10-K

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_____________________________

Form 10-K

R ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

OR

£TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

________________________________

Commission File Number 1-13884

CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	76-0451843
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1333 West Loop South
Suite 1700
Houston, Texas	77027
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (713) 513-3300

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

Title of Each Class	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share	New York Stock Exchange
Junior Participating Preferred Stock
Purchase Rights	New York Stock Exchange
Par Value $0.01 Per Share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes R No £

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes £ No R

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesR No £

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer RAccelerated filer £Non-accelerated filer £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes £ No R

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, held by non-affiliates of registrant as of June 30, 2006, our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $4,527,523,419. For the purposes of the determination of the above statement amount only, all directors and executive officers of the registrant are presumed to be affiliates. The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding as of February 9, 2007, was 112,530,879.

__________________________________

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of registrant’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2006 are incorporated by reference into Parts I and II. Portions of the registrant’s 2007 Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 9, 2007 are incorporated by reference into Part III.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM	PAGE
Part I
1. Business	3
Markets and Products	4
Market Issues	7
New Product Development	7
Competition	8
Manufacturing	9
Backlog	9
Patents, Trademarks and Other Intellectual Property	9
Employees	10
Executive Officers of Registrant	11
Glossary of Terms	12
1A. Risk Factors	12
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments	12
2. Properties	12
3. Legal Proceedings	13
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	14
Part II
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	14
6. Selected Financial Data	16
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	16
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	16
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	16
9A. Controls and Procedures	16
9B. Other Information	17
Part III
10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	17
11. Executive Compensation	17
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	17
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	18
14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services	18
Part IV
15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	18
Signatures	24

Fourth Amendment to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan

Change of Control Agreement

Portions of the 2006 Annual Report

Subsidiaries of Registrant

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Section 302 Certification of the CEO 

Section 302 Certification of the CFO

Certifications of CEO and CFO Pursuant to Section 906

2

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company held on May 5, 2006, stockholders voted to change the corporation’s name to Cameron International Corporation (Cameron or the Company). Upon the change in the corporate name, the Company also rebranded its three existing business segments into Drilling & Production Systems (DPS), formerly the Cameron segment; Valves & Measurement (V&M), formerly the Cooper Cameron Valves segment; and Compression Systems (CS), formerly the Cooper Compression segment. For additional business segment information for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, see Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which Notes are incorporated herein by reference in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Cameron is a leading international manufacturer of oil and gas pressure control and separation equipment, including valves, wellheads, controls, chokes, blowout preventers and assembled systems for oil and gas drilling, production and transmission used in onshore, offshore and subsea applications and provides oil and gas separation, metering and flow measurement equipment. Cameron is also a manufacturer of centrifugal air compressors, integral and separable gas compressors and turbochargers. See “Glossary of Terms” at the end of Item 1 for definitions of certain terms used in this section. Any reference to Cameron International Corporation, its divisions or business units within this paragraph or elsewhere within this Form 10-K as being a leader, leading provider, leading manufacturer, or having a leading position is based on the amount of equipment installed worldwide and available industry data.

Cameron’s origin dates back to the mid-1800s with the manufacture of steam engines that provided power for plants and textile or rolling mills. By 1900, with the discovery of oil and gas, Cameron’s predecessors moved into the production of internal combustion engines and gas compressors. Product offerings were added by the Company’s predecessors through various acquisitions, in particular the acquisitions of The Bessemer Gas Engine Company (gas engines and compressors); Pennsylvania Pump and Compressor (reciprocating air and gas compressors); Ajax Iron Works (compressors); Superior (engines and compressors); Joy Petroleum Equipment Group (valves, couplings and wellheads); Joy Industrial Compressor Group (compressors); and Cameron Iron Works (blowout preventers, ball valves, control equipment and McEvoy-Willis wellhead equipment and choke valves).

Cameron, a Delaware corporation, was incorporated on November 10, 1994. The Company operated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cooper Industries, Inc. until June 30, 1995, the effective date of the completion of an exchange offer with Cooper Industries’ stockholders resulting in the Company becoming a separate stand-alone company. The common stock of Cameron trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CAM”. The Company’s Internet address is www.c-a-m.com. General information about Cameron, including its Corporate Governance Principles, charters for the committees of the Company’s board of directors, Standards of Conduct, and Codes of Ethics for Management Personnel, including Senior Financial Officers and Directors, can be found in the Ethics and Governance section of the Company’s website. The Company makes available, free of charge, on its website the annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files or furnishes them to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).

Since its inception, the Company has completed several acquisitions, including the assets of Ingram Cactus Company in 1996, Orbit Valve International Inc. in 1998, Stewart and Stevenson’s Petroleum Equipment segment and Nutron Industries in 2002, Petreco International Inc. and the PCC Flow Technologies segment of Precision Castparts Corp. (PCC) in 2004, and NuFlo Technologies, Inc. and the On/Off Valve business unit of the Flow Control segment of Dresser, Inc. in 2005. In January 2006, the Company also acquired the assets and liabilities of Caldon, Inc. which added a new ultrasonic measurement product line to the existing flow management product line in the V&M segment.

Additionally, the Company also sold certain of its business operations, including its Wheeling Machine Products division in 1995, a rotating compressor product line in 1999 and certain Canadian aftermarket operations in 2000.

3

Business Segments

Markets and Products

Drilling & Production Systems Segment

DPS is one of the world’s leading providers of systems and equipment used to control pressures, direct flows of oil and gas wells and separate oil and gas from impurities. Its products are employed in a wide variety of operating environments including basic onshore fields, highly complex onshore and offshore environments, deepwater subsea applications and ultra-high temperature geothermal operations.

DPS’s products include surface and subsea drilling and production systems, control systems, blowout preventers (BOPs), oil and gas separation equipment, gate valves, actuators, chokes, wellheads, drilling riser and aftermarket parts and services. DPS’s products are marketed under the brand names CAMERON®, W-K-M®, MCEVOY® and WILLIS®. Additionally, DPS manufactures elastomers, which are used in pressure and flow control equipment and other petroleum industry applications, as well as in the petroleum, petrochemical, rubber molding and plastics industries.

DPS is one of the leading global suppliers of integrated drilling systems for land, offshore, platform and subsea applications. Drilling equipment designed and manufactured by DPS includes ram and annular BOPs, drilling risers, drilling valves, choke and kill manifolds, surface and subsea BOP control systems, multiplexed electro-hydraulic (MUX) control systems and diverter systems. DPS also provides services under CAMCHEC™, an inspection system that allows drilling contractors to inspect drilling riser on their rigs offline, saving time and money on maintenance and unnecessary transportation.

With oil and gas prices at historical highs, and with world oil demand expected to continue to grow, demand for drilling rigs led to full utilization in most sectors during 2006 with oil companies entering into long-term contracts for available rigs at unprecedented day rates, the reactivation of previously cold-stacked rigs and an escalation in newbuild rig activity. As a result, DPS experienced a record year in bookings for surface and subsea drilling products during 2006, further reinforcing Cameron’s role as a primary supplier of BOPs and related equipment to the industry. In order to meet this increased demand for drilling products, the Company has increased its investment in machine tools for its manufacturing facilities in Berwick, Louisiana, Beziers, France and Houston, Texas, including the development of a state-of-the-art riser fabrication and assembly facility in Beziers.

DPS is also a global market leader in supplying surface production equipment, from conventional to high-pressure, high temperature (HPHT) wellheads and API Christmas trees and chokes used on land or installed on offshore platforms.

The surface business, which has a global base of installed equipment and an aftermarket presence in virtually every major hydrocarbon-producing region around the world, remains the largest revenue contributor to the DPS segment. This business saw increased order levels in 2006 from most major regions around the world.

DPS continues to be a leader in providing subsea wellheads, Christmas trees, manifolds, and production controls to customers worldwide, from basic tree orders to integrated solutions that require systems engineering and project management as well as installation and aftermarket support. DPS’s Subsea Systems organization, created in 2005, has global responsibility for research and development, engineering, sales, manufacturing, installation and aftermarket support for subsea products and systems, and provides customers with integrated solutions to subsea field development requirements under engineering, procurement and construction contracts.

In order to address capacity needs, improve efficiency and lower manufacturing costs in the subsea product line, the Company began construction in mid-2006 on a new subsea manufacturing center in Johor, Malaysia. This $32 million investment includes a state-of-the-art manufacturing, assembly and test plant, and is expected to be in operation by the fourth quarter of 2007. Additional investments have been made in the Company’s subsea tree production facilities in Leeds, England and Taubate, Brazil and at the Company’s facility in Celle, Germany where control systems for subsea trees are manufactured.

As petroleum exploration activities have increasingly focused on subsea locations, DPS has directed much of its new product development efforts toward this market. DPS’s patented SpoolTree™ horizontal subsea production system, which was introduced in 1993, is used in oil and gas fields with subsea completions that require frequent retrieval of downhole equipment. With the SpoolTree system, well completion and workover activities can be performed without a workover riser or removal of the Christmas tree and under conventional blowout preventer control, thereby reducing the time, equipment and expense needed to perform such activities. 

4

DPS advanced its tradition of innovation with the introduction in 2004 of an all-electric, direct current powered subsea production system, CameronDC™, which is designed to offer greater reliability and provide substantial cost savings to customers.

DPS’s Flow Control group was formed to focus resources on the choke product line with the goal of enhancing DPS’s performance in this product line. Flow Control manufactures Cameron and Willis brand chokes and Cameron brand actuators for the surface and subsea production and drilling markets as well as drilling choke control panels and surface wellhead safety systems. The Company’s primary choke manufacturing operations are located in Longford, Ireland, and its primary surface gate valve actuator manufacturing operations are located at the Flow Control plant in Houston, Texas.

During 2006, the Flow Control product line was expanded with the addition of the LEDEEN® quarter-turn actuator line, acquired as part of the Dresser On/Off Valve business unit acquisition in late 2005. This product line is manufactured at the Company’s newly acquired facility in Voghera, Italy. Also, during 2006, the surface choke product line was expanded as Flow Control began producing AOP brand surface chokes in its Houston, Texas facility.

Petreco Processing Systems produces highly engineered equipment, systems and services for oil, gas, water and solids separation. Petreco’s products include electrostatic desalters and dehydrators, hydrocyclones, desanders, floatation equipment, processing equipment, gas processing equipment and electrochlorinators. These products are marketed under the brand names PETRECO®, VORTOIL®, KREBS®, UNICEL®, WEMCO®, METROL™, KCC™, DEPURATOR® and BFCC™.

DPS’s worldwide aftermarket service program, CAMSERV™, provides replacement parts for equipment through a comprehensive global network. In recent years, DPS has continued to enhance its aftermarket presence worldwide with new or upgraded facilities in Brazil, Mexico, Angola, Newfoundland, and Onne Port, Nigeria.

DPS’s research center, located in Houston, Texas, has ten specially designed test bays to test and evaluate DPS’s products under realistic conditions. These include environmental test chambers to simulate extreme pressures and temperatures, high-strength fixtures for the application of multi-million pound tensile and bending loads, high-pressure gas compressors and test enclosures, a hyperbaric chamber to simulate the external pressures of deepwater environments, and two circulation loops for erosion and flow testing.

DPS primarily markets its products directly to end-users through a worldwide network of sales and marketing employees, supported by agents in some international locations. Due to the technical nature of many of the products, the marketing effort is further supported by a staff of engineering employees.

DPS’s primary customers include oil and gas majors, independent producers, engineering and construction companies, drilling contractors, rental companies and geothermal energy producers.

Valves & Measurement Segment

V&M is a leading provider of valves and measurement systems primarily used to control, direct and measure the flow of oil and gas as they are moved from individual wellheads through flow lines, gathering lines and transmission systems to refineries, petrochemical plants and industrial centers for processing. Equipment used in these environments is generally required to meet demanding standards, including API 6D and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).

V&M’s products include gate valves, ball valves, butterfly valves, Orbit® valves, block & bleed valves, plug valves, globe valves, check valves, actuators, chokes and aftermarket parts and services. Measurement products include totalizers, turbine meters, flow computers, chart recorders, ultrasonic flow meters and sampling solutions.

In November 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of the On/Off Valve business unit of the Flow Control segment of Dresser, Inc., except for a portion of the business which was acquired in January 2006. Efforts to integrate this business, mostly in the V&M segment, were largely completed by the end of 2006. The inclusion of this business in the V&M segment, as well as strong market conditions, were the major contributors to the growth in the V&M segment’s orders, revenues and profitability in 2006.

V&M’s Distributed Valves group manufactures valves which are sold through distributed networks, primarily in North America, for use in oil and gas applications and are marketed under the brand names WKM®, DEMCO®, NUTRON®, TBV®, AOP®, THORNHILL CRAVER®, TEXSTEAM® and WHEATLEY®.

5

The Engineered Valves group of V&M provides large-diameter valves for use in natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), crude oil and refined products transmission lines. Products are marketed under the brand names CAMERON®, GROVE®, RING-O® and TOM WHEATLEY®.

V&M’s Processed Valves group provides critical service valves for refinery, chemical and petrochemical processing businesses and for associated storage terminal applications, particularly through the ORBIT AND GENERAL® valve product lines. Other products include TK® and ENTECH® check valves and WKM® and FOSTER® gate valves.

The Measurement Systems group of V&M designs, manufactures and distributes instrumentation for the oil and gas and process control industries to be used for the measurement and control of pressures, temperatures, levels and flows. The four main product lines of this group are NUFLO™, BARTON®, CALDON® and CLIF MOCK™.

The V&M segment also provides aftermarket services including OEM parts, repair, field service, asset management and remanufactured product to customers, particularly in support of the installed base of equipment sold under the numerous brands within the expanded V&M businesses.

V&M markets its equipment and services through a worldwide network of combined sales and marketing employees, distributors and agents in selected international locations. Due to the technical nature of many of the products, the marketing effort is further supported by a staff of engineering employees.

V&M’s primary customers include oil and gas majors, independent producers, engineering and construction companies, pipeline operators, drilling contractors and major chemical, petrochemical and refining companies.

Compression Systems Segment

CS is a provider of reciprocating and centrifugal compression equipment and aftermarket parts and services. Reciprocating compression equipment (Reciprocating Technology) is used throughout the energy industry by gas transmission companies, compression leasing companies, oil and gas producers and independent power producers. Integrally geared centrifugal compressors (Centrifugal Technology) are used by customers around the world in a variety of industries, including air separation, petrochemical and chemical. CS’s products include aftermarket parts and services, integral engine-compressors, separable compressors, turbochargers, integrally geared centrifugal compressors, compressor systems and controls. Its aftermarket services include spare parts, technical services, repairs, overhauls and upgrades.

The CS Reciprocating Technology group provides reciprocating compression equipment and related aftermarket parts and services for the oil and gas industry. Its products and services are marketed under the AJAX®, SUPERIOR®, COOPER-BESSEMER®, PENN™, ENTERPRISE™, TEXCENTRIC®, COMPRESSION SPECIALTIES™, and TURBINE SPECIALTIES™ brand names. CS provides global support for its products and maintains sales and/or service offices in key international locations. Ajax integral engine-compressors, which combine the engine and compressor on a single drive shaft, are used for gas re-injection and storage, as well as on smaller gathering and transmission lines. Superior-brand separable compressors are used primarily for natural gas applications, including production, storage, withdrawal, processing and transmission, as well as petrochemical processing. These high-speed separable compressor units can be matched with either natural gas engine drivers or electric motors.

Two new product offerings in the reciprocating product line are reflected in the 2006 results. The Axis™ reciprocating compressor is an all-new barrel-frame design targeted at the natural gas lease fleet markets. The new C-Force™ compressor was created through the addition of new tandem cylinders to a small Superior reciprocating frame, providing an offering suited to compressed natural gas (CNG) applications.

For the year ended December 31, 2006, approximately 69% of the Reciprocating Technology revenues are generated by aftermarket parts and services in support of the Company’s worldwide installed base of compression equipment.

Customers for Reciprocating Technology products include gas transmission companies, compression leasing companies, oil and gas producers and processors and independent power producers.

The CS Centrifugal Technology group manufactures and supplies integrally geared centrifugal compressors and provides aftermarket services to customers worldwide. Centrifugal air compressors, used primarily in manufacturing processes (plant air), are sold under the trade name of Turbo-Air®, with specific models including the TA-2000, TAC-2000, TA-3000, TA-6000 and TA-9000.

6

Engineered compressors are used in the process air and gas industries and are identified by the MSG® trade name. The process and plant air centrifugal compressors deliver oil-free compressed air and other gases to customers, thus preventing oil contamination of the finished products.

New product offerings planned for 2007 include the MSG80 and the TA-2040. The MSG80 will be the largest compressor made by Cameron and will target the air separation market, especially steel manufacturers. The TA-2040 will be a high pressure compressor to be sold into the plastic bottle blowing market.

Compression Systems provides installation and maintenance service, parts, repairs, overhauls and upgrades to its worldwide customers for plant air and process gas compressors. It also provides aftermarket service and repairs on all equipment it produces through a worldwide network of distributors, service centers and field service technicians utilizing an extensive inventory of parts.

Centrifugal Technology customers include petrochemical and refining companies, natural gas processing companies, durable goods manufacturers, utilities, air separation and chemical companies.

Market Issues

Cameron is one of the leaders in the global market for the supply of petroleum production equipment. Cameron believes that it is well-positioned to serve these markets. Plant and service center facilities around the world in major oil- and gas-producing regions provide a broad market coverage. Information relating to revenues generated from shipments to various geographic regions of the world is set forth on page 25 of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Operations and Financial Condition of Cameron International Corporation” incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.

The global market continues to be a source of growth for Cameron. This was particularly evident with regard to a surge in demand for additional drilling rigs in 2006 by oil companies worldwide. The desire to expand oil and gas resources and transmission capacity in developed and developing countries, for both economic and political reasons, continues to be a major factor affecting market demand. Additionally, establishment of industrial infrastructure in the developing countries will necessitate the growth of basic industries that require plant air and process compression equipment. Production and service facilities in North and South America, Europe, the Far and Middle East and West Africa provide the Company with the ability to serve the global marketplace.

In each of Cameron’s business segments, a large population of installed engines, compression equipment and oil and gas production equipment exists in the worldwide market. The long-lived nature of the equipment provides a relatively stable repair parts and service business. However, with respect to Compression Systems, approximately 37% of that segment’s 2006 revenues came from the sale of replacement parts for equipment that the Company no longer manufactures. Many of these units have been in service for long periods of time and are gradually being replaced. As this installed base of legacy equipment declines, the Company’s potential market for parts orders is also reduced. In recent years, the Company’s revenues from replacement parts associated with legacy equipment have declined nominally.

In recent years, DPS has been expanding into the deepwater subsea systems market. This market is significantly different from the Company’s other markets since deepwater subsea systems projects are significantly larger in scope and complexity, in terms of both technical and logistical requirements. Subsea projects (i) typically involve long lead times, (ii) typically are larger in financial scope, (iii) typically require substantial engineering resources to meet the technical requirements of the project and (iv) often involve the application of existing technology to new environments and in some cases, the application of new technology. These projects accounted for approximately 8% of the Company’s consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006. To the extent the Company experiences difficulties in meeting the technical and/or delivery requirements of the projects, the Company’s earnings or liquidity could be negatively impacted. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had a subsea systems project backlog of approximately $408.7 million.

Also, see Part I, Item 1A for a discussion of other risk factors, some of which are market related, that could affect the Company’s financial condition and future results.

New Product Development

Cameron introduced several drilling products during the last several years. These products include the 3.5 million-pound load capacity LoadKing™ riser system, used for drilling in up to 10,000-foot water depths; a lightweight and lower-cost locking

7

mechanism for subsea BOPs; a new generation of variable-bore ram packers; a Freestanding Drilling Riser, and an Environmental Safe Guard system.

Other Cameron-developed products include the patented SpoolTree™ subsea production system; the CAMTROL system that includes all of Cameron’s controls capabilities of production, drilling and workover; and the CameronDC subsea production system, which is the world’s first all-electric direct current-powered subsea production system, designed for increased reliability and improved performance in deepwater applications. Initial deployment of the CameronDC subsea production system is planned for mid-2007 in the Dutch North Sea.

During 2005, Cameron introduced a new subsea controls system that combines the traditional subsea control module and the subsea accumulator module in a single package, allowing for more efficient operation of the subsea tree and manifold valves. Additionally, a new state-of-the-art subsea test chamber in Cameron’s controls engineering facility in Celle, Germany facilitates testing of the Company’s control system.

Also in 2005, Cameron launched its updated CAMTROL subsea control module, which includes new electronics, lower power demand, a DC power option and fiber optic communications to further increase reliability and enable extended offset developments and high-bandwidth intelligent completions.

Cameron has also formed a joint venture with Curtiss-Wright EMD, with plans to combine Curtiss-Wright’s motor and pump expertise with Cameron’s subsea technologies to develop integrated subsea multiphase pumping systems.

In 2006, Subsea Systems and Petreco introduced their two-phase and three-phase subsea separation systems, developed through a joint technology team originally formed in 2005.

During 2005, DPS’s Flow Control group introduced a new three-inch underbalanced drilling choke, the DR30, in response to drilling customers’ increasing demand for higher-capacity chokes for use in underbalanced drilling applications.

Compression Systems’ product range was expanded through the addition of compressor frames (TAC-2000, TA-2020, TA-3000, TA-6000 and TA-9000) and the addition of trademarked accessories such as Dry Pak heat of compression dryers and Turboblend, a hydro-cracked turbomachinery lubricating oil. Compression Systems’ Engineered Compressor product line was redefined and the MSG Renaissance program was introduced to update the MSG product line.

Compression Systems has focused product development resources to further expand its high-efficiency plant air compressor line and to provide engineered compressors matched to the requirements of its customers. The latter is being achieved by advances in aerodynamic and rotor dynamic analytical design capability and the addition of centrifugal gas applications.

Two new offerings were introduced in 2005 in the reciprocating product line. The AXIS™ reciprocating compressor is an all-new barrel-frame design targeted at the natural gas lease fleet markets. The new C-Force™ compressor was created through the addition of new tandem cylinders to a small Superior reciprocating frame, providing an offering ideally suited to compressed natural gas applications.

Compression Systems plans to add two additional products to its centrifugal line in 2007 - the MSG80 and TA-2040, both discussed previously.

Competition

Cameron competes in all areas of its operations with a number of other companies, some of which have financial and other resources comparable to or greater than those of Cameron.

Cameron has a leading position in the petroleum production equipment markets. In these markets, Cameron competes principally with Aker Kvaerner, Balon Corporation, Circor International, Inc., Daniel Flow Measurement Division of Emerson Process Management, Dril-Quip, Inc., FlowServ Corp., FMC Technologies, Inc., GE Oil & Gas Group, Hanover Compressor Company, Hydril Company, Masterflo (a division of Steam-Flo Industries Ltd.), NATCO Group, Inc., National Oilwell Varco Inc., PBV-USA, Inc. (a Zy-Tech Global Industries company), Petrovalve (a Flotek Industries, Inc. company), Pibiviese, T3 Energy Services Inc., Tyco International Ltd., Valve Automation division of Emerson Process Management, Vetco International, Ltd. (in January 2007, it was

8

announced that General Electric had reached an agreement to purchase Vetco Gray, the oil and gas business unit of Vetco International, Ltd.), Wood Group and Worldwide Oilfield Machinery, Inc.

The principal competitive factors in the petroleum production equipment markets are technology, quality, service and price. Cameron believes several factors give it a strong competitive position in these markets. Most significant are Cameron’s broad product offering, its worldwide presence and reputation, its service and repair capabilities, its expertise in high-pressure technology and its experience in alliance and partnership arrangements with customers and other suppliers.

Cameron also has a strong position in the compression equipment markets. In these markets, Cameron competes principally with the Ariel Corporation, Atlas-Copco AB, CECO (a Compressor Engineering Corporation company), Demag, Dresser-Rand Company, FS-Elliott Company, LLC, Endyn Energy Dynamics, Hoerbiger Group, IR Air Solutions, TCS and Universal Compression. The principal competitive factors in the compression equipment markets are engineering and design capabilities, product performance, reliability, quality, service and price. Cameron has a competent engineering staff and skilled technical and service representatives.

Manufacturing

Cameron has manufacturing facilities worldwide that conduct a broad variety of processes, including machining, fabrication, assembly and testing, using a variety of forged and cast alloyed steels and stainless steel as the primary raw materials. In recent years, Cameron has rationalized plants and products, closed various manufacturing facilities, moved product lines to achieve economies of scale, and upgraded other facilities. This is an ongoing process as the Company seeks ways to improve delivery performance and reduce costs. Cameron maintains advanced manufacturing, quality assurance and testing equipment geared to the specific products that it manufactures and uses process automation in its manufacturing operations. Manufacturing facilities typically utilize computer-aided, numeric-controlled tools and manufacturing techniques that concentrate the equipment necessary to produce similar products in one area of the plant in a configuration commonly known as a manufacturing cell. One operator in a manufacturing cell can monitor and operate several machines, as well as assemble and test products made by such machines, thereby improving operating efficiency and product quality.

Cameron’s test capabilities are critical to its overall processes. The Company has the capability to test most equipment at rated operating conditions, measuring all operating parameters, efficiency and emissions. All process compressors for air separation and all plant air compressors are given a mechanical and aerodynamic test in a dedicated test center prior to shipment.

All of Cameron’s Asian, European and Latin American manufacturing plants are ISO certified and API licensed, and most of the U.S. plants are ISO certified. ISO is an internationally recognized verification system for quality management.

Backlog

Cameron’s backlog was approximately $3.531 billion at December 31, 2006 (approximately 78% of which is expected to be shipped during 2007), as compared to $2.156 billion at December 31, 2005, and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2004. Backlog consists of customer orders for which a purchase order has been received, satisfactory credit or financing arrangements exist and delivery is scheduled.

Patents, Trademarks and Other Intellectual Property

As part of its ongoing research, development and manufacturing activities, Cameron has a policy of seeking patents when appropriate on inventions involving new products and product improvements. Cameron owns 305 unexpired United States patents and 613 unexpired foreign patents. During 2006, 27 new U.S. and 66 new foreign patent applications were filed.

Although in the aggregate these patents are of considerable importance to the manufacturing of many of its products, Cameron does not consider any single patent or group of patents to be material to its business as a whole.

Trademarks are also of considerable importance to the marketing of Cameron’s products. Cameron considers the following trade names to be material to its business as a whole: CAMERON, COOPER-BESSEMER, AJAX, WILLIS and W-K-M. Other important trademarks used by Cameron include AOP, AXIS, BARTON, BFCC, C-B TURBOCHARGER, CAMCHEC, CAMERONDC, CLIF MOCK, CONTROL SEAL, CSI, DEMCO, DEPURATOR, DRYPAK, DYNACENTRIC, DYNASEAL, EDGE, ENTECH, ENTERPRISE, FOSTER, GENERAL VALVE, GENUINE JOY, GROVE, H & H, IC, INTERNATIONAL VALVES LTD. (U.K.), KCC, KREBS, LEDEEN, MCEVOY, METROL, MSG, NAVCO, NORTH STAR, NUFLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., NICKLES

9

INDUSTRIAL, NUTRON, ORBIT, PENN, PETRECO, POW-R-SEAL, QUAD 2000, RING-O, SAF-T-SEAL, SPOOLTREE, STEROM, SUPERIOR, TA, TBV, TECHNO, TEXCENTRIC, THORNHILL CRAVER, TRUSEAL, TURBINE SPECIALTIES (RECIPROCATING PRODUCTS), TK VALVE, TEXSTEAM, TOM WHEATLEY, TSI, TUNDRA, TURBO AIR, TWINSEAL, TXT, UNICEL, VALOR, VANTAGE, VORTOIL, WEMCO, WHEATLEY and others. Cameron has registered trademarks in countries where such registration is deemed important.

During 2006, the Company acquired the assets and liabilities of Caldon Inc. This acquisition included the trademark Caldon.

Cameron has the right to use the trademark Joy on aftermarket parts until November 2027.

Cameron also relies on trade secret protection for its confidential and proprietary information. Cameron routinely enters into confidentiality agreements with its employees, partners and suppliers. There can be no assurance, however, that others will not independently obtain similar information or otherwise gain access to Cameron’s trade secrets.

Employees

As of December 31, 2006, Cameron had approximately 12,400 employees, of which approximately 3,000 were represented by labor unions. Over 1,250 of these employees are covered by contracts expiring in 2007. Approximately 634 employees at the Company’s plants in Italy are under contracts which expire in mid-2007. In Brazil, the Company has approximately 492 employees at its facilities with contracts expiring on various dates in the second half of 2007.

During 2006, new three-year agreements were reached with the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers covering approximately 247 employees at the Company’s Centrifugal Technology facility in Buffalo, New York and approximately 59 employees at a DPS facility in Brookshire, Texas. In addition, a new three and one-half year agreement was entered into in January 2006 covering approximately 349 employees at the Company’s Leeds, England facility. The Company also entered into a new one-year agreement during 2006, which will expire in the third quarter of 2007, covering approximately 125 employees at a newly acquired facility in Brazil.

10

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Name and Age	Present Principal Position and Other Material Positions Held During Last Five Years
Sheldon R. Erikson (65)	Chief Executive Officer since January 1995. President from January 1995 to December 2006. Chairman of the Board of Directors since May 1996. Chairman of the Board from 1988 to April 1995 and President and Chief Executive Officer from 1987 to April 1995 of The Western Company of North America.
Jack B. Moore (53)	President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2007. Senior Vice President since July 2005. Vice President from May 2003 to July 2005. President, Drilling and Production Systems from July 2002 to December 2006. Vice President and General Manager, Cameron Western Hemisphere from July 1999 to July 2002. Vice President Western Hemisphere Operations, Vice President Eastern Hemisphere, Vice President Latin American Operations, Director Human Resources, Director Market Research and Director Materials of Baker Hughes Incorporated from 1976 to July 1999.
Franklin Myers (54)	Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer since January 2003. Senior Vice President from July 2001 to January 2003, Senior Vice President and President of the Cooper Energy Services division from August 1998 to July 2001 and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from April 1995 to July 1999.
John D. Carne (58)	Senior Vice President since February 2006. Vice President from May 2003 to February 2006. President, Drilling and Production Systems since January 2007. President, Valves and Measurement from April 2002 to December 2006. Director of Operations, Eastern Hemisphere, Cameron Division from 1999 to March 2002. Plant Manager, Leeds, England, Cameron Division from 1996 to 1999. Director of Operations, U.K. & Norway, Cooper Energy Services (U.K.) Ltd. from 1988 to 1996.
William C. Lemmer (62)	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since July 1999. Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Oryx Energy Company from 1994 to March 1999.
Joe Mongrain (48)	Vice President, Human Resources since June 2006. Director Human Resources, Schlumberger, Data and Consulting from May 2004 to May 2006 and Director, Human Resources, Schlumberger, North and South America from January 2001 to April 2004..
Lorne E. Phillips (35)	Vice President and Treasurer since December 2006. Treasurer from July 2005 to December 2006. General Manager, Canadian Operations from March 2003 to July 2005, Vice President, Marketing and M & A for Cameron’s Valves & Measurement group from June 2002 to March 2003 and Manager, Business Development from July 1999 to June 2002.
Robert J. Rajeski (61)	Vice President since July 2000. President, Compression Systems since October 2002. President, Cooper Turbocompressor division from July 1999 to October 2002 and President, Cooper Energy Services division from July 2001 to October 2002. Vice President and General Manager of Ingersoll-Dresser Pump Co., Engineered Pump division from 1994 to July 1999.
Charles M. Sledge (41)	Vice President and Corporate Controller since July 2001. Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer from 1999 to June 2001, and Vice President, Controller from 1996 to 1999, of Stage Stores, Inc., a chain of family apparel stores.
Dalton L. Thomas (57)	Vice President, Operations Support, since February 2004. President, Cameron division from July 1998 to 2001. Vice President, Eastern Hemisphere for Cameron division from 1995 to July 1998.
James E. Wright (52)	Vice President and President, Valves and Measurement group since January 2007. President, Distributed and Process Valves divisions from December 2005 to December 2006. Vice President and General Manager, Distributed Products from August 2002 to December 2005. Vice President and General Manager, North America Pipeline and Distributor Products from June 2001 to August 2002 and Vice President Marketing and North American Sales for V&M from August 1998 to June 2001.

11

Glossary of Terms

Actuator. A hydraulic or electric motor used to open or close valves.

Blowout Preventer. A hydraulically operated system of safety valves installed at the wellhead during drilling and completion operations for the purpose of preventing an increase of high-pressure formation fluids — oil, gas or water — in the wellbore from turning into a “blowout” of the well.

Centrifugal compressor. A compressor with an impeller or rotor, a rotor shaft and a casing which discharges gases under pressure by centrifugal force.

Choke. A type of valve used to control the rate and pressure of the flow of production from a well or through flowlines.

Christmas tree. An assembly of valves, pipes and fittings used to control the flow of oil and gas from a well.

Compressor. A device used to create a pressure differential in order to move or compress a vapor or a gas.

Controls. A device which allows the remote triggering of an actuator to open or close a valve.

Elastomer. A rubberized pressure control sealing element used in drilling and wellhead applications.

Integral reciprocating engine-compressor. A compressor in which the crankshaft is shared by the engine and compressor, each having its own piston rods driven by the shared crankshaft.

Integrally geared centrifugal compressor. A compressor in which the motor is geared so that the compressor runs at higher rpms than the motor itself to gain efficiency.

Reciprocating compressor. A compressor in which the compression effect is produced by the reciprocating motion of pistons and plungers operating in cylinders.

Riser. Pipe used to connect the wellbore of offshore wells to drilling or production equipment on the surface, and through which drilling fluids or hydrocarbons travel.

Valve. A device used to control the rate of flow in a line, to open or shut off a line completely, or to serve as an automatic or semi-automatic safety device.

Wellhead. The equipment installed at the surface of a wellbore to maintain control of a well and including equipment such as the casing head, tubing head and Christmas tree.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The information set forth under the caption “Factors That May Affect Financial Condition and Future Results” on pages 35 to 37 in the 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

There were no unresolved comments from the SEC staff at the time of filing of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company currently operates facilities ranging in size from approximately 670 square feet to approximately 1,350,000 square feet. The Company also owns and leases warehouses, distribution centers, aftermarket and storage facilities, sales and administrative offices. The Company leases its corporate headquarters office space and space for the DPS, V&M and CS division headquarters in Houston, Texas.

The Company manufactures, markets and sells its products and provides services throughout the world, operating facilities in numerous countries. At December 31, 2006, the significant facilities used by Cameron throughout the world for manufacturing,

12

distribution, aftermarket services, machining, storage, warehousing, sales and administration contained an aggregate of approximately 11,018,000 square feet of space, of which approximately 7,011,000 square feet (64%) was owned and 4,007,000 (36%) was leased. Of this total, approximately 6,455,000 square feet of space (59%) is located in the Western Hemisphere, 3,404,000 square feet of space (31%) is located in the Eastern Hemisphere, 936,000 square feet of space (8%) is located in Asia Pacific and the Middle East and 223,000 square feet of space (2%) is located in West Africa. The table below shows the number of significant operating manufacturing, warehouse, distribution and aftermarket facilities and sales and administrative offices by business segment and geographic area. DPS and V&M share space in certain facilities and, thus, are being reported together.

	Western Hemisphere	Eastern Hemisphere	Asia/Pacific and Middle East	West Africa	Total
DPS and V&M	133	28	41	13	215
CS	19	3	2	—	24

Taking into consideration the construction that is currently underway of a new subsea manufacturing facility in Johor, Malaysia that is scheduled to be in full operation by the fourth quarter of 2007, Cameron believes its facilities are suitable for their present and intended purposes and are adequate for the Company’s current and anticipated level of operations.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is subject to a number of contingencies which include environmental matters, litigation and tax contingencies.

Environmental Matters

The Company’s worldwide operations are subject to domestic and international regulations with regard to air, soil and water quality as well as other environmental matters. The Company, through its environmental management system and active third-party audit program, believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations.

The Company is currently identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) with respect to two sites designated for cleanup under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or similar state laws. One of these sites is Osborne, Pennsylvania (a landfill into which a predecessor of the CS operation in Grove City, Pennsylvania deposited waste), where remediation is complete and remaining costs relate to ongoing ground water treatment and monitoring. The other is believed to be a de minimis exposure. The Company is also engaged in site cleanup under the Voluntary Cleanup Plan of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality at former manufacturing locations in Houston and Missouri City, Texas. Additionally, the Company has discontinued operations at a number of other sites which had been active for many years. The Company does not believe, based upon information currently available, that there are any material environmental liabilities existing at these locations. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet included a noncurrent liability of $7.0 million for environmental matters.

Legal Matters

At the former manufacturing site in Houston, Texas, the Company discovered that contaminated underground water from this site had migrated under an adjacent residential area. Pursuant to applicable state regulations, the Company notified the affected homeowners in 2001. Since that time, the Company has entered into agreements with 21 homeowners that obligated the Company to reimburse them for any estimated decline in value at time of sale due to potential buyer’s concerns over contamination following a sale or, in the case of some agreements, to purchase the property after an agreed marketing period. Four of these agreements have had no claims made under them yet. In addition, the Company has settled eight other property claims by homeowners who have sold their properties. The Company has had expenses and losses of approximately $8.3 million from 2002 through 2006 related to these various agreements and settlements.

In addition, the Company is a named defendant in three lawsuits regarding this contamination and another suit which was settled in January, 2007. The settled case is Valice v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc. (80th Jud. Dist. Ct., Harris County, filed June 21, 2002), which was filed and settled as a class action. Pursuant to the settlement, the homeowners who remained part of the class will be entitled to receive a payment of approximately 3% of the 2006 appraised value of their property or reimbursement of any diminution in value of their property due to contamination concerns at the time of any sale. There were 21 homeowners who opted out of the class settlement.

13

The other suits pending regarding this matter have been filed by a number of homeowners who have opted out of the class action settlement. Moldovan v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc. (165th Jud. Dist. Ct., Harris County, filed October 23, 2006), was filed by six homeowners who opted-out of the class settlement. Other suits filed include Tuma v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc. (334^th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, filed on November 27, 2006) and Rudelson v. Cooper Industries, Inc. (189^th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, filed on November 29, 2006). The complaints filed in these actions make the claim that the contaminated underground water has reduced property values and seeks recovery of actual and exemplary damages for the loss of property value.

The Company is of the opinion that there is no health risk to area residents and that the lawsuits essentially reflect concerns over a possible decline in property value. The Company believes, based on its review of the facts and law, that any potential exposure from existing agreements, the class action settlement or other actions that have been or may be filed, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations. The Company reserved a total of $17.5 million reserved for these matters as of December 31, 2006.

The Company had been named as a defendant in a suit brought by a purchaser of an option to purchase a parcel of the same former manufacturing site, Silber/I-10 Venture Ltd., f/k/a Rocksprings Ltd. v. Falcon Interests Realty Corp., Cooper Industries Inc. and Cooper Cameron Corporation (212th Judicial District Court, Galveston County, filed August 15, 2002) that alleged fraud and breach of contract regarding the environmental condition of the parcel under option. The parties have settled this matter and the case has been dismissed. Based on the Asset Transfer Agreement pursuant to which Cooper Industries, Inc. (Cooper) spun-off the Company, Cooper has made a claim of approximately $2,500,000 against the Company for reimbursement of its legal fees and settlement costs with respect to this matter. The Company is of the opinion it is not required to make this reimbursement and intends to vigorously defend itself.

The Company has been named as a defendant in a number of multi-defendant, multi-plaintiff tort lawsuits since 1995. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet included a liability of approximately $4.3 million for such cases, including estimated legal costs.

The Company believes, based on its review of the facts and law, that the potential exposure from the remaining suits will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or liquidity.

Tax Contingencies

The Company has legal entities in over 35 countries. As a result, the Company is subject to various tax filing requirements in these countries. The Company prepares its tax filings in a manner which it believes is consistent with such filing requirements. However, some of the tax laws and regulations which the Company is subject to are subject to interpretation and/or judgment. Although the Company believes that the tax liability for periods ending on or before the balance sheet date have been adequately provided for in the financial statements, to the extent that a taxing authority believes that the Company has not prepared its tax filings in accordance with the authority’s interpretation of the tax laws/regulations, the Company could be exposed to additional taxes.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2006.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ANDISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The common stock of Cameron International Corporation, par value $.01 per share (together with the associated Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock), is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol CAM. No dividends were paid during 2006 or 2005.

14

The trading activity during 2006 and 2005 was as follows (reflects a 2-for-1 stock split effective December 15, 2005):

	Price Range ($)
	High	Low	Last
2006
First Quarter	$50.61	$38.08	$44.08
Second Quarter	56.09	42.10	47.77
Third Quarter	52.07	42.78	48.31
Fourth Quarter	57.81	44.60	53.05

	Price Range ($)
	High	Low	Last
2005
First Quarter	$29.805	$25.52	$28.605
Second Quarter	31.99	26.76	31.025
Third Quarter	37.695	30.86	36.965
Fourth Quarter	43.10	32.21	41.40

As of February 9, 2007, the approximate number of stockholders of record of Cameron common stock was 1,165.

Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is included in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which notes are incorporated herein by reference in Part II, Item 8 hereof.

In February 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors changed the number of shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for repurchase from the 5,000,000 shares authorized in August, 2004 to 10,000,000 shares in order to reflect the 2-for-1 stock split effective December 15, 2005. Additionally, on May 22, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved repurchasing shares of the Company’s common stock with the proceeds remaining from the Company’s 2.5% Convertible Debenture offering, after taking into account a planned repayment of $200.0 million principal amount of the Company’s outstanding 2.65% Senior Notes due 2007. This authorization is in addition to the 10,000,000 shares described above.

Purchases pursuant to the 10,000,000-share Board authorization may be made by way of open market purchases, directly or indirectly, for the Company’s own account or through commercial banks or financial institutions and by the use of derivatives such as a sale or put on the Company’s common stock or by forward or economically equivalent transactions. Shares of common stock purchased and placed in treasury during the three months ended December 31, 2006 under the Board’s two authorization programs described above are as follows:

Period	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share	Total number of shares purchased as part of all repurchase programs(a)	Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under all repurchase programs (b)
10/1/06 - 10/31/06	114,500	$45.37	7,660,115	8,520,878
11/1/06 - 11/30/06	—	$—	7,660,115	8,364,409
12/1/06 - 12/31/06	200,000	$55.30	7,860,115	8,208,880
Total	314,500	$51.69	7,860,115	8,208,880

____________

(a)All share purchases during the three months ended December 31, 2006 were done through open market transactions.

(b)Based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock of $53.05 per share on December 31, 2006, 1,902,080 shares are yet to be purchased under the May 2006 Board authorization relating to use of the remaining proceeds from the Company’s 2.5% Convertible Debenture offering described above.

Performance Graph

The following performance graph shows the cumulative total stockholder return on the Common Stock from December 31, 2000 to December 31, 2006, and compares it, over the same period of time, with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s Composite-500 Stock Index and the weighted average (based on stock market capitalization) cumulative total return of a Peer Group selected by the Company. The Peer Group includes the same companies as the previous three years: Baker Hughes Incorporated, BJ Services Company, Halliburton Company, Schlumberger Limited, Smith International, Inc. and Weatherford International, Inc. In each case, cumulative total return is calculated assuming a fixed investment of $100 on December 31, 2001, and the returns on the graph represent the value that each of these investments would have had at the end of each year shown.

The information included under this heading, “Performance Graph,” is “furnished” and not “filed” and shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or subject to Regulation 14A, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

     

	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/30/05	12/29/06
Cameron	100.0	123.44	115.46	133.33	205.15	262.88
S&P 500	100.0	78.03	100.16	110.92	116.28	134.43
Peer Group	100.0	94.12	112.49	148.97	221.25	259.36

15

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The information set forth under the caption “Selected Consolidated Historical Financial Data of Cameron International Corporation” on page 70 in the 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTSOF OPERATIONS

The information set forth under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition of Cameron International Corporation” on pages 25-39 in the 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information for this item is set forth in the section entitled “Market Risk Information” on pages 38-39 in the 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and the independent registered public accounting firm’s reports set forth on pages 40-69 in the 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders are incorporated herein by reference:

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Consolidated Results of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006.

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.

Consolidated Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006.

Consolidated Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING ANDFINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Disclosure Committee and the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of December 31, 2006. In conducting management’s evaluation as described above, the Brazilian operations of the Flow Control segment of Dresser, Inc., acquired during 2006, were excluded. These operations constituted less than 5% of the Company’s consolidated revenues, income before income taxes and total assets as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2006 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files

16

or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting - The report of management of the Company regarding internal control over financial reporting is set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and incorporated herein by reference.

(c) Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - The attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting is set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” and incorporated herein by reference.

(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting - During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company converted certain of the businesses acquired from Dresser in late 2005, located in Italy, Brazil and the United Kingdom, to its SAP enterprise-wide software systems that are used to manage the Company’s procurement, manufacturing, accounting and reporting needs. Other than as described above, no other changes have been made in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information regarding Section 16(a) compliance, the Audit Committee, the Company’s Code of Business Ethics and Ethics for Directors, shareholder nominating procedures and background of the directors appearing under the captions “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, “Corporate Governance and Board of Directors Matters”, and “Security Ownership of Management” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and its Board of Directors. A copy of the code of ethics is available on the Registrant’s Internet website at www.c-a-m.com and is available in print to any shareholder free of charge upon request. The Registrant intends to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of its code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on its website at the address set forth above.

The information under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference in this section.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information concerning "Executive Compensation" required by Item 11 shall be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT ANDRELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information concerning "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners" and "Security Ownership of Management" required by Item 12 shall be included in our Proxy Statement to be filed relating to the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

17

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information concerning the Company's "Policy on Related Person Transactions" and "Director Independence" required by Item 13 shall be included in our Proxy Statement to be filed relating to the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information concerning "Principal Accounting Firm Fees" required by Item 14 shall be included in the Proxy Statement to be filed relating to our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

(1)Financial Statements:

All financial statements of the Registrant as set forth under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2)Financial Statement Schedules:

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Cameron International Corporation

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Cameron International Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, and have issued our report thereon dated February 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K). Our audits also included the financial statement schedule included in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. This schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas

February 26, 2007

18

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(dollars in thousands)

				Additions
		Balance at beginning of period		Charged to costs and expenses		Charged to other accounts			Deductions (b)			Translation			Balance at end of period
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	9,775	$	2,082	$	(149	)	$	(3,495)		$	(910	)	$	7,303
Allowance for obsolete and excess inventory	$	48,305	$	10,760	$	858		$	(17,879)		$	2,179		$	44,223
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	4,513	$	1,583	$	4,556		$	(874)		$	(3	)	$	9,775
Allowance for obsolete and excess inventory	$	47,778	$	21,971	$	7,755	(a)	$	(28,084)	(a)	$	(1,115	)	$	48,305
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	1,823	$	3,313	$	145		$	(781)		$	13		$	4,513
Allowance for obsolete and excess inventory	$	37,317	$	18,659	$	2,500		$	(10,019)		$	(679	)	$	47,778

____________

(a) Certain amounts in 2005 have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation.

(b) Write-offs of uncollectible receivables, deductions for collections of previously reserved receivables and write-offs of obsolete inventory.

(3)Exhibits:

3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cameron International Corporation, dated June 30, 1995, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on July 25, 2005 (Commission File No. 33-94948), and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2	Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cameron International Corporation, filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 19, 1998 (Commission File No. 333-57995), and incorporated herein by reference.
3.3	Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cameron International Corporation, dated May 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2006).
3.4	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
4.1	Form of Rights Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1995, between the Company and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as Rights Agent, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Company (Commission File No. 33-94948), and incorporated herein by reference.
4.2	First Amendment to Rights Agreement between the Company and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as Rights Agent, dated November 1, 1997, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1997 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
4.3	Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 1998 (Registration Statement No. 333-51705), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.1	The Company's Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Company (Commission File No. 333-46638), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.2	First Amendment to the Company's Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on May 29, 2001 (File No. 333-61820), and incorporated herein by reference.

19

10.3	Second Amendment to the Company's Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on February 4, 2002 (File No. 333-82082), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.4	Third Amendment to the Company's Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on February 4, 2002 (File No. 333-82082), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.5	Fourth Amendment to the Company's Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.6	Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective May 1, 2003, filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.7	First through Third Amendments to the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.8	Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.9	Merger of the Petreco International, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan with and into the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.10	Merger of the the Company's Savings-Investment Plan for Hourly Employees with and into the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.11	Amendment to the NuFlo Technologies, Inc. 401(K) Plan and Merger of the NuFlo Technologies, Inc. 401(K) Plan with and into the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.12	The Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 5, 2005.
10.13	First Amendment to the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.14	The Company's Supplemental Excess Defined Benefit Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of the Company (Commission File No. 33-90288), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.15	First Amendment to Cameron International Corporation Supplemental Excess Defined Benefit Plan, effective as of January 1, 1996, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1996 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.16	The Company's 2003 Supplemental Excess Defined Contribution Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.13 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on June 18, 2003, of the Company (Commission File No. 333-106225), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.17	First Amendment to Cameron International Corporation 2003 Supplemental Excess Defined Contribution Plan filed as Exhibit 4.14 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on June 18, 2003, of the Company (Commission File No. 333-106225), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.18	Employment Agreement by and between Sheldon R. Erikson and the Company, effective as of August 13, 1999, filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1999 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.

20

10.19	Amendment to the Employment Agreement between the Company and Sheldon R. Erikson, dated August 24, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.48 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.20	Employment Agreement by and between Franklin Myers and the Company, effective as of September 1, 1999, filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1999 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.21	Amendment to the Employment Agreement between the Company and Franklin Myers, dated August 16, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.47 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.22	Form of Change in Control Agreement, effective November 11, 1999, by and between the Company and Scott Amann, William Lemmer and Robert Rajeski, filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1999 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.23	Amendment to the Change in Control Agreements, effective May 31, 2005, by and between the Company and Scott Amann, William Lemmer and Robert Rajeski, filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.24	Form of Change in Control Agreement, effective October 10, 2002, by and between the Company and Charles M. Sledge, filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.25	Amendment to the Employment Agreement between the Company and Charles M. Sledge, dated December 21, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.46 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.26	Form of Change in Control Agreement, effective May 8, 2003, by and between the Company and John Carne and Jack Moore, filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2003 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.27	Amended and Restated Management Incentive Compensation Plan of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to the Company 2005 Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 5, 2005.
10.28	Change in Control Policy of the Company, approved February 19, 1996, filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1996 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.29	Form of Executive Severance Program of the Company, effective July 1, 2000, and reissued January 1, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.30	Credit Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2005, among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and the banks named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005, of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.31	Individual Account Retirement Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees at the Company's Buffalo, New York Plant, filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-57991), incorporated herein by reference.
10.32	First through Eighth Amendments to the Individual Account Retirement Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees at the Company's Buffalo, New York Plant, filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.33	Ninth Amendment to the Individual Account Retirement Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees at the Cameron International Corporation Buffalo, New York Plant, filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.

21

10.34	Form of Indemnification Agreement, effective February 20, 2003, by and between the Company and Nathan M. Avery, C. Baker Cunningham, Sheldon R. Erikson, Lamar Norsworthy, Michael E. Patrick, David Ross and Bruce W. Wilkinson, filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for 2002 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.35	Form of Indemnification Agreement, effective February 20, 2003, by and between the Company and Mr. Jeff Altamari, Mr. Steve P. Beatty, Mr. John Carne, Mr. Hal Goldie, Mr. William C. Lemmer, Mr. Jack B. Moore, Mr. Franklin Myers, Mr. Robert Rajeski, Mr. Charles M. Sledge, and Mr. Rick Steans, filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2003 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.36	Form of Stock Option Agreement for grants dated November 22, 2004, under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to a Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.37	Change of Control Agreement, dated February 19, 2004, by and between Dalton Thomas and the Company, filed as Exhibit 10.49 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.38	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Restricted Stock Units granted on January 1, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.50 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.39	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Restricted Stock Units granted on January 1, 2006, filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.40	Form of Stock Option Agreement for grants dated November 22, 2004, under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to a Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.41	The Company's Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.42	The Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated as of November 2002, incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 8, 2003.
10.43	Sixth Amendment to the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated as of November 2002, incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of Stockholders held on May 8, 2003.
10.44	Seventh Amendment to the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.45	The Company's Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-79787), incorporated herein by reference.
10.46	First Amendment to the Company's Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, filed as Exhibit 10.43 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.47	Form of Stock Option Agreement for stock options granted on November 10, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.47 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.48	Third Amendment to the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit "A" of the Cameron International Corporation 2006 Proxy Statement.
10.49*	Fourth Amendment to the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.
10.50*	Change of Control Agreement, dated August 10, 2006, by and between Joseph H. Mongrain and Cameron International Corporation.
13.1*	Portions of the 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders are included as an exhibit to this report.

22

14.1	Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of Stockholders held on May 8, 2003.
14.2	Code of Ethics for Management Personnel, filed as Exhibit 14.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
14.3	Standards of Conduct, filed as Exhibit 14.3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
21.1*	Subsidiaries of registrant.
23.1*	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1*	Certification.
31.2*	Certification.
32.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

____________

*Filed herewith

23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signedon its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Registrant
By:	/s/ Charles M. Sledge
	(Charles M. Sledge)
	Vice President and Corporate Controller
	(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: February 27, 2007

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, thisreport has been signed on this 27^th day of February, 2007, by the following personson behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.

Signature	Title
/S/ Nathan M. Avery
(Nathan M. Avery)	Director
/s/ C. Baker Cunningham
(C. Baker Cunningham)	Director
/s/Sheldon R. Erikson	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Sheldon R. Erikson)	(principal executive officer)
/s/ Peter J. Fluor
(Peter J. Fluor)	Director
(Lamar Norsworthy)	Director
/s/ Michael E. Patrick
(Michael E. Patrick)	Director
/s/ David Ross III
(David Ross III)	Director
/s/ Bruce W. Wilkinson
(Bruce W. Wilkinson)	Director
/s/ Franklin Myers	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Franklin Myers)	(principal financial officer)

24

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description	Sequential Page Number
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cameron International Corporation, dated June 30, 1995, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on July 25, 2005 (Commission File No. 33-94948), and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2	Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cameron International Corporation, filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 19, 1998 (Commission File No. 333-57995), and incorporated herein by reference.
3.3	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
3.4	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
4.1	Form of Rights Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1995, between the Company and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as Rights Agent, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Company (Commission File No. 33-94948), and incorporated herein by reference.
4.2	First Amendment to Rights Agreement between the Company and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as Rights Agent, dated November 1, 1997, filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1997 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
4.3	Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 1998 (Registration Statement No. 333-51705), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.1	The Company's Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Company (Commission File No. 333-46638), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.2	First Amendment to the Company's Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on May 29, 2001 (File No. 333-61820), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.3	Second Amendment to the Company's Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on February 4, 2002 (File No. 333-82082), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.4	Third Amendment to the Company's Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on February 4, 2002 (File No. 333-82082), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.5	Fourth Amendment to the Company's Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.6	Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective May 1, 2003, filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.7	First through Third Amendments to the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.8	Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.

25

Exhibit Number	Description	Sequential Page Number
10.9	Merger of the Petreco International, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan with and into the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.10	Merger of the Company's Savings-Investment Plan for Hourly Employees with and into the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.11	Amendment to the NuFlo Technologies, Inc. 401(K) Plan and Merger of the NuFlo Technologies, Inc. 401(K) Plan with and into the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.12	The Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 5, 2005.
10.13	First Amendment to the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference
10.14	The Company's Supplemental Excess Defined Benefit Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of the Company (Commission File No. 33-90288), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.15	First Amendment to Cameron International Corporation Supplemental Excess Defined Benefit Plan, effective as of January 1, 1996, filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1996 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.16	The Company's 2003 Supplemental Excess Defined Contribution Plan, filed as Exhibit 4.13 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on June 18, 2003, of the Company (Commission File No. 333-106225), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.17	First Amendment to Cameron International Corporation 2003 Supplemental Excess Defined Contribution Plan filed as Exhibit 4.14 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on June 18, 2003, of the Company (Commission File No. 333-106225), and incorporated herein by reference.
10.18	Employment Agreement by and between Sheldon R. Erikson and the Company, effective as of August 13, 1999, filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1999 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.19	Amendment to the Employment Agreement between the Company and Sheldon R. Erikson, dated August 24, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.48 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.20	Employment Agreement by and between Franklin Myers and the Company, effective as of September 1, 1999, filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1999 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.21	Amendment to the Employment Agreement between the Company and Franklin Myers, dated August 16, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.47 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.22	Form of Change in Control Agreement, effective November 11, 1999, by and between the Company and Scott Amann, William Lemmer and Robert Rajeski, filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1999 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.

26

Exhibit Number	Description	Sequential Page Number
10.23	Amendment to the Change in Control Agreements, effective May 31, 2005, by and between the Company and Scott Amann, William Lemmer and Robert Rajeski, filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.24	Form of Change in Control Agreement, effective October 10, 2002, by and between the Company and Charles M. Sledge, filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.25	Amendment to the Employment Agreement between the Company and Charles M. Sledge, dated December 21, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.46 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.26	Form of Change in Control Agreement, effective May 8, 2003, by and between the Company and John Carne and Jack Moore, filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2003 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.27	Amended and Restated Management Incentive Compensation Plan of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to the Company's 2005 Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 5, 2005.
10.28	Change in Control Policy of the Company, approved February 19, 1996, filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 1996 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.29	Form of Executive Severance Program of the Company, effective July 1, 2000, and reissued January 1, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.30	Credit Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2005, among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and the banks named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005, of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.31	Individual Account Retirement Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees at the Company's Buffalo, New York Plant, filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-57991), incorporated herein by reference.
10.32	First through Eighth Amendments to the Individual Account Retirement Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees at the Cameron International Corporation Buffalo, New York Plant, filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.33	Ninth Amendment to the Individual Account Retirement Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees at the Company's Buffalo, New York Plant, filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.34	Form of Indemnification Agreement, effective February 20, 2003, by and between the Company and Nathan M. Avery, C. Baker Cunningham, Sheldon R. Erikson, Lamar Norsworthy, Michael E. Patrick, David Ross and Bruce W. Wilkinson, filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for 2002 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.35	Form of Indemnification Agreement, effective February 20, 2003, by and between the Company and Mr. Jeff Altamari, Mr. Steve P. Beatty, Mr. John Carne, Mr. Hal Goldie, Mr. William C. Lemmer, Mr. Jack B. Moore, Mr. Franklin Myers, Mr. Robert Rajeski, Mr. Charles M. Sledge, and Mr. Rick Steans, filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2003 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.

27

Exhibit Number	Description	Sequential Page Number
10.36	Form of Stock Option Agreement for grants dated November 22, 2004, under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to a Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.37	Change of Control Agreement, dated February 19, 2004, by and between Dalton Thomas and the Company, filed as Exhibit 10.49 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.38	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Restricted Stock Units granted on January 1, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.50 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.39	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Restricted Stock Units granted on January 1, 2006, filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.40	Form of Stock Option Agreement for grants dated November 22, 2004, under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to a Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.41	The Company's Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.42	The Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated as of November 2002, incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 8, 2003.
10.43	Sixth Amendment to the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated as of November 2002, incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of Stockholders held on May 8, 2003.
10.44	Seventh Amendment to the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.45	The Company's Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-79787), incorporated herein by reference.
10.46	First Amendment to the Company's Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, filed as Exhibit 10.43 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.47	Form of Stock Option Agreement for stock options granted November 10, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.47 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2005 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
10.48	Third Amendment to the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit "A" of the Cameron International Corporation 2006 Proxy Statement.
10.49*	Fourth Amendment to the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.
10.50*	Change of Control Agreement, dated August 10, 2006, by and between Joseph H. Mongrain and Cameron International Corporation.
13.1*	Portions of the 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders are included as an exhibit to this report.
14.1	Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of Stockholders held on May 8, 2003.
14.2	Code of Ethics for Management Personnel, filed as Exhibit 14.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.
14.3	Standards of Conduct, filed as Exhibit 14.3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2004 of the Company, and incorporated herein by reference.

28

Exhibit Number	Description	Sequential Page Number
21.1*	Subsidiaries of registrant.
23.1*	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1*	Certification.
31.2*	Certification.
32.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

____________

*Filed herewith

29

EX-10.49

 Exhibit 10.49

CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

FOURTH AMENDMENT

TO THE

2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (The “Plan”); and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective November 9, 2006:

1.The words “reported New York Stock Exchange closing price of the Shares” shall be substituted for the words “per Share weighted average daily trading” in the second sentence of Section 2.11 of the Plan.

2.As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.

APPROVED:

/s/ William C. Lemmer

______________________________

William C. Lemmer

Vice President, General Counsel

and Secretary

Date: November 9, 2006

1

EX-10.50

 Exhibit 10.50

August 10, 2006

Mr. Joseph H. Mongrain

8522 Burkhart Rd.

Houston, TX  77055

Dear Mr. Mongrain,

Cameron International Corporation (the “Company”) considers the establishment and maintenance of a sound and vital management to be essential for the protection and enhancement of the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Company recognizes that, as is the case with many publicly-held corporations, the possibility of a Change of Control¹ may arise and that such possibility, and the uncertainty and questions which it may raise among management, may result in the departure or distraction of management personnel to the detriment of the Company and its shareholders. Accordingly, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has determined that appropriate steps should be taken to assure the Company of the continuation of your service and to reinforce and encourage the attention and dedication of members of the Company’s management to their assigned duties without distraction in circumstances arising from the possibility of a Change of Control. In particular the Board believes it important, should the Company or its shareholders receive a proposal for or notice of a Change of Control, or consider one itself, that you be able to assess and advise the Company whether such transaction would be or is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, and to take such other action regarding such transaction as the Board might determine to be appropriate without being influenced by the uncertainties of your own situation.

In order to induce you to remain in the employ of the Company, this letter agreement (the “Agreement”), prepared pursuant to authority granted by the Board, sets forth the compensation and severance benefits which the Company agrees will be provided to you should your employment with the Company be terminated in connection with a Change of Control under the circumstances described below, as well as certain other benefits which will be made available to you should you be employed by the Company on the Effective Date of a Change of Control.

This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for as long as you remain in your current position with the Company or any other position of equal or higher grade which has historically made its holder eligible for a Change of Control Agreement; provided, however, that this Agreement shall terminate and cease to be in full force and effect upon your giving notice of your intent to terminate your employment with the Company for any reason other than Good Reason, whether by retirement, early retirement, or otherwise. This Agreement supersedes any prior Agreement between you and the Company regarding the subject matter hereof.

1.Termination in Connection with a Change of Control.

(a)If there is a termination of your employment with the Company either by the Company without Cause or by you for Good Reason during the period between the Effective Date of a Change of Control and 2 years following the occurrence of the Change of Control (the “Effective Period”), and if such Effective Date occurs during the life of this Agreement, you shall be entitled to the following benefits, whether or not this Agreement has been cancelled prior to the time of your termination:

(i)   all benefits conferred upon you by the Severance Package, and

(ii)in addition, all benefits payable under the provisions either of the Company’s employee and executive Plans in which you are a participant immediately prior to the Effective Date, or of those plans in existence at the time of your Termination Date, whichever are more favorable to you, in accordance with the terms and conditions of such Plans or plans, such benefits to be paid under such Plans or plans and not under this Agreement.

(b)Notwithstanding the above, you shall not be entitled to any such benefits if your termination results from your death or disability, unless your death or disability occurs (i) during the Effective Period and (ii), with respect to the benefits conferred by the Severance Package only, after either it has been decided that you will be terminated without Cause during the Effective Period, or you have given notice of termination for Good Reason during the Effective Period.

(c)You shall not be required to mitigate the amount of any payment provided for in this Agreement by seeking other employment, nor shall the amount of any payment provided for in this Agreement be reduced by any compensation earned by you as the result of employment by another employer after any Termination Date.

2.Procedures for Termination.

(a) If it is intended that your employment be terminated by you for Good Reason you shall transmit to the Company written notice setting forth the particulars upon which you base your determination that Good Reason exists and, only if the stated basis therefore is capable of being cured, requesting a cure within 10 days. Failing such a cure, a “final separation” shall then occur, and if such stated basis is not capable of cure by the Company, “final separation” shall occur co-extensive with delivery of the notice. For purposes of this Agreement, a “Termination Date” shall be deemed to have occurred upon the date of such “final separation”.

(b)If it is intended that your employment be terminated by the Company without Cause, a “Termination Date” shall be deemed to have occurred upon the 30^th day following the date of receipt of any notice so stating, or upon the date specified in the notice, whichever is later. If it is intended that your employment be terminated by the Company for Cause, if you contest such termination pursuant to any proceeding initiated pursuant to Section 6 hereof within 15 days of receipt of such notice, and it is ultimately determined that cause did not exist, then (anything else in the Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding) a “Termination Date” shall be deemed to have occurred upon the final resolution of such proceeding.

3.LTIP Benefit Acceleration. Immediately upon an applicable Termination Date, all contingent compensation rights issued to you under the LTIP Plan, which are then (i) held by you, a member of your Immediate Family, or a partnership or limited liability company whose partners or shareholders are you and members of your Immediate Family, and (ii) outstanding, shall become vested, exercisable, distributable and unrestricted (any contrary provision in the LTIP Plan notwithstanding) whether or not you continue to be employed by the Company. You shall have the right immediately upon any written request by you to the Company, to (i) exercise all or any portion of all your options covered (including, at your sole election, any associated Tandem SAR) by the LTIP Plan and to have the underlying Shares issued to you, (ii) have issued to you on a non-forfeitable basis any or all Shares covered by Restricted Stock Awards held by you under the LTIP Plan, (iii) have issued to you any or all Performance Shares and/or Performance Units held by you in the LTIP Plan, (iv) exercise all or any portion of any LTIP Plan Freestanding SAR held by you, and (v) obtain the full benefit of any other contingent compensation rights to which you may be entitled under the LTIP Plan, in each case as though all applicable Performance Targets had been met or achieved at maximum levels for all Performance Periods (including those extending beyond the Effective Date) and any and all other LTIP Plan contingencies had been satisfied in full at the date of the Change of Control and the maximum possible benefits thereunder had been earned at the date of the Change of Control.

4.Conditional Share Purchase Obligation.

(a)If a Change of Control occurs as a consequence of a tender offer or exchange offer (the “Tender Offer”), the Company shall, if requested by you, purchase from you (whether a Termination Date has occurred following the Change of Control) for cash on any business day selected by you upon not less than ten days’ notice to the Company, which day shall not be less than ten days following consummation of the Tender Offer nor more than three years after the Effective Date, up to that number of Shares which shall be equal to the product of (x) the number of Shares acquired by you upon exercise or distribution of any benefit under the Bonus Plan or LTIP Plan prior to consummation of the Tender Offer, multiplied by (y) the decimal equivalent of (I) the number of Shares accepted for purchase or exchange in the Tender Offer, divided by (II) the number of Shares timely and validly tendered pursuant to the Tender Offer. In the event the above obligation to purchase Shares occurs by reason of a cash tender offer or a combination cash tender offer and exchange offer, the cash price per share to be paid to you hereunder shall be equal to the highest price paid in cash pursuant to the Tender Offer. In the event such obligation occurs by reason of an exchange offer, the cash price per share to be paid to you hereunder shall be equal to the closing price, if traded on a stock exchange, or the average bid and asked prices, if traded in the over-the-counter market, of the security of the person so exchanged for the Shares (the “Exchange Security”) on the first day on which the Exchange Security could have been sold by you on such exchange or in the over-the-counter market, as the case may be, in a regular broker’s transaction had your Shares been tendered and accepted, multiplied by the number of Exchange Securities (or fraction thereof) issued in the Tender Offer for each Company Share; and

(b)If a Change of Control occurs pursuant to a Tender Offer and (i) a merger, consolidation, reorganization, sale, spin-off, or purchase of assets under which all remaining outstanding Shares will be converted into or become exchangeable for cash, or for securities (“Merger Security”) issued or to be issued by the Person who made the Tender Offer (or a subsidiary or affiliate of such Person) is thereafter proposed to the Company or its shareholders, and (ii) such merger, consolidation, reorganization or purchase of assets occurs less than three years after the Effective Date, and (iii) the amounts of cash into which each Share would be converted if the transaction is effected wholly for cash, or the Merger Security Value (as defined below) if such transaction is effected wholly for Merger Securities, or the sum of the cash and the Merger Security Value if the Transaction is effected partly for cash and partly for Merger Securities, as the case may be, is less than 95% of the per share price that would have been paid by the Company for such portion of your Shares had you exercised your option to require the Company to purchase such Shares under Section 4(a) above, the Company shall pay you (whether or not a Termination Date has occurred following a Change of Control), an amount in cash equal to the difference between the aggregate price you would have received from the number of Shares the Company would have been required to purchase from you had you exercised such option under Section 4(a) and the amount of cash and/or the Merger Security Value received for the same number of Shares in such merger, consolidation, reorganization or purchase of assets. Such cash payment shall be made to you on a business day selected by you upon no less than ten-calendar days’ notice to the Company or its Successor (as hereinafter defined). For purposes of this Section 4(b), “Merger Security Value” shall mean the closing price, if traded on a stock exchange, or the average bid and asked prices if traded in the over-the-counter market, of the Merger Security on the first day on which the Merger Security could have been sold by you on such exchange or in the over-the-counter market, as the case may be, in a regular broker’s transaction, multiplied by the number of Merger Securities (or fraction thereof) for which each Share was exchangeable or into which each Share was convertible. If no public market develops for the Merger Security within 30 days from the date of its issue, however, “Merger Security Value” shall mean the fair market value of such Merger Security (on a per unit basis in the written opinion of a nationally recognized investment banking firm acceptable to you) on the effective date of the merger, consolidation, reorganization or purchase of assets, as the case may be, multiplied by the number of Merger Securities (or fraction thereof) for which each Share was exchangeable or into which each Share was convertible.

1

5.Excise Tax.

(a)Any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, if any payment in the nature of compensation to be paid or provided to you under this Agreement or otherwise is considered to be a “parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G(b) of the Code, the Company shall pay to you an additional amount (hereinafter referred to as the “Excise Tax Premium”). The Excise Tax Premium shall be equal to the excise tax determined under Code Section 4999 attributable to the total amount of payments received by you. The Excise Tax Premium shall also include any amount attributable to excise tax on the Excise Tax Premium. The Company shall also pay to you an additional amount (the “Additional Amount”) such that the net amount received by you, after paying any applicable Excise Tax Premium and any federal or state income, excise or other tax on such additional amount, shall be equal to the amount that you would have received if such Excise Tax Premium were not applicable. You shall be deemed to pay income taxes at all relevant times at the highest marginal rate of income taxation in effect in your taxing jurisdiction. The Additional Amount shall include any amount attributable to income, excise or other tax on the Additional Amount.

(b)Not later than 30 days following any payment in the nature of compensation described herein, the independent public accountants acting as auditors for the Company on the date of the transaction constituting the change of control within the meaning of Code Section 280G (or another accounting firm designated by you) shall determine whether the sum of the present value of any “parachute payments” payable under this Agreement or otherwise and the present value of any other “parachute payments” received by you upon or after any such change of control is in excess of the amount you can receive without causing you to be subject to an excise tax with respect to such amount on account of Code Section 4999, and shall determine the amount of any Excise Tax Premium and Additional Amount payable to you. The Excise Tax Premium and Additional Amount shall be paid to you as soon as practicable but in no event later than the time when the tax payment is due, including by way of withholding, and shall be net of any amounts required to be withheld for taxes.

(c)For purposes of this Section, “present value” means the value determined in accordance with the principles of Section 1274 (b) (2) of the Code under the rules provided in Treasury Regulations under Section 280G of the Code.

(d)To the extent Code Section 280G is amended prior to the termination of this Agreement, or is replaced by a successor statute, the provisions of this Section 5 shall be deemed modified without further action of the parties in a manner consistent with such amendments or successor statutes, as the case may be. In the event that Code Section 280G or any successor statute is repealed, this Section 5 shall cease to be effective on the effective date of such repeal. The parties recognize that Treasury Regulations under Code Sections 280G and 4999 may affect the amount that may be paid hereunder and agree that, upon the issuance of any such regulations, this Agreement may be modified as in good faith may be deemed necessary in light of the provisions of such regulations to achieve the purposes hereof, and that consent to such modifications shall not be unreasonably withheld.

2

6.Dispute Resolution.

(a)This Agreement shall be governed in all respects, including as to validity, interpretation and effect, by the internal laws of the State of Texas without regard to choice of law principles.

(b)It is irrevocably agreed that if any dispute arises between us under this Agreement: (i) exclusive jurisdiction shall be in the lowest Texas state court of general jurisdiction sitting in Harris County, Texas, (ii) we are each at the time present in Texas for the purpose of conferring personal jurisdiction; (iii) any such action may be brought in such court, and any objection that the Company or you may now or hereafter have to the venue of such action or proceeding in any such court or that such action or proceeding was brought in an inconvenient court is waived, and we each agree not to plead or claim the same, (iv) service of process in any such proceeding or action may be effected by mailing a copy thereof by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested (or any substantially similar form of mail), postage prepaid, to such party at the address provided in Section 11 hereof, and (v) prior to any trial on the merits, we will submit to court supervised, non-binding mediation.

(c)Notwithstanding any contrary provision of Texas law, the Company shall have the burden of proof with respect to any of the following: (i) that Cause existed at the time any notice was given to you under Section 2 (ii) that Good Reason did not exist at the time notice was given to the Company under Section 2; and (iii) that a Change of Control has not occurred.

7.Successors; Binding Agreement.

(a)In the event any Successor (as defined below) does not assume this Agreement by operation of law the Company will seek to have any Successor, by agreement in form and substance satisfactory to you, expressly assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform it. If there has been a Change of Control prior to, or a Change of Control will result from, any such succession, then failure of the Company to obtain at your request such agreement prior to or upon the effectiveness of any such succession (unless assumption occurs as a matter of law) shall constitute Good Reason for termination by you of your employment and, upon delivery of a notice of termination by you to the Company, you shall be entitled to the benefits provided for herein. “Successor” shall mean any Person that succeeds to, or has the ability to control, the Company’s business as a whole, directly by merger, consolidation, spin-off or similar transaction, or indirectly by purchase of the Company’s Voting Securities or acquisition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company.

(b)This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by your personal and legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devisees and legatees.

8.Fees and Expenses. The Company shall pay all legal fees and expenses incurred by you as a result of your seeking to interpret, obtain, assert or enforce any right or benefit conferred upon you by this Agreement to the extent you are the prevailing party.

9.Notices. Any and all notices required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given when delivered in person to the persons specified below or deposited in the United States mail, certified or registered mail, postage prepaid and addressed as follows:

If to the Company:Cameron International Corporation

1333 West Loop South, Suite 1700

Houston, Texas 77027

Attention: Chief Executive Officer

If to you:Joseph H. Mongrain

8522 Burkhart Rd.

Houston, TX  77055

Either party may change, by the giving of notice in accordance with this Section 10, the address to which notices are thereafter to be sent.

10.Validity. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.

11.Survival. All obligations undertaken and benefits conferred pursuant to this Agreement, shall survive any termination of your employment and continue until performed in full.

12.Miscellaneous. No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived or discharged unless such modification, waiver or discharge is agreed to in writing signed by you and the Company. No waiver by either party hereto at any time of any breach by the other party hereto of, or of compliance with, any condition or provision of this Agreement to be performed by such other party shall be deemed a waiver of similar or dissimilar provisions or conditions at the same or at any prior or subsequent time. No agreements or representations, oral or otherwise, express or implied, with respect to the subject matter hereof have been made by either party which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement. The internal laws of the State of Texas shall govern the validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement.

13.Duplicate Originals. This Agreement has been executed in duplicate originals, with one to be held by each of the parties hereto.

If this letter correctly sets forth our understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof, please sign and return one copy of this letter to the Company.

Sincerely,
CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
BY: /s/ Sheldon R. Erikson
	Sheldon R. Erikson
	Chairman, President and
	Chief Executive Officer

Agreed to as of the 10^th day of August, 2006

/s/ Joseph H. Mongrain

Joseph H. Mongrain

¹ Reference is made to Annex I hereto for definitions of certain terms used in this Agreement, and such definitions are incorporated herein by such reference with the same effect as if set forth herein. Certain capitalized terms used in this Agreement in connection with the description of various Plans are defined in the respective Plans, but if any conflicts with a definition herein contained, the latter shall prevail.

3

EX-13.1

Exhibit 13.1

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and

Financial Condition of Cameron International Corporation

The following discussion of Cameron International Corporation’s (the Company or Cameron) historical results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report. All per share amounts included in this discussion are based on diluted shares outstanding.

Overview

At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company held on May 5, 2006, stockholders voted to change the corporation’s name to Cameron International Corporation. Upon the change in the corporate name, the Company also rebranded its three existing business segments into Drilling & Production Systems (DPS), formerly the Cameron segment; Valves & Measurement (V&M), formerly the Cooper Cameron Valves segment; and Compression Systems (CS), formerly the Cooper Compression segment.

Based upon the amount of equipment installed worldwide and available industry data, DPS is one of the world’s leading providers of systems and equipment used to control pressures, direct flows of oil and gas wells and separate oil and gas from impurities. DPS’s products are employed in a wide variety of operating environments including basic onshore fields, highly complex onshore and offshore environments, deepwater subsea applications and ultra-high temperature geothermal operations. DPS’s products include surface and subsea drilling and production systems, control systems, blowout preventers (BOPs), oil and gas separation equipment, gate valves, actuators, chokes, wellheads, drilling riser and aftermarket parts and services. DPS’s customers include oil and gas majors, independent producers, engineering and construction companies, drilling contractors, rental companies and geothermal energy producers. Based upon the amount of equipment installed worldwide and available industry data, V&M is a leading provider of valves and measurement systems primarily used to control, direct and measure the flow of oil and gas as they are moved from individual wellheads through flow lines, gathering lines and transmission systems to refineries, petrochemical plants and industrial centers for processing. V&M’s products include gate valves, ball valves, butterfly valves, Orbit^® valves, block and bleed valves, plug valves, globe valves, check valves, actuators, chokes and aftermarket parts and services. Measurement products include totalizers, turbine meters, flow computers, chart recorders, ultrasonic flow meters and sampling solutions. V&M’s customers include oil and gas majors, independent producers, engineering and construction companies, pipeline operators, drilling contractors and major chemical, petrochemical and refining companies. CS provides reciprocating and centrifugal compression equipment and related aftermarket parts and services. The Company’s compression equipment is used by gas transmission companies, compression leasing companies, oil and gas producers, independent power producers and in a variety of other industries around the world, including air separation, petrochemical and chemical.

Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were generated from shipments to the following regions of the world (dollars in millions):

Region	2006		2005		2004
North America	$	1,673.5	$	1,145.9	$	859.1
South America		301.2		141.8		89.7
Asia, including Middle East		693.3		486.8		390.4
Africa		471.8		348.2		438.0
Europe		525.7		359.4		292.8
Other		77.4		35.7		22.8
	$	3,742.9	$	2,517.8	$	2,092.8

In addition to the historical data contained herein, this Annual Report, including the information set forth in the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis and elsewhere in this report, may include forward-looking statements regarding future market strength, order levels, revenues and earnings of the Company, cash generated from operations, capital expenditures and the use of existing cash balances and future anticipated cash flows made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from those described in any forward-looking statements. Any such statements are based on current expectations of the Company’s performance and are subject to a variety of factors, some of which are not under the control of the Company, which can affect the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. Such factors may include overall demand for, and pricing of, the Company’s products; the size and timing of orders; the Company’s ability to successfully execute large subsea and drilling projects it has been awarded; the Company’s ability to convert backlog into revenues on a timely and profitable basis; the impact of acquisitions the Company has made or may make; changes in the price of (and demand for) oil and gas in both domestic and international markets; raw material costs and availability; political and social issues affecting the countries in which the Company does business; fluctuations in currency markets worldwide; and variations in global economic activity. In particular, current and projected oil and gas prices historically have generally directly affected customers’ spending levels and their related purchases of the Company’s products and services. Additionally, changes in oil and gas price expectations may impact the Company’s financial results due to changes in cost structure, staffing and spending levels. See additional factors discussed in “Factors That May Affect Financial Condition and Future Results” contained herein.

Because the information herein is based solely on data currently available, it is subject to change as a result of, among other things, changes in conditions over which the Company has no control or influence, and should not therefore be viewed as assurance regarding the Company’s future performance. Additionally, the Company is not obligated to make public indication of such changes unless required under applicable disclosure rules and regulations.

25

The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to warranty obligations, bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, assets held for sale, exposure to liquidated damages, income taxes, pensions and other postretirement benefits, other employee benefit plans, and contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. These policies and the other sections of the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition have been reviewed with the Company’s Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Revenue Recognition— The Company generally recognizes revenue once the following four criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery of the equipment has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the price of the equipment or service is fixed and determinable and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. For certain engineering, procurement and construction-type contracts, which typically include the Company’s subsea and drilling systems and processing equipment contracts, revenue is recognized in accordance with Statement of Position 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts (SOP 81-1). Under SOP 81-1, the Company recognizes revenue on these contracts using a units-of-completion method. Under the units-of-completion method, revenue is recognized once the manufacturing process is complete for each piece of equipment specified in the contract with the customer, including customer inspection and acceptance, if required by the contract. Approximately 17% and 13% of the Company’s revenues for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, was recognized under SOP 81-1.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts— The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that may result from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Such allowances are based upon several factors including, but not limited to, historical experience, the length of time an invoice has been outstanding, responses from customers relating to demands for payment and the current and projected financial condition of specific customers. Were the financial condition of a customer to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of its ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

Inventories— The Company’s aggregate inventories are carried at cost or, if lower, net realizable value. Inventories located in the United States and Canada are carried on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Inventories located outside of the United States and Canada are carried on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The Company provides a reserve for estimated obsolescence or excess quantities on hand equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value. The future estimated realizable value of inventory is generally based on the historical realized value of inventory that has not had recent customer demand. The Company ages its inventory with no recent demand and applies various valuation factors based on the number of years since the last demand from customers for such material. During 2005, the Company revised its estimates of realizable value on certain of its excess inventory. The impact of this revision was to increase the required reserve as of December 31, 2005 by $9.9 million. If future conditions cause a reduction in the Company’s current estimate of realizable value, due to a decrease in customer demand, a drop in commodity prices or other market-related factors that could influence demand for particular products, additional provisions may be required.

Goodwill— The Company reviews the carrying value of goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), which requires that the Company estimate the fair value of each of its reporting units annually and compare such amounts to their respective book values to determine if an impairment of goodwill is required. For the 2006, 2005 and 2004 evaluations, the fair value was determined using discounted cash flows and other market-related valuation models. Certain estimates and judgments, including future earnings and cash flow levels, future interest rates and future stock market valuation levels, are required in the application of the fair value models. Based upon each of the Company’s annual evaluations, no impairment of goodwill was required. However, should the Company’s estimate of the fair value of any of its reporting units decline dramatically in future periods, due to changes in customer demand, market activity levels, interest rates or other factors which would impact future earnings and cash flow levels, an impairment of goodwill could be required.

Product Warranty — The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time of sale based upon historical experience, or, in some cases, when specific warranty problems are encountered. Should actual product failure rates or repair costs differ from the Company’s current estimates, or should the Company reach a settlement for an existing warranty claim in an amount that is different from what has been previously estimated, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required. See Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details surrounding the Company’s warranty accruals.

Contingencies— The Company accrues for costs relating to litigation, including litigation defense costs, claims and other contingent matters, including tax contingencies and liquidated damage liabilities, when such liabilities become probable and reasonably estimable. Such estimates may be based on advice from third parties, amounts specified by contract, amounts designated by legal statute or tax administrative rulings, or on management’s judgment, as appropriate. Revisions to contingent liability reserves are reflected in income in the period in which different facts or information become known or circumstances change that affect our previous assumptions with respect to the likelihood or amount of loss. Amounts paid upon the ultimate resolution of contingent liabilities may be materially different from previous estimates and could require adjustments to the estimated reserves to be recognized in the period such new information becomes known.

26

Deferred Tax Assets— The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized, considering future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had a net operating loss carryforward for U.S. tax purposes of approximately $60.0 million, which does not begin to expire until 2022. Currently, the Company believes it is more likely than not that it will generate sufficient future taxable income to fully utilize this net operating loss carryforward. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded a valuation allowance against this net operating loss carryforward. In the event the oil and gas exploration activity in the United States deteriorates over an extended period of time, the Company may determine that it would not be able to fully realize this deferred tax asset in the future. Should this occur, a valuation allowance against this deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

The Company also considers all unremitted earnings of its foreign subsidiaries, except certain amounts primarily earned before 2003 and amounts previously subjected to tax in the U.S., to be permanently reinvested. Should the Company change its determination of earnings that it anticipates are to be remitted, it may be required to change the amount of deferred income taxes that are currently recorded

Pension and Postretirement Benefits Accounting— In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (SFAS 158). SFAS 158 requires plan sponsors of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans (collectively, postretirement benefit plans) to recognize the funded status of their postretirement benefit plans in their consolidated balance sheets, measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet, and provide additional disclosures. On December 31, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158. The effect of adopting SFAS 158 on the Company’s financial condition at December 31, 2006, has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. SFAS 158 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition at December 31, 2005 or 2004. The Company currently uses a measurement date of December 31 for its defined benefit pension plans. The Company expects to adopt the measurement date provisions of SFAS 158 for its postretirement benefit plans when required in 2008. SFAS 158 did not change the basic approach to measuring plan assets, benefit obligations and annual net periodic benefit costs. These issues are expected to be addressed by the FASB at a later date. Accordingly, the Company continues to follow the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions (SFAS 87) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (SFAS 106) in measuring its plan assets and benefit obligations as of December 31, 2006 and in determining the amount of its net periodic benefit costs for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The assumptions used in calculating the pension amounts recognized in the Company’s financial statements include discount rates, interest costs, expected return on plan assets, retirement and mortality rates, inflation rates, salary growth and other factors. The Company bases the discount rate assumptions on the average yield of a hypothetical high quality bond portfolio (rated AA- or better) with maturities that approximately match the estimated cash flow needs of the plans. The Company’s inflation assumption is based on an evaluation of external market indicators. The expected rate of return on plan assets is based on historical experience and estimated future investment returns taking into consideration anticipated asset allocations, investment strategy and the views of various investment professionals. Retirement and mortality rates are based primarily on actual plan experience. In accordance with SFAS 158, actual results that differ from these assumptions are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While the Company believes the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect the Company’s pension obligations and future expense.

A significant reason for the increase in pension expense since 2002 is the difference between the actual and assumed rates of return on plan assets in prior years. During 2001 and 2002, the Company’s pension assets earned substantially less than the assumed rates of return in those years. In accordance with SFAS 87, the difference between the actual and assumed rate of return is being amortized over the estimated average period to retirement of the individuals in the plans. In 2004 and 2005, the Company lowered the assumed rate of return for the assets in these plans. The plans earned more than the assumed rates of return in 2006 and 2005 and slightly less than the assumed rate of return in 2004.

The following table illustrates the sensitivity to a change in certain assumptions used in (i) the calculation of pension expense for the year ending December 31, 2007, and (ii) the calculation of the projected benefit obligation (PBO) at December 31, 2006 for the Company’s pension plans:

(dollars in millions)	Increase (decrease) in 2007 Pre-tax Pension Expense			Increase (decrease) in PBO at December 31, 2006
Change in Assumption:
25 basis point decrease in discount rate	$	1.5		$	16.8
25 basis point increase in discount rate	$	(1.2	)	$	(15.6	)
25 basis point decrease in expected return on assets	$	1.2			—
25 basis point increase in expected return on assets	$	(1.1	)		—

27

Financial Summary

The following table sets forth the consolidated percentage relationship to revenues of certain income statement items for the periods presented:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)		69.5			71.3			74.5
Selling and administrative expenses		14.1			15.2			14.3
Depreciation and amortization		2.7			3.1			3.9
Non-cash write-down of technology investment		—			—			0.2
Interest income		(0.7	)		(0.5	)		(0.2	)
Interest expense		0.5			0.5			0.9
Acquisition integration costs		0.8			—			—
Total costs and expenses		86.9			89.6			93.6
Income before income taxes		13.1			10.4			6.4
Income tax provision		(4.6	)		(3.6	)		(1.9	)
Net income		8.5	%		6.8	%		4.5	%

Results of Operations

Consolidated Results — 2006 Compared to 2005

The Company’s net income for 2006 totaled $317.8 million, or $2.72 per diluted share, compared to $171.1 million or $1.52 per diluted share in 2005. The results for 2006 included pre-tax charges of $29.6 million, or $0.16 per share, for acquisition integration activities associated with the operations of the Flow Control segment of Dresser, Inc. that were acquired in late 2005 and early 2006 (the Dresser Acquired Businesses). Additionally, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $17.5 million, or $0.10 per share, in 2006 for the anticipated cost of the settlement of a class action lawsuit related to contaminated underground water near a former manufacturing facility in Houston, Texas. These charges were partially offset by a pre-tax gain in the second quarter of 2006 of $10.0 million, or $0.06 per share, primarily relating to short-term intercompany loans made to the Company’s European subsidiaries in connection with the acquisition of the Dresser Acquired Businesses.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)) using the modified-prospective-transition method. Under SFAS 123(R), stock based compensation expense recognized during 2006 totaled $25.6 million, of which $10.0 million related to outstanding restricted and deferred stock unit grants and $15.6 million related to unvested outstanding stock option grants. There was no material cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 123(R). Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based payments under APB Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. During 2005, a total of $2.8 million in stock-based compensation expense was recognized related to the amortization of the fair value of restricted stock unit grants. Options granted under the Company’s equity compensation plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and all terms were fixed; accordingly, no expense was recognized under APB Opinion 25. During 2005, the Company began issuing restricted stock unit grants with no exercise price to key employees in place of stock options and, as more fully described in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, also made restricted stock unit grants to officers and key employees during 2006, some of which contained performance-based conditions. At December 31, 2006, approximately $19.0 million and $12.2 million of compensation costs remain to be recognized over the next 2.02 and 1.61 years relating to the grant date fair value of unvested stock option grants and unvested restricted stock unit grants, respectively.

Revenues

Revenues for 2006 totaled $3.743 billion, an increase of 48.7% from $2.518 billion in 2005. Revenues increased in each of the Company’s segments and across all product lines. The increase was driven primarily by high oil and gas prices, which have led to increased drilling and production activities and demand for new equipment. Entities acquired since the beginning of 2005 accounted for approximately $518.8 million, or 42.4% of the growth in revenues. Excluding the effect of newly acquired entities, the growth in the legacy businesses of DPS accounted for approximately 83.5% of the remaining increase in consolidated revenues. A discussion of revenue by segment may be found below.

Cost and Expenses

Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) for 2006 totaled $2.601 billion, an increase of $804.8 million, or 44.8%, from $1.796 billion in 2005. As a percent of revenues, cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) declined from 71.3% in 2005 to 69.5% in 2006. This decline is due primarily to (i) favorable pricing and a mix shift in 2006 to higher-margin distributed product sales by the V&M segment’s legacy operations, which had a combined effect of lowering the cost of sales-to-revenue ratio by approximately 0.8 percentage points, (ii) lower inventory obsolescence provisions in 2006 as 2005 included a $9.9 million charge related to a change in the

28

estimated recovery value of certain slow-moving inventory at DPS (a 0.6 percentage-point decrease), (iii) lower product warranty costs, driven largely by the favorable settlement of a warranty issue on a subsea project in DPS, which reduced warranty expense in 2006 compared to 2005 by $9.7 million (a 0.5 percentage-point decrease) and (iv) the application of manufacturing overhead to a larger revenue base, which reduced this ratio by approximately 1.0 percentage-points. These decreases were partially offset by the impact of entities acquired since the beginning of 2005, which caused a 1.0 percentage-point increase as these businesses incur a higher cost of sales to revenue ratio than the Company’s legacy operations.

Selling and administrative expenses for 2006 were $528.6 million, an increase of $147.3 million, or 38.6%, from $381.3 million in 2005. Acquisitions of new entities since the beginning of 2005 accounted for $61.2 million of the increase. Other factors contributing to the increase were (i) additional stock compensation expense of $22.8 million recognized in accordance with SFAS 123(R), which was adopted January 1, 2006, and (ii) a provision of $17.5 million for the expected costs of a class action lawsuit related to environmental contamination near a former manufacturing facility. The remaining portion of the increase was largely attributable to higher activity in the Company’s selling and marketing operations in order to support the growth in the business and higher employee-related costs due to higher headcount levels and increased employee incentives in connection with improvements in the Company’s financial performance during the year.

Depreciation and amortization for 2006 totaled $101.4 million, an increase of $23.0 million compared to 2005. Newly acquired entities accounted for approximately $11.0 million of the change with the remaining increase largely due to an impairment charge of $3.0 million related to certain long-lived assets in the DPS segment and higher levels of capital spending since the beginning of 2005.

Interest income for 2006 was $26.9 million as compared to $13.1 million in 2005. The increase of $13.8 million is primarily attributable to higher invested cash balances due primarily to the issuance of $500 million of convertible debt in May 2006 and positive operating cash flows as well as higher short term interest rates the Company has received on its invested cash balances.

Interest expense for 2006 totaled $20.7 million as compared to $12.0 million in 2005. Approximately $7.6 million of the increase is attributable to the issuance of $500 million of convertible debt in May 2006.

During 2006, acquisition integration costs totaling $29.6 million were incurred in connection with the integration of the Dresser Acquired Businesses primarily into the operations of the V&M segment. Approximately $10.5 million of the costs relate to non-cash asset impairment charges and $4.2 million relates to employee severance at a legacy facility being closed as a result of the acquisition. The remaining costs are for employee stay bonuses, employee relocation, plant rearrangement, plant and facility consolidation and other integration costs (see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

The income tax provision was $170.8 million in 2006 as compared to $91.9 million in 2005. The effective tax rate for both 2006 and 2005 was 34.9%.

Segment Results — 2006 Compared to 2005

Information relating to results by segment may be found in Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

DPS Segment

	Year Ended December 31,				Increase
(dollars in millions)	2006		2005		$		%
Revenues	$	2,113.1	$	1,507.8	$	605.3		40.1	%
Income before income taxes	$	364.7	$	178.9	$	185.8		103.8	%

DPS segment revenues for 2006 totaled $2.113 billion, an increase of $605.3 million, or 40.1%, from 2005’s revenues of $1.508 billion. Sales of drilling products increased approximately 60%, surface sales were up approximately 33%, subsea equipment sales increased approximately 43% and sales of oil, gas and water separation applications were up nearly 19%. The increase in drilling sales reflects the higher level of new major rig construction projects, as well as increased shipments of BOPs for land and jack-up rigs and higher sales levels for aftermarket parts and services. The increase in surface sales is a reflection of the current strong market conditions resulting from high commodity prices and high rig count levels. Subsea equipment sales were up in 2006 mainly due to shipments for large projects offshore West Africa. Revenues associated with an oil separation application to be used on a floating offshore storage platform offshore Brazil accounted for the majority of the increase in the oil, gas and water separation application product line.

Income before income taxes for 2006 totaled $364.7 million, an increase of $185.8 million, from 2005’s amount of $178.9 million. Cost of sales as a percent of revenues decreased from 72.7% in 2005 to 70.0% in 2006. The reduction was due primarily to (i) lower warranty costs, driven largely by the favorable settlement of a warranty issue on a subsea project, which reduced warranty expense in 2006 compared to 2005 by $9.7 million (a 0.8 percentage-point decrease), (ii) lower inventory obsolescence provisions in 2006 as 2005 included a $9.9 million charge related to a change in the estimated recovery value of certain slow-moving inventory (a 0.8 percentage-point decrease) and (iii) the application of manufacturing overhead to a larger revenue base (a 1.2 percentage-point decrease).

Selling and administrative expenses for 2006 totaled $216.0 million, an increase of $27.2 million, or 14.4%, from $188.8 million in 2005. Newly acquired entities, as well as increased headcount and activity levels in the selling and marketing operations of DPS in order to support the expansion of the business accounted for the majority of the increase in costs.

Depreciation and amortization expense for 2006 totaled $52.8 million as compared to $43.7 million in 2005, an increase of $9.1 million or 20.8%. The increase is primarily attributable to an impairment charge of $3.0 million related to certain long-lived assets and higher levels of capital spending since the beginning of 2005.

Acquisition integration costs totaling $0.3 million associated with a product line addition from the Dresser Acquired Businesses were incurred by DPS in 2006.

29

V&M Segment
	Year Ended December 31,				Increase
(dollars in millions)	2006		2005		$		%
Revenues	$	1,177.9	$	625.1	$	552.8		88.4	%
Income before income taxes	$	167.5	$	101.5	$	66.0		65.0	%

Revenues of the V&M segment for 2006 totaled $1.178 billion, an increase of 88.4% from $625.1 million in 2005. Acquisitions since the beginning of 2005 accounted for $503.5 million, or 91.1% of the increase. Engineered product line sales increased 173% in 2006 as compared to 2005. Absent the effect of the Dresser Acquired Businesses in late 2005 and early 2006, engineered sales decreased by approximately 11% in 2006. This decline related primarily to the discontinuance of a product line during 2006. Sales of distributed products were up over 39% in 2006. Approximately 34% of the increase was due to newly acquired entities with the remainder caused mainly by strong demand in the segment’s legacy businesses in the United States resulting from high commodity prices and rig count levels. Sales of equipment for the process markets increased more than 51%. Approximately 80% of the increase was the result of newly acquired entities with the remainder attributable mainly to new LNG projects internationally, as well as refinery upgrades and new storage capacity projects.

Income before income taxes for 2006 totaled $167.5 million, an increase of 65.0% from $101.5 million in 2005. Cost of sales as a percent of revenues increased from 67.3% in 2005 to 68.0% in 2006. The increase was due primarily to the impact of entities acquired since the beginning of 2005, which caused a 6.5 percentage-point increase as these businesses incur a higher cost of sales-to-revenue ratio than V&M’s legacy businesses. This increase was partially offset by (i) favorable pricing and a mix shift in 2006 to higher-margin distributed product sales by the segment’s legacy operations, which had a combined effect of lowering the cost of sales-to-revenue ratio by 3.7 percentage points and (ii) the application of manufacturing overhead by those operations to a larger revenue base, which positively impacted this ratio by approximately 2.1 percentage points.

Selling and administrative expenses for the V&M segment increased $65.5 million, or 76.2%, to $151.5 million in 2006 as compared to $86.0 million in 2005. Approximately $57.0 million of the increase is attributable to entities acquired since the beginning of 2005, with the remaining increase largely attributable to higher headcount levels in the legacy businesses and higher employee incentive costs due to strong business activity levels.

Depreciation and amortization for V&M increased by $13.9 million in 2006, to $30.7 million from $16.8 million in 2005. The increase is primarily attributable to newly acquired entities.

V&M incurred $26.8 million of acquisition integration costs in 2006 as a result of integrating the Dresser Acquired Businesses into the segment’s operations. These costs are described in “Consolidated Results - 2006 compared to 2005” above.

CS Segment

	Year Ended December 31,				Increase
(dollars in millions)	2006		2005		$		%
Revenues	$	452.0	$	384.9	$	67.1		17.4	%
Income before income taxes	$	45.7	$	26.7	$	19.0		71.2	%

Revenues in the CS segment totaled $452.0 million in 2006, an increase of 17.4%, compared to $384.9 million in 2005. Sales of gas compression equipment increased approximately 16%, nearly three-quarters of which was driven by higher shipments of new units due to higher beginning-of-the-year backlog levels, a large shipment of Superior compressors to a customer in the Far East and stronger demand for Ajax units from domestic lease fleet operators. Sales in the air compression market were up approximately 18%, due mainly to increased demand for new engineered machines.

Income before income taxes totaled $45.7 million in 2006, an increase of 71.2%, from $26.7 million in 2005. Over 90% of the increase is related to higher sales volumes. Cost of sales as a percent of revenues increased from 72.5% in 2005 to 72.7% in 2006. Rising material costs in excess of price increases and higher subcontract costs, partially offset by higher utilization and lower spending levels on certain variable costs, added 0.9 percentage points to the ratio of cost of sales to revenues. A decrease in income of over $1.9 million from 2005 to 2006 relating to the liquidation of LIFO inventory layers also added 0.6 percentage points to the increase. These increases were mostly offset by lower inventory obsolescence and product liability provisions, which accounted for a decrease of 1.2 percentage points in the 2006 ratio of cost of sales-to-revenues as compared to 2005.

Selling and administrative costs declined $1.5 million, or 2.4%, to $62.1 million in 2006 as compared to $63.6 million in 2005. The decline is due mainly to lower management incentive costs, partially offset by higher headcount levels.

Depreciation and amortization expense for the CS segment declined by $2.4 million, or 15.8%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. The decline was mainly due to assets which became fully depreciated or were disposed of during the year and the absence of a 2005 charge to write down the value of certain excess equipment relating to a plant consolidation within the segment.

Acquisition integration costs of $2.5 million were incurred by CS during 2006. The costs relate to the relocation of certain CS facilities into one of the locations acquired in connection with the acquisition of the Dresser Acquired Businesses.

30

Corporate Segment

The Corporate segment’s loss before income taxes for 2006 totaled $89.3 million compared to $44.1 million for 2005, an increase of $45.2 million. Included in the loss for 2006 was a foreign currency gain of $10.0 million recognized in the second quarter of 2006 relating primarily to short-term intercompany loans made to the Company’s European subsidiaries in connection with the acquisition of the Dresser Acquired Businesses in late 2005. More than offsetting this gain were additional selling and administrative costs of $56.1 million consisting primarily of (i) $22.8 million of additional expense relating to employee stock compensation programs, recognized in accordance with SFAS 123(R), which was adopted January 1, 2006, (ii) a provision of $17.5 million for the estimated cost of the settlement of a class action lawsuit related to environmental contamination near a former manufacturing facility and (iii) approximately $11.8 million of additional salaries, bonuses and other payments to employees related to higher headcount and improvements in the Company’s financial results for 2006 as compared to 2005. The remaining increase primarily relates to higher employee travel, rental expenses, third party service provider and other promotional and marketing costs.

Depreciation and amortization in the Corporate segment increased by $2.4 million to $4.9 million in 2006 compared to $2.5 million in 2005. The increase is due to higher levels of capital spending and lower amounts allocated to other segments for amortization of the Company’s enterprise-wide software systems.

The increases in interest income and interest expense during 2006 as compared to 2005 are discussed in “Consolidated Results - 2006 Compared to 2005” above.

Consolidated Results — 2005 Compared to 2004

The Company had net income of $171.1 million, or $1.52 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $94.4 million, or $0.88 per share for the year ended December 31, 2004, an increase in earnings per share of 72.7%. The results for 2004 include pre-tax charges of (i) $3.8 million related to the non-cash write-down of a technology investment, (ii) $6.8 million related to the non-cash write-off of debt issuance costs associated with retired debt and (iii) $6.1 million of severance costs, primarily related to a workforce reduction program at DPS.

Revenues

Revenues for 2005 totaled $2.518 billion, an increase of 20.3% from 2004 revenues of $2.093 billion. Revenues increased in each of the Company’s segments and across all product lines, except subsea, due to increased drilling and production activity in the Company’s markets primarily resulting from high oil and gas prices. Entities acquired during 2004 and 2005 accounted for approximately $262.9 million, or 61.9%, of the growth in revenues in 2005. A discussion of revenue by segment may be found below.

Cost and Expenses

Costs of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) for 2005 totaled $1.796 billion, an increase of 15.1% from 2004’s $1.560 billion. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) for 2005 decreased to 71.3% from 74.6% in 2004. The decrease in cost of sales as a percentage of revenue is due to (i) improved pricing in the DPS and V&M businesses, (ii) a shift towards higher-margin products (primarily surface and drilling equipment) and (iii) the application of relatively fixed overhead to a larger revenue base in DPS and V&M. The declines were partially offset by (i) rising material costs in the CS segment that the Company was not able to pass through to its customers, (ii) $11.2 million of higher warranty expense and provisions for excess inventory, primarily in DPS, and (iii) a decrease of approximately $5.7 million in non-cash LIFO income recognized during 2005 in the CS segment.

Selling and administrative expenses for 2005 were $381.3 million, an increase of $81.2 million, or 27.0%, from $300.1 million for 2004. Businesses acquired during 2004 and 2005 contributed $32.7 million, or 40.3%, of the increase. The remaining increase in selling and administrative expense for 2005 was primarily due to (i) higher headcount resulting from increased activity levels within the segments, (ii) $2.8 million related to non-cash stock compensation expense, (iii) an increase in bonus and sales incentive accruals based on the Company’s improved financial performance for the year and (iv) a $7.2 million increase in legal and environmental costs. These increases were partially offset by a $6.1 million reduction in severance costs, primarily associated with a workforce reduction program at DPS, which were recorded in 2004.

Depreciation and amortization expense for 2005 was $78.4 million, a decrease of $4.4 million from $82.8 million for 2004. The decrease in depreciation and amortization was primarily attributable to assets becoming fully depreciated, partially offset by approximately $5.7 million of additional depreciation and amortization relating to businesses acquired during 2004 and 2005. The Company’s capital spending for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 has been lower than its annual depreciation and amortization expense for those same periods, which has contributed to the decline in depreciation expense for 2005.

Interest income for 2005 was $13.1 million as compared to $4.9 million in 2004. The increase in interest income was attributable to higher excess cash balances available for investment during 2005 and higher short-term interest rates the Company has received on its invested cash balances.

Interest expense for 2005 totaled $12.0 million compared to $17.8 million in 2004. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to $6.8 million of accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs recorded in 2004 associated with the early retirement of the Company’s zero-coupon convertible debentures due 2021 (the Zero-Coupon Convertible Debentures) and $184.3 million of the Company’s 1.75% convertible debentures due 2021 (the 1.75% Convertible Debentures). Partially offsetting this decline was the full-year impact in 2005 of the $200.0 million of senior notes due 2007 (the Senior Notes), which were issued in March 2004, partially offset by lower-rate convertible debentures outstanding during the first four months of 2004.

The income tax provision was $91.9 million in 2005 as compared to $38.5 million in 2004. The effective tax rate for 2005 was 34.9% compared to 29.0% in 2004. The increase in the effective tax rate primarily reflects a shift in income during 2005 to higher tax rate jurisdictions, primarily the U.S. and Canada.

31

Segment Results — 2005 Compared to 2004

Information relating to results by segment may be found in Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

DPS Segment

	Year Ended December 31,				Increase
(dollars in millions)	2005		2004		$		%
Revenues	$	1,507.8	$	1,402.8	$	105.0		7.5	%
Income before income taxes	$	178.9	$	118.8	$	60.1		50.6	%

DPS’s revenues for 2005 totaled $1.508 billion, an increase of 7.5% from $1.403 billion in 2004. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates caused approximately 9.2% of the 2005 revenue increase. Drilling sales were up 2.4%, surface sales increased 18.8%, subsea sales declined 10.5% and sales in the oil, gas and water separation market increased 56.0%. Surface sales increased due to higher activity levels in each of the Company’s major operating regions. In addition, the full-year effect of the November 2004 acquisition of the PCC Flow Technologies segment of Precision Castparts Corp. (the PCC Acquisition) contributed approximately 23.8% of the increase in surface sales. Sales declined in the subsea market, primarily due to the decline in activity on several large projects offshore West Africa. The increase in the oil, gas and water separation market was also reflective of the strong overall market conditions that existed in 2005. Revenues associated with this product line, which was acquired in February 2004, also benefited from a full 12 months of activity in 2005 compared to 10 months in 2004.

Income before income taxes totaled $178.9 million for 2005, an increase of 50.6% from $118.8 million in 2004. The majority of this increase resulted from the increase in revenue and a decline in cost of sales as a percentage of revenue. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue decreased to 72.7% in 2005 from 76.6% in 2004. This reduction was primarily due to (i) favorable pricing, (ii) a movement in mix towards higher-margin drilling and surface sales from lower-margin subsea systems sales and (iii) the application of relatively fixed overhead to a larger revenue base. Partially offsetting these factors were higher raw material and labor costs, a $2.5 million non-cash write-down of an investment and a $12.8 million increase resulting from a change in the estimated recovery value of certain slow-moving inventory and higher warranty costs on a subsea systems project.

Selling and administrative costs in DPS increased $30.2 million or 19.0% in 2005 as compared to 2004. The majority of the increase was due to higher headcount and related costs necessitated by the higher activity levels, higher incentive accruals resulting from the improved financial performance of the segment and the full-year effect of businesses acquired during 2004. Partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in severance costs, as 2004 included $4.1 million related to a workforce reduction program at DPS.

DPS’s depreciation and amortization expense declined by $7.6 million in 2005 as an increasing number of assets became fully depreciated during the latter part of 2004 and during 2005.

V&M Segment

	Year Ended December 31,				Increase
(dollars in millions)	2005		2004		$		%
Revenues	$	625.1	$	350.1	$	275.0		78.6	%
Income before income taxes	$	101.5	$	37.8	$	63.7		168.4	%

V&M’s revenues for 2005 totaled $625.1 million, an increase of 78.6% from $350.1 million in 2004. The acquisition of NuFlo Technologies, Inc. (the NuFlo Acquisition) and the Dresser Flow Control Acquisition, both occurring in 2005, accounted for approximately $96.7 million, or 35.2% of the increase. Excluding these acquisitions, sales in the distributed product line increased 54.1% during 2005 due to strong market conditions, as evidenced by higher North American rig counts. In addition, the full-year impact of the PCC Acquisition in late 2004 added approximately $37.4 million to 2005 distributed product revenues. Sales in the engineered product line were up 45.9% compared to 2004. A significant portion of the increase, totaling approximately $65.0 million, was attributable to the full-year impact in 2005 of the late 2004 PCC Acquisition.

Income before income taxes for 2005 totaled $101.5 million, an increase of 168.4% from $37.8 million in 2004. The majority of this increase resulted from the increase in revenue and a decline in cost of sales as a percentage of revenue. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue decreased to 67.3% in 2005 from 69.9% in 2004. This reduction was primarily due to (i) favorable pricing, (ii) a shift in mix to higher-margin distributed and NuFlo products and (iii) the application of relatively fixed overhead to a larger revenue base.

Selling and administrative costs in V&M increased $30.5 million, or 54.9% in 2005 compared to 2004. Approximately $23.9 million of the dollar increase was attributable to businesses acquired in 2005 and 2004. The remaining increase relates to higher headcount and related costs necessitated by the higher activity level, and higher incentive accruals resulting from the improved financial performance of the segment.

Depreciation and amortization for 2005 increased $4.6 million compared to 2004, most of which was attributable to businesses acquired during 2005 and 2004.

32

CS Segment

	Year Ended December 31,				Increase
(dollars in millions)	2005		2004		$		%
Revenues	$	384.9	$	340.0	$	44.9		13.2	%
Income before income taxes	$	26.7	$	24.6	$	2.1		8.3	%

CS’s revenues were $384.9 million in 2005, up 13.2% from $340.0 million in 2004. The increase in revenues was attributable to an 18.6% increase in sales of air compression equipment, primarily due to higher worldwide demand for engineered units and aftermarket parts and repair services. Sales of gas compression equipment increased 7.6% compared to 2004 due to strong order demand, particularly in the Ajax product line during the first half of 2005.

Income before income taxes was $26.7 million in 2005, up 8.3% from $24.6 million in 2004. The increase in revenue was partially offset by higher cost of sales as a percentage of revenue, which increased to 72.5% in 2005 from 71.0% in 2004. The increase in cost of sales as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to higher raw material costs, which CS was unable to pass to its customers in the form of price increases, and a $5.7 million reduction in non-cash LIFO income.

Selling and administrative expenses increased by $6.5 million in 2005 as compared to 2004. The increase was primarily due to the higher activity level and the cost to settle a legal matter and higher environmental costs associated with a closed facility.

CS’s depreciation and amortization expense in 2005 declined $1.5 million from 2004, mainly due to assets which became fully depreciated in 2005.

Corporate Segment

The Corporate segment’s loss before income taxes decreased to $44.1 million in 2005 from $48.4 million in 2004. Higher interest income totaling $8.2 million, lower interest expense of $5.8 million and the absence in 2005 of a one-time writedown in 2004 of a technology investment totaling $3.8 million more than offset higher selling and administrative expenses and other costs of $13.5 million. Selling and administrative expenses increased primarily due to (i) higher accruals for bonus programs tied to the Company’s financial performance, (ii) $2.8 million of non-cash stock compensation costs and (iii) higher legal costs related primarily to the defense of certain patents and a case related to a former manufacturing site.

Orders and Backlog

Orders were as follows (in millions):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		Increase
DPS	$	3,256.9	$	2,301.1	$	955.8
V&M		1,296.0		710.8		585.2
CS		521.3		449.8		71.5
	$	5,074.2	$	3,461.7	$	1,612.5

Orders for 2006 were $5.074 billion, an increase of 46.6% from $3.462 billion in 2005.

DPS segment orders for 2006 totaled $3.257 billion, an increase of $955.8 million, or 41.5%, from $2.301 billion in 2005. Drilling orders, which accounted for most of the increase in total segment orders, were up approximately 231% and surface orders increased approximately 26%. These increases were partially offset by a 21% decrease in subsea orders. Orders for oil, gas and water separation applications were relatively flat in 2006. Nearly 84% of the increase in drilling orders was for equipment, which includes BOPs, control systems and riser, relating to new major floating rig construction projects. The remaining increase was attributable to strong demand for BOPs for land and jack-up rigs and aftermarket parts and services. Surface orders showed double-digit increases in all major regions except Canada due to increased demand for the Company’s products driven by higher activity levels, high commodity prices and new LNG projects. The decline in subsea orders primarily reflects the absence in 2006 of a $350.0 million award received in the second quarter of 2005 for a project in the West African market.

The V&M segment had orders of $1.296 billion in 2006, an increase of 82.3% from $710.8 million in 2005. Acquisitions since the beginning of 2005 accounted for $529.0 million or 90.4% of the increase. Engineered product line orders increased approximately 166% in 2006 as compared to 2005. Absent the effect of the Dresser Acquired Businesses in late 2005 and early 2006, engineered product line orders decreased by approximately 19% in 2006. This decline primarily reflects the discontinuance of a product line and the effects of a relocation of production between international locations during 2006. Orders for distributed products increased nearly 32% in 2006 as compared to 2005 with newly acquired entities accounting for approximately 47% of the increase. The remainder of the increase was due primarily to strong order levels in the United States resulting from high commodity prices and rig count levels partially offset by a weakening in demand from Canadian customers. Process equipment orders were up approximately 66% during 2006, with newly acquired entities accounting for nearly 59% of the increase. The remaining increase in orders was primarily attributable to new LNG projects internationally, as well as refinery upgrades and new storage capacity projects.

Orders taken by the CS segment in 2006 totaled $521.3 million, an increase of $71.5 million, or 15.9%, from $449.8 million in 2005. Orders in the gas compression market increased nearly 10%. Over 60% of the increase is attributable to higher demand for aftermarket parts as customers have kept their equipment operating at high utilization levels as a result of strong natural gas prices. The remaining increase is due largely to higher demand for Ajax units by domestic lease fleet operators and certain international customers. Orders in the air compression market increased nearly 24% in 2006 compared to 2005 driven mainly by a 41% increase in worldwide demand for engineered machines to meet customers’ air separation needs.

33

Backlog was as follows (in millions):

	December 31,
	2006		2005		Increase
DPS	$	2,661.3	$	1,503.6	$	1,157.7
V&M		620.8		469.0		151.8
CS		248.9		183.2		65.7
	$	3,531.0	$	2,155.8	$	1,375.2

Recent Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (FIN 48), to create a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Under FIN 48, income taxes will no longer be subject to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, as required. The Company is continuing to finalize certain estimates relating to the adoption of FIN 48 but at present does not expect there to be a material cumulative effect on its beginning retained earnings upon adoption.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the level of disclosures regarding fair value. SFAS 157 also emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement rather than an entity-specific measurement. The Company currently does not expect SFAS 157 to have a material effect on its financial position when adopted as required on January 1, 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s cash balances totaled $1.034 billion at December 31, 2006, an increase of nearly $671.6 million from $362.0 million at December 31, 2005. The main reasons for the increase were (i) positive operating cash flows during 2006 of $546.5 million, (ii) the issuance of $500.0 million of convertible debt in May 2006 and (iii) proceeds from stock option exercises of $76.0 million. These cash inflows were used to purchase more than 6.2 million shares of treasury stock at a cost of $282.2 million, or $45.21 per share, for capital expenditures of $184.8 million and for acquisitions totaling $28.8 million.

During 2006, the Company generated $546.5 million of cash from operating activities compared to $352.1 million in 2005. The primary reason for the increase was due to the higher level of earnings in 2006. Net income in 2006 totaled $317.8 million, compared to $171.1 million in 2005. Additionally, certain adjustments to net income to arrive at net cash provided by operating activities such as depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation expense, asset write-offs, provisions for deferred income taxes and the operating tax benefit of employee benefit plan transactions totaled $197.8 million, an increase of $80.1 million from $117.7 million in 2005. Reduced levels of working capital added $30.9 million to operating cash flow in 2006 compared to $63.3 million in 2005. The reduction in 2006 of cash flow from changes in working capital as compared to 2005 was due primarily to an increase in inventory levels, net of advance payments from customers for equipment orders and other accruals, as a result of the record level of backlog at December 31, 2006 and the 46.6% increase in orders in 2006 from 2005, as well as an increase in required income tax payments during 2006.

The Company utilized $197.0 million of cash for investing activities in 2006 as compared to $400.6 million in 2005. The main reason for the decrease was due to the acquisition of NuFlo Technologies, Inc. and the Dresser Acquired Businesses in 2005 which required the use of $317.4 million in cash, which was partially offset by higher levels of capital expenditures in 2006. During 2006, the Company spent a net amount of $28.8 million on acquisitions. Capital spending during 2006 totaled $184.8 million compared to $77.5 million in 2005. The increase reflects the Company’s intentions to increase capacity, improve efficiency and address market needs by upgrading machine tools and manufacturing processes.

During 2006, the Company’s financing activities generated $297.1 million of cash compared to $192.5 million in 2005. The Company issued $500.0 million of 2.5% twenty-year convertible debentures in May 2006 incurring issuance costs of approximately $8.6 million. The Company used the net proceeds of this debt offering and existing cash on hand to acquire more than 6.2 million shares of treasury stock at a total cost of $282.2 million during the year, including $190.2 million which was used for share repurchases immediately following the debt offering. Proceeds from stock option exercises and excess tax benefits available to the Company from stock option exercises and vesting of restricted stock units contributed an additional $92.6 million to the increase in the Company’s cash balances during 2006. During 2005, the Company received $223.1 million in proceeds from stock option exercises which was partially offset by (i) $14.8 million used to redeem a portion of the Company’s 1.75% debentures and (ii) $9.4 million relating to the purchase of 164,500 shares of treasury stock.

In the short-term, future cash flows will be used to fund capital spending for 2007, currently estimated to be approximately $225 million to $250 million as the Company continues its program to improve its manufacturing efficiency and expand capacity. Additionally, the Company plans to utilize the remaining proceeds from the 2.5% convertible debt offering to repay its Senior Notes, currently totaling $200.0 million face value, upon maturity in April 2007, or earlier.

On a longer-term basis, the Company has outstanding $238.0 million of 1.5% convertible debentures in addition to the $500 million of 2.5% convertible debentures described above. Holders of the 1.5% convertible debentures could require the Company to redeem them beginning in May 2009 whereas holders of the 2.5% convertible debentures could require redemption beginning in June 2011. The Company believes, based on its current financial condition, existing backlog levels and current expectations for future market conditions,

34

that it will be able to meet its short- and longer-term liquidity needs through additional debt issuances or refinancing or with cash generated from operating activities, existing cash balances on hand and amounts available under its $350.0 million five-year multicurrency revolving credit facility, expiring October 12, 2010, subject to certain extension provisions.

The following summarizes the Company’s significant cash contractual obligations and other commercial commitments for the next five years as of December 31, 2006.

(in millions)	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
Debt (a)	$	941.3	$	203.1	$	238.2	$	500.0	$	—
Capital lease obligations (b)		12.2		4.7		6.7		0.8		—
Operating leases		77.1		13.7		20.5		14.8		28.1
Purchase obligations (c)		784.9		753.1		31.1		0.7		—
Contributions to funded defined benefit pension plans (d)		5.5		5.5		—		—		—
Benefit payments expected for unfunded pension and postretirement benefit plans (e)		29.4		3.8		6.5		6.0		13.1
Total contractual cash obligations	$	1,850.4	$	983.9	$	303.0	$	522.3	$	41.2

(a) See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on redemption rights by the Company, and by holders of the Company’s debentures, that would allow for early redemption of the 1.5% Convertible Debentures in 2009 and the 2.5% Convertible Debentures in 2011.

(b) Payments shown include interest.

(c) Represents outstanding purchase orders entered into in the ordinary course of business.

(d) The Company does not estimate its future contributions beyond one year.

(e) Prior to expected Medicare Part D subsidy.

(in millions)	Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period
Other Unrecorded Commercial
Obligations and Off-Balance	Total		Less Than		1 - 3		4 - 5		After 5
Sheet Arrangements	Commitment		1 Year		Years		Years		Years
Committed lines of credit	$	350.0	$	—	$	—	$	350.0	$	—
Standby letters of credit and bank guarantees		447.0		193.8		169.8		75.4		8.0
Financial letters of credit		13.1		4.1		—		—		9.0
Other financial guarantees		1.7		0.3		—		—		1.4
Total commercial commitments	$	811.8	$	198.2	$	169.8	$	425.4	$	18.4

The Company secures certain contractual obligations under various agreements with its customers or other parties through the issuance of letters of credit or bank guarantees. The Company has various agreements with financial institutions to issue such instruments. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had $447.0 million of letters of credit and bank guarantees outstanding in connection with the delivery, installation and performance of the Company's products. Additional letters of credit and guarantees are outstanding at December 31, 2006 in connection with certain financial obligations of the Company. Should these facilities become unavailable to the Company, the Company’s operations and liquidity could be negatively impacted. Circumstances which could result in the withdrawal of such facilities include, but are not limited to, deteriorating financial performance of the Company, deteriorating financial condition of the financial institutions providing such facilities, overall constriction in the credit markets or rating downgrades of the Company.

Factors That May Affect Financial Condition and Future Results

The inability of the Company to deliver its backlog on time could affect the Company’s future sales and profitability and its relationships with its customers.

At December 31, 2006, the Company’s backlog exceeded $3.5 billion, a record level for the Company. The ability to meet customer delivery schedules for this backlog is dependent on a number of factors including, but not limited to, access to the raw materials required for production, an adequately trained and capable workforce, project engineering expertise for certain large projects, sufficient manufacturing plant capacity and appropriate planning and scheduling of manufacturing resources. Many of the contracts the Company enters into with its customers require long manufacturing lead times and contain penalty or incentive clauses relating to on-time delivery. A failure by the Company to deliver in accordance with customer expectations could subject the Company to financial penalties or loss of financial incentives and may result in damage to existing customer relationships. Additionally, the Company bases its earnings guidance to the financial markets on expectations regarding the timing of delivery of product currently in backlog. Failure to deliver backlog in accordance with expectations could negatively impact the Company’s financial performance and thus cause adverse changes in the market price of the Company’s outstanding common stock and other publicly-traded financial instruments.

35

The Company has embarked on a significant capital expansion program.

In 2006, the Company’s capital expenditures increased by more than $107.3 million from 2005. For 2007, the Company expects full-year capital expenditures of approximately $225.0 million to $250.0 million to continue its program of upgrading its machine tools, manufacturing technologies, processes and facilities in order to improve its efficiency and address current and expected market demand for the Company’s products. To the extent this program causes disruptions in the Company’s plants, or the needed machine tools or facilities are not delivered and installed or in use as currently expected, the Company’s ability to deliver existing or future backlog may be negatively impacted. In addition, if the program does not result in the expected efficiencies, future profitability may be negatively impacted.

Execution of subsea systems projects exposes the Company to risks not present in its surface business.

This market is significantly different from the Company’s other markets since subsea systems projects are significantly larger in scope and complexity, in terms of both technical and logistical requirements. Subsea projects (i) typically involve long lead times, (ii) typically are larger in financial scope, (iii) typically require substantial engineering resources to meet the technical requirements of the project and (iv) often involve the application of existing technology to new environments and in some cases, new technology. These projects accounted for approximately 8% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006. To the extent the Company experiences difficulties in meeting the technical and/or delivery requirements of the projects, the Company’s earnings or liquidity could be negatively impacted. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had a subsea systems project backlog of approximately $408.7 million.

Increases in the cost of and the availability of metals used in the Company’s manufacturing processes could negatively impact the Company’s profitability.

Beginning in the latter part of 2003 and continuing into 2006, commodity prices for items such as nickel, molybdenum and heavy metal scrap that are used to make the steel alloys required for the Company’s products increased significantly. Certain of the Company’s suppliers have passed these increases on to the Company. The Company has implemented price increases intended to offset the impact of the increase in commodity prices. However, if customers do not accept these price increases, future profitability will be negatively impacted. In addition, the Company’s vendors have informed the Company that lead times for certain raw materials are being extended. To the extent such change negatively impacts the Company’s ability to meet delivery requirements of its customers, the financial performance of the Company may suffer.

Downturns in the oil and gas industry have had, and may in the future have, a negative effect on the Company’s sales and profitability.

Demand for most of the Company’s products and services, and therefore its revenues, depends to a large extent upon the level of capital expenditures related to oil and gas exploration, production, development, processing and transmission. Declines, as well as anticipated declines, in oil and gas prices could negatively affect the level of these activities, or could result in the cancellation, modification or rescheduling of existing orders. The Company is typically protected against financial losses related to products and services it has provided prior to any cancellation. However, if the Company's customers cancel existing purchase orders, future profitability could be negatively impacted.  Factors that contribute to the volatility of oil and gas prices include the following:

• demand for oil and gas, which is impacted by economic and political conditions and weather;

• the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to set and maintain production levels and pricing;

• level of production from non-OPEC countries;

• policies regarding exploration and development of oil and gas reserves;

• the political environments of oil and gas producing regions, including the Middle East;

• the depletion rates of gas wells in North America; and

• advances in exploration and development technology.

Fluctuations in worldwide currency markets can impact the Company’s profitability.

The Company has established multiple “Centers of Excellence” facilities for manufacturing such products as subsea trees, subsea chokes, subsea production controls and BOPs. These production facilities are located in the United Kingdom and other European and Asian countries. To the extent the Company sells these products in U.S. dollars, the Company’s profitability is eroded when the U.S. dollar weakens against the British pound, the euro and certain Asian currencies, including the Singapore dollar.

In connection with the acquisition of the Dresser Acquired Businesses in late 2005 and early 2006, the Company entered into a number of short-term loans between certain wholly-owned subsidiaries to finance the acquisition cost and working capital needs of certain of Dresser’s international operations. Due to a significant weakening of the U.S. dollar in the second quarter of 2006, the Company recognized a significant currency gain relating to these euro-denominated loans made by a United States-based entity. The majority of these loans have now been repaid. Except for this impact in the second quarter of 2006, the Company’s gain or loss on foreign currency dominated transactions in other periods has not been material.

The Company’s worldwide operations expose it to instability and changes in economic and political conditions, foreign currency fluctuations, trade and investment regulations and other risks inherent to international business.

The economic risks of doing business on a worldwide basis include the following:

• volatility in general economic, social and political conditions;

• differing tax rates, tariffs, exchange controls or other similar restrictions;

• changes in currency rates;

• inability to repatriate income or capital;

• reductions in the number or capacity of qualified personnel; and

• seizure of equipment.

36

 Doing business on a worldwide basis also puts the Company and its operations at risk due to political risks and the need for compliance with the laws and regulations of many jurisdictions. These laws and regulations impose a range of restrictions on operations, trade practices, trade partners and investment decisions. From time to time, the Company receives inquiries regarding its compliance with such laws and regulations. The Company received a voluntary request for information dated September 2, 2005 from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission regarding certain of the Company’s West African activities and has responded to this request. The Company believes it has complied with all applicable laws and regulations with respect to its activities in this region. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control made an inquiry regarding U.S. involvement in a United Kingdom subsidiary’s commercial and financial activity relating to Iran in September 2004 and the U.S. Department of Commerce made an inquiry regarding sales by another United Kingdom subsidiary to Iran in February 2005. The Company responded to these two inquiries and has not received any additional requests related to these matters. The Company has restricted its non-U.S. subsidiaries and persons from doing any new business with countries the United States has classified as being state sponsors of terrorism, which include Iran, Syria, Sudan, North Korea and Cuba.

Cameron has manufacturing and service operations that are essential parts of its business in developing countries and economically and politically volatile areas in Africa, Latin America, Russia and other countries that were part of the Former Soviet Union, the Middle East, and Central and South East Asia. The Company also purchases a large portion of its raw materials and components from a relatively small number of foreign suppliers in developing countries. The ability of these suppliers to meet the Company’s demand could be adversely affected by the factors described above.

Compression Systems’ aftermarket revenues associated with legacy equipment are declining.

During 2006, approximately 37% of Compression Systems’ revenues came from the sale of replacement parts for equipment that the Company no longer manufactures. Many of these units have been in service for long periods of time, and are gradually being replaced. As this installed base of legacy equipment declines, the Company’s potential market for parts orders is also reduced. In recent years, the Company’s revenues from replacement parts associated with legacy equipment have declined nominally.

The Company is subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that expose the Company to potential liability.

The Company’s operations are subject to a variety of national and state, provisional and local laws and regulations, including laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The Company is required to invest financial and managerial resources to comply with these laws and expects to continue to do so in the future. To date, the cost of complying with governmental regulation has not been material, but the fact that such laws or regulations are frequently changed makes it impossible for the Company to predict the cost or impact of such laws and regulations on the Company’s future operations. The modification of existing laws or regulations or the adoption of new laws or regulations imposing more stringent environmental restrictions could adversely affect the Company.

Environmental Remediation

The Company’s worldwide operations are subject to domestic and international regulations with regard to air, soil and water quality as well as other environmental matters. The Company, through its environmental management system and active third-party audit program, believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations.

The Company is currently identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) with respect to two sites designated for cleanup under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or similar state laws. One of these sites is Osborne, Pennsylvania (a landfill into which a predecessor of the CS operation in Grove City, Pennsylvania deposited waste), where remediation is complete and remaining costs relate to ongoing ground water treatment and monitoring. The other is believed to be a de minimis exposure. The Company is also engaged in site cleanup under the Voluntary Cleanup Plan of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality at former manufacturing locations in Houston and Missouri City, Texas. Additionally, the Company has discontinued operations at a number of other sites which had been active for many years. The Company does not believe, based upon information currently available, that there are any material environmental liabilities existing at these locations. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet included a noncurrent liability of $7.0 million for environmental matters.

Environmental Sustainability

The Company has pursued environmental sustainability in a number of ways. Processes are monitored in an attempt to produce the least amount of waste. None of the Company’s facilities are rated above Small Quantity Generated status. All of the waste disposal firms used by the Company are carefully selected in an attempt to prevent any future Superfund involvements. Actions are taken in an attempt to minimize the generation of hazardous wastes and to minimize air emissions. None of the Company’s facilities are classified as sites that generate more than minimal air emissions. Recycling of process water is a common practice. Best management practices are used in an effort to prevent contamination of soil and ground water on the Company’s sites. The Company has an active health, safety and environmental audit program in place throughout the world.

37

Market Risk Information

The Company is currently exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency rates and changes in interest rates. A discussion of the Company’s market risk exposure in financial instruments follows.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

As described more fully under “Factors That May Affect Financial Condition and Future Results — Fluctuations in worldwide currency markets can impact the Company’s profitability” above, the Company has short-term intercompany loans and intercompany balances outstanding at December 31, 2006 denominated in currencies different from the functional currency of at least one of the parties. These transactions subject the Company’s financial results to risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Other than the second quarter of 2006, these amounts had not resulted in recognition of a material foreign currency gain or loss due to fluctuations in the applicable exchange rates.

A large portion of the Company’s operations consist of manufacturing and sales activities in foreign jurisdictions, principally in Europe, Canada, West Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and the Pacific Rim. As a result, the Company’s financial performance may be affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in these markets. Overall, the Company generally is a net receiver of Pounds Sterling and Canadian dollars and, therefore, benefits from a weaker U.S. dollar with respect to these currencies. Typically, the Company is a net payer of euros and Norwegian krone as well as other currencies such as the Singapore dollar and the Brazilian real. A weaker U.S. dollar with respect to these currencies may have an adverse effect on the Company. For each of the last three years, the Company’s gain or loss from foreign currency-denominated transactions has not been material, except as noted above.

In order to mitigate the effect of exchange rate changes, the Company will often attempt to structure sales contracts to provide for collections from customers in the currency in which the Company incurs its manufacturing costs. In certain instances, the Company will enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge specific large anticipated receipts in currencies for which the Company does not traditionally have fully offsetting local currency expenditures. The Company was party to a number of long-term foreign currency forward contracts at December 31, 2006. The purpose of the majority of these contracts was to hedge large anticipated non-functional currency cash flows on major subsea or drilling contracts involving the Company’s United States operations and its wholly-owned subsidiary in the United Kingdom. Information relating to the contracts and the fair value recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2006 and 2005 follows:

	December 31, 2006
	Year of Contract Expiration									December 31,
(amounts in millions except exchange rates)	2007		2008		2009		Total			2005
Sell USD/Buy GBP:
Notional amount to sell (in U.S. dollars)	$	65.4	$	11.0	$	2.6	$	79.0		$	220.4
Average GBP to USD contract rate		1.8091		1.8039		1.7989		1.8080			1.8124
Average GBP to USD forward rate at December 31, 2006		1.9589		1.9515		1.9426		1.9573			1.7274
Fair value at December 31, 2006 in U.S. dollars							$	6.5		$	(10.3	)
Sell GBP/Buy Euro:
Notional amount to buy (in euros)		16.0		0.9		—		16.9			45.8
Average GBP to EUR contract rate		1.3902		1.3693		1.3450		1.3891			1.4045
Average GBP to EUR forward rate at December 31, 2006		1.4756		1.4580		1.4365		1.4746			1.4333
Fair value at December 31, 2006 in U.S. dollars							$	(1.4	)	$	(1.1	)
Sell GBP/Buy NOK:
Notional amount to buy (in Norwegian krone)		20.7		0.6		—		21.3			58.5
Average GBP to NOK contract rate		11.2999		11.2173		—		11.2975			11.3817
Average GBP to NOK forward rate at December 31, 2006		12.1515		12.0085		—		12.1475			11.4874
Fair value at December 31, 2006 in U.S. dollars							$	(0.3	)	$	(0.1	)
Sell USD/Buy Euro:
Notional amount to buy (in euros)		25.1		10.4		—		35.5			—
Average EUR to USD contract rate		1.2888		1.3166		—		1.2970			—
Average EUR to USD forward rate at December 31, 2006		1.3288		1.3410		—		1.3324			—
Fair value at December 31, 2006 in U.S. dollars							$	—		$	—

38

Interest Rates

The Company is subject to interest rate risk on its long-term fixed interest rate debt and, to a lesser extent, variable-interest rate borrowings. Variable-rate debt, where the interest rate fluctuates periodically, exposes the Company’s cash flows to variability due to changes in market interest rates. Fixed-rate debt, where the interest rate is fixed over the life of the instrument, exposes the Company to changes in the fair value of its debt due to changes in market interest rates and to the risk that the Company may need to refinance maturing debt with new debt at a higher rate.

The Company has performed a sensitivity analysis to determine how market rate changes might affect the fair value of its debt. This analysis is inherently limited because it represents a singular, hypothetical set of assumptions. Actual market movements may vary significantly from the assumptions. The effects of market movements may also directly or indirectly affect the Company’s assumptions and its rights and obligations not covered by the sensitivity analysis. Fair value sensitivity is not necessarily indicative of the ultimate cash flow or the earnings effect from the assumed market rate movements.

An instantaneous one-percentage-point decrease in interest rates across all maturities and applicable yield curves would have increased the fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate debt positions by approximately $50.2 million ($15.8 million at December 31, 2005), whereas a one-percentage-point increase in interest rates would have decreased the fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt by $25.9 million at December 31, 2006 ($14.7 million at December 31, 2005). This analysis does not reflect the effect that increasing or decreasing interest rates would have on other items, such as new borrowings, nor the impact they would have on interest expense and cash payments for interest.

The Company manages its debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired position of fixed and floating rates and may employ interest rate swaps as a tool to achieve that goal. The major risks from interest rate derivatives include changes in the interest rates affecting the fair value of such instruments, potential increases in interest expense due to market increases in floating interest rates and the creditworthiness of the counterparties in such transactions.

In May 2004, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements on a notional amount of $150.0 million of its senior notes due April 15, 2007 (Senior Notes) to take advantage of short-term interest rates available. Under these agreements, the Company received interest from the counterparties at a fixed rate of 2.65% and paid a variable interest rate based on the published six-month LIBOR rate less 82.5 to 86.0 basis points. On June 7, 2005, the Company terminated these interest rate swaps and paid the counterparties approximately $1.1 million, which represented the fair market value of the agreements at the time of termination and was recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of the related debt. This amount is being amortized as an increase to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. The company’s interest expense was increased by $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of the amortization of the termination payment.

The fair value of the Company’s Senior Notes due 2007 is principally dependent on changes in prevailing interest rates. The fair values of the 1.5% and 2.5% convertible senior debentures are principally dependent on both prevailing interest rates and the Company’s current share price as it relates to the initial conversion price of the respective instruments.

The Company has various other long-term debt instruments, but believes that the impact of changes in interest rates in the near term will not be material to these instruments.

39

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company maintains a system of internal controls that is designed to provide reasonable but not absolute assurance as to the reliable preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or the Company’s internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of errors or fraud, if any, within Cameron have been detected.

The control environment of Cameron is the foundation for its system of internal controls over financial reporting and is embodied in the Company’s Standards of Conduct. It sets the tone of the Company’s organization and includes factors such as integrity and ethical values. The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are supported by formal policies and procedures that are reviewed, modified and improved as changes occur in the Company’s business or as otherwise required by applicable rule-making bodies.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of outside directors, meets periodically with members of management, the internal audit department and the independent registered public accountants to review and discuss internal controls over financial reporting and accounting and financial reporting matters. The independent registered public accountants and internal audit report to the Audit Committee and accordingly have full and free access to the Audit Committee at any time.

Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Cameron’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) over financial reporting.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included a review of the documentation surrounding the Company’s financial controls, an evaluation of the design effectiveness of these controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of these controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Although there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal controls over financial reporting - including the possibility of the circumvention or overriding of controls - based on management’s evaluation, management has concluded that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2006, based on the framework established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework”. However, because of changes in conditions, it is important to note that internal control system effectiveness may vary over time.

In conducting management’s evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, the Brazilian operations of the Flow Control segment of Dresser, Inc., acquired during 2006, were excluded. These operations constituted less than 5% of the Company’s consolidated revenues, income before income taxes and total assets as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that has audited the Company’s financial statements as of and for the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.

/s/ Sheldon R. Erikson

Sheldon R. Erikson

Chairman of the Board

and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Franklin Myers

Franklin Myers

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

40

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Cameron International Corporation

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Cameron International Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Cameron International Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of the Brazilian operations of the Flow Control segment of Dresser, Inc. which are included in the 2006 consolidated financial statements of Cameron International Corporation and constituted less than 5% of the Company’s consolidated revenues, income before income taxes and total assets as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Brazilian operations of the Flow Control segment of Dresser, Inc. were acquired by Cameron International Corporation during 2006. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Cameron International Corporation also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the Brazilian operations of the Flow Control segment of Dresser, Inc. acquired by Cameron International Corporation.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Cameron International Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Cameron International Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Cameron International Corporation as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related statements of consolidated results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 and our report dated February 26, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas

February 26, 2007

41

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Cameron International Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cameron International Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related statements of consolidated results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Cameron International Corporation at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment".  Also, as discussed in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132 (R)".

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

Houston, Texas

February 26, 2007

42

Consolidated Results of Operations

	Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2006			2005			2004
Revenues	$	3,742,907		$	2,517,847		$	2,092,845
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)		2,601,072			1,796,277			1,560,268
Selling and administrative expenses		528,568			381,267			300,124
Depreciation and amortization		101,350			78,398			82,841
Non-cash write-down of technology investment		—			—			3,814
Interest income		(26,939	)		(13,060	)		(4,874	)
Interest expense		20,677			11,953			17,753
Acquisition integration costs		29,578			—			—
Total costs and expenses		3,254,306			2,254,835			1,959,926
Income before income taxes		488,601			263,012			132,919
Income tax provision		(170,785	)		(91,882	)		(38,504	)
Net income	$	317,816		$	171,130		$	94,415
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	2.81		$	1.55		$	0.89
Diluted	$	2.72		$	1.52		$	0.88

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

43

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except shares and per share data)	2006			2005
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,033,537		$	361,971
Receivables, net		696,147			574,099
Inventories, net		1,009,414			705,809
Other		168,554			86,177
Total current assets		2,907,652			1,728,056
Plant and equipment, net		648,785			525,715
Goodwill		595,268			577,042
Other assets		199,045			267,749
Total assets	$	4,350,750		$	3,098,562
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current portion of long-term debt	$	207,345		$	6,471
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,364,716			891,519
Accrued income taxes		56,151			23,871
Total current liabilities		1,628,212			921,861
Long-term debt		745,408			444,435
Postretirement benefits other than pensions		20,757			40,104
Deferred income taxes		90,248			39,089
Other long-term liabilities		124,686			58,310
Total liabilities		2,609,311			1,503,799
Commitments and contingencies		—			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 116,170,863 shares issued at December 31, 2006 (115,629,117 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005)		1,162			1,156
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding		—			—
Capital in excess of par value		1,140,765			1,113,001
Retained earnings		760,958			443,142
Accumulated other elements of comprehensive income		16,326			37,464
Less: Treasury stock at cost, 3,881,236 shares at December 31, 2006		(177,772	)		—
Total stockholders’ equity		1,741,439			1,594,763
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,350,750		$	3,098,562

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

44

Consolidated Cash Flows

	Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	317,816		$	171,130		$	94,415
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		75,909			64,018			70,157
Amortization		25,441			14,380			12,684
Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with retired debt		—			—			6,844
Non-cash stock compensation expense		25,568			2,790			—
Non-cash write-down of investments		—			2,458			3,814
Non-cash write-off of assets associated with acquisition integration efforts		10,525			—			—
Tax benefit of employee benefit plan transactions, deferred income taxes and other		60,345			34,049			(14,704	)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of translation, acquisitions, dispositions and non-cash items:
Receivables		(81,762	)		(80,659	)		(44,387	)
Inventories		(269,771	)		(137,384	)		76,207
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		382,854			255,213			(9,063	)
Other assets and liabilities, net		(414	)		26,094			(736	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		546,511			352,089			195,231
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(184,830	)		(77,508	)		(53,481	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(28,846	)		(328,570	)		(171,032	)
Sales of short-term investments		—			—			22,033
Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment and other		16,638			5,474			10,133
Net cash used for investing activities		(197,038	)		(400,604	)		(192,347	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Loan borrowings (repayments), net		(308	)		(2,243	)		(4,919	)
Issuance of long-term debt		500,000			—			437,862
Redemption of convertible debt		—			(14,821	)		(443,903	)
Debt issuance costs		(8,630	)		—			(6,538	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(282,191	)		(9,395	)		(95,325	)
Proceeds from stock option exercises		76,002			223,085			46,334
Excess tax benefits from stock compensation plans		16,580			—			—
Principal payments on capital leases		(4,401	)		(4,098	)		(4,355	)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		297,052			192,528			(70,844	)
Effect of translation on cash		25,041			(9,040	)		2,842
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		671,566			134,973			(65,118	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		361,971			226,998			292,116
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	1,033,537		$	361,971		$	226,998

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

45

Consolidated Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

(dollars in thousands)	Common stock		Capital in excess of par value			Retained earnings		Accumulated other elements of comprehensive income			Treasury stock			Total
Balance - December 31, 2003	$	549	$	957,912		$	177,597	$	55,329		$	(54,664	)	$	1,136,723
Net income							94,415								94,415
Foreign currency translation									40,332						40,332
Minimum pension liability, net of $352 in taxes									(568	)					(568	)
Change in fair value of short-term investments and other, net of $0 in taxes									(119	)					(119	)
Comprehensive income															134,060
Purchase of treasury stock												(95,325	)		(95,325	)
Treasury stock issued under stock option and other employee benefit plans				(15,817	)							61,961			46,144
Tax benefit of employee stock benefit plan transactions				6,645											6,645
Balance - December 31, 2004		549		948,740			272,012		94,974			(88,028	)		1,228,247
Net income							171,130								171,130
Foreign currency translation									(49,110	)					(49,110	)
Change in fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, net of $3,873 in taxes									(8,441	)					(8,441	)
Other comprehensive income recognized in current year earnings, net of $18 in taxes									41						41
Comprehensive income															113,620
Non-cash stock compensation expense				2,790											2,790
Purchase of treasury stock												(9,395	)		(9,395	)
Common and treasury stock issued under stock option and other employee benefit plans		31		124,230								97,423			221,684
Tax benefit of employee stock benefit plan transactions				37,817											37,817
Stock split		576		(576	)										—
Balance - December 31, 2005		1,156		1,113,001			443,142		37,464			—			1,594,763
Net income							317,816								317,816
Foreign currency translation									57,130						57,130
Change in fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, net of $6,222 in taxes									13,468						13,468
Other comprehensive income recognized in current year earnings, net of $116 in taxes									(251	)					(251	)
Minimum pension liability, net									(337	)					(337	)
Comprehensive income															387,826
Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158, net of $44,382 in taxes									(91,148	)					(91,148	)
Non-cash stock compensation expense				25,568											25,568
Purchase of treasury stock												(282,191	)		(282,191	)
Common and treasury stock issued under stock option and other employee benefit plans		6		(28,804	)							103,777			74,979
Tax benefit of employee stock benefit plan transactions				23,284											23,284
Other				7,716								642			8,358
Balance - December 31, 2006	$	1,162	$	1,140,765		$	760,958	$	16,326		$	(177,772	)	$	1,741,439

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

46

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Summary of Major Accounting Policies

Company Operations — At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Cooper Cameron Corporation held on May 5, 2006, stockholders voted to change the corporation’s name to Cameron International Corporation (Cameron or the Company). Upon the change in the corporate name, the Company also rebranded its three existing business segments into Drilling & Production Systems (DPS), formerly the Cameron segment; Valves & Measurement (V&M), formerly the Cooper Cameron Valves segment; and Compression Systems (CS), formerly the Cooper Compression segment. Additional information regarding each segment may be found in Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cameron is a leading provider of flow equipment products, systems and services to worldwide oil, gas and process industries. Products include oil and gas pressure control and separation equipment, including valves, wellheads, controls, chokes, blowout preventers and assembled systems for oil and gas drilling, production and transmission processes used in onshore, offshore and subsea applications. Cameron also manufactures and services air and gas compressors and turbochargers.

Principles of Consolidation— The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all majority-owned subsidiaries. Investments from 20% to 50% in affiliated companies are accounted for using the equity method.

Estimates in Financial Statements — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include, but are not limited to, estimated losses on accounts receivable, estimated realizable value on excess and obsolete inventory, contingencies, including tax contingencies, estimated liabilities for litigation exposures and liquidated damages, estimated warranty costs, estimates related to pension accounting, estimated proceeds from assets held for sale and estimates related to deferred tax assets, including valuation allowances on deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition — The Company generally recognizes revenue once the following four criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery of the equipment has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the price of the equipment or service is fixed and determinable and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. For certain engineering, procurement and construction-type contracts, which typically include the Company’s subsea and drilling systems and processing equipment contracts, revenue is recognized in accordance with Statement of Position 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts (SOP 81-1). Under SOP 81-1, the Company recognizes revenue on these contracts using a units-of-completion method. Under the units-of-completion method, revenue is recognized once the manufacturing process is complete for each piece of equipment specified in the contract with the customer. This would include customer inspection and acceptance, if required by the contract. Approximately 17%, 13% and 15% of the Company’s revenues for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, was recognized under SOP 81-1.

Shipping and Handling Costs — Shipping and handling costs are reflected in the caption entitled “Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)” in the accompanying Consolidated Results of Operations statements.

Cash Equivalents— For purposes of the Consolidated Cash Flows statement, the Company considers all investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Short-term Investments — Investments in available for sale marketable debt and equity securities are carried at fair value, based on quoted market prices. Differences between cost and fair value are reflected as a component of accumulated other elements of comprehensive income until such time as those differences are realized. The basis for computing realized gains or losses is the specific identification method. If the Company determines that a loss is other than temporary, such loss will be charged to earnings. No material realized gains or losses on short-term investments were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts— The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that may result from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Such allowances are based upon several factors including, but not limited to, historical experience and the current and projected financial condition of specific customers.

Inventories — Aggregate inventories are carried at cost or, if lower, net realizable value. On the basis of current costs, 48% of inventories at December 31, 2006 and 42% at December 31, 2005 are carried on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. The remaining inventories, which are located outside the United States and Canada, are carried on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The Company provides a reserve for its inventory for estimated obsolescence or excess quantities on hand equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value. During 2005, the Company revised its estimates of realizable value on certain of its excess inventory. The impact of this revision was to increase the required reserve as of December 31, 2005 by $9,900,000. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company reduced its LIFO inventory levels in the CS segment resulting in a liquidation of certain low-cost inventory layers. Accordingly, the Company recorded non-cash LIFO income of $2,091,000, $4,033,000 and $9,684,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Plant and Equipment — Property, plant and equipment, both owned and under capital lease, is carried at cost. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The cost of renewals, replacements and betterments is capitalized. The Company capitalizes software developed or obtained for internal use. Accordingly, the cost of third-party software, as well as the cost of third-party and internal personnel that are directly involved in application development activities, are capitalized during the application development phase of new software systems projects. Costs during the preliminary project stage and post-implementation stage of new

47

software systems projects, including data conversion and training costs, are expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, or in the case of assets under capital leases, over the related lease term, if less, using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives of the major classes of property, plant and equipment are as follows:

	Estimated Useful Lives
Buildings and leasehold improvements		10 - 40 years
Machinery, equipment and tooling		3 - 18 years
Office furniture, software and other		3 - 10 years

Goodwill— In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), the Company reviews goodwill at least annually for impairment at the reporting unit level, or more frequently if indicators of impairment are present. The Company conducts its annual review by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its respective book value. The estimated fair value for the 2006, 2005 and 2004 annual evaluations was determined using discounted cash flows and other market-related valuation models. Certain estimates and judgments are required in the application of the fair value models. Each of the annual evaluations indicated that no impairment of goodwill was required. The Company’s reporting units for SFAS 142 purposes are the Drilling and Production Systems group, Petreco Process Systems division, the valves portion of the V&M group, NuFlo Measurement Systems division, the Reciprocating division (formerly Cooper Energy Services) and the Centrifugal division (formerly Cooper Turbocompressor). The Drilling and Production Systems group and Petreco Process Systems division form the DPS segment. The V&M segment consists of the valves portion of the V&M group and the NuFlo Measurement Systems division. The Reciprocating and Centrifugal divisions are included in the CS segment. See Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Company’s business segments.

Intangible Assets — The Company’s intangible assets, excluding goodwill, represent purchased patents, trademarks, customer lists and other identifiable intangible assets. The majority of other identifiable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the years expected to be benefited, generally ranging from 5 to 20 years. Such intangibles are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. As many areas of the Company’s business rely on patents and proprietary technology, it has followed a policy of seeking patent protection both inside and outside the United States for products and methods that appear to have commercial significance. The costs of developing any intangibles internally, as well as costs of defending such intangibles, are expensed as incurred.

Long-Lived Assets— In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144), long-lived assets, excluding goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles, to be held and used by the Company are reviewed to determine whether any events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. For long-lived assets to be held and used, the Company bases its evaluation on impairment indicators such as the nature of the assets, the future economic benefit of the assets, any historical or future profitability measurements and other external market conditions or factors that may be present. If such impairment indicators are present or other factors exist that indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, the Company determines whether an impairment has occurred through the use of an undiscounted cash flow analysis of the asset at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist. If an impairment has occurred, the Company recognizes a loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. Assets are classified as held for sale when the Company has a plan for disposal of such assets and those assets meet the held for sale criteria contained in SFAS 144 and are stated at estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell.

Product Warranty — Estimated warranty costs are accrued either at the time of sale based upon historical experience or, in some cases, when specific warranty problems are encountered. Adjustments to the recorded liability are made periodically to reflect actual experience.

Contingencies— The Company accrues for costs relating to litigation, including litigation defense costs, claims and other contingent matters, including tax contingencies and liquidated damage liabilities, when such liabilities become probable and reasonably estimable. Such estimates may be based on advice from third parties or on management’s judgment, as appropriate. Revisions to contingent liability reserves are reflected in income in the period in which different facts or information become known or circumstances change that affect the Company’s previous assumptions with respect to the likelihood or amount of loss. Amounts paid upon the ultimate resolution of contingent liabilities may be materially different from previous estimates and could require adjustments to the estimated reserves to be recognized in the period such new information becomes known.

Income Taxes — The asset and liability approach is used to account for income taxes by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Income tax expense includes U.S. and foreign income taxes, including U.S. federal taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries to the extent such earnings are planned to be remitted. Taxes are not provided on the translation component of comprehensive income since the effect of translation is not considered to modify the amount of the earnings that are planned to be remitted. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized considering future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.

Environmental Remediation and Compliance— Environmental remediation and postremediation monitoring costs are accrued when such obligations become probable and reasonably estimable. Such future expenditures are not discounted to their present value.

48

Pension and Postretirement Benefits Accounting — In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (SFAS 158). SFAS 158 requires plan sponsors of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans (collectively, postretirement benefit plans) to recognize the funded status of their postretirement benefit plans in their consolidated balance sheets, measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet, and provide additional disclosures. On December 31, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158. The effect of adopting SFAS 158 on the Company’s financial condition at December 31, 2006, has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. SFAS 158 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition at December 31, 2005 or 2004. The Company currently uses a measurement date of December 31 for its defined benefit pension plans. The Company expects to adopt the measurement date provisions of SFAS 158 for its postretirement benefit plans when required. SFAS 158 did not change the basic approach to measuring plan assets, benefit obligations and annual net periodic benefit costs. These issues are expected to be addressed by the FASB at a later date. Accordingly, the Company continues to follow the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions (SFAS 87) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (SFAS 106) in measuring its plan assets and benefit obligations as of December 31, 2006 and in determining the amount of its net periodic benefit costs for the year ended December 31, 2006. See Note 7 for further discussion of the effect of adopting SFAS 158 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation — At December 31, 2006, the Company had four stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described in further detail in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company measured compensation expense for its stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method. Effective January 1, 2006, compensation expense for the Company's stock-based compensation plans is now measured using the fair value method required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)). Under SFAS 123(R), the fair value of stock option grants and restricted stock unit awards is amortized to expense using the straight-line method over the shorter of the vesting period or the remaining employee service period.

Derivative Financial Instruments — The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as assets and liabilities and measures them at fair value. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), hedge accounting is only applied when the derivative is deemed highly effective at offsetting changes in anticipated cash flows of the hedged item or transaction. Changes in fair value of derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are deferred in accumulated other elements of comprehensive income until the underlying transactions are recognized in earnings, at which time any deferred hedging gains or losses are also recorded in earnings on the same line as the hedged item. Any ineffective portion of the change in the fair value of a derivative used as a cash flow hedge is recorded in earnings as incurred. The Company may at times also use forward contracts to hedge foreign currency assets and liabilities. These contracts are not designated as hedges under SFAS 133. Therefore, the change in fair value of these contracts are recognized in earnings as they occur and offset gains or losses on the related asset or liability.

Foreign Currency— For most subsidiaries and branches outside the U.S., the local currency is the functional currency. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation, the financial statements of these subsidiaries and branches are translated into U.S. dollars as follows: (i) assets and liabilities at year-end exchange rates; (ii) income, expenses and cash flows at average exchange rates; and (iii) stockholders’ equity at historical exchange rates. For those subsidiaries for which the local currency is the functional currency, the resulting translation adjustment is recorded as a component of accumulated other elements of comprehensive income in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

For certain other subsidiaries and branches, operations are conducted primarily in currencies other than the local currencies, which are therefore the functional currency. Non-functional currency monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at year-end exchange rates. Revenue, expense and gain and loss accounts of these foreign subsidiaries and branches are remeasured at average exchange rates. Non-functional currency non-monetary assets and liabilities, and the related revenue, expense, gain and loss accounts are remeasured at historical rates.

Foreign currency gains and losses arising from transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the entity involved are included in income. The effects of foreign currency transactions were gains (losses) of $14,414,000, $2,717,000 and $(1,982,000) for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Reclassifications and Revisions— Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements— In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (FIN 48), to create a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Under FIN 48, income taxes will no longer be subject to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, as required. The Company is continuing to finalize certain estimates relating to the adoption of FIN 48 but at present does not expect there to be a material cumulative effect on its beginning retained earnings upon adoption.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the level of disclosures regarding fair value. SFAS 157 also emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement rather than an entity-specific measurement. The Company currently does not expect SFAS 157 to have a material effect on its financial position when adopted as required on January 1, 2008.

49

Note 2: Acquisitions

On September 1, 2005, the Company announced it had agreed to acquire substantially all of the businesses included within the Flow Control segment of Dresser, Inc. (the Dresser Acquired Businesses). On November 30, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of all of these businesses other than a portion of the business, located in Brazil, which was acquired on January 10, 2006. The total net cash purchase price for the Dresser Acquired Businesses was approximately $210,470,000. The acquired operations serve customers in the worldwide oil and gas production, pipeline and process markets and have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to the acquisition, primarily in the V&M segment.

During 2006, the Company obtained information relating to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the Dresser Acquired Businesses existing at the acquisition date for purposes of allocating the purchase price in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations. As a result of incorporating this information into its initial purchase price allocation, goodwill associated with this acquisition has decreased by $17,174,000 since December 31, 2005 to approximately $88,349,000 at December 31, 2006.

In connection with the integration of the Dresser Acquired Businesses primarily into the V&M segment, which was mostly completed as of the end of 2006, a total of $29,578,000 in integration costs were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2006, of which approximately $10,525,000 related to non-cash impairment charges for goodwill, fixed assets and other assets at certain legacy locations of the Company that are in the process of being closed or otherwise being impacted by the integration. The components of the total integration costs are as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	Year Ended December 31, 2006
Plant rearrangement and other integration costs	$	13,241
Non-cash asset impairment charges		10,525
Employee severance		4,220
Stay bonuses and employee relocation costs		1,592
Total	$	29,578

On January 3, 2006, the Company acquired the assets and liabilities of Caldon, Inc. for approximately $13,089,000 in cash. The acquisition of Caldon added a new ultrasonic flow measurement product line to the existing flow measurement products in the V&M segment. Caldon’s results are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to the acquisition date. Goodwill associated with the Caldon acquisition totaled approximately $5,805,000 at December 31, 2006, most of which is deductible for income tax purposes.

On May 11, 2005, the Company acquired one hundred percent of the outstanding stock of NuFlo Technologies, Inc. (NuFlo), a Houston-based supplier of metering and related flow measurement equipment, for approximately $121,294,000 in cash and assumed debt. NuFlo’s results are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to the acquisition date in the V&M segment. Goodwill recorded as a result of this acquisition totaled approximately $75,444,000, most of which will not be deductible for income tax purposes.

Also, during 2005, the Company made three small product line acquisitions. Two of the acquisitions, totaling $10,118,000, were complementary to the current product offerings in the DPS segment. One acquisition in the amount of $1,022,000, plus certain additional amounts that have been deferred for annual payout over a three-year period ending January 5, 2008, was incorporated into the V&M segment. The results of the acquired entities have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to the respective acquisition dates. Total goodwill recorded as a result of these acquisitions amounted to $6,648,000, the majority of which will be deductible for income tax purposes.

On November 29, 2004, the Company acquired certain businesses of the PCC Flow Technologies segment of Precision Castparts Corp. (PCC), for approximately $79,668,000, net of cash acquired and debt assumed. The operations acquired serve customers in the surface oil and gas production, pipeline and process markets. The results of the PCC entities acquired are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to the acquisition date. Total goodwill recorded as a result of this acquisition was approximately $17,313,000, most of which will not be deductible for income tax purposes.

On July 2, 2004, the Company acquired the assets of Unicel, Inc. (Unicel), a supplier of oil separation products, for approximately $6,700,000 in cash and a note payable for $500,000. The Unicel acquisition expanded the product offering of Petreco International Inc. (Petreco). Unicel’s results are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to the acquisition date. Goodwill recorded from the Unicel acquisition totaled approximately $5,702,000, most of which will be deductible for income tax purposes.

On February 27, 2004, the Company acquired one hundred percent of the outstanding stock of Petreco, a Houston-based supplier of oil and gas separation products, for approximately $89,922,000, net of cash acquired and debt assumed. Petreco provides highly engineered, custom processing products to the oil and gas industry worldwide and provides the Company with additional product offerings that are complementary to its existing products. Petreco’s results are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to the acquisition date. Total goodwill recorded as a result of the Petreco acquisition was approximately $74,325,000, most of which will not be deductible for income tax purposes.

50

Note 3: Receivables

Receivables consisted of the following:

	December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005
Trade receivables	$	671,343		$	560,638
Other receivables		32,107			23,236
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(7,303	)		(9,775	)
Total receivables	$	696,147		$	574,099

Note 4: Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

	December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005
Raw materials	$	108,889		$	97,035
Work-in-process		300,970			214,730
Finished goods, including parts and subassemblies		687,088			476,770
Other		4,721			3,408
		1,101,668			791,943
Excess of current standard costs over LIFO costs		(48,031	)		(37,829	)
Allowance for obsolete and excess inventory		(44,223	)		(48,305	)
Total inventories	$	1,009,414		$	705,809

Note 5: Plant and Equipment, Goodwill and Other Assets

Plant and equipment consisted of the following:

	December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005
Land and land improvements	$	41,738		$	36,229
Buildings		282,049			220,315
Machinery and equipment		646,646			587,967
Tooling, dies, patterns, etc.		81,107			55,383
Office furniture & equipment		103,115			93,919
Capitalized software		95,953			83,221
Assets under capital leases		22,921			20,754
Construction in progress		74,021			35,079
All other		17,914			14,555
		1,365,464			1,147,422
Accumulated depreciation		(716,679	)		(621,707	)
Total plant and equipment	$	648,785		$	525,715

Changes in goodwill during 2006 were as follows:

(dollars in thousands)	DPS			V&M			CS		Total
Balance at December 31, 2005	$	229,932		$	284,888		$	62,222	$	577,042
Acquisition of Caldon, Inc. and a remaining portion of the Dresser Acquired Businesses by the V&M segment		—			22,881			—		22,881
Purchase price allocation adjustment to goodwill for the Dresser Acquired Businesses		(6,536	)		(10,638	)		—		(17,174	)
Impairment associated with a V&M legacy business to be closed		—			(4,763	)		—		(4,763	)
Translation and other		26,456			(9,174	)		—		17,282
Balance at december 31, 2006	$	249,852		$	283,194		$	62,222	$	595,268

51

Other assets consisted of the following:

	December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005
Long-term prepaid benefit costs of defined benefit pension plans	$	18,451		$	133,875
Deferred income taxes		45,703			53,767
Other intangibles:
Nonamortizable		8,607			8,610
Gross amortizable		94,683			53,316
Accumulated amortization		(20,807	)		(9,972	)
Other		52,408			28,153
Total other assets	$	199,045		$	267,749

Amortization associated with the Company’s capitalized software and other amortizable intangibles (primarily patents, trademarks, customer lists and other) recorded as of December 31, 2006 is expected to approximate $19,694,000, $15,196,000, $13,637,000, $12,164,000, and $11,488,000 for the years ending December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

Note 6: Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

	December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006		2005
Trade accounts payable and accruals	$	408,480	$	372,461
Salaries, wages and related fringe benefits		141,444		128,144
Advances from customers		573,527		240,980
Sales related costs and provisions		78,666		38,630
Payroll and other taxes		30,032		25,858
Product warranty		29,846		25,030
Other		102,721		60,416
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	1,364,716	$	891,519

Activity during the year associated with the Company’s product warranty accruals was as follows (dollars in thousands):

Balance December 31, 2005	Net Warranty Provisions	Charges Against Accrual	Translation and Other	Balance December 31, 2006
$25,030	$17,135	$(17,693)	$5,374	$29,846

Note 7: Employee Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Plan (Retirement Plan), which covered the majority of salaried U.S. employees and certain domestic hourly employees at the time it was frozen to most new entrants, effective May 1, 2003. In addition, the Company sponsors separate defined benefit pension plans for employees of its U.K. and German subsidiaries and several unfunded defined benefit arrangements for various other employee groups. The U.K. defined benefit pension plan was frozen to new entrants effective June 14, 1996. With respect to the freeze in the Retirement Plan, the basic credits to participant account balances decreased from 4% of compensation below the Social Security Wage Base plus 8% of compensation in excess of the Social Security Wage Base to 3% and 6%, respectively, and vesting for participants who had not completed three full years of vesting service as of May 1, 2003 changed from a three-year graded vesting with 33% vested after three years and 100% vested after five years to five-year cliff vesting.

Certain of the Company’s employees also participate in various domestic employee welfare benefit plans, including medical, dental and prescriptions. Additionally, certain employees receive retiree medical, prescription and life insurance benefits. All of the welfare benefit plans, including those providing postretirement benefits, are unfunded.

52

Total net benefit plan expense (income) associated with the Company’s defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following:

	Pension Benefits									Postretirement Benefits
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004			2006			2005			2004
Service cost	$	8,830		$	7,574		$	7,036		$	6		$	7		$	12
Interest cost		23,046			22,215			21,255			1,334			1,502			2,601
Expected return on plan assets		(31,500	)		(28,807	)		(27,795	)		—			—			—
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)		(525	)		(526	)		(526	)		(383	)		(388	)		(463	)
Amortization of losses (gains) and other		11,203			9,925			7,988			(979	)		(956	)		747
Total net benefit plan expense (income)	$	11,054		$	10,381		$	7,958		$	(22	)	$	165		$	2,897
Net benefit plan expense (income):
U.S. plans	$	4,804		$	3,155		$	2,819		$	(22	)	$	165		$	2,897
Foreign plans		6,250			7,226			5,139			—			—			—
Total net benefit plan expense (income)	$	11,054		$	10,381		$	7,958		$	(22	)	$	165		$	2,897

On December 31, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158. SFAS 158 required the Company to recognize the funded status of its pension and postretirement benefit plans in its December 31, 2006 consolidated balance sheet, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other elements of comprehensive income, net of tax. The adjustment to accumulated other elements of comprehensive income at adoption represents the net unrecognized actuarial (gains) losses and unrecognized prior service costs (credits) remaining from the initial adoption of SFAS 87 and SFAS 106, all of which were previously netted against the plan’s funded status in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 87 and SFAS 106. These amounts will be subsequently recognized as net periodic benefit plan cost pursuant to the Company’s historical accounting policy for amortizing such amounts. Further, actuarial gains and losses that arise in subsequent periods and are not recognized as net periodic benefit plan cost in the same periods will be recognized as a component of accumulated other elements of comprehensive income. Those amounts will be subsequently recognized as a component of net periodic benefit plan cost on the same basis as the amounts recognized in accumulated other elements of comprehensive income at the time of adopting SFAS 158.

The incremental effects of adopting the provisions of SFAS 158 on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 are presented in the following table. The adoption of SFAS 158 had no effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, or for any prior period presented, and it will not affect the Company’s operating results in future periods.

	December 31, 2006
(dollars in thousands)	Prior to Adopting SFAS 158			Effect of SFAS 158			As Reported
Long-term prepaid pension cost	$	139,767		$	(121,316	)	$	18,451
Intangible assets related to pension plans		72			(72	)		—
Current pension and postretirement benefit plan liabilities		3,422			—			3,422
Long-term pension liabilities		5,805			31,710			37,515
Long-term postretirement benefit plan liabilities		35,194			(14,437	)		20,757
Additional minimum pension liabilities		3,131			(3,131	)		—
Deferred income tax assets (liabilities), net		(49,728	)		44,382			(5,346	)
Accumulated other elements of comprehensive income		1,844			91,148			92,992

Included in accumulated other elements of comprehensive income at December 31, 2006 are the following amounts that have not yet been recognized in net periodic benefit plan cost as well as the amounts that are expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit plan cost during the year ending December 31, 2007:

	December 31, 2006						Year Ending December 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)	Before Tax			After Tax			Expected Amortization
Pension benefits:
Prior service credit, net	$	(2,461	)	$	(1,520	)	$	(540	)
Actuarial losses, net		155,487			103,427			14,674
Post retirement benefits:
Prior service credit		(2,677	)		(1,653	)		(382	)
Actuarial gains		(11,760	)		(7,262	)		(1,078	)
	$	138,589		$	92,992		$	12,674

53

The change in the projected benefit obligation associated with the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and the change in the accumulated benefit obligation associated with the Company’s postretirement benefit plans is as follows:

							Postretirement
	Pension Benefits						Benefits
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	422,897		$	414,569		$	24,912		$	26,672
Service cost		8,830			7,574			6			7
Interest cost		23,046			22,215			1,334			1,502
Plan participants’ contributions		921			910			—			—
Actuarial losses (gains)		17,374			22,924			(1,274	)		(998	)
Exchange rate changes		31,975			(25,384	)		—			—
Benefits and expenses paid from plan assets		(17,063	)		(19,628	)		—			—
Benefits paid directly by the Company		(573	)		(283	)		(1,714	)		(2,271	)
Benefit obligation at end of year	$	487,407		$	422,897		$	23,264		$	24,912
Benefit obligation at end of year:
U.S. plans	$	210,244		$	203,017		$	23,264		$	24,912
Foreign plans		277,163			219,880			—			—
Benefit obligation at end of year	$	487,407		$	422,897		$	23,264		$	24,912

The total accumulated benefit obligation for the Company’s defined benefit pension plans was $445,911,000 and $393,149,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The change in the plan assets associated with the Company’s defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans is as follows:

	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2006		2005
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	403,942		$	384,788		$	—	$	—
Actual return on plan assets		38,633			37,543			—		—
Actuarial gains		4,563			9,475			—		—
Company contributions		7,586			13,652			—		—
Plan participants’ contributions		921			910			—		—
Exchange rate changes		28,846			(22,798	)		—		—
Benefits and expenses paid from plan assets		(17,063	)		(19,628	)		—		—
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	467,428		$	403,942		$	—	$	—
Fair value of plan assets at end of year:
U.S. plans	$	223,835		$	201,867		$	—	$	—
Foreign plans		243,593			202,075			—		—
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	467,428		$	403,942		$	—	$	—

The funded status of the Company’s defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans is as follows:

	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Overfunded plans	$	18,451		$	3,228		$	—		$	—
Underfunded plans		(38,430	)		(22,183	)		(23,264	)		(24,912	)
Funded status	$	(19,979	)	$	(18,955	)	$	(23,264	)	$	(24,912	)

54

Actual asset investment allocations for the Company’s main defined benefit pension plans in the United States and the United Kingdom, which account for approximately 99% of total plan assets, are as follows:

	Pension Benefits
	2006		2005
U.S. plan:
Equity securities		65%		65%
Fixed income debt securities, cash and other		35%		35%
U.K. plan:
Equity securities		50%		51%
Fixed income debt securities, cash and other		50%		49%

In each jurisdiction, the investment of plan assets is overseen by a plan asset committee whose members act as trustees of the plan and set investment policy. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the investment strategy has been designed to approximate the performance of market indexes. The actual asset allocations for the U.S. plan at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were weighted slightly heavier toward equity securities than the targeted allocations.

During 2006, the Company made contributions totaling $7,586,000 to the assets of its various defined benefit pension plans. Contributions to plan assets for 2007 are currently expected to approximate $5,486,000, assuming no change in the current discount rate or expected investment earnings.

The weighted-average assumptions associated with the Company’s defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans were

as follows:

	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Assumptions related to net benefit costs:
Domestic plans:
Discount rate		5.75	%		5.75	%		5.5	%		5.75	%
Expected return on plan assets		8.5	%		8.5	%		—			—
Rate of compensation increase		4.5	%		4.5	%		—			—
Health care cost trend rate		—			—			9.0	%		10.0	%
Measurement date		1/1/2006			1/1/2005			10/1/2005			10/1/2004
International plans:
Discount rate		4.25 - 5.0	%		5.0 - 5.5	%		—			—
Expected return on plan assets		4.5 - 6.75	%		5.0 - 6.75	%		—			—
Rate of compensation increase		2.75 - 4.0	%		2.75 - 4.0	%		—			—
Measurement date		1/1/2006			1/1/2005			—			—
Assumptions related to end of period benefit obligations:
Domestic plans:
Discount rate		5.75	%		5.75	%		5.5	%		5.5	%
Rate of compensation increase		4.5	%		4.5	%		—			—
Health care cost trend rate		—			—			9.0	%		9.0	%
Measurement date		12/31/2006			12/31/2005			10/1/2006			10/1/2005
International plans:
Discount rate		4.5 - 5.0	%		4.25 - 5.0	%		—			—
Rate of compensation increase		2.75 - 4.0	%		2.75 - 4.0	%		—			—
Measurement date		12/31/2006			12/31/2005			—			—

The Company’s discount rate assumptions for its U.S. and U.K. defined benefit pension plans are based on the average yield of a hypothetical high quality bond portfolio with maturities that approximately match the estimated cash flow needs of the plans.

The assumptions for expected long-term rates of return on assets are based on historical experience and estimated future investment returns taking into consideration anticipated asset allocations, investment strategies and the views of various investment professionals.

The rate of compensation increase assumption for the U.S. plans is based on an age-grade scale ranging from 3.0% to 7.5% with a weighted-average rate of approximately 4.5%. The assumptions for the foreign plans reflect local economic conditions and the Company’s compensation strategy in those locations.

55

The health care cost trend rate is assumed to decrease gradually from 9.0% to 5.0% by 2011 and remain at that level thereafter. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:

(dollars in thousands)	One-percentage- point Increase		One-percentage- point Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost components in 2006	$	67	$	(60	)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2006	$	1,220	$	(1,099	)

Year-end amounts applicable to the Company’s pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets and accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were as follows:

	Projected Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets						Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Fair value of applicable plan assets	$	244,026		$	202,509		$	5,737		$	4,881
Projected benefit obligation of applicable plans	$	(282,456	)	$	(224,692	)		—			—
Accumulated benefit obligation of applicable plans		—			—		$	(15,529	)	$	(12,802	)

Future expected benefit payments and future expected receipts of Medicare Part D subsidies are as follows:

	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
(dollars in thousands)	U.S. Unfunded Plans		U.S. Funded Plans		Foreign Funded Plans		Payment Before Subsidy		Medicare Part D Subsidy
Year ended December 31:
2007	$	915	$	14,097	$	5,503	$	2,912	$	405
2008	$	410	$	13,963	$	5,706	$	2,883	$	407
2009	$	410	$	16,219	$	6,101	$	2,842	$	403
2010	$	280	$	14,966	$	6,693	$	2,745	$	384
2011	$	338	$	15,324	$	7,122	$	2,638	$	366
2012 - 2016	$	1,972	$	88,931	$	48,487	$	11,135	$	1,489

The Company’s domestic employees who are not covered by a bargaining unit and certain others are also eligible to participate in the Cameron International Corporation Retirement Savings Plan. Under this plan, employees’ savings deferrals are partially matched in cash and invested at the employees’ discretion. Additionally, the Company makes cash contributions for hourly employees who are not covered under collective bargaining agreements and will make contributions equal to a targeted rate of 2% of earnings of new employees hired on or after May 1, 2003, who are not eligible for participation in the Retirement Plan, based upon the achievement of certain financial objectives by the Company. The Company’s expense under this plan for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 amounted to $10,524,000, $9,573,000 and $8,026,000, respectively. In addition, the Company provides savings or other benefit plans for employees under collective bargaining agreements and, in the case of certain international employees, as required by government mandate, which provide for, among other things, Company matching contributions in cash based on specified formulas. Expense with respect to these various defined contribution and government-mandated plans for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 amounted to $19,045,000, $15,760,000 and $16,213,000, respectively.

Note 8: Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The Company has grants outstanding under four equity compensation plans, only one of which, the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (2005 EQIP), is currently available for future grants of equity compensation awards to employees and non-employee directors. The other three plans, which continue to have options outstanding at December 31, 2006, are the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated as of November 2002, the Broadbased 2000 Incentive Plan and the Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Accordingly, no stock-based employee compensation cost was recognized in the Consolidated Results of Operations statements, except with respect to the amortization of the intrinsic value of restricted stock unit grants totaling $2,790,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005. Options granted under the Company’s four equity compensation plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and all terms were fixed. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R), using the modified-prospective-transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized for the year ended December 31, 2006 included: (a) compensation cost related to all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), and (b) compensation cost related to all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). Results for prior periods have not been restated. Additionally, there was no material cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 123(R) at January 1, 2006.

56

Stock-based compensation expense recognized for the year ended December 31, 2006 under the provisions of SFAS 123(R) totaled $25,568,000, of which $9,974,000 and $15,594,000 are related to outstanding restricted and deferred stock unit grants and unvested outstanding stock option grants, respectively. Accordingly, the Company’s income before income taxes, net income, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2006 were lower than if the Company had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

	Year Ended
Decrease in	December 31, 2006
Income before income taxes	$	15,594
Net income		10,144
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.09
Diluted	$	0.09

The total income statement tax benefit recognized from stock-based compensation arrangements during the year ended December 31, 2006 totaled approximately $9,780,000.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share for 2005 and 2004, as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to options granted under the Company’s equity compensation plans. For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the value of the options is estimated using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing formula and amortized to expense over the options’ vesting periods.

	Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2005			2004
Net income, as reported	$	171,130		$	94,415
Add: Stock compensation expense included in net income		1,816			—
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value method, net of tax		(11,913	)		(24,818	)
Pro forma net income	$	161,033		$	69,597
Earnings per share:
Basic - as reported	$	1.55		$	0.89
Basic - pro forma	$	1.45		$	0.65
Diluted - as reported	$	1.52		$	0.88
Diluted - pro forma	$	1.41		$	0.64

During the second quarter of 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors accelerated the vesting on 622,262 pre-split option shares previously granted to employees of the Company in an effort to minimize the impact of the ultimate adoption of SFAS 123(R). Although this action established a new measurement date for these options under the intrinsic value method, there was no compensation expense associated with this action since the exercise price related to the accelerated options was above the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the day the acceleration was effective. However, approximately $10,365,000 of compensation expense under the fair value method was accelerated as a result of this action and has been reflected in the above pro forma table as additional compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Stock option awards

Options with terms of seven years are granted to officers and other key employees of the Company under the 2005 EQIP plan at a fixed exercise price equal to the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The options vest in one-third increments each year on the anniversary date following the date of grant, based on continued employment. Grants made in previous years to officers and other key employees under the Long-Term and Broadbased Incentive Plans provide similar terms, except that the options terminate after ten years rather than seven.

57

A summary of option activity under the Company’s stock compensation plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is presented below:

						Weighted-
						Average		Aggregate
				Weighted-		Remaining		Intrinsic
				Average		Contractual		Value
				Exercise		Term		(dollars in
Options	Shares			Price		(in years)		thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2006		6,656,075		$	27.49
Granted		1,319,337			53.50
Exercised		(2,900,951	)		27.27
Forfeited		(81,219	)		30.63
Expired		(13,000	)		32.12
Outstanding at December 31, 2006		4,980,242		$	34.44		5.52	$	93,720
Vested at December 31, 2006 or expected to vest in the future		4,936,557		$	34.38		5.51	$	93,197
Exercisable at December 31, 2006		2,508,054		$	25.72		4.86	$	68,618

	At
	December 31, 2006
Stock-based compensation cost not yet recognized under the straight-line method (dollars in thousands)	$	18,992
Weighted-average remaining expense recognition period (in years)		2.02

The fair values per share of option grants for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula with the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
Expected life (in years)		2.4			3.0			3.5
Risk-free interest rate		4.6	%		4.4	%		3.1	%
Volatility		30.2	%		27.0	%		29.0	%
Expected dividend yield		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%

The Company determined the assumptions involving the expected life of its options and volatility rates based primarily on historical data and consideration of expectations for the future.

The above assumptions and market prices of the Company’s common stock at the date of option exercises resulted in the following values:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
Grant-date fair value per option	$	12.17	$	7.88	$	6.57
Intrinsic value of options exercised (dollars in thousands)	$	71,178	$	103,157	$	18,813
Average intrinsic value per share of options exercised	$	24.54	$	9.67	$	6.54

Restricted and deferred stock unit awards

During 2005, the Company began issuing restricted stock units with no exercise price to key employees in place of stock options. During 2006, grants of restricted stock units were made to officers and key employees. Approximately 143,134 of the restricted stock unit grants during 2006 contained performance-based conditions which were fully satisfied based on the Company’s full-year 2006 financial performance against certain targets. The restricted stock units granted to officers during 2006 generally provide for 12.5% vesting on each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of grant and a final vesting of 75% on the third anniversary of the date of grant, based on continued employment. Restricted stock units granted to other key employees during 2006 generally provide for 25% vesting on the second anniversary of the date of grant and a final vesting of 75% on the third anniversary of the date of grant, based on continued employment, whereas restricted stock units granted prior to January 1, 2006 generally provide for 25% vesting on each of the first and second anniversaries of the grant date and a final vesting of 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date, based on continued employment.

58

Under a Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors approved by the Board of Directors in July 2005, non-employee directors are entitled to receive an annual grant of 6,000 deferred stock units from the 2005 EQIP plan upon first being elected to the Board and a grant of 4,000 deferred stock units annually thereafter (post-split basis). These units, which have no exercise price and no expiration date, vest in one-fourth increments quarterly over the following year but cannot be converted into common stock until the earlier of termination of Board service or three years, although Board members have the ability to voluntarily defer conversion for a longer period of time.

A summary of restricted stock unit award activity under the Company’s stock compensation plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is presented below:

				Weighted-Average
				Grant Date
Restricted Stock Units	Units			Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2006		329,700		$	27.71
Granted		393,527			41.64
Vested		(80,126	)		27.28
Forfeited		(18,840	)		34.99
Nonvested at December 31, 2006		624,261		$	36.33

	At
	December 31, 2006
Stock-based compensation cost not yet recognized under the straight-line method (dollars in thousands)	$	12,228
Weighted-average remaining expense recognition period (in years)		1.61

The intrinsic value of restricted stock units vesting during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $3,451,000 and $17,000, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, a total of 343,400 restricted stock units were granted at a weighted-average grant date fair value of $27.69 per share. The fair value of restricted stock units is determined based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.

At December 31, 2006, 3,279,052 shares were reserved for future grants of options, deferred stock units, restricted stock units and other awards. The Company may issue either treasury shares or newly issued shares of its common stock in satisfaction of these awards.

Note 9: Debt

The Company’s debt obligations were as follows:

	December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005
Senior notes, net of $301 of unamortized original issue discount and deferred loss on termination of interest rate swaps ($805 at December 31, 2005)	$	199,699		$	199,195
Convertible debentures		738,000			238,750
Other debt		3,557			3,705
Obligations under capital leases		11,497			9,256
		952,753			450,906
Current maturities		(207,345	)		(6,471	)
Long-term portion	$	745,408		$	444,435

On May 23, 2006, the Company issued $500,000,000 of twenty-year senior convertible debentures, due June 15, 2026, that pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 2.5% on each June 15 and December 15, beginning December 15, 2006 (the 2.5% Convertible Debentures). The Company has the right to redeem the 2.5% Convertible Debentures at any time on or after June 20, 2011, at principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. Holders may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the 2.5% Convertible Debentures on June 15 of 2011, 2016 and 2021, or at any time the Company undergoes a fundamental change as defined in the debenture agreement, for principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to June 15, 2011, holders may also convert their debenture holdings into shares of common stock at an initial conversion rate of 14.1328 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount, or $70.76 per share, only under the following circumstances:

• during any quarter after June 30, 2006, if the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeds 130% of the then current conversion price for at least 20 consecutive trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter;

• during the five business-day period after any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per debentures for each day of the period was less than 97% of the product of the last reported sales price of the Company’s common stock and the current conversion rate;

• upon the occurrence of specified corporate events; or

• upon receipt of a notice of redemption by the Company.

59

Holders may also convert the 2.5% Convertible Debentures into shares of common stock at any time on or after June 15, 2011 without meeting the above provisions. In either case involving conversion by the holders, any amount due up to and including the principal amount of the debt and accrued but unpaid interest will be satisfied in cash by the Company. The portion of the conversion value of the debt in excess of principal may, at the option of the Company, be satisfied in either cash or shares of the Company’s common stock. The initial conversion rate is subject to adjustment based on certain specified events or in the event the Company undergoes a fundamental change as defined. As part of the offering of the 2.5% Convertible Debentures, the Company agreed to file a shelf registration statement related to the resale of the debentures and the common stock issuable upon conversion of the debentures within a specified period of time and to have the registration statement become effective and maintain effectiveness during periods specified in the debenture agreement. This registration statement was filed timely by the Company on August 14, 2006. If the registration statement subsequently ceases to be effective, the Company could be subject to liquidated damage payments of up to 0.50% per year on the principal amount of the 2.5% Convertible Debentures, payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year during the period that the registration statement is not effective, as defined in the debenture agreement. The Company plans to use a portion of the proceeds from the offering to repay at maturity, or earlier, the $200,000,000 principal amount of 2.65% Senior Notes due 2007. Immediately following the offering, the Company used approximately $190,220,000 of the proceeds to purchase 4,166,915 shares of the Company’s common stock at an average cost of $45.65 per share. Remaining proceeds from the offering are available for acquisitions, further share repurchases and general corporate uses.

On October 12, 2005, the Company entered into a new $350,000,000 five-year multicurrency revolving credit facility, expiring October 12, 2010, subject to certain extension provisions. The credit facility (all of which was available at December 31, 2006) also allows for the issuance of letters of credit up to the full amount of the facility. The Company has the right to request an increase in the amount of the facility up to $700,000,000 and may request three one-year extensions of the maturity date of the facility, all subject to lender approval. The facility provides for variable-rate borrowings based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin (based on the Company’s then-current credit rating) or an alternate base rate. The agreement provides for facility and utilization fees and requires that the Company maintain a total debt-to-total capitalization ratio of less than 60% during the term of the agreement. The Company was in compliance with all loan covenants as of December 31, 2006.

On March 12, 2004, the Company issued senior notes due April 15, 2007 (the Senior Notes) in the aggregate amount of $200,000,000, with an interest rate of 2.65%, payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. In May 2004, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements on a notional amount of $150,000,000 of its Senior Notes to take advantage of short-term interest rates available. Under these agreements, the Company received interest from the counterparties at a fixed rate of 2.65% and paid a variable interest rate based on the published six-month LIBOR rate less 82.5 to 86.0 basis points. On June 7, 2005, the Company terminated these interest rate swaps and paid the counterparties approximately $1,074,000, which represented the fair market value of the agreements at the time of termination and was recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of the related debt. This amount is being amortized as an increase to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. The company’s interest expense was increased by $467,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of the amortization of the termination payment.

During 2004, the Company issued an aggregate amount of $238,000,000 of twenty-year convertible debentures due 2024 with an interest rate of 1.5%, payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15 (the 1.5% Convertible Debentures). The Company has the right to redeem the 1.5% Convertible Debentures anytime after five years at the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, and the debenture holders have the right to require the Company to repurchase the debentures on the fifth, tenth and fifteenth anniversaries of the issue. The 1.5% Convertible Debentures are convertible into the Company’s common stock at a rate of 28.9714 shares per debenture, or $34.52 per share. The holders can convert the debentures into the Company’s common stock only under the following circumstances:

• during any quarter in which the sales price of the Company’s common stock exceeds 120% of the conversion price for at least 20 consecutive trading days in the 30 consecutive trading-day period ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter;

• during any five consecutive trading-day period immediately following any five consecutive trading-day period in which the average trading price for the debentures is less than 97% of the average conversion value of the debentures;

• upon fundamental changes in the ownership of the Company’s common stock, which would include a change of control as defined in the debenture agreement.

The Company has elected to use the “cash pay” provision with respect to its 1.5% Convertible Debentures for any debentures tendered for conversion or designated for redemption. Under this provision, the Company will satisfy in cash its conversion obligation for 100% of the principal amount of any debentures submitted for conversion, with any remaining amount to be satisfied in shares of the Company’s common stock.

On May 16, 2001, the Company issued two series of convertible debentures with aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $450,000,000. The first series consisted of twenty-year zero-coupon convertible debentures (the Zero-Coupon Convertible Debentures) with an aggregate principal amount at maturity of approximately $320,756,000, and was repurchased in May 2004 for $259,524,000, net of unamortized discounts of $61,200,000.

The second series consisted of twenty-year convertible debentures in an aggregate amount of $200,000,000, with an interest rate of 1.75%, payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15 (the 1.75% Convertible Debentures). In May 2004, the Company redeemed $184,250,000 of the 1.75% Convertible Debentures. During February 2005, the Company retired an additional $15,000,000 of the 1.75% Convertible Debentures. The remaining portion was converted into shares of the Company’s common stock in May 2006.

The net proceeds from the Senior Notes and the 1.5% Convertible Debentures were used to retire the Company’s Zero-Coupon Convertible Debentures and a large portion of the 1.75% Convertible Debentures, as well as for other purposes, including share repurchases.

60

In connection with the early retirement of the Zero-Coupon Convertible Debentures and the 1.75% Convertible Debentures, the Company recorded a $6,844,000 pre-tax charge to write off the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with these debentures during the second quarter of 2004. This charge has been reflected in the caption entitled “Interest Expense” in the accompanying Consolidated Results of Operations.

In addition to the above, the Company also has other unsecured and uncommitted credit facilities available to its foreign subsidiaries to fund ongoing operating activities. Certain of these facilities also include annual facility fees.

Other debt has a weighted-average interest rate of 4.7% at December 31, 2006 (2.2% at December 31, 2005). Future maturities of the Company’s debt (excluding capital leases) are approximately $203,045,000 in 2007, $211,000 in 2008, $238,000,000 in 2009 and $500,000,000 in 2011. Maturities in 2009 and 2011 are related to the 1.5% Convertible Debentures and the 2.5% Convertible Debentures, which the holders have the right to require the Company to repurchase on May 15, 2009 and June 15, 2011, respectively.

Interest paid during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 approximated $19,515,000, $10,908,000, and $16,619,000, respectively.

Note 10: Leases

The Company leases certain facilities, office space, vehicles and office, data processing and other equipment under capital and operating leases. Rental expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $32,148,000, $20,653,000 and $23,157,000, respectively. Future minimum lease payments with respect to capital leases and operating leases with noncancelable terms in excess of one year were as follows:

	Capital			Operating
(dollars in thousands)	Lease Payments			Lease Payments
Year ended December 31:
2007	$	4,668		$	13,725
2008		4,202			10,944
2009		2,520			9,579
2010		834			8,521
2011		—			6,302
Thereafter		—			28,043
Future minimum lease payments		12,224			77,114
Less: amount representing interest		(727	)		—
Lease obligations at December 31, 2006	$	11,497		$	77,114

Note 11: Income Taxes

The components of income before income taxes were as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004
Income before income taxes:
U.S. operations	$	202,444	$	90,930	$	23,814
Foreign operations		286,157		172,082		109,105
Income before income taxes	$	488,601	$	263,012	$	132,919

The provisions for income taxes were as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004
Current:
U.S. federal	$	28,738	$	32,906	$	8,831
U.S. state and local		3,370		5,243		1,119
Foreign		85,036		49,118		18,835
		117,144		87,267		28,785
Deferred:
U.S. federal		45,157		465		6,046
U.S. state and local		6,791		70		909
Foreign		1,693		4,080		2,764
		53,641		4,615		9,719
Income tax provision	$	170,785	$	91,882	$	38,504

61

The reasons for the differences between the provision for income taxes and income taxes using the U.S. federal income tax rate were as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005			2004
U.S. federal statutory rate		35.00	%		35.00	%		35.00	%
State and local income taxes		1.53			1.36			0.85
Tax exempt income		(0.50	)		(1.00	)		(2.13	)
Foreign statutory rate differential		(3.72	)		(6.04	)		(8.77	)
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets		(0.39	)		0.06			0.21
Nondeductible expenses		1.55			1.49			1.77
Foreign income currently taxable in U.S.		1.33			1.46			2.11
All other		0.15			2.60			(0.07	)
Total		34.95	%		34.93	%		28.97	%
Total income taxes paid	$	64,111		$	34,941		$	38,853

Components of deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows:

	December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005
Deferred tax liabilities:
Plant and equipment	$	(21,785	)	$	(33,289	)
Inventory		(30,888	)		(46,208	)
Pensions		(5,346	)		(47,327	)
Other		(36,097	)		(22,752	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(94,116	)		(149,576	)
Deferred tax assets:
Postretirement benefits other than pensions		14,333			14,387
Reserves and accruals		58,670			45,135
Net operating losses and related deferred tax assets		54,678			143,739
Other		2,184			4,978
Total deferred tax assets		129,865			208,239
Valuation allowance		(33,077	)		(35,531	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	2,672		$	23,132

During the last three years, certain of the Company’s international operations have incurred losses that have not been tax benefited, while others utilized part of the previously reserved prior year losses. As a result of the foregoing, the valuation allowances established in prior years were decreased in 2006 by $2,902,000 and increased in 2005 and 2004, respectively, by $150,000 and $247,000, with a corresponding offset in the Company’s income tax expense. In addition, valuation allowances were established in 2005 in the amount of $10,778,000 to offset the tax benefit of net operating losses and other deferred tax assets recorded as part of an international acquisition. This amount was reduced in 2006 by $1,280,000 with a corresponding offset to goodwill. Further, certain valuation allowances are recorded in the non-U.S. dollar functional currency of the respective operation and the U.S. dollar equivalent reflects the effects of translation. The valuation allowance increased in 2006 and 2005 by $1,728,000 and $743,000, respectively, due to translation.

At December 31, 2006, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $60,000,000 in the U.S. that will expire in 2022 - 2023 if not utilized, approximately $35,000,000 in Brazil that had no expiration periods and approximately $20,500,000 in Italy, most of which will expire in 2008 - 2011. The Company had a valuation allowance of $33,077,000 as of December 31, 2006 against the net operating loss and other carryforwards. Approximately $9,000,000 of this amount will reduce goodwill in the event of any subsequent recognition of the related tax benefit. The Company has considered all available evidence in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, including future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In the event the Company were to determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the net deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

The tax benefit that the Company receives with respect to certain stock benefit plan transactions is credited to capital in excess of par value and does not reduce income tax expense. This benefit amounted to $23,284,000, $37,817,000 and $6,645,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The Company considers all unremitted earnings of its foreign subsidiaries, except certain amounts primarily earned before 2003 and amounts previously subjected to tax in the U.S., to be permanently reinvested. An estimate of the amounts considered permanently reinvested is $646,000,000. It is not practical for the Company to compute the amount of additional U.S. tax that would be due on this amount. The Company has provided deferred income taxes on the earnings that the Company anticipates to be remitted.

62

Note 12: Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

Under its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Company is authorized to issue up to 150,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share.

In February 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors changed the number of shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for repurchase from the 5,000,000 shares authorized in August, 2004 to 10,000,000 shares in order to reflect the 2-for-1 stock split effective December 15, 2005. Additionally, on May 22, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved repurchasing shares of the Company’s common stock with the proceeds remaining from the Company’s 2.5% Convertible Debenture offering, after taking into account a planned repayment of $200,000,000 principal amount of the Company’s outstanding 2.65% Senior Notes due 2007. This authorization is in addition to the 10,000,000 shares described above.

Purchases pursuant to the 10,000,000 share Board authorization may be made by way of open market purchases, directly or indirectly, for the Company’s own account or through commercial banks or financial institutions and by the use of derivatives such as a sale or put on the Company’s common stock or by forward or economically equivalent transactions.

Changes in the number of shares of the Company’s outstanding stock for the last three years were as follows:

	Common		Treasury			Shares
	Stock		Stock			Outstanding
Balance - December 31, 2003		54,933,658		(1,130,600	)		53,803,058
Purchase of treasury stock		—		(1,965,800	)		(1,965,800	)
Stock issued under stock option and other employee benefit plans		—		1,300,557			1,300,557
Balance - December 31, 2004		54,933,658		(1,795,843	)		53,137,815
Purchase of treasury stock		—		(164,500	)		(164,500	)
Stock issued under stock option and other employee benefit plans		3,130,345		1,960,343			5,090,688
Effect of stock split on shares outstanding		57,565,114		—			57,565,114
Balance - December 31, 2005		115,629,117		—			115,629,117
Purchase of treasury stock		—		(6,241,315	)		(6,241,315	)
Stock issued upon conversion of 1.75% convertible debentures		—		15,773			15,773
Stock issued under stock option and other employee benefit plans		541,746		2,344,306			2,886,052
Balance - December 31, 2006		116,170,863		(3,881,236	)		112,289,627

At December 31, 2006, 9,577,332 shares of unissued common stock were reserved for future issuance under various employee benefit plans.

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share. At December 31, 2006, no preferred shares were issued or outstanding. Shares of preferred stock may be issued in one or more series of classes, each of which series or class shall have such distinctive designation or title as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors of the Company prior to issuance of any shares. Each such series or class shall have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated in such resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance of such series or class of preferred stock as may be adopted by the Board of Directors prior to the issuance of any shares thereof. A total of 1,500,000 shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock has been reserved for issuance upon exercise of the Stockholder Rights described below.

Stockholder Rights Plan

On May 23, 1995, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each then-current and future outstanding share of common stock. Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company, par value $.01 per share, for an exercise price of $300. Unless earlier redeemed by the Company at a price of $.01 each, the Rights become exercisable only in certain circumstances constituting a potential change in control of the Company, described below, and will expire on October 31, 2007.

Each share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock purchased upon exercise of the Rights will be entitled to certain minimum preferential quarterly dividend payments as well as a specified minimum preferential liquidation payment in the event of a merger, consolidation or other similar transaction. Each share will also be entitled to 100 votes to be voted together with the common stockholders and will be junior to any other series of Preferred Stock authorized or issued by the Company, unless the terms of such other series provides otherwise.

63

Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, in the event any person or group of persons acquire beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, each holder of a Right, other than Rights beneficially owned by the acquiring person or group (which will have become void), will have the right to receive upon exercise of a Right that number of shares of common stock of the Company, or, in certain instances, common stock of the acquiring person or group, having a market value equal to two times the current exercise price of the Right.

Retained Earnings

Delaware law, under which the Company is incorporated, provides that dividends may be declared by the Company’s Board of Directors from a current year’s earnings as well as from the total of capital in excess of par value plus the retained earnings, which amounted to approximately $1,901,723,000 at December 31, 2006.

Note 13: Accumulated Other Elements of Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other elements of comprehensive income comprised the following:

	December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005
Accumulated foreign currency translation gain	$	104,619		$	47,489
Prior service credits, net, related to the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans		3,173			—
Actuarial losses, net, related to the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans		(96,165	)		—
Accumulated adjustments to record minimum pension liabilities, net of tax		—			(1,507	)
Change in fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, net of tax and other		4,699			(8,518	)
	$	16,326		$	37,464

Note 14: Business Segments

The Company’s operations are organized into three separate business segments — DPS, V&M and CS.

Based upon the amount of equipment installed worldwide and available industry data, DPS is one of the world’s leading providers of systems and equipment used to control pressures, direct flows of oil and gas wells and separate oil and gas from impurities. DPS’s products include surface and subsea drilling and production systems, control systems, blowout preventers, oil and gas separation equipment, gate valves, actuators, chokes, wellheads, drilling riser and aftermarket parts and services.

Based upon the amount of equipment installed worldwide and available industry data, V&M is a leading provider of valves and measurement systems primarily used to control, direct and measure the flow of oil and gas as they are moved from individual wellheads through flow lines, gathering lines and transmission systems to refineries, petrochemical plants and industrial centers for processing. V&M’s products include gate valves, ball valves, butterfly valves, Orbit valves, block and bleed valves, plug valves, globe valves, check valves, actuators, chokes and aftermarket parts and services. Measurement products include totalizers, turbine meters, flow computers, chart recorders, ultrasonic flow meters and sampling solutions.

CS provides reciprocating and centrifugal compression equipment and related aftermarket parts and services for the energy industry and for manufacturing companies and chemical process industries worldwide.

The Company’s primary customers are major and independent oil and gas exploration and production companies, engineering and construction companies, drilling contractors, pipeline operators, refiners and other industrial and petrochemical processing companies. CS’s customers also include manufacturers and companies in the air separation, power production, petrochemical and chemical process industries.

The Company markets its equipment through a worldwide network of sales and marketing employees supported by agents and distributors in selected international locations. Due to the extremely technical nature of many of the products, the marketing effort is further supported by a staff of engineering employees.

The Company expenses all research and product development and enhancement costs as incurred, or if incurred in connection with a product ordered by a customer, when the revenue associated with the product is recognized. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company incurred research and product development costs, including costs incurred on projects designed to enhance or add to its existing product offerings, totaling approximately $44,576,000, $34,394,000 and $31,849,000, respectively. DPS accounted for 81%, 80% and 84% of each respective year’s total costs.

64

Summary financial data by segment follows:

	Year Ended December 31, 2006
							Corporate
(dollars in thousands)	DPS		V&M		CS		& Other			Consolidated
Revenues	$	2,113,073	$	1,177,879	$	451,955	$	—		$	3,742,907
Depreciation and amortization	$	52,762	$	30,694	$	12,957	$	4,937		$	101,350
Interest income	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(26,939	)	$	(26,939	)
Interest expense	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	20,677		$	20,677
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	364,653	$	167,541	$	45,674	$	(89,267	)	$	488,601
Capital expenditures	$	115,052	$	33,331	$	20,453	$	15,994		$	184,830
Total assets	$	2,101,823	$	1,037,528	$	285,278	$	926,121		$	4,350,750

	Year Ended December 31, 2005
							Corporate
(dollars in thousands)	DPS		V&M		CS		& Other			Consolidated
Revenues	$	1,507,823	$	625,124	$	384,900	$	—		$	2,517,847
Depreciation and amortization	$	43,736	$	16,787	$	15,387	$	2,488		$	78,398
Interest income	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(13,060	)	$	(13,060	)
Interest expense	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	11,953		$	11,953
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	178,939	$	101,539	$	26,675	$	(44,141	)	$	263,012
Capital expenditures	$	49,789	$	13,807	$	7,269	$	6,643		$	77,508
Total assets	$	1,575,363	$	936,443	$	280,057	$	306,699		$	3,098,562

	Year Ended December 31, 2004
							Corporate
(dollars in thousands)	DPS		V&M		CS		& Other			Consolidated
Revenues	$	1,402,796	$	350,095	$	339,954	$	—		$	2,092,845
Depreciation and amortization	$	51,330	$	12,197	$	16,896	$	2,418		$	82,841
Interest income	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(4,874	)	$	(4,874	)
Interest expense	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	17,753		$	17,753
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	118,828	$	37,836	$	24,627	$	(48,372	)	$	132,919
Capital expenditures	$	28,929	$	13,717	$	6,853	$	3,982		$	53,481
Total assets	$	1,430,256	$	404,360	$	294,624	$	227,190		$	2,356,430

For internal management reporting, and therefore the above segment information Corporate and Other includes expenses associated with the Company’s Corporatqe office in Houston, Texas, as well as all of the Company’s interest income, interest expense, certain litigation expense managed by the Company’s General Counsel, foreign currency gains and losses from certain intercompany lending activities managed by the Company’s centralized Treasury function and all of the Company’s stock compensation expense. Consolidated interest income and expense are treated as a Corporate item because short-term investments and debt, including location, type, currency, etc., are managed on a worldwide basis by the Corporate Treasury Department. In addition, income taxes are managed on a worldwide basis by the Corporate Tax Department and are therefore treated as a corporate item.

65

Revenue by shipping location and long-lived assets by country were as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004
Revenues:
United States	$	1,900,781	$	1,365,770	$	1,016,125
United Kingdom		498,497		326,231		444,134
Other foreign countries		1,343,629		825,846		632,586
Total revenues	$	3,742,907	$	2,517,847	$	2,092,845

	December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006		2005		2004
Long-lived assets:
United States	$	719,377	$	655,922	$	560,088
United Kingdom		156,333		125,763		130,057
Other foreign countries		450,826		373,026		236,547
Total long-lived assets	$	1,326,536	$	1,154,711	$	926,692

Note 15: Earnings Per Share

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for each period presented was as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
(amounts in thousands)	2006		2005		2004
Net income	$	317,816	$	171,130	$	94,415
Add back interest on convertible debentures, net of tax		11		—		—
Net income (assuming conversion of convertible debentures)	$	317,827	$	171,130	$	94,415
Average shares outstanding (basic)		113,283		110,732		106,545
Common stock equivalents		1,805		1,475		1,163
Incremental shares from assumed conversion of convertible debentures		1,904		401		—
Shares utilized in diluted earnings per share calculation		116,992		112,608		107,708
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	2.81	$	1.55	$	0.89
Diluted	$	2.72	$	1.52	$	0.88

Diluted shares and net income used in computing diluted earnings per common share have been calculated using the if-converted method for the Company’s 1.75% Convertible Debentures for the period they were outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2006. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, these debentures were anti-dilutive. The Company’s 1.5% Convertible Debentures have been included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2006, since the average market price of the Company’s common stock exceeded the conversion value of the debentures during the year. The Company’s 2.5% Convertible Debentures have not been included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2006, as the conversion price of the debentures was in excess of the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the year. See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding conversion of theses debentures.

Note 16: Summary of Noncash Operating, Investing and Financing Activities

The effect on net assets of noncash operating, investing and financing activities was as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2006			2005
Change in net assets due to implementation of SFAS 158, including elimination of minimum pension liability	$	(91,485	)	$	—
Change in receivables from employees relating to equity issuances from stock compensation plans	$	(1,023	)	$	(1,400	)
Tax benefit recognized for certain employee stock compensation plan transactions	$	23,284		$	37,817
Change in fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, net of tax	$	13,468		$	(8,441	)
Other	$	8,358		$	—

66

Note 17: Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Guarantees, Concentrations of Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Guarantees

At December 31, 2006, the Company was contingently liable with respect to $447,021,000 of bank guarantees and standby letters of credit issued on its behalf by major domestic and international financial institutions in connection with the delivery, installation and performance of the Company’s products under contract with customers throughout the world. The Company was also liable to these financial institutions for financial letters of credit and other guarantees issued on its behalf totaling $14,767,000, which provide security to third parties relating to the Company’s ability to meet specified financial obligations, including payment of leases, customs duties, insurance and other matters.

The Company’s other off-balance sheet risks were not material at December 31, 2006.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Apart from its normal exposure to its customers, who are predominantly in the energy industry, the Company had no significant concentrations of credit risk at December 31, 2006. The Company typically does not require collateral for its customer trade receivables.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, trade payables, derivative instruments and debt instruments. The book values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables and floating-rate debt instruments are considered to be representative of their respective fair values. At December 31, 2006, the fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate debt (based on quoted market rates) was approximately $175,694,000 higher than the $938,000,000 face value of the debt.

In order to mitigate the effect of exchange rate changes, the Company will often attempt to structure sales contracts to provide for collections from customers in the currency in which the Company incurs its manufacturing costs. In certain instances, the Company will enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge specific large anticipated receipts or disbursements in currencies for which the Company does not traditionally have fully offsetting local currency expenditures or receipts. The Company was party to a number of long-term foreign currency forward contracts at December 31, 2006. The purpose of the majority of these contracts was to hedge large anticipated non-functional currency cash flows on major subsea or drilling contracts involving the Company’s United States operations and its wholly-owned subsidiary in the United Kingdom. Information relating to the contracts and the fair values recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2006 and 2005 follows:

	December 31, 2006
	Year of Contract Expiration										December 31,
(amounts in thousands except exchange rates)	2007		2008		2009		Total				2005
Sell USD/Buy GBP:
Notional amount to sell (in U.S. dollars)	$	65,406	$	10,966	$	2,621	$	78,993		$	220,436
Average GBP to USD contract rate		1.8091		1.8039		1.7989		1.8080			1.8124
Average GBP to USD forward rate at December 31, 2006		1.9589		1.9515		1.9426		1.9573			1.7274
Fair value at December 31, 2006 in U.S. dollars							$	6,525		$	(10,313	)
Sell GBP/Buy Euro:
Notional amount to buy (in euros)		15,965		899		12		16,876			45,807
Average GBP to EUR contract rate		1.3902		1.3693		1.3450		1.3891			1.4045
Average GBP to EUR forward rate at December 31, 2006		1.4756		1.4580		1.4365		1.4746			1.4333
Fair value at December 31, 2006 in U.S. dollars							$	(1,380	)	$	(1,128	)
Sell GBP/Buy NOK:
Notional amount to buy (in Norwegian krone)		20,670		600		—		21,270			58,479
Average GBP to NOK contract rate		11.2999		11.2173		—		11.2975			11.3817
Average GBP to NOK forward rate at December 31, 2006		12.1515		12.0085		—		12.1475			11.4874
Fair value at December 31, 2006 in U.S. dollars							$	(258	)	$	(82	)
Sell USD/Buy Euro:
Notional amount to buy (in euros)		25,086		10,450		—		35,536			—
Average EUR to USD contract rate		1.2888		1.3166		—		1.2970			—
Average EUR to USD forward rate at December 31, 2006		1.3288		1.3410		—		1.3324			—
Fair value at December 31, 2006 in U.S. dollars							$	(46	)	$	—

67

Note 18: Contingencies

The Company is subject to a number of contingencies which include environmental matters, litigation and tax contingencies.

Environmental Matters

The Company’s worldwide operations are subject to domestic and international regulations with regard to air, soil and water quality as well as other environmental matters. The Company, through its environmental management system and active third-party audit program, believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations.

The Company is currently identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) with respect to two sites designated for cleanup under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or similar state laws. One of these sites is Osborne, Pennsylvania (a landfill into which a predecessor of the CS operation in Grove City, Pennsylvania deposited waste), where remediation is complete and remaining costs relate to ongoing ground water treatment and monitoring. The other is believed to be a de minimis exposure. The Company is also engaged in site cleanup under the Voluntary Cleanup Plan of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality at former manufacturing locations in Houston and Missouri City, Texas. Additionally, the Company has discontinued operations at a number of other sites which had been active for many years. The Company does not believe, based upon information currently available, that there are any material environmental liabilities existing at these locations. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet included a noncurrent liability of $6,957,000 for environmental matters.

Legal Matters

At the former manufacturing site in Houston, Texas, the Company discovered that contaminated underground water from this site had migrated under an adjacent residential area. Pursuant to applicable state regulations, the Company notified the affected homeowners in 2001. Since that time, the Company has entered into agreements with 21 homeowners that obligated the Company to reimburse them for any estimated decline in value at time of sale due to potential buyer’s concerns over contamination following a sale or, in the case of some agreements, to purchase the property after an agreed marketing period. Four of these agreements have had no claims made under them yet. In addition, the Company has settled eight other property claims by homeowners who have sold their properties. The Company has had expenses and losses of approximately $8,300,000 from 2002 through 2006 related to these various agreements and settlements.

In addition, the Company is a named defendant in three lawsuits regarding this contamination and another suit which was settled in January, 2007. The settled case is Valice v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc. (80th Jud. Dist. Ct., Harris County, filed June 21, 2002), which was filed and settled as a class action. Pursuant to the settlement, the homeowners who remained part of the class will be entitled to receive a payment of approximately 3% of the 2006 appraised value of their property or reimbursement of any diminution in value of their property due to contamination concerns at the time of any sale. There were 21 homeowners who opted out of the class settlement.

The other suits pending regarding this matter have been filed by a number of homeowners who have opted out of the class action settlement. Moldovan v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc. (165th Jud. Dist. Ct., Harris County, filed October 23, 2006), was filed by six homeowners who opted out of the class settlement. Other suits filed include Tuma v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc. (334th Jud. Dist. Ct., Harris County, filed on November 27, 2006) and Rudelson v. Cooper Industries, Inc. (189th Jud. Dist. Ct., Harris County, filed November 29, 2006). The complaints filed in these actions make the claim that the contaminated underground water has reduced property values and seeks recovery of actual and exemplary damages for the loss of property value.

The Company is of the opinion that there is no health risk to area residents and that the lawsuits essentially reflect concerns over a possible decline in property value. The Company believes, based on its review of the facts and law, that any potential exposure from existing agreements, the class action settlement or other actions that have been or may be filed, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations. The Company has reserved a total of $17,500,000 for these matters as of December 31, 2006.

The Company had been named as a defendant in a suit brought by a purchaser of an option to purchase a parcel of the same former manufacturing site, Silber/I-10 Venture Ltd., f/k/a Rocksprings Ltd. v. Falcon Interests Realty Corp., Cooper Industries Inc. and Cooper Cameron Corporation (212th Judicial District Court, Galveston County, filed August 15, 2002) that alleged fraud and breach of contract regarding the environmental condition of the parcel under option. The parties have settled this matter and the case has been dismissed. Based on the Asset Transfer Agreement pursuant to which Cooper Industries, Inc. (Cooper) spun-off the Company, Cooper has made a claim of approximately $2,500,000 against the Company for reimbursement of its legal fees and settlement costs with respect to this matter. The Company is of the opinion it is not required to make this reimbursement and intends to vigorously defend itself.

The Company has been named as a defendant in a number of multi-defendant, multi-plaintiff tort lawsuits since 1995. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet included a liability of approximately $4,269,000 for such cases, including estimated legal costs.

The Company believes, based on its review of the facts and law, that the potential exposure from the remaining suits will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or liquidity.

Tax Contingencies

The Company has legal entities in over 35 countries. As a result, the Company is subject to various tax filing requirements in these countries. The Company prepares its tax filings in a manner which it believes is consistent with such filing requirements. However, some of the tax laws and regulations which the Company is subject to are subject to interpretation and/or judgment. Although the Company believes that the tax liability for periods ending on or before the balance sheet date have been adequately provided for in the financial statements, to the extent that a taxing authority believes that the Company has not prepared its tax filings in accordance with the authority’s interpretation of the tax laws/regulations, the Company could be exposed to additional taxes.

68

Note 19: Unaudited Quarterly Operating Results

Unaudited quarterly operating results were as follows:

	2006 (by quarter)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	1		2		3		4
Revenues	$	829,660	$	857,765	$	978,792	$	1,076,690
Revenues less cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)	$	244,665	$	274,856	$	293,824	$	328,490
Acquisition integration costs	$	10,028	$	9,083	$	3,648	$	6,819
Income from liquidation of LIFO inventory layers at Compression Systems	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,091
Charge relating to settlement of a class action lawsuit	$	6,500	$	—	$	2,000	$	9,000
Net income	$	56,042	$	75,964	$	89,285	$	96,525
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.48	$	0.67	$	0.80	$	0.86
Diluted	$	0.47	$	0.64	$	0.78	$	0.83

	2005 (by quarter)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	1		2		3		4
Revenues	$	547,888	$	594,784	$	636,613	$	738,562
Revenues less cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)	$	140,622	$	171,853	$	186,785	$	222,310
Income from liquidation of LIFO inventory layers at Compression Systems	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,033
Net income	$	28,591	$	38,630	$	49,218	$	54,691
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.27	$	0.35	$	0.44	$	0.48
Diluted	$	0.26	$	0.35	$	0.43	$	0.47

69

Selected Consolidated Historical Financial Data of Cameron International Corporation

The following table sets forth selected historical financial data for the Company for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2006. This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

	Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
Income Statement Data:
Revenues	$	3,742,907		$	2,517,847		$	2,092,845		$	1,634,346		$	1,538,100
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)		2,601,072			1,796,277			1,560,268			1,181,650			1,102,504
Selling and administrative expenses		528,568			381,267			300,124			288,569			273,105
Depreciation and amortization		101,350			78,398			82,841			83,565			77,907
Non-cash write-down of technology investment		—			—			3,814			—			—
Interest income		(26,939	)		(13,060	)		(4,874	)		(5,198	)		(8,542	)
Interest expense		20,677			11,953			17,753			8,157			7,981
Acquisition integration costs		29,578			—			—			—			—
Total costs and expenses		3,254,306			2,254,835			1,959,926			1,556,743			1,452,955
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change		488,601			263,012			132,919			77,603			85,145
Income tax provision		(170,785	)		(91,882	)		(38,504	)		(20,362	)		(24,676	)
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change		317,816			171,130			94,415			57,241			60,469
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—			—			—			12,209			—
Net income	$	317,816		$	171,130		$	94,415		$	69,450		$	60,469
Basic earnings per share:
Before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	2.81		$	1.55		$	0.89		$	0.53		$	0.56
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—			—			—			0.11			—
Net income per share	$	2.81		$	1.55		$	0.89		$	0.64		$	0.56
Diluted earnings per share:
Before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	2.72		$	1.52		$	0.88		$	0.52		$	0.55
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—			—			—			0.10			—
Net income per share	$	2.72		$	1.52		$	0.88		$	0.62		$	0.55
Balance Sheet Data (at the end of period):
Total assets	$	4,350,750		$	3,098,562		$	2,356,430		$	2,140,685		$	1,997,670
Stockholders’ equity	$	1,741,439		$	1,594,763		$	1,228,247		$	1,136,723		$	1,041,303
Long-term debt	$	745,408		$	444,435		$	458,355		$	204,061		$	462,942
Other long-term obligations	$	235,691		$	137,503		$	141,568		$	119,982		$	118,615

70

EX-21.1

											Exhibit 21.1
CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION -- SUBSIDIARIES & JOINT VENTURES
(Active As of February 21, 2007)
									% Owned		State/Country of
									By	% Owned	Incorporation or
Cameron International Corporation (Delaware)									Subsidiary	By CAM	Organization
1 - Cameron Algerie (1 share owned by CPEGI)										100%	Algeria
1 - Cameron Al Rushaid Limited Company										50%	Saudi Arabia
1 - Cameron Argentina S.A.I.C. (122,700 shares owned by CPEGI)									Less than 1%	100%	Argentina
1 - Cameron Gabon, S.A. (1 share owned by Chairman)										100%	Gabon
1 - Cameron/Curtiss-Wright EMD LLC										50%	Delaware, USA
1 - Cameron Offshore Systems Nigeria Limited										100%	Nigeria
1 - Cameron Services Middle East LLC (Joint Venture)										24%	Oman
1 - Cameron Venezolana, S.A. - (51% owned by CPEGI)									51%	49%	Venezuela
	2 - Cameron Remanufacturas, C.A.								100%		Venezuela
1 - Cameron Angola - Prestaçao de Serviços, Limitada - (1 share owned by CPEGI)										100%	Angola
1 - Compression Services Company										100%	Ohio, USA
1 - Cooper Cameron Foreign Sales Company Ltd.										100%	Barbados
1 - Cameron International Holding Corp. (CESI has partial interest)									8.36%	91.64%	Nevada, USA
	2 - Cameron Holding (Cayman) Limited								100%		Grand Cayman
		3 - Cameron Products Ltd.							100%		Grand Cayman
		3 - Cameron Russia Ltd.							100%		Grand Cayman
		3 - Cameron Services Russia Ltd.							100%		Grand Cayman
		3 - Cameron Australasia Pty. Ltd.							100%		Australia
			4 - Cooper Cameron Valves Australia Pty. Ltd.						100%		Australia
		3 - Cameron Campex Limited							80.1%		Grand Cayman
			4 - ShanDong Cooper Cameron Petroleum Equipment PTE LTD						100%		China
		3 - Cooper Cameron do Brasil Ltda. (1 share owned by Cameron (Lux) SARL)							100%		Brazil
			4 - On/Off Manufatura e Comércio de Vávulas Ltda.						100%		Brazil
			[1 share owned by Cameron Holding (Cayman) Limited]
		3 - Cameron (Trinidad) Limited							100%		Trinidad and Tobago
		3 - Cameron International Malaysia Sdn Bhd**							49%		Malaysia
			4 - Cameron Holding (Luxembourg) SARL						100%		Luxembourg
				5 - Cameron (Luxembourg) SARL					100%		Luxembourg
					6 - Cameron Systems (Ireland) Limited				100%		Ireland
					6 - Cameron GmbH				100%		Germany
					6 - Cameron Italy S.R.L.				100%		Italy
					6 - Cameron Ireland Limited				100%		Ireland
					6 - Cameron International Malaysia Systems Sdn Bhd				100%		Malaysia
					6 - Cameron Valves - Trading and Industrial Services LDA				55%		Portugal
						7 - Cameron Valves & Measurement West Africa Limited			70%		Nigeria
					6 - Cooper Cameron Netherlands B.V.				100%		Netherlands
						7 - CCC Euro Automation Center B.V.			100%		Netherlands
						7- Caméron România S.A.			100%		Romania
					6- Cooper Cameron Holding (Dutch) B.V.				100%		Netherlands
						7- Cameron Canada Corporation			100%		Canada/Nova Scotia
					6 - Cooper Cameron Holding (U.K.) Limited				100%		United Kingdom
						7 - Cameron France, S.A.S.			100%		France
						7 - Cameron Limited			100%		United Kingdom
							8 - Cooper Cameron (U.K.) Investments Limited		100%		United Kingdom
								9 - Nutron Manufacturers (India) Private Limited	100%		India
								9 - Flow Control-Tati Production Sdn. Bhd.	49%		Malaysia
								9 - Nutron Flow Control International (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.	100%		Malaysia
							8 - Cameron Offshore Engineering Limited		100%		United Kingdom
							8 - Cooper Cameron Pensions Limited		100%		United Kingdom
							8 - Cameron Integrated Services Limited		100%		United Kingdom
							8 - International Valves Limited		100%		United Kingdom
						7 - Cooper Cameron Holding B.V.			100%		Netherlands
							8 - Cooper Energy Services B.V.		100%		Netherlands
							8 - Cameron B.V.		100%		Netherlands
							8 - Cooper Cameron Holding (Norway) AS		100%		Norway
								9 - Cameron Norge AS	100%		Norway
		3 - Cameron (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.							100%		Singapore
			4 - Riyan Cameron (B) Sendirian Berhad						100%		Brunei
1 - Cameron (Holding) Corp.										100%	Nevada, USA
	2 - Cooper - Texgas Ltd. (1 share owned by Compression Services Co.)								50%		Colombia
	2- Cameron Technologies, Inc.								100%		Delaware, USA
		3 - Cameron Flow Systems Ltd.							100%		Alberta, CA
		3 - Cameron Technologies UK Limited							100%		England & Wales
		3 - NuFlo Finance and Royalty Company							100%		Delaware, USA
		3 - Cameron Technologies US, Inc.							100%		Delaware, USA
1 - OPE, Inc.										33%	Texas, USA
1 - OPE International, L.P.										33%	Texas, USA
1 - Sequel Holding, Inc.										100%	Delaware, USA
1 - Petreco International Inc. (partially owned by Sequel Holding, Inc.)									51%	49%	Delaware, USA
	2 - Petreco-KCC Holding, Inc.								100%		Delaware, USA
		3 - Petreco-KCC Limited							100%		United Kingdom
	2 - Petreco International Limited								100%		United Kingdom
		3 - KCC Group Limited							100%		United Kingdom
			4 - Petreco International (Middle East) Limited						100%		United Kingdom
			4 - KCC Process Equipment Limited						100%		United Kingdom
				5 - RJB Engineering (UK) Limited					100%		United Kingdom
			4 - KCC Resources (Jersey) Limited						100%		Jersey
	2 - Petreco Canada Inc.								100%		Canada/Alberta
1 - Cooper Cameron Corporation Nigeria Limited										60%	Nigeria
1 - Cooper Cameron Srl										100%	Italy
1 - Cameron Systems de Venezuela, S.A.										100%	Venezuela
1 - Cameron Energy Services International, Inc. (CESI)										100%	Ohio, USA
	2 - Canada Tiefbohrgeräte und Maschinenfabrik GmbH (1 share owned by CPEGI)								100%		Austria
1 - Cameron de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (1 share owned by CPEGI)										100%	Mexico
1 - Cameron Petroleum Equipment Group, Inc. (CPEGI)										100%	Delaware, USA
1 - Cameron Wellhead Services, Inc.										100%	Nevada, USA
	2 - Cooper Cameron (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd**								49%		Malaysia
		3 - Cooper Cameron Valves Singapore Pte. Ltd.							100%		Singapore
			4 - Cooper Cameron Corporation Sdn Bhd						70%		Malaysia
			4 - PCC Bumi Flow Technologies Sdn. Bhd.						49%		Malaysia
** Local Malaysian law requires that a majority of stock be owned by local residents.
Attorney/agents hold 51% of stock on CCC's behalf.

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements on Forms S-3, S-3/A and S-8 of Cameron International Corporation of our reports dated February 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cameron International Corporation, Cameron International Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Cameron International Corporation, incorporated by reference or included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Registration Statement No.	Purpose
No. 333-26923 No. 33-95004 No. 333-53545 No. 333-37850 No. 333-106224	Form S-8 Registration Statements pertaining to the Amended and Restated Cooper Cameron Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan
No. 33-95002	Form S-8 Registration Statement pertaining to the Cooper Cameron Corporation Retirement Savings Plan
No. 333-57991	Form S-8 Registration Statement pertaining to the Individual Account Retirement Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees at the Cooper Cameron Corporation Buffalo, New York Plant
No. 333-51705	Form S-3 Registration Statement pertaining to the Cooper Cameron Corporation shelf registration of debt securities
No. 333-79787	Form S-8 Registration Statement pertaining to the Cooper Cameron Corporation Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors
No. 333-46638 No. 333-82082 No. 333-61820 No. 333-104755	Form S-8 Registration Statements pertaining to the Cooper Cameron Corporation Broad Based 2000 Incentive Plan
No. 333-96565	Form S-3 and S-3/A Registration Statements pertaining to the Cooper Cameron Corporation shelf registration of up to $500 million of securities
No. 333-106225	Form S-8 Registration Statement pertaining to the Cooper Cameron Corporation Compensation Deferral Plan, Cooper Cameron Corporation Supplemental Excess Defined Contribution Plan and 2003 Cooper Cameron Corporation Supplemental Excess Defined Contribution Plan
No. 333-116667	Form S-3 and S-3/A Registration Statements pertaining to the Cooper Cameron Corporation 1.50% convertible Senior Debentures due 2024
No. 333-128414	Form S-8 Registration Statement pertaining to the Cooper Cameron Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
No. 333-136900
No. 333-136589	Form S-3 Registration Statement pertaining to the Cameron International Corporation 2.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2006.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas

February 26, 2007

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

Cameron International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Certification

I, Sheldon R. Erikson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cameron International Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 27, 2007

 /s/ Sheldon R. Erikson

 Sheldon R. Erikson

 Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

Cameron International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Certification

I, Franklin Myers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cameron International Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 27, 2007

/s/ Franklin Myers 

 Franklin Myers

 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of Cameron International Corporation (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer’s knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 27, 2007

/s/ Sheldon R. Erikson

Name: Sheldon R. Erikson

Title: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Franklin Myers

Name: Franklin Myers

Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cameron International Corporation and will be retained by Cameron International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Note: The certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. Registration Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.