Fair Value Measurement

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Note 13: Fair Value Measurement

We use a fair-value approach to value certain liabilities. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We use a fair value hierarchy, which distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

•	Level 1 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets;

•	Level 2 — Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and market corroborated inputs; and

•	Level 3 — Valuations based on models where significant inputs are not observable. The unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the fair value accounting guidance hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:

The financial instrument that is measured at fair value on a recurring basis is summarized as follows as of December 31, 2016:

Assets		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				December 31, 2016
Derivative embedded conversion feature		$	—			$	—			$	80,651			$	80,651

The financial instrument that is measured at fair value on a recurring basis is summarized as follows as of December 31, 2015:

Liabilities		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				December 31, 2015
Derivative embedded conversion feature		$	—			$	—			$	120,848			$	120,848

At December 31, 2014, we had no Level 3 assets or liabilities measured at fair value.

The following table shows the change in Level 3 financial instrument measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the period ended December 31, 2016:

	Derivative asset (liability) embedded conversion feature
Balance, December 31, 2014	$	—
Issuance during 2015		(66,227	)
Unrealized (loss) on change in fair value		(54,621	)
Balance, December 31, 2015		(120,848	)
Issuance during 2016		—
Unrealized gain on change in fair value		201,499
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	80,651

On January 5, 2015, WMIH raised $600.0 million of capital (less transaction costs) through the issuance of 600,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. The shares carry a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, equal to their initial purchase price. In addition, they have a mandatory redemption right three years from the issuance date at a price equal to the initial investment amount, and accrue dividends at 3% per annum.

The purpose of the capital raise was principally to pursue strategic acquisitions of operating companies that fit the Company’s desired business model. Management intends to pursue such an acquisition or acquisitions with the proceeds of the capital raise, and should it occur during the three-year term of the Series B Preferred Stock, there is a mandatory conversion of these shares into common stock of WMIH. Mandatory conversion occurs at a price that is the lesser of:

$2.25 per share of WMIH’s common stock; and

ii)

the arithmetic average of daily volume weighted-average prices of WMIH’s common stock during the 20 trading day period ending on the trading day immediately preceding the public announcement by WMIH of its entry into a definitive agreement for such acquisition, subject to a floor of $1.75 per share of WMIH’s common stock.

We use a binomial lattice option pricing model to value the embedded conversion feature that is subject to fair value liability accounting. The key inputs which we utilize in the determination of the fair value as of the reporting date include our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, expected stock price volatility over the term of the convertible preferred securities, which we estimated at 40% as of December 31, 2016, and 40% as of December 31, 2015, and risk-free interest rate, which was estimated at 0.6% as of December 31, 2016, and 0.6% as of December 31, 2015. In addition, the model requires the input of an expected probability of occurrence, which we estimated at 90% for both December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and the timing of a Qualified Acquisition which initiates the mandatory conversion, which we estimated at 6 months from December 31, 2016 and 12 months from December 31, 2015. The fair value of the embedded conversion feature liability is revalued each reportable balance sheet date utilizing our model computations with the decrease or increase in fair value being reported in the consolidated statements of operations as unrealized gain or (loss) on change in fair value of derivative embedded conversion feature, respectively. The primary factors affecting the fair value of the embedded conversion feature liability are the probability of occurrence and timing of a Qualified Acquisition, our stock price and our stock price volatility. In addition, the use of a model requires the input of subjective assumptions, and changes to these assumptions could provide differing results.

Our reported net income attributable to common and participating stockholders (“Net Income”) was approximately $183.7 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016. If the closing stock price of WMIH’s common stock had been 10% lower, our Net Income would have been approximately $23.2 million higher. If the closing stock price of WMIH’s common stock had been 10% higher, our Net Income would have been approximately $30.4 million lower. If our volatility assumption on December 31, 2016 had been 10% lower, our Net Income would have been approximately $5.4 million lower and if our volatility assumption had been 10% higher, our Net Income would have been approximately $0.9 million lower. If our probability of a transaction occurring assumption on December 31, 2016 had been 10% lower, our Net Income would have been approximately $9.0 million lower and if our probability of a transaction occurring assumption had been 10% higher, our Net Income would have been approximately $9.0 million higher.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References + Details