XML 68 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Variable Interest Entities
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Variable Interest Entities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Variable Interest Entities
Variable Interest Entities (EME only)
Projects or Entities that are Consolidated
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, EME consolidated 16 and 15 projects, respectively, that have noncontrolling interests held by others. These projects have a total generating capacity of 958 megawatts (MW) and 878 MW, respectively. Projects consolidated at June 30, 2013 increased from December 31, 2012 due to the sale of Edison Mission Wind Inc.'s (Edison Mission Wind) indirect equity interest in the Broken Bow I wind project (80 MW in Nebraska) to Capistrano Wind Partners for $112 million. Edison Mission Wind is a wholly owned subsidiary of EME. Outside investors provided $94 million of the funding. In determining that EME was the primary beneficiary of the projects that are consolidated, key factors considered were EME's ability to direct commercial and operating activities and EME's obligation to absorb losses of the variable interest entities.
EME's summarized financial information for consolidated projects consisted of the following:
(in millions)
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Current assets
$
91

 
$
74

Net property, plant and equipment
1,225

 
1,117

Other long-term assets
99

 
90

Total assets
$
1,415

 
$
1,281

Current liabilities
$
38

 
$
50

Long-term debt net of current portion
229

 
186

Deferred revenues
154

 
156

Long-term derivative liabilities
15

 
23

Other long-term liabilities
46

 
40

Total liabilities
$
482

 
$
455

Noncontrolling interests
$
390

 
$
288


Assets serving as collateral for the debt obligations had a carrying value of $636 million and $497 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and primarily consist of property, plant and equipment. The debt obligations are nonrecourse to EME. For further discussion, see Note 5—Debt and Credit Agreements.
Capistrano Wind Partners
In addition to the Broken Bow I transaction discussed above, in February 2012, Edison Mission Wind sold its indirect equity interests in the Cedro Hill wind project (150 MW in Texas), the Mountain Wind Power I wind project (61 MW in Wyoming), and the Mountain Wind Power II wind project (80 MW in Wyoming) to Capistrano Wind Partners for $346 million. Outside investors provided $238 million of the funding and Mission Energy Holding Company (MEHC) made a $4 million preferred investment. In December 2012, Edison Mission Wind sold its indirect equity interest in the Crofton Bluffs wind project (40 MW in Nebraska) to Capistrano Wind Partners for $58 million. Outside investors provided $46 million of the funding.
Through their ownership of Capistrano Wind Holdings, an indirect subsidiary of EME, Edison Mission Wind and EME's parent company, MEHC, own 100% of the Class A equity interests in Capistrano Wind Partners, and the Class B preferred equity interests are held by outside investors. Under the terms of the formation documents, preferred equity interests receive 100% of the cash available for distribution up to a scheduled amount to target a certain return and thereafter cash distributions are shared. Cash available for distribution includes 90% of the tax benefits realized by MEHC and contributed to Capistrano Wind Partners.
Edison Mission Wind retains indirect beneficial ownership of the common equity in the projects, net of MEHC's preferred investment, and retains responsibilities for managing the operations of Capistrano Wind Holdings and its projects. Accordingly, EME will continue to consolidate these projects. The $378 million contributed by the third-party investors and the $4 million preferred investment made by MEHC are reflected in noncontrolling interests on EME's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2013. The transactions between Edison Mission Wind and Capistrano Wind Partners were accounted for as a transfer among entities under common control and, therefore, resulted in no change in the book basis of the transferred assets. However, the transaction did trigger a taxable gain and new tax basis in the assets with a corresponding adjustment to deferred taxes and a reduction to equity.