SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES [Abstract]
Principles of Consolidation	Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Royal Investments of Delaware, Inc., Royal Captive Insurance Company, Royal Preferred, LLC, and Royal Bank, including Royal Bank's subsidiaries, Royal Real Estate of Pennsylvania, Inc., Royal Investment America, LLC, RBA Property LLC, Narberth Property Acquisition LLC, and Rio Marina LLC. In addition, the following are owned 60% by Royal Bank: Royal Bank America Leasing, LP, Crusader Servicing Corporation ("CSC") and Royal Tax Lien Services ("RTL"), LLC. During the fourth quarter of 2010, Royal Captive Insurance was dissolved. The investments were sold for a gain of approximately $8,000, $2.0 million was paid to the Company as a dividend, and the remaining funds, in the approximate amount of $500,000, were transferred to the Company. On December 30, 2010, the Company completed the sale of all of the outstanding common stock of Royal Asian Bank ("Royal Asian"), a wholly-owned subsidiary, to an investor group. Royal Asian's net loss of $ 953,000 through December 29, 2010 was consolidated into the Company's consolidated financial statements. Both of the Company's Trusts are not consolidated as further discussed below in "Variable Interest Entities". All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates	Use of Estimates In preparing the consolidated financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"), management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements; therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates. The principal estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the allowance for loan and lease losses, loans held for sale, the valuation of other real estate owned, the valuation of deferred tax assets, other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities, net periodic pension costs and the pension accumulate benefit obligation. In connection with the allowance for loan and lease losses estimate, management obtains independent appraisals for real estate collateral. However, future changes in real estate market conditions and the economy could affect the Company's allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the credit portfolio and the allowance. Such review may result in additional provisions based on their judgment of information available at the time of each examination.
Significant Concentration of Credit Risk	Significant Concentration of Credit Risk Most of the Company's activities are with customers located within the Mid-Atlantic region of the country. "Note 3 – Investment Securities" to the Consolidated Financial Statements discusses the types of securities in which the Company invests. "Note 4 – Loans and Leases" to the Consolidated Financial Statements discusses the types of lending in which the Company engages. The Company does not have any portion of its business dependent on a single or limited number of customers, the loss of which would have a material adverse effect on its business. The Company has 95% of its investment portfolio in securities issued by government sponsored entities. The Company's tax lien portfolio has a geographic concentration in the State of New Jersey. No substantial portion of loans is concentrated within a single industry or group of related industries, except a significant majority of loans are secured by real estate. There are numerous risks associated with commercial and consumer lending that could impact the borrower's ability to repay on a timely basis. They include, but are not limited to: the owner's business expertise, changes in local, national, and in some cases international economies, competition, governmental regulation, and the general financial stability of the borrowing entity. Over the last few years, the Company has been impacted by deterioration in economic conditions as it pertains to real estate loans. Commercial real estate, commercial loans, and construction and land loans represent 52%, 22%, and 19%, respectively, of the total $23.0 million in non-accrual loans at December 31, 2012. The Company attempts to mitigate these risks by making an analysis of the borrower's business and industry history, its financial position, as well as that of the business owner. The Company will also require the borrower to provide financial information on the operation of the business periodically over the life of the loan. In addition, most commercial loans are secured by assets of the business or those of the business owner, which can be liquidated if the borrower defaults, along with the personal surety of the business owner.
Variable Interest Entities ("VIEP")	Variable Interest Entities ("VIE") Real estate owned via equity investments: The Company, together with third party real estate development companies, formed variable interest entities ("VIEs") to construct various real estate development projects. These VIEs account for acquisition, development and construction costs of the real estate development projects in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 970, "Real Estate-General", and account for capitalized interest on those projects in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 835, "Interest". Due to economic conditions, management decided to curtail new equity investments. In accordance with ASC Topic 976, the full accrual method is used to recognize profit on real estate sales. Profits on the sales of this real estate are recorded when cash in excess of the amount of the original investment is received, and calculation of same is made in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement, the Company is no longer obligated to perform significant activities after the sale to earn profits, there is no continuing involvement with the property and; finally, the usual risks and rewards of ownership in the transaction had passed to the acquirer. At December 31, 2011, the remaining VIE was deconsolidated as a result of the substantial completion of the project and the sales of the remaining units. At December 31, 2011, the carrying amount of the investment in and due from the Partnership totaled $325,000 and were received in the first quarter of 2012. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company no longer had any VIEs consolidated into the Company's financial statements. Trust Preferred Securities: Royal Bancshares Capital Trust I/II ("Trusts") issued mandatory redeemable preferred stock to investors and loaned the proceeds to the Company. The Trusts hold, as their sole asset, subordinated debentures issued by the Company in 2004. The Company does not consolidate the Trusts as ASC Topic 810 precludes consideration of the call option embedded in the preferred stock when determining if the Company has the right to a majority of the Trusts expected returns. The non-consolidation results in the investment in common stock of the Trusts to be included in other assets with a corresponding increase in outstanding debt of $774,000. In addition, the income accrued on the Company's common stock investments is included in other income. Refer to "Note 10 – Borrowings and Subordinated Debentures" to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
U.S. GAAP RAP Difference	U.S. GAAP RAP Difference In connection with a prior bank regulatory examination, the Federal Deposit Insurance Company ("FDIC") concluded, based upon its interpretation of the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (the "Call Report") instructions and under regulatory accounting principles ("RAP"), that income from Royal Bank's tax lien business should be recognized on a cash basis, not an accrual basis. Royal Bank's current accrual method is in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Royal Bank disagrees with the FDIC's conclusion and filed the Call Report for December 31, 2012 and the previous nine quarters in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, the change in the manner of revenue recognition for the tax lien business for regulatory accounting purposes affects Royal Bank's and potentially the Company's capital ratios as disclosed in "Note 2 - Regulatory Matters and Significant Risks And Uncertainties" and "Note 15 - Regulatory Capital Requirements" to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Royal Bank is in discussions with the FDIC to resolve the matter.
Reclassifications	Reclassifications Certain items in the 2011 and 2010 consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation format. There was no effect on net loss for the periods presented herein as a result of reclassification.
Cash and Cash Equivalents	Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one-day periods.
Investment Securities	Investment Securities Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. Investments in debt securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity securities and reported at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses included in earnings. Debt and equity securities not classified as trading securities, nor as held to maturity securities are classified as available for sale securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains or losses, net of deferred income taxes (when applicable), reported in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders' equity. The Company did not hold trading securities nor had securities classified as held to maturity at December 31, 2012 and 2011. Discounts and premiums are accreted/amortized to income by use of the level-yield method. Gain or loss on sales of securities available for sale is based on the specific identification method. The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") at least on a quarterly basis. The Company assesses whether OTTI is present when the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost. All investment securities are evaluated for OTTI under FASB ASC Topic 320, "Investments-Debt & Equity Securities" ("ASC Topic 320"). The non-agency collateralized mortgage obligation that is rated below AA is evaluated under FASB ASC Topic 320 Subtopic 40, "Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets" or under FASB ASC Topic 325, "Investments-Other". In determining whether OTTI exists, management considers numerous factors, including but not limited to: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value is less than the amortized cost, (2) the Company's intent to hold or sell the security, (3) the financial condition and results of the issuer including changes in capital, (4) the credit rating of the issuer, (5) analysts earnings estimate, (6) industry trends specific to the security, and (7) timing of debt maturity and status of debt payments. Under ASC Topic 320, OTTI is considered to have occurred with respect to debt securities (1) if an entity intends to sell the security; (2) if it is more likely than not an entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) the present value of the expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis. In addition, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell the security. If an entity intends to sell the security or will be required to sell the security, the OTTI shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the fair value and the amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis, the OTTI shall be separated into two amounts, the credit-related loss and the noncredit-related loss. The credit-related loss is based on the present value of the expected cash flows and is recognized in earnings. The noncredit-related loss is based on other factors such as illiquidity and is recognized in other comprehensive income.
Other Investment	Other Investment This investment includes the Solomon Hess SBA Loan Fund, which the Company invested in to partially satisfy its community reinvestment requirement. Shares in this fund are not publicly traded and therefore have no readily determinable fair market value. An investor can have their investment in the Fund redeemed for the balance of their capital account at any quarter end with 60 days notice to the Fund. The investment in this Fund is recorded at cost.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock	Federal Home Loan Bank Stock As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh ("FHLB"), the Company is required to purchase and hold stock in the FHLB to satisfy membership and borrowing requirements. The stock can only be sold to the FHLB or to another member institution, and all sales of FHLB stock must be at par. As a result of these restrictions, there is no active market for the FHLB stock. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, FHLB stock totaled $6.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively. FHLB stock is held as a long-term investment and its value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. The Company evaluates impairment quarterly. The decision of whether impairment exists is a matter of judgment that reflects management's view of the FHLB's long-term performance, which includes factors such as the following: (1) its operating performance, (2) the severity and duration of declines in the fair value of its net assets related to its capital stock amount, (3) its liquidity position, and (4) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the FHLB. Based on the capital adequacy and the liquidity position of the FHLB, management believes that the par value of its investment in FHLB stock will be recovered. Accordingly, there is no other-than-temporary impairment related to the carrying amount of the Company's FHLB stock as of December 31, 2012.
Loans Held for Sale	Loans Held for Sale At December 31, 2012, the Company's loans held for sale ("LHFS") were comprised of one non-accrual commercial real estate loan for $1.6 million. The loans were transferred from loans held for investment ("LHFI") to LHFS at the lower of cost or fair market value using expected net sales proceeds. At the time of transfer to LHFS, a credit loss of $1.4 million was charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Generally any subsequent credit losses on LHFS are recorded as a component of non-interest expense. Additional impairment on the LHFS of $2.0 million was recorded in 2012. At December 31, 2011 LHFS were comprised of $12.6 million in non-accrual construction and land development loans and commercial and residential real estate loans.
Loans and Leases	Loans and Leases Loans and leases are classified as LHFI when management has the intent and ability to hold the loan or lease for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. LHFI are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of an allowance for loan and leases losses and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield (interest income) of the related loans. The Company is generally amortizing these amounts over the contractual life of the loan. The Company grants commercial and real estate loans, including construction and land development loans primarily in the greater Philadelphia metropolitan area as well as selected locations throughout the mid-Atlantic region. The Company also has participated with other financial institutions in selected construction and land development loans outside our geographic area. The Company has a concentration of credit risk in commercial real estate and construction and land development loans at December 31, 2012. A substantial portion of its debtors' ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon the housing sector specifically and the economy in general. The Company classifies its leases as finance leases, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 840, "Leases". The difference between the Company's gross investment in the lease and the cost or carrying amount of the leased property, if different, is recorded as unearned income, which is amortized to income over the lease term by the interest method. For all classes of loans receivable, the accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when management believes that the borrower's financial condition is such that collection of principal and interest is doubtful or when a loan becomes 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual all unpaid interest is reversed from interest income. Interest payments received on impaired nonaccrual loans are normally applied against principal. Excess proceeds received over the principal amounts due on impaired loans are recognized as income on a cash basis. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the loan is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (generally six months) and the ultimate collectibility of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. The past due status of all classes of loans receivable is determined based on contractual due dates for loan payments. A loan modification is deemed a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") when two conditions are met: 1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and 2) a concession is made by the Company that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower or collateral with similar credit risk characteristics. If in modifying a loan the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession it would not normally consider then the loan modification is classified as a TDR. All loans classified as TDRs are considered to be impaired. TDRs are returned to an accrual status when the loan is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual restructured terms for a reasonable period of time (generally six months) and the ultimate collectibility of the total contractual restructured principal and interest is no longer in doubt. At December 31, 2012, the Company had twelve TDRs, of which eight are on non-accrual status, with a total carrying value of $21.1 million. At the time of the modifications, seven of the loans were already classified as impaired loans. At December 31, 2011, the Company had twelve TDRs, of which seven were on non-accrual status, with a total carrying value of $14.2 million. At the time of the modifications, eight of the loans were already classified as impaired loans. The Company's policy for TDRs is to recognize income on currently performing restructured loans under the accrual method. The Company accounts for guarantees in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 460 "Guarantees" ("ASC Topic 460"). ASC Topic 460 requires a guarantor entity, at the inception of a guarantee covered by the measurement provisions of the interpretation, to record a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The Company has financial and performance letters of credit. Financial letters of credit require the company to make a payment if the customer's condition deteriorates, as defined in agreements. Performance letters of credits require the Company to make payments if the customer fails to perform certain non-financial contractual obligations.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses The Company's loan and lease portfolio (the "credit portfolio") is subject to varying degrees of credit risk. The Company maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses (the "allowance") to absorb losses in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance is based on the review and evaluation of the loan and lease portfolio, along with ongoing, quarterly assessments of the probable losses inherent in that portfolio. The allowance represents an estimation made pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 450, "Contingencies" ("ASC Topic 450") or FASB ASC Topic 310, "Receivables" ("ASC Topic 310"). The adequacy of the allowance is determined through evaluation of the credit portfolio, and involves consideration of a number of factors, as outlined below, to establish a prudent level. Determination of the allowance is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans and leases based on historical loss experience and consideration of current economic trends, which may be susceptible to significant change. Loans and leases deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance, while recoveries are credited to the allowance. Management adjusts the level of the allowance through the provision for loan and lease losses, which is recorded as a current period expense. The Company's systematic methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance includes: (1) general reserves reflecting historical loss rates by loan type, (2) specific reserves for risk-rated credits based on probable losses on an individual or portfolio basis and (3) qualitative reserves based upon current economic conditions and other risk factors. The loan portfolio is stratified into loan segments that have similar risk characteristics. The general allowance is based upon historical loss rates using a three-year rolling average of the historical loss experienced within each loan segment. The qualitative factors used to adjust the historical loss experience address various risk characteristics of the Company's loan and lease portfolio include evaluating: (1) trends in delinquencies and other non-performing loans, (2) changes in the risk profile related to large loans in the portfolio, (3) changes in the growth trends of categories of loans comprising the loan and lease portfolio, (4) concentrations of loans and leases to specific industry segments, (5) changes in economic conditions on both a local and national level, (6) quality of loan review and board oversight, (7) changes in lending policies and procedures, and (8) changes in lending staff. Each factor is assigned a value to reflect improving, stable or declining conditions based on management's best judgment using relevant information available at the time of the evaluation. Adjustments to the factors are supported through documentation of changes in conditions in a report accompanying the allowance calculation. The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower's overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for commercial loans or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments, for commercial and consumer loans. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not classified are rated pass. The specific reserves are determined utilizing standards required under ASC Topic 310. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that interest and principal will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Non-accrual loans and loans restructured under a troubled debt restructuring are evaluated for impairment on an individual basis considering all known relevant factors that may affect loan collectability such as the borrower's overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support available from financial guarantors and the sufficiency of current collateral values (current appraisals or rent rolls for income producing properties), and risks inherent in different kinds of lending (such as source of repayment, quality of borrower and concentration of credit quality). Non-accrual loans that experience insignificant payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans and commercial construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company's impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan's collateral. The Company obtains third-party appraisals to establish the fair value of real estate collateral. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property. For commercial and industrial loans secured by non-real estate collateral, such as accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, estimated fair values are determined based on the borrower's financial statements, inventory reports, accounts receivable aging or equipment appraisals or invoices. Indications of value from these sources are generally discounted based on the age of the financial information or the quality of the assets. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. A specific reserve is established for an impaired loan for the amount that the carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. Once a loan is determined to be impaired it will be deducted from the portfolio balance and the net remaining balance will be used in the general and qualitative analysis. Based on management's comprehensive analysis of the loan and lease portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance is adequate at December 31, 2012. However, its determination requires significant judgment, and estimates of probable losses inherent in the credit portfolio can vary significantly from the amounts actually observed. While management uses available information to recognize probable losses, future changes to the allowance may be necessary. These changes could be based in the credits comprising the portfolio and changes in the financial condition of borrowers, as the result of changes in economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the credit portfolio and the allowance. Such review may result in additional provisions based on their judgment of information available at the time of each examination, which may not be currently available to management.
Other Real Estate Owned	Other Real Estate Owned Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other expenses.
Premises and Equipment	Premises and Equipment Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which is computed principally on accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the accelerated methods over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the terms of the related leases. Expected term includes lease options periods to the extent that the exercise of such options is reasonably assured.
Interest Rate Swaps	Interest Rate Swaps For asset/liability management purposes, the Company had used interest rate swaps which are agreements between the Company and another party (known as counterparty) where one stream of future interest payments is exchanged for another based on a specified principal amount (known as notional amount). The Company will use interest rate swaps to hedge various exposures or to modify interest rate characteristics of various balance sheet accounts. Such derivatives are used as part of the asset/liability management process, are linked to specific liabilities, and have a high correlation between the contract and the underlying item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedge period. The Company had utilized interest rate swap agreements to convert a portion of its fixed rate time deposits to a variable rate (fair value hedge), to fund variable rate loans and investments as well as convert a portion of variable rate borrowings (cash flow hedge) to fund fixed rate loans. Interest rate swap contracts represent a series of interest flows and are exchanged over a prescribed period. As a consequence of the 2008 Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. ("Lehman") bankruptcy filing, the swap agreements and cash flow hedge that existed at the time of the bankruptcy filing were terminated. The Company had an agency mortgage-backed security (approximately $5.0 million) that was pledged as collateral at Lehman for our swap agreements. In October 2008, the Company sued Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. ("LBSF") to recover possession of its collateral. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the litigation and the Lehman bankruptcy, the Company classified the collateral as other-than-temporarily impaired for the entire amount as of December 31, 2008. In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company sold its claim and recorded a gain of $1.7 million. The Company did not have any interest rate swaps agreements at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures	Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures During 2012, the Company did not recognize any income from real estate joint ventures. During 2011, the Company recorded income from real estate joint ventures of $1.8 million. This income was related to a payment received from a guarantor on an investment which had been fully written down in 2007. During 2010, the Company had one investment in a real estate joint venture and accounted for it in accordance with ASC Topic 310 and FASB ASC Topic 976, "Real Estate-Retail Land" ("ASC Topic 976") because the Company was not a party to an operating agreement and had no legal ownership of the entity that owns the real estate. The real estate joint venture was an investment in an Ohio marina project in which the Company had a subordinate debt position. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company fully impaired the investment and recorded a $2.5 million charge to earnings. The impairment was the result of a lower collateral value due to the significant reduction in the cash flows being generated from the property. During the third quarter of 2010, the first mortgage lender foreclosed on the property. Partially offsetting the $2.5 million impairment charge was a $968,000 recovery on another investment in a real estate in joint venture which had been written down in 2007. The Company no longer holds any investments in real estate joint ventures.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance	Bank-Owned Life Insurance Royal Bank has purchased life insurance policies on certain executives. These policies are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized. During the fourth quarter of 2011, Royal Bank purchased an additional $5.0 million of bank owned life insurance. Income from these policies and changes in the cash surrender value are recorded in other income.
Transfer of Financial Assets	Transfer of Financial Assets The Company accounts for the transfer of financial assets in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 860, "Transfers and Servicing" ("ASC Topic 860"). ASC Topic 860 revises the standards for accounting for the securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and collateral. Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred asset through an agreement to repurchase them before maturity.
Advertising Costs	Advertising Costs Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. The Company's advertising costs were $127,000, $116,000, and $109,000 for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
Benefit Plans	Benefit Plans The Company has a noncontributory nonqualified, defined benefit pension plan covering certain eligible employees. The plan provides retirement benefits under pension trust agreements. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee's compensation during the highest three consecutive years during the last 10 years of employment. Net pension expense consists of service costs and interest costs. The Company accrues pension costs as incurred. The Company has a capital accumulation and salary reduction plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Under the plan, all employees are eligible to contribute up to the maximum allowed by Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") regulation, with the Company matching 100% of any contribution between 1% and 5% subject to a $2,500 per employee annual limit. During 2012 and 2010, no matching contribution was made as a result of a management decision to reduce costs. During 2011, the Company partially reinstated the matching contribution and contributed $128,000 to the plan.
Stock Compensation	Stock Compensation FASB ASC Topic 718, "Compensation-Stock Compensation" ("ASC Topic 718") requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in consolidated financial statements. The costs are measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. ASC Topic 718 covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. The effect of ASC Topic 718 is to require entities to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for stock options based on the grant-date fair value of the award, and to recognize the cost over the period the employee is required to provide services for the award. ASC Topic 718 permits entities to use any option-pricing model that meets the fair value objective in the Statement. The Company recorded compensation expense relating to stock options and restricted stock of $42,000, $93,000 and $35,000 during 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the Company had a director stock-based, an employee stock-based, and a long-term incentive compensation plans, which are more fully described in "Note 17 – Stock Compensation Plans" to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes	Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting guidance (FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes), which includes guidance related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, which sets out a consistent framework to determine the appropriate level of tax reserves to maintain for uncertain tax positions. The Company had no material unrecognized tax benefits or accrued interest and penalties as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. The Company's policy is to account for interest as a component of interest expense and penalties as a component of other expense. The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Income taxes are allocated to the Company and its subsidiaries based on the contribution of their income or use of their loss in the consolidated return. Separate state income tax returns are filed by the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for the years before January 1, 2005. Federal and state income taxes have been provided on the basis of reported income or loss. The amounts reflected on the tax returns differ from these provisions due principally to temporary differences in the reporting of certain items for financial reporting and income tax reporting purposes. The tax effect of these temporary differences is accounted for as deferred taxes applicable to future periods. Deferred income tax expense or benefit is determined by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date. The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance provided for the full amount which is not more likely than not to be realized.
Treasury Stock	Treasury Stock Shares of common stock repurchased are recorded as treasury stock at cost.
Earnings (Losses) Per Share Information	Earnings (Losses) Per Share Information Basic per share data excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted per share data takes into account the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted into common stock, using the treasury stock method. The Class B shares of the Company may be converted to Class A shares at the rate of 1.15 to 1.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	Comprehensive Income (Loss) The Company reports comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income" ("ASC Topic 220"), which requires the reporting of all changes in equity during the reporting period except investments from and distributions to shareholders. Net income (loss) is a component of comprehensive income (loss) with all other components referred to in the aggregate as other comprehensive income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses on available for sale investment securities, non-credit related losses on other-than-temporarily impaired investment securities, and adjustment to net periodic pension cost.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	Fair Value of Financial Instruments For information on the fair value of the Company's financial instruments refer to "Note 20 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments" to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Restrictions on Cash and Amounts Due From Banks	Restrictions on Cash and Amounts Due From Banks Royal Bank is required to maintain average balances on hand with the Federal Reserve Bank. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, these reserve balances amounted to $100,000.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs" ("ASU 2011-04") which generally clarifies guidance in ASC Topic 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures". The amendments in ASU 2011-004 explain how to measure fair value and change the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The Company adopted ASU 2011-04 during the first quarter of 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2011-05") which amends ASC Topic 220 "Comprehensive Income". To increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), the FASB decided to eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity, among other amendments in ASU 2011-05. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. For public entities, ASU 2011-05 was effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted the two-statement approach. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, "Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities" ("ASU 2011-11") which amends ASC Topic 210 "Balance Sheet". Because of the significant differences in requirements under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") are issuing joint requirements that will enhance current disclosures. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. This scope would include derivatives, sale and repurchase agreements and reverse sale and repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending arrangements. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by these amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-11 will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In February 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("ASU 2013-02") to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. However, ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. ASU 2013-02 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES [Abstract]

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Royal Investments of Delaware, Inc., Royal Captive Insurance Company, Royal Preferred, LLC, and Royal Bank, including Royal Bank's subsidiaries, Royal Real Estate of Pennsylvania, Inc., Royal Investment America, LLC, RBA Property LLC, Narberth Property Acquisition LLC, and Rio Marina LLC. In addition, the following are owned 60% by Royal Bank: Royal Bank America Leasing, LP, Crusader Servicing Corporation ("CSC") and Royal Tax Lien Services ("RTL"), LLC. During the fourth quarter of 2010, Royal Captive Insurance was dissolved. The investments were sold for a gain of approximately $8,000, $2.0 million was paid to the Company as a dividend, and the remaining funds, in the approximate amount of $500,000, were transferred to the Company. On December 30, 2010, the Company completed the sale of all of the outstanding common stock of Royal Asian Bank ("Royal Asian"), a wholly-owned subsidiary, to an investor group. Royal Asian's net loss of $ 953,000 through December 29, 2010 was consolidated into the Company's consolidated financial statements. Both of the Company's Trusts are not consolidated as further discussed below in "Variable Interest Entities". All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"), management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements; therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates.

The principal estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the allowance for loan and lease losses, loans held for sale, the valuation of other real estate owned, the valuation of deferred tax assets, other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities, net periodic pension costs and the pension accumulate benefit obligation. In connection with the allowance for loan and lease losses estimate, management obtains independent appraisals for real estate collateral. However, future changes in real estate market conditions and the economy could affect the Company's allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the credit portfolio and the allowance. Such review may result in additional provisions based on their judgment of information available at the time of each examination.

Significant Concentration of Credit Risk

Most of the Company's activities are with customers located within the Mid-Atlantic region of the country. "Note 3 – Investment Securities" to the Consolidated Financial Statements discusses the types of securities in which the Company invests. "Note 4 – Loans and Leases" to the Consolidated Financial Statements discusses the types of lending in which the Company engages. The Company does not have any portion of its business dependent on a single or limited number of customers, the loss of which would have a material adverse effect on its business. The Company has 95% of its investment portfolio in securities issued by government sponsored entities. The Company's tax lien portfolio has a geographic concentration in the State of New Jersey.

No substantial portion of loans is concentrated within a single industry or group of related industries, except a significant majority of loans are secured by real estate. There are numerous risks associated with commercial and consumer lending that could impact the borrower's ability to repay on a timely basis. They include, but are not limited to: the owner's business expertise, changes in local, national, and in some cases international economies, competition, governmental regulation, and the general financial stability of the borrowing entity. Over the last few years, the Company has been impacted by deterioration in economic conditions as it pertains to real estate loans. Commercial real estate, commercial loans, and construction and land loans represent 52%, 22%, and 19%, respectively, of the total $23.0 million in non-accrual loans at December 31, 2012.

The Company attempts to mitigate these risks by making an analysis of the borrower's business and industry history, its financial position, as well as that of the business owner. The Company will also require the borrower to provide financial information on the operation of the business periodically over the life of the loan. In addition, most commercial loans are secured by assets of the business or those of the business owner, which can be liquidated if the borrower defaults, along with the personal surety of the business owner.

Variable Interest Entities ("VIEP")

Variable Interest Entities ("VIE")

Real estate owned via equity investments: The Company, together with third party real estate development companies, formed variable interest entities ("VIEs") to construct various real estate development projects. These VIEs account for acquisition, development and construction costs of the real estate development projects in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 970, "Real Estate-General", and account for capitalized interest on those projects in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 835, "Interest". Due to economic conditions, management decided to curtail new equity investments.

In accordance with ASC Topic 976, the full accrual method is used to recognize profit on real estate sales. Profits on the sales of this real estate are recorded when cash in excess of the amount of the original investment is received, and calculation of same is made in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement, the Company is no longer obligated to perform significant activities after the sale to earn profits, there is no continuing involvement with the property and; finally, the usual risks and rewards of ownership in the transaction had passed to the acquirer. At December 31, 2011, the remaining VIE was deconsolidated as a result of the substantial completion of the project and the sales of the remaining units. At December 31, 2011, the carrying amount of the investment in and due from the Partnership totaled $325,000 and were received in the first quarter of 2012. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company no longer had any VIEs consolidated into the Company's financial statements.

Trust Preferred Securities: Royal Bancshares Capital Trust I/II ("Trusts") issued mandatory redeemable preferred stock to investors and loaned the proceeds to the Company. The Trusts hold, as their sole asset, subordinated debentures issued by the Company in 2004. The Company does not consolidate the Trusts as ASC Topic 810 precludes consideration of the call option embedded in the preferred stock when determining if the Company has the right to a majority of the Trusts expected returns. The non-consolidation results in the investment in common stock of the Trusts to be included in other assets with a corresponding increase in outstanding debt of $774,000. In addition, the income accrued on the Company's common stock investments is included in other income. Refer to "Note 10 – Borrowings and Subordinated Debentures" to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

U.S. GAAP RAP Difference

In connection with a prior bank regulatory examination, the Federal Deposit Insurance Company ("FDIC") concluded, based upon its interpretation of the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (the "Call Report") instructions and under regulatory accounting principles ("RAP"), that income from Royal Bank's tax lien business should be recognized on a cash basis, not an accrual basis. Royal Bank's current accrual method is in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Royal Bank disagrees with the FDIC's conclusion and filed the Call Report for December 31, 2012 and the previous nine quarters in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, the change in the manner of revenue recognition for the tax lien business for regulatory accounting purposes affects Royal Bank's and potentially the Company's capital ratios as disclosed in "Note 2 - Regulatory Matters and Significant Risks And Uncertainties" and "Note 15 - Regulatory Capital Requirements" to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Royal Bank is in discussions with the FDIC to resolve the matter.

Reclassifications

Certain items in the 2011 and 2010 consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation format. There was no effect on net loss for the periods presented herein as a result of reclassification.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one-day periods.

Investment Securities

Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. Investments in debt securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity securities and reported at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses included in earnings. Debt and equity securities not classified as trading securities, nor as held to maturity securities are classified as available for sale securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains or losses, net of deferred income taxes (when applicable), reported in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders' equity. The Company did not hold trading securities nor had securities classified as held to maturity at December 31, 2012 and 2011. Discounts and premiums are accreted/amortized to income by use of the level-yield method. Gain or loss on sales of securities available for sale is based on the specific identification method.

The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") at least on a quarterly basis. The Company assesses whether OTTI is present when the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost. All investment securities are evaluated for OTTI under FASB ASC Topic 320, "Investments-Debt & Equity Securities" ("ASC Topic 320"). The non-agency collateralized mortgage obligation that is rated below AA is evaluated under FASB ASC Topic 320 Subtopic 40, "Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets" or under FASB ASC Topic 325, "Investments-Other". In determining whether OTTI exists, management considers numerous factors, including but not limited to: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value is less than the amortized cost, (2) the Company's intent to hold or sell the security, (3) the financial condition and results of the issuer including changes in capital, (4) the credit rating of the issuer, (5) analysts earnings estimate, (6) industry trends specific to the security, and (7) timing of debt maturity and status of debt payments.

Under ASC Topic 320, OTTI is considered to have occurred with respect to debt securities (1) if an entity intends to sell the security; (2) if it is more likely than not an entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) the present value of the expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis. In addition, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell the security. If an entity intends to sell the security or will be required to sell the security, the OTTI shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the fair value and the amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis, the OTTI shall be separated into two amounts, the credit-related loss and the noncredit-related loss. The credit-related loss is based on the present value of the expected cash flows and is recognized in earnings. The noncredit-related loss is based on other factors such as illiquidity and is recognized in other comprehensive income.

Other Investment

This investment includes the Solomon Hess SBA Loan Fund, which the Company invested in to partially satisfy its community reinvestment requirement. Shares in this fund are not publicly traded and therefore have no readily determinable fair market value. An investor can have their investment in the Fund redeemed for the balance of their capital account at any quarter end with 60 days notice to the Fund. The investment in this Fund is recorded at cost.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh ("FHLB"), the Company is required to purchase and hold stock in the FHLB to satisfy membership and borrowing requirements. The stock can only be sold to the FHLB or to another member institution, and all sales of FHLB stock must be at par. As a result of these restrictions, there is no active market for the FHLB stock. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, FHLB stock totaled $6.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively.

FHLB stock is held as a long-term investment and its value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. The Company evaluates impairment quarterly. The decision of whether impairment exists is a matter of judgment that reflects management's view of the FHLB's long-term performance, which includes factors such as the following: (1) its operating performance, (2) the severity and duration of declines in the fair value of its net assets related to its capital stock amount, (3) its liquidity position, and (4) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the FHLB. Based on the capital adequacy and the liquidity position of the FHLB, management believes that the par value of its investment in FHLB stock will be recovered. Accordingly, there is no other-than-temporary impairment related to the carrying amount of the Company's FHLB stock as of December 31, 2012.

Loans Held for Sale

At December 31, 2012, the Company's loans held for sale ("LHFS") were comprised of one non-accrual commercial real estate loan for $1.6 million. The loans were transferred from loans held for investment ("LHFI") to LHFS at the lower of cost or fair market value using expected net sales proceeds. At the time of transfer to LHFS, a credit loss of $1.4 million was charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Generally any subsequent credit losses on LHFS are recorded as a component of non-interest expense. Additional impairment on the LHFS of $2.0 million was recorded in 2012. At December 31, 2011 LHFS were comprised of $12.6 million in non-accrual construction and land development loans and commercial and residential real estate loans.

Loans and Leases

Loans and leases are classified as LHFI when management has the intent and ability to hold the loan or lease for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. LHFI are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of an allowance for loan and leases losses and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield (interest income) of the related loans. The Company is generally amortizing these amounts over the contractual life of the loan. The Company grants commercial and real estate loans, including construction and land development loans primarily in the greater Philadelphia metropolitan area as well as selected locations throughout the mid-Atlantic region. The Company also has participated with other financial institutions in selected construction and land development loans outside our geographic area. The Company has a concentration of credit risk in commercial real estate and construction and land development loans at December 31, 2012. A substantial portion of its debtors' ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon the housing sector specifically and the economy in general.

The Company classifies its leases as finance leases, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 840, "Leases". The difference between the Company's gross investment in the lease and the cost or carrying amount of the leased property, if different, is recorded as unearned income, which is amortized to income over the lease term by the interest method.

For all classes of loans receivable, the accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when management believes that the borrower's financial condition is such that collection of principal and interest is doubtful or when a loan becomes 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual all unpaid interest is reversed from interest income. Interest payments received on impaired nonaccrual loans are normally applied against principal. Excess proceeds received over the principal amounts due on impaired loans are recognized as income on a cash basis. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the loan is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (generally six months) and the ultimate collectibility of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. The past due status of all classes of loans receivable is determined based on contractual due dates for loan payments.

A loan modification is deemed a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") when two conditions are met: 1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and 2) a concession is made by the Company that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower or collateral with similar credit risk characteristics. If in modifying a loan the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession it would not normally consider then the loan modification is classified as a TDR. All loans classified as TDRs are considered to be impaired. TDRs are returned to an accrual status when the loan is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual restructured terms for a reasonable period of time (generally six months) and the ultimate collectibility of the total contractual restructured principal and interest is no longer in doubt. At December 31, 2012, the Company had twelve TDRs, of which eight are on non-accrual status, with a total carrying value of $21.1 million. At the time of the modifications, seven of the loans were already classified as impaired loans. At December 31, 2011, the Company had twelve TDRs, of which seven were on non-accrual status, with a total carrying value of $14.2 million. At the time of the modifications, eight of the loans were already classified as impaired loans. The Company's policy for TDRs is to recognize income on currently performing restructured loans under the accrual method.

The Company accounts for guarantees in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 460 "Guarantees" ("ASC Topic 460"). ASC Topic 460 requires a guarantor entity, at the inception of a guarantee covered by the measurement provisions of the interpretation, to record a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The Company has financial and performance letters of credit. Financial letters of credit require the company to make a payment if the customer's condition deteriorates, as defined in agreements. Performance letters of credits require the Company to make payments if the customer fails to perform certain non-financial contractual obligations.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The Company's loan and lease portfolio (the "credit portfolio") is subject to varying degrees of credit risk. The Company maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses (the "allowance") to absorb losses in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance is based on the review and evaluation of the loan and lease portfolio, along with ongoing, quarterly assessments of the probable losses inherent in that portfolio. The allowance represents an estimation made pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 450, "Contingencies" ("ASC Topic 450") or FASB ASC Topic 310, "Receivables" ("ASC Topic 310"). The adequacy of the allowance is determined through evaluation of the credit portfolio, and involves consideration of a number of factors, as outlined below, to establish a prudent level.

Determination of the allowance is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans and leases based on historical loss experience and consideration of current economic trends, which may be susceptible to significant change. Loans and leases deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance, while recoveries are credited to the allowance. Management adjusts the level of the allowance through the provision for loan and lease losses, which is recorded as a current period expense. The Company's systematic methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance includes: (1) general reserves reflecting historical loss rates by loan type, (2) specific reserves for risk-rated credits based on probable losses on an individual or portfolio basis and (3) qualitative reserves based upon current economic conditions and other risk factors.

The loan portfolio is stratified into loan segments that have similar risk characteristics. The general allowance is based upon historical loss rates using a three-year rolling average of the historical loss experienced within each loan segment. The qualitative factors used to adjust the historical loss experience address various risk characteristics of the Company's loan and lease portfolio include evaluating: (1) trends in delinquencies and other non-performing loans, (2) changes in the risk profile related to large loans in the portfolio, (3) changes in the growth trends of categories of loans comprising the loan and lease portfolio, (4) concentrations of loans and leases to specific industry segments, (5) changes in economic conditions on both a local and national level, (6) quality of loan review and board oversight, (7) changes in lending policies and procedures, and (8) changes in lending staff. Each factor is assigned a value to reflect improving, stable or declining conditions based on management's best judgment using relevant information available at the time of the evaluation. Adjustments to the factors are supported through documentation of changes in conditions in a report accompanying the allowance calculation.

The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower's overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for commercial loans or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments, for commercial and consumer loans. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not classified are rated pass.

The specific reserves are determined utilizing standards required under ASC Topic 310. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that interest and principal will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Non-accrual loans and loans restructured under a troubled debt restructuring are evaluated for impairment on an individual basis considering all known relevant factors that may affect loan collectability such as the borrower's overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support available from financial guarantors and the sufficiency of current collateral values (current appraisals or rent rolls for income producing properties), and risks inherent in different kinds of lending (such as source of repayment, quality of borrower and concentration of credit quality). Non-accrual loans that experience insignificant payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans and commercial construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company's impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan's collateral. The Company obtains third-party appraisals to establish the fair value of real estate collateral. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property. For commercial and industrial loans secured by non-real estate collateral, such as accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, estimated fair values are determined based on the borrower's financial statements, inventory reports, accounts receivable aging or equipment appraisals or invoices. Indications of value from these sources are generally discounted based on the age of the financial information or the quality of the assets. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. A specific reserve is established for an impaired loan for the amount that the carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. Once a loan is determined to be impaired it will be deducted from the portfolio balance and the net remaining balance will be used in the general and qualitative analysis.

Based on management's comprehensive analysis of the loan and lease portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance is adequate at December 31, 2012. However, its determination requires significant judgment, and estimates of probable losses inherent in the credit portfolio can vary significantly from the amounts actually observed. While management uses available information to recognize probable losses, future changes to the allowance may be necessary. These changes could be based in the credits comprising the portfolio and changes in the financial condition of borrowers, as the result of changes in economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the credit portfolio and the allowance. Such review may result in additional provisions based on their judgment of information available at the time of each examination, which may not be currently available to management.

Other Real Estate Owned

Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other expenses.

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which is computed principally on accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the accelerated methods over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the terms of the related leases. Expected term includes lease options periods to the extent that the exercise of such options is reasonably assured.

Interest Rate Swaps

For asset/liability management purposes, the Company had used interest rate swaps which are agreements between the Company and another party (known as counterparty) where one stream of future interest payments is exchanged for another based on a specified principal amount (known as notional amount). The Company will use interest rate swaps to hedge various exposures or to modify interest rate characteristics of various balance sheet accounts. Such derivatives are used as part of the asset/liability management process, are linked to specific liabilities, and have a high correlation between the contract and the underlying item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedge period.

The Company had utilized interest rate swap agreements to convert a portion of its fixed rate time deposits to a variable rate (fair value hedge), to fund variable rate loans and investments as well as convert a portion of variable rate borrowings (cash flow hedge) to fund fixed rate loans. Interest rate swap contracts represent a series of interest flows and are exchanged over a prescribed period.

As a consequence of the 2008 Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. ("Lehman") bankruptcy filing, the swap agreements and cash flow hedge that existed at the time of the bankruptcy filing were terminated. The Company had an agency mortgage-backed security (approximately $5.0 million) that was pledged as collateral at Lehman for our swap agreements. In October 2008, the Company sued Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. ("LBSF") to recover possession of its collateral. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the litigation and the Lehman bankruptcy, the Company classified the collateral as other-than-temporarily impaired for the entire amount as of December 31, 2008. In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company sold its claim and recorded a gain of $1.7 million. The Company did not have any interest rate swaps agreements at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures

During 2012, the Company did not recognize any income from real estate joint ventures. During 2011, the Company recorded income from real estate joint ventures of $1.8 million. This income was related to a payment received from a guarantor on an investment which had been fully written down in 2007. During 2010, the Company had one investment in a real estate joint venture and accounted for it in accordance with ASC Topic 310 and FASB ASC Topic 976, "Real Estate-Retail Land" ("ASC Topic 976") because the Company was not a party to an operating agreement and had no legal ownership of the entity that owns the real estate. The real estate joint venture was an investment in an Ohio marina project in which the Company had a subordinate debt position. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company fully impaired the investment and recorded a $2.5 million charge to earnings. The impairment was the result of a lower collateral value due to the significant reduction in the cash flows being generated from the property. During the third quarter of 2010, the first mortgage lender foreclosed on the property. Partially offsetting the $2.5 million impairment charge was a $968,000 recovery on another investment in a real estate in joint venture which had been written down in 2007. The Company no longer holds any investments in real estate joint ventures.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance

Royal Bank has purchased life insurance policies on certain executives. These policies are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized. During the fourth quarter of 2011, Royal Bank purchased an additional $5.0 million of bank owned life insurance. Income from these policies and changes in the cash surrender value are recorded in other income.

Transfer of Financial Assets

The Company accounts for the transfer of financial assets in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 860, "Transfers and Servicing" ("ASC Topic 860"). ASC Topic 860 revises the standards for accounting for the securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and collateral. Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred asset through an agreement to repurchase them before maturity.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. The Company's advertising costs were $127,000, $116,000, and $109,000 for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Benefit Plans

The Company has a noncontributory nonqualified, defined benefit pension plan covering certain eligible employees. The plan provides retirement benefits under pension trust agreements. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee's compensation during the highest three consecutive years during the last 10 years of employment. Net pension expense consists of service costs and interest costs. The Company accrues pension costs as incurred.

The Company has a capital accumulation and salary reduction plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Under the plan, all employees are eligible to contribute up to the maximum allowed by Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") regulation, with the Company matching 100% of any contribution between 1% and 5% subject to a $2,500 per employee annual limit. During 2012 and 2010, no matching contribution was made as a result of a management decision to reduce costs. During 2011, the Company partially reinstated the matching contribution and contributed $128,000 to the plan.

Stock Compensation

FASB ASC Topic 718, "Compensation-Stock Compensation" ("ASC Topic 718") requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in consolidated financial statements. The costs are measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. ASC Topic 718 covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. The effect of ASC Topic 718 is to require entities to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for stock options based on the grant-date fair value of the award, and to recognize the cost over the period the employee is required to provide services for the award. ASC Topic 718 permits entities to use any option-pricing model that meets the fair value objective in the Statement. The Company recorded compensation expense relating to stock options and restricted stock of $42,000, $93,000 and $35,000 during 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

At December 31, 2012, the Company had a director stock-based, an employee stock-based, and a long-term incentive compensation plans, which are more fully described in "Note 17 – Stock Compensation Plans" to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting guidance (FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes), which includes guidance related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, which sets out a consistent framework to determine the appropriate level of tax reserves to maintain for uncertain tax positions. The Company had no material unrecognized tax benefits or accrued interest and penalties as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. The Company's policy is to account for interest as a component of interest expense and penalties as a component of other expense.

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Income taxes are allocated to the Company and its subsidiaries based on the contribution of their income or use of their loss in the consolidated return. Separate state income tax returns are filed by the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for the years before January 1, 2005.

Federal and state income taxes have been provided on the basis of reported income or loss. The amounts reflected on the tax returns differ from these provisions due principally to temporary differences in the reporting of certain items for financial reporting and income tax reporting purposes. The tax effect of these temporary differences is accounted for as deferred taxes applicable to future periods. Deferred income tax expense or benefit is determined by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date. The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance provided for the full amount which is not more likely than not to be realized.

Treasury Stock

Shares of common stock repurchased are recorded as treasury stock at cost.

Earnings (Losses) Per Share Information

Basic per share data excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted per share data takes into account the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted into common stock, using the treasury stock method.

The Class B shares of the Company may be converted to Class A shares at the rate of 1.15 to 1.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company reports comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income" ("ASC Topic 220"), which requires the reporting of all changes in equity during the reporting period except investments from and distributions to shareholders. Net income (loss) is a component of comprehensive income (loss) with all other components referred to in the aggregate as other comprehensive income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses on available for sale investment securities, non-credit related losses on other-than-temporarily impaired investment securities, and adjustment to net periodic pension cost.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

For information on the fair value of the Company's financial instruments refer to "Note 20 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments" to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Restrictions on Cash and Amounts Due From Banks

Royal Bank is required to maintain average balances on hand with the Federal Reserve Bank. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, these reserve balances amounted to $100,000.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs" ("ASU 2011-04") which generally clarifies guidance in ASC Topic 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures". The amendments in ASU 2011-004 explain how to measure fair value and change the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The Company adopted ASU 2011-04 during the first quarter of 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2011-05") which amends ASC Topic 220 "Comprehensive Income". To increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), the FASB decided to eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity, among other amendments in ASU 2011-05. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. For public entities, ASU 2011-05 was effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted the two-statement approach.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, "Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities" ("ASU 2011-11") which amends ASC Topic 210 "Balance Sheet". Because of the significant differences in requirements under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"), FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") are issuing joint requirements that will enhance current disclosures. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. This scope would include derivatives, sale and repurchase agreements and reverse sale and repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending arrangements. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by these amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-11 will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In February 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("ASU 2013-02") to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. However, ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. ASU 2013-02 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 will not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.