Recent Accounting Pronouncements Recent Accounting Pronouncements	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections [Abstract]
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS Pronouncements adopted during the three months ended March 31, 2019: ASU No. 2016-02, ASU No. 2018-11, ASU No. 2018-20, and ASU 2019-01 In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (ASC 842) which requires lessees to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases, including operating leases. The lessor accounting model was relatively unchanged by this ASU. Additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures are also required. During 2018 and early 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, ASU No. 2018-20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, and ASU No. 2019-01, Codification Improvements, which clarified certain implementation issues, provided an additional optional transition method and clarified the disclosure requirements during the period of adopting ASC 842, among others. The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02 and the related ASUs discussed above effective January 1, 2019 using the optional transition method. The Company elected the package of practical expedients that does not require the reassessment of whether expired or existing contracts contain leases, the reassessment of the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, or the reassessment of initial direct costs for existing leases. Additionally, the Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient. The Company conducted a review of all existing lease contracts and service contracts which might contain embedded leases. Some of the Company’s leases contain variable lease payments, the majority of which depend on an index or rate, such as the Consumer Price Index. At transition, the present value of variable payments was based on the index or rate as of January 1, 2019. To determine the present value of lease payments at transition, the Company applied a portfolio approach utilizing an FHLB Advance rate based on the weighted average remaining term of the Company’s existing leases as of January 1, 2019. As a result of adopting ASC 842, the Company established an ROU asset and a lease liability as of January 1, 2019 of $94.2 million and $118.9 million, respectively. Additionally, as part of the adoption of ASC 842, $24.7 million in pre-existing liabilities were reclassified to the ROU asset on January 1, 2019. This resulted in a gross-up of the balance sheet of $94.2 million as a result of recognizing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets for operating leases. The adoption of ASC 842 also required the recognition of previously deferred gains on sale-leaseback transactions which resulted in an insignificant increase to retained earnings on January 1, 2019. The related impact on the Company’s regulatory capital ratios was not significant. The Company does not expect material changes to the recognition of lease expense in future periods as a result of the adoption of ASC 842. See Note 8, Leases, for additional disclosures required by ASC 842. ASU No. 2018-16 In October 2018, the FASB released ASU No. 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes, which permits the use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under ASC 815 in addition to the interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the UST, the LIBOR swap rate, the OIS Rate based on the Fed Funds Effective Rate, and the SIFMA Municipal Swap Rate. The required effective date of this ASU was dependent upon when an entity adopted the provisions of ASU No. 2017-12. The Company adopted ASU No. 2018-16 effective January 1, 2019 on a prospective basis for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relations as ASU No. 2017-12 had previously been adopted on January 1, 2018. The implementation of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. ASU No. 2017-08 In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities, which will shorten the amortization period for callable debt securities held at a premium to the earliest call date instead of the maturity date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount, which will continue to be amortized to the maturity date. The Company adopted ASU No. 2017-08 effective January 1, 2019. The adoption of the ASU did not have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Pronouncements issued but not yet adopted: ASU No. 2016-13 In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (ASC 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The guidance introduces an impairment model that is based on expected credit losses (ECL), rather than incurred losses, to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments such as loans and held-to-maturity securities, including certain off-balance sheet financial instruments such as loan commitments. The measurement of ECL should consider historical information, current information, and reasonable and supportable forecasts, including estimates of prepayments, over the contractual term. Financial instruments with similar risk characteristics must be grouped together when estimating ECL. The ASU also amends the current AFS security impairment model for debt securities. The new model will require an estimate of ECL when the fair value is below the amortized cost of the asset through the use of an allowance to record estimated credit losses (and subsequent recoveries). Non-credit related losses will continue to be recognized through OCI. In addition, the guidance provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since their origination. The initial estimate of expected credit losses would be recognized through an ALLL with an offset (i.e., increase) to the cost basis of the related financial asset at acquisition. ASU No. 2016-13 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods. The ASU will be applied through a modified-retrospective approach, resulting in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. A prospective transition approach is required for debt securities for which OTTI had been recognized before the effective date. Amounts previously recognized in AOCI as of the date of adoption that relate to improvements in cash flows expected to be collected should continue to be accreted into income over the remaining life of the asset. Recoveries of amounts previously written off relating to improvements in cash flows after the date of adoption should be recorded in earnings when received. The Company has established a cross-function implementation team and engaged third-party consultants who have jointly developed a project plan to provide implementation oversight. The Company is in the process of developing and implementing current expected credit loss models that satisfy the requirements of the ASU and continues to identify key interpretive issues. The Company expects that this ASU will result in an increase to ALLL given the change to estimate losses over the full remaining estimated life of the loan portfolio as well as the adoption of an allowance for debt securities. The extent of the increase in the ALLL is not yet known and will depend on the composition of our loan and securities portfolios, finalization of credit loss models, macroeconomic conditions and forecasts at the adoption date. ASU No. 2018-13 In August 2018, the FASB released ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (ASC 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU. While adoption of this ASU will result in changes to existing disclosures, it will not have any impact on our financial position or results of operation. ASU No. 2018-17 In October 2018, the FASB released ASU No. 2018-17, Consolidation (ASC 810): Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities, which improves the consistency of the application of the variable interest entity (VIE) related party guidance for common control arrangements. This ASU requires reporting entities to consider indirect interests held through related parties under common control on a proportional basis rather than as the equivalent of a direct interest in its entirety (as currently required in GAAP) when determining whether a decision-making fee is a variable interest. ASU No. 2018-17 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. The guidance should be applied retrospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the earliest period presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. ASU No. 2019-04 In April 2019, the FASB released ASU No. 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (ASC 326), Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815), and Financial Instruments (ASC 825). The amendments in the ASU improve the Codification by eliminating inconsistencies and providing clarifications. ASU No. 2019-04 clarifies the scope of the credit losses standard and addresses various issues including, accrued interest receivable balances, recoveries, variable interest rates and prepayments. With respect to hedge accounting, the ASU addresses partial-term fair value hedges, fair value hedge basis adjustments, and certain transition requirements, among other things. For recognizing and measuring financial instruments, the ASU addresses the scope of the guidance, the requirement for remeasurement under ASC 820 when using the measurement alternative, certain disclosure requirements and which equity securities have to be remeasured at historical exchange rates. The amended guidance in this ASU related to the credit losses and the recognition and measurement of financial instruments will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption in any interim period permitted. Since the Company early adopted the guidance in ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities in 2018, the amended hedge accounting guidance in ASU No. 2019-04 will be effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after April 25, 2019 with early adoption permitted on any date after the issuance of this ASU. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Pronouncements adopted during the three months ended March 31, 2019:

ASU No. 2016-02, ASU No. 2018-11, ASU No. 2018-20, and ASU 2019-01

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (ASC 842) which requires lessees to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases, including operating leases. The lessor accounting model was relatively unchanged by this ASU. Additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures are also required. During 2018 and early 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, ASU No. 2018-20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, and ASU No. 2019-01, Codification Improvements, which clarified certain implementation issues, provided an additional optional transition method and clarified the disclosure requirements during the period of adopting ASC 842, among others.

The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02 and the related ASUs discussed above effective January 1, 2019 using the optional transition method. The Company elected the package of practical expedients that does not require the reassessment of whether expired or existing contracts contain leases, the reassessment of the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, or the reassessment of initial direct costs for existing leases. Additionally, the Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient.

The Company conducted a review of all existing lease contracts and service contracts which might contain embedded leases. Some of the Company’s leases contain variable lease payments, the majority of which depend on an index or rate, such as the Consumer Price Index. At transition, the present value of variable payments was based on the index or rate as of January 1, 2019. To determine the present value of lease payments at transition, the Company applied a portfolio approach utilizing an FHLB Advance rate based on the weighted average remaining term of the Company’s existing leases as of January 1, 2019. As a result of adopting ASC 842, the Company established an ROU asset and a lease liability as of January 1, 2019 of $94.2 million and $118.9 million, respectively. Additionally, as part of the adoption of ASC 842, $24.7 million in pre-existing liabilities were reclassified to the ROU asset on January 1, 2019. This resulted in a gross-up of the balance sheet of $94.2 million as a result of recognizing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets for operating leases. The adoption of ASC 842 also required the recognition of previously deferred gains on sale-leaseback transactions which resulted in an insignificant increase to retained earnings on January 1, 2019. The related impact on the Company’s regulatory capital ratios was not significant. The Company does not expect material changes to the recognition of lease expense in future periods as a result of the adoption of ASC 842. See Note 8, Leases, for additional disclosures required by ASC 842.

ASU No. 2018-16

In October 2018, the FASB released ASU No. 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes, which permits the use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under ASC 815 in addition to the interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the UST, the LIBOR swap rate, the OIS Rate based on the Fed Funds Effective Rate, and the SIFMA Municipal Swap Rate.

The required effective date of this ASU was dependent upon when an entity adopted the provisions of ASU No. 2017-12. The Company adopted ASU No. 2018-16 effective January 1, 2019 on a prospective basis for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relations as ASU No. 2017-12 had previously been adopted on January 1, 2018. The implementation of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2017-08

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities, which will shorten the amortization period for callable debt securities held at a premium to the earliest call date instead of the maturity date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount, which will continue to be amortized to the maturity date.

The Company adopted ASU No. 2017-08 effective January 1, 2019. The adoption of the ASU did not have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Pronouncements issued but not yet adopted:

ASU No. 2016-13

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (ASC 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The guidance introduces an impairment model that is based on expected credit losses (ECL), rather than incurred losses, to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments such as loans and held-to-maturity securities, including certain off-balance sheet financial instruments such as loan commitments. The measurement of ECL should consider historical information, current information, and reasonable and supportable forecasts, including estimates of prepayments, over the contractual term. Financial instruments with similar risk characteristics must be grouped together when estimating ECL.

The ASU also amends the current AFS security impairment model for debt securities. The new model will require an estimate of ECL when the fair value is below the amortized cost of the asset through the use of an allowance to record estimated credit losses (and subsequent recoveries). Non-credit related losses will continue to be recognized through OCI.

In addition, the guidance provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since their origination. The initial estimate of expected credit losses would be recognized through an ALLL with an offset (i.e., increase) to the cost basis of the related financial asset at acquisition.

ASU No. 2016-13 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods. The ASU will be applied through a modified-retrospective approach, resulting in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. A prospective transition approach is required for debt securities for which OTTI had been recognized before the effective date. Amounts previously recognized in AOCI as of the date of adoption that relate to improvements in cash flows expected to be collected should continue to be accreted into income over the remaining life of the asset. Recoveries of amounts previously written off relating to improvements in cash flows after the date of adoption should be recorded in earnings when received.

The Company has established a cross-function implementation team and engaged third-party consultants who have jointly developed a project plan to provide implementation oversight. The Company is in the process of developing and implementing current expected credit loss models that satisfy the requirements of the ASU and continues to identify key interpretive issues. The Company expects that this ASU will result in an increase to ALLL given the change to estimate losses over the full remaining estimated life of the loan portfolio as well as the adoption of an allowance for debt securities. The extent of the increase in the ALLL is not yet known and will depend on the composition of our loan and securities portfolios, finalization of credit loss models, macroeconomic conditions and forecasts at the adoption date.

ASU No. 2018-13

In August 2018, the FASB released ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (ASC 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods, with early adoption permitted.

The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU. While adoption of this ASU will result in changes to existing disclosures, it will not have any impact on our financial position or results of operation.

ASU No. 2018-17

In October 2018, the FASB released ASU No. 2018-17, Consolidation (ASC 810): Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities, which improves the consistency of the application of the variable interest entity (VIE) related party guidance for common control arrangements. This ASU requires reporting entities to consider indirect interests held through related parties under common control on a proportional basis rather than as the equivalent of a direct interest in its entirety (as currently required in GAAP) when determining whether a decision-making fee is a variable interest. ASU No. 2018-17 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. The guidance should be applied retrospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the earliest period presented.

The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2019-04

In April 2019, the FASB released ASU No. 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (ASC 326), Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815), and Financial Instruments (ASC 825). The amendments in the ASU improve the Codification by eliminating inconsistencies and providing clarifications.

ASU No. 2019-04 clarifies the scope of the credit losses standard and addresses various issues including, accrued interest receivable balances, recoveries, variable interest rates and prepayments. With respect to hedge accounting, the ASU addresses partial-term fair value hedges, fair value hedge basis adjustments, and certain transition requirements, among other things. For recognizing and measuring financial instruments, the ASU addresses the scope of the guidance, the requirement for remeasurement under ASC 820 when using the measurement alternative, certain disclosure requirements and which equity securities have to be remeasured at historical exchange rates.

The amended guidance in this ASU related to the credit losses and the recognition and measurement of financial instruments will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption in any interim period permitted. Since the Company early adopted the guidance in ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities in 2018, the amended hedge accounting guidance in ASU No. 2019-04 will be effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after April 25, 2019 with early adoption permitted on any date after the issuance of this ASU.

The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.