XML 42 R29.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
Condensed consolidated interim financial statements (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts. In evaluating the ultimate collectability of the Company’s accounts receivable, the Company analyzes its historical cash collection experience and trends for each of its government payors and commercial payors to estimate the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts and the amount of the provision for uncollectible accounts. Management regularly updates its analysis based upon the most recent information available to determine its current provision for uncollectible accounts and the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts. For receivables associated with dialysis patient services covered by government payors, like Medicare, the Company receives 80% of the payment directly from Medicare as established under the government’s bundled payment system and determines an appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts and provision for uncollectible accounts on the remaining balance due depending upon the Company’s estimate of the amounts ultimately collectible from other secondary coverage sources or from the patients. For receivables associated with services to patients covered by commercial payors that are either based upon contractual terms or for non-contracted health plan coverage, the Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts by recording a provision for uncollectible accounts based upon its historical collection experience, potential inefficiencies in its billing processes and for which collectability is determined to be unlikely. Approximately 1% of the Company’s net accounts receivable are associated with patient pay and it is the Company’s policy to reserve 100% of the outstanding accounts receivable balances for dialysis services when those amounts due are outstanding for more than three months.

Long-term incentive compensation

The Company’s stock-based compensation awards are measured at their estimated fair values on the date of grant if settled in shares or at their estimated fair values at the end of each reporting period if settled in cash. The value of stock-based awards so measured is recognized as compensation expense on a cumulative straight-line basis over the vesting terms of the awards, adjusted for expected forfeitures.

Fair value of financial instruments

The Company measures the fair value of certain assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions (temporary equity) based upon certain valuation techniques that include observable or unobservable inputs and assumptions that market participants would use in pricing these assets, liabilities, temporary equity and commitments. The Company also has classified certain assets, liabilities and temporary equity that are measured at fair value into the appropriate fair value hierarchy levels as defined by the FASB.

New accounting standards

In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updated (ASU) No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The amendments in this ASU apply to all inventory with the exception of inventory measured using last-in, first-out or the retail inventory method. This ASU simplifies the measurement of inventory. Under this new standard, inventory should be measured using the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonable predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement, which amends ASC 350-40, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software. This ASU provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If an arrangement includes a software license, the accounting for the license will be consistent with licenses of other intangible assets. If the arrangement does not include a license, the arrangement will be accounted for as a service contract. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 and can be adopted prospectively or retrospectively. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The amendments in the ASU clarify consolidation of VIEs regarding which reporting entity consolidates the legal entity. The amendments in the ASU are effective for the Company January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard as issued is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. In July 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of the effective date. The final ASU now permits the Company to adopt this standard on January 1, 2018. Early application is permitted as of the initial effective date of January 1, 2017, but not prior to that date. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

Accounting Policy [Abstract]  
Goodwill

5.

Goodwill

Changes in goodwill by reportable segments were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other-ancillary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. dialysis and

 

 

 

 

 

 

services and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

related lab services

 

 

HCP

 

 

strategic initiatives

 

 

Consolidated total

 

Balance at January 1, 2014

 

$

5,469,473

 

 

$

3,516,162

 

 

$

227,339

 

 

$

9,212,974

 

Acquisitions

 

 

143,021

 

 

 

48,649

 

 

 

29,844

 

 

 

221,514

 

Divestitures

 

 

(1,851

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,851

)

Foreign currency and other adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

(2,277

)

 

 

(15,065

)

 

 

(17,342

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

5,610,643

 

 

$

3,562,534

 

 

$

242,118

 

 

$

9,415,295

 

Acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

24,302

 

 

 

26,773

 

 

 

51,075

 

Divestitures

 

 

 

 

 

(446

)

 

 

 

 

 

(446

)

Foreign currency and other adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,978

)

 

 

(14,978

)

Balance at June 30, 2015

 

$

5,610,643

 

 

$

3,586,390

 

 

$

253,913

 

 

$

9,450,946

 

 

Each of the Company’s operating segments described in Note 17 to these condensed consolidated financial statements represents an individual reporting unit for goodwill impairment testing purposes, except that each sovereign jurisdiction within the Company’s international operating segments is considered a separate reporting unit.

Within the U.S. dialysis and related lab services operating segment, the Company considers each of its dialysis centers to constitute an individual business for which discrete financial information is available. However, since these dialysis centers have similar operating and economic characteristics, and the allocation of resources and significant investment decisions concerning these businesses are highly centralized and the benefits broadly distributed, the Company has aggregated these centers and deemed them to constitute a single reporting unit.

The Company has applied a similar aggregation to the HCP operations in each region, to the vascular access service centers in its vascular access services reporting unit, to the physician practices in its physician services reporting unit, and to the dialysis centers within each sovereign international jurisdiction. For the Company’s additional operating segments, no component below the operating segment level is considered a discrete business and therefore these operating segments directly constitute individual reporting units.

HCP’s current and expected future operating results have eroded, primarily as a result of recent reductions in its Medicare Advantage reimbursement rates, including the Medicare Advantage final benchmark rates for 2016 announced on April 6, 2015.

As a result, the Company has determined that three of its HCP reporting units, HCP California, HCP Nevada and HCP New Mexico, remain at risk of goodwill impairment. HCP California, HCP Nevada and HCP New Mexico have goodwill of $2,518,569, $517,618, and $71,684, respectively.

The Company obtained preliminary third-party valuations of these three businesses as of June 30, 2015, which indicate that the estimated fair values of HCP California, HCP Nevada and HCP New Mexico exceed their total carrying values by approximately 9.9%, 7.4% and 2.0%, respectively. Further reductions in HCP’s reimbursement rates or other significant adverse changes in its expected future cash flows or valuation assumptions could result in a goodwill impairment charge in the future.

For example, a sustained, long-term reduction of 3% in operating income for HCP California, HCP Nevada and HCP New Mexico could reduce their estimated fair values by up to 1.8%, 1.9% and 2.0%, respectively. Separately, an increase in their respective discount rates of 100 basis points could reduce the estimated fair values of HCP California, HCP Nevada and HCP New Mexico by up to 4.2%, 3.1% and 3.6%, respectively.

During the first six months of 2015, the Company recorded an immaterial goodwill impairment charge related to its international operations. Except as described above, no significant goodwill associated with the Company’s various other reporting units was considered at risk of impairment as of June 30, 2015. Since the dates of the Company’s last annual goodwill impairment tests, there have been certain developments, events, changes in operating performance and other changes in key circumstances that have affected the Company’s businesses. However, these did not cause management to believe it is more likely than not that the fair value of any of its reporting units would be less than its carrying amount.