XML 50 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
CALIFORNIA UTILITIES' REGULATORY MATTERS (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Public Utilities General Disclosures [Abstract]  
Schedule Of Regulatory Matters
EARNINGS IMPACTS FROM THE 2016 GRC FD RECORDED IN THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2016
(Dollars in millions)
SoCalGasSDG&E
PretaxAfter-taxPretaxAfter-tax
earningsearningsearningsearnings
(charge)(charge)(charge)(charge)
Retroactive revenue requirement increase
for the first quarter of 2016$20$12$15$9
Adjustments to revenue related to
tax repairs deductions:
Refund of 2015 memorandum account$(72)$(43)$(37)$(22)
True-up of 2012-2014 estimates to actuals(11)(6)(15)(9)
Total$(83)$(49)$(52)$(31)

MAJOR PROJECTS – UPDATES
Joint Utilities Projects
Southern Gas System Reliability Project (North-South Pipeline)
§ In July 2016, the CPUC issued a final decision which denies the California Utilities' request for a permit to construct.
§ In June 2016, SoCalGas recorded an after-tax impairment charge of $13 million for the development costs it had invested in the project. The pretax charge of $21 million is included in Operation and Maintenance on Sempra Energy's and SoCalGas' Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We expect to make a filing to the CPUC seeking recovery of all or a portion of these costs.
Pipeline Safety & Reliability Project
§ SDG&E and SoCalGas filed an amended application with the CPUC in March 2016 providing detailed analysis and testimony supporting the proposed project. The revised request also presents additional information on the costs and benefits of project alternatives, safety evaluation and compliance analysis, and statutory and procedural requirements. SDG&E and SoCalGas seek approval to construct the proposed project, estimated at a cost of $633 million, and authority to recover the associated revenue requirement in rates.
SDG&E Projects
Cleveland National Forest (CNF) Transmission Projects
§ In March 2016, the U.S. Forest Service issued a final decision authorizing issuance of the CNF Master Special Use Permit renewing SDG&E's land rights and authorizing the construction, operation and maintenance of facilities located on national forest lands for the next 50 years, as well as approving the majority of the fire-hardening activities proposed by SDG&E.
§ In May 2016, the CPUC issued a final decision granting SDG&E a permit to construct. The project will be installed at an estimated cost of $680 million: $470 million for the various transmission-level facilities and $210 million for associated distribution-level facilities, including distribution circuits and additional undergrounding required by the final environmental impact statement. In July 2016, the Cleveland National Forest Foundation and the Protect Our Communities Foundation filed a joint application for rehearing of the final decision.
Sycamore-Peñasquitos Transmission Project
§ March 2016 final environmental impact report (EIR) recommended an alternative that undergrounds more of the project than originally proposed, and is viewed as environmentally superior. The CPUC may consider this alternative.
§ The recommended alternative in the EIR has an estimated cost of $250 million to $300 million, compared to the original project cost estimate of $120 million to $150 million, and would also delay the project schedule by approximately 10 months.
§ CPUC decision expected in the second half of 2016.
South Orange County Reliability Enhancement
§ CPUC issued its final EIR for the project in April 2016. The EIR concluded that an alternative project is considered environmentally superior to SDG&E's proposal. The final EIR states that the CPUC is not required to adopt the environmentally superior alternative if there are overriding considerations in favor of another alternative. The CPUC will consider the findings in determining whether to approve SDG&E's proposed project or an alternative to it.
§ Final CPUC decision expected in the second half of 2016.
Energy Storage Projects
§ SDG&E filed an advice letter with the CPUC in July 2016 seeking approval to own and operate two energy storage projects totaling 37.5 MW. The purpose of the two projects is to enhance electric reliability in the San Diego service territory.
§ We expect a CPUC resolution later in 2016.