¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
ý | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
¨ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
¨ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12 |
ý | No fee required | ||||
¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | ||||
(1 | ) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(2 | ) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(3 | ) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |||
(4 | ) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||
(5 | ) | Total fee paid: | |||
¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | ||||
¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | ||||
(1 | ) | Amount Previously Paid: | |||
(2 | ) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||
(3 | ) | Filing Party: | |||
(4 | ) | Date Filed: |
2019 | Proxy Statement |
1. | Elect three Class I directors to hold office for a three-year term expiring in 2022; |
2. | Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Kforce’s independent registered public accountants for 2019; |
3. | Conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation; |
4. | Approve the Kforce Inc. 2019 Stock Incentive Plan; and |
5. | Attend to other business properly presented at the meeting. |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be Held on April 23, 2019. This proxy statement and our 2018 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at http://investor.kforce.com/investor-relations/financial-information/annual-reports-and-proxy. |
David L. Dunkel Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | Ralph E. Struzziero Lead Independent Director |
Class | Age | Position | Director Since | Current Term Expires | Expiration of Term for Which Nominated | Independent | Audit Comm | Comp. Comm | Nomin. Comm | Corp. Gov. Comm | Exec. Comm | |
Directors with Terms Expiring at the Annual Meeting/Nominees | ||||||||||||
Randall A. Mehl (1) | III | 51 | Director | 2017 | 2021 | 2022 | ü | |||||
Elaine D. Rosen | I | 66 | Director | 2003 | 2019 | 2022 | ü | |||||
Ralph E. Struzziero (2) | I | 74 | Director | 2000 | 2019 | 2022 | þ | |||||
Continuing Directors | ||||||||||||
John N. Allred | II | 72 | Director | 1998 | 2020 | N/A | ü | |||||
Richard M. Cocchiaro | II | 64 | Director | 1994 | 2020 | N/A | ||||||
Ann E. Dunwoody | II | 66 | Director | 2016 | 2020 | N/A | ü | |||||
A. Gordon Tunstall | II | 75 | Director | 1995 | 2020 | N/A | ü | |||||
David L. Dunkel | III | 65 | Chairman, CEO Director | 1994 | 2021 | N/A | ||||||
Mark F. Furlong | III | 61 | Director | 2001 | 2021 | N/A | ü | |||||
N. John Simmons | III | 63 | Director | 2014 | 2021 | N/A | ü | |||||
Non-Continuing Directors | ||||||||||||
Howard W. Sutter (1) | I | 70 | Director | 1994 | 2019 | N/A |
Legend: | þ | Lead Independent Director | Chair | Member | Financial Expert |
Randall A. Mehl | |||
Mr. Mehl is President and Chief Investment Officer of Stewardship Capital Advisors, LLC, which manages an equity fund focused on making investments in business and technology services. He also currently serves on the Board of Directors of two public companies, Insperity, Inc. and ICF International, Inc., as well as Stowell Associates Inc., a privately held home care agency. He previously served as a Managing Director and a partner with Baird Capital, a middle market private equity group, leading a team focused on the business and technology services sector from 2005 to 2016. From 1996 to 2005, Mr. Mehl was a senior equity research analyst with Robert W. Baird & Company, covering various areas within the broader business and technology services sector, including staffing. Mr. Mehl is an Audit Committee financial expert. Mr. Mehl has also previously served on various boards of directors, including Workforce Insight LLC, Myelin Communications, Vitalyst LLC, MedData, LLC, now a subsidiary of MEDNAX, American Auto Auction, LLC, Accume Partners, Inc, and Harris Research Inc. Mr. Mehl has previously served on the investment committee for several funds, and has expertise analyzing, acquiring and selling businesses. | |||
Director since 2017 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): ICF International, Inc. (NASDAQ: ICFI); Insperity, Inc. (NYSE: NSP) | Kforce Board Committee(s): Audit and Corporate Governance | |
Age | 51 |
Elaine D. Rosen | |||
Ms. Rosen has served as a director of Assurant, Inc., a provider of specialized insurance and insurance-related products and services since March 2009 and became the non-executive Chair of the Board in November 2010. Ms. Rosen has also served as the Chair of the Board of The Kresge Foundation since January 2007. Ms. Rosen serves as trustee or director of several non-profit organizations, is a past Chair of the Board of Preble Street, a homeless collaborative in Portland, Maine, and has served as a trustee of the Foundation for Maine’s Community Colleges since 2008. Ms. Rosen was a director of the Elmina B. Sewall Foundation from 2008 to 2012 and Downeast Energy Corp., a privately-held company that provides heating products and building supplies, from 2003 until its sale in April 2012. From 1975 to March 2001, Ms. Rosen held a number of positions with Unum Life Insurance Company of America, including President. Ms. Rosen has extensive experience as a senior executive in the insurance industry and as a director of several companies, as well as substantial experience with charitable organizations, particularly as the Chair of one of the largest private foundations in the country. With her background and experience as Chair of the Compensation Committee of Kforce; on the Board of Assurant, Inc., where she currently serves as the non-executive Chair and serves on the compensation committee, she has considerable expertise in, among other things, executive compensation, which is a subject matter that is undergoing dynamic change. | |||
Director since 2003 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): Assurant, Inc. (NYSE: AIZ) | Kforce Board Committee(s): Compensation (Chair); Nomination; and Corporate Governance | |
Age | 66 |
Ralph E. Struzziero | |||
Since 1995, Mr. Struzziero has operated an independent business consulting practice, providing interim executive-level advisory and professional services to a variety of organizations. In addition, he served as an adjunct professor at the University of Southern Maine from 1997 to 2006. Mr. Struzziero previously served as Chairman (1990-1994) and President (1980-1994) of Romac & Associates, Inc., one of Kforce’s predecessors. Mr. Struzziero is also currently a director of Automobile Club of Southern California, a travel club and property and casualty insurer in California, AAA of Northern New England, a travel club serving Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont, and Auto Club Enterprise, a holding company of these two companies. Mr. Struzziero previously served on the Board of Directors of Prism Medical Ltd., a publicly traded corporation on the TSX Venture Exchange in Canada and manufacturer and distributor of moving and handling equipment for the mobility challenged, from July 2011 until its sale in August 2016, and Downeast Energy Corp., a privately-held company that provides heating products and building supplies, from January 2001 until its sale in April 2012. Mr. Struzziero has extensive experience in the staffing industry. The Board believes this gives Mr. Struzziero, in his capacity as Lead Independent Director, a unique insight among the non-employee directors relating to Kforce’s business and operations. | |||
Director since 2000 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): None | Kforce Board Committee(s): Compensation; and Corporate Governance (Chair) | |
Age | 74 |
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 1. |
John N. Allred | |||
Mr. Allred has served as President of A.R.G., Inc., a provider of temporary and permanent physicians located in the Kansas City area since January 1994. He was a director at Source Services Corporation (Source) prior to its merger with Kforce in 1998 and served in various capacities with Source from 1976 to 1993 including Vice President (1987-1993), Regional Vice President (1983-1987) and Kansas City Branch Manager (1976-1983). Mr. Allred has extensive experience in the staffing industry and is particularly knowledgeable in the area of healthcare. His staffing industry experience (other than his directorship in Kforce) is with companies other than Kforce, which the Board believes allows him to address operational issues from a different perspective. | |||
Director since 1998 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): None | Kforce Board Committee(s): Audit; Nomination (Chair); and Corporate Governance | |
Age | 72 |
Richard M. Cocchiaro | |||
Mr. Cocchiaro served as a Vice Chairman of Kforce from 2004 through his retirement in January 2016, during which time he oversaw Customer First, our customer loyalty program, and served on both Kforce’s internal executive committee and innovation council. Previously, Mr. Cocchiaro served as Vice President of Strategic Accounts for Kforce (2000–2004), Vice President of Strategic Alliances for Kforce.com Interactive (1999) and National Director of Strategic Solutions within Kforce’s emerging technologies group (1994-1999). Mr. Cocchiaro has served in numerous leadership roles within Kforce including, among others, the financial services group, leading the Chicago market, the emerging technologies group, strategic alliances, national accounts and most recently leading Customer First, our customer loyalty program. He has extensive experience with Kforce’s field operations on a national basis, bringing an important perspective to the Board. | |||
Director since 1994 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): None | Kforce Board Committee(s): Executive | |
Age | 64 |
Ann E. Dunwoody | |||
General (Ret.) Dunwoody was the first woman in U.S. military history to achieve the rank of four-star general. From 2008 until her retirement in 2012, she led and ran the largest global logistics command in the Army comprising 69,000 military and civilian individuals, located in all 50 states and over 140 countries with a budget of $60 billion dollars. General (Ret.) Dunwoody also served as a strategic planner for the Chief of Staff of the Army. During her 38-year military career, she was decorated for distinguished service and has received many major military and honorary awards. General (Ret.) Dunwoody currently serves on the Board of Directors of L-3 Communications and Logistics Management Institute and previously served on the Board of Directors of Republic Services, Inc. She also serves on the Council of Trustees for the Association of the United States Army and the Board of Trustees for the Florida Institute of Technology and she is the president of First 2 Four LLC, a leadership mentoring and strategic advisory services company that offers visionary insights for managing large organizations to posture them for the future. She authored “A Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from the First Female Four Star General” and is a recipient of The Ellis Island Medal of Honor. General (Ret.) Dunwoody brings to the Board extensive military and management experience, including managing a significant portion of the United States Army’s budget as Commanding General, U.S. Army Materiel Command. General (Ret.) Dunwoody is also certified as an NACD Governance Fellow. She serves as a member of the Board of Directors on another publicly traded company and is also engaged in numerous charitable and civic activities, which the Board believes allows her to provide valuable and varied perspective. | |||
Director since 2016 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): L-3 Communications (NYSE: LLL) | Kforce Board Committee(s): Nomination and Corporate Governance | |
Age | 66 |
A. Gordon Tunstall | |||
Mr. Tunstall is the founder, and for more than 30 years has served as President, of Tunstall Consulting, Inc., a provider of strategic consulting and financial planning services. He has also served as a director of Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc., a medication risk management and distribution pharmacy, since March 2012. Mr. Tunstall previously served as a director for JLM Industries, Inc., Orthodontics Center of America, Inc., Discount Auto Parts, Inc., Advanced Lighting Technologies Inc., Health Insurance Innovations, Horizon Medical Products Inc., and L.A.T. Sportswear. Mr. Tunstall also qualifies as an Audit Committee financial expert and stands willing to assume this role if for any reason the current Audit Committee financial experts cease to serve on the Board. He provides the Board a unique point of view regarding strategy given his background as a successful strategic consultant for over 30 years advising a large number of companies in a variety of industries. | |||
Director since 1995 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): None | Kforce Board Committee(s): Nomination; Corporate Governance; and Executive | |
Age | 75 |
David L. Dunkel | |||
Mr. Dunkel has served as Kforce’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director since the Firm’s incorporation in 1994 and possesses a deep and unique understanding of the Firm’s business and operations. The Board believes that this experience, coupled with his extensive knowledge of the staffing industry, provides strong, consistent leadership and allows him to serve as a highly effective bridge between the Board and management. In addition, in his capacity as CEO, Mr. Dunkel frequently meets with shareholders, clients and other Firm stakeholders to communicate our business and strategy and to understand their various perspectives and insights, which he is then able to relay to the full Board for consideration and assessment. | |||
Director since 1994 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): None | Kforce Board Committee(s): Executive (Chair) | |
Age | 65 |
Mark F. Furlong | |||
Mr. Furlong has served as a director of Heska Corporation, a manufacturer of veterinary and animal health diagnostic and specialty products, since March 2019 and of Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc., a provider of wealth management, trust and private banking services, since September 2016; he has also served as a director of Antares Capital, a provider of financing solutions for middle market, private equity-backed transactions, since December 2015. He served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of BMO Harris Bank, N.A. from July 2011 to June 2015. Mr. Furlong served as a director of BMO Harris Bank, N.A. and BMO Financial Corporation from July 2011 to June 2015. Prior to its acquisition by BMO Harris Bank, N.A. in 2011, he served as Chairman of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation from October 2010, Chief Executive Officer from April 2007 and as President from July 2004. He also served as Chief Financial Officer of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation from April 2001 to October 2004. Mr. Furlong’s prior experience also includes service as an audit partner with Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Furlong is an Audit Committee financial expert. Kforce believes his considerable expertise, including his experience as President and Chief Executive Officer of BMO Harris Bank, N.A., the former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation and a former audit partner with Deloitte & Touche LLP, brings unique insight to the Board concerning capital allocation strategies and banking issues, in addition to his overall management and financial expertise. | |||
Director since 2001 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BPFH); Heska Corporation (NASDAQ: HSKA) | Kforce Board Committee(s): Audit (Chair); Compensation; and Corporate Governance | |
Age | 61 |
N. John Simmons | |||
Mr. Simmons is the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of DeMert Brands, Inc., a designer, manufacturer and distributor of haircare products. He previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of Growth Advisors, LLC, a provider of C-level advisory services to high-growth companies. He has served on various boards of directors, including Bonds.com Group, Inc. from 2013 to 2014, Loyola University New Orleans Board of Trustees from 2009 to 2015, during which he was Chairman of the Audit Committee and an Executive Committee member; Lifestyle Family Fitness, Inc. from 2001 to 2012; Technology Research Corporation as Chairman of the Compensation Committee from 2010 to 2011 and as Lead Director and Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee from 2009 to 2010; Medquist, Inc. as Chairman of the Audit Committee from 2005 to 2007; and SRI Surgical Express, Inc. as Lead Director, then Chairman of the Board from 2001 to 2008. He served as the CEO and President of Lifestyle Family Fitness, Inc. from 2008 to 2012. Mr. Simmons’ prior experience also includes service as President of New Homes Realty, a Florida-based residential real estate company operating in 35 states for two years, President of Quantum Capital Partners, a privately held venture capital firm for 14 years, Vice President and Controller for Eckerd Corporation for three years, Chief Financial Officer of Checkers Drive-In Restaurants for two years and as an audit partner with KPMG Peat Marwick. Mr. Simmons is an Audit Committee financial expert; he has extensive financial, accounting, management and director experience in several different industries. As a result, the Board believes that he brings valuable insight due to his extensive and varied experiences as a chief executive officer, chief financial officer, audit partner and director. | |||
Director since 2014 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): None | Kforce Board Committee(s): Audit and Corporate Governance | |
Age | 63 |
Howard W. Sutter | |||
Mr. Sutter has served as Kforce’s SVP, Leader Development since January 2017 and previously served as Vice Chairman since 2005; he also participates in Kforce’s mergers, acquisitions and divestitures. Prior to August 1994, Mr. Sutter served as Vice President of Romac-FMA (1984-1994) and Division President of Romac-FMA’s South Florida location (1982-1994). Mr. Sutter led Kforce’s merger, acquisition, and divestiture efforts for 19 years and, over this time, has led the effort on a significant number of acquisitions, including those of two public companies, and several divestitures. Mr. Sutter also has extensive experience in staffing operations. The Board believes that Mr. Sutter’s knowledge of the staffing industry, and more specifically the mergers and acquisition market, brings an important expertise to the Board. | |||
Director since 1994 | Other Current Public Company Board(s): None | Kforce Board Committee(s): Executive | |
Age | 70 |
• | oversee management performance on behalf of our shareholders; |
• | advocate on behalf of the long-term interests of our shareholders; |
• | discuss and consider the Firm’s strategic and executive succession planning; |
• | be actively involved in the oversight of risk that could affect Kforce; |
• | promote the exercise of sound corporate governance; and |
• | carry out other duties and responsibilities as may be required by state and federal laws, as well as the NASDAQ rules. |
At each Board meeting our Board receives: | On a monthly basis our Board receives: | ||
l | an executive summary that includes, among other items, a risk factors section; | l | a description of certain significant events and risk factors, if any, that have occurred in each period; |
l | Kforce’s financial and operational performance, including progress against its strategies; | l | a financial update from management; and |
l | management’s assessment of the current state of the capital markets and macro-economic environment; | l | any other necessary items requiring the attention of the Board. |
l | management’s analysis on the current state of the staffing industry and corporate development activities; | ||
l | a claims, litigation and ethics hotline summary; | ||
l | a report on the Firm’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program; and | ||
l | reports on other matters that may arise from time to time, that require reporting to the Board. |
Audit Committee | |
Members: | Roles and Responsibilities of the Committee: |
Mark F. Furlong (Chair) | The Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Firm and the audits of the Firm’s financial statements. In discharging this oversight role, the Audit Committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention, with full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of Kforce, and the power to retain outside counsel or other experts. This committee also has the responsibility for selecting, evaluating, compensating, and monitoring the independence and performance of the Firm’s independent auditors, reviewing and approving related party transactions and overseeing the Firm’s internal audit function and ERM program, including cybersecurity risk assessment. At each quarterly meeting, and more frequently as needed, the members of the Audit Committee meet in executive session. The Audit Committee also meets regularly in separate executive sessions with the Firm’s Vice President of Internal Audit, General Counsel, and Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accountants. The Board has determined that Messrs. Furlong, Mehl and Simmons, who are all members of the Audit Committee, as well as Mr. Tunstall are considered an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by SEC Rules. |
John N. Allred | |
Randall A. Mehl | |
N. John Simmons | |
Number of Meetings: | |
5 |
Compensation Committee | |
Members: | Roles and Responsibilities of the Committee: |
Elaine D. Rosen (Chair) | The Compensation Committee is responsible for development of the compensation principles to guide the design of the Firm’s executive compensation program. It is also responsible for reviewing and approving the executive compensation and benefit policies and practices of the Firm, approving any new or amended employment agreements for executive management including grants or awards to executive management under the Firm’s long-term incentive program and preparing an annual report on the Firm’s executive compensation policies and practices as required by SEC Rules. In the discharge of its duties, the Compensation Committee also has the authority to select and utilize a compensation consultant to assist in the evaluation of director and executive officer compensation. |
Mark F. Furlong | |
Ralph E. Struzziero | |
Number of Meetings: | |
6 |
Nomination Committee | |
Members: | Roles and Responsibilities of the Committee: |
John N. Allred (Chair) | The Nomination Committee is responsible for providing assistance to the Board in the selection of director candidates for election. In addition to identifying and recommending candidates for election to the Board, this committee also makes recommendations to the Board regarding the size and composition of the Board and establishes procedures for the nomination process. The Nomination Committee has the authority to retain a search firm to be used to identify director candidates and to approve the search firm’s fees and other retention terms. The Nomination Committee has not established “minimum qualifications” for director nominees because it is the view of this committee that the establishment of rigid “minimum qualifications” might preclude the consideration of otherwise desirable candidates for election to the Board. The Nomination Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders. Refer to the section titled “Shareholder Communications, Proposals and Other Matters” below. |
Ann E. Dunwoody | |
Elaine D. Rosen | |
A. Gordon Tunstall | |
Number of Meetings: | |
4 |
Corporate Governance Committee | |
Members: | Roles and Responsibilities of the Committee: |
Ralph E. Struzziero (Chair) | The functions of the Corporate Governance Committee are to: encourage and enhance communication among independent directors; provide a forum for independent directors to meet separately from management; provide leadership and oversight related to ethical standards; and provide a channel for communication with the CEO. The Corporate Governance Committee also coordinates a formal, written annual evaluation of the performance of the Board and each of its committees. Each member of the Board who is independent, within the meaning of these rules, serves on the Corporate Governance Committee. This committee is designed to fulfill the requirements of NASDAQ Rule 5605(b)(2) (i.e., through the meetings of this committee, our “independent” directors (as determined under the NASDAQ Rules) meet at least once annually in executive session without any of our management present). The Firm’s Lead Independent Director serves as the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee. |
John N. Allred | |
Ann E. Dunwoody | |
Mark F. Furlong | |
Randall A. Mehl | |
Elaine D. Rosen | |
N. John Simmons | |
A. Gordon Tunstall | |
Number of Meetings: | |
4 |
Executive Committee | |
Members: | Roles and Responsibilities of the Committee: |
David L. Dunkel (Chair) | The Executive Committee has the authority to act in place of the Board on all matters that would otherwise come before the Board, except for such matters that are required by law or by our Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws to be acted upon exclusively by the Board. |
Richard M. Cocchiaro | |
Howard W. Sutter | |
A. Gordon Tunstall | |
Number of Meetings: | |
None |
Audit | Compensation | Nomination | Corporate Governance | ||||
l | Responsible for the Firm’s risk assessment and ERM program | l | Oversees executive compensation risk | l | Oversees director succession risk | l | Leadership and oversight of ethical standards |
l | Monitors risk relating to the Firm’s financial statements, systems, reporting process and compliance | l | Responsible for preparation and required disclosures regarding compensation practices | l | Establishes procedures for the Board’s nomination process | l | Provides a forum for Board independent directors to meet separately from management |
l | Reviews and approves related party transactions and relationships involving directors and executive officers | l | Responsible for review of the overall compensation and benefits policies and practices of the Firm, including determining whether such policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Firm | l | Recommends candidates for election to the Board | l | Reviews and recommends to the Board any changes to the corporate governance guidelines |
l | Monitors and receives reports on the Firm’s cyber- security risks and incidents | l | Oversees the Board’s evaluation process |
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | All Other Compensation ($)(3) | Total ($) | Unvested Restricted Stock (4) | Deferred Restricted Stock Units (4) | ||||||||||
John N. Allred | $ | 107,000 | $ | 99,987 | $ | 2,348 | $ | 209,335 | 3,769 | — | ||||||
Richard M. Cocchiaro | $ | 50,000 | $ | 99,987 | $ | 4,494 | $ | 154,481 | 3,769 | 4,566 | ||||||
Ann E. Dunwoody | $ | 77,000 | $ | 99,987 | $ | 4,494 | $ | 181,481 | 3,769 | 4,566 | ||||||
Mark F. Furlong | $ | 107,000 | $ | 99,987 | $ | 2,348 | $ | 209,335 | 3,769 | — | ||||||
Randall A. Mehl | $ | 77,000 | $ | 99,987 | $ | 2,348 | $ | 179,335 | 3,769 | — | ||||||
Elaine D. Rosen | $ | 107,000 | $ | 99,987 | $ | 7,826 | $ | 214,813 | 3,769 | 10,144 | ||||||
N. John Simmons | $ | 77,000 | $ | 99,987 | $ | 2,348 | $ | 179,335 | 3,769 | — | ||||||
Ralph E. Struzziero | $ | 92,000 | $ | 99,987 | $ | 7,826 | $ | 199,813 | 3,769 | 10,144 | ||||||
Howard W. Sutter (5) | $ | — | $ | 150,006 | $ | 446,726 | $ | 596,732 | 3,973 | — | ||||||
A. Gordon Tunstall | $ | 77,000 | $ | 99,987 | $ | 2,348 | $ | 179,335 | 3,769 | — |
(1) | Fees earned or paid in cash consisted of: (a) annual retainer for each director of $30,000; (b) annual retainers for each committee chairperson of $15,000; (c) quarterly fees for each quarter of board service of $5,000; and (d) quarterly fees for each quarter of committee service of $3,750 for each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nomination Committee and $3,000 for the Corporate Governance Committee. |
(2) | The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The amounts for all directors, except for Mr. Sutter, reflect a grant of 3,717 shares of restricted stock with a closing stock price on the grant date of $26.90. For Mr. Sutter, the amount represents compensation for his employment at Kforce, which included a grant of 3,932 shares of restricted stock with a closing stock price on the grant date of $38.15. Mr. Sutter was not compensated for his service on the Board. |
(3) | The amounts reported in this column for all directors, except Mr. Sutter, represent the dollar value of dividend equivalents credited on unvested restricted stock and deferred restricted stock units in the form of additional restricted stock. For Mr. Sutter, the amount in this column represents employment compensation, which consisted of: $300,000 in salary, $137,850 in bonus, $7,456 in matching contributions made by Kforce attributable to defined contribution plans, and $1,420 in dividend equivalents credited on unvested restricted stock. Mr. Sutter was not compensated for his service on the Board. |
(4) | The beneficial ownership of common shares as of the Record Date for each of our directors is presented below under the heading of “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.” |
(5) | On January 31, 2019, Howard W. Sutter informed Kforce that due to his long tenure as a member of the Board and consistent with the Board’s refreshment initiatives, he would not stand for re-election as a Class I Director at the Annual Meeting. |
David L. Dunkel | Age: | 65 | |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | Mr. Dunkel has served as Kforce’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director since its incorporation in 1994. He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Romac-FMA, one of Kforce’s predecessors, for 14 years. | ||
Michael R. Blackman | Age: | 64 | |
Chief Corporate Development Officer | Mr. Blackman has served as Kforce’s Chief Corporate Development Officer since December 2009, prior to which he served as the Firm’s Senior Vice President of Investor Relations from 1999 to 2009 and Director of Selection and Senior Consultant in the healthcare services specialty from 1992 to 1999. | ||
Jeffrey B. Hackman | Age: | 40 | |
Senior Vice President, Finance and Accounting | Mr. Hackman has served as Kforce’s Principal Accounting Officer since October 2015 and as Senior Vice President of Finance and Accounting since March 2015. He is responsible for overseeing Kforce's finance, accounting, SEC reporting, tax, treasury, procurement, real estate and business operations (time capture, billing, accounts receivable and cash applications) functions. He previously served as the Firm’s Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Accounting Officer from February 2009 until September 2013 and as Kforce’s SEC Reporting Director from September 2007 to February 2009. Mr. Hackman served as the Global Chief Accounting Officer of Cunningham Lindsey from September 2013 until he rejoined Kforce in March 2015. Prior to 2007, he was an Audit Senior Manager with Grant Thornton LLP. | ||
David M. Kelly | Age: | 53 | |
Chief Financial Officer | Mr. Kelly has served as Kforce’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2013 and Corporate Secretary since February 2013. Mr. Kelly joined Kforce in 2000 and has served as Senior Vice President of Finance and Accounting from February 2009 to December 2012, Corporate Assistant Secretary from October 2010 to February 2013, Vice President of Finance from January 2005 to February 2009, Chief Accounting Officer from November 2000 to January 2005 and Group Financial Officer from January 2000 to November 2000. Before joining Kforce, Mr. Kelly served in various roles with different companies that included treasury director, vice president, and controller. | ||
Joseph J. Liberatore | Age: | 55 | |
President | Mr. Liberatore has served as Kforce’s President since January 2013. He previously served as Corporate Secretary from February 2007 to February 2013, Chief Financial Officer from October 2004 to December 2012, Executive Vice President from July 2008 to December 2012, Senior Vice President from 2000 to July 2008, Chief Talent Officer from 2001 to 2004 and Chief Sales Officer from September 2000 to August 2001. Mr. Liberatore has served in various other roles in Kforce (and its predecessors) since he joined the Firm in 1988. | ||
Kye L. Mitchell | Age: | 49 | |
Chief Operations Officer | Ms. Mitchell has served as Kforce’s Chief Operations Officer since March 2016. Before her appointment as Chief Operations Officer, Ms. Mitchell served as Chief Operations Officer for the East Region from January 2013 to March 2016, Field President from January 2009 through December 2012, Market President from February 2006 to December 2008, and Market Vice President from February 2005 through January 2006. Ms. Mitchell joined Kforce in 2005 when Kforce acquired VistaRMS where she served as President. | ||
Andrew G. Thomas | Age: | 52 | |
Chief Marketing Officer | Mr. Thomas has served as Kforce’s Chief Marketing Officer since July 2018. In his current role, he leads the Firm’s marketing, digital strategy, training and development, human resources, compensation and benefits organizations. Prior to this role, Mr. Thomas was the Firm’s Chief Field Services officer from December 2013 to July 2018. He has also served as the Executive Director of Kforce’s Finance and Accounting product offering where he oversaw strategy, operating model and critical activities, as well as various other roles in Kforce since he joined the Firm in 1997. |
Fee Type | 2018 | 2017 | |||||
Audit Fees (1) | $ | 879,827 | $ | 813,422 | |||
Audit-Related Fees (2) | $ | 11,500 | $ | 11,500 | |||
Tax Fees (3) | $ | 35,467 | $ | — | |||
All Other Fees (4) | $ | 1,895 | $ | 1,895 |
(1) | Represents fees associated with the annual audit and the review of our financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. |
(2) | Includes assurance and related services by the independent auditors that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, or other filings that are not captured under “Audit Fees” above. These services included consultations as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, FASB, and other regulatory or standard-setting bodies; internal control reviews, including consultation, under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; due diligence services and audits and accounting consultations related to dispositions. |
(3) | Represents fees for tax advice, tax planning and tax consultation for contemplated transactions and state income tax notices. |
(4) | Represents fees for an annual subscription to a Deloitte & Touche LLP research database and continuing education courses. The Audit Committee considered whether Deloitte & Touche LLP’s provision of the above non-audit services is compatible with maintaining such firm’s independence and satisfied itself as to Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence. |
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 2. |
1. | The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with Kforce Inc.’s management; |
2. | The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard 1301; |
3. | The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent auditors the independent auditors’ independence; and |
4. | Based on the review and discussion referred to in the above paragraphs, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in Kforce Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee has also selected Deloitte & Touche LLP, subject to ratification by shareholders, to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2019, and to provide review services for each of the quarters in the year ending December 31, 2019. |
Compensation Committee Report The Compensation Committee of Kforce (the Committee) has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and based on such review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated into Kforce’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Submitted by the Compensation Committee Elaine D. Rosen (Chair) ¦ Mark F. Furlong ¦ Ralph E. Struzziero |
• | David L. Dunkel, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
• | Joseph J. Liberatore, President |
• | David M. Kelly, Chief Financial Officer |
• | Kye L. Mitchell, Chief Operations Officer |
• | Andrew G. Thomas, Chief Marketing Officer |
• | Attained 99.9% of our target revenue and 109% of our target diluted earnings per share (EPS). |
• | Attained above target performance for our long-term incentive (LTI) metric; Kforce’s relative total shareholder return (TSR) over the past three years (January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018) of 31% ranked 2nd versus our industry peer group of 7 direct competitors, and attained a 50th percentile ranking versus our separately designated peer group. |
• | Continued to make progress on our strategic initiatives including implementing new and upgrading existing technologies, improving our alignment of revenue-generating talent, and executing a Kforce brand refresh. |
• | Above target annual incentive payouts, based on the performance against our financial metrics (payouts were slightly below target for revenue and above target for EPS) and on individual performance objectives (payouts were above target). |
• | LTI payouts for the CEO and the President at target based on median relative TSR performance versus our separately designated peer group, and LTI payouts for the other NEOs above target based on above median relative TSR performance versus our industry peer group. |
What We Do | What We Don’t Do | |||
l | Target Annual NEO Compensation at Market Median for Median Performance | l | Define Market Median by Comparison to Larger Companies | |
l | Provide Pay for Performance by Paying Higher Compensation for Above Median Performance and Lower Compensation for Below Median Performance | l | Set Easy Targets for Incentive Plans | |
l | Ensure Performance-Based Compensation is the Largest Part of Total Compensation | l | Provide Excessive Perquisites | |
l | Ensure Equity-Based LTI Compensation is a Significant Component of Performance-Based Compensation | l | Allow Repricing or Cash Buyouts of Previous Equity-Based LTI Grants | |
l | Require Share Ownership | l | Allow Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock or Other Related Activities | |
l | Maintain a Significant Clawback Policy | l | Create New Excise Tax Gross-ups | |
l | Create New or Materially Amend Executive Employment Agreements with Provisions for Severance Payouts Exceeding 1x Cash Compensation or Change in Control Severance Payouts Exceeding 2x Cash Compensation |
Attract and Retain Key Executives | Attracting and retaining key executive talent is critical to the success of a staffing firm in which people represent the true “assets” of such a company. The Committee believes an understanding of competitive market pay levels is essential to hiring and retaining qualified executives able to drive our long-term profitable growth and long-term shareholder value. The Committee further believes it is important to be knowledgeable concerning best practices and how comparable organizations compensate their executives. |
Target Annual NEO Compensation at Market Median | The executive compensation plan is designed to target the total pay level for our NEOs at the median of comparable companies. To effectively accomplish this, the Committee annually reviews compensation data from several independent sources. Our competitive market for executive talent is primarily staffing organizations; however, the Committee also reviews pay data for other professional service and consulting organizations of comparable size and similar business models. |
Provide Pay-for-Performance by Paying Higher Compensation for Above Median Performance and Lower Compensation for Below Median Performance | The Committee believes executive compensation should align with our revenue, profit and TSR performance and provide superior cash and equity compensation opportunities for superior performance. The Committee also believes the design of our compensation programs provides incentives for our NEOs to exceed targeted performance, which results in significant relative shareholder value creation and creates a positive perception of Kforce in the highly competitive market for executive talent. Accordingly, the opposite is true for below median performance resulting in lower compensation. |
Ensure Performance-Based Compensation is the Largest Part of Total Compensation | The Committee designs the compensation framework with significant emphasis on performance-based compensation over fixed compensation to motivate our NEOs to drive operational performance without encouraging unreasonable risk. Performance-based compensation at target comprised 73% of target total direct compensation for our CEO and between 64% to 73% for our other NEOs in 2018. |
Ensure Equity-Based LTI Compensation is a Significant Component of Performance-Based Compensation | The Committee believes equity-based LTI compensation should be a significant component of performance-based compensation to further focus executive efforts on long-term shareholder returns. Target equity LTI ranged from 60% to 67% of target total performance-based compensation for our NEOs in 2018. We believe the opportunity to earn the designated equity LTI performance objectives motivates the achievement of higher relative TSR; it also serves to retain our executives for the long-term, given the denomination of earned equity LTIs as time-based restricted stock. |
Require Share Ownership | The Committee believes our executives should have a personal financial stake in Kforce’s ongoing future success, primarily driven by a desire to match their interests with those of our shareholders. In addition to equity-based LTIs playing a significant role in our executive compensation program, all employees, including the NEOs, are eligible to purchase stock through the Kforce Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. To further align the interests of executives and long-term shareholders, our Board has adopted formal ownership guidelines, set forth below. |
Consider Tax Deductibility in Compensation Plan Design | The Committee considers all possible tax consequences in the design of our executive compensation programs. Our NEO compensation framework was structured so that our performance-based annual incentive and LTI awards would be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). The enactment of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) resulted in the elimination of performance-based compensation exemptions, except with respect to certain grandfathered arrangements granted prior to November 2, 2017. As a result, this has limited the tax deductibility of NEO compensation beginning in 2018. Although the use of the Kforce Inc. Amended and Restated Performance Incentive Plan previously approved by our shareholders was not historically the exclusive method of making annual incentives, its use has been discontinued as a result of the elimination of the compensation exemptions. Despite the changes to Section 162(m), we expect the structure of our NEO compensation program will continue to include a significant portion of performance-based compensation, which is consistent with our compensation philosophy of linking pay to performance and aligning executive interests with those of our shareholders. |
Set Challenging Performance Objectives | We work to set difficult but attainable financial growth performance objectives for our NEOs in the context of the annual incentive plan as evidenced by the fact that threshold and target goals and objectives have not been met in every plan year. |
Minimum Required Share Ownership Guidelines | Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a stock ownership policy for our directors and executives. The minimum level of holdings for each position is as follows: | |||||
Target Holding Level (Lesser Of) | ||||||
Position | Annual Retainer / Salary | OR | Shares | |||
Director | 3x | 5,000 | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | 5x | 200,000 | ||||
President | 3x | 100,000 | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2x | 50,000 | ||||
Chief Operations Officer | 2x | 30,000 | ||||
Other members of Kforce’s Executive Leadership Team | 0.5x | 10,000 | ||||
As of the Record Date, all directors, NEOs and other members of our executive leadership were in compliance with the policy. In accordance with the policy, directors have three years from the effective date of joining the Board, and executives have two years from the effective date of a promotion or salary increase, to attain the ownership level. |
Clawback Policy | Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a clawback policy applicable to all executive officers. Accordingly, in the event of a restatement of our financial statements because of a material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws, the Board will, if determined appropriate, recover from current executives any incentive-based compensation paid for any applicable performance periods beginning after March 30, 2012. |
Equity Plan Features | The Committee believes Kforce’s equity plans are structured to avoid problematic pay practices and features that could be detrimental to shareholder interests. None of our Stock Incentive Plans (as approved by shareholders in 2013, 2016 and 2017 and pending approval of Proposal 4 in 2019) permit repricing or cash buyouts of underwater options or stock appreciation rights without shareholder approval. The 2017 and 2019 Plans require a minimum vesting period of one year on all award types. In addition, the 2019 Plan requires a minimum holding period of one year after exercise of any options and stock appreciation rights for all NEOs; we will also apply this policy to any awards granted outside of this plan. |
Insider Trading, Anti-Pledging and Anti-Hedging | Our Insider Trading Policy governs the trading in our securities by directors, officers and employees and other persons who have or may have access to material, nonpublic information. The policy has the following restrictions: | ||
s | No trading while in the possession of material, nonpublic information | ||
s | No trading during designated black-out periods | ||
s | No trading without pre-approval (certain insiders) | ||
s | No margin accounts | ||
s | No pledging | ||
s | No hedging (including, but not limited to, prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) | ||
s | No trading in any interest or position relating to future stock price, such as a puts, calls or short sales |
Elimination of Excise Tax Gross-Up | In 2009, the Committee resolved to not enter into any new employment agreements, or materially amend any existing employment agreements with its executives that contain excise tax gross-up provisions in the event of a change-in-control event going forward. Since the Committee’s resolution, all new or amended executive employment agreements have excluded excise tax gross-up provisions. As a result, the only remaining employment agreements which continue to include excise tax gross-up provisions are with Messrs. Dunkel and Liberatore; both of these agreements were most recently amended in 2008. |
• | staying informed of current issues and emerging trends; |
• | ensuring Kforce’s executive compensation program remains aligned with best practices and are in the best interest of the shareholders; and |
• | establishing and maintaining a pay-for-performance executive compensation program consistent with our shareholders’ interests while providing appropriate incentives to our executives. |
ASGN Incorporated | Kelly Services, Inc. | Resources Connection, Inc. | TrueBlue, Inc. |
Computer Task Group, Inc. | ManpowerGroup, Inc. | Robert Half International Inc. |
Revenue | Market Capitalization | |||||||
25th Percentile | $ | 1,244,655 | $ | 716,351 | ||||
Median | $ | 2,949,494 | $ | 856,225 | ||||
75th Percentile | $ | 5,585,493 | $ | 3,130,578 | ||||
Kforce Inc. | $ | 1,418,353 | $ | 804,971 | ||||
Percentile Rank | 28 | 28 |
ASGN Incorporated | Huron Consulting Group Inc. | Resources Connection, Inc. |
Barrett Business Services, Inc. | ICF International, Inc. | TriNet Group, Inc. |
CBIZ, Inc. | Insperity, Inc. | TrueBlue, Inc. |
FTI Consulting, Inc. | Korn/Ferry International | Volt Information Sciences, Inc. |
Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. | Navigant Consulting, Inc. |
Revenue | Market Capitalization | |||||||
25th Percentile | $ | 900,001 | $ | 520,833 | ||||
Median | $ | 1,418,353 | $ | 992,616 | ||||
75th Percentile | $ | 2,263,542 | $ | 2,391,524 | ||||
Kforce Inc. | $ | 1,418,353 | $ | 804,971 | ||||
Percentile Rank | 50 | 35 |
• | Implementing new and upgrading existing technologies that we believe will allow us to more effectively and efficiently serve our clients, consultants and candidates and improve the scalability of our organization. We completed the deployment of a new time and expense application for our consultants and clients as well as a new expense application for our associates. In addition, we continue to make enhancements to our business and data intelligence capabilities as well as our customer relationship management system. We expect these initiatives to benefit us in 2019 and beyond. |
• | Improving our alignment of revenue-generating talent to the markets, products, industries and clients that present the greatest opportunity for profitable revenue growth. |
• | Executing a Kforce brand refresh to reinforce our core values with a consistent message and identity. |
• | Performance-based annual incentive compensation is primarily measured on revenue and EPS growth targets, which we believe serve to drive shareholder returns and, to a lesser extent, on individual performance objectives. |
• | LTI compensation is 100% performance-based, and is measured on Kforce’s TSR performance over a three-year measurement period relative to the specified peer groups. |
2018 COMPENSATION AT TARGET |
• | The payment of above target annual incentive levels, driven by performance against our financial metrics and individual performance objectives for 2018. |
• | The payment of target LTI for the CEO and the President based on attaining median relative TSR performance versus the Separately Designated Peer Group for the 2016-2018 measurement period, and payment of above target LTI for the other NEOs due to attaining above median relative TSR performance versus the Industry Peer Group for the 2016-2018 measurement period. |
2018 ACTUAL COMPENSATION PAYOUTS |
Name | 2017 Salary | 2018 Salary | Percentage Increase | |||||
David L. Dunkel | $ | 800,000 | $ | 875,000 | 9 | % | ||
Joseph J. Liberatore | $ | 600,000 | $ | 660,000 | 10 | % | ||
David M. Kelly | $ | 480,000 | $ | 480,000 | — | % | ||
Kye L. Mitchell | $ | 480,000 | $ | 480,000 | — | % | ||
Andrew G. Thomas | $ | 350,000 | $ | 350,000 | — | % |
1. | A financial metric incentive (the Financial Performance Incentive). The 2018 Financial Performance Incentive represented 80% (50% for Mr. Thomas) of the total target incentive award and required attainment of annual year-over-year revenue growth and year-over-year diluted EPS growth performance goals. |
2. | An objectives-based incentive for individual accomplishments and management business objectives (the MBO Incentive). The MBO Incentive represented 20% (50% for Mr. Thomas) of the total target incentive award. |
2018 Target Annual Incentive | 2018 Target Annual Incentive Allocations | |||||||||||||||||||
Name | 2018 Salary | % | $ | Revenue (40%; 25% for Mr. Thomas) | EPS (40%; 25% for Mr. Thomas) | MBO (20%; 50% for Mr. Thomas) | ||||||||||||||
David L. Dunkel | $ | 875,000 | 100 | % | $ | 875,000 | $ | 350,000 | $ | 350,000 | $ | 175,000 | ||||||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | $ | 660,000 | 90 | % | $ | 594,000 | $ | 237,600 | $ | 237,600 | $ | 118,800 | ||||||||
David M. Kelly | $ | 480,000 | 90 | % | $ | 432,000 | $ | 172,800 | $ | 172,800 | $ | 86,400 | ||||||||
Kye L. Mitchell | $ | 480,000 | 90 | % | $ | 432,000 | $ | 172,800 | $ | 172,800 | $ | 86,400 | ||||||||
Andrew G. Thomas (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jan. to Aug. 2018 | $ | 233,450 | 50 | % | $ | 116,725 | $ | 29,181 | $ | 29,181 | $ | 58,362 | ||||||||
Sept. to Dec. 2018 | $ | 116,550 | 90 | % | $ | 104,895 | $ | 26,224 | $ | 26,224 | $ | 52,448 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 350,000 | $ | 221,620 | $ | 55,405 | $ | 55,405 | $ | 110,810 |
(1) | The Annual Incentive for Mr. Thomas was modified beginning in September 2018 due to his additional responsibilities of leading the human resources, compensation and benefits organizations. |
Revenue (in millions) | Year-over-Year Growth | Payout % of Target (1) | Diluted EPS | Year-over-Year Growth | Payout % of Target (1) | |||
Threshold | $1,378 | 1% | 25% | $1.91 | 22% | 25% | ||
Target | $1,419 | 4% | 100% | $2.11 | 35% | 100% | ||
Maximum | $1,487 | 9% | 200% | $2.48 | 58% | 200% |
(1) | The incentive payout ranges for Mr. Thomas were modified beginning in September 2018 due to his additional responsibilities of leading the human resources, compensation and benefits organizations. For the first eight months of 2018, the interpolated payout percentages between Threshold and Target varied slightly from the last four months of 2018. |
2018 Attainment as a % of Target | 2018 Incentive Payouts | ||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Target Annual Incentive | Revenue (40%; 25% for Mr. Thomas) | EPS (40%; 25% for Mr. Thomas) | MBO (20%; 50% for Mr. Thomas) | Revenue | EPS | MBO | Total | |||||||||||||
David L. Dunkel | $ | 875,000 | 81% | 150% | 200% | $ | 283,500 | $ | 525,000 | $ | 350,000 | $ | 1,158,500 | ||||||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | $ | 594,000 | 81% | 150% | 200% | $ | 192,456 | $ | 356,400 | $ | 237,600 | $ | 786,456 | ||||||||
David M. Kelly | $ | 432,000 | 81% | 150% | 160% | $ | 139,968 | $ | 259,200 | $ | 138,240 | $ | 537,408 | ||||||||
Kye L. Mitchell | $ | 432,000 | 81% | 150% | 160% | $ | 139,968 | $ | 259,200 | $ | 138,240 | $ | 537,408 | ||||||||
Andrew G. Thomas (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Jan. to Aug. 2018 | $ | 116,725 | 88% | 150% | 170% | $ | 25,680 | $ | 43,772 | $ | 99,216 | $ | 168,668 | ||||||||
Sept. to Dec. 2018 | $ | 104,895 | 81% | 150% | 160% | $ | 21,240 | $ | 39,336 | $ | 83,916 | $ | 144,492 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 221,620 | $ | 46,920 | $ | 83,108 | $ | 183,132 | $ | 313,160 |
(1) | For the first eight months of 2018, the interpolated payout percentages between Threshold and Target for Mr. Thomas varied slightly from the last four months of 2018; therefore, both attainment percentages are presented. |
1. | For all NEOs, LTI performance objectives are based on Kforce’s TSR performance over a three-year measurement period relative to the Industry Peer Group; |
2. | For only the CEO and the President, LTI performance objectives are also based on Kforce’s TSR performance over a three-year measurement period relative to the Separately Designated Peer Group. |
Industry Peer Group Relative TSR Rank: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6-7 | 8 |
Industry Peer Group Relative TSR Percentile Rank: | 100 | 85 | 71 | 57 | 42 | 28-14 | 0 |
Total Value of LTI Pool ($ in Millions): | $13 | $12 | $11 | $10 | $9 | $8 | None |
% of LTI Pool Based on TSR Rank/Percentile Ranking | |||||||
David L. Dunkel | 16.7% | 16.7% | 16.7% | 16.7% | 16.7% | 15.0% | —% |
Joseph J. Liberatore | 13.3% | 13.3% | 13.3% | 13.3% | 13.3% | 12.0% | —% |
David M. Kelly | 8.3% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 8.1% | 8.1% | 7.5% | —% |
Kye L. Mitchell | 8.1% | 7.9% | 7.7% | 7.5% | 7.2% | 6.6% | —% |
Andrew G. Thomas | 3.8% | 3.9% | 4.0% | 4.2% | 4.4% | 3.8% | —% |
Separately Designated Peer Group Relative TSR Percentile Ranking | Performance Multiplier | LTI Compensation Impact | ||
0-25 | 50% | Reduction in Restricted Stock Award | ||
26-50 | 75% | Reduction in Restricted Stock Award | ||
51-75 | 100% | Full Restricted Stock Award | ||
76-100 | 150% | Full Restricted Stock Award Plus Cash LTI Payout |
Measurement Period | TSR Performance | Industry Peer Group Relative TSR Rank | Separately Designated Peer Group Relative TSR Percentile Ranking | Resulting LTI Pool | Grant Date of Restricted Stock Award | Grant Date Closing Stock Price |
2016-2018 | 31% | 2nd | 50th | $12 million | December 31, 2018 | $30.92 |
Name | # of Shares | Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
David L. Dunkel | 48,512 | $ | 1,499,991 | ||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | 38,810 | $ | 1,200,005 | ||||
David M. Kelly | 31,937 | $ | 987,492 | ||||
Kye L. Mitchell | 30,724 | $ | 949,986 | ||||
Andrew G. Thomas | 15,201 | $ | 470,015 |
• | The values from pension and other compensation columns of the SCT are not performance-based and change based on factors unrelated to performance such as changes in long-term interest rates (a key factor in calculating pension values). |
• | For 2016, the LTI restricted stock grants historically occurred on the first business day of each fiscal year and were based on our relative TSR performance for a measurement period ending in the prior year. As a result, the value of the awards were reflected as compensation in the SCT in the year of grant rather than in the performance year the award was earned. In order to rectify the misalignment created by our historical grant date practices and to create a more clear and transparent picture of our NEO compensation, the Committee approved a change in the timing of the grant date for the LTI restricted stock awards during 2016, which resulted in two LTI award grants in 2016, one on the first business day of the year (old method) and one on the last business day of the year (new method designed to match the performance year with the grant year). 2016 is the only year for such an occurrence and this misalignment no longer exists in 2017 and 2018. |
Earned Compensation for Corresponding Year of Performance | Financial and Shareholder Performance | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Annual Incentive | Long-term Incentive (1) | Total Direct Compensation (2) | Adjusted Revenue (3) | Adjusted EPS (3) | 3 Year TSR Performance | TSR Rank in Industry Peer Group | |||||||||||||||
David L. Dunkel, | 2018 | $ | 875,000 | $ | 1,158,500 | $ | 1,499,991 | $ | 3,533,491 | $ | 1,418,353 | $ | 2.30 | 31 | % | 2nd | ||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2017 | $ | 800,000 | $ | 435,200 | $ | 750,001 | $ | 1,985,201 | $ | 1,358,940 | $ | 1.57 | 12 | % | 5th | ||||||||
2016 | $ | 800,000 | $ | — | $ | 1,669,991 | $ | 2,469,991 | $ | 1,319,706 | $ | 1.45 | 20 | % | 4th | |||||||||
Joseph J. Liberatore, | 2018 | $ | 660,000 | $ | 786,456 | $ | 1,200,005 | $ | 2,646,461 | $ | 1,418,353 | $ | 2.30 | 31 | % | 2nd | ||||||||
President | 2017 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 293,760 | $ | 900,011 | $ | 1,793,771 | $ | 1,358,940 | $ | 1.57 | 12 | % | 5th | ||||||||
2016 | $ | 600,000 | $ | — | $ | 1,334,995 | $ | 1,934,995 | $ | 1,319,706 | $ | 1.45 | 20 | % | 4th | |||||||||
David M. Kelly, | 2018 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 537,408 | $ | 987,492 | $ | 2,004,900 | $ | 1,418,353 | $ | 2.30 | 31 | % | 2nd | ||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2017 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 235,008 | $ | 725,003 | $ | 1,440,011 | $ | 1,358,940 | $ | 1.57 | 12 | % | 5th | ||||||||
2016 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 172,800 | $ | 812,496 | $ | 1,465,296 | $ | 1,319,706 | $ | 1.45 | 20 | % | 4th | |||||||||
Kye L. Mitchell, | 2018 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 537,408 | $ | 949,986 | $ | 1,967,394 | $ | 1,418,353 | $ | 2.30 | 31 | % | 2nd | ||||||||
Chief Operations Officer | 2017 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 235,008 | $ | 650,011 | $ | 1,365,019 | $ | 1,358,940 | $ | 1.57 | 12 | % | 5th | ||||||||
2016 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 172,800 | $ | 750,011 | $ | 1,402,811 | $ | 1,319,706 | $ | 1.45 | 20 | % | 4th | |||||||||
Andrew G. Thomas, | 2018 | $ | 350,000 | $ | 313,160 | $ | 470,015 | $ | 1,133,175 | $ | 1,418,353 | $ | 2.30 | 31 | % | 2nd | ||||||||
Chief Marketing Officer |
(1) | Reflects the realignment of equity LTI awards to the corresponding year of performance for 2016. The equity LTI awards made on the first business day of 2016 related to 2015, which corresponds to the performance period for those awards. No adjustment was made to the 2017 and 2018 amounts; thus, these amounts are consistent with the SCT. |
(2) | Total direct compensation is the sum of salary, annual incentive and LTI earned for the corresponding year of performance. |
(3) | Represents non-GAAP Adjusted Revenue for 2017 and Diluted EPS for 2017 and 2016. The calculation of Adjusted Revenue and Adjusted Diluted EPS, and the reconciliation to the applicable GAAP figures, for 2017 and 2016 are set forth in the Appendix B within this Proxy Statement. For 2018, there were no adjustments and balances noted above are reported in accordance with GAAP. |
Kforce Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan | Kforce maintains a nonqualified deferred compensation plan in which eligible management and highly compensated key employees, as defined by IRS regulations, may elect to defer all or part of their compensation to later years. Amounts deferred are indexed to investment options selected by the eligible employees and the increase or decrease in value is based upon the performance of the selected investments. Eligible employees are permitted to change investment options and scheduled distributions annually. Kforce has insured the lives of certain participants in the deferred compensation plan to assist in the funding of the deferred compensation liability. Employer matching contributions to the nonqualified deferred compensation plan are discretionary and are funded annually as approved by the Board. |
Kforce Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | During 2006, Kforce adopted a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) for all NEOs. Of the NEOs, only Messrs. Dunkel and Liberatore participate in the SERP. The Committee previously decided to not allow any additional participants into the SERP. The primary goals of the SERP are to create an additional wealth accumulation opportunity, restore lost qualified pension benefits due to government limitations and retain our covered executive officers. The SERP will be funded entirely by Kforce, and benefits are taxable to the executive officer upon receipt and deductible by Kforce when paid. Benefits payable under the SERP upon the occurrence of a qualifying distribution event, as defined, are targeted at 45% of the covered executive officers’ average salary and annual incentive, as defined, from the three years in which the covered executive officer earned the highest salary and annual incentive during the last 10 years of employment, which is subject to adjustment for retirement prior to the normal retirement age and the participant’s vesting percentage. Benefits under the SERP are based on the lump sum present value but may be paid over the life of the covered executive officer or 10-year annuity, as elected by the covered executive officer upon commencement of participation in the SERP. Normal retirement age under the SERP is defined as age 65. Vesting under the plan is defined as 100% upon a participant’s attainment of age 55 and 10 years of service and 0% prior to a participant’s attainment of age 55 and 10 years of service. Full vesting also occurs if a participant with five years or more of service is involuntarily terminated by Kforce without cause or upon death, disability or a change in control. Certain conditions allow for early retirement as early as age 55. The benefits under the SERP are reduced for a participant who has not either reached age 62 and 10 years of service or age 55 and 25 years of service with a percentage reduction up to the normal retirement age. On each anniversary of the effective date, each NEO is credited with a year of service. The NEOs were not credited with any years of service prior to December 31, 2006, the effective date of the plan. The Committee believes the SERP provides significant retention benefits for the participants. |
Employment, Severance and Change in Control Agreements | Kforce has employment agreements with each of its NEOs, which provide for severance payments under certain termination circumstances, including termination following a change in control, as defined in the employment agreements. The Committee has determined it is in Kforce’s and its shareholders’ best interests to recognize the contributions of the NEOs to Kforce’s business and to retain the NEOs’ services. The specific amounts the NEOs would receive under the employment agreements are described in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section below. The Committee believes the employment agreements are an essential component of the executive compensation program and are helpful in attracting and retaining executive talent in a competitive market. The Committee periodically reviews the benefits provided under the employment agreements to determine that they continue to serve Kforce’s interests in providing significant retention benefits to these key executives, are consistent with market practice and are reasonable. In 2009, the Committee resolved to not enter into any new employment agreements or materially amend any existing employment agreements with its executives that contain excise tax gross-up provisions going forward. At this time, only Messrs. Dunkel and Liberatore have excise tax gross-up provisions in their existing employment agreements. In 2017, the Committee resolved to not enter into any new employment agreements or materially amend any existing employment agreements with its executives that contain provisions for severance payments that exceed 1x cash compensation or change in control severance payments that exceed 2x cash compensation. The amended and restated employment agreement for Mr. Thomas was effective January 1, 2013, but was publicly filed as a result of his NEO designation in 2018. Refer to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's report on Form 10-K filed on February 22, 2019. There have been no amendments or modifications to his employment agreement since January 1, 2013 and he did not become party to any pre-existing arrangement as a result of becoming an NEO. |
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits | Kforce does not generally provide any perquisites or other personal benefits to its NEOs. During 2017, Kforce provided for Ms. Mitchell’s relocation to our corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida from the Washington D.C. area; the value of this relocation is included within the “All Other Compensation” column of the SCT. |
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. | Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. | Resources Connection, Inc. |
ASGN Incorporated | Huron Consulting Group Inc. | Robert Half International Inc. |
Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. | Kelly Services, Inc. | TrueBlue, Inc. |
Computer Task Group, Incorporated | Korn/Ferry International | Volt Information Sciences, Inc. |
The Hackett Group, Inc. | Manpower Group Inc. |
• | All seven companies from the prior Industry Peer Group, which reflect prominence in the staffing industry; |
• | Four companies from the prior Separately Designated Peer Group, which are all of comparable size to Kforce and with similar business models to Kforce, including Korn/Ferry International, Volt Information Sciences, Inc., Huron Consulting Group Inc., and Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.; and |
• | Three new companies, which are also of comparable size and business model, including AMN Healthcare Services, Inc., Cross Country Healthcare, Inc., and The Hackett Group, Inc. |
Revenue | Market Capitalization | |||||||
25th Percentile | $ | 776,070 | $ | 474,930 | ||||
Median | $ | 1,418,353 | $ | 821,248 | ||||
75th Percentile | $ | 2,949,494 | $ | 2,441,862 | ||||
Kforce Inc. | $ | 1,418,353 | $ | 804,971 | ||||
Percentile Rank | 50 | 42 |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Stock Awards (1) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (2) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (3) | All Other Compensation (4) | Total | ||||||||||||
David L. Dunkel | 2018 | $ | 875,000 | $ | 1,499,991 | $ | 1,158,500 | $ | 653,336 | $ | 102,435 | $ | 4,289,262 | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2017 | $ | 800,000 | $ | 750,001 | $ | 435,200 | $ | 1,005,233 | $ | 88,518 | $ | 3,078,952 | ||||||
2016 | $ | 800,000 | $ | 3,504,988 | $ | — | $ | 1,450,087 | $ | 67,289 | $ | 5,822,364 | |||||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | 2018 | $ | 660,000 | $ | 1,200,005 | $ | 786,456 | $ | 37,547 | $ | 98,012 | $ | 2,782,020 | ||||||
President | 2017 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 900,011 | $ | 293,760 | $ | 656,799 | $ | 92,056 | $ | 2,542,626 | ||||||
2016 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 2,798,335 | $ | — | $ | 197,109 | $ | 88,151 | $ | 3,683,595 | |||||||
David M. Kelly | 2018 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 987,492 | $ | 537,408 | $ | — | $ | 65,239 | $ | 2,070,139 | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2017 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 725,003 | $ | 235,008 | $ | — | $ | 54,998 | $ | 1,495,009 | ||||||
2016 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 1,580,007 | $ | 172,800 | $ | — | $ | 50,220 | $ | 2,283,027 | |||||||
Kye L. Mitchell | 2018 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 949,986 | $ | 537,408 | $ | — | $ | 61,482 | $ | 2,028,876 | ||||||
Chief Operations Officer | 2017 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 650,011 | $ | 235,008 | $ | — | $ | 231,677 | $ | 1,596,696 | ||||||
2016 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 1,517,522 | $ | 172,800 | $ | — | $ | 50,220 | $ | 2,220,542 | |||||||
Andrew G. Thomas | 2018 | $ | 350,000 | $ | 470,015 | $ | 313,160 | $ | — | $ | 31,459 | $ | 1,164,634 | ||||||
Chief Marketing Officer |
(1) | As discussed in the CD&A above, the amounts reported for 2016 include two years’ worth of LTI restricted stock awards due to an administrative change in the timing of the annual grant date. |
(2) | Represents annual incentive compensation earned by the NEOs. |
(3) | For Messrs. Dunkel and Liberatore, the amounts in this column represent the aggregate change in the accumulated benefit obligation for the SERP using the same measurement dates used for reporting Kforce’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016. There were no changes made to the plan during the year and no increases to the benefits provided to the NEOs. |
(4) | The “All Other Compensation” column includes: |
Name | Year | Dividends (a) | Defined Contribution Plans (b) | One-Time Payments (c) | Total | |||||||||||||
David L. Dunkel | 2018 | $ | 102,435 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 102,435 | |||||||||
2017 | $ | 88,518 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 88,518 | ||||||||||
2016 | $ | 67,289 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 67,289 | ||||||||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | 2018 | $ | 98,012 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 98,012 | |||||||||
2017 | $ | 92,056 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 92,056 | ||||||||||
2016 | $ | 88,151 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 88,151 | ||||||||||
David M. Kelly | 2018 | $ | 63,389 | $ | 1,850 | $ | — | $ | 65,239 | |||||||||
2017 | $ | 53,198 | $ | 1,800 | $ | — | $ | 54,998 | ||||||||||
2016 | $ | 48,420 | $ | 1,800 | $ | — | $ | 50,220 | ||||||||||
Kye L. Mitchell | 2018 | $ | 60,257 | $ | 1,225 | $ | — | $ | 61,482 | |||||||||
2017 | $ | 51,885 | $ | 1,800 | $ | 177,992 | $ | 231,677 | ||||||||||
2016 | $ | 48,420 | $ | 1,800 | $ | — | $ | 50,220 | ||||||||||
Andrew G. Thomas | 2018 | $ | 31,459 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 31,459 |
(a) | This column reflects the value of dividend equivalents issued on unvested restricted stock in the form of additional shares of restricted stock. |
(b) | This column reflects the value of employer matching contributions attributable to our defined contribution 401(k) plan. |
(c) | The amount included for Ms. Mitchell for 2017 represents reimbursements and payments in connection with her relocation to the Firm’s corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida, including: $80,105 for real estate transaction costs and house-hunting, $59,156 for moving costs and $38,731 for a tax gross-up related to taxable relocation amounts. |
Restricted Stock Awards | |||||||
Name | Unvested Shares | Market Value of Unvested Shares ($)(1) | |||||
David L. Dunkel | 48,512 | (2) | $ | 1,499,991 | |||
20,161 | (3) | $ | 623,378 | ||||
45,175 | (4) | $ | 1,396,811 | ||||
32,767 | (5) | $ | 1,013,156 | ||||
16,554 | (6) | $ | 511,850 | ||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | 38,810 | (2) | $ | 1,200,005 | |||
29,032 | (3) | $ | 897,669 | ||||
36,116 | (4) | $ | 1,116,707 | ||||
26,129 | (5) | $ | 807,909 | ||||
13,260 | (6) | $ | 409,999 | ||||
6,881 | (7) | $ | 212,761 | ||||
David M. Kelly | 31,937 | (2) | $ | 987,492 | |||
23,387 | (3) | $ | 723,126 | ||||
21,981 | (4) | $ | 679,653 | ||||
13,706 | (5) | $ | 423,790 | ||||
6,926 | (6) | $ | 214,152 | ||||
7,714 | (7) | $ | 238,517 | ||||
Kye L. Mitchell | 30,724 | (2) | $ | 949,986 | |||
20,968 | (3) | $ | 648,331 | ||||
20,288 | (4) | $ | 627,305 | ||||
13,706 | (5) | $ | 423,790 | ||||
6,926 | (6) | $ | 214,152 | ||||
7,714 | (7) | $ | 238,517 | ||||
Andrew G. Thomas | 15,201 | (2) | $ | 470,015 | |||
12,904 | (3) | $ | 398,992 | ||||
11,225 | (4) | $ | 347,077 | ||||
6,548 | (5) | $ | 202,464 | ||||
3,311 | (6) | $ | 102,376 | ||||
3,104 | (8) | $ | 95,976 |
(1) | This column represents a market value of $30.92 per share, which is the closing stock price on December 31, 2018. |
(2) | With respect to the restricted stock granted to Mr. Dunkel on December 31, 2018, 33% of the total shares granted vest on: December 27, 2019, 2020 and 2021. With respect to the restricted stock granted to Messrs. Liberatore, Kelly and Thomas and Ms. Mitchell on December 31, 2018, 25% of the total shares granted vest on: December 27, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022. |
(3) | With respect to the restricted stock granted to Mr. Dunkel on December 31, 2017, and the additional shares granted due to Kforce’s quarterly dividends, 33% of the total shares granted vest(ed) on: December 27, 2018, 2019 and 2020. With respect to the restricted stock granted to Messrs. Liberatore, Kelly and Thomas and Ms. Mitchell on December 31, 2017, and the additional shares granted due to Kforce’s quarterly dividends, 20% of the total shares granted vest(ed) on: December 27, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022. |
(4) | With respect to the restricted stock granted to Messrs. Dunkel, Liberatore, Kelly and Thomas and Ms. Mitchell on December 31, 2016, and the additional shares granted due to Kforce’s quarterly dividends, 20% of the total shares granted vest(ed) on: December 31, 2017 and December 27, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021. |
(5) | With respect to the restricted stock granted to Messrs. Dunkel, Liberatore, Kelly and Thomas and Ms. Mitchell on January 4, 2016, and the additional shares granted due to Kforce’s quarterly dividends, 20% of the total shares granted vest(ed) on: January 4, 2017, December 31, 2017 and December 27, 2018, 2019 and 2020. |
(6) | With respect to the restricted stock granted to Messrs. Dunkel, Liberatore, Kelly and Thomas and Ms. Mitchell on January 2, 2015, and the additional shares granted due to Kforce’s quarterly dividends, 20% of the total shares granted vest(ed) on: January 2, 2016 and 2017, December 31, 2017 and December 27, 2018 and 2019. |
(7) | With respect to the restricted stock granted to Messrs. Liberatore and Kelly and Ms. Mitchell on August 25, 2014, and the additional shares granted due to Kforce’s quarterly dividends, 20% of the total shares granted vest(ed) on: August 25, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. |
(8) | With respect to the restricted stock granted to Mr. Thomas on October 14, 2013, and the additional shares granted due to Kforce’s quarterly dividends, 20% of the total shares granted vest on: October 14, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023. |
Name | Type of Award | Approval Date | Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other Stock Awards No. of Shares of Stock | Grant Date Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | |||||||||||||||||
David L. Dunkel | Annual Incentive (1) | 2/2/2018 | 12/31/2018 | $ | 218,750 | $ | 875,000 | $ | 1,750,000 | — | $ | — | |||||||
Equity LTI (2)(3) | — | 12/31/2018 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | 48,512 | $ | 1,499,991 | ||||||||
Cash LTI (3) | 2/2/2018 | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,255,000 | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | Annual Incentive (1) | 2/2/2018 | 12/31/2018 | $ | 148,500 | $ | 594,000 | $ | 1,188,000 | — | $ | — | |||||||
Equity LTI (2)(3) | — | 12/31/2018 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | 38,810 | $ | 1,200,005 | ||||||||
Cash LTI (3) | 2/2/2018 | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,610,000 | — | $ | — | ||||||||
David M. Kelly | Annual Incentive (1) | 2/2/2018 | 12/31/2018 | $ | 108,000 | $ | 432,000 | $ | 864,000 | — | $ | — | |||||||
Equity LTI (2) | — | 12/31/2018 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | 31,937 | $ | 987,492 | ||||||||
Kye L. Mitchell | Annual Incentive (1) | 2/2/2018 | 12/31/2018 | $ | 108,000 | $ | 432,000 | $ | 864,000 | — | $ | — | |||||||
Equity LTI (2) | — | 12/31/2018 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | 30,724 | $ | 949,986 | ||||||||
Andrew G. Thomas | Annual Incentive (1) | 2/2/2018 | 12/31/2018 | $ | 84,586 | $ | 221,620 | $ | 443,240 | — | $ | — | |||||||
Equity LTI (2) | — | 12/31/2018 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | 15,201 | $ | 470,015 |
(1) | These amounts represent the estimated payouts under the 2018 annual incentive compensation plan. The threshold, as defined in Item 402(d) of Regulation S-K, represents the minimum amount payable upon attaining minimum performance thresholds established by the Committee each year. If the minimum performance thresholds are not attained, there would be no payout. The maximum payout is 200% of the target multiplier for all components of the 2018 annual incentive compensation plan. Actual payments for annual incentive compensation earned during 2018 are listed in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the SCT. |
(2) | The equity LTI awards granted in the form of restricted stock under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan on December 31, 2018 have a four-year vesting period with 25% of the award vesting annually, except for Mr. Dunkel’s award which has a three-year vesting period with 33% of the award vesting annually. Restricted stock awards contain the right to forfeitable dividends in the form of additional shares of restricted stock at the same rate as the cash dividend on common stock and containing the same vesting provisions as the underlying award. The fair market value of restricted stock is determined based on the closing stock price of Kforce’s common stock at the date of grant. The stock price and grant date fair value for the December 31, 2018 awards was $30.92. The grant date fair value of the awards is included within the amounts presented in the “Stock Awards” column of the SCT. |
(3) | As a result of attaining the 50th percentile ranking for the relative TSR performance versus the 2018 Separately Designated Peer Group, Messrs. Dunkel and Liberatore did not receive LTI cash bonuses and had their equity LTI grant amounts reduced by 25%. |
Stock Awards | |||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting | Value Realized on Vesting (1) | |||||
David L. Dunkel | 58,067 | $ | 1,730,977 | ||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | 57,719 | $ | 1,805,585 | ||||
David M. Kelly | 37,664 | $ | 1,218,038 | ||||
Kye L. Mitchell | 36,498 | $ | 1,183,279 | ||||
Andrew G. Thomas | 15,941 | $ | 476,372 |
(1) | Value realized represents the market value of our common stock at the time of vesting multiplied by the number of shares vested. |
Name | Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#)(1) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(2) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | |||||||||
David L. Dunkel | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 12 | $ | 12,027,329 | $ | — | |||||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 12 | $ | 2,999,430 | $ | — |
(1) | On each anniversary of the effective date, each NEO is credited with a year of service. The NEOs were not credited with any years of service prior to December 31, 2006, which is the effective date of the plan. |
(2) | Represents the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit obligation computed as of the same pension plan measurement date used for financial reporting purposes with respect to Kforce’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2018. For a discussion of the assumptions used, refer to Note 9, Employee Benefit Plans, to Kforce’s Consolidated Financial Statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2018. |
Name | Executive Contributions in Last FY ($) | Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($) | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)(1) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)(2) | |||||||||||||||
David L. Dunkel | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (10,779 | ) | $ | — | $ | 197,192 | |||||||||
Joseph J. Liberatore (3) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
David M. Kelly (3) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Kye L. Mitchell (3) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Andrew G. Thomas (3) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (18,089 | ) | $ | — | $ | 399,692 |
(1) | The aggregate earnings for 2018 represents appreciation or depreciation in the market value of the respective accounts’ holdings and interest and dividends generated thereon. These amounts were not reported in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the SCT for 2018 as there were no above-market or preferential earnings generated. |
(2) | The aggregate balance include amounts related to employer contributions made by Kforce that were previously reported in the SCTs for prior years. |
(3) | Messrs. Liberatore, Kelly and Thomas and Ms. Mitchell have not or no longer participate in Kforce’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan. |
Name | Termination By Employer Without Cause or By Employee For Good Reason ($) | Following CIC - Termination By Employer Without Cause or By Employee For Good Reason ($) | CIC - No Termination ($) | Death ($) | Disability ($) | ||||||||||||||
David L. Dunkel | |||||||||||||||||||
Severance payment (1) | $ | 4,204,638 | $ | 8,111,554 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Equity-based compensation (2) | — | 5,045,186 | 5,045,186 | 5,045,186 | 5,045,186 | ||||||||||||||
Continuation of base salary (3) | — | — | — | 2,476,293 | — | ||||||||||||||
Continuation of health benefits (4) | — | 2,946 | — | 2,946 | — | ||||||||||||||
SERP (5) | — | 12,037,004 | — | 12,408,516 | 12,408,516 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 4,204,638 | $ | 25,196,690 | $ | 5,045,186 | $ | 19,932,941 | $ | 17,453,702 | |||||||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | |||||||||||||||||||
Severance payment (1) | $ | 2,400,216 | $ | 6,473,577 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Equity-based compensation (2) | — | 4,645,050 | 4,645,050 | 4,645,050 | 4,645,050 | ||||||||||||||
Continuation of base salary (3) | — | — | — | 1,867,832 | 1,867,832 | ||||||||||||||
Continuation of health benefits (4) | — | 8,094 | — | 8,094 | 15,870 | ||||||||||||||
SERP (5) | — | 4,315,296 | — | 2,515,717 | 2,515,717 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,400,216 | $ | 15,442,017 | $ | 4,645,050 | $ | 9,036,693 | $ | 9,044,469 | |||||||||
David M. Kelly | |||||||||||||||||||
Severance payment (1) | $ | 1,066,208 | $ | 3,444,911 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Equity-based compensation (2) | — | 3,266,730 | 3,266,730 | 3,266,730 | 3,266,730 | ||||||||||||||
Continuation of base salary (3) | — | — | — | 469,130 | 918,774 | ||||||||||||||
Continuation of health benefits (4) | — | 5,994 | — | 5,994 | 11,754 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,066,208 | $ | 6,717,635 | $ | 3,266,730 | $ | 3,741,854 | $ | 4,197,258 | |||||||||
Kye L. Mitchell | |||||||||||||||||||
Severance payment (1) | $ | 1,066,208 | $ | 3,332,413 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Equity-based compensation (2) | — | 3,102,081 | 3,102,081 | 3,102,081 | 3,102,081 | ||||||||||||||
Continuation of base salary (3) | — | — | — | 469,130 | 918,774 | ||||||||||||||
Continuation of health benefits (4) | — | 9,144 | — | 9,144 | 17,929 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,066,208 | $ | 6,443,638 | $ | 3,102,081 | $ | 3,580,355 | $ | 4,038,784 | |||||||||
Andrew G. Thomas | |||||||||||||||||||
Severance payment (1) | $ | 795,393 | $ | 2,060,810 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Equity-based compensation (2) | — | 1,616,900 | 1,616,900 | 1,616,900 | 1,616,900 | ||||||||||||||
Continuation of base salary (3) | — | — | — | 371,395 | 727,363 | ||||||||||||||
Continuation of health benefits (4) | — | 2,946 | — | 2,946 | 5,776 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 795,393 | $ | 3,680,656 | $ | 1,616,900 | $ | 1,991,241 | $ | 2,350,039 |
(1) | If any payment or distribution by Kforce to Messrs. Dunkel or Liberatore is determined to be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, Messrs. Dunkel or Liberatore would be entitled to receive from Kforce a payment in an amount sufficient to place them in the same after-tax financial position that they would have been if they had not incurred any excise tax. The severance amounts do not include any excise tax gross up for Messrs. Dunkel or Liberatore as each of the respective calculations resulted in no excise tax amount. Employment agreements with Messrs. Kelly and Thomas and Ms. Mitchell do not contain excise tax gross-up provisions and, thus, no amounts were included in the tables above. |
(2) | The amounts represent the number of applicable unvested restricted stock shares on December 31, 2018, multiplied by $30.92, which was Kforce’s closing stock price on that date. |
(3) | For purposes of the Disability scenario, we have used 2.99 years for Mr. Liberatore and 2.00 years for Messrs. Kelly and Thomas and Ms. Mitchell as these are deemed to be the most probable outcomes if a disability occurred on December 31, 2018, given their current ages. Mr. Dunkel’s amount is considered de minimus due to his current age. The annual payment amounts have been discounted at a rate of 4.25%, which is the lump sum conversion rate that was utilized for the SERP benefit at December 31, 2018. |
(4) | These amounts represent the value of Kforce’s portion of the health care benefits provided to each respective NEO consistent with those benefits received as of December 31, 2018. For purposes of the Disability scenario, Mr. Dunkel’s portion is considered de minimus due to his current age. The annual benefit amounts have been discounted at a rate of 4.00%, which is the discount rate that was utilized for the SERP benefit at December 31, 2018. |
(5) | These amounts represent the lump sum present value of the future monthly vested benefit as determined pursuant to the SERP, using a lump sum conversion rate of 4.25%. Upon death or disability, Messrs. Dunkel and Liberatore are entitled to continuation of base salary pursuant to their employment agreements. If this benefit is less than the benefit otherwise payable under the SERP, the SERP benefit disclosed is net of the related benefit under their employment agreements. |
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS AN ADVISORY VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 3. |
Award Type | Shares Outstanding | ||
Restricted stock outstanding (unvested) | 1,317 | ||
Stock options outstanding | None | ||
Shares remaining for grant under the 2017 SIP (1) | 1,609 |
(1) | Under the 2017 SIP, each option or stock appreciation right granted reduced the share reserve by one share; each full value share reduced the share reserve by 2.43 shares. |
What We Do | What We Don’t Do | |||
l | Require Board Approval for Accelerated Vesting Upon a Change in Control | l | Pay Out Dividends or Dividend Equivalents on Unvested Awards | |
l | Require Minimum Share Holding | l | Allow Repricing or Cash Buyouts of Previous Equity-Based LTI Grants | |
l | Maintain a Significant Clawback Policy | l | Allow Hedging or Pledging or Other Related Activities | |
l | Minimum Vesting Period of One Year for All Award Types | l | Allow Liberal Share Recycling | |
l | Minimum Holding Period of One Year After Exercise for Options and SARs |
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 4. |
Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (a) | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (b) | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) (c) | ||||
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders (1) | N/A | N/A | 1,622,023 | ||||
Employee stock purchase plans approved by shareholders (2) | N/A | N/A | 2,711,643 |
(1) | On April 18, 2017, the Kforce shareholders approved the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2017 Stock Incentive Plan allows for the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards (including restricted stock and restricted stock units) and other stock-based awards. Each grant of options or stock appreciation rights reduces the available shares under the Kforce Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan by an equal amount while each grant of stock awards reduces the available shares by 2.43 shares for each share awarded. As of the effective date of the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan, no additional awards may be granted pursuant to the previously approved 2016 Stock Incentive Plan; however, awards outstanding as of the effective date continue to vest in accordance with the terms of the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan and 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, the number of outstanding issued and unvested shares under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan, 2016 Stock Incentive Plan and 2013 Stock Incentive Plan were 660,713 shares, 240,214 shares and 419,207 shares, respectively. The weighted-average exercise price excludes these unvested shares because there is no exercise price for these awards. |
(2) | Includes the Kforce Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. As of December 31, 2018, there were options outstanding under the Kforce Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to purchase 4,765 shares of common stock at a discounted purchase price of $29.37. |
• | Robert W. Edmund, the Firm’s former General Counsel and Chief Talent Officer who resigned effective September 30, 2018, inadvertently filed one day late a Form 4 with respect to a transaction on September 30, 2018. This transaction resulted from Mr. Edmund’s forfeiture of 62,773 shares of restricted stock commensurate with Mr. Edmund’s last day of employment with the Firm. Mr. Edmund filed a Form 4 on October 3, 2018. |
• | David L. Dunkel inadvertently filed late a Form 4 with respect to a transaction on January 8, 2018. This transaction resulted from a brokerage account administrative error and was inadvertent. Upon becoming aware of such transaction, Mr. Dunkel filed a Form 4 on February 1, 2018 with respect to this transaction. |
Name of Individual or Identity of Group | Beneficially Owned Shares of Common Stock | Percent of Class | ||||
BlackRock, Inc. (1) 55 East 52nd Street; New York, New York 10055 | 2,529,737 | 9.8 | % | |||
The Vanguard Group (2) 100 Vanguard Blvd.; Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355 | 2,460,211 | 9.5 | % | |||
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (3) Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road; Austin, Texas, 78746 | 1,443,105 | 5.6 | % |
(1) | Based on Amendment No. 11 to Schedule 13G filed February 6, 2019 in which BlackRock, Inc. reported that, as of December 31, 2018, it had sole voting power over 2,336,757 of the shares and sole dispositive power over all 2,529,737 shares. |
(2) | Based on Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13G filed February 11, 2019 in which The Vanguard Group reported that, as of December 31, 2018, it had sole voting power over 48,328 of the shares and sole dispositive power over 2,412,723 shares. |
(3) | Based on Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed February 8, 2019 in which Dimensional Fund Advisors LP reported that, as of December 31, 2018, it had sole voting power over 1,357,028 of the shares and sole dispositive power over all 1,443,105 shares. |
Name of Individual or Identity of Group | Beneficially Owned Shares of Common Stock (1) (2) | Restricted Stock Units (2) | Percent of Class | ||||||
David L. Dunkel | 1,089,607 | — | 4.2 | % | |||||
Joseph J. Liberatore | 192,840 | — | * | ||||||
David M. Kelly | 142,725 | — | * | ||||||
Kye L. Mitchell | 117,848 | — | * | ||||||
Andrew G. Thomas | 81,451 | — | * | ||||||
John N. Allred | 10,964 | — | * | ||||||
Richard M. Cocchiaro | 708,255 | 8,335 | 2.7 | % | |||||
Ann E. Dunwoody | 5,415 | 8,335 | * | ||||||
Mark F. Furlong | 66,041 | — | * | ||||||
Randall A. Mehl | 4,504 | 3,769 | * | ||||||
Elaine D. Rosen | 18,886 | 13,913 | * | ||||||
N. John Simmons | 15,938 | — | * | ||||||
Ralph E. Struzziero | 29,058 | 13,913 | * | ||||||
Howard W. Sutter | 481,523 | — | 1.9 | % | |||||
A. Gordon Tunstall | 4,255 | — | * | ||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (3) | 3,062,665 | 48,265 | 11.8 | % |
* | Less than 1% of the outstanding common shares |
(1) | Includes 823,685 shares as to which voting and/or investment power is shared or controlled by another person, as follows: Mr. Dunkel, 40,849 (shares held by the David L. Dunkel 2011 Irrevocable Trust over which Mr. Dunkel has shared dispositive power); Mr. Sutter, 5,000 (shares held by spouse), 370,069 (shares held by Sutter Investments Ltd. of which H.S. Investments, Inc. is the sole general partner) and 89,693 (shares held by the Dunkel Family Receptacle Trust of which Mr. Sutter is the sole trustee); Mr. Struzziero, 1,987 (shares held by spouse); and Mr. Cocchiaro, 109,439 (shares held by the David Dunkel Jr Family Trust of which Mr. Cocchiaro is the sole trustee), 109,439 (shared held by the Matthew R. Dunkel Family Trust of which Mr. Cocchiaro is the sole trustee), and 97,209 (shares held by the Kristen A. Conner Family Trust of which Mr. Cocchiaro is the sole trustee). |
(2) | Amounts in the Beneficially Owned Shares of Common Stock column do not include shares to be received upon settlement of deferred restricted stock units more than 60 days after the Record Date; these shares are reflected in this Restricted Stock Units column of this table. The deferred restricted stock units have no voting rights and are not included in the Percent of Class column calculation. |
(3) | Balance includes all current NEOs, all current executive officers who are not NEOs (i.e., Messrs. Blackman and Hackman), and all current directors (i.e., those listed above). |
• | The election of three Class I directors to the Board for a three-year term expiring in 2022 (Proposal 1); |
• | Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Firm’s independent registered public accountants for 2019 (Proposal 2); |
• | An advisory resolution on executive compensation (Proposal 3); and |
• | Approval of the Kforce Inc. 2019 Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal 4). |
• | FOR election of the director nominees named in this Proxy Statement (Proposal 1); |
• | FOR ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Firm’s independent registered public accountant for 2019 (Proposal 2); |
• | FOR the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3); and |
• | FOR approval of the Kforce Inc. 2019 Stock Incentive Plan (Proposal 4); |
• | Via the Internet. You may vote on the Internet at http://www.investorvote.com/KFRC. Please see your proxy card for more information and voting deadlines. |
• | By Phone. You may call (toll free) 1-800- 652-VOTE (8683) and follow the recorded instructions. Please see your proxy card for voting deadlines. |
• | By Mail. Complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed postage paid envelope. Your proxy must be received by the Firm before commencement of the Annual Meeting. |
• | In person. You may vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting upon presentation of valid photo identification and proof of stock ownership as of the Record Date. |
(i) | the Grantee is convicted by a court of competent jurisdiction or enter a guilty plea or a plea of nolo contendere for any felony; or |
(ii) | the Grantee breaches any provisions of this Plan or his/her employment agreement and the breach results in material injury to the Firm or its acquiring or surviving entity; or |
(iii) | the Grantee engages in misconduct, a policy violation, dishonesty or fraud concerning the Firm or its acquiring or surviving entity’s business or affairs and this misconduct, policy violation, dishonesty or fraud results in material injury to the Firm or its acquiring or surviving entity. |
(i) | the acquisition by any person or entity, including a “group” as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act (a “Person”) of beneficial ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities of the Firm that may be cast for the election of directors; provided, however, that for purposes of this clause (i), the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in Control: (A) any acquisition directly from the Firm or one of its affiliates, (B) any acquisition by the Firm or one of its affiliates, (C) any acquisition by any executive benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Firm or one of its affiliates, (D) any acquisition by any corporation pursuant to a transaction that complies with clauses (A), (B) and (C) of clause (iii) of this section, or (E) any acquisition by David L. Dunkel or his family members; or |
(ii) | individuals who, as of the date of this Plan, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the date of this Plan whose election, or nomination for election by shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a person other than the Board; or |
(iii) | consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Firm (a “Business Combination”), in each case, unless, following such Business Combination, (A) all or substantially all of the Persons who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Firm’s outstanding Common Stock and outstanding voting securities immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of Common Stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, a corporation that as a result of such transaction owns the Firm or all or substantially all of the Firm’s assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately prior to such Business Combination of the Firm’s Common Stock and voting securities, as the case may be, (B) no person (excluding any corporation resulting from such Business Combination or any Executive benefit plan (or related trust) of the Firm or such corporation resulting from such Business Combination) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, twenty-five percent or more of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of Common Stock of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination or the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such corporation except to the extent that such ownership existed prior to the Business Combination and (C) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement, or of the action of the Board, providing for such Business Combination; or |
(iv) | approval by shareholders of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Firm. |
(i) | If the Common Stock is listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, including, but without limitation to, the National Market System of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Automated Quotation (“NASDAQ”) System, the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on such system or exchange (or the exchange with the greatest volume of trading in Common Stock) on the day of determination. |
(ii) | If the Common Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ System (but not on the National Market System thereof) or is regularly quoted by a recognized securities dealer but selling prices are not reported, the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock shall be the mean between the high bid and low asked prices for the Common Stock on the day of determination, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Committee deems reliable; |
(iii) | In the absence of an established market for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Committee on a reasonable basis using a method that complies with Code Section 409A. |
(a) | Procedure. |
(i) | Administration by Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. |
(ii) | Rule 16b-3. To the extent the Committee considers it desirable for transactions relating to Awards to be eligible to qualify for an exemption under Rule 16b-3, the transactions contemplated under the Plan shall be structured to satisfy the requirements for exemption under Rule 16b-3. |
(b) | Powers of the Committee. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, and subject to the specific duties delegated by the Board to the Committee, the Committee shall have the authority, in its discretion: |
(i) | to determine the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock; |
(ii) | to select the Employees and Consultants to whom Awards will be granted under the Plan; |
(iii) | to determine whether, when, to what extent and in what types and amounts Awards are granted under the Plan; |
(iv) | to determine the number of shares of Common Stock to be covered by each Award granted under the Plan; |
(v) | to determine the forms of Award Agreements, which need not be the same for each grant or for each Grantee, and which may be delivered electronically, for use under the Plan; |
(vi) | to determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan (including the minimum vesting provision in Sections 5(c) of the Plan and the holding requirements applicable to certain Options and SARs in Section 6(f)(ii) and 7(e) of the Plan), of any Award granted under the Plan. Such terms and conditions, which need not be the same for each Award or for each Grantee, include, but are not limited to, the exercise price, the time or times when Options and SARs may be exercised (which may be based on performance criteria), the extent to which vesting is suspended during a leave of absence, any vesting acceleration or waiver of forfeiture restrictions, and any restriction or limitation regarding any Award or the shares of Common Stock relating thereto, based in each case on such factors as the Committee shall determine; |
(vii) | to construe and interpret the terms of the Plan and Awards; |
(viii) | to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, rules and regulations relating to the operation and administration of the Plan to accommodate the specific requirements of local and foreign laws and procedures; |
(ix) | to modify or amend each Award (subject to Section 14 of the Plan). However, the Administrator’s authority to modify or amend an Award is expressly limited in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c). Therefore, any modification or amendment of an Option or SAR that would be treated as a “repricing” under NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c) shall not be effective without the approval of the shareholders of the Firm. For purposes of this Section 4(b)(ix) of the Plan, “repricing” means any of the following or any other action that has the same effect: |
a. | lowering the exercise price of an Option or SAR after it is granted; |
b. | any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles; or |
c. | canceling an Option or SAR at a time when its exercise price exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares, in exchange for another Award or cash, unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a merger, acquisition, spin-off, or other similar corporate transaction; |
(x) | to authorize any person to execute on behalf of the Firm any instrument required to effect the grant of an Award previously granted by the Committee; |
(xi) | to determine the terms and restrictions applicable to Awards; |
(xii) | to make such adjustments or modifications to Awards granted to Grantees who are Employees of foreign Subsidiaries as are advisable to fulfill the purposes of the Plan or to comply with Applicable Law; |
(xiii) | to delegate its duties and responsibilities under the Plan with respect to sub-plans applicable to foreign Subsidiaries, except its duties and responsibilities with respect to Employees who are also Officers or Directors subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act; |
(xiv) | to correct any defect or supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan, or in any Award Agreement, in the manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or expedient to make the Plan fully effective; |
(xv) | to provide any notice, agreement or other communication required or permitted by the Plan in either written or electronic form; |
(xvi) | subject to the minimum vesting provision in Sections 5(c) of the Plan, to determine the vesting period during which each Award shall be subject to a risk of forfeiture upon a voluntary termination of employment or service, or termination in other specified circumstances, and the terms upon which such risk will end (i.e., “vesting” will occur), at a stated date or dates or on an accelerated basis in specified circumstances; and |
(xvii) | to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for administering the Plan. |
(c) | Effect of Administrator’s Decision. The Committee’s decisions, determinations and interpretations shall be final and binding on all Grantees and any other holders of Awards. |
(a) | Eligibility. Awards other than Incentive Stock Options may be granted to Employees and Consultants. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Employees. If otherwise eligible, an Employee or Consultant who has been granted an Award may be granted additional Awards. Modifications to outstanding Awards may be made without regard to whether the Grantee is then currently eligible for a new Award. |
(b) | Maximum Term; Deferral. Subject to the following provision, the term during which an Award may be outstanding shall not extend more than 10 years after the Date of Grant and shall be subject to earlier termination as specified elsewhere in the Plan or Award Agreement. The Committee may permit or require a Grantee to defer receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due by virtue of the grant of or the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to Awards other than Options and SARs. If any such deferral is required or permitted, the Committee shall establish such rules and procedures for such deferral, including rules and procedures implemented pursuant to Section 21 of the Plan for compliance with Code Section 409A. Any deferral of a cash payment or of the delivery of Shares that is permitted or required by the Committee may, if so permitted or required by the Committee, extend more than ten years after the Date of Grant of the Award to which the deferral relates. |
(c) | Minimum Vesting. Except with respect to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the Share Reserve, as may be adjusted pursuant to Section 12 of the Plan, and except for the death or disability of the grantee, or a change in control, no Award shall provide for vesting that is any more rapid than vesting on the one (1) year anniversary of the date of grant or, with respect to a performance-based award, a performance period that is less than twelve (12) months. Treatment of Awards in cases of death, disability, and change in control may be specifically addressed in the Plan or an individual award agreement or an employment agreement with the grantee. |
(d) | Award Agreement. To the extent not set forth in the Plan, the terms and conditions of each Award, which need not be the same for each Award or for each Grantee, shall be set forth in an Award Agreement. The Committee, in its discretion, may require as a condition to any Award Agreement’s effectiveness that the Award Agreement be executed by the Grantee, including by electronic signature or other electronic indication of acceptance, and that the Grantee agree to such further terms and conditions as specified in the Award Agreement. |
(e) | Maximum Awards to Non-Employee Directors. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Plan, the following limitations shall apply to Awards granted to non-Employee Directors under the Plan: (i) the maximum number of Shares subject to Options and SARs granted under the Plan to any non-Employee Director during any calendar year shall not exceed $220,000 in total value (the “Non-Employee Director Option/SAR Limit”), and (ii) the maximum number of Shares subject to Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards granted under the Plan to any non-Employee Director during any calendar year shall not exceed $250,000 in total value, excluding for this purpose the value of any dividends or Dividend Equivalents paid pursuant to any Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards granted in a previous year (the “Non-Employee Director Full Value Award Limit”). For purposes of the Non-Employee Director Option/SAR Limit and the Non-Employee Director Full Value Award Limit, the value of any Award shall be its Date of Grant fair value for the Firm’s financial reporting purposes. |
(f) | Termination of Employment or Consulting Relationship. In the event that a Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee or Consultant terminates (other than upon the Grantee’s death or Disability), then, unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the Award Agreement or an employment agreement with the Grantee, and subject to Section 12 of the Plan: |
(i) | Subject to Section 5(f)(ii) below, the Grantee may exercise his or her unexercised Option or SAR within 30 days of the Date of Termination and only to the extent that the Grantee was entitled to exercise it at the Date of Termination (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of such Option or SAR as set forth in the Award Agreement). If, at the Date of Termination, the Grantee is not entitled to exercise his or her entire Option or SAR, the Shares covered by the unexercisable portion of the Option or SAR shall revert to the Plan and increase the Share Reserve. If, after the Date of Termination, the Grantee does not exercise his or her Option or SAR within 30 days, the Option or SAR shall terminate, and the Shares covered by such Option or SAR shall revert to the Plan and increase the Share Reserve. If a Grantee exercises his or her unexercised Option or SAR subsequent to the Date of Termination, the Grantee is not permitted to utilize Shares to cover the exercise cost of the Option or SAR or to cover their minimum payroll tax withholding obligations; |
(ii) | in the event that a Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee or Consultant terminates for Cause, all of his or her unexercised Options or SARs shall terminate immediately upon the Date of Termination and the Shares covered by such Option or SAR shall revert to the Plan and increase the Share Reserve; |
(iii) | the Grantee’s Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards, to the extent forfeitable immediately before the Date of Termination, shall thereupon automatically be forfeited; |
(iv) | the Grantee’s Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards that were not forfeitable immediately before the Date of Termination shall promptly be settled in accordance with the terms of the applicable Award Agreement; and |
(v) | any Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards subject to performance criteria with respect to which the Performance Period has not ended as of the Date of Termination shall terminate immediately upon the Date of Termination. |
(g) | Disability of Grantee. In the event that a Grantee’s Continuous Status as an Employee or Consultant terminates as a result of the Grantee’s Disability, then, unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the Award Agreement or an employment agreement with the Grantee: |
(i) | the Grantee may exercise his or her unexercised Option or SAR at any time within 90 days from the Date of Termination, but only to the extent that the Grantee was entitled to exercise the Option or SAR at the Date of Termination (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of the Option or SAR as set forth in the Award Agreement). If, at the Date of Termination, the Grantee is not entitled to exercise his or her entire Option or SAR, the Shares covered by the unexercisable portion of the Option or SAR shall revert to the Plan and increase the Share Reserve. If, after the Date of Termination, the Grantee does not exercise his or her Option or SAR within the time specified herein, the Option or SAR shall terminate, and the Shares covered by such Option or SAR shall revert to the Plan and increase the Share Reserve. |
(ii) | the Grantee’s Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards, to the extent forfeitable immediately before the Date of Termination, shall thereupon automatically be forfeited; |
(iii) | the Grantee’s Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards that were not forfeitable immediately before the Date of Termination shall promptly be settled in accordance with the terms of the applicable Award Agreement; and |
(iv) | any Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards subject to performance criteria with respect to which the Performance Period has not ended as of the Date of Termination shall terminate immediately upon the Date of Termination. |
(h) | Death of Grantee. In the event of the death of a Grantee, then, unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the Award Agreement or an employment agreement with the Grantee, |
(i) | the Grantee’s unexercised Option or SAR may be exercised at any time within 90 days following the date of death (but in no event later than the expiration of the term of such Option or SAR as set forth in the Award Agreement), by the Grantee’s estate or by a person who acquired the right to exercise the Option or SAR by bequest or inheritance, but only to the extent that the Grantee was entitled to exercise the Option or SAR at the date of death. If, at the time of death, the Grantee was not entitled to exercise his or her entire Option or SAR, the Shares covered by the unexercisable portion of the Option or SAR shall immediately revert to the Plan and increase the Share Reserve. If, after death, the Grantee’s estate or a person who acquired the right to exercise the Option or SAR by bequest or inheritance does not exercise the Option or SAR within the time specified herein, the Option or SAR shall terminate, and the Shares covered by such Option or SAR shall revert to the Plan and increase the Share Reserve. |
(ii) | the Grantee’s Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards, to the extent forfeitable immediately before the date of death, shall thereupon automatically be forfeited; |
(iii) | the Grantee’s Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards that were not forfeitable immediately before the date of death shall promptly be settled in accordance with the terms of the applicable Award Agreement; and |
(iv) | any Stock Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards subject to performance criteria with respect to which the Performance Period has not ended as of the date of death shall terminate immediately upon the date of death. |
(i) | Nontransferability of Awards. |
(i) | Except as provided in Section 5(i)(iii) below, each Award, and each right under any Award, shall be exercisable only by the Grantee during the Grantee’s lifetime, or, if permissible under Applicable Law, by the Grantee’s guardian or legal representative. |
(ii) | Except as provided in Section 5(i)(iii) below, no Award (prior to the time, if applicable, Shares are issued in respect of such Award), and no right under any Award, may be assigned, alienated, pledged, attached, sold or otherwise transferred or encumbered by a Grantee otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution (or in the case of Restricted Stock Awards, to the Firm) and any such purported assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, sale, transfer or encumbrance shall be void and unenforceable against the Firm or any Subsidiary; provided, that the designation of a beneficiary shall not constitute an assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, sale, transfer or encumbrance. |
(iii) | To the extent and in the manner permitted by Applicable Law, and to the extent and in the manner permitted by the Committee, and subject to such terms and conditions as may be prescribed by the Committee, a Grantee may transfer an Award to: |
a. | a child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, niece, nephew, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law of the Grantee (including adoptive relationships); |
b. | any person sharing the employee’s household (other than a tenant or employee); |
c. | a trust in which persons described in (a) and (b) have more than 50 percent of the beneficial interest; |
d. | a foundation in which persons described in (a) or (b) or the Grantee control the management of assets; or |
e. | any other entity in which the persons described in (a) or (b) or the Grantee own more than 50 percent of the voting interests; |
(a) | Limitations. |
(i) | Options granted under the Plan may be Incentive Stock Options, Nonqualified Stock Options, or a combination of the foregoing. Each Award shall specify whether (or the extent to which) the Option is an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option. Notwithstanding any such designation, to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Shares as of the Date of Grant with respect to which Options designated as Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by the Grantee during any calendar year (under the Plan and any other employee stock option plan of the Firm or any Parent or Subsidiary) exceeds $100,000, such Options shall be treated as Nonqualified Stock Options. |
(ii) | No Employee shall be granted, in any calendar year, Options to purchase more than 500,000 Shares, and no Consultant (other than a non-Employee Director, who is subject to the Non-Employee Director Option/SAR Limit in Section 5(e) of the Plan) shall be granted, in any calendar year, Options to purchase more than 100,000 Shares. The limitation described in this Section 6(a)(ii) shall be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Firm’s capitalization as described in Section 12 of the Plan. If an Option is canceled in the same calendar year in which it was granted (other than in connection with a transaction described in Section 12 of the Plan), the canceled Option will be counted against the limitation described in this Section 6(a)(ii). |
(b) | Term of Option. The term of each Option shall be stated in the Award Agreement; provided, however, that the term shall be 10 years from the Date of Grant or such shorter term as may be provided in the Award Agreement. Moreover, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Grantee who, at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns stock representing more than 10 percent of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Firm or any Parent or Subsidiary, the term of the Incentive Stock Option shall be five (5) years from the Date of Grant or such shorter term as may be provided in the Award Agreement. |
(c) | Option Exercise Price and Consideration. |
(i) | Exercise Price. The per share exercise price for the Shares to be issued pursuant to exercise of an Option shall be determined by the Committee and, except as otherwise provided in this Section 6(c)(i), shall be no less than 100 percent of the Fair Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant. |
a. | In the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an Employee who on the Date of Grant owns stock representing more than 10 percent of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Firm or any Parent or Subsidiary, the per Share exercise price shall be no less than 110 percent of the Fair Market Value per Share on the Date of Grant. |
b. | Any Option that is (1) granted to a Grantee in connection with the acquisition (“Acquisition”), however effected, by the Firm of another corporation or entity (“Acquired Entity”) or the assets thereof, (2) associated with an option to purchase shares of stock or other equity interest of the Acquired Entity or an affiliate thereof (“Acquired Entity Option”) held by such Grantee immediately prior to such Acquisition, and (3) intended to preserve for the Grantee the economic value of all or a portion of such Acquired Entity Option, may be granted with such exercise price as the Committee determines to be necessary to achieve such preservation of economic value. |
(d) | Waiting Period and Exercise Dates. At the time an Option is granted, the Committee shall fix the period within which the Option may be exercised and shall determine any conditions that must be satisfied before the Option may be exercised. An Option shall be exercisable only to the extent that it is vested according to the terms of the Award Agreement. |
(e) | Form of Consideration. The Committee shall determine the acceptable form of consideration for exercising an Option, including the method of payment. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option, the Committee shall determine the acceptable form of consideration at the time of Award. The acceptable form of consideration may consist of any combination of cash, personal check, wire transfer or, subject to the approval of the Committee: |
(i) | net exercise, in which case the Firm will not require payment of the Option exercise price from the Grantee but will reduce the number of Shares issued upon the exercise by the number of whole Shares that has an aggregate Fair Market Value that is equal to the aggregate Option exercise price for the portion of the Option exercised; |
(ii) | pursuant to procedures approved by the Committee, (A) through the sale of the Shares acquired on exercise of the Option through a broker-dealer to whom the Grantee has submitted an irrevocable notice of exercise and irrevocable instructions to deliver promptly to the Firm the amount of sale or loan proceeds sufficient to pay the exercise price, together with, if requested by the Firm, the amount of federal, state, local or foreign withholding taxes payable by the Grantee by reason of such exercise, or (B) through simultaneous sale through a broker of Shares acquired upon exercise; or |
(iii) | such other consideration and method of payment for the issuance of Shares to the extent permitted by Applicable Law. |
(f) | Exercise of Option. |
(i) | Procedure for Exercise; Rights as a Shareholder. |
a. | Any Option granted hereunder shall be exercisable according to the terms of the Plan and at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement. |
b. | An Option may not be exercised for a fraction of a Share. |
c. | An Option shall be deemed exercised when the Firm receives: |
i. | written or electronic notice of exercise (in accordance with the Award Agreement and any action taken by the Committee pursuant to Section 4.b. of the Plan) from the person entitled to exercise the Option, and |
ii. | full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Option is exercised. Full payment may consist of any consideration and method of payment authorized by the Committee and permitted by the Award Agreement and the Plan. |
iii. | Shares issued upon exercise of an Option shall be issued in the name of the Grantee or, if requested by the Grantee, in the name of the Grantee and his or her spouse (or other permitted transferee). Until the stock certificate evidencing such Shares is issued or delivery is otherwise effected by the Firm (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Firm or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Firm), no right to vote or receive dividends or any other rights as a shareholder shall exist with respect to the Optioned Stock, notwithstanding the exercise of the Option. The Firm shall issue (or cause to be issued) such stock certificate, or provide a commercially reasonable alternative means of delivery, promptly after the Option is exercised. No adjustment will be made for a dividend or other right for which the record date is prior to the date the stock certificate is issued or delivery is otherwise effected by the Firm, except as provided in Section 12 of the Plan. |
iv. | Exercising an Option in any manner shall decrease the number of Shares thereafter available, both for purposes of the Plan and for sale under the Option, by the number of Shares as to which the Option is exercised. |
(ii) | Holding Requirement. As a condition to the grant of an Option to a Grantee who is a Named Executive Officer, the Grantee shall hold the Shares acquired upon exercise of the Option for a minimum period of one year following the date of exercise. |
(a) | Base Price. The Base Price shall be equal to or greater than the Fair Market Value on the Date of Grant. |
(b) | Exercise of SARs. SARs shall be exercised by the delivery of a written or electronic notice of exercise to the Firm (in accordance with the Award Agreement and any action taken by the Committee pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Plan or otherwise), setting forth the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is to be exercised. |
(c) | Payment of SAR Benefit. Upon exercise of a SAR, the Grantee shall be entitled to receive payment in the form of Shares from the Firm in an amount determined by multiplying: |
(i) | the Spread; by |
(ii) | the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised; provided, that the Committee may provide in the Award Agreement that the benefit payable on exercise of a SAR shall not exceed such limit (which may be expressed as a percentage of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Date of Grant or as a fixed value limit or otherwise) as the Committee shall specify. The payment upon exercise of a SAR shall be in Shares that have an aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date of exercise of the SAR) equal to the amount of the payment. |
(d) | No Employee shall be granted, in any calendar year, SARs with respect to more than 500,000 Shares, and no Consultant (other than a non-Employee Director, who is subject to the Non-Employee Director Option/SAR Limit in Section 5(e) of the Plan) shall be granted, in any calendar year, SARs to purchase more than 100,000 Shares. The limitation described in this Section 7(d) shall be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Firm’s capitalization as described in Section 11 of the Plan. If a SAR is canceled in the same calendar year in which it was granted (other than in connection with a transaction described in Section 11 of the Plan), the canceled SAR will be counted against the limitation described in this Section 7(d). |
(e) | As a condition to the grant of a SAR to a Grantee who is a Named Executive Officer, the Grantee shall hold the Shares acquired upon exercise of the SAR for a minimum period of one year following the date of exercise. |
(a) | Administrator Action. Subject to the terms of the Plan, including without limitation the minimum vesting provision in Section 5(c) of the Plan, the Committee, acting in its discretion, may grant Stock Awards to any Employee or Consultant from time to time, in such amount and upon such terms and conditions as shall be determined by the Committee. A Stock Award may be made in Shares or denominated in units representing rights to receive Shares. No Stock Award relating to more than 500,000 Shares may be granted to an Employee in any calendar year, and no Stock Award relating to more than 100,000 Shares may be granted to any Consultant (other than a non-Employee Director, who is subject to the Non-Employee Director Full Value Award Limit in Section 5(e) of the Plan) in any calendar year. Each Stock Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement, and each Award Agreement shall set forth the conditions, if any, that will need to be timely satisfied before the Stock Award will be effective, vested and settled, and the conditions, if any, under which the Grantee’s interest in the related Shares or units will be forfeited. Any such conditions for effectiveness or nonforfeitability may be based upon the passage of time and continued service by the Grantee, or the achievement of specified performance objectives, or both time-based and performance-based conditions. The Committee, acting in its discretion, may make the grant of a Stock Award to a Grantee subject to the satisfaction of one, or more than one, objective employment, performance, or other grant condition that the Committee deems appropriate under the circumstances for Employees or Consultants generally or for a Grantee in particular, and the related Award Agreement shall set forth each such condition and the deadline for satisfying each such grant condition. Either as an alternative to or in addition to a condition on the effectiveness of the grant of a Stock Award, the Committee may make a Stock Award (if, when, and to the extent that the grant of the Stock Award becomes effective) subject to one, or more than one, objective employment, performance, or other forfeiture condition that the Committee acting in its discretion deems appropriate under the circumstances for Employees or Consultants generally or for a Grantee in particular, and the related Award Agreement shall set forth each such condition and the deadline for satisfying each such forfeiture condition. A Grantee’s nonforfeitable interest in the Shares related to a grant of a Stock Award shall depend on the extent to which each such condition is timely satisfied. |
(b) | Types of Stock Awards. A Stock Award made in Shares that are subject to forfeiture conditions and/or other restrictions may be designated as an Award of “Restricted Stock.” A Stock Award denominated in units that are subject to forfeiture conditions and/or other restrictions may be designated as an Award of “Restricted Stock Units” or “RSUs.” For the avoidance of doubt, the Committee is authorized to grant Shares as a bonus, or to grant Shares or other Awards in lieu of obligations of the Firm or a Subsidiary to pay cash or deliver other property under the Plan or under other plans or compensatory arrangements, subject to such terms as shall be determined by the Committee. |
(c) | Dividend Rights. |
(i) | Restricted Stock Award. Each Restricted Stock Award Agreement shall state whether the Grantee shall have a right to receive any cash dividends that are paid with respect to his or her Restricted Stock after the date his or her Restricted Stock Award has become effective and before the first day that the Grantee’s interest in such stock is forfeited completely or becomes completely vested and nonforfeitable. The Grantee shall not receive any payment of any dividends that are paid with respect to a Share of Restricted Stock unless and not earlier than such time as the Share becomes vested and nonforfeitable, and the Award Agreement shall (subject to Section 21 and other applicable requirements of Code Section 409A) set forth the conditions, if any, under which the Grantee will be eligible to receive payment(s) in the future of the cumulative cash dividends (without interest) payable on the Shares that become vested and nonforfeitable for the period beginning on the effective date of the Award and ending on the vesting date of the Award. If an Award Agreement calls for any such payments to be made, the Firm shall make such payments from the Firm’s general assets, and the Grantee shall be no more than a general and unsecured creditor of the Firm with respect to such payments. If a stock dividend is declared on such a Share after the Award is effective but before the Grantee’s interest in such Stock has been forfeited or has become nonforfeitable, such stock dividend shall be treated as part of the Award of the related Restricted Stock, and a Grantee’s interest in such stock dividend shall be forfeited or shall become vested and nonforfeitable at the same time as the Share with respect to which the stock dividend was paid is forfeited or becomes vested and nonforfeitable. If a dividend is paid other than in cash or stock, the disposition of such dividend shall be made in accordance with such rules as the Committee shall adopt with respect to each such dividend, which shall include a provision that the Grantee shall not receive any payment of any such dividends unless and not earlier than such time as the applicable Share becomes vested and nonforfeitable. For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding any provision of an Award Agreement or the absence of any Award Agreement provision relating to dividends, (a) no dividend or distribution declared with respect to a Share of Restricted Stock shall be paid to a Grantee unless and until the Share becomes vested and nonforfeitable, (b) a Grantee shall not have a vested and nonforfeitable right to any dividend or distribution declared with respect to a Share of Restricted Stock unless and until the Share becomes vested and nonforfeitable, and (c) a Grantee’s right to any dividend or distribution declared with respect to a Share of Restricted Stock shall be forfeited to the extent that the Grantee’s right to the Share is forfeited. |
(ii) | RSU Award. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, a Grantee shall not have any rights as a shareholder with respect to Shares underlying an Award of RSUs until such time, if any, as the underlying Shares are actually issued to the Grantee. The Committee may provide in an RSU Award Agreement for the payment of Dividend Equivalents to the Grantee at the time of vesting of the RSUs or other payout of the vested RSUs. The Award Agreement shall provide whether such Dividend Equivalents shall be paid in cash or converted into additional shares of Common Stock or RSUs by such formula and at such time and subject to such limitations as may be determined by the Committee. The Grantee shall not receive any payment of any Dividend Equivalent with respect to any RSU unless and not earlier than such time as the RSU becomes vested and nonforfeitable. The payment or crediting of Dividend Equivalents shall conform to the applicable requirements of Code Section 409A. For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding any provision of an Award Agreement or the absence of any Award Agreement provision relating to Dividend Equivalents, (a) no Dividend Equivalent with respect to any RSU shall be paid to a Grantee unless and until the RSU becomes vested and nonforfeitable, (b) a Grantee shall not have a vested and nonforfeitable right to any Dividend Equivalent with respect to an RSU unless and until the RSU becomes vested and nonforfeitable, and (c) a Grantee’s right to any Dividend Equivalent with respect to any RSU shall be forfeited to the extent that the Grantee’s right to the RSU is forfeited. |
(d) | Voting Rights. A Grantee shall have the right to vote the Shares related to his or her Restricted Stock grant after the Date of Grant but before his or her interest in such Shares has been forfeited or has become nonforfeitable. A Grantee shall not have the right to vote the Shares related to his or her RSU grant until such time, if any, as the Shares are actually issued to the Grantee. |
(e) | Satisfaction of Forfeiture Conditions. A Share related to a Restricted Stock Award shall cease to be Restricted Stock at such time as a Grantee’s interest in such Share becomes nonforfeitable under the Plan, and the certificate representing such Share shall be reissued as soon as practicable thereafter without any further restrictions related to Section 8(c) or Section 8(d) and shall be transferred to the Grantee. |
(a) | In General. The Committee may grant Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Stock Awards, and Other Stock-Based Awards that are Performance-Based Awards. On the Date of Grant of each Performance-Based Award, the Committee shall establish the Performance Period, the Performance Measure(s), and the Performance Goal(s) in respect of such Performance-Based Awards. Each Performance-Based Award shall provide that, in order for the Award to be granted or earned or for the Grantee to receive all or a portion of the Shares or cash subject to such Performance-Based Award, one or more specific Performance Goals must be attained over a designated Performance Period, with attainment of the Performance Goal(s) determined using specific Performance Measure(s). The Performance Goal(s), Performance Measure(s) and Performance Period shall be established by the Committee in its discretion. |
(b) | Performance Goals. If a Stock Award or Other Stock-Based Award is subject to this Section 10, then the effectiveness of the grant of the Award, or the vesting and nonforfeitability of the Award, or both the effectiveness of the grant of the Award and the vesting and nonforfeitability of the Award shall be subject to satisfaction of one, or more than one, objective Performance Goals. The Committee shall, for the Performance Period applicable to the Award, establish the Performance Goal(s) based on the Performance Measure(s) selected by the Committee to apply to each Award and a formula or matrix prescribing the extent to which such Award shall be earned based upon the level of achievement of such Performance Goal(s). The Committee may establish different Performance Goals for different Grantees and different Awards. The Performance Goal(s) with respect to such Performance Measure(s) may be established at such levels and in such terms as the Committee may determine, in its discretion, including in absolute terms, as a goal relative to performance in prior periods, or as a goal compared to the performance of one or more comparable companies or an index covering multiple companies. The performance goals may be established in terms of Firm-wide objectives, objectives that are related to the performance of the individual Grantee or the Subsidiary, division, department, or function within the Firm or Subsidiary in which the Grantee is employed, or any other manner that the Committee determines appropriate in its discretion. Performance goals need not be based on audited financial results. |
(c) | Adjustments and Procedure. The Committee shall retain discretion to decrease the amount of the Award at any time through the date at which the Committee certifies the attainment of the Performance Goal(s), generally referred to as “negative discretion.” The Committee may determine performance before payment of bonuses, capital charges, non-recurring income or expense, items of an unusual nature or of a type that indicates infrequency of occurrence, or other financial and general and administrative expenses for the Performance Period, and may measure the attainment of the Performance Goal by appropriately adjusting the evaluation of performance to exclude the effect of any changes in accounting principles affecting the Firm’s or a business unit’s reported results. The Committee may provide in the applicable Award Agreement additional rules and procedures relating to the Committee’s ability to adjust aspects of a Performance-Based Award, the Committee’s ability to increase or decrease the amount of compensation provided by a Performance-Based Award, and the Committee’s certification or other determination of the extent to which Performance Goals have or have not been attained. |
(a) | Changes in Capitalization. Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the Firm, the number of Covered Stock, and the number of Shares of Common Stock that have been authorized for issuance under the Plan but as to which no Awards have yet been granted or that have been returned to the Plan upon cancellation or expiration of an Award, and the annual per-person limitations on Awards, as well as the price per share of Covered Stock and share-based performance conditions of Awards, shall be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of the Common Stock, or any other increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Firm; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Firm shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration.” Such adjustment shall be made by the Board, whose determination in that respect shall be final, binding and conclusive. Except as expressly provided herein, no issuance by the Firm of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number or price of shares of Covered Stock. No adjustment shall be made pursuant to this Section 12 in a manner that would cause Incentive Stock Options to violate Code Section 422(b) or cause an Award to be subject to adverse tax consequences under Code Section 409A. |
(b) | Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, then the following provisions shall apply: |
(i) | Vesting. The Board may, in the exercise of its discretion, accelerate the vesting and nonforfeitability of any Award that is outstanding on the date such Change in Control is determined to have occurred and that is not yet fully vested and nonforfeitable on such date. |
(ii) | Dissolution or Liquidation. In the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Firm, to the extent that an Award is outstanding, it will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed action. The Board may, in the exercise of its discretion in such instances, declare that any Option or SAR shall terminate as of a date fixed by the Board and give each Grantee the right to exercise his or her Option or SAR as to all or any part of the Covered Stock, including Shares as to which the Option or SAR would not otherwise be exercisable. |
(iii) | Merger or Asset Sale. Except as otherwise determined by the Board, in its discretion, prior to the occurrence of a merger of the Firm with or into another corporation, or the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Firm, in the event of such a merger or sale each outstanding Option or SAR shall be assumed or an equivalent option or right shall be substituted by the successor corporation or a Parent or Subsidiary of the successor corporation. In the event that the successor corporation or a Parent or Subsidiary of the successor corporation does not agree to assume the Option or SAR or to substitute an equivalent option or right, the Board may, in the exercise of its discretion and in lieu of such assumption or substitution, provide for the Grantee to have the right to exercise the Option or SAR as to all or a portion of the Covered Stock, including Shares as to which it would not otherwise be exercisable. If the Board makes an Option or SAR exercisable in lieu of assumption or substitution in the event of a merger or sale of assets, the Committee shall notify the Grantee that the Option or SAR shall be fully exercisable for a period of 30 days from the date of such notice, and the Option or SAR will terminate upon the expiration of such period. For the purposes of this paragraph, the Option or SAR shall be considered assumed if, following the merger or sale of assets and in a manner consistent with Code Sections 409A and 424, the option or right confers the right to purchase, for each Share of Covered Stock subject to the Option or SAR immediately prior to the merger or sale of assets, the consideration (whether stock, cash, or other securities or property) received in the merger or sale of assets by holders of Common Stock for each Share held on the effective date of the transaction (and if holders were offered a choice of consideration, the type of consideration chosen by the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares); provided, however, that if such consideration received in the merger or sale of assets was not solely common stock of the successor corporation or its Parent, the Board may, with the consent of the successor corporation and the participant, provide for the consideration to be received upon the exercise of the Option or SAR, for each Share subject to the Option or SAR, to be solely common stock of the successor corporation or its Parent equal in Fair Market Value to the per Share consideration received by holders of Common Stock in the merger or sale of assets. |
(iv) | Except as otherwise determined by the Board, in its discretion, prior to the occurrence of a Change in Control other than the dissolution or liquidation of the Firm, a merger of the Firm with or into another corporation, or the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Firm, in the event of such a Change in Control, all outstanding Options and SARs, to the extent they are exercisable and vested, shall be terminated in exchange for a cash payment equal to an amount that does not exceed the Fair Market Value (reduced by the exercise price applicable to such Options or SARs). These cash proceeds shall be paid to the Grantee or, in the event of death of a Grantee prior to payment, to the estate of the Grantee or to a person who acquired the right to exercise the Option or SAR by bequest or inheritance. |
(a) | Amendment and Termination. The Board may at any time amend, alter, suspend or terminate the Plan. |
(b) | Shareholder Approval. The Firm shall obtain shareholder approval of any Plan amendment to the extent necessary and desirable to comply with Rule 16b-3 or with Section 422 of the Code (or any successor rule or statute) or other Applicable Law. Such shareholder approval, if required, shall be obtained in such a manner and to such a degree as is required by the Applicable Law. Without the approval of shareholders, no amendment or alteration of the Plan or any outstanding Option or SAR will have the effect of amendment or replacing such an Option or SAR in a transaction that constitutes a “repricing.” For this purpose, a “repricing” means: (1) amendment the terms of an Option or SAR after it is granted to lower its exercise price or Base Price; (2) any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”); and (3) repurchasing for cash or canceling an Option or SAR at a time when its strike price is equal to or greater than the fair market value of the underlying Stock, in exchange or substitution for another Option, SAR, Stock Award, Other Stock-Based Award, other equity, or cash or other property. A cancellation and exchange or substitution described in clause (3) of the preceding sentence will be considered a repricing regardless of whether the Option, SAR, Stock Award, Other Stock-Based Award, other equity, or cash or other property is delivered simultaneously with the cancellation, regardless of whether it is treated as a repricing under GAAP, and regardless of whether it is voluntary on the part of the Grantee. Adjustments of Awards under Section 12 will not be deemed “repricings,” however. The Committee shall have no authority to amend, alter, or modify any Award term after the Award has been granted to the extent that the effect is to waive a term that otherwise at that time would be mandatory for a new Award of the same type under the Plan. |
(c) | Effect of Amendment or Termination. No amendment, alteration, suspension or termination of the Plan shall impair the rights of any Grantee, unless mutually agreed otherwise between the Grantee and the Committee, which agreement must be in writing and signed by the Grantee and the Firm. |
(a) | Legal Compliance. Shares shall not be issued pursuant to an Award unless the exercise, if applicable, of such Award and the issuance and delivery of such Shares shall comply with all relevant provisions of law, including, without limitation, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, Applicable Law, and the requirements of any stock exchange or quotation system upon which the Shares may then be listed or quoted, and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Firm with respect to such compliance. |
(b) | Investment Representations. As a condition to the exercise of an Award, the Firm may require the person exercising such Award to represent and warrant at the time of any such exercise that the Shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Firm, such a representation is required. |
(a) | Inability to Obtain Authority. The inability of the Firm to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Firm’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Firm of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained. |
(b) | Grants Exceeding Allotted Shares. If the Covered Stock covered by an Award exceeds, as of the date of grant, the number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan without additional shareholder approval, such Award shall be void with respect to such excess Covered Stock, unless shareholder approval of an amendment sufficiently increasing the number of Shares subject to the Plan is timely obtained in accordance with Section 14 of the Plan. |
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) | Year Ended | |||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||
Reported (GAAP) | Adjustments | Adjusted (Non-GAAP) | ||||||||||
Reconciliation of Revenue and Gross Profit: | ||||||||||||
Revenue (1) | $ | 1,357,940 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,358,940 | ||||||
Gross profit (1) | $ | 408,056 | $ | 713 | $ | 408,769 | ||||||
GP % | 30.0 | % | 0.1 | % | 30.1 | % | ||||||
Flex GP % (2) | 27.2 | % | — | % | 27.2 | % | ||||||
Reconciliation of SG&A and Operating Margin: | ||||||||||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses (3) | $ | 331,172 | $ | 1,156 | $ | 332,328 | ||||||
SG&A as a percentage of Revenue | 24.4 | % | 0.1 | % | 24.5 | % | ||||||
Income from operations | $ | 68,629 | $ | (443 | ) | $ | 68,186 | |||||
Operating margin | 5.1 | % | (0.1 | )% | 5.0 | % | ||||||
Reconciliation of Tax Impact and Profitability: | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 64,094 | $ | (443 | ) | $ | 63,651 | |||||
Income tax expense (4) | $ | 30,809 | $ | (7,200 | ) | $ | 23,609 | |||||
Effective tax rate | 48.1 | % | (11.0 | )% | 37.1 | % | ||||||
Net income | $ | 33,285 | $ | 6,757 | $ | 40,042 | ||||||
Earnings per share - diluted | $ | 1.30 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 1.57 |
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) | Year Ended | |||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||
Reported (GAAP) | Adjustments | Adjusted (Non-GAAP) | ||||||||||
Reconciliation of SG&A and Operating Margin: | ||||||||||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses (5) | $ | 340,742 | $ | (6,015 | ) | $ | 334,727 | |||||
SG&A as a percentage of Revenue | 25.8 | % | (0.4 | )% | 25.4 | % | ||||||
Income from operations | $ | 59,056 | $ | 6,015 | $ | 65,071 | ||||||
Operating margin | 4.5 | % | 0.4 | % | 4.9 | % | ||||||
Reconciliation of Tax Impact and Profitability: | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 55,955 | $ | 6,015 | $ | 61,970 | ||||||
Income tax expense (6) | 23,182 | 681 | 23,863 | |||||||||
Effective tax rate | 41.4 | % | (2.9 | )% | 38.5 | % | ||||||
Net income | $ | 32,773 | $ | 5,334 | $ | 38,107 | ||||||
Earnings per share - diluted | $ | 1.25 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 1.45 |
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. | ý |
A | Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4. |
1. | Election of Directors: | ||||||||
For | Withhold | For | Withhold | For | Withhold | ||||
01 - Randall A. Mehl (Class I) | o | o | 02 - Elaine D. Rosen (Class I) | o | o | 03 - Ralph E. Struzziero (Class I) | o | o |
For | Against | Abstain | For | Against | Abstain | ||||
2. | Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Kforce’s independent registered public accountants for 2019. | o | o | o | 3. | Advisory vote on Kforce’s executive compensation. | o | o | o |
4. | Approve the Kforce Inc. 2019 Stock Incentive Plan. | o | o | o | 5. | In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments of the Annual Meeting. |
B | Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign | ||||||
NOTE: Please date and sign exactly as your name appears on your shares. If signing for estates, trusts, partnerships, corporations or other entities, your title or capacity should be stated. If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. The signer hereby revokes all proxies heretofore given by the signer to vote at said meeting or any adjournments thereof. | |||||||
Date(mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. | Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. | Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. | |||||
/ / |
SEE REVERSE SIDE | CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE | SEE REVERSE SIDE |
C | Non-Voting Items | ||||
Change of Address — Please print new address below. | Meeting Attendance | ||||
Mark box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. | o |
:I[]$LF6.C>&/3+TCBL"V8],XY.07#>#?
M5VXQ+NR:?8:].D(?2ORI:0EY*JZ_'/S,3)!QU\OM >Z(?A7\^.%(,F46#XCR
MZPQ,UUH)6T^V]+]H1 "4BQQ@#"DG*J6N^NM=>D9ES*\!]-/[1&>IL-:?+GA I4S@->%/H(
ML:**G:O(@BM?*W%,J-#XMZ8Q*X/3\#7* I1B,NGUURCEX^(U[:SA#$
&M<(FF4WS\=81"DVHEP.#9'
M.0%"42WUT/IYQA9.M>/RA^5+=\FTW76,0N"ORUH8PH%5:<(PIHX0DT()X4+\
M!#*QR=L=>\12D ^F.N>,-!(KY8Q#?6*5HI;GS2RET;)N'T\_I"Z _P FU3'Y
MX0P4XBOY?\1*S#S?7H((MUUY*-O6(@^MU*^U&UU'CTA(K+DMG3IG\_ P[-?J
M&UH=,X60AS@^O"(!V*+S;B0/6?)%0G,AAE77IXP1*AK[1Q0H^LO'Y'.(R]/P
MUYP))F>7:@[=D=G ,#CWT5P);QY>&N4$6CCT#:UE!7Y:T7YF(]Z_!]:?(\X
MOZHF13 :]4%"G/37,Q),O'F_IKP@DM(&.;X?++TP],I9^&LM95B$0:M(C-!XD$:K]J0TUC/]*MI)%!!%/.
MLK!EYTKJGO&2' /-L/Q]ND2EIW0^M>\,I2&U^?M$#1$\85DUZ*M2CA5^)KZ=
M(FA'EGZ:Z>,.ID,"V)\ WEKE$Y,H>.'MKK!*(44I;EYY?2F,#GR^'734@BAB
M": _3AIXDFHB$6YH[QJ,TC*2'&F#0SW=7;#U]/N_*"R)%?'7AERRB=H P'ET
MQUT>&=PR'Y2-$7SG623F94>)S% D>VM-))'MCKA U)\?M]Z:JA.7'LF],L
MEF=@6(KK7"%):6P.L_IU/A!T*)&NN43EHJVNI?7C! U2JI>?N!. \L==D>[G
MT;6L8C,#AF8BOR_,,R4XT!T8C,(!PTU($86]:*X"1JVOS@DRG $P66 &M#A!C++BFO#7G$42ZYZX4A\#SUX1-[$60#)H8H9]QJ$JA(KIO7EE6D0(#
M%M:]8G,!Q8 J=8G/L]#Y^W!O?"%(MP3M W3' U0
MI4,(336M- B>NFUZ1D9:I[0!4J3 XT&NB)GY1@J9J/ATUAU>(J.0S.M4Y1
M8^^O73P6BO=,]P(IPUT5@J;3AT\=5P@*$XZYZX1A))IPU]NK=(*54/#YY:^T
M"U$'-^TDY'E;5E)J:?76(W#]?MJGK$U-2NN/EY1B2I_7Y<8/'6M<$0;'M[?*) %QA77VH:XPS<#ZIQUA6)D #+6LJ&!O<$A:+@W]S4=;()1F
M#7#[<<(.EZ#E77KR:((F^1.M9"&TGS;EX4PUE##*ZC1]SCY?E"1P\1ZOY^T1
MFR6?\Z\8D@^/D^'M],3&/EKPQB+:U]F
M@J97G[1&W.::#(BUOE8*NF.L_P =8FH;B-"(K14-X\LH*D#Q;1R/AX09I=
M1K=XGG';SX)=6.M>F+Q.Z=>NGCBA76OH8,%M=-9PN2NB_?7MZ(35TVL,J1
M)Q76O)WB5ST]Z:]HG*DDY:\=>,--/)5,&>N5?/U
MUG!%QS0VF,95&=-=D6;+ 9OKJG6!K3AQK0?3V@DP$@8OSRZP*_5L=#5 :1#
MYXJ"G*GHA$&M*\]=/(0)9-WF.O'6$60 -,/G@].3?8F"SI:6RIY9_/R)@(C'
MMP.N*IY"2
*QGJ-9(LQ\./IKC$PFO+34P
M\WXQR6-5IRZ1PABS>OR\H56#>%$4+:UE&)RN%?31CBSAR)UX^\8FU\\N,0
MI;2H2PX-7.G^4*B9O9L=#V?+ZNH3HY
/2F<$YJN*17'W*!+4 *XY-KGRK"\Q3NPZ
M^?D>%(;FRVSSXA\GI^*TK$PD!N((;GKR@(CV[ZJEI7/P$843ZY<,X $QU5S6U\_+IKR')2'Y4]O+EYQ&?) /(:T*@](G
M*2&K@[CSSH&R;..314UYMSK36$+'HE'PJ)26/!M>6',=(9ER78^F5,\->48F
M2S>
CIH*N0Z3Z0"V#Z(BL>8Z45$E!%3F6Y9 :SAI,FE1S\NORAPV4@AQ
M@,] Q\]4ZQ":AQPX?9X:EV=P.COZ=-4$<6'2
MWX =ZQN6P%V D,[2G!09@>!O 8BE'&1\7C2]M6&>7$H;H+D&H4,59O3
M"@H85[TB65JEN$-6KTR()&'@>$-_UI&\S<@0:G_8V)M80/FLI_\ HFNW7[XF
M?ZS_ %Q -0FD25RU%2"%@D[IX9XUS-*,3PBAMW9^QSUB\D(4'5>!(!S#EJ &
ME06-<(R)JU+"@0D$%DEP:XN]$C@,><4UO$U"5,&0Q%[%E$\WH!5CCB&(A/YP
M&-!:UP$DAU1TQ%O3KK'AJD[Y:8B6R#E@(,#AB4*=8T(7_;4"@XY[V7*G@ T
M=:]JMEJ2\R6$*42YO4S+U#X8<'RC8!-FI0HK4%2V9)&=0QP=L31ZTK6*3;^U
MDI2$*4.[6 ED@E258.P:E+QX$Q2[:M(SDR.JT-?9ZR@)*K:@*#419Y\QJ@U41*23_ -H(I$)O8I"B52;1
M*FI^-F7*6$E\$VA*4N5;H"9JE.:BL;?8NQ4V85 A
OH4&