SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its Macau Subsidiary, SMC-L, and SMC-M. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation for all periods presented.

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

USE OF ESTIMATES

The Singing Machine makes estimates and assumptions in the ordinary course of business relating to sales returns and allowances, warranty reserves, inventory reserves and reserves for promotional incentives that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty; therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Historically, past changes to these estimates have not had a material impact on the Company's financial condition. However, circumstances could change which may alter future expectations.

Receivables, Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Policy [Policy Text Block]

COLLECTIBILITY OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The Singing Machine's allowance for doubtful accounts is based on management's estimates of the creditworthiness of its customers, current economic conditions and historical information, and, in the opinion of management, is believed to be in an amount sufficient to respond to normal business conditions. Management sets 100% reserves for customers in bankruptcy and other allowances based upon historical collection experience. Should business conditions deteriorate or any major customer default on its obligations to the Company, this allowance may need to be significantly increased, which would have a negative impact on operations.

Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block]

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

The functional currency of the Macau Subsidiary is the Hong Kong dollar. The financial statements of the subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars using year-end rates of exchange for assets and liabilities, and average rates of exchange for the year for revenues, costs, and expenses. Net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions and translations were not material during the periods presented.

Concentration of Credit Risk [Policy Text Block]

Concentration of Credit Risk

At times, the Company maintains cash in United States bank accounts that are in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured amounts of up to $250,000. As of March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, the Company had cash deposits of $0 and $964,282 respectively that exceeded the FDIC insurance limit. The Company maintains cash balances in foreign financial institutions. The insured amounts at foreign financial institutions at March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 are $23,794 and $277,859, respectively.

Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block]

INVENTORY

Inventories are comprised primarily of electronic karaoke equipment, microphones and accessories, and are stated at the lower of cost or market, as determined using the first in, first out method. The Singing Machine reduces inventory on hand to its net realizable value on an item-by-item basis when it is apparent that the expected realizable value of an inventory item falls below its original cost. A charge to cost of sales results when the estimated net realizable value of specific inventory items declines below cost. Management regularly reviews the Company's investment in inventories for such declines in value.

Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

In accordance with FASB ASC 210, "Earnings per Share", basic net (loss) earnings per share are computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) for the year by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) for the year by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding including the effect of common stock equivalents.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 there were common stock equivalents to purchase 1,836,000 shares of common stock of which 880,000 were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 there were common stock equivalents to purchase 1,256,000 shares of common stock of which 820,000 were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 there were common stock equivalents to purchase 1,251,380 shares of common stock of which 820,000 were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share.

Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue from the sale of equipment, accessories, musical recordings and subscriptions and third-party logistics services are recognized upon the later of: (a) the time of shipment or (b) when title passes to the customers and all significant contractual obligations and services have been satisfied and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Net sales are comprised of gross sales net of actual and estimated future returns, discounts and volume rebates. The total returns represent 8.1%, 8.0%, and 8.8% of the gross sales for the twelve months ended March 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The Company follows the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)

718-20, “Compensation – Stock Compensation Awards Classified as Equity”. ASC 718-20 requires all share-based payments to employees including grants of employee stock options, be measured at fair value and expensed in the consolidated statement of income over the service period (generally the vesting period). The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to value stock options. Employee stock option compensation expense in fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013 includes the estimated fair value of options granted, amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire portion of the award. For the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the stock option expense was $38,808, $99,851 and $7,277, respectively.

The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the assumptions outlined below. The expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of our stock and other contributing factors. The expected term is based upon observation of actual time elapsed between date of grant and exercise of options for all employees. Previously such assumptions were determined based on historical data.

For the year ended March 31, 2015: expected dividend yield 0%, risk-free interest rate of 0.26% , volatility 142.9% and expected term of three years.
For the year ended March 31, 2014: expected dividend yield 0%, risk-free interest rate of 0.13% to 0.15%, volatility 201.1% to 304.1% and expected term of three years.
For the year ended March 31, 2013: expected dividend yield 0%, risk-free interest rate of 0.14%, volatility 304.7% and expected term of one year.

Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block]

ADVERTISING

Costs incurred for producing and publishing advertising of the Company are charged to operations the first time the advertising takes place. The Company has entered into cooperative advertising agreements with its major customers that specifically indicated that the customer has to spend the cooperative advertising fund upon the occurrence of mutually agreed events. The percentage of the cooperative advertising allowance ranges from 2% to 9% of the purchase. The customers have to advertise the Company's products in the customer's catalog, local newspaper and other advertising media. The customer must submit the proof of the performance (such as a copy of the advertising showing the Company’s products) to the Company to request for the allowance. The customer does not have the ability to spend the allowance at their discretion. The Company believes that the identifiable benefit from the cooperative advertising program and the fair value of the advertising benefit is equal or greater than the cooperative advertising expense. Advertising expense for the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $1,599,629, $1,120,711 and $1,688,692 respectively.

Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block]

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS

All research and development costs are charged to results of operations as incurred. These expenses are shown as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. For the years ended March 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, these amounts totaled $114,525, $200,551 and $70,870, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We have adopted FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments, which requires disclosures of information about the fair value of certain financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. For purposes of this disclosure, the fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation.

The carrying amounts of the Company's short-term financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, obligations to clients for returns and allowances, warranty provision, accrued expenses and net due to related parties approximates fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity for these instruments.

Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]

INCOME TAXES

The Company follows the provisions of FASB ASC 740 "Accounting for Income Taxes." Under the asset and liability method of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax base. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. If it is more likely than not that some portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized, a valuation allowance is recognized. Prior to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, the Company recognized a valuation allowance against the entire amount of the deferred tax asset.

The Company recognized a provision for income taxes of approximately $0.1 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 compared to an income tax benefit of approximately $0.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014. As of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 there was a reduction in the gross deferred tax assets of approximately $91,000 due to the expiration of a California net operating loss carry-forward which was charged against the valuation reserve. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, the Company reversed a portion of the valuation allowance as the Company determined that it is more likely than not that the amount deferred tax assets that were reversed would be realized. As of March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, The Singing Machine had net deferred tax assets before valuation allowances of approximately $3.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively, against which the Company recorded valuation allowance totaling approximately $0.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively

The Company also follows the provisions in FASB ASC 740, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. ASC 740 defines a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurements of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As of March 31, 2015 this position did not result in any adjustment to the Company’s provision for income taxes. Additionally, in accordance with FASB ASC 710, the Company’s policy is to recognize interest or penalties related to income tax matters in the provision for income taxes. The Company currently has no liabilities recorded for accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company is subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for the tax years ended March 31, 2012 through March 31, 2015.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever circumstances and situations change such that there is an indication that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If the undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the related assets are less than the carrying amount, the carrying amounts are reduced to fair value and an impairment loss is recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10-05, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets."

Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block]

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is provided for in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to their estimated useful lives using accelerated and straight-line methods.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

CASH

The Company had cash balances at March 31, 2015 of $116,286 with no restrictions. The Company had cash balances at March 31, 2014 of $1,492,141 of which the Company was required to fund a restricted certificate of deposit in the amount of $138,042 as collateral for the standby letter of credit in the amount of $131,068 to satisfy terms of a security deposit requirement of our California warehouse lease agreement. The collateral and certificate of deposit were no longer required when the Company issued a replacement standby letter of credit in October 2014 from our revolving credit facility agreement with PNC Bank

Shipping and Handling Cost, Policy [Policy Text Block]

SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS

Shipping and handling costs are classified as a component of selling expenses and those billed to customers are recorded as a reduction of expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Policy Text Block]

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 which outlines a single comprehensive model for companies to use when accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The core principle of the revenue recognition model is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In order to achieve this core principle a company must apply the following steps in determining revenue recognition:

Identify the contract(s) with a customer

Identify the performance obligations in the contract.

Determine the transaction price.

Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.

Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim periods within that reporting period with early application not allowed. Management is currently assessing whether the implementation of ASU 2014-09 will have any material effect on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The ASU clarifies that entities should treat performance targets that can be met after the requisite service period of a share-based payment award as performance conditions that affect vesting. An entity would not record compensation expense (measured as of the grant date without taking into account the effect of the performance target) related to an award for which transfer to the employee is contingent on the entity’s satisfaction of a performance target until it becomes probable that the performance target will be met. The ASU is effective for all entities for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The implementation of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have any material effect on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The ASU requires that at every interim and annual period, management determine whether conditions or events exist which raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. If management’s initial consideration of the relevant conditions and events indicates that it is probable the entity will not be able to meet its obligations as they become due within the assessment period, then management must evaluate whether it is probable that plans to mitigate these factors will alleviate that substantial doubt. The mitigating effect is considered only if it is probable that the plan will be effectively implemented and probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raised the substantial doubt. If management’s plans will alleviate the substantial doubt, an entity must disclose in the notes to the financial statements the conditions or events that raised substantial doubt and management’s plans that alleviated those concerns. If management’s plans will not alleviate the substantial doubt, an entity must disclose in the notes to the financial statements the same conditions and events along with management’s plans that did not alleviate the substantial doubt, in addition to a statement that indicates there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016 and for interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Management is currently assessing whether the implementation of ASU 2014-15 will have any material effect on the company’s consolidated financial statement disclosures.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items. To be considered an extraordinary item under existing Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, an event or transaction that is identified as both unusual in nature and occurs infrequently must be segregated as an extraordinary item from results or ordinary operations, separately presented as an extraordinary item on an entity’s income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations and an entity must disclose income taxes and earnings per share data applicable to the extraordinary item. While the ASU eliminates the requirement to segregate and separately report an event that is identified as an extraordinary item it does not affect the reporting and disclosure requirements for an extraordinary item. ASU 2015-01 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those annual periods. The implementation of ASU 2015-01 is not expected to have any material effect on the company’s consolidated financial statement disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The ASU changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. Under the ASU, an entity presents these costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. The ASU specifies that “issue costs shall be reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the face amount of the note” and that “amortization of debt issue costs shall also be reported as interest expense”. Any debt issuance costs incurred before the associated funding is received should be reported on the balance sheet as deferred charges until the debt liability amount is recorded. The guidance in ASU 2015-03 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is allowed for financial statements that have not been previously issued with the new guidance to be applied retrospectively to all prior periods. Management is currently assessing whether the implementation of ASU 2015-03 will have any material effect on the company’s consolidated financial statements.