XML 170 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Note 7 - Goodwill and Intangibles
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]

7. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES


The following tables present information about the Company’s intangible assets on the dates indicated (in thousands):


   

June 30, 2013

   

June 30, 2012

 
   

Cost

   

Accumulated Amortization

   

Net

   

Cost

   

Accumulated Amortization

   

Net

 

Goodwill

  $ 3,034     $ -     $ 3,034     $ 3,034     $ -     $ 3,034  

Identifiable intangible assets

    10,000       (1,778

)

    8,222       15,858       (7,103

)

    8,755  

Identifiable intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):


   

June 30, 2013

   

June 30, 2012

 

Non-compete agreements

  $ 600     $ 600  

Trademarks and trade names

    1,480       1,480  

Completed technology

    2,010       2,010  

Customer relationships

    4,950       4,950  

Backlog

    -       260  

Software development

    635       282  

Other intangible assets

    325       -  

Total

    10,000       15,858  

Accumulated amortization

    (1,778

)

    (827

)

Total net balance

  $ 8,222     $ 8,755  

Identifiable intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of expected economic benefit.  


The estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five years, and thereafter, is as follows (in thousands):


Fiscal Year

       

2014

  $ 1,160  

2015

    1,160  

2016

    1,160  

2017

    1,158  

2018

    1,090  

Thereafter

    2,494  

The Company performed a qualitative analysis in accordance with ASU 2011-08 for its Bytewise reporting unit for its October 1, 2012 annual assessment of goodwill (commonly referred to as “Step Zero”). From a qualitative perspective, in evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units is not less than their respective carrying amount, relevant events and circumstances were taken into account, with greater weight assigned to events and circumstances that most affect the fair value of Bytewise or the carrying amounts of its assets. Items that were considered included, but were not limited to, the following: macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance, changes in management or key personnel, and other Bytewise specific events. After assessing these and other factors the Company determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the Bytewise reporting unit was not less than the carrying amount as of October 1, 2012. There were no triggering events identified from the annual assessment date through the fiscal year-end.