XML 75 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents approximate the carrying values due to the short period of time to maturity (Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy).

Receivables, net

Receivables, net

Receivables represent amounts billed and amounts earned that are to be billed in the near future. Included in accrued receivables are services and software hosting revenues earned in the current period but billed in the following period as well as license revenues that are determined to be fixed and determinable but that will be billed in future periods.

 

(in thousands)

   June 30,
2014
    December 31,
2013
 

Billed Receivables

   $ 179,512      $ 173,100   

Allowance for doubtful accounts

     (4,722     (4,459
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Billed, net

     174,790        168,641   

Accrued Receivables

     32,111        34,934   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Receivables, net

   $ 206,901      $ 203,575   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
Other Current Assets and Other Current Liabilities

Other Current Assets and Other Current Liabilities

 

(in thousands)

   June 30,
2014
     December 31,
2013
 

Settlement deposits

   $ 7,564       $ 27,770   

Settlement receivables

     5,472         20,119   

Current debt issuance costs

     5,075         5,276   

Other

     11,773         12,163   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other current assets

   $ 29,884       $ 65,328   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

   June 30,
2014
     December 31,
2013
 

Settlement payables

   $ 12,540       $ 42,841   

Accrued interest

     7,219         7,074   

Vendor financed licenses

     7,123         6,410   

Royalties payable

     4,201         5,627   

Other

     24,556         33,064   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other current liabilities

   $ 55,639       $ 95,016  
Off Balance Sheet Accounts

Off Balance Sheet Accounts

The Company also enters into agreements with certain clients to process payment funds on their behalf. When an automated clearing house or automated teller machine network payment transaction is processed, a transaction is initiated to withdraw funds from the designated source account and deposit them into a settlement account, which is a trust account maintained for the benefit of the Company’s clients. A simultaneous transaction is initiated to transfer funds from the settlement account to the intended destination account. These “back to back” transactions are designed to settle at the same time, usually overnight, such that the funds are received from the source at the same time as the funds are sent to their destination. However, due to the transactions being with various financial institutions there may be timing differences that result in float balances. These funds are maintained in accounts for the benefit of the client which are separate from the Company’s corporate assets. As the Company does not take ownership of the funds, those settlement accounts are not included in the Company’s balance sheet. The Company is entitled to interest earned on the fund balances. The collection of interest on these settlement accounts is considered in the Company’s determination of its fee structure for clients and represents a portion of the payment for services performed by the Company. The amount of off balance sheet settlement funds as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $208.6 million and $284.0 million, respectively.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The $14.1 million and $23.3 million accumulated other comprehensive loss included in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, represents the accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment. Since the undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are considered to be permanently reinvested, the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss have not been tax effected.

Goodwill

Goodwill

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill attributable to each reporting unit with goodwill balances during the six months ended June 30, 2014 were as follows:

 

(in thousands)

   Americas     EMEA      Asia/ Pacific      Total  

Gross Balance prior to December 31, 2013

   $ 488,698      $ 160,158       $ 67,793       $ 716,649   

Total impairment prior to December 31, 2013

     (47,432     —           —           (47,432
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

     441,266        160,158         67,793         669,217   

Goodwill from acquisitions (1)

     (3,192     —           —           (3,192

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     238        312         1,991         2,541   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2014

   $ 438,312      $ 160,470       $ 69,784       $ 668,566   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Goodwill from acquisitions relates to adjustments in the goodwill recorded for the acquisitions of Official Payments Holdings, Inc. (“OPAY”), Online Resources Corporation (“ORCC”), and Profesionales en Transacciones Electronicas S.A. (“PTESA”) as discussed in Note 3. The purchase price allocation for OPAY is preliminary as of June 30, 2014 and accordingly is subject to future changes during the maximum one-year allocation period.

In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, we assess goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year using October 1 balances or when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recovered. We evaluate goodwill at the reporting unit level and have identified our reportable segments, Americas, Europe/Middle East/Africa (“EMEA”), and Asia/Pacific, as our reporting units. Recoverability of goodwill is measured using a discounted cash flow model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. Use of a discounted cash flow model is common practice in impairment testing in the absence of available transactional market evidence to determine the fair value.

The calculated fair value was substantially in excess of the current carrying value for all reporting units based upon our October 1, 2013 annual impairment test and there have been no indications of impairment in the subsequent periods.

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling Interest

On April 10, 2014, the Company dissolved its partnership in South Africa with Cornastone Technology Investments (Proprietary) Limited (“CTI”). As a result, the Company paid CTI approximately $1.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014 for CTI's noncontrolling interest and loan balance.  Noncontrolling interest in this partnership of $1.1 million was included in other noncurrent liabilities as of December 31, 2013.

Revenue

Revenue

Vendor Specific Objective Evidence (“VSOE”)

ASC 985-605 requires the seller of software that includes post contract customer support (maintenance or “PCS”) to establish VSOE of fair value of the undelivered element of the contract in order to account separately for the PCS revenue. The Company has traditionally established VSOE of the fair value of PCS by reference to stated renewals, expressed in dollar terms, or separate sales with consistent pricing of PCS expressed in percentage terms. In determining whether a stated renewal is not substantive, the Company considers factors such as whether the period of the initial PCS term is relatively long when compared to the term of the software license or whether the PCS renewal rate is significantly below the Company’s normal pricing practices. In determining whether PCS pricing is consistent, the Company considers the population of separate sales that are within a reasonably narrow range of the median within the identified market segment over the trailing 12 month period.

Effective July 2013, the Company establishes VSOE of fair value of PCS by reference to stated renewals for all identified market segments. The Company continues to consider factors such as whether the period of the initial PCS term is relatively long when compared to the term of the software license or whether the PCS renewal is significantly below the Company’s normal pricing practices. In determining whether PCS pricing is significantly below the Company’s normal pricing practice, the Company considers the population of stated renewal rates that are within a reasonably narrow range of the median within the identified market segment over the trailing 12 month period. The change in estimation methodology does not have a material effect on our financial statements.

 

Certain of the Company’s software license arrangements include PCS terms that fail to achieve VSOE of fair value due to non-substantive renewal periods or non-substantive PCS renewal amounts. For these arrangements, VSOE of fair value of PCS does not exist and revenues for the software license, PCS and services, if applicable, are considered to be one accounting unit and are therefore recognized ratably over the longer of the contractual service term or PCS term once the delivery of both services has commenced. The Company typically classifies revenues associated with these arrangements in accordance with the contractually specified amounts, which approximate fair value assigned to the various elements, including software license fees, maintenance fees and services, if applicable.

This allocation methodology has been applied to the following amounts included in revenues in the condensed consolidated statements of operations from arrangements for which VSOE of fair value does not exist for each undelivered element:

 

(in thousands)

   Three Months Ended
June 30,
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
   2014      2013      2014      2013  

Software license fees

   $ 5,784       $ 5,559       $ 12,640       $ 11,360   

Maintenance fees

     2,197         2,447         4,413         4,768   

Services

     5         —           13         3   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 7,986       $ 8,006       $ 17,066       $ 16,131   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
Newly Issued Accounting Standards

Newly Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Updated (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standard Codification 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. The standard requires that entities recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which a company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flow.

Earnings per share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed on the basis of weighted average outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed on the basis of basic weighted average outstanding common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options and other outstanding dilutive securities.

Segment Information

The Company’s chief operating decision maker, together with other senior management personnel, currently focus their review of consolidated financial information and the allocation of resources based on reporting of operating results, including revenues and operating income (loss), for the geographic regions of the Americas, EMEA and Asia/Pacific and the Corporate line item. The Company’s products are sold and supported through distribution networks covering these three geographic regions, with each distribution network having its own sales force. The Company supplements its distribution networks with independent reseller and/or distributor arrangements. All administrative costs that are not directly attributable or reasonably allocable to a geographic segment are tracked in the Corporate line item. As such, the Company has concluded that its three geographic regions are its reportable segments.

 

The Company allocates segment support expenses such as global product development, business operations, and product management based upon percentage of revenue per segment. Depreciation and amortization costs are allocated as a percentage of the headcount by segment. The Corporate line item consists of the corporate overhead costs that are not allocated to reportable segments. Corporate overhead costs relate to human resources, finance, legal, accounting, merger and acquisition activity and amortization of acquisition-related intangibles and other costs that are not considered when management evaluates segment performance.