XML 27 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Loans and Leases
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Loans and Leases [Abstract] 
Loans and Leases
Note 4.         Loans and Leases
 
Major classifications of loans held for investment (“LHFI”) are as follows:
 
   
September 30,
  
December 31,
 
(In thousands)
 
2011
  
2010
 
Commercial and industrial
 $57,148  $74,027 
Construction
  17,199   29,044 
Land Development
  38,249   50,594 
Real Estate - residential
  27,529   29,299 
Real Estate - non-residential
  181,308   194,203 
Real Estate - multi-family
  11,998   10,277 
Tax certificates
  53,513   70,443 
Leases
  35,758   38,725 
Other
  1,247   793 
Total gross loans
 $423,949  $497,405 
Deferred fees, net
  (563)  (551)
Total loans and leases
 $423,386  $496,854 
 
The Company grants commercial and real estate loans, including construction and land development loans primarily in the greater Philadelphia metropolitan area as well as selected locations throughout the mid-Atlantic region.  The Company also has participated with other financial institutions in selected construction and land development loans outside our geographic area. The Company has a concentration of credit risk in commercial real estate, construction and land development loans at September 30, 2011.  A substantial portion of its debtors' ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon the housing sector specifically and the economy in general.
 
The Company classifies its leases as finance leases, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 840, “Leases”. The difference between the Company's gross investment in the lease and the cost or carrying amount of the leased property, if different, is recorded as unearned income, which is amortized to income over the lease term by the interest method.
 
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $23.7 million and $29.6 million, respectively, in loans held for sale (“LHFS”).  LHFS at September 30, 2011 are comprised of $19.1 million in non-accrual loans and $4.6 million in classified loans. These loans were transferred from LHFI in the fourth quarter of 2010 at the lower of cost or fair market value.
 
The Company uses a nine point grading risk classification system commonly used in the financial services industry as the credit quality indicator.  The first four classifications are rated Pass.  The riskier classifications include Watch, Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss.  The risk rating is related to the underlying credit quality and probability of default.  These risk ratings are used to calculate the historical loss component of the ALLL.
 
 
·
Pass: includes credits that demonstrate a low probability of default;
 
 
·
Watch: a warning classification which includes credits that are beginning to demonstrate above average risk through declining earnings, strained cash flows, increased leverage and/or weakening market fundamentals;
 
 
·
Special mention: includes credits that have potential weaknesses that if left uncorrected could weaken the credit or result in inadequate protection of the Company's position at some future date. While potentially weak, credits in this classification are marginally acceptable and loss of principal or interest is not anticipated;
 
 
·
Substandard accrual: includes credits that exhibit a well-defined weakness which currently jeopardizes the repayment of debt and liquidation of collateral even though they are currently performing. These credits are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company may incur a loss in the future if these weaknesses are not corrected;
 
 
·
Non-accrual (substandard non-accrual, doubtful, loss): includes credits that demonstrate serious problems to the point that it is probable that interest and principal will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
 
All loans, at the time of presentation to the appropriate loan committee, are given an initial loan “risk” rating by the Chief Credit Officer. From time to time, and at the general direction of any of the various loan committees, the ratings may be changed based on the findings of that committee. Items considered in assigning ratings include the financial strength of the borrower and/or guarantors, the type of collateral, the collateral lien position, the type of loan and loan structure, any potential risk inherent in the specific loan type, higher than normal monitoring of the loan or any other factor deemed appropriate by any of the various committees for changing the rating of the loan. Any such change in rating is reflected in the minutes of that committee.
 
The following tables present risk ratings for each loan portfolio segment at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, excluding LHFS.
 
September 30, 2011
       
Special
          
(In thousands)
 
Pass
  
Watch
  
Mention
  
Substandard
  
Non-accrual
  
Total
 
Construction and land development
 $981  $21,242  $21,479  $-  $11,746  $55,448 
Real Estate-non-residential
  88,865   54,642   28,125   -   9,676   181,308 
Commercial & industrial
  25,340   5,947   13,216   -   12,645   57,148 
Residential real estate
  19,344   6,447   305   -   1,433   27,529 
Multi-family
  5,224   4,042   1,015   -   1,717   11,998 
Leasing
  35,130   167   10   -   451   35,758 
Consumer
  1,171   76   -   -   -   1,247 
Tax certificates
  52,126   -   -   -   1,387   53,513 
Subtotal LHFI
  228,181   92,563   64,150   -   39,055   423,949 
Less: Deferred loan fees
                      (563)
Total LHFI
                     $423,386 
 
December 31, 2010
       
Special
          
(In thousands)
 
Pass
  
Watch
  
Mention
  
Substandard
  
Non-accrual
  
Total
 
Construction and land development
 $7,913  $24,056  $27,911  $-  $19,758  $79,638 
Real Estate-non-residential
  97,142   49,278   37,723   -   10,060   194,203 
Commercial & industrial
  27,864   6,488   25,400   8,317   5,958   74,027 
Residential real estate
  19,272   7,430   198   -   2,399   29,299 
Multi-family
  2,804   4,117   903   -   2,453   10,277 
Leasing
  37,731   252   10   -   732   38,725 
Consumer
  768   25   -   -   -   793 
Tax certificates
  68,641   -   -   -   1,802   70,443 
Subtotal LHFI
  262,135   91,646   92,145   8,317   43,162   497,405 
Less: Deferred loan fees
                      (551)
Total LHFI
                     $496,854 
 
The following tables present an aging analysis of past due payments for each loan portfolio segment at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, excluding LHFS.
 
September 30, 2011
 
30-59 Days
  
60-89 Days
  
Accruing
  
Total
       
(In thousands)
 
Past Due
  
Past Due
  
90+ Days
  
Non-accrual
  
Current
  
Total
 
Construction and land development
 $723  $-  $-  $11,746  $42,979  $55,448 
Real Estate-non-residential
  1,063   -   -   9,676   170,569   181,308 
Commercial & industrial
  40   -   -   12,645   44,463   57,148 
Residential real estate
  575   214   -   1,433   25,307   27,529 
Multi-family
  -   -   -   1,717   10,281   11,998 
Leasing
  167   10   -   451   35,130   35,758 
Consumer
  216   -   -   -   1,031   1,247 
Tax certificates
  -   -   -   1,387   52,126   53,513 
Subtotal LHFI
  2,784   224   -   39,055   381,886   423,949 
Less: Deferred loan fees
                      (563)
Total LHFI
                     $423,386 
 
December 31, 2010
 
30-59 Days
  
60-89 Days
  
Accruing
  
Total
       
(In thousands)
 
Past Due
  
Past Due
  
90+ Days
  
Non-accrual
  
Current
  
Total
 
Construction and land development
 $-  $-  $-  $19,758  $59,880  $79,638 
Real Estate-non-residential
  9,469   -   -   10,060   174,674   194,203 
Commercial & industrial
  146   659   -   5,958   67,264   74,027 
Residential real estate
  1,341   341   -   2,399   25,218   29,299 
Multi-family
  -   -   -   2,453   7,824   10,277 
Leasing
  252   10   -   732   37,731   38,725 
Consumer
  18   -   -   -   775   793 
Tax certificates
  -   -   -   1,802   68,641   70,443 
Subtotal LHFI
  11,226   1,010   -   43,162   442,007   497,405 
Less: Deferred loan fees
                      (551)
Total LHFI
                     $496,854 
 
The following tables detail the composition of the non-accrual loans at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
 
   
September 30, 2011
  
December 31, 2010
 
(In thousands)
 
Loan
balance
  
Specific
reserves
  
Loan
balance
  
Specific
reserves
 
Non-accrual loans held for investment
            
Construction and land development
 $11,746  $-  $19,758  $- 
Real Estate-non-residential
  9,676   -   10,060   1,363 
Commercial & industrial
  12,645   430   5,958   - 
Residential real estate
  1,433   23   2,399   74 
Multi-family
  1,717   -   2,453   245 
Leasing
  451   204   732   194 
Tax certificates
  1,387   106   1,802   31 
Total non-accrual LHFI
 $39,055  $763  $43,162  $1,907 
                 
Non-accrual loans held for sale
                
Construction and land development
 $12,193  $-  $13,371  $- 
Real Estate-non-residential
  6,687   -   8,638   - 
Residential real estate
  240   -   634   - 
Total non-accrual LHFS
 $19,120   -  $22,643   - 
Total non-accrual loans
 $58,175  $763  $65,805  $1,907 
 
Total non-accrual loans at September 30, 2011 were $58.2 million and were comprised of $39.1 million in LHFI and $19.1 million in LHFS.  Total non-accrual loans at December 31, 2010 were $65.8 million and were comprised of $43.2 million in LHFI and $22.6 million in LHFS.  For the three quarters ended September 30, 2011, the $7.6 million decrease in non-accrual loans was the result of a $20.0 million reduction in existing non-accrual loan balances through payments or return to accrual status, $9.8 million in charge-offs and impairments, and $3.9 million transferred to OREO which were offset by additions of $26.1 million.  The Company does not accrue interest income on non-accrual loans. If interest had been accrued, such income would have been approximately $1.1 million and $4.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.  The Company had no loans past due 90 days or more on which it has continued to accrue interest during the quarter. Typically, loans are restored to accrual status when the loan is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (generally six months) and the ultimate collectibility of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.
 
Included in the $763,000 in specific reserves at September 30, 2011 was $740,000 in new or additional impairment on three existing non-accrual loans based on new appraisals or changes in expected cash flows.
 
Impaired Loans
 
The Company identifies a loan as impaired when it is probable that interest and principal will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  The Company does not accrue interest income on impaired non-accrual loans. Excess proceeds received over the principal amounts due on impaired non-accrual loans are recognized as income on a cash basis.
 
Total cash collected on impaired loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 was $16.3 million and $14.5 million respectively, of which $16.3 million and $14.2 million was credited to the principal balance outstanding on such loans, respectively.
 
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans:
 
   
September 30,
  
December 31,
 
(In thousands)
 
2011
  
2010
 
Impaired LHFI with a valuation allowance
 $6,250  $9,620 
Impaired LHFI without a valuation allowance
  34,683   32,805 
Impaired LHFS
  19,120   22,643 
Total impaired loans
 $60,053  $65,068 
Valuation allowance related to impaired LHFI
 $763  $1,907 
 
Troubled Debt Restructurings
 
A loan modification is deemed a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when two conditions are met: 1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and 2) concessions are made by the Company that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower or collateral with similar credit risk characteristics.  During the third quarter of 2011, the Company adopted ASU 2011-02, “A Creditor's Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring” (“ASU 2011-02”) which amended guidance related to identifying and reporting TDRs.  If in modifying a loan the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession it would not normally consider then the loan modification is classified as a TDR. All loans classified as TDRs are considered to be impaired.  TDRs are returned to an accrual status when the loan is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual restructured terms for a reasonable period of time (generally six months) and the ultimate collectibility of the total contractual restructured principal and interest is no longer in doubt.  As required under ASU 2011-02, the Company reassessed all loan modifications that occurred after December 31, 2010 for identification as TDRs. At September 30, 2011, the Company had eight TDRs, of which seven are on non-accrual status, with a total carrying value of $10.9 million.  At the time of the modifications the eight loans were already classified as impaired loans.   The Company had one TDR at December 31, 2010 which was classified as a multi-family real estate non-accrual loan in the amount of $1.8 million.  The Company's policy for TDRs is to recognize income on currently performing restructured loans under the accrual method.
 
The following table details the Company's TDRs that are on an accrual status and a non-accrual status at September 30, 2011.
 
(In thousands)
 
Number of
loans
  
Accrual
Status
  
Non-Accrual
Status
  
Total
TDRs
 
              
Construction and land development
  2  $2,256  $967  $3,223 
Real Estate-non-residential
  2   -   3,010   3,010 
Commercial & industrial
  1   -   2,774   2,774 
Residential real estate
  2   -   185   185 
Multi-family
  1   -   1,717   1,717 
Total
  8  $2,256  $8,653  $10,909 
 
The following tables present newly restructured loans that occurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
 
   
Modifications by type for the three months ended
 
   
September 30, 2011
 
                          
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Number of
loans
  
Rate
  
Term
  
Payment
  
Combination
  
Total
  
Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
  
Post-Modification Outstanding
 Recorded
Investment
 
                          
Construction and land development
  1  $-  $-  $-  $2,256  $2,256  $4,178  $2,652 
Real Estate-non-residential
  2   -   2,927   83   -   3,010   3,013   3,013 
Commercial & industrial
  1   2,774   -   -   -   2,774   2,774   2,774 
Residential real estate
  1   -   -   45   -   45   46   46 
Total
  5  $2,774  $2,927  $128  $2,256  $8,085  $10,011  $8,485 
 
   
Modifications by type for the nine months ended
 
   
September 30, 2011
 
                          
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Number of loans
  
Rate
  
Term
  
Payment
  
Combination
  
Total
  
Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
  
Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 
                          
Construction and land development
  2  $-  $-  $-  $3,223  $3,223  $5,178  $3,652 
Real Estate-non-residential
  2   -   2,927   83   -   3,010   3,013   3,013 
Commercial & industrial
  1   2,774   -   -   -   2,774   2,774   2,774 
Residential real estate
  2   140   -   45   -   185   193   193 
Total
  7  $2,914  $2,927  $128  $3,223  $9,192  $11,158  $9,632 
 
At September 30, 2011, the Company had one commercial real estate TDR with a payment default occurring within 12 months of the restructure date, and the payment default occurring during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.  The carrying amount of the TDR in default was $83,000 at September 30, 2011.