XML 88 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments, Contingencies And Leases
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Commitments, Contingencies And Leases [Abstract]  
Commitments, Contingencies And Leases

Note 14Commitments, contingencies and leases

 

We have commitments under non-cancelable operating leases primarily for office facilities throughout the world. Certain leases require us to pay property taxes, insurance and routine maintenance, and include escalation clauses. Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2012, for each of the next five years are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

(In thousands)

2013

$

17,096 

2014

 

14,042 

2015

 

12,132 

2016

 

8,030 

2017

 

5,011 

Thereafter

 

7,019 

 

$

63,330 

 

Rent expense under operating leases was approximately $17.1 million, $16.3 million and $13.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2012, we have non-cancelable purchase commitments with various suppliers of customized inventory and inventory components totaling approximately $7.3 million over the next twelve months.

 

As of December 31, 2012, we have outstanding guarantees for payment of customs and foreign grants totaling approximately $5.0 million, which are generally payable over the next twelve months.

 

From November 1999 to May 2011, we sold products to the U.S. government under a contract with the General Services Administration ("GSA"). Our previous contract with GSA contained a price reduction or "most favored customer" pricing provision. During 2011 and 2012, we had been in discussions with GSA regarding our compliance with this pricing provision and provided GSA with information regarding our pricing practices. In 2011, GSA conducted an on-site review of our GSA pricing practices and orally informed us that GSA did not agree with our previous determination of the potential non-compliance amount. GSA subsequently requested that we conduct a further analysis of the non-compliance amount based upon a methodology that GSA proposed. This analysis resulted in calculated overpayments (including added interest) by GSA to us of approximately $13.1 million. During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, we established an accrual for $13.1 million which represented the amount of the loss contingency that was reasonably estimable at that time. On June 6, 2012, we entered into a Settlement Agreement with GSA and paid approximately $11.8 million in settlement of the foregoing matters. Due to the complexities of conducting business with GSA, the relatively small amount of revenue we realized from our previous GSA contract, and our belief that we can continue to sell our products to U.S. government agencies through other contracting methods, we cancelled our contract with GSA in April 2011, effective May 2011. To date, we have not experienced any material adverse impact on our results of operations as a result of the cancellation of our previous GSA contract.