Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

NOTE 10. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and commodity price fluctuations. Derivative contracts on various currencies are entered into in order to manage foreign currency exposures associated with certain product sourcing activities and intercompany sales. Interest rate swaps are entered into in order to manage interest rate risk associated with the Company’s variable-rate borrowings. Commodity hedging contracts are entered into in order to manage fluctuating market prices of certain purchased commodities and raw materials that are integrated into the Company’s end products.

The Company’s foreign currency management objective is to mitigate the potential impact of currency fluctuations on the value of its U.S. dollar cash flows and to reduce the variability of certain cash flows at the subsidiary level. The Company actively manages certain forecasted foreign currency exposures and uses a centralized currency management operation to take advantage of potential opportunities to naturally offset foreign currency exposures against each other. The decision of whether and when to execute derivative instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary from period to period depending on market conditions, the relative costs of the instruments and capacity to hedge. The duration is linked to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection between the two being regularly monitored. Polaris does not use any financial contracts for trading purposes. At June 30, 2011, Polaris had the following open contracts (in thousands):

Foreign Currency	Notional Amounts (in US Dollars)		Unrealized Loss
Australian Dollar	$	9,599	$	(625	)
Canadian Dollar		262,653		(6,526	)
Swedish Krona		5,958		(233	)
Total	$	278,210	$	(7,384	)

These contracts, with maturities through December 2012, met the criteria for cash flow hedges and the unrealized gains or losses, after tax, are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income in Shareholders’ Equity.

Polaris has entered into derivative contracts to hedge a portion of the exposure related to diesel fuel and aluminum for 2011. These diesel fuel and aluminum derivative contracts did not meet the criteria for hedge accounting.

The table below summarizes the carrying values of derivative instruments as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

	Carrying Values of Derivative Instruments as of June 30, 2011
	Fair  Value— Assets		Fair  Value— (Liabilities)			Derivative Net Carrying  Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Foreign exchange contracts(1)		—	$	(7,384	)	$	(7,384	)
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		—	$	(7,384	)	$	(7,384	)
Commodity contracts(1)	$	180		(43	)	$	137
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	$	180		(43	)	$	137
Total Derivatives	$	180	$	(7,427	)	$	(7,247	)

	Carrying Values of Derivative Instruments as of June 30, 2010
	Fair  Value— Assets		Fair  Value— (Liabilities)			Derivative Net Carrying  Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate contracts(1)		—	$	(414	)	$	(414	)
Foreign exchange contracts(1)	$	5,391		—			5,391
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments	$	5,391	$	(414	)	$	4,977
Commodity contracts(1)	$	1,353	$	(306	)	$	1,047
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	$	1,353	$	(306	)	$	1,047
Total Derivatives	$	6,744	$	(720	)	$	6,024

(1) Assets are included in Prepaid expenses and other and liabilities are included in Other accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into the income statement in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects the income statement. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in the current income statement. The table below provides data about the amount of gains and losses, net of tax, related to derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges included in Accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30 (in thousands):

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	For the Three  Months Ended June 30,					For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
Interest rate contracts	$	7		$	179	$	75		$	178
Foreign currency contracts		(1,145	)		4,293		(3,363	)		3,583
Total	$	(1,138	)	$	4,472	$	(3,288	)	$	3,761

The table below provides data about the amount of gains and losses, net of tax, reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income into income (loss) on derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI Into Income	For the Three  Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2011			2010			2011			2010
Interest rate contracts	Interest expense	$	(40	)	$	(291	)	$	(152	)	$	(588	)
Foreign currency contracts	Other expense (income) net		1,646			623			2,022			557
Foreign currency contracts	Cost of Sales		—			49			—			24
Total		$	1,606		$	381		$	1,870		$	(7	)

The net amount of the existing gains or losses at June 30, 2011 that is expected to be reclassified into the income statement within the next 12 months is expected to not be material. The ineffective portion of foreign currency contracts was not material for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

The Company recognized a loss of 2,000 and a gain of $661,000 in cost of sales on commodity contracts not designated as hedging instruments for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, versus losses of $2,544,000 and $2,438,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010.