6-K

FORM 6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

REPORT OF FOREIGN
PRIVATE ISSUER

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For  February 10, 2009

Commission File Number: 0-26424

SILVER STANDARD RESOURCES INC.

999 West Hastings Street, #1180, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 2W2

1. Consolidated Financial Statements, December 31, 2007 (Restated), 2006 and 2005
2. Management Discussion and Analysis (Restated) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007
3. Consolidated Financial Statements (Restated) for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2008
   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F  þ   Form 40-F  r

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):________

Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):________

Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted to furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must furnish and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the registrant is incorporated, domiciled or legally organized (the registrant’s “home country”), or under the rules of the home country exchange on which the registrant’s securities are traded, as long as the report or other document is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been distributed to the registrant’s security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or other Commission filing on EDGAR.

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes  r        No  þ

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 10, 2009

    SILVER STANDARD RESOURCES INC.

      (Registrant)

	/s/John J. Kim
By:	______________________________
	John J. Kim Corporate Secretary

EX-99.01

EX-99.02

SILVER STANDARD RESOURCES INC.

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Explanatory Note

We are filing this amendment to our management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 to reflect the retrospective effect of the adoption of Emerging Issues Committee Statement 172 (“EIC-172”).

Effective September 30, 2008, we adopted EIC-172, “Income Statement Presentation of a Tax Loss Carryforward Recognized following an Unrealized Gain in Other Comprehensive Income” for Canadian GAAP purposes.  This new EIC requires tax benefits from the recognition of previously unrealized tax losses carryforwards consequent to the recording of unrealized gains in Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”), such as unrealized gains on available-for-sale financial assets, to be recognized in net income.

Pursuant to the adoption of EIC-172, we are required to retrospectively adjust our 2007 financial statements, resulting in a reclassification of $5,084,000 of future income tax recovery from opening accumulated OCI to opening accumulated deficit effective January 1, 2007, and $1,098,000 of future income tax expense from OCI to net loss for the year ended December 31, 2007.

These adjustments affect our Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss), Comprehensive Loss and Deficit, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for Canadian GAAP.

No attempt has been made in this amended MD&A to modify or update other disclosures presented in the MD&A as originally filed, except as required to reflect the effects of the restatements discussed in the foregoing.  This amendment does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the 2007 MD&A on March 7, 2008.

Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Position and Operating Results

We are a silver resource company that has assembled a portfolio of silver-dominant projects located in seven countries in the Americas and Australia.  We focused our activities on the exploration for, and acquisition of, silver dominant projects, some of which have been previously mined, at times when lower metal prices prevailed in order to position us to benefit from silver price increases.  Our primary focus is to take advantage of the current environment of improved metal prices by moving our five principal projects towards commercial production.  We may monetize our non-core assets.  Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market under the trading symbol SSRI and on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol SSO.

This management discussion and analysis (MD&A) of the financial position and operating results of the company for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 is prepared as of March 7, 2008 and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. All dollar amounts referred to in this discussion and analysis are expressed in Canadian dollars except where indicated otherwise.  Additional information relating to us, including our annual information form, is available free of charge on our website at www.silverstandard.com, on the Canadian Securities Administrators’ (CSA) website at www.sedar.com, and on the EDGAR section of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) website at www.sec.gov.

PIRQUITAS CONSTRUCTION UPDATE

Since the decision in October 2006 to place the Pirquitas Project in production, we have made significant progress in advancing the project.  The Pirquitas property is located in the province of Jujuy in northwest Argentina and is expected to produce approximately 10.9 million ounces of silver, in excess of 2,500 tonnes of tin and 6,600 tonnes of zinc per year over a ten-year mine life.

As at December 31, 2007, approximately US$52.9 million of capital expenditures have been incurred on the property.  The mining equipment has arrived at site and is fully commissioned.  Equipment operators have been trained and are conducting general civil works with the construction team, developing open pit and waste access routes and carrying out initial open pit prestripping.  Site preparation earthworks are 70% complete, pre-cast concrete footings are 60% complete and the pre-fabricated steel structure for the process building is 30% complete.  We have ordered all of the major pieces of equipment required for the process plant.  The construction camp and all associated facilities on site are complete. Additionally off-site pre-fabricating and marshalling facilities are in place at lower altitudes near the regional capital of Jujuy. We are on target to commence commissioning in the fourth quarter of 2008 and ship concentrate in the first quarter of 2009.

In November 2007, we updated the capital cost estimate for the project to US$220 million from the initial capital cost estimate of US$146 million, which was based on 2005 cost estimates.  As at December 31, 2007, approximately US$52.9 million of capital expenditures have been incurred on the property.

2

FINANCIAL SUMMARY FOR 2007

· We recorded a loss for the year of $35.2 million or $0.57 per share, which includes non-cash stock based compensation expense of $15.0 million; a write-down of $12.0 million to reflect the reduction in the estimated fair value of asset-backed commercial paper due to the market liquidity disruption; a $3.5 million foreign exchange loss on US funds held due to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar; unrealized loss of $1.4 million reflecting the change in fair value of US dollar foreign exchange contracts; and $1.1 million in future income tax expense.

· We incurred $6.3 million for exploration and $52.9 million for construction and mining equipment at the Pirquitas property during the year.

· We incurred total expenditures of $43.6 million to advance our other key properties during the year.  Significant expenditures include $17.6 million for exploration at the Pitarrilla property in Mexico, $8.2 million for exploration at the San Luis property in Peru, $4.8 million for exploration at the Diablillos property in Argentina, and $2.6 million for exploration at the Snowfield property in Canada.

· In March 2007, we gave notice to our joint venture partner, Esperanza Silver Corporation, of our election to earn 70% of the San Luis property by incurring all exploration and development costs to complete a feasibility study.

FINANCIAL REVIEW

For the year ended December 31, 2007, we incurred a net loss of $35,223,000, or $0.57 per share, compared to earnings of $16,382,000, or $0.28 per share in 2006.  A discussion on the various components of the expense and income items compared to the prior year follows:

Financial Results from Operations

The following is a summary and discussion on the various components of the expenses and income items recorded during the year compared to the prior year:

	Year ended December 31
	2007	2006
Exploration and mineral property costs	$(000)	$(000)
Property examination and exploration	78	267
Mineral property costs written-off	-	101
Reclamation and accretion	782	2,131
	860	2,499

We incurred $78,000 in property examination and exploration expenditures in 2007 compared to $267,000 in 2006.  As our focus turned to the advancement and development of our existing properties, less emphasis was placed on grass roots exploration during 2007.  In 2006, $136,000 of the amount spent on grass roots exploration was in Peru and $90,000 in Mexico.  In 2006, we recorded a write-off in mineral property costs of $101,000 related to one property in Mexico and one property in Argentina.

Reclamation and accretion expense in 2007 amounted to $782,000 compared to $2,131,000 in 2006.  The various components of the expense were: $215,000 of accretion expense in 2007 compared to $243,000 in 2006; $135,000 of cash site restoration and clean-up costs in 2007 compared to $77,000 in 2006; and $432,000 due to changes in estimates of the amount or timing of future cash expenditures in 2007 compared to $1,811,000 in 2006.  In 2006, a significant one-time increase to reclamation provision was recorded for the Silver Standard Mine property in northern British Columbia following regulatory filing of an environmental report.

3

	Year ended December 31
	2007	2006
Expenses	$(000)	$(000)
Salaries and employee benefits	2,808	2,260
Depreciation	318	142
Professional fees	658	614
General and administration	5,054	4,025
Stock-based compensation	14,999	12,935
Foreign exchange loss	3,527	75
	27,364	20,051

Salaries and employee benefits for 2007 were $2,808,000 compared to $2,260,000 in 2006.  The $548,000 increase in salaries and benefits over 2006 is the result of hiring additional senior staff as we continue our transition to a producing company and the impact of salary adjustments effective at the beginning of 2007.

Depreciation expense during 2007 was $318,000 compared to $142,000 recorded in 2006.  The increase is mainly due to the depreciation and amortization of equipment and leasehold improvements in our Vancouver corporate office.

Professional fees include fees for the annual audit, accounting, tax and legal services.  Total costs for 2007 were $658,000 compared to $614,000 in 2006.  The $44,000 increase in expenses in 2007 over the prior year relates to higher accounting, tax and legal fees.  These higher costs are expected to continue as we grow and advance our properties.

General and administrative expenses for 2007 were $5,054,000 compared to $4,025,000 in 2006.  The $1,029,000 increase over 2006 is attributed to several factors.  In 2007, we donated shares to an education institution in the amount of $960,000 comparing to $351,000 in 2006.  As a company with a long history in the advancement of mineral projects, we understand the need for exploration and engineering excellence in education relating to the mining industry.  Consulting fees for recruiting agencies have also increased in 2007 for hiring of senior officers and technical staff as we move towards production.  Other areas where we experienced higher general and administrative costs were in the areas of listing and filing fees, travel, and director expenses.

Stock-based compensation expense for 2007 was $14,999,000 compared to $12,935,000 in 2006.  The $2,064,000 increase in the current year’s expense relates to more options outstanding and the amortization of previously issued options.  Of the current year’s expense, $2,804,000 related to general and administration for directors and consultants, as compared to $2,981,000 in 2006 and $12,195,000 related to employee salaries and benefits, as compared to $9,954,000 in 2006.  We value stock options granted to employees, directors and consultants using the Black-Scholes pricing model. An additional $524,000 in stock-based compensation was assigned to mineral property costs in 2007 compared to $751,000 in 2006.

4

	Year ended December 31
	2007	2006
Other income (expenses)	$(000)	$(000)
Investment income	6,757	5,984
Gain (loss) on sale of marketable securities	650	(2,667)
Unrealized loss on financial instruments held-for-trading	(1,801)	-
Write-up (down) of marketable securities	-	52
Write-down of other investments	(12,000)	-
Gain on sale of joint venture interest	-	35,390
Gain on sale of mineral properties	493	173
	(5,901)	38,932

Investment income was $6,757,000 for 2007 compared to $5,984,000 in 2006.  The increase in investment income is due to more funds available for investment subsequent to closing of the $171,067,000 public offering in May 2006.

In 2007, we sold 250,000 shares of Minco Silver Corp. for a $650,000 gain on sale of marketable securities.  In April 2006, we closed the sale of our 50% interest in the Manantial Espejo property to our joint venture partner, Pan American Silver Corp.  We received 1,950,000 common shares of Pan American valued at $55,056,000 recording a gain on sale of $35,390,000.  During the last quarter of 2006, we sold all our Pan American shares for proceeds of $51,955,000, resulting in a $3,101,000 loss on sale of marketable securities.  This loss was partially offset by a $434,000 gain on sale of other marketable securities for a net loss on sale of marketable securities of $2,667,000 in 2006.

The $1,801,000 unrealized loss on financial instruments held-for-trading primarily relate to the re-valuation of foreign exchange options.  In 2007, we entered into numerous US dollar forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuation in US dollar exchange rates.  As at year end, the mark-to-market adjustment of these derivative instruments result in an unrealized loss of $1,412,000.

Write-down of other investments of $12,000,000 relates to the impairment in estimated fair value of our investment in Canadian asset-backed commercial paper, which is further discussed in “Other investments” in the liquidity section below.

In 2007, we also sold a number of mineral properties for a gain of $493,000 compared to gains of $173,000 in 2006.

Future income tax expense was $1,098,000 for the year.  In September 2008, we retrospectively adopted new accounting guidance requiring recognition of tax benefits or losses used to offset future income tax against unrealized gains or losses on our marketable securities to be recorded in net earnings instead of other comprehensive income.  Future income tax expense reflects the tax effect on change in fair value of our marketable securities, which decreased during the year.  This guidance resulted in reclassification of $5,084,000 of future income tax recovery from opening accumulated other comprehensive income to opening accumulated deficit effective January 1, 2007 and $1,098,000 of future income tax expense was reclassified from other comprehensive loss to net loss for the year ended December 31, 2007.

5

Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected financial data from our audited consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with these statements:

	Year ended December 31
	2007 $(000)	2006 $(000)	2005 $(000)
Total revenues	nil	nil	nil
Earnings (loss) for year	(35,223)	16,382	(5,870)
Other comprehensive loss for the year	(5,339)
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share	(0.57)	0.28	(0.11)
Total assets	498,844	471,013	219,288
Long term debt	Nil	nil	nil
Working capital	117,268	250,234	40,344
Cash dividends declared	Nil	nil	nil

Summary of Quarterly Results

The following table sets forth selected quarterly financial information for each of our last eight quarters:

Quarter ending (unaudited)	Total Revenues $	Earnings (Loss) $(000)		Earnings (Loss)    Per Share $
December 31, 2007	nil	(14,170)	(1)	(0.23)
September 30, 2007	nil	(13,356)	(2)	(0.21)
June 30, 2007	nil	(6,861)	(3)	(0.11)
March 31, 2007	nil	(836)		(0.01)
December 31, 2006	nil	(1,701)	(4)	(0.02)
September 30, 2006	nil	2,695	(5)	0.04
June 30, 2006	nil	16,469	(6)	0.28
March 31, 2006	nil	(1,081)		(0.02)

Explanatory notes:

(1)	Includes $4,252,000 in non-cash expenses related to value assigned to stock options and a further $8,000,000 write-down in fair value of asset-backed commercial paper.
(2)	Includes $4,531,000 in non-cash expenses related to values assigned to stock options, $4,000,000 write-down in fair value of asset-backed commercial paper, $2,000,000 foreign exchange loss and a $1,929,000 loss on the fair value of foreign exchange contracts.
(3)	Includes $4,004,000 in non-cash expenses related to values assigned to stock options.
(4)	Includes $12,935,000 in non-cash expenses relating to values assigned to stock options and $9,722,000 in gains on sale and write-ups of marketable investments.
(5)	Includes a $3,090,000 write-up of investments and $2,138,000 of interest income.
(6)	Includes a $35,390,000 gain on sale of joint venture interest and a $15,860,000 write-down of investments.

Fourth Quarter Results

· We recorded a net loss of $14,170,000 or $0.23 per share, compared to a net loss of $1,701,000, or $0.02 per share.  The increase in net loss is mainly attributed to non-cash stock based compensation expense of $4,252,000 and a further write-down of $8,000,000 to reflect the change in estimated fair value of asset-backed commercial paper.

· Total capital expenditures for the period was $27,719,000, which includes $12,849,000 in construction and mining equipment primarily at Pirquitas and $12,318,000 in mineral property, net of $2,552,000 in non-cash working capital.  Significant mineral property expenditures include $5,007,000 for Pitarilla, $2,697,000 for Diablillos, $1,994,000 for Pirquitas, and $1,656,000 for San Luis.

6

FINANCIAL POSITION AND LIQUIDITY

Operating Activities

Cash flow used in operations totaled $4,531,000 in 2007, compared to $2,500,000 in 2006.  This increase is due to additional salaries, professional fees, general and administrative costs offset partially by higher investment income.

Financing Activities

During 2007, a net total of $11,794,000 was raised by issuing new equity compared to $203,267,000 in 2006.  The following table shows how the funds were raised:

	Year ended December 31
	2007	2006
	$(000)	$(000)
Financing activities
Exercise of stock options	11,794	6,548
Exercise of warrants	-	25,652
Public offering	-	182,663
Share issue costs	-	(11,596)
	11,794	203,267

A total of 886,600 shares were issued on the exercise of stock options for total proceeds received of $11,794,000 in 2007 compared to 668,750 shares issued on the exercise of stock options for total proceeds received of $6,548,000 in 2006.  The weighted average price received on the exercise of options was $13.30 per share in 2007 compared to $9.79 in 2006.  No share purchase warrants were exercised in 2007 compared to 1,386,625 warrants exercised for proceeds of $25,652,000 in 2006 with a weighted average price received of $18.50 per share.

On May 16, 2006, we closed a public offering of 7.2 million common shares for gross proceeds of $182,663,000.  The price received was $25.37 (US$23.00) per share.  After deducting underwriting fees and offering expenses of $11,596,000, net proceeds were $171,067,000.

Investing Activities

Mineral Properties and Capital Expenditures

Total expenditures incurred on mineral properties during the year was $42,749,000 compared to $39,379,000 in the prior year.  A summary of the expenditures by mineral property follows:

7

	Year ended December 31
	2007	2006
	$(000)	$(000)
Berenguela	147	2,079
Bowdens	607	579
Candelaria	321	401
Challacollo	1,998	407
Diablillos	4,768	407
Pirquitas	6,267	5,046
Pitarrilla	17,584	21,083
San Luis	8,196	1,402
Shafter	248	499
Snowfield	2,571	1,911
Veta Colorada	79	4,103
Other	837	1,462
Change in non-cash working capital	(874)	-
	42,749	39,379

The above table reflects cash expenditures incurred by property.  It does not include the value of shares issued for mineral properties and other non-cash charges.

Pirquitas

Since the decision in October 2006 to place the Pirquitas Project in production, significant progress has been made in advancing the project.  A total of $59,155,000 was spent at the Pirquitas property in Argentina during the year, which includes $6,267,000 in exploration activities and $52,888,000 on mine construction and mining equipment.

The mining equipment has arrived at site and is fully commissioned and in operation conducting the general civil works for the construction team, developing open pit and waste access routes and initial open pit pre-stripping. Site preparation earthworks are 70% complete, pre-cast concrete footings are 60% complete and the pre-fabricated steel structure for the process building is 30% complete.  All of the major pieces of equipment required for the process plant have been ordered. The construction camp and all associated facilities on site are complete.  Additionally, off-site pre-fabricating and marshalling facilities are in place at lower altitudes near the regional capital of Jujuy. The project is on target to commence commissioning during in the fourth quarter of 2008. We expect to start shipping concentrate in the first quarter of 2009.

In November 2007, we updated the reserve estimate for the Pirquitas Project using a silver price of $9.35 per ounce. The updated reserve estimate used the same mine plan and pit shell as the 2006 Report and factored in the updated capital cost estimate for the project. The Pirquitas Project is now estimated to have proven and probable reserves of 136.0 million ounces of silver and measured, indicated and inferred resources of 77.1 million ounces of silver.  It is estimated that project production will average approximately 10.9 million ounces of silver per year over a 10-year mine life.

We updated the capital cost estimate for the project to US$220 million plus IVA from the initial capital cost estimate of US$146 million plus IVA, which was based on 2005 cost estimates.  A significant portion of the increase is a result of increased costs in global construction materials and inflation pressures in Argentina, particularly labour, since the completion of the original estimate.  The revised estimate includes a contingency of US$15 million.  In addition, US$13.6 million of the capital cost increase is related to the layout of certain portions of the project to facilitate future expansion of the mine.

8

The government of Argentina is proposing to adopt a tax on the export of concentrates for projects with fiscal stability agreements predating 2002.  The Pirquitas Project has a fiscal stability agreement dating from 1998 and may be subject to this proposed export tax.  We are currently in discussions with the government of Argentina to determine the impact, if any, of the proposed export tax on the Pirquitas project.

San Luis

A total of $8,196,000 was spent at the San Luis joint venture property in Peru during the year compared to $1,402,000 in 2006.

Infill diamond drilling on the project’s Ayelén Vein has been completed.  An initial resource estimate completed in the fourth quarter of 2007 defined a measured and indicated resource of 7.1 million ounces of silver resources.

As a result of the gold and silver grades encountered to date, we have applied for permits to initiate underground exploration of the Ayelén Vein, which hosts the majority of the mineralization defined to date at the project. We also plan on initiating a feasibility study in the first half of 2008 for the development of the Ayelén Vein.  Subject to receipt of a positive feasibility study and a production decision by our board of directors, we plan to advance the project through development to production on an expedited basis.  In conjunction with the work planned for the Ayelén Vein, we will continue with our exploration of the remainder of the project for precious and base metals following the discovery of the BP Zone announced in late 2007.

We currently hold a 55% interest in the San Luis project and have elected to increase our interest to 70% by completing a feasibility study.  We have the right to increase our interest in the San Luis joint venture to 80% by placing the project in production.  The remaining joint venture interest is held by Esperanza Silver Corporation.

Pitarrilla

A total of $17,584,000 was spent on our Pitarrilla property in Mexico during the current year compared to $21,083,000 in 2006.  During the year, we expended an additional $8,111,000 in exploration activities.  In the prior year, $11,610,000 was incurred to acquire additional land surface rights.

The project contains measured and indicated resources of 383.1 million ounces of silver and inferred resources of 193.2 million ounces of silver.  The project also contains significant base metal mineralization and an underground program has commenced to access a zone of high grade silver and base metal mineralization in the Breccia Ridge Zone.

We are continuing to actively explore the Pitarrilla Project and working to complete step out drilling on the Breccia Ridge Zone and explore for new zones of mineralization. We have also initiated an underground exploration program to access the higher grade mineralization encountered at the Breccia Ridge Zone. An engineering scoping study has commenced to estimate the project economics of developing this higher grade zone.

Diablillos

A total of $4,768,000 was spent at the wholly-owned Diablillos silver-gold project in Argentina during the year compared to $407,000 in 2006.

We completed an 11,000-meter diamond drill program during 2007 and early 2008 on the project.  The objective of the program was to better define the inferred resource of 93.8 million ounces of silver resources and 815,000 ounces of gold resources.  We have also engaged a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101 to prepare an updated resource estimate for the Diablillos Project, which is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2008. Based on the results of the resource estimate, we will plan a follow up drill program and initiate engineering studies to estimate the project economics of developing the Diablillos Project.

9

Snowfield

A total of $2,571,000 was spent at the wholly-owned property in Canada during the year compared to $1,911,000 in 2006.

Based on results from the 2007 drill program, we have reserved four drills for a drill program scheduled to be underway in the third quarter of 2008. The drill program will focus on testing the potential extension of Seabridge Gold Inc.’s Mitchell Zone onto our Snowfield Project and expand the mineralization at the Snowfield zone.

Challacollo

A total of $1,998,000 was spent on the Challacollo property during the year compared to $407,000 in 2006. All expenditures relate to drilling activities on the property during the period.

Purchase and Sale of Marketable Securities

In 2007, we participated in a private placement to acquire 996,000 units of Esperanza Silver Corporation for $3,648,000.  Each unit is composed of one common share and one-half two-year warrant with an exercise price of $4.35.

We received $812,000 in proceeds on the sale of marketable securities in 2007 compared with $52,410,000 in 2006.  The amount in 2006 was due to the sale of all of our Pan American Silver Corp. shares received from sale of our 50% interest in the Manantial Espejo property for proceeds of $51,955,000.

Liquidity

At December 31, 2007, we have working capital of $117,268,000.

Subsequent to year end, we sold US$138,000,000 senior convertible notes (see “Subsequent events”) for net proceeds of US$133,800,000 after commissions.  The unsecured senior Notes mature on March 1, 2028 and bear interest at a rate of 4.5% per annum, payable semi-annually.  We intend to use part of the net proceeds of the offering to finance a portion of the development costs of the Pirquitas Project and to use the balance of the net proceeds for the exploration of our other properties, for working capital and for general corporate purposes.

With the development of the Pirquitas mine, we are transitioning from an acquirer of silver projects and assets to a developer of silver projects and producer of silver.  During its acquisition phase, we purchased approximately 1.95 million ounces of silver bullion for investment purposes at an average cost of US$5.85 per ounce.  In March 2008, we sold our silver bullion at an average price of US$20.30 per ounce for proceeds of US$39,648,000 (see “Subsequent events”), which will be used to advance our projects to production.

10

Cash

At December 31, 2007, we had a cash balance of $80,629,000 and no debt.  This compares to a cash balance of $229,616,000 at December 31, 2006, also with no debt.  The majority of the decrease is attributed to advancing the development of Pirquitas and our other projects totaling $88,305,000 and the reclassification of Canadian asset-backed commercial paper of $57,102,000 from cash and cash equivalents to other investments as discussed below.

Silver Bullion

As at December 31, 2007, we held 1,953,985 ounces of silver valued at an average cost of $8.08 (US$5.85) per ounce or $15,787,000.  The purchase of silver bullion was made, in part, to recognize that silver is an investment alternative for our cash reserves.

Marketable Securities

Our marketable securities at December 31, 2007 have a carried cost of $10,235,000 and a market value of $33,209,000 for an unrealized gain of $22,974,000 compared to a carried cost of $5,817,000 and a market value of $35,617,000 for an unrealized gain of $29,800,000 at December 31, 2006.  These investments were made in various mineral exploration companies and are considered to be liquid.

Other Investments

As at December 31, 2007, we had a total of $57,102,000 invested in Canadian asset-backed commercial paper (“ABCP”).  At the dates at which we acquired the investments, the non-bank sponsored ABCP were rated R-1 high by DBRS Limited (“DBRS”), the highest credit rating for commercial paper.  In August 2007, the ABCP market experienced liquidity problems and was subsequently frozen.  As a result, our investments in ABCP have not yet been repaid.

In September 2007, a Pan Canadian Committee (the “Committee”) consisting of a panel of major ABCP investors was formed to restructure the affected ABCP trusts.  According to the press release issued by the Committee on December 23, 2007, the proposal will involve restructuring ABCP for floating rate notes that have maturities based on the maturities of the assets underlying the ABCP.  Details regarding valuation of existing ABCP, separation of underlying assets into the various pools, composition of underlying assets and interest rates for the proposed new notes were not disclosed.  The Committee expects the restructuring process to be completed by April 2008.

Based on the limited data available, we estimated the fair values of our ABCP investments using a valuation technique which incorporates a probability weighted approach applied to discounted future cash flows.

Based on management’s best estimate, we have recorded an impairment of $12,000,000, or 21%, of our ABCP investments.  Significant assumptions and estimations used in our valuation model include:

· $54,059,000 is represented by a combination of synthetic and traditional securitized assets and collateralized debt that will, on restructuring, be pooled with similar assets from other trusts and be replaced with senior and subordinated floating rate notes.  The senior note is expected to have coupon rate similar to AAA rating while the subordinate notes will have coupon rate similar to BBB rating.

· $3,043,000 is represented by assets that have exposure to US sub-prime assets or home equity loan mortgages that will, on restructuring, be replaced with long-term floating rate notes.  The note is expected to have coupon rate similar to a non-investment grade rating of BB rating.

11

· Coupon rates for each class of notes will be similar to their assumed grade rating adjusted for margin facility and lack of liquidity.  A 0.5% increase in coupon rate would result in a $1,400,000 increase in fair value of our ABCP investments.

· Discount rates for each class of notes will be similar to their assumed grade rating adjusted for lack of market information.  A 0.5% increase in discount rate would result in a $1,200,000 decrease in fair value of our ABCP investments.

· The probability of a successful restructuring is very high (90%) and a 5% increase would result in a $400,000 increase in fair value of our ABCP investments.

Since the fair values are determined using a probability weighted approach and are based on our assessment of market conditions at December 31, 2007, the fair value reported may change materially in subsequent periods.

The remainder of our funds is held in short-term deposits, banker acceptances and government backed commercial paper.  In February 2008, we sold US$138 million senior convertible notes (see “Subsequent Events”) to finance a portion of the development costs of the Pirquitas Project and to fund the exploration of our other properties, for working capital and for general corporate purposes.  Subsequent to this financing, we have sufficient cash to meet our current development and exploration plans for 2008.

Foreign Exchange Options

In 2007, we entered into various foreign exchange option agreements to manage the foreign currency exposure related to anticipated mine construction costs for the Pirquitas project.  These forward contracts are classified as “held-for-trading” financial instruments.  As such, these derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value based on their quoted market price with movements in fair value recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Loss.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded an unrealized loss of $1,412,000 on these instruments based on mark-to-market adjustments.

Long-term Contractual Obligations

The following table discloses our contractual obligations:

		Payments due by Period
	Total $	Less Than 1 Year $	1-3 Years $	4-5 Years $	After 5 Years $
Lease obligations	1,596,000	277,000	907,000	412,000
Asset retirement obligations	5,344,000	1,029,000	2,148,000	430,000	1,737,000
Total	6,940,000	1,306,000	3,055,000	842,000	1,737,000

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES

Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Control and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of the President and Vice President, Finance, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the rules of the CSA and the SEC) as at December 31, 2007, and has concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

12

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The following report is provided by management in respect of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the rules of the CSA and the SEC):

(1)	Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
(2)	Our management has used the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) framework to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
(3)	As at December 31, 2007, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and concluded that such internal control over financial reporting is effective and that there are no material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.
(4)	PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, who has audited our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, has also issued a report on our financial statements and internal controls under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2007, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Related Party Transactions

During the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded expense reimbursements of $426,000, compared to $363,000 in 2006, from companies related by common directors or officers.  At December 31, 2007, accounts receivable include $111,000, compared to $49,000 in 2006 from these related parties.  Any amounts due to/from related parties are non-interest bearing and without specific terms of repayment.  Any transactions for expense reimbursement with related parties are at normal business terms.

Financial Instruments and Other Instruments

Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, silver bullion, marketable securities, accounts receivable and accounts payable.  It is management’s opinion that we are not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable.

We are exposed to currency risk on the acquisition and exploration expenditures on our properties since we have to settle expenditures either in local currency or U.S. dollars.  Our expenditures are negatively impacted by increases in value of either the U.S. dollar or local currencies versus the Canadian dollar.

13

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to use estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as revenues and expenses.  Our accounting policies are set out in full in note 2 of the annual financial statements.

Mineral Property Costs

We regularly review the net carrying value of each mineral property for conditions that suggest impairment.  This review requires significant judgment where we do not have any proven and probable reserves that would enable us to estimate future cash flows to be compared to the carrying values.  Factors considered in the assessment of asset impairment include, but are not limited to, whether there has been a significant decrease in the market price of the property; whether there has been a significant adverse change in the legal, regulatory, accessibility, title, environmental or political factors that could affect the property’s value; whether there has been an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amounts originally expected for the property’s acquisition, development or cost of holding; whether exploration activities produced results that are not promising such that no more work is being planned in the foreseeable future and whether the company has significant funds to be able to maintain its interest in the mineral property.

Where we do have proven and probable reserves, as is now the case at our Pirquitas property, the expected undiscounted future cash flows from an asset are compared to its carrying value.  These future cash flows are developed into models using assumptions that reflect the long-term operating plans for an asset given our best estimate of the most probable set of economic conditions.  Commodity prices used reflect market conditions at the time the models are developed.  These models are updated from time to time, and lower prices are used should market conditions deteriorate.  Inherent in these assumptions are significant risks and uncertainties.

No properties were written-off in the current year.  In 2006, two properties were written-off and a $101,000 expense was recorded.  Changes in market conditions, reserve estimates and other assumptions used in these estimates may result in future writedowns.

Stock-based compensation

We provide compensation benefits to our employees, directors, officers and consultants through a stock option plan.  The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of our stock.  We utilize historical data to estimate option exercises and termination behaviour with the valuation model.  The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the Government of Canada yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.  Actual results may differ materially from those estimates based on these assumptions.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The amounts recorded for asset retirement costs are based on estimates included in closure and remediation plans.  These estimates are based on engineering studies of the work that is required by environmental laws or public statements by management which results in an obligation.  These estimates include an assumption on the rate at which costs may inflate in future periods.  Actual costs and the timing of expenditures could differ from these estimates.

14

Income and Resource Taxes

The determination of our future tax liabilities and assets involves significant management estimation and judgment involving a number of assumptions.  In determining these amounts we interpret tax legislation in a variety of jurisdictions and make estimates of the expected timing of the reversal of future tax assets and liabilities.  We also make estimates of the future earnings which affect the extent to which potential future tax benefits may be used.  We are subject to assessment by various taxation authorities, which may interpret tax legislation in a manner different from our view.  These differences may affect the final amount or the timing of the payment of taxes.  When such differences arise we make provision for such items based on our best estimate of the final outcome of these matters.

Other Investments

We have invested in Canadian asset-backed commercial paper (“ABCP”), the market of which experienced liquidity crisis in August 2007.  As a result, our ABCP investments have not yet been repaid.  On September 6, 2007, a Pan Canadian Committee (the “Committee”) consisting of a panel of major ABCP investors was formed with legal and financial advisors to oversee the restructuring process.  As there was no market data available, we estimated the fair value of ABCP investments by discounting the expected future cash flow according to the probability of recoverability of principal and interest.  There is currently no certainty regarding the outcome of the ABCP restructuring process, it is reasonably possible that the actual timing and amount ultimately recovered may differ materially from our estimate.

Changes in Accounting Policies

Financial Instruments

Effective January 1, 2007, we have adopted CICA Handbook Section 3855 Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement and CICA Handbook Section 1530 Comprehensive Income (the “Financial Instrument Standards”).  Prior to January 1, 2007, the principal accounting policies affecting our financial instruments related to marketable securities that were valued at the lower of original cost and quoted market value.

The adoption of the Financial Instrument Standards resulted in our designating marketable securities and cash equivalents as available for sale investments and all derivative and other financial instruments as held for trading assets or liabilities measured at fair value.  We had no derivative financial instruments or other financial instruments held for trading at December 31, 2006.

As a consequence of adopting the Financial Instrument Standards on January 1, 2007, accumulated other comprehensive income increased by approximately $29,800,000 with a corresponding increase of approximately $29,800,000 in investments.  This represents the net gain on measuring the fair value of available for sale investments, which had been not recognized on a fair value basis prior to January 1, 2007.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, an unrealized loss on marketable securities of $6,437,000 was recorded in other comprehensive loss upon mark-to-market adjustments.

Upon adoption of the financial instrument standards, all regular-way purchases of financial assets are accounted for at the settlement date.  Transaction costs on financial assets and liabilities classified other than as held for trading will be treated as part of the investment cost.

15

Income Statement Presentation of Tax Loss Carryforward

Effective September 30, 2008, we adopted EIC-172, “Income Statement Presentation of a Tax Loss Carryforward Recognized Following an Unrealized Gain in Other Comprehensive Income”.  This abstract provides guidance on whether the tax benefit from the recognition of previously unrecognized tax loss carryforwards consequent to the recording of unrealized gains in other comprehensive income, such as unrealized gains on available-for-sale financial assets, should be recognized in net income or in other comprehensive income.  The abstract should be applied retrospectively, with restatement of prior periods from January 1, 2007, the date of adoption of CICA Handbook Section 3855, “Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement”.

The adoption of EIC-172 resulted in a reclassification of $5,084,000 of income tax recovery from opening accumulated other comprehensive income to opening accumulated deficit in 2007 and $1,098,000 of income tax expense from other comprehensive loss to net loss in 2007.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements issued which may impact us in the future are as follows:

Capital Disclosures

CICA Handbook Section 1535, Capital Disclosures, requires disclosure of the company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital, quantitative data about what the company regards as capital and whether the company has complied with any capital requirements and, if it has not complied, the consequences of such non-compliance.

This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements beginning on January 1, 2008. We have not yet determined the impact of the adoption of this change on the disclosure in our financial statements.

Financial Instruments Disclosures

CICA Handbook Section 3862, Financial Instruments – Disclosures, increases the disclosures currently required with the intent of enabling users to evaluate the significance of financial instruments for the company's financial position and performance, including disclosures about fair value. In addition, disclosure is required of qualitative and quantitative information about exposure to risks arising from financial instruments, including specified minimum disclosures about liquidity risk and market risk. The quantitative disclosures must also include a sensitivity analysis for each type of market risk to which the company is exposed, showing how earnings (loss) and other comprehensive income would have been affected by reasonably possible changes in the relevant risk variable. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements beginning on January 1, 2008. We have not yet determined the impact of the adoption of this change on the disclosure in our financial statements.

Inventories

CICA Handbook Section 3031, Inventories, prescribes the accounting treatment for inventories and provides guidance on the determination of costs and its subsequent recognition as an expense, including any write-down to net realizable value.  It also provides guidance on the cost formulas that are used to assign costs to inventories.  This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements beginning on January 1, 2008. We have not yet determined the impact of the adoption of this change on the disclosure in our financial statements.

16

Financial Instruments Presentation

CICA Handbook Section 3863, Financial Instruments – Presentation, replaces the existing requirements on presentation of financial instruments which have been carried forward unchanged to this new section. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements beginning on January 1, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on presentation in our financial statements.

General Standards on Financial Statement Presentation

CICA Handbook Section 1400, General Standards on Financial Statement Presentation, has been amended to include requirements to assess and disclose the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The changes are effective for interim and annual financial statements beginning January 1, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of these changes to have an impact on our financial statements.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

CICA Handbook Section 3064, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, establishes revised standards for recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of goodwill and intangible assets. Concurrent with the introduction of this standard, the CICA withdrew EIC 27, Revenues and Expenses during the pre-operating period. As a result of the withdrawal of EIC 27, companies will no longer be able to defer costs and revenues incurred prior to commercial production at new mine operations.  The changes are effective for interim and annual financial statements beginning January 1, 2009.  We have not yet determined the impact of the adoption of this change on the disclosure in our financial statements.

International Financial Reporting Standards

In January 2006, CICA Accounting Standards Board (“AcSB”) adopted a strategic plan for the direction of accounting standards in Canada. As part of that plan, accounting standards in Canada for public companies are expected to converge with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) by the end of 2011. We continue to monitor and assess the impact of convergence of Canadian GAAP and IFRS.

Outstanding Share Data

The authorized capital consists of unlimited common shares without par value.  As at March 7, 2008, the following common shares, options and share purchase warrants were outstanding:

	Number of Shares	Exercise Price $	Remaining Life (years)
Capital stock	62,888,547	-	-
Stock options	4,273,250	$12.85 - $40.62	0.8 – 4.8
Fully diluted	66,961,797	-	-

Subsequent Events

a) In February 2008, we sold US$138,000,000 senior convertible notes (“Notes”) for net proceeds of US$133,800,000 after commissions.  The unsecured Notes mature on March 1, 2028 and bear an interest rate of 4.5% per annum, payable semi-annually.  The Notes will be convertible into Silver Standard common shares at a fixed conversion rate of US$43.33 per common share upon specified events.  On conversion, at our election, holders of the Notes will receive cash and, if applicable, common shares, or a combination of cash and shares.  Holders of the Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or part of the Notes on March 1 of each of 2013, 2018, and 2023, and upon certain fundamental corporate changes.

17

       We intend to use part of the net proceeds of the offering to finance a portion of the development costs of the Pirquitas Project and to use the balance of the net proceeds for the exploration of our other properties, for working capital and for general corporate purposes.

b) In March 2008, we sold our silver bullion for cash proceeds of $39,244,000 (US$39,648,000).  As at December 31, 2007, the silver bullion was recorded on our balance sheet at a cost of $15,787,000.  As a result, we will recognize a gain of $23,457,000 on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss), Comprehensive Loss and Deficit in 2008.

18

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Pirquitas Project is our only mineral property under development and we may not be able to

successfully establish mining operations.

The Pirquitas Project is our only mineral property currently under development. The development of the Pirquitas Project and the future development of any other properties found to be economically feasible and approved by our board of directors will require the construction and operation of mines, processing plants and related infrastructure. As a result, we are and will continue to be subject to all of the risks associated with establishing new mining operations including:

➢ the timing and cost, which can be considerable, of the construction of mining and processing facilities;

➢ the availability and cost of skilled labor and mining equipment;

➢ the availability and cost of appropriate smelting and refining arrangements;

➢ the need to obtain necessary environmental and other governmental approvals and permits and the timing of the receipt of those approvals and permits;

➢ the availability of funds to finance construction and development activities;

➢ potential opposition from non-governmental organizations, environmental groups or local groups which

     may delay or prevent development activities; and

➢ potential increases in construction and operating costs due to changes in the cost of fuel, power,

     materials and supplies.

The costs, timing and complexities of mine construction and development for the Pirquitas Project and our other projects may be greater than we anticipate because the majority of our property interests are not located in developed areas, and as a result, may not be served by appropriate road access, water and power supply, and other support infrastructure, and cost estimates may increase as more detailed engineering work is completed on a project. It is common in new mining operations to experience unexpected costs, problems and delays during construction, development and mine start-up. In addition, delays in the commencement of mineral production often occur. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that our activities will result in profitable mining operations at the Pirquitas Project or any of our other mineral properties.

We have no revenue from operations and no ongoing mining operations of any kind.

We are a development stage company and have no revenue from operations and no ongoing mining operations of any kind. Other than the Pirquitas Project, all of our properties are in the exploration stage, and we have not defined or delineated any proven or probable reserves on any of our exploration stage properties. Mineral exploration involves significant risk because few properties that are explored contain bodies of ore that would be commercially economic to develop into producing mines. If our current exploration programs do not result in the discovery of commercial ore, we may need to write-off part or all of our investment in our existing exploration stage properties and we will be required to acquire additional properties.

The determination of whether any mineral deposits on our properties are economic is affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include:

➢ the metallurgy of the mineralization forming the mineral deposit;

➢ market fluctuations for metal prices;

➢ the proximity and capacity of natural resource markets and processing equipment; and

19

➢ government regulations governing prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection.

We may not have sufficient funds to develop our mineral properties or to complete further exploration programs.

We have limited financial resources. We had cash and cash equivalents of $80.6 million, silver bullion of $15.8 million and marketable securities of $33.2 million as of December 31, 2007. Since such date, we have expended funds on, among other things, the advancement of the Pirquitas Project at a rate reflecting its advanced development stage and consistent with the announced estimated capital costs of US$220 million to complete construction of the project in the fourth quarter of 2008. We do not generate operating revenue, and must finance our exploration activity and the development of our mineral properties by other means.  In the future, our ability to continue our exploration and development activities, if any, will depend on our ability to develop the Pirquitas Project and generate operating revenue or obtain additional external financing.

The sources of external financing that we may use for these purposes include project or bank financing, or public or private offerings of equity and debt. In addition, we may enter into one or more strategic alliances or joint ventures, or may decide to sell certain property interests, and may utilize one or a combination of all of these alternatives. The financing alternative chosen by us may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If additional financing is not available, we may have to postpone the development of, or sell, properties.

We have a history of losses.

We recorded a loss of $35.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, and have incurred a profit and loss during each of the following periods:

➢ profit of $16.382 million for the year ended December 31, 2006; and

➢ loss of $5.870 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

We expect to continue to incur losses unless and until such time as the Pirquitas Project enters into commercial production and generates sufficient revenues to fund continuing operations. The development of the Pirquitas Project and any other mineral property will require the commitment of substantial financial resources.

The amount and timing of expenditures will depend on a number of factors, including the progress of ongoing exploration and development, the results of consultants’ analyses and recommendations, the rate at which operating losses are incurred, the execution of any joint venture agreements with strategic partners, and our acquisition of additional property interests, some of which are beyond our control.

We cannot assure you that we will ever achieve profitability.

We follow Canadian disclosure practices concerning our mineral reserves and resources which allow for more disclosure than is permitted for U.S. reporting companies.

Our resource estimates are not directly comparable to those made in filings subject to SEC reporting and disclosure requirements, as we generally report resources in accordance with Canadian practices. These practices are different from the practices used to report resource estimates in reports and other materials filed with the SEC in that the Canadian practice is to report measured, indicated and inferred resources. In the United States, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated resources will ever be converted into reserves. Further, “inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically. Disclosure of “contained ounces” is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC only permits issuers to report “resources” as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.

20

Our reserve and resource estimates are based on interpretation and assumptions and may yield less mineral production under actual conditions than is currently estimated.

In making determinations about whether to advance any of our projects to development, we must rely upon estimated calculations as to the mineral reserves and grades of mineralization on our properties.  Until ore is actually mined and processed, mineral reserves and grades of mineralization must be considered as estimates only. These estimates are imprecise and depend upon geological interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling which may prove to be unreliable. We cannot assure you that:

➢ reserve, resource or other mineralization estimates will be accurate; or

➢ mineralization can be mined or processed profitably.

Any material changes in mineral reserve estimates and grades of mineralization will affect the economic viability of placing a property into production and a property’s return on capital. Our reserve and resource estimates have been determined and valued based on assumed future prices, cut-off grades and operating costs that may prove to be inaccurate. Extended declines in market prices for silver, gold, tin and zinc may render portions of our mineralization uneconomic and result in reduced reported mineral reserves.

Any material reductions in estimates of mineralization, or of our ability to extract this mineralization, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. We cannot assure you that mineral recovery rates achieved in small scale tests will be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale.

Mining is inherently dangerous and subject to conditions or events beyond our control.  The development and operation of a mine or mine property is inherently dangerous and involves many risks that even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome. These risks include:

➢ unusual or unexpected geological formations;

➢ metallurgical and other processing problems;

➢ metal losses;

➢ environmental hazards;

➢ power outages;

➢ labor disruptions;

➢ industrial accidents;

➢ periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions;

➢ flooding, explosions, fire, rockbursts, cave-ins and landslides;

➢ mechanical equipment and facility performance problems; and

➢ the availability of materials and equipment.

21

These risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties, production facilities or other properties, personal injury or death, including to our employees, environmental damage, delays in mining, increased production costs, asset write downs, monetary losses and possible legal liability. We may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums, or at all.  Insurance against certain environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution and other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from production, is not generally available to companies within the mining industry. We may suffer a material adverse effect on our business if we incur losses related to any significant events that are not covered by our insurance policies.

Changes in the market price of silver and other metals, which in the past have fluctuated widely, will affect our operations.

Our profitability and long-term viability will depend, in large part, on the market price of silver, gold, tin, zinc, lead and copper. The market prices for these metals are volatile and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including:

➢ global or regional consumption patterns;

➢ the supply of, and demand for, these metals;

➢ speculative activities;

➢ the availability and costs of metal substitutes;

➢ expectations for inflation; and

➢ political and economic conditions, including interest rates and currency values.

We cannot predict the effect of these factors on metal prices. A decrease in the market price of silver and other metals would affect the profitability of the Pirquitas Project and could affect our ability to finance the exploration and development of any of our other mineral properties. The market price of silver and other metals may not remain at current levels. In particular, an increase in worldwide supply, and consequent downward pressure on prices, may result over the longer term from increased silver production from mines developed or expanded as a result of current metal price levels.

We are subject to significant governmental regulations.

Our exploration activities are, and the development of the Pirquitas Project is, subject to extensive federal, state, provincial, territorial and local laws and regulations governing various matters, including:

➢ environmental protection;

➢ the management and use of toxic substances and explosives;

➢ the management of natural resources;

➢ the exploration of mineral properties;

➢ exports;

➢ price controls;

➢ taxation and mining royalties;

➢ labor standards and occupational health and safety, including mine safety; and

➢ historic and cultural preservation.

Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in civil or criminal fines or penalties or enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring corrective measures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions, or the imposition of additional local or foreign parties as joint venture partners, any of which could result in significant expenditures. We may also be required to compensate private parties suffering loss or damage by reason of a breach of such laws, regulations or permitting requirements. It is also possible that future laws and regulations, or more stringent enforcement of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities, could cause additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions on or suspensions of our activities and delays in the exploration and development of our properties.

22

We require further permits in order to conduct our current and anticipated future operations, and delays or a failure to obtain such permits, or a failure to comply with the terms of any such permits that we have obtained, would adversely affect our business.

Our current and anticipated future operations, including further exploration, development activities and commencement of production on our mineral properties, require permits from various governmental authorities. Obtaining or renewing governmental permits is a complex and time-consuming process. The duration and success of efforts to obtain and renew permits are contingent upon many variables not within our control.

We cannot assure you that all permits that we require for our operations, including any for construction of mining facilities or conduct of mining, will be obtainable or renewable on reasonable terms, or at all.  Delays or a failure to obtain such required permits, or the expiry, revocation or failure by us to comply with the terms of any such permits that we have obtained, would adversely affect our business.

Our activities are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may increase our costs and restrict our operations.

All of our exploration and potential development and production activities in Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Mexico, Peru and the United States are subject to regulation by governmental agencies under various environmental laws. To the extent that we conduct exploration activities or undertake new mining activities in other countries, we will also be subject to environmental laws and regulations in those jurisdictions. These laws address emissions into the air, discharges into water, management of waste, management of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, antiquities and endangered species and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations. Environmental legislation in many countries is evolving and the trend has been towards stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and increasing responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees.  Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may require significant capital outlays on our behalf and may cause material changes or delays in our intended activities. Future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant adverse impact on some portion of our business, causing us to reevaluate those activities at that time.

Land reclamation requirements for our exploration properties may be burdensome.

Although variable depending on location and the governing authority, land reclamation requirements are generally imposed on mineral exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations) in order to minimize long term effects of land disturbance. Reclamation may include requirements to:

➢ control dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents; and

➢ reasonably re-establish pre-disturbance land forms and vegetation.

In order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on us in connection with our exploration and potential development activities, we must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration and development programs. Certain of our projects have been subject to historic mining operations and certain of the properties that were historically mined by us are subject to remediation obligations. We have set up a provision for our reclamation bonds but this provision may not be adequate. If we are required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, our financial position could be adversely affected.

23

Our properties may be subject to uncertain title.

We cannot assure you that title to our properties will not be challenged. We own, lease or have under option, unpatented and patented mining claims, mineral claims or concessions which constitute our property holdings. The ownership and validity, or title, of unpatented mining claims and concessions are often uncertain and may be contested. We also may not have, or may not be able to obtain, all necessary surface rights to develop a property. Title insurance is generally not available for mineral properties and our ability to ensure that we have obtained a secure claim to individual mining properties or mining concessions may be severely constrained. We have not conducted surveys of all of the claims in which we hold direct or indirect interests. A successful claim contesting our title to a property will cause us to lose our rights to explore and, if warranted, develop that property. This could result in our not being compensated for our prior expenditures relating to the property.

Political or economic instability or unexpected regulatory change in the countries where our

properties are located could adversely affect our business.

Certain of our properties are located in countries, provinces and states more likely to be subject to political and economic instability, or unexpected legislative change, than is usually the case in certain other countries, provinces and states. Our mineral exploration or potential development activities could be adversely affected by:

➢ political instability and violence;

➢ war and civil disturbance;

➢ labor unrest;

➢ expropriation or nationalization;

➢ changing fiscal regimes and uncertain regulatory environments;

➢ fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

➢ high rates of inflation;

➢ changes to royalty and tax regimes, including the elimination of tax exemptions for mining

companies by the Argentinean government;

➢ underdeveloped industrial and economic infrastructure; and

➢ the unenforceability of contractual rights and judgments.

We cannot assure you that we will successfully acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights.

Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable ore deposits and no assurance can be given that any anticipated level of recovery of ore reserves will be realized or that any identified mineral deposit will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) ore body which can be legally and economically exploited. Estimates of reserves, resources, mineral deposits and production costs can also be affected by such factors as environmental permitting regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions.

Material changes in ore reserves, grades, stripping ratios or recovery rates may affect the economic viability of any project. Our future growth and productivity will depend, in part, on our ability to identify and acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights, and on the costs and results of continued

24

exploration and potential development programs. Mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature and is frequently non-productive. Substantial expenditures are required to:

➢ establish ore reserves through drilling and metallurgical and other testing techniques;

➢ determine metal content and metallurgical recovery processes to extract metal from the ore; and

➢ construct, renovate or expand mining and processing facilities.

In addition, if we discover ore, it would take several years from the initial phases of exploration until production is possible. During this time, the economic feasibility of production may change. As a result of these uncertainties, there can be no assurance that we will successfully acquire additional commercially mineable (or viable) mineral rights.

We may be adversely affected by future fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.

We maintain our bank accounts primarily in Canadian and U.S. dollars. We expect that our future revenue, if any, will be in U.S. dollars while certain of our costs will be incurred in other currencies. In particular, any appreciation in the currencies of Argentina, Australia, Chile, Mexico or other countries where we carry out exploration or development activities against the Canadian or U.S. dollar will increase our costs of carrying on operations in such countries. With the development of the Pirquitas Project, our costs denominated in the currency of Argentina have increased over past levels and we have greater exposure to Argentinean currency fluctuations. In addition, any decrease in the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar will result in a loss on our books to the extent we hold funds in U.S. dollars.  As a result, our financial performance and forecasts can be significantly impacted by changes in foreign exchange rates.

High metal prices since 2004 have encouraged increased mining exploration, development and construction activity, which has increased demand for, and cost of, exploration, development and construction services and equipment.

The strength of metal prices over the past four years has encouraged increases in mining exploration, development and construction activities around the world, which has resulted in increased demand for, and cost of, exploration, development and construction services and equipment. The costs of such services and equipment may continue to increase if current trends continue. Increased demand for services and equipment could result in delays if services or equipment cannot be obtained in a timely manner due to inadequate availability, and may cause scheduling difficulties due to the need to coordinate the availability of services or equipment, any of which could materially increase project exploration, development and/or construction costs.

We face industry competition in the acquisition of exploration properties and the recruitment

and retention of qualified personnel.

We compete with other exploration companies, many of which have greater financial resources than us or are further advanced in their development, for the acquisition of mineral claims, leases and other mineral interests as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees and other personnel. Competition for exploration resources at all levels is currently very intense, particularly affecting the availability of manpower, drill rigs and supplies. In particular, we face competition for qualified personnel and equipment for the Pirquitas Project, which may increase our estimated costs of developing the project or result in delays. We expect that a significant number of expatriate employees will be required in the early stages of the development of the Pirquitas Project to hire and train the local workforce. If we require and are unsuccessful in acquiring additional mineral properties or qualified personnel, we will not be able to grow at the rate we desire or at all.

25

Some of our directors and officers have conflicts of interest as a result of their involvement with other natural resource companies.

Some our directors and officers are directors or officers of other natural resource or mining-related companies such as, at present, our President, Robert Quartermain, who serves as a director of Canplats Resources Corporation, and our Vice President, Exploration, Kenneth McNaughton, who serves as a director of Minco Silver Corporation (with which we have a strategic alliance to jointly pursue silver opportunities in China).  These associations may give rise to conflicts of interest from time to time. As a result of these conflicts of interest, we may miss the opportunity to participate in certain transactions, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial position.

We may experience difficulty attracting and retaining qualified management to grow our business.

We are dependent on the services of key executives, including Mr. Quartermain, and other highly skilled and experienced executives and personnel focused on advancing our corporate objectives as well as the identification of new opportunities for growth and funding. Due to our relatively small size, the loss of these persons or our inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees required for the development of the Pirquitas Project and our other activities may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Enforcement of judgments or bringing actions outside the United States against us and our directors and officers may be difficult.

We are organized under the laws of, and headquartered in, British Columbia, Canada, and a majority of our directors and officers are not citizens or residents of the United States. In addition, a substantial part of our assets are located outside the United States and Canada. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for an investor to (i) enforce in courts outside the United States judgments against us and our directors and officers obtained in U.S. courts based upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws or (ii) bring in courts outside the United States an original action against us and our directors and officers to enforce liabilities based upon such U.S. securities laws. See “Enforceability of civil liabilities.”

We may fail to achieve and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

We documented and tested during our most recent fiscal year our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”). SOX requires an annual assessment by management of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and, for fiscal years commencing with our fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, an attestation report by our independent auditors addressing this assessment. We may fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting as such standards are modified, supplemented, or amended from time to time, and we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude, on an ongoing basis, that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of SOX. Our failure to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of SOX on an ongoing, timely basis could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which in turn could harm our business and negatively impact the trading price or the market value of our securities. In addition, any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Future acquisitions of companies, if any, may provide us with challenges in implementing the required processes, procedures and controls in our acquired operations. No evaluation can provide complete assurance that our internal control over financial reporting will detect or uncover all failures of persons within our Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be reported. The effectiveness of our processes, procedures and controls could also be limited by simple errors or faulty judgments. In addition, as we continue to expand, the challenges involved in implementing appropriate internal controls over financial reporting will increase and will require that we continue to improve our internal control over financial reporting. Although we intend to devote substantial time and incur substantial costs, as necessary, to ensure ongoing compliance, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in complying with Section 404 of SOX.

26

CAUTION ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The MD&A contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Canadian securities laws concerning the anticipated developments in our operations in future periods, our planned exploration activities, the adequacy of our financial resources and other events or conditions that may occur in the future. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management.

Statements concerning mineral reserve and resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as ‘‘expects’’, ‘‘anticipates’’, ‘‘plans’’, ‘‘projects’’, ‘‘estimates’’, ‘‘assumes’’, ‘‘intends’’, ‘‘strategy’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘potential’’ or variations thereof, or stating that certain actions, events or results ‘‘may’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘would’’, ‘‘might’’ or ‘‘will’’ be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be ‘‘forward-looking statements’’. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation: uncertainty of production at our mineral exploration properties; risks and uncertainties associated with new mining operations; risks related to our ability to obtain adequate financing for our planned development activities and to complete further exploration programs; our history of losses and expectation of future losses; differences in U.S. and Canadian practices for reporting resources; risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results and the geology, grade and continuity of our mineral deposits; unpredictable risks and hazards related to the development and operation of a mine or mine property; commodity price fluctuations; risks related to governmental regulations, including environmental regulations; risks related to delay or failure to obtain required permits, or non-compliance; increased costs and restrictions on operations due to compliance with environmental laws and regulations; risks related to reclamation activities on our properties; uncertainties related to title to our mineral properties; risks related to political instability and unexpected regulatory change; our ability to successfully acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights; currency fluctuations; increased competition in the mining industry for properties and qualified personnel; risks related to some of our directors’ and officers’ involvement with other natural resource companies; and our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and management.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and our actual achievements or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in this MD&A under the heading ‘‘Risks and Uncertainties”.  Our forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and we do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions should change. For the reasons set forth above, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

27

EX-99.03

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As at September 30, 2008

(expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars – unaudited)

		September 30	December 31
	Note	2008	2007
		$	$
Assets			(Restated)
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents		144,987	80,629
Silver bullion	3	-	15,787
Marketable securities	4a	16,064	33,209
Accounts receivable		2,923	2,903
Prepaid expenses and deposits		7,093	453
		171,067	132,981
Restricted cash		1,868	1,809
Other investments	5	26,700	45,102
Convertible debenture	4c	7,557	-
Valued added tax recoverable		20,190	9,527
Mineral property costs and property, plant, and equipment	6	443,907	302,588
Mineral property held-for-sale		-	6,837
		671,289	498,844
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable		15,140	9,640
Accrued liabilities		14,607	3,632
Accrued interest on convertible notes	7	549	-
Current portion of taxes payable		10,000	-
Current portion of asset retirement obligations		527	1,029
Foreign exchange derivatives	4b	-	1,412
		40,823	15,713
Asset retirement obligations		2,937	2,827
Taxes payable		3,370	-
Future income tax liability		27,032	25,253
Long-term convertible notes	7	108,670	-
		182,832	43,793
Non-controlling interest		608	608
		183,440	44,401
Shareholders' Equity
Share capital	8a	462,212	459,888
Value assigned to stock options	8b	38,769	31,810
Value assigned to convertible notes	7	36,553	-
Contributed surplus		649	649
Accumulated other comprehensive income		34	19,377
Deficit		(50,368)	(57,281)
		487,849	454,443
		671,289	498,844

Commitments (note 13)

Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors

“John R. Brodie”                                                                                            “Peter W. Tomsett”

 John R. Brodie, FCA                                                                                        Peter W. Tomsett

(Director)                                                                                         (Director)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

1

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) and Comprehensive Loss

(expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts – unaudited)

		Three Months Ended September 30		Nine Months Ended September 30
	Note	2008	2007	2008	2007
		$	$	$	$
			(Restated)		(Restated)
Exploration and mineral property costs
Property examination and exploration		75	3	242	61
Reclamation and accretion		53	121	175	286
		(128)	(124)	(417)	(347)
Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		807	596	2,021	1,651
Depreciation		81	100	229	228
Professional fees		271	143	699	454
General and administration		975	988	3,465	3,722
Stock-based compensation	8b	2,707	4,531	7,577	10,747
Foreign exchange loss (gain)		(1,656)	1,998	(3,366)	2,383
		(3,185)	(8,356)	(10,625)	(19,185)
Other income (expenses)
Investment income		1,018	1,212	2,616	5,763
Financing fees	7	-	-	(3,690)	-
Interest expense on convertible debt	7	(709)	-	(2,769)	-
Gain on sale of silver bullion	3	-	-	23,457	-
Gain on sale of marketable securities	4a	-	-	2,105	-
Unrealized gain (loss) on
financial instruments held-for-trading	4a,b	(924)	(1,860)	461	(2,176)
Write-down of other investments	5	-	(4,000)	(18,402)	(4,000)
Gain on sale of mineral property	6c	31,526	229	31,526	509
		30,911	(4,419)	35,304	96
Earnings (Loss) before income taxes		27,598	(12,899)	24,262	(19,436)
Income taxes:
Current income taxes	6c	13,370	-	13,370	-
Future income taxes	2	3,016	457	3,979	1,617
		16,386	457	17,349	1,617
Earnings (Loss) for the period		11,212	(13,356)	6,913	(21,053)
Weighted average shares outstanding (thousands)
Basic		62,699	62,518	62,687	62,061
Diluted		63,070	62,518	63,149	62,061
Earnings (Loss) per common share
Basic earnings (loss) per share		0.18	(0.21)	0.11	(0.34)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share		0.18	(0.21)	0.11	(0.34)
Comprehensive income
Earnings (Loss) for the period		11,212	(13,356)	6,913	(21,053)
Other comprehensive loss
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax	4a	(14,659)	(2,223)	(17,597)	(7,863)
Reclassification of realized gain on
sale of marketable securities, net of tax	4a	-	-	(1,746)	-
Other comprehensive loss for the period		(14,659)	(2,223)	(19,343)	(7,863)
Comprehensive loss for the period		(3,447)	(15,579)	(12,430)	(28,916)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars - unaudited)

		Three Months Ended September 30		Nine Months Ended September 30
	Note	2008	2007	2008	2007
		$	$	$	$
			(Restated)		(Restated)
Operating activities
Earnings (Loss) for the period		11,212	(13,356)	6,913	(21,053)
Items not affecting cash
Depreciation		81	100	229	228
Stock-based compensation	8b	2,707	4,531	7,577	10,747
Asset retirement obligations		39	54	118	161
Gain on sale of marketable securities	4a	-	-	(2,105)	-
Gain on sale of silver bullion	3	-	-	(23,457)	-
Gain on sale of mineral property		(31,526)	(229)	(31,526)	(509)
Unrealized loss (gain) on held-for-trading
financial instruments	4a,b	924	1,860	(461)	2,176
Accretion expense on convertible notes	7	345	-	1,305	-
Interest income on convertible debenture	4c	(169)	-	(169)	-
Write-down of other investments	5	-	4,000	18,402	4,000
Future income tax expense	2	3,016	457	3,979	1,617
Increase in non-current taxes payable		3,370	-	3,370	-
Foreign exchange loss		4,189	108	8,189	268
Donation of shares		-	325	-	639
Increase (decrease) in non-cash working capital items	9	1,996	499	4,008	(648)
Cash used in operating activities		(3,816)	(1,651)	(3,628)	(2,374)
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes	7	-	-	134,936	-
Financing costs related to equity portion of
convertible notes financing	7	-	-	(1,440)	-
Shares issued for cash		227	1,008	1,676	7,324
Cash generated by financing activities		227	1,008	135,172	7,324
Investing activities
Mineral property costs		(16,893)	(14,099)	(32,506)	(29,679)
Property, plant and equipment		(37,010)	(6,316)	(88,541)	(30,907)
Increase in value added tax recoverable (net)		(5,249)	(3,266)	(10,663)	(4,686)
Net proceeds from sale of mineral property	6c	22,480	-	22,480	-
Proceeds from sale of silver bullion	3	-	-	39,244	-
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities	4a	-	-	2,800	-
Reliant, net of cash		-	-	-	193
Purchase of marketable securities		-	-	-	(3,648)
Other investments	5	-	(57,102)	-	(57,102)
Cash used in investing activities		(36,672)	(80,783)	(67,186)	(125,829)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(40,261)	(81,426)	64,358	(120,879)
Cash and cash equivalents - Beginning of period		185,248	190,163	80,629	229,616
Cash and cash equivalents - End of period		144,987	108,737	144,987	108,737
Supplementary cash flow information (note 9)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

3

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars - unaudited)

	Common Shares		Values	Values		Accumulated
			assigned	assigned to		other	Retained	Total
	Number of		to stock	convertible	Contributed	comprehensive	earnings	shareholders'
	shares	Amount	options	notes	Surplus	income	(deficit)	equity
	(thousands)	$	$	$	$	$	$	$
						(Restated)	(Restated)	(Restated)
Balance, December 31, 2006	61,646	442,265	20,798	-	649	-	(27,142)	436,570
Transition adjustment to opening	-	-	-	-	-	24,716	5,084	29,800
balance (note 2)
Issued for cash:
Exercise of options	887	11,794	-	-	-	-	-	11,794
Exercise of warrants								-
For mineral property	9	358	-	-	-	-	-	358
Value assigned to options granted	-	-	15,523	-	-	-	-	15,523
Value of options exercised	-	4,511	(4,511)	-	-	-	-	-
Value of warrants exercised								-
Donations	27	960	-	-	-	-	-	960
Other comprehensive loss	-	-	-	-	-	(5,339)	-	(5,339)
Loss for the year	-	-	-	-	-	-	(35,223)	(35,223)
Balance, December 31, 2007	62,569	459,888	31,810	-	649	19,377	(57,281)	454,443
Issued for cash:
Exercise of options	123	1,449	-	-	-	-	-	1,449
Value assigned to options granted	-	-	2,381	-	-	-	-	2,381
Value of options exercised	-	566	(566)	-	-	-	-	-
Value assigned to convertible notes	-	-	-	36,553	-	-	-	36,553
Other comprehensive loss	-	-	-	-	-	(2,349)	-	(2,349)
Earnings for the period	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,673	1,673
Balance, March 31, 2008	62,692	461,903	33,625	36,553	649	17,028	(55,608)	494,150
Value assigned to options granted	-	-	2,477	-	-	-	-	2,477
Other comprehensive loss	-	-	-	-	-	(2,335)	-	(2,335)
Loss for the period	-	-	-	-	-	-	(5,972)	(5,972)
Balance, June 30, 2008	62,692	461,903	36,102	36,553	649	14,693	(61,580)	488,320
Issued for cash:
Exercise of options	13	227	-	-	-	-	-	227
Value assigned to options granted	-	-	2,749	-	-	-	-	2,749
Value of options exercised	-	82	(82)	-	-	-	-	-
Other comprehensive loss	-	-	-	-	-	(14,659)	-	(14,659)
Earnings for the period	-	-	-	-	-	-	11,212	11,212
Balance, September 30, 2008	62,705	462,212	38,769	36,553	649	34	(50,368)	487,849

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended  September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

1   NATURE OF OPERATIONS

We are a development stage company with a portfolio of silver-dominant projects located in seven countries in the Americas and Australia.  We are currently developing our Pirquitas property that is located in the province of Jujuy in northwest Argentina.

Management has estimated that we will have adequate funds from existing working capital to meet our corporate, development, administrative and property obligations for the coming year, including the construction of the Pirquitas property.  We will periodically need to obtain additional financing and while we have been successful in the past, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so in the future.

The recoverability of the amounts shown for mineral properties and related deferred costs is dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves, our ability to obtain necessary financing to complete the development, and upon future profitable production. The amounts shown as deferred expenditures and property acquisition costs represent net costs to date, less amounts amortized and/or written-off, and do not necessarily represent present or future values.

Although we have taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which we have an interest, in accordance with industry standards for the current stage of exploration of such properties, these procedures do not guarantee our title. Property title may be subject to unregistered prior agreements or transfers and may be affected by undetected defects.

2   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements follow the same accounting policies as our most recent audited annual consolidated financial statements except changes relating to capital disclosure and presentation and disclosure of financial instruments (see “Changes in Accounting Policies” below).  These changes became effective January 1, 2008.  These statements do not contain all the information required for annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our annual consolidated financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all of the adjustments necessary to fairly present the consolidated financial statements set forth herein have been made.  We have reclassified certain comparative figures to reflect the presentation used in our most recent annual consolidated financial statements.

Changes in Accounting Policies

Capital Disclosure

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted CICA Handbook Section 1535, “Capital Disclosures”, which requires the disclosure of information on our objectives, policies, and processes for managing capital.  This information is disclosed in note 11.

5

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

2.   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)

Financial Instruments – Disclosures

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted CICA Handbook Section 3862, “Financial Instruments – Disclosures” and CICA Handbook Section 3863, “Financial Instruments – Presentation”.  Section 3862 requires the disclosure of quantitative and qualitative information in our financial statements to evaluate (a) the significance of financial instruments for our financial position and performance; and (b) the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to which we are exposed during the period and at the balance sheet date.  Management’s objectives, policies and procedures for managing such risks are   disclosed in note 4(c).  Section 3863 replaces the existing requirements on presentation of financial instruments.

As at September 30, 2008, our financial instruments are comprised of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, restricted cash, convertible debenture receivable, other investments, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and convertible notes.  The fair value of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying value due to their short-term maturity or capacity of prompt liquidation.  Cash equivalents and restricted cash are designated as available-for-sale as they are not acquired for purpose of trading and have short-term maturity.  Marketable securities are reported at their fair market value based on quoted market prices.  Non-derivative based marketable securities are designated as available-for-sale financial instruments, as they were not acquired for purpose of trading.  Derivative based marketable securities are designated as held-for-trading financial instruments as their default category.  Convertible debenture receivable consists of a note receivable component and a conversion feature component.  The note receivable component is designated as loans and receivable and the conversion feature is designated as a derivative or held-for-trading financial instruments as their default category.  Convertible notes are designated as other liabilities as their default category and related transaction costs are expensed as incurred.  Interest expense related to expenditures incurred on development projects are capitalized to the project.

Going Concern

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted an amendment to CICA Handbook Section 1400, “General Standards of Financial Statement Presentation” in relation to going concern.  The amendment requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.  When management is aware of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast doubt on an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, those uncertainties must be disclosed.  In assessing the appropriateness of the going concern assumption, the standard requires management to consider all available information about the future, which is at least, but not limited to, twelve months from the balance sheet date.  The adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements for any of the periods presented.

6

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

2.   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)

Inventories

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted CICA Handbook Section 3031, “Inventories”, which prescribes the accounting treatment for inventories and provides guidance on the determination of costs and its subsequent recognition as an expense, including any write-down to net realizable value.  It also provides guidance on the cost formulas that are used to assign costs to inventories.  As at September 30, 2008, we have no inventories and this standard has no effect on our financial statements.

Income Statement Presentation of Tax Loss Carryforward

Effective September 30, 2008, we adopted EIC-172, “Income Statement Presentation of a Tax Loss Carryforward Recognized Following an Unrealized Gain in Other Comprehensive Income”.  This abstract provides guidance on whether the tax benefit from the recognition of previously unrecognized tax loss carryforwards consequent to the recording of unrealized gains in other comprehensive income, such as unrealized gains on available-for-sale financial assets, should be recognized in net income or in other comprehensive income.  The abstract should be applied retrospectively, with restatement of prior periods from January 1, 2007, the date of adoption of CICA Handbook Section 3855, “Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement”.

The adoption of EIC-172 resulted in a reclassification of $5,084,000 of future income tax recovery from opening accumulated other comprehensive income to opening accumulated deficit effective January 1, 2007, $1,098,000 of income tax expense from other comprehensive loss to net loss for the year ended December 31, 2007 and $3,979,000 of future income tax expense from other comprehensive loss to net loss in the current period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements issued which may impact us in the future are as follows:

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

CICA Handbook Section 3064, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, establishes revised standards for recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of goodwill and intangible assets. Concurrent with the introduction of this standard, the CICA withdrew EIC 27, Revenues and Expenses during the pre-operating period. As a result of the withdrawal of EIC 27, companies will no longer be able to defer operating costs and revenues incurred prior to commercial production at new mine operations.  The changes are effective for interim and annual financial statements beginning January 1, 2009.  We have not yet determined the impact of the adoption of this change on the disclosure in our financial statements.

7

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

2.   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)

International Financial Reporting Standards

In February 2008, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board (“AcSB”) confirmed that publicly listed companies will be required to adopt IFRS for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011.  Early adoption may be permitted, however, exemptive relief requires approval of the Canadian Securities Administrators. 

We are currently in the process of developing an IFRS conversion plan and evaluating the impact of the transition to IFRS.  We will continue to invest in training and resources throughout the transition period to facilitate a timely conversion.

3.       SILVER BULLION

In March 2008, we sold our silver bullion for cash proceeds of $39,244,000 (US$39,648,000).  As at December 31, 2007, the silver bullion was recorded on our balance sheet at a cost of $15,787,000.  The sale results in a gain of $23,457,000.  No tax expense was recorded as we have sufficient tax pools to offset the taxable gain on the sale.

4. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

(a)    Marketable Securities

At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we held shares or share purchase warrants as follows:

	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
			Accumulated			Accumulated
			Unrealized			Unrealized
	Fair Value	Cost	Gains (Losses)	Fair Value	Cost	Gains (Losses)
Available-For-Sale Shares	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)
Esperanza Silver Corporation	4,651	4,823	(172)	10,012	4,823	5,189
Aurcana Corporation	3,900	6,900	(3,000)	-	-	-
Minco Silver Corporation	3,342	2,270	1,072	13,694	2,966	10,728
Silvermex Resources Ltd.	825	300	525	3,250	300	2,950
Canplats Resources Corporation	850	50	800	1,760	50	1,710
Geologix Explorations Inc.	930	900	30	2,220	900	1,320
Other investments	1,566	780	786	2,246	780	1,466
	16,064	16,023	41	33,182	9,819	23,363
Held-For-Trading Warrants
Esperanza Silver Corporation	-	416	(416)	27	416	(389)
Total Marketable Securities	16,064	16,439	(375)	33,209	10,235	22,974

8

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

4. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Cont’d)

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized an unrealized loss of $21,217,000 (2007 – $9,480,000) on marketable securities designated as available-for-sale in other comprehensive income and an unrealized loss of $27,000 (2007 - $247,000) on financial instruments classified as held-for-trading in our earnings for the period.  The unrealized loss on marketable securities designated as available-for-sale resulted in future income tax expense of $3,979,000 (2007 - $1,617,000), representing the reversal of the tax benefit arising on recognition of previously unrecognized loss carryforwards, with a corresponding impact on other comprehensive loss.

In July 2008, as part of considerations received for sale of the Shafter Silver Project (See note 6(c)), we received 15 million common shares of Aurcana Corporation (“Aurcana”).  As at the date of the transaction, the Aurcana common shares had a fair value of $6,900,000.

During the period, we sold some investments for proceeds of $2,800,000 with an average cost base of $695,000, generating a gain of $2,105,000.  As a result of the transaction, $2,105,000 of unrealized gain previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income has been included in net income for the period.

(b)    Foreign Exchange Derivatives

At December 31, 2007, we held various USD foreign exchange option agreements with a negative fair value of $1,412,000.  All of these foreign exchange contracts have been closed during the first quarter and we have no outstanding foreign exchange option agreements at September 30, 2008.

(c)    Convertible Debenture

As part of considerations received for sale of the Shafter Silver Project (See note 6(c)), we received a $10 million convertible debenture (“Debenture”) from Aurcana.  The Debenture has a three-year term, a coupon rate of 3% and is convertible into 6,600,000 Aurcana common shares at $1.515 per share.

The note receivable component of the Debenture is designated as loans and receivable financial instrument.  At initial recognition, the fair value of the note receivable component was estimated at $6,868,000 using the discounted cash flow model method at market rate.  The note receivable component is accreted over an expected life of 3 years using the effective interest method.  As at September 30, 2008, the book value of the note receivable component of the Debenture was $7,039,000.  For the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, interest and accretion income of $234,000 was recorded to earnings in relation to the Debenture.

The conversion feature of the Aurcana Debenture is classified as a held-for-trading financial instrument by default.  The fair value of conversion feature was estimated, at initial recognition, to be $1,442,000 and is re-valued at each period end based on the Black-Scholes valuation model.  As at September 30, 2008, the fair value of the conversion feature was $518,000.  As a result, an unrealized loss of $924,000 on financial instruments held-for-trading was recorded to net earnings during the period.

9

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

4.       FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Cont’d)

(d)    Financial Risk Management

Our activities expose us to a variety of financial risks, including foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, commodity price risk, credit risk and liquidity risk.  From time to time, we may use foreign exchange contracts, commodity price contracts and interest rate swaps to manage exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange, metal prices and interest rates.  We do not have a practice of trading derivatives.  In the past, our use of derivatives was limited to specific programs to manage fluctuations in foreign exchange risk, which are subject to the oversight of the Board of Directors.

Foreign Exchange Risk

We operate projects in seven different countries and therefore, foreign exchange risk exposures arise from transactions denominated in foreign currencies.  Our foreign exchange risk arises primarily with respect to the US dollar, as the majority of our debt and capital expenses are denominated in US dollars.

Our exposure of US dollar on financial instruments is as follows:

	September 30	December 31
	2008	2007
	US$	US$
Cash and cash equivalents	103,010	10,769
Restricted cash	1,637	1,637
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(8,194)	(3,028)
Convertible notes	(103,047)	-
	(6,594)	9,378

As at September 30, 2008, with other variables unchanged, a $0.01 strengthening (weakening) of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would decrease (increase) our net earnings by $66,000.  There would be no significant effect on other comprehensive income.

Interest Rate Risk

Our interest rate risk mainly arises from the interest rate impact on our cash and cash equivalents.  Cash and cash equivalents receive interest based on market interest rates.  Our long-term note receivable and long-term debt have fixed interest rates and are not exposed to interest rate risk.

As at September 30, 2008, with other variables unchanged, a 1% increase (decrease) in the interest rate would increase (decrease) our net earnings by $1,058,000.  There would be no significant effect on other comprehensive income.

10

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

4.       FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Cont’d)

Commodity Price Risk

Our profitability and long-term viability will depend, in large part, on the market price of silver, gold, tin, zinc, lead and copper. The market prices for these metals are volatile and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including: global or regional consumption patterns; the supply of, and demand for, these metals; speculative activities; the availability and costs of metal substitutes; expectations for inflation; and  political and economic conditions, including interest rates and currency values.  We cannot predict the effect of these factors on metal prices. A decrease in the market price of silver and other metals would affect the profitability of the Pirquitas Project and could affect our ability to finance the exploration and development of any of our other mineral properties. The market price of silver and other metals may be subject to significant fluctuations.

Credit Risk

Credit risk arises from the non-performance by counterparties of contractual financial obligations.  Our credit risk arises primarily with respect to our money market investments, convertible debenture receivable and investment in asset-backed commercial papers.

We manage our credit risk by investing only in obligations of any Province of Canada, Canada or the United States of America or their respective agencies, obligations of enterprises sponsored by any of the above governments; banker’s acceptances purchased in the secondary market and having received the highest credit rating from a recognized rating agency in Canada or the United States, with a term of less than 180 days; and bank term deposits and bearer deposit notes, with a term of less than 180 days.

Our maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, other receivables, convertible debenture receivable (see note 4c) and other investments (see note 5).

Liquidity Risk

We manage liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash and cash equivalent balances.  If necessary, we may raise funds through the issuance of debt, equity, or monetization of non core assets.  For example, in February 2008, we completed a US$138 million, 4.5% convertible debenture due in 2028.  In July 2008, we closed the sale of our Shafter Silver Project for total considerations of $38.2 million.  In 2006, we also issued 7.2 million common shares for net proceeds of $171 million.  We ensure that there is sufficient capital to meet our obligations by continuously monitoring and reviewing actual and forecasted cash flows, and match the maturity profile of financial assets to development, capital and operating needs.

See “Note 13 – Commitments” for contractual undiscounted cash flow requirements for financial liabilities as at September 30, 2008.

11

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

5.       OTHER INVESTMENTS

As at September 30, 2008, we had a total of $57,102,000 invested in Canadian asset-backed commercial paper (“ABCP”).  At the dates at which we acquired the investments, the non-bank sponsored ABCP was rated R-1 high by DBRS Limited (“DBRS”), the highest credit rating for commercial paper.  In August 2007, the ABCP market experienced liquidity problems and was subsequently frozen.

In September 2007, a Pan Canadian Committee (the “Committee”) consisting of a panel of major ABCP investors was formed to restructure the affected ABCP trusts.  A press release issued by the Committee on December 23, 2007 outlined a proposal to restructure ABCP for new notes that have maturities based on the maturities of the assets underlying the ABCP.

At December 31, 2007, based on the limited data available, we estimated the fair values of our ABCP investments to be $45,102,000 using a valuation technique which incorporates a probability weighted approach applied to discounted future cash flows and an impairment of $12,000,000 was recorded in 2007.

On March 20, 2008, the Committee issued an information statement which provided details of the restructuring plan.  The proposed restructuring plan (the “Restructuring Plan”) was submitted under the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act and approved by a majority of noteholders on April 25, 2008.  The Restructuring Plan was sanctioned by the Ontario Superior Court on June 5, 2008.  On September 19, 2008, the Supreme Court of Canada denied an appeal by a group of investors seeking relief including dismissal of the Restructuring Plan.  On October 22, 2008, the Committee indicated the closing of the Restructuring Plan is expected to be completed by the end of November 2008.

We have updated our valuation model to reflect new information outlined in the information statement.  The restructuring plan contemplates:

· The creation of three master assets vehicles (MAV).  Participation in each of the MAV is dependant on the noteholder’s ability and willingness to self insure against margin calls.  

· Within each MAV, the issuance of 5 different series of notes:  

o Class A-1 Notes will be the senior notes, with the other series of Notes subordinated to them.  Class A-1 Notes are expected to receive AA ratings, have maturities ranging from 6 to 8 years and a coupon rate of Bankers Acceptance (“BA”) Rate less 0.5%.  

o Class A-2 Notes will be senior to the Class B and C Notes and IA Tracking Notes.  Class A-2 Notes are expected to receive AA ratings, have a maturity of 8 years and a coupon rate of BA Rate less 0.5%.  

o Class B Notes will be senior to the Class C Notes and IA Tracking Notes.  Class B Notes will not be rated and are expected to have a maturity of 8 years and a coupon rate of BA Rate less 0.5%.  

o Class C Notes will be senior to the IA Tracking Notes.  Class C Notes will not be rated and are expected to have a maturity of 8 years and a coupon rate of 20%.  

o IA Tracking Notes will not be rated.  IA Tracking Notes are expected to have a maturity of 8 years and a coupon rate equivalent to the net rate of return generated by the specific underlying assets.

12

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

5.       OTHER INVESTMENTS (Cont’d)

· The allocation of existing ABCP notes to proposed new notes was based on a report issued by J.P. Morgan, financial advisor to the Committee.  The new notes will be issued based on the relative contribution from the assets underlying the existing trusts based on this report.  

· There is no market data on these notes and no formal ratings have yet been issued by DBRS.

Based on the Restructuring Plan:

· $48,774,000 of our investments will be replaced with Class A-1 and Class A-2 Notes.  

· $3,681,000 of our investments will be replaced with Class B Notes.  

· $1,622,000 of our investments will be replaced with Class C Notes.  

· $3,025,000 of our investments will be replaced with IA Tracking Notes.

We have assessed the estimated fair value of our ABCP investments and based on the available information regarding current market conditions, the underlying assets of our existing trusts and the indicative values contained in the report issued by J.P. Morgan, we recorded an impairment of $18,402,000 in the first quarter of 2008.  This resulted in an estimated fair value of $26,700,000 which approximates those values contained in the J.P. Morgan report.  No impairment was recorded in the current quarter.  There is currently no certainty regarding the outcome of the ABCP investments and therefore the fair value reported may change materially in subsequent periods.  In July 2008, we initiated legal action against HSBC and DBRS by filing a writ and statement of claim in the Supreme Court of British Columbia to recover any losses that may occur with respect to the ultimate recovery of our ABCP.

6. MINERAL PROPERTY COSTS AND PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
		Accum.	Net Book		Accum.	Net Book
	Cost	Amort.	Value	Cost	Amort.	Value
	$	$	$	$	$	$
Mineral property costs	283,277	-	283,277	244,681	-	244,681
Construction in progress	136,560	-	136,560	33,625	-	33,625
Mining equipment and machinery	22,941	(951)	21,990	22,870	(413)	22,457
Other	3,285	(1,205)	2,080	2,743	(918)	1,825
	446,063	(2,156)	443,907	303,919	(1,331)	302,588

13

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

6. MINERAL PROPERTY COSTS AND PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

a) Mineral Property Costs

			Exploration
			and		Total	Total
		Acquisition	development	Future tax	September 30	December 31
		costs	costs	effects	2008	2007
		$	$	$	$	$
Argentina
	Diablillos	5,530	10,275	-	15,805	12,085
	Pirquitas	56,308	24,231	13,060	93,599	85,879
	Other	23	194	-	217	205
Australia
	Bowdens	10,900	8,793	3,260	22,953	22,851
	Other	2	253	-	255	246
Canada
	Silvertip	1,818	273	-	2,091	2,089
	Snowfield	125	9,231	-	9,356	4,489
	Sulphurets	2,393	1,255	-	3,648	3,648
	Sunrise Lake	1,234	71	-	1,305	1,301
Chile
	Challacollo	2,953	5,230	360	8,543	8,357
	Other	50	255	-	305	282
Mexico
	Pitarrilla	13,445	49,982	2,781	66,208	51,128
	San Marcial	1,250	794	-	2,044	2,019
	Veta Colorada	4,517	932	44	5,493	4,911
	Other	973	1,794	-	2,767	2,464
Peru
	Berenguela	12,936	3,327	6,200	22,463	21,947
	San Luis	417	15,012	1,023	16,452	11,453
	Other	-	103	-	103	-
United States
	Candelaria	2,981	3,650	265	6,896	6,634
	Maverick Springs	692	2,043	39	2,774	2,693
		118,547	137,698	27,032	283,277	244,681

14

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

6.       MINERAL PROPERTY COSTS AND PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Cont’d)

b) Property, Plant and Equipment

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded $825,000 of depreciation on property, plant, and equipment, of which $229,000 was charged to the Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) and Comprehensive Loss and $596,000 was deferred as mineral property costs.

c) Sale of Shafter Silver Project

On July 17, 2008, we closed the sale of the Shafter Silver Project in Presidio County, Texas, to Aurcana Corporation (“Aurcana”).  Under the terms of the agreement, Aurcana paid us total consideration of $38,210,000 consisting of $23,000,000 in cash, 15 million Aurcana common shares with a fair value of $6,900,000 and a $10,000,000 convertible debenture with a fair value of $8,310,000 (see note 4(c)).  After deducting transaction costs of $520,000, sale of the Shafter Silver Project resulted in a gain on sale of mineral property of $31,526,000 (after-tax gain of $18,156,000).

7.       CONVERTIBLE NOTES

In February 2008, we sold US$138,000,000 ($134,936,000) in senior convertible notes (“Notes”) for net proceeds of $129,806,000 after payment of commissions and expenses related to the offering.  The unsecured Notes mature on March 1, 2028 and bear an interest rate of 4.5% per annum, payable semi-annually.  The Notes will be convertible into our common shares at a fixed conversion rate, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments, only in the following events:

a.	during specified consecutive trading periods, the market price of our common shares exceeds 130% of the conversion price of the Notes,
b.	the trading price of the Notes falls to 97% or less of the amount equal to the then prevailing price of our common shares, multiplied by the applicable conversion rate,
c.	the Notes are called for redemption,
d.	upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions, or
e.	during specified periods in early 2013 and 2028.

On conversion, holders of the Notes will receive cash and, if applicable, common shares (or, at our election, in lieu of such common shares, cash or any combination of cash and common shares).  In addition, if certain fundamental changes occur to us, holders of the Notes may be entitled to an increased conversion rate.  The Notes will be convertible into our common shares at an initial conversion rate of 23.0792 common shares per US$1,000 principal amount of Notes converted, representing an initial conversion price of approximately US$43.33 per common share.

15

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

7. CONVERTIBLE NOTES (Cont’d)

Holders of the Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or part of their Notes on March 1 of each of 2013, 2018 and 2023, and upon certain fundamental corporate changes.  The repurchase price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes being converted, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.  Subject to specified conditions, we shall pay the purchase price in cash.  On and after March 5, 2013, we may redeem all or part of the Notes for cash at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.  All principal and interest payments will be denominated in US Dollars.

The face value of the Notes has been allocated as follows for accounting purposes:

Allocation of gross proceeds	USD$	CAD$
Gross proceeds	138,000	134,936
Fair value of debt component	(99,144)	(96,943)
Fair value of equity component	38,856	37,993
Convertible notes	USD$	CAD$
Opening balance	99,144	96,943
Accretion expense	3,385	3,483
Interest accrued	3,675	3,779
Interest paid	(3,157)	(3,323)
Foreign exchange loss on revaluation	-	8,337
Ending balance	103,047	109,219
Accrued interest on convertible notes	518	549
Long-term convertible notes	102,529	108,670
Total convertible notes	103,047	109,219

The fair value of the debt portion of the Notes at initial recognition was estimated using a discounted cash flow model method.  The fair value of the equity component was estimated using the residual value method.  The debt component of the Notes is accreted over an expected life of 5 years using the effective interest method.  Total financing fees associated with the transaction were $5,130,000, of which $3,690,000 was charged to net income for the period and $1,440,000 was charged to equity.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, interest expense and accretion expense related to the convertible notes was $3,779,000 and $3,483,000 respectively; $2,315,000 of interest expense and $2,178,000 of accretion expense were capitalized to construction in progress during the period resulting in $1,464,000 of interest and $1,305,000 of accretion expensed in the period.

16

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

8.       OUTSTANDING SHARES AND RELATED INFORMATION

(a)       Authorized Share Capital

   Our authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares without par value.

(b)       Options

At September 30, 2008, the total number of options outstanding was 4,436,250 with exercise prices ranging from $12.85 to $40.62 with weighted average remaining lives of 3.21 years.  This represents 7.1% of issued and outstanding capital.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, 180,000 options were granted to employees and consultants at a strike price between $29.02 and $32.08 and average fair value of $9.86 per option based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  We amortize the fair value of stock options on a graded basis over the respective vesting period of the stock options.  The allocation of fair value of options during the period was as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30		Nine Months Ended September 30
	2008	2007	2008	2007
	$	$	$	$
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Mineral property costs	43	211	31	494
Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss),
and Comprehensive Loss
Stock based compensation - Employee salaries and benefits	1,983	4,021	6,081	8,937
Stock based compensation - General and administration	724	510	1,496	1,810
	2,707	4,531	7,577	10,747
Total stock based compensation	2,750	4,742	7,608	11,241

(c)       Convertible Senior Notes due 2028

In February 2008, we sold US$138 million in senior convertible notes (“Notes”).  The Notes will be convertible into Silver Standard common shares at a fixed conversion rate of US$43.33 per common share upon specified events.  On conversion, holders of the Convertible Notes will receive cash and, if applicable, common shares (or, at our election, in lieu of such common shares, cash or any combination of cash and common shares).  The convertible notes mature on March 1, 2028.

(d)       Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share

  The shares issuable pursuant to the terms of the convertible debenture have not been included in the

  calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share as the impact would be anti-dilutive.

17

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

9.         SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Non-cash working capital activities were:
	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30		September 30
	2008	2007	2008	2007
	$	$	$	$
Accounts receivable	(1,336)	712	(20)	778
Prepaid expenses and deposits	(5,016)	(24)	(6,640)	(92)
Accounts payable and current portion of ARO	(264)	(449)	(223)	(1,276)
Accrued liabilities	212	260	342	(58)
Accrued interest on convertible debt	(1,600)	-	549	-
Current portion of taxes payable	10,000	-	10,000	-
	1,996	499	4,008	(648)
Non-cash investing activities were:
	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30		September 30
	2008	2007	2008	2007
	$	$	$	$
Non-cash investing activities
Accretion expense capitalized to construction
in progress	(1,250)	-	(2,178)	-
Shares acquired for sale of mineral property	-	650	-	900
Shares issued for mineral properties	-	-	-	(358)

10.      RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded administrative, technical services and expense reimbursements of $1,118,000 (2007 - $275,000) from companies related by common directors or officers.  At September 30, 2008, accounts receivable includes $89,000 (2007 - $44,000) from these related parties.  Amounts due from related parties are non-interest bearing and without specific terms of repayment.  Transactions for expense reimbursement with related parties are at normal business terms.

11.       CAPITAL RISK MANAGEMENT

Our objectives when managing capital are:

· to safeguard our ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the development of our mineral properties  

· to provide an adequate return to shareholders  

· to maintain a flexible capital structure which optimizes the cost of capital  

· to meet our long term debt obligations

In order to facilitate the management of our capital requirements, we prepare annual expenditure budgets and continuously monitor and review actual and forecasted cash flow.  The annual and updated budgets are approved by the Board of Directors.

18

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

11.       CAPITAL RISK MANAGEMENT (Cont’d)

To maintain the capital structure, we may, from time to time, attempt to issue new shares, issue new debt or dispose of non-core assets.  We expect our current capital resources will be sufficient to carry our exploration and development plans and operations through the current operating period.

12.       SEGMENTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

We have one operating segment, which is the exploration and development of mineral properties.  Mineral property expenditures by property are detailed in note 6.  Substantially all of our gains and losses were incurred in Canada.  Segment assets by geographic location are as follows:

						September 30, 2008
	Argentina	Australia	Canada	Chile	Mexico	Peru	United States	Total
	$	$	$	$	$	$	$	$
Mineral property
costs and property,
plant and equipment	268,172	23,210	17,732	8,849	76,708	39,567	9,669	443,907
Total assets	298,248	23,334	209,831	8,853	80,230	41,095	9,698	671,289
						December 31, 2007
	Argentina	Australia	Canada	Chile	Mexico	Peru	United States	Total
	$	$	$	$	$	$	$	$
Mineral property
costs and property,
plant and equipment	154,254	23,097	12,867	8,639	60,661	33,744	9,326	302,588
Total assets	170,565	23,240	181,707	8,763	64,157	34,208	16,204	498,844

13.       COMMITMENTS

As at September 30, 2008, we have committed to payments under contractual obligations as follows:

	Less than 1 year	1-3 years	4-5 years	Total
	$	$	$	$
Lease obligations	79	907	412	1,398
Asset retirement obligations	527	2,148	430	3,105
Long-term convertible notes*	3,163	12,651	150,651	166,465
	3,769	15,706	151,493	170,968
* Convertible notes are due in 2028 but expected to be repaid in 2013.  The notes are convertible into common shares at a fixed conversion rate upon specified events

19

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14. MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP)

Consolidated summarized balance sheets:

			September 30, 2008				December 31, 2007
	Canadian	Adjustments		U.S.	Canadian	Adjustments		U.S.
	GAAP			GAAP	GAAP			GAAP
	$		$	$	$		$	$
Assets
Current assets	171,067		-	171,067	132,981		-	132,981
Other investments	26,700		-	26,700	45,102		-	45,102
Convertible debenture	7,557		-	7,557	-		-	-
Value added tax recoverable	20,190		-	20,190	9,527		-	9,527
Mineral property costs(a)i)	283,277		(266,037)	17,240	251,518		(240,786)	10,732
Other property, plant and     equipment (a)vi)	160,630		(1,851)	158,779	57,907		-	57,907
Other assets	1,868		-	1,868	1,809		-	1,809
	671,289		(267,888)	403,401	498,844		(240,786)	258,058
Liabilities
Current liabilities	40,823		-	40,823	15,713		-	15,713
Long-term convertibles note     (a)vi)	108,670		32,556	141,226	-		-	-
Other liabilities (a)i)	33,339		(27,032)	6,307	28,080		(25,253)	2,827
	182,832		5,524	188,356	43,793		(25,253)	18,540
Non-controlling interest	608		-	608	608		-	608
Shareholders’ Equity
Share capital(a)iii)	462,212		(1,198)	461,014	459,888		(1,198)	458,690
Value assigned to:
Long-term convertible notes     (a)vi)	36,553		(36,553)	-	-		-	-
Stock options (a)v)	38,769		(5,459)	33,310	31,810		(5,459)	26,351
Contributed surplus	649		-	649	649		-	649
Accumulated other     comprehensive income (a)ii)	34		7	41	19,377		3,986	23,363
Deficit(a)i), (a)ii), (a)iii), (a)vi)	(50,368)		(230,209)	(280,577)	(57,281)		(212,862)	(270,143)
	488,457		(273,412)	215,045	454,443		(215,533)	239,518
	671,289		(267,888)	403,401	498,844		(240,786)	258,058

20

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14. MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

Consolidated summarized statements of loss:

	Three months ended September 30		Nine months ended September 30
	2008	2007	2008	2007
	$	$	$	$
Earnings (loss) in accordance with Canadian GAAP	11,212	(13,356)	6,913	(21,053)
Mineral property costs for the year (a)i)	(15,349)	(13,681)	(30,434)	(27,878)
Gain on sale of mineral property (a)i)	6,962	-	6,962	-
Accretion expense on convertible notes (a)vi)	292	-	1,126	-
Foreign exchange gain (loss) on convertible notes (a)vi)	(1,307)	-	2,460	-
Financing costs (a)vi)	-	-	(1,440)	-
Future income tax expense on marketable securities (a)ii)	3,016	457	3,979	1,617
Earnings (loss) in accordance with U.S. GAAP	4,826	(26,580)	(10,434)	(47,314)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
in accordance with Canadian GAAP	(14,659)	(2,223)	(19,343)	(7,863)
Future income tax expense on marketable securities (a)ii)	(3,016)	(457)	(3,979)	(1,617)
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)
in accordance with U.S. GAAP	(17,675)	(2,680)	(23,322)	(9,480)
Total comprehensive earnings (loss)
in accordance with U.S. GAAP	(12,849)	(29,260)	(33,756)	(56,794)
Basic weighted-average common shares (000’s)	62,699	62,518	62,687	62,061
Diluted weighted-average common shares (000’s)	63,070	62,518	62,687	62,061
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share	0.08	(0.43)	(0.17)	(0.76)

Consolidated summarized statements of cash flows:

	Three months ended September 30		Nine months ended September 30
	2008	2007	2008	2007
	$	$	$	$
Cash flows from operating activities
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP	(3,816)	(1,651)	(3,628)	(2,374)
Mineral property costs (a)i)	(12,917)	(12,611)	(26,096)	(25,406)
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP	(16,733)	(14,262)	(29,724)	(27,780)
Cash flows from investing activities
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP	(36,672)	(80,783)	(67,186)	(125,829)
Mineral property costs (a)i)	12,917	12,611	26,096	25,406
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP	(23,755)	(68,172)	(41,090)	(100,423)

 

21

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14. MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

a) We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada (Canadian GAAP), which differ in certain respects from those principles that we would have followed had our consolidated financial statements been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and requirements promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (collectively U.S. GAAP). The major differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP and their effect on the consolidated financial statements are summarized below:

i)        Under Canadian GAAP, the costs of acquiring mineral properties and related exploration and development expenditures are deferred.  SEC staff have interpreted U.S. GAAP to require that mineral property exploration and land use costs must be expensed as incurred until commercially mineable deposits are determined to exist within a particular property, as cash flows cannot be reasonably estimated prior to such determination.  Accordingly, for U.S. GAAP purposes, for all periods presented, we have expensed all land use costs for mineral properties and deferred exploration costs that have been incurred by us, excluding periodic option payments meeting the definition of a mineral right, for which commercially mineable reserves do not exist.  When proven and probable reserves are determined for a property and a final feasibility study prepared, any subsequent exploration and development costs of the property would be capitalized.  Periodic option payments that meet the definition of a mineral property right, as defined in EITF 04-2, ”Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets”, are viewed as a tangible asset and capitalized.  Capitalized option payments are amortized over the option period as defined in the related option agreement.  Once in production, any subsequent development costs would be treated as production costs charged to production. In early April 2006, a Feasibility Study Update for the Pirquitas property was completed.  This study defined proven and probable reserves and, as a consequence, exploration and development costs relating to this property from March 31, 2006 have been deferred under U.S. GAAP.

On July 17, 2008, we closed the sale of the Shafter Silver Project (see note 6(c)).  For Canadian GAAP, the sale resulted in a gain of $31,526,000 after deducting carrying value of disposed assets and liabilities and transaction costs.  For U.S. GAAP, the gain on sale of mineral property was increased by $6,962,000, reflecting the lower carrying value of mineral property costs under U.S. GAAP.

For Canadian GAAP, cash flows relating to mineral property exploration and land use costs are reported as investing activities.  For U.S. GAAP, these costs are characterized as operating activities.

22

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14. MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

ii) Under U.S. GAAP, securities that are available-for-sale are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains or losses are included as part of comprehensive income. An impairment on available-for-sale securities is recorded in income if such loss is determined to be other than temporary.

Under Canadian GAAP, prior to January 1, 2007, marketable securities were valued at the lower of cost and market with any write-down recorded as a charge to earnings.  Effective January 1, 2007, upon adoption of new CICA Handbook Section 3855, marketable securities have been designated as available-for-sale financial assets and are recorded at fair value consistent with U.S. GAAP.  We recognized an adjustment of $29,800,000 to the opening balance of accumulated other comprehensive income, representing the unrealized gain on available-for-sale marketable securities held by us at January 1, 2007 under Canadian GAAP.  No similar adjustment would be recognized under U.S. GAAP in 2007.  Consequently, GAAP differences related to available-for-sale securities have been eliminated effective January 1, 2007.

Under Canadian GAAP, as described in Note 2, effective September 30, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of EIC-172 which required the tax benefits recognized consequent to the recording of unrealized gains in comprehensive income to be recognized in net income.  Under U.S. GAAP, no similar provisions exist and such tax benefits would be recorded in other comprehensive income. For U.S. GAAP purposes, opening deficit as at January 1, 2007 would decrease and other comprehensive income would decrease by $5,084,000.  Other comprehensive loss would increase and income tax expense would decrease by $457,000 and $1,617,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 respectively and $3,016,000 and $3,979,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 respectively.

iii)        Under Canadian GAAP, before the introduction of Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) 1581, “Business Combinations”, the fair value of shares issued by an acquirer to effect a business combination was based on the quoted market price of shares at the date of acquisition. Under U.S. GAAP, the fair value of shares issued is based on the market price surrounding the date the business combination agreement is agreed to and announced.

iv)        Canadian GAAP provides for investments in jointly controlled entities to be accounted for using proportionate consolidation. Under U.S. GAAP, investments in incorporated joint ventures are to be accounted for using the equity method. Under an accommodation of the SEC, the accounting for joint ventures need not be reconciled from Canadian to U.S. GAAP. The different accounting treatment affects only the presentation and classification of financial statement items and not net income or shareholders’ equity.

23

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14. MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

 v)         For U.S. GAAP purposes, we previously accounted for employee stock-based compensation arrangements using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations. Accordingly, since stock options are granted at exercise prices that are at or above the quoted market value of our common shares at the date of grant, there is no compensation cost recognized by the company for options granted to employees.  We adopted the fair value based method of accounting for employee stock-based compensation under U.S. GAAP effective January 1, 2005 using the modified prospective transition method.  Under this method, we recognized employee stock-based compensation beginning January 1, 2005 as if the fair value method had been used to account for all employee awards granted, modified, or settled in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1994.

For Canadian GAAP purposes, we adopted, as of January 1, 2004, the CICA’s amendments to Section 3870, “Stock-Based Compensation and other Stock-Based Payments”, which required the fair value method to be applied to employee stock-based compensation.

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R, “Share Based Payment” for all employee stock-based awards granted, modified or settled after the effective date using the fair value measurement method.  Compensation cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award – the requisite service period.  For unvested awards outstanding as of the effective date, compensation was recognized based upon the grant-date fair value determined under SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”.  Upon adoption of SFAS 123R using the modified prospective method, there was no cumulative affect adjustment required and no differences exist between the accounting for employee stock-based compensation expense in 2006 to September 30, 2008 between Canadian and U.S. GAAP.

vi) Under U.S. GAAP, a value is assigned to the conversion feature only if the effective conversion rate is less than the market price of the common stock at the date of issuance.  No value would be assigned under U.S. GAAP to the conversion feature.  Accordingly, accretion expense would decrease by $1,126,000 (three months ended September 30, 2008 - $292,000), capitalized interest would decrease by $1,851,000 (three months ended September 30, 2008 - $1,054,000), foreign exchange gain (loss) would decrease by $2,460,000 (three months ended September 30, 2008 – increase of $1,307,000) and financing fees charged to net income would increase by $1,440,000 (three months ended September 30, 2008 - $nil).

24

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14. MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

b) Other disclosures

The following additional information would be presented if these consolidated financial statements were presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP:

i) Accounts receivable

	September 30, 2008 $	December 31, 2007 $
Value added tax	642	402
Other receivables	2,281	2,501
	2,923	2,903

ii) Development stage enterprise

We meet the definition of a development stage enterprise under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises.  The following additional disclosures are required under U.S. GAAP:

Consolidated summarized statements of loss and deficit and cash flows since October 1, 1993, the date we made a strategic decision to concentrate on the acquisition and exploration of bulk silver mineral properties in North, Central and South America.

Consolidated loss and deficit:

	Period from October 1, 1993 (inception) to September 30, 2008 $
Mineral property exploration and reclamation	293,591
General and administration, salaries, professional fees	82,521
Other income	(94,559)
Net loss for the period from October 1, 1993 to September 30, 2008,         being the deficit accumulated during the development stage	281,553
Opening retained earnings, October 1, 1993	(976)
Ending deficit, September 30, 2008	280,577

25

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14 MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

Consolidated cash flows:

	Period from October 1, 1993 (inception) to September 30, 2008 $
Operating activities	(190,124)
Investing activities	(98,864)
Financing activities	503,658
Increase in cash and cash and cash equivalents	143,856
Cash and cash equivalents – October 1, 1993	1,131
Cash and cash equivalents – September 30, 2008	144,987

iii) Additional shareholders’ equity disclosure required under FAS No. 7.

								Compre-
		Common Shares		Sub-	Values	Values		hensive	Retained	Total
	Issue	Number of		scriptions	assigned	assigned	Contributed	income (loss)	earnings (deficit)	shareholders’
	Price	shares	Amount	receivable	to options	to warrants	Surplus			equity
	$		$	$	$	$	$	$	$	$
Balance October 1, 1993		3,409,791	2,272	-	-	-	-	-	976	3,248
Issued for cash	0.75	2,810,000	2,108	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,108
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	0.72	25,000	18	-	-	-	-	-	-	18
- Allotted but not issued		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
- Assigned values to options issued		-	312	-	-	-	-	-	-	312
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	2,102	-	155	2,257
Balance September 30, 1994		6,244,791	4,710	-	-	-	2,102	-	1,131	7,943
Issued for cash
- Private placement	1.01	2,570,000	2,590	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,590
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	4.13	15,000	62	-	-	-	-	-	-	62
- Allotted shares issued	4.08	75,000	306	-	-	-	-	-	-	306
- Assigned values to options issued		-	18	-	-	-	-	-	-	18
Gain (loss) for year				-	-	-	(1,046)	-	(2,459)	(3,505)
Balance September 30, 1995		8,904,791	7,686	-	-	-	1,056	-	(1,328)	7,414
Issued for cash
- Private placement	4.27	2,550,000	10,890	-	-	-	-	-	-	10,890
-  Special warrants	4.00	2,000,000	8,000	-	-	-	-	-	-	8,000
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	5.20	85,000	443	-	-	-	-	-	-	443
- Finder's fees		-	(554)	-	-	-	-	-	-	(554)
- Assigned values to options issued		-	17	-	-	-	-	-	-	17
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	(58)	-	(8,874)	(8,932)
Balance December 31, 1996		13,539,791	26,482	-	-	-	998	-	(10,202)	17,278

26

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14 MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

								Compre-
		Common Shares		Sub-	Values	Values		hensive	Retained	Total
	Issue	Number of		scriptions	assigned	assigned	Contributed	income (loss)	earnings (deficit)	shareholders’
	Price	shares	Amount	receivable	to options	to warrants	Surplus			equity
	$		$	$	$	$	$	$	$	$
Issued for cash
- Private placement	5.00	6,800,00	3,400	-	-	-	-	-	-	3,400
- Exercise of options	5.72	25,000	143	-	-	-	-	-	-	143
- For special warrants	4.30	745,000	3,203	-	-	-	-	-	-	3,203
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	4.95	311,006	1,541	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,541
- Finder's fees	5.00	20,000	100	-	-	-	-	-	-	100
- Assigned values to options issued		-	810	-	-	-	-	-	-	810
- Share issue costs		-	(317)	-	-	-	-	-	-	(317)
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	(537)	-	(18,557)	(19,094)
Balance December 31, 1997		15,320,797	35,362	-	-	-	461	-	(28,759)	7,064
Issued for cash
- Private placement		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
- Exercise of options	5.70	10,000	57	-	-	-	-	-	-	57
- For special warrants	5.50	630,000	3,465	-	-	-	-	-	-	3,465
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	3.84	85,000	326	-	-	-	-	-	-	326
- Assigned values to options issued		-	155	-	-	-	-	-	-	155
- Share issue costs		-	(285)	-	-	-	-	-	-	(285)
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	(454)	-	(6,386)	(6,840)
Balance December 31, 1998		16,045,797	39,080	-	-	-	7	-	(35,145)	3,942
Issued for cash
- Private placement	1.40	1,388,144	1,944	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,944
- Exercise of options	1.75	100,700	176	-	-	-	-	-	-	176
- Exercise of warrants	1.93	567,955	1,096	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,096
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	2.20	50,000	110	-	-	-	-	-	-	110
- On business combination	1.75	2,285,451	3,999	-	-	-	-	-	-	3,999
- Share issue costs		-	(116)	-	-	-	-	-	-	(116)
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	8	-	(8,672)	(8,664)
Balance December 31, 1999		20,438,047	46,289	-	-	-	15	-	(43,817)	2,487
Issued for cash
- Private placement	1.50	1,633,334	2,450	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,450
- Exercise of options	1.75	807,100	1,413	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,413
- Exercise of warrants	1.60	1,273,859	2,038	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,038
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	2.22	27,500	61	-	-	-	-	-	-	61
- Finder's fees	1.50	86,666	130	-	-	-	-	-	-	130
- Fractional shares repurchased		-48	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
- Share issue costs		-	(134)	-	-	-	-	-	-	(134)
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	(13)	-	(5,777)	(5,790)
Balance December 31, 2000		24,266,458	52,247	-	-	-	2	-	(49,594)	2,655
Issued for cash
- Private placement	2.35	1,914,000	4,495	-	-	-	-	-	-	4,495
- Exercise of options	2.05	1,941,225	3,976	-	-	-	-	-	-	3,976
- Exercise of warrants	1.56	1,733,000	2,703	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,703
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	2.88	1,000,000	2,882	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,882
- Finder's fees	2.35	59,270	139	-	-	-	-	-	-	139
- Assigned value to warrants issued		-	-	-	-	326	-	-	-	326
- Share issue costs		-	(165)	-	-	-	-	-	-	(165)
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	(15,317)	(15,317)
Balance December 31, 2001		30,913,953	66,277	-	-	326	2	-	(64,911)	1,694

27

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14 MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

								Compre-
		Common Shares		Sub-	Values	Values		hensive	Retained	Total
	Issue	Number of		scriptions	assigned	assigned	Contributed	income (loss)	earnings	shareholders’
	Price	shares	Amount	receivable	to options	to warrants	Surplus		(deficit)	equity
	$		$	$	$	$	$	$	$	$
Issued for cash
- Private placement	4.21	4,750,000	19,979	-	-	-	-	-	-	19,979
- Exercise of options	2.63	695,734	1,827	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,827
- Exercise of warrants	3.10	1,584,301	4,919	-	-	-	-	-	-	4,919
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	6.33	198,706	1,258	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,258
- Finder's fees	4.01	80,640	323	-	-	-	-	-	-	323
- On conversion of conv. Debenture	5.80	360,636	2,092	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,092
- For mineral properties payables	5.49	596,917	3,280	-	-	-	-	-	-	3,280
- Assigned values to options issued		-	-	-	161	-	-	-	-	161
- Assigned value of exercised op/wts		-	339	-	(13)	(326)	-	-	-	-
- Donations	4.10	10,000	41	-	-	-	-	-	-	41
- Share issue costs		-	(656)	-	-	-	-	-	-	(656)
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	1,045	-	(19,282)	(18,237)
Balance December 31, 2002		39,190,887	99,679	-	148	-	1,047	-	(84,193)	16,681
Issued for cash
- Private placement		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
- Exercise of options	3.99	536,372	2,140	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,140
- Exercise of warrants	3.99	2,779,589	11,089	-	-	-	-	-	-	11,089
- Subscriptions receive on warrants		-	-	455	-	-	-	-	-	455
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	6.95	88,004	612	-	-	-	-	-	-	612
- On settlement of interest	7.52	9,980	75	-	-	-	-	-	-	75
- Assigned values to options issued		-	-	-	187	-	-	-	-	187
- Assigned value of exercised options		-	165	-	(165)	-	-	-	-	-
- Share issue costs		-	(54)	-	-	-	-	-	-	(54)
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	7,226	-	(14,099)	(6,873)
Balance December 31, 2003		42,604,832	113,706	455	170	-	8,273	-	(98,292)	24,312
Issued for cash
- Private placement	12.57	2,955,000	37,132	-	-	6,819	-	-	-	43,951
- Exercise of options	5.64	525,700	2,963	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,963
- Exercise of warrants	5.00	2,686,620	13,420	-	-	-	-	-	-	13,420
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	18.71	2,680,500	50,165	-	-	-	-	-	-	50,165
- Finder’s fees	12.58	31,250	393	-	-	192	-	-	-	585
- Assigned values to options issued		-	-	-	53	-	-	-	-	53
- Assigned value of exercised options		-	154	-	(86)	-	-	-	-	68
- shares issued on warrant subscriptions	4.90	92,900	455	(455)	-	-	-	-	-	-
- Share issue costs		-	(1,513)	-	-	-	-	-	-	(1,513)
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	(61,680)	(61,680)
Adjustment for stock-based comp.		-	-	-	-	-	-	(5,480)		(5,480)
Balance – December 31, 2004		51,576,802	216,875	-	137	7,011	-	2,793	(159,972)	66,844
Issued for cash
- Exercise of options	6.21	259,269	1,610	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,610
- Exercise of warrants	18.50	10,000	185	-	-	-	-	-	-	185
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	14.20	3,170	45	-	-	-	-	-	-	45
- Assigned values to options issued		-	-	-	4,194	-	-	-	-	4,194
- Assigned value of exercised options		-	12	-	(12)	-	-	-	-	-
- Assigned value of exercised  warrants		-	46	-	-	(46)	-	-	-	-
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	-	7,309	(26,581)	(19,272)
Balance – December 31, 2005		51,849,241	218,773	-	4,319	6,965	-	10,102	(186,553)	53,606

28

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14 MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

								Compre-
		Common Shares			Values	Values		hensive	Retained	Total
	Issue	Number of			assigned	assigned	Contributed	income (loss)	earnings (deficit)	shareholders’
	Price	shares	Amount		to options	to warrants	Surplus			equity
	$		$		$	$	$	$	$	$
Issued for cash
- Public offering	25.37	7,200,000	182,663	-	-	-	-	-	-	182,663
- Exercise of options	9.79	668,750	6,548	-	-	-	-	-	-	6,548
- Exercise of warrants	18.50	1,386,625	25,652	-	-	-	-	-	-	25,652
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	18.50	530,504	9,814	-	-	-	-	-	-	9,814
- Assigned values to options issued		-	-	-	13,686	-	-	-	-	13,686
- Assigned value of exercised options		-	2,583	-	(2,583)	-	-	-	-	-
- Assigned value of exercised warrants		-	6,400	-	-	(6,400)	-	-	-	-
- Donations	20.91	11,000	230	-	-	-	-	-	-	230
- Share issue costs		-	(11,596)	-	-	-	-	-	-	(11,596)
- Options expired/forfeited		-	-	-	(83)	-	83	-	-	-
- Warrants expired		-	-	-	-	(566)	566	-	-	-
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	-	19,698	(11,045)	8,653
Balance – December 31, 2006		61,646,120	441,067		15,339	-	649	29,800	(197,598)	289,257
Issued for cash
- Exercise of options	3.99	886,600	11,794	-	-	-	-	-	-	11,794
Non-cash
- Mineral properties	6.95	9,285	358	-	-	-	-	-	-	358
- Assigned values to options granted		-	-	-	15,523	-	-	-	-	15,523
- Assigned value of exercised options		-	4,511	-	(4,511)	-	-	-	-	-
- Donations		27,442	960	-	-	-	-	-	-	960
Other comprehensive loss for year		-	-	-	-	-	-	(6,437)	-	(6,437)
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	(72,545)	(72,545)
Balance - December 31, 2007		62,569,447	458,690		26,351	-	649	23,363	(270,143)	238,910
Issued for cash
- Exercise of options	12.32	136,100	1,676	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,676
Non-cash
- Assigned values to options granted		-	-	-	7,607	-	-	-	-	7,607
- Assigned value of exercised options		-	648	-	(648)	-	-	-	-	-
- Assigned value of convertible notes		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Other comprehensive loss for year		-	-	-	-	-	-	(23,322)	-	(23,322)
Gain (loss) for year		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	(10,434)	(10,434)
Balance - September 30, 2008		62,705,547	461,014	-	33,310	-	649	41	(280,577)	214,437

iv) Rental Expense

The total rent expense charged to the statement of earnings (loss) for the three month period ending September 30, 2008 was $89,000 (2007 - $77,000) and for the nine month period ending September 30, 2008 was $313,000 (2007 - $225,000).

29

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14                MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

v) Income Tax Uncertainty

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of Interpretation 48, the company did not recognize any further increases in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits other than positions arising in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

	$(000)
Balance as at January 1, 2008	1,475
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year	-
Decreases relating to settlements with the taxing authorities	-
Decreases relating to lapses of the applicable statute of limitations	-
Balance as at September 30, 2008	1,475

If recognized, none of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate due to the existence of valuation allowances against the related deferred tax assets.

The Company has not recognized interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits due to the forecasted loss carry forward amounts in relevant jurisdictions.

vi) Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

i) In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement” to define fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value and to expand disclosures about fair value measurements.  The statement only applies to fair value measurements that are already required or permitted under current accounting standards and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  The adoption of SFAS 157 for financial instruments as required at January 1, 2008 did not have a material effect on the company’s results of operations or financial position; however, the company provided additional disclosures in these consolidated financial statements.  The company will adopt SFAS 157 for non financial assets and non-financial liabilities on January 1, 2009, as required, and do not expect the provisions to have a material effect on the company’s results of operations or financial position.

30

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited)

14  MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value.  These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.  The company’s Level 1 assets include the valuation of available-for–sale investments with no trading restrictions using a market approach based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in an active market. The company’s Level 2 assets include the valuation of convertible debenture receivable based on the discounted cash flow approach; derivatives based on the Black-Scholes model; and long-term convertible notes based on average market quoted price provided by market makers in the over-the-counter market on the balance sheet date.  The company’s Level 3 assets include the valuation of other investments as determined using a probability-based discounted cash flow approach.

	Fair market value	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets	Significant other    observable inputs	Significant   unobservable inputs
		Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
Available-for-sale securities	16,064	16,064	-	-
Convertible debenture receivable	7,039	-	7,039	-
Other Investments	26,700	-	-	26,700
Derivatives	518	-	518	-
Long-term convertible debt	(106,688)	-	(106,688)	-
Total	(56,367)	16,064	(99,131)	26,700

ii) In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, Fair Value Option For Financial Assets and Liabilities, which permits entities to choose to measure various financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  The adoption of SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008 did not have a material effect on the company’s results of operations or financial position.

31

Silver Standard Resources Inc.

(a development stage company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008

(tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated - unaudited

14  MATERIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (Cont’d)

vii) Impact of recently issued accounting standards

i) In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, which specifies that non-controlling interests are to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside of equity. Because non-controlling interests are an element of equity, increases and decreases in the parent's ownership interest that leave control intact are accounted for as capital transactions.

The statement is effective for business combinations entered into on or after December 15, 2008, and is to be applied prospectively to all non-controlling interests, including any that arose before the effective date.  The effect of the adoption of this Statement to the company’s results of operations or financial position is still being determined.

ii) In December 2007, the FASB issued a revised standard on accounting for business combinations, SFAS 141R.   The statement is effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008.  We do not expect the adoption of this Interpretation to have a significant effect on the company’s results of operations or financial position, until the company enters into a business combination.

iii) In May 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position Accounting Principles Board 14-1 (“FSP APB 14-1”), which revises the accounting treatment for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion.  FSP APB 14-1 requires the issuer to separately account for the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments.  The value assigned to the liability component would be the estimated fair value, as of the date of issuance, of similar debt without the conversion option, but including any other embedded features.  The difference between the proceeds of the debt and the value allocated to the liability component would be recorded in equity.  The standard is effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and is to be applied retrospectively.  The effect of the adoption of this Statement to the company’s results of operations or financial position is still being determined.

iv) In June 2008, FASB Task Force reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock”.  The standard provides that an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) would not be considered indexed to the entity’s own stock if the strike price is denominated in a currency other than the issuer’s functional currency.  The Issue is effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008.  The effect of adopting this EITF on the company’s results of operations or financial position is still being determined.

32