10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010.

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number  1-34020

MICREL, INCORPORATED

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

California	94-2526744
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

2180 Fortune Drive, San Jose, CA       95131

(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 944-0800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x   No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨   No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and” “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨                                                                Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer ¨                                                                  Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)  Yes ¨ No x

As of October 29, 2010 there were 61,340,449 shares of common stock, no par value, outstanding.

	MICREL, INCORPORATED INDEX TO REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
		Page
	PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited):
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - at September 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	25
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	25
	PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	26
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	26
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	33
Item 6.	Exhibits	33
	Signature	34

2

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MICREL, INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	99,276		$	70,898
Short-term investments		2,007			--
Accounts receivable, less allowances: 2010, $2,621; 2009, $3,018		43,269			26,330
Inventories		34,216			34,191
Income taxes receivable		--			4,011
Prepaid expenses and other		1,682			1,449
Deferred income taxes		26,578			18,465
Total current assets		207,028			155,344
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS		12,520			12,692
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET		64,390			67,644
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		9,953			9,381
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET		319			509
OTHER ASSETS		1,431			388
TOTAL	$	295,641		$	245,958
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	18,305		$	15,342
Income taxes payable		2,064			--
Deferred income on shipments to distributors		43,028			23,405
Current portion of long-term debt		5,000			8,571
Other current liabilities		12,421			5,760
Total current liabilities		80,818			53,078
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET		--			2,857
LONG-TERM INCOME TAXES PAYABLE		5,196			4,672
Total liabilities		86,014			60,607
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 14)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value - authorized: 5,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding: none		--			--
Common stock, no par value - authorized: 250,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding:  2010 – 61,399,866 shares; 2009 – 62,348,268 shares		--			1,210
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,242	)		(1,759	)
Retained earnings		210,869			185,900
Total shareholders’ equity		209,627			185,351
TOTAL	$	295,641		$	245,958
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

MICREL, INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
NET REVENUES	$	80,626		$	58,872		$	221,729		$	157,656
COST OF REVENUES (1)		33,937			27,936			95,132			76,537
GROSS PROFIT		46,689			30,936			126,597			81,119
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research and development (1)		11,681			11,405			34,594			35,378
Selling, general and administrative (1)		12,770			9,507			35,738			27,278
Total operating expenses		24,451			20,912			70,332			62,656
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS		22,238			10,024			56,265			18,463
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income		146			164			416			677
Interest expense		(49	)		(116	)		(191	)		(176	)
Other income, net		40			5			115			85
Total other income, net		137			53			340			586
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		22,375			10,077			56,605			19,049
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		7,455			3,276			19,618			6,835
NET INCOME	$	14,920		$	6,801		$	36,987		$	12,214
NET INCOME PER SHARE:
Basic	$	0.24		$	0.11		$	0.59		$	0.19
Diluted	$	0.24		$	0.11		$	0.59		$	0.19
CASH DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE	$	0.035		$	0.035		$	0.105		$	0.105
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES USED IN
COMPUTING PER SHARE AMOUNTS:
Basic		61,936			62,322			62,236			63,993
Diluted		62,311			62,545			62,633			64,063
(1) Share-based compensation expense included in:
Cost of revenues	$	197		$	184		$	589		$	470
Research and development		453			425			1,309			1,133
Selling, general and administrative		550			427			1,539			1,116
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

MICREL, INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010			2009
NET CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	36,987		$	12,214
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		9,833			12,102
Share-based compensation expense		3,437			2,719
Tax benefit on the exercise of employee stock options		122			16
(Gain) or loss on disposal of assets		1			(101	)
Accrued rent		--			(69	)
Deferred income taxes		(9,335	)		(2,257	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(16,939	)		(9,186	)
Inventories		(39	)		2,837
Income taxes receivable		4,011			6,214
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(1,276	)		292
Accounts payable		2,963			(1,892	)
Income taxes payable		2,767			475
Other current liabilities		6,658			(4,163	)
Deferred income on shipments to distributors		19,623			1,753
Net cash provided by operating activities		58,813			20,954
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net		(6,390	)		(4,550	)
Purchases of investments		(2,001	)		(29,210	)
Proceeds from the sale of investments		1,000			46,472
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(7,391	)		12,712
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Long-term debt borrowings		--			15,000
Repayments of long-term debt		(6,428	)		(1,429	)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		3,019			313
Repurchases of common stock		(13,127	)		(32,448	)
Payment of cash dividends		(6,508	)		(6,708	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(23,044	)		(25,272	)
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		28,378			8,394
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - Beginning of period		70,898			48,343
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - End of period	$	99,276		$	56,737
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

MICREL, INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. SIGNIFICANT  ACCOUNTING  POLICIES

Interim Financial Information -The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Micrel, Incorporated and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (together “Micrel” or the “Company”) as of September 30, 2010 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) that management considers necessary for a fair statement of its financial position, operating results and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Operating results and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily in dicative of results for the entire year. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009, was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted (“GAAP”) in the United States of America. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements should also be read in conjunction with the Company’s critical accounting policies included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and those included in this Form 10-Q below.

Net Income Per Common and Equivalent Share - Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the number of weighted-average common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share reflects potential dilution from outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method. Reconciliation of weighted-average shares used in computing net income per share is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Weighted average common shares outstanding		61,936		62,322		62,236		63,993
Dilutive effect of stock options outstanding using the treasury stock method		375		223		397		70
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share		62,311		62,545		62,633		64,063

For each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, 4.4 million stock options, respectively, have been excluded from the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the diluted net income per share computations as they were anti-dilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, 7.2 million stock options and 7.5 million stock options, respectively, have been excluded from the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the diluted net income per share computations as they were anti-dilutive.

2. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued updated guidance related to fair value measurements and disclosures, which requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3, a reporting entity should disclose separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than one net number). The updated guidance also requires that an entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to m easure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements for Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the updated guidance had no impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

6

MICREL, INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

3. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Share-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the employee’s requisite service period. For further details regarding the Company’s share-based compensation arrangements, refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The following table summarizes total share-based compensation expense included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Cost of revenues	$	197		$	184		$	589		$	470
Research and development		453			425			1,309			1,133
Selling, general and administrative		550			427			1,539			1,116
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense		1,200			1,036			3,437			2,719
Less income tax effect		(381	)		(272	)		(1,109	)		(723	)
Net share-based compensation expense	$	819		$	764		$	2,328		$	1,996

During the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company granted 154,599 and 314,586 stock options, respectively, at weighted average fair values of $4.01 and $3.01 per share, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company granted 1,240,250 and 1,431,367 stock options, respectively, at weighted average fair values of $3.87 and $2.97 per share, respectively. The fair value of the Company’s stock options granted under the Company’s option plans was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Expected term (years)		5.7			6.6			6.1			6.7
Stock volatility		41.2	%		38.6	%		40.8	%		44.4	%
Risk free interest rates		1.5	%		2.8	%		2.2	%		2.7	%
Dividends during expected terms		1.4	%		1.7	%		1.4	%		1.9	%

As of September 30, 2010, there was $12.3 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation related to non-vested stock option awards which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.6 years. Total share-based compensation capitalized as part of inventory as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $133,000 and $145,000, respectively.

Under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), eligible employees are permitted to have salary withholdings to purchase shares of Common Stock at a price equal to 95% of the market value of the stock at the end of each three-month offer period, subject to an annual limitation. The ESPP is considered non-compensatory per current share-based compensation accounting guidelines.

7

MICREL, INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

4. INVESTMENTS

Investments purchased with remaining maturity dates of greater than three months and less than 12 months are classified as short-term. Certificates of deposit that are not debt securities and have original maturities greater than three months and remaining maturities less than one year are classified as short-term investments. Investments purchased with remaining maturity dates of 12 months or greater are classified either as short-term or as long-term based on maturities and the Company’s intent with regard to those securities (expectations of sales and redemptions). Short-term investments as of September 30, 2010 consist of certificates of deposit and are classified as short-term investments. Long-term investments as of September 30, 2010 consist of auction rate notes secured by student loans and are classified as av ailable-for-sale securities. Available-for sale securities are stated at market value with unrealized gains and losses included in shareholders’ equity. Unrealized losses are charged against income when a decline in the fair market value of an individual security is determined to be other than temporary. Realized gains and losses on investments are included in other income or expense.

To determine the fair value of financial instruments, the Company uses a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

• Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

• Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

• Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Most of the Company’s financial instruments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.

The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include money market funds and commercial paper. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs include U.S. agency securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The types of instruments valued based on unobservable inputs include the auction rate securities held by the Company. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company estimated the fair value of these auction rate securities using a discounted cash flow model incorporating assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value. Some of these assumptions include estimates for interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows and expected holding periods of the auction rate securities.

 Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):

Description	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets  Level 1		Significant Other Observable Inputs  Level 2		Significant Unobservable Inputs  Level 3		Total
Money market funds	$	72,099	$	4,984	$	−−	$	77,083
Certificates of deposit		2,007		−−		−−		2,007
Auction rate notes		−−		−−		12,520		12,520
Total	$	74,106	$	4,984	$	12,520	$	91,610

8

MICREL, INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

Description	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets  Level 1		Significant Other Observable Inputs  Level 2		Significant Unobservable Inputs  Level 3		Total
Money market funds	$	63,706	$	4,471	$	−−	$	68,177
Auction rate notes		−−		−−		12,692		12,692
Total	$	63,706	$	4,471	$	12,692	$	80,869

As of September 30, 2010, the Company had approximately $12.5 million of auction rate notes, the fair value of which has been measured using Level 3 inputs. Auction rate notes are securities that are structured with short-term interest rate reset dates of generally less than ninety days, but with contractual maturities that can be in excess of ten years. At the end of each reset period, which occurs every seven or twenty eight days for the securities held by the Company, investors can sell or continue to hold the securities at par. As a result of sell orders exceed buy orders, auctions for the student loan-backed notes held by the Company have failed as of September 30, 2010. To date the Company has collected all interest payable on all of its auction-rate securities when due and expects to continue to do so in the future. T he principal associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs, a buyer is found outside of the auction process, the issuers redeem the securities, the issuers repay principal over time from cash flows prior to final maturity or final payments come due according to contractual maturities ranging from 23 to 36 years. As a result, the Company has classified all auction rate notes as long-term investments as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. In the event of a failed auction, the notes bear interest at a predetermined maximum rate based on the credit rating of notes as determined by one or more nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. For the auction rate notes held by the Company as of September 30, 2010, the maximum interest rate is generally one month LIBOR plus 1.5% based on the notes’ AAA rating as of that date.

The Company has used a combination of discounted cash flow models and observable transactions for similar securities to determine the estimated fair value of its investment in auction rate notes as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates for interest rates, estimates for discount rates using yields of comparable traded instruments adjusted for illiquidity and other risk factors, amount of cash flows and expected holding periods of the auction rate notes. Based on this assessment of fair value as of September 30, 2010, the Company determined there was a cumulative decline in the fair value of its auction rate notes of approximately $2.0 million (recorded net of tax as an unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive loss). As of September 30, 2010, the fair value of the Company’s auction rate notes have been in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months. The Company has deemed the unrealized loss to be temporary as the Company believes it will recover its cost basis in these investments.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the changes in the Company’s Level 3 securities (consisting of auction rate notes) are as follows (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs  (Level 3)
Beginning balance, December 31, 2009	$	12,692
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		--
Total gains, before tax		828
Settlements		(1,000	)
Ending balance, September 30, 2010	$	12,520

9

MICREL, INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

5. INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Finished goods	$	9,533	$	11,139
Work in process		23,492		21,467
Raw materials		1,191		1,585
Total inventories	$	34,216	$	34,191

6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):

	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
Manufacturing equipment	$	174,167		$	169,392
Land		8,137			8,137
Buildings and improvements		53,610			53,193
Office furniture and research equipment		14,450			13,612
Assets held for sale		910			910
		251,274			245,244
Accumulated depreciation		(186,884	)		(177,600	)
Total property, plant and equipment, net	$	64,390		$	67,644

Depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $3.2 million and $9.6 million, respectively.

7. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Components of intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):

	As of September 30, 2010						As of December 31, 2009
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
Developed and core technology	$	8,718	$	8,718	$	--	$	8,718	$	8,718	$	--
Patents and trade name		10,318		9,999		319		10,318		9,809		509
Customer relationships		1,455		1,455		--		1,455		1,455		--
Total intangible assets	$	20,491	$	20,172	$	319	$	20,491	$	19,982	$	509

Acquired technology, patents and other intangible assets continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 7 years using the straight-line method. Total intangible amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $64,000 and $190,000, respectively.

The estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets as of September 30, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31,
2010 (three months)	$	64
2011		255
Thereafter		--
	$	319

10

MICREL, INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

8. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Other current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Accrued compensation	$	8,451	$	2,819
Accrued commissions		2,242		1,657
Accrued workers compensation and health insurance		743		517
All other current accrued liabilities		985		767
Total other current liabilities	$	12,421	$	5,760

9. BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS

Under the terms of an unsecured credit facility with Bank of the West, the Company has a $5 million line of credit available for general working capital needs, which includes a $5 million letter of credit sub-facility including a $2 million foreign exchange sub-facility. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had no borrowings under the line of credit. Interest under the line of credit facility will accrue based on one of three interest rates, at the Company’s option: (1) a variable alternate base rate plus 1.00%, the alternate base rate being the greater of (x) Bank of the West’s prime rate, (y) the Fed Funds Rate plus 0.5% or (z) daily adjusted one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%; (2) floating one-month LIBOR plus 2.25% or (3) fixed LIBOR for one, two, three or six month periods, plus 2.25%.

The agreement includes certain restrictive covenants and, as of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with such covenants.

The credit facility also includes a $15 million term loan facility to finance the repurchase of shares of the Company’s common stock. In May 2009, the Company borrowed $15 million under the term loan. Interest under the term loan facility is payable at a rate equal to floating one-month LIBOR plus 2.25%. Borrowings are payable over 21 equal monthly installments, which commenced on August 31, 2009. The following table summarizes the Company’s long-term debt (in thousands):

	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
Notes payable bearing variable interest at 1 month LIBOR plus 2.25%	$	5,000		$	11,428
Current portion		(5,000	)		(8,571	)
Long-term debt	$	--		$	2,857

As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of the Company’s notes payable was not materially different than its respective carrying value.

10. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In June 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate swap contract (the “Swap”), to partially offset its exposure to the effects of changes in interest rates on its variable-rate financing obligations. As a result of entering into the Swap, the Company has economically hedged the variability on future interest payments resulting in a fixed rate of 3.36% for $2.5 million of the Company’s notes payable as of September 30, 2010 (see Note 9). The Company will experience variability in future interest payments for the remaining $2.5 million unhedged portion of the Company’s notes payable. The Company does not hold derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Swap is considered a cash flow hedge.

11

MICREL, INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.

All derivatives are recorded at fair value in either prepaid and other current assets or other accrued liabilities. The Company reports cash flows from derivative instruments in cash flows from operating activities. As of September 30, 2010, the notional amount of the outstanding interest rate swap contract was $2.5 million. The effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was not material. The fair values of the Company’s derivative assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, were not material. The Company will continue to revaluate the fair value of the derivative instrument at each period end and record corresponding impact on the balance sheet and Statement of Operations.

11. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, two customers accounted for more than 10% of net revenues. Two worldwide distributors accounted for $44.8 million (20%) and $44.3 million (20%) of net revenues, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, three customers accounted for more than 10% of net revenues. An original equipment manufacturer accounted for $20.1 million (13%) and two worldwide distributors accounted for $29.9 million (19%) and $21.7 million (14%) of net revenues, respectively.

As of September 30, 2010, two worldwide distributors and an Asian-based stocking representative accounted for 26%, 16% and 11%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. At December 31, 2009, three world-wide distributors and an original equipment manufacturer accounted for 19%, 18%, 10% and 11%, respectively, of total accounts receivable.

12. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Net Income	$	14,920	$	6,801	$	36,987	$	12,214
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of tax		361		489		517		211
Comprehensive income	$	15,281	$	7,290	$	37,504	$	12,425

13. SEGMENT REPORTING

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker. The Company has two reportable segments: standard products and other products, which consist primarily of custom and foundry products and revenues from the license of patents. The chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance based on revenue. Accordingly, all expenses are considered corporate level activities and are not allocated to segments. Therefore, it is not practical to show profit or loss by reportable segments. Also, the chief operating decision maker does not assign assets to these segments. Consequently, it is not relevant to show assets by reportable segments.

12

MICREL, INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Net Revenues by Segment	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(dollars in thousands)	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net Revenues:
Standard Products	$	78,793		$	57,249		$	215,594		$	152,968
Other Products		1,833			1,623			6,135			4,688
Total net revenues	$	80,626		$	58,872		$	221,729		$	157,656
As a Percentage of Total Net Revenues:
Standard Products		98	%		97	%		97	%		97	%
Other Products		2	%		3	%		3	%		3	%
Total net revenues		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

14. LITIGATION AND OTHER CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, claims have been filed by or have arisen against the Company in its normal course of business. The Company believes that the ultimate resolution of these claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

As of September 30, 2010, the Company believes it is not reasonably likely that an unrecorded material loss has been incurred. Generally, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and no assurance can be given that the Company will prevail in any particular lawsuit. Accordingly, the pending lawsuits, as well as potential future litigation with other companies, could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

15. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM

On February 5, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a $15 million share repurchase program for calendar year 2010. On September 13, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase to the amount authorized for repurchase from $15.0 million to $30.0 million. Share repurchases are recorded as a reduction of common stock to the extent available. Any amounts in excess of common stock are recorded as a reduction of retained earnings. Shares of common stock purchased pursuant to the repurchase program are cancelled from outstanding shares upon repurchase and credited to an authorized and un-issued reserve account. Share repurchases are intended to reduce the number of outstanding shares of common stock to increase shareholder value and offset dilution from the Company’s stock option plans and emp loyee stock purchase plan. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company repurchased 1,334,191 shares of its common stock for an aggregate price of $13.1 million.

16. INCOME TAXES

The income tax provision for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as a percentage of income before taxes, was 33.3% and 34.7%, respectively. The tax provision for these periods included $358,000 in prior year benefits recognized in the third quarter of 2010. In addition, the tax provision for these periods excluded approximately 1.0% in benefits, as a percentage of income before taxes, from the Federal research and development credit which expired on December 31, 2009. The income tax provision for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as a percentage of income before taxes, was 32.5% and 35.9%, respectively. The tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2009 included $261,000 in prior year benefits. The tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 included an additional $525,000 provision to reduce the amount of non-current deferred tax assets that were determined to be unrealizable, offset in part by $261,000 in prior year benefits recognized.

13

MICREL, INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

As of September 30, 2010, the gross liability for uncertain tax positions was $12.0 million and the net liability, reduced for the federal effects of potential state tax exposures, was $9.2 million. If these uncertain tax positions are sustained upon tax authority audit, or otherwise become certain, the net $9.2 million would favorably affect the Company’s tax provision in such future periods. Included in the $9.2 million is $2.2 million which has not yet reduced income tax payments, and therefore, has been netted against non-current deferred tax assets. The remaining $7.0 million liability consists of $5.2 million included in long-term income taxes payable and $1.8 million included in current income taxes payable. The Company does not anticipate a significant change to the $5.2 million long-term uncertain income tax positi ons within the next 12 months. The Company believes that the uncertainties surrounding the $1.8 million in current uncertain income tax positions may be resolved within the next 12 months.

The Company continues to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as part of the income tax provision. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had $650,000 and $478,000, respectively, accrued for interest and $0 accrued for penalties for both periods. These accruals are included as a component of long-term income taxes payable.

The Company is required to file U.S. federal income tax returns as well as income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company may be subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for calendar years 2006 and forward. Significant state tax jurisdictions include California, New York and Texas, and generally, the Company is subject to routine examination for years 2005 and forward in these jurisdictions. In addition, any research and development credit carryforwards that were generated in prior years and utilized in these years may also be subject to examination by respective state taxing authorities. Generally, the Company is subject to routine examination for years 2002 and forward in various immaterial foreign tax jurisdictions in which it operates.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities result primarily from temporary differences between book and tax bases of assets and liabilities and state research and development credit carryforwards. The Company had net current deferred tax assets of $26.6 million and net long-term deferred tax assets of $10.0 million as of September 30, 2010. The Company must regularly assess the likelihood that future taxable income levels will be sufficient to ultimately realize the tax benefits of these deferred tax assets. The Company currently believes that future taxable income levels will be sufficient to realize the tax benefits of these deferred tax assets and has not established a valuation allowance. Should the Company determine that future realization of these tax benefits is not likely, a valuation allowance would be established, which would increase the Company’s tax provision in the period of such determination.

17. DIVIDENDS

On July 22, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.035 per outstanding share of common stock. The payment of $2.2 million was made on August 22, 2010 to shareholders of record as of August 11, 2010.

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On October 21, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.035 per outstanding share of common stock payable on November 24, 2010 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 10, 2010. This dividend will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2010 and is expected to be approximately $2.2 million.

14

ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The statements contained in this Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  including statements regarding the Company’s expectations, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding the future. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to statements regarding: future revenues and dependence on standard products sales and international sales; the levels of international sales; the effect of global market conditions on revenue levels, profitability and results of operations; future products or product development; statements regarding fluctuations in the Company’s result s of operations; future returns and price adjustments and allowance; future uncollectible amounts and doubtful accounts allowance; future products or product development; future research and development spending and the Company’s product development strategy; the Company’s markets, product features and performance; product demand and inventory to service such demand; competitive threats and pricing pressure; the effect of dependence on third parties; the Company’s future use and protection of its intellectual property; future expansion or utilization of manufacturing capacity; future expenditures; current or future acquisitions; the ability to meet anticipated short-term and long-term cash requirements; effect of changes in market interest rates on investments; the Company’s need and ability to attract and retain certain personnel; the cost and outcome of litigation and its effect on the Company; the future realization of tax benefits; and share-based incentive awards and expectations regarding future stock based compensation expense. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believe,” "estimate,” "may,” "can,” "will,” "could,” "would,” "intend,” "objective,” "plan,” "expect,” "likely,” "potential,” "possible” or "anticipate” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to the Company on the date of this report, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those risks discussed under “Risks Factors” and elsewhere in this document, which could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Additional factors that may affect operating results are contained within the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Micrel designs, develops, manufactures and markets a range of high-performance analog power integrated circuits (“ICs”), mixed-signal ICs and digital ICs. The Company currently ships over 3,000 standard products. These products address a wide range of end markets including cellular handsets, portable computing, enterprise and home networking, wide area and metropolitan area networks, digital televisions and industrial equipment. The Company also manufactures custom analog and mixed-signal circuits and provides wafer foundry services for customers who produce electronic systems for communications, consumer and military applications.

The Company’s high performance power management analog products are characterized by high power density and small form factor. The demand for high performance power management circuits has been fueled by the growth of portable communications and computing devices, including for example, cellular handsets, portable media players and notebook computers. The Company also has an extensive power management offering for the networking and communications infrastructure markets including cloud, single-board and enterprise servers, network switches and routers, storage area networks and wireless base stations. Recently, the Company entered the solid state lighting market, and is seeing strength in the emergence of solid state drives and analog switches including USB switches.

The Company’s high bandwidth communications circuits are used primarily for enterprise networks, storage area networks, access networks and metropolitan area networks. With form factor, size reductions, and ease of use critical for system designs, Micrel utilizes innovative packaging and proprietary process technology to address these challenges.

The Company’s family of Ethernet products targets the digital home and industrial/embedded networking markets. This product portfolio consists of physical layer transceivers (“PHY”), Media Access Controllers (“MAC”), switches, and System-On-Chip (“SoC”) devices that support various Ethernet protocols supporting communication transmission speeds from 10 Megabits per second to a Gigabit per second.

15

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

In addition to standard analog and mixed signal products, the Company offers customers various combinations of design, process and foundry services.

The following table presents the Company’s revenues by product line, as a percentage of total net revenues.

Net Revenues by Product Line	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
As a Percentage of Total Net Revenues
Standard Products
Analog		63	%		68	%		62	%		68	%
High bandwidth		17			13			17			14
Ethernet		18			16			18			15
Total standard products		98			97			97			97
Foundry, custom and other		2			3			3			3
Total net revenues		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

The Company’s products address a wide range of end markets. The following table presents the Company’s revenues by end market as a percentage of total net revenues.

Net Revenues by End Market	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
As a Percentage of Total Net Revenues
Industrial		39	%		34	%		39	%		35	%
High-speed communications		31			27			31			28
Computer		16			17			15			16
Wireless handsets		11			16			12			16
Automotive, military and other		3			6			3			5
Total net revenues		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

To enhance the readers’ understanding of the Company’s performance, the following is a chronological overview of the Company’s results for the quarterly periods from January 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010.

The worldwide macroeconomic recession continued to impact demand in the first quarter of 2009 and the Company’s customers continued to maintain lean inventory levels. Despite the difficult environment, first quarter of 2009 bookings increased over fourth quarter levels and resulted in a book-to-bill ratio greater than one for both the original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) and distribution sales channels. The Company’s first quarter of 2009 revenues were $47.0 million, compared to $55.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2008. Gross margin in the first quarter of 2009 was 50.3%, compared to 52% in the prior quarter. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to factory capacity under-utilization as the Company continued to control its inventory levels. Net income in the first quarter of 2009 was $1.5 milli on, or $0.02 per diluted share, as compared to fourth quarter 2008 net income of $4.9 million, or $0.07 per diluted share. The Company maintained its quarterly $0.035 per share dividend and repurchased 1.9 million shares under its stock repurchase plan.

16

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

The Company’s revenues and net income increased in the second quarter of 2009, as compared to the first quarter of 2009. The Company’s book-to-bill ratio was greater than one. Second quarter revenues grew on a sequential quarter basis for the first time in four quarters. The Company experienced revenue growth in all major product lines with primary growth in markets in China. In particular, the build out of China’s 3G infrastructure was an important driver for the Company’s revenue growth in the second quarter of 2009. Revenues increased to $51.8 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared to $47.0 million in the first quarter of 2009. Second quarter 2009 operating expenses were down by 4% sequentially. Second quarter 2009 net income of $3.9 million was more than double the net income of $1.5 million repo rted for the first quarter of 2009. The Company also continued its stock repurchase program. In addition, the Company also maintained its quarterly $0.035 per share dividend payment.

Revenues for the third quarter of 2009 totaled $58.9 million, as compared to $51.8 million in the second quarter of 2009 and $67.6 million in the third quarter of 2008. Sequential revenue growth was driven by increasing demand across most major markets served by the Company. Bookings for the third quarter of 2009 resulted in a book-to-bill ratio that was greater than one for the third consecutive quarter. Gross margin in the third quarter of 2009 increased to 52.5%, as compared to 51.3% in the second quarter of 2009, in part due to increased revenue levels to cover fixed manufacturing costs.  Third quarter 2009 net income increased 76% to $6.8 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, as compared to $3.9 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2009. As a result of the Company’s ongoing expense manage ment and the Company’s stock repurchase program, third quarter 2009 earnings per diluted share were equal to $0.11, which was equal to the third quarter 2008 earnings per diluted share, despite significantly lower revenues in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the third quarter of 2008. The Company also maintained its quarterly $0.035 per share dividend.

Revenues in the fourth quarter of 2009 increased 4% to $61.2 million, as compared to $58.9 million in the third quarter of 2009. The sequential growth was driven by increasing demand across most major markets for the Company’s products. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the book-to-bill ratio was significantly greater than one. Fourth quarter 2009 gross margin increased to 53.3%, from 52.5% in the third quarter of 2009. The improvement in gross margin was in part due to better capacity utilization as a result of increased revenue levels to cover fixed manufacturing costs. During the quarter, total operating expenses included a $6.5 million non-cash, pre-tax charge related to the impairment of certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment located at the Company’s San Jose fabrication facility. Operating income in the fou rth quarter of 2009 was $5.5 million, or 8.9% of sales, as compared to $10.0 million, or 17.0% of sales, in the third quarter 2009. Net income in the fourth quarter of 2009 was $4.1 million, or $0.07 per basic and diluted share, which included a $0.06 per diluted share reduction due to equipment impairment. In comparison, net income in the third quarter of 2009 was $6.8 million, or $0.11 per basic and diluted share. In addition, the Company continued to maintain its quarterly $0.035 per share dividend.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, revenue was $218.9 million, as compared to revenue of $259.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Net income for 2009 was $16.3 million, or $0.26 per diluted share, as compared to net income of $28.3 million, or $0.40 per diluted share in 2008. During 2009, the Company generated $37.6 million in cash flow from operations, repurchased $32.5 million of its common stock, purchased its San Jose California corporate facility for approximately $6.0 million, paid $8.9 million of dividends to shareholders and made other capital investments of $6.1 million.

17

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

During the first quarter of 2010, demand from customers serving the industrial and communications end markets resulted in strong bookings and solid revenue growth. Revenues during the first quarter of 2010 increased to $67.2 million, representing a 9.7% increase from the $61.2 million reported for the fourth quarter of 2009. As compared to the first quarter of 2009, revenues were higher by $20.2 million, or 43.0% due to higher overall demand from customers in all geographies and end markets. First quarter 2010 gross margin was 55.4%, representing an increase from 53.3% in the fourth quarter of 2009. The Company’s operating margin in the first quarter of 2010 was 22.2%, as compared to 8.9% in the fourth quarter of 2009. Net income for the first quarter of 2010 was $9.7 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, reflecting an increase as compared to the fourth quarter of 2009 net income of $4.1 million, or $0.07 per diluted share. Earnings per share for the fourth quarter of 2009 included $0.06 per diluted share of equipment impairment expense. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company generated $17.9 million in cash flow from operations. The Company also maintained its quarterly $0.035 per share dividend.

During the second quarter of 2010, revenues increased to $73.9 million, representing an increase of $6.7 million, or 10.0%, from $67.2 million in the first quarter of 2010. Compared to the same period last year, revenues increased by $22.1 million, or 42.7%, due to higher overall demand from customers in all geographies and end markets. Demand from customers serving the communications and computer end markets increased, resulting in a book-to-bill ratio that was greater than one. The gross margin in the second quarter of 2010 was 57.8%, as compared to 55.4% in the first quarter of 2010. This increase was largely due to improved factory utilization and in part due to a reduced sales mix of lower margin products shipped to the wireless handset market. The Company’s operating margin for the second quarter of 2010 increased to 25. 8% as compared to 22.2% in the first quarter of 2010. Net income for the second quarter of 2010 was $12.4 million, or $0.20 per basic and diluted share, as compared to net income equal to $9.7 million, or $0.16 per basic and diluted share for the first quarter of 2010, and net income equal to $3.9 million, or $0.06 per basic and diluted share, for the second quarter of 2009. During the second quarter of 2010, cash flows from operations were $26.8 million. The Company repurchased $1.3 million of its common stock during the second quarter of 2010 and also maintained its quarterly $0.035 per share dividend.

During the third quarter of 2010, revenues increased to $80.6 million, representing an  increase of $6.7 million, or 9.1%, from $73.9 million in the second quarter of 2010, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of revenue growth for the Company. The increase in revenues as compared to the prior quarter was primarily due to improved demand in the industrial and communications end markets. Compared to the same period last year, revenues increased by $21.8 million, or 37.0%, due to greater overall demand from customers in all geographies and end markets. This is reflective of the Company’s successful initiatives to penetrate new high-growth markets, the release of a significant number of new products that are gaining market traction, an expanded sales force, solid operational execution and improved macro-economic condit ions. During the third quarter of 2010, order lead times dropped to an average of six to eight weeks, a more customary range as compared to the average eight to twelve week range experienced during the first half of the year. Bookings for the third quarter of 2010 declined from second quarter 2010 levels, primarily due to reduced orders from distributors as they adjusted inventories to be in-line with reduced order lead times. The Company’s book-to-bill ratio for the third quarter of 2010 was less than one, however, the book-to-bill ratio remains above one on a year-to-date basis. Third quarter gross margin was 57.9%, as compared to 57.8% in the prior quarter. During the quarter, gross margin improvement resulting from increased factory capacity utilization was offset by an increase in reserves for excess inventory. The Company’s operating margin for the third quarter of 2010 increased to 27.6% as compared to 25.8% in the second quarter of 2010. This marks the sixth consecutive quarter of operati ng margin increase and represents the highest operating margin since the Company’s revenue peak in the fourth quarter of 2000. Net income for the third quarter of 2010 was $14.9 million, or $0.24 per basic and diluted share, as compared to net income equal to $12.4 million, or $0.20 per basic and diluted share for the second quarter of 2010, and net income equal to $6.8 million, or $0.11 per basic and diluted share, for the third quarter of 2009. Third quarter earnings per diluted share were $0.24, which reflects an all-time quarterly record for Micrel and surpasses its previous record of $0.23, which was achieved in the fourth quarter of 2000 when total revenues were 27% higher. This increase in earnings per diluted share was due in part to a lower number of outstanding shares attributable to the Company’s share re-purchase program which has reduced the Company’s diluted share count 37% as compared to December 31, 2000. During the third quarter of 2010, cash flows from operations were $14. 1 million. The Company repurchased $10.9 million of its common stock during the third quarter of 2010 and also maintained its $0.035 per share dividend.

18

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

The Company derives a substantial portion of its net revenues from standard products. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company’s standard products sales accounted for 98% and 97%, respectively, of the Company’s net revenues. The Company believes that a substantial portion of its net revenues in the future will depend upon standard products sales, although such sales as a proportion of net revenues may vary as the Company adjusts product output levels to correspond with varying economic conditions and demand levels in the markets which it serves. The standard products business is characterized by short-term orders and shipment schedules, and customer orders typically can be canceled or rescheduled without significant penalty to the customer. Since most standard products backlog is cancelabl e without significant penalty, the Company typically plans its production and inventory levels based on forecasts of customer demand, which are highly unpredictable and can fluctuate substantially. In addition, the Company is limited in its ability to reduce costs quickly in response to any revenue shortfalls.

The Company may experience significant fluctuations in its results of operations. Factors that affect the Company’s results of operations include the volume and timing of orders received, changes in the mix of products sold, the utilization level of manufacturing capacity, competitive pricing pressures and the successful development and customer acceptance of new products. These and other factors are described in further detail later in this discussion and in Part II Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. As a result of the foregoing or other factors, including global economic conditions, there can be no assurance that the Company will not experience material fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly or annual basis, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condi tion and results of operations or cash flows.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and discussed within this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the bas is for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company considers certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition and receivables, inventory valuation, share-based compensation, income taxes, and litigation to be critical to the fair presentation of its financial statements. For a detailed discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies, see Note 1 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this document and Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Revenue Recognition and Receivables. Micrel generates revenue by selling products to OEMs, distributors and stocking representatives. Stocking representative firms may buy and stock the Company’s products for resale or may act as the Company’s sales representative in arranging for direct sales from the Company to an OEM customer. The Company’s policy is to recognize revenue from sales to customers when the rights and risks of ownership have passed to the customer, when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered, the price is fixed or determinable and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

The Company allows certain distributors located in North America and Europe, and in certain countries in Asia, significant return rights, price protection and pricing adjustments subsequent to the initial product shipment. As these returns and price concessions have historically been significant, and future returns and price concessions are difficult to reliably estimate, the Company defers recognition of revenue and related cost of sales (in the balance sheet line item “deferred income on shipments to distributors”) derived from sales to these distributors until they have resold the Company’s products to their customers. Although revenue and related cost of sales are not recognized, the Company records an accounts receivable and relieves inventory at the time of initial product shipment. As standard terms are FOB shipping point, payment terms are enforced from shipment date and legal title and risk of inventory loss passes to the distributor upon shipment.

19

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

In addition, where revenue is deferred upon shipment and recognized on a sell-through basis, the Company may offer price adjustments to its distributors to allow the distributor to price the Company’s products competitively for specific resale opportunities. The Company estimates and records an allowance for distributor price adjustments for which the specific resale transaction has been completed, but the price adjustment claim has not yet been received and recorded by the Company.

Sales to OEM customers and stocking representatives are recognized based upon the shipment terms of the sale transaction when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. The Company does not grant return rights, price protection or pricing adjustments to OEM customers. The Company offers limited contractual stock rotation rights to stocking representatives. In addition, the Company is not contractually obligated to offer, but may infrequently grant, price adjustments or price protection to certain stocking representatives on an exception basis. At the time of shipment to OEMs and stocking representatives, an allowance for returns is established based upon historical return rates, and an allowance for price adjustments is established based on an estimate of price adjustments to be granted. Actual future returns and price ad justments could be different than the allowance established.

The Company also maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable. This estimate is based on an analysis of specific customer creditworthiness and historical bad debts experience. Actual future uncollectible amounts could exceed the doubtful accounts allowance established.

Inventory Valuation. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. The Company records adjustments to write down the cost of obsolete and excess inventory to the estimated market value based on historical and forecasted demand for its products. If actual future demand for the Company’s products is less than currently forecasted, additional inventory adjustments may be required. Once an inventory write-down provision is established, it is maintained until the product to which it relates is sold or otherwise disposed of.

Share-Based Compensation. Share-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense in the statement of operations. To determine fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model which requires input factors such as expected term, stock price volatility, dividend yield and risk free interest rate. In addition, the Company estimates expected forfeiture rates of stock grants and share-based compensation expense is only recognized for those shares expected to vest. Determining the input factors, such as expected term, expected volatility and estimated forfeiture rates, requires significant judgment based on subjective future expectations.

Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities result primarily from temporary timing differences between book and tax valuation of assets and liabilities, and state research and development credit carryforwards. The Company must regularly assess the likelihood that future taxable income levels will be sufficient to ultimately realize the tax benefits of these deferred tax assets. As of September 30, 2010, the Company believes that future taxable income levels will be sufficient to realize the tax benefits of these deferred tax assets and has not established a valuation allowance. Should the Company determine that future realization of these tax benefits is not more likely than not, a valuation allowance would be established, which would increase the Company’s ta x provision in the period of such determination.

The Company uses a two-step approach to recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes.

Litigation. The semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. During recent years, the Company has resolved litigation involving intellectual property claims. An estimated liability is accrued when it is determined to be probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The liability accrual is charged to income in the period such determination is made. The Company regularly evaluates current information available to determine whether such accruals should be made.

20

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of total net revenues for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of revenues		42.1			47.5			42.9			48.5
Gross profit		57.9			52.5			57.1			51.5
Operating expenses:
Research and development		14.5			19.4			15.6			22.5
Selling, general and administrative		15.8			16.1			16.1			17.3
Total operating expenses		30.3			35.5			31.7			39.8
Income from operations		27.6			17.0			25.4			11.7
Other income (expense):
Interest income		0.2			0.3			0.2			0.4
Interest expense		--			(0.2	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)
Other income, net		--			--			--			0.1
Total other income, net		0.2			0.1			0.1			0.4
Income before income taxes		27.8			17.1			25.5			12.1
Provision for income taxes		9.3			5.5			8.8			4.3
Net income		18.5	%		11.6	%		16.7	%		7.8	%

Net Revenues. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, net revenues increased 37% to $80.6 million from $58.9 million for the same period in the prior year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net revenues increased 41% to $221.7 million from $157.7 million for the same period in the prior year. These increases were primarily the result of increased unit shipments into the industrial, communications and computer markets.

Customer demand for semiconductors can change quickly and unexpectedly. The Company’s revenue levels have been highly dependent on the amount of new orders that are received for which product is requested to be delivered to the customer within the same quarter. Within the semiconductor industry these orders that are booked and shipped within the quarter are called “turns fill” orders. When the turns fill level exceeds approximately 35% of quarterly revenue, it makes it very difficult to predict near term revenues and income. Because of the long cycle time to build its products, the Company’s lack of visibility into demand when turns fill is high makes it difficult to predict what product to build to match future demand.

As noted in Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors” and above in the overview section of this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” a trend has developed over the last several years whereby customers in the semiconductor supply chain have worked to minimize the amount of inventory of semiconductors they hold. As a consequence, customers are generally providing less order backlog to the Company and other semiconductor suppliers, and relying on short lead times to buffer their build schedules. Shorter lead times reduce visibility into end demand and increase the reliance on turns fill orders. The reluctance of customers to provide order backlog together with short lead times and the uncertain growth rate of the world economy, make it diffi cult to precisely predict future levels of sales and profitability.

21

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Sales to customers in Asia represented 61% and 59%, respectively, of net revenues for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 as compared to 65% and 62%, respectively, of the Company’s net revenues for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009. The trend for the Company’s customers to move their electronics manufacturing to Asian countries has resulted in increased pricing pressure for the Company and other semiconductor manufacturers. Asian based manufacturers are typically more concerned about cost and less concerned about the capability of the integrated circuits they purchase. This can make it more difficult for United States based companies to differentiate themselves in any manner other than by lowering prices. The increased concentration of electronics procurement and manufacturing in the Asia Pacific region has led, and may continue to lead, to continued price pressure for the Company’s products in the future.

Gross Profit. Gross profit is affected by a variety of factors including the volume of product sales, manufacturing capacity utilization, product mix, average selling prices and product yields. The Company’s gross margin increased to 57.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 52.5% for the comparable period in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company’s gross margin increased to 57.1% from 51.5% for the comparable period in 2009. These increases were primarily due to improved factory utilization and, to a lesser extent, a reduced sales mix of lower margin products shipped to the wireless handset market as compared to the same periods in 2009.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses as a percentage of net revenues represented 14.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 19.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2009.  On a dollar basis, research and development expenses increased slightly to $11.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $11.4 million for the same period in the prior year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, research and development expenses as a percentage of net revenues represented 15.6% and 22.5%, respectively. On a dollar basis, research and development expenses decreased $0.8 million, or 2%, to $34.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $35.4 million for the comparable period in 2009. This decrease was prim arily due to decreased prototype fabrication costs. The Company believes that the development and introduction of new products is critical to its future success and expects to continue its investment in research and development activities in the future.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. As a percentage of net revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses represented 15.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 16.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2009.  On a dollar basis, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $3.3 million, or 34%, to $12.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from $9.5 million for the comparable period in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues represented 16.1% and 17.3%, respectively.  On a dollar basis, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $8.5 million, or 31%, to $35.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $27.3 million for the comparable period in 2009. This increase was primarily due to increased sales headcount, increased sales commissions and increased bonus compensation accruals.

Share-Based Compensation. The Company’s results of operations for the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 included $1.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of non-cash expense related to the fair value of share-based compensation awards. For the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s results of operations included $3.4 million and $2.7 million, respectively, of share-based compensation awards. Share-based compensation expense is included in the statement of operations in cost of revenues, research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expense (see Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

Other Income (Expense). Other income, net reflects interest income from investments in short-term and long-term investment securities and money market funds and other non-operating income, offset by interest expense incurred on term notes.

22

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Provision for Income Taxes. The income tax provision for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as a percentage of income before taxes, was 33.3% and 34.7%, respectively. The tax provision for these periods included $358,000 in prior year benefits recognized in the third quarter of 2010. In addition, the tax provision for these periods excluded approximately 1.0% in benefits, as a percentage of income before taxes, from the Federal research and development credit which expired on December 31, 2009. The income tax provision for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as a percentage of income before taxes, was 32.5% and 35.9%, respectively. The tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2009, included $261,000 in prior year benefits. The tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 , included an additional $525,000 provision, to reduce the amount of non-current deferred tax assets that were determined to be unrealizable, offset in part by $261,000 in prior year benefits recognized. The income tax provision for such interim periods differs from taxes computed at the federal statutory rate primarily due to the effect of non-deductible share-based compensation expense, state income taxes, federal and state research and development credits and federal qualified production activity deductions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, the Company’s principal sources of funding have been its cash from operations, bank borrowings and sales of common stock. Principal sources of liquidity at September 30, 2010 consisted of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $101.3 million and a $5.0 million revolving line of credit from a commercial bank.

The Company generated $58.8 million in cash from operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Significant cash flows included cash provided by net income of $37.0 million plus additions for non-cash activities of $4.1 million (consisting primarily of $9.8 million in depreciation and amortization and $3.4 million in share-based compensation expense partially offset by a $9.3 million increase in deferred income taxes) combined with a $19.6 million increase in deferred income, a $6.7 million increase in other accrued liabilities, a $3.0 million increase in accounts payable and a $2.8 million increase in income taxes payable combined with a $4.0 million decrease in income taxes receivable, which were offset in part by a $16.9 million increase in accounts receivable resulting from increased product ship ments, and a $1.3 million increase in prepaid and other assets.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company generated $21.0 million in cash from operating activities. Significant cash flows included cash provided by net income of $12.2 million plus additions for non-cash activities of $12.4 million (consisting primarily of $12.1 million in depreciation and amortization and $2.7 million in share-based compensation expense partially offset by a $2.3 million increase in deferred income taxes) combined with a $6.2 million decrease in income taxes receivable, a $2.8 million decrease in inventories and a $1.8 million increase in deferred income, which were offset in part by a $9.2 million increase in accounts receivable combined with a $4.2 million decrease in other current liabilities and a $1.9 million decrease in accounts payable.

The Company used $7.4 million of cash in investing activities comprised primarily of $6.4 million of purchases of property, plant and equipment and $2.0 million in purchases of short-term investments, which was partially offset by $1.0 million in proceeds from the sale of long-term auction rate securities.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company generated $12.7 million of cash from investing activities comprised primarily of $17.3 million in net proceeds from the sale of investments, which was partially offset by $4.6 million of purchases of property, plant and equipment.

The Company used $23.0 million of cash in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily for the repurchase of $13.1 million of the Company’s common stock, $6.5 million for the payment of cash dividends and $6.4 million in repayments of long-term debt, which was partially offset by $3.0 million in proceeds from employee stock transactions.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company used $25.3 million of cash in financing activities primarily for the repurchase of $32.5 million of the Company's common stock, $6.7 million for the payment of cash dividends and $1.4 million in repayments of long-term debt, which was partially offset by $15.0 million in proceeds of long-term debt borrowing.

23

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

The Company currently intends to spend approximately $10 million to $15 million to purchase capital equipment and make facility improvements during the next twelve months primarily for manufacturing equipment and additional research and development related software and equipment.

On October 21, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.035 per outstanding share of common stock payable on November 24, 2010 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 10, 2010. This dividend will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2010 and is expected to be approximately $2.2 million.

The Company is currently authorized by its Board of Directors to repurchase an additional $16.9 million of its common stock through December 31, 2010.

The Company believes that its cash from operations, existing cash balances and short-term investments, and its credit facility will be sufficient to meet its cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. In the longer term, the Company believes future cash requirements will continue to be met by its cash from operations, credit arrangements and future debt or equity financings as required.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Please refer to Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the expected impact of recently issued accounting standards.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

As of September 30, 2010, the Company had the following contractual obligations and commitments (in thousands):

	Payments Due By Period
	Total		Less than  1 Year		1-3  Years		4-5  Years		After 5  Years
Long-term debt (see Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)	$	5,000	$	5,000	$	--	$	--	$	--
Operating leases		1,713		847		729		137		--
Open purchase orders		19,750		19,750		--		--		--
Total	$	26,463	$	25,597	$	729	$	137	$	--

Open purchase orders are defined as agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable pricing provisions; and the approximate timing of the transactions.

Borrowing agreements consisted of an unsecured credit facility with Bank of the West. The credit facility includes a $5.0 million line of credit available for general working capital needs, a $5.0 million letter of credit sub-facility and a $2.0 million foreign exchange sub-facility. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had no borrowings under the line of credit. The credit facility also includes a $15 million term loan facility to finance the repurchase of shares of the Company’s common stock. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had borrowed $15 million under the term loan facility, of which $10.0 million has been repaid.

As of September 30, 2010, the Company had $9.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits. Included in the $9.2 million is $2.2 million that has not yet reduced income tax payments, and, therefore, has been netted against non-current deferred tax assets. The remaining $7.0 million liability consists of $5.2 million included in long-term income taxes payable and $1.8 million included in current income taxes payable. The Company does not anticipate a significant change to the $5.2 million long-term uncertain income tax positions within the next 12 months. The Company believes that the uncertainties surrounding the $1.8 million in current uncertain income tax positions may be resolved within the next 12 months.

24

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements and has not entered into any transactions involving unconsolidated, limited purpose entities or commodity contracts.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

At September 30, 2010, the Company held $14.5 million in principal of senior auction rate notes secured by student loans. Auctions for these auction rate notes have failed as of September 30, 2010. The funds associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs, a buyer is found outside of the auction process, the issuers redeem the securities or the underlying securities have matured. As a result, the Company may have limited or no ability to liquidate its investment and fully recover the carrying value of its investment in the near term. As of September 30, 2010, the Company has recorded a $2.0 million pre-tax temporary impairment of these securities to other comprehensive income, a component of shareholders’ equity. If it is determined that the fair value of these securities is other than temporarily impaired, the Company would record a loss, which could be material, in its statement of operations in the period such other than temporary decline in fair value is determined. The Company currently has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of the auction process occurs or the issuers redeem the securities.

At September 30, 2010, the Company had no fixed-rate long-term debt subject to interest rate risk.

At September 30, 2010, the Company held an interest rate swap contract, a derivative financial instrument, to partially offset its exposure to the effects of changes in interest rates on its variable-rate financing obligations. The notional amount of the outstanding interest rate swap contract at September 30, 2010 was $2.5 million. The Company currently intends to hold the interest rate swap contract to maturity. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10 percent from levels at September 30, 2010, the fair value of the interest rate swap would decline by an immaterial amount.

ITEM 4:  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of September 30, 2010.

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

25

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The information included in Note 14 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption “Litigation and Other Contingencies” in Item 1 of Part I is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

Factors That May Affect Operating Results

If a company’s operating results are below the expectations of public market analysts or investors, then the market price of its Common Stock could decline. Many factors that can affect a company’s quarterly and annual results are difficult to control or predict. Some of the factors which can affect a multinational semiconductor business such as the Company are described below.

Geopolitical and Macroeconomic Risks That May Affect Multinational Enterprises

Weak global economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. While the current global economic downturn may be improving and the Company has seen improvement in the business climate for semiconductors, there is no guarantee that these conditions will continue to improve or that these conditions will not further decline again in the future. The semiconductor industry has traditionally been highly cyclical and has often experienced significant downturns in connection with, or in anticipation of, declines in general economic conditions. The Company cannot accurately predict the timing, severity or duration of such downturns. A global recession may result in a decrease in orders for the Compan y’s products, which may materially adversely affect the Company’s revenues, results of operations and financial condition. In addition to reduction in sales, the Company’s profitability may decrease during economic downturns because the Company may not be able to reduce costs at the same rate as its sales decline.

Demand for semiconductor components is increasingly dependent upon the rate of growth of the global economy.  Many factors could adversely affect regional or global economic growth. Some of the factors that could slow global economic growth include: volatility in global credit markets, price inflation or deflation for goods, services or materials, a slowdown in the rate of growth of the Chinese economy, a significant act of terrorism which disrupts global trade or consumer confidence, and geopolitical tensions including war and civil unrest. Reduced levels of economic activity, or disruptions of international transportation, could adversely affect sales on either a global basis or in specific geographic regions. For example, recent forecasts suggest a decline in the rate of U.S. economic growth in early 2011, which may impact the growth rate of the semiconductor industry including Micrel. Furthermore, although during 2010 the partial economic recovery contributed to higher than average growth in the semiconductor industry, as the semiconductor industry returns to its normal trend line the growth rate may decline. A slowdown in semiconductor growth rates may exacerbate a near-term slowdown in semiconductor bookings as lead times return to historic levels.

Market conditions may lead the Company to initiate cost reduction plans, which may negatively affect near term operating results. Weaker customer demand, competitive pricing pressures, excess capacity, weak economic conditions or other factors, may cause the Company to initiate actions to reduce the Company’s cost structure to improve the Company’s future operating results. The cost reduction actions may require incremental costs to implement, which could negatively affect the Company’s operating results in periods when the incremental costs or liabilities are incurred.

26

Tightening of the credit markets may adversely affect the Company’s business in a number of ways. The unprecedented contraction and extreme disruption of the credit and financial markets in the United States, Europe, and Asia led to, among other things, extreme volatility in security prices, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades of certain investments and declining valuation of others. These economic developments adversely affected the Company’s business in a number of ways. A similar tightening of credit in financial markets may limit the ability of the Company’s customers and suppliers to obtain financing for capital purchases and operations. This could result in a decrease in or cancellation of orders for the Company’ s products or reduced ability to finance operations to supply products to the Company. The Company cannot predict the likely duration and severity of disruptions in financial markets and adverse economic conditions in the U.S. and other countries. Further, fluctuations in worldwide economic conditions make it is extremely difficult for the Company to forecast future sales levels based on historical information and trends. Visibility into customer demand is limited due to short order lead times. Portions of the Company’s expenses are fixed and other expenses are tied to expected levels of sales activities. To the extent the Company does not achieve its anticipated levels of sales, its gross profit and net income could be adversely affected until such expenses are reduced to an appropriate level.

The Company has generated a substantial portion of its net revenues from export sales. The Company believes that a substantial portion of its future net revenues will depend on export sales to customers in international markets, including Asia. International markets are subject to a variety of risks, including changes in policy by the U.S. or foreign governments, acts of terrorism, foreign government instability, social conditions such as civil unrest, economic conditions including high levels of inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the value of foreign currencies and currency exchange rates and trade restrictions or prohibitions. Changes in exchange rates that strengthen the U.S. dollar could increase the price of the Company’s products in the local currencies of the fo reign markets it serves. This would result in making the Company’s products relatively more expensive than its competitors’ products that are denominated in local currencies, leading to a reduction in sales or profitability in those foreign markets. The Company has not taken any protective measures against exchange rate fluctuations, such as purchasing hedging instruments. In addition, the Company sells to domestic customers that do business worldwide and cannot predict how the businesses of these customers may be affected by economic or political conditions elsewhere in the world. Such factors could adversely affect the Company’s future revenues, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Semiconductor Industry Specific Risks

The volatility of customer demand in the semiconductor industry limits a company’s ability to predict future levels of sales and profitability. Semiconductor suppliers can rapidly increase production output, leading to a sudden oversupply situation and a subsequent reduction in order rates and revenues as customers adjust their inventories to true demand rates. A rapid and sudden decline in customer demand for products can result in excess quantities of certain products relative to demand. Should this occur the Company’s operating results may be adversely affected as a result of charges to reduce the carrying value of the Company’s inventory to the estimated demand level or market price. The Company’s quarterly revenues are highly dependent upon turns fil l orders (orders booked and shipped in the same quarter). The short-term and volatile nature of customer demand makes it extremely difficult to accurately predict near term revenues and profits.

The semiconductor industry is highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change, price-erosion and increased international competition. Significant competitive factors include product features; performance and price; timing of product introductions; emergence of new computer and communications standards; and quality and customer support. If the Company is unable to compete favorably in these areas, revenues and profits could be negatively affected.

27

The short lead time environment in the semiconductor industry has allowed many end consumers to rely on semiconductor suppliers, stocking representatives and distributors to carry inventory to meet short-term requirements and minimize their investment in on-hand inventory. Over the past several years, customers have worked to minimize the amount of inventory of semiconductors they hold. As a consequence, customers are generally providing less order backlog to the Company and other semiconductor suppliers, resulting in short order lead times and reduced visibility into customer demand. As a consequence of the short lead time environment and corresponding unpredictability of customer demand, the Company has increased its inventories over the past five to six years to maintain reli able service levels. If actual customer demand for the Company’s products is different from the Company’s estimated demand, delivery schedules may be impacted, product inventory may have to be scrapped, or the carrying value reduced, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. In addition, the Company maintains a network of stocking representatives and distributors that carry inventory to service the volatile short-term demand of the end customer. Should the relationship with a distributor or stocking representative be terminated, the future level of product returns could be higher than the returns allowance established, which could negatively affect the Company’s revenues and results of operations.

During periods when economic growth and customer demand have been less certain, both the semiconductor industry and the Company have experienced significant price erosion. If price erosion occurs, it will have the effect of reducing revenue levels and gross margins in future periods. Furthermore, the trend for the Company’s customers to move their electronics manufacturing to Asian countries has brought increased pricing pressure for Micrel and the semiconductor industry as a whole. Asian based manufacturers are typically more concerned about cost and less concerned about the capability of the integrated circuits they purchase. The increased concentration of electronics procurement and manufacturing in the Asia Pacific region may lead to continued price pressure and additi onal product advertising costs for the Company’s products in the future.

Many semiconductor companies, including the Company, face risks associated with a dependence upon third parties that manufacture, assemble or package certain of its products. These risks include reduced control over delivery schedules and quality; inadequate manufacturing yields and excessive costs; the potential lack of adequate capacity during periods of excess demand; difficulties selecting and integrating new subcontractors; potential increases in prices; disruption in supply due to civil unrest, terrorism, natural disasters or other events which may occur in the countries in which the subcontractors operate; and potential misappropriation of the Company’s intellectual property. The occurrence of any of these events may lead to increased costs or delay delivery of the Company’s products, which would harm its profitability and customer relationships. The Company does not have long-term supply contracts with any of its third-party vendors. Therefore, the vendors are not obligated to perform services or supply products to the Company for any specific period, in any specific quantities, or at any specific price, except as may be provided in a particular accepted purchase order or guarantee. Additionally, the Company’s wafer and product requirements typically represent a relatively small portion of the total production of the third-party foundries and outside assembly, testing and packaging contractors. As a result, the Company is subject to the risk that a third-party supplier will provide delivery or capacity priority to other larger customers at the expense of the Company, resulting in an inadequate supply to meet customer demand or higher costs to obtain the necessary product supply.

The Company outsources some of its wafer fabrication, most of its test and all of its assembly requirements to third-party vendors. When demand for semiconductors improves, availability of these outsourced services typically becomes tight, resulting in longer than normal lead times and delinquent shipments to customers. The degree to which Micrel may have difficulty obtaining these services could have a negative impact on the Company’s revenues, bookings and backlog. If these lead times extend beyond eight weeks, the resulting loss of near-term visibility for our customers could result in their placing higher order levels than their actual requirements which may result in higher levels of order cancellations in the future. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to accurately forecast demand and moderate its buil d schedules to accommodate the possibility of an increase in order cancellations. Accordingly, the Company faces the risk of overbuilding inventory which is a typical consequence of sharp demand increases.

28

The markets that the Company serves frequently undergo transitions in which products rapidly incorporate new features and performance standards on an industry-wide basis. If the Company’s products are unable to support the new features or performance levels required by OEMs in these markets, it would likely lose business from existing or potential customers and would not have the opportunity to compete for new design wins until the next product transition. If the Company fails to develop products with required features or performance standards or experiences even a short delay in bringing a new product to market, or if its customers fail to achieve market acceptance of their products, its revenues could be significantly reduced for a substantial period of time.

Because the standard products market for ICs is diverse and highly fragmented, the Company encounters different competitors in various market areas. Many of these competitors have substantially greater technical, financial and marketing resources and greater name recognition than the Company. The Company may not be able to compete successfully in either the standard products or custom and foundry products businesses in the future and competitive pressures may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

The success of companies in the semiconductor industry depends in part upon intellectual property, including patents, trade secrets, know-how and continuing technology innovation. The success of companies like Micrel may depend on their ability to obtain necessary intellectual property rights and protect such rights. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by the Company to protect its intellectual property will be adequate to prevent misappropriation or that others will not develop competitive technologies or products. There can be no assurance that any patent owned by the Company will not be invalidated, circumvented or challenged, that the rights granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages or that any of its pending or future patent applications will be issu ed with the scope of the claims sought, if at all. Furthermore, others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to the Company’s technology, duplicate technology or design around the patents owned by the Company. Additionally, the semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. Claims alleging infringement of intellectual property rights have been asserted against the Company in the past and could be asserted against the Company in the future. These claims could result in the Company having to discontinue the use of certain processes or designs; cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products; incur significant litigation costs and damages; attempt to obtain a license to the relevant intellectual property and develop non-infringing technology. The Company may not be able to obtain or renew such licenses on acceptable terms or to develop non-infringing technology. Existing claims or other assertions or claims for indemnity resulting from infringement claims could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. In addition, the Company relies on third parties for certain technology that is integrated into some of its products. If the Company is unable to continue to use or license third-party technologies in its products on acceptable terms, or the technology fails to operate, the Company may not be able to secure alternative technologies in a timely manner and its business would be harmed.

The significant investment in semiconductor manufacturing capacity and the rapid growth of circuit design centers in China may present a competitive threat to established semiconductor companies due to the current low cost of labor and capital in China. The emergence of low cost competitors in China could reduce the revenues and profitability of established semiconductor manufacturers.

There is intense competition for qualified personnel in the semiconductor industry. The loss of any key employees or the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel, including management, engineers and sales and marketing personnel, could delay the development and introduction of the Company’s products, and harm its ability to sell its products. The Company believes that its future success is dependent on the contributions of its senior management, including its President and Chief Executive Officer, certain other executive officers and senior engineering personnel. The Company does not have long-term employment contracts with these or any other key personnel, and their knowledge of the Company’s business and industry would be difficult to replace.

29

Companies in the semiconductor industry are subject to a variety of federal, state and local governmental regulations related to the use, storage, discharge and disposal of toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous chemicals used in its manufacturing process. Any failure to comply with present or future regulations could result in the imposition of fines, the suspension of production, alteration of manufacturing processes or a cessation of operations. In addition, these regulations could restrict the Company’s ability to expand its facilities at their present locations or construct or operate a new wafer fabrication facility or could require the Company to acquire costly equipment or incur other significant expenses to comply with environmental regulations or clean up prior d ischarges. The Company’s failure to appropriately control the use of, disposal or storage of, or adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous substances could subject it to future liabilities and could have a material adverse effect on its business.

Company-Specific Risks

In addition to the risks that affect multinational semiconductor companies listed above, there are additional risks which are more specific to the Company such as:

An important part of the Company’s strategy is to continue to focus on the market for high-speed communications ICs. Should demand from the Company’s customers in this end market decrease, or if lower customer demand for the Company’s high bandwidth products materializes, the Company’s future revenue growth and profitability could be adversely affected.

The wireless handset (cellular telephone) market comprises a significant portion of the Company’s standard product revenues. The Company derives a significant portion of its net revenues from customers serving the wireless handset market. Due to the highly competitive and fast changing environment in which the Company’s wireless handset customers operate, demand for the product the Company sells into this end market can change rapidly and unexpectedly. If the Company’s wireless handset customers acceptance of Micrel’s products decreases, or if these customers lose market share, or accumulate too much inventory of completed handsets, the demand for the Company’s products could decline sharply which could adversely affect the Company’s revenue s and results of operations.

The Company’s gross margin, operating margin and net income are highly dependent on the level of revenue and capacity utilization that the Company experiences. Semiconductor manufacturing is a capital-intensive business resulting in high fixed costs. If the Company is unable to utilize its installed wafer fabrication or test capacity at a high level, the costs associated with these facilities and equipment would not be fully absorbed, resulting in higher average unit costs and lower profit margins.

The Company has invested in certain auction rate securities that may not be accessible for in excess of 12 months and these auction rate securities may experience an other than temporary decline in value, which would adversely affect the Company’s income. At September 30, 2010, the Company held $14.5 million in principal of auction rate notes secured by student loans. As of September 30, 2010, all of these auction rate securities have failed to auction successfully due to sell orders exceeding buy orders. The Company has recorded a $2.0 million pre-tax temporary impairment of these securities to other comprehensive income, a component of shareholders’ equity. If it is determined that the fair value of these securities is other than temporarily impaired, t he Company would record a loss, which could be material, in its statement of operations in the period such other than temporary decline in fair value is determined. For additional information regarding the Company’s investments, see Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company faces various risks associated with the trend toward increased shareholder activism. In 2008, the Company became engaged in a proxy contest with a large shareholder. This dispute led to a significant increase in operating expenses which appreciably reduced the Company’s operating profit and net income. While this dispute has been resolved, the Company could become engaged in another proxy contest in the future. Another proxy contest would require significant additional management time and increased operating expenses, which could adversely affect the Company’s profitability and cash flows.

30

The semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. To the extent that the Company becomes involved in such intellectual property litigation, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources to the Company and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operation or cash flows.

In the event of an adverse ruling in any intellectual property litigation that might arise in the future, the Company might be required to discontinue the use of certain processes or designs, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or obtain licenses to the infringing technology. There can be no assurance, however, that under such circumstances, a license would be available under reasonable terms or at all. In the event of a successful claim against the Company and the Company’s failure to develop or license substitute technology on commercially reasonable terms, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows could be adversely affected. The Company does not believe that any material and specific risk currently exists related to the loss of use of patents, products or processes.

The complexity of the Company’s products may lead to errors or defects, which could subject the Company to significant costs or damages and adversely affect market acceptance of its products. Although the Company’s customers and suppliers rigorously test its products, these products may contain undetected errors, weaknesses or defects. If any of the Company’s products contain production defects, reliability, quality or compatibility problems that are significant, the Company’s reputation may be damaged and customers may be reluctant to continue to buy its products. This could adversely affect the Company’s ability to retain and attract new customers. In addition, these defects could interrupt or delay sales of affected products, which could advers ely affect the Company’s results of operations.

If defects are discovered after commencement of commercial production, the Company may be required to incur significant costs to resolve the problems. This could result in significant additional development costs and the diversion of technical and other resources from other development efforts. The Company could also incur significant costs to repair or replace defective products or may agree to be liable for certain damages incurred. These costs or damages could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company will continue to expend substantial resources developing new products, applications or markets and may never achieve the sales volume that it anticipates for these products, which may limit the Company’s future growth and harm its results of operations. The Company’s future success will depend in part upon the success of new products. The Company has in the past, and will likely in the future, expend substantial resources in developing new and additional products for new applications and markets. The Company may experience unforeseen difficulties and delays in developing these products and experience defects upon volume production and broad deployment. The markets the Company enters will likely be highly competitive and competitors may have substantiall y more experience in these markets. The Company’s success will depend on the growth of the markets it enters, the competitiveness of its products and its ability to increase market share in these markets. If the Company enters markets that do not achieve or sustain the growth it anticipates, or if the Company’s products are not competitive, it may not achieve volume sales, which may limit the Company’s future growth and would harm its results of operations.

If the Company is unable to convert a significant portion of its design wins into revenue, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted. The Company has secured a significant number of design wins for new and existing products. Such design wins are necessary for revenue growth. However, many of the Company’s design wins may never generate revenues if end-customer projects are unsuccessful in the marketplace or the end-customer terminates the project, which may occur for a variety of reasons. Mergers and consolidations among customers may lead to termination of certain projects before the associated design win generates revenue. If design wins do generate revenue, the time lag between the design win and meaningful revenue is typically from six months to greater than eighteen months. If the Company fails to convert a significant portion of its design wins into substantial revenue, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.

31

If the Company’s distributors or sales representatives stop selling or fail to successfully promote its products, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted. Micrel sells many of its products through sales representatives and distributors. The Company’s non-exclusive distributors and sales representatives may carry its competitors’ products, which could adversely impact or limit sales of the Company’s products. Additionally, they could reduce or discontinue sales of the Company’s products or may not devote the resources necessary to adequately sell the Company’s products. The Company’s agreements with distributors contain limited provisions for return of products, including s tock rotations whereby distributors may return a percentage of their purchases based upon a percentage of their most recent three months of shipments. In addition, in certain circumstances upon termination of the distributor relationship, distributors may return some portion of their prior purchases. The loss of business from any of the Company’s significant distributors or the delay of significant orders from any of them could materially and adversely harm the Company’s business, financial conditions and results of operations.

In addition, the Company depends on the continued viability and financial resources of these distributors and sales representatives, some of which are small organizations with limited working capital. In turn, these distributors and sales representatives are subject to general economic and semiconductor industry conditions. If some or all of the Company’s distributors and sales representatives experience financial difficulties, or otherwise become unable or unwilling to promote and sell the Company’s products, or deliver the Company’s products in a timely manner, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.

The Company manufactures most of its semiconductors at its San Jose, California fabrication facilities. The Company’s existing wafer fabrication facility, located in Northern California, may be subject to natural disasters such as earthquakes. A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake or prolonged drought, could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results. Furthermore, manufacturing semiconductors requires manufacturing tools that are unique to each product being produced. If one of these unique manufacturing tools was damaged or destroyed, the Company’s ability to manufacture the related product would be impaired and its business would suffer until the tool was repaired or replaced. Addition ally, the fabrication of ICs is a highly complex and precise process. Small impurities, contaminants in the manufacturing environment, difficulties in the fabrication process, defects in the masks used to print circuits on a wafer, manufacturing equipment failures, and wafer breakage or other factors can cause a substantial percentage of wafers to be rejected or numerous die on each wafer to be nonfunctional. The Company maintains approximately two to three months of inventory that has completed the wafer fabrication manufacturing process. This inventory is generally located offshore at third party subcontractors and can, but may not be sufficient to, act to buffer some of the adverse impact from a disruption to the Company’s San Jose wafer fabrication activity arising from a natural disaster such as an earthquake.

The Company’s results of operations could vary as a result of the methods, estimations and judgments used in applying its accounting policies. The methods, estimates and judgments used by the Company in applying its accounting policies have a significant impact on its results of operations. Such methods, estimates and judgments are, by their nature, subject to substantial risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in rulemaking by the regulatory bodies, and factors may arise over time that lead the Company to change its methods, estimates, and judgments. Changes in those methods, estimates and judgments could significantly impact the Company’s results of operations.

Changes in tax laws could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations. The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and in various immaterial foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s worldwide tax liabilities. The Company believes that it complies with applicable tax law. If the governing tax authorities have a different interpretation of the applicable law or if there is a change in tax law, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

32

ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On February 5, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a $15 million share repurchase program for calendar year 2010. On September 13, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase to the amount authorized for repurchase from $15.0 million to $30.0 million. The timing and amount of any repurchase of shares will be determined by the Company’s management, based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors. Share repurchases are recorded as a reduction of common stock to the extent available. Any amounts in excess of common stock are recorded as a reduction of retained earnings. Repurchases of the Company’s common stock during the first nine months of 2010 were as follows:

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs ($000)
January 2010		--		--		--	$	15,000
February 2010		88,472	$	8.03		88,472	$	14,290
March 2010		26,545		9.67		26,545	$	14,033
Total Q1 2010		115,017		8.41		115,017
April 2010		--		--		--	$	14,033
May 2010		71,300		11.12		71,300	$	13,240
June 2010		44,700		10.72		44,700	$	12,761
Total Q2 2010		116,000		10.96		116,000
July 2010		153,211		10.47		153,211	$	11,157
August 2010		688,200		9.79		688,200	$	4,420
September 2010		261,763		9.73		261,763	$	16,872
Total Q3 2010		1,103,174		9.87		1,103,174
Total 2010		1,334,191	$	9.84		1,334,191

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description
31	Certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32	Certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

33

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	MICREL, INCORPORATED
	(Registrant)
Date: November 8, 2010	By            /s/ Clyde R. Wallin
	Clyde R. Wallin
	Vice President, Finance and
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Authorized Officer and
	Principal Financial Officer)

34

EX-31

EXHIBIT 31

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Raymond D. Zinn, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micrel, Incorporated;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial control to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

d)     disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2010	By            /s/ Raymond D. Zinn
	Raymond D. Zinn
	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
	(Principal Executive Officer)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Clyde R Wallin, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micrel, Incorporated;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial control to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

d)      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2010	By            /s/ Clyde R. Wallin
	Clyde R. Wallin
	Vice President, Finance and
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-32

EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Micrel, Incorporated (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 8, 2010	By            /s/ Raymond D. Zinn
	Raymond D. Zinn
	Chief Executive Officer

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Micrel, Incorporated (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 8, 2010	By            /s/ Clyde R. Wallin
	Clyde R. Wallin
	Chief Financial Officer