EX-99 3 prxeuro.htm Unassociated Document

Shareholder Meeting Results (Unaudited)
iSHARES®, INC.

A special meeting of shareholders of iShares, Inc. was scheduled on July 14, 2005 and subsequently adjourned until August 11, 2005. The proposals acted upon by shareholders at the special meeting and the results of the shareholder vote were as follows:

Proposal 1*
To elect the eight nominees specified below as Directors of the Company, each of whom will serve until his/her successor is duly elected or appointed and qualified.


Director
Votes For
Votes Withheld
Lee T. Kranefuss
514,380,779
13,203,425
John E. Martinez
514,431,297
13,152,907
Richard K. Lyons
514,795,814
12,788,388
George G.C. Parker
509,155,829
18,428,374
W. Allen Reed
514,418,913
13,165,293
Cecilia H. Herbert
514,381,937
13,202,268
Charles A. Hurty
514,442,567
13,141,638
John E. Kerrigan
514,830,983
12,753,220
Messrs. Kranefuss, Martinez, Lyons, Reed and Parker previously served as Directors of the Company and were re-elected. Ms. Herbert and Messrs. Hurty and Kerrigan were newly elected.


Proposal 2A
To approve a change to the Company’s fundamental investment policy to simplify and conform each Fund’s investment restriction regarding issuing senior securities. The shareholders of the iShares MSCI Germany Index Fund, iShares MSCI Netherlands Index Fund and iShares MSCI Switzerland Index Fund did not approve this proposal.


iShares MSCI Index Fund
Votes
For
Votes
Against
Votes
Abstaining
Broker
Non-Votes **
Austria
2,884,959
65,749
222,523
962,796
Belgium
1,482,566
43,740
74,902
405,883
EMU
2,734,892
98,272
103,919
1,075,723
France
828,162
178,236
7,055
200,710
Germany
2,368,605
181,068
79,215
2,566,569
Italy
622,042
14,930
5,521
185,045
Netherlands
838,057
76,143
17,348
636,422
Spain
683,738
55,673
28,147
175,573
Sweden
1,258,559
22,666
25,604
356,425
Switzerland
629,965
34,188
18,663
1,237,452
United Kingdom
9,639,753
2,284,284
94,975
1,614,899


Proposal 2B
To approve a change to the Company’s fundamental investment policy to simplify and conform each Fund’s investment restriction regarding the making of loans. The shareholders of the iShares MSCI Germany Index Fund, iShares MSCI Netherlands Index Fund and iShares MSCI Switzerland Index Fund did not approve this proposal.


iShares MSCI Index Fund
Votes
For
Votes
Against
Votes
Abstaining
Broker
Non-Votes **
Austria
2,854,656
86,018
232,557
962,796
Belgium
1,477,907
49,352
73,948
405,884
EMU
2,730,274
103,167
103,642
1,075,723
France
827,194
179,954
6,305
200,710
Germany
2,367,398
187,739
73,750
2,566,570
Italy
621,869
15,103
5,521
185,045
Netherlands
837,912
76,288
17,348
636,422
Spain
683,239
56,041
28,277
175,574
Sweden
1,258,589
22,966
25,274
356,425
Switzerland
622,865
40,699
19,252
1,237,452
United Kingdom
9,628,318
2,294,895
95,799
1,614,899


Proposal 2C
This proposal did not apply to the Funds in this shareholder report.


Proposal 2D
This proposal did not apply to the Funds in this shareholder report.


Proposal 3
To approve a change in the classification of the investment objectives of certain Funds from fundamental to non-fundamental. The shareholders of the iShares MSCI Belgium Index Fund, iShares MSCI Italy Index Fund and iShares MSCI Sweden Index Fund approved this proposal. The proposal did not pass in the other Funds in this shareholder report.


iShares MSCI Index Fund
Votes
For
Votes
Against
Votes
Abstaining
Broker
Non-Votes **
Austria
2,724,589
214,575
234,066
962,797
Belgium
1,453,881
70,905
76,422
405,883
EMU
2,472,672
361,541
102,870
1,075,723
France
720,634
286,514
6,305
200,710
Germany
2,243,543
304,700
80,645
2,566,569
Italy
601,385
35,557
5,551
185,045
Netherlands
826,664
87,536
17,348
636,422
Spain
625,676
112,595
29,287
175,573
Sweden
1,183,848
95,027
27,954
356,425
Switzerland
572,355
92,009
18,452
1,237,452
United Kingdom
8,486,421
3,434,447
98,144
1,614,899


Proposal 4
This proposal did not apply to the Funds in this shareholder report.




*  Denotes Company-wide proposal and voting results.
**
Broker non-votes are proxies received by the Fund from brokers or nominees, who did not receive instructions from the beneficial owner or other persons entitled to vote, and who have no discretionary power to vote on a particular matter. Broker non-votes have the effect of a vote against the proposal.