XML 58 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments And Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Commitments And Contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments And Contingencies

Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies

 

We offer a one-year limited warranty on most hardware products, with a two or three-year warranty on a subset of our hardware products, which is included in the sales price of many of our products. Provision is made for estimated future warranty costs at the time of the sale for the estimated costs that may be incurred under the basic limited warranty. Our estimate is based on historical experience and product sales during the period.

 

The warranty reserve for the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

2012

 

2011

Balance at the beginning of the period

$

 1,271

$

 921

Accruals for warranties issued during the period

 

 1,104

 

 1,515

Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period

 

 (1,070)

 

 (1,192)

Balance at the end of the period

$

 1,305

$

 1,244

 

As of June 30, 2012, we had non-cancelable purchase commitments with various suppliers of customized inventory and inventory components totaling approximately $9 million over the next twelve months.

 

As of June 30, 2012, we had outstanding guarantees for payment of customs and foreign grants totaling approximately $4 million, which are generally payable over the next twelve months.

 

From November 1999 to May 2011, we sold products to the U.S. government under a contract with the General Services Administration ("GSA"). During such time, our sales under the contract were approximately 2% of our total sales. Our previous contract with GSA contained a price reduction or "most favored customer" pricing provision. In the past several quarters, we had been in discussions with GSA regarding our compliance with this pricing provision and provided GSA with information regarding our pricing practices. In 2011, GSA conducted an on-site review of our GSA pricing practices and orally informed us that GSA did not agree with our previous determination of the potential non-compliance amount. GSA subsequently requested that we conduct a further analysis of the non-compliance amount based upon a methodology that GSA proposed. This analysis resulted in calculated overpayments (including added interest) by GSA to us of approximately $13.1 million. During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, we established an accrual for $13.1 million which represented the amount of the loss contingency that was reasonably estimable at that time. On June 6, 2012, we entered into a Settlement Agreement with GSA and paid approximately $11.8 million in settlement of the foregoing matters. Due to the complexities of conducting business with GSA, the relatively small amount of revenue we realized from our previous GSA contract, and our belief that we can continue to sell our products to U.S. government agencies through other contracting methods, we cancelled our contract with GSA in April 2011, effective May 2011. To date, we have not experienced any material adverse impact on our results of operations as a result of the cancellation of our previous GSA contract.