-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, RiOnW4uq0gBz6WrdjfXNvTL9A881yRdn418tvoBQmxpM3PqVRPdzyfm5RvaaVN1y cjhoFziTPi5NtWvTy4uHlQ== 0000950123-05-013372.txt : 20051109 0000950123-05-013372.hdr.sgml : 20051109 20051109170735 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950123-05-013372 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 6 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20050930 FILED AS OF DATE: 20051109 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20051109 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000927720 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: RADIO BROADCASTING STATIONS [4832] IRS NUMBER: 133827791 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-27823 FILM NUMBER: 051190931 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3191 CORAL WAY CITY: MIAMI STATE: FL ZIP: 33145 BUSINESS PHONE: 3054416901 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3191 CORAL WAY CITY: MIAMI STATE: FL ZIP: 33145 10-Q 1 y14457e10vq.htm FORM 10-Q FORM 10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
     
(Mark One)
   
þ
  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
 
or
 
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    For the transition period from           to
Commission file number 33-82114
(SBS LOGO)
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware
  13-3827791
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
2601 South Bayshore Drive, PH II
Coconut Grove, Florida 33133
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(305) 441-6901
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o
      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes þ          No o
      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes o          No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
      Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of November 7, 2005, 40,277,805 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 24,503,500 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and 380,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, which are convertible into 7,600,000 shares of Class A common stock, were outstanding.
 
 


SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.
INDEX
             
        Page
         
 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
   Financial Statements — Unaudited     3  
     Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2005     3  
     Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three- and Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2005     4  
     Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Loss for the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2005.     5  
     Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2005     6  
     Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements     7  
   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     16  
   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     25  
   Controls and Procedures     26  
 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
   Legal Proceedings     26  
   Exhibits     28  
 EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION
 EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION
 EX-32.1: CERTIFICATION
 EX-32.2: CERTIFICATION

2


Table of Contents

PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements — Unaudited
SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
                     
    December 31,   September 30,
    2004   2005
         
    (In thousands,
    except share data)
Assets
Current assets:
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 132,032     $ 100,901  
 
Net receivables
    32,622       31,033  
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    2,520       3,168  
 
Assets held for sale
    65,004       65,109  
             
   
Total current assets
    232,178       200,211  
Property and equipment, net
    22,178       22,155  
FCC licenses
    710,410       710,410  
Goodwill
    32,806       32,806  
Other intangible assets, net
    1,400       2,123  
Deferred financing costs, net
    10,073       9,079  
Other assets
    678       1,369  
Derivative instrument
          4,380  
             
    $ 1,009,723     $ 982,533  
             
 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
               
 
Current portion of the senior credit facility term loan due 2009
  $ 123,750     $  
 
Current portion of the senior credit facility term loan due 2012
          3,250  
 
Current portion of the senior credit facility term loan due 2013
          100,000  
 
Current portion of other long-term debt
    3,154       73  
 
Deposits on sale of stations
          35,000  
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    24,225       14,299  
 
Accrued interest
    5,428       1,141  
 
Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock dividends payable
          2,013  
 
Deferred commitment fee
    525       469  
             
   
Total current liabilities
    157,082       156,245  
Senior credit facility term loan due 2013, less current portion
          320,125  
95/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009, net
    326,476        
Other long-term debt, less current portion
    567       512  
Deferred income taxes
    127,055       139,730  
Other long-term liabilities
    993       661  
             
   
Total liabilities
    612,173       617,273  
             
Cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock:
               
 
103/4% Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock, plus accrued dividends at December 31, 2004, $0.01 par value, liquidation value $1,000 per share. Authorized 280,000 shares; 83,054 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 89,932 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2005
    84,914       89,932  
             
Stockholders’ equity:
               
 
Series C preferred stock, $0.01 par value and liquidation value. Authorized 600,000 shares; issued and outstanding 380,000 shares
    1       1  
 
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value. Authorized 100,000,000 shares; 40,197,805 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 40,277,805 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2005
    4       4  
 
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value. Authorized 50,000,000 shares; 24,583,500 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 24,503,500 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2005
    2       2  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    520,450       520,421  
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes
          2,628  
 
Accumulated deficit
    (207,821 )     (247,728 )
             
   
Total stockholders’ equity
    312,636       275,328  
             
    $ 1,009,723     $ 982,533  
             
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
                                     
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
         
    2004   2005   2004   2005
                 
    (In thousands, except   (In thousands, except
    per share data)   per share data)
Net revenue
  $ 41,127     $ 43,047     $ 110,651     $ 122,961  
                         
Operating expenses:
                               
 
Engineering and programming
    8,097       8,292       23,046       24,609  
 
Selling, general and administrative
    13,637       15,683       39,256       47,859  
 
Corporate expenses
    2,943       3,154       9,170       10,588  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    798       867       2,443       2,521  
                         
   
Total operating expenses
    25,475       27,996       73,915       85,577  
                         
   
Operating income from continuing operations
    15,652       15,051       36,736       37,384  
                         
Other (expense) income:
                               
 
Interest expense, net
    (10,437 )     (8,021 )     (30,875 )     (28,837 )
 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          (29,443 )           (32,597 )
 
Other, net
    14       (8 )     270       1,792  
                         
   
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and discontinued operations
    5,229       (22,421 )     6,131       (22,258 )
Income tax expense
    8,462       10,618       9,960       10,618  
                         
   
Loss from continuing operations before discontinued operations
    (3,233 )     (33,039 )     (3,829 )     (32,876 )
Income on discontinued operations, net of tax
    17,638       3       28,527        
                         
   
Net income (loss)
  $ 14,405     $ (33,036 )   $ 24,698     $ (32,876 )
Dividends on preferred stock
    (2,164 )     (2,406 )     (6,326 )     (7,031 )
                         
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders
  $ 12,241     $ (35,442 )   $ 18,372     $ (39,907 )
                         
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share:
                               
 
Net loss per common share before discontinued operations
  $ (0.08 )   $ (0.49 )   $ (0.16 )   $ (0.55 )
   
Net income per common share from discontinued operations
  $ 0.27     $     $ 0.44     $  
                         
 
Net income (loss) per common share
  $ 0.19     $ (0.49 )   $ 0.28     $ (0.55 )
                         
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
                               
 
Basic
    64,756       72,381       64,722       72,381  
                         
 
Diluted
    64,962       72,381       65,095       72,381  
                         
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Loss
for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
                                                                                     
    Class C   Class A   Class B                
    Preferred Stock   Common Stock   Common Stock       Accumulated        
                Additional   Other       Total
    Number   Par   Number   Par   Number   Par   Paid-In   Comprehensive   Accumulated   Stockholders’
    of Shares   Value   of Shares   Value   of Shares   Value   Capital   Income   Deficit   Equity
                                         
    (In thousands, except share data)
Balance at December 31, 2004
    380,000     $ 1       40,197,805     $ 4       24,583,500     $ 2       520,450             (207,821 )     312,636  
 
Issuance cost of the Series B preferred stock
                                        (29 )                 (29 )
 
Conversion of Class B common stock to Class A common stock
                80,000             (80,000 )                              
Series B preferred stock dividends
                                                    (7,031 )     (7,031 )
Comprehensive income (loss):
                                                                               
  Net loss                                                     (32,876 )     (32,876 )
  Unrealized gain on derivative instrument (net of income tax expense of $1,752)                                               2,628             2,628  
                                                             
   
Comprehensive loss
                                                                            (30,248 )
                                                             
Balance at September 30, 2005
    380,000     $ 1       40,277,805     $ 4       24,503,500     $ 2     $ 520,421     $ 2,628     $ (247,728 )   $ 275,328  
                                                             
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                         
    Nine Months Ended
    September 30,
     
    2004   2005
         
    (In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 24,698     $ (32,876 )
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
   
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (28,527 )      
   
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          32,597  
   
Gain on disposal of fixed assets
    58       14  
   
Depreciation and amortization
    2,443       2,521  
   
Net barter income
    (348 )     (241 )
   
Provision for doubtful trade accounts receivable
    682       527  
   
Amortization of debt discount
    909       717  
   
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    1,491       1,400  
   
Increase in deferred income taxes
    9,809       10,923  
   
Amortization of deferred commitment fee
    (56 )     (56 )
   
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
     
(Increase) decrease in trade receivables
    (5,341 )     955  
     
Decrease (increase) in other current assets
    1,022       (677 )
     
Increase in other assets
    (254 )     (701 )
     
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (3,735 )     (9,306 )
     
Increase in deferred commitment fee
    600        
     
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest
    7,206       (4,287 )
             
       
Net cash provided by continuing operations
    10,657       1,510  
       
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations
    1,565       (291 )
             
       
Net cash provided by operating activities
    12,222       1,219  
             
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
 
Proceeds from sale of radio stations, net of closing costs
    51,924        
 
Advances on purchase price of stations
    (234 )     (750 )
 
Deposit on sale of stations
          35,000  
 
Additions to property and equipment
    (2,318 )     (2,590 )
             
       
Net cash provided by investing activities
    49,372       31,660  
             
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
 
Payments of other long-term debt
    (168 )     (3,468 )
 
Payment of deferred financing costs
    (166 )     (9,043 )
 
Payment of deferred offering costs
    (375 )      
 
Proceeds from Class A stock options exercised
    453        
 
Payment of the 95/8% senior subordinated notes, due 2009 and related premiums
          (351,124 )
 
Proceeds from senior credit facility term loan due 2012
          325,000  
 
Proceeds from senior credit facility term loan due 2013
          100,000  
 
Payment of senior credit facility term loan due 2012
          (1,625 )
 
Payment of senior credit facility term loan due 2009
    (938 )     (123,750 )
             
       
Net cash used in financing activities
    (1,194 )     (64,010 )
             
       
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    60,400       (31,131 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    45,609       132,032  
             
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
    106,009       100,901  
             
Supplemental cash flows information:
               
 
Interest paid during the period
    21,733       33,469  
             
 
Income taxes paid during the period, net
    337       1,613  
             
 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
     
Accrual and/or issuance of Series B preferred stock as payment of preferred stock dividends
  $ 6,326     $ 5,018  
             
     
Accrual of dividend payable for payment of Series B preferred stock cash dividends
  $     $ 2,013  
             
     
Unrealized gain on derivative instrument
  $     $ 4,380  
             
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
      The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our” or “SBS”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2005 and for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 do not contain all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements as of, and for, the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, included in our fiscal year end 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
      In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, which are all of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. The results of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123). SFAS No. 123R requires companies to expense the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees. We are required to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006. We are evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123R and have not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123R, and have not determined whether the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123 in Note 4(d).
      In December 2004, FASB issued FASB Statement No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets” (SFAS No. 153), which replaces the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” (APB No. 29), exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 will be effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring on or after January 1, 2006.
3. Assets Held for Sale
      On August 17, 2004, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group, LLC (“Styles Media Group”), to sell the assets of radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, for a cash purchase price of $120.0 million (the “LA Asset Sale”). In connection with this agreement, Styles Media Group made a $6.0 million non-refundable deposit to the purchase price into escrow. On February 18, 2005, Styles Media Group exercised its right under the agreement to extend the closing date until March 31, 2005, by releasing the deposit from escrow to us.
      On March 30, 2005, we entered into an amendment to the asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group. In connection with this amendment, Styles Media Group made an additional $14.0 million non-refundable deposit to the purchase price and we agreed to extend the closing date from March 31, 2005, to the later date of July 31, 2005 or five days following the grant of the FCC Final Order. On July 29, 2005, we entered into a second amendment to the asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group. In connection with this second amendment, Styles Media Group made an additional $15.0 million non-refundable deposit to the purchase price and we agreed to extend the closing date from July 31, 2005, to the date that is designated by Styles Media Group, but no later than January 31, 2006. In addition, Styles Media Group will make an additional $20.0 million non-refundable deposit to the purchase price two days following the grant of the FCC

7


Table of Contents

license renewals which we expect to occur in the fourth quarter of 2005. Although we expect the LA Asset Sale to be completed, there can be no assurance that such sale will be completed.
      On August 17, 2004, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Spanish Broadcasting System SouthWest, Inc., we entered into a time brokerage agreement with Styles Media Group pursuant to which Styles Media Group was permitted to begin broadcasting its programming on radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM beginning on September 20, 2004. The time brokerage agreement will terminate upon the closing under, or termination of, the asset purchase agreement.
      We determined that, since we were not eliminating all significant revenues and expenses generated in this market, the pending LA Asset Sale did not meet the criteria to classify the stations’ operations as discontinued operations. However, we reclassified the stations’ assets as assets held for sale. On September 30, 2005, we had assets held for sale consisting of $63.9 million of intangible assets and $1.2 million of property and equipment, net, for radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM.
      KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM generated net revenues of $1.0 million and $0.6 million and generated station operating income of $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2005, respectively. KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM generated net revenues of $3.5 million and $1.7 million and generated station operating income of $1.7 million and $1.3 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2005, respectively. For the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2005, net revenue and station operating income were mainly generated by the funds received related to the stations’ time brokerage agreement.
      We intend to use the net cash proceeds received from the LA Asset Sale to repay certain amounts under our new senior secured credit facility term loan due 2013. Therefore, we have reclassified the senior secured credit facility term loan due 2013 balance from long-term debt to current debt. If the proposed LA Asset Sale does not close, we will be unable to use the anticipated proceeds from such sale to reduce our debt.
4. Stockholders’ Equity
     (a)  Series C Preferred Stock
      On December 23, 2004, in connection with the closing of the merger agreement, dated October 5, 2004, with Infinity Media Corporation (“Infinity”), Infinity Broadcasting Corporation of San Francisco (“Infinity SF”) and SBS Bay Area, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of SBS (“SBS Bay Area”), we issued to Infinity (i) an aggregate of 380,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Series C preferred stock”), each of which is convertible at the option of the holder into twenty fully paid and non-assessable shares of our Class A common stock; and (ii) a warrant to purchase an additional 190,000 shares of Series C preferred stock, exercisable at any time from December 23, 2004 until December 23, 2008, at an exercise price of $300.00 per share (the “Warrant”).
      Under the terms of the certificate of designation governing the Series C preferred stock, the holder of Series C preferred stock has the right to convert each share of Series C preferred stock into twenty fully paid and nonassessable shares of our Class A common stock. The shares of Series C preferred stock issued at the closing of the merger are convertible into 7,600,000 shares of our Class A common stock, subject to adjustment, and the Series C preferred stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant is convertible into an additional 3,800,000 shares of our Class A common stock, subject to adjustment. To date, none of these warrants have been exercised.
      In connection with the closing of the merger transaction, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with Infinity, pursuant to which, following a period of one year (or earlier if we take certain actions), Infinity may instruct us to file up to three registration statements, on a best efforts basis, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) providing for the registration for resale of the Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock.

8


Table of Contents

      We are required to pay holders of Series C preferred stock dividends on parity with our Class A common stock and Class B common stock, and each other class or series of our capital stock, if created, after December 23, 2004.
     (b)  Class A and B Common Stock
      The rights of the holders of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are identical, except for voting rights and conversion provisions. The Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share and the Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. Holders of each class of common stock are entitled to receive dividends and, upon liquidation or dissolution, are entitled to receive all assets available for distribution to stockholders. The holders of each class have no preemptive or other subscription rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to such shares. Each class of common stock is subordinate to our 103/4% Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share and liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Series B preferred stock”) and on parity with the Series C preferred stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, winding up and dissolution of SBS.
     (c)  Warrants
      In connection with the purchase of KXOL-FM and the merger agreement with Infinity, as discussed in Note 4 (a), we have warrants outstanding to ultimately purchase an aggregate of 4,500,000 shares of our Class A common stock. The following table summarizes information about these warrants which are outstanding as of September 30, 2005:
                     
    Number of Class A        
    Common Shares   Per Share   Warrant
Warrant Date of Issue   Underlying Warrants   Exercise Price   Expiration Date
             
March 31, 2003
    100,000     $6.14     March 31, 2006  
April 30, 2003
    100,000     $7.67     April 30, 2006  
May 31, 2003
    100,000     $7.55     May 31, 2006  
June 30, 2003
    100,000     $8.08     June 30, 2006  
July 31, 2003
    100,000     $8.17     July 31, 2006  
August 31, 2003
    100,000     $7.74     August 31, 2006  
September 30, 2003
    100,000     $8.49     September 30, 2006  
December 23, 2004
    3,800,000     (see Note 4(a))     December 23, 2008  
                 
      4,500,000              
                 
     (d)  Stock Option Plans
      In September 1999, we adopted an employee incentive stock option plan (the “1999 ISO Plan”) and a non-employee director stock option plan (the “1999 NQ Plan”). Options granted under the 1999 ISO Plan will vest according to terms to be determined by the compensation committee of our board of directors, and will have a contractual life of up to 10 years from the date of grant. Options granted under the 1999 NQ Plan will vest 20% upon grant and 20% each year for the first four years from grant. All options granted under the 1999 ISO Plan and the 1999 NQ Plan vest immediately upon a change in control of SBS, as defined therein. A total of 3,000,000 shares and 300,000 shares of Class A common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1999 ISO Plan and the 1999 NQ Plan, respectively. Additionally, on November 2, 1999, we granted a stock option to purchase 250,000 shares of Class A common stock to a former director. These options vested immediately, and expire 10 years from the date of grant.

9


Table of Contents

      A summary of the status of our stock options, as of December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2005, and changes during the nine-months ended September 30, 2005, is presented below (in thousands, except per share data):
                   
        Weighted
        Average
        Exercise
    Shares   Price
         
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
    3,013     $ 12.28  
 
Granted
    174       9.46  
 
Exercised
           
 
Forfeited
    (383 )     14.02  
             
Outstanding at September 30, 2005
    2,804     $ 11.87  
             
      The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):
                                           
        Weighted            
        Average            
        Remaining   Weighted       Weighted
        Contractual   Average       Average
    Number   Life   Exercise   Number   Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices   Outstanding   (Years)   Price   Exercisable   Price
                     
$  0 — 4.99
    100       5.2     $ 4.81       100     $ 4.81  
 
 5 — 9.99
    1,710       7.4       9.01       1,048       8.68  
 
10 — 14.99
    268       8.6       10.95       77       11.23  
 
15 — 19.99
    16       6.6       15.48       16       15.48  
 
20 — 24.99
    710       4.1       20.00       710       20.00  
                               
      2,804       6.6     $ 11.87       1,951     $ 12.76  
                               
      We apply Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for our stock option plans. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income (loss), as all options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted to employees during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 was $6.63 and $7.42 and $5.05 and $5.82, respectively, on the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions at:
                                 
    Three-Months Ended   Nine-Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
         
    2004   2005   2004   2005
                 
Expected life
    7 years       5 years       7 years       5 years  
Dividends
    None       None       None       None  
Risk-free interest rate
    4.08 %     4.18 %     3.47 %     4.14 %
Expected volatility
    76 %     69 %     78 %     71 %

10


Table of Contents

      Had compensation expense for our plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, our net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders and net income (loss) per common share would have been adjusted to pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):
                                   
    Three-Months Ended   Nine-Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
         
    2004   2005   2004   2005
                 
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders:
                               
As reported
  $ 12,241       (35,442 )   $ 18,372       (39,907 )
Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax
    (1,050 )     (670 )     (3,919 )     (1,999 )
                         
Pro forma net income (loss)
  $ 11,191       (36,112 )   $ 14,453       (41,906 )
                         
Net income (loss) per common share:
                               
 
As reported: Basic and Diluted
  $ 0.19       (0.49 )   $ 0.28       (0.55 )
                         
 
Pro forma: Basic and Diluted
  $ 0.17       (0.50 )   $ 0.22       (0.58 )
                         
5. Litigation
      From time to time we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business, such as contractual matters and employee-related matters. In the opinion of management, such litigation is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial position.
Hurtado Litigation
      On June 14, 2000, an action was filed in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit (the “Court”) in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida by Jose Antonio Hurtado against us, alleging that he was entitled to a commission related to an acquisition made by us (the “Hurtado Case”). The Hurtado Case was tried before a jury during the week of December 1, 2003 and Mr. Hurtado was awarded the sum of $1.8 million, plus interest, which we accrued for during the quarter ended December 31, 2003. Mr. Hurtado also filed an application for attorneys’ fees, which we opposed on grounds that there was no contractual or statutory basis for such an award. We filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was heard on February 6, 2004. On March 12, 2004, the Court denied our motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, upon its own motion, the Court granted a new trial. On April 7, 2004, Mr. Hurtado filed a notice of appeal with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, challenging the order granting a new trial, and on April 8, 2004, we filed a notice of cross-appeal, challenging the denial of our motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. On August 27, 2004, Mr. Hurtado filed his initial brief, and on January 10, 2005, we filed a combined response brief and initial brief on our cross-appeal. On March 7, 2005, Mr. Hurtado filed his reply brief and our reply brief was due 20 days thereafter. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals set the matter for oral argument on April 13, 2005. Subsequently, on May 5, 2005, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that judgment should be entered in our favor. On May 19, 2005, Mr. Hurtado filed a motion for rehearing which was denied, and the mandate upon the denial of Mr. Hurtado’s motion was issued on July 29, 2005. During the nine-months ended September 30, 2005, we reversed the legal contingency accrual of $1.8 million, plus interest related to this contingency based on the denial of Mr. Hurtado’s motion. We filed a motion with the trial court requesting judgment in our favor and are currently in the process of scheduling the hearing.
Wolf, et. al., Litigation
      On November 28, 2001, a complaint was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Southern District of New York”) and was amended on April 19, 2002. The amended complaint alleges that the named plaintiff, Mitchell Wolf, purchased shares of our Class A common stock pursuant to the October 27, 1999 prospectus and registration statement relating to our initial

11


Table of Contents

public offering which closed on November 2, 1999. The complaint was brought on behalf of Mr. Wolf and an alleged class of similarly situated purchasers, against us, eight underwriters and/or their successors-in-interest who led or otherwise participated in our initial public offering, two members of our senior management team, one of whom is our Chairman of the Board, and an additional director, referred to collectively as the individual defendants. To date, the complaint, while served upon us, has not been served upon the individual defendants, and no counsel has appeared for them.
      This case is one of more than 300 similar cases brought by similar counsel against more than 300 issuers, 40 underwriter defendants, and 1,000 individuals alleging, in general, violations of federal securities laws in connection with initial public offerings, in particular, failing to disclose that the underwriter defendants allegedly solicited and received additional, excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which they allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted shares issued in connection with each offering. All of these cases, including the one involving us, have been assigned for consolidated pretrial purposes to one judge of the Southern District of New York. One of the claims against the individual defendants, specifically the Section 10b-5 claim, has been dismissed.
      In June of 2003, after lengthy negotiations, a settlement proposal was embodied in a memorandum of understanding among the investors in the plaintiff class, the issuer defendants and the issuer defendants’ insurance carriers. On July 23, 2003, our Board of Directors approved both the memorandum of understanding and an agreement between the issuer defendants and the insurers. The principal components of the settlement include: 1) a release of all claims against the issuer defendants and their directors, officers and certain other related parties arising out of the alleged wrongful conduct in the amended complaint; 2) the assignment to the plaintiffs of certain of the issuer defendants’ potential claims against the underwriter defendants; and 3) a guarantee by the insurers to the plaintiffs of the difference between $1.0 billion and any lesser amount recovered by the plaintiffs against the underwriter defendants. The payments will be charged to each issuer defendant’s insurance policy on a pro rata basis.
      On February 15, 2005, the Southern District of New York granted preliminary approval to the proposed settlement agreement, subject to a narrowing of the proposed bar on underwriter and non-settling defendant claims against the issuer defendants to cover only contribution claims. The Court directed the parties to submit revised settlement documents consistent with its Opinion and scheduled a conference for March 18, 2005 in order to (a) make final determinations as to the form, substance and program of notice, and (b) schedule a Rule 23 fairness hearing. Pursuant to the Court’s request, on May 2, 2005 the parties submitted an Amendment to Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Defendant Issuers and Individuals (the “Amendment”). Our Board of Directors approved the Amendment on May 4, 2005 and it has since received unanimous approval from all the non-bankrupt issuers.
      On July 25, 2005, anticipating that a notice of pendency of class action would be required by Court Order in the near future and in order to facilitate the mailing of such notice, we authorized our transfer agent, First Union National Bank, to release the identities of all our transferees and record holders during the class period to the Notice Administrator, The Garden City Group, Inc. On August 31, 2005, the Court entered an Order confirming preliminary approval of the Issuers’ Settlement, with only minor modifications, setting March 24, 2006, as the deadline for submission of any objections or requests for exclusion from the Settlement, scheduling a Settlement Fairness Hearing for April 24, 2006, to determine whether the Settlement should be finally approved, and, as anticipated, requiring the Notice Administrator to provide notice of pendency of class action. We do not have sufficient information to assess our potential exposure to liability, if any, and no amounts have been accrued in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Amigo Broadcasting Litigation
      On December 5, 2003, Amigo Broadcasting, L.P. (“Amigo”) filed an original petition and application for temporary injunction in the District Court of Travis County, Texas (the “Court”), against us, Raul Bernal (“Bernal”) and Joaquin Garza (“Garza”), two of our former employees. Amigo filed a first and second amended petition and application for temporary injunction on June 25, 2004 and February 18, 2005, respectively. The second amended petition alleged that we (1) misappropriated Amigo’s proprietary interests

12


Table of Contents

by broadcasting the characters and concepts portrayed by the Bernal and Garza radio show (the “Property”), (2) wrongfully converted the Property to our own use and benefit, (3) induced Bernal and Garza to breach their employment agreements with Amigo, (4) used and continued to use Amigo’s confidential information and property with the intention of diverting profits from Amigo and of inducing Amigo’s potential customers to do business with us and our syndicators, (5) invaded Amigo’s privacy by misappropriating the name and likeness of Bernal and Garza, and (6) committed violations of the Lanham Act by diluting and infringing on Amigo’s trademarks. Based on these claims, Amigo seeks damages in excess of $3.0 million.
      On December 5, 2003, the Court issued a temporary injunction against all of the defendants and scheduled a hearing before the Court on December 17, 2003. The temporary injunction dissolved by its terms on December 1, 2004. On December 17, 2003, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, whereby the Court entered an Order on Consent of the settling parties, permitting Bernal and Garza’s radio show to be broadcast on our radio stations. In addition, we agreed that we would not broadcast the Bernal and Garza radio show in certain prohibited markets and that we would not distribute certain promotional materials that were developed by Amigo. On January 5, 2004, we answered the remaining claims asserted by Amigo for damages. The parties have exchanged some written discovery and are in the process of scheduling depositions. The case was scheduled for a jury trial on May 23, 2005. On March 18, 2005, the case was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. A mediation between the parties was scheduled for August 22, 2005, however, this mediation has been postponed indefinitely until the parties conduct further discovery on the matter. Thus, the extent of any adverse impact on the company with respect to this matter can not be reasonably estimated at this time.
6. New Senior Secured Credit Facilities
General
      On June 10, 2005, we entered into a first lien credit agreement with Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, as syndication agent (“Merrill Lynch”), Wachovia Bank, National Association, as documentation agent (“Wachovia”), Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as administrative agent (“Lehman”) and certain other lenders (the “First Lien Credit Facility”). The First Lien Credit Facility contains a term loan in the amount of $325.0 million, payable in twenty-eight consecutive quarterly installments commencing on June 30, 2005, and continuing on the last day of each of December, March, June and September of each year thereafter, through, and including, March 31, 2012. The amount of the quarterly installment due on each such payment date is equal to 0.25% of the original principal balance of the term loan funded on June 10, 2005, which is approximately $0.8 million. Through September 30, 2005, we have made two of these principal payments, totaling $1.6 million. The term loan is due and payable on June 10, 2012. The First Lien Credit Facility also includes a revolving credit loan in an aggregate principal amount of $25.0 million. The initial scheduled maturity of the revolving credit line is June 10, 2010. We currently have not made any drawings under the revolving credit loan.
      On June 10, 2005, we also entered into a second lien term loan agreement with Merrill Lynch, Wachovia, Lehman and certain other lenders (the “Second Lien Credit Facility”; together with the First Lien Credit Facility, the “Credit Facilities”). The Second Lien Credit Facility provides for a term loan in the amount of $100.0 million with a scheduled maturity of June 10, 2013, with the full amount of such term loan being payable on such date.
      The Credit Facilities are subject to certain mandatory prepayments upon the occurrence of certain events, including asset sales (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the credit agreements).
      Approximately $123.7 million of the proceeds from the Credit Facilities was used to repay our $135.0 million senior secured credit facility term loan due 2009 and accrued interest. The remaining proceeds, together with cash on hand, totaling approximately $357.5 million, were placed in escrow with the trustee to redeem all of our $335.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 95/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009, including the redemption premium and accrued interest through redemption. The redemption occurred on July 12, 2005 (See Note 8).

13


Table of Contents

      We intend to use the net cash proceeds received from the LA Asset Sale to repay certain amounts under the Second Lien Credit Facility. Therefore, we have reclassified the Second Lien Credit Facility balance from long-term debt to current debt. If the proposed LA Asset Sale does not close, we will be unable to use the anticipated proceeds from such sale to reduce our debt.
Interest and Fees
      The interest rates per annum applicable to loans under the Credit Facilities are, at our option, the Base Rate or Eurodollar Base Rate (as defined in the respective credit agreement) plus, in each case, an applicable margin. The applicable interest rate under our First Lien Credit Facility will be reduced by 0.25% upon the achievement of certain conditions. Initially, the applicable margin in respect of (i) the First Lien Credit Facility is (a) 2.00% per annum for Eurodollar loans and (b) 1.00% per annum for Base Rate loans and (ii) the Second Lien Credit Facility is (a) 3.75% per annum for Eurodollar loans and (b) 2.75% per annum for Base Rate loans. The Base Rate is a fluctuating interest rate equal to the greater of (1) the Prime Rate in effect on such day and (2) the Federal Funds Effective Rate in effect on such day plus one-half of 1%.
      In addition, we will be required to pay the lenders under the revolving credit facility under the First Lien Credit Facility a commitment fee with respect to any unused commitments thereunder, at a per annum rate of 0.50%. We are also required to pay a prepayment fee in respect of all mandatory and optional prepayments under the Second Lien Credit Facility in an amount equal to: (i) 1.0% of the principal prepaid if (a) such prepayment is made with the proceeds of the LA Asset Sale on or before June 10, 2006 or (b) such prepayment is made after June 10, 2007, but on or before June 10, 2008 or (ii) 2.0% of the principal prepaid if (a) such prepayment is made other than with the proceeds of the LA Asset Sale on or before June 10, 2006 or (b) such prepayment is made after June 10, 2006, but on or before June 10, 2007.
Collateral and Guarantees
      Our domestic subsidiaries, including any future direct or indirect subsidiaries that may be created or acquired by us, with certain exceptions as set forth in the credit agreements, guarantee our obligations under each of the First Lien Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility. The guarantees with respect to the First Lien Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility are secured by a perfected first priority security interest, or by a second priority security interest, as applicable, in substantially all of the guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets (including, without limitation, intellectual property and all of the capital stock of each of our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of certain of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries), subject to certain exceptions.
Covenants and Other Matters
      Our Credit Facilities include certain negative covenants restricting or limiting our ability to, among other things:
  •  incur additional debt, incur contingent obligations and issue additional preferred stock;
 
  •  create liens;
 
  •  pay dividends, distributions or make other specified restricted payments, and restrict the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments to us;
 
  •  sell assets;
 
  •  make certain capital expenditures, investments and acquisitions;
 
  •  enter into certain transactions with affiliates;
 
  •  enter into sale and leaseback transactions; and
 
  •  merge or consolidate with any other person or sell, assign, transfer, lease, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets.

14


Table of Contents

      The Credit Facilities contain certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants and events of default, including failure to pay principal, interest or fees, material inaccuracy of representations and warranties, violations of covenants, certain bankruptcy and insolvency events, certain ERISA events, certain events related to our FCC licenses, a change of control, cross-defaults to other debt and material judgments.
7. Derivative Financial Instrument (Interest Rate Swap)
      On June 29, 2005, we entered into a five year interest rate swap to hedge against the potential impact of increases in interest rates on the First Lien Credit Facility. The interest rate swap fixed our LIBOR interest rate for five years at 4.23%, plus the applicable margin (2.00% as of September 30, 2005). We are accounting for our interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” as amended by SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities.” The fair market value of this swap at September 30, 2005 was an asset of $4.4 million, with an associated deferred income tax liability of $1.8 million. As we have designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge, and the swap was perfectly effective during the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2005, the net asset was recorded as a component of comprehensive income and no ineffectiveness was recognized.
8. Redemption of 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009
      On June 13, 2005, we announced that we called for redemption of all of our outstanding $335.0 million aggregate principal amount 95/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009 (the “95/8% Notes”). The aggregate redemption price of the 95/8% Notes, including redemption premium and accrued interest, was approximately $357.5 million, which was held in trust. On July 12, 2005 (the “Redemption Date”), we redeemed $335.0 million in the aggregate principal amount of the 95/8% Notes at a price of $1,048.13 per $1,000, plus accrued interest through the Redemption Date. As a result of the early extinguishment of the 95/8% Notes, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt related to call premiums and the write-off of unamortized discount and deferred financing costs of approximately $29.4 million during the three-months ended September 30, 2005.
9. Television Station Acquisition
      On July 12, 2005, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Mega Media Holdings, Inc. (“Mega Media”), entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with WDLP Broadcasting Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“WDLP”), WDLP Licensed Subsidiary, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of WDLP, Robin Broadcasting Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Robin Broadcasting Company”), and Robin Licensed Subsidiary, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Robin Broadcasting Company. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Mega Media will acquire the assets, including licenses, permits and authorizations issued by the FCC used in or related to the operation of television stations WDLP-TV (Channel 22), its derivative digital television station WDLP-DT (Channel 3) in Key West, Florida and WSBS-CA (Channel 50) in Miami, Florida. The purchase price is equal to $37.0 million, plus $0.3 million since the transaction did not close prior to August 31, 2005, plus expenses, plus or minus certain customary pro-rations. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2005; however, we cannot assure you that the transaction will close. We have paid $0.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2005 which will be applied to the purchase price upon closing. At closing, Mega Media may pay $22.5 million of the purchase price by the delivery of a three-year promissory note guaranteed by us and secured by the assets being acquired in the transaction. The remainder of the cash due at closing of $14.0 million will be funded with cash on hand and operations. The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, and covenants. The closing of the sale is subject to certain conditions, including FCC consent. We expect to continue to incur start-up expenses related to Mega Media.

15


Table of Contents

10. Second Amendment to Related Party Lease Agreement
      Since November 1, 2000, we have been leasing our corporate office space under a 10-year lease, with the right to renew for two consecutive five-year terms. Our corporate headquarters are located in a 21-story office building in Coconut Grove, Florida owned by Irradio Holdings, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership (“Irradio”), for which the general partner is Irradio Investments, Inc., a Florida subchapter S corporation, wholly-owned by Mr. Alarcón, Jr., our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors.
      On July 6, 2005, we entered into the Second Amendment to Lease, effective as of December 1, 2004, amending our existing Lease, dated as of December 14, 2000, as amended (the “Second Amendment”) with Irradio. On July 5, 2005, we received an opinion from Merrill Lynch as to the fairness of the Second Amendment. Under the terms of the Second Amendment, the parties agreed to extend the lease term of the existing office space until April 30, 2015, expand the size of the office space and pay a total average monthly rent of approximately $131,000. The additional office space will be used for the operations of the Miami stations. We believe that the monthly rent we pay is at the market rate.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
      We are the largest Hispanic-controlled radio broadcasting company in the United States. Upon the completion of all previously announced transactions, we will own and operate 20 radio stations in markets that reach approximately 49% of the U.S. Hispanic population and one television station, which reaches 1.5 million households in the Miami-Ft. Lauderdale area. Our radio stations are located in six of the top ten Hispanic markets of Los Angeles, New York, Puerto Rico, Chicago, Miami and San Francisco. Los Angeles and New York have the largest and second largest Hispanic populations, and are the largest and second largest radio markets in the United States in terms of advertising revenue, respectively. Our top three markets, based on net revenues, are New York, Los Angeles and Miami. A significant decline in net revenue or station operating income from our stations in any of these markets could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. As part of our operating business, we also operate LaMusica.com, a bilingual Spanish-English Internet website providing content related to Latin music, entertainment, news and culture.
      The success of each of our stations depends significantly upon its audience ratings and share of the overall advertising revenue within its market. The broadcasting industry is a highly competitive business, but some barriers to entry do exist. Each of our stations competes with both Spanish-language and English-language stations in its market, as well as with other advertising media such as newspapers, cable television, the Internet, magazines, outdoor advertising, transit advertising and direct mail marketing. Factors which are material to our competitive position include management experience, our station’s rank in its market, signal strength and frequency and audience demographics, including the nature of the Spanish-language market targeted by a particular station.
      Our primary source of revenue is the sale of advertising time on our radio stations to local and national advertisers. Our revenue is affected primarily by the advertising rates that our stations are able to charge, as well as the overall demand for advertising time in each respective market. Seasonal net broadcasting revenue fluctuations are common in the broadcasting industry and are due to fluctuations in advertising expenditures by local and national advertisers. Typically for the radio broadcasting industry, the first calendar quarter generally produces the lowest revenue. Our most significant operating expenses are compensation expenses, programming expenses, professional fees and advertising and promotional expenses. Our senior management strives to control these expenses, as well as other expenses, by working closely with local station management and others, including vendors.

16


Table of Contents

Comparison Analysis of the Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2005
      The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2005. Various fluctuations illustrated in the table are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes.
                                     
    Three Months Ended    
    September 30,   Change
         
    2004   2005   $   %
                 
    (In thousands)        
Net revenue
  $ 41,127     $ 43,047       1,920       5 %
 
Engineering and programming expense
    8,097       8,292       195       2 %
 
Selling, general and administrative expense
    13,637       15,683       2,046       15 %
 
Corporate expenses
    2,943       3,154       211       7 %
 
Depreciation and amortization
    798       867       69       9 %
                         
   
Operating income from continuing operations
    15,652       15,051       (601 )     (4 )%
 
Interest expense, net
    (10,437 )     (8,021 )     (2,416 )     (23 )%
 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          (29,443 )     29,443       100 %
 
Other income (expense), net
    14       (8 )     (22 )     (157 )%
 
Income tax expense
    8,462       10,618       2,156       25 %
 
Income on discontinued operations, net of taxes
    17,638       3       (17,635 )     (100 )%
                         
   
Net income (loss)
  $ 14,405     $ (33,036 )     (47,441 )     (329 )%
                         
      Net Revenue. The increase in net revenue was due partially to our start-up station in San Francisco, KRZZ-FM, which generated net revenues of approximately $1.3 million for the current quarter. In addition, we had increases in our Puerto Rico market, mainly from promotional events, and our New York market, primarily from local revenue.
      Engineering and Programming Expenses. The increase in engineering and programming expenses was mainly caused by our start-up station in San Francisco, KRZZ-FM, totaling $0.3 million and our new television project, totaling $0.3 million. These expenses were offset by a decrease in compensation and benefits.
      Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was mainly caused by (a) related expenses of our new start-up station in San Francisco, KRZZ-FM, totaling $0.7 million and our new television project, totaling $0.6 million, (b) professional fees related mostly to our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (c) building expense related to a new lease for our Miami stations’ facilities and (d) the provision for doubtful accounts receivable. These expenses were offset by a decrease in cash advertising.
      Corporate Expenses. The increase in corporate expenses was mainly caused by an increase in employee compensation and benefits and legal and professional fees.
      Operating Income from Continuing Operations. The decrease in operating income from continuing operations was primarily attributed to the increases in engineering and programming, selling, general and administrative expenses and corporate expenses, partially offset by the increase in net revenue.
      Interest Expense, Net. The decrease in interest expense, net, was primarily due to lower interest expense incurred on the Credit Facilities that were entered into on June 10, 2005 versus interest expense incurred on our prior debt structure. In addition, interest expense, net, decreased due to an increase in interest income resulting from a general increase in interest rates on our cash balances.

17


Table of Contents

      Loss on early extinguishment of debt. The loss on early extinguishment of debt was due to call premiums paid and the write-off of unamortized discount and deferred financing costs related to the redemption of the 95/8% senior subordinated notes, due 2009, on July 12, 2005.
      Income Taxes. The increase in income tax expense was due primarily to an increase in income from continuing operations before income taxes and discontinued operations, excluding the loss on early extinguishment of debt. Our effective book tax rate has been impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS No. 142). As a result of adopting SFAS No. 142, the reversal of our deferred tax liabilities related to our intangible assets could no longer be assured over our net operating loss carry forward period. Therefore, our effective book tax rate is impacted by a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets. We expect that total income tax expense for the full year to be approximately $17.0 million, which is comprised primarily of deferred income tax expense.
      Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes. The decrease in discontinued operations, net of taxes, was mainly attributable to the $17.0 million gain recognized in the prior year’s quarter on the sale of our San Francisco station, KPTI-FM, net of closing costs and taxes.
      Net Income. The decrease in net income was primarily due to the loss on early extinguishment of debt, the increase in income taxes, and the decrease in income from discontinued operations, offset by a decrease in interest expense, net.
Comparison Analysis of the Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2005
      The following summary table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2005. Various fluctuations illustrated in the table are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes.
                                     
    Nine Months Ended    
    September 30,   Change
         
    2004   2005   $   %
                 
    (In thousands)        
Net revenue
  $ 110,651     $ 122,961       12,310       11 %
 
Engineering and programming expense
    23,046       24,609       1,563       7 %
 
Selling, general and administrative expense
    39,256       47,859       8,603       22 %
 
Corporate expenses
    9,170       10,588       1,418       15 %
 
Depreciation and amortization
    2,443       2,521       78       3 %
                         
   
Operating income from continuing operations
    36,736       37,384       648       2 %
 
Interest expense, net
    (30,875 )     (28,837 )     (2,038 )     (7 )%
 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          (32,597 )     32,597       100 %
 
Other income, net
    270       1,792       1,522       564 %
 
Income tax expense
    9,960       10,618       658       7 %
 
Income (loss) on discontinued operations, net
    28,527             (28,527 )     (100 )%
                         
   
Net income (loss)
  $ 24,698     $ (32,876 )     (57,574 )     (233 )%
                         
      Net Revenue. The increase in net revenue was mainly due to the double-digit growth in our New York and Los Angeles markets primarily from local and barter revenue. In addition, our new start-up station in San Francisco, KRZZ-FM, generated net revenues of approximately $3.3 million for the current nine-months.
      Engineering and Programming Expenses. The increase in engineering and programming expenses was mainly caused by expenses of our start-up station in San Francisco, KRZZ-FM, totaling $1.1 million and our new television project, totaling $0.3 million. These expenses were offset by a decrease in compensation and benefits.

18


Table of Contents

      Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was mainly caused by: (a) expenses of our new start-up station in San Francisco, KRZZ-FM, totaling $3.8 million and our new television project, totaling $0.6 million; (b) barter expense due to related marketing costs; (c) professional fees related to our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; (d) promotional events expenses; (e) building expense related to a new lease for our Miami stations facilities; and, (f) local commissions due to the increase in net revenue. These expenses were offset by a decrease in cash advertising.
      Corporate Expenses. The increase in corporate expenses was mainly caused by an increase in employee compensation and benefits and legal and professional fees.
      Operating Income from Continuing Operations. The increase in operating income from continuing operations was primarily attributed to the increase in net revenues, offset by increases in engineering and programming, selling, general and administrative expenses and corporate expenses.
      Interest Expense, Net. The decrease in interest expense, net, was primarily due to lower interest expense incurred on the Credit Facilities that were entered into on June 10, 2005 versus interest expense incurred on our prior debt structure. In addition, interest expense, net, decreased due to an increase in interest income resulting from a general increase in interest rates on our cash balances.
      Loss on early extinguishment of debt. The loss on early extinguishment of debt was due to (a) call premiums paid and the write-off of unamortized discount and deferred financing costs related to the redemption of the 95/8% senior subordinated notes, due 2009, on July 12, 2005 and (b) the write-off of deferred financing costs related to the pay-down of the $135.0 million senior secured credit facility term loan due 2009, on June 10, 2005.
      Other Income, net. The increase in other income, net, was due to the reversal of the legal judgment upon appeal, in the Hurtado Case, that was expensed in a prior period.
      Income Taxes. The increase in income tax expense was due primarily to an increase in income from continuing operations before income taxes and discontinued operations, excluding the loss on early extinguishment of debt. Our effective book tax rate has been impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 142. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 142, the reversal of our deferred tax liabilities related to our intangible assets could no longer be assured over our net operating loss carry forward period. Therefore, our effective book tax rate is impacted by a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets. We expect total income tax expense for the full year to be approximately $17.0 million, which is comprised primarily by deferred income tax expense.
      Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes. The decrease in discontinued operations, net of taxes, was primarily attributable to (a) the $11.6 million gain recognized in the prior year on the sale of our San Antonio stations, KLEY-FM and KSAH-AM, net of closing costs and taxes, and (b) the $17.0 million gain recognized in the prior year on the sale of our San Francisco station, KPTI-FM, net of closing costs and taxes.
      Net Income. The decrease in net income was primarily due to the loss on early extinguishment of debt, increase in income taxes, decrease in income from discontinued operations, offset by an decrease in interest expense, net.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
      Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash provided by operations and, to the extent necessary, undrawn commitments that are available under our $25.0 million revolving credit facility. Our ability to raise funds by increasing our indebtedness is limited by the terms of the certificates of designations governing our preferred stock and the credit agreements governing our Credit Facilities. Additionally, our certificates of designations and credit agreements each place restrictions on us with respect to the sale of assets, liens, investments, dividends, debt repayments, capital expenditures, transactions with affiliates and consolidations and mergers, among other things. We had cash and cash equivalents of $132.0 million and $100.9 million as of December 31, 2004, and September 30, 2005, respectively.

19


Table of Contents

      The following summary table presents a comparison of our capital resources for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2005, with respect to certain of our key measures affecting our liquidity. The changes set forth in the table are discussed below. This section should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes.
                           
    Nine Months Ended    
    September 30,   Change
         
    2004   2005   $
             
    (In thousands)    
Capital expenditures
  $ 2,318     $ 2,590       272  
                   
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
  $ 12,222     $ 1,219       (11,003 )
Net cash flows provided by investing activities
    49,372       31,660       (17,712 )
Net cash flows used in financing activities
    (1,194 )     (64,010 )     (62,816 )
                   
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  $ 60,400     $ (31,131 )        
                   
      Net Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from operating activities were primarily a result of the increase in cash received from customers, offset mainly by an increase in cash paid to vendors and for interest and the reversal of the legal judgment upon appeal, in the Hurtado Litigation.
      Net Cash Flows Provided by Investing Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from investing activities were primarily a result of (a) deposits totaling $35.0 million received for the pending sale of our Los Angeles stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, offset by capital expenditures for 2005 and (b) proceeds of $51.9 million we received in 2004 for the sale of San Antonio stations KLEY-FM and KSAH-AM, and San Francisco station, KPTI-FM, offset by capital expenditures.
      Net Cash Flows Used In Financing Activities. Changes in our net cash flows from financing activities were primarily a result of the 2005 refinancing, which (a) paid-down the $135.0 million senior secured credit facility term loan due 2009, (b) redeemed the 95/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009 and (c) incurred additional financing costs. Offsetting these outflows were the inflows from the Credit Facilities.
      Management believes that cash from operating activities, together with cash on hand, should be sufficient to permit us to meet our operating obligations in the foreseeable future, including required interest and quarterly principal payments pursuant to the credit agreements governing our Credit Facilities and capital expenditures, excluding the acquisitions of FCC licenses. Assumptions (none of which can be assured) which underlie management’s beliefs, include the following:
  •  The demand for advertising within the radio broadcasting industry and economic conditions in general will not deteriorate in any material respect;
 
  •  We will continue to successfully implement our business strategies; and
 
  •  We will not incur any material unforeseen liabilities, including environmental liabilities.
      Our strategy is to primarily utilize cash flows from operations to meet our capital needs and contractual obligations. However, we also have bank borrowings available to meet our capital needs and contractual obligations and, when appropriate and, if available, will obtain financing by issuing debt or stock.
      On June 10, 2005, we entered into new senior secured credit facilities with affiliates of Lehman, Merrill Lynch, and Wachovia. The senior secured credit facilities provided for an aggregate of $425.0 million in funded term loans, consisting of a $325.0 million first lien credit facility, plus a $25.0 million revolving loan facility and a $100.0 million second lien credit facility.
      On June 10, 2005, approximately $123.7 million of the proceeds from the new Credit Facilities were used to repay our $135.0 million senior secured credit facility term loan due 2009 and accrued interest. Due to this repayment, we incurred a loss on early extinguishment of debt, totaling approximately $3.2 million, related to write-offs of deferred financing costs. The remaining proceeds, together with cash on hand, totaling approximately $357.5 million, were placed in escrow with the trustee to redeem all of our $335.0 million

20


Table of Contents

aggregate principal amount of 95/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009, including the redemption premium and accrued interest through redemption. On July 12, 2005, the 95/8% senior subordinated notes due 2009 were redeemed and we incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt, totaling approximately $29.4 million related to call premiums, and the write-off of unamortized discount and deferred financing costs.
      On June 29, 2005, we entered into a five year interest rate swap to hedge against the potential impact of increases in interest rates on the First Lien Credit Facility. The interest rate swap fixed our LIBOR interest rate for five years at 4.23%, plus the applicable margin (2.00% as of September 30, 2005). We are accounting for our interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” as amended by SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities.” The fair market value of this swap at September 30, 2005, was an asset of $4.4 million, with an associated deferred income tax liability of $1.8 million. As we have designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge, and the swap was perfectly effective during the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2005, the net asset was recorded as a component of comprehensive income and no ineffectiveness was recognized.
      On August 17, 2004, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group, LLC (“Styles Media Group”), to sell the assets of radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM, serving the Los Angeles, California market, for a cash purchase price of $120.0 million (the “LA Asset Sale”). In connection with this agreement, Styles Media Group made a $6.0 million non-refundable deposit to the purchase price into escrow. On February 18, 2005, Styles Media Group exercised its right under the agreement to extend the closing date until March 31, 2005, by releasing the deposit from escrow to us.
      On March 30, 2005, we entered into an amendment to the asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group. In connection with this amendment, Styles Media Group made an additional $14.0 million non-refundable deposit to the purchase price and we agreed to extend the closing date from March 31, 2005, to the later date of July 31, 2005, or five days following the grant of the FCC Final Order. On July 29, 2005, we entered into a second amendment to the asset purchase agreement with Styles Media Group. In connection with this second amendment, Styles Media Group made an additional $15.0 million non-refundable deposit to the purchase price and we agreed to extend the closing date from July 31, 2005, to the date that is designated by Styles Media Group, but no later than January 31, 2006. In addition, Styles Media Group will make an additional $20.0 million non-refundable deposit to the purchase price two days following the grant of the FCC license renewals which we expect to occur in the fourth quarter of 2005. Although we expect the LA Asset Sale to be completed, there can be no assurance that such sale will be completed.
      On August 17, 2004, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Spanish Broadcasting System SouthWest, Inc., we entered into a time brokerage agreement with Styles Media Group pursuant to which Styles Media Group was permitted to begin broadcasting its programming on radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM beginning on September 20, 2004. The time brokerage agreement will terminate upon the closing under, or termination of, the asset purchase agreement.
      We determined that, since we were not eliminating all significant revenues and expenses generated in this market, the pending LA Asset Sale did not meet the criteria to classify the stations’ operations as discontinued operations. However, we reclassified the stations’ assets as assets held for sale. On September 30, 2005, we had assets held for sale consisting of $63.9 million of intangible assets and $1.2 million of property and equipment, net, for radio stations KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM.
      KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM generated net revenues of $1.0 million and $0.6 million and generated station operating income of $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2005, respectively. KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM generated net revenues of $3.5 million and $1.7 million and generated station operating income of $1.7 million and $1.3 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2005, respectively. For the three- and nine-months ended September 30, 2005, net revenue and station operating income were mainly generated by the funds received related to the stations’ time brokerage agreement.
      We intend to use the net cash proceeds received from the LA Asset Sale to repay certain amounts under our new senior secured credit facility term loan due 2013. Therefore, we have reclassified the senior secured

21


Table of Contents

credit facility term loan due 2013 balance from long-term debt to current debt. If the proposed LA Asset Sale does not close, we will be unable to use the anticipated proceeds from such sale to reduce our debt.
      On July 12, 2005, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Mega Media Holdings, Inc. (“Mega Media”), entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with WDLP Broadcasting Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“WDLP”), WDLP Licensed Subsidiary, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of WDLP, Robin Broadcasting Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Robin Broadcasting Company”), and Robin Licensed Subsidiary, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Robin Broadcasting Company. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Mega Media will acquire the assets, including licenses, permits and authorizations issued by the FCC used in or related to the operation of television stations WDLP-TV (Channel 22), its derivative digital television station WDLP-DT (Channel 3) in Key West, Florida and WSBS-CA (Channel 50) in Miami, Florida. The purchase price is equal to $37.0 million, plus $0.3 million since the transaction did not close prior to August 31, 2005, plus expenses, plus or minus certain customary pro-rations. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2005; however, we cannot assure you that the transaction will close. We have paid $0.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2005, which will be applied to the purchase price upon closing. At closing, Mega Media may pay $22.5 million of the purchase price by the delivery of a three-year promissory note guaranteed by us and secured by the assets being acquired in the transaction. The remainder of the cash due at closing of $14.0 million will be funded with cash on hand and operations. The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, and covenants. The closing of the sale is subject to certain conditions, including FCC consent. We expect to continue to incur start-up expenses related to Mega Media. For the fourth quarter ending December 31, 2005, we expect start-up expenses for the anticipated launch of the TV station to total approximately $3.5 million.
      We continuously evaluate opportunities to make strategic acquisitions, primarily in the largest Hispanic markets in the United States. We engage in discussions regarding potential acquisitions from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Except as discussed above, we currently have no other written understandings, letters of intent or contracts to acquire stations or other companies. We anticipate that any future acquisitions would be financed through funds generated from permitted debt financing, equity financing, operations, asset sales or a combination of these sources. However, there can be no assurance that financing from any of these sources, if necessary and available, can be obtained on favorable terms for future acquisitions.
      During 2005, we have entered into various contractual obligations. Therefore, we have revised our contractual obligations table from what was previously disclosed in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table summarizes our principal and interest contractual obligations at September 30, 2005, and

22


Table of Contents

the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows for the remainder of 2005 and future periods ($ in thousands):
                                                                 
        As of   For the Year Ended
        September 30,    
Contractual Obligations   Total   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   Thereafter
                                 
Recorded obligations:
                                                               
Senior secured credit facility term loan due 2012(a)
  $ 458,672       5,850       22,418       22,223       22,029       21,835       23,941       340,376  
Senior secured credit facility term loan due 2013(b)
    103,693       2,005       101,688                                
Other long-term debt(c)
    717       27       108       108       108       108       108       150  
103/4% Series B cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred stock(d)
    78,149       2,417       9,668       9,668       9,668       9,668       9,668       27,392  
                                                 
    $ 641,231       10,299       133,882       31,999       31,805       31,611       33,717       367,918  
                                                 
Unrecorded obligations:
                                                               
Operating leases(e)
    37,023       976       5,513       3,542       3,470       2,943       3,147       17,432  
Employment agreements(f)
    37,292       3,776       13,705       10,459       7,418       1,498       438        
                                                 
    $ 74,315       4,752       19,218       14,001       10,888       4,441       3,585       17,432  
                                                 
Total obligations
  $ 715,546       15,051       153,100       46,000       42,693       36,052       37,302       385,350  
                                                 
 
(a) Our senior secured credit facility term loan due 2012 is a variable-rate debt instrument, but we entered into an interest rate swap to hedge (fix) our interest rate for five years. See Notes 6 and 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information. For the purpose of calculating our contractual obligations, we assumed an interest rate of approximately 7.48% after the five year interest rate swap terminates.
 
(b) Our senior secured credit facility term loan due 2013 is a variable-rate debt instrument. The net cash proceeds received from the sale of our Los Angeles (KZAB-FM and KZBA-FM) radio stations, when and if completed, will be used to repay our borrowings under this credit facility. Therefore, we reclassified the Credit Facilities balance from long-term debt to current debt. For the purpose of calculating our contractual obligations, we assumed that the senior secured credit facility will be paid-down on January 31, 2006, and an interest rate of approximately 8.02%.
 
(c) Other long-term debt relates to a capital lease.
 
(d) Our Series B preferred stock has no specified maturity. However, holders of the preferred stock may exercise an option on October 15, 2013, to require us to redeem all or a portion of their preferred stock. The holders of shares of Series B preferred stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends at a rate of 103/4% per year of the $1,000 liquidation preference per share. All dividends are cumulative from the date of issuance of the Series B preferred stock and are payable quarterly in arrears on October 15, January 15, April 15 and July 15 of each year. On or before October 15, 2008, we, at our option, may pay dividends in cash or in additional fully paid and non-assessable shares of Series B preferred stock (including fractional shares or, at our option, cash in lieu of fractional shares) having an aggregate liquidation preference equal to the amount of such dividends. After October 15, 2008, dividends may be paid only in cash, which are included in this contractual obligation table. Our ability to pay cash dividends is subject to the terms of our credit facilities.
 
The dividend due October 15, 2005, was the first preferred stock dividend paid in cash. For the purpose of calculating our contractual obligations we assumed that the Series B preferred stock will pay dividends in cash going forward as of September 30, 2005.
 
(e) Included in our non-cancelable operating lease obligations are minimum lease payments for office space and facilities and certain equipment.
 
(f) We are committed to employment contracts for certain executives, on-air talent, managers and others expiring through 2010.

23


Table of Contents

New Accounting Pronouncements
      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123). SFAS No. 123R requires companies to expense the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees. We are required to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006. We are evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123R and have not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123R, and have not determined whether the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123 in Note 4(d).
      In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets” (SFAS No. 153), replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” (APB No. 29), exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 will be effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring on or after January 1, 2006.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
      This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains both historical and forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of statements that include phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will” or other similar words or phrases. Similarly, statements that describe our objectives, plans or goals are, or may be, forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be different from any future results, performance and anticipated achievements expressed or implied by these statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
  •  Our substantial amount of debt could adversely affect our financial health;
 
  •  We will require a significant amount of cash to service our debt and to make cash dividend payments under our Series B preferred stock;
 
  •  Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control;
 
  •  We may not have the funds or the ability to raise the funds necessary to repurchase our Series B preferred stock if holders exercise their repurchase right, or to finance the change of control offer required by our Series B preferred stock and the indenture that would govern our 103/4% subordinated exchange notes due 2013, if issued;
 
  •  Any acceleration of our debt or event of default would harm our business and financial condition;
 
  •  Despite our current significant level of debt, we and our subsidiaries may still be able to incur substantially more debt, which, if increased, could further intensify the risks associated with our substantial leverage;
 
  •  The terms of our debt restrict us from engaging in many activities and require us to satisfy various financial tests;
 
  •  The terms of our debt and our preferred stock impose or will impose restrictions on us that may adversely affect our business;
 
  •  We may not complete the proposed sale of our Los Angeles stations;

24


Table of Contents

  •  We may not complete the proposed purchase of WDLP-TV (Channel 22) and WDLP-DT (Channel 3), in Key West, Florida, and WSBS-CA (Channel 50) in Miami, Florida.
 
  •  We have experienced net losses in the past and, to the extent that we experience net losses in the future, our ability to raise capital and the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected;
 
  •  Our operating results could be adversely affected by a national or regional recession;
 
  •  A large portion of our net revenue and station operating income currently comes from our New York, Los Angeles and Miami markets;
 
  •  Loss of any key personnel could adversely affect our business;
 
  •  Our growth depends on successfully executing our acquisition strategy;
 
  •  We are a holding company and depend entirely upon cash flow from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations;
 
  •  Raúl Alarcón, Jr., our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President, has majority voting control and this control may discourage or influence certain types of transactions, including an actual or potential change of control such as a merger or sale;
 
  •  We compete for advertising revenue with other radio groups as well as television and other media companies, many of which have greater resources than we do;
 
  •  Cancellations or reductions in advertising could adversely affect our net revenues;
 
  •  The FCC has begun more vigorous enforcement of its indecency rules against the broadcast industry, which could have a material adverse effect on our business;
 
  •  We may face regulatory review for additional acquisitions and divestitures in our existing markets and, potentially, acquisitions in new markets;
 
  •  Any failure by us to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could cause a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements and could have a material adverse effect on our business and the price of our Class A common stock;
 
  •  We must be able to respond to rapidly changing technology, services and standards which characterize our industry in order to remain competitive;
 
  •  Our business depends on maintaining our FCC licenses. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain these licenses;
 
  •  The market price of our shares of Class A common stock may fluctuate significantly; and
 
  •  Current or future sales by existing stockholders could depress the market price of our Class A common stock.
      Consequently, such forward-looking statements should be regarded solely as our current plans, estimates and beliefs. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
      We believe that inflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2005, respectively. However, there can be no assurance that inflation will not have an adverse impact on our future operating results and financial condition.
      Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows due to adverse changes in interest rates and other relevant market risks. Our primary market risk is a change in interest rates associated with borrowings under the Credit Facilities. Advances under the Credit Facilities bear base rate or Eurodollar rate interest, plus applicable margins, which vary in accordance with

25


Table of Contents

prevailing economic conditions. Our earnings are affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those changes have on interest expense from variable-rate debt instruments and on interest income generated from our cash and investment balances.
      As of September 30, 2005, all of our debt, other than our $100.0 million senior secured credit facility term loan due 2013, had fixed interest rates. If variable interest rates average 10% higher in 2005 than they did during 2004, our variable interest expense would increase by approximately $0.8 million, compared to a variable annualized estimated $7.7 million for 2004 measured as of December 31, 2004. If interest rates average 10% lower in 2005 than they did during 2004, our interest income from cash and investment balances would decrease by approximately $0.1 million, compared to $0.8 million for 2004. These amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our variable-rate debt, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances at December 31, 2004.
      As part of our efforts to mitigate interest rate risk, on June 29, 2005, we entered into a five year interest rate swap agreement that hedged (fixed) the interest rate, based on LIBOR, on our current Eurodollar rate of our $325.0 million senior secured credit facility term loan due 2012 at an interest rate for five years at 4.23%, plus the applicable margin (2.00% as of September 30, 2005). This agreement is intended to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations and was not entered into for speculative purposes. As a result, we believe that interest rate risk is not material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
      Evaluation Of Disclosure Controls And Procedures. Our principal executive and financial officers have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-14(c) of the Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive and financial officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
      Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
      From time to time we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business, such as contractual matters and employee-related matters. In the opinion of management, such litigation is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial position.
     Hurtado Litigation
      On June 14, 2000, an action was filed in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit (the “Court”) in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida by Jose Antonio Hurtado against us, alleging that he was entitled to a commission related to an acquisition made by us (the “Hurtado Case”). The Hurtado Case was tried before a jury during the week of December 1, 2003 and Mr. Hurtado was awarded the sum of $1.8 million, plus interest, which we accrued for during the quarter ended December 31, 2003.
      Mr. Hurtado also filed an application for attorneys’ fees, which we opposed on grounds that there was no contractual or statutory basis for such an award. We filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was heard on February 6, 2004. On March 12, 2004, the Court denied our motion for judgment

26


Table of Contents

notwithstanding the verdict and, upon its own motion, the Court granted a new trial. On April 7, 2004, Mr. Hurtado filed a notice of appeal with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, challenging the order granting a new trial, and on April 8, 2004, we filed a notice of cross-appeal, challenging the denial of our motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. On August 27, 2004, Mr. Hurtado filed his initial brief, and on January 10, 2005, we filed a combined response brief and initial brief on our cross-appeal. On March 7, 2005, Mr. Hurtado filed his reply brief and our reply brief was due 20 days thereafter. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals set the matter for oral argument on April 13, 2005. Subsequently, on May 5, 2005, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that judgment should be entered in our favor. On May 19, 2005, Mr. Hurtado filed a motion for rehearing which was denied, and the mandate upon the denial of Mr. Hurtado’s motion was issued on July 29, 2005. During the nine-months ended September 30, 2005, we reversed the legal contingency accrual of $1.8 million, plus interest related to this contingency based on the denial of Mr. Hurtado’s motion. We filed a motion with the trial court requesting judgment in our favor and are currently in the process of scheduling the hearing.
     Wolf, et. al., Litigation
      On November 28, 2001, a complaint was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Southern District of New York”) and was amended on April 19, 2002. The amended complaint alleges that the named plaintiff, Mitchell Wolf, purchased shares of our Class A common stock pursuant to the October 27, 1999, prospectus and registration statement relating to our initial public offering which closed on November 2, 1999. The complaint was brought on behalf of Mr. Wolf and an alleged class of similarly situated purchasers, against us, eight underwriters and/or their successors-in-interest who led or otherwise participated in our initial public offering, two members of our senior management team, one of whom is our Chairman of the Board, and an additional director, referred to collectively as the individual defendants. To date, the complaint, while served upon us, has not been served upon the individual defendants, and no counsel has appeared for them.
      This case is one of more than 300 similar cases brought by similar counsel against more than 300 issuers, 40 underwriter defendants, and 1,000 individuals alleging, in general, violations of federal securities laws in connection with initial public offerings, in particular, failing to disclose that the underwriter defendants allegedly solicited and received additional, excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which they allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted shares issued in connection with each offering. All of these cases, including the one involving us, have been assigned for consolidated pretrial purposes to one judge of the Southern District of New York. One of the claims against the individual defendants, specifically the Section 10b-5 claim, has been dismissed.
      In June of 2003, after lengthy negotiations, a settlement proposal was embodied in a memorandum of understanding among the investors in the plaintiff class, the issuer defendants and the issuer defendants’ insurance carriers. On July 23, 2003, our Board of Directors approved both the memorandum of understanding and an agreement between the issuer defendants and the insurers. The principal components of the settlement include: 1) a release of all claims against the issuer defendants and their directors, officers and certain other related parties arising out of the alleged wrongful conduct in the amended complaint; 2) the assignment to the plaintiffs of certain of the issuer defendants’ potential claims against the underwriter defendants; and 3) a guarantee by the insurers to the plaintiffs of the difference between $1.0 billion and any lesser amount recovered by the plaintiffs against the underwriter defendants. The payments will be charged to each issuer defendant’s insurance policy on a pro rata basis.
      On February 15, 2005, the Southern District of New York granted preliminary approval to the proposed settlement agreement, subject to a narrowing of the proposed bar on underwriter and non-settling defendant claims against the issuer defendants to cover only contribution claims. The Court directed the parties to submit revised settlement documents consistent with its Opinion and scheduled a conference for March 18, 2005 in order to (a) make final determinations as to the form, substance and program of notice, and (b) schedule a Rule 23 fairness hearing. Pursuant to the Court’s request, on May 2, 2005 the parties submitted an Amendment to Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Defendant Issuers and

27


Table of Contents

Individuals (the “Amendment”). Our Board of Directors approved the Amendment on May 4, 2005 and it has since received unanimous approval from all the non-bankrupt issuers.
      On July 25, 2005, anticipating that a notice of pendency of class action would be required by Court Order in the near future and in order to facilitate the mailing of such notice, we authorized our transfer agent, First Union National Bank, to release the identities of all our transferees and record holders during the class period to the Notice Administrator, The Garden City Group, Inc. On August 31, 2005, the Court entered an Order confirming preliminary approval of the Issuers’ Settlement, with only minor modifications, setting March 24, 2006 as the deadline for submission of any objections or requests for exclusion from the Settlement, scheduling a Settlement Fairness Hearing for April 24, 2006 to determine whether the Settlement should be finally approved, and, as anticipated, requiring the Notice Administrator to provide notice of pendency of class action. We do not have sufficient information to assess our potential exposure to liability, if any, and no amounts have been accrued in the consolidated financial statements.
     Amigo Broadcasting Litigation
      On December 5, 2003, Amigo Broadcasting, L.P. (“Amigo”) filed an original petition and application for temporary injunction in the District Court of Travis County, Texas (the “Court”), against us, Raul Bernal (“Bernal”) and Joaquin Garza (“Garza”), two of our former employees. Amigo filed a first and second amended petition and application for temporary injunction on June 25, 2004 and February 18, 2005, respectively. The second amended petition alleged that we (1) misappropriated Amigo’s proprietary interests by broadcasting the characters and concepts portrayed by the Bernal and Garza radio show (the “Property”), (2) wrongfully converted the Property to our own use and benefit, (3) induced Bernal and Garza to breach their employment agreements with Amigo, (4) used and continued to use Amigo’s confidential information and property with the intention of diverting profits from Amigo and of inducing Amigo’s potential customers to do business with us and our syndicators, (5) invaded Amigo’s privacy by misappropriating the name and likeness of Bernal and Garza, and (6) committed violations of the Lanham Act by diluting and infringing on Amigo’s trademarks. Based on these claims, Amigo seeks damages in excess of $3.0 million.
      On December 5, 2003, the Court issued a temporary injunction against all of the defendants and scheduled a hearing before the Court on December 17, 2003. The temporary injunction dissolved by its terms on December 1, 2004. On December 17, 2003, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, whereby the Court entered an Order on Consent of the settling parties, permitting Bernal and Garza’s radio show to be broadcast on our radio stations. In addition, we agreed that we would not broadcast the Bernal and Garza radio show in certain prohibited markets and that we would not distribute certain promotional materials that were developed by Amigo. On January 5, 2004, we answered the remaining claims asserted by Amigo for damages. The parties have exchanged some written discovery and are in the process of scheduling depositions. The case was scheduled for a jury trial on May 23, 2005. On March 18, 2005, the case was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. A mediation between the parties was scheduled for August 22, 2005, however, this mediation has been postponed indefinitely until the parties conduct further discovery on the matter. Thus, the extent of any adverse impact on the company with respect to this matter can not be reasonably estimated at this time.
Item 6. Exhibits
      (a) Exhibits —
             
  3 .1     Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the “Company”), dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s 1999 Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-85499) (the “1999 Registration Statement”)) (Exhibit A to this exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 25, 1996 (the “1996 Current Report”)).
 
  3 .2     Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s 1999 Registration Statement).

28


Table of Contents

             
  3 .3     Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated May 10, 2005).
 
  3 .4     Certificate of Elimination of 14 11/4% Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated November 14, 2003 (the “11/14/03 Quarterly Report”)).
 
  4 .1     Article V of the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s 1999 Registration Statement).
 
  4 .2     Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003, Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series A Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s 11/14/03 Quarterly Report).
 
  4 .3     Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003, Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series B Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s 11/14/03 Quarterly Report).
 
  4 .4     Indenture dated June 29, 1994, among the Company, IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee, the Guarantors named therein and the Purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s 1994 Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the “1994 Registration Statement”)).
 
  4 .5     First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 25, 1996, to the Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report).
 
  4 .6     Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 1, 1997, to the Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report).
 
  4 .7     Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 21, 1999, to the Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to the Company’s 1999 Registration Statement).
 
  4 .8     Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with The Bank of New York as Trustee, dated November 2, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 2, 1999 (the “1999 Current Report”)).
 
  4 .9     Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with The Bank of New York as Trustee, dated June 8, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on June 25, 2001 (the “2001 Form S-3”)).
 
  4 .10     Form of stock certificate for the Class A common stock of the Company (incorporated by reference to the Company’s 1999 Registration Statement).
 
  4 .11     Certificate of Elimination of 14 11/4% of Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2003).
 
  4 .12     Certificate of Designation Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (“Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock”) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2004).
 
  4 .13     Certificate of Correction to Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock of the Company dated January 7, 2005 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2005).

29


Table of Contents

             
  31 .1     Chief Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31 .2     Chief Financial Officer’s Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  32 .1     Chief Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  32 .2     Chief Financial Officer’s Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

30


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
  SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.
  By:  /s/ Joseph A. García
 
 
  Joseph A. García
  Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary (principal
financial and accounting officer and duly
authorized officer of the registrant)
Date: November 9, 2005

31


Table of Contents

      (a) Exhibits —
             
  3.1       Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the “Company”), dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s 1999 Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-85499) (the “1999 Registration Statement”)) (Exhibit A to this exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 25, 1996 (the “1996 Current Report”)).
 
  3.2       Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s 1999 Registration Statement).
 
  3.3       Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated May 10, 2005).
 
  3.4       Certificate of Elimination of 14 11/4% Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated November 14, 2003 (the “11/14/03 Quarterly Report”)).
 
  4.1       Article V of the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated September 29, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s 1999 Registration Statement).
 
  4.2       Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003, Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series A Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s 11/14/03 Quarterly Report).
 
  4.3       Certificate of Designations dated October 29, 2003, Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions of the 103/4% Series B Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s 11/14/03 Quarterly Report).
 
  4.4       Indenture dated June 29, 1994, among the Company, IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee, the Guarantors named therein and the Purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s 1994 Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the “1994 Registration Statement”)).
 
  4.5       First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 25, 1996, to the Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report).
 
  4.6       Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 1, 1997, to the Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to the 1996 Current Report).
 
  4.7       Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 21, 1999, to the Indenture dated as of June 29, 1994, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to the Company’s 1999 Registration Statement).
 
  4.8       Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with The Bank of New York as Trustee, dated November 2, 1999 (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 2, 1999 (the “1999 Current Report”)).
 
  4.9       Indenture with respect to 95/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 with The Bank of New York as Trustee, dated June 8, 2001 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on June 25, 2001 (the “2001 Form S-3”)).
 
  4.10       Form of stock certificate for the Class A common stock of the Company (incorporated by reference to the Company’s 1999 Registration Statement).

32


Table of Contents

             
  4.11       Certificate of Elimination of 14 11/4% of Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series A of the Company, dated October 28, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2003).
 
  4.12       Certificate of Designation Setting Forth the Voting Power, Preferences and Relative, Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (“Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock”) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2004).
 
  4.13       Certificate of Correction to Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock of the Company dated January 7, 2005 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2005).
 
  31.1       Chief Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  31.2       Chief Financial Officer’s Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  32.1       Chief Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  32.2       Chief Financial Officer’s Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

33 EX-31.1 2 y14457exv31w1.htm EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION EX-31.1

 

Exhibit 31(i).1
CERTIFICATION
I, Raúl Alarcón, Jr., certify that:
      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.;
      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
      4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
        (b) Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
        (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
        (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
      5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
        (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Raúl Alarcón, Jr.
 
 
  Name: Raúl Alarcón, Jr.
  Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors,
  Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: November 9, 2005
EX-31.2 3 y14457exv31w2.htm EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION EX-31.2
 

Exhibit 31(i).2
CERTIFICATION
I, Joseph A. García, certify that:
      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.;
      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
      4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
        (b) Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
        (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
        (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
      5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
        (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Joseph A. García
 
 
  Name: Joseph A. García
  Title: Chief Financial Officer,
  Executive Vice President and
Secretary
Date: November 9, 2005
EX-32.1 4 y14457exv32w1.htm EX-32.1: CERTIFICATION EX-32.1
 

Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raúl Alarcón, Jr., Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Raúl Alarcón, Jr.
 
 
  Name: Raúl Alarcón, Jr.
  Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors,
  President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 9, 2005
EX-32.2 5 y14457exv32w2.htm EX-32.2: CERTIFICATION EX-32.2
 

Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph A. García, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Joseph A. García
 
 
  Name: Joseph A. García
  Title: Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice
  President and Secretary
Date: November 9, 2005
GRAPHIC 6 y14457y1445701.gif GRAPHIC begin 644 y14457y1445701.gif M1TE&.#EA?0!'`/??`$!`0("`@,#`P&UM;:"@H!`0$%!04-#0T&!@8"`@('!P M<-O;V^#@X/___S`P,&YN;O#P\+"PL)"0D.WM[9*2D@$!`>_O[WAX>+R\O'5U M=7=W=X6%A4]/3VIJ:D%!09.3DVEI:=?7UUQ<7'9V=J^OK_+R\JZNKN7EY71T M=,G)R<_/SWEY>6]O;YN;FYJ:FG-S7EI:6K^_OW)R'A\[.SH&!@2DI*3P\/&QL;(N+BV%A8:.CH\+" MPO/S\WIZ>EU=78J*BM_?WVAH:/;V]KZ^OL;&QH^/CTM+2Z>GI^GIZ7M[>_7U M]=W=W8F)B5M;6U-34TA(2*&AH6)B8H*"@CDY.5%149:6EEE96?3T]+:VMB(B M(BHJ*BWH2$A$E)28:&AK*RLF5E9;2TM.;F MYI24E)>7E[N[NTY.3E]?7T5%18Z.CO?W]V=G9S\_/QL;&_CX^'Y^?IR'O[^_L3$Q.'AX>CHZ`P,##8V-E=75Q<7%R\O+R@H*/S\_!H:&K>W MMR8F)@```/___P`````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M`````````````````````"'Y!`$``-\`+`````!]`$<```C_`+\)'$BPH,&# M"!,J7,BPX0$!$"-*E&A$&8T0#3-JW,BQ8\(3%S!\JV#`0($`"1RP*+!F1H4. MW,#`+HW1O`0`)O M`.YV%/'UYX9OI2Q8`*"GPR<&0+BQ(C6&R2$7!GJ@:"&8X0$`H,EZ&STZ<&>- MA7_>^!;#;`5204RUJ5#``*P@49(AR)(#Q(O3&@.0+@V\88K4/S$P2`!-R843 M90@XH5:(#Q$".=C\`#1BAX_B#(4/_S<-/N$'Y-TZ?(N$(XHI%HV`X'!CB!,F M(2)RQ`"Q0T.J\@J)1QIY`!K$`7K=E$#`)'584H01Q0C00Q]P,#&"'UQ0L4,, M./AQ1($'"4@WW@0YF%`"!$`&HETL$W=/3@0A@R:)!J`"/@L(HD`X"!QA@F-Y30S!HHP""$ ML%3\L`H2+O!0B1%7#*'""RHT@*ZS7A880JT_F?!-!Q+0D<$*=(S`Q18($$'( M&3)DD,8;:00@L(_I@G@=5^LW<[300` M`T`$-!(!_2&``,/[!@0$(`$#C.8DQUN>_/3D-@`4((,'$0!I$'`5Q9WH!-%0 MP#`4`()$>$`#,_A%`,C@A2]40`$I04`%_]['D.7MCX@'88#HO%$`('ICA%TB M'PH1`H`5[H1("-J4)_[0@!$P@`89:(`KP``!,TBC"P9HH`I($(>,&-%T"Q&` M_D8#16?]Y7X,(4`4"0.((61#`'8+0@#"\P&D64,`7 M&J)";\#1,W.L8_(8P@!G/2\G!T+0%DHP!!XHP5%)``$18@&"(-Q@!J/P`AD* M`(`*\%$A?RD80R)`&O3-SUF75,@0`AQ:08@>#$`),'`%""BQ""]@0;:S MO8IM$Y)9X90.(@00'0`$`(!;%@1N7\&`'MZ@#0OTBA*J`6R<#"DI.\Z3F!(K8PS3>H`(KY"$%&%#% M$UPP"!(PH05*>,`6$"$'2K+/&PY0``$$0&#LTG6J[.LF0>K78(24()2:^H88 MZE"%$-!B#X4XP2M,D`L)T.`5`?`!"_#P"49\J"$G/K$#@!<`XX7HI0R)*6D2 MH!"Y+L0$?II6$YI0WP8^=,&("*0N*R1/C-Q(7I)B!T>\`!N-(%$=O[TB1/P2:JV6"%V'(UY.<+J M!VA@`=^8@+"'3>QB$UL/Z6.PK._L@.-1%:*<'$X!`FR`N_*ZU]SX!C>VS>UN M>[O;P.:($9<=9?Y1M:H-DW@XW1Y0X3'(/ M1WT$(\M!#_*7T;`MUJ,#P*T)0N]LX_OAV]:W1WJ'`!/Z6]==JE\!9%P0`9F. M`?UFWPD3TG![0_S>$O^_2O%ZIP!3C\?.@:&L-P9L$"6.Q@%3_(RL=2F0DI\< MWRD_3017F.#:`#;)D][Q$TZ/M`JDDZ@FR@-:[_O6P?_T$3&QVG:23YSBI(K01HF[<^ZB2N_=( M.@V?>X/C\HD=&0,%EL_\V>>DJ0-')USO,FZG?T-T_.L(!0;`_>Z#GO9U]XC_ M_DA]E[Y`P(,2),C0P[^1[7>?^]]GZG!HZQG26/^IOA0``J17``8C@/X,X7[O M%W]Q-!S-YA%+='D%\A`0<14"Z'TZX6DSQSO3QR`6&5S*!"!X0WP1G9L$X7DTX4^^Y<788>&;6@\*E1Q M:$A,&K0^I:$`?.$7*T1$#`!$-!AZA_6W&'B(@`6Y$2!Z""`3"+ M,R5X$J!P`F"+WQ`!P7.(AVA"578[U!.%ZL-EY/4-7!@8O5.*Q<,\@?$9V3=C M6A%E@-9B`I`2ASB%?A@`O'2(*,&$ACB'"="&5>87'*05^>,`HY@`4:>.!M"' MP!@8;FB*";!QWQ"%L\B,@8&"6]&,H+%B;NA[!/$04>>-5@:"@A&%"MF0#OA^ 3&>B0$ND1.L!\R]<"SH<3`0$`.S\_ ` end
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----