XML 37 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 18. Fair Value Measurements

 

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

 

ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date

 

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data

 

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability

 

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.

 

In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

 

Investment securities available for sale: The fair values of exchange-listed equity securities are based on quoted market prices and are categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of debt securities were generally determined based on matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique that utilizes observable market inputs including, for example, yield curves, credit ratings and prepayment speeds. Fair values determined using matrix pricing are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

 

Redeemable common stock: The Company has certain shares of common stock outstanding whereby the holder may put its shares to the Company for cash. This redeemable common stock is recorded at its fair value in the mezzanine equity section of our consolidated balance sheets and changes in fair value are recorded in retained earnings. Under the terms of the agreement, the fair value of common stock is determined annually by applying a market valuation approach based upon comparative financial and pricing analysis of the Company with a peer group of publicly traded financial institutions. The comparative financial analysis is based on three types of market pricing ratios: price to earnings, price to book (or price to tangible book) and price to assets, with a greater emphasis given to price to earnings and price to book value. Valuations include assumptions not observable in the marketplace, and the related fair value measurements have been categorized as level 3 measurements.

 

The Company is required, on a nonrecurring basis, to adjust the carrying value of certain assets or provide valuation allowances related to certain assets, using fair value measurements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

Impaired loans: The specific reserves for collateral-dependent impaired loans are based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell. The fair value of collateral was determined based on appraisals, with further adjustments made to the appraised values due to various factors, including the age of the appraisal, age of comparables included in the appraisal, and changes in the market and in the collateral. As these significant adjustments are based on unobservable inputs, the resulting fair value measurements have been categorized as Level 3 measurements.

 

Foreclosed real estate: Foreclosed real estate is recorded at fair value based on property appraisals, less estimated selling costs, at the date of transfer. The carrying value of foreclosed real estate is not remeasured to fair value on a recurring basis, but is subject to fair value adjustments when the carrying value exceeds the fair value, less estimated selling costs. Property appraisals are based on assumptions generally not observable in the marketplace, and the related nonrecurring fair value measurement adjustments have been classified as Level 3.

 

Mortgage servicing rights: Mortgage servicing rights are initially measured at fair value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company utilizes the amortization method to subsequently measure its capitalized servicing assets. In accordance with ASC Topic 860, the Company must record impairment charges when the carrying value of certain strata exceeds their estimated fair value. To estimate the fair value of servicing rights, the Company computes the present value of expected future cash flows associated with the servicing rights using assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future servicing income and expense. Such assumptions include estimates of the cost of servicing loans, loan default rates, an appropriate discount rate, and prepayment speeds. For purposes of evaluating and measuring impairment of capitalized servicing rights, the Company stratifies such assets based on the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying financial instruments that are expected to have the most impact on projected prepayments, cost of servicing, and other factors affecting future cash flows associated with the servicing rights. Such factors may include financial asset or loan type, note rate and term. The amount of impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the capitalized servicing rights for a stratum exceeds estimated fair value. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance. The determination of fair value of capitalized servicing rights is considered a Level 2 valuation.

 

The following tables summarize assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

 

    December 31, 2015  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
    Inputs     Inputs     Inputs     Fair Value  
Recurring:                                
Investment securities available for sale:                                
Residential mortgage-backed securities   $ -     $ 20,142     $ -     $ 20,142  
SBA pools     -       2,574       -       2,574  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions     -       11,642       -       11,642  
Government-sponsored enterprise equity Securities     -       92       -       92  
Redeemable common stock     -       -       (2,881 )     (2,881 )
Nonrecurring:                                
Foreclosed real estate     -       -       1,632       1,632  
Collateral-dependent impaired loans     -       -       1,685       1,685  
 
    December 31, 2014  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
    Inputs     Inputs     Inputs     Fair Value  
Recurring:                                
Investment securities available for sale:                                
Residential mortgage-backed securities   $ -     $ 22,545     $ -     $ 22,545  
SBA pools     -       1,832       -       1,832  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions     -       9,698       -       9,698  
Government-sponsored enterprise equity Securities     -       102       -       102  
Redeemable common stock     -       -       (2,533 )     (2,533 )
Nonrecurring:                                
Foreclosed real estate     -       -       3,656       3,656  
Collateral-dependent impaired loans     -       -       3,002       3,002  
Mortgage servicing rights     -       646       -       646  

 

Changes in the fair value of redeemable common stock, which is a recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013   $ 2,342  
Change in fair value related to redeemable common stock     191  
Balance as of December 31, 2014     2,533  
Purchase of shares by the Company     (267 )
Change in fair value related to redeemable common stock     615  
Balance as of December 31, 2015   $ 2,881  

 

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 there were no transfers in or out of Levels 1, 2, and 3.

 

ASC Topic 825 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not recognized at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are recognized at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are discussed above. The methodologies for financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed in Note 1.

 

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:

 

        December 31  
        2015     2014  
    Level in Fair
Value
Hierarchy
  Carrying
Amount
    Fair
Value
    Carrying
Amount
    Fair
Value
 
Financial assets:                                    
Cash and cash equivalents   Level 1   $ 12,059     $ 12,059     $ 14,373     $ 14,373  
Certificates of deposit   Level 2     9,543       9,543       4,181       4,181  
Federal funds sold   Level 2     9,100       9,100       2,000       2,000  
Securities available for sale   Level 2     34,450       34,450       34,177       34,177  
FHLB stock   Level 2     1,986       1,986       2,079       2,079  
Loans held for sale   Level 2     1,337       1,337       1,707       1,707  
Loans receivable, net   Level 2     197,595       199,971       182,050       183,219  
Accrued interest receivable   Level 2     1,020       1,020       834       834  
Mortgage servicing rights   Level 2     1,863       2,293       1,886       2,578  
Financial liabilities:                                    
Deposits   Level 2     239,950       232,350       221,972       215,199  
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance   Level 2     2,646       2,646       2,630       2,630  
Accrued interest payable   Level 2     12       12       17       17  

 

Interest rate risk: The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. As a result, the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change, and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to manage interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed-rate obligations are more likely to prepay in a falling-rate environment and less likely to prepay in a rising-rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising-rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling-rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Company’s overall interest rate risk.

 

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements with comparable credit risks and the current creditworthiness of the parties. Commitments are generally short-term in nature and, if drawn upon, are issued under current market terms and conditions for credits with comparable risks. Therefore, the fair values of these financial instruments are not significant.