497 1 sticker.htm PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT Rochester Fund Municipals
                           Rochester Fund Municipals
                  Supplement dated September 30, 2004 to the
                      Prospectus dated February 24, 2004


1. This supplement is in addition to the supplement dated July 6, 2004.

2. The  following  new section  should be added after the section  titled "HOW
THE FUND IS MANAGED - Advisory Fees" on page 14:

      PENDING LITIGATION. Six law suits have been filed as putative
      derivative and class actions against the Fund's investment Manager,
      Distributor and Transfer Agent of the Fund, some of the Oppenheimer
      funds, including the Fund, and Directors or Trustees of some of those
      funds, excluding this Fund. The complaints allege that the Manager
      charged excessive fees for distribution and other costs, improperly
      used assets of the funds in the form of directed brokerage commissions
      and 12b-1 fees to pay brokers to promote sales of Oppenheimer funds,
      and failed to properly disclose the use of fund assets to make those
      payments in violation of the Investment Company Act and the Investment
      Advisers Act of 1940. The complaints further allege that by permitting
      and/or participating in those actions, the defendant Directors breached
      their fiduciary duties to fund shareholders under the Investment
      Company Act and at common law. Those law suits were filed on August 31,
      2004, September 3, 2004, September 14, 2004, September 14, 2004,
      September 21, 2004 and September 22, 2004, respectively, in the U. S.
      District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaints
      seek unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the
      funds' investment advisory agreements, an accounting of all fees paid,
      and an award of attorneys' fees and litigation expenses.

            The Manager and the Distributor believe the claims asserted in
      these law suits to be without merit, and intend to defend the suits
      vigorously. The Manager and the Distributor do not believe that the
      pending actions are likely to have a material adverse effect on the
      Fund or on their ability to perform their respective investment
      advisory or distribution agreements with the Fund.




September 30, 2004                                                PS0365.010