XML 16 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
8. Fair Value Measurements
Valuation hierarchy under GAAP categorizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
    Level 1 — inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
    Level 2 — inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
 
    Level 3 — inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and are significant to the fair value measurement.
A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
The following table summarizes CBIZ’s assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis subsequent to initial recognition and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value (in thousands):
                         
                    December 31,  
    Level     June 30, 2011     2010  
Deferred compensation plan assets
    1     $ 35,516     $ 33,361  
Corporate bonds
    1     $ 28,814     $ 15,255  
Interest rate swaps
    2     $ (67 )   $ (16 )
Auction rate securities
    3     $ 3,936     $ 10,216  
Contingent purchase price liabilities
    3     $ (15,866 )   $ (17,265 )
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, there were no transfers between the valuation hierarchy Levels 1, 2 and 3. The following table summarizes the change in fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities identified as Level 3 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (pre-tax basis) (in thousands):
                 
            Contingent  
    Auction Rate     Purchase Price  
    Securities     Liabilities  
Beginning balance — January 1, 2011
  $ 10,216     $ (17,265 )
Sale of auction rate securities
    (6,600 )      
Payment of contingent purchase price liability
          330  
Unrealized gains included in accumulated other comprehensive loss
    220        
Change in fair value of contingency
          1,152  
Change in net present value of contingency
          (83 )
Increase in cash flows
    100        
 
           
Ending balance — June 30, 2011
  $ 3,936     $ (15,866 )
 
           
Auction Rate Securities — CBIZ’s investments in ARS were classified as Level 3 as a result of liquidity issues in the ARS market, an inactive trading market of the securities, and the lack of quoted prices from broker-dealers. Accordingly, a fair value assessment was performed on each security based on a discounted cash flow model utilizing various assumptions that included maximum interest rates for each issue, probabilities of successful auctions, failed auctions or default, the timing of cash flows, the quality and level of collateral of the securities, and the rate of recovery from bond insurers in the event of default.
During the first six months of 2011, CBIZ sold two investments in ARS and as a result, recorded a loss of approximately $0.1 million in “Other income (expense), net”. At June 30, 2011, CBIZ had one investment in ARS with a par value of $4.4 million, and at December 31, 2010, CBIZ held three investments in ARS with par values totaling $13.4 million. Changes in the fair value of ARS resulted in an unrealized loss of $0.1 million and an unrealized gain of $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and an unrealized gain of $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The difference in par value and fair value was determined to be temporary due to dislocation in the credit markets, the quality of the investments and their underlying collateral, and the probability of a passed auction or redemption in the future, considering the issuer’s ability to refinance if necessary. ARS are included in “Funds held for clients — non-current”, as CBIZ does not intend to sell this investment until an anticipated recovery of par value occurs. The ARS held at June 30, 2011 matures in October 2037.
Contingent Purchase Price Liabilities - Contingent purchase price liabilities resulted from business acquisitions made after January 1, 2009, and are classified as Level 3 due to the utilization of a probability weighted discounted cash flow approach to determine the fair value of the contingency. The contingent purchase price liabilities are included in “Other current liabilities” and “Accrued expenses — non-current”, depending on the expected settlement date. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the contingent liability decreased as a result of payments totaling $0.3 million and a $1.2 million adjustment to the estimate of future contingent liabilities, partially offset by net present value adjustments totaling $0.1 million. See Note 12 for further discussion of contingent purchase price liabilities.
The following table provides additional information with regards to the ARS with temporary impairments, aggregated by the length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position (in thousands):
                                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    12 Months or Greater     12 Months of Greater  
Description of Security   Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses  
Auction rate securities
  $ 3,936     $ 444     $ 7,716     $ 664  
The following table presents financial instruments that are not carried at fair value but which require fair value disclosure as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
                                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    Carrying Value     Fair Value     Carrying Value     Fair Value  
2006 Convertible Notes
  $ 750     $ 750     $ 39,250     $ 40,050  
2010 Convertible Notes
  $ 117,780     $ 159,006     $ 116,577     $ 141,670  
 
                               
Although the trading of CBIZ’s 2006 Convertible Notes and 2010 Convertible Notes is limited, the fair value was determined based upon their most recent quoted trading activity. The 2006 Convertible Notes and 2010 Convertible Notes are carried at face value less any unamortized debt discount.
The carrying value of CBIZ’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of bank debt approximates fair value, as the interest rate on the bank debt is variable and approximates current market rates.