10-Q 1 d10q.htm FORM 10Q Form 10Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2004

 

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Transition Period from              to             

 

Commission File Number 0-25032

 


 

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

DELAWARE   25-1724540

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

 

600 Mayer Street

Bridgeville, PA 15017

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

 

(412) 257-7600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x

 

As of July 31, 2004, there were 6,305,891 shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share.

 



Table of Contents

UNIVERSA L STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains historical information and forward-looking statements that reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Statements looking forward in time, including statements regarding future growth, cost savings, expanded production capacity, broader product lines, greater capacity to meet customer quality reliability, price and delivery needs, enhanced competitive posture, effect of new accounting pronouncements and no material financial impact from litigation or contingencies are included in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

 

The Company’s actual results will be affected by a wide range of factors including the concentrated nature of the Company’s customer base to date and the Company’s dependence on its significant customers; the receipt, pricing and timing of future customer orders; changes in product mix; the limited number of raw material and energy suppliers and significant fluctuations that may occur in raw material and energy prices; the Company’s reliance on certain critical manufacturing equipment; the ability to acquire the ESR Building prior to the expiration of the Armco Lease; the Company’s ongoing requirement for continued compliance with environmental laws; and the ultimate outcome of the Company’s current and future litigation matters. Many of these factors are not within the Company’s control and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the Company’s actual results in future periods to be materially different from any future performance suggested herein. Any unfavorable change in the foregoing or other factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Further, the Company operates in an industry sector where securities values may be volatile and may be influenced by economic and other factors beyond the Company’s control.

 

   

DESCRIPTION


   PAGE NO.

PART I.

  FINANCIAL INFORMATION     

Item 1.

  Financial Statements     
             Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations    3
             Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets    4
             Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows    5
             Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements    6

Item 2.

  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    10

Item 3.

  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    14

Item 4.

  Controls and Procedures    14

PART II.

  OTHER INFORMATION     

Item 1.

  Legal Proceedings    15

Item 6.

  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K    15

SIGNATURES

   16

CERTIFICATIONS

    

 

2


Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Information)

(Unaudited)

 

    

For the

Three-month period

ended June 30,


   

For the

Six-month period

ended June 30,


 
     2004

    2003

    2004

    2003

 

Net sales

   $ 29,026     $ 16,837     $ 50,333     $ 31,537  

Cost of products sold

     24,531       15,941       43,875       30,621  

Selling and administrative expenses

     1,947       1,525       3,475       2,918  
    


 


 


 


Operating income (loss)

     2,548       (629 )     2,983       (2,002 )

Interest expense

     (106 )     (94 )     (194 )     (189 )

Other income

     3       23       11       50  
    


 


 


 


Income (loss) before taxes

     2,445       (700 )     2,800       (2,141 )

Income tax provision (benefit)

     879       (260 )     1,007       (1,118 )
    


 


 


 


Net income (loss)

   $ 1,566     $ (440 )   $ 1,793     $ (1,023 )
    


 


 


 


Earnings (loss) per share – Basic

   $ 0.25     $ (0.07 )   $ 0.28     $ (0.16 )
    


 


 


 


Earnings (loss) per share – Diluted

   $ 0.25     $ (0.07 )   $ 0.28     $ (0.16 )
    


 


 


 


Weighted average shares of Common Stock outstanding

                                

Basic

     6,299,579       6,284,691       6,297,816       6,284,665  

Diluted

     6,355,148       6,284,691       6,345,591       6,284,665  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

    

June 30,

2004


   

December 31,

2003


 
     (Unaudited)        

ASSETS

                

Current assets

                

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 369     $ 4,735  

Accounts receivable, (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $197 and $163, respectively)

     19,548       12,690  

Inventory

     30,578       22,281  

Deferred taxes

     1,222       1,222  

Other current assets

     2,719       3,063  
    


 


Total current assets

     54,436       43,991  

Property, plant and equipment, net

     39,805       40,176  

Other assets

     732       758  
    


 


Total assets

   $ 94,973     $ 84,925  
    


 


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

                

Current liabilities

                

Trade accounts payable

   $ 10,939     $ 6,792  

Outstanding checks in excess of bank balance

     305       813  

Accrued employment costs

     1,740       833  

Current portion of long-term debt

     1,928       1,944  

Other current liabilities

     1,550       195  
    


 


Total current liabilities

     16,462       10,577  

Bank revolver

     3,167       —    

Long-term debt

     4,632       5,599  

Deferred taxes

     9,397       9,313  
    


 


Total liabilities

     33,658       25,489  
    


 


Commitments and contingencies

     —         —    

Stockholders’ equity

                

Senior Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share; 1,980,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding

     —         —    

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 6,573,791` and 6,564,306 shares issued

     7       7  

Additional paid-in capital

     28,415       28,329  

Retained earnings

     34,524       32,731  

Treasury Stock at cost; 269,900 common shares held

     (1,631 )     (1,631 )
    


 


Total stockholders’ equity

     61,315       59,436  
    


 


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 94,973     $ 84,925  
    


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

    

For the

Six-month period

ended June 30,


 
     2004

    2003

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

                

Net income (loss)

   $ 1,793     $ (1,023 )

Adjustments to reconcile to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

                

Depreciation and amortization

     1,571       1,571  

Deferred taxes

     84       145  

Tax benefit from exercise of stock options

     3       —    

Changes in assets and liabilities:

                

Accounts receivable, net

     (6,858 )     (797 )

Inventory

     (8,297 )     780  

Trade accounts payable

     4,147       1,776  

Accrued employment costs

     907       (13 )

Refundable taxes

     —         (265 )

Other, net

     1,720       839  
    


 


Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

     (4,930 )     3,013  
    


 


Cash flow from investing activities:

                

Capital expenditures

     (1,195 )     (191 )
    


 


Net cash used in investing activities

     (1,195 )     (191 )
    


 


Cash flows from financing activities:

                

Net borrowings under revolving line of credit

     3,167       —    

Proceeds from deferred loan agreement

     —         200  

Repayments of long-term debt

     (983 )     (959 )

(Decrease) increase in outstanding checks in excess of bank balance

     (508 )     641  

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

     83       25  
    


 


Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     1,759       (93 )
    


 


Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

     (4,366 )     2,729  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     4,735       3,308  
    


 


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 369     $ 6,037  
    


 


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

                

Interest paid

   $ 190     $ 160  

Income taxes paid

   $ 104     $ 35  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

 

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of operations for the three- and six- month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, balance sheets as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, these statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, all of which were of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and the consolidated results of operations and of cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

 

Note 2 – Common Stock

 

The reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding utilized for the earnings per common share computations are as follows:

 

    

For the

Three-month period

ended June 30,


  

For the

Six-month period

ended June 30,


     2004

   2003

   2004

   2003

Weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding

   6,299,579    6,284,699    6,297,816    6,284,669

Effect of dilutive securities

   55,569    —      47,775    —  
    
  
  
  

Weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, as adjusted

   6,355,148    6,284,699    6,345,591    6,284,669
    
  
  
  

 

The Company had 1,196 and 1,088 common stock equivalents outstanding for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003, respectively, which were not included in the common share computations for earnings (loss) per share as the common stock equivalents were anti-dilutive.

 

Note 3 – Stock-Based Compensation Plans

 

The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings per share between the Company’s use of the intrinsic value method and the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock-based employee and director compensation (dollars, except per share amounts, in thousands):

 

    

For the

Three-month period

ended June 30,


   

For the

Six-month period

ended June 30,


 
     2004

    2003

    2004

    2003

 

Net income (loss), as reported

   $ 1,566     $ (440 )   $ 1,793     $ (1,023 )

Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair-value based method, net of taxes

     (47 )     (29 )     (86 )     (57 )
    


 


 


 


Pro forma net income (loss)

   $ 1,519     $ (469 )   $ 1,707     $ (1,080 )
    


 


 


 


Earnings (loss) per common share:

                                

Basic – as reported

   $ 0.25     $ (0.07 )   $ 0.28     $ (0.16 )
    


 


 


 


Basic – pro forma

   $ 0.24     $ (0.07 )   $ 0.27     $ (0.17 )
    


 


 


 


Diluted – as reported

   $ 0.25     $ (0.07 )   $ 0.28     $ (0.16 )
    


 


 


 


Diluted – pro forma

   $ 0.24     $ (0.07 )   $ 0.27     $ (0.17 )
    


 


 


 


 

6


Table of Contents

Note 4 – New Accounting Pronouncements

 

No new accounting pronouncements have been issued during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 that would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Further, there have been no changes in the Company that would impact the accounting pronouncements disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

Note 5 - Inventory

 

The major classes of inventory are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2004


   December 31,
2003


Raw materials and supplies

   $ 3,765    $ 2,265

Semi-finished and finished steel products

     24,370      17,743

Operating materials

     2,443      2,273
    

  

Total inventory

   $ 30,578    $ 22,281
    

  

 

Note 6 - Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following (dollars in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2004


    December 31,
2003


 

Land and land improvements

   $ 953     $ 953  

Buildings

     5,987       5,987  

Machinery and equipment

     49,938       49,801  

Construction in progress

     1,199       141  
    


 


       58,077       56,882  

Accumulated depreciation

     (18,272 )     (16,706 )
    


 


Property, plant and equipment, net

   $ 39,805     $ 40,176  
    


 


 

Property, plant and equipment includes certain buildings and structures located in Bridgeville, PA that were previously leased from Armco, which merged with and into AK Steel in 1999 (“Armco”). In 2003, the Company exercised its option to purchase all of the property permitted under the capital lease with Armco for $1.

 

The ESR building, which houses the Company’s four electro-slag remelting furnaces and ancillary equipment in Bridgeville, was not included in the option to purchase. The Company will continue to operate the equipment in the ESR building under a lease with Armco that was extended to March 8, 2005. The Company has entered into negotiations with AK Steel to purchase the ESR building. In the event the ESR building is not purchased, or the lease is not extended beyond March 8, 2005, the relocation of the ESR equipment would have an adverse material effect on the financial condition of the Company.

 

In 2003, the Company entered into a $200,000 Deferred Loan Agreement maturing on December 31, 2006 with the City of Dunkirk, New York. No principal or interest payments will be required under the Deferred Loan Agreement provided the Company hires 30 new employees and more than 50% of those jobs are made available to certain Dunkirk City residents. The Company believes it will meet the conditions of the Deferred Loan Agreement. Therefore, the proceeds have been applied to reduce the acquisition cost of new equipment at the Company’s Dunkirk facility.

 

7


Table of Contents

Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies

 

The Company, as well as other steel companies, is subject to demanding environmental standards imposed by federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The Company is not aware of any environmental condition that currently exists at any of its facilities that would cause a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.

 

In connection with the Company’s June 2, 1995 agreement with Armco to purchase certain assets and a parcel of real property located in Titusville, Armco agreed to indemnify the Company up to $3,000,000 in the aggregate for liabilities under environmental laws arising out of conditions on or under the Titusville property existing prior to June 2, 1995. Armco also agreed to indemnify the Company for any liabilities arising out of environmental conditions existing off-site as of June 2, 1995, and that indemnification is not subject to the $3,000,000 limitation.

 

The Company has filed no claims against Armco since the inception of the acquisition agreement. In addition, management is not aware of any financial difficulties being experienced by AK Steel, as successor to Armco, that would prevent its performance under the acquisition agreement.

 

In connection with the acquisition of the Dunkirk facility, Dunkirk Specialty Steel entered into an order with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“NY DEC”) that precludes NY DEC from bringing any action against the Company relating to existing environmental conditions as of February 14, 2002. There can be no assurance that any other party will not assert any claims with respect to environmental conditions at the Dunkirk facility, or that the Company will have the financial resources to discharge any liabilities if legally compelled to do so.

 

On June 29, 2001, suit was filed against the Company in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania by Teledyne Technologies, Incorporated (“Teledyne”). The suit alleges that steel product manufactured by the Company was defective and the Company was or should have been aware of the defects. Teledyne has alleged that the defective steel supplied by the Company caused certain crankshafts sold by Teledyne for use in aircraft engines to be defective. As a result, Teledyne is claiming damages relating to the recall, replacement and repair of aircraft engines.

 

In 2002, Teledyne was unsuccessful in its pursuit of a similar claim brought against another specialty steel producer who supplied the same steel product. After in-depth investigation, it is the Company’s position that the suit is without merit and it intends to vigorously defend that position. Additionally, the Company believes that it has insurance coverage that is available for this claim. At this time, the Company is engaged in discovery and believes that the final disposition of this suit will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.

 

On April 7, 2003, United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. (“USAU”), a New York corporation, as managers and on behalf of United States Aircraft Insurance Group (“USAIG”), the Company’s Aircraft Products Liability insurance carrier, filed suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania asking the court for a declaratory judgment as to what actual liability and obligations were applicable to USAIG relating to the insurance policy issued to the Company, and the allegations made by Teledyne. The Company and USAU reached a settlement agreement as of May 1, 2004 regarding the allocation of certain potential costs associated with the Teledyne claim and have agreed to jointly file a motion to have the declaratory suit dismissed. On July 27, 2004 the suit brought by USAU was dismissed.

 

The Company maintains a supply contract agreement with Talley Metals Technology, Inc. a subsidiary of Carpenter Technology Corporation (“Talley Metals”). While the initial term of the agreement expired December 31, 2002, the agreement continues to automatically renew with the placement of new orders each month and requires a 90-day notice to terminate. In addition, Talley Metals is required under the agreement to purchase a minimum of 1,000 tons of stainless reroll billet products each calendar month and average at least 1,250 tons per month during the last twelve-month period. The value of the contract on a monthly basis will depend on product mix and key raw material prices. Due to market conditions during 2003, the Company waived Talley Metals’ requirement to purchase the monthly minimum quantity of stainless reroll billets.

 

8


Table of Contents

Note 8 - Business Segments

 

The Company is comprised of two business segments: Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, which consists of the Bridgeville and Titusville facilities, and Dunkirk Specialty Steel, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary located in Dunkirk, New York. The Universal Stainless & Alloy Products manufacturing process involves melting, remelting, treating and hot and cold rolling of semi-finished and finished specialty steels. Dunkirk Specialty Steel’s manufacturing process involves hot rolling and finishing of specialty steel bar, rod and wire products. The segment data are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

    

For the

Three-month period

ended June 30,


   

For the

Six-month period

ended June 30,


 
     2004

    2003

    2004

    2003

 

Net sales:

                                

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products

   $ 25,482     $ 14,499     $ 44,327     $ 26,900  

Dunkirk Specialty Steel

     8,035       5,395       14,780       10,179  

Intersegment

     (4,491 )     (3,057 )     (8,774 )     (5,542 )
    


 


 


 


Consolidated net sales

   $ 29,026     $ 16,837     $ 50,333     $ 31,537  
    


 


 


 


Operating income (loss):

                                

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products

   $ 1,897     $ (255 )   $ 2,298     $ (1,029 )

Dunkirk Specialty Steel

     651       (374 )     685       (973 )
    


 


 


 


Total operating income (loss)

   $ 2,548     $ (629 )   $ 2,983     $ (2,002 )
    


 


 


 


Interest expense and other financing costs:

                                

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products

   $ 72     $ 57     $ 126     $ 115  

Dunkirk Specialty Steel

     34       37       68       74  
    


 


 


 


Total interest expense and other financing costs

   $ 106     $ 94     $ 194     $ 189  
    


 


 


 


Other income

                                

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products

   $ 3     $ 17     $ 9     $ 40  

Dunkirk Specialty Steel

     —         6       2       10  
    


 


 


 


Total other income

   $ 3     $ 23     $ 11     $ 50  
    


 


 


 


 

     June 30,
2004


   December 31,
2003


Total assets:

             

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products

   $ 76,940    $ 65,025

Dunkirk Specialty Steel

     13,865      11,128

Corporate assets

     4,168      8,772
    

  

     $ 94,973    $ 84,925
    

  

 

9


Table of Contents

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Results of Operations

 

An analysis of the Company’s operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

    

For the

Three-month period

ended June 30,


   

For the

Six-month period

ended June 30,


 
     2004

   2003

    2004

   2003

 

Net sales:

                              

Stainless steel

   $ 22,889    $ 12,612     $ 39,057    $ 23,849  

Tool steel

     3,743      2,599       6,908      4,500  

High-strength low alloy steel

     1,064      668       1,925      1,339  

High-temperature alloy steel

     612      625       1,322      1,142  

Conversion services

     596      265       928      598  

Other

     122      68       193      109  
    

  


 

  


Total net sales

     29,026      16,837       50,333      31,537  

Cost of products sold

     24,531      15,941       43,875      30,621  

Selling and administrative expenses

     1,947      1,525       3,475      2,918  
    

  


 

  


Operating income (loss)

   $ 2,548    $ (629 )   $ 2,983    $ (2,002 )
    

  


 

  


 

Market Segment Information

 

    

For the

Three-month period

ended June 30,


  

For the

Six-month period

ended June 30,


     2004

   2003

   2004

   2003

Net sales:

                           

Service centers

   $ 12,267    $ 7,905    $ 22,173    $ 14,855

Rerollers

     8,187      4,240      12,257      8,039

Forgers

     5,133      2,355      8,949      4,002

Original equipment manufacturers

     1,904      1,372      3,838      2,421

Wire redrawers

     843      640      2,039      1,520

Conversion services

     596      265      928      598

Miscellaneous

     96      60      149      102
    

  

  

  

Total net sales

   $ 29,026    $ 16,837    $ 50,333    $ 31,537
    

  

  

  

Tons Shipped

     12,131      8,645      21,197      16,058
    

  

  

  

 

Three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the similar period in 2003

 

Net sales for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 increased $12.2 million and $18.8 million, respectively, as compared to the similar periods in 2003. These increases are primarily due to increased shipments within each market segment as well as the adoption of surcharge mechanisms for additional raw material components and other price increases implemented during the first half of 2004. In addition, the 2004 financial results have benefited from greater demand of higher value-added niche products due to improved economic conditions. Shipments of aerospace, power generation, petrochemical and tool steel products for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 have increased in comparison to the same prior year periods.

 

Cost of products sold, as a percentage of net sales, was 84.5% and 94.7% for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and was 87.2% and 97.1% for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decreases are primarily due to increased production volumes, improved mix of products shipped and higher selling prices, partially offset by higher raw material, labor, utility and other manufacturing supply costs.

 

10


Table of Contents

Selling and administrative expenses increased by $422,000 and $557,000 in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004, respectively, as compared to similar periods in 2003. These increases are primarily due to higher employment costs.

 

Interest expense and other financing costs increased by $12,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to June 30, 2003 and increased $5,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. The increases were primarily due to an increased use of the revolving line of credit, partially offset by the continued reduction in long-term debt outstanding.

 

The effective income tax rate utilized in the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was 36.0% and 37.1%, respectively. The effective income tax rate utilized in the current period reflects the anticipated effect of the Company’s permanent tax deductions against expected income levels in 2004. The effective income tax rate for the remainder of 2004 is expected to approximate 36%.

 

Business Segment Results

 

An analysis of the net sales and operating income for the reportable segments for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products Segment

 

    

For the

Three-month period

ended June 30,


   

For the

Six-month period

ended June 30,


 
     2004

   2003

    2004

   2003

 

Net sales:

                              

Stainless steel

   $ 16,376    $ 7,949     $ 27,096    $ 15,060  

Tool steel

     3,668      2,413       6,747      4,180  

High-strength low alloy steel

     399      464       812      871  

High-temperature alloy steel

     525      547       1,075      1,025  

Conversion services

     475      198       724      508  

Other

     106      61       152      94  
    

  


 

  


       21,549      11,632       36,606      21,738  

Intersegment

     3,933      2,867       7,721      5,162  
    

  


 

  


Total net sales

     25,482      14,499       44,327      26,900  

Material cost of sales

     8,390      5,244       18,924      9,640  

Operation cost of sales

     13,864      8,512       20,743      16,371  

Selling and administrative expenses

     1,331      998       2,362      1,918  
    

  


 

  


Operating income (loss)

   $ 1,897    $ (255 )   $ 2,298    $ (1,029 )
    

  


 

  


 

Net sales for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 for this segment, which consists of the Bridgeville and Titusville facilities, increased by $11.0 million, or 76%, in comparison to the three-month period ended June 30, 2003 and $17.4 million, or 65%, in comparison to the similar 2003 six-month period. The increase in net sales for the three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 in comparison to the same year-ago periods are primarily due to increased revenues associated with the sale of power generation, aerospace and commodity products. Net sales of power generation, aerospace and commodity products increased by 135%, 113% and 78%, respectively for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, and by 78%, 73% and 79%, respectively, for the six-months ended June 30, 2004.

 

Operating income for the Universal Stainless & Alloy Products segment increased by $2.2 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to June 30, 2003 and increased by $3.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004. The increases are primarily due to increased production volumes, improved mix of products shipped and higher selling prices, partially offset by higher raw material, labor, utility and other manufacturing supply costs.

 

11


Table of Contents

Dunkirk Specialty Steel Segment

 

    

For the

Three-month period

ended June 30,


   

For the

Six-month period

ended June 30,


 
     2004

   2003

    2004

   2003

 

Net sales:

                              

Stainless steel

   $ 6,513    $ 4,663     $ 11,961    $ 8,789  

Tool steel

     75      186       161      320  

High-strength low alloy steel

     665      204       1,113      468  

High-temperature alloy steel

     87      78       247      117  

Conversion services

     121      67       204      90  

Other

     16      7       41      15  
    

  


 

  


       7,477      5,205       13,727      9,799  

Intersegment

     558      190       1,053      380  
    

  


 

  


Total net sales

     8,035      5,395       14,780      10,179  

Material cost of sales

     3,902      2,941       7,379      5,553  

Operation cost of sales

     2,866      2,301       5,603      4,599  

Selling and administrative expenses

     616      527       1,113      1,000  
    

  


 

  


Operating income (loss)

   $ 651    $ (374 )   $ 685    $ (973 )
    

  


 

  


 

Net sales for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 for this segment increased by $2.6 million, or 49%, in comparison to the three-month period ended June 30, 2003 and $4.6 million, or 45%, in comparison to the similar 2003 six-month period. The increase in net sales for the three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 in comparison to the same year-ago periods are primarily due to increased revenues associated with the sale of aerospace, commodity and petrochemical products. Net sales of aerospace, commodity and petrochemical products increased by 64%, 26% and 44%, respectively for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, and by 47%, 36% and 26%, respectively, for the six-months ended June 30, 2004.

 

Operating income increased by $1.0 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to June 30, 2003 and increased by $1.7 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004. The increases are primarily due to increased production volumes, improved mix of products shipped and higher selling prices, partially offset by higher raw material, labor, utility and other manufacturing supply costs.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The Company has financed its operating activities through cash on hand at the beginning of the period and additional borrowings. At June 30, 2004, working capital approximated $38.0 million, as compared to $33.4 million at December 31, 2003. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities decreased from 4.2:1 at December 31, 2003 to 3.3:1 at June 30, 2004. The debt to capitalization ratio was 9.7% at June 30, 2004 and 11.3% at December 31, 2003.

 

Cash received from sales of $43.5 million and $30.7 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003, respectively, represent the primary source of cash from operations. An analysis of the primary uses of cash is as follows:

 

    

For the

Six-month period

ended June 30,


     2004

   2003

Raw material purchases

   $ 24,247    $ 10,093

Employment costs

     11,938      9,469

Utilities

     6,130      4,678

Other

     6,124      3,499
    

  

Total uses of cash

   $ 48,439    $ 27,739
    

  

 

12


Table of Contents

Cash used to fund raw material purchases, employment costs and utilities increased during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 in comparison to the similar year-ago period primarily due to increased sales and higher transaction prices. The cost of raw materials contained within work-in-process inventory is approximately $10.0 million higher at June 30, 2004 as compared to June 30, 2003, as a result of increased raw material transaction prices and demand. The Company continuously monitors market price fluctuations of its key raw materials. The following table reflects the average market value per pound for selected months impacting raw material costs for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004.

 

     December
2002


   June
2003


   December
2003


   June
2004


Nickel

   $ 3.26    $ 4.03    $ 6.43    $ 6.14

Chrome

   $ 0.33    $ 0.45    $ 0.54    $ 0.73

Molybdenum

   $ 3.51    $ 5.63    $ 7.10    $ 15.71

Carbon Scrap

   $ 0.06    $ 0.06    $ 0.09    $ 0.11

 

Increased demand from foreign (primarily China) and domestic sources caused most raw material market values to rise significantly during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004. The market values for these raw materials, except for nickel, have continued to increase in 2004. In response, the Company announced sales price increases of 3% effective January 2, 2004, an additional 4% effective February 4, 2004, an additional 3% effective April 1, 2004 and another 4% effective May 15, 2004. In addition, the Company began to calculate its nickel surcharge using an $0.18 per pound premium over the London Metal Exchange (LME) prices on February 4, 2004, implemented an iron surcharge component on February 16, 2004 and expanded the use of surcharges to include tool steel products on May 1, 2004. On July 26, 2004, the Company announced a 7% base price increase on all premium remelted and high strength low alloy grades of steel and a 5% base price increase on all other stainless and tool steel grades. The Company also increased the premium over the LME price for nickel used to calculate its raw material surcharge from $0.18 per pound to $0.23 per pound. These increases will be effective with shipments on August 1, 2004. There can be no assurance that these sales price increases will completely offset its rising costs or that adequate supplies of raw materials will continue to be available to meet market demand.

 

The Company had capital expenditures for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 of $1,195,000. These funds have been primarily used at its Bridgeville facility to purchase additional annealing furnaces that were installed and operational as of June 30, 2004 and to build a new reheat furnace for the Company’s universal rolling mill.

 

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company entered into a $200,000 Deferred Loan Agreement maturing on December 31, 2006 with the City of Dunkirk, New York. No principal or interest payments will be required under the Deferred Loan Agreement provided the Company hires 30 new employees and more than 50% of those jobs are made available to certain Dunkirk City residents. The Company believes it will meet the conditions of the Deferred Loan Agreement. Therefore, the proceeds have been applied to reduce the acquisition cost of new equipment at the Company’s Dunkirk facility.

 

The Company satisfies its capital requirements primarily through the sale of Common Stock and the issuance of long-term debt. The Company does not maintain off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases nor does it participate in non-exchange traded contracts requiring fair value accounting treatment or material related party transaction arrangements.

 

At June 30, 2004, the Company had $3.3 million of its $ 6.5 million revolving line of credit with PNC Bank available for borrowings. The Company is in compliance with its covenants as of June 30, 2004.

 

The Company anticipates that it will fund its 2004 working capital requirements, its capital expenditures and the stock repurchase program primarily from funds generated from operations and borrowings. The Company’s long-term liquidity requirements, including capital expenditures, are expected to be financed by a combination of internally generated funds, borrowings and other sources of external financing if needed.

 

13


Table of Contents

2004 Outlook

 

These are forward-looking statements for purposes of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and actual results may vary.

 

The Company estimates that third quarter 2004 sales will range from $30 to $35 million and that it will incur a net earnings per diluted share ranging from $0.30 to $0.35. In the third quarter of 2003, sales were $18.6 million and diluted net loss per share was $0.02. The following factors were considered in developing these estimates:

 

The Company’s total backlog approximated $49 million on June 30, 2004, as compared to $37 million on March 31, 2004 reflecting increased strength in all of the Company’s niche markets.

 

The third quarter results are expected to benefit from capital improvements implemented in the second quarter, including the addition of annealing furnaces for ingot, billet and bar products. The addition of a reheat furnace is scheduled to be completed in August 2004 and is expected to increase the production of the Bridgeville blooming mill with its full benefit expected in the 2004 fourth quarter.

 

Sales from the Dunkirk Specialty Steel segment are expected to approximate $9 million due to anticipated stronger customer demand. Further sales growth is expected when additional reroll product is available from the Bridgeville operation.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

No new accounting pronouncements have been issued during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 that would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Further the Company has reviewed the status of its accounting pronouncements and believes there are no significant changes from that disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, except as provided in this Form 10-Q.

 

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

The Company has reviewed the status of its market risk and believes there are no significant changes from that disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, except as provided in this Form 10-Q in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2004 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in accordance with the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls.

 

14


Table of Contents

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

On June 29, 2001, suit was filed against the Company in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania by Teledyne Technologies, Incorporated (“Teledyne”). The suit alleges that steel product manufactured by the Company was defective and the Company was or should have been aware of the defects. Teledyne has alleged that the defective steel supplied by the Company caused certain crankshafts sold by Teledyne for use in aircraft engines to be defective. As a result, Teledyne is claiming damages relating to the recall, replacement and repair of aircraft engines.

 

In 2002, Teledyne was unsuccessful in its pursuit of a similar claim brought against another specialty steel producer who supplied the same steel product. After in-depth investigation, it is the Company’s position that the suit is without merit and it intends to vigorously defend that position. Additionally, the Company believes that it has insurance coverage that is available for this claim. At this time, the Company is engaged in discovery and believes that the final disposition of this suit will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.

 

On April 7, 2003, United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. (“USAU”), a New York corporation, as managers and on behalf of United States Aircraft Insurance Group (“USAIG”), the Company’s Aircraft Products Liability insurance carrier, filed suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania asking the court for a declaratory judgment as to what actual liability and obligations were applicable to USAIG relating to the insurance policy issued to the Company, and the allocations made by Teledyne. The Company and USAU reached a settlement agreement as of May 1, 2004 regarding the allocation of certain potential costs associated with the Teledyne claim and have agreed to jointly file a motion to have the declaratory suit dismissed. On July 27, 2004 the suit brought by USAU was dismissed.

 

Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8 -K

 

  a. Exhibits – none.

 

  b. One Report on Form 8-K was filed during the second quarter 2004. This Report covered Press Releases under item 5, Other Events, and no financial statements were filed with this report.

 

  1.) A Report on Form 8-K was filed on April 21, 2004 in which the Company announced the results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2004.

 

15


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

     UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

Date: August 10, 2004

  

/s/ C. M. McAninch


    

Clarence M. McAninch

    

President and Chief Executive Officer

    

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 10, 2004

  

/s/ Richard M. Ubinger


    

Richard M. Ubinger

    

Vice President of Finance,

    

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

    

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

16