XML 24 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Note 5 - Loans
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Loans, Notes, Trade and Other Receivables Disclosure [Text Block]
5. Loans

Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balance net of any unearned income, charge-offs, deferred loan fees and costs on originated loans and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Interest on loans is recognized on the accrual basis. The accrual of income on loans is generally discontinued when certain factors, such as contractual delinquency of 90 days or more, indicate reasonable doubt as to the timely collectability of such income. Uncollected interest previously recognized on non-accrual loans is reversed from interest income at the time the loan is placed on non-accrual status. A non-accrual loan can be returned to accrual status when contractual delinquency returns to less than 90 days delinquent. Subsequent cash payments received on non-accrual loans that do not bring the loan to less than 90 days delinquent are recorded on a cash basis. Subsequent cash payments can also be applied first as a reduction of principal until all principal is recovered and then subsequently to interest, if in management’s opinion, it is evident that recovery of all principal due is unlikely to occur. Net loan origination costs and premiums or discounts on loans purchased are amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the loans using the level-yield method. Prepayment penalties received on loans which pay in full prior to their scheduled maturity are included in interest income in the period they are collected.

The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses at an amount, which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb probable estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management’s judgment in determining the adequacy of the allowance is based on evaluations of the collectability of loans. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available. In assessing the adequacy of the Company's allowance for loan losses, management considers various factors such as, the current fair value of collateral for collateral dependent loans, the Company's historical loss experience, recent trends in losses, collection policies and collection experience, trends in the volume of non-performing and classified loans, changes in the composition and volume of the gross loan portfolio and local and national economic conditions. The Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors”) reviews and approves management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis.

The allowance for loan losses is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. Increases and decreases in the allowance other than charge-offs and recoveries are included in the provision for loan losses. When a loan or a portion of a loan is determined to be uncollectible, the portion deemed uncollectible is charged against the allowance and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The Company recognizes a loan as non-performing when the borrower has indicated the inability to bring the loan current, or due to other circumstances which, in our opinion, indicate the borrower will be unable to bring the loan current within a reasonable time, or if the collateral value is deemed to have been impaired. All loans classified as non-performing, which includes all loans past due 90 days or more, are classified as non-accrual unless there is, in our opinion, compelling evidence the borrower will bring the loan current in the immediate future. Appraisals and/or updated internal evaluations are obtained as soon as practical and before the loan become 90 days delinquent. The loan balances of collateral dependant impaired loans are compared to the loan’s updated fair value. The balance which exceeds fair value is charged-off.  Management reviews the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and records as a provision the amount deemed appropriate, after considering current year charge-offs, charge-off trends, new loan production, current balance by particular loan categories and delinquent loans by particular loan categories.

A loan is considered impaired when, based upon the most current information, the Company believes it is probable that it will be unable to collect all amounts due, both principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Interest income on impaired loans is recorded on a cash basis. The Company’s management considers all non-accrual loans impaired.

The Company reviews each impaired loan to determine if a charge-off is to be recorded or if a valuation allowance is to be allocated to the loan. The Company does not allocate a valuation allowance to loans for which we have concluded the current value of the underlying collateral will allow for recovery of the loan balance either through the sale of the loan or by foreclosure and sale of the property.

The Company uses multiple valuation approaches in evaluating the underlying collateral. These include obtaining a third party appraisal, an income approach and a sales approach. When obtained, third party appraisals are given the most weight. The income approach is used for income producing properties and uses current revenues less operating expenses to determine the net cash flow of the property. Once the net cash flow is determined, the value of the property is calculated using an appropriate capitalization rate for the property. The sales approach uses comparable sales prices in the market. When we do not obtain third party appraisals, we place greater reliance on the income approach to value the collateral.

In preparing internal evaluations of property values, the Company seeks to obtain current data on the subject property from various sources, including: (1) the borrower; (2) copies of existing leases; (3) local real estate brokers and appraisers; (4) public records (such as for real estate taxes and water and sewer charges); (5) comparable sales and rental data in the market; (6) an inspection of the property and (7) interviews with tenants. These internal evaluations primarily focus on the income approach and comparable sales data to value the property.

As of September 30, 2011, the Company utilized recent third party appraisals of the collateral to measure impairment for $74.4 million, or 53.8%, of collateral dependent impaired loans and used internal evaluations of the property’s value for $64.0 million, or 46.2%, of collateral dependent impaired loans.

The following table shows net loan charge-offs (recoveries) for the periods indicated:

   
For the three months ended
   
For the nine months ended
 
   
September 30,
   
September 30,
   
September 30,
   
September 30,
 
(In thousands)
 
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
Multi-family residential
  $ 2,188     $ 1,808     $ 3,984     $ 4,042  
Commercial real estate
    1,549       806       4,071       1,138  
One-to-four family – mixed-use property
    808       758       1,288       1,583  
One-to-four family – residential
    -       21       1,928       115  
Construction
    -       -       703       862  
Small Business Administration
    137       93       608       345  
Commercial business and other
    73       22       514       (163 )
    Total net loan charge-offs
  $ 4,755     $ 3,508     $ 13,096     $ 7,922  

The Company may restructure a loan to enable a borrower to continue making payments when it is deemed to be in our best long-term interest. This restructure may include reducing the interest rate or amount of the monthly payment for a specified period of time, after which the interest rate and repayment terms revert to the original terms of the loan. The Company classifies these loans as troubled debt restructured (“TDR”).

The Company reviews its delinquencies on a loan by loan basis and continually explores ways to help borrowers meet their obligations and return them back to current status. Management takes a proactive approach to managing delinquent loans, including conducting site examinations and encouraging borrowers to meet with a Bank representative. We have been developing short-term payment plans that enable certain borrowers to bring their loans current. In addition, we have restructured certain problem loans by either: reducing the interest rate until the next reset date, extending the amortization period thereby lowering the monthly payments, deferring a portion of the interest payment, or changing the loan to interest only payments for a limited time period. At times, certain problem loans have been restructured by combining more than one of these options. These restructurings have not included a reduction of principal balance. We believe that restructuring these loans in this manner will allow certain borrowers to become and remain current on their loans. Restructured loans are classified as a TDR when the Savings Bank grants a concession to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties. Loans which have been current for six consecutive months at the time they are restructured as TDR remain on accrual status. Loans which were delinquent at the time they are restructured as a TDR are placed on non-accrual status until they have made timely payments for six consecutive months. Loans that are restructured as TDR but are not performing in accordance with the restructured terms are excluded from the TDR table below, as they are placed on non-accrual status and reported as non-performing loans.

No loans were modified and classified as a TDR during the three months ended September 30, 2011.During the three months ended September 30, 2010, two multi-family loans totaling $7.2 million were modified and classified as a TDR as each of these borrowers was given an interest rate that was considered below market for that borrower, with one also having the loan’s amortization term extended, and one also having deferral of the payment of a portion of the interest; and  two commercial mortgage loans totaling $2.5 million were modified and classified as TDR as each of these borrowers was given an interest rate that was considered below market for that borrower, with one loan also changed to payments of interest only.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, six multi-family loans totaling $1.8 million were modified and classified as a TDR as each of these borrowers was given an interest rate that was considered below market for that borrower and each had the loan’s amortization term extended; two constructions loans totaling $24.2 million were modified and classified as a TDR as each of these borrowers was given an interest rate that was considered below market for that borrower; one commercial business loan for $2.0 million was modified and classified as a TDR as the borrower was given an interest rate that was considered below market for that borrower; and three one-to-four family – mixed-use property loans totaling $0.9 million was modified and classified as a TDR as each of these borrowers was given an interest rate that was considered below market for that borrower with two of the loans also having the loan’s amortization term extended. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, three multi-family loans totaling $7.5 million were modified and classified as a TDR as each of these borrowers was given an interest rate that was considered below market for that borrower, with one also having the loan’s amortization term extended, and one also having deferral of the payment of a portion of the interest; three commercial mortgage loans totaling $5.6 million were modified and classified as a TDR as each of these borrowers was given an interest rate that was considered below market for that borrower, with one loan also changed to payments of interest only; and one one-to-four family – mixed-use property loan for $0.5 million was modified and classified as a TDR as the borrower was given an interest rate that was considered below market for that borrower. For each of the loans that were modified and classified as a TDR the borrower was experiencing financial difficulties. The recorded investment of each of the loans modified and classified to a TDR was unchanged as there was no principal forgiven in any of these modifications.

The allocation of a portion of the allowance for loan losses for a TDR loan is based upon the present value of the future expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective rate or if the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell. At September 30, 2011, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were modified to a TDR. The modification of loans to a TDR did not have a significant effect on our operating results, nor did it require a significant allocation of the allowance for loan losses to these loans.

The following table shows loans classified as TDR that are performing according to their restructured terms at the periods indicated:

 
September 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
 
 
Number
   
Recorded
   
Number
   
Recorded
 
(Dollars in thousands)
of contracts
   
investment
   
of contracts
   
investment
 
                       
Multi-family residential
  11     $ 9,893       5     $ 7,946  
Commercial real estate
  2       2,480       3       5,815  
One-to-four family - mixed-use property
  3       797       1       206  
Construction
  1       8,508       -       -  
Commercial business and other
  1       2,000       -       -  
Total performing troubled debt restructured
  18     $ 23,678       9     $ 13,967  

During the three months ended September 30, 2011, one construction loan for $11.5 million, which was modified and classified as a TDR within the previous 12 months, was reclassified to non-accrual status as it was no longer performing in accordance with its modified terms. No loans which were previously modified and classified as a TDR were reclassified to non-accrual status during the three months ended September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, one construction loan for $11.5 million, one commercial loan for $3.3 million and two one-to-four family – mixed-use property loans totaling $0.7 million , which were modified and classified as a TDR within the previous 12 months, were reclassified to non-accrual status as they are no longer performing in accordance with their modified terms. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, one commercial loan for $1.4 million and two one-to-four family – mixed-use property loans totaling $0.9 million , which were modified and classified as a TDR within the previous 12 months, were reclassified to non-accrual status as they are no longer performing in accordance with their modified terms.

The following table shows loans classified as TDR that are not performing according to their restructured terms at the periods indicated:

 
September 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
 
 
Number
   
Recorded
   
Number
   
Recorded
 
(Dollars in thousands)
of contracts
   
investment
   
of contracts
   
investment
 
                       
Multi-family residential
  -     $ -       -     $ -  
Commercial real estate
  2       4,427       1       1,496  
One-to-four family - mixed-use property
  4       1,626       3       1,287  
One-to-four family - residential
  -       -       1       491  
Construction
  1       11,466       -       -  
                               
Total troubled debt restructurings  that subsequently defaulted
   7     $  17,519        5     $  3,274  


The following table shows non-performing loans at the periods indicated:

 
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
(In thousands)
2011
   
2010
 
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing:
         
Multi-family residential
$ -     $ 103  
Commercial real estate
  423       3,328  
Construction
  5,245       -  
Commercial business and other
  -       6  
Total
  5,668       3,437  
               
Non-accrual loans:
             
Multi-family residential
  27,846       35,633  
Commercial real estate
  21,062       22,806  
One-to-four family - mixed-use property
  29,890       30,478  
One-to-four family - residential
  10,673       10,695  
Co-operative apartments
  152       -  
Construction
  14,331       4,465  
Small business administration
  613       1,159  
Commercial business and other
  6,122       3,419  
Total
  110,689       108,655  
Total non-performing loans
$ 116,357     $ 112,092  

The interest foregone on non-accrual loans and loans classified as TDR totaled $2.2 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The interest foregone on non-accrual loans and loans classified as TDR totaled $6.3 million and $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The following table shows an age analysis of our recorded investment in loans at September 30, 2011:

                                   
             
Greater
                   
 
30 - 59 Days
   
60 - 89 Days
   
than
   
Total Past
             
(in thousands)
Past Due
   
Past Due
   
90 Days
   
Due
   
Current
   
Total Loans
 
                                   
Multi-family residential
$ 15,200     $ 4,228     $ 26,671     $ 46,099     $ 1,287,708     $ 1,333,807  
Commercial real estate
  10,911       5,215       21,062       37,188       567,593       604,781  
One-to-four family - mixed-use property
  22,030       1,834       29,890       53,754       652,182       705,936  
One-to-four family - residential
  5,114       1,477       10,672       17,263       205,289       222,552  
Co-operative apartments
  204       -       152       356       5,206       5,562  
Construction loans
  13,960       5,353       2,865       22,178       29,344       51,522  
Small Business Administration
  112       -       566       678       13,782       14,460  
Taxi medallion
  -       -       -       -       68,570       68,570  
Commercial business and other
  1,929       2,150       6,123       10,202       196,357       206,559  
    Total
$ 69,460     $ 20,257     $ 98,001     $ 187,718     $ 3,026,031     $ 3,213,749  

The following table shows an age analysis of our recorded investment in loans at December 31, 2010:

                                     
               
Greater
                   
   
30 - 59 Days
   
60 - 89 Days
   
than
   
Total Past
             
(in thousands)
 
Past Due
   
Past Due
   
90 Days
   
Due
   
Current
   
Total Loans
 
                                     
Multi-family residential
  $ 30,799     $ 7,014     $ 35,736     $ 73,549     $ 1,178,627     $ 1,252,176  
Commercial real estate
    17,167       2,181       26,134       45,482       617,312       662,794  
One-to-four family - mixed-use property
    19,596       6,376       30,478       56,450       672,360       728,810  
One-to-four family - residential
    4,826       1,046       10,695       16,567       224,809       241,376  
Co-operative apartments
    133       -       -       133       6,082       6,215  
Construction loans
    2,900       5,485       4,465       12,850       62,669       75,519  
Small Business Administration
    418       991       1,159       2,568       14,943       17,511  
Taxi medallion
    -       -       -       -       88,264       88,264  
Commercial business and other
    4,534       3       3,425       7,962       179,199       187,161  
    Total
  $ 80,373     $ 23,096     $ 112,092     $ 215,561     $ 3,044,265     $ 3,259,826  

The following table shows the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:


   
For the nine months
 
   
ended September 30
 
(In thousands)
 
2011
   
2010
 
             
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 27,699     $ 20,324  
Provision for loan losses
    15,000       15,000  
Charge-off's
    (13,534 )     (8,851 )
Recoveries
    438       929  
Balance, end of period
  $ 29,603     $ 27,402  

The following table shows the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011:

(in thousands)
 
Multi-family residential
 
Commercial real estate
 
One-to-four family - mixed-use property
 
One-to-four family - residential
 
Co-operative apartments
 
Construction loans
 
Small Business Administration
 
Taxi medallion
 
Commercial business and other
 
Total
 
                                           
Allowance for credit losses:
                                         
Beginning balance
  $ 9,007   $ 4,905   $ 5,997   $ 938   $ 17   $ 589   $ 1,303   $ 639   $ 4,304   $ 27,699  
   Charge-off's
    4,093     4,194     1,401     1,991     -     703     628     -     524     13,534  
   Recoveries
    109     123     113     63     -     -     20     -     10     438  
   Provision
    4,835     4,596     (224 )   2,676     7     1,101     491     (588 )   2,106     15,000  
Ending balance
  $ 9,858   $ 5,430   $ 4,485   $ 1,686   $ 24   $ 987   $ 1,186   $ 51   $ 5,896   $ 29,603  
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 83   $ 139   $ 32   $ -   $ -   $ 321   $ 255   $ -   $ 2,927   $ 3,757  
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
  $ 9,775   $ 5,291   $ 4,453   $ 1,686   $ 24   $ 666   $ 931   $ 51   $ 2,969   $ 25,846  
                                                               
Financing Recevables:
                                                             
Ending balance
  $ 1,333,807   $ 604,781   $ 705,936   $ 222,552   $ 5,562   $ 51,522   $ 14,460   $ 68,570   $ 206,559   $ 3,213,749  
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 27,817   $ 13,366   $ 16,123   $ 2,684   $ -   $ 19,974   $ 510   $ -   $ 7,854   $ 88,328  
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
  $ 1,305,990   $ 591,415   $ 689,813   $ 219,868   $ 5,562   $ 31,548   $ 13,950   $ 68,570   $ 198,705   $ 3,125,421  

The following table shows our recorded investment, unpaid principal balance and allocated allowance for loan losses, average recorded investment and interest income recognized for loans that were considered impaired at or for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011:

       
Unpaid
     
Average
 
Interest
 
   
Recorded
 
Principal
 
Related
 
Recorded
 
Income
 
   
Investment
 
Balance
 
Allowance
 
Investment
 
Recognized
 
                       
   
(Dollars in thousands)
 
With no related allowance recorded:
                     
Mortgage loans:
                     
Multi-family residential
  $ 34,537   $ 38,716   $ -   $ 36,707   $ 296  
Commercial real estate
    43,466     49,448     -     37,099     938  
One-to-four family mixed-use property
    34,016     36,317     -     32,306     192  
One-to-four family residential
    11,589     13,610     -     10,656     60  
Co-operative apartments
    152     152     -     95     -  
Construction
    12,079     12,080     -     11,223     377  
Non-mortgage loans:
                               
Small Business Administration
    -     -     -     -     -  
Taxi Medallion
    9,231     9,540     -     14,681     219  
Commercial Business and other
    -     -     -     -     -  
                                 
Total loans with no related allowance recorded
    145,070     159,863     -     142,767     2,082  
                                 
With an allowance recorded:
                               
Mortgage loans:
                               
Multi-family residential
    9,894     9,894     83     12,011     299  
Commercial real estate
    2,480     2,480     139     3,395     77  
One-to-four family mixed-use property
    797     797     32     1,589     34  
One-to-four family residential
    -     -     -     191     -  
Co-operative apartments
    -     -     -     -     -  
Construction
    19,974     19,974     321     22,540     485  
Non-mortgage loans:
                               
Small Business Administration
    510     510     255     971     3  
Taxi Medallion
    -     -     -     -     -  
Commercial Business and other
    7,814     8,478     2,927     7,999     160  
                                 
Total loans with an allowance recorded
    41,469     42,133     3,757     48,696     1,058  
                                 
Total Impaired Loans:
                               
Total mortgage loans
  $ 168,984   $ 183,468   $ 575   $ 167,812   $ 2,758  
                                 
Total non-mortgage loans
  $ 17,555   $ 18,528   $ 3,182   $ 23,651   $ 382  
                                 


In accordance with our policy and the current regulatory guidelines, we designate loans as “Special Mention,” which are considered “Criticized Loans,” and “Substandard,” “Doubtful,” or “Loss,” which are considered “Classified Loans”.  If a loan does not fall within one of the previous mentioned categories then the loan would be considered “Pass.” We designate a loan as Substandard when a well-defined weakness is identified that jeopardizes the orderly liquidation of the debt. We designate a loan Doubtful when it displays the inherent weakness of a Substandard loan with the added provision that collection of the debt in full, on the basis of existing facts, is highly improbable. We designate a loan as Loss if it is deemed the debtor is incapable of repayment.  Loans that are designated as Loss are charged to the Allowance for Loan Losses. Loans that are non-accrual are designated as Substandard, Doubtful or Loss. We designate a loan as Special Mention if the asset does not warrant classification within one of the other classifications, but does contain a potential weakness that deserves closer attention.

The following table sets forth the recorded investment in loans designated as Criticized or Classified at September 30, 2011:

(In thousands)
 
Special Mention
   
Substandard
   
Doubtful
   
Loss
   
Total
 
                               
Multi-family residential
  $ 14,894     $ 43,362     $ -     $ -     $ 58,256  
Commercial real estate
    13,381       45,946       -       -       59,327  
One-to-four family - mixed-use property
    17,842       34,016       -       -       51,858  
One-to-four family - residential
    3,410       11,590       -       -       15,000  
Co-operative apartments
    -       152       -       -       152  
Construction loans
    2,570       32,053       -       -       34,623  
Small Business Administration
    768       221       289       -       1,278  
Commercial business and other
    14,556       15,810       1,237       -       31,603  
Total loans
  $ 67,421     $ 183,150     $ 1,526     $ -     $ 252,097  

The following table sets forth the recorded investment in loans designated as Criticized or Classified at December 31, 2010:

(In thousands)
 
Special Mention
   
Substandard
   
Doubtful
   
Loss
   
Total
 
                               
Multi-family residential
  $ 20,277     $ 51,626     $ -     $ -     $ 71,903  
Commercial real estate
    13,228       32,120       -       -       45,348  
One-to-four family - mixed-use property
    15,546       33,539       -       -       49,085  
One-to-four family - residential
    2,849       10,874       -       -       13,723  
Co-operative apartments
    -       -       -       -       -  
Construction loans
    5,945       30,589       -       -       36,534  
Small Business Administration
    558       1,432       -       -       1,990  
Commercial business and other
    14,302       13,628       1,238       -       29,168  
Total loans
  $ 72,705     $ 173,808     $ 1,238     $ -     $ 247,751