UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-07153
T. Rowe Price Fixed Income Series, Inc. |
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
David Oestreicher |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrants telephone number, including area
code: (410) 345-2000
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: June 30,
2014
Item 1. Report to Shareholders
Prime
Reserve Portfolio |
June 30,
2014 |
Highlights |
The views and opinions in this report were current as of June 30, 2014. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the funds future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.
Managers Letter
T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Portfolio
Dear Investor
The Federal Reserve kept the fed funds target rate extremely low in the first half of 2014. Since the beginning of January, however, the central bank has been reducing the size of its monthly asset purchasesa process that should be complete by the end of 2014 and should be followed by the onset of measured short-term rate increases sometime in mid- to late 2015. Like many other money market funds, the T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Portfolio continued to offer investors principal stability and liquidity, albeit with yields and total returns barely above 0%.
Economy and Interest Rates
After producing mostly moderate growth in 2013, the U.S. economy contracted at a 2.9% annualized rate in the first quarter of 2014, according to the most recent estimates. Harsh winter weather that curtailed housing activity and consumer spending was a major reason for the downturn, but stronger second-quarter business and housing investment, sustained growth in labor income, and improving sales and manufacturing data suggest that the economy is rebounding strongly. Job growth has been solid, and the unemployment rate declined to 6.1% in June.
The Fed reduced its purchases of Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities over the last six months, trimming its monthly purchases by $10 billion increments following its monetary policy meetings. We believe the Fed will complete winding down its asset purchases by the end of 2014 and that short-term interest rate increases are likely to begin around mid- to late 2015.
Performance Comparison
The Prime Reserve Portfolio returned 0.00% in the first half of 2014. As shown in the Performance Comparison table, the portfolio fared about the same as its Lipper peer group average. Like many of its peers, T. Rowe Price has voluntarily waived all or a portion of the management fee it is entitled to receive from the portfolio in an effort to maintain a 0% or positive net yield for the portfolio. The Lipper benchmarks negative return reflects the fact that some of the portfolios represented in the peer group average are cash management accounts whose annuity unit valueswhich are not necessarily fixed at $1.00declined slightly during our reporting period.
Portfolio Review
Although the beginning of the Feds tapering of its asset purchase program was a leading story in fixed income markets over the past six months, the very short-term securities in which we invest felt no impact from the change in Fed policy. Rather, money market rates remained closely tied to the federal funds rate, currently targeted at between 0.00% and 0.25%. Short-term rates are unlikely to rise significantly until the Fed signals that a short-term benchmark rate increase is imminent.
The Treasury bill market did, however, feel some impact from another bout of uncertainty caused by U.S. lawmakers indecisiveness regarding budget negotiations and debt ceiling issues in February. As they had in the summer of 2011 and fall of 2013, worries grew that a deadlocked Congress might not permit the repayment of short-term Treasury obligations that were coming due, but the price volatility was much milder this time. The downward pressure on prices was quickly ameliorated when Congress voted to suspend the debt ceiling until March 2015.
Excluding the temporary sell-off in Treasury bills caused by the budget negotiations, the first half of our fiscal year saw continued low rates. The three-month LIBOR, a benchmark interbank lending rate, continued its slow descent, slipping from 0.24% to 0.23% over the last six months. The LIBOR is the basis for pricing many money market instruments, so we have seen lower rates across all money market products. Three-month Treasury bill rates have traded in a range between 0.005% and 0.08%, while one-year Treasury bill yields have fluctuated between 0.07% and 0.09%. The overwhelming demand for high-quality liquid investments in recent years has led to very minimal differences in yields between the shortest-term securities and those with slightly longer maturities.
Repurchase agreements, or repos, continue to play an important role in the portfolio, as they provide another way to obtain high liquidity and quality. During the last six months, we started entering into repos with the Federal Reserve as a counterparty at very competitive rates, averaging around 0.04%. With pending bank regulatory reform, we expect the Federal Reserve to increasingly supplant banks and dealers as a source of supply of such agreements. Municipal variable rate securities also remain a sizable portion of the portfolio; rates on these investments averaged 0.08% over the last six months.
Outlook
The Feds own forecasts suggest that short-term interest rates will move higher sometime in the middle to latter part of 2015. Obviously, those forecasts are subject to the ongoing flow of economic data. With that time frame just beginning to enter into the investment horizon of the portfolio, we are quite cognizant that some money market rates may move higher in anticipation of a rate hike. For now, we are maintaining the same strategy of keeping the portfolios weighted average maturity longer than that of the competitor average. If, in our opinion, the likelihood of rate hikes begins to increase, we may focus more on shorter-term securities so that we can reinvest in higher-yielding money market instruments as soon as they become available. What will remain constant is our focus on principal stability, quality, and liquidityespecially in the current low interest rate environment.
Respectfully submitted,
Joseph K. Lynagh
Chairman of the portfolios Investment Advisory
Committee
July 9, 2014
The committee chairman has day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolio and works with committee members in developing and executing the portfolios investment program.
Risks of Investing in Money Market Securities |
Since money market portfolios are managed to maintain a constant $1.00 share price, there should be little risk of principal loss. However, there is no assurance the portfolio will avoid principal losses if holdings default or are downgraded or if interest rates rise sharply in an unusually short period. In addition, the portfolios yield will vary; it is not fixed for a specific period like the yield on a bank certificate of deposit. An investment in the portfolio is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency. Although a money market portfolio seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in it.
Glossary |
Fed funds target rate: The interest rate charged on overnight loans of reserves by one financial institution to another in the United States. The Federal Reserve sets a target federal funds rate to affect the direction of interest rates.
Gross domestic product: The total market value of all goods and services produced in a country in a given year.
LIBOR: The London Interbank Offered Rate, which is a benchmark for short-term taxable rates.
Lipper averages: The averages of available mutual fund performance returns for specified time periods in categories defined by Lipper Inc.
Repurchase agreement (repo): A form of short-term borrowing using collateral in which a bank or broker-dealer sells government securities to another party, such as the Federal Reserve, and commits to buy them back at a fixed price on a future date, usually within a week.
SEC yield (7-day simple): A method of calculating a money funds yield by annualizing the funds net investment income for the last seven days of each period divided by the funds net asset value at the end of the period. Yield will vary and is not guaranteed.
Weighted average life: A measure of a funds credit quality risk. In general, the longer the average life, the greater the funds credit quality risk. The average life is the dollar-weighted average maturity of a portfolios individual securities without taking into account interest rate readjustment dates. Money funds must maintain a weighted average life of less than 120 days.
Weighted average maturity: A measure of a funds interest rate sensitivity. In general, the longer the average maturity, the greater the funds sensitivity to interest rate changes. The weighted average maturity may take into account the interest rate readjustment dates for certain securities. Money funds must maintain a weighted average maturity of less than 60 days.
Performance and Expenses
T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Portfolio
Growth of $10,000 |
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the portfolio over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for portfolios lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from portfolio returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
Fund Expense Example
As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (Actual) provides
information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the
information on this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the
expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by
$1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then
multiply the result by the number on the first line under the heading Expenses
Paid During Period to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during
this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison
Purposes
The information on the second
line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account values and
expenses derived from the funds actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year
rate of return before expenses (not the funds actual return). You may compare
the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this
5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the
shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and
expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or
expenses you paid for the period.
You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.
Financial Highlights
T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve
Portfolio
(Unaudited)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Portfolio of Investments
T. Rowe Price
Prime Reserve Portfolio
June 30, 2014 (Unaudited)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Assets and
Liabilities
T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve
Portfolio
June 30, 2014 (Unaudited)
($000s,
except shares and per share amounts)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Operations
T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Portfolio
(Unaudited)
($000s)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net
Assets
T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve
Portfolio
(Unaudited)
($000s)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Notes to Financial
Statements
T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve
Portfolio
June 30, 2014 (Unaudited)
T. Rowe Price Fixed Income Series, Inc. (the corporation), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Prime Reserve Portfolio (the fund) is a diversified, open-end management investment company established by the corporation. The fund commenced operations on December 31, 1996. The fund seeks preservation of capital, liquidity, and, consistent with these, the highest possible current income. Shares of the fund are currently offered only through certain insurance companies as an investment medium for both variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies.
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Preparation The fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 (ASC 946). The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), including but not limited to ASC 946. GAAP requires the use of estimates made by management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value ultimately realized upon sale or maturity.
Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Paydown gains and losses are recorded as an adjustment to interest income. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions are declared daily and paid monthly. Capital gain distributions, if any, are generally declared and paid by the fund annually.
NOTE 2 - VALUATION
The funds financial instruments are valued and its net asset value (NAV) per share is computed at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day the NYSE is open for business. The funds financial instruments are reported at fair value, which GAAP defines as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee (the Valuation Committee) has been established by the funds Board of Directors (the Board) to ensure that financial instruments are appropriately priced at fair value in accordance with GAAP and the 1940 Act. Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops and oversees pricing-related policies and procedures and approves all fair value determinations.
Various valuation techniques and inputs are used to determine the fair value of financial instruments. GAAP establishes the following fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs used to measure fair value:
Level 1 quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial instruments that the fund can access at the reporting date
Level 2 inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar financial instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in inactive markets, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, and credit spreads)
Level 3 unobservable inputs
Observable inputs are developed using market data, such as publicly available information about actual events or transactions, and reflect the assumptions market participants would use to price the financial instrument. Unobservable inputs are those for which market data are not available and are developed using the best information available about the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. GAAP requires valuation techniques to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level but rather the degree of judgment used in determining those values. For example, securities held by a money market fund are generally high quality and liquid; however, they are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value are not quoted prices in an active market.
In accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, the fund values its securities at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities for which amortized cost is deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee. On June 30, 2014, all of the funds financial instruments were classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
NOTE 3 - OTHER INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the funds prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
Restricted Securities The fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Prompt sale of such securities at an acceptable price may be difficult and may involve substantial delays and additional costs.
NOTE 4 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences. The amount and character of tax-basis distributions and composition of net assets are finalized at fiscal year-end; accordingly, tax-basis balances have not been determined as of the date of this report.
At June 30, 2014, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $20,241,000.
NOTE 5 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Price Group). The investment management and administrative agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an all-inclusive annual fee equal to 0.55% of the funds average daily net assets. The fee is computed daily and paid monthly. The all-inclusive fee covers investment management, shareholder servicing, transfer agency, accounting, and custody services provided to the fund, as well as fund directors fees and expenses. Interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses are paid directly by the fund.
Price Associates may voluntarily waive all or a portion of its management fee and reimburse operating expenses to the extent necessary for the fund to maintain a zero or positive net yield (voluntary waiver). Any amounts waived or reimbursed under this voluntary agreement are not subject to repayment by the fund. Price Associates may amend or terminate this voluntary arrangement at any time without prior notice. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, management fees waived totaled $40,000.
Information on Proxy Voting Policies, Procedures, and Records |
A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each funds Statement of Additional Information. You may request this document by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SECs website, sec.gov.
The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our website, troweprice.com. To access it, click on the words Social Responsibility at the top of our corporate homepage. Next, click on the words Conducting Business Responsibly on the left side of the page that appears. Finally, click on the words Proxy Voting Policies on the left side of the page that appears.
Each funds most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SECs website. To access it through our website, follow the directions above to reach the Conducting Business Responsibly page. Click on the words Proxy Voting Records on the left side of that page, and then click on the View Proxy Voting Records link at the bottom of the page that appears.
How to Obtain Quarterly Portfolio Holdings |
The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The funds Form N-Q is available electronically on the SECs website (sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room, 100 F St. N.E., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.
Approval of Investment Management Agreement |
On April 30, 2014, the funds Board of Directors (Board), including a majority of the funds independent directors, approved the continuation of the investment management agreement (Advisory Contract) between the fund and its investment advisor, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Advisor). The April meeting followed a telephonic meeting held on March 4, 2014, during which the Board reviewed information and discussed the continuation of the Advisory Contract. In connection with its deliberations, the Board requested, and the Advisor provided, such information as the Board (with advice from independent legal counsel) deemed reasonably necessary. The Board considered a variety of factors in connection with its review of the Advisory Contract, also taking into account information provided by the Advisor during the course of the year, as discussed below:
Services Provided by the
Advisor
The Board considered the nature,
quality, and extent of the services provided to the fund by the Advisor. These
services included, but were not limited to, directing the funds investments in
accordance with its investment program and the overall management of the funds
portfolio, as well as a variety of related activities such as financial,
investment operations, and administrative services; compliance; maintaining the
funds records and registrations; and shareholder communications. The Board also
reviewed the background and experience of the Advisors senior management team
and investment personnel involved in the management of the fund, as well as the
Advisors compliance record. The Board concluded that it was satisfied with the
nature, quality, and extent of the services provided by the Advisor.
Investment Performance of the
Fund
The Board reviewed the funds
three-month, one-year, and year-by-year returns, as well as the funds average
annualized total returns over the 3-, 5-, and 10-year periods, and compared
these returns with a wide variety of previously agreed-upon comparable
performance measures and market data, including those supplied by Lipper and
Morningstar, which are independent providers of mutual fund data.
On the basis of this evaluation and the Boards ongoing review of investment results, and factoring in the relative market conditions during certain of the performance periods, the Board concluded that the funds performance was satisfactory.
Costs, Benefits, Profits, and Economies
of Scale
The Board reviewed detailed
information regarding the revenues received by the Advisor under the Advisory
Contract and other benefits that the Advisor (and its affiliates) may have
realized from its relationship with the fund, including any research received
under soft dollar agreements and commission-sharing arrangements with
broker-dealers. The Board considered that the Advisor may receive some benefit
from soft-dollar arrangements pursuant to which research is received from
broker-dealers that execute the applicable funds portfolio transactions. The
Board received information on the estimated costs incurred and profits realized
by the Advisor from managing T. Rowe Price mutual funds. While the Board did not
review information regarding profits realized from managing the fund in
particular because the fund had not achieved sufficient scale to produce
meaningful profit margin percentages, the Board concluded that the Advisors
profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the funds.
The Board also considered whether the fund benefits under the fee levels set forth in the Advisory Contract from any economies of scale realized by the Advisor. The Board noted that, under the Advisory Contract, the fund pays the Advisor a single fee based on the funds average daily net assets that includes investment management services and provides for the Advisor to pay all expenses of the funds operations except for interest, taxes, portfolio transaction fees, and any nonrecurring extraordinary expenses that may arise. The Board also noted that an arrangement is in place whereby the Advisor may voluntarily waive all or a portion of the management fee it is entitled to receive from the fund or pay all or a portion of the funds operating expenses in order to maintain a zero or positive net yield for the fund. The Board concluded that, based on the profitability data it reviewed and consistent with this single fee structure, the Advisory Contract provided for a reasonable sharing of any benefits from economies of scale with the fund.
Fees
The Board was provided with information regarding industry trends in
management fees and expenses, and the Board reviewed the funds single fee
structure in comparison with fees and expenses of other comparable funds based
on information and data supplied by Lipper. For these purposes, the Board
assumed that the funds management fee rate was equal to the single fee less the
funds operating expenses. After including reductions resulting from voluntary
management fee waivers, the information provided to the Board indicated that the
funds management fee rate was below the median for comparable funds and the
funds total expense ratio was above the median for comparable funds.
The Board also reviewed the fee schedules for institutional accounts and private accounts with similar mandates that are advised or subadvised by the Advisor and its affiliates. Management provided the Board with information about the Advisors responsibilities and services provided to institutional account clients, including information about how the requirements and economics of the institutional business are fundamentally different from those of the mutual fund business. The Board considered information showing that the mutual fund business is generally more complex from a business and compliance perspective than the institutional business and that the Advisor generally performs significant additional services and assumes greater risk in managing the fund and other T. Rowe Price mutual funds than it does for institutional account clients.
On the basis of the information provided and the factors considered, the Board concluded that the fees paid by the fund under the Advisory Contract are reasonable.
Approval of the Advisory Contract
As noted, the Board approved the
continuation of the Advisory Contract. No single factor was considered in
isolation or to be determinative to the decision. Rather, the Board concluded,
in light of a weighting and balancing of all factors considered, that it was in
the best interests of the fund and its shareholders for the Board to approve the
continuation of the Advisory Contract (including the fees to be charged for
services thereunder). The independent directors were advised throughout the
process by independent legal counsel.
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
A code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions is filed as an exhibit to the registrants annual Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the registrants most recent fiscal half-year.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Disclosure required in registrants annual Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Disclosure required in registrants annual Form N-CSR.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrants disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.
(b) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) The registrants code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed with the registrants annual Form N-CSR.
(2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.
(3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.
(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price Fixed Income Series, Inc.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date August 18, 2014 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date August 18, 2014 | ||
By | /s/ Gregory K. Hinkle | |
Gregory K. Hinkle | ||
Principal Financial Officer | ||
Date August 18, 2014 |
Item 12(a)(2).
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Edward C. Bernard, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Portfolio; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |
Date: August 18, 2014 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer |
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Gregory K. Hinkle, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Portfolio; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |
Date: August 18, 2014 | /s/ Gregory K. Hinkle | |
Gregory K. Hinkle | ||
Principal Financial Officer |
Item 12(b).
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 | ||
Name of Issuer: T. Rowe Price Prime Reserve Portfolio | ||
In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR for the above named Issuer, the undersigned hereby | ||
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that: | ||
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities | |
Exchange Act of 1934; | ||
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial | |
condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |
Date: August 18, 2014 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date: August 18, 2014 | /s/ Gregory K. Hinkle | |
Gregory K. Hinkle | ||
Principal Financial Officer |
'1) '!A8VME="!B96=I
M;CTG[[N_)R!I9#TG5S5-,$UP0V5H:4AZ X!N=ST=O$7S,84VF2W6S:92$N0$
MB0RJ5U)L1MS`632$*4_96!$5=!-T#0-`T#0-`T#
M0-`T#0-`T#0-`T#0<&8@-3*M!$:5J15_@I2G\-=!4XCEF#RTN1#B,<$N+2]J
M)4:3#.J_&W=6,E::M3X_9O*O5_'T$;CW/^&\C?VV#RR)\D4]RU"JUW%JK4:4
MJX*TH2:E>-H-H!E]T>DM!*@
E0VHD)$SM'<>"_B8&@XXNR-CLAFYDF4M4'DN:H>!`B\*-\,>@#VZ5
MI3YS8DMX6]+%^M4R/%BBYXU96.,R
;D:SH?("?$9')2@HB6J,
/11THBI0BL6"P-K#+PJ5JU+H;&%:)%:`D
M5HD7W=!TQ&9QN8@C.QSZ/C$1KJ7@0$+%'5;%F!T$UL68D#%F(F!C:0Z#6(V!
MXS(GYCBP3Y9QV7Y#*8!@4I')>5>\VUW#11K$R9`RJF`22'XE]*K0T&RTS>-+
M(5QZV$Z4%;7"E;&@HK;J"U@"2TE4:W4%I@6@FU(1IXE6E*>-*>-?_&M?"F@Y
MT%6[D^$3+"*R00F;J11;M-JC?*M!HJLB@[%&5.ME`JR[<\OX^G0=,WRO"X5E
M%32D$ZJ2D[,2)*F,V@8M1%9%4X_C<'_#JZS'H4T@#I@N88/-KF,A%)6./K2D
MOO84N!4*D&Y3[)BD5KY=:'T_=(?VM!W7RS!,KA:4%O2Q?G#\>@AX[*XLO>C-QAF(*26!Q:A11@5
M95BIF2)@4'QNN`:T(Q^Z.@UWB<*5$Q7'V0\C)/FBI24\DQ12W536C9'CDS9!
M*NROPH;I"95$+8TMGSS%WF!UEL?QKEK+UJF1XL47/&K*QQF3E5>U-2*TZ-R!
M):1=N2_-9VSA?Y(BL/58N4QTN3+BQI*W2H)`N:@"H1I-@48`L&GVA4ED)T\?
MNZ#R7+0YP1LTR!-VI\7,NR$3@4FD
!"Q61SRHH2./X=LA63E4=6CPI",ERC4BBRHRB#`Q(
M2
*7+.X;@ZM!A@
)07<A
MO?B\=!I&!`Q*JNV8E1JM%=];J556BQ!G3<0=-V@XR/%5S;D:SH?("?$9')2@HB6J,
58+:RH;6J
,Z,F"S'PO4XWYIL@!K,5N6VI[$JD%Y],JRY7Q:"5Z]S3_TM
M_P!9[#Z]'[J_Q3^#_D?G_P`;01L?R7W!?',YG#.S=3&/EBGU.,WQGK<8)@7"
M/A3?2(/[KY2MS;+J#0"Y+[@TQN2D4X9XS8R8+,?"]3C?FFR`&LQ6Y;:GL2J0
M7GTRK+E?%H)/KW-/_2W_`%GL/KT?NK_%/X/^1^?_`!M!&QW)?<%Z#.9PSLW4
MQCY8I]3C-NGK<8)@7"/A3?2(/[KY2MS;+J#0"Y+[@TQN2D4X9XS8R8+,?"]2
MC?FFR`&LQ6Y;:GL2J07GTRK+E?%H),//R,
M07L?,DWWJ^'0(>>YHW-*B2>+=MC"F34,R??H99%CK$HDK9&EY=Z=37L?,C67
MM^+05GZM]SNPWOT%^;[/?[3U:)]5WFSVNY;;])^=W_E_U;YN@LYN>YHK--B1
MN+=SC`F0D+R??H7?%D+(I=+QL^08[50*$1H8T"JTB96LE5M$;%NT5_=7!8P*!G.
MN?!QR1G*5Q1KBYTL'6-V\D:MI3.CBJ-O[@MGQ253\+'^8-W4);8AM/&LYGV\
MISG'LR<20S'1X4Z-*AI9'I54\Y(44:V-DW&JL.M=X6`+-SY*[.H*[@>/A1>:
M>X541EHJS*Q*UJ`"%PUQ,,J_P4IXTJTFE_YR9]Z[05D&=E,$&"Q/'4P(B,[G
M\Y$<+8YU$-L\A*!H42Q-*V]J`U"M/,#IW%?'H.8O,.0Y&1Q46]H$M^;S.%EL
M`)%%5?C8^0`9"UC('RF%#H91GU?;N=#MU8/T%QQCDW(
L?&OWMA?477T_%UG<&%O"N.,ES)58[1/(4KWB0DR0CF1#4:L[<&
M411U:5^>*][X2ON$=!T9P7C3<6[&O2]Z'U03'NERVR[HIT;'*DPVE+$D-IN*
M(77+9UAU$6@S1.'X&)D2R$=3@D,M)H]U))+&!2E*-8@F50Q_V4\9!K)Q6C
J-5WDRZLSN.[W:,W=P?S/GV">WN=5N@L(O&\1%S
MDK.)6VF3F(3%DN)[S$U1ZE50[1'5-+*L96A4"_S#_;+08%":14"A%TI(B3_$T%D/M+[?#C<;C*8K\EB$SHV/5W$GRU90""8-V
MY<>\)E3Q,B)?X5F@%[2^WQ8W)8RN*\8673!C9!7<2?,5BP$(8W;EP;(@-/$"
M$F?BWZ"3_MOPO_#O^L_J3YS_`-Z_VCYG]#\C^:T$8?:7V^'&XW&4Q7Y+$)G1
ML>KN)/EJR@$$P;MRX]X3*GB9$2_PK-`+VE]OBQN2QE<5^2RZ8,;(*[B3YBL6
M`A#&[