EX-99.77E LEGAL 2 ex99-365.txt ROCHESTER FUND MUNICIPALS LITIGATION A consolidated amended complaint was filed as a putative class action against the Manager and the Transfer Agent and other defendants (including 51 of the Oppenheimer funds including the Fund) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on January 10, 2005 and was amended on March 4, 2005. The complaint alleged, among other things, that the Manager charged excessive fees for distribution and other costs, and that by permitting and/or participating in those actions, the Directors/Trustees and the Officers of the funds breached their fiduciary duties to fund shareholders under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and at common law. The plaintiffs sought unspecified damages, an accounting of all fees paid, and an award of attorneys' fees and litigation expenses. In response to the defendants' motions to dismiss the suit, seven of the eight counts in the complaint, including the claims against certain of the Oppenheimer funds, as nominal defendants, and against certain present and former Directors, Trustees and Officers of the funds, and the Distributor, as defendants, were dismissed with prejudice, by court order dated March 10, 2006, and the remaining count against the Manager and the Transfer Agent was dismissed with prejudice by court order dated April 5, 2006. The plaintiffs filed an appeal of those dismissals on May 11, 2006. The Manager believes that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and that there are substantial grounds to sustain the district court's rulings. The Manager also believes that it is premature to render any opinion as to the likelihood of an outcome unfavorable to it, the funds, the Directors/Trustees or the Officers on the appeal of the decisions of the district court, and that no estimate can yet be made with any degree of certainty as to the amount or range of any potential loss.