SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005

Commission file number: 001-13100

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	56-1871668
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600, Raleigh, N.C.

(Address of principal executive office)

27604

(Zip Code)

(919) 872-4924

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of ‘accelerated filer’ and ‘large accelerated filer’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act.    Large accelerated filer  x     Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The Company had 54,136,934 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 30, 2006.

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	2
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004	4
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2005	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	26
	Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements	26
	Overview	26
	Results of Operations	29
	Liquidity and Capital Resources	32
	Critical Accounting Estimates	38
	Funds From Operations	39
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	41
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	42
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45
Item 6.	Exhibits	45

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We refer to (1) Highwoods Properties, Inc. as the “Company,” (2) Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership as the “Operating Partnership,” (3) the Company’s common stock as “Common Stock,” (4) the Company’s preferred stock as “Preferred Stock,” (5) the Operating Partnership’s common partnership interests as “Common Units,” (6) the Operating Partnership’s preferred partnership interests as “Preferred Units” and (7) in-service properties (excluding apartment units) to which the Company has title and 100.0% ownership rights as the “Wholly Owned Properties.”

The information furnished in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) that are, in our opinion, necessary for a fair presentation of the aforementioned financial statements for the interim period.

The aforementioned financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Risk Factors included herein and in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited and $ in thousands, except per share amounts)

	March 31, 2005			December 31, 2004
Assets:
Real estate assets, at cost:
Land	$	406,953		$	411,043
Buildings and tenant improvements		2,872,822			2,883,631
Development in process		41,791			26,349
Land held for development		178,897			182,945
Furniture fixtures and equipment		22,654			22,403
		3,523,117			3,526,371
Less – accumulated depreciation		(607,040	)		(595,262	)
Net real estate assets		2,916,077			2,931,109
Real estate and other assets, net of accumulated depreciation, held for sale		21,478			47,134
Cash and cash equivalents		55,342			24,482
Restricted cash		3,711			3,875
Accounts receivable, net		14,141			15,423
Notes receivable		7,634			8,447
Accrued straight-line rents receivable, net		63,736			61,353
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates		72,231			72,610
Deferred financing and leasing costs, net		64,611			65,019
Prepaid expenses and other		11,975			10,206
Total Assets	$	3,230,936		$	3,239,658
Liabilities, Minority Interest in the Operating Partnership and Stockholders’ Equity:
Mortgages and notes payable	$	1,582,389		$	1,572,574
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		118,216			119,935
Financing obligations		63,208			65,309
Total Liabilities		1,763,813			1,757,818
Minority interest in the Operating Partnership		106,079			113,730
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 authorized shares;
8 5/8% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $1,000 per share), 104,945 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004		104,945			104,945
8% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25 per share), 6,900,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004		172,500			172,500
8% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $250 per share), 400,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004		100,000			100,000
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 authorized shares; 54,052,810 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2005 and 53,813,422 at December 31, 2004, respectively		540			538
Additional paid-in capital		1,420,437			1,416,130
Distributions in excess of net earnings		(428,553	)		(419,078	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,675	)		(2,814	)
Deferred compensation		(6,150	)		(4,111	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity		1,361,044			1,368,110
Total Liabilities, Minority Interest in the Operating Partnership and Stockholders’ Equity	$	3,230,936		$	3,239,658

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited and in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Rental and other revenues	$	115,527		$	117,921
Operating expenses:
Rental property and other expenses		40,821			44,546
Depreciation and amortization		35,122			32,142
Impairment of assets held for use		2,572			—
General and administrative		8,429			11,344
Total operating expenses		86,944			88,032
Interest expense:
Contractual		25,588			27,449
Amortization of deferred financing costs		847			1,165
Financing obligations		1,647			4,693
		28,082			33,307
Other income:
Interest and other income		1,980			1,785
Loss on debt extinguishment		(27	)		—
		1,953			1,785
Income/(loss) before disposition of property, minority interest and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		2,454			(1,633	)
Gains on disposition of property, net		403			888
Minority interest in the Operating Partnership		183			704
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		2,641			1,240
Income from continuing operations		5,681			1,199
Discontinued operations:
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interest		1,331			1,581
Net gains on sales of discontinued operations, net of minority interest, including a gain from a related party transaction of $3,864 in 2005		14,142			3,358
		15,473			4,939
Net income		21,154			6,138
Dividends on preferred stock		(7,713	)		(7,713	)
Net income available for/(loss attributable to) common stockholders	$	13,441		$	(1,575	)
Net income/(loss) per common share—basic:
(Loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.12	)
Income from discontinued operations		0.29			0.09
Net income/(loss)	$	0.25		$	(0.03	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic		53,644			53,186
Net income/(loss) per common share—diluted:
(Loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.12	)
Income from discontinued operations		0.29			0.09
Net income/(loss)	$	0.25		$	(0.03	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted		53,644			53,186
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.425		$	0.425

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005

(Unaudited and in thousands, except share amounts)

	Number of Common Shares	Common Stock		Series A Preferred		Series B Preferred		Series D Preferred		Additional Paid-In Capital			Deferred Compen- sation			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Distributions in Excess of Net Earnings			Total
Balance at December 31, 2004	53,813,422	$	538	$	104,945	$	172,500	$	100,000	$	1,416,130		$	(4,111	)	$	(2,814	)	$	(419,078	)	$	1,368,110
Issuance of Common Stock, net	129,880		1		—		—		—		2,198			—			—			—			2,199
Common Stock Dividends	—		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			(22,916	)		(22,916	)
Preferred Stock Dividends	—		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			(7,713	)		(7,713	)
Adjustment to minority interest of unitholders in the Operating Partnership	—		—		—		—		—		(542	)		—			—			—			(542	)
Issuance of Restricted Stock, net	109,508		1		—		—		—		1,419			(1,420	)		—			—			—
Fair market value of options granted	—		—		—		—		—		1,232			(1,232	)		—			—			—
Amortization of equity-based compensation	—		—		—		—		—		—			613			—			—			613
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—		—		—		—			—			139			—			139
Net income	—		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			21,154			21,154
Balance at March 31, 2005	54,052,810	$	540	$	104,945	$	172,500	$	100,000	$	1,420,437		$	(6,150	)	$	(2,675	)	$	(428,553	)	$	1,361,044

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited and in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
				(Revised – See Note 1)
Operating activities:
Net income	$	21,154		$	6,138
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		35,258			33,145
Amortization of lease incentives		234			244
Impairment of assets held for use		2,572			—
Amortization of equity-based compensation		613			1,877
Amortization of deferred financing costs		847			1,165
Amortization of accumulated other comprehensive loss		176			210
(Gains) and impairments on disposition of property, net		(16,127	)		(4,636	)
Minority interest in the Operating Partnership		1,548			(130	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		(2,641	)		(1,240	)
Change in financing obligations		(306	)		1,447
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated affiliates		1,942			962
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		(15,161	)		(3,891	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		30,109			35,291
Investing activities:
Additions to real estate assets and deferred leasing costs		(33,921	)		(28,325	)
Proceeds from disposition of real estate assets		54,227			21,774
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated affiliates		964			829
Net repayments in notes receivable		1,599			(15	)
Contributions to unconsolidated affiliates		—			(9,988	)
Other investing activities		107			(38	)
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities		22,976			(15,763	)
Financing activities:
Distributions paid on common stock and common units		(25,443	)		(25,368	)
Dividends paid on preferred stock		(7,713	)		(7,713	)
Net proceeds from the sale of common stock		2,199			320
Repurchase of common units		(989	)		(50	)
Borrowings on revolving loan		37,000			175,500
Repayment of revolving loan		(27,000	)		(100,000	)
Borrowings on mortgages and notes payable		6,696			—
Repayment of mortgages and notes payable		(6,924	)		(3,252	)
Payments on financing obligations		—			(62,500	)
Additions to deferred financing costs		(51	)		(379	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(22,225	)		(23,442	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		30,860			(3,914	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		24,482			21,696
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	55,342		$	17,782
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized	$	22,687		$	22,425

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued

(Unaudited and in thousands)

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:

The following table summarizes the net assets acquired/disposed subject to mortgage notes payable and other non-cash transactions:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Assets:
Net real estate assets	$	(5,923	)	$	1,916
Accounts receivable		(363	)		—
Notes receivable		231			702
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates		—			(2,645	)
Deferred leasing costs, net		—			260
Prepaid and other		—			(104	)
	$	(6,055	)	$	129
Liabilities:
Mortgages and notes payable		43			—
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		127			129
	$	170		$	129
Minority Interest and Stockholders’ Equity	$	(6,225	)	$	—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2005

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Description of the Company

Highwoods Properties, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that operates in the southeastern and midwestern United States. As of March 31, 2005, the Company’s wholly owned assets included: 439 in-service office, industrial and retail properties; 156 apartment units; 1,115 acres of undeveloped land suitable for future development; and an additional five properties under development.

The Company conducts substantially all of its activities through, and substantially all of its interests in the properties are held directly or indirectly by, Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. At March 31, 2005, the Company owned 100.0% of the preferred partnership interests (“Preferred Units”) and 90.2% of the common partnership interests (“Common Units”) in the Operating Partnership. Limited partners (including certain officers and directors of the Company) own the remaining Common Units. Each Common Unit is redeemable for the cash value of one share of the Company’s common stock, $.01 par value (the “Common Stock”), or, at the Company’s option, one share of Common Stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company redeemed in cash or property from limited partners 273,648 Common Units, which increased the percentage of Common Units owned by the Company to 90.2% at March 31, 2005 from 89.8% at December 31, 2004. Preferred Units in the Operating Partnership were issued to the Company in connection with the Company’s preferred stock offerings in 1997 and 1998 (the “Preferred Stock”). The net proceeds raised from each of the Preferred Stock issuances were contributed by the Company to the Operating Partnership in exchange for the Preferred Units. The terms of each series of Preferred Units generally parallel the terms of the respective Preferred Stock as to dividends, liquidation and redemption rights.

Basis of Presentation

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). The presentation in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows of operating cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2004 have been revised by beginning with net income, rather than income from continuing operations. As more fully described in Note 9, as required by SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” (“SFAS No. 144”), the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2004 and the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 were revised from previously reported amounts to reflect in real estate and other assets held for sale and in discontinued operations the assets and operations for those properties sold or held for sale in the first quarter of 2005 which qualified for discontinued operations.

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the Operating Partnership, wholly owned subsidiaries and those subsidiaries in which the Company owns a majority voting interest with the ability to control operations of the subsidiaries and where no approval, veto or other important rights have been granted to the minority stockholders. In accordance with Statement of Position 78-9, “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures,” the Company consolidates partnerships, joint ventures and limited liability companies when the Company controls the major operating and financial policies of the entity through majority ownership or in its capacity as general partner or managing member. The Company does not consolidate entities where the other interest holders have important rights, including the right to approve decisions to encumber the entities with debt and acquire or dispose of properties. In addition, the Company consolidates those entities, if any, where the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary in a variable interest entity (as defined by FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46(R)”)). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.

8

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION - Continued

The Company has elected and expects to continue to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal or state income taxes on its net income that it distributes to stockholders. Continued qualification as a REIT depends on the Company’s ability to satisfy the dividend distribution tests, stock ownership requirements and various other qualification tests prescribed in the Code. In June 1994, the Company formed a taxable REIT subsidiary, as permitted under the Code, through which it conducts certain business activities. The taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to federal and state income taxes on its net taxable income and the Company records provisions for such taxes, to the extent required, based on its income recognized for financial statement purposes, including the effects of temporary differences between such income and the amount recognized for tax purposes.

The accompanying unaudited financial information, in the opinion of management, contains all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company has condensed or omitted certain notes and other information from the interim financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Minority Interest in the Operating Partnership

Minority interest in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements relates to the common ownership interests in the Operating Partnership owned by various individuals and entities other than the Company. As of March 31, 2005, the minority interest in the Operating Partnership consisted of approximately 5.8 million Common Units. Minority interest in the net income of the Operating Partnership is computed by applying the weighted average percentage of Common Units not owned by the Company during the period (as a percent of the total number of outstanding Common Units) to the Operating Partnership’s net income/(loss) after deducting distributions on Preferred Units. The result is the amount of minority interest expense or income recorded for the period. In addition, when a Common Unitholder redeems a Common Unit for a share of Common Stock or cash, the minority interest is reduced and the Company’s share in the Operating Partnership is increased. At the end of each reporting period, the Company determines the amount that represents the minority unitholders’ share of the net assets (at book value) of the Operating Partnership and compares this amount to the minority interest balance that resulted from transactions during the period involving minority interest. The Company adjusts the minority interest liability to the computed share of net assets with an offsetting adjustment to the Company’s paid in capital.

Following is the minority interest in the net income of the Operating Partnership:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Amount shown as minority interest in continuing operations	$	183		$	704
Amount related to income from discontinued operations		(149	)		(184	)
Amount related to gain on sale of discontinued operations		(1,582	)		(390	)
Total minority interest in net income of the Operating Partnership	$	(1,548	)	$	130

9

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION - Continued

Stock – Based Compensation

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS No. 148”), the Company expenses all stock options issued on or after January 1, 2003 over the vesting period based upon the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The unamortized value of option grants since January 1, 2003 aggregated $2.1 million at March 31, 2005. See below for the amounts that would have been deducted from net income if the Company had elected to expense the fair value of all stock option awards that had vested rather than only those awards issued subsequent to January 1, 2003:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Net income available for/(loss) attributable to common stockholders – as reported	$	13,441		$	(1,575	)
Add: Stock option expense included in reported net income (1)		82			128	(1)
Deduct: Total stock option expense determined under fair value recognition method for all awards (1)		(169	)		(274	)(1)
Pro forma net income/(loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	13,354		$	(1,721	)
Basic net income/(loss) per common share - as reported	$	0.25		$	(0.03	)
Basic net income/(loss) per common share - pro forma	$	0.25		$	(0.03	)
Diluted net income/(loss) per common share - as reported	$	0.25		$	(0.03	)
Diluted net income/(loss) per common share - pro forma	$	0.25		$	(0.03	)

(1) Amounts include the effect of dividend equivalent rights.

Impact of Newly Adopted and Issued Accounting Standards

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47 (“FIN 47”) “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of SFAS No. 143” which clarifies that a liability for the performance of asset retirement activities should be recorded if the obligation to perform such activities is unconditional, whether or not the timing or method of settlement of the obligation may be conditional on a future event. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of 2005. The Company implemented FIN 47 in the fourth quarter of 2005, and the application of FIN 47 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In July 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) SOP 78-9-1, “Interaction of AICPA Statement of Position 78-9 and EITF Issue No. 04-5.” The EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights,” stating that a general partner is presumed to control a limited partnership and should consolidate the limited partnership unless the limited partners possess substantive kick-out rights or the limited partners possess substantive participating rights. This FSP eliminates the concept of “important rights” of SOP 78-9 and replaces it with the concepts of “kick-out rights” and “substantive participating rights” as defined in Issue 04-5. This FSP is effective after June 29, 2005 for general partners of all new partnerships formed and for existing partnerships for which the partnership agreements are modified. For general partners in all other partnerships, the guidance in this FSP is effective no later than January 1, 2006. The Company currently expects to consolidate one of its existing joint ventures, Highwoods-Markel Associates, LLC, upon the adoption of this FSP in January 2006; the Company expects to treat this as a change of accounting principle as permitted by the FSP. The change is not expected to have any effect on the Company’s net income. The Consolidated Balance Sheet is expected to be impacted by including approximately $50 million of real estate assets, net of accumulated depreciation, and other assets, approximately $40 million in mortgages and notes payable and other liabilities, with the remaining effects to investments in unconsolidated affiliates and to minority interest.

10

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION - Continued

Impact of Newly Adopted and Issued Accounting Standards - Continued

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (R), “Share-Based Payment,” which revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” to require all share-based payments to employees to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. SFAS No. 123 (R) must be adopted no later than January 1, 2006. On January 1, 2006, the Company plans to adopt the modified prospective method in which compensation cost is based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 (R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123 (R) that remain unvested on the effective date. Because the Company has used a fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation costs for all employee stock compensation awards granted, modified or settled since January 1, 2003 and does not expect to have significant unvested awards from periods prior to January 1, 2003 outstanding at January 1, 2006, the Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R) to have a material impact on its financial condition and results of operations upon adoption.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 153, “Exchange of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29” (SFAS No. 153). The amendment eliminates the use of the “similar productive assets” concept to account for nonmonetary exchanges at book value with no gain being recognized and requires that nonmonetary exchanges be accounted for at fair value, recognizing any gain or loss, if the transactions meet a commercial-substance criterion and fair value is determinable. The Statement is effective for nonmonetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company will apply SFAS No. 153 to any applicable transactions occurring on or after January 1, 2006.

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (SFAS No. 154). The Statement replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” (APB Opinion No. 20) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. This Statement requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. The Statement is effective for any accounting changes and corrections of errors made on or after January 1, 2006.

11

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

2. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AND OTHER AFFILIATES

During the past several years, the Company has formed various joint ventures with unrelated investors. The Company has retained minority equity interests ranging from 12.50% to 50.00% in these joint ventures. The Company generally has accounted for its unconsolidated joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. As a result, the assets and liabilities of these joint ventures for which the Company uses the equity method of accounting are not included on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. One joint venture is accounted for as a financing arrangement pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 66, as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and another joint venture is consolidated pursuant to FIN 46(R). These two joint ventures are not reflected in the tables below.

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates as of March 31, 2005 and combined summarized financial information for our unconsolidated joint ventures for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

Office Property	Location	Total Rentable Square Feet (000)		Ownership Interest
Board of Trade Investment Company	Kansas City, MO	166		49.00	%
Dallas County Partners I, LP	Des Moines, IA	641		50.00	%
Dallas County Partners II, LP	Des Moines, IA	272		50.00	%
Dallas County Partners III, LP	Des Moines, IA	7		50.00	%
Fountain Three	Des Moines, IA	710		50.00	%
RRHWoods, LLC	Des Moines, IA	769	(1)	50.00	%
Kessinger/Hunter, LLC	Kansas City, MO	—		26.50	%
4600 Madison Associates, LLC	Kansas City, MO	262		12.50	%
Plaza Colonnade, LLC	Kansas City, MO	285		50.00	%
Highwoods DLF 98/29, LP	Atlanta, GA; Charlotte, NC; Greensboro, NC; Raleigh, NC; Orlando, FL; Baltimore, MD	1,199		22.81	%
Highwoods DLF 97/26 DLF 99/32, LP	Atlanta, GA; Greensboro, NC; Orlando, FL	822		42.93	%
Highwoods KC Glenridge Office, LP	Atlanta, GA	185		40.00	%
Highwoods KC Glenridge Land, LP	Atlanta, GA	—		40.00	%
HIW-KC Orlando LLC	Orlando, FL	1,271		40.00	%
Concourse Center Associates, LLC	Greensboro, NC	118		50.00	%
Highwoods-Markel Associates, LLC	Richmond, VA	412		50.00	%
Weston Lakeside, LLC	Raleigh, NC	—		50.00	%
Total		7,119

(1) Includes 75,000 square feet for an office building currently under development.

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005		2004
Income Statements:
Revenues	$	34,649	$	24,086
Expenses:
Interest expense and loan cost amortization		8,316		5,848
Depreciation and amortization		7,251		4,941
Operating expenses		13,991		10,236
Total expenses		29,558		21,025
Net income	$	5,091	$	3,061
The Company’s share of:
Net income (1)	$	2,641	$	1,240
Interest expense and loan cost amortization	$	3,463	$	2,426
Depreciation and amortization (real estate related)	$	2,643	$	2,015

(1) The Company’s share of net income is greater than its weighted average ownership percentage in the joint ventures due to purchase accounting and other related adjustments.

12

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

2. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AND OTHER AFFILIATES - Continued

On September 27, 2004, the Company and an affiliate of Crosland, Inc. (“Crosland”) formed Weston Lakeside, LLC, in which the Company has a 50.0% ownership interest. On June 29, 2005, the Company contributed 22.4 acres of land at an agreed upon value of $3.9 million to this joint venture, and Crosland contributed approximately $2.0 million in cash; immediately thereafter, the joint venture distributed approximately $1.9 million to the Company and a gain of $0.5 million was recorded. Crosland will develop, manage and operate this joint venture, which is now constructing approximately 332 rental residential units at a total estimated cost of approximately $33 million expected to be completed by the second quarter of 2007. Crosland, Inc. will receive 3.25% of all project costs other than land as a development fee and 3.5% of gross revenue of the joint venture in management fees. The Company is providing certain development services for the project and will receive a fee equal to 1.0% of all project costs excluding land. The joint venture is financing the development with a $28.4 million construction loan that is guaranteed by Crosland, Inc. The Company has accounted for this joint venture using the equity method of accounting.

On December 22, 2004, the Company and Easlan Investment Group, Inc. (“Easlan”) formed The Vinings at University Center, LLC. The Company contributed 7.8 acres of land at an agreed upon value of $1.6 million to the joint venture in December 2004 in return for a 50.0% equity interest and Easlan contributed $1.1 million, in the form of non-interest bearing promissory notes, for a 50.0% equity interest in the entity. Upon formation, the joint venture entered into a $9.7 million secured construction loan to complete the construction of 156 apartment units on the 7.8 acres of land. Easlan has guaranteed this construction loan, and at December 31, 2005, $7.7 million had been borrowed on the loan. The construction of the apartments was completed in the first quarter of 2006. Easlan is the manager and leasing agent for these apartment units and receives customary management fees and leasing commissions. The Company has received development fees throughout the construction project and will receive management fees of 1.0% of gross revenues at the time the apartments are 80.0% occupied. The Company is currently consolidating this joint venture under the provisions of FIN 46(R) because Easlan has no at-risk equity and accordingly the Company absorbs the majority of the joint venture’s expected losses. Accordingly, the Company’s balance sheet at March 31, 2005 includes $1.9 million of development in process and a $0.4 million construction note payable.

For additional information regarding our investments in unconsolidated and other affiliates, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

3. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

For information regarding sale transactions that were accounted for as financing arrangements at March 31, 2005 under paragraphs 25 through 29 of SFAS No. 66, see Note 5 herein and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

4. ASSET DISPOSITIONS

During 2005 and the first quarter of 2006, the Company’s dispositions consisted of the following:

	For the Year 2005								First Quarter 2006
	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter
Operating properties (square feet in thousands)		1,179		690		2,733		263		1,999
Land held for development (acres)		—		77.4		50.0		71.8		60.6
Gross sale proceeds on operating properties	$	61,199	$	39,900	$	264,558	$	20,563	$	153,900
Gross sale proceeds on development land	$	—	$	14,190	$	3,134	$	7,795	$	6,087

13

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

4. ASSET DISPOSITIONS - Continued

Included among the dispositions of operating properties during 2005 were the following larger transactions, all of which except the Eastshore transaction were recorded as discontinued operations. In the first quarter, the Company sold an office building in Raleigh, North Carolina to an owner/user for gross proceeds of approximately $27.3 million. In the first and second quarters, the Company sold industrial buildings in Winston-Salem, North Carolina for gross proceeds of approximately $27.0 million, as more fully described in Note 6 herein. In the second quarter, the Company sold two vacant buildings in Highwoods Preserve, Tampa, Florida to an owner/user for gross proceeds of approximately $24.5 million. In the third quarter, the Company sold all of its operating properties and certain vacant land in Charlotte, North Carolina and certain operating properties in Tampa, Florida in a single transaction for gross proceeds of approximately $228 million. In connection with this sale, the Company closed its division office in Charlotte and incurred employee severance costs of approximately $0.6 million, which were charged to general and administrative expenses during the second and third quarters. In the third quarter, the Company also recognized as a completed sale a transaction involving three office buildings in Richmond, Virginia that were sold in 2002 (“Eastshore”); this transaction had been accounted for as a financing due to a significant guarantee of rent under leases in the sold properties that was made by the Company when the sale occurred in 2002, as more fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10K. This transaction was recorded as a completed sale transaction in July 2005 when the maximum exposure to loss under the guarantees became less than the related deferred gain; accordingly, $1.7 million in gain was recognized in the third and fourth quarters of 2005 and additional gain will be recognized in 2006 and 2007 as the maximum exposure under the guarantees is reduced. Payments made under rent guarantees after July 2005 are recorded as a reduction of the deferred gain.

In the first quarter of 2006, the Company sold office and industrial properties in Atlanta, Georgia, Columbia, South Carolina and Tampa, Florida in a single transaction for gross proceeds of approximately $141 million. This transaction was classified as held for sale and an impairment loss of $7.7 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. The properties subject to this sale were recorded as discontinued operations in fourth quarter 2005.

Gains, losses and impairments on disposition of properties, net, from dispositions not classified as discontinued operations, consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005		2004
Gains on disposition of land	$	153	$	1,036
Gains/(losses) on disposition of depreciable properties		250		(148	)
Total	$	403	$	888

The gains on land and operating properties in the first quarter 2005 relate to minor condemnation, deferred gain recognition from prior sales and adjustments to prior sale transactions.

Net gains on sale and impairments of discontinued operations, net of minority interest, consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Gains on disposition of depreciable properties	$	15,724		$	3,748
Allocable minority interest		(1,582	)		(390	)
Total	$	14,142		$	3,358

See Note 9 for information on discontinued operations and impairment of long-lived assets.

14

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

5. MORTGAGES, NOTES PAYABLE AND FINANCING OBLIGATIONS

The Company’s consolidated mortgages and notes payable consisted of the following at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:

	March 31, 2005		December 31, 2004
Secured mortgage loans	$	822,389	$	822,574
Unsecured loans		760,000		750,000
Total	$	1,582,389	$	1,572,574

As of March 31, 2005, the Company’s outstanding mortgages and notes payable were secured by real estate assets with an aggregate undepreciated book value of approximately $1.4 billion.

Refinancings and Preferred Stock Redemptions in 2005 and 2006

During 2005 and the first quarter of 2006, the Company paid off $196.2 million of outstanding loans, excluding any normal debt amortization, which included $176.2 million of secured debt with a weighted average interest rate of 6.9% and $20.0 million of unsecured floating rate debt with an interest rate of 4.9%. Included in the $176.2 million was $89.8 million of floating rate secured debt. The Company incurred $0.5 million loss on debt extinguishments in 2005 in connection with these loan pay-downs. Approximately $350 million of real estate assets (based on undepreciated cost basis) became unencumbered after paying off the secured debt. The Company also used some of the proceeds from its disposition activity to redeem, in August 2005 and February 2006, all of the Company’s outstanding Series D Preferred Shares and 3.2 million of its outstanding Series B Preferred Shares, aggregating $180.0 million plus accrued dividends. These reductions in outstanding debt and preferred stock balances were made primarily from proceeds from property dispositions that closed in 2005 and 2006 described in Note 4. In connection with the redemption of preferred stock, the excess of the redemption cost over the net carrying amount of the redeemed shares was recorded as a reduction to net income available for common shareholders. These reductions amounted to $4.3 million and $1.7 million for the third quarter of 2005 and first quarter of 2006, respectively.

On May 1, 2006, the Company obtained a new $350.0 million, three-year unsecured revolving credit facility from Bank of America, N.A. The Company used $273.0 million of proceeds from the new revolving credit facility, together with available cash, to pay off the remaining outstanding balance of $178.0 million under its previous revolving credit facility and a $100.0 million bank term loan, both of which have now been terminated. Loss on debt extinguishments of approximately $0.5 million will be recorded in second quarter 2006. The Company and Bank of America plan to syndicate the new revolving credit facility later in 2006.

The new revolving credit facility is initially scheduled to mature on May 1, 2009. The Company has an option to extend the maturity date by one additional year assuming no default exists and, at any time prior to May 1, 2008, may request increases in the borrowing availability under the credit facility by up to an additional $100.0 million. The increases in borrowing availability are subject to approval by the lender(s). The interest rate has been reduced from LIBOR plus 105 basis points to LIBOR plus 80 basis points and the annual base facility fee has been reduced from 25 basis points to 20 basis points.

In May, July, August and September 2005 and February 2006, the Company obtained waivers from the lenders under its previous $250.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility and its previous bank term loans related to timely reporting to the lenders of annual and quarterly financial statements and to covenant violations that could arise from future redemptions of preferred stock due to the reclassification of the preferred stock from equity to a liability during the period of time from the announcement of the redemption until the redemption is completed. The aforementioned modifications did not change the economic terms of the loans. In connection with these modifications, the Company incurred certain loan costs that are capitalized and amortized over the remaining term of the loans.

15

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

5. MORTGAGES, NOTES PAYABLE AND FINANCING OBLIGATIONS - Continued

Financing Obligations

The Company’s financing obligations consisted of the following at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:

	March 31, 2005		December 31, 2004
SF-HIW Harborview, LP financing obligation	$	14,488	$	14,808
Eastshore financing obligation		28,774		28,777
Capitalized ground lease obligation (1)		—		1,778
Tax increment financing obligation (2)		19,946		19,946
Total	$	63,208	$	65,309

(1) This liability represents a capitalized lease obligation to the lessor of land on which the Company owned a building. The Company was obligated to make fixed payments to the lessor through March 2010. The net present value of these payments discounted at 7.13% is shown as a liability in the balance sheet, which accretes each month for the difference between the interest on the financing obligation and the fixed payments. The accretion would continue until the liability equals the residual value of the land. On March 31, 2005, this liability was settled as a result of the sale of the building and assumption by the buyer of the Company’s ground lease.

(2) In connection with tax increment financing for construction of a public garage related to an office building constructed by the Company in 2000, the Company is obligated to pay fixed special assessments over a 20-year period. The net present value of these assessments, discounted at 6.93%, is shown as a financing obligation in the balance sheet. The Company also receives special tax revenues and property tax rebates which are intended, but not guaranteed, to provide funds to pay the special assessments.

6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has previously reported that it had a contract to acquire development land in the Bluegrass Valley office development project from GAPI, Inc., a corporation controlled by Gene H. Anderson, an executive officer and director of the Company. Under the terms of the contract, the development land was purchased in phases, and the purchase price for each phase or parcel was settled in cash and/or Common Units. The price for the various parcels was based on an initial value for each parcel, adjusted for an interest factor, applied up to the closing date and also for changes in the value of the Common Units. On January 17, 2003, the Company acquired an additional 23.5 acres of this land from GAPI, Inc. for 85,520 shares of Common Stock and $384,000 in cash for total consideration of $2.3 million. In May 2003, 4.0 acres of the remaining acres not yet acquired by the Company was taken by the Georgia Department of Transportation to develop a roadway interchange for consideration of $1.8 million. The Department of Transportation took possession and title of the property in June 2003. As part of the terms of the contract between the Company and GAPI, Inc., the Company was entitled to and received in 2003 the $1.8 million proceeds from the condemnation. In July 2003, the Company appealed the condemnation and is currently seeking additional payment from the state; the recognition of any gain has been deferred pending resolution of the appeal process. In April 2005, the Company acquired for cash an additional 12.1 acres of the Bluegrass Valley land from GAPI, Inc. and also settled for cash the final purchase price with GAPI, Inc. on the 4.0 acres that were taken by the Georgia Department of Transportation, which aggregated approximately $2.7 million, of which $0.7 million was recorded as a payable to GAPI, Inc. on the Company’s financial statements as of March 31, 2005. In August 2005, the Company acquired 12.7 acres, representing the last parcel of land to be acquired, for cash of $3.2 million. The Company believes that the purchase price with respect to each land parcel was at or below market value. These transactions were unanimously approved by the full Board of Directors with Mr. Anderson abstaining from the vote. The contract provided that the land parcels could be paid in Common Units or in cash, at the option of the seller. This feature constituted an embedded derivative pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The embedded derivative feature was accounted for separately and adjusted based on changes in the fair value of the Common Units. This resulted in an increase to other income of $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2005 and $0.03 million in the first quarter of 2004. In the remainder of 2005, $0.3 million in expense was recorded related to the embedded derivative, which expired upon the closing of the final land transaction in August 2005.

16

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS - Continued

On February 28, 2005 and April 15, 2005, the Company sold through a third party broker three non-core industrial buildings in Winston-Salem, North Carolina to John L. Turner and certain of his affiliates for a gross sales price of approximately $27.0 million, of which $20.3 million was paid in cash and the remainder from the surrender of 256,508 Common Units. The Company recorded a gain of approximately $4.8 million upon the closing of these sales. Mr. Turner, who was a director at the time of these transactions, retired from the Board of Directors effective December 31, 2005. The Company believes that the purchase price paid for these assets by Mr. Turner and his affiliates was equal to their fair market value. The sales were unanimously approved by the full Board of Directors with Mr. Turner not being present to discuss or vote on the matter.

7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The interest rate on all of the Company’s variable rate debt is adjusted at one to three month intervals, subject to settlements under any outstanding interest rate hedge contracts. The Company received net payments from counter parties under interest rate hedge contracts totaling $0.04 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005, which was recorded as a decrease to interest expense.

The AOCL balance at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $2.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively, and consisted of deferred gains and losses from past cash flow hedging instruments which are being recognized as interest expense over the terms of the related debt (see Note 8). The Company expects that the portion of the cumulative loss recorded in AOCL at March 31, 2005 associated with these derivative instruments, which will be recognized as interest expense within the next 12 months, will be approximately $0.7 million.

As described in Note 6, the land purchase agreement with GAPI, Inc. included an embedded derivative feature due to the price for the land parcels being determined by the fair value of Common Units, which was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133.

8. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Other comprehensive income represents net income plus the changes in certain amounts deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) related to hedging activities not reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The components of other comprehensive income are as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Net income	$	21,154		$	6,138
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized derivative losses on cash-flow hedges		(37	)		(85	)
Amortization of hedging gains and losses included in other comprehensive income		176			210
Total other comprehensive income		139			125
Total comprehensive income	$	21,293		$	6,263

17

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

9. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND THE IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

As part of its business strategy, the Company will from time to time selectively dispose of non-core properties and use the net proceeds for investments or other purposes. The table below sets forth the net operating results and net carrying value of those assets classified as discontinued operations. These assets classified as discontinued operations comprise 2.4 million square feet of office and industrial properties and 88 apartment units sold during 2004 and the first quarter of 2005 and 0.5 million square feet of property held for sale at March 31, 2005. These long-lived assets relate to disposal activities that were initiated subsequent to the effective date of SFAS No. 144, or that met certain stipulations prescribed by SFAS No. 144. The operations of these assets have been reclassified from the ongoing operations of the Company to discontinued operations, and the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations after the disposal transactions:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Rental and other revenues	$	2,119		$	4,524
Operating expenses:
Rental property and other expenses		474			1,736
Depreciation and amortization		136			1,003
Total operating expenses		610			2,739
Interest expense		32			31
Other income		3			11
Income before minority interest in the Operating Partnership and net gains on sale and impairment of discontinued operations		1,480			1,765
Minority interest in discontinued operations		(149	)		(184	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interest in the Operating Partnership		1,331			1,581
Net gains on sale and impairment of discontinued operations		15,724			3,748
Minority interest in discontinued operations		(1,582	)		(390	)
Net gains on sale and impairment of discontinued operations, net of minority interest in the Operating Partnership		14,142			3,358
Total discontinued operations	$	15,473		$	4,939

The net book value of property classified as discontinued operations that were held for sale at March 31, 2005 or were sold during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 aggregated approximately $41.7 million.

Certain other assets were sold during 2004 that did not meet the criteria of SFAS No. 144 to be classified as discontinued operations due to the Company’s ongoing management and/or leasing services on behalf of the new owners.

SFAS No. 144 also requires that a long-lived asset classified as held for sale be measured at the lower of the carrying value or fair value less cost to sell. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, there were no properties held for sale which had a carrying value that was greater than fair value less cost to sell; therefore, no impairment losses related to assets sold or held for sale were recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

SFAS No. 144 also requires that if indicators of impairment exist, the carrying value of a long-lived asset classified as held for use be compared to the sum of its estimated undiscounted future cash flows. If the carrying value is greater than the sum of its undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment loss should be recognized for the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, one land parcel held for use had indicators of impairment where the carrying value exceeded the sum of estimated undiscounted future cash flows. Therefore, an impairment loss on assets held for use of $2.6 million was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2005. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, there were no similar impairment losses recorded.

18

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

9. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND THE IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS - Continued

The following table includes the major classes of assets and liabilities of the properties classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:

	March 31, 2005			December 31, 2004
Land	$	1,876		$	4,693
Land held for development		7,552			7,546
Buildings and tenant improvements		15,104			39,128
Development in process		—			—
Accumulated depreciation		(3,314	)		(4,529	)
Net real estate assets		21,218			46,838
Deferred leasing costs, net		80			124
Accrued straight-line rents receivable		165			165
Prepaid expenses and other		15			7
Total assets	$	21,478		$	47,134
Tenant security deposits and accrued real estate taxes	$	(203	)	$	(184	)

10. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Numerator:
Income from continuing operations	$	5,681		$	1,199
Non-convertible preferred stock dividends		(7,713	)		(7,713	)
Numerator for basic earnings/(loss) per share –
(Loss) from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders		(2,032	)		(6,514	)
Income from discontinued operations		15,473			4,939
Net income (loss)	$	13,441		$	(1,575	)
Denominator:
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings/(loss) per share - weighted-average shares		53,644			53,186
Basic earnings per share:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.12	)
Income from discontinued operations		0.29			0.09
Net income (loss)	$	0.25		$	(0.03	)
Diluted earnings per share (1):
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.12	)
Income from discontinued operations		0.29			0.09
Net income (loss)	$	0.25		$	(0.03	)

(1) Pursuant to SFAS No. 128, income/(loss) from continuing operations, after preferred dividends is the controlling number in determining whether potential common shares are dilutive or antidilutive. Because such potential common shares would be antidilutive to loss from continuing operations allocable to common shareholders, diluted earnings per share is the same as basic earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. Potential common shares include stock options, warrants, shares issuable upon conversions of Common Units and unvested restricted shares, and would have amounted to approximately 6.6 million shares and 6.9 million shares in the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition, potential common shares that would have been antidilutive due to the option or warrant exercise price being less than the average stock price for the periods reported were 3.3 million shares and 1.9 million shares at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

19

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalent investments and its restricted cash at financial institutions. The combined account balances at each institution typically exceed FDIC insurance coverage and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage.

Land Leases

Certain properties in the Company’s wholly owned portfolio are subject to land leases expiring through 2082. Rental payments on these leases are adjusted annually based on either the consumer price index (CPI) or on a pre-determined schedule. Land leases subject to increases under a pre-determined schedule are accounted for under the straight-line method.

For three properties, the Company has the option to purchase the leased land during the lease term at the greater of 85.0% of appraised value or $0.03 million per acre.

As of March 31, 2005, the Company’s payment obligations for future minimum payments on operating leases (which include scheduled fixed increases, but exclude increases based on CPI) were as follows:

Remainder of 2005	$	872
2006		1,139
2007		1,155
2008		1,172
2009		1,215
Thereafter		44,795
	$	50,348

Capital Expenditures

The Company incurs capital expenditures to lease space to its customers, maintain the quality of its existing properties and build new properties. Capital expenditures include tenant improvements, building improvements, new building completion costs and land infrastructure costs. Tenant improvements are the costs required to customize space for the specific needs of first-generation and second-generation customers. Building improvements are recurring capital costs not related to a specific customer to maintain existing buildings. New building completion costs are expenses for the construction of new buildings. Land infrastructure costs are expenses to prepare development land for future development activity that is not specifically related to a single building. Excluding recurring capital expenditures for leasing costs and tenant improvements and for normal building improvements, the Company’s expected future capital expenditures for started and/or committed new development projects as of May 15, 2006 were approximately $200 million, which includes several projects started or committed after December 31, 2005. A significant portion of these future expenditures are currently subject to binding contractual arrangements.

Environmental Matters

Substantially all of the Company’s in-service properties have been subjected to Phase I environmental assessments (and, in certain instances, Phase II environmental assessments). Such assessments and/or updates have not revealed, nor is management aware of, any environmental liability that management believes would have a material adverse effect on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

20

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - Continued

Joint Ventures

Certain properties owned in joint ventures with unaffiliated parties have buy/sell options that may be exercised to acquire the other partner’s interest by either the Company or its joint venture partner if certain conditions are met as set forth in the respective joint venture agreement.

Guarantees and Other Obligations

The following is a tabular presentation and related discussion of various guarantees and other obligations as of March 31, 2005:

Entity or Transaction	Type of Guarantee or Other Obligation	Amount Recorded/ Deferred		Date Guarantee Expires
Des Moines Joint Ventures (1),(6)	Debt	$	—	Various through
				11/2015
RRHWoods, LLC (2),(7)	Debt	$	—	8/2006
Plaza Colonnade (2),(8)	Indirect Debt (4)	$	58	12/2009
SF-HIW Harborview, LP (3),(5)	Rent and tenant improvement (4)	$	—	9/2007
Eastshore (Capital One) (3),(9)	Rent (4)	$	—	11/2007
Capital One (3),(10)	Rent (4)	$	1,278	10/2009
Industrial (3),(11)	Rent (4)	$	5,394	12/2006
Industrial Environmental (3),(11)	Rent (4)	$	140	Until Remediated
Highwoods DLF 97/26 DLF 99/32, LP (2),(12)	Rent (4)	$	855	6/2008
RRHWoods, LLC and Dallas County Partners (2),(13)	Indirect Debt (4)	$	649	6/2014
HIW-KC Orlando, LLC (3),(14)	Rent (4)	$	574	4/2011
HIW-KC Orlando, LLC (3),(14)	Leasing Costs	$	1,452	12/2024

(1) Represents guarantees entered into prior to the January 1, 2003 effective date of FIN 45 for initial recognition and measurement.

(2) Represents guarantees that fall under the initial recognition and measurement requirements of FIN 45.

(3) Represents guarantees that are excluded from the fair value accounting and disclosure provisions of FIN 45 since the existence of such guarantees prevents sale treatment and/or the recognition of profit from the sale transaction.

(4) The maximum potential amount of future payments disclosed below for these guarantees assumes the Company pays the maximum possible liability under the guaranty with no offsets or reductions. If the space is leased, it assumes the existing tenant defaults at March 31, 2005 and the space remains unleased through the remainder of the guaranty term. If the space is vacant, it assumes the space remains vacant through the expiration of the guaranty. Since it is assumed that no new tenant will occupy the space, lease commissions, if applicable, are excluded.

(5) As more fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, in 2002 the Company granted its partner in SF-HIW Harborview, LP a put option and also entered into a master lease arrangement for five years covering vacant space in the building owned by the partnership and agreed to pay certain tenant improvement costs. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make related to the rent guarantees and tenant improvements is $1.0 million as of March 31, 2005.

21

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - Continued

(6) The Company has guaranteed certain loans in connection with the Des Moines joint ventures. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under the guarantees was $24.4 million at March 31, 2005. Of this amount, $8.6 million arose from housing revenue bonds that require credit enhancements in addition to the real estate mortgages. The bonds bear a floating interest rate, which at March 31, 2005 averaged approximately 1.86%, and mature in 2015. Guarantees of $9.3 million will expire upon two industrial buildings becoming 93.8% and 95.0% leased or when the related loans mature. As of March 31, 2005, these buildings were 93.8% and 75.0% leased, respectively. The remaining $6.5 million in guarantees relate to loans on four office buildings that were in the lease-up phase at the time the loans were initiated. Each of the loans will mature by May 2008. The average occupancy of the four buildings at March 31, 2005 is 93.0%. If the joint ventures are unable to repay the outstanding balances under the loans, the Company will be required, under the terms of the agreements, to repay the outstanding balances. Recourse provisions exist to enable the Company to recover some or all of such payments from the joint ventures’ assets and/or the other partners. The joint ventures currently generate sufficient cash flow to cover the debt service required by the loans.

(7) In connection with the RRHWoods, LLC joint venture, the Company renewed its guarantee of $6.2 million to a bank in July 2003; this guarantee expires in August 2006 and may be renewed by the Company. The bank provides a letter of credit securing industrial revenue bonds, which mature in 2015. The Company would be required to perform under the guarantee should the joint venture be unable to repay the bonds. The Company has recourse provisions in order to recover from the joint venture’s assets and the other partner for amounts paid in excess of the Company’s proportionate share. The property collateralizing the bonds is 100.0% leased and currently generates sufficient cash flow to cover the debt service required by the bond financing. As a result, no liability has been recorded in the Company’s Balance Sheet.

(8) On December 9, 2004, the Plaza Colonnade, LLC joint venture refinanced its construction loan with a $50.0 million non-recourse permanent loan, thereby releasing the Company from its former guarantees of a construction loan agreement and a construction completion agreement, which arose from the formation of the joint venture to construct an office building. The $50.0 million mortgage bears a fixed interest rate of 5.72%, requires monthly principal and interest payments and matures on January 31, 2017. The Company and its joint venture partner have signed a contingent master lease limited to 30,772 square feet for five years. The Company’s maximum exposure under this master lease was $2.0 million as of March 31, 2005. However, the current occupancy level of the building is sufficient to cover all debt service requirements.

On March 30, 2004, the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Kansas City, Missouri issued $18.5 million in non-recourse bonds to finance public improvements made by the joint venture for the benefit of the Kansas City Missouri Public Library. Since the joint venture leases the land for the office building from the library, the joint venture was obligated to build certain public improvements. The net bond proceeds were $18.1 million and will be used for project and debt service costs. The joint venture has recorded this obligation on its balance sheet. Cash proceeds from tax increment financing revenue generated by the building and its tenants are expected to be sufficient in the future to pay the required debt service on the bonds.

(9) As more fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, in connection with the sale of three office buildings to a third party in 2002 (the “Eastshore” transaction), the Company agreed to guarantee rent shortfalls and re-tenanting costs for a five-year period of time from the date of sale (through November 2007). The Company’s maximum exposure to loss under these agreements as of March 31, 2005 is $11.6 million. These three buildings are currently leased to a single tenant, Capital One Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Capital One Financial Services, Inc., under leases that expire from May 2006 to March 2010. This transaction had been accounted for as a financing transaction and was recorded as a completed sale transaction in the third quarter of 2005 when the maximum exposure to loss under these guarantees became less than the related deferred gain; gain will be recognized in future periods as the maximum exposure under the guarantees is reduced.

(10) In connection with an unrelated disposition of 298,000 square feet of property in 2003 (the “Capital One” transaction), which was fully leased to Capital One Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Capital One Financial Services, Inc., the Company agreed to guarantee to the buyer, over various contingency periods through October 2009, any rent shortfalls on certain space. Because of this guarantee, in accordance with SFAS No. 66, the Company deferred $4.4 million of the total $8.4 million gain. The deferred portion of the gain is recognized when each contingency period is concluded. As a result, the Company recognized $1.3 million of the deferred gain in 2003 and an additional $1.7 million during 2004. The remaining deferred gain representing the Company’s contingent liability with respect to the guarantee was $1.3 million as of March 31, 2005. As of July 2005, there were no remaining circumstances under which the Company could be required to make payments under this guarantee. Accordingly, the remaining deferred gain was recognized in the third quarter of 2005.

22

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - Continued

(11) In December 2003, the Company sold 1.9 million square feet of industrial property for $58.4 million in cash, a $5.0 million note receivable that bears interest at 12.0% and a $1.7 million note receivable that bears interest at 8.0%. In addition, the Company agreed to guarantee, over various contingency periods through December 2006, any rent shortfalls on 16.3% of the rentable square footage of the industrial property, which is occupied by two tenants. The Company’s contingent liability with respect to such guarantee as of March 31, 2005 is $1.2 million. The total gain as a result of the transaction was $6.0 million. Because the terms of the notes required only interest payments to be made by the buyer until 2005, in accordance with SFAS No. 66, the entire $6.0 million gain was deferred and offset against the note receivable on the balance sheet and the cost recovery method was being used for this transaction. As of March 31, 2005, $5.4 million of the gain remained deferred. On June 30, 2005, the Company agreed to modify the note receivable to reduce the amount due by $0.3 million. The modified note balance and all accrued interest aggregating $6.2 million was paid in full on July 1, 2005. Because the maximum exposure to loss from the rent guarantee at July 1, 2005 was $0.8 million, that amount of gain was deferred and $4.3 million of the deferred gain was recognized at that date. Additionally, as part of the sale, the Company agreed to indemnify and hold the buyer harmless with respect to environmental concerns on the property of up to $0.1 million. As a result, $0.1 million of the gain was deferred at the time of sale and will remain deferred until the environmental concerns are remediated.

(12) In the Highwoods DLF 97/26 DLF 99/32, LP joint venture, a single tenant currently leases an entire building under a lease scheduled to expire on June 30, 2008. The tenant also leases space in other buildings owned by the Company. In conjunction with an overall restructuring of the tenant’s leases with the Company and with this joint venture, the Company agreed to certain changes to the lease with the joint venture in September 2003. The modifications included allowing the tenant to vacate the premises on January 1, 2006, and reducing the rent obligation by 50.0% and converting the “net” lease to a “full service” lease with the tenant liable for 50.0% of these costs at that time. In turn, the Company agreed to compensate the joint venture for any economic losses incurred as a result of these lease modifications. As of March 31, 2005, the Company recorded approximately $0.9 million in other liabilities and $0.9 million as a deferred charge in other assets on its Consolidated Balance Sheet to account for the lease guarantee. However, should new tenants occupy the vacated space during the two and a half year guarantee period, the Company’s liability under the guarantee would diminish. The Company’s maximum potential amount of future payments with regard to this guarantee was $1.1 million as of March 31, 2005. No recourse provisions exist to enable the Company to recover any amounts paid to the joint venture under this lease guarantee arrangement.

(13) RRHWOODS, LLC and Dallas County Partners each developed a new office building in Des Moines, Iowa. On June 25, 2004, the joint ventures financed both buildings with a $7.4 million ten-year loan from a lender. As an inducement to make the loan at a 6.3% long-term rate, the Company and its partner agreed to master lease the vacant space and each guaranteed $0.8 million of the debt with limited recourse. As leasing improves, the guarantee obligations under the loan agreement diminish. As of March 31, 2005, the Company expensed its share of the master lease payments totaling $0.01 million and recorded $0.6 million in other liabilities and $0.6 million as a deferred charge included in other assets on its Consolidated Balance Sheet with respect to this guarantee. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make based on the current leases in place is approximately $3.5 million as of March 31, 2005. The likelihood of the Company paying on its $0.8 million guarantee is remote since the joint venture currently satisfies the minimum debt coverage ratio and should the Company have to pay its portion of the guarantee, it would recover the $0.8 million from other joint venture assets.

(14) In connection with the formation of HIW-KC Orlando, LLC, the Company agreed to guarantee rent to the joint venture for 3,248 rentable square feet commencing in August 2004 and expiring in April 2011. Additionally, the Company agreed to guarantee the initial leasing costs, originally estimated at $4.1 million, for approximately 11% of the joint venture’s total square footage. $1.5 million is estimated to remain under the guarantee at March 31, 2005.

(15) In connection with the RRHWoods, LLC joint venture, the Company and its partner each guaranteed $2.9 million to a bank in August 2005, effective November 2005. This guarantee expires in November 2009 and can be renewed, at the joint venture’s option, through November 2011. The bank provides a letter of credit securing industrial revenue bonds, which mature in November 2015. The joint venture’s industrial building secures the bonds. The Company would be required to perform under the guarantee should the joint venture be unable to repay the bonds. The Company has recourse provisions to recover from the joint venture’s assets. The property collateralizing the bonds generates sufficient cash flow to cover the debt service required by the bond financing. In addition to the direct guarantee, the Company is committed to a master lease for 50.0% of the debt service should the cash flow from the property not be able to pay the debt service of the bonds. As a result of this master lease, the Company has recorded $0.06 million in other liabilities and $0.06 million as a deferred charge in other assets on its Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2005.

23

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - Continued

Litigation, Claims and Assessments

The Company is from time to time a party to a variety of legal proceedings, claims and assessments arising in the ordinary course of its business. The Company regularly assesses the liabilities and contingencies in connection with these matters based on the latest information available. For those matters where it is probable that the Company has incurred or will incur a loss and the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated, reserves are recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements. In other instances, because of the uncertainties related to both the probable outcome and amount or range of loss, a reasonable estimate of liability, if any, cannot be made. Based on the current expected outcome of any such matters, none of these proceedings, claims or assessments is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Notwithstanding the above, the SEC’s Division of Enforcement has issued a confidential formal order of investigation in connection with the Company’s previous restatement of its financial results. Even though the Company is cooperating fully, it cannot provide any assurances that the SEC’s Division of Enforcement will not take any action that would adversely affect the Company.

12. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The sole business of the Company is the acquisition, development and operation of rental real estate properties. The Company operates office, industrial and retail properties and apartment units. There are no material inter-segment transactions.

The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CDM”) assesses and measures operating results based upon property level net operating income. The operating results for the individual assets within each property type have been aggregated since the CDM evaluates operating results and allocates resources on a property-by-property basis within the various property types.

24

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(tabular dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

12. SEGMENT INFORMATION - Continued

All operations are within the United States and, at March 31, 2005, no tenant of the Wholly Owned Properties comprised more than 4.1% of the Company’s consolidated revenues. The following table summarizes the rental income, net operating income and assets for each reportable segment for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Rental and Other Revenues (1):
Office segment	$	97,395		$	100,937
Industrial segment		7,590			7,170
Retail segment		10,183			9,473
Apartment segment		359			341
Total Rental and Other Revenues	$	115,527		$	117,921
Net Operating Income (1):
Office segment	$	62,011		$	61,417
Industrial segment		5,637			5,479
Retail segment		6,946			6,377
Apartment segment		112			102
Total Net Operating Income		74,706			73,375
Reconciliation to income before disposition of property, minority interest and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates:
Depreciation and amortization		(35,122	)		(32,142	)
Interest expense		(28,082	)		(33,307	)
Impairment of assets held for use		(2,572	)		—
General and administrative expense		(8,429	)		(11,344	)
Interest and other income		1,980			1,785
Loss on debt extinguishment		(27	)		—
Income/(loss) before disposition of property, minority interest and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	$	2,454		$	(1,633	)
	March 31, 2005			December 31, 2004
Total Assets:
Office segment	$	2,500,082		$	2,529,577
Industrial segment		240,473			256,340
Retail segment		256,882			262,515
Apartment segment		12,492			12,207
Corporate and other		221,007			179,019
Total Assets	$	3,230,936		$	3,239,658

(1) Net of discontinued operations.

25

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the information in this Quarterly Report may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under this section. You can identify forward-looking statements by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue” or other similar words. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that our plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. When considering such forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the following important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement:

• speculative development activity by our competitors in our existing markets could result in an excessive supply of office, industrial and retail properties relative to tenant demand;

• the financial condition of our tenants could deteriorate;

• we may not be able to complete development, acquisition, reinvestment, disposition or joint venture projects as quickly or on as favorable terms as anticipated;

• we may not be able to lease or release space quickly or on as favorable terms as old leases;

• increases in interest rates would increase our debt service costs;

• we may not be able to meet our liquidity requirements or obtain capital on favorable terms to fund our working capital needs and growth initiatives or to repay or refinance outstanding debt upon maturity;

• we could lose key executive officers; and

• our southeastern and midwestern markets may suffer unexpected declines in economic growth.

This list of risks and uncertainties, however, is not intended to be exhaustive. You should also review the other cautionary statements we make in “Business – Risk Factors” set forth in our 2004 Annual Report.

Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

OVERVIEW

We are a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed equity REIT that provides leasing, management, development, construction and other customer-related services for our properties and for third parties. As of March 31, 2005, we owned or had an interest in 504 in-service office, industrial and retail properties, encompassing approximately 39.5 million square feet and 543 apartment units. As of that date, we also owned 1,115 acres of development land, approximately 530 acres of which are considered core holdings. We are based in Raleigh, North Carolina, and our properties and development land are located in Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. Additional information about us can be found on our website at www.highwoods.com. Information on our website is not part of this Quarterly Report.

26

Results of Operations

Approximately 83% of our rental and other revenue in 2005 was derived from our office properties. As a result, while we own and operate a limited number of industrial, retail and apartment properties, our operating results depend heavily on successfully leasing our office properties. Furthermore, since approximately 60% of our office properties are located in Florida, Georgia and North Carolina, economic growth in those states is and will continue to be an important determinative factor in predicting our future operating results. Accordingly, most of the analysis and comments below focus on our office properties.

The key components affecting our rental revenue stream are dispositions, acquisitions, new developments placed in service, average occupancy and rental rates. Average occupancy generally increases during times of improving economic growth, as our ability to lease space outpaces vacancies that occur upon the expirations of existing leases, while average occupancy generally declines during times of slower economic growth, when new vacancies tend to outpace our ability to lease space. Asset acquisitions, dispositions and new developments placed in service directly impact our rental revenues and could impact our average occupancy, depending upon the occupancy percentage of the properties that are acquired, sold or placed in service. A further indicator of the predictability of future revenues is the expected lease expirations of our portfolio. As a result, in addition to seeking to increase our average occupancy by leasing current vacant space, we also must concentrate our leasing efforts on renewing leases on expiring space. Whether or not our rental revenue tracks average occupancy proportionally depends upon whether rents under new leases signed are higher or lower than the rents under the previous leases.

Our expenses primarily consist of rental property expenses, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses and interest expense. Rental property expenses are expenses associated with our ownership and operation of rental properties and include variable expenses, such as common area maintenance and utilities, and fixed expenses, such as property taxes and insurance. Some of these variable expenses may be lower when our average occupancy declines, while fixed expenses remain constant regardless of average occupancy. Depreciation and amortization is a non-cash expense associated with the ownership of real property and generally remains relatively consistent each year, unless we buy or sell assets, since we depreciate our properties on a straight-line basis over a fixed life. General and administrative expenses, net of amounts capitalized, consist primarily of management and employee salaries and other personnel costs, corporate overhead and long-term incentive compensation. Interest expense depends upon the amount of our borrowings, the weighted average interest rates on our debt and the amount of interest capitalized on development projects.

We record in “equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates” our proportionate share of net income or loss, adjusted for purchase accounting effects, of our unconsolidated joint ventures.

Additionally, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” requires us to record net income received from properties sold or held for sale that qualify as discontinued operations under SFAS No. 144 separately as “income from discontinued operations.” As a result, we separately record revenues and expenses from these qualifying properties. As also required by SFAS No. 144, prior period results are reclassified to reflect the operations for such properties in discontinued operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We incur capital expenditures to lease space to our customers and to maintain the quality of our properties to successfully compete against other properties. Tenant improvements are the costs required to customize the space for the specific needs of the customer. Lease commissions are costs incurred to find the customer for the space. Lease incentives are costs paid to or on behalf of tenants to induce them to enter into leases and which do not relate to customizing the space for the tenant’s specific needs. Building improvements are recurring capital costs not related to a customer to maintain the buildings. As leases expire, we either attempt to relet the space to an existing customer or attract a new customer to occupy the space. Generally, customer renewals require lower leasing capital expenditures than reletting to new customers. However, market conditions such as supply of available space on the market, as well as demand for space, drive not only customer rental rates but also tenant improvement costs. Leasing capital expenditures are amortized over the term of the lease and building improvements are depreciated over the appropriate useful life of the assets acquired. Both are included in depreciation and amortization in results of operations.

27

Because we are a REIT, we are required under the federal tax laws to distribute at least 90.0% of our REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains, to our stockholders. We generally use rents received from customers and proceeds from sales of non-core development land to fund our operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures and stockholder dividends. To fund property acquisitions, development activity or building renovations, we may sell other assets and may incur debt from time to time. Our debt generally consists of mortgage debt, unsecured debt securities and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Our revolving credit facility and the indenture governing our outstanding long-term unsecured debt securities require us to satisfy various operating and financial covenants and performance ratios. As a result, to ensure that we do not violate the provisions of these debt instruments, we may from time to time be limited in undertaking certain activities that may otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders, such as repurchasing capital stock, acquiring additional assets, increasing the total amount of our debt or increasing stockholder dividends. We review our current and expected operating results, financial condition and planned strategic actions on an ongoing basis for the purpose of monitoring our continued compliance with these covenants and ratios. Any unwaived event of default could result in an acceleration of some or all of our debt, severely restrict our ability to incur additional debt to fund short- and long-term cash needs or result in higher interest expense.

To generate additional capital to fund our growth and other strategic initiatives and to lessen the ownership risks typically associated with owning 100.0% of a property, we may sell some of our properties or contribute them to joint ventures. When we create a joint venture with a strategic partner, we usually contribute one or more properties that we own and/or vacant land to a newly formed entity in which we retain an interest of 50.0% or less. In exchange for our equal or minority interest in the joint venture, we generally receive cash from the partner and retain some or all of the management income relating to the properties in the joint venture. The joint venture itself will frequently borrow money on its own behalf to finance the acquisition of, and/or leverage the return upon, the properties being acquired by the joint venture or to build or acquire additional buildings. Such borrowings are typically on a non-recourse or limited recourse basis. We generally are not liable for the debts of our joint ventures, except to the extent of our equity investment, unless we have directly guaranteed any of that debt. In most cases, we and/or our strategic partners are required to guarantee customary exceptions to non-recourse liability in non-recourse loans.

We have historically also sold additional Common Stock or Preferred Stock or issued Common Units to fund additional growth or to reduce our debt, but we have limited those efforts since 1998 because funds generated from our capital recycling program in recent years have provided sufficient funds to satisfy our liquidity needs. In addition, we have recently used funds from our capital recycling program to redeem Common Units and Preferred Stock for cash.

28

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

In accordance with SFAS No. 144 and as described in Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we reclassified the operations and/or gain/(loss) from disposal of certain properties to discontinued operations for all periods presented if the operations and cash flows have been or will be eliminated from our ongoing operations and we will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations after the disposal transaction and the properties were either sold during 2004 and the first quarter of 2005 or were held for sale at March 31, 2005. Accordingly, any properties sold during 2004 and the first quarter of 2005 that did not meet certain conditions as stipulated by SFAS No. 144 were not reclassified to discontinued operations.

The following table sets forth information regarding our unaudited results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (in millions):

	Three Months Ended March 31,						$ Change			% of Change
	2005			2004
Rental and other revenues	$	115.5		$	117.9		$	(2.4	)	(2.0	)%
Operating expenses:
Rental property and other expenses		40.8			44.6			(3.8	)	(8.5	)
Depreciation and amortization		35.1			32.1			3.0		9.3
Impairment of assets held for use		2.6			—			2.6		100.0
General and administrative		8.4			11.3			(2.9	)	(25.7	)
Total operating expenses		86.9			88.0			(1.1	)	(1.3	)
Interest expense:
Contractual		25.6			27.4			(1.8	)	(6.6	)
Amortization of deferred financing costs		0.8			1.2			(0.4	)	(33.3	)
Financing obligations		1.7			4.7			(3.0	)	(63.8	)
		28.1			33.3			(5.2	)	(15.6	)
Other income:
Interest and other income		2.0			1.8			0.2		11.1
Loss on debt extinguishments		—			—			—		(100.0	)
		2.0			1.8			0.2		10.0
Income/(loss) before disposition of property, minority interest and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		2.5			(1.6	)		4.1		255.0
Gains on disposition of property, net		0.4			0.9			(0.5	)	(55.6	)
Minority interest in the Operating Partnership		0.2			0.7			(0.5	)	(71.4	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		2.6			1.2			1.4		116.7
Income from continuing operations		5.7			1.2			4.5		375.0
Discontinued operations:
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interest		1.3			1.6			(0.3	)	(18.8	)
Net gains on sale of discontinued operations, net of minority interest		14.1			3.3			10.8		327.3
		15.4			4.9			10.5		214.3
Net income		21.1			6.1			15.0		245.9
Dividends on preferred shares		(7.7	)		(7.7	)		—		—
Net income available for /(loss attributable to) common stockholders	$	13.4		$	(1.6	)	$	15.0		937.5	%

Rental and Other Revenues

The decrease in rental and other revenues from continuing operations was primarily the result of the contribution of certain properties to the HIW-KC Orlando joint venture formed in June of 2004, which negatively impacted rental and other revenues by approximately $5.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005. Partly offsetting this decrease was an increase in lease termination fees of approximately $2.3 million in 2005.

29

Operating Expenses

The decrease in rental and other operating expenses from continuing operations (real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, repairs and maintenance and other property-related expenses) primarily resulted from the contribution of certain properties to the HIW-KC Orlando joint venture formed in July of 2004, which reduced rental and other operating expenses from continuing operations by approximately $2.2 million.

Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations increased in the first quarter of 2005 compared to first quarter of 2004 primarily from normal increases from tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs placed in service subsequent to first quarter 2004, from a building placed in service in September 2004, and from adjustments to write off unamortized balances of tenant improvements and deferred leasing costs for early lease terminations, partly offset by the effect from the contribution of properties in 2004 to the HIW-KC Orlando joint venture, as discussed above.

In the first quarter of 2005, an impairment loss of $2.6 million was recognized in connection with 46 acres of land that did not meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale, but whose carrying value was greater than its fair value less cost to sell.

The decrease in general and administrative expenses primarily relates to severance costs incurred in 2004 related to the former CEO’s retirement and increased costs of personnel and consultants in connection with implementing the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the restatement of our financial statements in 2004, partly offset by higher long-term incentive compensation costs and higher salary, fringe benefit and employee relocation costs in 2005.

Interest Expense

The decrease in contractual interest was primarily due to a decrease in average borrowings from $1,737 million in the three months ended March 31, 2004 to $1,564 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005, partially offset by an increase in weighted average interest rates on outstanding debt from 6.4% in the three months ended March 31, 2004 to 6.6% in the three months ended March 31, 2005. In addition, capitalized interest in 2005 was approximately $0.1 million higher compared to 2004 due to increased development activity and higher average construction and development costs.

The decrease in interest expense on financing obligations was primarily a result of the purchase of our partner’s interest in the Orlando City Group properties in MG-HIW, LLC in March 2004 which eliminated interest on the $62.5 million financing obligation (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2004 Annual Report for additional information on real estate sales that are accounted for as financing transactions).

Gains on Disposition of Property; Minority Interest; Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates

Net gains on dispositions of properties not classified as discontinued operations were $0.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Gains are dependent on the specific assets sold, their historical cost basis and other factors, and can vary significantly from period to period.

Minority interest in the continuing operations of the Operating Partnership, after Preferred Unit distributions, was $0.2 million of income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and $0.7 million of income for the three months ended March 31, 2004; the decrease was due to a corresponding decrease in the Operating Partnership’s loss from continuing operations, after Preferred Unit distributions.

The increase in equity in earnings from continuing operations of unconsolidated affiliates was primarily a result of an increase related to the formation of the HIW-KC Orlando, LLC joint venture in the second quarter of 2004, which contributed approximately $0.7 million to equity in earnings from continuing operations of unconsolidated affiliates in the first quarter of 2005. In addition, the Plaza Colonnade, LLC joint venture, which was placed in service in the fourth quarter of 2004, contributed approximately $0.2 million to equity in earnings in the first quarter of 2005. In addition, certain non-recurring expenses in the Dallas County Partners joint venture decreased in the first quarter of 2005 by approximately $0.2 million.

30

Discontinued Operations

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we classified net income of $15.5 million and $4.9 million, net of minority interest, as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These amounts relate to 2.4 million square feet of office and industrial property and 88 apartment units sold during 2004 and the first quarter of 2005 and 0.5 million square feet of property held for sale at March 31, 2005. These amounts include gain on the sale of these properties of $14.1 million and $3.3 million, net of minority interest, in the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Net Income

We recorded net income in the three months ended March 31, 2005 of $21.1 million, compared to $6.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2004, resulting from the various factors described above.

31

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Statement of Cash Flows

As required by GAAP, we report and analyze our cash flows based on operating activities, investing activities and financing activities. The following table sets forth the changes in our cash flows in the first three months of 2004 as compared to the first three months of 2005 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004			Change
Cash Provided By Operating Activities	$	30,109		$	35,291		$	(5,182	)
Cash Provided By/(Used In) Investing Activities		22,976			(15,763	)		38,739
Cash Used In Financing Activities		(22,225	)		(23,442	)		1,217
Total Cash Flows	$	30,860		$	(3,914	)	$	34,774

In calculating cash flow from operating activities, GAAP requires us to add depreciation and amortization, which are non-cash expenses, back to net income. As a result, we have historically generated a significant positive amount of cash from operating activities. From period to period, cash flow from operations depends primarily upon changes in our net income, as discussed more fully above under “Results of Operations,” changes in receivables and payables, and net additions or decreases in our overall portfolio, which affect the amount of depreciation and amortization expense.

Cash provided by or used in investing activities generally relates to capitalized costs incurred for leasing and major building improvements and our acquisition, development, disposition and joint venture activity. During periods of significant net acquisition and/or development activity, our cash used in such investing activities will generally exceed cash provided by investing activities, which typically consists of cash received upon the sale of properties and distributions of capital from our joint ventures.

Cash used in financing activities generally relates to stockholder dividends, distributions on Common Units, incurrence and repayment of debt and sales, repurchases or redemptions of Common Stock, Common Units and Preferred Stock. As discussed previously, we use a significant amount of our cash to fund stockholder dividends and Common Unit distributions. Whether or not we incur significant new debt during a period depends generally upon the net effect of our acquisition, disposition, development and joint venture activity. We use our revolving credit facility for working capital purposes, which means that during any given period, in order to minimize interest expense associated with balances outstanding under our revolving credit facility, we will likely record significant repayments and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

The decrease of $5.2 million in cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of $11.3 million increased use of cash from net changes in operating assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004, partially offset by higher cash flows from higher net income from operating activities in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004.

The increase of $38.7 million in cash provided by investing activities was primarily a result of an increase in proceeds from dispositions of real estate assets of approximately $32.5 million and a decrease of $10.0 million in contributions made to unconsolidated affiliates during the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. These increases were partially offset by an increase of $5.6 million in additions to real estate assets in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004.

The increase of $1.2 million in cash used in financing activities was primarily the result of higher net cash inflows from the issuance of Common Stock, net of repurchases of Common Stock and Common Units. Net cash flows from debt transactions and from distributions on Common Stock, Common Units and Preferred Stock were nearly identical in both periods.

In 2005, we continued our capital recycling program of selectively disposing of non-core properties in order to use the net proceeds for investments or other purposes. At March 31, 2005, we had 2.4 million square feet of properties, 88 apartment units, 31.0 acres of land and 0.5 million square feet of property classified as held for sale pursuant to SFAS No. 144 with a carrying value of $21.5 million.

32

Capitalization

The following table sets forth our capitalization as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	March 31, 2005		December 31, 2004
Mortgages and notes payable, at recorded book value	$	1,582,389	$	1,572,574
Financing obligations	$	63,208	$	65,309
Preferred Stock, at liquidation value	$	377,445	$	377,445
Common Stock and Common Units outstanding		59,881		59,915
Per share stock price at period end	$	26.82	$	27.70
Market value of Common Stock and Common Units		1,606,008		1,659,646
Total market capitalization with debt	$	3,629,050	$	3,674,974

Based on our total market capitalization of approximately $3.6 billion at March 31, 2005 (at the March 31, 2005 per share stock price of $26.82 and assuming the redemption for shares of Common Stock of the 5.8 million Common Units in the Operating Partnership not owned by the Company), our mortgages and notes payable represented approximately 43.6% of our total market capitalization.

Mortgages and notes payable at March 31, 2005 was comprised of $822.4 million of secured indebtedness with a weighted average interest rate of 6.9% and $760.0 million of unsecured indebtedness with a weighted average interest rate of 6.0%. As of March 31, 2005, our outstanding mortgages and notes payable were secured by real estate assets with an aggregate undepreciated book value of approximately $1.4 billion.

We do not intend to reserve funds to retire existing secured or unsecured debt upon maturity. For a more complete discussion of our long-term liquidity needs, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Current and Future Cash Needs.”

Contractual Obligations

See our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a table setting forth a summary regarding our known contractual obligations at December 31, 2004. The financing obligation of $28.8 million as of December 31, 2004 relating to the Eastshore transaction was eliminated as of September 30, 2005 because the transaction was recorded as a completed sale transaction in the third quarter of 2005 when the maximum exposure to loss under the guarantees became less than the related gain; deferred gain will be recognized in future periods as the maximum exposure under the guarantees is reduced.

Refinancings and Preferred Stock Redemptions in 2005 and First Quarter of 2006

During 2005 and the first quarter of 2006, we paid off $196.2 million of outstanding loans, excluding any normal debt amortization, which included $176.2 million of secured debt with a weighted average interest rate of 6.9% and $20.0 million of unsecured floating rate debt with an interest rate of 4.9%. Included in the $176.2 million was $89.8 million of floating rate secured debt. Approximately $350 million of real estate assets (based on undepreciated cost basis) became unencumbered after paying off the secured debt. We also used some of the proceeds from our disposition activity to redeem, in August 2005 and February 2006, all of our outstanding Series D Preferred Shares and 3.2 million of our outstanding Series B Preferred Shares, aggregating $180.0 million plus accrued dividends. These reductions in outstanding debt and Preferred Stock balances were made primarily from proceeds from property dispositions that closed in 2005 and 2006. In connection with the redemption of Preferred Stock, the excess of the redemption cost over the net carrying amount of the redeemed shares was recorded as a reduction to net income available for common shareholders. These reductions amounted to $4.3 million and $1.7 million for the third quarter of 2005 and first quarter of 2006, respectively.

33

Unsecured Indebtedness

On May 1, 2006, we obtained a new $350.0 million, three-year unsecured revolving credit facility from Bank of America, N.A. We used $273.0 million of proceeds from the new revolving credit facility, together with available cash, to pay off the remaining outstanding balance of $178.0 million under our previous revolving credit facility and the $100.0 million bank term loan, both of which have now been terminated. In connection with these payoffs, we expect to write off approximately $0.5 million in unamortized deferred financing costs in the second quarter of 2006 as a loss on debt extinguishment. We and Bank of America plan to syndicate the new revolving credit facility later in 2006.

Our new revolving credit facility is initially scheduled to mature on May 1, 2009. We have an option to extend the maturity date by one additional year assuming no default exists and, at any time prior to May 1, 2008, may request increases in the borrowing availability under the credit facility by up to an additional $100.0 million. The increases in borrowing availability are subject to approval by the lender(s). The interest rate has been reduced from LIBOR plus 105 basis points to LIBOR plus 80 basis points and the annual base facility fee has been reduced from 25 basis points to 20 basis points.

Like our previous revolving credit facility, the new revolving credit facility requires us to comply with customary operating covenants and various financial and operating ratios. We believe the required financial and operating ratios under the new revolving credit facility are less stringent and more appropriately reflect our current and future business prospects than the requirements under our previous revolving credit facility. We expect to be in compliance with these provisions of our new revolving credit facility for the foreseeable future. However, depending upon our future operating performance and property and financing transactions and general economic conditions, we cannot assure you that no circumstance will arise in the future that would render us unable to comply with any of these covenants or result in an increase in the borrowing costs under this facility.

If any of our lenders ever accelerated outstanding debt due to an event of default, we would not be able to borrow any further amounts under our revolving credit facility, which would adversely affect our ability to fund our operations. If our debt cannot be paid, refinanced or extended at maturity or upon acceleration, in addition to our failure to repay our debt, we may not be able to make distributions to stockholders at expected levels or at all. Furthermore, if any refinancing is done at higher interest rates, the increased interest expense would adversely affect our cash flows and ability to make distributions to stockholders. Any such refinancing could also impose tighter financial ratios and other covenants that would restrict our ability to take actions that would otherwise be in our stockholders’ best interest, such as funding new development activity, making opportunistic acquisitions, repurchasing our securities or paying distributions.

In May, July, August and September 2005 and February 2006, we obtained waivers from the lenders under our previous revolving credit facility and our previous bank term loans related to timely reporting to the lenders of annual and quarterly financial statements and to covenant violations that could arise from future redemptions of Preferred Stock due to the reclassification of the Preferred Stock from equity to a liability during the period of time from the announcement of the redemption until the redemption is completed. The aforementioned modifications did not change the economic terms of the loans. In connection with these modifications, we incurred certain loan costs that are capitalized and amortized over the remaining terms of the loans. In November 2005, we amended the $100.0 million bank term loan to extend the maturity date to July 17, 2006 and reduce the spread over the LIBOR interest rate from 130 basis points to 100 basis points. These loans were paid off in May 2006 in connection with the closing of our new revolving credit facility, as discussed above.

As of the date of this filing, the Operating Partnership has not yet satisfied its requirement under the indenture governing the outstanding notes to file timely SEC reports, but expects to do so as soon as practicable. Under the indenture, the notes may be accelerated if the trustee or 25% of the holders provide written notice of a default and such default remains uncured after 60 days. If the Operating Partnership failed to file its delinquent SEC reports prior to expiration of the 60-day cure period after receipt of any such default notice, the lender under our revolving credit facility would also have the ability to accelerate amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility. To date, neither the trustee nor any holder has sent us any such default notice. The Operating Partnership is in compliance with all other covenants under the indenture and is current on all payments required thereunder.

34

Current and Future Cash Needs

Rental revenue, together with construction management, maintenance, leasing and management fees, is our principal source of funds to meet our short-term liquidity requirements, which primarily consist of operating expenses, debt service, stockholder dividends, any guarantee obligations and recurring capital expenditures. In addition, we could incur tenant improvements and lease commissions related to any releasing of vacant space.

We expect to fund our short-term liquidity requirements through a combination of available working capital, cash flows from operations and the following:

• the selective disposition of non-core land and other assets;

• borrowings under our revolving credit facility (which has up to $76 million of availability as of May 1, 2006, excluding the $100.0 million expansion option) and under our existing $50.0 million secured revolving construction loan (all of which was available at May 1, 2006);

• the sale or contribution of some of our Wholly Owned Properties, development projects and development land to strategic joint ventures to be formed with unrelated investors, which would have the net effect of generating additional capital through such sale or contributions;

• the issuance of secured debt; and

• the issuance of new unsecured debt.

Our long-term liquidity needs generally include the funding of capital expenditures to lease space to our customers, maintain the quality of our existing properties and build new properties. Capital expenditures include tenant improvements, building improvements, new building completion costs and land infrastructure costs. Tenant improvements are the costs required to customize space for the specific needs of first-generation and second-generation customers. Building improvements are recurring capital costs not related to a specific customer to maintain existing buildings. New building completion costs are expenses for the construction of new buildings. Land infrastructure costs are expenses to prepare development land for future development activity that is not specifically related to a single building. Excluding recurring capital expenditures for leasing costs and tenant improvements and for normal building improvements, our expected future capital expenditures for started and/or committed new development projects as of May 15, 2006 are approximately $200 million. A significant portion of these future expenditures are currently subject to binding contractual arrangements.

Additionally, $110.0 million of 7.0% unsecured notes will mature in December 2006 and approximately $63 million of 8.2% secured debt will mature in February 2007. We expect to repay both borrowings with proceeds from pending or future disposition activity and the issuance of additional unsecured debt. We also have a significant pool of unencumbered assets that could serve as collateral for additional secured debt. Although we expect to repay or refinance all of this outstanding debt on or prior to their respective maturity dates, no assurances can be given that we will be able to do so on favorable terms or at all.

Our long-term liquidity needs also include the funding of development commitments, selective asset acquisitions and the retirement of mortgage debt, amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and long-term unsecured debt. Our goal is to maintain a conservative and flexible balance sheet. Accordingly, we expect to meet our long-term liquidity needs through a combination of (1) the issuance by the Operating Partnership of additional unsecured debt securities, (2) the issuance of additional equity securities by the Company and the Operating Partnership, (3) borrowings under other secured construction loans that we may enter into, as well as (4) the sources described above with respect to our short-term liquidity. We expect to use such sources to meet our long-term liquidity requirements either through direct payments or repayments of borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As mentioned above, we do not intend to reserve funds to retire existing secured or unsecured indebtedness upon maturity. Instead, we will seek to refinance such debt at maturity or retire such debt through the issuance of equity or debt securities or from proceeds from sales of properties.

35

We anticipate that our available cash and cash equivalents and cash flows from operating activities, with cash available from borrowings and other sources, will be adequate to meet our capital and liquidity needs in both the short and long term. However, if these sources of funds are insufficient or unavailable, our ability to pay dividends to stockholders and satisfy other cash payments may be adversely affected.

Stockholder Dividends

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must distribute to stockholders at least 90.0% of our REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains. REIT taxable income, the calculation of which is determined by the federal tax laws, does not equal net income under GAAP. We generally expect to use our cash flow from operating activities for dividends to stockholders and for payment of recurring capital expenditures. Future dividends will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors. The following factors will affect our cash flows and, accordingly, influence the decisions of the Board of Directors regarding dividends:

• debt service requirements after taking into account debt covenants and the repayment and restructuring of certain indebtedness;

• scheduled increases in base rents of existing leases;

• changes in rents attributable to the renewal of existing leases or replacement leases;

• changes in occupancy rates at existing properties and execution of leases for newly acquired or developed properties;

• operating expenses and capital replacement needs, including tenant improvements and leasing costs; and

• sales of properties and non-core land.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have several off balance sheet joint venture and guarantee arrangements. The joint ventures were formed with unrelated investors to generate additional capital to fund property acquisitions, repay outstanding debt or fund other strategic initiatives and to lessen the ownership risks typically associated with owning 100.0% of a property. When we create a joint venture with a strategic partner, we usually contribute one or more properties that we own to a newly formed entity in which we retain an interest of 50.0% or less. In exchange for an equal or minority interest in the joint venture, we generally receive cash from the partner and frequently retain the management income relating to the properties in the joint venture. For financial reporting purposes, certain assets we sold have been accounted for as financing arrangements.

As of March 31, 2005, our unconsolidated joint ventures had $819.2 million of total assets and $603.9 million of total liabilities as reflected in their financial statements. At March 31, 2005, our weighted average equity interest based on the total assets of these unconsolidated joint ventures was 40.6%. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, these unconsolidated joint ventures earned $5.1 million of total net income of which our share, after appropriate purchase accounting and other adjustments, was $2.6 million. For additional information about our unconsolidated joint venture activity, see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

36

As of March 31, 2005, our unconsolidated joint ventures had $576.9 million of outstanding mortgage debt. All of this joint venture debt is non-recourse to us except (1) in the case of customary exceptions pertaining to such matters as misuse of funds, environmental conditions and material misrepresentations and (2) those guarantees and loans described in the following paragraphs. The following table sets forth the scheduled maturities of our share of the outstanding debt of our unconsolidated joint ventures as of March 31, 2005 ($ in thousands):

Remainder of 2005	$	2,449
2006		5,544
2007		12,622
2008		10,266
2009		14,679
Thereafter		198,914
	$	244,474

For additional information regarding our off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2004, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Off Balance Sheet Arrangements” in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Financing Arrangements

For information regarding sales transactions that were accounted for as financing arrangements at December 31, 2004, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financing and Profit-Sharing Arrangements” in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest Rate Hedging Activities

To meet, in part, our long-term liquidity requirements, we borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility bear interest at variable rates. Our long-term debt, which consists of secured and unsecured long-term financings and the issuance of unsecured debt securities, typically bears interest at fixed rates although some loans bear interest at variable rates. In addition, we have assumed fixed rate and variable rate debt in connection with acquiring properties. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as collars, swaps, caps and treasury lock agreements in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We do not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

The following table sets forth information regarding our interest rate hedge contracts as of March 31, 2005 ($ in thousands):

Type of Hedge	Notional Amount		Maturity Date	Reference Rate	Fixed Rate		Fair Market Value
Interest Rate Swap	$	20,000	6/1/2005	1 month USD-LIBOR-BBA	1.590	%	$	65

The interest rate on all of our variable rate debt is adjusted at one and three month intervals, subject to settlements under these interest rate hedge contracts. We also enter into treasury lock agreements from time to time in order to limit our exposure to an increase in interest rates with respect to future debt offerings. During the first quarter of 2005, $41,000 was received from counter parties under interest rate hedge contracts. The interest rate swap that matured on June 1, 2005 was not renewed or extended. We currently have no outstanding interest rate hedge contracts.

As further described below under “- Related Party Transactions,” we had an embedded derivative as part of the land purchase arrangement with GAPI, Inc. that expired in August 2005 upon closing of the final land parcel under the arrangement.

37

Related Party Transactions

We have previously reported that we had a contract to acquire development land in the Bluegrass Valley office development project from GAPI, Inc., a corporation controlled by Gene H. Anderson, an executive officer and director of the Company. Under the terms of the contract, the development land was purchased in phases, and the purchase price for each phase or parcel was settled in cash and/or Common Units. The price for the various parcels was based on an initial value for each parcel, adjusted for an interest factor, applied up to the closing date and also for changes in the value of the Common Units. On January 17, 2003, we acquired an additional 23.5 acres of this land from GAPI, Inc. for 85,520 shares of Common Stock and $384,000 in cash for total consideration of $2.3 million. In May 2003, 4.0 acres of the remaining acres not yet acquired by us was taken by the Georgia Department of Transportation to develop a roadway interchange for consideration of $1.8 million. The Department of Transportation took possession and title of the property in June 2003. As part of the terms of the contract between us and GAPI, Inc., we were entitled to and received in 2003 the $1.8 million proceeds from the condemnation. In July 2003, we appealed the condemnation and are currently seeking additional payment from the state; the recognition of any gain has been deferred pending resolution of the appeal process. In April 2005, we acquired for cash an additional 12.1 acres of the Bluegrass Valley land from GAPI, Inc. and also settled for cash the final purchase price with GAPI, Inc. on the 4.0 acres that were taken by the Georgia Department of Transportation, which aggregated approximately $2.7 million, of which $0.7 million was recorded as a payable to GAPI, Inc. on our financial statements as of March 31, 2005. In August 2005, we acquired 12.7 acres, representing the last parcel of land to be acquired, for cash of $3.2 million. We believe that the purchase price with respect to each land parcel was at or below market value. These transactions were unanimously approved by the full Board of Directors with Mr. Anderson abstaining from the vote. The contract provided that the land parcels could be paid in Common Units or in cash, at the option of the seller. This feature constituted an embedded derivative pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The embedded derivative feature was accounted for separately and adjusted based on changes in the fair value of the Common Units. This resulted in an increase to other income of $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2005 and $0.03 million in the first quarter of 2004. In the remainder of 2005, $0.3 million in expense was recorded related to the embedded derivative, which expired upon the closing of the final land transaction in August 2005.

On February 28, 2005 and April 15, 2005, we sold through a third party broker three non-core industrial buildings in Winston-Salem, North Carolina to John L. Turner and certain of his affiliates for a gross sales price of approximately $27.0 million, of which $20.3 million was paid in cash and the remainder from the surrender of 256,508 Common Units. We recorded a gain of approximately $4.8 million upon the closing of these sales. Mr. Turner, who was a director at the time of these transactions, retired from the Board of Directors effective December 31, 2005. We believe that the purchase price paid for these assets by Mr. Turner and his affiliates was equal to their fair market value. The sales were unanimously approved by the full Board of Directors with Mr. Turner not being present to discuss or vote on the matter.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

There were no changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates made by management in the three months ended March 31, 2005. For a detailed description of our critical accounting estimates, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Estimates” in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

38

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

We believe that FFO and FFO per share are beneficial to management and investors and are important indicators of the performance of any equity REIT. Because FFO and FFO per share calculations exclude such factors as depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and gains or losses from sales of operating real estate assets (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), they facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between other REITs. Our management believes that historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. As a result, management believes that the use of FFO and FFO per share, together with the required GAAP presentations, provide a more complete understanding of our performance relative to our competitors and a more informed and appropriate basis on which to make decisions involving operating, financing and investing activities.

FFO and FFO per share as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to our calculation of FFO and FFO per share as described below. However, you should be aware that FFO and FFO per share are non-GAAP financial measures and therefore do not represent net income or net income per share as defined by GAAP. Net income and net income per share as defined by GAAP are the most relevant measures in determining our operating performance because FFO and FFO per share include adjustments that investors may deem subjective, such as adding back expenses such as depreciation and amortization. Furthermore, FFO per share does not depict the amount that accrues directly to the stockholders’ benefit. Accordingly, FFO and FFO per share should never be considered as alternatives to net income or net income per share as indicators of our operating performance.

Our calculation of FFO, which we believe is consistent with the calculation of FFO as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) and which appropriately excludes the cost of capital improvements and related capitalized interest, is as follows:

• Net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP;

• Less dividends to holders of Preferred Stock;

• Plus depreciation and amortization of assets uniquely significant to the real estate industry;

• Less gains, or plus losses, from sales of depreciable operating properties (but excluding impairment losses) and excluding items that are classified as extraordinary items under GAAP;

• Plus minority interest;

• Plus or minus adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures (to reflect funds from operations on the same basis); and

• Plus or minus adjustments for depreciation and amortization and gains/(losses) on sales and minority interest related to discontinued operations.

Other REITs may not define FFO in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do.

39

FFO and FFO per share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized in the following table ($ in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005						2004
	Amount			Per Share			Amount			Per Share
Funds from operations:
Net income	$	21,154					$	6,138
Dividends to preferred shareholders		(7,713	)					(7,713	)
Net income applicable to/(loss attributable to) common shareholders		13,441		$	0.25			(1,575	)	$	(0.03	)
Add/(Deduct):
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets		34,434			0.57			31,444			0.52
(Gain)/loss on disposition of depreciable real estate assets		(250	)		—			148			—
Minority interest from the Operating Partnership in income/(loss) from operations		(183	)		—			(704	)		—
Unconsolidated affiliates:
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets		2,643			0.04			2,015			0.03
Discontinued operations:
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets		136			—			1,003			0.02
(Gain)/loss on sale		(15,724	)		(0.26	)		(3,748	)		(0.06	)
Minority interest from the Operating Partnership in income from discontinued operations		1,731			—			574			—
Funds from operations	$	36,228		$	0.60		$	29,157		$	0.48
Dividend payout data:
Dividends paid per common share/common unit	$	0.425					$	0.425
As a percentage of funds from operations		70.8	%					88.5	%
Weighted average shares outstanding (1)		60,216						60,092

(1) Includes assumed conversion of all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents.

40

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The effects of potential changes in interest rates are discussed below. Our market risk discussion includes “forward-looking statements” and represents an estimate of possible changes in fair value or future earnings that would occur assuming hypothetical future movements in interest rates. These disclosures are not precise indicators of expected future effects, but only indicators of reasonably possible effects. As a result, actual future results may differ materially from those presented. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources” and the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our accounting policies and other information related to these financial instruments.

To meet in part our long-term liquidity requirements, we borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility bear interest at variable rates. Our long-term debt, which consists of secured and unsecured long-term financings and the issuance of unsecured debt securities, typically bears interest at fixed rates although some loans bear interest at variable rates. In addition, we have assumed fixed rate and variable rate debt in connection with acquiring properties. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time we enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as collars, swaps, caps and treasury lock agreements in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We do not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

As of March 31, 2005, we had approximately $1,214 million of fixed rate debt outstanding. The estimated aggregate fair market value of this debt at March 31, 2005 was approximately $1,294 million. If interest rates increase by 100 basis points, the aggregate fair market value of our fixed rate debt as of March 31, 2005 would decrease by approximately $55.8 million. If interest rates decrease by 100 basis points, the aggregate fair market value of our fixed rate debt as of March 31, 2005 would increase by approximately $60.4 million.

As of March 31, 2005, we had approximately $348 million of variable rate debt outstanding that was not protected by interest rate hedge contracts. If the weighted average interest rate on this variable rate debt is 100 basis points higher or lower during the 12 months ended March 31, 2006, our interest expense would be increased or decreased approximately $3.5 million.

For a discussion of our interest rate hedge contract in effect at March 31, 2005, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Interest Rate Hedging Activities.” If interest rates increase by 100 basis points, the fair market value of this interest rate hedge contract as of March 31, 2005 would increase by $33,000. If interest rates decrease by 100 basis points, the fair market value of this interest rate hedge contract as of March 31, 2005 would decrease by $33,000. This interest rate hedge contract matured on June 1, 2005 and was not renewed or extended. We currently have no outstanding interest rate hedge contracts.

At March 31, 2005, we had an embedded derivative as part of a land purchase arrangement, as described under “Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations – Liquidity And Capital Resources – Related Party Transactions.” This embedded derivative expired in August 2005 upon closing of the final land parcel under the arrangement.

41

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

GENERAL

The purpose of this section is to discuss the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and recent changes in our internal control over financial reporting. The statements in this section represent the conclusions of Edward J. Fritsch, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Terry L. Stevens, our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

The CEO and CFO evaluations of our controls and procedures include a review of the controls’ objectives and design, the controls’ implementation by us and the effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this Quarterly Report. We seek to identify data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, is undertaken. Our controls and procedures are also evaluated on an ongoing basis by or through the following:

• activities undertaken and reports issued by employees in our internal audit department;

• quarterly sub-certifications by representatives from appropriate business and accounting functions to support the CEO and CFO’s evaluation of our controls and procedures;

• other personnel in our finance and accounting organization;

• members of our internal disclosure committee; and

• members of the audit committee of our Board of Directors.

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, do not expect that our controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is required to establish and maintain internal control over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. As defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

• pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of assets;

• provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and

• provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

42

As reported in Item 9A of our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, our management reported that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2004 due to material weaknesses that existed as of such date in: (1) our accounting processes for capitalizing interest and carrying costs during lease-up and internal leasing, development and construction costs; (2) our fixed asset and lease incentive accounting processes; and (3) our financial statement close process. The first two material weaknesses could also affect the equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated Financial Statements for those joint ventures for which we are primarily responsible for the preparation of their financial statements.

In Item 9A of our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, our management will report that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2005 due to material weaknesses that existed as of such date in: (1) our real estate asset and lease incentive accounting processes, which in turn could affect the equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated Financial Statements for those joint ventures for which we are primarily responsible for the preparation of their financial statements; and (2) our journal entry approval and financial statement close processes.

To mitigate or remediate specified material weaknesses reported in our 2004 Annual Report, during 2005, we formed a permanent committee to monitor and oversee the ongoing remediation of all deficiencies identified in our annual assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. This committee consists of our CFO, COO and representatives from appropriate business and accounting functions within the Company. Second, we designed, implemented and tested new and enhanced accounting processes for capitalizing interest and carrying costs during lease-up and internal leasing, development and construction costs. As a result, the material weakness reported in our 2004 Annual Report relating to capitalizing interest and carrying costs during lease-up and internal leasing, development and construction costs no longer existed as of December 31, 2005. Third, we designed, implemented and tested new and enhanced fixed asset and lease incentive accounting processes to reasonably assure the timely start of depreciation on certain building improvements, the effectiveness of fixed asset account reconciliations, the proper allocation of costs to land parcels, the proper classification and depreciation of depreciable infrastructure costs and the proper depreciation of newly constructed buildings during the lease-up phase. While these changes have remediated various aspects of our real estate asset accounting during 2005, we still had material weaknesses with respect to our real estate asset and lease incentive accounting processes as of December 31, 2005.

During the second quarter of 2006, to remediate our material weakness regarding the use of and dependence upon manually prepared spreadsheets in accumulating and consolidating restatement adjustments recorded in connection with our historical financial statements, we began to record in our general ledger and fixed asset accounting systems all of the restatement adjustments related to our amended 2003 Annual Report and our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which should reduce the likelihood of errors in our future consolidated financial statements by lessening our reliance upon such manually prepared spreadsheets in the financial statement close process. We expect to complete this project before December 31, 2006.

We also plan to undertake the following overall activities to improve our internal control over financial reporting. First, we are developing and implementing a Company-wide policy and procedures manual for use by our divisional and accounting staff, intended to reasonably assure consistent and appropriate assessment and application of GAAP. The first phase of this process has focused on the preparation of formal written policies and procedures with respect to accounting for building and tenant improvements. Second, we plan to provide training for our accounting staff and employees in our various divisional operating offices to educate our personnel with respect to the accounting adjustments that were made to the historical financial statements in our 2004 Annual Report and in our amended 2003 Annual Report and to the material weaknesses and other control deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that existed as of December 31, 2004 and as of December 31, 2005. Third, we plan to implement improvements to our journal entry review and approval processes and to limit the ability of users to record and delete journal entries in our general ledger system which should reduce the likelihood of potential errors in future financial statements. Fourth, we plan to implement revised approval procedures over signing of

43

construction contracts and change orders to provide reasonable assurance that such matters are approved by management at appropriate levels in the Company. Fifth, we engaged a search firm to assist us with the process of hiring a Chief Accounting Officer (new position).

We have developed and implemented or are in the process of developing and implementing remediation plans for the material weaknesses described above. Our management is working closely with the audit committee to monitor the ongoing remediation of these material weaknesses.

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

SEC rules also require us to maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our annual and periodic reports filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. As defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based solely on the material weaknesses described above, our CEO and CFO do not believe that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the end of the quarterly period covered by this Quarterly Report.

44

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On February 24, 2005, we issued 35,000 shares of Common Stock to a director (who retired from the Board on December 31, 2005) upon the exercise of warrants to purchase Common Stock at a purchase price of $21.00 per share. Such shares were issued in a private transaction pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description
10.13	Agreement between the Operating Partnership and G-T Gateway, LLC, effective as of February 11, 2005 (filed as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004)
10.14	Agreement among Winston-Salem Industrial, LLC, the Operating Partnership and G-T Gateway, LLC, effective as of January 28, 2005 (filed as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004)
10.15	Agreement among the Operating Partnership, John L. Turner and Robert Goldman, effective as of January 28, 2005 (filed as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004)
10.16	Agreement among the Operating Partnership, John L. Turner, Robert Goldman and Henry P. Royster, Jr., effective as of February 11, 2005 (filed as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004)
31.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

45

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
By:	/s/ EDWARD J. FRITSCH
	Edward J. Fritsch
	President and Chief Executive Officer
By:	/s/ TERRY L. STEVENS
	Terry L. Stevens
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: June 2, 2006

46