Recent Accounting Pronouncements	12 Months Ended
Mar. 30, 2012
New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS	In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements. The update requires entities to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of the delivered goods and services based on a selling price hierarchy. The update eliminates the residual method of revenue allocation and requires revenues to be allocated using the relative selling price method. The Company adopted this update prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. The Company has evaluated this standard and determined it will not have a material effect on the Company's statements of financial condition or results of operations. In May 2011, the FASB issued an ASU with amendments to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in GAAP. The amendments in this update clarified the language used to describe many of the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The following areas were impacted by this ASU: (i) application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts; (ii) measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in shareholders' equity; and (iii) additional quantitative disclosures regarding unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, or the Company's fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012. The Company has evaluated this standard and determined that, other than requiring additional disclosures, it did not have a material impact on the Company's statements of financial condition or results of operations. In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income that requires changes in stockholders' equity to be presented either (i) in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or (ii) in two separate consecutive statements. The ASU requires retrospective application and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, or the Company's fiscal year 2013. In December 2011, the FASB indefinitely deferred the effective date for amendments pertaining to the presentation of reclassification adjustments by component. The Company has evaluated this standard and determined it will not have a material effect on the Company's statements of financial condition or results of operations. In September 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance to simplify the method in which entities test goodwill for impairment. This ASU allows an entity to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. Additional disclosure requirements were included with this update, including an explanation of qualitative factors used in the goodwill analysis. The amendments in this update are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, or the Company's fiscal year 2013. The Company has evaluated this standard and determined it will not have an effect on the Company's statements of financial condition or results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

12 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2012

New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements. The update requires entities to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of the delivered goods and services based on a selling price hierarchy. The update eliminates the residual method of revenue allocation and requires revenues to be allocated using the relative selling price method. The Company adopted this update prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. The Company has evaluated this standard and determined it will not have a material effect on the Company's statements of financial condition or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued an ASU with amendments to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in GAAP. The amendments in this update clarified the language used to describe many of the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The following areas were impacted by this ASU: (i) application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts; (ii) measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in shareholders' equity; and (iii) additional quantitative disclosures regarding unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, or the Company's fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012. The Company has evaluated this standard and determined that, other than requiring additional disclosures, it did not have a material impact on the Company's statements of financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income that requires changes in stockholders' equity to be presented either (i) in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or (ii) in two separate consecutive statements. The ASU requires retrospective application and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, or the Company's fiscal year 2013. In December 2011, the FASB indefinitely deferred the effective date for amendments pertaining to the presentation of reclassification adjustments by component. The Company has evaluated this standard and determined it will not have a material effect on the Company's statements of financial condition or results of operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance to simplify the method in which entities test goodwill for impairment. This ASU allows an entity to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. Additional disclosure requirements were included with this update, including an explanation of qualitative factors used in the goodwill analysis. The amendments in this update are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, or the Company's fiscal year 2013. The Company has evaluated this standard and determined it will not have an effect on the Company's statements of financial condition or results of operations.