XML 29 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Fair Value Measurements  
Fair Value Measurements

10. Fair Value Measurements

 

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach, and cost approach). The levels of the hierarchy are described below:

 

·

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

·

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

 

·

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

 

The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.

 

The following methods and assumptions are used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate:

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

The fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximates the carrying value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, due to the short maturity of the cash equivalents and as such is a Level 1 measurement.

 

Loans to the Jamul Tribe

 

The fair value of the Company’s loans to the Jamul Tribe was based on market interest rates for similarly rated observable instruments.  Although we determined that these inputs fell within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s loan is impaired and as such the fair value is estimated based on the present value of expected future cash flows of the facility discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate which is a Level 3 measurement.  Therefore, the Company concluded that this instrument should be classified as a Level 3 measurement.  See Note 2 for further details.

 

Long-term debt

 

The fair value of the Company’s Term Loan A and B components of its senior secured credit facility and senior unsecured notes is estimated based on quoted prices in active markets and as such is a Level 1 measurement. The fair value of the remainder of the Company’s senior secured credit facility approximates its carrying value as it is revolving, variable rate debt and as such is a Level 2 measurement.

 

Other long term obligations at June 30, 2017, included the relocation fees for Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway and Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course and the repayment obligation of a hotel and event center located near Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg. The fair value of the relocation fees for Hollywood Gaming at Dayton Raceway and Hollywood Gaming at Mahoning Valley Race Course approximates its carrying value as the discount rate of 5.0% approximates the market rate of similar debt instruments and as such is a Level 2 measurement.  Finally, the fair value of the repayment obligation for the hotel and event center is estimated based on a rate consistent with comparable municipal bonds and as such is a Level 2 measurement.

 

Other liabilities

 

Other liabilities at June 30, 2017 is primarily comprised of the contingent purchase price consideration related to the purchases of Plainridge Racecourse and Rocket Speed.  The fair value of the Company’s contingent purchase price consideration related to its Plainridge Racecourse acquisition is estimated based on a discounted cash flow model and as such is a Level 3 measurement.  The fair value of the Company’s contingent purchase price consideration related to its Rocket Speed acquisition is estimated by applying an option pricing method using a Monte Carlo simulation which is a quantitative technique that estimates the distribution of an outcome variable that depends on probabilistic input variables and as such is a Level 3 measurement.  At each reporting period, the Company assesses the fair value of these liabilities and changes in their fair values are recorded in earnings. The amount related to the change in fair value of these obligations resulted in a charge to general and administrative expense of $1.4 million and $3.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to a charge of $0.1 million and a reduction of $1.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

 

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values by input level of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2017

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Amount

    

Fair Value

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

224,399

 

$

224,399

 

$

224,399

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Loans to the Jamul Tribe

 

 

84,152

 

 

84,152

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

84,152

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior secured credit facility

 

 

812,001

 

 

847,494

 

 

797,494

 

 

50,000

 

 

 —

 

Senior unsecured notes

 

 

399,208

 

 

406,000

 

 

406,000

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Other long-term obligations

 

 

126,573

 

 

127,301

 

 

 —

 

 

127,301

 

 

 —

 

Other liabilities

 

 

52,955

 

 

52,955

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

52,955

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Amount

    

Fair Value

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

229,510

 

$

229,510

 

$

229,510

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

Loans to the Jamul Tribe

 

 

92,100

 

 

98,000

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

98,000

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior secured credit facility

 

 

962,703

 

 

976,092

 

 

785,092

 

 

191,000

 

 

 —

 

Senior unsecured notes

 

 

296,895

 

 

312,000

 

 

312,000

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Other long-term obligations

 

 

154,084

 

 

152,132

 

 

 —

 

 

152,132

 

 

 —

 

Other liabilities

 

 

48,244

 

 

48,244

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

48,244

 

 

The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 liabilities (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended

 

    

June 30, 2017

 

 

Liabilities

 

Assets

 

 

Contingent

 

Loans to the

 

 

Purchase Price

 

Jamul Tribe

Balance at January 1, 2017

 

$

48,244

$

98,000

Unamortized discount

 

 

 —

 

(5,865)

Additions

 

 

830

 

372

Payments

 

 

(41)

 

(2,720)

Included in earnings

 

 

3,922

 

(5,635)

Balance at June 30, 2017

 

$

52,955

$

84,152

 

The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used in calculating fair value for our Level 3 liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valuation

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Technique

    

Input

    

Discount Rate

 

 

Volatility Rate

 

Contingent purchase price - Plainridge

 

Discounted cash flow

 

Discount rate

 

8.30

%

 

N/A

%

Contingent purchase price - Rocket Speed

 

Option pricing method

 

Discount rate, Volatility rate

 

11.00

%

 

70.92

%