UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 0-24624
CHINDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 13-3097642 | |
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
4340 East West Highway, Suite 1100, Bethesda, Maryland |
20814 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(301) 215-7777
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares outstanding of each class of the registrant’s common equity, as of May 8, 2012, was 15,657,816 shares of Common Stock and 1,162,500 shares of Class B Common Stock.
CHINDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
INDEX
FORM 10-Q
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1. |
3 | |||||
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 |
3 | |||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 |
4 | |||||
5 | ||||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 |
6 | |||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2012 |
7 | |||||
8 | ||||||
Item 2. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
22 | ||||
Item 3. |
28 | |||||
Item 4. |
29 | |||||
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION |
| |||||
Item 1. |
29 | |||||
Item 1A. |
30 | |||||
Item 2. |
30 | |||||
Item 3. |
30 | |||||
Item 4. |
30 | |||||
Item 5. |
30 | |||||
Item 6. |
30 | |||||
32 | ||||||
Exhibits Index |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands except share data)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 38,955 | $ | 33,755 | ||||
Investments |
4,556 | 26,394 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $9,078 and $8,300, respectively |
15,534 | 13,947 | ||||||
Receivables from affiliates |
11,566 | 10,984 | ||||||
Inventories of supplies, net |
1,877 | 2,307 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
3,970 | 3,887 | ||||||
Other current assets |
6,246 | 4,652 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
82,704 | 95,926 | ||||||
Restricted cash and sinking funds |
12,052 | 1,030 | ||||||
Investments |
— | 100 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
33,931 | 33,728 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
72,490 | 65,465 | ||||||
Noncurrent deferred income taxes |
472 | 424 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,750 | 2,719 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 204,399 | $ | 199,392 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 6,007 | $ | 3,957 | ||||
Payable to affiliates |
11,012 | 9,404 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
11,963 | 11,735 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
6,191 | 5,549 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
2,242 | 2,141 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
37,415 | 32,786 | ||||||
Long-term debt and convertible debentures |
23,891 | 23,818 | ||||||
Long-term deferred tax liability |
288 | 287 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
61,594 | 56,891 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 500,000 shares authorized, none issued |
— | — | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, 28,200,000 shares authorized, including 3,200,000 designated Class B: |
||||||||
Common stock – 15,657,816 and 15,652,917 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
157 | 157 | ||||||
Class B stock – 1,162,500 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
12 | 12 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
119,560 | 118,930 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
13,960 | 14,491 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
9,116 | 8,911 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders’ equity |
142,805 | 142,501 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 204,399 | $ | 199,392 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Healthcare services revenue |
$ | 32,512 | $ | 24,185 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits |
18,537 | 14,755 | ||||||
Other operating expenses |
4,985 | 4,319 | ||||||
Supplies and purchased medical services |
4,096 | 2,635 | ||||||
Bad debt expense |
765 | 432 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,651 | 1,137 | ||||||
Lease and rental expense |
1,853 | 1,200 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
31,887 | 24,478 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) from operations |
625 | (293 | ) | |||||
Other income and (expenses) |
||||||||
Interest income |
139 | 142 | ||||||
Interest (expense) |
(124 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliate |
98 | (147 | ) | |||||
Miscellaneous (expense) income - net |
(10 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
728 | (443 | ) | |||||
Provision for income taxes |
(1,259 | ) | (787 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss |
$ | (531 | ) | $ | (1,230 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss per common share - basic |
$ | (.03 | ) | $ | (.08 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic |
16,291,792 | 16,075,847 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss per common share - diluted |
$ | (.03 | ) | $ | (.08 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted |
16,291,792 | 16,075,847 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (531 | ) | $ | (1,230 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
99 | 563 | ||||||
Share of other comprehensive income of unconsolidated affiliate |
106 | 361 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other comprehensive income |
205 | 924 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive loss |
$ | (326 | ) | $ | (306 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (531 | ) | $ | (1,230 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,651 | 1,137 | ||||||
Inventory write down |
11 | (1 | ) | |||||
Provision for doubtful accounts - healthcare services |
765 | 432 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
5 | 49 | ||||||
Equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliate |
(98 | ) | 147 | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
(126 | ) | (354 | ) | ||||
Stock based compensation |
614 | 1,202 | ||||||
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |
214 | (19 | ) | |||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
2 | 2 | ||||||
Amortization of debt discount |
62 | 63 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
1,052 | — | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
(2,333 | ) | 264 | |||||
Receivables from affiliates |
(583 | ) | 8,060 | |||||
Inventories of supplies |
421 | (3 | ) | |||||
Other current assets and other assets |
(1,630 | ) | 1,070 | |||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, other current liabilities and deferred revenue |
1,192 | 5,001 | ||||||
Payable to affiliates |
1,609 | 1,181 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
99 | (278 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
2,396 | 16,723 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Purchases of short-term investments and CDs |
— | (20,265 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from redemption of CDs |
21,970 | 21,987 | ||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(7,141 | ) | (8,064 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
14,829 | (6,342 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Restricted cash for sinking fund |
(12,051 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants |
16 | 114 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(12,035 | ) | 114 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
10 | 98 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
5,200 | 10,593 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
33,755 | 32,007 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 38,955 | $ | 42,600 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for taxes |
$ | 1,289 | $ | 1,418 | ||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities consist of the following: |
||||||||
Change in property and equipment purchases included in accounts payable |
$ | 216 | $ | (561 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
6
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the three months ended March 31, 2012
(in thousands except share data)
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | Common Stock Class B | Additional Paid In Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
15,652,917 | $ | 157 | 1,162,500 | $ | 12 | $ | 118,930 | $ | 14,491 | $ | 8,911 | $ | 142,501 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
— | — | — | — | — | (531 | ) | — | (531 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 99 | 99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share of other comprehensive income of unconsolidated affiliate |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 106 | 106 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | (326 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
— | — | — | — | 614 | — | — | 614 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options exercised and issuance of restricted stock, net of restricted stock forfeited |
4,899 | — | — | — | 16 | — | — | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2012 |
15,657,816 | $ | 157 | 1,162,500 | $ | 12 | $ | 119,560 | $ | 13,960 | $ | 9,116 | $ | 142,805 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Chindex International, Inc. (“Chindex” or “the Company”), founded in 1981, is an American healthcare company providing healthcare services in China through the operations of United Family Healthcare (“UFH”), a network of private care hospitals and affiliated ambulatory clinics. UFH currently operates in Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin and Guangzhou.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of Chindex International, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Policies and procedures
Consolidation
The consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its subsidiaries in which the Company has greater than 50 percent ownership, and variable interest entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Entities in which the Company has less than 50 percent ownership or does not have a controlling financial interest but is considered to have significant influence are accounted for on the equity method.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated condensed financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated condensed financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates. Areas in which significant judgments and estimates are used include revenue recognition, receivable collectibility, and deferred tax valuation allowances.
Revenue Recognition
All revenue is derived from providing healthcare services. Revenue related to services provided is net of contractual adjustments or discounts and is recognized in the period services are provided. The Company makes an estimate at the end of the month for certain inpatients that have not completed service. This estimate reflects only the cost of care up to the end of the month. Revenue is dependent on seasonal fluctuations related to epidemiology factors and the life styles of the expatriate community.
8
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, which provided guidance on comprehensive income. This guidance is intended to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements by presenting it in either a single statement or two-statement approach. This guidance is effective for us beginning January 1, 2012. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2012, and the adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Note 2. INVESTMENTS
The following table summarizes the Company’s investments, including accrued interest, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
Current investments: |
||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
$ | 4,556 | $ | 18,812 | ||||
U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises |
— | 1,575 | ||||||
Corporate bonds |
— | 6,007 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current investments |
$ | 4,556 | $ | 26,394 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Noncurrent investments: |
||||||||
Corporate bonds |
$ | — | $ | 100 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total noncurrent investments |
$ | — | $ | 100 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The Company’s current investments as of March 31, 2012 include $4,556,000 of Certificates of Deposit, with fixed interest rates of 0.8% issued by HSBC, a large international financial institution. The Company’s investments in Certificates of Deposit are intended to be held to maturity.
The Company’s current investments as of December 31, 2011 include $18,812,000 of Certificates of Deposit, with a fixed interest rate of 0.55% issued by HSBC, a large international financial institution. The Company’s investments in Certificates of Deposit are intended to be held to maturity. Other than Certificates of Deposit, the Company’s current investments also include available-for-sale securities at fair value, which approximates cost, of $1,575,000 issued by U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises and corporate bonds of $6,007,000, which mature within the next twelve months. The Company’s current investments are recorded at fair value, and the difference between fair value and amortized cost as of December 31, 2011 was de minimis. The Company’s noncurrent investments of $100,000 as of December 31, 2011, consist of corporate bonds which mature in 38 months.
Note 3. INVENTORIES OF SUPPLIES, NET
Inventories of supplies consist of medical supplies and pharmaceuticals in the amounts of $1,877,000 at March 31, 2012 and $2,307,000 at December 31, 2011.
9
Note 4. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE
Background – Chindex Medical Limited
On December 31, 2010, Chindex and Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical (Group) Co., Ltd. (“FosunPharma”), a leading manufacturer and distributor of Western and Chinese medicine and devices in China, completed the first closing (the “Initial Closing”) of the formation of Chindex Medical Limited (“CML”) to independently operate certain combined medical device businesses, including Chindex’s Medical Products division. The formation of CML represents a basis of the strategic alliance between the two companies, which aims to capitalize on the long-term opportunity presented by medical product sectors in China. CML is focused on marketing, distributing, selling and servicing medical devices in China, including in Hong Kong, as well as activities in R&D and manufacturing of medical devices for the Chinese and export markets. CML is owned 51% by FosunPharma and 49% by Chindex.
Upon the Initial Closing, CML became the owner of the Company’s former Medical Products division. On June 24, 2011, CML became the holder of legal title to the FosunPharma-contributed businesses. Notwithstanding this transfer, the registration with and approval of Shanghai Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) was required in order for CML to exercise certain of the rights and benefits as shareholder of such businesses, but CML was entitled to such benefits on a contractual basis under an entrusted management agreement. The registration with and approval of SAFE was received on March 7, 2012, and all legal formalities related to the final closing of the joint venture formation were completed as of March 30, 2012.
Deconsolidation
FosunPharma has a controlling financial interest in CML. The Company was required to deconsolidate the contributed businesses when it ceased to have a controlling financial interest in the applicable subsidiaries. As explained below, the Company concluded that CML is a voting interest entity, rather than a variable interest entity. Therefore, the reduction of the Company’s interest to 49% indicated that it no longer had a controlling financial interest and needed to deconsolidate under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810. Accordingly, Chindex deconsolidated its Medical Products division from its consolidated balance sheet, effective December 31, 2010.
Variable Interest Entity Analysis
ASC 810-10-20 defines a variable interest as an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of a variable interest entity’s (“VIE’s”) expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. An equity interest is considered to be a variable interest in a company and as such, the Company’s interest in CML is a variable interest. A holder of a variable interest in an entity is required to determine whether the entity is a VIE and, if so, whether it must consolidate the entity.
In its VIE analysis, the Company considered the five characteristics of a VIE described in ASC 810-10-15-14. Management evaluated the characteristics of its investment in CML and believes that CML would not be deemed a VIE. Management concluded that FosunPharma effectively contributed its businesses to CML as of the formation date since the entrusted management agreement (the “Entrustment Agreement”) entered into by a subsidiary of CML, FosunPharma and a subsidiary of FosunPharma provides CML with unilateral control over Shanghai Chuangxin (as defined in the Entrustment Agreement). Although the legal form of the transaction is that FosunPharma initially delivered a promissory note in exchange for its interest in CML, Management notes that this was required solely due to a timing delay in receiving regulatory approvals. The substance of the arrangement is that FosunPharma has irrevocably arranged the contribution of Shanghai Chuangxin in exchange for its equity interest in CML particularly because the probability of governmental approvals was high (and in fact has already been obtained). Accordingly, Management believes that FosunPharma’s investment would be deemed equity at risk and that the combined equity of CML would be sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. It should be noted that CML has been financed 100% with equity and does not have any other forms of subordinated financial support, which justifies the position that the amount of equity is sufficient to conduct operations.
Management also considered certain characteristics related to control and expected economics of CML to support the conclusion that CML is not a VIE. The Company and FosunPharma control CML, as they have the ability to
10
elect all of the members of the Board of Directors of CML, and there are no other interests that provide its holders with participating rights over the activities that most significantly impact CML’s economic performance. Accordingly, the group of holders of the equity investment at risk has the power to direct the activities of CML that most significantly impact CML’s economic performance. Additionally, Management concluded that, pursuant to the agreements entered into in connection with the formation of CML, the voting rights held by both FosunPharma and the Company are proportional to their economic interests in CML. Management further noted that FosunPharma and the Company have both the obligation to absorb the losses and the right to receive the expected residual returns of CML as there are no other interests that either protect them from absorbing expected losses or cap their residual returns. Therefore, Management has concluded the entity is not a VIE and must be assessed under the voting interest model.
It is generally understood that when a company owns less than 50% of an entity that is not considered a VIE, the company is precluded from consolidating its investee. Specifically, ASC 810-10-25-1 states that the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest. Since the Company owns 49% of CML (whereas a single entity, FosunPharma, owns 51%), and does not have control over the entity through the Board of Directors (whereas FosunPharma has the power to appoint a majority of such Board of Directors), the Company should not consolidate CML. Conversely, FosunPharma obtained control through its majority stock ownership and Board of Directors representation upon the Initial Closing. Therefore, the Company’s investment in CML is accounted for as an equity method investment.
Summarized Financial Information for CML
Beginning with the commencement of CML operations on January 1, 2011, Chindex follows the equity method of accounting to recognize its 49% interest in the net assets and the net earnings of CML on an on-going basis. Summarized financial information for the unconsolidated CML affiliate for which the equity method of accounting is used is presented below on a 100 percent basis. The assets and liabilities of CML as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 as follows (in thousands):
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
Current assets |
$ | 99,089 | $ | 104,726 | ||||
Noncurrent assets |
18,161 | 18,261 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 117,250 | $ | 122,987 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 53,091 | $ | 59,941 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities |
1,734 | 1,539 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
54,825 | 61,480 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity |
62,425 | 61,507 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 117,250 | $ | 122,987 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The operating results of CML for three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Revenue |
$ | 27,023 | $ | 26,087 | ||||
Income before income taxes |
638 | 244 | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
462 | (37 | ) |
CML is a 51%-owned subsidiary of FosunPharma. The assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity in the summarized financial data table presented above for CML have been prepared on a stand-alone basis, with the assets and liabilities of the entities contributed to CML by FosunPharma reported on a historical cost basis, while the assets and liabilities acquired from Chindex have been recorded on a fair value basis. In reporting its 49% interest in the net assets
11
and net earnings of CML using the equity method of accounting, Chindex includes its 49% interest in the stand-alone financial statements of CML, and also records adjustments to reflect the amortization of basis differences attributable to the fair values in excess of net book values of identified tangible and intangible assets contributed by FosunPharma to CML at its formation date. In addition, certain employees of CML participate in Chindex stock-based compensation programs. The expense for these stock options or restricted stock is recognized by CML as the services are provided. The total stock-based compensation expense recognized by CML for three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $237,000 and $279,000, respectively.
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, Chindex recognized income of $98,000, for its 49% equity in the operating results of CML. This consisted of income of $226,000, for its 49% interest in the stand-alone net income of CML (after recognition of stock-based compensation expense) and after deducting $128,000, for the amortization of basis differences attributable to acquired intangibles.
As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, Chindex had a receivable from CML entities of $11,566,000 and $10,984,000, respectively, primarily related to advance payments for procurement of medical equipment supplied under a logistics service agreement whereby CML serves as an agent for Chindex. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, Chindex had a payable to CML entities of $11,012,000 and $9,404,000, respectively, which represented the actual purchases of medical equipment by CML on behalf of Chindex under the logistics service agreement. It is expected that the medical equipment will be purchased within one year.
Services Agreement
CML and Chindex entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”), effective January 1, 2011. Under the Services Agreement, Chindex provides advice and support services as requested by CML. The services include management and administrative support services for marketing, sales and order fulfillment activities conducted in the United States and China, order processing and exporting of goods sold to customers in China, advice relating to the marketing of products sold in China by CML, analysis of sales opportunities and other assistance including services such as payroll, database administration, internal auditing, accounting and finance that will assist CML in carrying out its activities in the United States and China. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, total expenses recognized by CML under the services agreement were $726,000 and $1,053,000, respectively, in addition to stock-based compensation.
Note 5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
(in thousands) | ||||||||
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
Property and equipment, net consists of the following: |
||||||||
Furniture and equipment |
$ | 28,897 | $ | 25,376 | ||||
Vehicles |
274 | 240 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
15,254 | 21,463 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
45,543 | 34,566 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
89,968 | 81,645 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(17,478 | ) | (16,180 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 72,490 | $ | 65,465 | |||||
|
|
|
|
12
Construction in progress relates to the development of the United Family Healthcare network of private hospitals and health clinics in China, including facilities and systems development. Construction costs incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2012 primarily related to the expansion of the Company’s existing Beijing hospital campus and to the Beijing rehabilitation hospital project. Capitalized interest on construction in progress was $144,000 and $122,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $1,651,000 and $1,137,000, respectively.
Note 6. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
(in thousands) | ||||||||
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
Accrued expenses: |
||||||||
Accrued expenses- rent |
$ | 2,909 | $ | 3,775 | ||||
Accrued compensation |
7,127 | 6,056 | ||||||
Accrued expenses- other |
1,927 | 1,904 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 11,963 | $ | 11,735 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accrued other taxes payable- non-income |
$ | 773 | $ | 717 | ||||
Customer deposits |
3,668 | 3,117 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
1,750 | 1,715 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 6,191 | $ | 5,549 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Note 7. DEBT
The Company’s short-term and long-term debt balances are (in thousands):
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Short term | Long term | Short term | Long term | |||||||||||||
Long term loan |
$ | — | $ | 10,308 | $ | — | $ | 10,297 | ||||||||
Convertible notes, net of debt discount |
— | 13,583 | — | 13,521 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | — | $ | 23,891 | $ | — | $ | 23,818 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term loan- IFC 2005
In October 2005, Beijing United Family Hospital (BJU) and Shanghai United Family Hospital (SHU), majority-owned subsidiaries of the Company, obtained long-term debt financing under a program with the International Finance Corporation (IFC) (a division of the World Bank) for 64,880,000 Chinese Renminbi (“RMB”) (approximately $8,000,000) (the “IFC 2005 RMB Loan”). The term of the loan is 10 years at an initial interest rate of 6.73% with the borrowers required to make annual payments into a sinking fund beginning with the first payment in September 2010. Deposits into the sinking fund would accumulate until a lump sum payment is made at maturity of the debt in October 2015. The interest rate would be reduced to 4.23% for any amount of the outstanding loan on deposit in the sinking fund.
Effective March 14, 2012, the Company entered into an Amendment and Restatement Agreement to the 2005 RMB Loan Agreement, and a Certificate of Deposit Retention and Pledge Agreement. The agreements were necessary in order
13
to incorporate the effects of the expansion of the Beijing hospital campus on the collateral and loan covenant provisions of the original IFC 2005 RMB Loan Agreement. The revised terms of the agreements provide for (1) advance funding by the Company of the full principal and interest amounts by the purchase of a series of certificates of deposit having a face amount equal to the full principal and interest amount and the subsequent pledge of such certificates of deposit to the IFC, and (2) elimination of loan covenants required under the original loan agreement. The advance funding of the loan principal and interest by the Company into restricted accounts rather than paying off the debt was necessary in order to avoid significant prepayment penalties. As of March 31, 2012, the certificates of deposit total $12,052,000 and are recorded in long-term restricted cash and sinking funds. The RMB debt is classified as long-term and will be paid off as originally scheduled on October 15, 2015.
As of March 31, 2012, the outstanding balance of this debt was 64,880,000 Chinese Renminbi (current translated value of $10,308,000) and was classified as long-term. As the advance funding of the sinking fund does not extinguish the long-term debt liability, the entire loan is expected to be classified as long-term until a financial reporting date that is less than one year from final maturity. The balance sheet classification of the sinking fund assets is similarly noncurrent, until a date that is less than one year from the lump sum payment.
Convertible Notes- JPM
On November 7, 2007, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Magenta Magic Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands (JPM), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to JPM: (i) 538,793 shares (the “Tranche A Shares”) of the Company’s common stock; (ii) the Company’s Tranche B Convertible Notes due 2017 in the aggregate principal amount of $25 million (the “Tranche B Notes”) and (iii) the Company’s Tranche C Convertible Notes due 2017 in the aggregate principal amount of $15 million (the “Tranche C Notes” and, with the Tranche B Notes, the “Notes”) at a price of $18.56 per Tranche A Share (for an aggregate price of $10 million for the Tranche A Shares) and at face amount for the Notes for a total purchase price of $50 million in gross proceeds (the “JPM Financing”).
The Tranche B Notes had a ten-year maturity, bore no interest of any kind and provided for conversion into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $18.56 per share at any time and automatic conversion upon the Company entering into one or more newly committed financing facilities (the “Facilities”) making available to the Company at least $50 million, pursuant to which Facilities all conditions precedent (with certain exceptions) for initial disbursement had been satisfied, subject to compliance with certain JPM Financing provisions. The Facilities as required for conversion of the Tranche B Note had to have a minimum final maturity of 9.25 years from the date of initial drawdown, a minimum moratorium on principal repayment of three years from such date, principal payments in equal or stepped up amounts no more frequently than twice in each 12-month period, no sinking fund obligations, other covenants and conditions included in the Investor Rights Agreement, which expires on November 6, 2012, and also limit the purchase price of any equity issued under the Facilities to at least equal to the initial conversion price of the Notes or higher amounts depending on the date of issuance thereof. In January 2008, the Tranche B Notes were converted into 1,346,984 shares of our common stock.
The Tranche C Notes have a ten-year maturity, bear no interest of any kind and are convertible at the same conversion price as the Tranche B Notes at any time and will be automatically converted upon the completion of two proposed new and/or expanded hospitals in China in Beijing and Guangzhou (the “JV Hospitals”), subject to compliance with certain JPM Financing provisions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Notes would be automatically converted after the earlier of 12 months having elapsed following commencement of operations at either of the JV Hospitals or either of the JV Hospitals achieving break-even earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for any 12-month period ending on the last day of a fiscal quarter, subject to compliance with certain JPM Financing provisions.
The JPM Financing was completed in two closings. At the first closing, which took place on November 13, 2007, the Company issued (i) the Tranche A Shares, (ii) the Tranche B Notes and (iii) an initial portion of the Tranche C Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $6 million, with the closing of the balance of the Tranche C Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $9 million subject to, among other things, the approval of the Company’s stockholders. At the second closing, which took place on January 11, 2008, following such stockholder approval, the Company issued such balance of the Tranche C Notes.
14
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company incurred issuance costs of $314,000, which primarily consisted of legal and other professional fees. Of these costs, $61,000 is attributable to the Tranche A shares, $159,000 is attributable to Tranche B Notes which converted in January 2008 and the remaining of $94,000 is attributable to the Tranche C Notes and has been capitalized to be amortized over the life of the Notes. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the unamortized financing cost was $52,000 and $54,000, respectively, and is included in Other Assets in the consolidated condensed balance sheets.
The Company accounts for convertible debt in accordance with ASC 470-20. Accordingly, the Company recorded, as a discount to convertible debt, the intrinsic value of the conversion option based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are usually amortized over the term of the related debt to their stated date of redemption. So, in respect to the Notes, this debt discount would be amortized through interest expense over the 10 year term of the Notes unless earlier converted or repaid. In fiscal 2008, under this method, the Company recorded (i) a discount on the Tranche B Notes of $2,793,000 against the entire principal amount of the Notes; and (ii) a discount on the Tranche C Notes of $2,474,000 against the entire principal amount of the Notes.
The debt discount pursuant to the Notes as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $1,417,000 and $1,479,000, respectively. Amortization of the discount was approximately $62,000 for three months ended March 31, 2012 and $63,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, respectively.
International Finance Corporation and DEG-Deutsche Investitions und Entwicklungsgesellschaft
In 2007 and 2008, we entered into two US Dollar loan facilities with International Finance Corporation (“IFC”) and DEG-Deutsche Investitions und Entwicklungsgesellschaft (“DEG”) to supplement the financing of expansion projects in China. These facilities were never used and at this time are not available. We are in preliminary stages of negotiating successor facilities with these lenders. There can be no assurances as to the amounts, if any, that may be available under such successor facilities or whether such facilities will be achievable on terms acceptable to us and the lenders, which failure, absent alternative sources of financing, could have a material adverse effect on our operations and our ability to complete our proposed expansion projects on time or at all.
In connection with the issuance of the original IFC and the DEG facilities, the Company incurred issuance costs of $1,019,000, which primarily consisted of legal and other professional fees. These issuance costs were capitalized
15
and were intended to be amortized over the life of the debt. However, due the expiration of the DEG facility, the issuance cost related to DEG of $260,000 was expensed as interest expense in 2011. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the balance of the unamortized financing costs was $759,000 and is included in other assets in the consolidated condensed balance sheets.
Debt Payments Schedule
The following table sets forth the Company’s debt obligations as of March 31, 2012:
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||||||
Long term loan |
$ | 10,308 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 10,308 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Convertible notes |
15,000 | — | — | — | — | 15,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 25,308 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 10,308 | $ | 15,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. TAXES
We recorded a $1,259,000 provision for taxes in the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to a provision for taxes of $787,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The effective tax rate was calculated in accordance with ASC 740-270. Our tax expense includes the effect of losses in entities for which we cannot recognize a benefit in accordance with the provisions of ASC 270 and ASC 740-270 and the effect of valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.
The Company’s effective tax rate is unusually high in the three months ended March 31, 2012. The table below provides detail on the major components of consolidated pretax income and consolidated tax expense. The table below illustrates our tax expense in three categories. Our operating entities consist of our established hospitals and clinics in China, and which therefore record tax expense at the China statutory rate of approximately 25%. Our start up entities in the table below consist of Tianjin United Family hospital and Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital which are currently in start up mode or still in development, and no tax benefit has been recorded for the effect of the start up losses for those entities. Our parent company and subsidiary holding companies, referred to as the corporate entities in the table below, have incurred losses for which no tax benefits were recorded.
Three months ended March 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||
Income Before Income Taxes |
Provision for Income Taxes |
Effective Tax Rate |
||||||||||
Operating Entities |
$ | 4,591 | $ | 1,259 | 27 | % | ||||||
Start-Up Entities |
(3,105 | ) | — | 0 | % | |||||||
Corporate Entities |
(758 | ) | — | 0 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 728 | $ | 1,259 | 173 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similarly, the Company also had an unusually high effective tax rate in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The table below provides detail of the income or loss before income taxes and the provision for income taxes using the same three categories for the analysis.
16
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||
Income Before Income Taxes |
Provision for Income Taxes |
Effective Tax Rate |
||||||||||
Operating Entities |
$ | 2,493 | $ | 787 | 32 | % | ||||||
Start-Up Entities |
(140 | ) | — | 0 | % | |||||||
Corporate Entities |
(2,796 | ) | — | 0 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | (443 | ) | $ | 787 | 178 | % | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
Note 9. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company follows ASC 260 whereby basic earnings per share excludes any dilutive effects of options, restricted stock, warrants and convertible securities and diluted earnings per share includes such effects. The Company does not include the effects of stock options, restricted stock, warrants and convertible securities for periods when such an effect would be antidilutive.
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted Earnings per Share (EPS) computations for net income and other related disclosures (in thousands, except for share and per share data):
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Basic net income per share computation: |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (531 | ) | $ | (1,230 | ) | ||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding- basic |
16,291,792 | 16,075,847 | ||||||
Net loss per common share - basic: |
$ | (.03 | ) | $ | (.08 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Diluted net income per share computation: |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (531 | ) | $ | (1,230 | ) | ||
Interest expense for convertible notes |
62 | 63 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Numerator for diluted earnings per share |
$ | (469 | ) | $ | (1,167 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding- basic |
16,291,792 | 16,075,847 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||
Shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive outstanding stock options, conversion of convertible debentures, vesting of restricted stock and exercise of warrants: |
— | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted |
16,291,792 | 16,075,847 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss per common share - diluted: |
$ | (.03 | ) | $ | (.08 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, there were 916,361 and 1,384,304 shares, respectively, which were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per share as the effect would have been antidilutive.
17
Note 10. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company incurred stock based compensation expense of $614,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and $1,202,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 for Chindex employees and outside directors.
The Company generally grants stock options that vest over a three or five year period to senior, long-term employees. Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Stock options have up to 10-year contractual terms. The Company recognizes expense ratably over the vesting period of the stock options or restricted stock, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company will record additional expense if the actual forfeitures are lower than estimated and will record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeitures are higher than estimated.
The Company calculates grant-date fair values using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. To calculate fair market value, this model utilizes certain information, such as the interest rate on a risk-free security maturing generally at the same time as the expected life of the option being valued and the exercise price of the option being valued. It also requires certain assumptions, such as the expected amount of time the option will be outstanding until it is exercised or it expires and the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock over the expected life of the option.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2012:
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)* |
|||||||||||||
Options outstanding at December 31, 2011 |
1,206,439 | $ | 10.35 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
— | — | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(9,024 | ) | 1.78 | |||||||||||||
Canceled |
(2,500 | ) | 13.26 | |||||||||||||
Expired |
(6,125 | ) | 11.44 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Options outstanding at March 31, 2012 |
1,188,790 | $ | 10.41 | 5.36 | $ | 1,850 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Options exercisable at March 31, 2012 |
1,062,260 | $ | 10.03 | 5.08 | $ | 1,850 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
* | The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based on the positive difference between the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on March 31, 2012 ($9.50) and the exercise price of the underlying options. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $70,000 and $112,000, respectively, and the actual cash received upon exercise of stock options was $16,000 and $114,000 respectively. The unamortized fair value of the stock options as of March 31, 2012 was $705,000, the majority of which is expected to be expensed over the weighted-average period of 1.77 years.
18
The following table summarizes activity relating to restricted stock for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
Number of shares underlying restricted stock |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value of Restricted Stock (in thousands) * |
|||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2011 |
525,800 | |||||||
Granted |
— | |||||||
Vested |
— | |||||||
Forfeited |
(4,125 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2012 |
521,675 | $ | 4,956 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Expected to vest |
496,283 | $ | 4,715 | |||||
|
|
* | The aggregate intrinsic value on this table was calculated based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on March 31, 2012 ($9.50). |
The weighted average remaining contractual term of the restricted stock, calculated based on the service-based term of each grant, is approximately two years. As of March 31, 2012, the unamortized fair value of the restricted stock was $5,708,000. This unamortized fair value is expected to be expensed over the weighted-average period of 2.89 years. Restricted stock is valued at the stock price on the date of grant.
Note 11. STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT – FOSUNPHARMA
On June 14, 2010, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with Fosun Industrial Co., Limited (the “Investor”) and Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical (Group) Co., Ltd. (“FosunPharma”). Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to issue and sell to Investor a total of 1,990,447 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock (representing approximately 10% of all outstanding common stock after such sale, based on the number of outstanding shares as of the date of the Stock Purchase Agreement) at a purchase price of $15 per share.
Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, the sale of the Shares would be completed in two closings. The initial closing occurred on August 27, 2010, at which the Company issued 933,022 Shares to Investor for an aggregate purchase price of $13,995,330. At the second closing (the “Second Closing”) under the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company would sell the remaining 1,057,425 Shares to Investor for an aggregate purchase price of $15,861,375. The Second Closing has been subject to the consummation of CML, which was initially formed effective December 31, 2010 and recently fully consummated. CML engages in the businesses of, among other things, (i) the marketing, distribution and servicing of medical equipment in China and Hong Kong (except that sales and distribution related activities in relation to sales and servicing in China and Hong Kong may take place in other jurisdictions) and (ii) the manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution of medical devices and medical equipment and consumables, including our former Medical Products division. CML is 51%-owned by FosunPharma and 49%-owned by the Company.
At the initial closing under the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company, Investor and FosunPharma also entered into a stockholder agreement (the “Stockholder Agreement”). Under the Stockholder Agreement, until the first to occur of (i) Investor holds 5% or less of the outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) there shall have been a change of control of the Company as defined in the Stockholder Agreement, and (iii) the seventh anniversary of the initial closing, Investor has agreed to vote its shares in accordance with the recommendation of the Company’s Board of Directors on any matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company relating to the election of directors and compensation matters and with respect to certain proxy or consent solicitations. The Stockholder Agreement also contains standstill restrictions on Investor generally prohibiting the purchase of additional securities of the Company. The standstill restrictions terminate on the same basis as does the voting agreement above, except that the 5% standard would increase to 10% upon the Second Closing. In addition, the Stockholder Agreement contains a lock-up restricting sales by Investor of its shares of the Company’s common stock for a period of five years following the date of the Stockholder Agreement, subject to certain exceptions.
19
Upon the Second Closing, Investor would have the right to, among other things, nominate two designees for election to the Company’s Board of Directors, which would be increased to nine members. Further, such final portion of the Shares to be purchased by FosunPharma would be subject to the terms of the Stockholder Agreement, which currently governs other shares of the Company’s common stock held by Fosun entities. In order to induce Investor to enter into the transaction and without any consideration therefore, each of the Company’s chief executive, operating and financial officers holding such offices as of the date of the Stock Purchase Agreement, in their capacities as stockholders of the Company, agreed to certain limitations on his or her right to dispose of shares of the Company’s common stock and to vote for the Investor’s board nominees. Although all conditions to the Second Closing have been satisfied, it has not yet occurred.
The Company evaluated whether this contingent Stock Purchase Agreement should be accounted for as a derivative instrument or whether it qualified for a scope exception under ASC 815-10. The Company concluded that the contract qualified for the scope exception because the contract was indexed to the Company’s own stock and was classified in stockholders’ equity.
Note 12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
The Company leases office space, warehouse space, and space for hospital and clinic operations under operating leases. Future minimum payments under these noncancelable operating leases consist of the following (in thousands):
Nine months ending December 31, |
||||
2012 |
$ | 4,925 | ||
Year ending December 31, 2013 |
6,271 | |||
2014 |
5,883 | |||
2015 |
5,804 | |||
2016 |
4,730 | |||
Thereafter |
43,129 | |||
|
|
|||
Net minimum rental commitments |
$ | 70,742 | ||
|
|
The above leases require the Company to pay certain pass through operating expenses and rental increases based on inflation.
Rental expense was approximately $1,853,000 and $1,200,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Note 13. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
ASC 820, which defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. It clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop our own assumptions. This hierarchy requires us to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.
20
The following table presents the balances of investment securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level (in thousands):
As of March 31, 2012: |
||||||||||||||||
Description |
Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Corporate Bonds |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||
Description |
Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises |
$ | 1,575 | $ | — | $ | 1,575 | $ | — | ||||||||
Corporate Bonds |
6,107 | — | 6,107 | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,682 | $ | — | $ | 7,682 | $ | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The valuation of these investment securities are obtained from a financial institution that trades in similar securities.
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.
The fair value of debt under ASC 820 is not the settlement amount of the debt, but is based on an estimate of what an entity might pay to transfer the obligation to another entity with a similar credit standing. Observable inputs for the Company’s debt such as quoted prices in active markets are not available, as the Company’s long-term debt is not publicly-traded. Accordingly, the Company has estimated the fair value amounts using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies. However, it requires considerable judgment in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the fair value estimate presented is not necessarily indicative of the amount that the Company or holders of the debt instruments could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair values.
The fair value of the Company’s convertible debt was calculated based on an estimate of the present value of the debt payments combined with an estimate of the value of the conversion option, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For the Company’s other long-term debt, the fair value was calculated based on an estimate of the present value
21
of the debt payments. As of March 31, 2012, the carrying value of the Company’s convertible debt, net of debt discount, and the long-term debt outstanding for the IFC 2005 RMB Loan was $23.9 million, and the estimated fair value was $25.1 million. Since the full principal amount of the IFC RMB Loan of $10.3 million has been funded into a restricted account for the benefit of the lender, that amount has been used as the fair value. The carrying amounts of the remaining debt instruments approximate fair value, as the instruments are subject to variable rates of interest or have short maturities.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q relating to plans, strategies, objectives, economic performance and trends and other statements that are not descriptions of historical facts may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking information is inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” and in other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, including, without limitation, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Forward-looking statements may be identified by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “forecasts,” “potential,” or “continue” or similar terms or the negative of these terms. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, the Company cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. The Company has no obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates. Areas in which significant judgments and estimates are used include revenue recognition, receivable collectability, and deferred tax valuation allowances.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to three months ended March 31, 2011
Overview of Consolidated Results
We own and operate the United Family Healthcare network of private hospitals and clinics in the People’s Republic of China. United Family Healthcare currently operates hospitals and affiliated clinic facilities in the Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin and Guangzhou markets. Our network operations in the Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou market have earned the accreditation of the Joint Commission International. Our current network operations include the following facilities:
• | Beijing Market |
• | Beijing United Family Hospital main campus |
• | Expanding from 50 to 120 licensed beds |
• | In the recent period 41 available beds |
• | Four affiliated satellite clinics |
• | Shanghai Market |
• | Shanghai United Family Hospital main campus |
• | 50 licensed beds |
• | In the recent period 30 available beds |
22
• | Two affiliated satellite clinics |
• | Two managed clinics |
• | Tianjin Market |
• | Tianjin United Family Hospital main campus |
• | 26 licensed beds |
• | In the recent period 25 available beds |
• | Guangzhou Market |
• | One affiliated clinic |
We have undertaken a number of market expansion projects in our current markets:
In Beijing, continued expansion at our flagship hospital campus, where we recently more than doubled our licensed beds.
In Beijing, development of the rehabilitation hospital for expansion of our services for those seeking quality premium care when recovering from surgeries or debilitating illnesses in the neurological cardiac and orthopedic areas.
In Shanghai, continued expansion at our flagship hospital campus in Puxi and at our managed clinic in the Pudong district.
In Tianjin, expansion through development of a freestanding clinic that will coordinate services with our newly opened hospital.
In Guangzhou, development of a new hospital expected to open in 2014-2015.
In connection with our expansion plans outlined above, over the next twelve months we have planned capital expenditures of up to $40 million for construction, equipment and information systems (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources”). During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the development, pre-opening and start up expenses, including post-opening expenses, for these projects were $3,203,000 compared to $798,000 in the same period of the prior year, reflecting primarily expenses incurred for the Beijing, Tianjin and Pudong projects.
The Chinese Government’s healthcare reform program encourages private investment, such as Chindex’s United Family Healthcare, as the primary source for development of specialty and premium healthcare services within the Chinese healthcare system. Nevertheless, expansions of our existing facilities as well as new hospital and affiliated clinic projects are complex, requiring several phases over extended periods of time. The projects are subject to delays routinely encountered in complex construction projects in regulated industries and are subject to, among other things, the receipt of (i) medical-related approvals from local health authorities and in some cases the Ministry of Health at the national level, (ii) foreign invested joint venture health facility approvals from the local Bureau of Commerce and Trade, and (iii) local construction and safety approvals. Accordingly, we give windows of expected completion of our expansion projects, the exact timing of which are subject to the actual receipt of the various government licenses and permits.
Our discussion and analysis below relates to the revenue and expenses of our healthcare services business for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the comparable period in the prior year.
23
Net Revenue
(in thousands)
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||
Healthcare services net revenue |
$ | 32,512 | $ | 24,185 | 34 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our healthcare services revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $32,512,000, a 34% increase from the three months ended March 31, 2011 revenue of $24,185,000. The increase in net revenue is attributable to growth in both inpatient and outpatient services.
The table below identifies the relative contribution of inpatient and outpatient services to gross revenue:
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Inpatient/Outpatient gross revenue percentages |
||||||||
Inpatient services as percent of gross revenue |
38 | % | 38 | % | ||||
Outpatient services as percent of gross revenue |
62 | % | 62 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
100 | % | 100 | % | |||||
|
|
|
|
The table below identifies the primary service lines contributing to gross revenue:
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Gross revenue by service line (hospital facilities only): |
||||||||
Surgical services |
18.9 | % | 17.8 | % | ||||
OB/GYN |
14.9 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||
Pediatrics |
7.6 | % | 7.6 | % | ||||
Ancillary services |
||||||||
Laboratory |
10.2 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||
Radiology |
11.1 | % | 11.3 | % | ||||
Pharmacy |
12.3 | % | 11.7 | % | ||||
All other services |
25.0 | % | 26.2 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
100 | % | 100 | % | |||||
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
(in thousands)
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits |
$ | 18,537 | $ | 14,755 | 26 | % | ||||||
Other operating expenses |
4,985 | 4,319 | 15 | % | ||||||||
Supplies and purchased medical services |
4,096 | 2,635 | 55 | % | ||||||||
Bad debt expense |
765 | 432 | 77 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,651 | 1,137 | 45 | % | ||||||||
Lease and rental expense |
1,853 | 1,200 | 54 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | 31,887 | $ | 24,478 | 30 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages and benefits increased 26% in the recent period compared to the comparable prior year period primarily due to the increased headcount of 33.8% associated with the revenue increases and development activities. The increase in headcount was due to both increased activities in our existing facilities as well as for hiring new personnel to staff our expanded Beijing and new Tianjin facilities.
24
Other operating expenses increased by $666,000 or 15%, primarily due to increased office and administrative supplies of approximately $200,000, business travel and meals of approximately $114,000, and building utilities and other outside services of approximately $294,000.
Supplies and purchased medical services increased by $1,461,000 or 55%, due to increased usage of medical supplies and pharmaceuticals related to higher patient procedures as well as initial stocking of operating supplies for departments in the new Tianjin hospital and other new services in Beijing of approximately $1,291,000 or 56%, and increased purchased medical services of approximately $170,000 or 55%.
Bad debt expense increased by $333,000, and, as a percentage of net revenue, bad debt expense was 2.4% in 2012, compared to 1.8% in the prior year period, both of which are in line with our historic averages.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $514,000 or 45% to $1,651,000, primarily due to the opening of expanded facilities, which are now being depreciated.
Lease and rental expense increased to $1,853,000 in the recent period compared to $1,200,000 in the prior year period, primarily due to the increase in the total building space utilized in the expanded operations of our hospital and clinic network.
Other Income and Expenses
Interest income during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $139,000 and $142,000, respectively, as interest rates on cash balances continued to be very low.
Interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $124,000 and $103,000, respectively, due to increases of capitalized interest due to higher construction activities.
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates in the amount of $98,000 and ($147,000) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, represents our 49% interest in the income of CML.
Taxes
We recorded a provision for taxes of $1,259,000 (an effective tax rate of approximately 173%) in the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to a provision for taxes of $787,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase of the effective tax rate in the current quarter is primarily due to the effect of losses in entities for which we cannot recognize tax benefit.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The following table sets forth our cash, investments, and accounts receivable as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 38,955 | $ | 33,755 | ||||
Investments |
4,556 | 26,394 | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
15,534 | 13,947 | ||||||
Receivables from affiliates |
11,566 | 10,984 |
25
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2012 | March 31, 2011 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (531 | ) | $ | (1,230 | ) | ||
Non cash items |
3,100 | 2,658 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
1,052 | — | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
(2,333 | ) | 264 | |||||
Receivable from affiliates |
(583 | ) | 8,060 | |||||
Inventories |
421 | (3 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, other current liabilities and deferred revenue |
1,192 | 5,001 | ||||||
Payable to affiliates |
1,609 | 1,181 | ||||||
Other |
(1,531 | ) | 792 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 2,396 | $ | 16,723 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was lower than the three months ended March 31, 2011, primarily due to the increase in accounts receivable and receivable from affiliates.
The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows from investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2012 | March 31, 2011 | |||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Purchases of short-term investments and CDs |
$ | — | $ | (20,265 | ) | |||
Proceeds from redemption of CDs |
21,970 | 21,987 | ||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(7,141 | ) | (8,064 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
$ | 14,829 | $ | (6,342 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
Investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 included acquisitions of property and equipment in connection with our ongoing development and expansion of the United Family Healthcare network of private hospitals and clinics. Investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011, included acquisitions of property and equipment in connection with our ongoing development and expansion of the United Family Healthcare network of private hospitals and clinics, and redemption of CDs were reinvested in comparable instruments.
The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows from financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2012 | March 31, 2011 | |||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Restricted cash for sinking fund |
$ | (12,051 | ) | $ | — | |||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants |
16 | 114 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
$ | (12,035 | ) | $ | 114 | |||
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2012, the certificates of deposit total $12,052,000 and are recorded in long-term restricted cash and sinking funds.
26
Capital Resources and Financing Requirements
In 2007 and 2008, we entered into two US Dollar loan facilities with International Finance Corporation (IFC) and DEG-Deutsche Investitions und Entwicklungsgesellschaft (DEG) to supplement the financing of expansion projects in China. These facilities were never used and at this time are not available. We are in preliminary stages of negotiating successor facilities with these lenders. There can be no assurances as to the amounts, if any, that may be available under such successor facilities or whether such facilities will be achievable on terms acceptable to us and the lenders, which failure, absent an alternative source of financing, could have a material adverse effect on our operations and our ability to complete our proposed expansion projects on time or at all.
Over the past four years, there have been continuing and significant disruptions in the world financial markets including those in China. We have not experienced significant negative impacts to operating activities as a result of these events. We have taken steps to ensure the security of our cash and investment holdings through deposits with highly liquid, global banking institutions. Our daily operations generate significant operating cash flows and have not been dependent upon credit availability. Our patient base in our current facilities are by and large considered to be in the wealthiest segment of society, for whom healthcare spending represents a very small percentage of their income and therefore is expected to be less impacted by an economic slowdown and to the extent their assets are affected, this will likely not impact their decision making on healthcare purchases. Our current expansion projects as described above are expected to be funded with existing cash and credit facilities as described above, provided that there can be no assurances that such facilities will be available or sufficient, that the preconditions to disbursements under the facilities will be satisfied.
Over the next twelve months, we anticipate total capital expenditures of up to $40 million related to the maintenance and expansion of our business operations. In our Beijing and Shanghai operating hospital and clinic facilities, we plan maintenance and organic growth expenditures of up to $4 million for each facility. United Family Healthcare network development plans include up to $2 million in expenditures primarily related to network IT investment. Expansion projects are expected to account for up to $30 million in expenditures. Specifically, we anticipate final payments related to the expansion of the Beijing hospital main campus and New Hope clinic to be approximately $9 million; final payments related to the opening of the Tianjin hospital to be approximately $5 million; we plan for expenditures of approximately $16 million for the Beijing Rehabilitation project. We intend to fund these expenditures through corporate capital reserves and cash flow from operations. Registered foreign debt is expected to be secured by each operating foreign invested joint venture upon obtaining required governmental and credit approvals.
The expansion projects in the Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin and Guangzhou markets are underway in various states of progress. In particular, due to the timing of the development process for the planned joint venture hospital in Guangzhou, significant expenditures for that project are not expected until 2013 and beyond.
Based on the foregoing, we believe that our existing capital resources are sufficient to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 months, although there can be no assurances to this effect. We will require financing arrangements to meet our capital expenditures beyond this period.
27
Although we regularly consider and evaluate possible additional or alternative financing opportunities, no such financing currently is in place or under substantive negotiations. We will continue to evaluate a wide range of such opportunities, including both debt and equity-based financings in which we may borrow funds and/or share with one or more financial, institutional or strategic partners the ownership interest in one or more projects.
We may not be able to raise adequate capital to complete some or all of our business strategies, including our ongoing expansion projects, or to react rapidly to changes in technology, products, services or the competitive landscape. Healthcare service and medical product providers in China often face high capital requirements in order to take advantage of new market opportunities, respond to rigorous competitive pressures and react quickly to changes in technology. Many of our competitors are committing substantial capital and, in many instances, are forming alliances to acquire or maintain market leadership. There can be no assurance that we will be able to satisfy our capital requirements in the future. In particular, our strategy of expanding our healthcare facilities and services includes the establishment and maintenance of healthcare facilities, which require particularly significant capital. In addition, CML plans to expand its distribution capabilities for medical products. In the absence of sufficient available capital, we would be unable to establish or maintain healthcare facilities as planned, and the joint venture would be unable to expand its distribution business as planned.
TIMING OF REVENUES
Our revenue is dependent on seasonal fluctuations related to epidemiology factors and the life styles of the expatriate community. For example, many expatriate families traditionally take annual home leave outside of China during the summer months. As a result of these factors impacting the timing of revenues, our operating results have varied and are expected to continue to vary from period to period and year to year.
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE AND IMPACT OF INFLATION
Because we receive 100% of our revenue and generate approximately 96% of our expenses within China, we have foreign currency exchange risk. The Chinese currency (RMB) is not freely traded and is closely controlled by the Chinese Government. The U.S. dollar (USD) has experienced volatility in world markets recently. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the RMB appreciated approximately 0.1% against the USD, resulting in an exchange loss of $214,000.
As part of our risk management program, we also perform sensitivity analyses to assess potential changes in revenue, operating results, cash flows and financial position relating to hypothetical movements in currency exchange rates. Our sensitivity analysis of changes in the fair value of the RMB to the USD at March 31, 2012, indicated that if the USD uniformly increased in value by 10% relative to the RMB, we would have experienced a 5% increase in net loss. Conversely, a 10% increase in the value of the RMB relative to the USD at March 31, 2012, would have resulted in a 6% decrease in net loss.
Based on the Consumer Price Index, for the three months ended March 31, 2012, the average annual rate of inflation in China and the United States was 3.8% and 2.8%, respectively. The average annual rate of inflation over the three-year period from 2009 to 2011 was 2.7% in China and 1.5% in the United States.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Company holds the majority of all cash assets in 100% principal protected AA/Aa or higher rated accounts. Therefore, the Company believes that its market risk exposures are immaterial and reasonable possible near-term
28
changes in market interest rates will not result in material near-term reductions in other income, material changes in fair values or cash flows. The Company does not have instruments for trading purposes. Instruments for non-trading purposes are operating and development cash assets held in interest-bearing accounts. The Company is exposed to certain foreign currency exchange risk (See “Foreign Currency Exchange and Impact of Inflation”).
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ”Exchange Act“), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the ordinary course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the Company’s ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with GAAP, such that there is a more than remote likelihood that a misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers have evaluated any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2012, and has concluded that there was no change that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
None.
29
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
None.
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not Applicable.
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated October 28, 2004. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. | |
3.2 | Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation dated July 9, 2007. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 10, 2007. | |
3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company dated September 21, 2011. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 23, 2011. | |
3.4 | Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. | |
4.1 | Form of Specimen Certificate representing the Common Stock of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 33-78446) (the “IPO Registration Statement”). | |
4.2 | Form of Specimen Certificate representing the Class B Common Stock of the Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the IPO Registration Statement. | |
4.3 | Rights Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2007, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, which includes a form of Right Certificate as Exhibit B and a Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock as Exhibit C. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2007. | |
4.4 | Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2007, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 7, 2007. | |
4.5 | Amendment No. 2 to Rights Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2010, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 14, 2010. | |
10.1 | Amendment and Restatement Agreement to RMB Loan Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2011 among Beijing United Family Health Center, Shanghai United Family Hospital, Inc. and International Finance Corporation (filed herewith). | |
10.2 | Certificate of Deposit Retention and Pledge Agreement, dated March 14, 2012, between Beijing United Family Health Center, China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd., Beijing Chaoyangmen Sub-branch and International Finance Corporation (filed herewith). |
30
31.1 | Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith) | |
31.2 | Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith) | |
31.3 | Certification of the Company’s Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith) | |
32.1 | Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith) | |
32.2 | Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith) | |
32.3 | Certification of the Company’s Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith) | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document (furnished herewith) | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (furnished herewith) | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (furnished herewith) | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document (furnished herewith) | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (furnished herewith) | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (furnished herewith) |
31
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CHINDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. | ||
Dated: May 10, 2012 | By: /s/ Lawrence Pemble | |
Lawrence Pemble | ||
Chief Operating Officer and Director | ||
Dated: May 10, 2012 | By: /s/ Robert C. Low | |
Robert C. Low | ||
Senior Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Controller | ||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
32