XML 25 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2023
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date, and also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. The three-level hierarchy of valuation techniques established to measure fair value is defined as follows:
(i)Level 1 - Observable Inputs:  Quoted prices in active markets for identical investments;
(ii)Level 2 - Pricing Models with Significant Observable Inputs:  Other significant observable inputs, including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, credit risk, etc.; and
(iii)Level 3 - Unobservable Inputs:  Unobservable inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model. Management estimates include certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs, including the entity’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of derivatives and certain investments.
Whenever possible, the Company is required to use observable market inputs (Level 1) when measuring fair value. In such cases, the level at which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input requires judgment and considers
factors specific to the asset or liability being measured. In certain cases, inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company held the following types of financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
Equity Securities. Equity securities includes investments in public company common stock and are recorded at fair value based on the quoted market price of each share on the valuation date. The fair value of these securities are within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Equity investments that do not have regular market pricing, but for which fair value can be determined based on other data values or market prices, are recorded at fair value within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The Company has elected to apply the fair value method to one equity securities investment that would otherwise be accounted for under the equity method of accounting. As of March 31, 2023, the aggregate carrying amount of this investment was $43.3 million, and is included in equity securities, in the consolidated balance sheet (refer to Note 3 for additional information).
Series B Warrants. Series B Warrants are recorded at fair value, using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model (Level 3). On October 28, 2022, the cash exercise feature of the Unadjusted Series B Warrants expired, which resulted in a fair value of zero for such warrants (refer to Note 8 for additional information). The fair value of the remaining Series B Warrants as of March 31, 2023 was estimated based on the following significant assumptions: volatility of 47 percent, risk-free rate of 4.86 percent, term of 0.29 years and a dividend yield of 0 percent. The fair value of the two Series B Warrants as of December 31, 2022 was estimated based on the following significant assumptions: volatility of 53 percent, risk-free rate of 4.76 percent, term of 0.54 years and a dividend yield of 0 percent. Refer to the "Embedded derivative liabilities" discussion below for additional information on assumptions.
Embedded derivative liabilities. Embedded derivatives that are required to be bifurcated from their host contract are evaluated and valued separately from the host instrument. During the quarter ended December 31, 2022 in connection with the Recapitalization Agreement, the Company changed its methodology from a binomial lattice framework to an as-converted value (Level 3), based on an expected Series A Convertible Preferred Stock conversion date on or prior to July 14, 2023 (refer to Note 8 for additional information).
The volatility of the Company’s common stock is estimated by analyzing the Company’s historical volatility, implied volatility of publicly traded stock options, and the Company’s current asset composition and financial leverage. Prior to December 31, 2022, the selected volatility, as described herein, represented a haircut from the Company’s actual realized historical volatility. A volatility haircut is a concept used to describe a commonly observed occurrence in which the volatility implied by market prices involving options, warrants and convertible debt is lower than historical actual realized volatility. Prior to December 31, 2022, the assumed base case term used in the valuation models was the period remaining until November 15, 2027, the Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock maturity date. The risk-free interest rate was based on the yield on the U.S. Treasury with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the conversion and early redemption options. The fair value of the embedded derivative as of March 31, 2023 was estimated based on the following significant assumptions: coupon rate of 8 percent, conversion ratio of 27.40, conversion date of July 14, 2023 and a discount rate of 15.70 percent. The fair value of the embedded derivative as of December 31, 2022 was estimated based on the following significant assumptions: coupon rate of 8 percent, conversion ratio of 27.40, conversion date of July 14, 2023 and a discount rate of 16.30 percent. The fair value measurement of the embedded derivative is sensitive to these assumptions and changes in these assumptions could result in a materially different fair value measurement.
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
(In thousands)
Assets
March 31, 2023:
Equity securities$60,724 $— $— $60,724 
December 31, 2022:
Equity securities$61,608 $— $— $61,608 
Liabilities
March 31, 2023:
Series A embedded derivative liabilities$— $— $11,812 $11,812 
Series B warrants— — 73,152 73,152 
Total$— $— $84,964 $84,964 
December 31, 2022:
Series A embedded derivative liabilities$— $— $16,835 $16,835 
Series B warrants— — 84,780 84,780 
Total$— $— $101,615 $101,615 
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the estimated fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities, which are measured at fair value as a on a recurring basis:
Series A Warrant LiabilitiesSeries A Embedded Derivative LiabilitiesSeries B Warrant LiabilitiesTotal
(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2021$11,291 $18,448 $96,378 $126,117 
Remeasurement to fair value(896)(3,942)(23,260)(28,098)
Balance at March 31, 202210,395 14,506 73,118 98,019 
Balance at December 31, 2022$— $16,835 $84,780 $101,615 
Remeasurement to fair value— (5,023)(11,628)(16,651)
Balance at March 31, 2023$— $11,812 $73,152 $84,964 
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, from time to time, the Company measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The Company reviews the carrying value of equity securities without readily determinable fair value, equity method investments and patents on a quarterly basis for indications of impairment, and other long-lived assets at least annually. When indications of potential impairment are identified, the Company may be required to determine the fair value of those assets and record an adjustment for the carrying amount in excess of the fair value determined. Any fair value determination would be based on valuation approaches, which are appropriate under the circumstances and utilize Level 2 and Level 3 measurements as required.