-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, DtNTxoLPzmvW2vi1hiuev4bSudMIzpE1NYqRrD30BxSWkyUgJ/Ykm3E7OOdnt2dQ 28OcOtbiqh4J0cXOoBeQ6g== 0001193125-05-207978.txt : 20051026 0001193125-05-207978.hdr.sgml : 20051026 20051025173958 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001193125-05-207978 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 8-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20051025 ITEM INFORMATION: Results of Operations and Financial Condition ITEM INFORMATION: Financial Statements and Exhibits FILED AS OF DATE: 20051026 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20051025 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000921082 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS [6798] IRS NUMBER: 561871668 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MD FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 8-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-13100 FILM NUMBER: 051155262 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3100 SMOKETREE CT STREET 2: STE 600 CITY: RALEIGH STATE: NC ZIP: 27604 BUSINESS PHONE: 9198724924 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3100 SMOKETREE COURT STREET 2: STE 600 CITY: RALEIGH STATE: NC ZIP: 27604 8-K 1 d8k.htm CURRENT REPORT Current Report

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 


 

FORM 8-K

 


 

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 25, 2005

 


 

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant specified in its charter)

 


 

Maryland   1-13100   56-1871668
(State of Incorporation)   (Commission File Number)   (IRS Employer Identification No.)

 

3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600

Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (919) 872-4924

 


 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

 

¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 



Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition

 

On October 25, 2005, Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing operational information for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. This press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. In addition, the Company posted on its web site supplemental information regarding its operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2.

 

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits

 

Exhibit

  

Description


99.1    Press release dated October 25, 2005
99.2    Supplemental operating information for the quarter ended September 30, 2005


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

By:

 

/s/ Terry L. Stevens


    Terry L. Stevens
   

Vice President,

Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer

 

Dated: October 26, 2005

EX-99.1 2 dex991.htm PRESS RELEASE Press Release

LOGO

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                                                  Ref: 05-29

 

Contact:    Tabitha Zane
     Vice President, Investor Relations
     919-431-1529

 

Highwoods Properties Reports:

 

Third Quarter 2005 Operational Results

85.8% Occupancy

1.6M sf Second Generation Space Leased

 

Multi-Tenant Office Building in Richmond Announced

 

Status Update on Financial Review and Audit

 


 

Raleigh, NC – October 25, 2005 – Highwoods Properties, Inc. (NYSE: HIW), the largest owner and operator of suburban office properties in the Southeast, today reported operational results for the third quarter of 2005. The Company also announced that it is building a multi-tenant office building in Richmond and provided a status update on the financial review and audit.

 

Ed Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties, stated, “Third quarter leasing activity remained strong, with 1.6 million square feet of second generation space leased. Total in-service occupancy increased to 85.8%, a 260 basis point improvement from the third quarter of 2004 and a 170 basis point sequential increase. We also saw a strong increase in office occupancy, which was 85.0% at the end of this quarter, compared to 83.5% the previous quarter and 80.9% a year ago.

 

The Company has made substantial progress this year in strengthening its balance sheet. Through September 30, 2005, we have paid off $270.1 million of debt and preferred stock. This includes $120.1 million of secured debt at an average rate of 7.2%, which unencumbered approximately $280 million of assets, $130 million of 8% preferred stock and a $20 million floating rate unsecured term loan.”

 

Third Quarter 2005 Highlights

 

    Second generation leasing activity in Highwoods’ portfolio totaled approximately 1.6 million square feet, including 1.1 million square feet of office space. For the first nine months of the year, leasing activity totaled approximately 5.0 million square feet, 3.5 million of which was office space. Customer retention was 72% for the quarter and 70% year to date.

 

    Occupancy in the Company’s 29.8 million square foot in-service portfolio at September 30, 2005 was 85.8%, up 260 basis points from 83.2% at September 30, 2004. Office occupancy since September 30, 2004, has increased 410 basis points from 80.9% to 85.0%.


Highwoods Properties

October 25, 2005

 

    Straight-line (GAAP) rental rates for signed office leases decreased 2.6% in the third quarter from straight line rental rates under the previous leases, in line with the Company’s 2005 expectations. Cash rents for office leases signed declined 6.8%, also in line with the Company’s expectations.

 

    Office tenant improvements and leasing commissions as a percentage of term base rent (excluding free rent) were 9.6% compared to the five quarter average of 11.2%. On a dollar per square foot basis, tenant improvements and leasing commissions were $7.85, below our 2005 expectations of $10 to $11 per square foot.

 

    2.5 million square feet were sold, generating $234.5 million of gross proceeds. Through September 30, 2005, the Company has sold 4.4 million square feet for gross proceeds of $336 million, surpassing the high end of the Company’s 2005 disposition goal of $300 million. The average occupancy of the properties sold through September 30, 2005 was 79.4%, which includes the two vacant buildings at Highwoods Preserve. Excluding Buildings II and IV at the Preserve, the average occupancy of the properties sold was 84.0%

 

    The Company placed two buildings in service during the quarter. These properties, which encompass 466,000 square feet, represent an investment of $36.6 million and are 100% leased.

 

    At quarter end, the Company’s wholly owned development pipeline includes eight projects encompassing approximately 790,000 square feet, representing a total projected investment of $127.6 million. At September 30, 2005, these projects were 57.5% pre-leased and were located in seven of the Company’s markets.

 

Development of Multi-Tenant Office Building Announced in Richmond

 

The Company announced that it will begin development of Stony Point IV, a multi-tenant Class “A” 104,000 square foot office building in The Park at Stony Point located in Richmond, Virginia. This project, which is currently 46% pre-leased to a high credit, specialty insurance underwriter, represents a projected investment by the Company of approximately $13.1 million, and is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company currently owns three additional properties in this office park, encompassing a total of 354,000 square feet, and they are 97% leased. The average occupancy of the submarket in which this office park is located is 90.3%. The Company noted that Stony Point IV is included in its third quarter development pipeline.

 

Mr. Fritsch stated, “This development project contributes to our achieving an important goal of our Strategic Management Plan which is to build high quality, differentiated assets. Our Stony Point properties have consistently performed very well and we anticipate the demand for this newest addition will be strong. This project is expected to generate a 10+% stabilized cash return on our total investment.”

 

Filing Status Update

 

The Company continues its work to finalize the preparation of its financial statements and Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent auditor, is in the process of auditing these financial statements. At this time, the Company cannot provide a definitive date as to when its financial review and E&Y’s audit will be completed. However, based on current information and from discussions with E&Y, the Company believes it will file its 2004 Form 10-K prior to year end. Following the filing of its 2004 Form 10-K, the Company anticipates filing its 2005 10-Qs as soon as possible.

 

2


Highwoods Properties

October 25, 2005

 

SEC Update

 

The Company noted that there has been no change in the status of the formal investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Management continues to cooperate fully and remains confident and comfortable with the information being provided to the SEC.

 

2005 Funds from Operations Outlook

 

Based on its review of year-to-date operational results, the Company reconfirmed the FFO guidance it published on September 28, 2005 for full-year 2005 of $2.27 to $2.33 per share. This estimate continues to reflect management’s view of current and future market conditions, including assumptions with respect to rental rates, occupancy levels, operating expenses and asset dispositions and acquisitions. This estimate excludes any asset gains or impairments associated with actual or potential depreciable property dispositions, as well as any one-time, non-recurring charges or credits that may occur during the year. Specifically, the estimate does not reflect the previously disclosed $4.2 million reduction in FFO and net income available for common shareholders that the Company will record pursuant to EITF Topic D-42. This reduction, which will be taken in the third quarter, is related to the redemption of $130 million of preferred stock on August 22, 2005. This outlook also assumes that any further adjustments to its historical financial statements as a result of the aforementioned review and audit will not have a material impact on the Company’s expected 2005 financial results.

 

Non-GAAP Information

 

We believe that FFO and FFO per share are beneficial to management and investors as important indicators of the performance of an equity REIT. FFO and FFO per share can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between other REITs because they exclude factors, such as depreciation, amortization and gains and losses from sales of real estate assets, which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates. FFO and FFO per share as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to our calculations of FFO and FFO per share. CAD is another useful financial performance measure of an equity REIT. CAD provides an additional basis to evaluate the ability of a REIT to incur and service debt, fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures and pay distributions. CAD does not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all cash needs. FFO, FFO per share and CAD are non-GAAP financial measures and do not represent net income or cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as defined by GAAP. They should not be considered as alternatives to net income as indicators of our operating performance or to cash flows as measures of liquidity. Furthermore, FFO per share does not depict the amount that accrues directly to the stockholders’ benefit.

 

FFO is defined by NAREIT as net income or loss, excluding gains or losses from sales of depreciated property, plus operating property depreciation and amortization and adjustments for minority interest and unconsolidated companies on the same basis. As clarified by NAREIT in October 2003, impairment losses on depreciable real estate assets are included in FFO. Our calculation of FFO is consistent with FFO as defined by NAREIT.

 

Supplemental Information

 

A copy of the Company’s third quarter 2005 Supplemental Information that includes leasing and operational statistics is available in the “Investor Relations/Quarterly Earnings” section of the Company’s Web site at www.highwoods.com. You may also obtain a copy of all Supplemental Information published by the Company by contacting Highwoods Investor Relations at 919-431-1521/ 800-256-2963 or by e-mail to HIW-IR@highwoods.com. If you would like to receive future Supplemental Information packages by e-mail, please contact the Investor Relations department as noted above or by written request to: Investor Relations Department, Highwoods Properties, Inc., 3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27604.

 

3


Highwoods Properties

October 25, 2005

 

Conference Call

 

On Wednesday, October 26, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern time, Highwoods will host a teleconference call to discuss the matters outlined in this press release. For US/Canada callers, dial (888) 202-5268 and international callers dial (706) 643-7509. A live listen-only Web cast can be accessed through the Company’s Web site at www.highwoods.com under the “Investor Relations” section.

 

Telephone and Web cast replays will be available two hours after the completion of the call. The telephone replay will be available beginning at 12:00 p.m. Eastern time through 5:00 p.m., Friday, November 4. Dial-in numbers for the replay are (800) 642-1687 US/Canada, (706) 645-9291 international. The conference ID is 1122022.

 

About the Company

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc., a member of the S&P MidCap 400 Index, is a fully integrated, self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that provides leasing, management, development, construction and other customer-related services for its properties and for third parties. As of September 30, 2005, the Company owned or had an interest in 454 in-service office, industrial and retail properties encompassing approximately 37.1 million square feet. Highwoods also owns 988 acres of development land. Highwoods is based in Raleigh, North Carolina, and its properties and development land are located in Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. For more information about Highwoods Properties, please visit our Web site at www.highwoods.com.

 

Certain matters discussed in this press release, such as the effect of tenant bankruptcies on our operations, expected timing of the filing of our SEC reports, anticipated continuing compliance with debt agreements, expected leasing and financing activities and financial and operating performance and the cost and timing of expected development projects and asset dispositions, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are distinguished by use of the words “will”, “expect”, “intends” and words of similar meaning. Although Highwoods believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved.

 

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Highwoods’ current expectations include, among others, the following: the financial condition of our customers could deteriorate; the final completion of audited financial statements and SOX 404 testing could necessitate additional unexpected adjustments and/or result in unexpected costs; unwaived defaults, if any, under our debt instruments could result in an acceleration of some of our outstanding debt; speculative development by others could result in excessive supply of office properties relative to customer demand; we may not be able to lease or re-lease space quickly or on as favorable terms as old leases; unexpected difficulties in obtaining additional capital to satisfy our future cash needs or unexpected increases in interest rates would increase our debt service costs; and others detailed in the Company’s amended 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent SEC reports.

 

4

EX-99.2 3 dex992.htm SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Supplemental Information

Exhibit 99.2

 

LOGO

 

Supplemental Information

September 30, 2005


Supplemental Information

Table of Contents

September 30, 2005

 

Schedule    


   Page

Summary and Corporate Information

   i, ii and iii

Capitalization

   1

Long-Term Debt Summary

   2

Long-Term Debt Detail

   3

Portfolio Summary

   4, 5 and 6

Occupancy Trends

   7

Leasing Statistics

   8, 9 and 10

Leasing Statistics by Market

   11

Rental Rate Comparisons by Market

   12

Lease Expirations

   13 and 14

Office Lease Expirations by Market by Quarter

   15

Industrial Lease Expirations by Market by Quarter

   16

Office Lease Expirations by Market by Year

   17

Industrial Lease Expirations by Market by Year

   18

Customer Diversification

   19

Acquisition Activity

   20

Disposition Activity and Depreciable Assets Contributed to Joint Ventures

   21

Development Activity

   22

Development Land

   23

Joint Ventures Portfolio Summary

   24

Joint Ventures Lease Expirations

   25

Joint Ventures Development

   26

 

The information within refers to all Highwoods Properties’ wholly-owned entities, except pages 24 to 26 unless noted otherwise.

 

Certain matters discussed in this supplemental, including estimates of net operating income, pre-leasing commitments and the cost, timing and stabilization of announced development projects, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Although Highwoods believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Highwoods’ current expectations include general economic conditions, local real estate conditions, the timely development and lease-up of properties, and the other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s SEC reports.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

      9/30/05


Corporate Information

 

Board of Directors

 

Thomas W. Adler

Gene H. Anderson

Kay N. Callison

Edward J. Fritsch

Ronald P. Gibson

William E. Graham Jr.

Lawrence S. Kaplan

L. Glenn Orr Jr.

O. Temple Sloan Jr., Chairman

Willard H. Smith Jr.

John L. Turner

F. William Vandiver, Jr.

 

Senior Management Team

 

Edward J. Fritsch

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

Michael E. Harris

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

 

Terry L. Stevens

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

 

Gene H. Anderson

Senior Vice President and Director

 

Michael F. Beale

Senior Vice President

 

Robert G. Cutlip

Senior Vice President

 

S. Hugh Esleeck

Treasurer

 

W. Brian Reames

Senior Vice President

 

Thomas S. Hill

Corporate Vice President, Leasing

 

Carman J. Liuzzo

Vice President, Investments

 

Kevin E. Penn

Chief Information Officer and Vice President, Strategy

 

Mack D. Pridgen III

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 

Research Coverage

 

Deutsche Banc Securities

Lou Taylor - - 212-469-4912

 

Green Street Advisors

Jim Sullivan - 949-640-8780

 

KeyBanc Capital Markets

Richard Moore - 216-443-2815

 

Legg Mason

David Fick - 410-454-5018

 

Morgan Stanley Dean Witter

Gregory Whyte - 212-761-6331

 

Prudential Equity Group

Jim Sullivan - 212-778-2515

 

Smith Barney Citigroup

Jonathan Litt - - 212-816-0231

 

Wachovia Securities

Chris Haley - 443-263-6773

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  ii   9/30/05


Corporate Information

 

Divisional Offices

 

Atlanta/Piedmont Triad

Gene H. Anderson - Regional Manager

 

Atlanta, GA

Gene H. Anderson, Senior Vice President

 

Piedmont Triad, NC

Mark W. Shumaker, Vice President

 

Orlando/Tampa

Michael F. Beale - Regional Manager

 

Orlando, FL

Michael F. Beale, Senior Vice President

 

Tampa, FL

Stephen A. Meyers, Vice President

 

Raleigh/Richmond

Robert G. Cutlip - Regional Manager

 

Raleigh, NC

Robert G. Cutlip, Senior Vice President

 

Richmond, VA

Paul W. Kreckman, Vice President

 

Memphis/Nashville/Columbia/Greenville

W. Brian Reames - Regional Manager

 

Nashville, TN

W. Brian Reames, Senior Vice President

 

Columbia, SC and Greenville, SC

W. Brian Reames, Senior Vice President

 

Memphis, TN

Steven Guinn, Vice President

 

Kansas City

 

Kansas City, MO

Barrett Brady, Senior Vice President

 

Corporate Headquarters

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600

Raleigh, NC 27604

919-872-4924

 

Stock Exchange

 

NYSE         Trading Symbol: HIW

 

Investor Relations Contact

 

Tabitha Zane

Vice President, Investor Relations

Phone:  919-431-1529

Fax:       919-876-6929

E-mail:  tabitha.zane@highwoods.com

 

Information Request

To request a standard Investor Relations package, Annual Report or to be added to our e-mail or fax list, please contact the Investor Relations Coordinator at:

Phone: 919-431-1521

Email: HIW-IR@highwoods.com

 

The Company

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc., a member of the S&P MidCap 400 Index, is a fully integrated, self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that provides leasing, management, development, construction and other customer-related services for its properties and for third parties. As of September 30, 2005, the Company owned or had an interest in 454 in-service office, industrial and retail properties encompassing approximately 37.1 million square feet. Highwoods also owns 988 acres of development land. Highwoods is based in Raleigh, North Carolina, and its properties and development land are located in Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. For more information about Highwoods Properties, please visit our Web site at www.highwoods.com.

LOGO

 

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  iii   9/30/05


Capitalization

 

Dollars, shares, and units in thousands

 

     09/30/05

   06/30/05

   03/31/05

   12/31/04

   09/30/04

Long-Term Debt (see page 9 & 10):

   $ 1,440,784    $ 1,558,999    $ 1,582,010    $ 1,572,169    $ 1,600,627

Eastshore Debt 1/

     —        19,800      —        —        —  
    

  

  

  

  

Total debt per the balance sheet

     1,440,784      1,578,799      1,582,010      1,572,169      1,600,627

Finance Obligations:

   $ 34,746    $ 43,168    $ 63,096    $ 65,309    $ 64,754

Preferred Stock (at redemtion value):

                                  

Series A 8 5/8% Perpetual Preferred Stock

   $ 104,945    $ 104,945    $ 104,945    $ 104,945    $ 104,945

Series B 8% Perpetual Preferred Stock

     142,500      172,500      172,500      172,500      172,500

Series D 8% Perpetual Preferred Stock

     —        100,000      100,000      100,000      100,000
    

  

  

  

  

Total preferred stock

   $ 247,445    $ 377,445    $ 377,445    $ 377,445    $ 377,445
    

  

  

  

  

Shares and Units Outstanding:

                                  

Common stock outstanding

     54,030      54,037      54,053      53,813      53,713

Minority interest partnership units

     5,493      5,668      5,828      6,102      6,128
    

  

  

  

  

Total shares and units outstanding

     59,523      59,705      59,881      59,915      59,841
    

  

  

  

  

Stock price at period end

   $ 29.51    $ 29.76    $ 26.82    $ 27.70    $ 24.61

Market value of common equity

   $ 1,756,524    $ 1,776,821    $ 1,606,008    $ 1,659,646    $ 1,472,687
    

  

  

  

  

Total market capitalization with debt and obligations 3/

   $ 3,479,499    $ 3,756,433    $ 3,628,559    $ 3,674,569    $ 3,515,513
    

  

  

  

  


1/ This debt is the 100% obligation of an entity that Highwoods has no ownership interest in but has been consolidated according to GAAP.

These properties are no longer consolidated as of 9/30/05.

 

See pages 24 to 26 for information regarding Highwoods’ Joint Ventures

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 1   9/30/05


Long-Term Debt Summary

 

Dollars in thousands

 

     09/30/05

    06/30/05

    03/31/05

    12/31/04

    09/30/04

 

Balances Outstanding:

                                        

Secured:

                                        

Conventional fixed rate 1/

   $ 676,558     $ 709,595     $ 754,226     $ 755,596     $ 768,324  

Variable rate debt 2/

     46,226       84,404       67,784       66,573       50,803  
    


 


 


 


 


Secured total

   $ 722,784     $ 793,999     $ 822,010     $ 822,169     $ 819,127  
    


 


 


 


 


Unsecured:

                                        

Fixed rate bonds and notes

   $ 460,000     $ 460,000     $ 460,000     $ 460,000     $ 460,000  

Variable rate debt

     100,000       120,000       120,000       120,000       120,000  

Credit facility

     158,000       185,000       180,000       170,000       201,500  
    


 


 


 


 


Unsecured total

   $ 718,000     $ 765,000     $ 760,000     $ 750,000     $ 781,500  
    


 


 


 


 


Total

   $ 1,440,784     $ 1,558,999     $ 1,582,010     $ 1,572,169     $ 1,600,627  
    


 


 


 


 


Average Interest Rates:

                                        

Secured:

                                        

Conventional fixed rate

     7.0 %     7.1 %     7.1 %     7.2 %     7.2 %

Variable rate debt

     5.0 %     4.9 %     4.7 %     4.2 %     3.7 %
    


 


 


 


 


Secured total

     6.9 %     6.8 %     6.9 %     6.9 %     6.9 %
    


 


 


 


 


Unsecured:

                                        

Fixed rate bonds

     7.4 %     7.4 %     7.4 %     7.4 %     7.4 %

Variable rate debt

     5.4 %     4.7 %     3.5 %     3.5 %     3.0 %

Credit facility

     4.9 %     4.3 %     3.4 %     3.4 %     2.2 %
    


 


 


 


 


Unsecured total

     6.5 %     6.2 %     6.0 %     5.9 %     5.4 %
    


 


 


 


 


Average

     6.7 %     6.5 %     6.5 %     6.4 %     6.2 %
    


 


 


 


 


 

Maturity Schedule:

 

     Future Maturities of Debt

  

Total Debt 3/


  

Average

Interest Rate


 

Year


   Secured Debt 3/

   Unsecured Debt

     

2005

   $ —      $ 100,000    $ 100,000    5.4 %

2006 4/

     2,102      268,000      270,102    5.8 %

2007

     115,539      —        115,539    6.9 %

2008

     —        100,000      100,000    7.1 %

2009

     168,273      50,000      218,273    7.9 %

2010

     135,941      —        135,941    7.8 %

2011

     —        —        —      —    

2012

     22,800      —        22,800    6.1 %

2013

     272,867      —        272,867    5.9 %

2014

     —        —        —      —    

Thereafter

     5,262      200,000      205,262    7.5 %
    

  

  

  

Total maturities

   $ 722,784    $ 718,000    $ 1,440,784    6.7 %
    

  

  

  

 

Weighted average maturity = 5.1 years


1/ Includes a $22.8 million loan related to a consolidated 20% owned joint venture property (Harborview).
2/ Includes the construction loan related to a consolidated 50% owned joint venture property (Vinings).
3/ Excludes annual principal amortization
4/ The $268.0 million of unsecured debt maturities includes $158.0 million related to the credit facility which matures in 2006.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 2   9/30/05


Long-Term Debt Detail

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Secured Loans

 

Lender    


   Rate

    Maturity
Date


   Loan
Balance
09/30/05


Monumental Life Ins. Co.

   7.8 %   Nov-09    $ 160,442

Northwestern Mutual

   6.0 %   Mar-13      140,405

Northwestern Mutual

   7.8 %   Nov-10      135,941

Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. 1/

   5.7 %   Dec-13      125,970

Northwestern Mutual

   8.2 %   Feb-07      63,872

PNC/Am South/Southtrust 2/

   5.1 %   Oct-07      38,271

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 3/

   6.1 %   Oct-12      22,800

PFL Life Ins. Co. 4/

   8.1 %   Jun-07      5,441

Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. 1/

   6.5 %   Dec-13      5,500

Ohio National

   8.0 %   Nov-17      5,262

Lutheran Brotherhood

   6.8 %   Apr-09      3,945

PFL Life Ins. Co. 4/ 5/

   6.2 %   Jun-07      3,544

USG Annuity

   7.7 %   Feb-06      2,102

Security Life of Denver

   8.9 %   Aug-09      2,023

Southland Life Ins. Co.

   8.8 %   Aug-09      1,864

American United Life

   9.0 %   Jun-13      991

Central Carolina Bank 3/ 6/

   3.8 %   Jan-08      4,411
    

      

     6.9 %        $ 722,784
    

      

Unsecured Bonds

                 

Bonds

   7.0 %   Dec-06    $ 110,000

Bonds

   7.1 %   Feb-08      100,000

Bonds

   8.1 %   Jan-09      50,000

Bonds

   7.5 %   Apr-18      200,000
    

      

     7.4 %        $ 460,000
    

      

Unsecured Loans

                 

Term Loan 2/

   5.4 %   Nov-05    $ 100,000

Line of Credit 2/

   4.9 %   Jul-06      158,000
    

      

     5.1 %        $ 258,000
    

      

Total Debt

   6.7 %        $ 1,440,784
    

      


1/ These two loans are secured by the same assets.
2/ Floating rate loan based on one month libor.
3/ Loan relates to a consolidated 20% owned joint venture property (Harborview).
4/ These two loans are secured by the same assets.
5/ Floating rate loan based on ninety day libor.
6/ Loan relates to a consolidated 50% owned joint venture property (Vinings).

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 3   9/30/05


Portfolio Summary - Wholly-Owned Properties Only 1/

 

(Rentable Square Feet)

 

     09/30/05

    06/30/05

    03/31/05

    12/31/04

    09/30/04

 
Office Industrial & Retail In-Service:                               

Office 2/

   21,432,000     23,849,000     24,254,000     24,628,000     25,151,000  

Industrial

   6,977,000     6,623,000     6,991,000     7,829,000     7,992,000  

Retail 3/

   1,417,000     1,417,000     1,409,000     1,409,000     1,410,000  
    

 

 

 

 

Total

   29,826,000     31,889,000     32,654,000     33,866,000     34,553,000  
    

 

 

 

 

Development Completed - Not Stabilized:                               

Office 2/

   —       —       —       —       —    

Industrial

   —       353,000     353,000     353,000     353,000  

Retail

   9,600     9,600     —       —       —    
    

 

 

 

 

Total

   9,600     362,600     353,000     353,000     353,000  
    

 

 

 

 

Development - In Process:                               

Office 2/

   780,000     710,000     358,000     358,000     333,000  

Industrial

   —       —       —       —       —    

Retail

   —       —       9,600     9,600     —    
    

 

 

 

 

Total

   780,000     710,000     367,600     367,600     333,000  
    

 

 

 

 

Total:                               

Office 2/

   22,212,000     24,559,000     24,612,000     24,986,000     25,484,000  

Industrial

   6,977,000     6,976,000     7,344,000     8,182,000     8,345,000  

Retail 3/

   1,426,600     1,426,600     1,418,600     1,418,600     1,410,000  
    

 

 

 

 

Total

   30,615,600     32,961,600     33,374,600     34,586,600     35,239,000  
    

 

 

 

 

Same Property                               

Office 2/

   21,092,000     21,092,000     21,092,000     21,092,000     21,092,000  

Industrial

   6,623,000     6,623,000     6,623,000     6,623,000     6,623,000  

Retail

   1,417,000     1,417,000     1,417,000     1,417,000     1,417,000  
    

 

 

 

 

Total

   29,132,000     29,132,000     29,132,000     29,132,000     29,132,000  
    

 

 

 

 

Percent Leased/Pre-Leased:                               
In-Service:                               

Office

   85.0 %   83.5 %   82.3 %   82.7 %   80.9 %

Industrial

   86.2 %   83.8 %   86.8 %   90.2 %   88.4 %

Retail

   96.4 %   96.0 %   95.5 %   97.3 %   94.5 %
    

 

 

 

 

Total

   85.8 %   84.1 %   83.8 %   85.0 %   83.2 %
    

 

 

 

 

Development Completed - Not Stabilized:                               

Office

   —       —       —       —       —    

Industrial

   —       100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %

Retail

   87.0 %   87.0 %   —       —       —    
    

 

 

 

 

Total

   87.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %
    

 

 

 

 

Development - In Process:                               

Office

   57.1 %   60.8 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %

Industrial

   —       —       —       —       0.0 %

Retail

   —       —       66.0 %   44.0 %   —    
    

 

 

 

 

Total

   57.1 %   61.1 %   99.1 %   98.5 %   100.0 %
    

 

 

 

 

Same Property                               

Office

   85.1 %   84.6 %   84.5 %   84.6 %   82.3 %

Industrial

   86.1 %   83.8 %   86.2 %   88.7 %   87.1 %

Retail

   96.4 %   96.0 %   95.1 %   96.8 %   94.1 %
    

 

 

 

 

Total

   85.8 %   85.0 %   85.4 %   86.1 %   83.9 %
    

 

 

 

 


1/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66
2/ Substantially all of our Office properties are located in suburban markets
3/ Excludes 430,000 square feet of basement space in the Country Club Plaza and other Kansas City retail properties

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 4   9/30/05


Portfolio Summary

(Continued)

 

As of 9/30/2005

 

Summary by Location, Wholly-Owned Properties Only 1/:

 

Market


  

Rentable

Square Feet


   

Occupancy


    Percentage of Annualized Revenue 2/

 
       Office

    Industrial

    Retail

    Total

 

Raleigh 3/

   4,358,000     85.5 %   16.1 %   0.2 %   —       16.3 %

Atlanta

   6,818,000     83.3 %   12.3 %   3.8 %   —       16.1 %

Kansas City

   2,316,000 4/   91.7 %   4.3 %   —       9.5 %   13.8 %

Nashville

   2,874,000     95.6 %   13.0 %   —       —       13.0 %

Tampa

   2,851,000     76.7 %   11.5 %   —       —       11.5 %

Piedmont Triad 5/

   5,589,000     89.1 %   7.0 %   3.6 %   —       10.6 %

Richmond

   1,955,000     93.1 %   8.3 %   —       —       8.3 %

Memphis

   1,216,000     83.8 %   4.8 %   —       —       4.8 %

Greenville

   1,105,000     71.2 %   2.7 %   0.1 %   —       2.8 %

Columbia

   426,000     62.1 %   1.2 %   —       —       1.2 %

Orlando

   218,000     100.0 %   1.2 %   —       —       1.2 %

Other

   100,000     56.3 %   0.4 %   —       —       0.4 %
    

 

 

 

 

 

Total

   29,826,000     85.8 %   82.8 %   7.7 %   9.5 %   100.0 %
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary by Location, Including Joint Venture Properties:

 

Market


  

Rentable

Square Feet


   

Occupancy


    Percentage of Annualized Revenue 2/ 6/

 
       Office

    Industrial

    Retail

    Multi-
Family


    Total

 

Piedmont Triad

   5,953,000     89.7 %   6.6 %   3.2 %   —       —       9.8 %

Atlanta

   7,653,000     84.3 %   12.3 %   3.3 %   —       —       15.6 %

Raleigh

   4,813,000     86.8 %   14.8 %   0.1 %   —       —       14.9 %

Tampa

   3,056,000     78.3 %   10.4 %   —       —       —       10.4 %

Kansas City

   3,029,000 4/   89.7 %   4.8 %   0.0 %   8.4 %   —       13.2 %

Richmond

   2,368,000     94.3 %   8.0 %   —       —       —       8.0 %

Nashville

   2,874,000     95.6 %   11.6 %   —       —       —       11.6 %

Orlando

   1,903,000     92.6 %   4.1 %   —       —       —       4.1 %

Des Moines

   2,324,000     90.8 %   3.3 %   0.4 %   0.1 %   0.4 %   4.2 %

Greenville

   1,105,000     71.2 %   2.4 %   0.1 %   —       —       2.5 %

Memphis

   1,216,000     83.8 %   4.2 %   —       —       —       4.2 %

Columbia

   426,000     62.0 %   1.0 %   —       —       —       1.0 %

Other

   210,000     79.2 %   0.4 %   —       —       —       0.4 %

Charlotte

   148,000     100.0 %   0.1 %   0.0 %   —       —       0.1 %
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

   37,078,000     87.2 %   84.0 %   7.1 %   8.5 %   0.4 %   100.0 %
    

 

 

 

 

 

 


1/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66
2/ Annualized Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
3/ Raleigh Market encompasses Raleigh, Durham, Cary, and Research Triangle metropolitan area.
4/ Excludes 430,000 square feet of basement space in the Country Club Plaza and other Kansas City retail properties
5/ Piedmont Triad Market encompasses Greensboro, Winston-Salem metropolitan area.
6/ Includes Highwoods’ share of Joint Venture Annualized Rental Revenue, see page 24

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 5   9/30/05


Portfolio Summary - Wholly-Owned Properties Only 1/

(Continued)

 

As of 9/30/2005

 

     Office Properties

    Industrial

 

Market


   Rentable
Square Feet


   Occupancy

    Percentage
of Office
Annualized
Revenue 2/


    Rentable
Square
Feet


   Occupancy

    Percentage
of Industrial
Annualized
Revenue 2/


 

Raleigh

   4,257,000    85.9 %   19.6 %   101,000    68.9 %   2.0 %

Nashville

   2,874,000    95.6 %   15.7 %   —      —       —    

Atlanta

   3,492,000    80.5 %   14.9 %   3,326,000    86.1 %   49.3 %

Tampa

   2,851,000    76.7 %   13.9 %   —      —       —    

Richmond

   1,955,000    93.1 %   10.1 %   —      —       —    

Piedmont Triad

   2,146,000    90.1 %   8.4 %   3,443,000    88.4 %   47.5 %

Memphis

   1,216,000    83.8 %   5.8 %   —      —       —    

Kansas City

   895,000    84.2 %   5.2 %   4,000    100.0 %   0.1 %

Greenville

   1,002,000    75.5 %   3.2 %   103,000    28.9 %   1.1 %

Columbia

   426,000    62.1 %   1.4 %   —      —       —    

Orlando

   218,000    100.0 %   1.4 %   —      —       —    

Other

   100,000    56.3 %   0.4 %   —      —       —    
    
  

 

 
  

 

     21,432,000    85.0 %   100.0 %   6,977,000    86.2 %   100.0 %
    
  

 

 
  

 

 

     Retail

 

Market


   Rentable
Square
Feet


   Occupancy

    Percentage
of Retail
Annualized
Revenue 2/


 

Kansas City 3/

   1,417,000    96.4 %   100.0 %
    
  

 

     1,417,000    96.4 %   100.0 %
    
  

 


1/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66
2/ Annualized Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
3/ Excludes 430,000 square feet of basement space in the Country Club Plaza and other Kansas City retail properties

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 6   9/30/05


Occupancy Trends - Office, Industrial and Retail Properties 1/

 

Market


  

Measurement


   09/30/05

    06/30/05

    03/31/05

    12/31/04

    09/30/04

 

Atlanta

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/3/

   6,818,000
83.3
83.0
 
%
%
  6,465,000
81.9
81.9
 
%
%
  6,826,000
83.0
82.3
 
%
%
  6,825,000
83.7
83.3
 
%
%
  6,825,000
81.3
80.9
 
%
%

Charlotte

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/

   —  
—  
—  
 
 
 
  1,492,000
66.9
—  
 
%
 
  1,492,000
67.7
—  
 
%
 
  1,492,000
72.9
—  
 
%
 
  1,655,000
74.6
—  
 
%
 

Columbia

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/

   426,000
62.0
62.0
 
%
%
  426,000
61.6
61.6
 
%
%
  426,000
59.9
59.9
 
%
%
  426,000
60.4
60.4
 
%
%
  426,000
57.5
57.5
 
%
%

Greenville

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/

   1,105,000
71.2
71.2
 
%
%
  1,105,000
75.5
75.5
 
%
%
  1,127,000
81.1
82.7
 
%
%
  1,127,000
80.5
82.1
 
%
%
  1,319,000
79.4
80.0
 
%
%

Kansas City 4/

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/

   2,315,000
91.7
91.7
 
%
%
  2,315,000
91.4
91.4
 
%
%
  2,308,000
91.6
91.3
 
%
%
  2,308,000
94.1
93.8
 
%
%
  2,308,000
92.4
92.1
 
%
%

Memphis

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/

   1,216,000
83.8
83.8
 
%
%
  1,216,000
82.3
82.3
 
%
%
  1,216,000
80.6
80.6
 
%
%
  1,216,000
83.2
83.2
 
%
%
  1,216,000
82.1
82.1
 
%
%

Nashville

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/

   2,874,000
95.6
95.6
 
%
%
  2,873,000
95.1
95.0
 
%
%
  2,870,000
92.8
92.7
 
%
%
  2,870,000
93.3
93.2
 
%
%
  2,870,000
93.4
93.3
 
%
%

Orlando

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/

   218,000
100.0
100.0
 
%
%
  218,000
96.8
96.8
 
%
%
  222,000
97.7
99.5
 
%
%
  222,000
93.2
94.9
 
%
%
  387,000
94.4
94.9
 
%
%

Piedmont Triad

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/

   5,589,000
89.1
89.1
 
%
%
  5,593,000
88.3
88.4
 
%
%
  5,722,000
90.4
91.0
 
%
%
  6,652,000
92.5
91.9
 
%
%
  6,652,000
91.9
91.2
 
%
%

Raleigh

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/

   4,358,000
85.5
85.5
 
%
%
  4,432,000
83.8
83.8
 
%
%
  4,432,000
83.3
83.2
 
%
%
  4,597,000
83.8
83.2
 
%
%
  4,739,000
81.1
80.1
 
%
%

Richmond

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/3/

   1,955,000
93.1
92.7
 
%
%
  1,841,000
93.2
93.2
 
%
%
  1,836,000
95.1
94.8
 
%
%
  1,835,000
94.1
93.7
 
%
%
  1,835,000
92.0
91.7
 
%
%

Tampa

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

Current Properties 2/

   2,851,000
76.7
76.7
 
%
%
  3,813,000
77.2
73.3
 
%
%
  4,077,000
70.5
71.1
 
%
%
  4,196,000
71.0
72.4
 
%
%
  4,221,000
66.1
65.5
 
%
%
         

 

 

 

 

Total 5/

  

Rentable Square Feet

Occupancy

   29,725,000
85.8
 
%
  31,789,000
84.1
 
%
  32,554,000
83.8
 
%
  33,766,000
85.0
 
%
  34,453,000
83.2
 
%
         

 

 

 

 

     Current Properties 2/3/    85.8 %   84.8 %   85.2 %   85.9 %   83.7 %
         

 

 

 

 


1/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66
2/ Only properties that were owned and in-service on September 30, 2005 are included for each quarter shown.
3/ Excludes properties placed in service in Q3 05
4/ Excludes 430,000 square feet of basement space in the Country Club Plaza and other Kansas City retail properties
5/ Excludes a 100,000 square foot building located in South Florida

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 7   9/30/05


Leasing Statistics

 

Office Portfolio 1/

 

     Three Months Ended

 
     9/30/05 2/

    6/30/05 3/

    3/31/05 4/

    12/31/04 5/

    9/30/04 6/

    Average

 

Net Effective Rents Related to Re-Leased Space:

                                                

Number of lease transactions (signed leases)

     180       223       188       206       219       203  

Rentable square footage leased

     1,069,468       1,155,513       1,235,718       1,101,291       1,368,577       1,186,113  

Square footage of Renewal Deals

     826,512       785,827       677,799       726,959       703,003       744,020  

Renewed square footage (% of total)

     77.3 %     68.0 %     54.9 %     66.0 %     51.4 %     62.7 %

New Leases square footage (% of total)

     22.7 %     32.0 %     45.1 %     34.0 %     48.6 %     37.3 %

Average per rentable square foot over the lease term:

                                                

Base rent

   $ 17.71     $ 17.31     $ 16.20     $ 17.40     $ 16.68     $ 17.06  

Tenant improvements

     (1.10 )     (1.45 )     (0.94 )     (1.51 )     (1.27 )     (1.25 )

Leasing commissions 7/

     (0.57 )     (0.60 )     (0.66 )     (0.62 )     (0.64 )     (0.62 )

Rent concessions

     (0.27 )     (0.31 )     (0.41 )     (0.31 )     (0.37 )     (0.33 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


Effective rent

     15.77       14.95       14.19       14.96       14.40       14.86  

Expense stop

     (4.85 )     (5.33 )     (4.46 )     (5.61 )     (5.32 )     (5.11 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


Equivalent effective net rent

   $ 10.92     $ 9.62     $ 9.73     $ 9.35     $ 9.08     $ 9.75  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Average term in years

     3.8       4.1       5.7       5.0       3.7       4.4  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Capital Expenditures Related to Re-leased Space:

                                                

Tenant Improvements:

                                                

Total dollars committed under signed leases

   $ 5,996,413     $ 8,869,553     $ 5,644,830     $ 9,208,835     $ 9,455,102     $ 7,834,947  

Rentable square feet

     1,069,468       1,155,513       1,235,718       1,101,291       1,368,577       1,186,113  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Per rentable square foot

   $ 5.61     $ 7.68     $ 4.57     $ 8.36     $ 6.91     $ 6.61  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Leasing Commissions:

                                                

Total dollars committed under signed leases 7/

   $ 2,398,139     $ 2,629,936     $ 4,109,601     $ 2,806,566     $ 2,969,620     $ 2,982,772  

Rentable square feet

     1,069,468       1,155,513       1,235,718       1,101,291       1,368,577       1,186,113  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Per rentable square foot

   $ 2.24     $ 2.28     $ 3.33     $ 2.55     $ 2.17     $ 2.51  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Total:

                                                

Total dollars committed under signed leases

   $ 8,394,553     $ 11,499,489     $ 9,754,430     $ 12,015,400     $ 12,424,721     $ 10,817,719  

Rentable square feet

     1,069,468       1,155,513       1,235,718       1,101,291       1,368,577       1,186,113  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Per rentable square foot

   $ 7.85     $ 9.95     $ 7.89     $ 10.91     $ 9.08     $ 9.12  
    


 


 


 


 


 



1/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66
2/ Includes 115K square feet of leases that start in 2007 or later
3/ Includes 68K square feet of leases that start in 2007 or later
4/ Includes 89K square feet of leases that start in 2007 or later
5/ Includes 111K square feet of leases that start in 2007 or later
6/ Includes 128K square feet of leases that start in 2006 or later
7/ Excludes a full allocation of internal marketing cost

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 8   9/30/05


Leasing Statistics

 

Industrial Portfolio

 

     Three Months Ended

 
     9/30/05 1/

    6/30/05 2/

    3/31/05

    12/31/04

    9/30/04 3/

    Average

 

Net Effective Rents Related to Re-Leased Space:

                                                

Number of lease transactions (signed leases)

     32       30       15       36       34       29  

Rentable square footage leased

     498,819       359,342       599,048       1,216,644       285,706       591,912  

Square footage of Renewal Deals

     349,405       224,203       579,069       875,445       246,797       454,984  

Renewed square footage (% of total)

     70.0 %     62.4 %     96.7 %     72.0 %     86.4 %     76.9 %

New Leases square footage (% of total)

     30.0 %     37.6 %     3.3 %     28.0 %     13.6 %     23.1 %

Average per rentable square foot over the lease term:

                                                

Base rent

   $ 4.19     $ 5.16     $ 3.39     $ 3.49     $ 4.73     $ 4.19  

Tenant improvements

     (0.45 )     (0.51 )     (0.16 )     (0.13 )     (0.33 )     (0.32 )

Leasing commissions 4/

     (0.06 )     (0.12 )     (0.06 )     (0.06 )     (0.07 )     (0.07 )

Rent concessions

     (0.02 )     (0.16 )     (0.01 )     (0.03 )     (0.05 )     (0.05 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


Effective rent

     3.66       4.37       3.16       3.27       4.28       3.75  

Expense stop

     (0.38 )     (0.31 )     (0.08 )     (0.09 )     (0.54 )     (0.28 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


Equivalent effective net rent

   $ 3.28     $ 4.06     $ 3.08     $ 3.18     $ 3.74     $ 3.47  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Average term in years

     4.1       3.7       1.3       2.0       2.6       2.7  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Capital Expenditures Related to Re-leased Space:

                                                

Tenant Improvements:

                                                

Total dollars committed under signed leases

   $ 1,256,241     $ 917,527     $ 361,044     $ 756,077     $ 307,534     $ 719,684  

Rentable square feet

     498,819       359,342       599,048       1,216,644       285,706       591,912  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Per rentable square foot

   $ 2.52     $ 2.55     $ 0.60     $ 0.62     $ 1.08     $ 1.22  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Leasing Commissions:

                                                

Total dollars committed under signed leases 4/

   $ 185,669     $ 172,719     $ 63,473     $ 226,000     $ 64,714     $ 142,515  

Rentable square feet

     498,819       359,342       599,048       1,216,644       285,706       591,912  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Per rentable square foot

   $ 0.37     $ 0.48     $ 0.11     $ 0.19     $ 0.23     $ 0.24  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Total:

                                                

Total dollars committed under signed leases

   $ 1,441,910     $ 1,090,245     $ 424,517     $ 982,077     $ 372,247     $ 862,199  

Rentable square feet

     498,819       359,342       599,048       1,216,644       285,706       591,912  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Per rentable square foot

   $ 2.89     $ 3.03     $ 0.71     $ 0.81     $ 1.30     $ 1.46  
    


 


 


 


 


 



1/ Includes 113K square feet of leases that start in 2007 or later
2/ Includes 4K square feet of leases that start in 2007 or later
3/ Includes 74K square feet of leases that start in 2006 or later
4/ Excludes a full allocation of internal marketing cost

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 9   9/30/05


Leasing Statistics

 

Retail Portfolio

 

     Three Months Ended

 
     9/30/05

    6/30/05 1/

    3/31/05

    12/31/04

    9/30/04 2/

    Average

 

Net Effective Rents Related to Re-Leased Space:

 

                                       

Number of lease transactions (signed leases)

     7       10       4       23       18       12  

Rentable square footage leased

     10,721       39,723       10,993       106,629       34,300       40,473  

Square footage of Renewal Deals

     6,502       36,118       1,750       78,579       15,530       27,696  

Renewed square footage (% of total)

     60.6 %     90.9 %     15.9 %     73.7 %     45.3 %     68.4 %

New Leases square footage (% of total)

     39.4 %     9.1 %     84.1 %     26.3 %     54.7 %     31.6 %

Average per rentable square foot over the lease term:

                                                

Base rent

   $ 17.61     $ 21.49     $ 26.09     $ 17.03     $ 26.45     $ 21.73  

Tenant improvements

     (1.21 )     (1.64 )     (2.65 )     (1.73 )     (1.84 )     (1.81 )

Leasing commissions 3/

     (1.11 )     (0.40 )     (0.88 )     (0.26 )     (0.56 )     (0.64 )

Rent concessions

     (0.08 )     0.00       0.00       0.00       (0.04 )     (0.02 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


Effective rent

     15.21       19.45       22.56       15.04       24.01       19.26  

Expense stop

     0.00       0.00       0.00       0.00       0.00       0.00  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Equivalent effective net rent

   $ 15.21     $ 19.45     $ 22.56     $ 15.04     $ 24.01     $ 19.26  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Average term in years

     4.3       8.7       9.3       8.3       5.7       7.3  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Capital Expenditures Related to Re-leased Space:

                                                

Tenant Improvements:

                                                

Total dollars committed under signed leases

   $ 62,187     $ 695,152     $ 308,098     $ 2,137,327     $ 403,309     $ 721,215  

Rentable square feet

     10,721       39,723       10,993       106,629       34,300       40,473  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Per rentable square foot

   $ 5.80     $ 17.50     $ 28.03     $ 20.04     $ 11.76     $ 17.82  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Leasing Commissions:

                                                

Total dollars committed under signed leases 3/

   $ 12,026     $ 43,041     $ 3,778     $ 220,528     $ 86,458     $ 73,166  

Rentable square feet

     10,721       39,723       10,993       106,629       34,300       40,473  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Per rentable square foot

   $ 1.12     $ 1.08     $ 0.34     $ 2.07     $ 2.52     $ 1.81  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Total:

                                                

Total dollars committed under signed leases

   $ 74,213     $ 738,193     $ 311,876     $ 2,357,855     $ 489,767     $ 794,381  

Rentable square feet

     10,721       39,723       10,993       106,629       34,300       40,473  
    


 


 


 


 


 


Per rentable square foot

   $ 6.92     $ 18.58     $ 28.37     $ 22.11     $ 14.28     $ 19.63  
    


 


 


 


 


 



1/ Includes 16K square feet of leases that start in 2007 or later
2/ Includes 6K square feet of leases that start in 2006 or later
3/ Excludes a full allocation of internal marketing cost

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 10   9/30/05


Leasing Statistics by Market

 

For the Three Months ended September 30, 2005

 

Office Portfolio 1/

 

Market


   Rentable
Square Feet
Leased


   Average
Term


   GAAP
Rental
Rate


   TI’s
Per SF


  

Lease
Commissions

Per SF 2/


Atlanta

   302,736    2.3    $ 16.50    $ 2.55    $ 0.48

Raleigh

   202,649    4.4      17.72      5.68      2.31

Piedmont Triad

   168,941    3.7      15.58      2.43      2.50

Tampa

   118,982    5.1      16.83      13.33      4.41

Memphis

   93,278    3.0      19.15      6.45      0.73

Richmond

   62,313    4.8      20.12      8.91      2.46

Nashville

   45,811    3.9      19.77      3.56      1.83

Kansas City

   38,763    5.9      24.86      7.44      4.97

Greenville

   28,606    6.0      14.35      15.40      6.57

Columbia

   7,389    4.6      15.00      3.88      2.36
    
  
  

  

  

     1,069,468    3.8    $ 17.44    $ 5.61    $ 2.24
    
  
  

  

  

Industrial Portfolio

                              

Market


   Rentable
Square Feet
Leased


   Average
Term


   GAAP
Rental
Rate


   TI’s
Per SF


  

Lease
Commissions

Per SF 2/


Atlanta

   293,881    5.6    $ 3.85    $ 3.29      0.49

Piedmont Triad

   193,233    1.9      4.54      1.40    $ 0.14

Raleigh

   11,705    2.5      5.96      1.74      0.38
    
  
  

  

  

     498,819    4.1    $ 4.17    $ 2.52    $ 0.37
    
  
  

  

  

Retail Portfolio

                              

Market


   Rentable
Square Feet
Leased


   Average
Term


   GAAP
Rental
Rate


   TI’s
Per SF


   Lease
Commissions
Per SF


Kansas City

   10,721    4.3    $ 17.53    $ 5.80    $ 1.12
    
  
  

  

  

     10,721    4.3    $ 17.53    $ 5.80    $ 1.12
    
  
  

  

  


1/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66
2/ Total lease commissions per square foot excludes all internal charges from Leasing Departments, which are not allocated to individual leases.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 11   9/30/05


Rental Rate Comparisons by Market

 

For the Three Months ended September 30, 2005

 

Office Portfolio 1/

 

Market


   Rentable
Square Feet
Leased


   Current
Rent


   Previous
Rent


   Percentage
Change
Rent


 

Atlanta

   302,736    $ 16.50    $ 17.67    -6.6 %

Raleigh

   202,649      17.72      19.73    -10.2 %

Piedmont Triad

   168,941      15.58      14.99    3.9 %

Tampa

   118,982      16.83      16.80    0.2 %

Memphis

   93,278      19.15      19.44    -1.5 %

Richmond

   62,313      20.12      20.07    0.2 %

Nashville

   45,811      19.77      18.94    4.4 %

Kansas City

   38,763      24.86      21.91    13.5 %

Greenville

   28,606      14.35      12.43    15.5 %

Columbia

   7,389      15.00      16.79    -10.7 %
    
  

  

  

GAAP Rent Growth

   1,069,468    $ 17.44    $ 17.90    -2.6 %
    
  

  

  

Cash Rent Growth

   1,069,468    $ 17.25    $ 18.50    -6.8 %
    
  

  

  

Industrial Portfolio                          

Market


  

Rentable

Square Feet
Leased


   Current
Rent


   Previous
Rent


  

Percentage

Change
Rent


 

Atlanta

   293,881    $ 3.85    $ 3.57    7.8 %

Piedmont Triad

   193,233      4.54      5.15    -11.8 %

Raleigh

   11,705      5.96      8.74    -31.8 %
    
  

  

  

GAAP Rent Growth

   498,819    $ 4.17    $ 4.29    -2.7 %
    
  

  

  

Cash Rent Growth

   498,819    $ 4.12    $ 4.58    -10.0 %
    
  

  

  

Retail Portfolio                          

Market


   Rentable
Square Feet
Leased


   Current
Rent


   Previous
Rent


   Percentage
Change
Rent


 

Kansas City

   10,721    $ 17.53    $ 16.06    9.2 %
    
  

  

  

GAAP Rent Growth

   10,721    $ 17.53    $ 16.06    9.2 %
    
  

  

  

Cash Rent Growth

   10,721    $ 21.18    $ 21.05    0.6 %
    
  

  

  


1/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 12   9/30/05


Lease Expirations

 

September 30, 2005

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Year


   Rentable
Square Feet
Expiring


   Percent of
Rentable
Square Feet


    Annualized
Revenue 1/


   Average
Rental
Rate


   Percent of
Annualized
Revenue 1/


 
Office: 2/                                

2005 3/

   794,863    4.4 %   $ 15,763    $ 19.83    4.9 %

2006

   2,752,158    15.1 %     50,805      18.46    15.7 %

2007

   1,852,512    10.2 %     32,470      17.53    10.0 %

2008

   2,970,923    16.3 %     49,464      16.65    15.3 %

2009

   2,539,491    13.9 %     46,212      18.20    14.3 %

2010

   2,257,033    12.4 %     40,847      18.10    12.6 %

2011

   1,693,399    9.3 %     31,968      18.88    9.9 %

2012

   963,090    5.3 %     18,779      19.50    5.8 %

2013

   513,992    2.8 %     9,288      18.07    2.9 %

2014

   419,428    2.3 %     8,249      19.67    2.5 %

2015 and thereafter

   1,466,224    8.0 %     19,776      13.49    6.1 %
    
  

 

  

  

     18,223,113    100.0 %   $ 323,621    $ 17.76    100.0 %
    
  

 

  

  

Industrial:                                

2005 4/

   728,643    12.1 %   $ 3,609    $ 4.95    12.1 %

2006

   1,430,255    23.8 %     6,248      4.37    20.8 %

2007

   1,059,493    17.6 %     6,245      5.89    20.9 %

2008

   774,959    12.9 %     3,578      4.62    12.0 %

2009

   682,606    11.4 %     4,072      5.97    13.6 %

2010

   418,362    7.0 %     2,037      4.87    6.8 %

2011

   174,401    2.9 %     788      4.52    2.6 %

2012

   198,536    3.3 %     975      4.91    3.3 %

2013

   102,384    1.7 %     637      6.22    2.1 %

2014

   206,731    3.4 %     835      4.04    2.8 %

2015 and thereafter

   235,432    3.9 %     894      3.80    3.0 %
    
  

 

  

  

     6,011,802    100.0 %   $ 29,918    $ 4.98    100.0 %
    
  

 

  

  


1/ Annualized Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
2/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66
3/ Includes 208,000 square feet of leases that are on a month to month basis or 0.9% of total annualized revenue
4/ Includes 143,000 square feet of leases that are on a month to month basis or 0.1% of total annualized revenue

 

Note: 2005 and beyond expirations that have been renewed are reflected above based on the renewal expiration date.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 13   9/30/05


Lease Expirations

 

September 30, 2005

 

(Continued)

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Year


   Rentable
Square Feet
Expiring


   Percent of
Rentable
Square Feet


    Annualized
Revenue 1/


   Average
Rental
Rate


   Percent of
Annualized
Revenue 1/


 
Retail:                                

2005 2/

   4,243    0.3 %   $ 20    $ 4.71    0.1 %

2006

   103,699    7.5 %     2,539      24.48    6.8 %

2007

   85,689    6.2 %     2,530      29.53    6.7 %

2008

   129,441    9.4 %     3,650      28.20    9.7 %

2009

   178,477    13.0 %     4,495      25.19    11.9 %

2010

   100,472    7.3 %     3,433      34.17    9.1 %

2011

   57,974    4.2 %     1,807      31.17    4.8 %

2012

   132,034    9.6 %     3,893      29.48    10.4 %

2013

   109,674    8.0 %     2,843      25.92    7.6 %

2014

   80,159    5.8 %     1,453      18.13    3.9 %

2015 and thereafter

   392,705    28.7 %     10,941      27.86    29.0 %
    
  

 

  

  

     1,374,567    100.0 %   $ 37,604    $ 27.36    100.0 %
    
  

 

  

  

Total:                                

2005 3/4/

   1,527,749    6.0 %   $ 19,392    $ 12.69    5.0 %

2006

   4,286,112    16.7 %     59,592      13.90    15.3 %

2007

   2,997,694    11.7 %     41,245      13.76    10.5 %

2008

   3,875,323    15.1 %     56,692      14.63    14.5 %

2009

   3,400,574    13.3 %     54,779      16.11    14.0 %

2010

   2,775,867    10.8 %     46,317      16.69    11.8 %

2011

   1,925,774    7.5 %     34,563      17.95    8.8 %

2012

   1,293,660    5.1 %     23,647      18.28    6.0 %

2013

   726,050    2.8 %     12,768      17.59    3.3 %

2014

   706,318    2.8 %     10,537      14.92    2.7 %

2015 and thereafter

   2,094,361    8.2 %     31,611      15.09    8.1 %
    
  

 

  

  

     25,609,482    100.0 %   $ 391,143    $ 15.27    100.0 %
    
  

 

  

  


1/ Annualized Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
2/ Includes 4,000 square feet of leases that are on a month to month basis or 0.0% of total annualized revenue
3/ Includes 355,000 square feet of leases that are on a month to month basis or 1.0% of total annualized revenue
4/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66

 

Note: 2005 and beyond expirations that have been renewed are reflected above based on the renewal expiration date.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 14   9/30/05


Office Lease Expirations by Market by Quarter 1/

 

Dollars in thousands

 

         Three Months Ended

       
         9/30/05 /2

    12/31/05

    03/31/06

    06/30/06

    Total

 

Atlanta

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
163,640
0.9
3,554
1.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
145,050
0.8
1,911
0.6
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
57,301
0.3
887
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
171,081
0.9
2,752
0.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
537,072
2.9
9,104
2.8
 
%
 
%

Columbia

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
21,397
0.1
503
0.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,077
0.0
18
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
17,391
0.1
369
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
39,865
0.2
890
0.3
 
%
 
%

Greenville

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
1,160
0.0
21
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
29,998
0.2
589
0.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
119,623
0.7
2,248
0.7
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
10,699
0.1
221
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
161,480
0.9
3,079
1.0
 
%
 
%

Kansas City

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
59,074
0.3
1,182
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
52,871
0.3
1,134
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
18,549
0.1
373
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
22,735
0.1
497
0.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
153,229
0.8
3,186
1.0
 
%
 
%

Memphis

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
10,404
0.1
185
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
41,602
0.2
826
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
25,086
0.1
430
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
16,128
0.1
312
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
93,220
0.5
1,753
0.5
 
%
 
%

Nashville

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
128,259
0.7
2,558
0.8
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
155,870
0.9
3,063
0.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
50,911
0.3
1,061
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
65,882
0.4
1,400
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
400,922
2.2
8,082
2.5
 
%
 
%

Orlando

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%

Piedmont Triad

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
95,109
0.5
1,380
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
80,856
0.4
1,412
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
58,389
0.3
1,043
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
57,095
0.3
1,002
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
291,449
1.6
4,837
1.5
 
%
 
%

Raleigh

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
167,299
0.9
3,448
1.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
220,681
1.2
4,360
1.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
81,902
0.4
1,726
0.5
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
259,236
1.4
3,261
1.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
729,118
4.0
12,795
4.0
 
%
 
%

Richmond

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
80,848
0.4
1,205
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
85,774
0.5
1,450
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
22,510
0.1
410
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
39,673
0.2
1,002
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
228,805
1.3
4,067
1.3
 
%
 
%

Tampa

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
68,567
0.4
1,740
0.5
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
53,068
0.3
1,093
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
76,033
0.4
1,516
0.5
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
8,978
0.0
179
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
206,646
1.1
4,528
1.4
 
%
 
%

Other

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
1,095
0.0
5
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,095
0.0
5
0.0
 
%
 
%

Total

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
796,852
4.3
15,781
4.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
866,847
4.8
15,856
4.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
510,304
2.8
9,694
3.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
668,898
3.7
10,995
3.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
2,842,901
15.6
52,326
16.2
 
%
 
%

1/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66
2/ Includes 208,000 square feet of leases that are on a month to month basis or 0.9% of total annualized revenue
3/ Annualized Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 15   9/30/05


Industrial Lease Expirations by Market by Quarter

 

Dollars in thousands

 

         Three Months Ended

   

Total


 
         9/30/05 /1

    12/31/05

    03/31/06

    06/30/06

   

Atlanta

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
594,875
9.9
3,027
10.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
122,812
2.0
656
2.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
34,091
0.6
236
0.8
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
93,720
1.6
444
1.5
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
845,498
14.1
4,363
14.6
 
%
 
%

Greenville

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
16,081
0.3
206
0.7
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
16,081
0.3
206
0.7
 
%
 
%

Kansas City

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
2,018
0.0
17
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
2,018
0.0
17
0.1
 
%
 
%

Piedmont Triad

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
120,608
2.0
468
1.6
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
529,737
8.8
1,840
6.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
225,924
3.8
686
2.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
262,102
4.4
1,171
3.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,138,371
18.9
4,165
13.9
 
%
 
%

Raleigh

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
13,160
0.2
114
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
9,548
0.2
93
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
22,708
0.4
207
0.7
 
%
 
%

Total

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
728,643
12.1
3,609
12.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
680,196
11.3
2,812
9.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
260,015
4.3
922
3.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
355,822
5.9
1,615
5.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
2,024,676
33.7
8,958
30.0
 
%
 
%

1/ Includes 143,000 square feet of leases that are on a month to month basis or 0.1% of total annualized revenue
2/ Annualized Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 16   9/30/05


Office Lease Expirations by Market by Year 1/

 

Dollars in thousands

 

         2005 2/

    2006

    2007

    2008

    Thereafter

 

Atlanta

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
161,651
0.9
3,536
1.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
414,024
2.3
6,252
1.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
264,823
1.5
3,681
1.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
573,366
3.1
8,850
2.7
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,397,436
7.7
25,892
8.0
 
%
 
%

Columbia

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
21,397
0.1
503
0.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
61,836
0.3
1,173
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
61,766
0.3
1,048
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
63,170
0.3
1,102
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
56,114
0.3
700
0.2
 
%
 
%

Greenville

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
1,160
0.0
21
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
188,865
1.0
3,593
1.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
16,115
0.1
302
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
99,410
0.5
1,824
0.6
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
451,237
2.5
4,696
1.5
 
%
 
%

Kansas City

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
59,074
0.3
1,182
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
132,238
0.7
2,806
0.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
94,911
0.5
1,976
0.6
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
78,678
0.4
1,598
0.5
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
388,577
2.1
9,386
2.9
 
%
 
%

Memphis

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
10,404
0.1
185
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
89,993
0.5
1,706
0.5
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
109,136
0.6
2,103
0.6
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
179,883
1.0
3,571
1.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
629,076
3.5
11,216
3.5
 
%
 
%

Nashville

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
128,259
0.7
2,558
0.8
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
446,187
2.4
9,009
2.8
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
203,191
1.1
3,909
1.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
238,629
1.3
4,710
1.5
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,732,146
9.5
30,718
9.5
 
%
 
%

Orlando

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
6,465
0.0
175
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
21,694
0.1
447
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
9,240
0.1
199
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
180,533
1.0
3,794
1.2
 
%
 
%

Piedmont Triad

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
95,109
0.5
1,380
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
230,240
1.3
3,994
1.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
196,089
1.1
2,969
0.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
634,579
3.5
7,974
2.5
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
778,257
4.3
10,907
3.4
 
%
 
%

Raleigh

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
167,299
0.9
3,447
1.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
620,317
3.4
10,317
3.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
414,833
2.3
7,333
2.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
581,236
3.2
9,740
3.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,871,880
10.3
32,127
9.9
 
%
 
%

Richmond

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
80,848
0.4
1,205
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
267,491
1.5
5,094
1.6
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
282,864
1.6
4,663
1.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
282,651
1.6
5,320
1.6
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
905,885
5.0
16,319
5.0
 
%
 
%

Tampa

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
68,567
0.4
1,740
0.5
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
294,502
1.6
6,686
2.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
173,253
1.0
3,686
1.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
210,632
1.2
4,021
1.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,439,746
7.9
28,877
8.9
 
%
 
%

Other

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
1,095
0.0
5
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
13,837
0.1
355
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
19,449
0.1
555
0.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
21,770
0.1
483
0.1
 
%
 
%

Total

 

RSF

% of Total Office RSF

Annualized Revenue 3/

% of Total Office Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
794,863
4.4
15,762
4.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
2,752,158
15.1
50,805
15.7
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,852,512
10.2
32,472
10.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
2,970,923
16.3
49,464
15.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
9,852,657
54.1
175,115
54.1
 
%
 
%

1/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66
2/ Includes 208,000 square feet of leases that are on a month to month basis or 0.9% of total annualized revenue
3/ Annualized Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 17   9/30/05


Industrial Lease Expirations by Market by Year

 

Dollars in thousands

 

         2005 1/

    2006

    2007

    2008

    Thereafter

 

Atlanta

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
594,875
9.9
3,026
10.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
330,863
5.5
1,911
6.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
593,583
9.9
3,214
10.7
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
347,988
5.8
1,609
5.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
997,676
16.6
4,994
16.7
 
%
 
%

Greenville

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
16,081
0.3
206
0.7
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
5,350
0.1
59
0.2
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
8,470
0.1
61
0.2
 
%
 
%

Kansas City

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
2,018
0.0
17
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
0
0.0
—  
0.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,756
0.0
19
0.1
 
%
 
%

Piedmont Triad

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
120,608
2.0
468
1.6
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,071,745
17.8
4,021
13.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
462,360
7.7
2,994
10.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
406,433
6.8
1,746
5.8
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
982,321
16.3
4,969
16.6
 
%
 
%

Raleigh

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
13,160
0.2
114
0.4
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
9,548
0.2
93
0.3
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
3,550
0.1
37
0.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
15,188
0.3
163
0.5
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
28,229
0.5
194
0.6
 
%
 
%

Total

 

RSF

% of Total Industrial RSF

Annualized Revenue 2/

% of Total Industrial Annl Rev

    
 
$
 
728,643
12.1
3,608
12.1
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,430,255
23.8
6,248
20.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
1,059,493
17.6
6,245
20.9
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
774,959
12.9
3,577
12.0
 
%
 
%
   
 
$
 
2,018,452
33.6
10,237
34.2
 
%
 
%

1/ Includes 143,000 square feet of leases that are on a month to month basis or 0.1% of total annualized revenue
2/ Annualized Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 18   9/30/05


Customer Diversification 1/

 

September 30, 2005

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Top 20 Customers

 

Customer


   RSF

   Annualized
Revenue 2/


   Percent of
Annualized
Revenue 2/


    Average
Remaining
Lease
Term in Years


Federal Government

   1,175,072    $ 17,824    4.56 %   5.9

AT&T 3/

   537,529      10,260    2.62 %   3.4

Price Waterhouse Coopers

   297,795      7,528    1.92 %   4.6

State Of Georgia

   356,175      6,846    1.75 %   4.1

T-Mobile USA

   205,394      5,031    1.29 %   3.6

US Airways

   295,046      4,010    1.03 %   2.2

IBM

   188,763      3,768    0.96 %   0.6

Volvo

   278,940      3,742    0.96 %   3.8

Hartford Insurance

   118,807      3,681    0.94 %   1.0

Northern Telecom

   246,000      3,651    0.93 %   2.4

SCI Services, Inc.

   160,996      3,417    0.87 %   11.8

BB&T

   243,951      3,343    0.85 %   6.3

Lockton Companies

   132,718      3,339    0.85 %   9.4

CHS Professional Services

   170,524      3,046    0.78 %   1.4

MCI

   127,268      2,579    0.66 %   0.6

Metropolitan Life Insurance

   118,017      2,250    0.58 %   5.8

Lifepoint Corporate Services

   120,112      2,223    0.57 %   5.8

Icon Clinical Research

   99,163      2,148    0.55 %   6.7

The Martin Agency

   118,518      2,018    0.52 %   11.5

CIGNA Healthcare of NC

   180,000      1,999    0.51 %   0.8
    
  

  

 
     5,170,788    $ 92,703    23.70 %   4.5
    
  

  

 

 

By Industry

 

Category


   Percent of
Annualized
Revenue 2/


 

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

   21.0 %

Insurance

   10.1 %

Manufacturing

   8.7 %

Finance/Banking

   8.3 %

Retail Trade

   8.1 %

Telecommunication

   7.7 %

Government/Public Administration

   7.1 %

Health Care and Social Assistance

   6.6 %

Wholesale Trade

   5.5 %

Transportation and Warehousing

   3.5 %

Real Estate Rental and Leasing

   3.3 %

Accommodation and Food Services

   2.8 %

Administrative and Support Services

   2.4 %

Other Services (except Public Administration)

   2.3 %

Information

   1.8 %

Educational Services

   0.8 %
    

     100.0 %
    


1/ Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as Financings or Profit Sharing arrangements under FAS 66
2/ Annualized Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.
3/ AT&T and SBC have received final approval on their plans to merge. SBC currently leases 5K square feet with $114K in associated annualized revenue.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 19   9/30/05


Acquisition Activity

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Name


   Market

   Type

  

Date

Acquired


  

Square

Footage


  

Total

Cost


First quarter 2005:                         

None

                        
Second quarter 2005:                         

None

                        
Third quarter 2005:                         

None

                        

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 20   9/30/05


Disposition Activity

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Name


  

Market


  

Type 1/


  

Date

Sold


   Square
Footage


   Occupancy

    Gross Sales
Price


First quarter 2005:                                 

Northside

   Tampa    O    02/24/05    85,700    93.5 %   $ 9,000

531 Northridge Warehouse

   Piedmont Triad    I    02/28/05    598,100    100.0 %      

531 Northridge Office

   Piedmont Triad    O    02/28/05    91,800    100.0 %      
                   
  

 

                    689,900    100.0 %     18,656

3928 Westpoint Boulevard

   Piedmont Triad    I    02/28/05    240,000    100.0 %     6,225

4300 Six Forks Road

   Raleigh    O    03/31/05    163,300    98.0 %     27,318
                   
  

 

First quarter totals

                  1,178,900    99.3 %     61,199
                   
  

 

Second quarter 2005:                                 

2599 Empire Drive

   Piedmont Triad    I    04/15/05    89,600    100.0 %     2,150

Highwoods Preserve II

   Tampa    O    06/30/05    32,600    0.0 %      

Highwoods Preserve IV

   Tampa    O    06/30/05    207,100    0.0 %      
                   
  

 

                    239,700    0.0 %     24,500

Kennestone Corporate Center

   Atlanta    O    06/30/05    82,600    73.3 %      

Chattahoochee Avenue

   Atlanta    I    06/30/05    62,100    90.1 %      

LaVista Business Park

   Atlanta    I    06/30/05    216,300    94.5 %      
                   
  

 

                    361,000    88.8 %     13,250
                   
  

 

Second quarter totals

                  690,300    59.4 %     39,900
                   
  

 

Third quarter 2005:                                 

Charlotte/Sabal

   Charlotte/Tampa    O    07/22/05    2,432,900    75.3 %     228,000

Ironwood/Leatherwood

   Raleigh    O    08/29/05    75,200    86.4 %     6,500
                   
  

 

Third quarter totals

                  2,508,100    75.6 %     234,500
                   
  

 

Nine month totals

                  4,377,300    79.4 %   $ 335,599
                   
  

 

 

Depreciable Assets Contributed to Joint Ventures

 

     Market

   Type 1/

   Date
Contributed


   Square
Footage


   Occupancy

   Gross Sales
Price


First quarter 2005:                              

None

                             
Second quarter 2005:                              

None

                             

Third quarter 2005:

                             

None

                             

1/ The letters “O” and “I” represent Office and Industrial, respectively.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 21   9/30/05


Development Activity

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Property


  

Market


   Type 1/

   Rentable
Square
Feet


   Anticipated
Total
Investment


  

Investment
@

09/30/05


   Pre-
Leasing


    Estimated
Completion
Date


   Estimated
Stabilization
Date


In - Process                                             
Office:                                             

Center for Disease Control

   Atlanta    O    109,000    $ 21,375    $ 16,568    100 %   4Q 05    4Q 05

ThyssenKrupp

   Memphis    O    78,000      8,800      1,053    100 %   1Q 07    1Q 07

Cool Springs III

   Nashville    O    153,000      20,050      3,589    0 %   2Q 06    4Q 07

Glenlake Four

   Raleigh    O    158,000      26,889      3,302    46 %   3Q 06    1Q 08

Stony Point IV

   Richmond    O    104,000      13,125      1,050    46 %   4Q 06    4Q 07

3330 Healy Rd 2/

   Piedmont Triad    O    40,000      3,600      2,998    0 %   4Q 06    2Q 07

FBI 3/

   Tampa    O    138,000      31,090      23,775    100 %   4Q 05    4Q 05
              
  

  

  

        

Total or Weighted Average

             780,000    $ 124,929    $ 52,335    57 %         
              
  

  

  

        
Completed Not Stabilized 4/                                             
Retail 5/:                                             

Griffith Road/Boutique Shops

   Piedmont Triad    R    9,600    $ 2,634    $ 2,410    87 %   2Q 05    2Q 06
              
  

  

  

        

Total or Weighted Average

             9,600    $ 2,634    $ 2,410    87 %         
              
  

  

  

        

Grand Total or Weighted Average

        789,600    $ 127,563    $ 54,745    57 %         
              
  

  

  

        

 

Placed In Service

 

Property


   Market

   Type 1/

   In-Service
Date


   Rentable
Square Feet


  

Investment
@

09/30/05


   Quarter 3
2005 NOI 6/


   Occ %

    Leasing %

 

National Archives Record Administration

   Atlanta    I    9/1/2005    354,000    $ 18,295    $ 132    88 %   100 %

Saxon

   Richmond    O    7/1/2005    112,000      15,798      309    100 %   100 %
                   
  

  

  

 

Total or Weighted Average

                  466,000    $ 34,093    $ 441    91 %   100 %
                   
  

  

  

 


1/ The letters “O”, “I”, and “R” represent Office, Industrial, and Retail, respectively.
2/ Redevelopment property
3/ An approved 25,000 square feet expansion at an additional anticipated cost of $4.5 million is included.
4/ Completed Not Stabilized properties are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in the Land and Building accounts, not Development-in-process.
5/ Excludes a vacant building in Kansas City acquired in the first quarter for $4.1 million for potential future retail development or sale to a retail user.
6/ NOI = Net Operating Income (Property Revenue excluding Straight Line Rent - Property Expense)

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 22   9/30/05


Development Land

September 30, 2005

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Market


  

Usable

Acres


  

Total

Estimated
Market Value


On Balance Sheet:

           

Research Triangle

   318    $ 60,792

Atlanta

   226      42,062

Piedmont Triad

   117      23,150

Richmond

   57      14,296

Kansas City 1/

   44      16,594

Baltimore

   44      13,166

Charlotte

   41      7,623

Nashville

   39      12,486

Tampa

   33      14,026

Orlando

   25      12,470

Memphis

   21      5,100

Greenville

   12      1,800

Jacksonville

   9      1,885

Columbia

   2      276
    
  

Total 2/

   988    $ 225,726
    
  


1/ Includes 27 acres of residential land
2/ Developable square footage on core land holdings is approximately 6.3 million of office space and 1.8 million of industrial space

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 23   9/30/05


Joint Ventures Portfolio Summary

 

As of September 30, 2005

 

Summary by Location:

 

                Percentage of Annualized Revenue - Highwoods’ Share Only 3/

 

Market


  

Rentable

Square Feet 1/


   Occupancy 2/

    Office

    Industrial

    Retail

    Multi-Family

    Total

 

Des Moines

   2,324,000    90.8 %   28.3 %   3.8 %   1.0 %   3.3 %   36.4 %

Orlando

   1,685,000    91.6 %   26.2 %   —       —       —       26.2 %

Atlanta

   835,000    93.0 %   12.4 %   —       —       —       12.4 %

Kansas City

   713,000    83.3 %   8.8 %   —       —       —       8.8 %

Richmond

   413,000    100.0 %   5.2 %   —       —       —       5.2 %

Piedmont Triad

   364,000    100.0 %   3.9 %   —       —       —       3.9 %

Raleigh

   455,000    99.6 %   3.7 %   —       —       —       3.7 %

Tampa

   205,000    100.0 %   2.1 %   —       —       —       2.1 %

Charlotte

   148,000    100.0 %   0.8 %   —       —       —       0.8 %

Other

   110,000    100.0 %   0.5 %   —       —       —       0.5 %
    
  

 

 

 

 

 

Total

   7,252,000    92.6 %   91.9 %   3.8 %   1.0 %   3.3 %   100.0 %
    
  

 

 

 

 

 


1/ Excludes Des Moines’ apartment units
2/ Excludes Des Moines’ apartment occupancy percentage of 92.8%
3/ Annualized Rental Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 24   9/30/05


Joint Ventures Lease Expirations

 

September 30, 2005

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Year


  

Rentable

Square

Feet

Expiring


  

Percent of

Rentable

Square

Feet


   

Annualized

Revenue 1/


  

Average

Rental

Rate


  

Percent of

Annualized

Revenue 1/


 

Total

                               

2005

   152,538    2.2 %   $ 2,705    $ 17.73    2.1 %

2006

   657,677    9.7 %     12,563      19.10    10.0 %

2007

   439,731    6.5 %     8,101      18.42    6.4 %

2008

   1,371,574    20.1 %     23,346      17.02    18.4 %

2009

   853,693    12.6 %     15,975      18.71    12.7 %

2010

   591,159    8.7 %     10,437      17.66    8.3 %

2011

   573,773    8.4 %     10,606      18.48    8.4 %

2012

   422,183    6.2 %     8,956      21.21    7.1 %

2013

   710,834    10.5 %     13,749      19.34    10.9 %

2014

   386,249    5.7 %     8,418      21.79    6.7 %

2015 and thereafter

   640,195    9.4 %     11,360      17.74    9.0 %
    
  

 

  

  

     6,799,606    100.0 %   $ 126,216    $ 18.56    100.0 %
    
  

 

  

  


1/ Annualized Revenue is September, 2005 rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass throughs) multiplied by 12.

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 25   9/30/05


Joint Ventures Development

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Property


  

%

Ownership


 

Market


  

Rentable

Square

Feet


  

Anticipated

Total

Investment


  

Investment

@

09/30/05


  

Pre-

Leasing


   

Estimated

Completion

Date


   

Estimated

Stabilization

Date


 

Sonoma

   50%   Des Moines    75,000    $ 9,364      4,746      60 %   2Q05     2Q 06  

The Vinings at University Center 2/ 3/

   50%   Charlotte    156 units      11,300      7,230      0 %   1Q06     3Q 06  

Weston Lakeside 3/

   50%   Raleigh    332 units      33,200      3,106      0 %   1Q07     1Q08  
             
  

  

  


           

Total or Weighted Average 4/

            75,000    $ 20,664    $ 10,626      60 %            
             
  

  

  


           

Highwoods’ Share of the above

                 $ 10,082    $ 5,313                     
                  

  

                    

Placed In Service

 

Property


   Market

 

Type 1/


   In-Service
Date


   Rentable
Square
Feet


  

Investment
@

09/30/05


   Quarter 3
2005 NOI 5/


    Occ %

    Leasing %

 

Plaza Colonade, LLC 1/

   Kansas City   O    9/1/2005      285,000    $ 69,140    $ 1,344     77 %   77 %

Summit

   Des Moines   O    9/1/2005      35,000      3,442      72     75 %   75 %

Pinehurst

   Des Moines   O    9/1/2005      35,000      3,740      105     89 %   90 %
                  

  

  


 

 

                     355,000    $ 76,322    $ 1,521     78 %   78 %
                  

  

  


 

 


1/ Includes $16.2 million in investment cost that has been funded by tax increment financing
2/ The Vinings at University Center is currently a fifty percent owned joint venture consolidated under the provisions of FIN 46.
3/ Estimated Completion Date is the date the last unit is expected to be delivered
4/ Pre-leasing percentage does not include multi-family
5/ NOI = Net Operating Income (Property Revenue excluding Straight Line Rent - Property Expense)

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

  Page 26   9/30/05
GRAPHIC 4 g93670image1.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g93670image1.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@``9`!D``#_[``11'5C:WD``0`$````/```_^X`#D%D M;V)E`&3``````?_;`(0`!@0$!`4$!@4%!@D&!08)"P@&!@@+#`H*"PH*#!`, M#`P,#`P0#`X/$`\.#!,3%!03$QP;&QL<'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'P$'!P<-#`T8$!`8 M&A41%1H?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\? M'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?_\``$0@`@`(-`P$1``(1`0,1`?_$`)@```,``P`#`0`````` M```````'"`0%!@(#"0$!`0`````````````````````0``$#`@0#`P4("PP) M!`(#``$"`P0%!@`1$@?9JRX?9P$VY];?A"_NO`&? M6YX0O[KP!GUN>$+^Z\`9];GA"_NO`&?6YX0O[KP!GUN>$+^Z\`9];GA"_NO` M&?6YX0O[KP!GUN>$+^Z\`9];GA"_NO`&?6YX0O[KP!GUN>$+^Z\`X-I?UG?H MP[^L?E?/WM3G*Y')T^S:$:,_9_0SUZ_+@.UP'*711-Q)=0$FW+GBTJ*EL#YO MDTY,M*G!\)3W.:6`?`#A@)JW`ZB-^[&NF7;E9^:C*C:5(>:C*+;K2QJ0X@E8 M.2AXC@>&`=6PMP[GW;0&[LNR;#33*@A::;3(L8(7DAPH+[CI4HC,I4`CPXX! MK8#6W#!K4VF+CT:IBD3RI)1-,=$H)`/%/*64I.?GP"'WDN'J%VXHK==:N.#6 M:074LR74TYJ.ZRI?J%2,W`4J/HYA7;EPP'(;2;R[];DW6*#$K42`PTRJ5.G> MPLN%IE!2DZ$$`*4I2PD#/`.JL[]T"W(:7Z_0;CA1T9(N*A6]37*G7)[-.@->O(D+"$Y_%&?%2CW`<3@%) M)ZI;=FRUQ+,MRLW8Z@Y%V'&4AGWR%.#W6Q@/4[O[N>RV77=H*R&QQ40ZXH@= MO8(N>`T[O670(,A4:M6E5J=)0.+"RWK!S[TN]J;SLMRY:1;I<1R.X^@)0'$NJ4\N,C24J'`'//Q[HT\>D(TF* MR"I'K/--IU3*BZRRW&C@@E/-5S5'TM. M20`2?<.`:&`P*Y4I5-IKLR+3I%6>;*0F##+0>7J4`2GG+:1Z.>9S5@%3=74U M1K3D(8N2T;AI:W<^2I]B,$.:>WEN)?4A67D.`U]'ZMK6K6EM)R4M24.J(2,QQP&&OK1VW0M2%T>L)6DD*26HX((X$$%_`-#;+3UITT5(4*HU MJ*@+7*-,0RXMA"`#K6AQQM9&6?J`Y9<<`M+5ZLK&N:Z*9;U/I-43)JCZ([3K MJ(X0A2SD"K2ZHY#ORP#OP&-4I4F+`D28T1R?(:05M0V5-H<=4.Q"5.J0@$_; M*`P"HNSJ*:L_DKNBR:]3([YTMR5(B.M%66>GF-OJ1JX=FK/`>BQ^I^W;UN:- M0*#;M7???4.8^41PVRUF`IYTATZ4)SX^\./#`-ZHU*GTV&[.J,IJ'#9&IZ2^ MM+;:!XJ6H@#`*:L=4VVL:8J!0VJA<\U)RY=*C*6DGR+<+>H>5(.`PCU&W,&_ M:#M;<@A]A>Y*]6?W/*_TX#*HO5;MA+FB!6$S[[4IHN:?.H# M`-%RZ;9;HGSZNK1$T73K^4(.`]*NH2\T(+J]J+B#(&HJY:R=/CERI[`(U.K;4`!WGY1MH?9P&ZM7JKVBKSS<=^:_1)+G!*:DWRV\_#G- MJ<;3YU$8!NQY$>2PW(CNH>8=2%M/-J"T*2>(4E0S!!P'FI02"I1`2!F2>``& M`3EP]2-,775VWM_19-[5MO,.F&=$1O+@27\EZD@]J@-/VV`]:KHZJ7TAUBSJ M%%2>(8?EEQP#+L)0^E.>`YVY-^-][0CK?N;;IH16_7G177%QTCQ4XT9"4C[H MC`=#T_[]5/G^P-L/P6F%+4HMK*D.\Q2CZ62@G(A([<`Z!"2<\!)W3_`-3=8171;M_5!4R%47`(-7?R"X[RL@&W5`#Y M)?QCZI^U[`_.H*7O=MW7?;Z?==2?M2IN*,%_6"6'#FHQG,AW#U#\)/E!P'CT MP[I[AW+N>BF5ZO2JC`,&0X8SZ@I&M&G2K++M&>`[:@Q]WKJWSN%+-Q3:?8M` MJ.EY*"GEN%`2L1&@1D<_AGX*?*1@.[N"OP=QJ-7:)M[=BH%ST)[+GQ5E*>:D M$!#F8/,86B./>SOR9>7.@R`=(4H@> MDRKX7D](<,\P?]N6Y>].W,J-2=KK]7L>IP5O0(SSJ5^RRU/-J"$Y#-39;*BV MH=W`]Q(35-ZCMPK4WCK:ID]VJ6]$JLR*[1G".6(R)"D`,\/06A*1I/O\,`W] MWI%ZW/9,3<':>Y9GLJ&.9*I<5?!UE.94M#>1*7VCF'$=^7B.(8VX-]7=!Z8: M'&0NK5(+]% MIM7P$<-*G5Y9('=V]@P'?]1G4*_;:19%F3E_/$<(15JR%!;C&C+Y%*R#F\K+ MY17P>SUL](=ITK77<=S;:R:A<%0>J4UNIOL(D2%:EAI++*DIS\A43QP#CP!@ M(FZSD!.ZL)03EKI$;39C(D19K#C# MS*@"%H<24DX<"5'N`.`G_:JQ+AWOK3FX&X\E!(]):NT\#F%24VETVEPFH--BM0H3`"68S"$MMI`[@E M(`P&3@-%=UCVI=],73;BIK,^,H$(+B5)P"DVBLV5M-N;4K- M<>7)MRZ63-MV8YEGSX8)>CKR_P"(&EZL^Q02#Y`&HZVZ?'79EOU`H3[2Q451 MT.9>EH>86M0S\,V4X#-Z*XG+VUJLDM@%^KN`.<,U);CLC(^8DX"@L`8!*]7< M*/(V;DON)![T7#@.`Z'(S.5WR=/RX]A:"^\(//41[I& M`Y[K$VZ8HUSPKOI[`:B5W4W4`@9)$UH9ZSEWO-\?*4D]^`=/2A78]3V9IL5L MCG4E^3#?2.Y1=+Z3[J'A@'#@/Q:D(0I2R`A()43V`#MSP'S1>N*/2]Q';BH" M>5%AU9PW)CJ\6WD!:?L*P&7 M@$_U7SHD;9:J-OI2MR7(B,10KN=YR7,T^4(;5@.J];@1RY]80F M:\`!SW$N#^IQ&\^]2?3\A42>`P'%V30;SZB+D?N&\);L*Q:8_HCTJ,HH;6YE MGR6O$I21S73Z7'(9?!"H;;M.VK9IZ*?0*;'IL1``Y;"`DJR[UK]99\JB3@-M M@%YOG^K:+8`S)X#`0.R)L=F'4 M)4&0];*YI*(RUNHCO*:*5.LI=``U\M02I2?2&>`^A&T=4L:JV-3ZC9<)FGTA M].2H;*$H4T\C@XV]IXEQ)[5'M[>_`=G@-%=UCVI=]-73KBIK-0CJ!"%.)^5; M)^$TZ,EH5Y4G`27<4>^^F^_&G*++E%O2UX-Q4=95$F)S+:LM;3B>#C3@'8I"N'V1PP$)TR$(/47&A MI;#28]UI;0V.Q*4U#)(X>`P'T*P!@%ENCT_V'?D)Y:H;=+KQ23'J\5`0O7W< M]"=*7D^.KCX$8":-O=S+VV0OJ1:=R%QZA,/\NI4[,K2A*\BF5$)[,TD+R&06 M.WCQ`.;JOW&D4[;.F1J#*^1NM>7MS*N"X26PXH(4.YWF('W.8[\!O>E6WJ+3 M=H:94(*$&;5U//U&2`-:G$/+:2@GMR;2C(#SGOP#AP'XI*5)*5`*2H9*2>(( M/<<`F9FU:+'W7I-\69`<%+J[IIES4B(G-#2)1`1+;0GU6T.A*G`."BO`EF0VIIP#@=*TE)X^8X#YU[O;45K;BZ%TN9J?IK^IRE5'+) M+[.??W!Q'8M/=V]A&`=>PF[%&O>WE[3[AZ9:9+7L](EOGTGD`>@PI9XAYO(% ME?:>SM`S#V[/[2UO;?J'%.F9R*7)I\QRDU++)+S0*."NX.([%I]WL(P&PZG- M_/F=,JP[3=Y52=!37:@UZ)92X,RPVH?\18/IJ^".';V!,UAWS7K)N:+<%$=Y MZD=KJY:%^5"KNI+]$N"6_,A30/12X\LNN,.?%6@J.7QD\?'(/ MSI_WPF;=5WV.H*6_:=16/;XXS46%G@)+2?$?#2/63Y0,!5V[UDN;B;:QJ);3 MT=,2H2(3[4M)`81$"@M3J`G+5Z!S2D=N`5VZNXMN[+6:UMOM^0FX7&\YTX9% MQCF)&M]U0[9+H]4?`&1X#2,!-=CV37Q MX#/CWD\!Q.`^@VVNW]$L*TXUN4DEQ#)+DN2OUWI"P-;JP.S,``#N3D,!U.`, M!&G6Q]8=$^B$_E+V`[S9KJ)VGMS;*@T.L55R-4H#"FI+/LLAP!1<4K@IM"DD M9*\Y@*_L*WF;B2JFT]'>3 MZJVW(CRDJ'D(.`\>DB\[0I.V,J#5:Y`I\P51]PQYA;3(2H)<4DD'2>. M`=GZR-NO\TT?\?C?A,`?K(VZ_P`TT?\`'XWX3`*?J:OVP*KM+5Z7!N"G3JFI MR(N/$C2FGG%%,A!)"6U*SR1J)P'+=#G_`,2\/NX'[C^`<&_]E"[]JZS`;;US MH;?SA3^\\Z*"O2GRK;UH]W`(#HLN_P!CNJKVL^YDS5HXE1$G_GQ3Z03Y5-+) M/W.`L/`+'J/O06KM15G6EZ)U53\V0LCDK7)!#BAW^BT%GSX"<=W=CT6ELW:% M?1&Y57;S;N)0]8KF_+,Z_P"9RY7NX!Y])EX?/VU3%->7"6#ZW)5\HP M?-I44#[G`.G`3IU!AR^=U;)VOC'5'#GSE6B,LCVRB4UNKLK"1J]J0@R))\?3"W$^[@%AT97K)@WE/M)U9 M,&L,*DL-D\$RHPS)2/MVM6K[D8"R<`8!7=2EG,W-M)6/D]4@@ M*-W$YGL]&?J_T8"^,`8`P$L=;5IQ@U;]V,HTR%+73)BP/63D7F,_NZP]JJBA":HB=1GCD%\ MYGGM`^1;!6HCSH&`9=N[I[5ZL"DMD@^^,!/FWUZ6OO[8;]D7F4-7;#;YC$I(2E:U(& M29D<Y556_*6Y!MB$K*=/0!K<7EF&&-0(*^]1[$CW`0_+;O:7 MLQNM46Z#44URAQI!BS@V=0=N6\WLY<[S= M,B(>9CH6TZEAM*D*#R,E)4$Y@^;`([HD_P`;W!]&#\H1@+&P$$=.:V4=0%&Y MJ->I^:E'D48SV1P&BWQ+C6\]U*>XE-3<5P^+F"G_`%VCVYNS;F15;BHC51J`J3S`?<6Z"&T--%*0$+2.U9[L`XF^GS9AM. ME-J0R/MBZH^^I9.`_5=/NS*DZ3:D/(^',!]\+P"SZA-EML+_VB'_L.X"G2`001F#P(.`@B MZ83VS_4&)$<%$&GSVYT4)&6J!).:VQYFUK:]S`7G'?9D,-R&%AQAY"7&G$\0 MI"AFDCS@X">MS-&XW4+;5B(/-HUK(-3K:>U)<.ETH5XC2&D?OS@'/N):+%WV M16;<>R!J$9:&%J[$/I]-E?[UQ*3@)+Z2;HD6WNG,M>H%3":RTY$<87PTS8A* MT!7ER#B/.94C/XBHS11_J MX"XXRH/5.`A[II3(5O=;/(SS#KY7E\017=7V M,!]!<`8#37HE*K-KR5#-)ITL$'L(+"\!#_2NEY6^%!Y9R"43"YF,_1]D=S[Q M@,B!_P"5P_\`[:O\L.`O'`&`,`ANLQR.G:F(AP`NKJT<,^0AEXG_`%V?!]GY?-U_P`'NP&74H?MM.E0 M]>CVEEQG7EGIYB2G/+R9X#YPUVB7EM???LSRET^NTAY+T.6WZJTY^@ZV3P6V ML>/E2>\8"GFE6GU);:\MPM4Z^Z,GM[V7E#UN]2HKY''O2?*.(+/I>H%7M_?I M^C5B,J)484*6U(87VA0T<0>PI(X@C@1QP'G6-GZWN5U#W7#CZHU%B3RNK5/3 MFEI!2G)",^"G5_!'NG@,!0J(]C3[;KFT5D5I%(JM+A>S*3%)+K!<]915_P`1 M15P>*3J&KCDK+`0C=MIURT[@ET&MQS&J$->EQ/:E23Q2XA7PD+'%)P#\Z):U M5!===HGM"C2EP/;3%/%`D(>::#@\#H609YOL]\:0VF\UF5FG].5'L]I'M]8CKIE/0W%"E/J6M3^RJ^_.8!BX`P"WZC7.7 MLG=2NW..TG^%(;3_`*;RXJI6K/[F0U_&P%D8"`^GO_P`@*%_: MYGY,_@.IZPK"DTF^FKL9;_\`QE?;2EUP=B)C"`A25>&MM*5#Q]+PP#\Z:+_C M79MA3XZG`:I04(IT]HG-6EI.3#GF6T!Q\0<`U\`8`P'S\V:=;;Z@J(I9TI-6 M>2#Y5\Q*1[I.`?O6O]75%^ET?DSV`V'1I]4LGZ7D_>6,`]L`8!1]53R&]D:V ME6>;KL-"`FGK1L8RZ%2KSBM%3U- M7[#4%#_Z[QU,J5Y$.YI_?X#KM@MSX4G8I-7JKV:K39>BU%1/I%N(C6SV]ZF2 MA(\3@-3TI4F=5&+FW*JPSJ-T3G$LD]@9:65+T'+U2ZK1^\&`?V`B'J-H,[;_ M`'M8NJEIY351=:K,)0[!):6#(0?.XG4?(O`//J!W2B1-D6Y])=S?O%EJ-3M) MS5R93?,>/#P:S1Y"H8#N=G[-%G;;T*A*1HE,QTO3AW^TO_*O`_T5LJB36TP*BH#@A]K-3*E?SC>:?WF`;W2_>L>Y-J*=%+@-0H(^ M;IC>>:@EOBPK+MR4UD/.#@&W@#`2-UGV!(8K5.OB*V50YK:8%14!GH?:S+*U M?=M^C^]\N`Z"T-Z*4UTM3UNR0FMT>(NA)8)^4+KR2W$6D=I3RE9Y_:*\,!S? M1?8LELIA0&E0("B."Y#V1=*3_`--O@?N\!7N`,`O-_P"[8]L;3U^6 MM83)FQU4Z$GO4]+!:]'[E!4OW,`CNBRQ'G*E5;VE,D1X[9IU-6KL4ZX0M]2? MN$!*<_MC@%Q#GM_M0HEH25(5=IR!X'TIY3_IP%]X`P!@)&ZS+T:J=?HUE4\\ M]ZG9RIS;>:E>T2`$LM9#X0;S.7VPP'>V&\]LI0+#M^NMM,0+E=E_/TU9R,:I M/AI45*E>J$)0DMK/DU=@P#\P!@#`29UOTNF-U&UJFV$IJKB-2$%0S'AF,!/95:O4GMQE\C3=P:(C,#XBS[ZE1GR/*4*\WI!-%#K-Y M;77Y[2TE=/KM(>+,N([ZJT\-;3@'K-N)\/(H=QP%P;;UJP=QG(&X]*9#5P1H MJZ=-1J'-9YA2M3+P'KA)3FVOP/E(P'"=0V]U.L"'+MFT`RS==54I^HR6$I!B M\X#4\LCMD.)RTY]@XGX.82);EUUZW;AC7#29:V*M%=YR)!)45$^N',_72L$A M0/:,!5]6IUJ]2.W"*K30U3K[HZ-"FB>*',L^2X?65'>.9;7\$_O@0XOH\I51 MI&Z]QTRI1UQ)\.ENLR8SHTK0M,I@$$8!A6]M3:]A5R[=UMPELZE5"=)ID9>E MU#+#[ZRVO3Q"Y#P5DA/P<_'L"4JA>7LU_P`BZ[1CFWTIF*ETR,RK/D`G,(\, MB,]2?5R.GLP%UKW8IM,V>I^X=?:T!^!'E*B,\2N2^@:6FL\\M2U9`GL';@(4 MW%W"N"_;FD5ZM.9N.>A%BI)Y4=@$E#38/<,^)[SQ.`>_3WLI3:'2_P!:6X01 M#I\)OVNE1)0R2A*>*9;R3QS_`.2C+,GC\7`/W:/70XD^[@*#Z8*[`JFS5$9C.I7(I@>B36@1J;<2\M:0H=VIM25#`-;`&`575 M!4HD+9.OHD+"%S/9HT9)(S6X9#:](S[?10I7F&`G7H]N&G4K=)Z)-=0R:O`< MB15K4$A3X<;=2@$\,U);5EXGA@+6J<^/3J;+GR7$LQXC+C[SJ^"4H;25*4KR M`#`?/78^X(M*WDMRK3W$,1S-4AYY9TH1[2A;.HDG@`7.T]F`O6]K+H-Z6U*H M%:9YT&6G-*TY:VG!Q0ZTKCDM)[#[AX'`1[-M#=GI\N_Y_IR#4*$3RW9S25*B M26"<^5)0,RROAP)[#ZI.`H6PNIS:^ZHS:9<]-OU0@!V%45!M&K_IR#DTH>&9 M!\F`9<>XK?DM\R-4XCS?QVWVECQ[0HX#7UO<&QZ'&=DU:O0(C;(*EA26P2M1\`!G@(-VDG1E[WV[,*]##U9;6E2^'!QTZ<_X0P#]ZW*Q$1;%O4;F) M,QZ:N9RL_3#3+2F]1'<"IW+W,!Y]$]>I:K2K=!YZ15&YYF^S%0"U,.,MMA:4 M]I`4T0K+LX>.`I+`&`275[4X47:!Z&\ZE,FH38S<5K,:EEM?-60.W)*4\3YL M`LNB>YJ5#K%Q4&4^AF;4D1GX*%J"2Z8Y<#B$9]J@'0V[C@H76I;$&I0LB5J M?B/D-H1Q&6IPY'AQ&`^A5D6Q&M:T:1;T;BU3(K;!4/A+`S<7^_62KWJNPS;/`CO2M!^ M"M*O22>XX"1GK4W,Z=KS7<--876K0?):DO-Y\MV/GFE$H)!Y+J.U*\M.?9GF M4X"C+"WXVUO2*TJ#5FH506/3IK3ZRAZ.>`M39C=G9>1:U.H-NSFJ M+[&V&Q2:@M+#^OM6K6HA#REJ))4D\?`=F`:XG02G6)#101GJ"TY9>.>>`XN] M-[]LK0C.+J=;8>E-CT:=#6F3)4KXNALG3YUE(P"">H6X_49=$6ISHSMN[>P5 M$1%+S)4@GTE-!0'.>* MEK6KO)S4I1[3QP'SQ%UP8N[)NQ"%/0&:Z:HE">"ELB7SP!GEQ*G23 M1:Q^F]_/BIW<\XJ0U'4H.MQWEG477%]CCV?9EZ*>[,Y$!UO47M]4[XVTE4ZD MLB15X3[P9D$#O.`?%'ZCMF:I'2ZW)P&+ M4!]KW`!4_P`WP?F_YNY"/8.3[/[+I'+Y.G1R M]/9IT\,L!C7)_AVJ_P!CD?>E8#YM63>==LVY(EP41[DS8BN*3GRW6SZ[3J1E MJ0L<"/=''`5!?EIVUO\`V`S>UH)0S>5.;YD.UESL/8?M0 M7O1ZY5H>[(XAP.W.X5>L*Z(U?H[GRC1T2HJB0W(8)&MIS+N/<>XY M$=F`O#;N?8-[/,[EV^T$U29#--GJ!"7$@+0X69*$\"XV4#2KXOVN6`DGJ4W7 MK5WWM-H:M46A6]*>B1805F''F5EIR0YEVJ44G3\5/E)S!0(0I:@A`*EJ("4@ M9DD]@`P%B;UTZ13>E*BP)4PA6>>`7O3AL0S6" MF_;R;2Q:T#4_#CR=U'/<3\4?\`#2?.>)X`].C+ZIYGTQ(^\1\`^,!X/-\UEQK6IO6D MIUH.2DYC+-)[B.[`*%[I3VFE37IM0;J-0ER%%;[\FFZKBK+/(>3`9V`X*^]E+)OJJ-U"Y/;9?);#;,1,MUN,WEVK0TD@ M)6KO([D_99*@I-,E)4DY@B9(!!'[[`;F7L)95^.3/PV`Z6V=J;9MJ:Q)H\FJ,LQLPS`74YCL0 M`I*AZXBB?$B.IM)/G&`Y9?2'LVI94(\]`)S"$RU9#R#-)/V`\F`P!T\;.(D-R&+<1&D-?R;L:1*84#X M@MNI.>`[6A4"FT*`(%.#J8P45@/OO25YJRS^4?6XO+AV9Y8#8X#B[MV;VWNZ MJ_.MQT<5"=H2T'5OR4@(3V!*$.)0GW!@-6YTY;*K*#^C#+:FSFA33TEM0/CF MAT'`=;;%FT"V&7V:,T\TW(*2ZEZ3)E<4`A.GVAQW3P/PNJ:<_4]J1EEX?R6>`ZJU^GC: M&W'4/P[?:DRFR"F1.4N6H$=A"72IL'S)P#&2E*4A*0$I2,DI'``#N&`UUPVW M0KCIBZ77(350I[BDK7&>&:"I!S2,(M)@1Z?&&7R,5I#*.'VJ`D8#-P!@,2I4>D51GD5.#'G,?\`*DM(>3_! M6%#`7Z/53/B/8W^'_:5@/F-SH?_`-8_TA_],!V6U>ZM2V[N M=NL4QE2XSF352@EPZ)#&?%)X<%I[4*[CY"00LVRK>L&Y;JB;N6H\E+E3@NQ* M@T@`!QQ:D'-U(/H/MZ-*_CRTF1)45!:3ZL5Q9R(4GAR5=H.0[=.`56]>TBJHN?IO78+.MJ(Y3.>XSK M*D*<;D-)0K2>\)<4,_+@$YN>[$&Y5UA4U3#RV7XE M8:>;44.-KBM)4E23D0H%[,$8#\3U@[9.C*+3JU)7VZ&XK1.7C_+8#T_ME;9) M7I=IE9:`.2RJ.QZ/G'/P&ZHO59LS4WD-.5-^FK7V>VQW$)!\JV^:@>Z<`U:9 M5*;5834^F2F9L)X:F9,=:76U#R*22,!E8`P!@#`&`,`8#0U._K&I:EHJ5PTV M&XWZ[;TMA"AYTE6>`*=?UC5-2$T^X:;+6OBA#,MA:C^]"\\!OL!C3:G38"4* MG2V8J7"0@ON(;"B.T#41G@,7]*;9]+_\O"]#UOZRUPX9\?2P&+^GEC_YBIGX MY'_CX`_3RQ_\Q4S\`P)&]&TL=HN.7=2BD=H1 M*;<5X\$H*E'WL!NF;TM-VWXUQ?.\5JAS$A4:HONI896%9Y#4Z49'@>!XX#&& MY6W1&8NFD$>(GQOX^`/UD;=_YHI'X]&_CX`_61MW_FBD?CT;^/@,V!=]IU%8 M13ZU`F+/8EB4RZ3GY$*.`VV`U]P7!1K>H\FLUJ4F%3(:0J3)6%$("E!`X)"E M'-2@.`P&LB;C[?2V$OQKFI;C2QFE0F,?N%>8P'N_3RQ_\Q4S\6 M/_F*F?CD?^/@/4=Q]O`2#=%)!'`CVZ-_'P&OIU,IDI&7;FH*RX8#]CW=:DEN0 M[&K4!]N(V7I2VY+*TM-#M6X4J.E(\3PP&"G6EM M"1Y5*(`P'%R]\]H(CG+=NVG%0)!Y;P='#RMA0P&9`W>VMGD"+=E*6HC,)5+: M;5W=RU)/?@-K2+SM*M5&13:/6(E1G1$)=DLQ7D/%"%G(%105#M\N`W.`UUR? MX=JO]CD?>E8#Y>X`P%#=&%?J[-_SZ"B2KYIEP'93T0\4<]E;:4.#P5I60BO3GYSEF2S7]L[_(/I8#QZTO!7_!3EFD?#/VOK`I]_-\Y^XU:]C@%<:TZ>X?8(IS2IY8] M'VAX?&(]1/P1Y2<`\=V:[4J1TI6^8#ZX[D^!283SC9TJY+D8*<3GVY+2C21TF6 M8$+%/N*OP5+X^A+0I.KQ(+8)]_`+?<"R=]-GHQN*W;PFUBW&%I]H#JE.%@*4 M`DO1GB\V4$G3K3[PP#;V`WW8W*ITB#4640[GIJ$N2F6LPT^T3IYS0))3DK(+ M23P)'CP#?;O;R6WMK14R9_\`6ZO*!^;:2VH!QTC@5K/'0VGO5EY!F<`KK=L; M=_>%A%=OVN2+22#P+NM1\`,L`PJ1TU;+TUI*$V MZW+6GM>F.O/J5PRS(4O1[R=:6D^1)4IOWTX! M5W3;6\6Q0%=M6MOW'9#*@)5-G:G1'03D.8V#Z*>[FM:>/:,`V]M=R+`W@H7- M=I\9VHP1_7Z-.;;D*8*^&MO6DA;:\O6`\ARP$\]7.VEM6I6J)5;>@-TZ-6$/ MHE18Z=#`>CE!"D('HHU)=XA(RX8#NNGC8[:ZY]K*;7*]11/J+IP"UW#Z3ET*"_<.VE6FQ MZE!07A3END.+"!F1'?;Y:PO+L2K//Q&`TNP^Z])O6M)LO@)4FGQWT+AH6G1UM[4:>Z;7Y&DPY"4NI#3Y+[#B=0(*5%2]"O`8!?=8FW%JTNA4JZ:13V*?.< MF"%-]F0EI#R5M+<0I2$`)U)+66KMR/'NP&/TK;36#=UE52IW+1FJE*;J*H[# MKBW4E+:6&U:CS:R!$;35U3*S,`'.=6\8[95WZ&V=)2/.LX#A^I#8K;>S=NA6[; MIRX4]$YAI;BI#[P4TXE84G2XM2>T`YY8#3=+NS=A7U;U:J%SP5S7HLMN/&"7 MGF0A/*UJ_DEHSS*N_`.69TG;*/L*::IH;:ZS*GMG6ZHBE1HE6I$9SRO:*;[,W(A(00"^J0!R$)/VY4./<..`0FUEG5O?6;*O?<>:\_;T: M2IFDT%AQ3,8K2`5^BDYA"`H)S!U*/:KAQ!ZQ=G-J(K*66K1I.A/87(C+BO=4 MM*E'W3@.;NSIEVAN".M**.FCRE`Z)=,/(*2?^EZ3)]U&`5&UU@U[9K?>%3*F MX)-`N9A^!3JLD:6W%\'FT+3QT.ZFPG3G\+@3@*LP&NN3_#M5_LO1M];CWT5)^^LX!?[U_6Y=_TK*^^G`<5@,BGU";3IT>?!?7&FQ7$O1Y#9 M*5H<0?2/=D"#P%=;X_ M^*=H?S5&_(S@)%P!@+@Z."?U1.\",JK)R/C\FS@'G@#`1/UG?6K"^B&/O[^` MJ?9SZI[0^B(?WE.`['`>J7+BPXKTN6ZEB+'0IU]YPA*$(0-2E*)X``#`?.>= M'>W"W?EMT9M2_P!(JR\N*G+B&GWU+UJS[`ELZE>`&`Z'J"A:-_:U'=XHOWI+!9H%!I+_MTH\$ZUE+@0/C'0TI7O>(P&+MD MU-WIW^%8N)'.@LE=1DQ#Q;1&C$)CQ@.S1K4@*^-Z1[3@+A``&0X#PP!@#`>J M7$BS(KT26TE^+(0II]E8U)6VL:5)4#V@@Y8"":JNJ['[Z2332HQ:=)"VV=1R MD4V3DODJ/?\`)JTYGL6,^[`-+K0J,2IVU8U2AKYD2;[5(CN=FIMUIA:#[J3@ M>NQPQLA;V2M7-,MPY]VJ6[PP#6P'@Z\TRTMYY8;:;25N.*.24I2,R23W`8 M#YZ;>QUUS?BDJH:2VT_7A+C!`]2,W(+Y/'N2TDX#<=4_UZ5O[B%^2-8"\(?_ M`,-C^;1_LC`>[`8$"O46H3Y]/@S69,VEK0W46&E!2F%N)U)2YEV$@=F`\6[> MI#=P/7`VQHJLB,B'(?2I0#C+:RML+0#I4I!4=*B,P#EV8!(]:7U84SZ89_)W M\!X]%?U9U7Z7=_)V,!0.`\'WV([+C[[B66&DE;KKA"4)2D9E2E'@`!WX""-Q MUO;M[\3VK29,IJH/LQ8KZ$^B68[:&5R5G+@WZ!7F?@Y8"W*59E%IM59J[:5N MU%BFL4=IYQ683%845Y(3V)*U'-9[\AX8#?8!)=8'U.N?2,7_`'\!SW1(E7Z% M7"K+T34D`'NS#"<_W`I;9SZI[/^AX7WA.`_-XV%O[47TDG`> M;3L*HP$.H*),&8T%))&I#C3JS:E MNJ3%;UA?%1*BEOFZN/8D>3`+WI8WSM:WJ*[9ESR4TU'M"I%-J#O!@\X#6TZO ML00I.:5'AQ[LN(5C%EQ)D=$B(\W(CN#-MYI25H4/$*22#@/;@-33`-/9CI_MO;9MVE''CI4\"KAYTIP%@X`P!@#`1MUKTQIF^Z'4$(TJF4WEN*^,6'E]WF<& M`T&ZTYZ;L%M0Z\25H346`5#+T6'4-(]P)0!@&)LEU$VM:^VE(H%0HU9?DP.< ME4B'&0\PL+?6X"E1<0>&O(C+MP'9.=55+>"_FNRKCG$*TMGV5*4J/@2E3A'O M8#C+RNKJ*W6AKH-"M"1;%OS!HE/2BIEQUI7:EQ]X,_)D>LEM&9[.(X8!B[$] M/E-VW;75:@^BHW1);Y3DE`(9CMDYJ;8U9*.K(:ED9GN`&>83=U7MI&]U5T\" MMB$5'R^SH&?O#`/^%T]W@8;)7NM<6HH22$.N)2,QV`%X]GGP&-6.G"_I$5;< M/=>MJ)'\E*6^I"CY2B0G(>X[]X=3>W$1B?+KD*H4B2OE?.,2$R.4YVI0 MZA;9TZQZIXCWW_HP_E"\!2VSGU3V?\`0\+[ MPG`>_=7ZL;L^AYWY.O`1ATVV-4KON^H0X%Q3K;=BP%/JETY2D.K'-;1RR4J1 MZ/I9^Y@*,_9YNW__`%:Y?Z=S\+@%_N;TO;FOTI^5!O*7=?(!>%+J"WDNK(XD M-:G7FU+\`=.>`=6P5>56MI;>==S$N"Q\W2VU@A:'82BP4K!XA6E`/NX!@K0A M:%(6D*0H$*21F"#P((.`0&X71_9M>E/5"V9BK>ENDK7$".=#*CQ]%&:5M9_: MJ('5TW]0-G.+?MJ69"$G5KH\Y;"SEXMN%@D^09X#U-[[=1UA/H8N1N0 MZRE60:K4,Y+\B7TAI:O/K.`=>T_55:EXS6*-7(_S!6Y!#<O1M];CWT5)^^LX!?[U_6Y=_ MTK*^^G`<5@#`4CT1?XQN+Z.;^_IP"+OS_'%Q?2;'J?&'H_%R#D>EC?96J/MY<[^2A\G;\YTY'AP$-PG_VOX/Q<`^]V M;8=NC;>X:$P-4F7#68RXT4;=QNGR#RT5J(_!]+ADZ MG)]';WDLE/G.`N;`&`,`8"*NLJLMU#<^#2H_RCE,I[33J4YD\Y]Q;NG(=^A2 M/?P&9U'VPY:^T^V%!>&F1"9DB2GP?<0RXZ/Z1:L`^>F7ZD+9^XD_E;V`:&`, M`8"$.J_Z[JE_9X7WA&`NF%_\-C^;1_LC`>[`:JL6S2:M/I-0F-J,VB2#*I[Z M%%"T+6VII:21VH6A>2D]AX>&`VN`G_K1(.U],(.8-89R(_L[^`R^C;ZHW_I: M3]Z9P#GKM#I5>H\NCU:.F53IS:F9+"^Q25>7M!':".(/'`0[8:F1"1S([V7#4G@%>!R4.[`6;M_?="OFUXEPT9S./(&EYA1' M,8>3Z[+@'8I)]\9$<#@.CP!@$EU@?4ZY](Q?]_`:;HG4G]75:3F-0JZR1WY& M,QE^Y@*&P!@(YZV_\;V_]&'\H7@*6V<^J>S_`*'A?>$X#V;MO-L[6W:XX)XX#QJ5TTBFUZDT.8M34VMA_P";E%)Y2UQDI6MLK[`L MH5J2._(X#;X`P'HFP84Z*Y$FQVY45X:76'D)<;4D]RDJ!!P$3]4FT-'L6OT^ MLV\W[+2*US,X:3Z,>2SI*@WX(6E8*1W$'NR&`=/ZSZY^RE^E_M"OGSYO]C]K MR.OG>T^P\[/+U\O3S^-@'957(3=,F.3\O84,.*EYYYS,_;B=9I?V^BF' M0/:G4EE2'$'G@)UDATJ5Q&GOP'=X`P$0=8\@N;N-MG+)BEQD#+MXK=7Q_A8" MJME7VG]I+16T=212HJ"?MFVPA0]Q23@.UP!@#`0%U`RC^O\`KKKR\T,S(@)\ M$(89X) MS$M&GL2I7K^"N/><@8'3=O\`-7E3VK8N.0$W7#1DP^LY>W,H'K@_\Y(]<=_K M#OR!;=1NRM;M6YE[D6>VL4Y3Z9TU+`].#+"]9>"1_P`)2_2S^">WAE@'MLOO M9;VXM#8'.;BW,PV!4J4I02O6D>DZR#Q6TKMX>KV'R@RL`8#B-T]V[6V[H;DV MJ/H=J2T$TZDH4.?(7V#T>)2C/UEG@//D,`A-AMJ;AON]G=V+X:*8;DE4VGQW M$D>TR,\VUI0KL89R&CQR'<#@,GKCDJ__`$^-J&G^ON%/#//Y!(/[N`:'2Q-3 M)V2H21IU1ERV5!)[")3BAGYKCGLU0J\56MF#$R*I*VW4^BIX-)5EIX)\=66 M`Y;K$B1*1M;;%%@`,P8T]MF/'SS(:CQ7$(XGB=(/;@-GT6S`[MG4XNL%4>K. M'0.U(<89()\Y!P%`8#E-S-NJ'?\`:LF@55.DK^4A3`,W(\A(]!U'[BAWCA@( MSLB\KRV'W)F4NJLK7#2X&:S3@3RWV>UN0P3D-6DZFU=X]$^0+BMBZ*#=%$C5 MNA2T3:=*3FV\@]A'K(6D\4K2>"DGB,!M<`C^L-YMO:#0HY*=J45#8\2$N*_< M2T-SF75H[PAQG2D^Z6U8"E,`8"->MAY*MP*&R",VZ4%' M(\?3D.]H_>X"C=AI#E.6`]^]JTHVBN\J(`-*D MC,^*FR`/=)P$Q]%LUIGJ6Z-$=DTJ@63,8;MI MA(R=>=+J?:9CF7JE&IO(#,`9CQS!N[*]0]LW[`8@5)YJEW8A(0_"<4$(D*[. M9&4KUM7Q/6'E''`-[`?A(`*B<@.))[`,!('4==2MTMP*)8=DCYU53ENH'/\` M3R]S`==<-,75:!4Z6A8;7/B/QDN*&827FU("B!X:L!'YZ*=RLSE5Z.1W'FR? MP&`/V*MR_P`[4?\`I9/X#`'[%6Y?YVH_]+)_`8#]'13N3DX9)'V.1@ M/U'11N.2-=9I"1GZ1#DDY#^@&`]O[$M_?GVE>_)_!8`_8EO[\^TKWY/X+`'[ M$M_?GVE>_)_!8#Q_8GW#YF7SW2>7EZ^J3GGYN3_IP%$;%;;53;NQS;]3E,3) M)F/2N;&U\O2XE``],).?H>&`8>`]4OVOV1[V,MB7RU>SE[46^9D=&O3Z6G5V MY8"9+OZ4=P+RN2;<5P79!54)JDE09C.\M*4I"4MH25#2E"0`.)\O'`=MMOMA MO38%*^9:;ZA0(5*J$ZA5N M'$0VR)CGM<:66D9)]+2AUM:@D<#D,^_QP#(P&-4XHETV7$4TT^)#+C19?!+* M]:2G2X!QT'/)7DP$F0>B^^HTAN8U<\&%,9<#C"XR9.;:DG-*D+R0H$8!Y6]1 M]^*7"9@U.K4&X6DY-NR)34F/(+?8=2F@IM9R\4#/O.`Y^]NE:Q:W4#5[=D/V MG60KF)>@?R`<[=89S04'^;6D>3`8#-D=5E$:]GIEZTNL1D9);-0:/.R\2I3# MBC[KAP'N59_575V>14+RI%'97P<7`8UO9>0EE'V%C`9UH=,%FTRJ?/ETS)-X M5TJ#BI-2)+.L<=7))65_]Q:AY,`Y$I2E(2D!*4C)*1P``[A@$1N7TU5_<2X5 M5BNWF$):"FJ?#8IX#;$?45)1F9&:EWS9#`9NWFQ%][>QWXUMWXA4*0O MFN4^92PZP7<@G6,I*5H5D!GI5Q[\`X:6W4VX#**H\S(GI3E(?CMJ9:4K/M2V MM;JD\/MC@,K`>F8W)"1@,Y[IWO)X@N;KW"HCL]-P?N/X#GZQT?SJH$B7N%4921GJ M$QE4CWM4@8#LMF>G2A;:5.56/G)RL5:0T8[3ZVDL(::4H*6$("G#J5I&:M79 M@/S='I].XU71-K5U36X<8J^;Z:TRP&8Z5Y:LNPJ4K3Q4KC@-=9/35,L:6_+M M6^*A3WI"0E]!C1WF7`G/3S&G,TJTYG(]H[C@&]0(59A4Y+%8J0JTT*),P,(B MYI/8.6A2D\/'`;'`)_=GITINY-SM5RHUQ^$&(J(C,5AAHY!"E+U%Q1U*S*SV M]F`P+,Z:9ME2%OVQ?=4IY=(+S(9CN,N$=A6RX%-J/ERSP#;MVGUR#`+%:JPK M,O65"6(Z(OH$#));;*D\./'`+S=S8R=N5,9^<;J?A4B*=<.E,Q6RA#A3I4XI M96%.*/'+/L'`=^8>EQM:U(4/#,<. M[`.>WX-=A0U-5FJ(JTG5FB2B,F+DG(#24)6L$YYG/A@-G@$+>O2HQ>5TS;AK MEW37I$M9T-B.T`TT">6RCTLM+:>'9Q[3Q.`WED;'758\-=/MN_I;-+4LN"#* M@QY+:5*]8HUJ!1GWZWM?P',O]$J)+Y>E7L^^HGTEN M0M2R,_C*D'`/ZU+$M^V[,BVA%8#](CL*CNMR$I7SPYF75.C+2HN*42KAEQP" MINKH\VVJLA4JBR9E`>42KE,J#[`).?!#OICW',L!BT_8?>VA(#%!W3?]D;(Y M34IEQ:4CP"7''TCS#`9LCI^W!N))8O;`,`8`P!@#`&`,`8`P! M@#`&`,`8`P!@#`&`,`8`P!@#`&`,`8`P!@#`&`,`8`P!@#`&`,`8`P!@#`&` C,`8`P!@#`&`,`8`P!@#`&`,`8`P!@#`&`,`8`P!@#`&`_]D_ ` end GRAPHIC 5 g93670image2.jpg GRAPHIC begin 644 g93670image2.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`@``9`!D``#_[``11'5C:WD``0`$````/```_^X`#D%D M;V)E`&3``````?_;`(0`!@0$!`4$!@4%!@D&!08)"P@&!@@+#`H*"PH*#!`, M#`P,#`P0#`X/$`\.#!,3%!03$QP;&QL<'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'P$'!P<-#`T8$!`8 M&A41%1H?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?'Q\? M'Q\?'Q\?'Q\?_\``$0@`*`"F`P$1``(1`0,1`?_$`'P```("`P$!```````` M``````0%`P8"!P@!``$!`````````````````````!```00!`P,"!`,%`PT! M`````@$#!`4&`!$2(1,',2)!410583)"<2,S%@AR4[.!4H*RDW2T-756=A]*E"P\.Y2!4)#*&V&Z<]D]F_7IUT`0>3,Q.K;L@M(!-2(K4VO M9^UOH_,;<:[Y#$:66A/&TW[G!'T].JZ#![RO?M#2N'D=0D7(C-NFF?;I",/D M`">R.+*1!52/M^_;W[BNV@BE>6\JA27V+"SAP$B0`LY[\FHDMMQFG=T;;>59 M6Z/&0\1;1%55]-!M#%KF3D.&5MO%D`C]C%;D-R"8(`533?EV%-21%^7/_+H$ M'B'-LARVNNY-TW%:B?#0#9%F.95GE/'L4C M+!>K;UF7)1QUIP7FTB#R5OD)J*\MT3EQZ?+01U/F03:R$[FL^C=I;9**+%BN MK)>G3B1%%M@5!K\_)-MU]-U79$T#YV9Y0..LEBKJ6C4>05[TM]7/P$G@:5M" M_8BI^.@0EY.RF-<8?5SZ!J-(REU^,^V4@T.&]##F^BIVU1P51%[9"6RZ"P^2 MLLLL1Q"PR2'#9G-UC2OR8SKI,D0(J)["$'$WZ[]4T"/%O)=]8YTSBMQ41X'U M=0%S"F-2#=1YLU`5;`2;;]S:DO+K\-`9DODI*#R1C6)2H[2QLD%Y&9G=5'&G M6AW`2;X[;.E[17EZZ"?/\SN<9E5`Q(D23&LI"L/.27S86.TVT;[\D]@,5::: M:52^.@]JLJRO(X86=!51X].^G.%*M'G&G9+2_E=%AIMPFP-.H\RY*G7CH*_5 M>8;"XRN1AL*LBLW\57A=DORR6`ZL?CW1BN`US><;YIW`XBH?'0.K3.KG&GXS M>5P(\6#.=&+&NXCINQ&Y+G1H)0&#;C(F71#3D._KMH%^,9UGF1V610(=;5QC MQVP*N>)^1()'B$4/F/%KVHJ$GKH)G_+`4,Z569K7+3SF8[Q^->U+5.T$]@94*!(*0XO;=%#;%R0TJ#RV7 MKQ!41=`U^^9%_)'W7[2O\R?3?\GW7C];^3M\_P"Z[OZ_\SW:#17G1JPD>4HX MP60J_]'7B[Z=ISJ:[?(4]RIH!9N18QE/C6NAVM0=RV1I6V49ICG.::%-PC.\MY(?#=53T30'^26K*!#QAS.'1G4M36PE8K6'$ M=@H'Y=OAH-7^#\6K+2'E\F2[,!Q,GM`XQYDF.&R.)M[&C`=^OKMH)[NBKZ? M^H#`!BN235^%;09*6KOJ#/ MU4-MEE]SY"!*ON^&^@Z?E1FIT0F5<,6GAZ.L.$V>R]443!470Y`R=EWE22(QVB;`0-47C[6T1>GQ70;#\UX8D3Q3DTI;ZX?[,$R[ M+TOFT:[IT,>/5%T'V>L_:*OQ]Y`8%1#&SC,6>WK]ML6@CO*OX-D0%H`\TH9> M6XKE&95G[RQA3&96+F/NY,T)JN[9)\)#G?VV]44=`)GLF1Y.P[)+?'.3[$&@ M!F``>Y3DSD;F2VQV_6,9L&U3YDJ:#;.!7%=!IE6+Y)<3+S<50@A.)S5\R_NY".@(+^K0;=_J M%5AWQ/<5JCW9UJK$*KBIU<=ENOAV@;'U4D5.7X(F^@7>"VW6;;R`P^7.0S>" MV^?S,(;(DN_]I%T$'FI^!*S#"8FR/%32W[NZXCW$CU3#*B^3PIOL#O+CLOYN MN@*+PG6MLI/P#*;/&&7Q[T9B#(^IK5YIR0ACN\PXKZ^TMM`)$\E9B_X6FWQE M$:R*)/2F;LR1?HG26P;@?7BF_P##1'%/Y;C\M!IWS[EL*#YDNL?R`7'\8L68 M3CBM=7X,H8XHW.B_)QO]0^ACT7X*@+?(Y5MSFT2@NKQ7;Q:BI/&\N[S@QTE" MPAHAHJH@-2S+EW=N0'LJ]-]`1?3L\R+`:_&@A-TM[/MI[&9R51&$<2&RP3LJ M4?HTWQ5">X^TU%%Z[[:"#R3<8OAC>.65/8??+\*"#%QLW&R%J"P($A6"MGNG M>=555D?T_F7KQT'37B.9(7Q!C,MU'ID@ZQEQS@J$\X1#N2[F0[DJKOU705?Q MQ?8/7,64O#:+(WXKDU]+0>!O`LY%3OJ0//;]S?;EQT&=EE?A.^R>!>V=G*@Y M-4N+"AQW5FQ9,9YS?DS].B(G-Q/ALO)/3?0,J-OP]!LIT)F6HR,E>,I\.S*2 MC4Y]Q-BW"8B-F9?(=`1.H?'N-FW4LV%E!4QY,TE;,GNDC?IN$9DG#;#Y;(@Z M!?28KX:.370:]B3%LJ(WYU9!=, MG30"-R/$Y+=6598RJ21"`IUY#AN2Z]WBOJ\<(D!54U_6+>Y+\=]`L^L\)M6< M8FTM(N1SA-V/.!FW;LY`"B(MOW9 M`J2HKZHRJB8\NG)/3TT#S%;KQPS9NT%9#?B3[-IR1(^OARVCE`TB(YW)$P$5 MW82_*I+T_#0(PB>'8<)XZ^OL2H4Y]TJUNT.L5$5>?$(ZJR0?V!4=!<_NV#?^ MO_NG&/\`R9]#WN'9_)L2_Z7&_U$T%&\(V63QZ;)FJ MRE;GL+DMLJ2#F!'3DKR;HHJ!ET^>@0YM@][59GC^96Y1I&1Y!E=6(5\8S"*P MQ%CO"TWW2'D9KZD?#]B:"TY?)LO(%X_XRNXC..HV4>R[QN+(>G16'$<4J\T! ML!)"!!-57D*;^W0,?Z?'RLL5M+^:G*^M+>=]V=/JXAL/*TTRJKU06FA%!'X: M"7^H=@6O&LN^8+L7.//QK"FEC_$;DB^`<17UV<$U`A^.^@0>&KC(V6,Q6%0G M/)[))[KKB26&`%PD;4@5#7E[5^.V@K^8X5D=/D=+DDPXC=]D^9U\ANO;4SAQ MQ8BNM-"9H@$9DG5PD%-U]-!N%IO.7[=J'?1:R5CTEEP'UBH\KH/BHDTIH[TX M+Q).G7EMH*-7/Y)'\U>1Y%%#C3Y#<"H7Z:0\;"F2,.*``0@X.Y>GNT!?CN'" MSR^7R';N-_=(D=:91YUN4IKS<=1P45%V0=NJ)H"XVV(F_F%2X\2)U(TY@BK_HBB:`7)4N?_T15+3K&^K_ M`)8D!YGPJGBU,6+5Y=45C8L0U!TZZP6.TG%L20Q_#E]4X/QVZ[Z!)Y(\/9ADV M62;>MG43,-YMH`;L*IF7(16P05Y/&)$2;^GRT%?F>!?*$TP-2'&FP9;) MRCCDHM-#Q;!-P_*(ILB:#TO`ODYR&U!!?)LQ6EEWN.2"8:".PKE%'+@TVFP-CN/013T30;KQBKF5.-5U9(- MAV9#C`RXY':2.P1@.VX-#T`=_@F@K7BS!K_#HEG"L)L6='L;"39HXRVXT8.R MB0C;V)20A14Z+ZZ"7R-A5UDTK&I%9,CQ%Q^T;MB&0!FCI,BHBW[%3BBH:[KH M,_(6!/Y570),.4-5EE.\,FGN`131AU51'05.BN-.!N)`OKH%U)@F7T$J;94T M^`Q)M7?J;BJ-IY8#LI11#E,;%W8YN;>\=S%=`?-PV\R1^+_-\N,Y5PGFY3=+ M`;,67GV2YM%)==53<$"]R-H(IOMOOH,?'.#W>*.WB3+"//8NK*1;*C;)M&T[ M)5.3:*IFA"G'UZ+H,O(^#W&4NX\[6V3-O+ M09V-1Y2EL=AC(*V`A["Y(8KW3=$5_,K?V5%G=SDC5DV M_"N68D8X!LGW&VX+:MMDCW<7D9;JI*H]570>R?'ME$SUS+<9LVZQ+!H6[ZL= M85YB:XW_``WEXFWVW1'IR'U^.@RR+!KJRS['LMBV,>.M#'D,+"<8-Q'OJT07 M5YHX/'9!3CT702^2,'LPJI>[0`6V M!9;)\A1,U@W$*-*C5BU:PW8CCK9`;G=,^2/-DB\MMOPT$]MB&([KZ:">NI?)\&&->N0P+!L!X-V,^+ZAC"I&,-2Y`'*E)92+5%'Z@[!)(S$DJFW#?OM )BO';;9-M!__9 ` end
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----