XML 88 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
Note 7 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Notes to Financial Statements  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]
7. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES
 
The following tables present information about the Company’s goodwill and identifiable intangible assets on the dates indicated (in thousands):
 
 
 
June 30, 2015
 
 
June 30, 2014
 
   
Cost
   
Accumulated Amortization
   
Net
   
Cost
   
Accumulated Amortization
   
Net
 
Goodwill
  $ 3,034     $ -     $ 3,034     $ 3,034     $ -     $ 3,034  
Identifiable intangible assets
    11,368       (4,243
)
    7,125       10,720       (2,960
)
    7,760  
 
Identifiable intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
 
   
June 30, 2015
   
June 30, 2014
 
Non-compete agreements
  $ 600     $ 600  
Trademarks and trade names
    1,480       1,480  
Completed technology
    2,358       2,358  
Customer relationships
    4,950       4,950  
Software development
    1,655       1,007  
Other intangible assets
    325       325  
Total
    11,368       10,720  
Accumulated amortization
    (4,243
)
    (2,960
)
Total net balance
  $ 7,125     $ 7,760  
 
Identifiable intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of expected economic benefit.  
 
The estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five years, and thereafter, is as follows (in thousands):
 
Fiscal Year
               
2016
  $ 1,434          
2017
    1,432          
2018
    1,364          
2019
    1,285          
2020
    761          
Thereafter
    849          
 
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed. The Company’s acquisition of Bytewise in 2011 gave rise to goodwill. The Company performs an impairment assessment on an annual basis as of the end of our October month end or more frequently if circumstances warrant. For fiscal year 2015, the impairment assessment was a two-step process. The first step requires a comparison of the implied fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit is higher than its fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step of the evaluation must be performed. In the second step, the potential impairment is calculated by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying value of the goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is greater than the implied fair value of its goodwill, an impairment loss will be recognized for the excess.
 
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is subjective and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions. With the assistance of an independent third-party appraisal firm, the Company estimates the fair value using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows. The Company believes this approach yields the most appropriate evidence of fair value. The Company also utilizes the comparable company multiples method and market transaction fair value method to validate the fair value amount it obtains using the income approach. The key assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow model includes estimates of future cash flows from operating activities offset by estimated capital expenditures of the reporting unit, the estimated terminal value for the reporting unit, a discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital, overall economic conditions, and an assessment of current market capitalization. Any unfavorable material changes to these key assumptions could potentially impact the Company’s fair value determinations.
 
The fair value of the 2015 goodwill assessment exceeded the carrying amount by approximately 37.4%.
Therefore no goodwill impairment was recorded. If future results significantly vary from current estimates, related projections, or business assumptions in the future due to changes in industry or market conditions, the Company may be required to record impairment charges.