XML 63 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Regulatory Matters
3 Months Ended
Nov. 30, 2013
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Matters
Student Financial Aid
In fiscal year 2013, University of Phoenix generated 90% of our total consolidated net revenue and more than 100% of our operating income, and 83% of the University’s cash basis revenue for eligible tuition and fees was derived from Title IV financial aid program funds, as calculated under the 90/10 Rule described below.
All U.S. federal financial aid programs are established by Title IV of the Higher Education Act and regulations promulgated thereunder. The U.S. Congress must periodically reauthorize the Higher Education Act and annually determine the funding level for each Title IV program. In August 2008, the Higher Education Act was reauthorized through September 30, 2013 by the Higher Education Opportunity Act. Congress has begun Higher Education Act reauthorization hearings and there is currently an automatic one year extension that continues the current authorization through September 30, 2014. Changes to the Higher Education Act, including changes in eligibility and funding for Title IV programs, are likely to occur in connection with this reauthorization, but we cannot predict the scope and substance of any such changes.
The Higher Education Act, as reauthorized, specifies the manner in which the U.S. Department of Education reviews institutions for eligibility and certification to participate in Title IV programs. Every educational institution involved in Title IV programs must be certified to participate and is required to periodically renew this certification.
University of Phoenix was recertified in November 2009 and entered into a new Title IV Program Participation Agreement which expired on December 31, 2012. University of Phoenix has submitted necessary documentation for re-certification and its eligibility continues on a month-to-month basis until the Department issues its decision on the application. We have no reason to believe that the University’s application will not be renewed in due course, and it is not unusual to be continued on a month-to-month basis until the Department completes its review. However, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, the imposition of the Notice sanction by The Higher Learning Commission, as described below, might have on this process.
Western International University was recertified in May 2010 and entered into a new Title IV Program Participation Agreement which expires September 30, 2014.
Higher Learning Commission (“HLC”)
University of Phoenix and Western International University are accredited by The Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (“HLC”). This accreditation provides the following:
Recognition and acceptance by employers, other higher education institutions and governmental entities of the degrees and credits earned by students;
Qualification to participate in Title IV programs (in combination with state higher education operating and degree granting authority); and
Qualification for authority to operate in certain states.
During fiscal year 2013, the accreditations of University of Phoenix and Western International University were reaffirmed by HLC through the 2022-2023 academic year. At the same time, HLC placed both universities on Notice status for a two-year period. Notice status is a sanction that means that HLC has determined that an institution is on a course of action that, if continued, could lead the institution to be out of compliance with one or more of the HLC Criteria for Accreditation or Core Components. We believe the imposition of the sanction of Notice on University of Phoenix could adversely impact our business.
90/10 Rule
To remain eligible to participate in Title IV programs, proprietary institutions of higher education must comply with the so-called “90/10 Rule” under the Higher Education Act, as reauthorized, and must derive 90% or less of their cash basis revenue, as defined in the rule, from Title IV programs. The 90/10 Rule percentage for University of Phoenix was 83% for fiscal year 2013. Based on recent trends, we do not expect the 90/10 Rule percentage for University of Phoenix to exceed 90% for fiscal year 2014. However, the 90/10 Rule percentage for University of Phoenix remains high and could exceed 90% in the future depending on the degree to which its various initiatives are effective, the impact of future changes in its enrollment mix, and regulatory and other factors outside our control, including any reduction in military benefit programs or changes in the treatment of such funding for purposes of the 90/10 Rule calculation. Various members of Congress have proposed changes to the 90/10 Rule that would, if enacted, reduce the percentage to 85% and adversely change the manner in which military aid is treated for purposes of the rule calculation.
Student Loan Cohort Default Rates
To remain eligible to participate in Title IV programs, an educational institution’s student loan cohort default rates must remain below certain specified levels. Educational institutions will lose eligibility to participate in Title IV programs if their three-year cohort default rate equals or exceeds 40% for any given year or 30% for three consecutive years. The three-year cohort default rate for University of Phoenix for the 2010 federal fiscal year was 26.0%. Based on our most recent trends, we expect that our 2011 three-year cohort default rate will be lower than the 2010 three-year cohort default rate. However, if our student loan default rates approach the applicable limits, we may be required to increase efforts and resources dedicated to improving these default rates.
Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Education (“OIG”)
In October 2011, the OIG notified us that it was conducting a nationwide audit of the Department’s program requirements, guidance, and monitoring of institutions of higher education offering distance education. In connection with the OIG’s audit of the Department, the OIG examined a sample of University of Phoenix students who enrolled during the period from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011. The OIG subsequently notified University of Phoenix that in the course of this review it identified certain conditions that the OIG believes are Title IV compliance exceptions at University of Phoenix. Although University of Phoenix is not the direct subject of the OIG’s audit of the Department, the OIG has asked University of Phoenix to respond so that it may consider University of Phoenix’s views in formulating its audit report of the Department. In September 2013, the OIG provided to University of Phoenix, among other institutions, a draft appendix to its audit report. The draft appendix again identifies compliance exceptions at University of Phoenix. University of Phoenix has responded to the appendix. These exceptions relate principally to the calculation of the amount of Title IV funds returned after student withdrawals and the process for confirming student eligibility prior to disbursement of Title IV funds. We are not the direct subject of the OIG’s audit of the Department, and we have not accrued any liability associated with this matter.