XML 73 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
The fair value measurement guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset and liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Assets and liabilities of the Company measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013 are summarized as follows (in thousands): 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description
 
December 31,
2013
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
 
$
15,649

 
$
8,225

 
$
7,424

 
$

Available-for-sale securities
 
97,652

 
22,968

 
74,684

 

Foreign exchange contracts
 
128

 

 
128

 

Total Assets
 
$
113,429

 
$
31,193

 
$
82,236

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description
 
September 30,
2013
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
 
$
7,754

 
$
6,152

 
$
1,602

 
$

Available-for-sale securities
 
90,391

 
2,199

 
88,192

 

Foreign exchange contracts
 
31

 

 
31

 

Total Assets
 
$
98,176

 
$
8,351

 
$
89,825

 
$

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts
 
$
5

 
$

 
$
5

 
$


Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents of $8.2 million and $6.2 million at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013, respectively, consisting of Money Market Funds, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets. Cash equivalents of $7.4 million and $1.6 million at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013, respectively, consisting of Bank Certificate of Deposits, U.S. Government Agency Securities and Municipal Securities, are classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy because they are not actively traded.
Available-For-Sale Securities
Available-for-sale securities of $23.0 million and $2.2 million at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013, respectively, consisting primarily of highly rated Corporate Bonds, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets of identical assets or liabilities. Available-for-sale securities of $74.7 million and $88.2 million at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013, respectively, consisting of Municipal Securities, Bank Certificate of Deposits, Commercial Paper, U.S. Treasury Securities and Obligations of U.S. Government Agency Securities, and Mortgage-Backed Securities are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are not actively traded and are valued using matrix pricing and benchmarking. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used to value securities by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Foreign exchange contract assets and liabilities are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because there may not be an active market for each contract. However, the inputs used to calculate the value of the contract were obtained from an active market.