Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

The fair value measurement guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset and liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities of the Company measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 are summarized as follows (in thousands):



			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description	June 30, 2014		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Recurring fair value measurements
Assets
Cash equivalents	$	30,433	$	2,045	$	28,388	$	—
Available-for-sale securities	128,207		—		128,207		—
Foreign exchange contracts	15		—		15		—
Total Assets	$	158,655	$	2,045	$	156,610	$	—
Liabilities
Foreign exchange contracts	$	4	$	—	$	4	$	—

Nonrecurring fair value measurements
Assets
Note receivable	$	1,007	$	—	$	—	$	1,007



			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description	September 30, 2013		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Recurring fair value measurements
Assets
Cash equivalents	$	7,754	$	6,152	$	1,602	$	—
Available-for-sale securities	90,391		2,199		88,192		—
Foreign exchange contracts	31		—		31		—
Total Assets	$	98,176	$	8,351	$	89,825	$	—
Liabilities
Foreign exchange contracts	$	5	$	—	$	5	$	—

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents of $2.0 million and $6.2 million at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively, consisting of Money Market Funds, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets. Cash equivalents of $28.4 million and $1.6 million at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively, consisting of Bank Certificate of Deposits, U.S. Government Agency Securities and Municipal Securities, are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy because they are not actively traded.

Available-For-Sale Securities

Available-for-sale securities of $2.2 million at September 30, 2013, consisting primarily of highly rated Corporate Bonds, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets of identical assets or liabilities. Available-for-sale securities of $128.2 million and $88.2 million at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively, consisting of Municipal Securities, Bank Certificate of Deposits, Commercial Paper, U.S. Treasury Securities and Obligations of U.S. Government Agency Securities, and Mortgage-Backed Securities are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are not actively traded and are valued using matrix pricing and benchmarking. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used to value securities by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

Foreign Exchange Contracts

Foreign exchange contract assets and liabilities are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because there may not be an active market for each contract. However, the inputs used to calculate the value of the contract were obtained from an active market.

Note Receivable

As a result of indicators of impairment identified in the third quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company evaluated the recoverability of a note receivable and adjusted its value based on fair value methods. The impairment of this note receivable is described more fully in Note 15. The note receivable is classified as a Level 3 instrument, as the inputs used in the analysis are unobservable and required significant management judgment.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References+ Details