e10vqza

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

AMENDMENT No. 1 to FORM 10-Q


þ		Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004.


o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-13053

STILLWATER MINING COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		81-0480654

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1321 Discovery Drive Billings, Montana		59102

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(406) 373-8700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: YES þ NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2): YES þ NO o

At August 2, 2004 the company had outstanding 90,278,976 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share.

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Stillwater Mining Company

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(as revised -						(as revised -
	see Note 2)						see Note 2)
Revenues
Mine production	$	44,345		$	58,910		$	116,647		$	121,530
Secondary processing		12,026			1,101			28,186			2,635
Sales of palladium received in Norilsk Nickel transaction and other		27,836			—			40,067			—

Total revenue		84,207			60,011			184,900			124,165

Costs and expenses
Cost of metals sold:
Mine production		19,504			46,223			66,799			93,092
Secondary processing		10,775			1,087			26,144			2,190
Sales of palladium received in Norilsk Nickel transaction and other		18,572			—			26,424			—

Total cost of metal sold		48,851			47,310			119,367			95,282

Depreciation and amortization:
Mine production		14,910			10,397			29,907			20,310
Secondary processing		12			18			23			36

Total depreciation and amortization		14,922			10,415			29,930			20,346

Total costs of revenues		63,773			57,725			149,297			115,628

General and administrative		3,926			3,302			7,649			7,000
Norilsk Nickel transaction related expenses		—			3,043			—			3,043

Total costs and expenses		67,699			64,070			156,946			125,671

Operating income (loss)		16,508			(4,059	)		27,954			(1,506	)

Other income (expense)
Interest income		386			68			671			179
Interest expense		(3,360	)		(4,684	)		(7,261	)		(9,595	)


Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change		13,534			(8,675	)		21,364			(10,922	)

Income tax benefit		—			3,393			—			4,292

Reduction of net operating loss deferred tax asset resulting from ownership change		—			(13,979	)		—			(13,979	)


Total income tax provision		—			(10,586	)		—			(9,687	)


Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change		13,534			(19,261	)		21,364			(20,609	)

Cumulative effect of change in accounting, net of $264 income tax benefit in 2003		—			—			6,035			(408	)

Net income (loss)	$	13,534		$	(19,261	)	$	27,399		$	(21,017	)

Other comprehensive income, net of tax		3,397			321			2,914			352

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	16,931		$	(18,940	)	$	30,313		$	(20,665	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Stillwater Mining Company
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
Continued	2004		2003			2004		2003
	(as revised -					(as revised -
	see Note 2)					see Note 2)
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	13,534	$	(19,261	)	$	21,364	$	(20,609	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—		—			6,035		(408	)

Net income (loss)	$	13,534	$	(19,261	)	$	27,399	$	(21,017	)


Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic		90,146		47,921			90,022		45,799
Diluted		90,541		47,921			90,293		45,799

Basic earnings (loss) per share
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	0.15	$	(0.40	)	$	0.23	$	(0.45	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—		—			0.07		(0.01	)

Net income (loss)	$	0.15	$	(0.40	)	$	0.30	$	(0.46	)


Diluted earnings (loss) per share
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	0.15	$	(0.40	)	$	0.23	$	(0.45	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—		—			0.07		(0.01	)

Net income (loss)	$	0.15	$	(0.40	)	$	0.30	$	(0.46	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Stillwater Mining Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	June 30,			December 31,
	2004			2003
	(as revised -
	see Note 2)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	53,808		$	47,511
Restricted cash equivalents		2,650			2,650
Inventories		207,638			202,485
Accounts receivable		17,791			3,777
Deferred income taxes		4,578			4,313
Other current assets		5,030			4,270

Total current assets		291,495			265,006

Property, plant and equipment, net		424,400			419,528
Other noncurrent assets		5,583			6,054

Total assets	$	721,478		$	690,588


LIABILITIES and STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	11,093		$	9,781
Accrued payroll and benefits		9,103			10,654
Property, production and franchise taxes payable		8,505			8,504
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		1,940			1,935
Portion of debt repayable upon liquidation of finished palladium in inventory		37,011			74,106
Other current liabilities		1,613			5,290

Total current liabilities		69,265			110,270

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		121,583			85,445
Deferred income taxes		4,578			4,313
Other noncurrent liabilities		11,600			11,263

Total liabilities		207,026			211,291

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 90,239,460 and 89,849,239 shares issued and outstanding		902			899
Paid-in capital		602,078			592,974
Accumulated deficit		(86,356	)		(113,756	)
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)		2,094			(820	)
Unearned compensation — restricted stock awards		(4,266	)		—

Total stockholders’ equity		514,452			479,297

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	721,478		$	690,588

See notes to consolidated financial statements

Stillwater Mining Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(as revised -						(as revised -
	see Note 2)						see Note 2)
Cash flows from operating activities

Net income (loss)	$	13,534		$	(19,261	)	$	27,399		$	(21,017	)

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		14,922			10,482			29,930			20,479
Deferred income taxes		—			10,795			—			9,652
Cumulative effect of change in accounting		—			—			(6,035	)		672
Stock issued under employee benefit plans		1,038			831			2,096			1,862
Amortization of debt issuance costs		286			2,158			566			2,516
Amortization of restricted stock compensation		274			652			274			670
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Inventories		(11,112	)		5,706			882			10,696
Accounts receivable		8,585			(1,807	)		(14,014	)		12,288
Accounts payable		1,504			8,370			1,312			4,636
Other		(4,448	)		(5,195	)		(2,727	)		(6,446	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		24,583			12,731			39,683			36,008

Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures		(20,317	)		(11,662	)		(34,892	)		(26,196	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(20,317	)		(11,662	)		(34,892	)		(26,196	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations		(517	)		(52,783	)		(965	)		(58,136	)
Issuance of common stock, related to Norilsk Nickel transaction (1)		—			90,817			—			90,284
Issuance of common stock, net of stock issue costs		2,428						2,471
Payment for debt issuance costs		—			(152	)		—			(1,606	)

Net cash provided used in financing activities		1,911			37,882			1,506			30,542


Cash and cash equivalents
Net increase		6,177			38,951			6,297			40,354
Balance at beginning of period		47,631			27,316			47,511			25,913

Balance at end of period	$	53,808		$	66,267		$	53,808		$	66,267


(1) Non-cash Financing activities:
Fair value of issuance of common stock (net of issue costs)	$	—	$	239,030		$	—	$	238,497
Inventory received in connection with the Norilsk Nickel transaction		—		(148,213	)		—		(148,213	)

Net cash received in Norilsk Nickel transaction	$	—	$	90,817		$	—	$	90,284

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 to the Stillwater Mining Company (the company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, amends and supplements the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on August 5, 2004 (the “Original Form 10-Q”). This Amendment No. 1 amends Part I, Item 1 – Financial Statements, to reflect a change in the company’s method of amortizing capitalized mine development costs, effective January 1, 2004. As a result of the change in accounting method the net income set forth in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) decreased approximately $3.0 million and $4.8 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, respectively. A discussion of the change in accounting method is set forth in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Amendment No. 1.

This Amendment No. 1 reflects certain amounts that have been reclassified, including the 2003 amounts for revenues, cost of metals sold, and depreciation and amortization.

The Amendment No. 1 does not reflect events that have occurred after August 5, 2004, the date the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was originally filed. Information with respect to those events has been or will be set forth, as appropriate, in the Company’s subsequent periodic filings, including its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q as amended and Current Reports on Form 8-K and Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any reference to facts and circumstances at a “current” date refer to such facts and circumstances as of such original filing date.

Stillwater Mining Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1 — General

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the company’s financial position as of June 30, 2004 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. The results of operations for the quarter and six-month periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the company’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A.

Note 2 – Change in Amoritzation Method for Mine Development Assets

Prior to 2004, the company amortized all capitalized development costs at its mines over all proven and probable reserves at each mine. Following the asset impairment write-down at the end of 2003, the company revisited its assumptions and estimates for amortizing capitalized mine development costs. The company concluded to continue amortizing the cost of all of the mine development that had been placed in service through 2003 over all proven and probable reserves, because in management’s view these remaining unamortized costs related to infrastructure that would be used for the entire life of the mine. However, for development placed in service after 2003, the company concluded to use a shorter life, amortizing the cost of this new development over only the ore reserves in the immediate and relevant vicinity of the new development. This approach was reflected in the company’s net income as previously reported in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004.

Following a review of its filings by the SEC, the company recently determined it would change its method of accounting for mine development costs as follows:

• All ongoing development costs of footwall laterals and ramps, including similar development costs incurred before 2004, are to be amortized over the ore reserves in the immediate and relevant vicinity of the development.

The change in accounting method has been applied retroactively to January 1, 2004. The effect of this change in accounting method was to reduce previously reported earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 by $3.0 million ($0.03 per share) and $4.8 million ($0.06 per share), including a charge of $3.0 million and $10.8 million attributable to additional amortization for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and a benefit of $6.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 attributable to the cumulative effect adjustment on January 1, 2004.

A summary of the aggregate effect of this change in method of amortizing capitalized mine development costs is shown below:

Changes to the Consolidated Balance Sheet


	As of June 30, 2004
				As previously
	As revised			reported
Inventories	$	207,638		$	203,679
Propery, plant and equipment, net	$	424,400		$	433,207
Total assets	$	721,478		$	726,326
Accumulated deficit	$	(86,356	)	$	(81,508	)
Total stockholders’ equity	$	514,452		$	519,300

Changes to the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss):


	For the three-months ended June 30, 2004
			As previously
	As revised		reported
Cost of metals sold	$	48,851	$	50,183
Depreciation and amortization	$	14,922	$	10,634
Total cost of revenues	$	63,773	$	60,817
Net income	$	13,534	$	16,491
Comprehensive income	$	16,931	$	19,888
Basic earnings per share	$	0.15	$	0.18
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.15	$	0.18

Changes to the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss):


	For the six-months ended June 30, 2004
			As previously
	As revised		reported
Cost of metals sold	$	119,367	$	117,290
Depreciation and amortization	$	29,930	$	21,123
Total cost of revenues	$	149,297	$	138,413
Net income	$	27,399	$	32,248
Comprehensive income	$	30,313	$	35,162
Basic earnings per share	$	0.30	$	0.36
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.30	$	0.36

Note 3 – Stock-Based Compensation Costs

The company has elected to account for stock options and other stock-based compensation awards using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Accordingly, because stock options are granted at fair market value, no compensation expense has been recognized for stock options issued under the company’s stock option plans. The company records

compensation expense for other stock-based compensation awards ratably over the vesting periods. The company has adopted the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The following pro forma disclosures illustrate the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share as if the fair value based method of accounting, as set forth in SFAS No. 123, had been applied.


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(as revised -						(as revised -
(in thousands)	see Note 2)						see Note 2)
Net income (loss), as reported	$	13,534		$	(19,261	)	$	27,399		$	(21,017	)
Add: Stock based employee compensation expense
included in reported net income (loss), net of tax		274			652			274			670
Deduct: Stock based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for stock options, net of tax		(445	)		(1,213	)		(603	)		(1,494	)

Pro forma net income (loss)	$	13,363		$	(19,822	)	$	27,070		$	(21,841	)

Earnings (loss) per share

Basic - as reported	$	0.15		$	(0.40	)	$	0.30		$	(0.46	)
Basic - pro forma	$	0.15		$	(0.41	)	$	0.30		$	(0.48	)

Diluted - as reported	$	0.15		$	(0.40	)	$	0.30		$	(0.46	)
Diluted - pro forma	$	0.15		$	(0.41	)	$	0.30		$	(0.48	)

Note 4 – Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of earnings items and other gains and losses affecting stockholders’ equity that, under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), are excluded from current net income. For the company, such items consist of unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments related to commodity price and interest rate hedging activities.

The net of tax balance in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 was $2.1 million and ($0.8 million), respectively.

The company had commodity instruments relating to fixed forward metal sales and financially settled forwards outstanding during the first six months of 2004. The net unrealized gain on these instruments, $2.1 million at June 30, 2004, will be reflected in other comprehensive income until these instruments are settled. All commodity instruments outstanding at June 30, 2004 are expected to be settled within the next eighteen months (see Note 9).

The company’s interest rate swaps, which were accounted for as hedging instruments, matured on March 4, 2004 (see Note 9).

The following summary sets forth the changes in other comprehensive loss accumulated in stockholders’ equity:


	Interest			Commodity
(in thousands)	Rate Swaps			Instruments			Total
Balance at December 31, 2003	$	(269	)	$	(551	)	$	(820	)
Reclassification to earnings		269			11			280
Change in value		—			2,634			2,634

Balance at June 30, 2004	$	—		$	2,094		$	2,094

Note 5 - Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2004		2003
	(as revised -
(in thousands)	see Note 2)
Metals Inventory
Raw ore	$	927	$	661
Concentrate and in-process		35,483		17,393
Finished goods		160,107		173,715

		196,517		191,769
Materials and supplies		11,121		10,716
	$	207,638	$	202,485

Inventories are stated at the lower of current market value (taking into consideration the company’s long-term sales contracts), or average unit cost. Metal inventory costs include direct labor and materials, depreciation and amortization, and overhead costs relating to mining and processing activities.

Note 6 – Long-Term Debt

Credit Agreement

In February 2001, the company entered into a $250 million credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions

which replaced a previous $175 million bank facility. The credit facility has been amended or waivers have been obtained eight times with the most recent waiver effective for the first and second quarters of 2004. The credit facility provides for a $65 million five-year term loan facility (Term A), a $135 million seven-year term loan facility (Term B) and a $25 million revolving credit facility (reduced from $50 million at the company’s request as of March 20, 2003). Amortization of the term loan facilities commenced on March 31, 2002.

During 2003, the company renewed a letter of credit in the amount of $7.5 million, carrying an annual fee of 4.0%. This letter of credit reduced by $7.5 million the amount available under the revolving credit facility at June 30, 2004. The revolving credit facility requires an annual commitment fee of 0.5% on the remaining unadvanced amount.

In accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, the company is required to offer 50% of the net cash proceeds from the sale of the 877,169 ounces of palladium inventory received in the 2003 Norilsk Nickel transaction to prepay its term loans. In accordance with the scheduled delivery of this palladium under the sales agreements in place as of June 30, 2004, $37.0 million of the long-term debt has been classified as a current liability. The lenders are not obligated to accept any prepayment offer. If the lenders decline the prepayment, the company retains the cash but the availability under the revolving credit facility is reduced by the amount of the prepayment declined. Once the revolving credit availability is reduced to zero, any amounts declined will become restricted cash applied to collateralize letters of credit outstanding against the revolving credit line. As of June 30, 2004, the company has offered a total of $15.9 million of cash proceeds from sales of palladium received in the Norilsk Nickel stock purchase for prepayment of the Term B facility. (The prepayment offers are made as cash is actually received, which normally lags behind recognition of sales revenue.) These offers were all declined and the availability to borrow under the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2004 has been reduced accordingly by $15.9 million to $1.6 million. Once this availability is reduced to zero, any further amounts declined by the banks will be reserved to cash collateralize any letters of credit outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The Term B facility final maturity date is December 31, 2007. The final maturity date of the revolving credit facility is December 30, 2005.

As of June 30, 2004, the company has $127.8 million outstanding under the Term B facility, bearing interest at a variable rate plus a margin, reset quarterly (8.0% at June 30, 2004). The schedule of principal payments on the amounts outstanding as of June 30, 2004, without regard to possible prepayments from sales of the inventory received in connection with the Norilsk Nickel transaction, is as follows:


	Term B facility
Year ended	(in thousands)
2004 (July - Dec)	$	675
2005		1,350
2006		60,750
2007		65,002

Total	$	127,777

During the first quarter of 2004, as a result of lower production from its mine operations, the company did not meet the minimum production covenant under the bank credit facility. This covenant is calculated based on the total ore tons produced during the preceding four calendar quarters. The bank syndicate granted a waiver of this covenant that was effective for the first and second- quarters of 2004. The covenant violation is not expected to have any material effect on the company’s liquidity. The company’s production forecasts show that the company is expected to be in compliance with this production covenant for the third and fourth quarters of 2004, as low production in the first half of 2003 is no longer included in of the calculation and East Boulder production is expected to continue to increase. In addition, the company is currently seeking to renegotiate, refinance or replace the credit facility. The covenant violation is not expected to have any material effect on the company’s liquidity.

Note 7 – Earnings per Share

Outstanding options to purchase 1,402,915 and 2,577,604 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, because the effect would have been antidilutive using the treasury stock method because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of the common shares. The effect of outstanding stock options on diluted weighted average shares outstanding was an increase of 178,143 and 161,634 shares for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Outstanding options to purchase 1,470,460 and 2,574,704 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, because the effect would have been antidilutive using the treasury stock method because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of the common shares. The effect of outstanding stock options on diluted weighted average shares outstanding was an increase of 160,695 and 174,031 shares for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

On April 29, 2004, 6,816 shares of restricted stock were granted to the non-management Board of Directors. These shares of restricted stock vest on October 29, 2004. On May 7, 2004, 348,170 shares of restricted stock were granted to members of management. These shares of restricted stock vest on May 7, 2007. During 2002, the company granted 135,119 shares of restricted stock to certain officers and employees which vested during 2003 and 2002. The effect of outstanding restricted stock on diluted weighted average shares outstanding was an increase of 107,576 and 1,059 shares for the six-month periods ending June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Note 8 – Long-Term Sales Contracts

During 1998, the company entered into three PGM supply contracts with its customers that contain guaranteed floor prices for metal delivered. The company has since amended these contracts to extend the terms and to modify the pricing mechanisms. One of these contracts applies to the company’s production through December 2010, one to the company’s production through December 2006 and the third is expected to be fulfilled in 2007. As the following table illustrates, the company has committed 80% to 100% of its palladium production and 70% to 80% of its platinum production annually through 2010. Metal sales are priced at a modest discount to market. The remaining production is not committed under these contracts and remains available for sale at prevailing market prices. The contracts provide for floor and ceiling price structures as summarized below:


	PALLADIUM				PLATINUM
	Subject to		Subject to Ceiling		Subject to Floor		Subject to Celing
	Floor Prices		Prices		Prices		Prices
		Avg.		Avg.		Avg.		Avg.
	% of Mine	Floor	% of Mine	Ceiling	% of Mine	Floor	% of Mine	Ceiling
YEAR	Production	Price	Production	Price	Production	Price	Production	Price
2004	100%	$371	39%	$644	80%	$425	16%	$856
2005	100%	$355	31%	$702	80%	$425	16%	$856
2006	100%	$339	25%	$783	80%	$425	16%	$856
2007	100%	$357	19%	$975	70%	$425	14%	$850
2008	80%	$385	20%	$975	70%	$425	14%	$850
2009	80%	$380	20%	$975	70%	$425	14%	$850
2010	80%	$375	20%	$975	70%	$425	14%	$850

The sales contracts provide for adjustments to ounces committed based on actual production. These contracts contain termination provisions that allow the purchasers to terminate in the event the company breaches certain provisions of the contract and the breach is not cured within periods ranging from 10 to 30 days of notice by the purchaser. The long-term sales contracts qualify for the normal sales exception from hedge accounting rules provided in SFAS No. 138 because they will not settle net and will result in physical delivery. The floors and ceilings embedded within the long-term sales contracts are treated as part of the host contract, not as a separate derivative instrument, and are therefore also not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133.

The company entered into sales agreements during the first quarter of 2004 to sell the palladium received in the stock transaction with Norilsk Nickel. Under these agreements, the company will sell approximately 36,500 ounces of palladium per month, ending in the first quarter of 2006, at close to market prices. Separately, under one of these agreements, the company also will sell 3,250 ounces of platinum and 1,900 ounces of rhodium per month, also at prices close to market.

Note 9 – Financial Instruments

The company from time to time uses various derivative financial instruments to manage the company’s exposure to market prices associated with changes in palladium and platinum commodity prices and in interest rates. The company accounts for its derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, which requires that derivatives be reported on the balance sheet at fair value and, if the derivative is not designated as a hedging instrument, changes in fair value must be recognized in earnings in the period of change. Because the company hedges only with instruments that have a high correlation with the value of the underlying exposures, changes in the derivatives’ fair value are expected to be offset by changes in the value of the hedged transaction.

Commodity Derivatives

The company enters into fixed forwards and financially settled forwards that are accounted for as cash-flow hedges to hedge the price risk in its secondary recycling activity and mine production, respectively. In the fixed forward transactions, metals in the recycled material are sold forward at the time of receipt and delivered against the fixed forward contracts when the ounces are recovered. Financially settled forwards may be used as a mechanism to hedge against fluctuations in metal prices associated with future production. Under financially settled forwards, at each settlement date the company receives the difference between the forward price and the market price if the market price is below the forward price, and the company pays the difference between the forward price and the market price if the market price is above the forward price. The company’s financially settled forwards are settled in cash at maturity.

During the second quarter of 2004, the company entered into financially settled forward transactions covering about 20% of its anticipated platinum sales from July of 2004 through December of 2005. These transactions are designed to hedge 40,500 ounces of platinum sales from mine production for the next eighteen months at an overall average price of approximately $784 per ounce

Until these contracts mature, any net change in the value of the hedging instrument is reflected currently in stockholders equity in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI). A net unrealized gain of $2.1 million on these hedging instruments existing at June 30, 2004, will be reflected in AOCI. When these instruments are settled, any remaining gain or loss on the cash flow hedges will be offset by metal inventory losses or gains and will be recognized in operating income. All commodity instruments outstanding at June 30, 2004 are expected to be settled within the next eighteen months.

A summary of the company’s derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2004 is as follows:


Mine Production:
Financially Settled Forwards
	Platinum
	Ounces		Price		Index
Third Quarter 2004		7,200	$	801	London PM
Fourth Quarter 2004		7,000	$	795	London PM
First Quarter 2005		6,400	$	791	London PM
Second Quarter 2005		6,500	$	786	London PM
Third Quarter 2005		6,700	$	768	London PM
Fourth Quarter 2005		6,700	$	764	London PM


Secondary Recycling:
Fixed Forwards
	Platinum				Palladium				Rhodium
	Ounces		Price		Ounces		Price		Ounces		Price
Third Quarter 2004		11,566	$	836		8,824	$	249		1,201	$	825
Fourth Quarter 2004		1,089	$	802		—		—		—		—

Financially Settled Forwards

Platinum

Palladium

Ounces

Price

Ounces

Price

Index

Third Quarter 2004

9,801

849

1,089

261

London PM

Interest Rate Derivatives

The company entered into two identical interest rate swap agreements which fixed the interest rate on $100.0 million of the company’s debt, which were effective March 4, 2002 and matured on March 4, 2004. These interest rate swap agreements qualified as a cash flow hedge and were considered to be highly effective since the change in the value of the interest rate swap offset changes in the future cash flows related to interest payments on the company’s debt. During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, hedging losses of $0.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively, were recognized as additional interest expense.

Note 10 – Income Taxes

The company computes income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” SFAS No. 109 requires an asset and liability approach which results in the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of those assets and liabilities, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The company has net operating loss carryforwards (NOL’s), which expire in 2009 through 2023. The company has reviewed its net deferred tax assets and has provided a valuation allowance to reflect the estimated amount of net deferred tax assets which management considers more likely than not will not be realized. The company has not recognized any income tax provision or benefit for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as any changes in the net deferred tax assets and liabilities have been offset by a corresponding change in the valuation allowance.

Note 11 – Subsequent Events

the remaining unutilized amount. The new credit facility contains customary financial and other covenants; however, it does not include a minimum production covenant. The new credit facility requires that the company offer 25% of the proceeds received for the sales out of the palladium inventory received from the Norilsk Nickel transaction as prepayments against the credit facility. It also requires that 50% of the company’s annual excess cash flow be offered for prepayment against the credit facility. With the completion of the refinancing, the company expects to incur a one time charge in the third quarter of 2004 of approximately $5.0 million which includes a prepayment charge and the write-off of deferred costs on the former credit facility.

Subsequent to the end of the second quarter the company has entered into financially settled forward contracts covering an additional 26,500 ounces of platinum for the period of August of 2004 through January of 2006 at an overall average price of about $788 per ounce.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following commentary provides management’s perspective and analysis regarding the financial and operating performance of Stillwater Mining Company (the “company”) for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2004. It consists of the following subsections:

•   “Overview” – a brief summary of the company’s consolidated results and financial position, the primary factors affecting those results, and some issues of continuing interest that may affect performance in the future.

•   “Key Factors” – indicators of profitability and efficiency at the company’s various operations individually and, where relevant, on a consolidated basis.

•   “Results of Operations” – a discussion and analysis of the specific operating and financial results for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same periods in 2003.

•   “Liquidity and Capital Resources” – a discussion of the company’s cash flow and liquidity, investing and financing activities, and significant contractual obligations.

•   “Critical Accounting Policies” – a review of accounting policies the company considers critical because they involve assumptions that could have a material effect on the company’s reported assets, liabilities, income or cash flow and that require difficult, subjective or complex judgments by management.

These items should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto included in this quarterly report and in the company’s 2003 annual report on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A.

Amendment of Financial Statements

The company revised its consolidated financial statements for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2004 to reflect the change in its method of amortizing capitalized mine development costs and to add certain other disclosures. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of this change in the accounting method.

Overview

Two overriding factors heavily influence the company’s profitability: the volatility of PGM prices and the company’s cost structure. Metal prices are dictated by market forces and so are beyond the direct control of the company, although market effects can be mitigated through long-term sales agreements and at times through hedging activities. Several other major producers in the mining industry either produce PGMs as a byproduct of other refining, or enjoy ores with a substantially higher proportion of (higher-priced) platinum to palladium. The company does not enjoy these advantages and has a higher cost structure than most of its competitors, putting it at a disadvantage. The company’s unit costs generally are affected by the level of ore production, by the consistency and quality of the ore mined, by the choice of mining method, and by overall operating efficiency. The company spends substantial amounts of development capital each year in the mines to sustain ongoing production. Despite these challenges, minimizing unit costs in a safe and efficient manner is the principal operating focus of the company.

In 1998, the company entered into three long-term sales contracts that commit most of the mines’ production through 2010. These contracts have floor prices that, in the recent low price environment for palladium, have been of significant benefit in allowing the company to continue operating profitably. Unless extended or modified, as to which there can be no assurance, these contracts will all expire by 2010. At that time, the company could be fully exposed to market prices and the absence of these contracts after 2010 could negatively affect the company’s operating results.

During the second quarter of 2004, the company fixed platinum prices in the forward market by entering into financially settled forward transactions covering about 20% of our anticipated platinum mine production for the period from July of 2004 through December of 2005. The company believes that the spread between palladium and platinum prices may narrow if consumers switch from using platinum to palladium for existing and new applications, driven by the lower price of palladium. The company believes the price of platinum could weaken if this switching occurs and has locked in the price on a portion of future sales. The second quarter 2004 transactions fix the price for 40,500 ounces of platinum sales from mine production for the next eighteen-months at an overall average price of about $784 per ounce. Subsequent to the end of the second quarter the company has entered into financially settled forward contracts covering an additional 26,500 ounces of platinum for the period of August of 2004 through January of 2006 at an overall average price of about $788 per ounce. The hedges are expected to modestly reduce the overall volatility of the company’s earnings and cash flow.

Volatility of PGM prices has caused the company significant concerns in the past. The decision to build the second mine, known as East Boulder, along the J-M Reef was made in 1998, at a time when the palladium price was rising and widely expected to continue higher. The East Boulder facilities were largely financed through available cash and through bank borrowings that were expected to be repaid as mine production came on line. However, as the project proceeded, the cost of construction far exceeded initial estimates and at the same time palladium prices plummeted, leaving the company badly over-leveraged. Ultimately, in the fall of 2001, the company was forced to slow down development at East Boulder in order to avoid running out of cash.

Following this slow down, for a time the company’s financial position remained precarious. On eight separate occasions since February of 2001, the company was obliged to amend its credit agreement or obtain covenant waivers. In early 2002, Stillwater secured $60 million of additional equity funding through a private offering of its common stock. The company revised its mining plans several times in an effort to optimize production and minimize costs in light of financial limitations. Recognizing these challenges, the company considered several strategic options including seeking a financial partner that could infuse additional equity and bring Stillwater’s capital structure back into balance. This process led to the stock purchase transaction, announced in November of 2002 and closed in June of 2003, whereby Norilsk Nickel acquired 50.8% of the company for $100 million in cash and 877,169 ounces of palladium, through the purchase of newly issued Stillwater common shares. Norilsk Nickel subsequently completed a public cash tender offer for some additional shares, increasing their ownership interest to 55.5%.

The stock purchase agreement with Norilsk Nickel also provided that the parties intended to negotiate an agreement to market at least one million ounces of Norilsk Nickel palladium through Stillwater annually. As disclosed previously, the company and Norilsk Nickel have since determined not to pursue such an agreement at this time.

The company was obligated by its banks to utilize $50.0 million of the cash proceeds from the Norilsk Nickel transaction to pay down bank debt. Consequently, the Term A loan facility was paid off in full on June 30, 2003. During the first quarter of 2004, the company entered into contracts to resell the 877,169 ounces of palladium received from Norilsk Nickel to DaimlerChrysler, Mitsubishi and Engelhard Corporation. The palladium is being sold in equal monthly quantities over the next two years, at close to market prices at the time of sale. The company’s banks had the option under the 2001 credit agreement to apply 50% of the cash proceeds from the sale of this inventory to reduce the company’s outstanding debt. Since the banks declined to accept all or any portion of these proceeds, the availability under the company’s revolving credit line was reduced by an amount equal to the amount declined. As of June 30, 2004, the outstanding undrawn availability under the prior revolving line of credit had been reduced to $1.6 million.

The company obtained production covenant waivers from its bank group effective for the first and second quarters of 2004. The company was in material compliance with all other provisions of the credit facility as of June 30, 2004. On August 3, 2004, the company completed the refinancing of its bank credit facility. The new credit facility consists of a $140 million six-year term loan maturing July 31, 2010, and bearing interest at a variable rate plus a margin (LIBOR plus 325 basis points, or approximately 4.75% at August 3, 2004) and a $40 million five-year revolving credit facility expiring July 31, 2009 and initially bearing interest at LIBOR plus 300 basis points, or approximately 4.50%. Proceeds of the new facility were applied to pay off the previous debt facility and the remainder for general corporate purposes. The revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit facility that has

been partially utilized to secure a $7.5 million letter of credit in support of certain of the company’s reclamation obligations. The letter of credit carries an annual fee of 3.00%. The revolving credit facility requires an annual commitment fee of 0.75% on the remaining unutilized amount. The new credit facility contains customary financial and other covenants; however, it does not include a minimum production covenant. The new credit facility requires that the company offer 25% of the proceeds received for the sale of palladium inventory received from the Norilsk Nickel transaction as prepayments against the credit facility. The new credit facility also requires that 50% of the company’s annual excess cash flow be offered for prepayment against the credit facility.

During July of 2004, the company entered into financially settled forwards for 26,500 ounces of platinum sales through January 2006 at an overall average price of approximately $788 per ounce. The company believes that it now has adequate liquidity for its contemplated needs.

In looking to the future, the company’s primary focus will remain on profitability. Reducing production costs will continue to be a priority. One opportunity to reduce unit production costs may be to increase the production rate at the East Boulder mine. As previously disclosed, the company is gradually increasing production at East Boulder to 1,650 tons of ore per day. While the company had planned to achieve this daily rate by the end of 2004, several issues have been identified which will extend the ramp-up period into 2006. The issues have centered on recognition that the developed state of the mine must be further advanced in order to achieve and maintain the higher production level. The work on improving the developed state will include:

•   additional primary development to increase the number of ramp systems and working faces

•   additional diamond drilling to more accurately identify changes in structure

•   development of a ventilation raise to surface to support a larger amount of equipment while improving underground air quality related to diesel particulate matter (DPM).

Ore production levels at East Boulder have averaged just over 1,300 tons of ore per day so far this year, up slightly from approximately 1,250 tons of ore per day for the first six-months of 2003. Full utilization of equipment at the mine will not be attained until after completion of two new ventilation shafts in late 2005.

During the second-quarter of 2004, the company shut down its smelter and base metals refinery for about five weeks for routine smelter re-bricking and other refurbishing. This planned shutdown reduced second-quarter earnings and cash flow, although sales out of the palladium inventory continued, partially mitigating the effect of the outage. Production at the mines was unaffected by this shutdown. The mine concentrates were stockpiled at the smelter and processed once the facility came back up. The company’s processing of these stockpiles was largely completed by June 30, 2004 and the metal was shipped for final refining.

The company’s financial results for the six-months ended June 30, 2004 improved compared to the same period in 2003, even with the five-week outage in Columbus to refurbish the smelter and refinery. Earnings for the first six months of 2004 totaled $27.4 million, as revised, compared to a loss of $21.0 million for the first half of 2003. This improvement is largely due to increased realized prices and additional sales volume of PGMs during the first six-months of 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003 offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization expense as a result of the company’s change in accounting method for amortizing capitalized mine development in 2004. The increase in sales volumes resulted from sales in 2004 of palladium received in the Norilsk Nickel stock purchase transaction and from a new contract for secondary processing (i.e., recycling) of autocatalysts. The 2003 loss also included a one-time deferred tax adjustment related to the Norilsk Nickel transaction that reduced earnings by $14.0 million. Cash flow from operations increased to $39.7 million in the first half of 2004, up from $36.0 million in the first half of 2003; first-half 2004 cash flow remained strong in spite of growth in operating capital requirements associated with the smelter rebricking.

The company continually reviews ways to increase demand for its products in order to improve profitability. Stillwater has undertaken a promotional effort to establish a palladium council that would coordinate industry efforts to strengthen demand and foster new applications for palladium. Stillwater also has entered into a third-party agreement to produce and market palladium coins and is exploring ways to increase jewelry demand for palladium.

The labor agreement covering the company’s union employees at the Stillwater Mine and the Columbus processing facilities was scheduled to expire at noon on July 1, 2004. The company and the union reached tentative

agreement on a new labor agreement just prior to expiration and extended the contract expiration until noon on July 12, 2004, in order to allow time for the union membership to vote on the contract. On July 11, 2004, the union leadership notified the company that a vote of their membership had rejected the proposed agreement, and accordingly the bargaining unit went on strike effective at noon on July 12, 2004. On July 19, 2004, the members of the union voted to approve a three-year contract, which provides for a 3% annual salary increase and a contract renewal cash bonus. Employees returned to work beginning with the day shift on July 21, 2004. Despite the resolution of this strike, we cannot assure that we will not encounter additional strikes or other types of conflicts with labor unions or employees in the future.

As noted above, the Company completed the refinancing of its bank credit facility on August 3, 2004. With the completion of the refinancing, the Company expects to incur one-time charges in the third quarter of 2004 totaling approximately $5.0 million, including a prepayment charge and the write-off of deferred costs associated with the former bank credit facility.

In addition, a nonrecurring valuation adjustment of $2.1 million related to the buyout of the lease on one of the tunnel boring machines at the East Boulder Mine will occur during the third quarter of 2004.

Stillwater Mining Company
Key Factors
(Unaudited)


	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
OPERATING AND COST DATA FOR MINE PRODUCTION	(as revised)				(as revised)
*Consolidated:*
Ounces produced (000)
Palladium		114		112		228		224
Platinum		34		33		67		67

Total		148		145		295		291


Tons milled (000)		302		301		616		591
Mill head grade (ounce per ton)		0.53		0.52		0.52		0.54

Sub-grade tons milled (000)(1)		11		19		26		40
Sub-grade tons mill head grade (ounce per ton)		0.28		0.18		0.24		0.21

Total tons milled (000)(1)		313		320		642		631
Combined mill head grade (ounce per ton)		0.52		0.50		0.51		0.52
Total mill recovery (%)		91		91		91		91

Total operating costs per ounce (Non-GAAP)(2)	$	230	$	248	$	235	$	251
Total cash costs per ounce (Non-GAAP) (2), (3)	$	264	$	281	$	274	$	281
Total production costs per ounce (Non-GAAP) (2), (3),(4)	$	366	$	354	$	376	$	352

Total operating costs per ton milled (Non-GAAP)(2)	$	108	$	112	$	108	$	116
Total cash costs per ton milled (Non-GAAP) (2), (3)	$	124	$	127	$	126	$	130
Total production costs per ton milled (Non-GAAP) (2), (3), (4)	$	172	$	160	$	173	$	162

*Stillwater Mine:*
Ounces produced (000)
Palladium		84		81		165		165
Platinum		25		24		49		50

Total		109		105		214		215


Tons milled (000)		186		181		381		366
Mill head grade (ounce per ton)		0.62		0.62		0.60		0.63

Sub-grade tons milled (000)(1)		11		19		26		40
Sub-grade tons mill head grade (ounce per ton)		0.28		0.18		0.24		0.21

Total tons milled (000)(1)		197		200		407		406
Combined mill head grade (ounce per ton)		0.60		0.58		0.57		0.59
Total mill recovery (%)		92		92		92		91

Total operating costs per ounce (Non-GAAP)(2)	$	209	$	233	$	221	$	230
Total cash costs per ounce (Non-GAAP) (2), (3)	$	240	$	262	$	258	$	257
Total production costs per ounce (Non-GAAP) (2), (3), (4)	$	324	$	325	$	343	$	318

Total operating costs per ton milled (Non-GAAP)(2)	$	115	$	122	$	116	$	122
Total cash costs per ton milled (Non-GAAP) (2), (3)	$	132	$	138	$	135	$	136
Total production costs per ton milled (Non-GAAP) (2), (3), (4)	$	178	$	171	$	180	$	169

Stillwater Mining Company
Key Factors (continued)
(Unaudited)


	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
OPERATING AND COST DATA FOR MINE PRODUCTION
(Continued)	(as revised)				(as revised)
*East Boulder Mine:*
Ounces produced (000)
Palladium		30		31		63		59
Platinum		9		9		18		17

Total		39		40		81		76


Tons milled (000)		116		120		235		225
Mill head grade (ounce per ton)		0.38		0.38		0.39		0.38

Sub-grade tons milled (000)(1)		—		—		—		—
Sub-grade tons mill head grade (ounce per ton)		—		—		—		—

Total tons milled (000)(1)		116		120		235		225
Combined mill head grade (ounce per ton)		0.38		0.38		0.39		0.38
Total mill recovery (%)		88		88		89		89

Total operating costs per ounce (Non-GAAP)(2)	$	289	$	290	$	271	$	308
Total cash costs per ounce (Non-GAAP) (2), (3)	$	333	$	330	$	318	$	350
Total production costs per ounce (Non-GAAP) (2), (3), (4)	$	484	$	428	$	463	$	448

Total operating costs per ton milled (Non-GAAP)(2)	$	96	$	96	$	94	$	103
Total cash costs per ton milled (Non-GAAP) (2), (3)	$	111	$	109	$	110	$	117
Total production costs per ton milled (Non-GAAP) (2), (3), (4)	$	162	$	141	$	160	$	150

(1)		Sub-grade tons milled includes reef waste material only. Total tons milled includes ore tons and sub-grade tons only.

(2)		Total operating costs include costs of mining, processing and administrative expenses at the mine site (including mine site overhead and credits for metals produced other than palladium and platinum from mine production). Total cash costs include total operating costs plus royalties, taxes other than income tax and other. Total production costs include total cash costs plus asset retirement costs and depreciation and amortization. Income taxes, corporate general and administrative expenses, asset impairment writedowns, gain or loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment, restructuring costs, Norilsk Nickel transaction expenses and interest income and expense are not included in total operating costs, total cash costs or total production costs.

(3)		Operating cost per ton, operating cost per ounce, cash cost per ton, cash cost per ounce, production cost per ton and production cost per ounce represent non-U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) measurements that management uses to monitor and evaluate the performance efficiency of its mining operations. Management believes cash costs per ounce and per ton provide an indicator of profitability and efficiency at each location and on a consolidated basis, as well as provide a meaningful basis to compare our results with those of other mining companies and other operating mining properties. See table “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP measures to cost of revenues” and accompanying discussion.

(4)		A summary of the aggregate effect for the of the change in the accounting method (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements) is shown below:


	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30, 2004				June 30, 2004
			As previously				As previously
	As revised		reported		As revised		reported
*Consolidated:*
Total production costs	$	53,933	$	49,662	$	111,137	$	102,365
Total production cost per ounce	$	366	$	337	$	376	$	347
Total production cost per ton milled	$	172	$	159	$	173	$	159

*Stillwater Mine:*
Total production costs	$	35,212	$	33,097	$	73,466	$	69,040
Total production cost per ounce	$	324	$	305	$	343	$	323
Total production cost per ton milled	$	178	$	168		180		170

*East Boulder Mine:*
Total production costs	$	18,721	$	16,565	$	37,671	$	33,325
Total production cost per ounce	$	484	$	428	$	463	$	409
Total production cost per ton milled	$	162	$	143	$	160	$	142

Stillwater Mining Company
Key Factors (continued)
(Unaudited)


	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
SALES AND PRICE DATA

Ounces sold (000)
Mine Production:
Palladium		70		117		188		236
Platinum		20		34		52		68

Total		90		151		240		304

Other PGM activities:
Palladium		118		—		171		2
Platinum		10		1		27		1
Rhodium		2		—		5		—

Total		130		1		203		3


Total ounces sold		220		152		443		307


Average realized price per ounce (5)
Mine Production:
Palladium	$	388	$	341	$	382	$	353
Platinum	$	860	$	565	$	863	$	572
Combined (6)	$	491	$	391	$	486	$	401

Other PGM activities:
Palladium	$	256	$	234	$	256	$	259
Platinum	$	833	$	642	$	783	$	605
Rhodium	$	796	$	577	$	785	$	649

Average market price per ounce (5)
Palladium	$	256	$	170	$	249	$	208
Platinum	$	832	$	646	$	850	$	654
Combined (6)	$	382	$	276	$	380	$	306

(5)		The company’s average realized price represents revenues (include the effect of contractual floor and ceiling prices) and hedging gains and losses realized on commodity instruments, but excluding contract discounts, all divided by total ounces sold. The average market price represents the average London PM Fix for palladium, platinum and combined prices and Johnson Matthey quotation for rhodium prices for the actual months of the period.

(6)		The company reports a combined average realized and market price of palladium and platinum based on actual sales of mine production ounces. Prior period amounts have been adjusted to conform with the current year presentation.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP measures to cost of revenues

The company utilizes certain non-GAAP measures as indicators in assessing the performance of its mining and processing operations during any period. Because of the processing time required to complete the extraction of finished PGM products, there are typically lags from one to three months between ore production and sale of the finished product. Sales in any period include some portion of material mined and processed from prior periods as the revenue recognition process is completed. Consequently, while cost of revenues (a GAAP measure included in the company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income/(Loss)) appropriately reflects the expense associated with the materials sold in any period, the company has developed certain non-GAAP measures to assess the costs associated with its producing and processing activities in a particular period and to compare those costs between periods.

While the company believes that these non-GAAP measures may also be of value to outside readers, both as general indicators of the company’s mining efficiency from period to period and as insight into how the company internally measures its operating performance, these non-GAAP measures are not standardized across the mining industry and in most cases will not be directly comparable to similar measures that may be provided by other companies. These non-GAAP measures are only useful as indicators of relative operational performance in any period, and because they do not take into account the inventory timing differences that are included in cost of revenues, they cannot meaningfully be used to develop measures of profitability. A reconciliation of these measures to cost of revenues for each period shown is provided as part of the following tables, and a description of each non-GAAP measure is provided below.

Total Cost of Revenues: For the company on a consolidated basis, this measure is equal to consolidated cost of revenues, as reported in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income/(Loss). For the Stillwater Mine, East Boulder Mine, and other PGM activities, the company segregates the expenses within cost of revenues that are directly associated with each of these activities and then allocates the remaining facility costs included in consolidated cost of revenues in proportion to the monthly volumes from each activity. The resulting total cost of revenues measures for Stillwater Mine, East Boulder Mine and other PGM activities are equal in total to consolidated cost of revenues as reported in the company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income/(Loss).

Total Production Costs (Non-GAAP): Calculated as total cost of revenues (for each mine or consolidated) adjusted to exclude gains or losses on asset dispositions, costs and profit from secondary recycling, and changes in product inventories. This non-GAAP measure provides an indication of the total costs incurred in association with production and processing in a period, before taking into account the timing differences resulting from inventory changes and before any effect of asset dispositions or secondary recycling activities. It is used by the company as a comparative measure of the level of total production and processing activities in a period, and may be compared to prior periods or between the company’s mines. As noted above, because this measure does not take into account the inventory timing differences that are included in cost of revenues, it cannot be used to develop meaningful measures of earnings or profitability.

When divided by the total tons milled in the respective period, Total Production Cost per Ton Milled (Non-GAAP) – measured for each mine or consolidated – provides an indication of the cost per ton milled in that period. Because of variability of ore grade in the company’s mining operations, production efficiency underground is frequently measured against ore tons produced rather than contained PGM ounces. And because ore tons are first actually weighed as they are fed into the mill, mill feed is the first point at which production tons are measured precisely. Consequently, Total Production Cost per Ton Milled (Non-GAAP) is a general measure of production efficiency, and is affected both by the level of Total Production Costs (Non-GAAP) and by the volume of tons produced and fed to the mill.

When divided by the total recoverable PGM ounces from production in the respective period, Total Production Cost per Ounce (Non-GAAP) – measured for each mine or consolidated – provides an indication of the cost per ounce produced in that period. Recoverable PGM ounces from production are an indication of the amount of PGM product extracted through mining in any period. Because extracting PGM material is ultimately the objective of mining, the cost per ounce of extracting and processing PGM ounces in a period is a useful measure for comparing extraction efficiency between periods and between the company’s mines. Consequently, Total Production Cost per

Ounce (Non-GAAP) in any period is a general measure of extraction efficiency, and is affected by the level of Total Production Costs (Non-GAAP), by the grade of the ore produced and by the volume of ore produced in the period.

Total Cash Costs (Non-GAAP): This non-GAAP measure is calculated by excluding the depreciation and amortization and asset retirement costs from Total Production Costs (Non-GAAP) for each mine or consolidated. The company uses this measure as a comparative indication of the cash costs related to production and processing in any period. As noted above, because this measure does not take into account the inventory timing differences that are included in cost of revenues, it cannot be used to develop meaningful measures of earnings or profitability.

When divided by the total tons milled in the respective period, Total Cash Cost per Ton Milled (Non-GAAP) – measured for each mine or consolidated– provides an indication of the level of cash costs incurred per ton milled in that period. Because of variability of ore grade in the company’s mining operations, production efficiency underground is frequently measured against ore tons produced rather than contained PGM ounces. And because ore tons are first weighed as they are fed into the mill, mill feed is the first point at which production tons are measured precisely. Consequently, Total Cash Cost per Ton Milled (Non-GAAP) is a general measure of production efficiency, and is affected both by the level of Total Cash Costs (Non-GAAP) and by the volume of tons produced and fed to the mill.

When divided by the total recoverable PGM ounces from production in the respective period, Total Cash Cost per Ounce (Non-GAAP) – measured for each mine or consolidated– provides an indication of the level of cash costs incurred per PGM ounce produced in that period. Recoverable PGM ounces from production are an indication of the amount of PGM product extracted through mining in any period. Because ultimately extracting PGM material is the objective of mining, the cost per ounce of extracting and processing PGM ounces in a period is a useful measure for comparing extraction efficiency between periods and between the company’s mines. Consequently, Total Cash Cost per Ounce (Non-GAAP) in any period is a general measure of extraction efficiency, and is affected by the level of Total Cash Costs (Non-GAAP), by the grade of the ore produced and by the volume of ore produced in the period.

Total Operating Costs (Non-GAAP): This non-GAAP measure is derived from Total Cash Costs (Non-GAAP) for each mine or consolidated by excluding royalty, tax and insurance expenses from Total Cash Costs (Non-GAAP). Royalties, taxes and insurance costs are contractual or governmental obligations outside of the control of the company’s mining operations, and in the case of royalties and most taxes, are driven more by the level of sales realizations rather than by operating efficiency. Consequently, Total Operating Costs (Non-GAAP) is a useful indicator of the level of production and processing costs incurred in a period that are under the control of mining operations. As noted above, because this measure does not take into account the inventory timing differences that are included in cost of revenues, it cannot be used to develop meaningful measures of earnings or profitability.

When divided by the total tons milled in the respective period, Total Operating Cost per Ton Milled (Non-GAAP) – measured for each mine or consolidated– provides an indication of the level of controllable cash costs incurred per ton milled in that period. Because of variability of ore grade in the company’s mining operations, production efficiency underground is frequently measured against ore tons produced rather than contained PGM ounces. And because ore tons are first actually weighed as they are fed into the mill, mill feed is the first point at which production tons are measured precisely. Consequently, Total Operating Cost per Ton Milled (Non-GAAP) is a general measure of production efficiency, and is affected both by the level of Total Operating Costs (Non-GAAP) and by the volume of tons produced and fed to the mill.

When divided by the total recoverable PGM ounces from production in the respective period, Total Operating Cost per Ounce (Non-GAAP) – measured for each mine or consolidated– provides an indication of the level of controllable cash costs incurred per PGM ounce produced in that period. Recoverable PGM ounces from production are an indication of the amount of PGM product extracted through mining in any period. Because ultimately extracting PGM material is the objective of mining, the cost per ounce of extracting and processing PGM ounces in a period is a useful measure for comparing extraction efficiency between periods and between the company’s mines. Consequently, Total Operating Cost per Ounce (Non-GAAP) in any period is a general measure of extraction efficiency, and is affected by the level of Total Operating Costs (Non-GAAP), by the grade of the ore produced and by the volume of ore produced in the period.

Key Factors (contined)


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
(in thousands, except per ounce and per ton data)	(as revised)						(as revised)
*Consolidated:*
Total operating costs (Non-GAAP)	$	33,805		$	35,863		$	69,401		$	72,825
Total cash costs (Non-GAAP)	$	38,930		$	40,557		$	81,048		$	81,689
Total production costs (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	53,933		$	51,038		$	111,137		$	102,166
Divided by total ounces		148			145			295			291
Divided by total tons milled		313			320			642			631

Total operating cost per ounce (Non-GAAP)	$	230		$	248		$	235		$	251
Total cash cost per ounce (Non-GAAP)	$	264		$	281		$	274		$	281
Total production cost per ounce (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	366		$	354		$	376		$	352

Total operating cost per ton milled (Non-GAAP)	$	108		$	112		$	108		$	116
Total cash cost per ton milled (Non-GAAP)	$	124		$	127		$	126		$	130
Total production cost per ton milled (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	172		$	160		$	173		$	162

Reconciliation to consolidated cost of revenues:
Total operating costs (Non-GAAP)	$	33,805		$	35,863		$	69,401		$	72,825
Royalities, taxes and other		5,125			4,694			11,647			8,864

Total cash costs (Non-GAAP)	$	38,930		$	40,557		$	81,048		$	81,689
Asset retirement costs		93			84			182			167
Depreciation and amortization		14,910			10,397			29,907			20,310

Total production costs (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	53,933		$	51,038		$	111,137		$	102,166
Change in product inventory		(2,460	)		5,598			9,589			10,827
Costs of secondary recycling		10,775			1,087			26,144			2,190
Secondary recycling depreciation		12			18			23			36
Add: Profit from secondary recycling		1,513			(3	)		2,478			410
(Gain) or loss on sale of assets and other costs		—			(13	)		(74	)		(1	)

Total consolidated cost of revenues	$	63,773		$	57,725		$	149,297		$	115,628


*Stillwater Mine*:
Total operating costs (Non-GAAP)	$	22,639		$	24,377		$	47,310		$	49,596
Total cash costs (Non-GAAP)	$	26,061		$	27,480		$	55,118		$	55,341
Total production costs (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	35,212		$	34,066		$	73,466		$	68,406
Divided by total ounces		109			105			214			215
Divided by total tons milled		197			200			407			406

Total operating cost per ounce (Non-GAAP)	$	209		$	233		$	221		$	230
Total cash cost per ounce (Non-GAAP)	$	240		$	262		$	258		$	257
Total production cost per ounce (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	324		$	325		$	343		$	318

Total operating cost per ton milled (Non-GAAP)	$	115		$	122		$	116		$	122
Total cash cost per ton milled (Non-GAAP)	$	132		$	138		$	135		$	136
Total production cost per ton milled (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	178		$	171		$	180		$	169

Key Factors (continued)


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
(in thousands, except per ounce and per ton data)	(as revised)						(as revised)
*Stillwater Mine continued:*
Reconciliation to cost of revenues:
Total operating costs (Non-GAAP)	$	22,639		$	24,377		$	47,310		$	49,596
Royalties, taxes and other		3,422			3,103			7,808			5,745

Total cash costs (Non-GAAP)	$	26,061		$	27,480		$	55,118		$	55,341
Asset retirement costs		76			69			149			137
Depreciation and amortization		9,075			6,517			18,199			12,928

Total production costs (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	35,212		$	34,066		$	73,466		$	68,406
Change in product inventory		(11,439	)		4,128			(9,302	)		8,820
Add: Profit from secondary recycling		1,112			—			1,798			318
(Gain) or loss on sale of assets and other costs		—			(13	)		(2	)		(1	)

Total cost of revenues	$	24,885		$	38,181		$	65,960		$	77,543


*East Boulder Mine:*
Total operating costs (Non-GAAP)	$	11,166		$	11,486		$	22,091		$	23,229
Total cash costs (Non-GAAP)	$	12,869		$	13,077		$	25,930		$	26,348
Total production costs (Non-GAAP) (4)	$	18,721		$	16,972		$	37,671		$	33,760
Divided by total ounces		39			40			81			76
Divided by total tons milled		116			120			235			225

Total operating cost per ounce (Non-GAAP)	$	289		$	290		$	271		$	308
Total cash cost per ounce (Non-GAAP)	$	333		$	330		$	318		$	350
Total production cost per ounce (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	484		$	428		$	463		$	448

Total operating cost per ton milled (Non-GAAP)	$	96		$	96		$	94		$	103
Total cash cost per ton milled (Non-GAAP)	$	111		$	109		$	110		$	117
Total production cost per ton milled (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	162		$	141		$	160		$	150

Reconciliation to cost of revenues:
Total operating costs (Non-GAAP)	$	11,166		$	11,486		$	22,091		$	23,229
Royalties, taxes and other		1,703			1,591			3,839			3,119

Total cash costs (Non-GAAP)	$	12,869		$	13,077		$	25,930		$	26,348
Asset retirement costs		17			15			33			30
Depreciation and amortization		5,835			3,880			11,708			7,382

Total production costs (Non-GAAP)(4)	$	18,721		$	16,972		$	37,671		$	33,760
Change in product inventory		(9,593	)		1,470			(7,533	)		2,007
Add: Profit from secondary recycling		401			(3	)		680			92
(Gain) or loss on sale of assets and other costs		—			—			(72	)		—

Total cost of revenues	$	9,529		$	18,439		$	30,746		$	35,859


*Other PGM activities:*
Reconciliation to cost of revenues:
Change in product inventory	$	18,572		$	—		$	26,424		$	—
Secondary recycling depreciation		12			18			23			36
Costs of secondary recycling		10,775			1,087			26,144			2,190

Total cost of revenues	$	29,359		$	1,105		$	52,591		$	2,226

Results of Operations

Three-month period ended June 30, 2004 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2003

Production. During the second quarter of 2004, the company’s consolidated mining operations increased production, as compared to the second quarter of 2003, as follows:


	Three months ended
	June 30,
							Percentage
					Increase/		Increase/
	2004		2003		(Decrease)		(Decrease)
Palladium (000)		114		112		2		2	%
Platinum (000)		34		33		1		3	%

Total (000)		148		145		3		2	%

The increase was primarily due to a 4% increase in ounces produced at the Stillwater Mine primarily related to a 3% increase in ore grade. Stillwater Mine produced approximately 84,000 ounces of palladium and 25,000 ounces of platinum in the second quarter of 2004, compared to approximately 81,000 ounces of palladium and 24,000 ounces of platinum in the second quarter of 2003.

Revenues. Revenues were $84.2 million for the second quarter of 2004 compared to $60.0 million for the second quarter of 2003. The following discussion covers key factors contributing to the increase in revenues:


	Three months ended
(in thousands)	June 30,
								Percentage
					Increase/			Increase/
	2004		2003		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Revenues	$	84,207	$	60,011	$	24,196			40	%


Mine Production Ounces Sold:

Palladium		70		117		(47	)		(40	%)
Platinum		20		34		(14	)		(41	%)

Total		90		151		(61	)		(40	%)

Other PGM activities Ounces Sold:

Palladium		118		—		118			N/A
Platinum		10		1		9			900	%
Rhodium		2		—		2			N/A

Total		130		1		129			N/A


Total Ounces sold		220		152		68			45	%

The $24.2 million, or 40%, increase is primarily due to higher realized PGM prices, the sale of a portion of the 877,169 ounces of palladium inventory received from Norilsk Nickel plus the inclusion of secondary processing revenues as a result of the new auto-catalyst processing agreement. The sale of 110,000 ounces of the palladium inventory contributed $27.8 million to revenue for the second quarter of 2004, while sales of 20,000 ounces from the secondary reprocessing activities contributed $12.0 million to revenues.

Palladium sales from mine production were 70,000 ounces during the second quarter of 2004 compared to 117,000 ounces for the second quarter of 2003. Platinum sales from mine production were approximately 20,000 ounces during the second quarter of 2004 compared to approximately 34,000 for the same period of 2003. The

decrease in sales of mine production is due to the shutdown of the smelter and base metals refinery for a period of five weeks for routine smelter re-bricking and other refurbishing. Production from the mine operations continued during the shutdown period and concentrates were stockpiled at the smelter. The company had largely completed processing of the stockpiles by June 30, 2004 and the metal was shipped for final refining.


	Three months ended
	June 30,
							Percentage
					Increase/		Increase/
	2004		2003		(Decrease)		(Decrease)
Average realized price per ounce

Mine Production:
Palladium	$	388	$	341	$	47		14	%
Platinum	$	860	$	565	$	295		52	%
Combined	$	491	$	391	$	100		26	%

Other PGM Activities:
Palladium	$	256	$	234	$	22		9	%
Platinum	$	833	$	642	$	191		30	%
Rhodium	$	796	$	577	$	219		38	%

Average market price per ounce

Palladium	$	256	$	170	$	86		51	%
Platinum	$	832	$	646	$	186		29	%
Combined	$	382	$	276	$	106		38	%

The company’s combined average realized price per ounce of palladium and platinum sold from mine production in the second quarter of 2004 increased 26% to $491, compared to $391 in the second quarter of 2003, largely reflecting the trend in PGM prices over the same period. The combined average market price increased 38% to $382 per ounce in the second quarter of 2004, compared to $276 per ounce in the second quarter of 2003. The average realized price per ounce of palladium sold from mine production was $388 in the second quarter of 2004, compared to $341 in the second quarter of 2003 (benefiting in both periods from the contractual price floors), while the average market price of palladium was $256 per ounce in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $170 per ounce in the second quarter of 2003. The company’s average realized price per ounce of platinum sold from mine production was $860 in the second quarter of 2004, compared to $565 in the second quarter of 2003. The average market price of platinum was $832 per ounce in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $646 per ounce in the second quarter of 2003. The average realized prices received for palladium, platinum and rhodium prices from the company’s other PGM activities (autocatalyst recycling and sales of palladium inventory from Norilsk Nickel) during the second quarter of 2004 were $256, $833 and $796 per ounce, respectively.

Cost of metals sold. Cost of metals sold was $48.9 million for the second quarter of 2004, as revised, compared to $47.3 million for the second quarter of 2003, a 3% increase.

The cost of metal sold from mine production was $19.5 million in the second quarter of 2004, as revised, compared to $46.2 million in the same period of 2003, a 58% decrease. The decrease was primarily due to the 40% decrease in ounces sold and a decrease in the cost of metals sold per ounce. The decrease in ounces sold is primarily attributable to the shutdown of the smelter and base metals refinery for a period of five weeks for routine smelter re-bricking and other refurbishing.

Total consolidated cash costs per ounce produced, a non-GAAP measure, in the second quarter of 2004 decreased $17 or 6% to $264 per ounce from $281 per ounce in the second quarter of 2003. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in operating costs primarily related to higher by-product and secondary recycling credits at the Stillwater and East Boulder Mines, as a result of higher sales volumes and higher commodity prices.

The cost of metals sold from secondary processing activates was $10.8 million in the second quarter of 2004, compared to $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2003. The increase was primarily due to the cost of acquiring and processing the increased ounces generated from the company’s long-term sourcing agreement for spent catalytic materials entered into during the fourth quarter of 2003.

The cost of metals sold from palladium received in the Norilsk Nickel transaction and other activities was $18.6 million in the second quarter of 2004 primarily due to the sale of approximately 110,000 ounces of palladium at an average cost of $169 per ounce. There were no such sales in the second quarter of 2003.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization was $14.9 million for the second quarter of 2004, as revised, compared to $10.4 million for the second quarter of 2003, a 43% increase. The increase was due to a change in the company’s method of amortizing capitalized mine development costs (see Note 2 to the company’s consolidated financial statements). As a result of the change, certain capitalized mine development costs are amortized over a shorter period, which results in higher amortization expense than the company has experienced in previous periods.

Expenses. General and administrative expenses in the second quarter 2004 were $3.9 million, compared to $3.3 million during the second quarter of 2003. The increase is primarily due to higher costs associated with other PGM marketing activities.

Interest expense of $3.4 million in the second quarter of 2004 decreased approximately $1.3 million from $4.7 million in the prior year second quarter due to the repayment of the Term A facility near the end of the second quarter of 2003.

Income Taxes. The company had no income tax provision or benefit for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, compared to an income tax provision of $10.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. The second quarter 2003 net tax provision included a $14.0 million write-off of net operating loss carryforwards resulting from the Norilsk Nickel transaction. The company has not recognized any income tax provision or benefit for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as any changes in deferred tax liabilities and assets have been offset by changes in the valuation allowance provided for the company’s net deferred tax assets (see Note 10).

Other Comprehensive Income. For the second quarter of 2004, other comprehensive income includes a change in fair value of $3.4 million for commodity hedging instruments. For the same period of 2003, other comprehensive income, net of tax, included reclassification adjustments to interest expense of $0.3 million.

Six-month period ended June 30, 2004 compared to six-month period ended June 30, 2003

PGM Production. During the first half of 2004, the company’s consolidated mining operations increased production, as compared to the first half of 2003, as follows:


	Six months ended
	June 30,
							Percentage
					Increase/		Increase/
	2004		2003		(Decrease)		(Decrease)
Palladium (000)		228		224		4		2	%
Platinum (000)		67		67		—		—

Total (000)		295		291		4		2	%

The increase was primarily due to a 7% ramp up in production at the East Boulder Mine, which produced approximately 63,000 ounces of palladium and approximately 18,000 ounces of platinum in the first half of 2004 compared to approximately 59,000 ounces of palladium and approximately 17,000 ounces of platinum in the first half of 2003.

Revenues. For the first six-months of 2004 revenues were $184.9 million compared to $124.2 million for the first

half of 2003. The following discussion covers key factors contributing to the increase in revenues:


	Six months ended
(in thousands)	June 30,
					Percentage
					Increase/			Increase/
	2004		2003		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Revenues	$	184,900	$	124,165	$	60,735			49	%


Mine Production Ounces Sold:

Palladium		188		236		(48	)		(20	%)
Platinum		52		68		(16	)		(23	%)

Total		240		304		(64	)		(21	%)


Other PGM activities Ounces Sold:

Palladium		171		2		169			N/A
Platinum		27		1		26			N/A
Rhodium		5		—		5			N/A

Total		203		3		200			N/A


Total Ounces sold		443		307		136			44	%

The $60.7 million, or 49%, increase is primarily due to: (1) a 21% increase in the average combined realized palladium and platinum prices from sales of mine production (see average realized price discussion below), (2) the sale of approximately 156,000 ounces of palladium inventory received from Norilsk Nickel transaction and (3) inclusion of secondary processing revenues as a result of the new auto-catalyst processing agreement. Sales from the palladium inventory contributed $40.1 million to revenue for the first half of 2004, while sales of 47,000 ounces from secondary reprocessing contributed $28.2 million to revenues for the same period.

Palladium sales from mine production decreased to approximately 188,000 ounces during the first half of 2004 compared to 236,000 ounces for the first half of 2003. Platinum sales decreased to approximately 52,000 ounces during the first half of 2004 compared to approximately 68,000 for the same period of 2003. This decrease in sales of mine production is due to the five-week shutdown of the smelter and base metals refinery for routine smelter re-bricking and other refurbishing in the first half of 2004. Production from mine operations continued during the shutdown period and concentrates were stockpiled at the smelter. Processing of these stockpiles was largely completed by June 30, 2004, and the metal was shipped for final refining. Altogether, the total quantity of PGMs sold increased 44% to approximately 443,000 ounces during the first half of 2004 compared with 307,000 ounces for the same period of 2003.


	Six months ended
	June 30,
								Percentage
					Increase/			Increase/
	2004		2003		(Decrease)			(Decrease)
Average realized price per ounce

Mine Production:
Palladium	$	382	$	353	$	29			8	%
Platinum	$	863	$	572	$	291			51	%
Combined	$	486	$	401	$	85			21	%

Other PGM Activities:
Palladium	$	256	$	259	$	(3	)		(1	%)
Platinum	$	783	$	605	$	178			29	%
Rhodium	$	785	$	649	$	136			21	%

Average market price per ounce
Palladium	$	249	$	208	$	41			20	%
Platinum	$	850	$	654	$	196			30	%
Combined	$	380	$	306	$	74			24	%

The company’s combined average realized price per ounce of palladium and platinum sold from mine production in the first half of 2004 increased by 21% to $486, compared to $401 in the first half of 2003, largely driven by higher period-on-period platinum prices. The combined average market price increased by 24% to $380 per ounce in the first half of 2004, compared to $306 per ounce in the first half of 2003, reflecting the trend in both platinum and palladium prices over the same period. The company’s average realized price per ounce of palladium sold from mine production was $382 in the first half of 2004, compared to $353 in the first half of 2003 (helped in both years by the contractual floor prices for palladium), while the average market price of palladium was $249 per ounce in the first half of 2004 compared to $208 per ounce in the first half of 2003. The company’s average realized price per ounce of platinum sold from mine production was $863 in the first half of 2004, compared to $572 in the first half of 2003 (reflecting ceiling prices for platinum which expired at the end of 2003), while the average market price of platinum was $850 per ounce in the first half of 2004 compared to $654 per ounce in the first half of 2003. The average realized palladium, platinum and rhodium prices received from the company’s other PGM activities during the first six months of 2004 were $256, $783 and $785, respectively.

Cost of metals sold. Cost of metals sold was $119.4 million for the first half of 2004, as revised, compared to $95.3 million for the first half of 2003, a 25% increase.

The cost of metal sold from mine production was $66.8 million in the first six months of 2004, as revised, compared to $93.1 million in the same period of 2003, a 28% decrease. The decrease was primarily due to the 21% decrease in ounces sold and a decrease in the cost of metals sold per ounce. The decrease in ounces sold is primarily attributable to the shutdown of the smelter and base metals refinery for a period of five weeks for routine smelter re-bricking and other refurbishing.

Total consolidated cash costs per ounce produced, a non-GAAP measure, for the first half of 2004 decreased $7 or 2% to $274 per ounce from $281 per ounce in the first half of 2003. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in operating costs primarily related to higher by-product and secondary recycling credits at the Stillwater and East Boulder Mines, as a result of higher sales volumes and higher commodity prices.

The cost of metals sold from secondary processing activates was $26.1 million in the first six months of 2004, compared to $2.2 million in the first six months of 2003. The increase was primarily due to the cost of acquiring and processing the increased ounces generated from the company’s long-term sourcing agreement for spent catalytic materials entered into during the fourth quarter of 2003.

The cost of metals sold from palladium received in the Norilsk Nickel transaction and other activities was $26.4 million in the first half of 2004 primarily due to the sale of approximately 156,000 ounces of palladium at an average cost of $169 per ounce. There were no such sales in the second quarter of 2003.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization was $29.9 million for the first half of 2004, as revised, compared to $20.3 million for the first half of 2003, a 47% increase. The increase was due to a change in the company’s method of amortizing capitalized mine development costs (see Note 2 to the company’s consolidated financial statements). As a result of the change, certain capitalized mine development costs are amortized over a shorter period, which results in higher amortization expense than the company has experienced in previous periods.

Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $0.6 million, or 9%, in the first half of 2004 as compared to the same period of 2003. The increase of $0.6 million is primarily due to higher costs associated with other PGM marketing activities.

Interest expense decreased period on period by $2.3 million primarily due to the repayment of the Term A facility near the end of the second quarter of 2003.

Income Taxes. The company had no income tax provision or benefit for the six-months ended June 30, 2004, compared to an income tax provision of $9.7 million for the six-months ended June 30, 2003. The net tax provision for the first six months of 2003 includes a $14.0 million write-off of net operating loss carryforwards associated with the Norilsk Nickel transaction. The company has not recognized any income tax provision or benefit for the period ended June 30, 2004 as any changes in deferred tax liabilities and assets have been offset by changes in the valuation disposition allowance provided for the company’s net deferred tax assets (see Note 10).

Other Comprehensive Income. For the first half of 2004, other comprehensive income, net of tax, includes an increase in the fair value of commodity instruments of $2.6 million and a reclassification to interest expense on interest rate swaps of $0.3 million. There were no open interest rate swaps remaining at June 30, 2004. For the same period of 2003, other comprehensive income, net of tax, reflects a decline in the fair value of the interest rate swaps of $0.3 million offset by reclassification adjustments to interest expense of $0.7 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The company’s operating capital at June 30, 2004, was $222.2 million compared to $154.7 million at December 31, 2003. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 4.2 at June 30, 2004, and 2.4 at December 31, 2003. The increase in operating capital resulted from the reclassification of part of the current portion of long-term debt back as a long-term obligation. With the receipt of 877,169 ounces of palladium as part of the Norilsk Nickel transaction in 2003, the company’s bank credit agreement was amended to require that 50% of the proceeds from the sale of that inventory be applied to prepay long-term debt. Absent an agreement for the liquidation of that inventory, the company reflected as a current liability the portion of long-term debt subject to repayment (based on the palladium value on the transaction date). During the first quarter of 2004 the company entered into sales agreement for the disposition of this inventory and the term of these sales agreements is two years, and as such a portion of the long-term debt secured by finished goods inventory at December 31, 2003 has been reclassified from a current liability to a long-term liability.

For the quarter and six-months ended June 30, 2004, net cash provided by operations was $24.6 million and $39.7 million respectively, compared to $12.7 million and $36.0 million respectively, for the comparable periods of 2003. The increase in cash provided by operations of $11.9 million and $3.7 million respectively, was primarily driven by the following factors:


		Three months ended					Six months ended
		June 30,					June 30,
		2004			2003		2004			2003
		(as amended)					(as amended)
•	Total palladium and platinum ounces sold from mine production (oz)		90,000			151,000		240,000			304,000

•	Combined realized price per ounce of palladium and platinum from mine production	$	491		$	391	$	486		$	401

•	Total consolidated cash costs per ounce from mine production	$	264		$	281	$	274		$	281

•	Total palladium ounces sold from the inventory received in the Norilsk Nickel Transaction (palladium inventory)		110,000			—		156,000			—

•	Weighted average combined realized price per ounce from sales of palladium inventory	$	253		$	—	$	257		$	—

•	Total cost per ounce related to palladium inventory	$	169		$	—	$	169		$	—

•	General and administrative expense (000’s)	$	3,925		$	3,302	$	7,649		$	7,000

•	Norilsk Nickel transaction related costs (000’s)	$	—		$	3,043	$	—		$	3,043

•	Interest expense (000’s)	$	3,360		$	4,684	$	7,261		$	9,595

•	Source (use) of cash in net operating assets and/or liabilities (000’s)	$	(5,471	)	$	7,074	$	(14,547	)	$	21,174

Three-month period ended June 30, 2004 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2003

Cash flows from the change in operating assets and liabilities resulted in a use of cash of $5.5 million compared to a source of cash of $7.1 million for the same period last year. The change in working capital is primarily related to an increase in inventory of $16.8 million attributed to an increase in finished goods inventory related to the re-bricking of the smelter furnace, offset in part by a decrease in metal sales receivables of $10.4 million, due to higher metal prices and inventory sales from palladium received from Norilsk Nickel.

Net cash used in investing activities was $20.3 million during the second quarter of 2004 compared to $11.7 million in the same period in 2003. The company’s investing activities are capital expenditures for property, plant, equipment and mine development.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.9 million compared to $37.9 million for the same period in 2003. The cash provided by financing activities during the first half of 2004 is due to issuance of common stock related to stock option exercises, offset by payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations. Financing activities in the first half of 2003 included full repayment of the Term A facility in conjunction with the closing of the Norilsk Nickel transaction offset by net cash received in connection from the Norilsk Nickel transaction.

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $6.2 million and $39.0 million for the second quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Six-month period ended June 30, 2004 compared to six-month period ended June 30, 2003

Cash flows from the change in operating assets and liabilities resulted in a use of cash of $14.5 million compared to a source of cash of $21.2 million for same period last year. This change in working capital is primarily related to an increase in metal sales receivables of $26.3 million, due to higher metal prices, and sales from palladium inventory received from Norilsk Nickel and by increases in inventory of $9.8 million attributed to an increase in finished goods inventory related to the re-bricking of the smelter furnace.

Net cash used in investing activities was $34.9 million in the first half of 2004 compared to $26.2 million in the

same period in 2003. The company’s primary investing activities capital expenditures for property, plant, equipment and mine development.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.5 million compared to $30.5 million for the comparable period in 2003. The cash provided by financing activities during the first half of 2004 is due to issuance of common stock related to stock option exercises, offset by payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations. Financing activities in the first half of 2003 included full repayment of the Term A facility in conjunction with the closing of the Norilsk Nickel transaction offset by net cash received in connection with the Norilsk Nickel transaction.

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $6.3 million and $40.4 million for the first six months of 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Credit Facility

At June 30, 2004, the company’s available cash was $53.8 million, it had $127.8 million outstanding under its Term B facility, and $7.5 million was outstanding as letters of credit under the revolving credit facility. As provided in the company’s credit agreement, as of June 30, 2004, the company had offered term loan prepayments to the banks totaling $15.9 million, representing 50% of the proceeds received from the sale of palladium ounces received from Norilsk Nickel. The banks declined these prepayment offers and therefore the amount available under the company’s revolving credit facility was reduced by the $15.9 million. Reflecting this reduction, as of June 30, 2004, the company had $1.6 million available under its revolving credit facility. Once the availability under the revolving credit facility was reduced to zero, any further amounts declined by the banks would have become restricted cash collateralizing the outstanding letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility. The final maturity date of the Term B loan facility was December 31, 2007. The final maturity date of the revolving credit facility was December 30, 2005.

During the first and second quarter of 2004, as a result of lower production from its mine operations, the company did not meet the minimum trailing four-quarter average production covenant under the credit facility. The bank syndicate granted a waiver of this covenant that was effective for the first and second quarters of 2004.

On August 3, 2004, the company completed the refinancing of its bank credit facility. The new credit facility consists of a $140 million six-year term loan maturing July 31, 2010, and bearing interest at a variable rate plus a margin (LIBOR plus 325 basis points, or approximately 4.75% at August 3, 2004) and a $40 million five-year revolving credit facility expiring July 31, 2009 and initially bearing interest at LIBOR plus 300 basis points, or approximately 4.50%. Proceeds of the new facility have been applied to pay off the previous debt facility and the remainder will be used for general corporate purposes. The revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit facility that has been partially utilized to secure a $7.5 million letter of credit in support of certain of the company’s reclamation obligations. The letter of credit carries an annual fee of 3.00%. The revolving credit facility requires an annual commitment fee of 0.75% on the remaining unutilized amount. The new credit facility contains customary financial and other covenants; however, it does not include a minimum production covenant. The new credit facility provides that the company offer 25% of the proceeds received for the sale of palladium inventory received from the Norilsk Nickel transaction as prepayments against the credit facility. It also requires that 50% of the company’s annual excess cash flow will be offered for prepayment against the credit facility. With the completion of the refinancing, the company expects to incur a one time charge in the third quarter of 2004 of approximately $5.0 million including a prepayment charge and the write off of deferred costs on the former credit facility.

Contractual Obligations

The company is obligated to make future payments under various contracts, including debt agreements and capital lease agreements. The following table represents the company’s principal contractual debt obligations and other commercial commitments as of June 30, 2004:


in thousands	2004		2005		2006		2007		2008		Thereafter		Total
Term B facility	$	675	$	1,350	$	60,750	$	65,002	$	—	$	—	$	127,777
Capital lease obligations, net of interest		225		479		443		424		458		534		2,563
Special Industrial Education Impact Revenue Bonds		73		153		165		178		190		96		855

Exempt Facility Revenue Bonds, net of discount		—		—		—		—		—		29,339		29,339

Total long-term debt and capital leases		973		1,982		61,358		65,604		648		29,969		160,534
Other noncurrent liabilities		—		7,302		—		—		—		4,298		11,600

Total	$	973	$	9,284	$	61,358	$	65,604	$	648	$	34,267	$	172,134

Debt obligations referred to in the table are presented as due for repayment under the terms of the loan agreements and before any effect of the sale of palladium acquired in the Norilsk Nickel transaction. Under the provisions of the Term B facility, the company was required to offer 50% of the net proceeds from the sale of palladium received in the Norilsk Nickel transaction to repay its Term B facility. The lenders were not obligated to accept the repayment offer. As of June 30, 2004, the company had sold approximately 156,000 ounces of the palladium received in the Norilsk Nickel transaction and had offered a total of $15.9 million of cash proceeds from these sales for prepayment of the Term B facility. (The prepayment offers were made as cash was actually received, which normally lagged behind recognition of sales revenue.) These offers were all declined and the availability to borrow under the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2004 had been reduced accordingly by $15.9 million to $1.6 million.

Amounts included in other noncurrent liabilities that are anticipated to be paid in 2005 include workers’ compensation costs, property taxes and severance taxes. Amounts that are anticipated to be paid after 2008 are asset retirement obligation costs.

Critical Accounting Policies

Listed below are the accounting policies that the company believes are critical to its financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding estimates or assumptions involved and the magnitude of the liability, revenue or expense being reported.

Mine Development Expenditures — Capitalization and Amortization

Mining operations are inherently capital intensive, generally requiring substantial capital investment for the initial and concurrent development and infrastructure of the mine. Many of these expenditures are necessarily incurred well in advance of actual extraction of ore. Underground mining operations such as those conducted by the company require driving tunnels and sinking shafts that provide access to the underground orebody and construction and development of infrastructure, including electrical and ventilation systems, rail and other forms of transportation, shop facilities, material handling areas and hoisting systems. Ore mining and removal operations require significant underground facilities used to conduct mining operations and to transport the ore out of the mine to processing facilities located above ground.

Contemporaneously with mining, additional development is undertaken to provide access to ongoing extensions of the orebody, allowing more ore to be produced. In addition to the development costs that have been previously incurred, these ongoing development expenditures are necessary to access and support all future mining activities.

Mine development expenditures incurred to date to increase existing production, develop new orebodies or develop mineral property substantially in advance of production are capitalized and amortized using a units-of-production method based upon the associated proven and probable ore reserves. Mine development expenditures consist of vertical shafts, multiple surface adits and underground infrastructure development including footwall laterals, ramps, rail and transportation, electrical and ventilation systems, shop facilities, material handling areas, ore handling facilities, dewatering and pumping facilities. Many such facilities are required not only for current operations, but also for all future planned operations.

Expenditures incurred to sustain existing production and access specific ore reserve blocks or stopes provide benefit to ore reserve production over limited periods of time (secondary development) and are charged to operations as incurred. These costs include ramp and stope access excavations from primary haulage levels (footwall laterals), stope material rehandling/laydown excavations, stope ore and waste pass excavations and chute installations, stope ventilation raise excavations and stope utility and pipe raise excavations.

The company calculates amortization of capitalized mine development costs by the application of an amortization rate to current production. The amortization rate is based upon un-amortized capitalized mine development costs, and the related ore reserves. Capital expenditures are added to the un-amortized capitalized mine development costs as the related assets are placed into service. In the calculation of the amortization rate, changes in ore reserves are accounted for as a prospective change in estimate. Ore reserves and the further benefit of capitalized mine development costs are based on significant management assumptions. Any changes in these assumptions, such as a change in the mine plan or a change in estimated proven and probable ore reserves, could have a material effect on the expected period of benefit resulting in a potentially significant change in the amortization rate and/or the valuations of related assets. The company’s proven ore reserves are generally expected to be extracted utilizing its existing mine development infrastructure. Additional capital expenditures will be required to access the company’s estimated probable ore reserves. These anticipated capital expenditures are not included in the current calculation of depreciation and amortization.

The company changed its accounting method for amortizing capitalized mine development costs in the fourth quarter of 2004. These mine development costs include the initial costs incurred to gain primary access to the ore reserves, plus the ongoing development costs of footwall laterals and ramps driven parallel to the reef that are used to access and provide support for the mining stopes in the reef.

Prior to 2004, the company amortized all such capitalized development costs at its mines over all proven and probable reserves at each mine. Following the asset impairment writedown at the end of 2003, the company revisited its assumptions and estimates for amortizing capitalized mine development costs. The company concluded to continue amortizing the cost of all of the mine development that had been placed in service through 2003 over all proven and probable reserves, because in management’s view these remaining unamortized costs related to infrastructure that would be used for the entire life of the mine. However, for development placed in service after 2003, the company concluded to use a shorter life, amortizing the cost of this new development over only the ore reserves in the immediate and relevant vicinity of the new development. This approach was reflected in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004.

Following a review of its filings by the SEC, the company recently determined it would change its method of accounting for mine development costs as follows:

• Unamortized costs of the shaft at the Stillwater Mine and the initial development at the East Boulder Mine will continue to be treated as life-of-mine infrastructure costs, to be amortized over total proven and probable reserves at each location, and

• All ongoing development costs of footwall laterals and ramps, including similar development costs incurred before 2004, are to be amortized over the ore reserves in the immediate and relevant vicinity of the development.

This change in accounting method required the company to measure the effect of the change at January 1, 2004, as if the new method of amortization had been used in all prior periods. The credit for the cumulative effect of the change for all periods prior to 2004 of $ 6.0 million is shown as the “Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, as revised. Because the change in accounting method is effective from January 1, 2004, the company is not required to amend quarterly and annual reports prior to 2004. The effect of this change in accounting method was to reduce previously reported earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 by $3.0 million ($0.03 per share) and $4.8 million ($0.06 per share), including a charge of $3.0 million and $10.8 million attributable to additional amortization for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and a benefit of $6.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 attributable to the cumulative effect adjustment on January 1, 2004.

Asset Impairment

The company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The company reviews and evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment when events and changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts of its assets may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than carrying amount of the asset. Future cash flows include estimates of recoverable ounces, PGM prices (considering current and historical prices, long-term sales contracts prices, price trends and related factors), production levels and capital and reclamation expenditures, all based on life-of-mine plans and projections. If the assets are impaired, a calculation of fair market value is performed, and if fair market value is lower than the carrying value of the assets, the assets’ carrying value is reduced to their fair market value. There was no impairment during the second quarter of 2004.

Assumptions underlying future cash flows are subject to risks and uncertainties. Any differences between significant assumptions and market conditions, such as PGM prices, lower than expected recoverable ounces, and/or the company’s operating performance, could have a material effect on the company’s determination of ore reserves, or its ability to recover the carrying amounts of its long-lived assets, resulting in potential additional impairment charges.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are determined using the asset and liability approach in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This method gives consideration to the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities based on currently enacted tax rates. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. A valuation allowance has been provided at June 30, 2004 for the portion of the company’s net deferred tax assets which, more likely than not, will not be realized (see Note 10).

Reclamation and Environmental Costs

Effective January 1, 2003, the company adopted SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. The standard applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and normal use of the asset.

SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. The liability is accreted at the end of each period through charges to operating expense. If the obligation ultimately is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, the company will recognize a gain or loss at the time of settlement.

The company’s current reclamation bonding requirements in place total approximately $20.7 million at June 30, 2004. The current bond amount is an estimate of reclamation and closure costs. The regulatory agencies review the bonding requirements and reclamation estimates on a 5-year rotation or whenever a major amendment to the operating permits is approved. The company expects that the Stillwater Mine bond will be reviewed and adjusted by the regulatory agencies during 2004. Any differences between the estimated amounts and actual post-closure reclamation and site restoration costs could have a material effect on the company’s estimated liability, resulting in a

change in the recorded amount. The SFAS No. 143 accrued reclamation liability was approximately $4.3 million at June 30, 2004.

Hedging Program

From time to time, the company enters into derivative financial instruments, including fixed forwards, cashless put and call option collars and financially settled forwards to manage the effect of changes in the prices of palladium and platinum on the company’s revenue. The company accounts for its derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133 which requires that derivatives be reported on the balance sheet at fair value and, if the derivative is not designated as a hedging instrument, changes in fair value must be recognized in earnings in the period of change. If the derivative is designated as a hedge, and to the extent such hedge is determined to be highly effective, changes in fair value are either (a) offset by the change in fair value of the hedged asset or liability (if applicable) or (b) reported as a component of other comprehensive income in the period of change, and subsequently recognized in the determination of net income in the period the offsetting hedged transaction occurs. The company primarily uses derivatives to hedge metal prices and interest rates. As of June 30, 2004, the company’s unrealized gain from outstanding derivatives was valued at $2.1 million, which is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Because these hedges are highly effective, the company expects any ultimate gains or losses on the hedging instruments will be largely offset by corresponding and appropriate changes in the hedged transaction.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS; FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

Some statements contained in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and, therefore, involve uncertainties or risks that could cause actual results to differ materially. These statements may contain words such as “ believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates” or similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of the company’s future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Such statements include, but are not limited to, comments regarding expansion plans, costs, grade, production and recovery rates, permitting, labor matters, financing needs, the terms of future credit facilities and capital expenditures, increases in processing capacity, cost reduction measures, safety, timing for engineering studies, and environmental permitting and compliance, litigation and the palladium and platinum market. Additional information regarding factors which could cause results to differ materially from management’s expectations is found in the section entitled “Risk Factors” above in the company’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The company intends that the forward-looking statements contained herein be subject to the above-mentioned statutory safe harbors. Investors are cautioned not to rely on forward-looking statements. The company disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

The company is exposed to market risk, including the effects of adverse changes in metal prices and interest rates as discussed below.

Commodity Price Risk

The company produces and sells palladium, platinum and associated byproduct metals directly to its customers and also through third parties. As a result, financial performance can be materially affected when prices for these commodities fluctuate. In order to manage commodity price risk and to reduce the impact of fluctuation in prices, the company enters into long-term contracts and from time to time uses various derivative financial instruments. Because the company hedges only with instruments that have a high correlation with the value of the hedged transactions, changes in the fair value of the derivatives are expected to be offset by changes in the value of the hedged transaction.

The company has entered into long-term sales contracts with General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company

and Mitsubishi Corporation. The contracts cover significant portions of the company’s mined PGM production through December 2010 and stipulate floor and ceiling prices for some of the covered production. In the first quarter of 2004 the company also entered into new sales contracts under which all of the 877,169 ounces of palladium received in the Norilsk Nickel stock purchase transaction will be sold, at close to market prices at the time of sale, over a period of two years primarily for use in automobile catalytic converters. Under these agreements, the company will sell approximately 36,500 ounces of palladium per month, ending in the first quarter of 2006, at close to market prices. Separately, under one of these agreements, the company also will sell 3,250 ounces of platinum and 1,900 ounces of rhodium per month also at prices close to market.

From time to time, the company utilizes financially settled forwards, fixed forward contracts and cashless put and call option collars. During the second quarter of 2004, the company entered into fixed forwards and financially settled forwards that were accounted for as cash-flow hedges. Fixed forward sales of metals from processing secondary materials are sold forward at the time of receipt and delivered against the forward contracts when the ounces are recovered. Under financially settled forwards, at each settlement date, the company receives the difference between the forward price and the market price if the market price is below the forward price, and the company pays the difference between the forward price and the market price if the market price is above the forward price. The company’s financially settled forwards are settled in cash at maturity. The company expects all of these transactions to settle during the next eighteen months. The net unrealized gain on these instruments due to changes in metal prices at June 30, 2004 was $2.1 million. There were no outstanding fixed forward and financially settled forward commodity instruments settled during the second quarter of 2003.

A summary of the company’s derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2004 is as follows:


Mine Production:

Financially Settled Forwards


	Platinum
	Ounces		Price		Index
Third Quarter 2004		7,200	$	801	London PM
Fourth Quarter 2004		7,000	$	795	London PM
First Quarter 2005		6,400	$	791	London PM
Second Quarter 2005		6,500	$	786	London PM
Third Quarter 2005		6,700	$	768	London PM
Fourth Quarter 2005		6,700	$	764	London PM


Secondary Recycling:

Fixed Forwards


	Platinum				Palladium				Rhodium
	Ounces		Price		Ounces		Price		Ounces		Price
Third Quarter 2004		11,566	$	836		8,824	$	249		1,201	$	825
Fourth Quarter 2004		1,089	$	802		—		—		—		—

Financially Settled Forwards


	Platinum				Palladium
	Ounces		Price		Ounces		Price		Index
Third Quarter 2004		9,801	$	849		1,089	$	261	London PM

Interest Rate Risk

During the first quarter of 2002, the company entered into two identical interest rate swap agreements. These swaps fixed the interest rate on $100.0 million of the company’s debt. The interest rate swap agreements were effective March 4, 2002 and matured on March 4, 2004. The company has not replaced or renewed the interest rate swap agreements and consequently is exposed to the full effect on earnings and cash flow of fluctuations in interest rates. If the annual effective interest rate of the variable rate debt increases or (decreases) by 1%, the effect on interest expense would be an increase or a (decrease) of approximately $1.3 million annually.

As of June 30, 2004, the company had $127.8 million outstanding under the Term B facility, bearing interest at a variable rate plus a margin, which was reset quarterly (8.0% at June 30, 2004). The final maturity of the Term B facility was December 31, 2007.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Except as set forth below, in the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Stockholder Litigation

In 2002, nine lawsuits were filed against the company and certain senior officers in United States District Court, Southern District of New York, purportedly on behalf of a class of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired common stock of the company from April 20, 2001 through and including April 1, 2002. They assert claims against the company and certain of its officers under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Plaintiffs challenge the accuracy of certain public disclosures made by the company regarding its financial performance and, in particular, its accounting for probable ore reserves. In July 2002, the court consolidated these actions and appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel. Plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint in September 2002. In October 2002, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint and to transfer the case to federal district court in Montana. The motion to transfer the case was granted on May 9, 2003, and the case is now pending in the federal district court in Montana. On January 30, 2004, the court held a status conference at which time the plaintiffs were given until March 30, 2004 to file a second amended complaint, which the plaintiffs subsequently filed. Pursuant to a briefing schedule set by the court, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint on May 14, 2004, and plaintiffs filed their opposition on June 14, 2004. Defendants filed their reply on June 28, 2004. The hearing on the motion to dismiss has been continued from July 22, 2004 to August 27, 2004. The company considers the lawsuit without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself in the action.

On June 20, 2002, a stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed against the company (as a nominal defendant) and its directors in state court in Delaware. It arises out of allegations similar to the class actions and seeks damages allegedly on behalf of the stockholders of Stillwater for breach of fiduciary duties by the directors. No relief is sought against the company which is named as a nominal defendant. The parties have agreed to suspend activity in this matter pending the outcome of the motion to dismiss in the above referenced class action suit.

Item 2. Changes in Securities

None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits: See attached exhibit index

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

Form 8-K filed April 29, 2004 regarding:

1. Press Release issued on April 29, 2004 regarding 2004 first quarter results.

Form 8-K filed May 4, 2004 reporting:

2. Details concerning the refinancing or the existing credit facility.

Form 8-K filed on July 13, 2004 regarding

3. Press Release issued on July 12, 2004 regarding labor strike

Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2004 regarding

4. Press Release issued on July 20, 2004 regarding contract ratification


	PAGE
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements		3

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		38

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		40

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		41

Item 2. Changes in Securities		41

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		41

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		42

Item 5. Other Information		42

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		42

SIGNATURES		43

CERTIFICATION		45
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification - CEO
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification - VP and CFO
Section 1350 Certification
Section 1350 Certification


		STILLWATER MINING COMPANY
			(Registrant)

Date: March 31, 2005	By:	/s/ FRANCIS R. McALLISTER

			Francis R. McAllister
			Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
			(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 31, 2005
		By:	/s/ GREGORY A. WING

			Gregory A. Wing
			Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer)


Number		Description
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification – Chief Executive Officer, dated March 31, 2005.

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification – Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, dated March 31, 2005.

32.1		Section 1350 Certification, dated March 31, 2005.

32.2		Section 1350 Certification, dated March 31, 2005.


Dated: March 31, 2005		/s/ FRANCIS R. McALLISTER

		Francis R. McAllister
		Chairman and Chief
		Executive Officer


Dated: March 31, 2005		/s/ GREGORY A. WING

		Gregory A. Wing
		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

	•	“Overview” – a brief summary of the company’s consolidated results and financial position, the primary factors affecting those results, and some issues of continuing interest that may affect performance in the future.

	•	“Key Factors” – indicators of profitability and efficiency at the company’s various operations individually and, where relevant, on a consolidated basis.

	•	“Results of Operations” – a discussion and analysis of the specific operating and financial results for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same periods in 2003.

	•	“Liquidity and Capital Resources” – a discussion of the company’s cash flow and liquidity, investing and financing activities, and significant contractual obligations.

	•	“Critical Accounting Policies” – a review of accounting policies the company considers critical because they involve assumptions that could have a material effect on the company’s reported assets, liabilities, income or cash flow and that require difficult, subjective or complex judgments by management.

	•	additional primary development to increase the number of ramp systems and working faces

	•	additional diamond drilling to more accurately identify changes in structure

	•	development of a ventilation raise to surface to support a larger amount of equipment while improving underground air quality related to diesel particulate matter (DPM).

	•	Unamortized costs of the shaft at the Stillwater Mine and the initial development at the East Boulder Mine will continue to be treated as life-of-mine infrastructure costs, to be amortized over total proven and probable reserves at each location, and

	•	All ongoing development costs of footwall laterals and ramps, including similar development costs incurred before 2004, are to be amortized over the ore reserves in the immediate and relevant vicinity of the development.

1.	I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-Q/A of Stillwater Mining Company (the “Company”);

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the Company and have:

	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

	c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.