XML 28 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.1
LEASES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 30, 2023
LEASES  
LEASES

NOTE 8 – LEASES

 

The Company leases land, office space and equipment. Arrangements are assessed at inception to determine if a lease exists and right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Because the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate of return, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate at the inception of a lease to calculate the present value of lease payments. The Company has elected to apply the short-term lease exception for all asset classes, excluding lease liabilities from the balance sheet and recognizing the lease payments in the period they are incurred.

The components of lease expense are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Financial Statement Classification

 

Year ended

December 30, 2023

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2022

 

Finance leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization expense

 

SG&A Expense

 

$237

 

 

$204

 

Interest expense

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

52

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

$289

 

 

$248

 

Operating leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating costs

 

Operating costs

 

 

762

 

 

 

491

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

SG&A Expense

 

 

3,948

 

 

 

2,218

 

 

 

 

 

$4,710

 

 

$2,709

 

Total lease expense

 

 

 

$4,999

 

 

$2,957

 

 

Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Financial Statement Classification

 

December 30, 2023

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

ROU Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

Right of Use asset

 

$5,079

 

 

$8,072

 

Finance leases

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

795

 

 

 

761

 

Total ROU Assets:

 

 

 

$5,874

 

 

$8,833

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

Current portion of operating leases

 

$1,726

 

 

$1,638

 

Finance leases

 

Current portion of finance leases

 

 

263

 

 

 

211

 

Noncurrent Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

Long Term operating leases

 

 

5,761

 

 

 

6,669

 

Finance leases

 

Long Term finance leases

 

 

548

 

 

 

548

 

Total lease liabilities

 

 

 

$8,298

 

 

$9,066

 

 

The weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate are as follows:

 

 

 

December 30, 2023

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

Weighted average remaining lease term (years)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

7.3

 

Finance leases

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

3.7

 

Weighted average discount rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

10.2%

 

 

11.0%

Finance leases

 

 

9.1%

 

 

8.2%

 

Maturities of operating lease liabilities as of December 30, 2023 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

Finance leases

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2024

 

$1,919

 

 

$305

 

 

$2,224

 

2025

 

 

1,395

 

 

 

268

 

 

 

1,663

 

2026

 

 

920

 

 

 

239

 

 

 

1,159

 

2027

 

 

951

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

1,016

 

2028 and thereafter

 

 

3,157

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

3,171

 

Total lease payments

 

 

8,342

 

 

 

891

 

 

 

9,233

 

Less: imputed interest

 

 

(855)

 

 

(80)

 

 

(935)

Total lease liabilities

 

$7,487

 

 

$811

 

 

$8,298

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ROU assets recorded on a lessee’s balance sheet under ASC 842 are subject to the ASC 360-10 impairment guidance applicable to long-lived assets. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset group may not be recoverable (i.e., impairment indicators exist), the asset group is tested to determine whether an impairment exists. In 2023, the Company ceased operations at its fabrication facility in Brookshire, Texas and facility in Monahans, Texas.  The method used to measure the impairment loss was the held and use model under ASC 360-10-35. Under the held-and-used impairment model, there are two steps after a trigger is identified. The first step is referred to as the recoverability test, which involves comparing the carrying amount of the asset group to the undiscounted future expected cash flows of the asset group. If the carrying amount of the asset group is less than the undiscounted cash flows for the asset group, the lessee has passed the recoverability test, and no impairment charge should be recognized.

 

Under Step 2 of the held-and-used impairment model, the lessee compares the carrying amount of the asset group to its fair value. An asset group’s undiscounted cash flows used in the recoverability test (i.e., Step 1) and fair value used in Step 2 will be different amounts. Undiscounted cash flows do not take the time value of money into consideration, whereas fair value does take the time value of money into consideration. In addition, undiscounted cash flows are estimated using an entity-specific perspective, while fair value is estimated using a market-participant perspective. When the carrying amount of the asset group is higher than its fair value, an impairment loss exists. When the carrying amount of the asset group is lower than its fair value, an impairment loss does not exist.

 

During the third quarter of 2023, we determined the carrying amount of the ROU asset located in Monahans, Texas was no longer recoverable and wrote the balance down to its estimated fair value. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2023, we determined the carrying amount of the ROU asset located in Brookshire, Texas exceeded its  fair value by $1.6 million. The total impairment loss of $1.8 million was reported within the SG&A section of the Commercial segment on the Consolidate Statement of Operations. The discount rate used to measure the fair value of the ROU asset in Brookshire, Texas was 7.71%, which was based on the average WACC for market participants in the same industry since we believe this is the highest and best use of the facility.