Goodwill

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Goodwill.

Goodwill

3.  Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting unit for the six months ended December 31, 2012 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Reporting Unit
Asset Class	License			SMS, Training, and Other		Professional Services			Total
Balance as of June 30, 2012
Goodwill	$	69,570		$	15,398	$	5,102		$	90,070
Accumulated impairment losses	(65,569		)	—		(5,102		)	(70,671		)
	$	4,001		$	15,398	$	—		$	19,399
Effect of currency translation	83			369		—			452
Balance as of December 31, 2012
Goodwill	$	69,653		$	15,767	$	5,102		$	90,522
Accumulated impairment losses	(65,569		)	—		(5,102		)	(70,671		)
	$	4,084		$	15,767	$	—		$	19,851

We test goodwill for impairment annually (or more often if impairment indicators arise), at the reporting unit level in accordance with the provisions of ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other.

We adopted ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, during fiscal 2012. In accordance with the provisions of ASU No. 2011-08, we must first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine based on this assessment that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we are required to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The first step requires us to determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the carrying amount, including goodwill, of such reporting unit. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, no impairment loss is recognized. However, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the goodwill of the unit may be impaired. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based upon the implied fair value of goodwill at the valuation date.

Fair value of a reporting unit is determined using a combined weighted average of a market-based approach (utilizing fair value multiples of comparable publicly traded companies) and an income-based approach (utilizing discounted projected cash flows). In applying the income-based approach, we would be required to make assumptions about the amount and timing of future expected cash flows, growth rates and appropriate discount rates. The amount and timing of future cash flows would be based on our most recent long-term financial projections. The discount rate we would utilize would be determined using estimates of market participant risk-adjusted weighted-average costs of capital and reflect the risks associated with achieving future cash flows.

We have elected December 31 as the annual impairment assessment date and perform additional impairment tests if triggering events occur.  We performed our annual impairment test for each reporting unit as of December 31, 2012, and, based upon the results of our qualitative assessment, determined that it is not likely that their respective fair values are less than their carrying amounts. As such, we did not perform the two-step goodwill impairment test and did not recognize impairment losses during the three and six months ended December 31, 2012.