N-CSR

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT

INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number 811-3614

Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

6803 South Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Arthur S. Gabinet

OFI Global Asset Management, Inc.

Two World Financial Center, New York, New York 10281-1008

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 768-3200

Date of fiscal year end: December 31

Date of reporting period: 12/31/2013

Item 1.  Reports to Stockholders.

Table of Contents

Fund Performance Discussion	3
Top Holdings and Allocations	13
Fund Expenses	18
Statement of Investments	20
Statement of Assets and Liabilities	43
Statement of Operations	45
Statements of Changes in Net Assets	46
Statement of Cash Flows	47
Financial Highlights	48
Notes to Financial Statements	52
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	73
Federal Income Tax Information	74
Board Approval of the Fund’s Investment Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements	75
Special Shareholder Meeting	78
Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures; Updates to Statement of Investments	80
Trustees and Officers	81
Privacy Policy Notice	89

Class A Shares

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS AT 12/31/13

	Class A Shares of the Fund
	Without Sales Charge	With Sales Charge	Barclays Municipal     Bond Index
1-Year	-10.84%	-15.08%	-2.55%
5-Year	11.04	9.96	5.89
10-Year	3.80	3.29	4.29

Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and a 4.75% maximum applicable sales charge except where “without sales charge” is indicated. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investment. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677).

The Fund’s name was changed to Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals, from Rochester Fund Municipals, on March 28, 2013.

OppenheimerFunds/Rochester is using social media to provide timely information related to muni market developments at www.twitter.com/RochesterFunds.

2         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Fund Performance Discussion

At the end of this reporting period, the Fund’s Class A shares produced a tax-free distribution yield of 6.63% at net asset value (NAV) and, for New Yorkers in the top federal and state income tax brackets, delivered an amount comparable to a taxable investment with a 12.48% yield. As many investors had anticipated for months, the Federal Reserve announced late in this reporting period that in 2014 it would begin to “taper” what had been a $85 billion-a-month bond purchasing initiative. The prices of municipal bonds declined, and the NAVs and total returns of municipal bond funds throughout the industry (including this Fund’s) followed suit. While yields remained quite competitive, the total return for the Fund’s Class A shares was -10.84% (without sales charge) for the 12 months ended December 31, 2013.

MARKET OVERVIEW

Amid sluggish economic growth this reporting period, many investors grew increasingly concerned about the potential impact of any change to the Federal Reserve’s policy of quantitative easing.

In mid-November 2013, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke spoke frankly about his reasons for holding regular press conferences – the first of their kind for the Fed – as he approached the end of his 8-year tenure, saying that “transparency in monetary policy enhances public understanding and confidence.”

Bernanke’s explanation came in the aftermath of the market’s reaction to a Fed announcement in June that it was “prepared to increase or reduce the pace of its purchases” and that the short-term Fed Funds target rate, which it controls, would remain between zero and 0.25%. The market reaction was a sharp sell-off by fixed-income investors, many of whom believed that a policy change was imminent.

By the time Bernanke and other Fed officials tried to correct the market’s interpretation

YIELDS & DISTRIBUTIONS FOR CLASS A SHARES
Dividend Yield w/o sales charge	6.63	%
Dividend Yield with sales charge	6.32
Standardized Yield	6.44
Taxable Equivalent Yield	12.48
Last distribution (12/30/13)	$0.079
Total distributions (1/1/13 to 12/31/13)	$0.95
Endnotes for this discussion begin on page 15 of this report

3         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

of what had been communicated, prices of municipal bonds had fallen and bond fund outflows worsened. As a result, yields rose, effectively turning the investors’ fears into a reality. Investors who were able to ride out the price volatility and focus on the long term were able to buy bonds with higher yields.

Speculation about who would succeed Fed Chairman Bernanke was widespread during this reporting period, and many news reports sought to discern how policies might change under new leadership. While Lawrence Summers was seen as the early front runner, he withdrew from consideration in mid-September. Janet Yellen became the front runner thereafter. In November 2013, the Senate Banking Committee approved her nomination. As of December 31, 2013, Ms. Yellen had not yet been confirmed by the full Senate.

In mid-December 2013, the Fed announced plans “to modestly reduce the pace of its asset purchases,” to a total of $75 billion a month. No changes to the Fed Funds target rate were announced.

Given the current Fed Funds rate, the only plausible change would be an increase. We remind investors that a change in the Fed Funds rate does not automatically translate into a change in longer-term interest rates, which are determined by the marketplace. Additionally, the Fund’s investment team believes that its focus on finding value in the marketplace and producing competitive levels of tax-free income is well suited for the market conditions that existed this reporting period.

AAA-rated municipal securities remained “cheap to Treasuries” this reporting period, a condition that exists when nominal, pre-tax muni yields exceed available Treasury yields. This condition allows investors to earn higher nominal yields on their muni holdings than on Treasuries and to benefit further from the federal, state and, where applicable, local tax exemptions on municipal investment income.

As of December 31, 2013, the average yield on 30-year, AAA-rated muni bonds was 4.41%, up 152 basis points from December 31, 2012. On December 31, 2013, the average yield on 10-year, AAA-rated muni bonds was 2.79%, up 100 basis points from the December 2012 date, and the average yield on 1-year, AAA-rated muni bonds was 0.23%, up 3 basis points from the December 2012 date.

In New York State, officials began this reporting period with strong statements about their commitment to hurricane relief efforts. In January 2013, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo proposed a $1 billion program to build or preserve 14,000 housing units over the next 5 years in the wake of Hurricane Sandy’s damage to the metropolitan region. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, in his final State of the City Address in February 2013, also focused on rebuilding efforts, calling it “the single most important piece of unfinished business that lies ahead of us in 2013.”

4         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

For the third consecutive year, New York State lawmakers passed a budget ahead of schedule. The $141 billion spending plan called for a 4% increase in spending, including the added spending based on the federal aid received for post-Sandy rebuilding. The state budget process, according to news reports, was “one of the smoothest state budget negotiations” in years. A high-tax bracket, first approved as a temporary measure at the end of 2011, was extended by three years to 2017.

In June of this reporting period, the New York State legislature created the 10-member Financial Restructuring Board for Local Governments, which is designed to provide local governments across the state with plans and strategies to overcome financial challenges. One goal of this project is to reduce pressure on taxpayers for payment of public services.

Later in the reporting period, State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli expanded his list of local governments that have been assessed as facing fiscal stress. In an update to an earlier report, the comptroller explained that the list includes municipalities that have low fund balances, a pattern of operating deficits and an inadequate amount of cash to pay their bills. Municipal officials were critical of the methodology, noting that many of the municipalities on the list have “solid” bond ratings.

In August 2013, Moody’s Investors Service changed its outlook on New York State general obligation (G.O.) debt to positive and affirmed its Aa2 rating. The credit rating agency said that the new outlook “reflects improvements in the state’s economy, governance, financial position and fiscal outlook that, if continued, would allow the state to improve its reserves and draw closer to structural balance.” The G.O. ratings from Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings remained steady, at AA.

New York State ranked second (behind California) among state issuers of municipal debt in 2013, according to Thomson Reuters data published in The Bond Buyer. In all, the state issued $40.6 billion in bonds, down 17% versus 2012.

In New York City, Mayor Bloomberg and Council Speaker Christine Quinn agreed to enact a $70 billion budget for fiscal year 2014. The spending plan included $250 million for storm resiliency and $58 million for the Housing Authority to offset cuts experienced due to federal sequestration. Speaker Quinn’s candidacy for mayor in November 2013 was unsuccessful, and Bill de Blasio was elected to replace Mayor Bloomberg, who had served three terms.

During fiscal 2013, New York City sold $12.8 billion of bonds, of which $6.8 billion were new-money bonds for capital improvements. The remainder were refinancings, which officials say led to gross savings of $917 million.

5         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Investors in the municipal market became increasingly skittish after Detroit filed for bankruptcy in July, even though the move had been widely anticipated. Detroit, the 18th largest U.S. city, already had a long history of fiscal problems by the time of its bankruptcy filing. During this reporting period, media coverage about municipal debt issued in Puerto Rico also contributed to market volatility. Details about the Fund’s Puerto Rico holdings can be found in the Fund Performance section, which follows.

Successful investors, we have found, maintain a long-term perspective regardless

of the specific developments associated with any given reporting period. To maximize the benefits that municipal bond funds seek to provide, many investors reinvest their dividends and allow the income generated from their investments to compound over time.

FUND PERFORMANCE

Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals held nearly 800 securities as of December 31, 2013. The Fund was invested in a broad range of sectors, providing shareholders with a diversity of holdings that we believe would be difficult and costly to replicate in an individual portfolio.

The Class A shares had a distribution yield of 6.63% at net asset value as of December 31, 2013. For a taxable investment to have

6         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

provided a greater benefit than an investment in this Fund, it would have had to yield more than 12.48%, based on the Fund’s standardized yield as of December 31, 2013, and the top combined 2013 New York and federal income tax rate. As long-time investors know, yields on fixed-income funds rise when share prices fall, and yields have historically contributed the lion’s share of the long-term total returns generated by bonds.

Refundings were a common occurrence during this reporting period and led to increased dividend pressure throughout the muni bond fund industry. In refundings, municipal issuers seek to reduce their debt service obligations by exercising the call feature on their higher coupon bonds and

then borrowing at lower interest rates. During this reporting period, these types of transactions made it difficult for some funds to replace the called bonds with bonds that had equally attractive yields.

Refundings tend to become less popular in higher-rate environments, as the savings on debt service payments may not be sufficient to justify the process’s costs. However, when interest rates are low, as they were for most of this reporting period, refundings generally put dividends of longer-term funds, such as this Fund, under pressure.

The dividend of the Fund, which was $0.080 per Class A share at the outset of the reporting period, was reduced to $0.078 per share beginning with the July 2013

7         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

payout and then increased to $0.079 with the November 2013 payout. In all, the Fund distributed 95 cents per Class A share this reporting period.

Securities issued in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which are exempt from federal, state and local income taxes, represented 24.6% of the Fund’s net assets at the end of this reporting period. The Fund’s holdings, some of which are insured, include G.O. debt, sales tax revenue bonds and securities from many different sectors. Most of the Fund’s investments in securities issued in Puerto Rico are supported by taxes and other revenues and are designed to help finance electric utilities, highways and education, among other things. (Puerto Rico’s “tobacco bonds,” which are backed by proceeds from the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement as discussed later in this report, represented an additional 2.5% of net assets on December 31, 2013.)

Since his inauguration, first-time governor Alejandro García Padilla has expanded on the fiscal discipline that was the hallmark of his predecessor, Luis Fortuño. We have been impressed by the current governor’s focus on the economy. Already he has cut the government payrolls, enacted comprehensive pension reforms, and raised revenues via tax rate changes and improved enforcement.

Midway through this reporting period, however, Puerto Rico debt became the subject of a variety of critical reports. The

coverage focused on the Commonwealth’s lingering economic difficulties, which were exacerbated by the Great Recession. The reports also failed to highlight the significant fiscal strides that the Commonwealth’s elected officials have made or the unique provisions in the island’s constitution that prioritize G.O. debt-service payments. This coverage led to increased pricing pressure and, as a result, the Fund’s holdings in Puerto Rico paper detracted from performance this reporting period.

Most of the sales tax revenue bonds held by the Fund this reporting period were issued in Puerto Rico. In all, this sector represented 7.7% of the Fund’s total assets as of December 31, 2013, and included bonds issued in Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Debt-service payments on securities in this sector are paid using the issuing municipality’s sales tax revenues. An investment in this sector requires Fund managers to consider the economic conditions that a municipality has experienced and will likely experience and the aggregate face value of the sales tax revenue bonds being issued relative to the municipality’s historic and likely sales tax cash flows. During this reporting period, the sector detracted from the Fund’s total return.

Over the years, investors should note, Puerto Rico has demonstrated its ability and its willingness to honor its debt obligations. According to the Government Development

8         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Bank of Puerto Rico, “in the history of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, its public corporations and political subdivisions, there has been no instance of default in the timely payment of principal of, or interest on, any publicly held debt.”

At the end of this reporting period, the Commonwealth’s G.O. debt carried investment-grade ratings from the three national credit ratings agencies, and the island’s revenue-backed debt carried investment-grade ratings from S&P and Fitch. Late in the reporting period, the ongoing fiscal challenges in Puerto Rico led Moody’s to place the island’s G.O. debt under review for possible downgrade.

2014 Update: After this reporting period ended, S&P, Moody’s and Fitch – in that order – downgraded Puerto Rico’s G.O.s and an assortment of other securities issued on island to below investment grade with negative implications. Throughout the industry, municipal bond funds with Puerto Rico holdings can expect to see an increase in the percentage of their assets that are below investment grade. At Oppenheimer Rochester, this Fund, like most of our funds, has a prospectus limitation on the purchases of below-investment-grade bonds (see page 11 for further details). Investors should note that our perspective has not changed: Puerto Rico continues to show a very strong willingness to pay bondholders; additionally, our credit research shows that coverage ratios are sufficient and legal protections remain strong for the bonds we hold.

Shareholders in this Fund and in many of our competitors’ funds have benefited over the long term from the triple-tax-free status of income generated by Puerto Rico holdings. While price volatility can be unnerving in the short term, the yields on Puerto Rico paper became increasingly attractive this reporting period.

Municipal bonds backed by proceeds from the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (the MSA), the national litigation settlement with U.S. tobacco manufacturers, represented 22.3% of the Fund’s total assets at the end of this reporting period. “Credit spread widening”—which occurs when the difference between yields on low-rated municipal bonds and higher-rated bonds increases—caused the tobacco sector (and many other credit-sensitive sectors) to detract from the Fund’s performance this reporting period.

Nonetheless, we like that “tobacco bonds” can provide tax-exempt income for investors as well as benefits to the issuing states and territories. We believe the securities we hold in this sector are fundamentally sound credits. Our long-term view of the sector remains bullish and, given attractive valuations, we believe that it is likely we will continue to hold a greater percentage of tobacco bonds in our portfolios than our peers. As in prior reporting periods, the tobacco bonds this Fund held during this

9         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

reporting period made all scheduled payments of interest and principal on time and in full. Investors should note that we believe the sector is well positioned to provide high levels of tax-free income to the long-term benefit of our yield-seeking investors.

In September 2013, an arbitration panel ruled that New York State had “diligently enforced” the terms of the MSA and was thus eligible to receive the portion of its 2003 MSA proceeds that had been disputed (the non-participating manufacturer adjustment). Officials said that New York State would receive an additional $92 million in MSA proceeds as a result of the panel’s ruling, which we see as a positive for bondholders.

The Fund’s holdings in municipal bonds issued by utilities represented 13.0% of total assets at the end of this reporting period. As of December 31, 2013, this set of holdings included electric utilities with 7.8%, sewer utilities with 3.5%, water utilities with 1.3%, and gas utilities with 0.4%. Our holdings in these sectors consist of securities in the mid-range of the credit spectrum. Of these four sectors, only gas utilities contributed favorably to the Fund’s total return this reporting period.

The Fund’s airline-backed holdings represented 8.3% of total assets as of December 31, 2013. Many of the Fund’s holdings are backed by a security interest in the airport terminal buildings or

maintenance facilities whose construction they finance, and we believe that these bonds offer investors valuable collateral. For example, our 2002 investment in the construction of a new terminal at John F. Kennedy International Airport and our subsequent work with American Airlines and others to develop a package of security documents that included strong protections for bondholders in the event of a bankruptcy led to positive outcomes for our shareholders in the aftermath of the airline’s bankruptcy filing. Late in 2012 and also during this reporting period, American made virtually full payments on its secured bonds. American emerged from bankruptcy late in this reporting period. We believe that our work with American on behalf of our shareholders demonstrates the power of our approach to credit research. The airline sector was the top contributor to Fund performance this reporting period.

The Fund was also invested in securities used to finance marine and aviation facilities this reporting period. Many of the securities in this sector are backed by the valuable collateral of the projects whose construction they finance. At the end of the reporting period, 6.2% of the Fund’s total assets were invested in securities in the marine/aviation facilities sector, including many highly rated bonds. The marine and aviation facilities sector did not contribute positively to the Fund’s performance this reporting period.

10         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

The impact of credit spread widening and higher yields was also felt in other sectors in which the Fund was invested as of December 31, 2013. For example, the highways/commuter facilities, hospital/healthcare and higher education sectors detracted from the Fund’s performance this reporting period.

“Inverse floaters” continued to provide high levels of income to funds across the industry during this reporting period, which was characterized by stable and low rates in the short-term market. We continue to believe that “inverse floaters” are an essential element of this Fund’s portfolio because they can produce attractive yields under certain market conditions. However, amid the market volatility of this reporting period, inverse floaters detracted from the Fund’s total return. As is its penchant, the Rochester-based investment team will continue to monitor and make adjustments to its portfolios that it believes can provide the greatest benefit to Fund shareholders.

Our approach to municipal bond investing remains flexible and responsive to market conditions. Shareholders should note that market conditions during this reporting period did not affect the Fund’s overall investment goals or cause it to pay any capital gain distributions. In closing, we believe that our time-tested strategies and the Fund’s structure and sector composition will continue to benefit fixed-income investors through interest rate and economic cycles.

INVESTMENT STRATEGY

The Rochester investment team focuses exclusively on municipal bonds and has consistently used a time-tested, value-oriented and security-specific approach to fund management. We know that market conditions can and do fluctuate, but we do not waver in our belief in the power of tax-free yield to help investors achieve their long-term objectives.

The Fund invests primarily in investment-grade municipal securities. It may invest up to 25% of its total assets in below-investment grade securities, or “junk” bonds; the percentage of assets is measured at the time of purchase as is the credit quality of the securities. Additionally, the credit quality is based on Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”) ratings or, if no NRSRO rating, on internal ratings. As of December 31, 2013, market movements or rating changes of municipal bonds caused the Fund’s below-investment-grade holdings to exceed this threshold. As a result, no further purchases of below-investment-grade bonds will be made until the Fund’s holdings of these types of bonds is once again below 25% of total assets.

Our team continually searches for undervalued bonds that we believe will provide a meaningful level of tax-free income until maturity. Rather than making allocation shifts based on expected market conditions, we search the marketplace for what we believe to be the best values for

11         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

generating income. It remains important to note that we do not manage our funds based on predictions of interest rate changes.

Instead, our investment approach involves scouring the market for municipal securities that meet our stringent credit criteria and buying bonds that we believe will deliver above-average yields relative to peer funds. We focus on identifying inefficiencies in market pricing that can lead to investment advantages. We seek to maintain a thoughtful mix of industry sectors, maturities and credit ratings in this Fund’s portfolio.

The Rochester Way, we believe, distinguishes our approach to municipal investing from those of our competitors.

Daniel G. Loughran,

Senior Vice President, Senior Portfolio Manager and Team Leader, on behalf of the rest of the Rochester portfolio management team: Scott S. Cottier, Troy E. Willis, Mark R. DeMitry, Michael L. Camarella, Charles S. Pulire and Elizabeth S. Mossow.

12         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Top Holdings and Allocations

TOP TEN CATEGORIES

Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement	22.3%
Airlines	8.3
Electric Utilities	7.8
Sales Tax Revenue	7.7
Marine/Aviation Facilities	6.2
General Obligation	6.0
Highways/Commuter Facilities	4.6
Hospital/Healthcare	3.8
Higher Education	3.8
Sewer Utilities	3.5

Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2013, and are based on total assets.

CREDIT ALLOCATION

	NRSRO- Rated			Sub-Adviser-Rated			Total
AAA		2.6	%		0.5	%		3.1%
AA		15.6			0.8			16.4
A		13.6			0.4			14.0
BBB		23.8			14.3			38.1
BB or lower		22.2			6.2			28.4
Total		77.8			22.2			100.0

The percentages above are based on the market value of the securities as of December 31, 2013, and are subject to change. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. determines the credit allocation of the Fund’s assets using ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs), such as Standard & Poor’s. For any security rated by an NRSRO other than S&P, the sub-adviser, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., converts that security’s rating to the equivalent S&P rating. If two or more NRSROs have assigned a rating to a security, the highest rating is used. For securities not rated by an NRSRO, the sub-adviser uses its own credit analysis to assign ratings in categories similar to those of S&P. The use of similar categories is not an indication that the sub-adviser’s credit analysis process is consistent or comparable with any NRSRO’s process were that NRSRO to rate the same security.

For the purposes of this Credit Allocation table, securities rated within the NRSROs’ four highest categories – AAA, AA, A and BBB – are investment-grade securities. For further details, please consult the Fund’s prospectus or Statement of Additional Information.

13         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Performance

DISTRIBUTION YIELDS

As of 12/31/13

	Without Sales Charge	With Sales Charge
Class A	6.63%	6.32%
Class B	5.63	N/A
Class C	5.65	N/A
Class Y	6.80	N/A

STANDARDIZED YIELDS

For the 30 Days Ended 12/31/13

Class A	6.44	%
Class B	5.89
Class C	5.89
Class Y	6.91

TAXABLE EQUIVALENT YIELDS

As of 12/31/13

Class A	12.48	%
Class B	11.41
Class C	11.41
Class Y	13.39

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITHOUT SALES CHARGE AS OF 12/31/13

	Inception Date	1-Year		5-Year		10-Year		Since     Inception
Class A (RMUNX)	5/15/86		-10.84%		11.04%		3.80%		6.10%
Class B (RMUBX)	3/17/97		-11.59		10.02		3.25		4.34
Class C (RMUCX)	3/17/97		-11.63		10.09		2.91		3.76
Class Y (RMUYX)	4/28/00		-10.72		11.19		3.95		4.92

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITH SALES CHARGE AS OF 12/31/13

	Inception Date	1-Year		5-Year		10-Year		Since    Inception
Class A (RMUNX)	5/15/86		-15.08%		9.96%		3.29%		5.92%
Class B (RMUBX)	3/17/97		-15.79		9.75		3.25		4.34
Class C (RMUCX)	3/17/97		-12.47		10.09		2.91		3.76
Class Y (RMUYX)	4/28/00		-10.72		11.19		3.95		4.92

14         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

COMPARISON OF CHANGE IN VALUE OF $10,000 HYPOTHETICAL INVESTMENTS IN:

Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investments. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and the applicable sales charge: for Class A shares, the current maximum initial sales charge of 4.75%; for Class B shares, the contingent deferred sales charge of 5% (1-year) and 2% (5-year); and for Class C, the contingent deferred sales charge of 1% for the 1-year period. There is no sales charge for Class Y shares. Because Class B shares convert to Class A shares 72 months after purchase, the 10-year return for Class B shares uses Class A performance for the period after conversion.

The Fund’s performance is compared to the performance of the Barclays Municipal Bond Index, an unmanaged index of a broad range of investment-grade municipal bonds that is a measure of the general municipal bond market. The Fund’s performance is also compared to the Consumer Price Index, a non-securities index that measures changes in the inflation rate. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be purchased by investors. Index performance includes reinvestment of income, but does not reflect transaction costs, fees, expenses or taxes. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only as a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, and does not predict or depict performance of the Fund. The Fund’s performance reflects the effects of the Fund’s business and operating expenses.

Distribution yields for Class A shares are based on dividends of $0.079 for the 35-day accrual period ended December 30, 2013, which included the amounts that were set to be accrued on December 31, 2013. The yield without sales charge for Class A shares is calculated by

15         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

dividing annualized dividends by the Class A net asset value on December 30, 2013; for the yield with sales charge, the denominator is the Class A maximum offering price on that date. Distribution yields for Class B, C and Y are annualized based on dividends of $0.0670, $0.0672 and $0.0810, respectively, for the 35-day accrual period ended December 30, 2013, and on the corresponding net asset values on that date. the Class B, C and Y share dividends were paid on December 30, 2013, and included the amounts set to be accrued on December 31, 2013.

Standardized yield is based on the Fund’s net investment income for the 30-day period ended December 31, 2013, and either that date’s maximum offering price (for Class A shares) or net asset value (for the other classes). Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields.

Taxable equivalent yield is based on the standardized yield and the 2013 top federal and New York combined tax rate of 48.4%. Calculations factor in the 3.8% tax on unearned income under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as applicable. A portion of the Fund’s distributions may be subject to tax; distributions may also increase an investor’s exposure to the alternative minimum tax. Capital gains distributions are taxable as capital gains. Tax treatments of the Fund’s distributions and capital gains may vary by state; investors should consult a tax advisor to determine if the Fund is appropriate for them. Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields. This Report must be preceded or accompanied by a Fund prospectus.

The average yields for AAA-rated municipal securities are provided by Municipal Market Advisors (MMA) and are based on its benchmark of general obligation bonds structured with a 5% coupon. The MMA 5% benchmark is constructed using yields from the leading underwriters, who represent a significant percentage of the primary activity of the top 10 underwriters and therefore the total issuance.

Investments in “tobacco bonds,” which are backed by the proceeds a state or territory receives from the 1998 national litigation settlement with tobacco manufacturers, may be vulnerable to economic and/or legislative events that affect issuers in a particular municipal market sector. Annual payments by MSA-participating manufacturers, for example, hinge on many factors, including annual domestic cigarette shipments, inflation and the relative market share of non-participating manufacturers. To date, we believe consumption figures remain within an acceptable range of the assumptions used to structure MSA bonds. Future MSA payments could be reduced if consumption were to fall more rapidly than originally forecast.

The Fund’s investment strategy and focus can change over time. The mention of specific fund holdings does not constitute a recommendation by OppenheimerFunds, Inc. or its affiliates.

Before investing in any of the Oppenheimer funds, investors should carefully consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses contain this and other information about the funds, and may be obtained by asking your financial advisor, visiting oppenheimerfunds.com, or calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Read prospectuses and summary prospectuses carefully before investing.

16         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Shares of Oppenheimer funds are not deposits or obligations of any bank, are not guaranteed by any bank, are not insured by the FDIC or any other agency and involve investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.

17         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Fund Expenses

Fund Expenses. As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, which may include sales charges (loads) on purchase payments, contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service fees; and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

The examples are based on an investment of $1,000.00 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire 6-month period ended December 31, 2013.

Actual Expenses. The first section of the table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section for the class of shares you hold, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expense that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000.00 (for example, an $8,600.00 account value divided by $1,000.00 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes. The second section of the table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for each class of shares, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year for each class before expenses, which is not the actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example for the class of shares you hold with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as front-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads), or a $12.00 fee imposed annually on accounts valued at less than $500.00 (subject to exceptions described in the Statement of Additional Information). Therefore, the “hypothetical” section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

18         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Actual	Beginning Account Value July 1, 2013	Ending Account Value December 31, 2013	Expenses     Paid During     6 Months Ended     December 31, 2013
Class A	$    1,000.00	$       916.50	$          4.26
Class B	1,000.00	912.40	8.52
Class C	1,000.00	912.30	8.43
Class Y	1,000.00	917.10	3.58
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)
Class A	1,000.00	1,020.77	4.49
Class B	1,000.00	1,016.33	8.98
Class C	1,000.00	1,016.43	8.88
Class Y	1,000.00	1,021.48	3.78

Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for that class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Those annualized expense ratios, excluding indirect expenses from affiliated funds, based on the 6-month period ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:

Class	Expense Ratios
Class A		0.88	%
Class B		1.76
Class C		1.74
Class Y		0.74

The expense ratios reflect voluntary waivers and/or reimbursements of expenses by the Fund’s Manager and Transfer Agent. Some of these undertakings may be modified or terminated at any time, as indicated in the Fund’s prospectus. The “Financial Highlights” tables in the Fund’s financial statements, included in this report, also show the gross expense ratios, without such waivers or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses, if applicable.

19         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    December 31, 2013

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	Municipal Bonds and Notes—113.9%
	New York—85.3%
	$        1,035,000	Albany County, NY IDA (Albany College of Pharmacy)1		5.375%			12/01/2024	$	1,045,039
	1,700,000	Albany County, NY IDA (Albany College of Pharmacy)1		5.625			12/01/2034		1,705,287
	605,000	Albany County, NY IDA (Wildwood Programs)1		4.900			07/01/2021		581,320
	1,525,000	Albany, NY Capital Resource Corp. (College Saint Rose)1		5.375			07/01/2026		1,592,374
	1,315,000	Albany, NY Capital Resource Corp. (College Saint Rose)1		5.625			07/01/2031		1,359,237
	8,165,000	Albany, NY Capital Resource Corp. (College Saint Rose)1		5.875			07/01/2041		8,406,684
	1,420,000	Albany, NY Hsg. Authority (Lark Drive)1		5.500			12/01/2028		1,420,767
	645,000	Albany, NY IDA (Albany Rehabilitation)1		8.375			06/01/2023		638,905
	3,125,000	Albany, NY IDA (Brighter Choice Charter School)1		5.000			04/01/2027		2,882,156
	1,350,000	Albany, NY IDA (Brighter Choice Charter School)1		5.000			04/01/2032		1,186,394
	900,000	Albany, NY IDA (Brighter Choice Charter School)1		5.000			04/01/2037		757,143
	900,000	Albany, NY IDA (New Covenant Charter School)2		7.000			05/01/2025		134,991
	1,760,000	Albany, NY IDA (Sage Colleges)1		5.300			04/01/2029		1,543,467
	1,360,000	Albany, NY Parking Authority		7.242	3		11/01/2017		1,154,395
	5,000,000	Amherst, NY IDA (Beechwood Health Care Center)1,4		5.200			01/01/2040		4,070,300
	545,000	Blauvelt, NY Volunteer Fire Company		6.250			10/15/2017		538,989
	2,735,000	Brookhaven, NY IDA (Enecon Corp.)1		6.300			11/01/2033		2,439,893
	1,625,000	Brookhaven, NY IDA (Stony Brook Foundation)1		6.500			11/01/2020		1,633,775
	1,000,000	Broome County, NY IDA (University Plaza)1		5.100			08/01/2030		914,080
	1,250,000	Broome County, NY IDA (University Plaza)1		5.100			08/01/2036		1,101,937
	3,030,000	Broome County, NY IDA (University Plaza)1		5.000			08/01/2036		2,634,130
	95,000	Broome County, NY IDA (University Plaza)1		5.000			08/01/2025		90,731
	3,000,000	Broome County, NY IDA (University Plaza)1		5.200			08/01/2030		2,773,650
	4,450,000	Broome County, NY IDA (University Plaza)1		5.200			08/01/2036		3,977,232
	1,770,000	Buffalo & Erie County, NY Industrial Land Devel. (Buffalo State College Foundation Hsg. Corp.)1		5.375			10/01/2041		1,828,268
	870,000	Buffalo & Erie County, NY Industrial Land Devel. (Buffalo State College Foundation Hsg. Corp.)1		6.000			10/01/2031		964,073
	860,000	Build NYC Resource Corp. (YMCA of Greater New York)		5.000			08/01/2032		872,556
	3,000,000	Bushnell Basin, NY Fire Assoc. (Volunteer Fire Dept.)1		5.750			11/01/2030		2,858,370
	1,000,000	Canton, NY Resource Corp. Student Hsg. Facility (Grasse River-SUNY Canton)1		5.000			05/01/2040		1,020,050
	970,000	Cattaraugus County, NY IDA (St. Bonaventure University)1		5.450			09/15/2019		970,621
	105,000	Chautauqua, NY Utility District1		5.000			06/01/2025		107,579
	95,000	Chautauqua, NY Utility District1		5.000			06/01/2023		97,885
	1,515,000	Chemung County, NY IDA (Hathorn Redevel. Company)1		5.000			07/01/2033		1,518,439

20        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$            810,000	Chemung County, NY IDA (Hathorn Redevel. Company)1,4		4.850%			07/01/2023	$	823,235
	1,515,000	Clifton Springs, NY Hospital & Clinic1,4		8.000			01/01/2020		1,407,647
	255,000	Columbia County, NY IDA (Berkshire Farms)1		7.500			12/30/2014		250,110
	7,000,000	Dutchess County, NY IDA (Bard College)1		5.000			08/01/2046		5,958,960
	2,200,000	Dutchess County, NY IDA (Elant Fishkill)1		5.250			01/01/2037		1,781,208
	800,000	Dutchess County, NY IDA (St. Francis Hospital)5		7.500			03/01/2029		642,776
	650,000	Dutchess County, NY Local Devel. Corp. (Health Quest System)1		5.750			07/01/2040		683,208
	1,000,000	Dutchess County, NY Water & Wastewater Authority		5.400	3		06/01/2027		581,460
	2,135,000	East Rochester, NY Hsg. Authority (Jefferson Park Apartments)1		6.750			03/01/2030		2,134,936
	2,460,000	East Rochester, NY Hsg. Authority (Woodland Village)1		5.500			08/01/2033		2,162,340
	2,810,000	Elmira, NY Hsg. Authority (Eastgate Apartments)1		6.250			06/01/2044		2,359,388
	1,735,000	Erie County, NY IDA (Buffalo City School District)1		5.250			05/01/2030		1,859,035
	865,000	Erie County, NY IDA (Buffalo City School District)1		5.250			05/01/2032		917,843
	1,465,000	Erie County, NY IDA (Buffalo City School District)1		5.250			05/01/2031		1,562,086
	7,050,000	Erie County, NY IDA (Charter School Applied Tech)1		6.875			06/01/2035		7,223,923
	2,900,000	Erie County, NY IDA (Global Concepts Charter School)1		6.250			10/01/2037		2,919,111
	715,000	Erie County, NY IDA (The Episcopal Church Home)1		6.000			02/01/2028		715,229
	1,024,000,000	Erie County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.		7.650	3		06/01/2060		3,645,440
	194,300,000	Erie County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.		7.196	3		06/01/2055		1,521,369
	72,595,000	Erie County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.000			06/01/2045		52,156,611
	25,330,000	Erie County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.000			06/01/2038		18,976,476
	135,450,000	Erie County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.		6.488	3		06/01/2050		2,814,651
	93,000,000	Erie County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.		6.140	3		06/01/2047		2,887,650
	1,410,000	Essex County, NY IDA (International Paper Company)1		4.600			03/01/2027		1,342,898
	1,500,000	Essex County, NY IDA (International Paper Company)1		6.625			09/01/2032		1,636,665
	1,100,000	Essex County, NY IDA (North Country Community College Foundation)1		5.300			06/01/2035		1,085,810
	410,000	Essex County, NY IDA (North Country Community College Foundation)1		5.200			06/01/2025		414,485

21        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Principal Amount			Coupon		Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$          975,000	Essex County, NY IDA (North Country Community College Foundation)1		5.000%		06/01/2020	$	997,922
	1,235,000	Essex County, NY IDA (North Country Community College Foundation)1		5.200		06/01/2025		1,248,005
	320,000	Essex County, NY IDA (North Country Community College Foundation)1		5.000		06/01/2020		327,703
	220,000	Essex County, NY IDA Solid Waste Disposal (International Paper Company)1		5.200		03/01/2028		219,978
	185,000	Fishkill, NY GO1		5.000		04/15/2029		185,636
	900,000	Franklin County, NY IDA (North Country Community College Foundation)1		5.200		06/01/2025		909,846
	100,000	Glens Falls, NY GO1		6.000		02/01/2040		106,918
	905,000	Green Island, NY Power Authority1		5.125		12/15/2024		849,659
	1,695,000	Green Island, NY Power Authority1		6.000		12/15/2025		1,706,255
	1,675,000	Green Island, NY Power Authority1		6.000		12/15/2020		1,694,564
	1,945,000	Hempstead, NY IDA (Adelphi University)1		5.000		10/01/2030		2,019,785
	3,665,000	Hempstead, NY IDA (Peninsula Counseling Center)1		6.500		11/01/2038		3,215,085
	810,000	Herkimer County, NY IDA (Folts Adult Home)1		5.500		03/20/2040		895,666
	1,000,000	Herkimer County, NY IDA (Herkimer County College Foundation)1		6.250		08/01/2034		1,000,380
	34,450,000	Hudson Yards, NY Infrastructure Corp.1		5.750		02/15/2047		36,646,876
	4,840,000	Hudson Yards, NY Infrastructure Corp.1		5.000		02/15/2047		4,796,682
	3,400,000	L.I., NY Power Authority, Series A1		5.000		05/01/2036		3,458,208
	26,395,000	L.I., NY Power Authority, Series A1		5.000		05/01/2038		26,602,729
	9,800,000	L.I., NY Power Authority, Series A1		5.750		04/01/2039		10,508,834
	29,735,000	L.I., NY Power Authority, Series A		5.000		09/01/2037		30,087,657
	23,515,000	L.I., NY Power Authority, Series A		5.000		09/01/2042		23,529,814
	65,000	L.I., NY Power Authority, Series B1		5.000		12/01/2035		65,386
	7,000,000	L.I., NY Power Authority, Series B		5.000		09/01/2029		7,177,730
	1,900,000	L.I., NY Power Authority, Series B1		5.750		04/01/2033		2,050,499
	100,000	Madison County, NY IDA (Commons II Student Hsg.)1		5.000		06/01/2033		95,694
	5,300,000	Madison County, NY IDA (Commons II Student Hsg.)1		5.000		06/01/2040		4,880,982
	1,100,000	Madison County, NY IDA (Morrisville State College Foundation)1		5.000		06/01/2032		1,018,160
	860,000	Madison County, NY IDA (Morrisville State College Foundation)1		5.000		06/01/2028		827,053
	1,320,000	Madison County, NY IDA (Oneida Healthcare Center)1		5.300		02/01/2021		1,320,436
	5,500,000	Madison County, NY IDA (Oneida Healthcare Center)1		5.350		02/01/2031		5,520,900
	570,000	Middletown, NY IDA (Flanagan Design & Display)2		7.500		11/01/2018		424,621
	2,405,000	Monroe County, NY IDA (Parma Senior Hsg. Assoc.)1		6.500		12/01/2042		2,234,149
	1,130,000	Monroe County, NY IDA (Rochester Schools Modernization)		5.000		05/01/2030		1,186,669
	3,660,000	Monroe County, NY IDA (Summit at Brighton)1		5.500		07/01/2027		2,918,081

22        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
$	2,345,000	Monroe County, NY IDA (Summit at Brighton)1		5.375%			07/01/2032	$	1,693,887
	455,000	Monroe County, NY IDA (Volunteers of America)1		5.700			08/01/2018		436,577
	2,765,000	Monroe County, NY IDA (Volunteers of America)1		5.750			08/01/2028		2,461,348
	1,840,000	Monroe County, NY Industrial Devel. Corp. (Nazareth College of Rochester)1		5.500			10/01/2041		1,871,170
	850,000	Monroe County, NY Industrial Devel. Corp. (Nazareth College of Rochester)1		5.000			10/01/2026		880,727
	500,000	Monroe County, NY Industrial Devel. Corp. (Nazareth College of Rochester)1		5.250			10/01/2031		507,590
	850,000	Monroe County, NY Industrial Devel. Corp. (St. John Fisher College)1		5.625			06/01/2026		900,354
	1,495,000	Monroe County, NY Industrial Devel. Corp. (St. John Fisher College)1		6.000			06/01/2034		1,554,471
	15,100,000	Monroe County, NY Industrial Devel. Corp. (Unity Hospital Rochester)1		5.750			08/15/2035		16,807,055
	650,000,000	Monroe County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp. (TASC)		7.701	3		06/01/2061		2,281,500
	580,000	Monroe, NY Newpower Corp1		5.625			01/01/2026		580,974
	2,265,000	Monroe, NY Newpower Corp.1		5.500			01/01/2034		2,216,642
	700,000	Mount Vernon, NY IDA (Kings Court)1		5.200			12/01/2033		703,703
	2,600,000	Mount Vernon, NY IDA (Meadowview)1		6.200			06/01/2029		2,548,104
	1,655,000	Mount Vernon, NY IDA (Meadowview)1		6.150			06/01/2019		1,655,695
	1,218,573	Municipal Assistance Corp. for Troy, NY		5.741	3		01/15/2022		945,990
	802,824	Municipal Assistance Corp. for Troy, NY		5.733	3		07/15/2021		640,838
	525,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (ACDS)1		5.950			11/01/2022		492,702
	195,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (ALIA-ACDS)1		7.500			06/01/2015		195,355
	400,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (ALIA-HH)1		7.125			06/01/2017		400,588
	310,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (ALIA-HHS)1		7.125			06/01/2017		310,456
	25,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (ALIA-LVH)1		7.500			06/01/2015		25,045
	7,765,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside)		6.700			01/01/2043		4,301,033
	2,245,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (CNGCS)		8.150			06/01/2030		2,246,369
	145,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (CNGCS)1		7.500			06/01/2015		145,264
	3,950,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (CSMR)1		5.950			11/01/2022		3,706,996
	495,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (Epilepsy Foundation of L.I.)1		5.950			11/01/2022		464,548
	1,660,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (Hispanic Counseling Center)1		6.500			11/01/2037		1,534,770
	3,150,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (Keyspan-Glenwood Energy Center)1		5.250			06/01/2027		3,158,788
	545,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (Life’s WORCA)1		5.950			11/01/2022		511,472
	3,535,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (New York Water Service Corp.)1		5.000			12/01/2035		3,488,515
	1,810,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (North Shore CFGA)1		6.750			05/01/2024		1,772,280
	925,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (PLUS Group Home)1		6.150			11/01/2022		874,967
	645,000	Nassau County, NY IDA (United Veteran’s Beacon House)1		6.500			11/01/2037		596,341
	460,000	Nassau County, NY IDA, Series A-A1		6.000			06/01/2021		444,825

23        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$        5,300,000	Nassau County, NY IDA, Series A-B1		6.000%			06/01/2021	$	5,125,153
	515,000	Nassau County, NY IDA, Series A-C1		6.000			06/01/2021		498,010
	575,000	Nassau County, NY IDA, Series A-D1		6.000			06/01/2021		556,031
	2,400,000	Nassau County, NY Local Economic Assistance Corp. (Winthrop University Hospital)		5.000			07/01/2032		2,364,408
	4,490,000	Nassau County, NY Local Economic Assistance Corp. (Winthrop University Hospital)		5.000			07/01/2037		4,318,931
	40,000,000	Nassau County, NY Tobacco Settlement Corp.		7.351	3		06/01/2060		142,400
	20,000,000	Nassau County, NY Tobacco Settlement Corp.		5.820	3		06/01/2046		636,000
	1,055,215,000	Nassau County, NY Tobacco Settlement Corp.		6.537	3		06/01/2060		4,685,155
	122,875,000	Nassau County, NY Tobacco Settlement Corp.1		5.125			06/01/2046		82,834,952
	9,000,000	Nassau County, NY Tobacco Settlement Corp.1		5.250			06/01/2026		7,696,980
	105,975,000	Nassau County, NY Tobacco Settlement Corp.		6.221	3		06/01/2046		3,126,262
	22,780,000	Nassau County, NY Tobacco Settlement Corp. (TASC)1		5.000			06/01/2035		16,253,758
	3,670,000	New Rochelle, NY IDA (Soundview Apartments)1		5.375			04/01/2036		3,711,324
	1,800,000	Niagara County, NY IDA (Niagara Falls Memorial Medical Center)		5.750			06/01/2018		1,803,258
	20,000	Niagara County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.750			05/15/2022		19,455
	1,480,000	Niagara County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		6.250			05/15/2034		1,392,355
	6,295,000	Niagara County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		6.250			05/15/2040		5,736,759
	125,000	Niagara Falls, NY Public Water Authority1		5.500			07/15/2034		126,318
	500,000	Niagara, NY Area Devel. Corp. (Niagara University)		5.000			05/01/2035		490,325
	850,000	Niagara, NY Area Devel. Corp. (Niagara University)		5.000			05/01/2042		819,995
	385,000	Niagara, NY Frontier Transportation Authority (Buffalo Niagara International Airport)1		5.000			04/01/2028		361,773
	2,025,000	Niagara, NY Frontier Transportation Authority (Buffalo Niagara International Airport)1		5.625			04/01/2029		2,039,762
	2,270,000	North Tonawanda, NY HDC (Bishop Gibbons Associates)1		7.375			12/15/2021		2,703,320
	19,230,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust I1		6.625			06/01/2042		18,253,501
	6,245,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust I1		6.500			06/01/2035		5,841,698
	5,185,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust I1		6.250			06/01/2028		5,085,863
	53,880,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust II (TASC)1		5.750			06/01/2043		51,136,969
	29,835,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust II (TASC)1		5.625			06/01/2035		28,650,550
	245,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust III1		6.000			06/01/2043		240,504
	608,700,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust IV		6.816	3		06/01/2060		2,166,972
	131,335,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust IV		5.920	3		06/01/2050		2,738,335
	304,690,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust IV		6.395	3		06/01/2055		3,677,608
	7,000,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust IV1		5.000			06/01/2038		5,342,400
	52,535,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust IV (TASC)1		5.000			06/01/2042		36,970,981
	38,275,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust IV (TASC)1		5.000			06/01/2045		26,622,176
	82,500,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust IV (TASC)1		6.250			06/01/2041		69,363,525
	598,653,613	NY Counties Tobacco Trust V		6.210	3		06/01/2050		13,565,491

24        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$        236,140,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust V		6.070%	3		06/01/2038	$	17,587,707
	3,845,000,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust V		7.846	3		06/01/2060		13,688,200
	643,195,000	NY Counties Tobacco Trust V		6.850	3		06/01/2055		6,380,494
	62,345,000	NY Liberty Devel. Corp. (Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park)6		5.625			01/15/2046		65,445,354
	15,000,000	NY Liberty Devel. Corp. (Bank of America Tower)6		5.125			01/15/2044		15,236,850
	2,199,995	NY Liberty Devel. Corp. (National Sports Museum)2		6.125			02/15/2019		22
	6,510,000	NY MTA, Series 2008C1		6.500			11/15/2028		7,543,397
	85,000	NY MTA, Series A1		5.000			11/15/2032		85,059
	6,800,000	NY MTA, Series A1		5.250			11/15/2038		7,002,776
	3,400,000	NY MTA, Series A		5.000			11/15/2029		3,579,146
	500,000	NY MTA, Series A		5.000			11/15/2026		539,910
	500,000	NY MTA, Series A		5.000			11/15/2027		533,200
	4,000,000	NY MTA, Series C		5.000			11/15/2038		4,026,560
	27,675,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.000			11/15/2030		28,882,460
	1,225,000	NY MTA, Series D1		5.250			11/15/2034		1,272,126
	2,150,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.000			11/15/2032		2,215,124
	13,400,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.000			11/15/2027		14,263,362
	1,375,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.250			11/15/2026		1,517,395
	1,100,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.250			11/15/2030		1,174,162
	585,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.250			11/15/2027		637,281
	1,100,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.250			11/15/2029		1,182,368
	690,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.250			11/15/2028		748,602
	1,100,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.250			11/15/2033		1,154,384
	1,100,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.250			11/15/2032		1,157,948
	1,100,000	NY MTA, Series D		5.250			11/15/2031		1,166,022
	8,000,000	NY MTA, Series D-1		5.000			11/01/2027		8,542,880
	3,500,000	NY MTA, Series D-1		5.000			11/01/2028		3,707,305
	41,970,000	NY MTA, Series F1		5.000			11/15/2030		43,801,151
	2,100,000	NY MTA, Series H1		5.000			11/15/2033		2,157,435
	3,000,000	NY MTA, Series H1		5.000			11/15/2025		3,248,040
	10,860,000	NY Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority1		5.000			11/15/2028		11,710,229
	3,200,000	NY Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority		5.000			11/15/2029		3,419,520
	2,100,000	NY Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority		5.000			11/15/2030		2,252,208
	317,515,000	NY TSASC, Inc. (TFABs)1		5.125			06/01/2042		230,366,658
	250,510,000	NY TSASC, Inc. (TFABs)1		5.000			06/01/2034		187,356,429
	13,950,000	NY TSASC, Inc. (TFABs)1		5.000			06/01/2026		12,104,136
	5,000,000	NYC Capital Resources Corp. (Albee Retail Devel.)1		7.250	7		11/01/2042		4,987,300
	15,000	NYC GO1		5.000			06/01/2020		16,004
	5,760,000	NYC GO		5.000			08/01/2031		6,104,794
	5,000	NYC GO1		5.000			04/01/2035		5,297
	8,750,000	NYC GO		5.000			03/01/2033		9,168,950
	3,000,000	NYC GO1		5.000			08/01/2029		3,216,030
	350,000	NYC GO		5.000			10/01/2030		372,942
	5,000,000	NYC GO1		5.000			08/01/2029		5,342,250
	3,800,000	NYC GO1		5.000			08/01/2035		3,928,174

25        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$        10,000,000	NYC GO6		5.000%			10/01/2034	$	10,376,400
	20,000,000	NYC GO6		5.250			03/01/2021		22,944,000
	8,915,000	NYC GO6		5.000			03/01/2035		9,195,849
	9,265,000	NYC GO6		5.000			12/01/2033		9,521,872
	20,760,000	NYC GO1		4.950	7		12/15/2033		20,760,000
	70,000	NYC GO1		5.000			04/01/2035		72,342
	5,400,000	NYC GO6		5.000			08/01/2035		5,619,915
	10,920,000	NYC GO6		5.000			08/01/2030		11,308,097
	2,500,000	NYC GO1		5.000			10/01/2029		2,682,900
	5,000	NYC GO1		7.750			08/15/2028		5,038
	240,000	NYC GO1		5.250			06/01/2027		240,737
	395,000	NYC GO1		5.375			06/01/2032		396,189
	15,000	NYC GO1		5.500			11/15/2037		15,046
	5,000	NYC GO1		7.250			08/15/2024		5,023
	5,000	NYC GO1		5.320			01/15/2028		5,016
	5,000	NYC GO		5.950			08/01/2014		5,024
	2,000,000	NYC GO1		6.250			12/15/2031		2,262,980
	5,135,000	NYC GO		5.000			10/01/2032		5,405,974
	3,300,000	NYC GO1		5.000			10/01/2033		3,452,064
	1,915,000	NYC GO		5.000			10/01/2034		1,994,741
	4,405,000	NYC GO1		5.000			05/15/2036		4,643,310
	5,395,000	NYC GO ROLs8		18.374	9		05/15/2036		6,562,478
	1,475,000	NYC GO ROLs8		18.363	9		05/15/2031		1,970,600
	875,000	NYC GO ROLs8		18.378	9		05/15/2033		1,123,570
	2,670,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.450			11/01/2046		2,580,074
	3,735,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.450			11/01/2040		3,782,323
	780,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.000			11/01/2030		778,190
	4,685,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)6		5.050			11/01/2039		4,684,649
	5,140,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.350			11/01/2037		5,196,334
	890,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)1		4.950			11/01/2039		891,593
	25,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.550			11/01/2039		25,689
	7,205,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.250			11/01/2045		7,239,440
	5,100,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.150			11/01/2037		5,220,768
	1,675,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.200			11/01/2035		1,646,977
	10,910,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)6		5.700			11/01/2046		11,252,670
	8,035,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)6		5.200			11/01/2040		8,061,178
	2,840,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)6		5.550			11/01/2039		2,918,270
	3,500,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)6		5.000			11/01/2037		3,490,095
	3,090,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)6		5.500			11/01/2034		3,184,953
	14,110,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)6		5.250			11/01/2030		14,281,370
	1,215,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.350			05/01/2041		1,224,647
	3,000,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)6		5.125			11/01/2032		3,024,690
	2,435,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.)6		5.100			11/01/2027		2,475,070
	70,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.), Series A1		5.500			11/01/2034		70,327
	29,700,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.), Series B6		5.350			05/01/2049		29,919,188
	8,365,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.), Series C6		5.125			05/01/2040		8,368,762
	11,250,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.), Series C6		5.050			11/01/2036		11,176,167
	13,180,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.), Series G-16		4.875			11/01/2039		13,093,501
	1,345,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.), Series H-21		5.200			11/01/2038		1,346,587

26        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Principal Amount			Coupon		Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$        3,400,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.), Series H-21		5.250%		05/01/2046	$	3,403,978
	15,510,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.), Series I-26		5.200		11/01/2038		15,408,209
	30,000	NYC HDC, Series B-21		5.300		05/01/2036		30,001
	2,750,000	NYC HDC, Series C6		5.000		11/01/2026		2,778,105
	940,000	NYC IDA (Allied Metal)1		7.125		12/01/2027		881,776
	45,000	NYC IDA (Allied Metal)1		6.375		12/01/2014		44,612
	2,335,000	NYC IDA (Amboy Properties)1		6.750		06/01/2020		2,129,310
	59,350,000	NYC IDA (American Airlines)1		7.750		08/01/2031		63,977,520
	338,060,000	NYC IDA (American Airlines)1		8.500		08/01/2028		362,745,141
	39,860,000	NYC IDA (American Airlines)1		8.000		08/01/2028		43,396,379
	18,200,000	NYC IDA (American Airlines)1		7.625		08/01/2025		19,664,372
	340,000	NYC IDA (American Airlines)1		7.500		08/01/2016		360,543
	3,530,000	NYC IDA (American National Red Cross)1		5.000		02/01/2036		3,286,571
	525,000	NYC IDA (Atlantic Veal & Lamb)		8.375		12/01/2016		517,009
	900,000	NYC IDA (Bark Frameworks)		6.750		11/01/2019		855,846
	4,220,000	NYC IDA (Beth Abraham Health Services)		6.500		11/15/2034		4,259,668
	5,500,000	NYC IDA (Beth Abraham Health Services)		6.500		02/15/2022		5,615,830
	1,035,000	NYC IDA (Beth Abraham Health Services)		6.500		11/15/2027		1,056,362
	153,620,000	NYC IDA (Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners)1		5.750		10/01/2036		116,092,170
	22,255,000	NYC IDA (Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners)1		6.200		10/01/2022		20,260,062
	97,130,000	NYC IDA (Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners)1		5.650		10/01/2028		78,130,401
	4,145,000	NYC IDA (Calhoun School)		6.625		12/01/2034		4,962,726
	16,205,000	NYC IDA (Calhoun School)1		6.625		12/01/2034		17,617,914
	2,895,000	NYC IDA (Center for Elimination of Family Violence)1		7.375		11/01/2036		2,860,173
	3,400,000	NYC IDA (Center for Nursing/Rehabilitation)1		5.375		08/01/2027		2,849,506
	14,100,000	NYC IDA (Center for Nursing/Rehabilitation)1		5.375		08/01/2027		11,817,069
	18,000,000	NYC IDA (Chapin School)1		5.000		11/01/2038		16,831,080
	3,145,000	NYC IDA (Comprehensive Care Management)		6.125		11/01/2035		3,010,520
	680,000	NYC IDA (Comprehensive Care Management)		7.875		12/01/2016		680,401
	1,340,000	NYC IDA (Comprehensive Care Management)		6.375		11/01/2028		1,340,630
	3,385,000	NYC IDA (Comprehensive Care Management)		6.375		11/01/2028		3,387,234
	1,490,000	NYC IDA (Comprehensive Care Management)		6.000		05/01/2026		1,490,685
	805,000	NYC IDA (Cool Wind Ventilation)1		5.450		11/01/2017		775,730
	725,000	NYC IDA (Cool Wind Ventilation)1		5.450		11/01/2017		698,639
	5,685,000	NYC IDA (Cool Wind Ventilation)1		6.075		11/01/2027		5,018,889
	5,500,000	NYC IDA (Family Support Systems)2		7.500		11/01/2034		2,199,835
	490,000	NYC IDA (Good Shepherd Services)		5.875		06/01/2014		491,083
	2,670,000	NYC IDA (Gourmet Boutique)1,10		5.750		05/01/2021		1,876,022
	7,290,000	NYC IDA (Guttmacher Institute)1		5.750		12/01/2036		6,574,559
	700,000	NYC IDA (Independent Living Assoc.)1		6.200		07/01/2020		685,972
	1,240,000	NYC IDA (Liberty-IAC/Interactive Corp.)1		5.000		09/01/2035		1,211,368
	3,745,000	NYC IDA (Manhattan Community Access Corp.)1		6.000		12/01/2036		3,482,475
	1,895,000	NYC IDA (Margaret Tietz Nursing & Rehabilitation Center)1		6.375		11/01/2038		1,773,398

27        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$      9,175,000	NYC IDA (Margaret Tietz Nursing & Rehabilitation Center)1		6.375%			11/01/2038	$	8,586,240
	15,560,000	NYC IDA (MediSys Health Network)		6.250			03/15/2024		13,373,509
	8,405,000	NYC IDA (Metro Biofuels)2		6.000			11/01/2028		4,638,383
	2,095,000	NYC IDA (Metropolitan College of New York)1		5.750			03/01/2020		2,138,660
	40,000,000	NYC IDA (NYU)6		5.250			07/01/2048		41,384,816
	2,935,000	NYC IDA (Petrocelli Electric)		8.000			11/01/2017		2,756,699
	805,000	NYC IDA (Petrocelli Electric)1		8.000			11/01/2018		748,996
	1,750,000	NYC IDA (PSCH)1		6.375			07/01/2033		1,674,312
	6,800,000	NYC IDA (Reece School)1		7.500			12/01/2037		7,086,892
	1,000,000	NYC IDA (Roundabout Theatre)1		5.000			10/01/2023		935,660
	2,760,000	NYC IDA (Sahadi Fine Foods)1		6.750			11/01/2019		2,642,120
	200,000	NYC IDA (Samaritan Aids Services)1		5.000			11/01/2024		200,272
	875,000	NYC IDA (SFTU/YAI/CRV Obligated Group)1		5.000			07/01/2026		768,285
	4,380,000	NYC IDA (Showman Fabricators)		7.500			11/01/2028		4,523,445
	1,625,000	NYC IDA (Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program)1		4.750			07/01/2020		1,489,572
	995,000	NYC IDA (Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program)1		5.250			07/01/2022		881,819
	500,000	NYC IDA (Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program)1		6.650			07/01/2023		485,210
	280,000	NYC IDA (Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program)1		7.875			08/01/2025		279,952
	475,000	NYC IDA (St. Francis College)1		5.000			10/01/2034		476,230
	5,760,000	NYC IDA (Stallion)		5.500			11/01/2036		4,644,518
	955,000	NYC IDA (Stallion)1		6.000			11/01/2027		859,777
	1,275,000	NYC IDA (Streamline Plastics)		8.125			12/01/2025		1,229,329
	225,000	NYC IDA (Streamline Plastics)		7.750			12/01/2015		224,095
	6,808,500	NYC IDA (Studio School)2		7.000			11/01/2038		5,093,915
	2,480,000	NYC IDA (Surprise Plastics)2		8.500			11/01/2023		2,355,826
	605,000	NYC IDA (Surprise Plastics)2		7.500			11/01/2049		574,708
	1,500,000	NYC IDA (Terminal One Group Assoc.)1		5.500	7		01/01/2021		1,614,075
	1,000,000	NYC IDA (The Bank Street College)1		5.250			12/01/2030		999,930
	380,000	NYC IDA (The Bank Street College)1		5.250			12/01/2021		380,410
	8,800,000	NYC IDA (The Child School)1		7.550			06/01/2033		8,806,248
	3,570,000	NYC IDA (Therapy & Learning Center)1		8.250			09/01/2031		3,573,677
	8,500,000	NYC IDA (Tides Two Rivers Foundation)1		5.650			12/01/2039		8,617,980
	9,580,000	NYC IDA (TIP/AeFM/AeH/AeHC/AeJFK/AeKC/AeL Obligated Group)		5.000			07/01/2028		9,087,301
	32,040,000	NYC IDA (Unicef)1		5.300			11/01/2038		29,210,868
	5,000,000	NYC IDA (United Jewish Appeal-Federal Jewish Philanthropies)		5.000			07/01/2034		5,217,600
	3,640,000	NYC IDA (Urban Resource Institute)1		7.375			11/01/2033		3,345,924
	70,500,000	NYC IDA (Visy Paper)1		7.950			01/01/2028		70,584,600
	5,500,000	NYC IDA (Visy Paper)1,4		7.800			01/01/2016		5,504,125
	1,930,000	NYC IDA (Vocational Instruction)2		7.750			02/01/2033		1,058,026
	1,335,000	NYC IDA (W & W Jewelers)1		8.250			02/01/2021		1,312,772
	2,900,000	NYC IDA (Weizmann Institute)1		5.900			11/01/2034		2,758,103

28        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Principal Amount			Coupon		Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$      5,930,000	NYC IDA (Weizmann Institute)1		5.900%		11/01/2034	$	5,639,845
	995,000	NYC IDA (World Casing Corp.)1		6.700		11/01/2019		943,837
	6,800,000	NYC IDA (Yankee Stadium)1		1.804		03/01/2022		6,076,072
	36,110,000	NYC IDA (Yankee Stadium)1		5.000		03/01/2046		35,311,608
	70,000	NYC IDA (Yankee Stadium)1		5.000		03/01/2036		70,134
	16,500,000	NYC IDA (Yankee Stadium)1		7.000		03/01/2049		18,773,700
	100,000	NYC IDA (Yankee Stadium)1		5.000		03/01/2031		100,513
	24,270,000	NYC IDA (Yeled Yalda Early Childhood)1		5.725		11/01/2037		21,963,136
	31,750,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority6		5.500		06/15/2043		33,685,798
	21,570,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority6		5.375		06/15/2043		22,712,337
	4,495,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1		5.000		06/15/2039		4,514,418
	2,650,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1		5.750		06/15/2040		2,929,337
	25,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1		5.000		06/15/2024		26,058
	19,740,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1		5.000		06/15/2039		19,825,277
	225,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1		5.000		06/15/2035		227,390
	8,950,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1		5.000		06/15/2031		9,458,270
	75,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1		5.000		06/15/2035		76,662
	7,350,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1		5.250		06/15/2040		7,689,791
	3,000,000	NYC Sales Tax Asset Receivables Corp., Series A1		5.000		10/15/2032		3,072,270
	700,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority1		5.125		01/15/2034		741,503
	1,700,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)1		5.500		01/15/2039		1,871,309
	15,000,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)6		5.250		07/15/2037		15,790,650
	5,410,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)1		5.000		07/15/2040		5,553,365
	25,000,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)6		5.000		07/15/2037		25,841,750
	8,190,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1		5.000		02/01/2035		8,606,216
	15,000,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)6		5.000		05/01/2034		15,846,450
	20,335,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)6		5.000		02/01/2030		21,934,538
	6,000,000	NYC Trust for Cultural Resources (Wildlife Conservation Society)		5.000		08/01/2033		6,331,620
	1,845,000	NYS Convention Center Devel. Corp. (Hotel Unit)1		5.000		11/15/2035		1,854,539
	850,000	NYS DA (Brooklyn Law School)		5.000		07/01/2028		880,353
	850,000	NYS DA (Brooklyn Law School)		5.000		07/01/2027		887,680
	430,000	NYS DA (Brooklyn Law School)		5.000		07/01/2030		438,050
	430,000	NYS DA (Brooklyn Law School)		5.000		07/01/2029		440,772
	260,000	NYS DA (Catholic Health System)		5.000		07/01/2032		251,022
	500,000	NYS DA (Catholic Health System)		5.000		07/01/2032		482,735
	3,335,000	NYS DA (CHSLI/GSHMC/MMC/SCHRC Obligated Group)1		5.000		07/01/2027		3,347,173
	300,000	NYS DA (Culinary Institute of America)		5.000		07/01/2034		290,652
	285,000	NYS DA (Fordham University)1		5.000		07/01/2038		295,183
	5,300,000	NYS DA (Interagency Council Pooled Loan Program)1		7.000		07/01/2031		5,301,537
	5,700,000	NYS DA (Interagency Council)1		7.000		07/01/2035		7,192,374

29        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$      3,000,000	NYS DA (Iona College)		5.000%			07/01/2032	$	2,992,830
	3,490,000	NYS DA (Manhattan College)1		5.300			07/01/2037		3,409,800
	18,230,000	NYS DA (Memorial Sloan-Kettering)6		5.000			07/01/2035		18,290,635
	150,000	NYS DA (Mental Health Services Facilities)1		5.000			02/15/2037		152,592
	860,000	NYS DA (Miriam Osborn Memorial Home Assoc.)		5.000			07/01/2029		878,017
	135,000	NYS DA (New School University)1		5.000			07/01/2033		135,034
	1,000,000	NYS DA (New School University)1		5.750			07/01/2050		1,049,100
	5,000,000	NYS DA (New School University)1		5.000			07/01/2041		4,999,650
	150,000	NYS DA (New York Methodist Hospital)1		5.250			07/01/2033		150,473
	11,500,000	NYS DA (North Shore L.I. Jewish Obligated Group)1		5.250			05/01/2034		11,891,345
	2,000,000	NYS DA (NYU Hospitals Center)1		5.625			07/01/2037		2,045,800
	8,575,000	NYS DA (NYU Hospitals Center)1		5.000			07/01/2036		8,630,995
	6,035,000	NYS DA (Providence Rest)1		5.000			07/01/2035		5,284,970
	2,700,000	NYS DA (Providence Rest)1		5.125			07/01/2030		2,497,311
	3,100,000	NYS DA (Providence Rest)1		5.250			07/01/2025		2,998,723
	1,525,000	NYS DA (School District Bond Financing Program), Series C1		7.500			04/01/2039		1,801,589
	2,645,000	NYS DA (School District Bond Financing Program), Series C1		7.375			10/01/2033		3,110,308
	1,750,000	NYS DA (School District Bond Financing Program), Series C1		7.250			10/01/2028		2,091,425
	1,495,000	NYS DA (School District Financing)1		5.000			10/01/2020		1,734,051
	1,920,000	NYS DA (SFH/GSHMC/MMC/SCHRC Obligated Group)1		5.100			07/01/2034		1,925,779
	5,770,000	NYS DA (Smithtown Special Library District)1		6.000			07/01/2028		6,540,410
	2,480,000	NYS DA (Special Surgery Hospital)1		6.000			08/15/2038		2,763,042
	270,000	NYS DA (St. John’s University)		5.000			07/01/2028		283,729
	10,750,000	NYS DA (St. John’s University)		5.000			07/01/2030		11,133,883
	3,500,000	NYS DA (St. Joseph’s College)1		5.250			07/01/2035		3,511,445
	48,400,000	NYS DA (St. Mary’s Hospital for Children)		7.875			11/15/2041		49,016,616
	1,575,000	NYS DA (St. Thomas Aquinas College)1		5.250			07/01/2028		1,575,158
	5,620,000	NYS DA (State Personal Income Tax Authority)1		5.000			02/15/2034		5,890,940
	15,915,000	NYS DA (State Personal Income Tax Authority)6		5.000			03/15/2034		16,708,652
	3,000,000	NYS DA (State University of New York)1		5.000			07/01/2040		3,095,670
	2,500,000	NYS DA (Teachers College)		5.000			07/01/2034		2,578,575
	5,240,000	NYS DA (The Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center)1		6.250			02/15/2035		5,653,803
	4,395,000	NYS DA (The New School)1		5.000			07/01/2031		4,570,448
	60,000	NYS DA (University of Rochester)1		5.000			07/01/2034		60,876
	1,000,000	NYS DA (University of Rochester)1		0.000	12		07/01/2039		1,022,800
	11,695,000	NYS DA (Vassar College)6		5.000			07/01/2046		11,885,751
	3,105,000	NYS DA (Yeshiva University)1		5.000			11/01/2031		3,136,857
	3,000,000	NYS DA (Yeshiva University)1		5.000			09/01/2034		2,984,490
	2,185,000	NYS DA (Yeshiva University)1		5.000			09/01/2038		2,160,419
	1,405,000	NYS EFC (Clean Water & Drinking Revolving Funds)1		5.000			06/15/2037		1,480,673
	430,000	NYS EFC (NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority)1		5.000			06/15/2034		436,226

30        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$      250,000	NYS EFC (United Waterworks)1		5.150%			03/01/2034	$	247,200
	25,000	NYS ERDA (Brooklyn Union Gas Company)1		4.700			02/01/2024		25,514
	15,000	NYS ERDA (Brooklyn Union Gas Company)		5.500			01/01/2021		15,057
	16,300,000	NYS ERDA (Brooklyn Union Gas Company) RIBS		13.481	9		07/01/2026		16,449,960
	7,000,000	NYS ERDA (Brooklyn Union Gas Company) RIBS		12.371	9		04/01/2020		7,003,080
	350,000	NYS ERDA (LILCO)1		5.300			10/01/2024		352,313
	95,000	NYS ERDA (LILCO)		5.300			08/01/2025		95,306
	150,000	NYS ERDA (LILCO)		5.300			08/01/2025		150,483
	1,350,000	NYS ERDA (Rochester Gas & Electric)1		0.120	7		08/01/2032		1,136,970
	600,000	NYS HFA (Affordable Hsg.)1		5.200			11/01/2030		615,948
	10,220,000	NYS HFA (Affordable Hsg.)6		5.450			11/01/2045		10,304,909
	2,000,000	NYS HFA (Affordable Hsg.)1		5.000			11/01/2042		2,007,400
	150,000	NYS HFA (Affordable Hsg.)1		6.750			11/01/2038		169,745
	1,080,000	NYS HFA (Affordable Hsg.)1		6.450			11/01/2029		1,167,372
	2,365,000	NYS HFA (Affordable Hsg.)1		5.250			11/01/2038		2,374,460
	1,350,000	NYS HFA (Children’s Rescue)1		7.625			05/01/2018		1,349,865
	930,000	NYS HFA (Friendship)1		5.100			08/15/2041		930,372
	1,185,000	NYS HFA (Golden Age Apartments)1		5.000			02/15/2037		1,181,706
	150,000	NYS HFA (Highland Avenue Senior Apartments)1		5.000			02/15/2039		147,671
	120,000	NYS HFA (Horizons at Wawayanda)1		5.150			11/01/2040		120,986
	2,080,000	NYS HFA (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.375			02/15/2035		2,080,374
	2,075,000	NYS HFA (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.500			08/15/2030		2,076,058
	1,710,000	NYS HFA (Multifamily Hsg.)1		5.650			02/15/2034		1,710,787
	1,255,000	NYS HFA (Multifamily Hsg.)1		6.400			11/15/2027		1,256,707
	3,620,000	NYS HFA (Multifamily Hsg.)1		4.850			02/15/2038		3,525,011
	590,000	NYS HFA (Nonprofit Hsg.)		8.400			11/01/2017		592,855
	495,000	NYS HFA (Nonprofit Hsg.)		8.400			11/01/2015		497,698
	470,000	NYS HFA (Nonprofit Hsg.)		8.400			11/01/2014		470,000
	535,000	NYS HFA (Nonprofit Hsg.)		8.400			11/01/2016		537,766
	630,000	NYS HFA (Nonprofit Hsg.)1		8.400			11/01/2018		632,829
	1,250,000	NYS HFA (State Personal Income Tax Authority)1		5.000			03/15/2036		1,275,738
	395,000	NYS LGSC (SCSB)		7.375			12/15/2016		396,714
	835,000	NYS LGSC (SCSB)		7.750			12/15/2021		841,713
	5,000,000	NYS Liberty Devel. Corp. (4 World Trade Center)1		5.000			11/15/2031		5,207,650
	20,000,000	NYS Liberty Devel. Corp. (4 World Trade Center)1		5.750			11/15/2051		21,098,000
	10,000,000	NYS Liberty Devel. Corp. (7 World Trade Center)		5.000			09/15/2040		10,346,200
	7,650,000	NYS Thruway Authority		5.000			01/01/2032		7,941,083
	50,000	Oneida County, NY IDA (Civic Facilities-Mohawk Valley)1		4.625			09/15/2030		45,103
	830,000	Oneida County, NY IDA (Civic Facilities-Mohawk Valley)1		5.000			09/15/2035		752,345
	1,185,000	Onondaga County, NY IDA (Free Library)1		5.125			03/01/2030		1,206,923
	1,115,000	Onondaga County, NY IDA (Free Library)1		5.125			03/01/2037		1,121,768
	13,570,000	Onondaga County, NY Res Rec		5.000			05/01/2015		13,449,770
	42,834,598	Onondaga County, NY Res Rec		0.000	12		05/01/2022		38,495,453
	1,000,000	Onondaga, NY Civic Devel Corp. (Le Moyne College)		5.000			07/01/2032		969,490

31        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Principal Amount			Coupon		Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$        1,540,000	Onondaga, NY Civic Devel Corp. (Le Moyne College)		5.000%		07/01/2042	$	1,448,786
	3,465,000	Onondaga, NY Civic Devel Corp. (Upstate Properties)1		5.250		12/01/2041		3,505,090
	2,000,000	Onondaga, NY Civic Devel. Corp. (Le Moyne College)1		5.375		07/01/2040		2,012,520
	1,435,000	Orange County, NY Funding Corp. (Mount St. Mary College)1		5.000		07/01/2042		1,338,181
	2,090,000	Orange County, NY IDA (Arden Hill Life Care Center)1		7.000		08/01/2031		2,101,704
	2,120,000	Orange County, NY IDA (Arden Hill Life Care Center)		7.000		08/01/2021		2,120,000
	2,325,000	Orange County, NY IDA (Arden Hill Life Care Center)1		7.000		08/01/2031		2,303,959
	2,235,000	Orange County, NY IDA (St. Luke’s Cornwall Hospital Obligated Group)1		5.375		12/01/2026		2,235,090
	1,715,000	Orange County, NY IDA (St. Luke’s Cornwall Hospital Obligated Group)1		5.375		12/01/2021		1,716,183
	6,330,000	Orange County, NY IDA (St. Luke’s Cornwall Hospital Obligated Group)1		5.375		12/01/2026		6,330,253
	19,290,000	Port Authority NY/NJ (Continental Airlines)1		9.125		12/01/2015		19,695,862
	16,505,000	Port Authority NY/NJ (JFK International Air Terminal)1		5.750		12/01/2022		16,612,282
	32,015,000	Port Authority NY/NJ (JFK International Air Terminal)1		5.750		12/01/2025		32,168,352
	40,000,000	Port Authority NY/NJ (KIAC)1		6.750		10/01/2019		38,281,200
	19,175,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 136th Series6		5.375		11/01/2028		19,584,741
	22,855,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 136th Series6		5.500		11/01/2029		23,353,005
	33,025,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 136th Series6		5.125		05/01/2034		33,404,357
	5,050,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 136th Series1		5.125		05/01/2034		5,107,974
	26,000,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 138th Series6		4.750		12/01/2034		25,998,960
	27,255,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 141st Series6		4.500		09/01/2029		27,442,890
	35,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 143rd Series1		5.000		04/01/2036		35,510
	47,910,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 143rd Series6		5.000		10/01/2030		49,021,512
	10,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 146th Series1		4.500		12/01/2034		9,800
	12,840,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 146th Series6		4.500		12/01/2034		12,586,362
	26,100,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 146th Series6		4.750		12/01/2027		26,408,972
	10,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 146th Series1		4.750		12/01/2027		10,120
	13,005,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 147th Series6		4.750		10/15/2028		13,078,855
	20,000,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 147th Series6		5.000		10/15/2032		20,307,395
	17,790,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 147th Series6		5.000		10/15/2027		18,563,508
	15,000,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 151st Series6		6.000		09/15/2028		16,523,400
	82,000,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 151st Series6		5.750		03/15/2035		87,826,455
	22,500,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 152nd Series6		5.750		11/01/2030		24,470,775
	101,940,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 152nd Series6		5.250		11/01/2035		107,206,220
	13,715,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 152nd Series6		5.250		05/01/2038		14,362,341
	15,300,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 161st Series6		5.000		10/15/2031		16,487,433
	20,250,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 163rd Series6		5.000		07/15/2039		20,840,693
	15,000,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 166th Series6		5.250		07/15/2036		16,140,150

32        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$    21,515,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 166th Series6		5.000%			01/15/2041	$	22,092,221
	400,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 172nd Series1		5.000			10/01/2034		407,552
	50,660,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 37th Series6		5.250			07/15/2034		51,327,699
	2,755,000	Poughkeepsie, NY IDA (Eastman & Bixby Redevel. Corp.)1		6.000			08/01/2032		2,757,121
	2,525,000	Ramapo, NY Local Devel. Corp.1		5.000			03/15/2033		2,560,173
	1,500,000	Rensselaer County, NY IDA (Franciscan Heights)1		5.375			12/01/2036		1,503,780
	7,300,000	Rensselaer County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.750			06/01/2043		7,098,885
	6,385,000	Rensselaer County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.625			06/01/2035		6,109,168
	4,820,000	Rensselaer, NY City School District COP1		5.000			06/01/2036		4,601,027
	1,075,000	Riverhead, NY IDA (Michael Reilly Design)		8.875			08/01/2021		1,077,000
	1,195,000	Rockland County, NY IDA (CRV/Rockland County Assoc. for the Learning Disabled Obligated Group)1		4.900			07/01/2021		1,099,233
	30,000,000	Rockland County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.		5.875	3		08/15/2045		1,032,000
	13,095,000	Rockland County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.750			08/15/2043		12,483,071
	486,000,000	Rockland County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.		6.596	3		08/15/2060		1,725,300
	9,225,000	Rockland County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.625			08/15/2035		8,825,558
	25,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2020		26,073
	45,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2030		45,518
	30,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2021		31,073
	25,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2019		26,285
	20,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2016		21,568
	25,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2017		26,780
	25,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2018		26,527
	35,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2026		35,641
	40,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2027		40,653
	40,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2029		40,530
	35,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2025		35,721
	30,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2022		30,922
	30,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2023		30,799
	30,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2024		30,691
	50,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2033		50,381
	55,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2034		55,372
	50,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2032		50,446
	45,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2031		45,460
	60,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2035		60,329
	40,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2028		40,571
	20,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2015		20,954
	60,000	Sanford Town, NY GO1		5.250			04/15/2036		60,277
	2,650,000	Seneca County, NY IDA (New York Chiropractic College)1		5.000			10/01/2027		2,675,944

33        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Principal Amount			Coupon		Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$    28,260,000	SONYMA, Series 1096		4.950%		10/01/2034	$	28,258,474
	22,640,000	SONYMA, Series 1376		4.700		10/01/2031		22,530,552
	12,600,000	SONYMA, Series 1406		4.750		10/01/2037		11,730,621
	7,785,000	SONYMA, Series 1436		4.900		10/01/2037		7,549,841
	520,000	St. Lawrence County, NY IDA (Clarkson University)1		6.000		09/01/2034		570,773
	4,775,000	St. Lawrence County, NY IDA (Clarkson University)1		5.375		09/01/2041		4,872,267
	1,510,000	St. Lawrence County, NY IDA (Clarkson University)		5.000		09/01/2041		1,494,266
	4,360,000	St. Lawrence County, NY IDA (Curran Renewable Energy)1		7.250		12/01/2029		3,486,125
	1,280,000	St. Lawrence County, NY IDA (St. Lawrence University)		5.000		07/01/2030		1,355,110
	1,355,000	St. Lawrence County, NY IDA (St. Lawrence University)		5.000		07/01/2031		1,427,235
	11,850,000	Suffolk County, NY Economic Devel. Corp. (Catholic Health Services)1		5.000		07/01/2028		12,076,335
	945,000	Suffolk County, NY Economic Devel. Corp. (Family Residences Essential Enterprises)1		6.000		12/01/2019		935,909
	1,005,000	Suffolk County, NY Economic Devel. Corp. (Family Residences Essential Enterprises)1		6.750		06/01/2027		947,494
	4,230,000	Suffolk County, NY Economic Devel. Corp., Series A1		7.375		12/01/2040		4,173,614
	545,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ACLD)1		6.000		12/01/2019		539,757
	1,585,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-ACLD)1		5.950		10/01/2021		1,546,912
	30,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-ADD)		7.500		09/01/2015		30,115
	40,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-ADD)1		6.950		12/01/2014		40,060
	215,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-ADD)1		7.125		06/01/2017		215,307
	845,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-Adelante)1		6.500		11/01/2037		782,800
	2,200,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-DDI)1		5.950		10/01/2021		2,147,134
	615,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-FREE)1		5.950		10/01/2021		600,222
	440,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-IGHL)1		5.950		10/01/2021		429,427
	630,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-IGHL)1		5.950		11/01/2022		609,103
	350,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-IGHL)1		6.000		10/01/2031		313,114
	160,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-NYS ARC)		7.500		09/01/2015		160,613
	580,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-NYS ARC)1		5.950		11/01/2022		560,761
	120,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-Pederson-Krag Center)1		8.375		06/01/2016		120,894
	135,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-SMCFS)		7.500		09/01/2015		135,517
	100,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-Suffolk Hostels)		7.500		09/01/2015		100,320
	1,475,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-UCPAGS)1		5.950		10/01/2021		1,439,556
	35,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-UCPAGS)		6.375		06/01/2014		35,034
	295,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-UCPAGS)1		7.000		06/01/2016		295,490
	65,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-UCPAGS)		7.500		09/01/2015		65,249
	150,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-UCPAGS)		6.950		12/01/2014		150,110
	3,530,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-UVBH)1		6.500		11/01/2037		3,270,157
	565,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (ALIA-WORCA)1		5.950		11/01/2022		546,259
	365,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Catholic Charities)1		6.000		10/01/2020		360,094

34        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$          95,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (DDI)1		6.000%			12/01/2019	$	94,086
	320,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (DDI)1		6.000			10/01/2020		315,699
	305,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (DDI)1		6.000			10/01/2020		300,901
	130,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Dowling College)1		5.000			06/01/2036		115,254
	2,600,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Easter Long Island Hospital Assoc.)1		5.375			01/01/2027		2,377,908
	2,040,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Federation of Organizations)1		8.125			04/01/2030		2,041,591
	1,995,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Huntington First Aid Squad)		6.750			11/01/2017		1,989,594
	150,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Independent Group Home Living)1		6.000			12/01/2019		148,557
	760,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Independent Group Home Living)1		6.000			10/01/2020		749,786
	5,600,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Jefferson’s Ferry)1		5.000			11/01/2028		5,687,528
	4,065,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (L.I. Network Community Services)1		7.550			02/01/2034		4,155,731
	7,555,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Medford Hamlet Assisted Living)1,4		6.375			01/01/2039		6,496,016
	635,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Nassau-Suffolk Services for Autism)1		6.750			11/01/2036		609,949
	1,865,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Nassau-Suffolk Services for Autism)1		6.750			11/01/2036		1,791,426
	2,000,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (New York Institute of Technology)1		5.000			03/01/2026		2,013,240
	26,425,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Nissequogue Cogeneration Partners)1		5.500			01/01/2023		25,848,142
	2,365,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Pederson-Krager Center)1		8.125			04/01/2030		2,303,534
	4,800,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Pederson-Krager Center)1		7.200			02/01/2035		4,140,048
	930,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program)1		5.250			07/01/2022		858,130
	310,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (Suffolk Hotels)1		6.000			10/01/2020		310,428
	3,165,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (United Cerebral Palsy Assoc.)		7.875			09/01/2041		3,202,094
	1,080,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (United Cerebral Palsy Assoc.)1		6.000			12/01/2019		1,069,610
	640,000	Suffolk County, NY IDA (WORCA)1		6.000			10/01/2020		631,398
	119,295,000	Suffolk, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		6.625			06/01/2044		104,115,904
	29,915,000	Suffolk, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		6.000			06/01/2048		23,175,151
	10,080,000	Suffolk, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.375			06/01/2028		9,089,640
	287,265,000	Suffolk, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.		8.000	3		06/01/2048		7,276,422
	3,005,000	Sullivan County, NY Community College COP2,11		5.750			08/15/2025		2,490,814
	6,367,500	Syracuse, NY Hsg. Authority (Loretto Sedgwick Heights Corp.)1		8.500			11/01/2031		6,459,001
	2,320,000	Syracuse, NY Hsg. Authority (Pavilion on James)		7.500			11/01/2042		2,009,746
	203,935,000	Syracuse, NY IDA (Carousel Center)1		5.000			01/01/2036		193,885,083
	1,000,000	Syracuse, NY IDA (Crouse Irving Health Hospital)1		5.375			01/01/2023		990,520

35        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$    4,980,000	Syracuse, NY IDA (James Square)		7.197%	3		08/01/2025	$	2,354,942
	2,050,000	Syracuse, NY IDA (Jewish Home of Central New York)1		7.375			03/01/2031		1,761,155
	615,000	Syracuse, NY IDA (Jewish Home of Central New York)1		7.375			03/01/2021		570,874
	1,700,000	Tompkins County, NY Devel. Corp. (Tompkins Cortland Community College Foundation)		5.000			07/01/2038		1,573,452
	2,425,000	Tompkins County, NY Devel. Corp. (Tompkins Cortland Community College Foundation)		5.000			07/01/2032		2,304,235
	30,000	Tompkins, NY Health Care Corp. (Reconstruction Home)1		10.800			02/01/2028		30,777
	2,000,000	Troy, NY Capital Resource Corp. (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)1		5.000			09/01/2030		2,053,440
	185,000	Ulster County, NY Res Rec1		5.000			03/01/2020		191,721
	1,925,000	Ulster County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		6.250			06/01/2025		1,853,525
	3,005,000	Ulster County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		6.450			06/01/2040		2,641,095
	3,180,000	Ulster County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		6.000			06/01/2040		2,761,703
	1,280,000	Warren & Washington Counties, NY IDA (GFH/GFHF Obligated Group)1		5.000			12/01/2035		1,280,013
	20,000	Westchester County, NY GO1		5.375			12/15/2014		20,474
	10,645,000	Westchester County, NY Healthcare Corp., Series A1		5.000			11/01/2030		10,834,162
	1,700,000	Westchester County, NY Healthcare Corp., Series B1		5.125			11/01/2041		1,703,145
	1,215,000	Westchester County, NY IDA (Clearview School)1		7.250			01/01/2035		1,191,295
	1,225,000	Westchester County, NY IDA (Guiding Eyes for the Blind)1		5.375			08/01/2024		1,254,412
	755,000	Westchester County, NY IDA (JDAM)1		6.750			04/01/2016		758,337
	3,400,000	Westchester County, NY IDA (Lawrence Hospital)1		5.000			01/01/2028		3,314,830
	460,000	Westchester County, NY IDA (Lawrence Hospital)1		5.125			01/01/2018		460,874
	1,470,000	Westchester County, NY IDA (Schnurmacher Center)1		6.500			11/01/2033		1,492,447
	52,815,000	Westchester County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.125			06/01/2045		39,009,159
	59,400,000	Westchester County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.125			06/01/2038		47,893,626
	4,500,000	Westchester County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.1		5.000			06/01/2026		4,056,750
	2,785,000	Yonkers, NY IDA (Hudson Scenic Studio)1		6.625			11/01/2019		2,652,211
	1,415,000	Yonkers, NY IDA (Philipsburgh Hall Associates)1		7.500			11/01/2030		1,210,023
	1,050,000	Yonkers, NY IDA (Sarah Lawrence College)1		6.000			06/01/2041		1,102,794
	1,200,000	Yonkers, NY IDA (St. Joseph’s Hospital)1		6.150			03/01/2015		1,200,348
	1,900,000	Yonkers, NY IDA (St. Joseph’s Hospital), Series 98-A1		6.150			03/01/2015		1,900,551

36        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	New York (Continued)
	$          500,000	Yonkers, NY IDA (St. Joseph’s Hospital), Series 98-B1		6.150%			03/01/2015	$	500,145
	685,000	Yonkers, NY Parking Authority1		6.000			06/15/2018		685,212
	1,215,000	Yonkers, NY Parking Authority1		6.000			06/15/2024		1,098,761
									5,145,877,394
	U.S. Possessions—28.6%
	825,000	Guam Education Financing Foundation COP1		5.000			10/01/2023		811,569
	10,000,000	Guam GO1		7.000			11/15/2039		10,440,200
	6,000,000	Guam GO1		6.750			11/15/2029		6,220,920
	2,400,000	Guam Government Business Privilege1		5.000			01/01/2031		2,414,160
	345,000	Guam Hsg. Corp. (Single Family Mtg.)1		5.750			09/01/2031		362,112
	2,790,000	Guam Power Authority, Series A		5.000			10/01/2030		2,853,305
	1,560,000	Guam Power Authority, Series A		5.000			10/01/2024		1,694,815
	7,700,000	Guam Power Authority, Series A1		5.500			10/01/2040		7,651,259
	1,230,000	Guam Power Authority, Series A		5.000			10/01/2023		1,360,393
	31,250,000	Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth, Series A1		5.000			06/01/2030		23,400,937
	1,865,000	Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth, Series A1		5.000			10/01/2022		1,620,909
	7,795,000	Northern Mariana Islands Ports Authority, Series A1		6.250			03/15/2028		5,419,786
	15,130,000	Northern Mariana Islands Ports Authority, Series A1		6.600			03/15/2028		13,435,440
	1,950,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority1		5.000			07/01/2033		1,222,592
	16,250,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority		5.750			07/01/2037		10,972,325
	1,580,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority1		5.250			07/01/2029		1,033,304
	10,000,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority1		5.250			07/01/2024		7,209,800
	15,350,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority1		6.000			07/01/2047		10,352,040
	19,000,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority6		5.125			07/01/2047		15,066,620
	84,470,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority1		6.000			07/01/2044		57,413,414
	30,000,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority1		5.125			07/01/2047		23,789,400
	80,800,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority1		6.000			07/01/2038		56,208,520
	4,000,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority1		6.000			07/01/2044		2,718,760
	55,825,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority1		6.125			07/01/2024		41,750,401
	745,000,000	Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)		7.165	3		05/15/2055		18,461,100
	168,500,000	Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)		6.627	3		05/15/2050		9,366,915
	3,519,880,000	Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)		7.625	3		05/15/2057		44,843,271
	56,685,000	Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1		5.625			05/15/2043		46,569,562
	3,179,200,000	Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)		8.375	3		05/15/2057		28,994,304
	5,675,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		6.500			07/01/2040		3,983,056
	3,670,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		6.000			07/01/2040		2,490,058
	1,000,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		6.000			07/01/2028		683,830
	2,700,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		6.000			07/01/2035		1,844,154
	3,205,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.625			07/01/2033		2,157,927
	10,455,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.750			07/01/2041		6,842,798
	30,000,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.750			07/01/2036		20,070,600
	390,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		6.000			07/01/2039		265,797
	14,500,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.250			07/01/2031		9,399,335
	3,315,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.125			07/01/2031		2,134,197

37        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	U.S. Possessions (Continued)
	$    43,385,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.250%			07/01/2037	$	27,065,298
	10,230,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.250			07/01/2034		6,613,797
	30,890,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.125			07/01/2031		19,886,982
	1,000,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.500			07/01/2026		687,000
	7,850,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.500			07/01/2029		5,290,665
	38,095,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO		5.500			07/01/2039		24,372,038
	5,000,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO		5.750			07/01/2028		3,382,600
	5,000,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.375			07/01/2033		3,287,600
	1,270,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		6.000			07/01/2028		1,138,441
	6,000,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		6.500			07/01/2037		4,438,260
	770,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.875			07/01/2036		521,506
	76,300,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.500			07/01/2032		51,024,099
	2,920,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.250			07/01/2030		1,926,704
	2,000,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.000			07/01/2033		1,266,900
	2,200,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.250			07/01/2026		1,472,482
	2,500,000	Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO1		5.250			07/01/2032		1,617,050
	15,480,000	Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A		7.000			07/01/2043		12,257,064
	10,105,000	Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA1		5.250			07/01/2029		6,466,594
	510,000	Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series RR1		5.000			07/01/2024		435,719
	3,550,000	Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT1		5.000			07/01/2037		2,176,292
	50,000,000	Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series UU1		0.704	7		07/01/2029		29,890,000
	170,000	Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW1		5.500			07/01/2038		108,256
	1,695,000	Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX1		5.250			07/01/2040		1,059,595
	4,845,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority1		5.250			07/01/2030		3,665,049
	4,000,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority1		5.500			07/01/2029		3,159,520
	4,945,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority1		5.300			07/01/2035		3,514,609
	9,515,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority1		5.000			07/01/2028		5,790,353
	270,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority1		5.750			07/01/2020		215,873
	1,840,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series G1		5.000			07/01/2042		1,103,614
	8,980,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series G1		5.000			07/01/2033		5,630,190
	1,120,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series H1		5.450			07/01/2035		723,509
	1,145,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series K1		5.000			07/01/2030		728,163
	6,500,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series K1		5.000			07/01/2027		4,127,500
	2,600,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series L1		5.250			07/01/2023		2,291,406
	915,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series L1		5.250			07/01/2030		600,899

38        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	U.S. Possessions (Continued)
	$    78,610,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series M1		5.000%			07/01/2046	$	46,462,441
	10,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series M1		5.000			07/01/2046		11,486
	3,190,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series N1		5.250			07/01/2032		2,545,652
	57,615,000	Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series N1		5.250			07/01/2039		35,070,250
	41,740,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure1		5.000			07/01/2046		24,698,810
	5,000,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure1		6.000			12/15/2026		3,461,300
	142,985,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure1		5.000			07/01/2041		86,238,543
	675,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure1		5.000			07/01/2037		418,352
	1,295,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure1		5.500			07/01/2026		1,069,800
	25,255,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure1		5.000			07/01/2031		16,066,978
	15,000,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure1		5.500			07/01/2027		12,270,600
	65,725,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure		5.730	3		07/01/2045		3,474,224
	16,955,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure		5.650	3		07/01/2029		4,930,005
	17,490,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure1		5.000			07/01/2037		10,839,952
	25,000,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure		5.800	3		07/01/2032		3,287,250
	1,680,000	Puerto Rico Infrastructure (Mepsi Campus)1		6.500			10/01/2037		1,004,052
	6,315,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University)1		5.500			12/01/2031		4,564,419
	1,235,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University)1		5.375			12/01/2021		1,040,142
	6,285,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University)1		5.000			03/01/2036		4,082,610
	1,350,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University)		5.000			04/01/2027		976,712
	1,200,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University)		5.375			04/01/2042		796,080
	875,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University)		5.125			04/01/2032		600,425
	23,000,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Cogeneration Facilities)1		6.625			06/01/2026		20,113,270
	5,000,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Hospital Auxilio Mutuo)1		6.250			07/01/2026		5,002,850
	650,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (International American University)		5.000			10/01/2031		498,219
	550,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ryder Memorial Hospital)1		6.600			05/01/2014		549,219
	5,250,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ryder Memorial Hospital)1		6.700			05/01/2024		4,724,318
	7,000,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (San Lucas & Cristo Redentor Hospitals)		5.750			06/01/2029		3,990,000
	200,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (University of the Sacred Heart)		5.000			10/01/2042		133,164
	5,490,000	Puerto Rico ITEMECF (University Plaza)1		5.000			07/01/2033		4,211,105
	4,990,000	Puerto Rico Municipal Finance Agency, Series A1		5.250			08/01/2025		3,366,454
	7,500,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		6.750			07/01/2036		5,554,275
	850,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		5.500			07/01/2037		544,850
	18,585,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		5.250			07/01/2029		11,936,216
	7,500,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		5.000			07/01/2037		4,523,625
	8,000,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		6.500			07/01/2030		6,030,720

39        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Principal Amount			Coupon			Maturity		Value
	U.S. Possessions (Continued)
	$  121,570,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		5.250%			07/01/2033	$	78,171,942
	9,450,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		5.375			07/01/2033		6,151,572
	1,500,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		6.250			07/01/2021		1,184,640
	7,500,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		6.250			07/01/2031		5,449,875
	90,355,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		5.000			07/01/2036		54,965,657
	2,110,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		5.625			07/01/2039		1,361,182
	1,980,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		5.875			07/01/2039		1,311,592
	31,050,000	Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority1		6.000			07/01/2041		20,652,287
	11,810,000	Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., Series B1		5.500			08/01/2031		7,676,736
	15,265,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A		7.890	3		08/01/2034		2,357,527
	7,255,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A1		6.500			08/01/2044		5,693,942
	1,490,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A1		5.000			08/01/2043		976,456
	75,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A1		5.500			08/01/2037		53,829
	296,445,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A6		5.250			08/01/2057		220,423,362
	80,000,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A		6.504	3		08/01/2043		10,156,000
	409,990,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A		5.606	3		08/01/2054		24,349,306
	30,000,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A		6.500	3		08/01/2042		4,083,600
	3,130,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A1		5.000			08/01/2024		2,707,419
	106,150,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A		6.000	3		08/01/2056		4,909,438
	10,000,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A-11		5.250			08/01/2043		6,792,100
	250,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C1		6.000			08/01/2042		186,835
	9,985,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C1		5.250			08/01/2041		6,839,825
	95,245,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C1		5.750			08/01/2057		76,623,650
	39,470,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C1		0.000	12		08/01/2032		27,739,121
	1,450,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C1		6.000			08/01/2039		1,088,486
	4,000,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C1		5.375			08/01/2036		2,820,920
	4,525,000	University of Puerto Rico1		5.000			06/01/2026		2,846,859
	7,280,000	University of Puerto Rico, Series P1		5.000			06/01/2030		4,344,631
	67,190,000	University of Puerto Rico, Series Q1		5.000			06/01/2036		38,206,922
	24,375,000	University of Puerto Rico, Series Q1		5.000			06/01/2030		14,546,756
	5,140,000	V.I. Public Finance Authority (Gross Receipts Taxes Loan Notes)1		5.000			10/01/2032		4,975,520
	590,000	V.I. Public Finance Authority (Matching Fund Loan Notes)1		6.000			10/01/2039		596,785
	3,160,000	V.I. Public Finance Authority (Matching Fund Loan Notes)		5.000			10/01/2032		3,058,880
	11,100,000	V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.		7.300	3		05/15/2035		1,367,964
	1,015,000	V.I. Water & Power Authority, Series A1		5.000			07/01/2031		792,268
									1,722,017,764
	Total Municipal Bonds and Notes (Cost $8,321,691,989)								6,867,895,158
	Shares
	Common Stocks—0.1%
	1,401	CMS Liquidating Trust13,14 (Cost $4,483,200)							4,836,252
	Total Investments, at Value (Cost $8,326,175,189)—114.0%								6,872,731,410
	Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets—(14.0)								(842,678,883	)
	Net Assets—100.0%							$	6,030,052,527

40        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Footnotes to Statement of Investments

1. All or a portion of the security position has been segregated for collateral to cover borrowings. See Note 6 of the accompanying Notes.

2. This security is not accruing income because the issuer has missed an interest payment on it and/or is not anticipated to make future interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the original contractual interest rate. See Note 1 of the accompanying Notes.

3. Zero coupon bond reflects effective yield on the date of purchase.

4. All or a portion of the security position is when-issued or delayed delivery to be delivered and settled after December 31, 2013. See Note 1 of the accompanying Notes.

5. Subject to a forbearance agreement. Rate shown is the original contractual interest rate. See Note 1 of the accompanying Notes.

6. Security represents the underlying municipal bond with respect to an inverse floating rate security held by the Fund. The bond was purchased by the Fund and subsequently transferred to a trust, which issued the related inverse floating rate security. See Note 1 of the accompanying Notes.

7. Represents the current interest rate for a variable or increasing rate security.

8. Represents an inverse floating rate security that is subject to a shortfall/reimbursement agreement. See Note 1 of accompanying notes.

9. Represents the current interest rate for the inverse floating rate security. See Note 1 of the accompanying Notes.

10. This security is accruing partial income at an anticipated effective rate based on expected interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the original contractual interest rate.

11. Restricted security. The aggregate value of restricted securities as of December 31, 2013 was $2,490,814, which represents 0.04% of the Fund’s net assets. See Note 8 of the accompanying Notes. Information concerning restricted securities is as follows:

Security	Acquisition Date		Cost		Value		Unrealized Depreciation
Sullivan County, NY Community
College COP		3/23/07	$	3,005,000	$	2,490,814	$	514,186

12. Denotes a step bond: a zero coupon bond that converts to a fixed or variable interest rate at a designated future date.

13. Non-income producing security.

14. Received as a result of a corporate action.

To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below:

ACDS	Assoc. for Children with Down Syndrome
ACLD	Adults and Children with Learning and Developmental Disabilities
ADD	Aid to the Developmentally Disabled
AeFM	Aero Ft. Myers
Aeh	Aero Harrisburg
AeHC	Aero Houston Central
AeJFK	Aero JFK
AeKC	Aero Kansas City
AeL	Aero Lauderdale
ALIA	Alliance of Long Island Agencies
ARC	Assoc. of Retarded Citizens
CFGA	Child and Family Guidance Assoc.
CHSLI	Catholic Health Services of Long Island
CNGCS	Central Nassau Guidance and Counseling Services
COP	Certificates of Participation
CRV	Crystal Run Village
CSMR	Community Services for the Mentally Retarded
DA	Dormitory Authority
DDI	Developmental Disabilities Institute

41        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS    Continued

Footnotes to Statement of Investments Continued

DRIVERS	Derivative Inverse Tax Exempt Receipts
EFC	Environmental Facilities Corp.
ERDA	Energy Research and Devel. Authority
FREE	Family Residences and Essential Enterprises
GFH	Glens Falls Hospital
GFHF	Glens Falls Hospital Foundation
GO	General Obligation
GSHMC	Good Sumaritan Hospital Medical Center
HDC	Housing Devel. Corp.
HFA	Housing Finance Agency
HH	Harmony Heights, Inc.
HHS	Harmony Heights School
IDA	Industrial Devel. Agency
IGHL	Independent Group Home for Living
	Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Community
ITEMECF	Facilities
JDAM	Julia Dyckman Andrus Memorial
JFK	John Fitzgerald Kennedy
LGSC	Local Government Services Corp.
LILCO	Long Island Lighting Corp.
LVH	Little Village House
MMC	Mercy Medical Center
MTA	Metropolitan Transportation Authority
NY/NJ	New York/New Jersey
NYC	New York City
NYS	New York State
NYU	New York University
PSCH	Professional Service Centers for the Handicapped, Inc.
Res Rec	Resource Recovery Facility
RIBS	Residual Interest Bonds
ROLs	Reset Option Longs
SCHRC	St. Charles Hospital and Rehabilitation Center
SCSB	Schuyler Community Services Board
SFH	St. Francis Hospital
SFTU	Services for the Underserved
SMCFS	St. Mary’s Children and Family Services
SONYMA	State of New York Mortgage Agency
SUNY	State University of New York
TASC	Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds
TFABs	Tobacco Flexible Amortization Bonds
TIP	Transportation Infrastructure Properties
UCPAGS	United Cerebral Palsy Assoc. of Greater Suffolk
UVBH	United Veteran’s Beacon House
WORCA	Working Organization for Retarded Children and Adults
YAI	Young Adult Institute
YMCA	Young Men’s Christian Assoc.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

42        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES    December 31, 2013

Assets
Investments, at value (cost $8,326,175,189)—see accompanying statement of investments	$	6,872,731,410
Receivables and other assets:
Interest		124,475,919
Shares of beneficial interest sold		15,693,232
Investments sold (including $1,790,000 sold on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis)		3,918,659
Other		977,974
Total assets		7,017,797,194
Liabilities
Bank overdraft		7,037,043
Payables and other liabilities:
Payable for short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 1)		832,780,000
Payable for borrowings (See Note 6)		101,100,000
Shares of beneficial interest redeemed		39,715,378
Investments purchased		2,300,000
Trustees’ compensation		1,709,734
Dividends		941,889
Distribution and service plan fees		871,396
Transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees		524,052
Shareholder communications		354,534
Interest expense on borrowings		5,294
Other		405,347
Total liabilities		987,744,667
Net Assets	$	6,030,052,527
Composition of Net Assets
Additional paid-in capital	$	8,390,103,263
Accumulated net investment income		71,502,802
Accumulated net realized loss on investments		(978,109,759)
Net unrealized depreciation on investments		(1,453,443,779)
Net Assets	$	6,030,052,527

43        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES    Continued

Net Asset Value Per Share
Class A Shares:
Net asset value and redemption price per share (based on net assets of $4,947,548,779 and 346,173,864 shares of beneficial interest outstanding)	$	14.29
Maximum offering price per share (net asset value plus sales charge of 4.75% of offering price)	$	15.00
Class B Shares:
Net asset value, redemption price (excludes applicable contingent deferred sales charge) and offering price per share (based on net assets of $46,038,365 and 3,225,078 shares of beneficial interest outstanding)	$	14.28
Class C Shares:
Net asset value, redemption price (excludes applicable contingent deferred sales charge) and offering price per share (based on net assets of $868,280,136 and 60,874,946 shares of beneficial interest outstanding)	$	14.26
Class Y Shares:
Net asset value, redemption price and offering price per share (based on net assets of $168,185,247 and 11,766,907 shares of beneficial interest outstanding)	$	14.29

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

44        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS    For the Year Ended December 31, 2013

Investment Income
Interest	$	519,859,283
Other income		3,073
Total investment income		519,862,356
Expenses
Management fees		34,779,197
Distribution and service plan fees:
Class A		9,073,442
Class B		683,446
Class C		10,986,154
Transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees:
Class A		4,924,686
Class B		63,941
Class C		923,669
Class Y		171,991
Shareholder communications:
Class A		729,601
Class B		28,915
Class C		209,414
Class Y		35,299
Interest expense and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 1)		7,977,626
Borrowing fees		2,834,081
Accounting service fees		625,750
Trustees’ compensation		192,031
Custodian fees and expenses		77,519
Interest expense on borrowings		58,222
Other		682,988
Total expenses		75,057,972
Less waivers and reimbursements of expenses		(32,666)
Net expenses		75,025,306
Net Investment Income		444,837,050
Realized and Unrealized Loss
Net realized loss on investments		(73,872,629)
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments		(1,215,152,121)
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Operations	$	(844,187,700)

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

45        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

	Year Ended December 31, 2013		Year Ended December 31, 2012
Operations
Net investment income	$	444,837,050	$	442,621,077
Net realized gain (loss)		(73,872,629)		15,064,654
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation		(1,215,152,121)		489,927,983
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations		(844,187,700)		947,613,714
Dividends and/or Distributions to Shareholders
Dividends from net investment income:
Class A		(366,957,815)		(384,065,493)
Class B		(3,458,983)		(5,745,070)
Class C		(55,983,729)		(58,473,713)
Class Y		(12,077,031)		(10,693,230)
		(438,477,558)		(458,977,506)
Beneficial Interest Transactions
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from beneficial interest transactions:
Class A		(727,116,140)		209,512,039
Class B		(37,794,713)		(46,595,065)
Class C		(167,788,631)		83,939,442
Class Y		3,288,005		65,472,787
		(929,411,479)		312,329,203
Net Assets
Total increase (decrease)		(2,212,076,737)		800,965,411
Beginning of period		8,242,129,264		7,441,163,853
End of period (including accumulated net investment income of $71,502,802 and $64,147,571, respectively)	$	6,030,052,527	$	8,242,129,264

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

46        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS    For the Year Ended December 31, 2013

Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net decrease in net assets from operations	$	(844,187,700)
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Purchase of investment securities		(1,253,469,833)
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities		2,160,674,027
Short-term investment securities, net		125,041,859
Premium amortization		5,969,059
Discount accretion		(61,495,974)
Net realized loss on investments from unaffiliated companies		73,872,629
Total net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments		1,215,152,121
Change in assets:
Increase in other assets		(95,010)
Decrease in interest receivable		10,998,748
Decrease in receivable for securities sold		1,815,236
Change in liabilities:
Increase in other liabilities		439,633
Decrease in payable for securities purchased		(94,523,817)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,340,190,978
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from borrowings		1,248,900,000
Payments on borrowings		(1,172,400,000)
Payments on short-term floating rate notes issued		(79,205,000)
Proceeds from shares sold		1,207,035,308
Payments on shares redeemed		(2,459,592,740)
Cash distributions paid		(109,320,277)
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,364,582,709)
Net decrease in cash		(24,391,731)
Cash, beginning balance		17,354,688
Cash, ending balance	$	(7,037,043)

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of reinvestment of dividends and distributions of $328,216,114.

Cash paid for interest on borrowings—$54,788.

Cash paid for interest on short-term floating rate notes issued—$7,977,626.

47        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Class A	Year Ended   December 31, 2013		Year Ended   December 31, 2012		Year Ended   December 30, 2011 1		Year Ended   December 31, 2010		Year Ended   December 31, 2009
Per Share Operating Data
Net asset value, beginning of period	$	17.02	$	15.98	$	15.33	$	15.70	$	11.54
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment income2		0.97		0.95		1.02		0.98		0.98
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)		(2.75)		1.08		0.66		(0.38)		4.09
Total from investment operations		(1.78)		2.03		1.68		0.60		5.07
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders:
Dividends from net investment income		(0.95)		(0.99)		(1.03)		(0.97)		(0.91)
Net asset value, end of period	$	14.29	$	17.02	$	15.98	$	15.33	$	15.70
Total Return, at Net Asset Value3		(10.84)%		12.94%		11.50%		3.63%		45.07%
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period (in millions)	$	4,948	$	6,725	$	6,115	$	6,295	$	6,913
Average net assets (in millions)	$	6,159	$	6,537	$	5,937	$	7,013	$	6,360
Ratios to average net assets:4
Net investment income		6.05%		5.67%		6.65%		6.01%		6.96%
Expenses excluding interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued and interest and fees from borrowings		0.72%		0.67%		0.69%		0.67%		0.70%
Interest and fees from borrowings		0.04%		0.05%		0.06%		0.08%		0.45%
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued5		0.11%		0.14%		0.15%		0.18%		0.27%
Total expenses		0.87%		0.86%		0.90%		0.93%		1.42%
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses		0.87%		0.86%		0.90%		0.93%		1.42%
Portfolio turnover rate		15%		10%		11%		7%		8%

1. December 30, 2011 represents the last business day of the Fund’s reporting period.

2. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.

3. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.

4. Annualized for periods less than one full year.

5. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

48        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Class B	Year Ended   December 31, 2013		Year Ended   December 31, 2012		Year Ended   December 30, 2011 1		Year Ended   December 31, 2010		Year Ended   December 31, 2009
Per Share Operating Data
Net asset value, beginning of period	$	17.00	$	15.96	$	15.31	$	15.68	$	11.53
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment income2		0.82		0.80		0.87		0.82		0.85
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)		(2.73)		1.07		0.67		(0.37)		4.07
Total from investment operations		(1.91)		1.87		1.54		0.45		4.92
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders:
Dividends from net investment income		(0.81)		(0.83)		(0.89)		(0.82)		(0.77)
Net asset value, end of period	$	14.28	$	17.00	$	15.96	$	15.31	$	15.68
Total Return, at Net Asset Value3		(11.59)%		11.91%		10.47%		2.67%		43.66%
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period (in millions)	$	46	$	94	$	133	$	181	$	246
Average net assets (in millions)	$	68	$	115	$	146	$	220	$	248
Ratios to average net assets:4
Net investment income		5.09%		4.76%		5.72%		5.07%		6.05%
Expenses excluding interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued and interest and fees from borrowings		1.62%		1.61%		1.65%		1.62%		1.67%
Interest and fees from borrowings		0.04%		0.05%		0.06%		0.08%		0.45%
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued5		0.11%		0.14%		0.15%		0.18%		0.27%
Total expenses		1.77%		1.80%		1.86%		1.88%		2.39%
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses		1.77%		1.80%		1.86%		1.88%		2.39%
Portfolio turnover rate		15%		10%		11%		7%		8%

1. December 30, 2011 represents the last business day of the Fund’s reporting period.

2. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.

3. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.

4. Annualized for periods less than one full year.

5. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

49        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS    Continued

Class C	Year Ended   December 31, 2013		Year Ended   December 31, 2012		Year Ended   December 30, 2011 1		Year Ended   December 31, 2010		Year Ended   December 31, 2009
Per Share Operating Data
Net asset value, beginning of period	$	16.99	$	15.95	$	15.30	$	15.67	$	11.52
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment income2		0.83		0.81		0.88		0.83		0.86
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)		(2.75)		1.07		0.67		(0.37)		4.07
Total from investment operations		(1.92)		1.88		1.55		0.46		4.93
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders:
Dividends from net investment income		(0.81)		(0.84)		(0.90)		(0.83)		(0.78)
Net asset value, end of period	$	14.26	$	16.99	$	15.95	$	15.30	$	15.67
Total Return, at Net Asset Value3		(11.63)%		12.00%		10.56%		2.75%		43.82%
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period (in millions)	$	868	$	1,223	$	1,069	$	1,120	$	1,250
Average net assets (in millions)	$	1,096	$	1,167	$	1,039	$	1,271	$	1,131
Ratios to average net assets:4
Net investment income		5.18%		4.79%		5.77%		5.14%		6.09%
Expenses excluding interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued and interest and fees from borrowings		1.59%		1.54%		1.57%		1.54%		1.57%
Interest and fees from borrowings		0.04%		0.05%		0.06%		0.08%		0.45%
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued5		0.11%		0.14%		0.15%		0.18%		0.27%
Total expenses		1.74%		1.73%		1.78%		1.80%		2.29%
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses		1.74%		1.73%		1.78%		1.80%		2.29%
Portfolio turnover rate		15%		10%		11%		7%		8%

1. December 30, 2011 represents the last business day of the Fund’s reporting period.

2. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.

3. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.

4. Annualized for periods less than one full year.

5. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

50        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Class Y	Year Ended   December 31, 2013		Year Ended   December 31, 2012		Year Ended   December 30, 2011 1		Year Ended   December 31, 2010		Year Ended   December 31, 2009
Per Share Operating Data
Net asset value, beginning of period	$	17.02	$	15.98	$	15.33	$	15.69	$	11.54
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment income2		0.99		0.97		1.04		0.99		1.00
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)		(2.75)		1.08		0.66		(0.36)		4.08
Total from investment operations		(1.76)		2.05		1.70		0.63		5.08
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders:
Dividends from net investment income		(0.97)		(1.01)		(1.05)		(0.99)		(0.93)
Net asset value, end of period	$	14.29	$	17.02	$	15.98	$	15.33	$	15.69
Total Return, at Net Asset Value3		(10.72)%		13.10%		11.64%		3.84%		45.18%
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period (in millions)	$	168	$	200	$	124	$	101	$	65
Average net assets (in millions)	$	198	$	179	$	109	$	100	$	57
Ratios to average net assets:4
Net investment income		6.21%		5.78%		6.76%		6.14%		7.09%
Expenses excluding interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued and interest and fees from borrowings		0.59%		0.54%		0.56%		0.54%		0.55%
Interest and fees from borrowings		0.04%		0.05%		0.06%		0.08%		0.45%
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued5		0.11%		0.14%		0.15%		0.18%		0.27%
Total expenses		0.74%		0.73%		0.77%		0.80%		1.27%
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses		0.74%		0.73%		0.77%		0.80%		1.27%
Portfolio turnover rate		15%		10%		11%		7%		8%

1. December 30, 2011 represents the last business day of the Fund’s reporting period.

2. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.

3. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.

4. Annualized for periods less than one full year.

5. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

51        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    December 31, 2013

1. Significant Accounting Policies

Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals (the “Fund”), formerly Rochester Fund Municipals, is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek to provide as high a level of income exempt from federal income tax and New York State and New York City personal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management while seeking preservation of shareholders’ capital. The Fund’s investment adviser is OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OFI” or the “Sub-Adviser”). The Manager has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with OFI.

The Fund offers Class A, Class C and Class Y shares, and previously offered Class B shares for new purchase through June 29, 2012. Subsequent to that date, no new purchases of Class B shares are permitted, however reinvestment of dividend and/or capital gain distributions and exchanges of Class B shares into and from other Oppenheimer funds will be allowed. Class A shares are sold at their offering price, which is normally net asset value plus a front-end sales charge. Class C shares are sold, and Class B shares were sold, without a front-end sales charge but may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”). Class Y shares are sold to certain institutional investors or intermediaries without either a front-end sales charge or a CDSC, however, the intermediaries may impose charges on their accountholders who beneficially own Class Y shares. All classes of shares have identical rights and voting privileges with respect to the Fund in general and exclusive voting rights on matters that affect that class alone. Earnings, net assets and net asset value per share may differ due to each class having its own expenses, such as transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees and shareholder communications, directly attributable to that class. Class A, B and C shares have separate distribution and/or service plans under which they pay fees. Class Y shares do not pay such fees. Class B shares will automatically convert to Class A shares 72 months after the date of purchase.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund.

Inverse Floating Rate Securities. The Fund invests in inverse floating rate securities that pay interest at a rate that varies inversely with short-term interest rates. Because inverse floating rate securities are leveraged instruments, the value of an inverse floating rate security will change more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and other market fluctuations than the market value of a conventional fixed-rate municipal security of similar maturity and credit quality, including the municipal bond underlying an inverse floating rate security.

An inverse floating rate security is created as part of a financial transaction referred to as a “tender option bond” transaction. In most cases, in a tender option bond transaction the Fund sells a fixed-rate municipal bond (the “underlying municipal bond”) to a broker dealer (the “sponsor”). The sponsor creates a trust (the “Trust”) into which it deposits the underlying municipal bond. The Trust then issues and sells short-term floating rate securities with a fixed principal amount representing a senior interest in the underlying municipal bond to third parties and a residual, subordinate interest in the underlying municipal bond (referred

52        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

to as an “inverse floating rate security”) to the Fund. The interest rate on the short-term floating rate securities resets periodically, usually weekly, to a prevailing market rate and holders of these securities are granted the option to tender their securities back to the Trust for repurchase at their principal amount plus accrued interest thereon (the “purchase price”) periodically, usually daily or weekly. A remarketing agent for the Trust is required to attempt to re-sell any tendered short-term floating rate securities to new investors for the purchase price. If the remarketing agent is unable to successfully re-sell the tendered short-term floating rate securities, a liquidity provider to the Trust (typically an affiliate of the sponsor) must contribute cash to the Trust to ensure that the tendering holders receive the purchase price of their securities on the repurchase date.

Because holders of the short-term floating rate securities are granted the right to tender their securities to the Trust for repurchase at frequent intervals for the purchase price, with such payment effectively guaranteed by the liquidity provider, the securities generally bear short-term rates of interest commensurate with money market instruments. When interest is paid on the underlying municipal bond to the Trust, such proceeds are first used to pay the Trust’s administrative expenses and accrued interest to holders of the short-term floating rate securities, with any remaining amounts being paid to the Fund, as the holder of the inverse floating rate security. Accordingly, the amount of such interest on the underlying municipal bond paid to the Fund is inversely related the rate of interest on the short-term floating rate securities. Additionally, because the principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities is fixed and is not adjusted in response to changes in the market value of the underlying municipal bond, any change in the market value of the underlying municipal bond is reflected entirely in a change to the value of the inverse floating rate security.

Typically, the terms of an inverse floating rate security grant certain rights to the Fund, as holder. For example, the Fund may have the right upon request to require that the Trust compel a tender of the short-term floating rate securities to facilitate the Fund’s acquisition of the underlying municipal bond. Following such a request, the Fund pays the Trust the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities and a specified portion of any market value gain on the underlying municipal bond since its deposit into the Trust, which the Trust uses to redeem the short-term floating rate securities. The Trust then distributes the underlying municipal bond to the Fund. Similarly, the Fund may have the right to directly purchase the underlying municipal bond from the Trust by paying to the Trust the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities and a specified portion of any market value gain on the underlying municipal bond since its deposit into the Trust, which the Trust uses to redeem the short-term floating rate securities. Through the exercise of either of these rights, the Fund can voluntarily terminate or “collapse” the Trust, terminate its investment in the related inverse floating rate security and obtain the underlying municipal bond. Additionally, the Fund also typically has the right to exchange with the Trust (i) a principal amount of short-term floating rate securities held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of the inverse floating rate security or (ii) a principal amount of the inverse floating rate security held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of short-term floating rate securities (which are typically then sold to other investors). Through the exercise of this right, the Fund may increase (or decrease) the principal amount of short-term floating

53        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    Continued

1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

rate securities outstanding, thereby increasing (or decreasing) the amount of leverage provided by the short-term floating rate securities to the Fund’s investment exposure to the underlying municipal bond.

The Fund’s investments in inverse floating rate securities involve certain risks. As short-term interest rates rise, an inverse floating rate security produces less current income (and, in extreme cases, may pay no income) and as short-term interest rates fall, an inverse floating rate security produces more current income. Thus, if short-term interest rates rise after the issuance of the inverse floating rate security, any yield advantage is reduced or eliminated. All inverse floating rate securities entail some degree of leverage represented by the outstanding principal amount of the related short-term floating rate securities. The value of, and income earned on, an inverse floating rate security that has a higher degree of leverage will fluctuate more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and to changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond than that of an inverse floating rate security with a lower degree of leverage, and is more likely to be eliminated entirely under adverse market conditions. Changes in the value of an inverse floating rate security will also be more significant than changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond because the leverage provided by the related short-term floating rate securities increases the sensitivity of an inverse floating rate security to changes in interest rates and to the market value of the underlying municipal bond. An inverse floating rate security can be expected to underperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is decreasing (or is already small) or when long-term interest rates are rising, but can be expected to outperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is increasing (or is already large) or when long-term interest rates are falling. Additionally, a tender option bond transaction typically provides for the automatic termination or “collapse” of a Trust upon the occurrence of certain adverse events, usually referred to as “mandatory tender events” or “tender option termination events.” These events may include, among others, a credit ratings downgrade of the underlying municipal bond below a specified level, a decrease in the market value of the underlying municipal bond below a specified amount, a bankruptcy of the liquidity provider or the inability of the remarketing agent to re-sell to new investors short-term floating rate securities that have been tendered for repurchase by holders thereof. Following the occurrence of such an event, the underlying municipal bond is generally sold for current market value and the proceeds distributed to holders of the short-term floating rate securities and inverse floating rate security, with the holder of the inverse floating rate security (the Fund) generally receiving the proceeds of such sale only after the holders of the short-term floating rate securities have received proceeds equal to the purchase price of their securities (and the liquidity provider is generally required to contribute cash to the Trust only in an amount sufficient to ensure that the holders of the short-term floating rate securities receive the purchase price of their securities in connection with such termination of the Trust). Following the occurrence of such events, the Fund could potentially lose the entire amount of its investment in the inverse floating rate security.

Finally, the Fund may enter into shortfall/reimbursement agreements with the liquidity provider of certain tender option bond transactions in connection with certain inverse floating

54        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

rate securities held by the Fund. These agreements commit the Fund to reimburse the liquidity provider to the extent that the liquidity provider must provide cash to a Trust, including following the termination of a Trust resulting from the occurrence of a “mandatory tender event.” In connection with the occurrence of such an event and the termination of the Trust triggered thereby, the shortfall/reimbursement agreement will make the Fund liable for the amount of the negative difference, if any, between the liquidation value of the underlying municipal bond and the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Under the standard terms of a tender option bond transaction, absent such a shortfall/reimbursement agreement, the Fund, as holder of the inverse floating rate security, would not be required to make such a reimbursement payment to the liquidity provider. The Manager monitors the Fund’s potential exposure with respect to these agreements on a daily basis and intends to take action to terminate the Fund’s investment in related inverse floating rate securities, if it deems it appropriate to do so. As of December 31, 2013, the Fund’s maximum exposure under such agreements is estimated at $398,005,000.

When the Fund creates an inverse floating rate security in a tender option bond transaction by selling an underlying municipal bond to a sponsor for deposit into a Trust, the transaction is considered a secured borrowing for financial reporting purposes. As a result of such accounting treatment, the Fund includes the underlying municipal bond on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities (but does not separately include the related inverse floating rate security on either). The Fund also includes a liability on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities equal to the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest on the related short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Interest on the underlying municipal bond is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations, while interest payable on the related short-term floating rate securities is recorded as interest expense. At December 31, 2013, municipal bond holdings with a value of $1,470,738,914 shown on the Fund’s Statement of Investments are held by such Trusts and serve as the underlying municipal bonds for the related $832,780,000 in short-term floating rate securities issued and outstanding at that date.

At December 31, 2013, the inverse floating rate securities associated with tender option bond transactions accounted for as secured borrowings were as follows:

Principal Amount		Inverse Floater1	Coupon Rate2		Maturity Date		Value
	$23,960,000	NY Austin Trust Various States Inverse Certificates		8.002%		11/1/39	$	23,697,878
	16,400,000	NY Austin Trust Various States Inverse Certificates		11.933		7/1/48		17,784,816
	31,175,000	NY Liberty Devel. Corp. (Bank of America Tower at One Bryant Park) LIFERS		11.205		1/15/46		34,275,356
	7,500,000	NY Liberty Devel. Corp. ROLs3		9.742		1/15/44		7,736,850
	23,955,000	NY/NJ Port Authority Austin Trust Inverse Certificates		9.353		10/1/30		25,066,512
	7,700,000	NY/NJ Port Authority Austin Trust Inverse Certificates		7.113		12/1/34		7,446,362
	15,660,000	NY/NJ Port Authority Austin Trust Inverse Certificates		7.532		12/1/27		15,968,972
	5,460,000	NYC GO DRIVERS		9.343		8/1/30		5,848,097
	4,170,000	NYC GO DRIVERS		10.297		12/1/33		4,426,872
	4,015,000	NYC GO DRIVERS		10.291		3/1/35		4,295,849
	2,430,000	NYC GO DRIVERS		10.299		8/1/35		2,649,915
	5,000,000	NYC GO ROLs		19.242		3/1/21		7,944,000
	2,500,000	NYC GO ROLs3		15.601		10/1/34		2,876,400

55        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    Continued

1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Principal Amount		Inverse Floater1	Coupon Rate2		Maturity Date		Value
$	4,180,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) DRIVERS		9.561%		5/1/40	$	4,183,762
	4,015,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) DRIVERS		9.713		11/1/40		4,041,178
	1,375,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) DRIVERS		9.303		11/1/26		1,403,105
	1,225,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) DRIVERS		9.451		11/1/27		1,265,070
	775,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) DRIVERS		19.927		11/1/34		869,953
	2,730,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) DRIVERS		20.78		11/1/46		3,072,670
	710,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) DRIVERS		20.192		11/1/39		788,270
	1,500,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) DRIVERS		9.555		11/1/32		1,524,690
	1,750,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) DRIVERS		9.303		11/1/37		1,740,095
	2,340,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) DRIVERS		9.413		11/1/39		2,339,649
	3,955,000	NYC HDC (Multifamily Hsg.) ROLs3		17.183		11/1/30		4,126,370
	11,310,000	NYC Hsg. Devel. Corp. (Multifamily Hsg.) ROLs3		13.035		5/1/49		11,529,188
	5,395,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority3		16.897		6/15/43		6,537,337
	15,875,000	NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority LIFERS		10.377		6/15/43		17,810,797
	6,250,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid) ROLs3		44.50		7/15/37		7,091,750
	3,750,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid) ROLs3		46.81		7/15/37		4,540,650
	10,170,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax) ROLs3		9.517		2/1/30		11,769,538
	7,500,000	NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax) ROLs3		9.519		5/1/34		8,346,450
	8,205,000	NYS DA (Memorial Sloan-Kettering) DRIVERS		10.297		7/1/35		8,265,635
	5,265,000	NYS DA (Vassar College) DRIVERS		10.295		7/1/46		5,455,751
	3,980,000	NYS DA ROLs3		15.596		3/15/34		4,773,652
	3,410,000	NYS HFA ROLs3		14.793		11/1/45		3,494,909
	3,750,000	Port Authority NY/NJ ROLs3		22.103		9/15/28		5,273,400
	3,580,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 11588th Series ROLs3		15.958		10/15/28		3,653,855
	5,500,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 11588th Series ROLs3		16.895		10/15/32		5,807,395
	4,895,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 11588th Series ROLs3		16.886		10/15/27		5,668,508
	9,090,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 11589th Series ROLs3		12.511		9/1/29		9,277,890
	11,430,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 136th Series DRIVERS		10.312		11/1/29		11,928,005
	11,015,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 136th Series DRIVERS		13.951		5/1/34		11,394,357
	11,880,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 136th Series DRIVERS		8.269		11/1/28		12,289,741
	13,000,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 138th Series DRIVERS		8.797		12/1/34		12,998,960
	24,000,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 151st Series LIFERS		17.10		3/15/35		29,115,600
	4,570,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 152nd Series DRIVERS		14.328		5/1/38		5,217,340
	30,970,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 152nd Series LIFERS		10.446		11/1/35		34,169,820
	10,125,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 163rd Series LIFERS		9.379		7/15/39		10,715,692
	10,755,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 166th Series		9.27		1/15/41		11,332,221
	20,000,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 3090th Series DRIVERS		9.818		11/1/35		22,066,400
	7,500,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 3114th Series DRIVERS		15.855		11/1/30		9,470,775
	3,335,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 3115th Series DRIVERS		15.847		3/15/35		4,045,855
	7,500,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 3249th Series ROLs3		9.976		7/15/36		8,640,150
	7,650,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 3264th Series ROLs3		9.469		10/15/31		8,837,433
	25,330,000	Port Authority NY/NJ, 37th Series DRIVERS		9.808		7/15/34		25,997,699
	9,500,000	Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority ROLs3		9.502		7/1/47		5,566,620
	148,225,000	Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. LIFERS3		9.68		8/1/57		72,203,362
	3,905,000	SONYMA ROLs3		9.07		10/1/37		3,669,841
	6,320,000	SONYMA ROLs3		8.767		10/1/37		5,450,621
	16,960,000	SONYMA ROLs3		7.80		10/1/34		16,958,474
	11,330,000	SONYMA ROLs3		8.684		10/1/31		11,220,552
							$	637,958,914

56        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

1. For a list of abbreviations used in the Inverse Floater table see the Portfolio Abbreviations table at the end of the Statement of Investments.

2. Represents the current interest rate for the inverse floating rate security.

3. Represents an inverse floating rate security that is subject to a shortfall/reimbursement agreement.

The Fund may also purchase an inverse floating rate security created as part of a tender option bond transaction not initiated by the Fund when a third party, such as a municipal issuer or financial institution, transfers an underlying municipal bond to a Trust. For financial reporting purposes, the Fund includes the inverse floating rate security related to such transaction on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities, and interest on the security is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations.

The Fund may invest in inverse floating rate securities with any degree of leverage (as measured by the outstanding principal amount of related short-term floating rate securities). However, the Fund may only expose up to 20% of its total assets to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities. This limitation is measured by comparing the aggregate principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities that are related to the inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund to the total assets of the Fund. The Fund’s exposure to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities amounts to $832,780,000 or 11.87% of its total assets as of December 31, 2013.

Securities on a When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis. The Fund may purchase securities on a “when-issued” basis, and may purchase or sell securities on a “delayed delivery” basis. “When-issued” or “delayed delivery” refers to securities whose terms and indenture are available and for which a market exists, but which are not available for immediate delivery. Delivery and payment for securities that have been purchased by the Fund on a when-issued basis normally takes place within six months and possibly as long as two years or more after the trade date. During this period, such securities do not earn interest, are subject to market fluctuation and may increase or decrease in value prior to their delivery. The purchase of securities on a when-issued basis may increase the volatility of the Fund’s net asset value to the extent the Fund executes such transactions while remaining substantially fully invested. When the Fund engages in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions, it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to complete the transaction. Their failure to do so may cause the Fund to lose the opportunity to obtain or dispose of the security at a price and yield it considers advantageous. The Fund may also sell securities that it purchased on a when-issued basis or forward commitment prior to settlement of the original purchase.

As of December 31, 2013, the Fund had sold securities issued on a delayed delivery basis as follows:

	When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis Transactions
Sold securities		$1,790,000

57        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    Continued

1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Credit Risk. The Fund invests in high-yield, non-investment-grade bonds, which may be subject to a greater degree of credit risk. Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer to meet interest or principal payments or both as they become due. The Fund may acquire securities that have missed an interest payment, and is not obligated to dispose of securities whose issuers or underlying obligors subsequently miss an interest payment. Information concerning securities not accruing interest as of December 31, 2013 is as follows:

Cost	$	30,503,065
Market Value	$	18,971,141
Market Value as a % of Net Assets		0.31	%

The Fund has entered into forbearance agreements with certain obligors under which the Fund has agreed to temporarily forego receipt of the original principal or coupon interest rates. As of December 31, 2013, securities with an aggregate market value of $642,776, representing 0.01% of the Fund’s net assets, were subject to these forbearance agreements.

Concentration Risk. There are certain risks arising from geographic concentration in any state, commonwealth or territory. Certain economic, regulatory or political developments occurring in the state, commonwealth or territory may impair the ability of certain issuers of municipal securities to pay principal and interest on their obligations.

Allocation of Income, Expenses, Gains and Losses. Income, expenses (other than those attributable to a specific class), gains and losses are allocated on a daily basis to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of net assets represented by such class. Operating expenses directly attributable to a specific class are charged against the operations of that class.

Federal Taxes. The Fund intends to comply with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income, including any net realized gain on investments not offset by capital loss carryforwards, if any, to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income or excise tax provision is required. The Fund files income tax returns in U.S. federal and applicable state jurisdictions. The statute of limitations on the Fund’s tax return filings generally remain open for the three preceding fiscal reporting period ends.

The tax components of capital shown in the following table represent distribution requirements the Fund must satisfy under the income tax regulations, losses the Fund may be able to offset against income and gains realized in future years and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes.

58        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Undistributed Net Investment Income	Undistributed Long-Term Gain		Accumulated Loss Carryforward1,2,3		Net Unrealized Depreciation Based on cost of Securities and Other Investments for Federal Income Tax Purposes
$70,048,901		$—		$978,952,150		$1,452,601,388

1. As of December 31, 2013, the Fund had $978,952,150 of net capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized capital gains, if any, and thereby reduce future taxable gain distributions. Details of the capital loss carryforwards are included in the table below. Capital loss carryovers with no expiration, if any, must be utilized prior to those with expiration dates.

Expiring
2016	$	443,946,792
2017		324,022,087
No expiration		210,983,271
Total	$	978,952,150

2. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Fund did not utilize any capital loss carryforward.

3. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, the Fund utilized $7,361,424 of capital loss carryforward to offset capital gains realized in that fiscal year.

Net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) may differ for financial statement and tax purposes. The character of dividends and distributions made during the fiscal year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. Also, due to timing of dividends and distributions, the fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the fiscal year in which the income or net realized gain was recorded by the Fund.

Accordingly, the following amounts have been reclassified for December 31, 2013. Net assets of the Fund were unaffected by the reclassifications.

Reduction to Paid-in Capital	Increase to Accumulated Net Investment Income		Increase to Accumulated Net Realized Loss on Investments
$304,537		$995,739		$691,202

The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was as follows:

	Year Ended December 31, 2013		Year Ended   December 31, 2012
Distributions paid from:
Exempt-interest dividends	$	436,964,547	$	457,622,902
Ordinary income		1,513,011		1,354,604
Total	$	438,477,558	$	458,977,506

59        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    Continued

1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The aggregate cost of securities and other investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2013 are noted in the following table. The primary difference between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments, if applicable, is attributable to the tax deferral of losses or tax realization of financial statement unrealized gain or loss.

Federal tax cost of securities	$	7,463,611,4601
Gross unrealized appreciation	$	170,937,884
Gross unrealized depreciation		(1,623,539,272)
Net unrealized depreciation	$	(1,452,601,388)

1. The Federal tax cost of securities does not include cost of $861,721,338, which has otherwise been recognized for financial reporting purposes, related to bonds placed into trusts in conjunction with certain investment transactions. See the Inverse Floating Rate Securities note above.

Trustees’ Compensation. The Fund has adopted an unfunded retirement plan (the “Plan”) for the Fund’s independent trustees. Benefits are based on years of service and fees paid to each trustee during their period of service. The Plan was frozen with respect to adding new participants effective December 31, 2006 (the “Freeze Date”) and existing Plan Participants as of the Freeze Date will continue to receive accrued benefits under the Plan. Active independent trustees as of the Freeze Date have each elected a distribution method with respect to their benefits under the Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Fund’s projected benefit obligations, payments to retired trustees and accumulated liability were as follows:

Projected Benefit Obligations Increased	$	59,938
Payments Made to Retired Trustees		155,894
Accumulated Liability as of December 31, 2013		1,183,660

The Board of Trustees has adopted a compensation deferral plan for independent trustees that enables trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Fund. For purposes of determining the amount owed to the Trustee under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of the Fund or in other Oppenheimer funds selected by the Trustee. The Fund purchases shares of the funds selected for deferral by the Trustee in amounts equal to his or her deemed investment, resulting in a Fund asset equal to the deferred compensation liability. Such assets are included as a component of “Other” within the asset section of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferral of trustees’ fees under the plan will not affect the net assets of the Fund, and will not materially affect the Fund’s assets, liabilities or net investment income per share. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the compensation deferral plan.

60        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders. Dividends and distributions to shareholders, which are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid annually.

Investment Income. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Discount and premium, which are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations, are amortized or accreted daily.

Custodian Fees. “Custodian fees and expenses” in the Statement of Operations may include interest expense incurred by the Fund on any cash overdrafts of its custodian account during the period. Such cash overdrafts may result from the effects of failed trades in portfolio securities and from cash outflows resulting from unanticipated shareholder redemption activity. The Fund pays interest to its custodian on such cash overdraft at a rate equal to the 1 Month LIBOR Rate plus 2.00%. The “Reduction to custodian expenses” line item, if applicable, represents earnings on cash balances maintained by the Fund during the period. Such interest expense and other custodian fees may be paid with these earnings.

Security Transactions. Security transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on securities sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.

Indemnifications. The Fund’s organizational documents provide current and former trustees and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Fund. In the normal course of business, the Fund may also enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would be dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.

Other. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

2. Securities Valuation

The Fund calculates the net asset value of its shares as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”), normally 4:00 P.M. Eastern time, on each day the Exchange is open for trading.

61        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    Continued

2. Securities Valuation (Continued)

The Fund’s Board has adopted procedures for the valuation of the Fund’s securities and has delegated the day-to-day responsibility for valuation determinations under those procedures to the Manager. The Manager has established a Valuation Committee which is responsible for determining a “fair valuation” for any security for which market quotations are not “readily available.” The Valuation Committee’s fair valuation determinations are subject to review, approval and ratification by the Fund’s Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting covering the calendar quarter in which the fair valuation was determined.

Valuation Methods and Inputs

Securities are valued using unadjusted quoted market prices, when available, as supplied primarily by third party pricing services or dealers.

The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or the fair value of the types of securities described below:

Securities traded on a registered U.S. securities exchange (including exchange-traded derivatives other than futures and futures options) are valued based on the last sale price of the security reported on the principal exchange on which it is traded, prior to the time when the Fund’s assets are valued. In the absence of a sale, the security is valued at the last sale price on the prior trading day, if it is within the spread of the current day’s closing “bid” and “asked” prices, and if not, at the current day’s closing bid price. A security of a foreign issuer traded on a foreign exchange, but not listed on a registered U.S. securities exchange, is valued based on the last sale price on the principal exchange on which the security is traded, as identified by the third party pricing service used by the Manager, prior to the time when the Fund’s assets are valued. If the last sale price is unavailable, the security is valued at the most recent official closing price on the principal exchange on which it is traded. If the last sales price or official closing price for a foreign security is not available, the security is valued at the mean between the bid and asked price per the exchange or, if not available from the exchange, obtained from two dealers. If bid and asked prices are not available from either the exchange or two dealers, the security is valued by using one of the following methodologies (listed in order of priority); (1) using a bid from the exchange, (2) the mean between the bid and asked price as provided by a single dealer, or (3) a bid from a single dealer.

Shares of a registered investment company that are not traded on an exchange are valued at that investment company’s net asset value per share.

Corporate and government debt securities (of U.S. or foreign issuers) and municipal debt securities, event-linked bonds, loans, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and asset-backed securities are valued at the mean between the “bid” and “asked” prices utilizing evaluated prices obtained from third party pricing services or broker-dealers who may use matrix pricing methods to determine the evaluated prices.

Short-term money market type debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are valued at cost adjusted by the amortization of discount or premium to maturity (amortized cost), which approximates market value. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity in excess of sixty days are valued at the mean between the “bid” and “asked” prices utilizing evaluated prices obtained from third party pricing services or broker-dealers.

62        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

2. Securities Valuation (Continued)

A description of the standard inputs that may generally be considered by the third party pricing vendors in determining their evaluated prices is provided below.

Security Type	Standard inputs generally considered by third-party pricing vendors
Corporate debt, government debt, municipal, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities	Reported trade data, broker-dealer price quotations, benchmark yields, issuer spreads on comparable securities, the credit quality, yield, maturity, and other appropriate factors.
Loans	Information obtained from market participants regarding reported trade data and broker-dealer price quotations.
Event-linked bonds	Information obtained from market participants regarding reported trade data and broker-dealer price quotations.

If a market value or price cannot be determined for a security using the methodologies described above, or if, in the “good faith” opinion of the Manager, the market value or price obtained does not constitute a “readily available market quotation,” or a significant event has occurred that would materially affect the value of the security the security is fair valued either (i) by a standardized fair valuation methodology applicable to the security type or the significant event as previously approved by the Valuation Committee and the Fund’s Board or (ii) as determined in good faith by the Manager’s Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee considers all relevant facts that are reasonably available, through either public information or information available to the Manager, when determining the fair value of a security. Fair value determinations by the Manager are subject to review, approval and ratification by the Fund’s Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting covering the calendar quarter in which the fair valuation was determined. Those fair valuation standardized methodologies include, but are not limited to, valuing securities at the last sale price or initially at cost and subsequently adjusting the value based on: changes in company specific fundamentals, changes in an appropriate securities index, or changes in the value of similar securities which may be further adjusted for any discounts related to security-specific resale restrictions. When possible, such methodologies use observable market inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices of similar securities, observable interest rates, currency rates and yield curves. The methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities nor can it be assured that the Fund can obtain the fair value assigned to a security if it were to sell the security.

To assess the continuing appropriateness of security valuations, the Manager, or its third party service provider who is subject to oversight by the Manager, regularly compares prior day prices, prices on comparable securities, and sale prices to the current day prices and challenges those prices exceeding certain tolerance levels with the third party pricing service or broker source. For those securities valued by fair valuations, whether through a standardized fair valuation methodology or a fair valuation determination, the Valuation Committee reviews and affirms the reasonableness of the valuations based on such methodologies and fair valuation determinations on a regular basis after considering all relevant information that is reasonably available.

63        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    Continued

2. Securities Valuation (Continued)

Classifications

Each investment asset or liability of the Fund is assigned a level at measurement date based on the significance and source of the inputs to its valuation. Various data inputs are used in determining the value of each of the Fund’s investments as of the reporting period end. These data inputs are categorized in the following hierarchy under applicable financial accounting standards:

1) Level 1-unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (including securities actively traded on a securities exchange)

2) Level 2-inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and market corroborated inputs such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.)

3) Level 3-significant unobservable inputs (including the Manager’s own judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability).

The inputs used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities.

The table below categorizes amounts that are included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2013 based on valuation input level:

	Level 1— Unadjusted Quoted Prices		Level 2— Other Significant Observable Inputs		Level 3— Significant Unobservable Inputs		Value
Assets Table
Investments, at Value:
Municipal Bonds and Notes
New York	$	—	$	5,144,684,377	$	1,193,017	$	5,145,877,394
U.S. Possessions		—		1,722,017,764		—		1,722,017,764
Common Stock		—		—		4,836,252		4,836,252
Total Assets	$	—	$	6,866,702,141	$	6,029,269	$	6,872,731,410

Currency contracts and forwards, if any, are reported at their unrealized appreciation/ depreciation at measurement date, which represents the change in the contract’s value from trade date. Futures, if any, are reported at their variation margin at measurement date, which represents the amount due to/from the Fund at that date. All additional assets and liabilities included in the above table are reported at their market value at measurement date.

The table below shows the transfers between Level 2 and Level 3. The Fund’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the beginning of the reporting period.

	Transfers out of Level 2*			Transfers into Level 3*
Assets Table
Investments, at Value:
Municipal Bonds and Notes
New York	$	(1,077,693)		$	1,077,693
Common Stocks		(4,483,200	)		4,483,200
Total Assets	$	(5,560,893)		$	5,560,893

64        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

2. Securities Valuation (Continued)

* Transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 because of the lack of observable market data.

3. Shares of Beneficial Interest

The Fund has authorized an unlimited number of no par value shares of beneficial interest of each class. Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:

	Year Ended December 31, 2013						Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount
Class A
Sold		58,182,815		$	939,765,979			43,752,207		$	736,429,794
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested		19,114,833			302,143,673			18,605,792			312,929,359
Redeemed		(126,143,272	)		(1,969,025,792	)		(49,921,605	)		(839,847,114)
Net increase (decrease)		(48,845,624	)	$	(727,116,140	)		12,436,394		$	209,512,039
Class B
Sold		63,517		$	982,203			468,895		$	7,802,437
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested		183,023			2,915,459			289,236			4,849,418
Redeemed		(2,581,925	)		(41,692,375	)		(3,538,715	)		(59,246,920)
Net decrease		(2,335,385	)	$	(37,794,713	)		(2,780,584	)	$	(46,595,065)
Class C
Sold		8,846,064		$	140,521,583			10,698,099		$	179,792,612
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested		3,072,509			48,503,252			2,973,587			49,918,988
Redeemed		(23,026,222	)		(356,813,466	)		(8,675,224	)		(145,772,158)
Net increase (decrease)		(11,107,649	)	$	(167,788,631	)		4,996,462		$	83,939,442
Class Y
Sold		5,738,468		$	91,460,318			5,916,661		$	98,693,710
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested		674,500			10,649,066			555,844			9,360,263
Redeemed		(6,386,709	)		(98,821,379	)		(2,521,904)			(42,581,186)
Net increase		26,259		$	3,288,005			3,950,601		$	65,472,787

4. Purchases and Sales of Securities

The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities, other than short-term obligations, for the year ended December 31, 2013 were as follows:

	Purchases		Sales
Investment securities	$	1,253,469,833	$	2,160,674,027

65        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    Continued

5. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates

Management Fees. Under the investment advisory agreement, the Fund pays the Manager a management fee based on the daily net assets of the Fund at an annual rate as shown in the following table:

Fee Schedule
Up to $100 million	0.54	%
Next $150 million	0.52
Next $1.75 billion	0.47
Next $3 billion	0.46
Next $3 billion	0.45
Next $6 billion	0.44
Over $14 billion	0.42

Sub-Adviser Fees. The Manager has retained the Sub-Adviser to provide the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. Under the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Manager pays the Sub-Adviser an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the investment management fee collected by the Manager from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any investment management fee waivers. The fee paid to the Sub-Adviser is paid by the Manager, not by the Fund.

Accounting Service Fees. Accounting service fees paid to the Manager were in accordance with the accounting services agreement with the Fund which provides for an annual fee of $12,000 for the first $30 million of average daily net assets and $9,000 for each additional $30 million of average daily net assets. The fee arrangement associated with these services was terminated effective April 1, 2013.

Transfer Agent Fees. OFI Global (the “Transfer Agent”) serves as the transfer and shareholder servicing agent for the Fund. Fees incurred by the Fund with respect to these services are detailed in the Statement of Operations.

Sub-Transfer Agent Fees. The Transfer Agent has retained Shareholder Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of OFI (the “Sub-Transfer Agent”), to provide the day-to-day transfer agent and shareholder servicing of the Fund. Under the Sub-Transfer Agency Agreement, the Transfer Agent pays the Sub-Transfer Agent an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the transfer agent fee collected by the Transfer Agent from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. The fee paid to the Sub-Transfer Agent is paid by the Transfer Agent, not by the Fund.

Distribution and Service Plan (12b-1) Fees. Under its General Distributor’s Agreement with the Fund, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (the “Distributor”) acts as the Fund’s principal underwriter in the continuous public offering of the Fund’s classes of shares.

66        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

5. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)

Service Plan for Class A Shares. The Fund has adopted a Service Plan (the “Plan”) for Class A shares under Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Under the Plan, the Fund reimburses the Distributor for a portion of its costs incurred for services provided to accounts that hold Class A shares. Reimbursement is made periodically at an annual rate of up to 0.15% of the daily net assets of Class A shares of the Fund. The Distributor currently uses all of those fees to pay dealers, brokers, banks and other financial institutions periodically for providing personal service and maintenance of accounts of their customers that hold Class A shares. Any unreimbursed expenses the Distributor incurs with respect to Class A shares in any fiscal year cannot be recovered in subsequent periods. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plan are detailed in the Statement of Operations.

Distribution and Service Plans for Class B and Class C Shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution and Service Plans (the “Plans”) for Class B and Class C shares under Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 to compensate the Distributor for its services in connection with the distribution of those shares and servicing accounts. Under the Plans, the Fund pays the Distributor an annual asset-based sales charge of 0.75% on Class B and Class C shares daily net assets. The Distributor also receives a service fee of 0.25% per year under each plan. If either the Class B or Class C plan is terminated by the Fund or by the shareholders of a class, the Board of Trustees and its independent trustees must determine whether the Distributor shall be entitled to payment from the Fund of all or a portion of the service fee and/or asset-based sales charge in respect to shares sold prior to the effective date of such termination. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plans are detailed in the Statement of Operations. The Distributor determines its uncompensated expenses under the Plans at calendar quarter ends. The Distributor’s aggregate uncompensated expenses under the Plans at December 31, 2013 were as follows:

Class B	$	34,053,198
Class C		37,895,728

Sales Charges. Front-end sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (“CDSC”) do not represent expenses of the Fund. They are deducted from the proceeds of sales of Fund shares prior to investment or from redemption proceeds prior to remittance, as applicable. The sales charges retained by the Distributor from the sale of shares and the CDSC retained by the Distributor on the redemption of shares is shown in the following table for the period indicated.

Year Ended	Class A Front-End Sales Charges Retained by Distributor		Class A Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor		Class B Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor		Class C Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor
December 31, 2013		$1,033,358		$456,520		$115,110		$123,618

67        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    Continued

5. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)

Waivers and Reimbursements of Expenses. The Manager has voluntarily agreed to reimburse the Fund for a portion of the legal costs and fees incurred in connection with the pending litigation matters discussed in the “Pending Litigation” note which appears later in this report. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Manager reimbursed the Fund $32,666 for legal costs and fees.

The Transfer Agent has voluntarily agreed to limit transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees for Classes B, C, and Y shares to 0.35% of average annual net assets per class and for Class A shares to 0.30% of average annual net assets of the class.

Some of these undertakings may be modified or terminated at any time; some may not be modified or terminated until after one year from the date of the current prospectus, as indicated therein.

6. Borrowings

The Fund can borrow money from banks in amounts up to one third of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less all liabilities and indebtedness other than borrowings (meaning that the value of those assets must be at least 300% of the amount borrowed). The Fund can use those borrowings for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities. The Fund also may borrow to meet redemption obligations or for temporary and emergency purposes. When the Fund invests borrowed money in portfolio securities, it is using a speculative investment technique known as leverage and changes in the value of the Fund’s investments will have a larger effect on its share price than if it did not borrow because of the effect of leverage.

The Fund can also use the borrowings for other investment-related purposes, including in connection with the Fund’s inverse floater investments as discussed in Note 1. The Fund may use the borrowings to reduce the leverage amount of, or unwind or “collapse” trusts that issued “inverse floaters” owned by the Fund, or in circumstances in which the Fund has entered into a shortfall and forbearance agreement with the sponsor of the inverse floater trust to meet the Fund’s obligation to reimburse the sponsor of the inverse floater for the difference between the liquidation value of the underlying bond and the amount due to holders of the short-term floating rate notes issued by the Trust. See the discussion in Note 1 (Inverse Floating Rate Securities) for additional information.

The Fund will pay interest and may pay other fees in connection with loans. If the Fund does borrow, it will be subject to greater expenses than funds that do not borrow. The interest on borrowed money and the other fees incurred in conjunction with loans are an expense that might reduce the Fund’s yield and return. Expenses incurred by the Fund with respect to interest on borrowings and commitment fees are disclosed separately or as other expenses on the Statement of Operations.

The Fund entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with conduit lenders and Citibank N.A. which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed, secured borrowing facility that permits borrowings of up to $2.0 billion, collectively, by the Oppenheimer Rochester Funds. To secure the loan, the

68        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

6. Borrowings (Continued)

Fund pledges investment securities in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Securities held in collateralized accounts to cover these borrowings are noted in the Statement of Investments. Interest is charged to the Fund, based on its borrowings, at current commercial paper issuance rates (0.1495% as of December 31, 2013). The Fund pays additional fees annually to its lender on its outstanding borrowings to manage and administer the facility and is allocated its pro-rata share of an annual structuring fee and ongoing commitment fees both of which are based on the total facility size. Total fees and interest that are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations related to its participation in the borrowing facility during the year ended December 31, 2013 equal 0.03% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis. The Fund has the right to prepay such loans and terminate its participation in the conduit loan facility at any time upon prior notice.

As of December 31, 2013, the Fund had borrowings outstanding at an interest rate of 0.1495%. Details of the borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:

Average Daily Loan Balance	$	33,001,096
Average Daily Interest Rate		0.172	%
Fees Paid	$	1,896,941
Interest Paid	$	54,788

7. Reverse Repurchase Agreements

The Fund may engage in reverse repurchase agreements. A reverse repurchase agreement is the sale of one or more securities to a counterparty at an agreed-upon purchase price with the simultaneous agreement to repurchase those securities on a future date at a higher repurchase price. The repurchase price represents the repayment of the purchase price and interest accrued thereon over the term of the repurchase agreement. The cash received by the Fund in connection with a reverse repurchase agreement may be used for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities or for other purposes such as those described in the preceding “Borrowings” note.

The Fund entered into a Committed Repurchase Transaction Facility (the “Facility”) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (the “counterparty’) which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed reverse repurchase agreement facility that permits aggregate outstanding reverse repurchase agreements of up to $750 million, collectively. Interest is charged to the Fund on the purchase price of outstanding reverse repurchase agreements at current LIBOR rates plus an applicable spread. The Fund is also allocated its pro-rata share of an annual structuring fee based on the total Facility size and ongoing commitment fees based on the total unused amount of the Facility. The Fund retains the economic exposure to fluctuations in the value of securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility and therefore these transactions are considered secured borrowings for financial reporting purposes. The Fund also continues to receive the economic benefit of interest payments received on securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements, in the form of a direct payment from the counterparty. These payments are included in

69        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    Continued

7. Reverse Repurchase Agreements (Continued)

interest income on the Statement of Operations. Total fees and interest related to the Fund’s participation in the Facility during the year ended December 31, 2013 are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations and equal 0.01% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis.

The securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility are valued on a daily basis. To the extent this value, after adjusting for certain margin requirements of the Facility, exceeds the cash proceeds received, the Fund may request the counterparty to return securities equal in margin value to this excess. To the extent that the cash proceeds received exceed the margin value of the securities subject to the transaction, the counterparty may request additional securities from the Fund. The Fund has the right to declare the first or fifteenth day of any calendar month as the repurchase date for any outstanding reverse repurchase agreement upon delivery of advanced notification and may also recall any security subject to such a transaction by substituting eligible securities of equal or greater margin value according to the Facility’s terms.

The Fund executed no transactions under the Facility during the year ended December 31, 2013.

Details of reverse repurchase agreement transactions for the year ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:

Fees Paid $        861,618

8. Restricted Securities

As of December 31, 2013, investments in securities included issues that are restricted. A restricted security may have a contractual restriction on its resale and is valued under methods approved by the Board of Trustees as reflecting fair value. Securities that are restricted are marked with an applicable footnote on the Statement of Investments. Restricted securities are reported on a schedule following the Statement of Investments.

9. Pending Litigation

Since 2009, seven class action lawsuits have been pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado against OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OFI”), OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc., the Fund’s principal underwriter and distributor (the “Distributor”), and certain funds – including the Fund – advised by OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. and distributed by the Distributor (the “Defendant Funds”). The lawsuits also name as defendants certain officers and current and former trustees of the respective Defendant Funds. The lawsuits raise claims under federal securities law and allege, among other things, that the disclosure documents of the respective Defendant Funds contained misrepresentations and omissions and that the respective Defendant Funds’ investment policies were not followed. The plaintiffs in these actions seek unspecified damages, equitable relief and awards of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses. The Defendant Funds’ Boards of Trustees have also engaged counsel to represent the Funds and the present and former Independent Trustees named in those suits.

70        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

9. Pending Litigation (Continued)

On August 26, 2013, the parties – including the Fund – in six of these lawsuits executed a memorandum of understanding setting forth the terms of proposed settlements of those actions. The proposed settlements are subject to a variety of contingencies, including the execution of settlement agreements, which will require preliminary and final approval by the court. The proposed settlements do not resolve a seventh outstanding lawsuit relating to Oppenheimer California Municipal Fund.

Other class action and individual lawsuits have been filed since 2008 in various state and federal courts against the Manager and certain of its affiliates by investors seeking to recover investments they allegedly lost as a result of the “Ponzi” scheme run by Bernard L. Madoff and his firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC (“BLMIS”). Plaintiffs in these suits allege that they suffered losses as a result of their investments in several funds managed by an affiliate of OFI and assert a variety of claims, including breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and violation of federal and state securities laws and regulations, among others. They seek unspecified damages, equitable relief and awards of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses. Neither the Distributor, nor any of the Oppenheimer mutual funds, their independent trustees or directors are named as defendants in these lawsuits. None of the Oppenheimer mutual funds invested in any funds or accounts managed by Madoff or BLMIS. On February 28, 2011, a stipulation of partial settlement of three groups of consolidated putative class action lawsuits relating to these matters was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. On August 19, 2011, the court entered an order and final judgment approving the settlement as fair, reasonable and adequate. In September 2011, certain parties filed notices of appeal from the court’s order approving the settlement. The settlement does not resolve other outstanding lawsuits against OFI and its affiliates relating to BLMIS.

On April 16, 2010, a lawsuit was filed in New York state court against OFI, an affiliate of OFI and AAArdvark IV Funding Limited (“AAArdvark IV”), an entity advised by OFI’s affiliate, in connection with investments made by the plaintiffs in AAArdvark IV. Plaintiffs allege breach of contract and common law fraud claims against the defendants and seek compensatory damages, costs and disbursements, including attorney fees. On April 11, 2013, the court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dismissing plaintiffs’ fraud claim with prejudice and dismissing their contract claim without prejudice, and granted plaintiffs leave to replead their contract claim to assert a cause of action for specific performance within 30 days. On May 9, 2013, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from the court’s dismissal order. On January 7, 2014, the appellate court affirmed the lower court’s dismissal order. On July 15, 2011, a lawsuit was filed in New York state court against OFI, an affiliate of OFI and AAArdvark Funding Limited (“AAArdvark I”), an entity advised by OFI’s affiliate, in connection with investments made by the plaintiffs in AAArdvark I. The complaint alleges breach of contract and common law fraud claims against the defendants and seeks compensatory damages, costs and disbursements, including attorney fees. On November 9, 2011, a lawsuit was filed in New York state court against OFI, an affiliate of OFI and AAArdvark XS Funding Limited (“AAArdvark XS”), an entity advised by OFI’s affiliate, in

71        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    Continued

9. Pending Litigation (Continued)

connection with investments made by the plaintiffs in AAArdvark XS. The complaint alleged breach of contract against the defendants and sought compensatory damages, costs and disbursements, including attorney fees. On November 8, 2013, the parties filed a stipulation of discontinuance dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice.

OFI believes the lawsuits and appeals described above are without legal merit and, with the exception of actions it has settled, is defending against them vigorously. While it is premature to render any opinion as to the outcome in these lawsuits, or whether any costs that the Defendant Funds may bear in defending the suits might not be reimbursed by insurance, OFI believes that these suits should not impair the ability of OFI or the Distributor to perform their respective duties to the Fund, and that the outcome of all of the suits together should not have any material effect on the operations of any of the Oppenheimer mutual funds.

72        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals, formerly Rochester Fund Municipals, including the statement of investments, as of December 31, 2013, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2013, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals as of December 31, 2013, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado

February 28, 2014

73         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

FEDERAL INCOME TAX INFORMATION    Unaudited

In early 2014, if applicable, shareholders of record received information regarding all taxable dividends and distributions paid to them by the Fund during calendar year 2013.

None of the dividends paid by the Fund during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 are eligible for the corporate dividend-received deduction. 99.65% of the dividends were derived from interest on municipal bonds and are not subject to federal income taxes; 100% of the dividends are not subject to New York State and New York City income taxes. For the state income tax reporting purposes of non-New York State shareholders, the distribution breaks down as follows: New York State (71.3%), Puerto Rico (27.4%), Guam (0.5%), Virgin Islands (0.2%); Northern Mariana Isles (0.6%).

During 2013, 26.8181% of this tax-exempt income was derived from “private activity bonds”. These are municipal bonds used to finance privately operated facilities. The interest on these bonds is not taxable for most investors. For the few investors subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax, the interest from these bonds is considered a preference item.

The foregoing information is presented to assist shareholders in reporting distributions received from the Fund to the Internal Revenue Service. Because of the complexity of the federal regulations which may affect your individual tax return and the many variations in state and local tax regulations, we recommend that you consult your tax advisor for specific guidance.

74         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

BOARD APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY

AND SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENT    Unaudited

The Fund has entered into an investment advisory agreement with OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OFI” or the “Sub-Adviser”) (“OFI Global” and “OFI” together the “Managers”) and OFI Global has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with OFI whereby OFI provides investment sub-advisory services to the Fund (collectively, the “Agreements”). Each year, the Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including a majority of the independent Trustees, is required to determine whether to renew the Agreements. The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, requires that the Board request and evaluate, and that the Managers provide, such information as may be reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Agreements. The Board employs an independent consultant to prepare a report that provides information, including comparative information that the Board requests for that purpose. In addition to in-person meetings focused on this evaluation, the Board receives information throughout the year regarding Fund services, fees, expenses and performance.

The Adviser, Sub-Adviser and the independent consultant provided information to the Board on the following factors: (i) the nature, quality and extent of the Managers’ services, (ii) the investment performance of the Fund and the Managers, (iii) the fees and expenses of the Fund, including comparative expense information, (iv) the profitability of the Managers and their affiliates, including an analysis of the cost of providing services, (v) whether economies of scale are realized as the Fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for Fund investors and (vi) other benefits to the Managers from their relationship with the Fund. The Board was aware that there are alternatives to retaining the Managers.

Outlined below is a summary of the principal information considered by the Board as well as the Board’s conclusions.

Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered information about the nature, quality and extent of the services provided to the Fund and information regarding the Managers’ key personnel who provide such services. The Sub-Adviser’s duties include providing the Fund with the services of the portfolio managers and the Sub-Adviser’s investment team, who provide research, analysis and other advisory services in regard to the Fund’s investments; securities trading services; oversight of third-party service providers; monitoring compliance with applicable Fund policies and procedures and adherence to the Fund’s investment restrictions; and risk management. The Managers are responsible for providing certain administrative services to the Fund as well. Those services include providing and supervising all administrative and clerical personnel who are necessary in order to provide effective corporate administration for the Fund; compiling and maintaining records with respect to the Fund’s operations; preparing and filing reports required by the Securities and Exchange Commission; preparing periodic reports regarding the operations of the Fund for its shareholders; preparing proxy materials for shareholder meetings; and preparing the registration statements required by Federal and state securities laws for the sale of the Fund’s shares. The Managers also provide the Fund with office space, facilities and equipment.

The Board also considered the quality of the services provided and the quality of the Managers’ resources that are available to the Fund. The Board took account of the fact that the Sub-Adviser has had over fifty years of experience as an investment adviser and that its assets under management rank it among the top mutual fund managers in the United States. The Board evaluated the Sub-Adviser’s advisory, administrative, accounting, legal, compliance services and risk management, and information the Board has received regarding

75         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

the experience and professional qualifications of the Managers’ key personnel and the size and functions of its staff. In its evaluation of the quality of the portfolio management services provided, the Board considered the experience of Daniel Loughran, Scott Cottier, Troy Willis, Mark DeMitry, Michael Camarella, Charles Pulire and Elizabeth Mossow, the portfolio managers for the Fund, and the Sub-Adviser’s investment team and analysts. The Board members also considered the totality of their experiences with the Managers as directors or trustees of the Fund and other funds advised by the Managers. The Board considered information regarding the quality of services provided by affiliates of the Managers, which its members have become knowledgeable about in connection with the renewal of the Fund’s service agreements. The Board concluded, in light of the Managers’ experience, reputation, personnel, operations and resources that the Fund benefits from the services provided under the Agreement.

Investment Performance of the Fund, the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser. Throughout the year, the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser provided information on the investment performance of the Fund, the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser, including comparative performance information. The Board also reviewed information, prepared by the Adviser, the Sub-Adviser and the independent consultant, comparing the Fund’s historical performance to its benchmark and to the performance of other retail muni New York long funds. The Board noted that the Fund’s one-year, three-year, five-year and ten-year performance was better than its category median.

Costs of Services by the Adviser. The Board reviewed the fees paid to the Adviser and the other expenses borne by the Fund. The Board also considered the comparability of the fees charged and the services provided to the Fund to the fees and services for other clients or accounts advised by the Adviser. The independent consultant provided comparative data in regard to the fees and expenses of the Fund and other retail front-end load muni New York long funds with comparable asset levels and distribution features. The Fund’s contractual management fees and total expenses were lower than its peer group median and its category median.

Economies of Scale and Profits Realized by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser. The Board considered information regarding the Managers’ costs in serving as the Fund’s investment adviser and sub-adviser, including the costs associated with the personnel and systems necessary to manage the Fund, and information regarding the Managers’ profitability from their relationship with the Fund. The Board reviewed whether the Managers may realize economies of scale in managing and supporting the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund currently has management fee breakpoints, which are intended to share with Fund shareholders economies of scale that may exist as the Fund’s assets grow.

Other Benefits to the Managers. In addition to considering the profits realized by the Managers, the Board considered information that was provided regarding the direct and indirect benefits the Managers receive as a result of their relationship with the Fund, including compensation paid to the Managers’ affiliates. The Board also considered that the Managers must be able to pay and retain experienced professional personnel at competitive rates to provide quality services to the Fund.

Conclusions. These factors were also considered by the independent Trustees meeting separately from the full Board, assisted by experienced counsel to the Fund and to the independent Trustees. Fund counsel and the independent Trustees’ counsel are independent of the Managers within the meaning and intent of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rules.

76        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Based on its review of the information it received and its evaluations described above, the Board, including a majority of the independent Trustees, decided to continue the Agreements through September 30, 2014. In arriving at its decision, the Board did not identify any factor or factors as being more important than others, but considered all of the above information, and considered the terms and conditions of the Agreements, including the management fees, in light of all the surrounding circumstances.

77        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS    Unaudited

On October 25, 2013, following an adjournment from a second shareholder meeting of Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals (the “Fund”) held on June 21, 2013, as adjourned to August 2, 2013, August 12, 2013, and September 27, a meeting of the Fund was held at which the sub-proposals below (Proposal No. 2 (including all of its sub-proposals)) and an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization to reorganize the Fund into a Delaware statutory trust (Proposal No. 3) were approved as described in the Fund’s Proxy Statement. The following is a report of the votes cast:

2a: Proposal to revise the fundamental policy relating to borrowing

For	Against	Abstain
182,049,580	14,305,111	51,590,620

2b-1: Proposal to revise the fundamental policy relating to concentration of investments

For	Against	Abstain
182,667,793	13,739,335	51,538,187

2c-1: Proposal to remove the fundamental policy relating to diversification of investments

For	Against	Abstain
180,737,051	15,237,905	51,970,364

2d: Proposal to revise the fundamental policy relating to lending

For	Against	Abstain
181,617,105	14,298,694	52,029,518

2e: Proposal to remove the additional fundamental policy relating to estate and commodities

For	Against	Abstain
182,063,632	14,123,629	51,758,053

2f: Proposal to revise the fundamental policy relating to senior securities

For	Against	Abstain
181,759,036	14,305,352	51,880,930

2g: Proposal to remove the additional fundamental policy relating to underwriting

For	Against	Abstain
181,416,018	14,183,149	52,346,148

2h: Proposal to revise the fundamental policy relating to tax-free securities

For	Against	Abstain
179,399,108	16,628,796	51,917,411

2m: Proposal to remove miscellaneous fundamental policy relating to investment strategy restrictions

For	Against	Abstain
180,804,264	14,848,621	52,292,427

2r: Proposal to convert the Fund’s investment objective from fundamental to non-fundamental

For	Against	Abstain
174,854,216	20,011,046	53,080,053

2s: Proposal to approve a change in the Fund’s investment objective

For	Against	Abstain
179,858,633	16,248,336	51,838,344

78         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Proposal 3: To approve an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization that provides for the reorganization of a Fund from a Maryland corporation or Massachusetts business trust, as applicable, into a Delaware statutory trust.

For	Against	Abstain
184,615,775	11,535,433	51,794,104

79        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

PORTFOLIO PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES;

UPDATES TO STATEMENTS OF INVESTMENTS    Unaudited

The Fund has adopted Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures under which the Fund votes proxies relating to securities (“portfolio proxies”) held by the Fund. A description of the Fund’s Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), (ii) on the Fund’s website at oppenheimerfunds.com, and (iii) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the Fund is required to file Form N-PX, with its complete proxy voting record for the 12 months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. The Fund’s voting record is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), and (ii) in the Form N-PX filing on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first quarter and the third quarter of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Form N-Q filings are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Those forms may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

Householding—Delivery of Shareholder Documents

This is to inform you about OppenheimerFunds’ “householding” policy. If more than one member of your household maintains an account in a particular fund, OppenheimerFunds will mail only one copy of the fund’s prospectus (or, if available, the fund’s summary prospectus), annual and semiannual report and privacy policy. The consolidation of these mailings, called householding, benefits your fund through reduced mailing expense, and benefits you by reducing the volume of mail you receive from OppenheimerFunds. Householding does not affect the delivery of your account statements.

Please note that we will continue to household these mailings for as long as you remain an OppenheimerFunds shareholder, unless you request otherwise. If you prefer to receive multiple copies of these materials, please call us at 1.800.CALL-OPP (225-5677). You may also notify us in writing or via email. We will begin sending you individual copies of the prospectus (or, if available, the summary prospectus), reports and privacy policy within 30 days of receiving your request to stop householding.

80         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

 TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS    Unaudited

Name, Position(s) Held with the Fund, Length of Service, Year of Birth	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years; Other Trusteeships/Directorships Held; Number of Portfolios in the Fund Complex Currently Overseen
Independent Trustees	The address of each Trustee in the chart below is 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924. Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, or until his or her resignation, retirement, death or removal.
Brian F. Wruble, Chairman of the Board of Trustees (since 2007), Trustee (since 2001) Year of Birth: 1943	Director of Community Foundation of the Florida Keys (non-profit) (since July 2012); Chairman Emeritus and Non-Voting Trustee of The Jackson Laboratory (non-profit) (since August 2011); Director of Special Value Opportunities Fund, LLC (registered investment company) (affiliate of the Sub-Adviser’s parent company) (since September 2004); Member of Zurich Insurance Advisory Council (insurance) (since 2004); Treasurer (since 2007) and Trustee of the Institute for Advanced Study (non-profit educational institute) (since May 1992); Chairman (August 2007-August 2011) and Trustee (since August 1991) of the Board of Trustees of The Jackson Laboratory (non-profit); General Partner of Odyssey Partners, L.P. (hedge fund) (September 1995-December 2007); Special Limited Partner of Odyssey Investment Partners, LLC (private equity investment) (January 1999-September 2004). Oversees 51 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. Mr. Wruble has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since April 2001, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations.
David K. Downes, Trustee (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1940	Director of THL Credit Inc. (since June 2009); Trustee of Employee Trusts (since January 2006); Chief Executive Officer and Board Member of Community Capital Management (investment management company) (since January 2004); President of The Community Reinvestment Act Qualified Investment Fund (investment management company) (since 2004); Director of Internet Capital Group (information technology company) (since October 2003); formerly, Independent Chairman GSK Employee Benefit Trust (April 2006- June 2013); Director of Correctnet (January 2006-2007); Independent Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Quaker Investment Trust (registered investment company) (2004-2007); Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Lincoln National Investment Companies, Inc. (subsidiary of Lincoln National Corporation, a publicly traded company) and Delaware Investments U.S., Inc. (investment management subsidiary of Lincoln National Corporation) (1993-2003); President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee of Delaware Investment Family of Funds (1993-2003); President and Board Member of Lincoln National Convertible Securities Funds, Inc. and the Lincoln National Income Funds, TDC (1993-2003); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Retirement Financial Services, Inc. (registered transfer agent and investment adviser and subsidiary of Delaware Investments U.S., Inc.) (1993-2003); President and Chief Executive Officer of Delaware Service Company, Inc. (1995-2003); Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Vice Chairman and Director of Equitable Capital Management Corporation (investment subsidiary of Equitable Life Assurance Society) (1985-1992); Corporate Controller of Merrill Lynch Company (financial services holding company) (1977-1985); held the following positions at the Colonial Penn Group, Inc. (insurance company): Corporate Budget Director (1974-1977), Assistant Treasurer (1972-1974) and Director of Corporate Taxes (1969-1972); held the following positions at Price Waterhouse Company (financial services firm): Tax Manager (1967-1969), Tax Senior (1965-1967) and Staff Accountant (1963-1965); United States Marine Corps (1957-1959).

81         OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

 TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS    Unaudited /Continued

David K. Downes, Continued	Oversees 51 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. Mr. Downes has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since December 2005, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations.
Matthew P. Fink, Trustee (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1941	Trustee of the Committee for Economic Development (policy research foundation) (2005-2011); Director of ICI Education Foundation (education foundation) (October 1991-August 2006); President of the Investment Company Institute (trade association) (October 1991-June 2004); Director of ICI Mutual Insurance Company (insurance company) (October 1991-June 2004); Author of The Rise of Mutual Funds: An Insider’s View published by Oxford University Press (second edition 2010). Oversees 51 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. Mr. Fink has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since January 2005, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations.
Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., Trustee (since 2013) Year of Birth: 1948	Advisory Board Member of the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs of Syracuse University (since April 2012); Director of Mercury Defense Systems Inc. (information technology) (August 2011-February 2013); Trustee of the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation (since November 2010); Advisory Board Member of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory (federally-funded research development center) (since May 2010); Director of The Boeing Company (aerospace and defense) (since October 2009); Trustee of MITRE Corporation (federally-funded research development center) (since September 2008); Independent Director of QinetiQ Group Plc (defense technology and security) (February 2008-August 2011); Director of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (on-line career services) (since January 2008, Lead Director since June 2011); Chairman of Alenia North America, Inc. (military and defense products) (January 2008-October 2009); Director of SRA International, Inc. (information technology and services) (January 2008-July 2011); President of Giambastiani Group LLC (national security and energy consulting) (since October 2007); United States Navy, career nuclear submarine officer (June 1970-October 2007), Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (2005-October 2007), NATO Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (2003-2005), Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command (2002-2005). Since his retirement from the U.S. Navy in October 2007, Admiral Giambastiani has also served on numerous U.S. Government advisory boards, investigations and task forces for the Secretaries of Defense, State and Interior and the Central Intelligence Agency. Oversees 51 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. Admiral Giambastiani has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since February 2013, including as an Advisory Board Member for certain Oppenheimer funds, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. For purposes of this report, Admiral Giambastiani is identified as a Trustee.
Phillip A. Griffiths, Trustee (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1938	Fellow of the Carnegie Corporation (since 2007); Member of the National Academy of Sciences (since 1979); Council on Foreign Relations (since 2002); Foreign Associate of Third World Academy of Sciences (since 2002); Chair of Science Initiative Group (since 1999); Member of the American Philosophical Society (since 1996); Trustee of Woodward Academy (since 1983); Director of GSI Lumonics Inc. (precision technology products company) (2001-2010); Senior Advisor of The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation (2001-2010); Distinguished

82        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Phillip A. Griffiths, Continued	Presidential Fellow for International Affairs of the National Academy of Science (2002-2010); Director of the Institute for Advanced Study (1991-2004); Director of Bankers Trust New York Corporation (1994-1999); Provost at Duke University (1983-1991). Oversees 51 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. Mr. Griffiths has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since June 1999, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations.
Mary F. Miller, Trustee (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1942	Trustee of International House (not-for-profit) (since June 2007); Trustee of the American Symphony Orchestra (not-for-profit) (October 1998-November 2011); and Senior Vice President and General Auditor of American Express Company (financial services company) (July 1998-February 2003). Oversees 51 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. Ms. Miller has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since August 2004, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations.
Joel W. Motley, Trustee (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1952	Member of the Vestry of Trinity Wall Street (since April 2012); Director of Southern Africa Legal Services Foundation (since March 2012); Board Member of Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting (non-profit journalism) (since December 2010); Managing Director of Public Capital Advisors, LLC (privately-held financial advisor) (since January 2006); Managing Director of Carmona Motley, Inc. (privately-held financial advisor) (since January 2002); Director of Columbia Equity Financial Corp. (privately-held financial advisor) (2002-2007); Managing Director of Carmona Motley Hoffman Inc. (privately-held financial advisor) (January 1998-December 2001); Member of the Finance and Budget Committee of the Council on Foreign Relations, Member of the Investment Committee and Board of Human Rights Watch and Member of the Investment Committee and Board of Historic Hudson Valley. Oversees 51 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. Mr. Motley has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since October 2002, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations.
Joanne Pace, Trustee/Advisory Board Member (since 2012) Year of Birth: 1958	Board Director of Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (since November 2012); Advisory Board Director of The Alberleen Group LLC (since March 2012); Advisory Board Director of The Agile Trading Group LLC (since March 2012); Advisory Council Member of 100 Women in Hedge Funds (non-profit) (since December 2012); Advisory Council Member of Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital (non-profit) (since May 2012); Board Director of The Komera Project (non-profit) (since April 2012); New York Advisory Board Director of Peace First (non-profit) (since March 2010); Senior Advisor of SECOR Asset Management, LP (2010-2011); Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of Morgan Stanley Investment Management (2006-2010); Partner and Chief Operating Officer of FrontPoint Partners, LLC (hedge fund) (2005-2006); held the following positions at Credit Suisse: Managing Director (2003-2005); Global Head of Human Resources and member of Executive Board and Operating Committee (2004-2005), Global Head of Operations and Product Control (2003-2004); held the following positions at Morgan Stanley: Managing Director (1997-2003), Controller and Principal Accounting Officer (1999-2003); Chief Financial Officer (temporary assignment) for the Oversight Committee, Long Term Capital Management (1998-1999). Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Audit

83        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

 TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS    Unaudited /Continued

Joanne Pace, Continued	and Nominating Committee of The Global Chartist Fund, LLC of Oppenheimer Asset Management (2011-2012); Board Director of Managed Funds Association (2008-2010); Board Director of Morgan Stanley Foundation (2007-2010) and Investment Committee Chair (2008-2010). Oversees 51 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. Ms. Pace has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since November 2012, including as an Advisory Board Member for certain Oppenheimer funds, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Board’s deliberations. For purposes of this report, Ms. Pace is identified as a Trustee.
Joseph M. Wikler, Trustee (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1941	Director of C-TASC (bio-statistics services) (2007-2012); formerly, Director of the following medical device companies: Medintec (1992-2011) and Cathco (1996-2011); Member of the Investment Committee of the Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore (since 1994); Director of Lakes Environmental Association (environmental protection organization) (1996-2008); Director of Fortis/Hartford mutual funds (1994-December 2001). Oversees 51 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. Mr. Wikler has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since August 2005, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations.
Peter I. Wold, Trustee (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1948	Director of Arch Coal, Inc. (since 2010); President of Wold Oil Properties, Inc. (oil and gas exploration and production company) (since 1994); Vice President of American Talc Company, Inc. (talc mining and milling) (since 1999); Managing Member of Hole-in-the-Wall Ranch (cattle ranching) (since 1979); Director and Chairman of Wyoming Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute Commission (enhanced oil recovery study) (2004-2012); Director and Chairman of the Denver Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (1993-1999); and Director of PacifiCorp. (electric utility) (1995-1999). Oversees 51 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. Mr. Wold has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since August 2005, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations.
INTERESTED TRUSTEE AND OFFICER	Mr. Glavin is an “Interested Trustee” because he is affiliated with the Manager and the Sub-Adviser by virtue of his positions as an officer and director of the Manager and a director of the Sub-Adviser, and as a shareholder of the Sub-Adviser’s parent company. Both as a Trustee and as an officer, he serves for an indefinite term, or until his resignation, retirement, death or removal. Mr. Glavin’s address is Two World Financial Center, 225 Liberty Street, 11th Floor, New York, New York 10281-1008.
William F. Glavin, Jr., Trustee, President and Principal Executive Officer (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1958	Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Manager (since January 2013); President of the Manager (January 2013-May 2013); Chairman of the Sub-Adviser (December 2009-December 2012); Chief Executive Officer (January 2009-December 2012) and Director of the Sub-Adviser (since January 2009); President of the Sub-Adviser (May 2009-December 2012); Management Director (since June 2009), President (since December 2009) and Chief Executive Officer (since January 2011) of Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp. (“OAC”) (the Sub-Adviser’s parent holding company); Director of Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc. (since March 2010); Executive Vice President (March 2006-February 2009) and Chief Operating Officer (July 2007-February 2009) of

84        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

William F. Glavin, Jr., Continued	Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (OAC’s parent company); Director (May 2004-March 2006) and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Compliance Officer (May 2004-January 2005), President (January 2005-March 2006) and Chief Executive Officer (June 2005-March 2006) of Babson Capital Management LLC; Director (March 2005-March 2006), President (May 2003-March 2006) and Chief Compliance Officer (July 2005-March 2006) of Babson Capital Securities, Inc. (a broker-dealer); President (May 2003-March 2006) of Babson Investment Company, Inc.; Director (May 2004-August 2006) of Babson Capital Europe Limited; Director (May 2004-October 2006) of Babson Capital Guernsey Limited; Director (May 2004-March 2006) of Babson Capital Management LLC; Non-Executive Director (March 2005-March 2007) of Baring Asset Management Limited; Director (February 2005-June 2006) Baring Pension Trustees Limited; Director and Treasurer (December 2003-November 2006) of Charter Oak Capital Management, Inc.; Director (May 2006-September 2006) of C.M. Benefit Insurance Company; Director (May 2008-June 2009) and Executive Vice President (June 2007-July 2009) of C.M. Life Insurance Company; President (March 2006-May 2007) of MassMutual Assignment Company; Director (January 2005-December 2006), Deputy Chairman (March 2005-December 2006) and President (February 2005-March 2005) of MassMutual Holdings (Bermuda) Limited; Director (May 2008-June 2009) and Executive Vice President (June 2007-July 2009) of MML Bay State Life Insurance Company; Chief Executive Officer and President (April 2007-January 2009) of MML Distributors, LLC; and Chairman (March 2006-December 2008) and Chief Executive Officer (May 2007-December 2008) of MML Investors Services, Inc. An officer of 90 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex.
OTHER OFFICERS OF THE FUND	The addresses of the Officers in the chart below are as follows: for Mr. Gabinet and Ms. Nasta, Two World Financial Center, 225 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10281-1008, for Messrs. Vandehey and Wixted, 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924 and for Messrs. Loughran, Cottier, Willis, DeMitry, Camarella, Pulire and Stein, 350 Linden Oaks, Rochester, New York 14625. Each Officer serves for an annual term or until his or her resignation, retirement, death or removal.
Daniel G. Loughran, Vice President (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1963	Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since July 2007) and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since December 2001); Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (April 2001-June 2007) and a Portfolio Manager with the Sub-Adviser (December 1999- November 2001). Team Leader, a Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds.
Scott S. Cottier, Vice President (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1971	Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since September 2002). Portfolio Manager and trader at Victory Capital Management (1999-2002). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds.
Troy E. Willis, Vice President (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1972	Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since July 2009) and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since January 2006); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2005-June 2009). Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (June 2003-December 2005). Corporate Attorney for Southern Resource Group (June 1999-December 2003). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds.

85        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

 TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS    Unaudited /Continued

Mark R. DeMitry Vice President (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1976	Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since July 2009); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Fund (September 2006- June 2009). Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2003-September 2006) and a Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (July 2001-May 2003). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds.
Michael L. Camarella Vice President (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1976	Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since January 2011); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2009-December 2010); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (January 2008-December 2010). Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (April 2006-December 2007) and a Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2003-March 2006). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds.
Charles S. Pulire, Vice President (since 2011) Year of Birth: 1977	Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since February 2013); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (December 2010-January 2013); Research Analyst of the Manager (February 2008-November 2010); Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (May 2006-January 2008). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds.
Richard A. Stein Vice President (since 2007) Year of Birth: 1957	Director of the Rochester Credit Analysis team (since March 2004); Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since June 2011) and a Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (November 1997-May 2011); heads up the Rochester Credit Analysis team (since May 1993).
Arthur S. Gabinet, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer (since 2011) Year of Birth: 1958	Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Manager (since January 2013); General Counsel OFI SteelPath, Inc. (since January 2013); Executive Vice President (May 2010-December 2012) and General Counsel (since January 2011) of the Sub-Adviser; General Counsel of the Distributor (since January 2011); General Counsel of Centennial Asset Management Corporation (January 2011-December 2012); Executive Vice President (January 2011-December 2012) and General Counsel of HarbourView Asset Management Corporation (since January 2011); Assistant Secretary (since January 2011) and Director (since January 2011) of OppenheimerFunds International Ltd. and OppenheimerFunds plc; Director of Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc. (January 2011-December 2012) and General Counsel (since January 2011); Executive Vice President (January 2011-December 2011) and General Counsel of Shareholder Financial Services, Inc. and Shareholder Services, Inc. (since January 2011); Executive Vice President (January 2011-December 2012) and General Counsel of OFI Private Investments Inc. (since January 2011); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Legacy Program (January 2011-December 2011); Executive Vice President (January 2011-December 2012) and General Counsel of OFI Global Institutional, Inc. (since January 2011); General Counsel, Asset Management of the Sub-Adviser (May 2010-December 2010); Principal, The Vanguard Group (November 2005-April 2010); District Administrator, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (January 2003-October 2005). An officer of 90 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex.
Christina M. Nasta, Vice President and Chief Business Officer (since 2011) Year of Birth: 1973	Senior Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (since January 2013); Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2010-December 2012); Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (January 2003-July 2010); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (January 2003-July 2010). An officer of 90 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex.

86        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Mark S. Vandehey, Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer (since 2004) Year of Birth: 1950

Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Manager (since January 2013); Chief Compliance Officer of OFI SteelPath, Inc. (since January 2013); Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (March 2004-December 2012); Chief Compliance Officer of the Sub-Adviser, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc., OFI Global Trust Company, OFI Global Institutional, Inc., Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc., OFI Private Investments, Inc., Harborview Asset Management Corporation, Trinity Investment Management Corporation, and Shareholder Services, Inc. (since March 2004); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc., Centennial Asset Management Corporation and Shareholder Services, Inc. (June 1983-December 2012). An officer of 90 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex.

Brian W. Wixted, Treasurer and Principal Financial & Accounting Officer (since 1999) Year of Birth: 1959

Senior Vice President of the Manager (since January 2013); Treasurer of the Sub-Adviser, HarbourView Asset Management Corporation, Shareholder Financial Services, Inc., Shareholder Services, Inc., and Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc. (March 1999-June 2008), OFI Private Investments, Inc. (March 2000-June 2008), OppenheimerFunds International Ltd. and OppenheimerFunds plc (since May 2000), OFI Global Institutional, Inc. (November 2000-June 2008), and OppenheimerFunds Legacy Program (charitable trust program established by the Sub-Adviser) (June 2003-December 2011); Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of OFI Global Trust Company (since May 2000); Assistant Treasurer of Oppenheimer Acquisition Corporation (March 1999-June 2008). An officer of 90 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex.

The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers and is available without charge upon request, by calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677).

87        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

  OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Manager	OFI Global Asset Management, Inc.
Sub-Adviser	OppenheimerFunds, Inc.
Distributor	OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc.
Transfer and Shareholder     Servicing Agent	OFI Global Asset Management, Inc.
Sub-Transfer Agent	Shareholder Services, Inc. DBA OppenheimerFunds Services
Independent Registered     Public Accounting Firm	KPMG LLP
Legal Counsel	Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

© 2014 OppenheimerFunds, Inc. All rights reserved.

88        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

PRIVACY POLICY NOTICE    

As an Oppenheimer fund shareholder, you are entitled to know how we protect your personal information and how we limit its disclosure.

Information Sources

We obtain nonpublic personal information about our shareholders from the following sources:

— Applications or other forms

— When you create a user ID and password for online account access

— When you enroll in eDocs Direct, our electronic document delivery service

— Your transactions with us, our affiliates or others

— A software program on our website, often referred to as a “cookie,” which indicates which parts of our site you’ve visited

— When you set up challenge questions to reset your password online

If you visit oppenheimerfunds.com and do not log on to the secure account information areas, we do not obtain any personal information about you. When you do log on to a secure area, we do obtain your user ID and password to identify you. We also use this information to provide you with products and services you have requested, to inform you about products and services that you may be interested in and assist you in other ways.

We do not collect personal information through our website unless you willingly provide it to us, either directly by email or in those areas of the website that request information. In order to update your personal information (including your mailing address, email address and phone number) you must first log on and visit your user profile.

If you have set your browser to warn you before accepting cookies, you will receive the warning message with each cookie. You can refuse cookies by turning them off in your browser. However, doing so may limit your access to certain sections of our website.

We use cookies to help us improve and manage our website. For example, cookies help us recognize new versus repeat visitors to the site, track the pages visited, and enable some special features on the website. This data helps us provide a better service for our website visitors.

Protection of Information

We do not disclose any non-public personal information (such as names on a customer list) about current or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law.

Disclosure of Information

We send your financial advisor (as designated by you) copies of confirmations, account statements and other documents reporting activity in your fund accounts. We may also use details about you and your investments to help us, our financial service affiliates, or firms that jointly market their financial products and services with ours, to better serve your investment needs or suggest financial services or educational material that may be of interest to you. If this requires us to provide you with an opportunity to “opt in” or “opt out” of such information sharing with a firm not affiliated with us, you will receive notification on how to do so, before any such sharing takes place.

Right of Refusal

We will not disclose your personal information to unaffiliated third parties (except as permitted by law), unless we first offer you a reasonable opportunity to refuse or “opt out” of such disclosure.

89        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

PRIVACY POLICY NOTICE    Continued

Internet Security and Encryption

In general, the email services provided by our website are encrypted and provide a secure and private means of communication with us. To protect your own privacy, confidential and/or personal information should only be communicated via email when you are advised that you are using a secure website. As a security measure, we do not include personal or account information in non-secure emails, and we advise you not to send such information to us in non-secure emails. Instead, you may take advantage of the secure features of our website to encrypt your email correspondence. To do this, you will need to use a browser that supports Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol.

We do not guarantee or warrant that any part of our website, including files available for download, are free of viruses or other harmful code. It is your responsibility to take appropriate precautions, such as use of an anti-virus software package, to protect your computer hardware and software.

— All transactions, including redemptions, exchanges and purchases, are secured by SSL and 128-bit encryption. SSL is used to establish a secure connection between your PC and OppenheimerFunds’ server. It transmits information in an encrypted and scrambled format.

— Encryption is achieved through an electronic scrambling technology that uses a “key” to code and then decode the data. Encryption acts like the cable converter box you may have on your television set. It scrambles data with a secret code so that no one can make sense of it while it is being transmitted. When the data reaches its destination, the same software unscrambles the data.

— You can exit the secure area by either closing your browser, or for added security, you can use the Log Out button before you close your browser.

Other Security Measures

We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your personal account information. Our employees and agents have access to that information only so that they may offer you products or provide services, for example, when responding to your account questions.

How You Can Help

You can also do your part to keep your account information private and to prevent unauthorized transactions. If you obtain a user ID and password for your account, do not allow it to be used by anyone else. Also, take special precautions when accessing your account on a computer used by others.

Who We Are

This joint notice describes the privacy policies of the Oppenheimer funds, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., and each of its investment adviser subsidiaries, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. and OFI Global Trust Co. It applies to all Oppenheimer fund accounts you presently have, or may open in the future, using your Social Security number—whether or not you remain a shareholder of our funds. This notice was last updated November 2013. In the event it is updated or changed, we will post an updated notice on our website at oppenheimerfunds.com. If you have any questions about these privacy policies, write to us at P.O. Box 5270, Denver, CO 80217-5270, email us by clicking on the Contact Us section of our website at oppenheimerfunds.com or call us at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677).

90        OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS

Item 2.  Code of Ethics.

The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions.

Item 3.  Audit Committee Financial Expert.

The Board of Trustees of the registrant has determined that David Downes, the Board’s Audit Committee Chairman, is an audit committee financial expert and that Mr. Downes is “independent” for purposes of this Item 3.

Item 4.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

(a) Audit Fees

The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed $53,700 in fiscal 2013 and $52,700 in fiscal 2012.

(b) Audit-Related Fees

The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed no such fees in fiscal 2013 and $2,500 in fiscal 2012.

The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed $697,965 in fiscal 2013 and $264,139 in fiscal 2012 to the registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant.

Such services include: Internal control reviews, GIPS attestation procedures, internal audit training, surprise exams, reorganization, and system conversion testing

(c) Tax Fees

The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed no such fees in fiscal 2013 and no such fees in fiscal 2012.

The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed $581,620 in fiscal 2013 and $451,924 in fiscal 2012 to the registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant.

Such services include: tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. Tax compliance generally involves preparation of original and amended tax returns, claims for a refund and tax payment- planning services. Tax planning and tax advice includes assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.

(d) All Other Fees

The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed no such fees in fiscal 2013 and no such fees in fiscal 2012.

The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed no such fees in fiscal 2013 and no such fees in fiscal 2012 to the registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant.

Such fees would include the cost to the principal accountant of attending audit committee meetings and consultations regarding the registrant’s retirement plan with respect to its Trustees.

(e) (1) During its regularly scheduled periodic meetings, the registrant’s audit committee will pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and other services to be provided by the principal accountants of the registrant.

The audit committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chairman for any subsequent new engagements that arise between regularly scheduled meeting dates provided that any fees such pre-approved are presented to the audit committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

Under applicable laws, pre-approval of non-audit services may be waived provided that: 1) the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than five percent of the total amount of fees paid by the registrant to its principal accountant during the fiscal year in which services are provided 2) such services were not recognized by the registrant at the time of engagement as non-audit services and 3) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the audit committee of the registrant and approved prior to the completion of the audit.

(2) 0%

(f) Not applicable as less than 50%.

(g) The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed $1,279,585 in fiscal 2013 and $718,563 in fiscal 2012 to the registrant and the registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant related to non-audit fees. Those billings did not include any prohibited non-audit services as defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(h) The registrant’s audit committee of the board of Trustees has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence. No such services were rendered.

Item 5.  Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

Not applicable.

Item 6.  Schedule of Investments.

a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

b) Not applicable.

Item 7.  Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 8.  Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9.  Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.

Item 10.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

The Fund’s Governance Committee Provisions with Respect to Nominations of Directors/Trustees to the Respective Boards

None

Item 11.  Controls and Procedures.

Based on their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c)) as of 12/31/2013, the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer found the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurances that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in the reports that it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (a) is accumulated and communicated to registrant’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (b) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12.  Exhibits.

(a) (1) Exhibit attached hereto.

(2) Exhibits attached hereto.

(3) Not applicable.

(b) Exhibit attached hereto.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals

By:	/s/  William F. Glavin, Jr.
	William F. Glavin, Jr.
	Principal Executive Officer
Date:	2/10/2014

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:	/s/  William F. Glavin, Jr.
	William F. Glavin, Jr.
	Principal Executive Officer
Date:	2/10/2014
By:	/s/  Brian W. Wixted
	Brian W. Wixted
	Principal Financial Officer
Date:	2/10/2014

EX-99.CODE ETH

CODE OF ETHICS

FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS

OF THE OPPENHEIMER FUNDS

AND OPPENHEIMERFUNDS, INC.

This Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Financial Officers (referred to in this document as the “Code”) has been adopted by each of the investment companies for which OppenheimerFunds, Inc. or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates (referred to collectively in this document as “OFI”) acts as investment adviser (individually, a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”), and by OFI to effectuate compliance with Section 406 under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules adopted to implement Section 406.

This Code applies to OFI’s and each Fund’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions (“Covered Officers”). A listing of positions currently within the ambit of Covered Officers is attached as Exhibit A.¹

1. Purpose of the Code

This Code sets forth standards and procedures that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote:

• honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

• full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that a Fund files with, or submits to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in other public communications made by the Fund;

• compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

• the prompt internal reporting of violations of this Code to the Code Administrator identified below; and

• accountability for adherence to this Code.

In general, the principles that govern honest and ethical conduct, including the avoidance of conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, reflect, at the minimum, the following: (1) the duty at all times in performing any responsibilities as a Fund financial officer, controller, accountant or principal executive officer to place the interests of the Funds ahead of personal interests; (2) the fundamental standard that Covered Officers should not take inappropriate advantage of their positions; (3) the duty to assure that a Fund’s financial statements and reports to its shareholders are prepared honestly and accurately in accordance with applicable

¹ The obligations imposed by this Code on Covered Officers are separate from and in addition to any obligations that may be imposed on such persons as Covered Persons under the Code of Ethics adopted by OFI and the Funds under Rule 17j-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended and any other code of conduct applicable to Covered Officers in whatever capacity they serve. This Code does not incorporate by reference any provisions of the Rule 17j-1 Code of Ethics and accordingly, any violations or waivers granted under the Rule 17j-1 Code of Ethics will not be considered a violation or waiver under this Code.

rules, regulations and accounting standards; and (4) the duty to conduct the Funds’ business and affairs in an honest and ethical manner. Each Covered Officer should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual as well as apparent conflicts of interest.

It is acknowledged that, as a result of the contractual relationship between each Fund and OFI, of which the Covered Officers are also officers or employees, and subject to OFI’s fiduciary duties to each Fund, the Covered Officers will, in the normal course of their duties, be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions that will have different effects on OFI and the Funds. It is further acknowledged that the participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contractual relationship between each Fund and OFI and is consistent with the expectations of the Board of Trustees/Directors of the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of the Funds.

2. Prohibitions

The specific provisions and reporting requirements of this Code are concerned primarily with promoting honest and ethical conduct and avoiding conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships. No Covered Officer may use information concerning the business and affairs of a Fund, including the investment intentions of a Fund, or use his or her ability to influence such investment intentions, for personal gain to himself or herself, his or her family or friends or any other person or in a manner detrimental to the interests of a Fund or its shareholders.

No Covered Officer may use his or her personal influence or personal relationships to influence the preparation and issuance of financial reports of a Fund whereby the Covered Officer would benefit personally to the detriment of the Fund and its shareholders.

No Covered Officer shall intentionally for any reason take any action or fail to take any action in connection with his or her official acts on behalf of a Fund that causes the Fund to violate applicable laws, rules and regulations.

No Covered Officer shall, in connection with carrying out his or her official duties and responsibilities on behalf of a Fund:

(i) employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud a Fund or its shareholders;

(ii) intentionally cause a Fund to make any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading in its official documents, regulatory filings, financial statements or communications to the public;

(iii) engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any Fund or its shareholders;

(iv) engage in any manipulative practice with respect to any Fund;

(v) use his or her personal influence or personal relationships to influence any business decision, investment decisions, or financial reporting by a Fund whereby the Covered Officer would benefit personally to the detriment of the Fund or its shareholders;

(vi) intentionally cause a Fund to fail to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations, including failure to comply with the requirement of full, fair, accurate, understandable and timely disclosure in reports and documents that a Fund files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Fund;

(vii) intentionally mislead or omit to provide material information to the Fund’s independent auditors or to the Board of Trustees/Directors or the officers of the Fund or its investment adviser in connection with financial reporting matters;

(viii) fail to notify the Code Administrator or the Chief Executive Officer of the Fund or its investment adviser promptly if he or she becomes aware of any existing or potential violations of this Code or applicable laws;

(ix) retaliate against others for, or otherwise discourage the reporting of, actual or apparent violations of this Code; or

(x) fails to acknowledge or certify compliance with this Code if requested to do so.

3. Reports of Conflicts of Interests

If a Covered Officer becomes aware of a conflict of interest under this Code or, to the Covered Officer’s reasonable belief, the appearance of one, he or she must immediately report the matter to the Code’s Administrator. If the Code Administrator is involved or believed to be involved in the conflict of interest or appearance of conflict of interest, the Covered Officer shall report the matter directly to the OFI’s Chief Executive Officer.

Upon receipt of a report of a conflict, the Code Administrator will take prompt steps to determine whether a conflict of interest exists. If the Code Administrator determines that an actual conflict of interest exists, the Code Administrator will take steps to resolve the conflict. If the Code Administrator determines that the appearance of a conflict exists, the Code Administrator will take appropriate steps to remedy such appearance. If the Code Administrator determines that no conflict or appearance of a conflict exists, the Code Administrator shall meet with the Covered Officer to advise him or her of such finding and of his or her reason for taking no action. In lieu of determining whether a conflict or appearance of conflict exists, the Code Administrator may in his or her discretion refer the matter to the Fund’s Board of Trustees/Directors.

4. Waivers

Any Covered Officer requesting a waiver of any of the provisions of this Code must submit a written request for such waiver to the Code Administrator, setting forth the basis of such request and all necessary facts upon which such request can be evaluated. The Code Administrator shall review such request and make a written determination thereon, which shall be binding. The Code Administrator may in reviewing such request, consult at his discretion with legal counsel to OFI or to the Fund.

In determining whether to waive any of the provisions of this Code, the Code Administrator shall consider whether the proposed waiver:

(i) is prohibited by this Code;

(ii) is consistent with honest and ethical conduct; and

(iii) will result in a conflict of interest between the Covered Officer’s personal and professional obligations to a Fund.

In lieu of determining whether to grant a waiver, the Code Administrator in his or her discretion may refer the matter to the appropriate Fund’s Board of Trustees/Directors.

5. Reporting Requirements

(a)    Each Covered Officer shall, upon becoming subject to this Code, be provided with a copy of this Code and shall affirm in writing that he or she has received, read, understands and shall adhere to this Code.

(b)    At least annually, all Covered Officers shall be provided with a copy of this Code and shall certify that they have read and understand this Code and recognize that they are subject thereto.

(c)    At least annually, all Covered Officers shall certify that they have complied with the requirements of this Code and that they have disclosed or reported any violations of this Code to the Code Administrator or the Chief Executive Officer of the Fund or its investment adviser.

(d)    The Code Administrator shall submit a quarterly report to the Board of Trustees/Directors of each Fund containing (i) a description of any report of a conflict of interest or apparent conflict and the disposition thereof; (ii) a description of any request for a waiver from this Code and the disposition thereof; (iii) any violation of the Code that has been reported or found and the sanction imposed; (iv) interpretations issued under the Code by the Code Administrator; and (v) any other significant information arising under the Code including any proposed amendments.

(e)    Each Covered Officer shall notify the Code Administrator promptly if he or she knows of or has a reasonable belief that any violation of this Code has occurred or is likely to occur. Failure to do so is itself a violation of this Code.

(f)    Any changes to or waivers of this Code, including “implicit” waivers as defined in applicable SEC rules, will, to the extent required, be disclosed by the Code Administrator or his or her designee as provided by applicable SEC rules.²

6. Annual Review

At least annually, the Board of Trustees/Directors of each Fund shall review the Code and consider whether any amendments are necessary or desirable.

7. Sanctions

Any violation of this Code of Ethics shall be subject to the imposition of such sanctions by OFI as may be deemed appropriate under the circumstances to achieve the purposes of this Code and may include, without limitation, a letter of censure, suspension from employment or termination of employment, in the sole discretion of OFI.

8. Administration and Construction

(a)    The administration of this Code of Ethics shall be the responsibility of OFI’s General Counsel or his designee as the “Code Administrator” of this Code, acting under the terms of this Code and the oversight of the Trustees/Directors of the Funds.

(b)    The duties of such Code Administrator will include:

(i) Continuous maintenance of a current list of the names of all Covered Officers;

(ii) Furnishing all Covered Officers a copy of this Code and initially and periodically informing them of their duties and obligations thereunder;

(iii) Maintaining or supervising the maintenance of all records required by this Code, including records of waivers granted hereunder;

(iv) Issuing interpretations of this Code which appear to the Code Administrator to be consistent with the objectives of this Code and any applicable laws or regulations;

(v) Conducting such inspections or investigations as shall reasonably be required to detect and report any violations of this Code, with his or her recommendations, to the Chief Executive Officer of OFI and to the Trustees/Directors of the affected Fund(s) or any committee appointed by them to deal with such information; and Periodically conducting educational training programs as needed to explain and reinforce the terms of this Code.

(c)    In carrying out the duties and responsibilities described under this Code, the Code Administrator may consult with legal counsel, who may include legal counsel to the applicable Funds, and such other persons as the Administrator shall deem necessary or desirable. The Code Administrator shall be protected from any liability hereunder or under any applicable law, rule or regulation, for decisions made in good faith based upon his or her reasonable judgment.

² An “implicit waiver” is the failure to take action within a reasonable period of time regarding a material departure from a provision of this Code that has been made known to the General Counsel, the Code Administrator, and an executive officer of the Fund or OFI.

9. Required Records

The Administrator shall maintain and cause to be maintained in an easily accessible place, the following records for the period required by applicable SEC rules (currently six years following the end of the fiscal year of OFI in which the applicable event or report occurred):

(a) A copy of any Code which has been in effect during the period;

(b) A record of any violation of any such Code and of any action taken as a result of such violation, during the period;

(c) A copy of each annual report pursuant to the Code made by a Covered Officer during the period;

(d) A copy of each report made by the Code Administrator pursuant to this Code during the period;

(e) A list of all Covered Officers who are or have been required to make reports pursuant to this Code during the period, plus those person(s) who are or were responsible for reviewing these reports;

(f) A record of any request to waive any requirement of this Code, the decision thereon and the reasons supporting the decision; and

(g) A record of any report of any conflict of interest or appearance of a conflict of interest received by the Code Administrator or discovered by the Code Administrator during the period, the decision thereon and the reasons supporting the decision.

10. Amendments and Modifications

Other than non-substantive or administrative changes, this Code may not be amended or modified unless approved or ratified by the Board of Trustees/Directors of each Fund.

11. Confidentiality.

This Code is identified for the internal use of the Funds and OFI. Reports and records prepared or maintained under this Code are considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly to the extent permitted by applicable laws, rules and regulations. Except as otherwise required by law or this Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the Trustees/Directors of the affected Fund(s) and their counsel, the independent auditors of the affected Funds and/or OFI, and to OFI, except as such disclosure may be required pursuant to applicable judicial or regulatory process.

Dated as of: June 25, 2003, as revised August 30, 2006 and further revised as of March 5, 2010.

Exhibit A

Positions Covered by this Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Financial Officers*

Each Oppenheimer fund

President (Principal Executive Officer)

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

OFI

President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

* There are no other positions with the Funds or OFI who perform similar functions to those listed above.

EX-99.CERT

Exhibit 99.CERT

Section 302 Certifications

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William F. Glavin, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of Trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: 2/10/2014

/s/  William F. Glavin, Jr.

William F. Glavin, Jr.

Principal Executive Officer

Exhibit 99.CERT

Section 302 Certifications

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brian W. Wixted, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of Trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: 2/10/2014

/s/  Brian W. Wixted

Brian W. Wixted

Principal Financial Officer

EX-99.906CERT

EX-99.906CERT

Section 906 Certifications

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William F. Glavin, Jr., Principal Executive Officer, and Brian W. Wixted, Principal Financial Officer, of Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals (the “Registrant”), each certify to the best of his knowledge that:

1. The Registrant’s periodic report on Form N-CSR for the period ended 12/31/2013 (the “Form N-CSR”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. This certification is being furnished to the Commission solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form N-CSR filed with the Commission.

Principal Executive Officer	Principal Financial Officer
Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals	Oppenheimer Rochester Fund Municipals
/s/  William F. Glavin, Jr.	/s/  Brian W. Wixted
William F. Glavin, Jr.	Brian W. Wixted
Date: 2/10/2014	Date: 2/10/2014