XML 99 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Fair Value Measurements

5.    Fair Value Measurements

The fair value measurement guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset and liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities of the Company measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and 2011 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 

     September  30,
2012
     Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using  

Description

      Quoted Prices in
Active  Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant  Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Assets

           

Cash Equivalents

   $ 17,508       $ 17,508       $       $   

Available-for-sale securities

     145,592         60,231         85,361           

Foreign exchange contracts

     10                 10           
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 163,110       $ 77,739       $ 85,371       $   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities

           

Foreign exchange contracts

   $ 13       $       $ 13       $   

 

     September  30,
2011
     Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using  
        Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant  Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

Assets

           

Cash Equivalents

   $ 9,576       $ 9,576       $       $   

Available-for-sale securities

     146,985         63,331         83,654           
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 156,561       $ 72,907       $ 83,654       $   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents of $17.5 million and $9.6 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, consisting primarily of Money Market Funds, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets.

Available-For-Sale Securities

Available-for-sale securities of $60.2 million and $63.3 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, consisting of highly rated Corporate Bonds, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets of identical assets or liabilities. Available-for-sale securities of $85.4 million and $83.7 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, consisting of Mortgage-Backed Securities, Municipal Securities, Bank Certificate of Deposits, Commercial Paper and U.S. Treasury Securities and Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using matrix pricing and benchmarking. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used to value securities by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

Foreign Exchange Contracts

Foreign exchange contract assets and foreign exchange contract liabilities of $10,000 and $13,000, respectively, at September 30, 2012 are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because there may not be an active market for each contract, however, the inputs used to calculate the value of the contract were obtained from an active market.