XML 102 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
6. Fair Value Measurements

The valuation hierarchy under GAAP categorizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

 

 

Level 1 — inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

 

Level 2 — inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

 

 

Level 3 — inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and are significant to the fair value measurement.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The following table summarizes CBIZ’s assets and liabilities at December 31, 2012 and 2011 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis subsequent to initial recognition and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value (in thousands):

 

                         
    Level     December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 

Deferred compensation plan assets

    1     $ 39,779     $ 33,585  

Corporate and municipal bonds

    1     $ 29,776     $ 30,923  

Interest rate swaps

    2     $ (817   $ (670

Contingent purchase price liabilities

    3     $ (30,012   $ (25,325

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no transfers between the valuation hierarchy Levels 1, 2 and 3. The following table summarizes the change in fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities identified as Level 3 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (pre-tax basis, in thousands):

 

                 
    Auction Rate
Securities
    Contingent
Purchase
Price Liabilities
 

Beginning balance — January 1, 2011

  $ 10,216     $ (17,265

Additions from business acquisitions

          (13,404

Sales of auctions rate securities

    (10,980      

Payment of contingent purchase price payable

          2,051  

Unrealized gains included in accumulated other comprehensive loss

    664        

Change in fair value of contingency

          3,479  

Change in net present value of contingency

          (186

Increase in expected cash flows of OTTI investment

    100        
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance — December 31, 2011

  $     $ (25,325
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Additions from business acquisitions

          (17,611

Payment of contingent purchase price payable

          11,970  

Change in fair value of contingency

          1,135  

Change in net present value of contingency

          (181
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance — December 31, 2012

  $     $ (30,012
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Auction Rate Securities — During the year ended December 31, 2011, CBIZ sold all of its investments in ARS and as a result, realized a gain of approximately $0.1 million in “Other income, net” and reversed prior period unrealized losses of $0.7 million. Prior to the sale of the remaining ARS, CBIZ classified its investments in ARS as Level 3 due to the lack of quoted prices from broker-dealers and the inactive markets for ARS. Accordingly, a fair value assessment of these securities was performed on each security based on a discounted cash flow model utilizing various assumptions that included maximum interest rates for each issue, probabilities of successful auctions, failed auctions or default, the timing of cash flows, the quality and level of collateral of the securities, and the rate of recovery from bond insurers in the event of default.

The following table provides a rollforward of the pre-tax credit losses recognized in earnings related to this ARS for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

 

         
    Accumulated
Credit Losses
 

Balance at January 1, 2011

  $ 2,132  

Additions related to OTTI losses not previously recognized

     

Reductions due to sales

     

Reductions due to sales of OTTI investment

    (2,256

Additions due to increases in previously recognized OTTI losses

    124  

Reductions due to increases in expected cash flows

     
   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $  
   

 

 

 

Contingent Purchase Price Liabilities — Contingent purchase price liabilities result from business acquisitions and are classified as Level 3 due to the utilization of a probability weighted discounted cash flow approach to determine the fair value of the contingency. A contingent liability is established for each acquisition that has a contingent purchase price component and normally extends over a term of three to six years. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the contingent purchase price liabilities is the future performance of the acquired business. The future performance of the acquired business directly impacts the contingent purchase price that is paid to the seller, thus performance that exceeds target could result in a higher payout, and a performance under target could result in a lower payout. Changes in the expected amount of potential payouts are recorded as adjustments to the initial contingent purchase price liability, with the same amount being recorded in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. These liabilities are reviewed quarterly and adjusted if necessary. See Note 19 for further discussion of contingent purchase price liabilities.

The following table presents financial instruments that are not carried at fair value but which require fair value disclosure as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

 

                                 
    December 31, 2012     December 31, 2011  
    Carrying
Value
    Fair
Value
    Carrying
Value
    Fair
Value
 

2006 Notes

  $ 750     $ 750     $ 750     $ 750  

2010 Notes

  $ 121,666     $ 135,181     $ 119,028     $ 141,690  

The fair value was determined based upon their most recent quoted market price and as such, is considered to be a Level 1 fair value measurement. The 2006 Notes and 2010 Notes are carried at face value less any unamortized debt discount. See Note 8 for further discussion of CBIZ’s debt instruments.