XML 66 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations [Abstract]  
Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations
Note 9.Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations
 
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.  These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.  Such financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they become payable.  Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.  The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.
 
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.  The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
 
The contract amounts are as follows:
 
 
 
March 31,
  
December 31,
 
(In thousands)
 
2014
  
2013
 
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
  
 
Open-end lines of credit
 
$
28,527
  
$
21,182
 
Commitments to extend credit
  
3,855
   
200
 
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written
  
2,058
   
2,679
 

Legal Proceedings
 
From time to time, the Company is a party to routine legal proceedings within the normal course of business.  Such routine legal proceedings in the aggregate are believed by management to be immaterial to the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
 
On or about March 15, 2012, CSC, RTL and the Company were named defendants, among others, in a complaint filed by Marina Bay Towers Urban Renewal II, LP (“MBT”) in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Cape May County.  The complaint alleges a conspiracy to rig bids in municipal tax lien auctions.  MBT does not seek to represent a class and only seeks remedies related to itself.  As of the date of this filing, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may result from this proceeding.