10q doc
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1999
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________to _________
Commission file number: 0-25688
SDL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
77-0331449
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
80 Rose Orchard Way, San Jose, CA 95134-1365
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(408) 943-9411
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[X] Yes
[ ] No
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of October 29,
1999 was 35,366,634.
SDL, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited):
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - September 30, 1999 and
December 31, 1998
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - three and nine
months ended September 30, 1999 and 1998
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - nine months ended
September 30, 1999 and 1998
Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risks
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1: Legal Proceedings
Item 2: Changes in Securities
Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5: Other Information
Item 6: Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SDL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
September 30, December 31,
1999 1998
------------ ------------
(unaudited) (1)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ....................... $206,056 $17,023
Short-term marketable securities ................ 86,293 17,635
Accounts receivable, net ........................ 42,685 23,042
Inventories ..................................... 30,008 21,288
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ....... 3,946 3,875
------------ ------------
Total current assets .............................. 368,988 82,863
Property and equipment, net ....................... 53,431 39,848
Long-term marketable securities ................... -- 3,552
Restricted cash ................................... 703 722
Note due from related party ....................... 488 512
Other assets ...................................... 7,178 4,563
------------ ------------
Total assets ...................................... $430,788 $132,060
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable ................................ $12,165 $10,014
Accrued payroll and related expenses ............ 6,415 2,354
Income taxes payable ............................ 4,157 1,890
Unearned revenue ................................ 125 643
Current portion of capital leases ............... 1,082 1,098
Other accrued liabilities ....................... 6,319 3,159
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities ......................... 30,263 19,158
Long-term liabilities:
Capital leases .................................. 460 1,416
Notes payable ................................... -- 612
Other long-term liabilities ..................... 4,250 2,668
------------ ------------
Total long-term liabilities ....................... 4,710 4,696
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock.................................. -- --
Common stock..................................... 35 15
Additional paid-in capital ...................... 414,924 138,895
Accumulated other comprehensive income........... 360 887
Accumulated deficit, $26.3 million relating
to the repurchase of common stock in 1992
and $5.8 million relating to a
recapitalization in 1992 ...................... (19,469) (31,551)
------------ ------------
395,850 108,246
Less common stockholders' notes receivable ...... (35) (40)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity ........................ 395,815 108,206
------------ ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity ........ $430,788 $132,060
============ ============
(1) The balance sheet at December 31, 1998 has been derived from the audited
financial statements at that date.
See accompanying notes.
SDL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data - unaudited)
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
-------------------- --------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Total revenue:
Product revenue..................... $46,383 $24,498 $124,910 $73,618
Research revenue.................... 1,124 2,460 3,434 8,639
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
47,507 26,958 128,344 82,257
Cost of revenue:
Cost of product revenue............. 25,778 15,750 71,808 49,175
Cost of research revenue............ 878 1,748 2,854 6,584
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
26,656 17,498 74,662 55,759
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Gross margin.......................... 20,851 9,460 53,682 26,498
Operating expenses:
Research and development............ 5,237 3,200 13,310 9,342
Selling, general and administrative. 6,527 4,036 18,650 12,019
Merger costs........................ -- -- 2,677 --
In-process research and development. -- -- 1,495 --
Amortization of purchased
intangibles........................ 210 193 599 582
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Total operating expenses.............. 11,974 7,429 36,731 21,943
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Operating income ..................... 8,877 2,031 16,951 4,555
Interest income, net.................. 589 330 1,172 927
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Income before income taxes............ 9,466 2,361 18,123 5,482
Provision for income taxes............ 2,082 251 4,905 723
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Net income............................ $7,384 $2,110 $13,218 $4,759
========= ========== ========== =========
Net income per share - basic.......... $0.23 $0.07 $0.43 $0.17
========= ========== ========== =========
Net income per share - diluted........ $0.22 $0.07 $0.40 $0.16
========= ========== ========== =========
Number of weighted average
shares - basic...................... 32,093 28,672 31,043 28,519
========= ========== ========== =========
Number of weighted average
shares - diluted.................... 34,146 30,240 33,085 30,179
========= ========== ========== =========
See accompanying notes.
SDL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands - unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
--------------------
1999 1998
--------- ---------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income............................................ $13,218 $4,759
--------- ---------
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization..................... 8,388 6,470
In-process research and development............... 1,495 --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable............................ (19,524) 37
Inventories.................................... (7,580) (3,057)
Accounts payable............................... 2,020 (1,048)
Accrued payroll and related expenses........... 4,061 374
Income taxes payable........................... 2,267 (106)
Unearned revenue............................... (518) 221
Other accrued liabilities...................... 3,603 (1,524)
Long-term liabilities.......................... 1,581 1,338
Other.......................................... (911) 1,234
--------- ---------
Total adjustments..................................... (5,118) 3,939
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities.............. 8,100 8,698
--------- ---------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of property and equipment, net............ (21,356) (10,957)
Acquisition of the fiber laser business of Polaroid... (5,055) --
Sale (purchase) of marketable securities, net......... (65,797) 7,729
--------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities.................. (92,208) (3,228)
--------- ---------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of stock pursuant to employee stock plans.... 9,743 1,609
Proceeds from issuance of common stock................ 266,301 --
Payments on capital leases............................ (850) (986)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash................ 3 (49)
Payments on stockholders' note receivable............ 5 --
Payments on notes payable............................. (898) (448)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities.............. 274,304 126
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents.............. 190,196 5,596
Net cash activity of IOC for the three
months ended December 31, 1998....................... (1,163) --
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period....... 17,023 6,170
--------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period............. $206,056 $11,766
========= =========
See accompanying notes.
SDL, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
September 30, 1999
1. Basis of Presentation and Business Activities
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 1999 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 1999. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements
and footnotes thereto included in the Registrant Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1998 and Form
8-K filed with the SEC on June 29, 1999.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SDL,
Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, SDL Optics and SDL
Integrated Optics. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
The functional currency of the Company's Canadian subsidiary is the
U.S. dollar. These financial statements are remeasured into U.S.
dollars for consolidation. The functional currency of the Company's
United Kingdom subsidiary is the British Pound Sterling. As such,
all assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate on
the balance sheet date. Revenues and costs and expenses are
translated at weighted average rates of exchange prevailing during
the period. Translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders'
equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included
in interest income, net and were immaterial for all periods
presented.
The Company operates and reports financial results on a fiscal year
of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Friday closest to December 31. The
third fiscal quarter of 1999 and 1998 ended on October 1, 1999 and
October 2, 1998, respectively. For ease of discussion and
presentation, all accompanying financial statements have been shown
as ending on the last day of the calendar month.
In May 1999, the Company authorized a two-for-one split of its
common stock, effected in the form of a stock dividend, which was
paid on June 2, 1999 to stockholders of record on May 14, 1999. All
of the share and per share data in these financial statements has
been adjusted to reflect the stock split.
In May 1999, the Company's stockholders approved an increase in the
Company's authorized shares of its common stock to 70 million
shares.
The Company merged with IOC International plc. ("IOC") in May 1999
in a pooling of interests transaction. The condensed consolidated
financial statements for the three and nine months ended September
30, 1998 have been restated to include the financial position,
results of operations and cash flows of IOC. There were no
transactions between IOC and the Company prior to the combination
and no significant adjustments were necessary to conform IOC's
accounting policies. Because of differing year ends, financial
information relating to SDL's three and nine months ended September
30, 1998 has been combined with financial information relating to
IOC's three and nine months ended June 30, 1998. IOC's net loss for
the three months ended December 31, 1998 was not combined with SDL's
net income, but rather was included as an adjustment to
stockholders' equity in the Company's financial results for the
three months ended March 31, 1999. IOC's results of operations for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 1999 has been
combined with SDL's results of operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 1999.
In September 1999, the Company issued 3,392,500 shares of common
stock, including the underwriters' exercise of their over-allotment
option for 442,500 shares, priced at $82.00 per share. Net proceeds
to the Company were approximately $266.3 million.
In June 1998, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"). This statement establishes
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and
for hedging activities. It requires that derivatives be recognized
in the balance sheet at fair value and specifies the accounting for
changes in fair value. In June 1999, the FASB issued SFAS 137,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities -
Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133" to defer
the effective date of SFAS 133 until fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2000. The Company generally does not use derivative
financial instruments and the impact of SFAS 133 is not anticipated
to be material when adopted.
2. Net Income Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
net income per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
------------------- -------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Numerator:
Net income........................ $7,384 $2,110 $13,218 $4,759
========= ========= ========= =========
Denominator:
Denominator for basic net income
per share - weighted average
shares.......................... 32,093 28,672 31,043 28,519
Incremental common shares
attributable to shares
issuable under employee stock
plans........................... 2,053 1,568 2,042 1,660
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Denominator for diluted net
income per share adjusted
weighted average shares and
assumed conversions............. 34,146 30,240 33,085 30,179
========= ========= ========= =========
Net income per share - basic...... $0.23 $0.07 $0.43 $0.17
========= ========= ========= =========
Net income per share - diluted.... $0.22 $0.07 $0.40 $0.16
========= ========= ========= =========
3. Inventories
The components of inventories consist of the following (in
thousands):
September 30, December 31,
1999 1998
------------ ------------
Raw materials ............. $11,251 $7,849
Work-in-process............ 15,293 13,439
Finished Goods............. 3,464 --
------------ ------------
$30,008 $21,288
============ ============
4. Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income presented in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet consists of the accumulated net unrealized
gains and losses on available-for-sale marketable securities and
foreign currency translation adjustments, net of the related tax
effects. The tax effects for other comprehensive income were
immaterial for all periods presented.
Total comprehensive income amounted to approximately $7.7 million for
the third quarter 1999 compared to a comprehensive income of $2.5
million for the third quarter of 1998. For nine months ended
September 30, 1999, comprehensive income amounted to $13.0 million
compared to $5.5 million for the corresponding 1998 period.
5. Segment Reporting
SDL has three reportable segments: communications, research, and
printing and materials processing. The communications business unit
develops, designs, manufactures and distributes lasers, modulators,
drivers, modules and subsystems for applications in the telecom,
cable television, satellite and dense wavelength division
multiplexing markets. The research business unit conducts research,
development or product customization, involving both communications
and printing and material processing applications, for Fortune 500
companies, major international customers, smaller domestic and
international companies, and multiple Federal government agencies.
Research revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income includes
research, development, and product customization conducted by all the
segments of the Company. The printing and materials processing
business unit develops, designs, manufacturers and distributes lasers
and subsystems for applications in the surface heat treating, product
labeling, digital imaging, digital proofing, and thermal printing
solutions markets.
The operating segments reported below are the segments of the Company
for which separate financial information is available and for which
operating income/loss amounts are evaluated regularly by executive
management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. The accounting policies of the operating segments are
the same as those described in the summary of accounting policies.
The Company's reportable segments are business units that offer
different products. The reportable segments are each managed
separately because they manufacture and distribute distinct products
with different applications. The Company does not allocate assets to
its individual operating segments.
Information about reported segment income or loss is as follows (in
thousands):
Printing
Communica- and
tion Material
Products Research Processing Total
---------- --------- ----------- ----------
Quarter ended Septebmer 30, 1999:
Revenue from external customers... $32,109 $972 $14,426 $47,507
Amortization...................... 78 -- 132 210
Segment Operating Income (loss)... $9,911 ($533) ($501) $8,877
Printing
Communica- and
tion Material
Products Research Processing Total
---------- --------- ----------- ----------
Quarter ended September 30, 1998:
Revenue from external customers... $13,718 $2,048 $11,192 $26,958
Amortization...................... 155 -- 38 193
Segment Operating Income ......... $616 $92 $1,323 $2,031
Printing
Communica- and
tion Material
Products Research Processing Total
---------- --------- ----------- ----------
Nine months ended September 30, 1999:
Revenue from external customers... $90,751 $3,605 $33,988 $128,344
Amortization...................... 234 -- 365 599
Segment Operating Income (loss)... $24,330 ($735) ($1,772) $21,823
Printing
Communica- and
tion Material
Products Research Processing Total
---------- --------- ----------- ----------
Nine months ended September 30, 1998:
Revenue from external customers... $41,069 $6,166 $35,022 $82,257
Amortization...................... 465 -- 117 582
Segment Operating Income (loss)... ($11) $563 $4,003 $4,555
A reconciliation of the totals reported for the operating segments to
the applicable line items in the consolidated financial statements is
as follows (in thousands):
For the nine months
ended September 30,
----------------------
1999 1998
----------- ----------
Operating Income
Total operating income from operating
segments............................... $21,823 $4,555
Merger costs.............................. (2,677) --
In-process R&D and related costs.......... (2,195) --
----------- ----------
Total consolidated operating income ........ $16,951 $4,555
=========== ==========
6. Mergers & Acquisitions
IOC International plc.
On May 18, 1999, the Company merged with IOC, a United Kingdom-based
manufacturer of lithium niobate components for long haul fiber optic
transmission systems in a pooling of interests transaction. The
Company exchanged 1,130,098 shares of SDL common stock and reserved
116,974 shares for IOC options assumed by the Company. Merger
related expenses of $2.7 million were recorded in the second quarter
of fiscal 1999. Combined and separate unaudited results of SDL and
IOC for the periods prior to the acquisition were as follows (in
thousands):
Nine Months Ended September
1999 1998
---------- ----------
Total revenues:
Prior to April 1, 1999:..
SDL................... $35,730 $76,738
IOC................... 1,936 5,519
Combined results after March 31, 1999.. 90,678 --
---------- ----------
$128,344 $82,257
Net income (loss):
Prior to April 1, 1999:..
SDL................... $3,010 $8,704
IOC................... (387) (3,945)
Combined results after March 31, 1999.. 10,595 --
---------- ----------
$13,218 $4,759
Polaroid's fiber laser business
In February 1999, the Company acquired the fiber laser business of
Polaroid for $5.3 million in cash, which includes related transaction
costs of $0.1 million. The business acquired included all the
physical assets, intellectual property, including the assignment of
38 patents and the licensing of 22 patents in the fiber laser and
fiber amplifier area, and the ongoing operation of the fiber
manufacturing facilities and fiber laser subsystem. The acquisition
was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The
Company recorded $1.5 million as in-process research and development
for development projects that had not yet reached technological
feasibility. Intangible assets are being amortized straight-line
over a seven year life. In addition, the Company recorded $0.7
million to accrue for certain pre-existing obligations to integrate
the fiber laser business. The results of the fiber laser business
are not material to the Company's historical consolidated results of
operations.
The purchase price allocation for the fiber laser business
acquisition was recorded as follows (in thousands):
Inventory ................. $979
Property and equipment..... 229
Intangibles................ 2,596
In-process R&D............. 1,495
------------
Net assets acquired........ $5,299
============
Liabilities................ $244
Cash paid, including
transaction costs.......... 5,055
------------
Total purchase price....... $5,299
============
7. Contingencies
In 1985, Rockwell International Corporation (Rockwell) asserted, and
in 1995 filed suit in the Northern California Federal District Court
against the Company alleging that a Company fabrication process
infringed certain patent rights set forth in a patent owned by
Rockwell. Rockwell sought to permanently enjoin the Company from
infringing Rockwell's alleged patent rights and sought unspecified
actual and treble damages plus costs. The Company answered Rockwell's
complaint asserting, among other defenses, that Rockwell's patent is
invalid. Rockwell's suit was stayed in 1995 pending resolution of
another suit, involving the same patent, brought by Rockwell against
the Federal government, and in which SDL had intervened. The suit
between the Federal government and Rockwell was resolved in January
1999, by way of a settlement payment of $16.9 million from the Federal
government to Rockwell. The Company did not participate in the
settlement. As a result of that settlement, the suit was dismissed
and the stay of Rockwell's suit against the Company was lifted and the
California suit was reactivated. Limited discovery has been conducted
by the parties in preparation of the case for trial. Rockwell has
also filed motions for summary judgement relative to certain patent
claims of Rockwell's patent alleging that the Company has infringed
and that certain evidence presented by the Company is not applicable,
which motions the Company will vigorously oppose in court. The
resolution of this litigation is fact intensive so that the outcome
cannot be determined and remains uncertain. If Rockwell prevailed in
the litigation, it could be awarded monetary damages against the
Company. While we believe that we have meritorious defenses to
Rockwell's allegations, there can be no assurance that Rockwell will
not ultimately prevail in this dispute. If Rockwell were to prevail,
Rockwell could be awarded substantial monetary damages and/or an
injunction against us for the sale of infringing products. If this
injunction were entered, we may seek to obtain a license to use
Rockwell's patent until the January 2000 expiration date of the
patent. We cannot assure you, however, that a license would be
available on reasonable terms or at all. The award of monetary damages
against us, including past damages, or the failure to obtain a license
to use Rockwell's patent on commercially reasonable terms could have a
material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Litigation and trial of Rockwell's claim against us is expected to
involve significant expense to us and could divert the attention of
our technical and management personnel and could have a material
adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Shortly after the aforementioned suit between Rockwell and the Federal
government was filed in 1993, the Federal government had notified the
Company that if the Federal government were liable to Rockwell, then
the Federal government might seek indemnification for a portion of its
liability from the Company. Since the Federal government's settlement
with Rockwell in January 1999, it has never stated the amount of the
Company's alleged indemnity obligation, nor has it repeated its
assertion that the Company might have some indemnity obligation to the
Federal government.
SDL is engaged in various cost-reimbursement type contracts with the
Federal government. These contracts utilize allowable costs plus
contract fee to determine revenue. Federally-funded contracts are
subject to audit of pricing and actual costs incurred, which have
resulted and could result in the future, in price adjustments. The
government has in the past and could in the future, challenge the
Company's accounting methodology for computing indirect rates and
allocating indirect costs to government contracts. The government is
currently challenging certain indirect cost allocations. While
management believes that amounts recorded on its financial statements
are adequate to cover all related risks, the government has not
concluded its investigation or agreed to a settlement with the
Company. Although the outcome of this matter cannot be determined at
this time, management does not believe that its outcome will have a
material adverse affect on the Company's financial position, results
of operations or cash flows. Nevertheless, based on future
developments, the Company's estimate of the outcome of these matters
could change in the near term.
In addition, the Company is involved in other legal controversies
arising in the ordinary course of business.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
SDL designs, manufactures and markets semiconductor lasers, fiber optic
related products and optoelectronic systems. Since 1996, the Company
strategy has strongly focused on providing solutions for optical
communications. The Company's optical communications products power the
transmission of data, voice and Internet information over fiber optic
networks to meet the needs of telecommunications, dense wavelength
division multiplexing, cable television and satellite communications
applications. During the first nine months of 1999, the Company derived
72% of its revenue from optical communication markets. With the
increased focus on commercial communications products, the proportion of
SDL's revenue derived from U. S. government related projects has declined
from 40% in fiscal 1996 to 11% during the first nine months of 1999.
SDL's optical products also serve a wide variety of non-communications
applications, including materials processing, printing, medical and
scientific instrumentation. From the original products introduced in
1984, the Company has expanded its product offering to over 150 standard
products in addition to providing custom design and packaging for OEM
customers. The Company's revenue also includes revenue from customer-
funded research programs.
Because of the diversity of products, customers and applications, gross
margins tend to fluctuate based in part on the mix of revenue in each
reported period. SDL's revenue growth in 1997-1998 was constrained in
part by a shortage in qualified manufacturing capacity, especially in the
wafer fabrication area. The Company's new wafer fabrication facility
received qualification in June 1998, for certain key product lines,
allowing a faster ramp-up in production.
The Company operates and reports financial results on a fiscal year of 52
or 53 weeks ending on the Friday closest to December 31. The third
fiscal quarter of 1999 and 1998 ended on October 1, 1999 and October 2,
1998, respectively. For ease of discussion and presentation, all
accompanying financial statements have been shown as ending on the last
day of the calendar month.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenue. Total revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 1999
increased 76% to $47.5 million compared to $27.0 million in the
corresponding 1998 quarter. For the first nine months of 1999, total
revenue increased 56% to $128.3 million from $82.3 million reported for
the comparable period. Product revenue was $46.4 million and $124.9
million for the third quarter and first nine months of 1999,
respectively, which represents increases of 89% and 70% when compared
with the corresponding periods in 1998. The increase in product revenue
for the third quarter and first nine months of 1999 was primarily due to
increased sales of $20.3 million and $52.2 million, respectively, of the
Company's fiber optic communication products. Research revenue declined
both in dollars and as a percentage of total revenue compared to the
third quarter and first nine months of 1998. This downward trend in
research revenue is a result of the Company's continued longer-term
strategy focus on commercial communication product opportunities.
Revenue derived directly or indirectly from U.S. government sources
declined to 5% and 11% of total revenue for the third quarter and first
nine months of 1999, respectively, compared to 25% and 28% for the
corresponding periods in 1998.
Results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 1999 are not
considered indicative of the results to be expected for any future period
or for the entire year. In addition, there can be no assurance that the
market for the Company's products will grow in future periods at its
historical percentage rate or that certain market segments will not
decline. Further, there can be no assurance that the Company will be
able to increase or maintain its market share in the future or to achieve
historical growth rates.
Gross Margin. Gross margins increased to 44% and 42% for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 1999 from 35% and 32% in the comparable
1998 periods. Three factors contributed to the increase in gross
margins. These were: (i) a more favorable mix of higher margin fiber
optic communication product sales, especially increased shipments of pump
lasers for undersea fiber cable, as compared to revenue derived from
lower margin U.S. government contracts and non-communication product
sales; (ii) increased unit volume resulting in better utilization of
fixed costs; and, (iii) reduction of costs related to 980nm pump lasers.
These favorable factors were partially offset by warranty provisions and
declining average selling prices on certain products due to long-term
contract arrangements.
The Company's gross margin can be affected by a number of factors,
including product mix, customer mix, applications mix, pricing pressures
and product yield. Generally, the cost of newer products has tended to
be higher as a percentage of product revenue than that of more mature,
higher volume products. In addition, the cost of research revenue is
significantly higher as a percentage of revenue, as research revenue is
typically based on costs incurred rather than market pricing.
Considering these factors, gross margin fluctuations are difficult to
predict and there can be no assurance that the Company will achieve or
maintain gross margins at historical levels in future periods.
Research and Development. Research and development expense was $5.2
million, or 11% of revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 as
compared to $3.2 million, or 12% of revenue for the quarter ended
September 30, 1998. For the first nine months of 1999, research and
development expense was $13.3 million, or 10% of revenue as compared to
$9.3 million, or 11% of revenue for the corresponding 1998 period. The
increase in research and development spending is primarily due to
increased expenditures associated with the continued development and
enhancement of the Company's fiber optic communication products.
The Company is committed to continuing its significant research and
development expenditures and expects that the absolute dollar amount of
research and development expenses will increase as it invests in
developing new products and processes, expanding and enhancing its
existing product lines, and reducing its costs, although research and
development expenses may vary as a percentage of revenue.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expense was $6.5 million, or 14% of revenue for the quarter ended
September 30, 1999 as compared to $4.0 million, or 15% of revenue for the
quarter ended September 30, 1998. The increase in SG&A spending was
primarily due to the following: (i) higher personnel-related costs to
support the growth in revenues and operations; (ii) increased
professional service expenses; and, (iii) expansion of the information
systems infrastructure to manage the Company's growth. For the first
nine months of 1999, SG&A expense was $18.7 million as compared to $12.0
million for the corresponding 1998 period. SG&A expense, as a percentage
of revenue, was 15% for both periods. SG&A spending increased during
the first nine months of 1999 primarily due to continued expansion of the
Company's business and personnel and the implementation of the Company's
new enterprise resource planning software. There can be no assurances
that current SG&A levels as a percentage of total revenue are indicative
of future SG&A as a percentage of total revenue.
In-process research and development. The Company's acquisition of the
fiber laser business from Polaroid during the first quarter 1999 resulted
in the write-off of purchased in-process research and development of $1.5
million. In the future, additional in-process research and development
write-offs can be anticipated to the extent the Company may from time to
time acquire companies or new product lines.
Merger Costs. In the quarter ended June 30, 1999, the Company recorded
merger related costs of $2.7 million in connection with the acquisition
of IOC in a transaction accounted for as a pooling of interest. The
costs incurred related primarily to printing, filing fees and
professional fees for legal and accounting services.
Interest Income, net. Net interest income for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 1999 was $0.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively,
compared to $0.3 million and $0.9 million for the corresponding 1998
periods. The increase in interest income was primarily due to the
interest earned on interest bearing securities purchased with proceeds
from the Company's September 1999 stock offering.
Provision for Income Taxes. The Company recorded a provision for income
taxes of $4.9 million and $0.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Excluding the impact of the
in-process research and development charge and IOC merger costs in 1999,
the effective tax rate for the first nine months of 1999 was 22%,
compared to 13% for the first nine months of 1998. In 1998, the Company
benefited from previously unrecognized tax loss carryforwards, generated
from a 1997 legal settlement, which reduced the federal and state
provisions to minimum tax levels offset partially by unbenefited foreign
tax losses generated. The increase in the 1999 tax rate is primarily
attributable to the Company's utilization of the remainder of federal and
state tax loss carryforwards.
Although realization is not assured, the Company believes that it will
generate future taxable income sufficient to realize the benefit of the
$4.0 million of net deferred tax assets recorded. The amount of the net
deferred tax assets considered realizable could be reduced or increased
in the near term if estimates of future taxable income are changed.
Management intends to evaluate the realizability of the net deferred tax
assets on a quarterly basis to assess the need for the valuation
allowance.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of September 30, 1999, the Company's combined balance of cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities was $292.3 million. Cash provided
by operating activities is primarily the result of net income, non-cash
expenses for depreciation and amortization, and increases in accrued
payroll and accrued liabilities offset by increases in accounts
receivable and inventory.
Cash used in investing activities was $92.2 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 1999. The Company incurred capital expenditures of
$21.4 million for facilities expansion and capital equipment purchases to
expand its manufacturing capacities for its fiber optic communication
products. The Company currently expects to spend approximately $9 million
for capital equipment purchases and leasehold improvements during the
remainder of 1999. During the first nine months of 1999, the Company
invested excess net cash of $65.8 million in short term investments. In
addition, the Company acquired Polaroid's fiber laser business during the
first quarter of 1999 which resulted in cash payments of $5.1 million.
The Company generated $274.3 million from financing activities during the
first nine months of 1999 primarily from the issuance of stock under
employee stock plans and a public offering of the Company's common stock,
offset by capital lease and notes payable payments.
The Company believes that current cash balances, cash generated from
operations, and cash available through the bank and equity markets will
be sufficient to fund capital equipment purchases, acquisitions of
complementary businesses, and working capital requirements for the
foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurances that events in
the future will not require the Company to seek additional capital sooner
or, if so required, that adequate capital will be available on terms
acceptable to the Company.
IMPACT OF YEAR 2000
Like many other companies, the year 2000 computer issue creates risks for
SDL. Some of the Company's older computer programs were written using
two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. As a result,
those computer programs have time-sensitive software that recognize a
date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. If internal
systems do not correctly recognize and process date information beyond
the year 1999, there could be a material adverse impact on the Company's
business and results of operations.
To address these year 2000 issues within its internal systems, the
Company has established a task team and initiated a comprehensive program
designed to deal with the most critical systems first. Assessment and
remediation are proceeding in tandem, and the Company has most changes to
critical systems completed. These activities are intended to encompass
all systems software applications in use by the Company, including front
and back-end manufacturing, facilities, sales, finance and human
resources.
As newer, more functional software solutions were currently available and
were Year 2000 compliant, the Company has concluded that the conversion
to enterprise resource planning software programs supporting the
Company's manufacturing, finance, distribution / logistics and human
resource operations was more cost effective. The conversion project was
completed during the quarter ended June 30, 1999.
Assessment and remediation of year 2000 issues in tertiary business
information systems is on-going. The Company has determined that over
90% of the Company's desktop PC hardware systems are known to be year
2000 compliant. Additionally, the Company has concluded that the
purchase of newer, more functional software for its network server
applications is more cost effective than upgrading its existing software
to a year 2000 compliant version. Completing the remediation of the
Company's tertiary business information systems is not expected to be a
significant burden on the Company.
To date, based on its evaluations of its current manufacturing process,
SDL believes it has no material exposure to contingencies directly
related directly to the Year 2000 issue for the products it has sold or
will sell in the future.
SDL is also actively working with critical suppliers of products and
services to determine that the suppliers' operations and the products and
services they provide are year 2000 compatible or to monitor their
progress toward year 2000 compatibility. In addition, the Company has
commenced work on various types of contingency planning to address
potential problem areas with internal systems. It is expected that
assessment, remediation and contingency planning activities will be on-
going throughout the fourth quarter of 1999 with the goal of resolving
all material internal systems and third party issues.
The costs incurred to date related to these programs are approximately
$3.9 million. The Company currently expects that the total cost of these
programs, including both incremental spending and redeployed resources,
will total approximately $4.2 million, which includes $2.6 million for
the purchase of new software and hardware that will be capitalized and
$1.6 million that will be expensed as incurred. The Company expects
that operating activities will fund these year 2000 remediation costs.
In some instances, the installation schedule of new software and hardware
in the normal course of business is being accelerated to also afford a
solution to year 2000 capability issues. The costs of these projects and
dates on which the Company believes it will complete the year 2000
modifications are based on management's best estimates, which were
derived utilizing numerous assumptions of future events, including the
continued availability of certain resources and other factors.
Based on currently available information, management does not believe
that the year 2000 matters discussed above related to internal systems or
products sold to customers will have a material adverse impact on the
Company's financial condition or overall trends in results of operations;
however, it is uncertain to what extent the Company may be affected by
such matters. Any failure to timely, successfully and cost-effectively
assess, identify, remediate and resolve the Company's year 2000 issues,
including those regarding its own as well as suppliers' and third
parties' internal systems, products, services and contingency plans, may
have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of
operations and could expose us to year 2000 related litigation and
claims. The Company is continuing its efforts to ensure year 2000
readiness, and there is risk that there may be new year 2000 issues not
identified above and significant delays in or increased costs associated
with such efforts which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business and results of operations.
RISK FACTORS
The statements contained in this Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely
historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding the Company's
expectations, plans, intentions, beliefs or strategies regarding the
future. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding research
and development expenditures, the ability to realize the benefit of net
deferred tax assets, capital equipment purchases and leasehold
improvement expenditures, the Company's year 2000 plans, the impact and
expenses of year 2000 issues, completion of assessment and remediation of
year 2000 issues, future liability related to year 2000 issues, the
Company's year 2000 readiness, and the Company's liquidity and
anticipated cash needs and availability under the heading "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A)." All forward-looking statements included in this document are
based on information available to the Company on the date hereof, and SDL
assumes no obligation to update any such forward looking statement. It
is important to note that the Company's actual results could differ
materially from those in such forward-looking statements. Among the
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the
risks discussed above in the MD&A, particularly the risks related to the
year 2000 problem, and the factors detailed below. You should also
consult the risk factors listed in the Company's Registration Statement
on Form S-4 filed with the SEC on April 2, 1999, as amended, and from
time to time in the Company's Reports on Forms 10-Q, 8-K, 10-K, 10-K/A
and Annual Reports to Stockholders.
Manufacturing Risks
The manufacture of semiconductor lasers and related products and systems
that we sell is highly complex and precise, requiring production in a
highly controlled and clean environment. Changes in the manufacturing
processes or the inadvertent use of defective or contaminated materials
by us or our suppliers have in the past and could in the future
significantly impair our ability to achieve acceptable manufacturing
yields and product reliability. If we do not achieve acceptable yields or
product reliability, our operating results and customer relationships
will be adversely affected. We rely almost exclusively on our own
production capability in:
o computer-aided chip and package design,
o wafer fabrication,
o wafer processing,
o device packaging,
o hybrid microelectronic packaging,
o printed circuit board testing, and
o final assembly and testing of products.
Because we manufacture, package and test these components, products and
systems at our own facility, and because these components, products and
systems are not readily available from other sources, our business and
results of operations will be significantly impaired if our manufacturing
is interrupted by any of the following:
o shortages of parts or equipment,
o equipment failures,
o poor yields,
o fire or natural disaster,
o labor or equipment shortages, or
o otherwise.
A significant portion of our production relies or occurs on equipment for
which we do not have a backup. To alleviate, at least in part, this
situation, we remodeled our front-end wafer fabrication facility and our
packaging and test facility. We cannot assure you that we will not
experience further start-up costs and yield problems in fully utilizing
our increased wafer capacity targeted by these remodeling efforts. In
addition, we are deploying a new manufacturing execution software system
designed to further automate and streamline our manufacturing processes,
and there may be unforeseen deficiencies in this system which could
adversely affect our manufacturing processes. In the event of any
disruption in production by one of these machines or systems, our
business and results of operations could be materially adversely
affected. Furthermore, we have a limited number of employees dedicated to
the operation and maintenance of our equipment, loss of whom could affect
our ability to effectively operate and service our equipment. We
experienced lower than expected production yields on some of our
products, including certain key product lines over the past 3 years. This
reduction in yields:
o adversely affected gross margins,
o delayed component, product and system shipments, and
o to a certain extent, delayed new orders booked.
Although more recently, our yields have improved, we cannot assure you
that yields will continue to improve or not decline in the future, nor
that in the future our manufacturing yields will be acceptable to ship
products on time. To the extent that we experience lower than expected
manufacturing yields or experience any shipment delays, gross margins
will likely be significantly reduced and we could lose customers and
experience reduced or delayed customer orders and cancellation of
existing backlog. We presently are ramping production of some of our
product lines by:
o changing our shift schedules and equipment coverage,
o hiring and training new personnel,
o acquiring new equipment, and
o expanding our packaging facilities and capabilities.
Difficulties in starting production to meet expected demand and schedules
have occurred in the past and may occur in the future including the
following:
o quality problems could arise, yields could fall, and gross margins
could be reduced during such a ramp.
o aggressive volume pricing for large long-term orders has been provided
to certain customers.
o cost reductions in manufacturing are required to avoid a drop in gross
margins for certain products sold to customers receiving volume
pricing.
These cost reductions may not occur rapidly enough to avoid a decrease in
gross margins on products sold under volume pricing terms. In that event,
our business and results of operations would be materially adversely
affected.
Competition
Our various markets are highly competitive. We face current or potential
competition from four primary sources:
o direct competitors,
o potential entrants,
o suppliers of potential new technologies, and
o suppliers of existing alternative technologies.
We offer a range of components, products and systems and have numerous
competitors worldwide in various segments of our markets. As the markets
for our products grow, new competitors have recently emerged and are
likely to continue to do so in the future. We also sell products and
services to companies with which we presently compete or in the future
may compete and certain of our customers have been or could be acquired
by, or enter into strategic relations with our competitors. In most of
our product lines, our competitors and we are working to develop new
technologies, or improvements and modifications to existing technologies,
which will obsolete present products. Many of our competitors have
significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing,
sales and other resources than we do.
In addition, many of these competitors may be able to respond more
quickly to new or emerging technologies, evolving industry trends and
changes in customer requirements and to devote greater resources to the
development, promotion and sale of their products than we. We cannot
assure you that:
o our current or potential competitors have not already or will not in
the future develop or acquire products or technologies comparable or
superior to those that we developed,
o combine or merge with each other or our customers to form significant
competitors,
o expand production capacity to more quickly meet customer supply
requirements, or
o adapt more quickly than we do to new technologies, evolving industry
trends and changing customer requirements.
Increased competition has resulted and could, in the future, result in
price reductions, reduced margins or loss of market share, any of which
could materially and adversely affect our business and results of
operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete
successfully against current and future competitors or that competitive
pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business
and results of operations. We expect that both direct and indirect
competition will increase in the future. Additional competition could
have an adverse material effect on our results of operations through
price reductions and loss of market share.
Dependence on Emerging Applications and New Products
Our current products serve many applications in the communications and
materials processing and printing markets. In many cases, our products
are substantially completed, but the customer's product incorporating our
products is not yet completed or the applications or markets for the
customer's product are new or emerging. In addition, some of our
customers are currently in the process of developing new products that
are in various stages of development, testing and qualification, and
sometimes are in emerging applications or new markets.
We believe that rapid customer acceptance and qualification of our new
products is key to our financial results. In the communications market
qualification is an especially costly, time consuming and difficult
process. A substantial portion of our products address markets that are
not now, and may never become, substantial commercial markets. We have
experienced, and are expected to continue to experience, delays in
qualification, fluctuation in customer orders and competitive,
technological and pricing constraints that may preclude development of
markets for our products and our customers' products.
We and our customers are often required to test and qualify laser pump
modules, modulators, amplifiers, transmitters, and marking systems among
other new products for potential volume applications. In the
communications market qualification is an especially costly, time
consuming and difficult process. We cannot assure you that:
o we or our customers will continue their existing product development
efforts, or if continued that such efforts will be successful,
o markets will develop for any of our technology or that pricing will
enable such markets to develop,
o other technology or products will not supersede our products or our
customer's products, or
o we or our customers will be able to qualify products for certain
customers or markets.
We may also be unable to develop or qualify new products on a timely
schedule. Moreover, even if we are successful in the timely development
of new products that are accepted in the market, we often experience
lower margins on these products. The lower margins are due to lower
yields and other factors, and thus we may be unable to manufacture and
sell new products at an acceptable cost so as to achieve acceptable gross
margins.
Need To Manage Growth
We have on occasion been unable to manufacture products in quantities
sufficient to meet demand of our existing customer base and new
customers. The expansion in the scope of our operations has placed a
considerable strain on our management, financial, manufacturing and other
resources and has required us to implement and improve a variety of
operating, financial and other systems, procedures and controls. In
addition, we have currently deployed a new enterprise resource planning
system and manufacturing execution system.
We cannot assure you that any existing or new systems, procedures or
controls will be adequate to support our operations or that our systems,
procedures and controls will be designed, implemented or improved in a
cost-effective and timely manner. Any failure to implement, improve and
expand such systems, procedures and controls in an efficient manner at a
pace consistent with our business could have a material adverse effect on
our business and results of operations.
Our future success is dependent, in part, on our ability to attract,
assimilate and retain additional employees, including certain key
personnel. We will continue to need a substantial number of additional
personnel, including those with specialized skills, to commercialize our
products and expand all areas of our business in order to continue to
grow. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure you
that we will be able to attract, assimilate or retain additional highly
qualified personnel.
Risks of Acquisitions
Our strategy involves the acquisition and integration of additional
companies' products, technologies and personnel. We have limited
experience in acquiring outside businesses. Acquisition of businesses
requires substantial time and attention of management personnel and may
require additional equity or debt financings. Furthermore, integration of
newly established or acquired businesses is often disruptive. Since we
have acquired or in the future may acquire one or more businesses, we
cannot assure you that we will:
o identify appropriate targets,
o acquire such businesses on favorable terms,
o be able to successfully integrate or attain the anticipated synergies
expected by bringing such organizations into our business,
o retain the employees required to successfully operate and grow the
business, or
o be able to improve or even maintain the operating results of such
businesses.
Failure to do so could significantly impair our business, financial
condition and results of operations and a have a material adverse effect
on our business and results of operations.
Dependence Upon Government Programs And Contracts
The Company derived approximately 11%, 26%, and 34% of its revenue
during the first nine months of 1999, fiscal 1998, and fiscal 1997,
respectively, directly and indirectly from a variety of Federal
government sources. The Company received approximately 8%, 13% and 17% of
its revenue for the first nine months of 1999, and fiscal 1998, and
fiscal 1997, respectively, from Lockheed Martin through several U.S.
government and commercial programs. Almost all of the Company's revenue
from Lockheed Martin during these periods was derived from Federally-
funded programs. Revenue from certain of these Lockheed Martin programs
are expected to decrease in the near term.
The demand for certain of our services and products is directly related
to the level of funding of government programs. We believe that the
success and further development of our business is dependent, in
significant part, upon the continued existence and funding of such
programs and upon our ability to participate in such programs. For
example, Federal programs funded substantially all of our research
revenue for 1998, 1997 and 1996. Most of our Federally-funded programs
are subject to renewal every one or two years, so that continued work by
us under these programs in future periods is not assured. Federally-
funded programs are subject to termination for convenience of the
government agency, at which point we would be reimbursed for related
allowable costs incurred to the termination date.
Federally-funded contracts are subject to audit of pricing and actual
costs incurred, which have resulted, and could result in the future, in
price adjustments. The Federal government has in the past, and could in
the future, challenge our accounting methodology for computing indirect
rates and allocating indirect costs to government contracts. The
government is currently challenging certain indirect cost allocations.
While we believe that amounts recorded on our financial statements are
adequate to cover all related risks, the government has not concluded its
investigation or agreed to a settlement with us. Although the outcome of
this matter cannot be determined at this time, we do not believe that its
outcome will have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows. However, based on future
developments, our estimate of the outcome of these matters could change
in the near term. In addition, a change in our accounting practices in
this area could result in reduced profit margins on government contracts.
Dependence on Key Employees
Our future performance also depends in significant part upon the
continued service of our key technical and senior management personnel.
The loss of the services of one or more of our officers or other key
employees could significantly impair our business, operating results and
financial condition. While many of our current employees have many years
of service with us, there can be no assurance that we will be able to
retain our existing personnel. If we are unable to retain and hire
additional personnel, our business and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected. See also "Our acquisition strategy
poses several risks" above.
Risk of Patent Infringement Claims
The semiconductor, optoelectronics, communications, information and laser
industries are characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and
other intellectual property rights. From time to time we have received
and may receive in the future, notice of claims of infringement of other
parties' proprietary rights and licensing offers to commercialize third
party patent rights. In addition, we cannot assure you that:
o additional infringement claims (or claims for indemnification
resulting from infringement claims) will not be asserted against us,
or
o that existing claims or any other assertions will not result in an
injunction against the sale of infringing products or otherwise
significantly impair our business and results of operations.
In 1985, we first received correspondence from Rockwell International
Corporation alleging that we used a fabrication process that infringes
Rockwell's patent rights. Those allegations led to two related lawsuits,
one of which is still pending. The first lawsuit was filed in August
1993, when Rockwell sued the Federal government in the United States
Court of Federal Claims, alleging infringement of these patent rights
with respect to the contracts the Federal government has had with at
least 15 companies, including us (Rockwell International Corporation v.
The United States of America, No. 93-542C (US Ct. Fed. Cl.)). We were not
originally named as a party to this lawsuit. However, the Federal
government has asserted that, if we were held liable to Rockwell for
infringement of Rockwell's patent rights in connection with some of its
contracts with us, then we would be liable to indemnify the Federal
government for a portion of its liability on certain contracts.
In June 1995, we filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit filed in
August 1993 after Rockwell filed a second lawsuit against us in May, 1995
in California. That motion was granted on August 17, 1995. Upon
intervening in the Federal government's lawsuit, we filed an answer to
Rockwell's complaint, alleging that:
o Rockwell's patent was invalid and that we did not infringe Rockwell's
patent,
o Rockwell's patent was unenforceable under the doctrine of inequitable
conduct, and
o Rockwell's action is barred by the doctrines of laches and equitable
estoppel.
After extensive discovery, we moved, as did the Federal government, for
summary judgment on the ground that Rockwell's patent was invalid. By
order dated February 5, 1997, the Court of Federal Claims granted those
motions and entered judgment in our favor and in favor of the Federal
government. However, Rockwell appealed the Court of Federal Claims'
decision, and on June 15, 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit issued an opinion vacating the judgment that had been
entered in our favor and in favor of the Federal government. The US
Circuit Court for the Federal Circuit held that the Court of Federal
Claims had erred in finding that there were no genuine disputes of
material fact concerning the obviousness of the Rockwell patent, and that
the resolution of these disputes could not be decided by summary
judgement but instead requires a trial. The Federal Circuit:
o remanded the case back to the trial court for further proceedings, and
o affirmed the Court of Federal Claims' denial of our motion for summary
judgment of invalidity based on anticipation, as well as the Court of
Federal Claims' claim construction.
Subsequent to the Federal Circuit's action, the United States agreed to
pay Rockwell $16.9 million in settlement of the first lawsuit and the
first lawsuit was dismissed by the Court of Federal Claims in January
1999. We did not participate in the settlement. Since the settlement, the
Federal government has not again raised the issue of our potential
indemnity obligation to them.
As noted above, we made our decision to intervene in the first lawsuit
filed after Rockwell filed the second lawsuit against us in the Northern
District of California, alleging that we had infringed the Rockwell
patent in connection with our manufacture and sale of products to
customers other than the United States. Again, the complaint alleges that
we used a fabrication process that infringes the Rockwell patent
(Rockwell International Corporation v. SDL, Inc., No. C95-01729 MHP (US
Dist.Ct., N.D. Cal.)). By its complaint, Rockwell seeks a permanent
injunction against us to:
o enjoin us from infringement of the Rockwell patent,
o require us to pay damages in an unspecified amount for our alleged
past infringement of the patent, treble damages and attorneys' fees.
The complaint was served on us on June 30, 1995, and we filed an answer
to the complaint on August 18, 1995, alleging that:
o Rockwell's patent is invalid,
o we did not infringe Rockwell's patent,
o Rockwell's patent is unenforceable under the doctrine of inequitable
conduct, and
o Rockwell's action is barred by the doctrines of laches and equitable
estoppel.
On August 11, 1995, prior to filing our answer, we filed a motion to stay
this action based upon the pendency of the lawsuit brought by the federal
government. The District Court granted our motion to stay on September
15, 1995. Subsequent to the settlement of the first lawsuit, the District
Court lifted this stay, and discovery re-commenced in the second lawsuit.
Although the Court of Federal Claims ruled in our favor in the first
lawsuit, finding the patent invalid on motion for summary judgment, the
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the summary judgment
ruling, meaning that the issue of validity needed to go to trial. Such a
trial would now occur before a jury in California. The California judge
also required that a settlement conference between Rockwell and SDL be
scheduled in order to see if the parties can resolve the dispute before
trial, which conference occurred in the first part of June 1999. The
parties were unable to successfully resolve the lawsuit.
Later in June 1999, Rockwell filed a motion for summary judgement
relative to certain patent claims in their patent rights seeking to have
the court summarily find us to have infringed those claims, which motion
will be vigorously opposed by the Company. The hearing on the motion was
held in October. No decision on the issues has been made. Regardless of
the outcome of the decision of this motion, the Company believes that its
other defenses in the litigation of patent invalidity, inequitable
conduct, laches and equitable estoppel are meritorious and will be
pursued at trial.
The resolution of this litigation is fact intensive so that the outcome
cannot be determined and remains uncertain. If Rockwell prevailed in the
litigation, it could be awarded monetary damages against the Company.
While we believe that we have meritorious defenses to Rockwell's
allegations, there can be no assurance that Rockwell will not ultimately
prevail in this dispute. If Rockwell were to prevail, Rockwell could be
awarded substantial monetary damages and/or an injunction against us for
the sale of infringing products. If this injunction were entered, we may
seek to obtain a license to use Rockwell's patent until the January 2000
expiration date of the patent. We cannot assure you, however, that a
license would be available on reasonable terms or at all. The award of
monetary damages against us, including past damages, or the failure to
obtain a license to use Rockwell's patent on commercially reasonable
terms could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations. Litigation and trial of Rockwell's claim against us is
expected to involve significant expense to us and could divert the
attention of our technical and management personnel and could have a
material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition, we are involved in various legal proceedings and
controversies arising in the ordinary course of our business.
Customer Order Fluctuations
Our product revenue is subject to fluctuations in customer orders.
Occasionally, some of our customers have ordered more products than they
need in a given period, thereby building up inventory and delaying
placement of subsequent orders until such inventory has been reduced. We
may also build inventory in anticipation of receiving new orders in the
future. Also, customers have occasionally placed large orders that they
have subsequently cancelled. In addition, due to the fact that our sales
of our 980 nm pump module products comprise a significant portion of our
total revenues, our revenues are particularly susceptible to customer
order fluctuations for this product. These fluctuations, cancellations
and the failure to receive new orders can have adverse effects on our
business and results of operations. We may also have incurred significant
inventory or other expenses in preparing to fill such orders prior to
their cancellation. Virtually our entire backlog is subject to
cancellation. Cancellation of significant portions of our backlog, or
delays in scheduled delivery dates, could have a material adverse effect
on our business and results of operations.
Dependence of Proprietary Technology
Our future success and competitive position is dependent in part upon our
proprietary technology, and we rely in part on patent, trade secret,
trademark and copyright law to protect our intellectual property. There
can be no assurance that:
o any of the over 200 patents, domestic and foreign, owned or
approximately 125 patents licensed by us will not be invalidated,
circumvented, challenged or licensed to others,
o the rights granted under the patents will provide competitive
advantages to us,
o any of our approximately 150 pending or future patent applications
will be issued with the scope of the claims sought by us, if at all,
or
o that others will not develop technologies that are similar or superior
to our technology, duplicate our technology or design around the
patents we own, or patent or assert patents on technology which we
might use or intend to use.
In addition, effective copyright and trade secret protection may be
unavailable, limited or not applied for in certain foreign countries. Our
technology is licensed on a non-exclusive basis from Xerox and other
third parties that may license such technology to others, including our
competitors. There can be no assurance that steps we take to protect our
technology will prevent misappropriation of such technology. In addition,
litigation has been necessary and may be necessary in the future:
o to enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights,
o to protect our trade secrets,
o to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others, or
o to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity of intellectual
property rights developed internally or acquired from third parties.
Litigation of this type has resulted in substantial costs and diversion
of resources and could have a material adverse effect on our business and
results of operations. Moreover, we may be required to participate in
interference proceedings to determine the propriety of inventions. These
proceedings could result in substantial cost to us.
International Distribution Risks
Revenues from customers outside of the United States accounted for
approximately 37 percent, 27 percent and 25 percent, of our total revenue
in the first nine months of 1999, fiscal 1998 and 1997, respectively.
International revenue carries a number of inherent risks, including:
o reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries,
o the impact of unstable environments in economies outside the United
States,
o generally longer receivable collection periods,
o changes in regulatory environments,
o tariffs, and
o other potential trade barriers.
In addition, some of our international revenue is subject to export
licensing and approvals by the Department of Commerce or other Federal
governmental agencies. Although to date, we have experienced little
difficulty in obtaining such licenses or approvals, the failure to obtain
these licenses or approvals or comply with such regulations in the future
could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations.
We currently use local distributors in key industrialized countries and
local representatives in smaller markets. Although we have formal
distribution contracts with some of our distributors and representatives,
some of our relationships are currently on an informal basis. Most of our
international distributors and representatives offer only our products;
however, certain distributors offer competing products and we cannot
assure you that additional distributors and representatives will not also
offer products that are competitive with our products. We cannot assure
you that our international distributors and representatives will enter
into formal distribution agreements at all or on acceptable terms, will
not terminate informal or contractual relationships, will continue to
sell our products or that we will provide the distributors and resellers
with adequate levels of support. Our business and results of operations
will be affected adversely if we lose a significant number of our
international distributors and representatives or experience a decrease
in revenue from these distributors and representatives.
Environmental Risks
We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws and
regulations concerning the storage, use, discharge and disposal of toxic,
volatile, or otherwise hazardous or regulated chemicals or materials used
in our manufacturing processes. Further, we are subject to other safety,
labeling and training regulations as required by local, state and federal
law. We have established an environmental and safety compliance program
to meet the objectives of applicable federal, state and local laws. Our
environmental and safety department administers this compliance program
which includes monitoring, measuring and reporting compliance,
establishing safety programs and training our personnel in environmental
and safety matters. We cannot assure you that changes in these
regulations and laws will not have an adverse economic effect on us.
Further, these local, state, and federal regulations could restrict our
ability to expand our operations. If we do not:
o obtain required permits for,
o operate within regulations for,
o control the use of, or
o adequately restrict the discharge of hazardous or regulated substances
or materials under present or future regulations, we may be required
to pay substantial penalties, to make costly changes in our
manufacturing processes or facilities or to suspend our operations.
Dependence on Single Source And Other Third Party Suppliers
We depend on a single or limited number of outside contractors and
suppliers for raw materials, packages and standard components, and to
assemble printed circuitboards. We generally purchase these products
through standard purchase orders or one-year supply agreements. We do not
have long-term guaranteed supply agreements with these suppliers. We seek
to maintain a sufficient safety stock to overcome short-term shipping
delays or supply interruptions by our suppliers. We also endeavor to
maintain ongoing communications with our suppliers to guard against
interruptions in supply. To date, we have generally been able to obtain
sufficient supplies in a timely manner. However, our business and results
of operations have in the past been and could be impaired by:
o a stoppage or delay of supply,
o substitution of more expensive or less reliable parts,
o receipt of defective parts or contaminated materials, and
o an increase in the price of such supplies or our inability to obtain
reduced pricing from our suppliers in response to competitive
pressures.
Potential Volatility of Stock Price
The market price of our Common Stock may fluctuate significantly because
of:
o announcements of technological innovations,
o large customer orders,
o customer order delays or cancellations,
o customer qualification delays,
o new products by us, our competitors or third parties,
o possible acquisition of us by a third party,
o merger or acquisition announcements,
o production problems,
o quarterly variations in our actual or anticipated results of
operations, and
o developments in litigation in which we are or may become involved.
Furthermore, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume
volatility, which has particularly affected the market prices of many
high technology companies. This volatility has often been unrelated to
the operating performance of such companies. This broad market volatility
may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. Many companies
in the optical communications industry have in the past year experienced
historical highs in the market prices of their stock. We cannot assure
you that the market price of our Common Stock will not experience
significant volatility in the future, including volatility that is
unrelated to our performance.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company's market risk disclosures set forth in Item 7A of its Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1998 have not
changed significantly.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Not applicable
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES
Not applicable
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) List of Exhibits
Exhibit 27.1 - Financial Data Schedule
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
Not applicable
SDL, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: November 2, 1999
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael L. Foster
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael L. Foster
|
|
Vice President, Finance
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Duly Authorized Officer, and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|