Fair Value Measurements	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]
Fair Value Measurements	Note 7: Fair Value Measurements The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the inputs used to determine fair value, which are as follows: Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. Level 2 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions. The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances where the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability. The carrying amounts of our cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated fair value at December 31, 2018 and 2017 due to their short-term nature (Level 1). The fair value of the Term Loan and Revolver at December 31, 2018 and 2017 approximated the carrying amount as the interest rate is based upon floating short-term interest rates (Level 2). The fair value of the Notes was approximately $18.8 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017 (Level 2).

Fair Value Measurements

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2018

Note 7: Fair Value Measurements

The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the inputs used to determine fair value, which are as follows:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

Level 2 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.

The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances where the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability.

The carrying amounts of our cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated fair value at December 31, 2018 and 2017 due to their short-term nature (Level 1). The fair value of the Term Loan and Revolver at December 31, 2018 and 2017 approximated the carrying amount as the interest rate is based upon floating short-term interest rates (Level 2). The fair value of the Notes was approximately $18.8 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017 (Level 2).