unable to produce sufficient quantities of certain products to meet demand. We expect to experience difficulty from time to time in obtaining an adequate supply of products from our major vendors, which may result in delays in completing sales.
We may not be able to compete effectively with other companies in our business segments, which will cause our net sales and market share to decline and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our businesses are highly competitive and we face strong competition from competitors that are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us. We believe that our prices and delivery terms are competitive; however, our competitors may offer more aggressive pricing than we do. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience intense competitive pricing pressures in our businesses, which could require us to reduce prices, with a corresponding adverse impact on our operating results. Additionally, as competition in the technology industry has intensified, certain of our key technology suppliers have heightened their direct marketing initiatives. These initiatives have resulted in some of our clients electing to purchase technology products directly from the manufacturer, rather than through us. While we expect these initiatives to continue, there could be a material adverse impact on our business if the shift of clients to purchase directly from manufacturers occurs more quickly than anticipated.

13


 

Our technology solutions and electronic components businesses are dependent on a limited number of major customers and clients and the loss of any of these major customers and clients would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Sales of our products and services in our technology solutions and electronic components businesses have been and will continue to be concentrated in a small number of clients and customers. Three of our clients accounted for approximately 39% of our total revenues for 2004 in our technology solutions business, with one client, Philip Morris USA, accounting for approximately 14% of our total consolidated net revenues for the year. Similarly, five customers accounted for approximately 64% of our total sales of electronic components in 2004. In the event that any of these major customers or clients should cease to purchase products or services from us, or purchase significantly fewer products and services in the future, we could experience materially adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
During July 2005, Philip Morris USA indicated its intention to transition certain outsourcing and product sales provided by the Company to a new vendor on or before the contract termination date of April 2006. During September 2005, written notification was received that terminates the enterprise service desk services portion of the engagement, effective April 1, 2006. We are awaiting final details of the transition, including the timing of the transition of the other contractual portions of the engagement. We plan to aggressively realign our cost structure in response to this development.
Our recreational products business is seasonal and is subject to fluctuations, based upon various economic and climatic conditions that could harm us.
Sales of our recreational products are affected directly by the usage levels and purchases of recreational vehicles, snowmobiles, motorcycles and ATVs, and marine products. The purchase and, in particular, the usage of these types of vehicles, are affected by weather conditions. As a result, sales of our recreational products business are highly susceptible to unpredictable events, and ordinarily decline in the winter months resulting in losses during these periods of the year. Additionally, unusual weather conditions in a particular season, such as unusually cold weather in the spring or summer months, can cause period-to-period fluctuations in our sales of recreational products. The usage and purchases of recreational vehicles, snowmobiles, motorcycles and ATVs, and marine products are also affected by consumers’ level of discretionary income and their confidence about economic conditions and changes in interest rates and in the availability and cost of gasoline. As a result, sales of our recreational products can fluctuate based upon unpredictable circumstances that are outside of our control.
Our recreational products business relies heavily upon vendors with which we have no long-term relationships.
We do not have long term supply contracts with our recreational products suppliers, which may adversely affect the terms on which we purchase products for resale or result in our inability to purchase products from one or more of such vendors in the future. These vendors may choose to distribute their products directly to aftermarket dealers or establish exclusive supply relationships with other distributors. Additionally, manufacturers of new recreational vehicles, snowmobiles, motorcycles and ATVs, and marine products may choose to incorporate optional equipment as standard equipment on their vehicles at the time of manufacture that are similar to products available for sale to dealers by distributors such as us. In addition to decreased sales, we would encounter increased competition in our markets, or may be unable to offer certain products to our customers, upon any such changes in our relationships with our recreational products vendors.
If we are unable to recruit and retain key personnel necessary to operate our businesses, our ability to compete successfully will be adversely affected.
We are heavily dependent on our current executive officers, management and technical personnel. The loss of any key employee or the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could adversely affect our ability to execute our current business plans and successfully develop commercially viable products and services. Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and we might not be able to retain our existing key employees or attract and retain any additional personnel. In addition, our recent financial operating results may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified personnel.
If we are unable to develop innovative products and services in our technology solutions and electronic components businesses, demand for our products and services may decrease.
Our future operating results in our technology solutions and electronic components businesses are dependent on our ability to continually develop, introduce and market new and innovative products, to modify existing products, to respond to technological change and to customize certain products to meet customer requirements. There are numerous risks inherent in this process, including the risks that we will be unable to anticipate the direction of technological change or that we will be unable to develop and market new products and applications in a timely fashion to satisfy customer demands. If this occurs, we could lose customers and experience adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our electronic components business is cyclical and demand may decline in the future, which could adversely affect us.
Sales at our electronic components business have historically fluctuated with the performance of the electronic and semiconductor component industry. A decrease in demand within this industry could adversely affect our results of operations.

14


 

A significant or prolonged economic downturn could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in our technology solutions business.
Our results of operations are affected by the level of business activity of our clients, which in turn is affected by the level of economic activity in the industries and markets that they serve. The general economic weakness in the IT industry resulting from among other things, the decline in discretionary IT spending by our clients and prospective clients, has adversely affected our revenues in recent years. A lack of improvement or continued decline in the level of business activity of our clients could continue to adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal and disclosure control, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, which would harm our business and the trading price of our securities.
Effective internal and disclosure controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a public company. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our reputation and operating results would be harmed. We are in the process of beginning a review and analysis of our internal control over financial reporting for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. As part of that process we may discover material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control as defined under standards adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), that require remediation. Under the PCAOB standards, a “material weakness” is a significant deficiency or combination of significant deficiencies that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. A “significant deficiency” is a control deficiency or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affect a company’s ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is a more than remote likelihood that a misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.
As a result of weaknesses that may be identified in our internal control, we may also identify certain deficiencies in some of our disclosure controls and procedures that we believe require remediation. If we discover weaknesses, we will make efforts to improve our internal and disclosure controls. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful. Any failure to maintain effective controls or timely effect any necessary improvement of our internal and disclosure controls could harm operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Ineffective internal and disclosure controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our securities.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company has no investments in market risk-sensitive investments for either trading purposes or purposes other than trading purposes.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2005. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

15


 

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Note to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements under the heading titled “Litigation”, included in Part I of this report, is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
     None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
     None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
     None
Item 5. Other Information
     None
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1   Certification of John A. Fellows, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14 adopted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2   Certification of Mitchell I. Rosen, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14 adopted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1   Certification of John A. Fellows, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2   Certification of Mitchell I. Rosen, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
 
 
Dated: November 14, 2005  By:   /s/ John A. Fellows    
    John A. Fellows   
    President and Chief Executive Officer
(authorized officer of registrant)
 
 
 
     
Dated: November 14, 2005  By:   /s/ Mitchell I. Rosen    
    Mitchell I. Rosen   
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer
 

16

EX-31.1 2 a14477exv31w1.htm EXHIBIT 31.1 exv31w1
 

         
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, John A. Fellows, certify that:
  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bell Industries, Inc.;
 
  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: November 14, 2005
         
     
  /s/ John A. Fellows    
  John A. Fellows   
  Chief Executive Officer   

 

EX-31.2 3 a14477exv31w2.htm EXHIBIT 31.2 exv31w2
 

         
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Mitchell I. Rosen, certify that:
  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bell Industries, Inc.;
 
  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: November 14, 2005
         
     
  /s/ Mitchell I. Rosen    
  Mitchell I. Rosen   
  Chief Financial Officer   

 

EX-32.1 4 a14477exv32w1.htm EXHIBIT 32.1 exv32w1
 

         
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bell Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John A. Fellows, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: November 14, 2005
         
     
  /s/ John A. Fellows    
  John A. Fellows   
  Chief Executive Officer   

 

EX-32.2 5 a14477exv32w2.htm EXHIBIT 32.2 exv32w2
 

         
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bell Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Mitchell I. Rosen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: November 14, 2005
         
     
  /s/ Mitchell I. Rosen    
  Mitchell I. Rosen   
  Chief Financial Officer   
 

 

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----