EXHIBIT 13

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes relating thereto included herein.  When necessary, reclassifications have been made to prior period data for purposes of comparability with current period presentation without impacting earnings.  

Overview

Unity Bancorp, Inc. (the “Parent Company”) is a bank holding company incorporated in New Jersey and is registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended.  Its wholly-owned subsidiary, Unity Bank (the “Bank” or, when consolidated with the Parent Company, the “Company”) is chartered by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance.  The Bank provides a full range of commercial and retail banking services through the Internet and its eighteen branch offices located in Bergen, Hunterdon, Middlesex, Somerset, Union and Warren counties in New Jersey, and Northampton County in Pennsylvania as well as a loan production office in Bergen County, New Jersey.  These services include the acceptance of demand, savings, and time deposits and the extension of consumer, real estate, Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and other commercial credits.

Results of Operations

Net income totaled $12.9 million, or $1.20 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $13.2 million, or $1.38 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2016.  The 2.4 percent decrease in net income was primarily due to the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" ("TCJA") which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. TCJA, which lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, will provide a significant tax benefit in 2018 and beyond. However, net income for 2017 was adversely effected due to the $1.7 million revaluation of the Company's deferred tax assets. For additional information on the revaluation of net deferred tax assets, see the "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" section in "Item 6. Selected Financial Data".

Highlights for the year include:

• 20.3 percent increase in total loans driven by a 26.3 percent increase in residential mortgage loans, a 20.0 percent increase in consumer loans and a 19.2 percent increase in commercial loans.

• 10.3 percent increase in total deposits with an 18.6 percent increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, 13.3 percent increase in interest-bearing deposits and a 9.1 percent increase in savings deposits.

• Net interest income increased 19.9 percent due to earning asset growth and improved margins.

• Net interest margin of 3.83 percent compared to 3.58 percent at prior year end due to strong loan growth and the benefit of a rising rate environment.

• Credit quality continues to improve. Nonperforming loans fell to $3.0 million.

The Company's performance ratios for the past two years are listed in the following table:

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017			2016
Net income per common share - Basic  (1)	$	1.22		$	1.40
Net income per common share - Diluted  (2)	$	1.20		$	1.38
Return on average assets	1.02		%	1.17		%
Return on average equity  (3)	11.47		%	15.37		%
Efficiency ratio (4)	55.57		%	56.51		%

(1) Defined as net income divided by weighted average shares outstanding.

(2) Defined as net income divided by the sum of weighted average shares and the potential dilutive impact of the exercise of outstanding options.

(3) Defined as net income divided by average shareholders' equity.

(4) The efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measure of operational performance. It is defined as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income less any gains or losses on securities.

Net income presented above includes the impact of TCJA in 2017 and the gain on subordinated debentures in 2016. During the first quarter of 2016, the Company repurchased $5.2 million of its outstanding subordinated debentures, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $2.3 million on the transaction. This gain is included in noninterest income on the income statement. Net income, excluding the nonrecurring gain on the repurchased subordinated debentures, was $11.7 million, or $1.23 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2016. Return on average assets and average common equity for the year ended December 31, 2016 would have been 1.04% and 13.65% respectively.

On December 22, 2017, the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" was signed which lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. This adjustment resulted in a $1.7 million increase in income tax expense and is reflected in our tax provision on the income statement. Net income excluding the DTA tax rate adjustment was $14.6 million, or $1.36 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2017. Return on average assets and average common equity for the year ended December 31, 2017 would have been 1.15% and 13.02%, respectively.

The Company's non-GAAP performance ratios for the past two years, which exclude the gain on the repurchase of the subordinated debenture and the DTA tax adjustment, are listed in the following table. The Company believes these non-GAAP ratios are beneficial to investors and provide better comparability of the Company's performance over both periods. For additional information see the "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" section in "Item 6. Selected Financial Data".

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017			2016
Net income per common share - Basic  (1)	$	1.38		$	1.25
Net income per common share - Diluted  (2)	$	1.36		$	1.23
Return on average assets	1.15		%	1.04		%
Return on average equity  (3)	13.02		%	13.65		%
Efficiency ratio (4)	55.57		%	59.26		%

(1) Defined as net income divided by weighted average shares outstanding.

(2) Defined as net income divided by the sum of weighted average shares and the potential dilutive impact of the exercise of outstanding options.

(3) Defined as net income divided by average shareholders' equity.

(4) Defined as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income less any gains or losses on securities.

Net Interest Income

The primary source of the Company’s operating income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest and dividends earned on earning assets and fees earned on loans, and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities.  Earning assets include loans to individuals and businesses, investment securities, interest-earning deposits and federal funds sold.  Interest-bearing liabilities include interest-bearing checking, savings and time deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") advances and other borrowings.  Net interest income is determined by the difference between the yields earned on earning assets and the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities (“net interest spread”) and the relative amounts of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.  The Company’s net interest spread is affected by regulatory, economic and competitive factors that influence interest rates, loan demand, deposit flows and general levels of nonperforming assets.

Tax-equivalent net interest income amounted to $45.9 million in 2017, an increase of $7.6 million from $38.4 million in 2016.  The Company’s net interest margin increased 25 basis points to 3.83 percent in 2017, compared to 3.58 percent in 2016.  The net interest spread was 3.57 percent, an increase of 21 basis points from 3.36 percent in 2016. This was due to strong loan growth, the rising interest rate environment and a stable cost of funds.

During 2017, tax-equivalent interest income was $55.4 million, an increase of $8.2 million or 17.5 percent when compared to 2016.  This increase was driven primarily by the increase in the average volume of loans:

• Of the $8.2 million increase in interest income on a tax-equivalent basis, $6.3 million of the increase was due primarily to the increased volume of earning assets and $2.0 million of the increase was due to an increase in yields on average interest-earning assets due to the rising interest rate environment.

• The yield on interest-earning assets increased 21 basis points to 4.61 percent in 2017 when compared to 2016. 

• The average volume of interest-earning assets increased $130.5 million to $1.2 billion in 2017 compared to $1.1 billion in 2016.  This was due primarily to a $127.0 million increase in average loans, primarily commercial, residential mortgage, consumer and SBA loans and a $3.6 million increase in average investment securities, partially offset by a $3.5 million decrease in SBA 504 loans.

Total interest expense was $9.5 million in 2017, an increase of $686 thousand or 7.8 percent compared to 2016.  This increase was driven by the increased volume in savings deposits, partially offset by a decrease in the volume of time deposits and decreased rates on borrowed funds and subordinated debentures compared to a year ago:

• Of the $686 thousand increase in interest expense, $366 thousand was due to an increase in the volume of average interest-bearing liabilities and $320 thousand was due to increased rates on these liabilities.

• The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities remained flat at 1.04 percent in 2017 and 2016.  While the cost of interest-bearing deposits increased 4 basis points to 0.86 percent in 2017, the cost of borrowed funds and subordinated debentures decreased 41 basis points to 2.04 percent.

• Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $912.5 million in 2017, an increase of $74.7 million or 8.9 percent, compared to 2016.  The increase in interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to an increase in average savings deposits.

The following table reflects the components of net interest income, setting forth for the periods presented herein: (1) average assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity, (2) interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities, (3) average yields earned on interest-earning assets and average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, (4) net interest spread, and (5) net interest income/margin on average earning assets.  Rates/yields are computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35 percent in 2017 and 2016.

Consolidated Average Balance Sheets

(Dollar amounts in thousands, interest amounts and interest rates/yields on a fully tax-equivalent basis)

For the years ended December 31,	2017								2016
	Average balance			Interest			Rate/Yield		Average balance			Interest			Rate/Yield
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and repos	$	70,139		$	851		1.21	%	$	71,265		$	214		0.30	%
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock	6,230			370			5.94		5,241			245			4.67
Securities:
Taxable	66,107			2,029			3.07		61,053			1,698			2.78
Tax-exempt	6,225			240			3.86		7,649			307			4.01
Total securities (A)	72,332			2,269			3.14		68,702			2,005			2.92
Loans, net of unearned discount:
SBA loans	59,293			3,805			6.42		56,834			3,181			5.60
SBA 504 loans	23,654			1,177			4.98		27,135			1,356			5.00
Commercial loans	547,347			26,973			4.93		483,479			23,900			4.94
Residential mortgage loans	319,074			14,650			4.59		273,612			12,205			4.46
Consumer loans	102,898			5,296			5.15		84,222			4,021			4.77
Total loans (B)	1,052,266			51,901			4.93		925,282			44,663			4.83
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,200,967		$	55,391		4.61	%	$	1,070,490		$	47,127		4.40	%
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks	23,321								24,409
Allowance for loan losses	(13,033		)						(12,841		)
Other assets	58,481								50,103
Total noninterest-earning assets	68,769								61,671
Total assets	$	1,269,736							$	1,132,161
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	159,642		$	665		0.42	%	$	133,212		$	537		0.40	%
Savings deposits	397,250			2,738			0.69		328,486			1,742			0.53
Time deposits	219,847			3,278			1.49		261,225			3,670			1.40
Total interest-bearing deposits	776,739			6,681			0.86		722,923			5,949			0.82
Borrowed funds and subordinated debentures	135,730			2,772			2.04		114,853			2,818			2.45
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	912,469		$	9,453		1.04	%	$	837,776		$	8,767		1.04	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	237,207								199,554
Other liabilities	7,090								8,895
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities	244,297								208,449
Total shareholders' equity	112,970								85,936
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,269,736							$	1,132,161
Net interest spread				$	45,938		3.57	%				$	38,360		3.36	%
Tax-equivalent basis adjustment				(81		)						(103		)
Net interest income				$	45,857							$	38,257
Net interest margin							3.83	%							3.58	%

(A) Yields related to securities exempt from federal and state income taxes are stated on a fully tax-equivalent basis.  They are reduced by the nondeductible portion of interest expense, assuming a federal tax rate of 35 percent and applicable state rates.

(B) The loan averages are stated net of unearned income, and the averages include loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued.

2015									2014								2013
Average balance			Interest				Rate/Yield		Average balance			Interest			Rate/Yield		Average balance			Interest			Rate/Yield
$	34,883		$	39			0.11	%	$	44,900		$	44		0.10	%	$	39,971		$	39		0.10	%
3,695			155				4.19		3,972			165			4.15		4,007			159			3.97
62,937			1,459				2.32		81,334			2,183			2.68		93,132			2,443			2.62
11,739			421				3.59		14,493			526			3.63		18,587			681			3.66
74,676			1,880				2.52		95,827			2,709			2.83		111,719			3,124			2.79
50,997			2,693				5.28		53,232			2,467			4.63		60,891			2,660			4.37
30,366			1,414				4.66		33,754			1,676			4.97		37,920			1,911			5.04
428,702			21,357				4.98		379,327			19,329			5.10		328,229			17,322			5.28
246,278			11,048				4.49		196,333			8,898			4.53		155,237			7,013			4.52
69,580			3,202				4.60		51,188			2,301			4.50		45,705			1,947			4.26
825,923			39,714				4.81		713,834			34,671			4.86		627,982			30,853			4.92
$	939,177		$	41,788		41,788	4.45	%	$	858,533		$	37,589		4.38	%	$	783,679		$	34,175		4.37	%
25,952									27,021								22,728
(12,638		)							(13,124		)						(14,423		)
43,742									44,312								41,688
57,056									58,209								49,993
$	996,233								$	916,742							$	833,672
$	126,876		$	438			0.35	%	$	125,706		$	430		0.34	%	$	118,289		$	383		0.32	%
290,848			1,088				0.37		274,395			856			0.31		277,891			710			0.26
240,132			3,160				1.32		214,984			2,777			1.29		146,115			2,191			1.50
657,856			4,686				0.71		615,085			4,063			0.66		542,295			3,284			0.61
87,652			2,974				3.39		91,230			3,243			3.55		91,475			3,245			3.55
$	745,508		$	7,660			1.03	%	$	706,315		$	7,306		1.03	%	$	633,770		$	6,529		1.03	%
172,172									144,310								130,768
4,611									3,764								3,164
176,783									148,074								133,932
73,942									62,353								65,970
$	996,233								$	916,742							$	833,672
			$	34,128			3.42	%				$	30,283		3.35	%				$	27,646		3.34	%
			(137		)							(171		)						(221		)
			$	33,991								$	30,112							$	27,425
							3.63	%							3.53	%							3.53	%

The rate volume table below presents an analysis of the impact on interest income and expense resulting from changes in average volume and rates over the periods presented.  Changes that are not solely due to volume or rate variances have been allocated proportionally to both, based on their relative absolute values.  Amounts have been computed on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35 percent.

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017 versus 2016									2016 versus 2015
	Increase (decrease) due to change in:									Increase (decrease) due to change in:
(In thousands on a tax-equivalent basis)	Volume			Rate			Net			Volume			Rate			Net
Interest income:
Federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and repos	$	(3	)	$	640		$	637		$	66		$	109		$	175
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	51			74			125			70			20			90
Securities	91			173			264			(204		)	329			125
Net loans	6,109			1,129			7,238			4,805			144			4,949
Total interest income	$	6,248		$	2,016		$	8,264		$	4,737		$	602		$	5,339
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	102		$	26		$	128		$	26		$	73		$	99
Savings deposits	407			589			996			151			503			654
Time deposits	(613		)	221			(392		)	302			208			510
Total interest-bearing deposits	(104		)	836			732			479			784			1,263
Borrowed funds and subordinated debentures	470			(516		)	(46		)	794			(950		)	(156		)
Total interest expense	366			320			686			1,273			(166		)	1,107
Net interest income - fully tax-equivalent	$	5,882		$	1,696		$	7,578		$	3,464		$	768		$	4,232
Decrease in tax-equivalent adjustment							22									34
Net interest income							$	7,600								$	4,266

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses totaled $1.7 million for 2017, an increase of $430 thousand compared to $1.2 million for 2016.  Each period’s loan loss provision is the result of management’s analysis of the loan portfolio and reflects changes in the size and composition of the portfolio, the level of net charge-offs, delinquencies, current economic conditions and other internal and external factors impacting the risk within the loan portfolio.  Additional information may be found under the captions “Financial Condition - Asset Quality” and “Financial Condition - Allowance for Loan Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments.”  The current provision is considered appropriate based upon management’s assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

Noninterest Income

The following table shows the components of noninterest income for the past two years:

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017		2016
Branch fee income	$	1,384	$	1,269
Service and loan fee income	2,100		1,020
Gain on sale of SBA loans held for sale, net	1,617		2,099
Gain on sale of mortgage loans, net	1,530		2,621
BOLI income	469		378
Net security gains	62		424
Gain on repurchase of subordinated debt	—		2,264
Other income	1,108		985
Total noninterest income	$	8,270	$	11,060

Noninterest income was $8.3 million for 2017, a $2.8 million decrease compared to $11.1 million for 2016.  This decrease was primarily due to a nonrecurring gain on the repurchase of subordinated debentures in 2016. The Company repurchased $5.2 million of its outstanding debentures on February 26, 2016. The subordinated debentures were repurchased at a price of $0.5475 per dollar, resulting in a 2016 pre-tax gain of $2.3 million on the transaction. Excluding the nonrecurring gain, noninterest income decreased $526 thousand to $8.3 million primarily due to lower gains on the sale of mortgage and SBA loans and securities, partially offset by an increase in branch fee income.

Changes in noninterest income reflect:

• Branch fee income increased $115 thousand from the prior year due to higher levels of overdraft fees and service charges from commercial checking accounts and paper statement fees.

• Service and loan fee income increased $1.1 million in 2017 primarily due to increased loan interest rate swap program fees and loan and mortgage servicing income.

• Net gains on the sale of SBA loans decreased $482 thousand to $1.6 million in 2017 due to a decrease in the volume of SBA loans sales.  In 2017, $19.4 million in SBA loans were sold compared to $24.7 million in the prior year.

• During the year, $82.1 million in residential mortgage loans were sold at a gain of $1.5 million compared to $108.1 million in loans sold at a gain of $2.6 million during the prior year. The decrease was by design as management elected to hold more residential mortgages in portfolio for long term investment.

• BOLI income increased $91 thousand from prior year, primarily due to the purchase of a $10.0 million Separate Account BOLI policy.

• Net gains on the sale of securities totaled $62 thousand and $424 thousand in 2017 and 2016, respectively. For additional information on securities, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

• Other income, which includes check card related income and miscellaneous service charges, totaled $1.1 million and $985 thousand in 2017 and 2016, respectively. The increase was primarily due to increases in Visa check card interchange fees and rental income.

Noninterest Expense

The following table presents a breakdown of noninterest expense for the past two years:

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017		2016
Compensation and benefits	$	17,117	$	14,952
Occupancy	2,381		2,360
Processing and communications	2,551		2,628
Furniture and equipment	2,079		1,700
Professional services	1,022		976
Loan collection and OREO expenses	463		654
Other loan expenses	186		152
Deposit insurance	546		713
Advertising	1,179		1,095
Director fees	637		559
Other expenses	1,883		1,842
Total noninterest expense	$	30,044	$	27,631

Noninterest expense totaled $30.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $2.4 million when compared to $27.6 million in 2016. The majority of this increase may be attributed to costs of expanding our retail branch and lending networks which resulted in higher compensation and benefits expenses.

Changes in noninterest expense reflect:

• Compensation and benefits expense, the largest component of noninterest expense, increased $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, when compared to 2016.  Expenses have risen as we expanded our branch network, lending and support staff. This additional headcount has resulted in higher salary, commission and benefit expense.

• Occupancy expense remained relatively flat with expenses of $2.4 million in 2017 and 2016.

• Processing and communications remained relatively flat with expenses of $2.6 million in 2017 and 2016.

• Furniture and equipment expense increased $379 thousand in 2017, due to investment in our technology infrastructure through equipment, network and software upgrades that will improve our efficiency and keep our data secure.

• Professional service fees increased $46 thousand in 2017, primarily due to increased consulting expenses, partially offset by decreased loan review and legal expenses.

• Loan collection and OREO expenses decreased $191 thousand in 2017, primarily due to lower legal and property tax expense.

• Other loan expenses increased $34 thousand in 2017, when compared to 2016, primarily due to an increase in loan appraisal expenses, partially offset by decreases in site visits, inspections and tax service fees.

• Deposit insurance expense decreased $167 thousand in 2017 when compared to 2016 as a result of a drop in our assessment rate due to the capital raise in December 2016.

• Advertising expenses increased $84 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2017 in support of our retail and lending sales as well as the branch expansion.

• Director fees increased $78 thousand in 2017 when compared to 2016.

• Other expenses increased $41 thousand in 2017, primarily due to increased officer and employee training and provision for commitments.

Income Tax Expense

For 2017, the Company reported income tax expense of $9.5 million for an effective tax rate of 42.5%, compared to an income tax expense of $7.3 million and an effective tax rate of 35.5% in 2016. This increase was due to the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”, which lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% starting in 2018. Under ASC 740, Income Taxes, Unity was required to adjust its deferred income tax balances as of the enactment date, December 22, 2017, to reflect the lower tax rate of 21%. This adjustment resulted in a $1.7 million increase in income tax expense and an effective tax rate of 42.5% for the year. Excluding this, our income tax expense was $7.8 million with an effective tax rate of 34.8% for the year ended December 31, 2017. For additional information on the revaluation of the deferred tax asset and the effective tax rate, see the "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" section in "Item 6. Selected Financial Data". For additional information on income taxes, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Financial Condition

Total assets increased $265.6 million or 22.3 percent, to $1.5 billion at December 31, 2017, compared to $1.2 billion at December 31, 2016.  This increase was primarily due to increases of $196.3 million in net loans, with strong commercial, residential and consumer loan growth, $44.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and $8.3 million in securities.  

Total deposits increased $97.4 million, primarily due to increases of $40.2 million in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, $33.1 million in savings deposits, $19.3 million in interest-bearing demand deposits and $4.8 million in time deposits. Borrowed funds increased $154.0 million to $275.0 million at December 31, 2017 due to increased overnight borrowings.

Total shareholders’ equity increased $11.8 million from year end 2016, primarily due to net income from operations, less dividends paid on our common stock. Net income was $12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $316 thousand from the prior year.  Other changes in shareholders’ equity included stock-based transactions of $1.2 million and an other comprehensive gain net of tax of $46 thousand, partially offset by common stock dividends paid in 2017.

These fluctuations are discussed in further detail in the sections that follow. 

Securities

The Company’s securities portfolio consists of available for sale (“AFS”) and held to maturity (“HTM”) investments.  Management determines the appropriate security classification of available for sale or held to maturity at the time of purchase.  The investment securities portfolio is maintained for asset-liability management purposes, as well as for liquidity and earnings purposes.

AFS securities are investments carried at fair value that may be sold in response to changing market and interest rate conditions or for other business purposes.  Activity in this portfolio is undertaken primarily to manage liquidity and interest rate risk, to take advantage of market conditions that create economically attractive returns and as an additional source of earnings.  AFS securities consist primarily of obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, obligations of state and political subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities, and corporate and other securities.

AFS securities totaled $53.5 million at December 31, 2017, an increase of $12.9 million or 31.9%, compared to $40.6 million at December 31, 2016.  This net increase was the result of:

• $29.4 million from the purchase of seven collateralized mortgage obligations, four corporate bonds, two mortgage backed securities, one agency note, one municipal security, and seven equity or community bank holdings, partially offset by

• $13.2 million in principal payments, maturities and called bonds,

• $2.8 million in sales net of realized gains, which consisted of five mortgage backed securities,

• $261 thousand of depreciation in the market value of the portfolio.  At December 31, 2017, the portfolio had a net unrealized loss of $532 thousand compared to a net unrealized loss of $271 thousand at December 31, 2016.  These net unrealized losses are reflected net of tax in shareholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income, and

• $227 thousand in net amortization of premiums.

The weighted average life of AFS securities, adjusted for prepayments, amounted to 6.2 years and 5.5 years at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.   

HTM securities, which are carried at amortized cost, are investments for which there is the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity.  The portfolio is comprised of obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, obligations of state and political subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities, and corporate and other securities.

HTM securities were $16.3 million at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $4.7 million or 22.3 percent, from year end 2016.  This net decrease was the result of:

• $4.3 million in principal payments, maturities and called bonds,

• $495 thousand in sales net of realized gains, which consisted of one municipal security, and

• $62 thousand in net amortization of premiums, partially offset by

• $163 thousand from the purchase of one municipal security.

The weighted average life of HTM securities, adjusted for prepayments, amounted to 5.9 years and 6.9 years at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of HTM securities was $16.3 million and $21.0 million, respectively. 

The Company sold one held to maturity security due to a significant deterioration in the creditworthiness of the bond. Investments in debt securities may be classified as held-to-maturity and measured at amortized cost in the statement of financial position only if the reporting enterprise has the positive intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity. Evidence of a significant deterioration in the issuer's creditworthiness is a circumstance in which the enterprise may change its intent to hold a certain security to maturity without calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity in the future. This event was isolated, nonrecurring, and unusual for the Company.

The average balance of taxable securities amounted to $66.1 million in 2017 compared to $61.1 million in 2016.  The average yield earned on taxable securities increased 29 basis points to 3.07 percent in 2017, from 2.78 percent in 2016.  The average balance of tax-exempt securities amounted to $6.2 million in 2017 compared to $7.6 million in 2016.  The average yield earned on tax-exempt securities decreased 15 basis points to 3.86 percent in 2017, from 4.01 percent in 2016. 

Securities with a carrying value of $20.8 million and $17.7 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, were pledged to secure other borrowings and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

Approximately 82 percent of the total investment portfolio had a fixed rate of interest at December 31, 2017, compared to 78 percent in 2016.

For additional information on securities, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loans

The loan portfolio, which represents the Company’s largest asset group, is a significant source of both interest and fee income.  The portfolio consists of SBA, SBA 504, commercial, residential mortgage and consumer loans.  Each of these segments is subject to differing levels of credit and interest rate risk.

Total loans increased $197.3 million or 20.3 percent to $1.2 billion at December 31, 2017, compared to $973.4 million at year end 2016.  Commercial loans, residential mortgages, consumer loans, and SBA loans increased $97.8 million, $76.1 million, $18.3 million and $9.5 million, respectively, partially offset by a decline of $4.5 million in SBA 504 loans.

The following table sets forth the classification of loans by major category, including unearned fees, deferred costs and excluding the allowance for loan losses at December 31^st for the past five years:

	2017				2016				2015				2014				2013
(In thousands, except percentages)	Amount		% of total		Amount		% of total		Amount		% of total		Amount		% of total		Amount		% of total
Ending balance:
SBA loans held for investment	$	43,999	3.8	%	$	42,492	4.4	%	$	39,393	4.4	%	$	40,401	5.3	%	$	48,918	7.2	%
SBA 504 loans	21,871		1.9		26,344		2.7		29,353		3.3		34,322		4.5		31,564		4.7
Commercial loans	606,994		51.8		509,171		52.3		465,518		52.3		401,949		52.7		363,340		53.5
Residential mortgage loans	365,145		31.2		289,093		29.7		264,523		29.8		220,878		29.0		182,067		26.8
Consumer loans	109,855		9.4		91,541		9.4		77,057		8.7		59,096		7.8		46,139		6.8
Total loans held for investment	1,147,864		98.1		958,641		98.5		875,844		98.5		756,646		99.3		672,028		99.0
SBA loans held for sale	22,810		1.9		14,773		1.5		13,114		1.5		5,179		0.7		6,673		1.0
Total loans	$	1,170,674	100.0	%	$	973,414	100.0	%	$	888,958	100.0	%	$	761,825	100.0	%	$	678,701	100.0	%

Average loans increased $127.0 million or 13.7 percent from $925.3 million in 2016, to $1.1 billion in 2017.  The increase in average loans was due to increases in commercial loans, residential mortgages, consumer and SBA 7(a) loans, partially offset by a decrease in SBA 504 loans.  The yield on the overall loan portfolio increased 10 basis points to 4.93 percent for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 4.83 percent for the prior year.    

SBA 7(a) loans, on which the SBA historically has provided guarantees of up to 90 percent of the principal balance, are considered a higher risk loan product for the Company than its other loan products.  These loans are made for the purposes of providing working capital, financing the purchase of equipment, inventory or commercial real estate.  Generally, an SBA 7(a) loan has a deficiency in its credit profile that would not allow the borrower to qualify for a traditional commercial loan, which is why the SBA provides the guarantee.  The deficiency may be a higher loan to value (“LTV”) ratio, lower debt service coverage (“DSC”) ratio or weak personal financial guarantees.  In addition, many SBA 7(a) loans are for start up businesses where there is no historical financial information.  Finally, many SBA borrowers do not have an ongoing and continuous banking relationship with the Bank, but merely work with the Bank on a single transaction.  The guaranteed portion of the Company’s SBA loans is generally sold in the secondary market with the nonguaranteed portion held in the portfolio as a loan held for investment.  

SBA 7(a) loans held for sale, carried at the lower of cost or market, amounted to $22.8 million at December 31, 2017,  an increase of $8.0 million from December 31, 2016.  SBA 7(a) loans held for investment amounted to $44.0 million at December 31, 2017, an increase of $1.5 million from $42.5 million at December 31, 2016.  The yield on SBA 7(a) loans, which are generally floating and adjust quarterly to the Prime Rate, was 6.42 percent for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 5.60 percent in the prior year.

The guarantee rates on SBA 7(a) loans range from 50 percent to 90 percent, with the majority of the portfolio having a guarantee rate of 75 percent at origination.  The guarantee rates are determined by the SBA and can vary from year to year depending on government funding and the goals of the SBA program.  The carrying value of SBA loans held for sale represents the guaranteed portion to be sold into the secondary market.  The carrying value of SBA loans held for investment represents the unguaranteed portion, which is the Company's portion of SBA loans originated, reduced by the guaranteed portion that is sold into the secondary market.  Approximately $97.5 million and $92.6 million in SBA loans were sold but serviced by the Company at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and are not included on the Company’s balance sheet.  There is no direct relationship or correlation between the guarantee percentages and the level of charge-offs and recoveries on the Company’s SBA 7(a) loans.  Charge-offs taken on SBA 7(a) loans effect the unguaranteed portion of the loan.  SBA loans are underwritten to the same credit standards irrespective of the guarantee percentage.  

The SBA 504 program consists of real estate backed commercial mortgages where the Company has the first mortgage and the SBA has the second mortgage on the property.  Generally, the Company has a 50 percent LTV ratio on SBA 504 program loans at origination.  At December 31, 2017, SBA 504 loans totaled $21.9 million, a decrease of $4.4 million from $26.3 million at December 31, 2016.  The yield on SBA 504 loans was 4.98 percent for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 5.00 percent in 2016.

Commercial loans are generally made in the Company’s marketplace for the purpose of providing working capital, financing the purchase of equipment, inventory or commercial real estate and for other business purposes.  These loans amounted to $607.0 million at December 31, 2017, an increase of $97.8 million from year end 2016.  The yield on commercial loans was 4.93 percent for 2017, compared to 4.94 percent in 2016.

Residential mortgage loans consist of loans secured by 1 to 4 family residential properties.  These loans amounted to $365.1 million at December 31, 2017, an increase of $76.1 million from year end 2016.  Sales of mortgage loans totaled $82.1 million for 2017.  Approximately $3.5 million of the loans sold were from portfolio, with the remainder consisting of new production. The yield on residential mortgages was 4.59 percent for 2017, compared to 4.46 percent for 2016. Residential mortgage loans maintained in portfolio are generally to individuals that do not qualify for conventional financing. In extending credit to this category of borrowers, the Bank considers other mitigating factors such as credit history, equity and liquid reserves of the borrower. As a result, the residential mortgage loan portfolio of the Bank includes fixed and adjustable rate mortgages with rates that exceed the rates on conventional fixed-rate mortgage loan products but are not considered high priced mortgages.

Consumer loans consist of home equity loans, construction loans and loans for the purpose of financing the purchase of consumer goods, home improvements, and other personal needs, and are generally secured by the personal property being purchased.  These loans amounted to $109.9 million at December 31, 2017, an increase of $18.3 million from December 31, 2016.  This increase was generated primarily by consumer construction loans, a product the Company first offered in 2014.  The yield on consumer loans was 5.15 percent for 2017, compared to 4.77 percent for 2016.

There are no concentrations of loans to any borrowers or group of borrowers exceeding 10 percent of the total loan portfolio and no foreign loans in the portfolio. 

In the normal course of business, the Company may originate loan products whose terms could give rise to additional credit risk.  Interest-only loans, loans with high LTV ratios, construction loans with payments made from interest reserves and multiple loans supported by the same collateral (e.g. home equity loans) are examples of such products.  However, these products are not material to the Company’s financial position and are closely managed via credit controls that mitigate their additional inherent risk.  Management does not believe that these products create a concentration of credit risk in the Company’s loan portfolio.

The following table shows the maturity distribution or repricing of the loan portfolio and the allocation of fixed and floating interest rates at December 31, 2017:

	December 31, 2017
(In thousands)	One year or less		One to five years		Over five years		Total
SBA loans	$	63,535	$	2,400	$	874	$	66,809
SBA 504 loans	6,336		15,266		269		21,871
Commercial loans
Commercial other	18,272		24,286		40,268		82,826
Commercial real estate	54,511		312,121		103,064		469,696
Commercial real estate construction	13,009		19,674		21,789		54,472
Total	$	155,663	$	373,747	$	166,264	$	695,674
Amount of loans with maturities or repricing dates greater than one year:
Fixed interest rates							$	159,014
Floating or adjustable interest rates							380,997
Total							$	540,011

For additional information on loans, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) occur when a creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to a debtor’s financial condition, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.  These concessions typically include reductions in interest rate, extending the maturity of a loan, other modifications of payment terms, or a combination of modifications.  When the Company modifies a loan, management evaluates the loan for any possible impairment using either the discounted cash flows method, where the value of the modified loan is based on the present value of expected cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, or by using the fair value of the collateral less selling costs.  If management determines that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, impairment is recognized by segment or class of loan, as applicable, through an allowance estimate or charge-off to the allowance.  This process is used, regardless of loan type, and for loans modified as TDRs that subsequently default on their modified terms.

At December 31, 2017, there was one loan totaling $786 thousand that was classified as a TDR and deemed impaired, compared to one loan totaling $153 thousand at December 31, 2016.  Restructured loans that are placed in nonaccrual status may be removed after six months of contractual payments and the borrower showing the ability to service the debt going forward. The remaining TDR was in accrual status since it is performing in accordance with the restructured terms. There are no commitments to lend additional funds on this loan. The following table presents a breakdown of performing and nonperforming TDRs by class as of December 31^st for the past two years.

	December 31, 2017						December 31, 2016
(In thousands)	Performing TDRs		Nonperforming TDRs		Total TDRs		Performing TDRs		Nonperforming TDRs		Total TDRs
SBA loans held for investment	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	153	$	153
Commercial real estate	786		—		786		—		—		—
Total	$	786	$	—	$	786	$	—	$	153	$	153

For additional information on TRDs, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Asset Quality

Inherent in the lending function is credit risk, which is the possibility a borrower may not perform in accordance with the contractual terms of their loan.  A borrower’s inability to pay their obligations according to the contractual terms can create the risk of past due loans and, ultimately, credit losses, especially on collateral deficient loans.  The Company minimizes its credit risk by loan diversification and adhering to strict credit administration policies and procedures.  Due diligence on loans begins when we initiate contact regarding a loan with a borrower.  Documentation, including a borrower’s credit history, materials establishing the value and liquidity of potential collateral, the purpose of the loan, the source of funds for repayment of the loan, and other factors, are analyzed before a loan is submitted for approval.  The loan portfolio is then subject to on-going internal reviews for credit quality, as well as independent credit reviews by an outside firm. 

The risk of loss is difficult to quantify and is subject to fluctuations in collateral values, general economic conditions and other factors.  In some cases, these factors have also resulted in significant impairment to the value of loan collateral.  The Company values its collateral through the use of appraisals, broker price opinions, and knowledge of its local market.

Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans and OREO.  Nonperforming loans consist of loans that are not accruing interest (nonaccrual loans) as a result of principal or interest being delinquent for a period of 90 days or more or when the ability to collect principal and interest according to the contractual terms is in doubt.  When a loan is classified as nonaccrual, interest accruals discontinue and all past due interest previously recognized as income is reversed and charged against current period income.  Generally, until the loan becomes current, any payments received from the borrower are applied to outstanding principal, until such time as management determines that the financial condition of the borrower and other factors merit recognition of a portion of such payments as interest income.  Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest are not included in nonperforming loans.  Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing generally represent loans that are well collateralized and in a continuing process that are expected to result in repayment or restoration to current status.

The following table sets forth information concerning nonperforming assets and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at December 31^st for the past five years:

(In thousands, except percentages)	2017			2016			2015			2014			2013
Nonperforming by category:
SBA loans held for investment (1)	$	632		$	1,168		$	1,764		$	3,348		$	2,746
SBA 504 loans	—			513			518			2,109			1,101
Commercial loans	68			426			2,164			4,721			4,029
Residential mortgage loans	1,669			2,672			2,224			645			5,727
Consumer loans	625			2,458			590			545			1,680
Total nonperforming loans (2)	$	2,994		$	7,237		$	7,260		$	11,368		$	15,283
OREO	426			1,050			1,591			1,162			633
Total nonperforming assets	$	3,420		$	8,287		$	8,851		$	12,530		$	15,916
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest:
SBA loans held for investment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	161		$	—
Commercial loans	60			—			—			7			14
Residential mortgage loans	—			—			—			722			5
Total past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest	$	60		$	—		$	—		$	890		$	19
Nonperforming loans to total loans	0.26		%	0.74		%	0.82		%	1.49		%	2.25		%
Nonperforming loans and TDRs to total loans (3)	0.32			0.74			1.16			1.96			3.35
Nonperforming assets to total loans and OREO	0.29			0.85			0.99			1.64			2.34
Nonperforming assets to total assets	0.23			0.70			0.82			1.24			1.73
(1) Guaranteed SBA loans included above	$	27		$	60		$	288		$	1,569		$	540
(2) Nonperforming TDRs included above	—			153			293			2,960			467
(3) Performing TDRs	786			—			3,015			3,548			7,452

Nonperforming loans were $3.0 million at December 31, 2017, a $4.2 million decrease from $7.2 million at year end 2016.  Since year end 2016, nonperforming loans in the consumer, residential, SBA, SBA 504, and commercial segments decreased.  Included in nonperforming loans at December 31, 2017 are approximately $27 thousand of loans guaranteed by the SBA, compared to $60 thousand at December 31, 2016.  In addition, there were $60 thousand in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at December 31, 2017, compared to no such loans at December 31, 2016.

OREO properties totaled $426 thousand at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $624 thousand from $1.1 million at year end 2016.  During 2017, the Company took title to three new properties valued at $872 thousand that resulted in a charge to the allowance of $97 thousand. The Company sold six OREO properties, resulting in a net loss of $245 thousand on the sales.

The Company also monitors potential problem loans.  Potential problem loans are those loans where information about possible credit problems of borrowers causes management to have doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with loan repayment terms. These loans are not included in nonperforming loans as they continue to perform.  Potential problem loans totaled $4.0 million at December 31, 2017, an increase of $2.8 million from $1.1 million at December 31, 2016. The increase is due to the addition of eight loans totaling $4.0 million offset by the deletion of seven loans totaling $597 thousand, as well as the payoff of two loans totaling $356 thousand.

For additional information on asset quality, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Loan Commitments

Management reviews the level of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis.  The standardized methodology used to assess the adequacy of the allowance includes the allocation of specific and general reserves.  Specific reserves are made to individual impaired loans, which have been defined to include all nonperforming loans and TDRs.  The general reserve is set based upon a representative average historical net charge-off rate adjusted for certain environmental factors such as: delinquency and impairment trends, charge-off and recovery trends, volume and loan term trends, risk and underwriting policy trends, staffing and experience changes, national and local economic trends, industry conditions and credit concentration changes. 

When calculating the five-year historical net charge-off rate, the Company weights the past three years more heavily as it believes they are more indicative of future charge-offs.  All of the environmental factors are ranked and assigned a basis points value based on the following scale: low, low moderate, moderate, high moderate, and high risk.  The factors are evaluated separately for each type of loan.  For example, commercial loans are broken down further into commercial and industrial loans, commercial mortgages, construction loans, etc.  Each type of loan is risk weighted for each environmental factor based on its individual characteristics. 

According to the Company’s policy, a loss (“charge-off”) is to be recognized and charged to the allowance for loan losses as soon as a loan is recognized as uncollectable.  All credits which are 90 days past due must be analyzed for the Company's ability to collect on the credit.  Once a loss is known to exist, the charge-off approval process is immediately expedited.

The allowance for loan losses totaled $13.6 million at December 31, 2017, compared to $12.6 million at December 31, 2016, with resulting allowance to total loan ratios of 1.16 percent and 1.29 percent, respectively.  Net charge-offs amounted to $673 thousand for 2017, compared to $1.4 million for 2016.  The following table is a summary of the changes to the allowance for loan losses for the past five years, including net charge-offs to average loan ratios for each major loan category:

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands, except percentages)	2017			2016			2015			2014			2013
Balance, beginning of year	$	12,579		$	12,759		$	12,551		$	13,141		$	14,758
Provision charged to expense	1,650			1,220			500			2,550			2,350
Charge-offs:
SBA loans held for investment	293			557			370			1,053			1,076
SBA 504 loans	76			—			589			92			1,193
Commercial loans	151			775			309			1,037			1,392
Residential mortgage loans	55			101			50			740			375
Consumer loans	336			30			130			593			588
Total charge-offs	911			1,463			1,448			3,515			4,624
Recoveries:
SBA loans held for investment	121			33			54			140			250
SBA 504 loans	2			—			—			—			182
Commercial loans	100			29			1,052			166			204
Residential mortgage loans	12			—			49			60			17
Consumer loans	3			1			1			9			4
Total recoveries	238			63			1,156			375			657
Total net charge-offs	673			1,400			292			3,140			3,967
Balance, end of year	$	13,556		$	12,579		$	12,759		$	12,551		$	13,141
Selected loan quality ratios:
Net charge-offs to average loans:
SBA loans held for investment	0.29		%	0.92		%	0.62		%	1.72		%	1.36		%
SBA 504 loans	0.31			—			1.94			0.27			2.67
Commercial loans	0.01			0.15			(0.17		)	0.23			0.36
Residential mortgage loans	0.01			0.04			—			0.35			0.23
Consumer loans	0.32			0.03			0.19			1.14			1.28
Total loans	0.06			0.15			0.04			0.44			0.63
Allowance to total loans	1.16			1.29			1.44			1.65			1.94
Allowance to nonperforming loans	452.77			173.82			175.74			110.41			85.98

The following table sets forth, for each of the major lending categories, the amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated to each category and the percentage of total loans represented by such category, as of December 31^st of the past five years.  The allocated allowance is the total of identified specific and general reserves by loan category.  The allocation is not necessarily indicative of the categories in which future losses may occur.  The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of the portfolio.

	2017				2016				2015				2014				2013
(In thousands, except percentages)	Reserve amount		% of loans to total loans		Reserve amount		% of loans to total loans		Reserve amount		% of loans to total loans		Reserve amount		% of loans to total loans		Reserve amount		% of loans to total loans
Balance applicable to:
SBA loans held for investment	$	1,471	3.8	%	$	1,576	4.4	%	$	1,961	4.4	%	$	1,883	5.3	%	$	2,587	7.2	%
SBA 504 loans	430		1.9		573		2.7		741		3.3		1,337		4.5		957		4.7
Commercial loans	7,395		51.8		6,729		52.3		6,309		52.3		6,270		52.7		6,840		53.5
Residential mortgage loans	3,130		31.2		2,593		29.7		2,769		29.8		2,289		29.0		2,132		26.8
Consumer loans	1,130		9.4		925		9.4		817		8.7		667		7.8		573		6.8
Unallocated	—		—		183		—		162		—		105		—		52		—
Total loans held for investment	13,556		98.1		12,579		98.5		12,759		98.5		12,551		99.3		13,141		99.0
SBA loans held for sale	—		1.9		—		1.5		—		1.5		—		0.7		—		1.0
Total loans	$	13,556	100.0	%	$	12,579	100.0	%	$	12,759	100.0	%	$	12,551	100.0	%	$	13,141	100.0	%

In addition to the allowance for loan losses, the Company maintains a reserve for unfunded loan commitments that is maintained at a level that management believes is adequate to absorb estimated probable losses.  Adjustments to the reserve are made through other expense and applied to the reserve which is maintained in other liabilities.  At December 31, 2017, a $292 thousand commitment reserve was reported on the balance sheet as an “other liability”, compared to a $181 thousand commitment reserve at December 31, 2016.

For additional information on the allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded loan commitments, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Deposits

Deposits, which include noninterest-bearing demand deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits, savings deposits and time deposits, are the primary source of the Company’s funds.  The Company offers a variety of products designed to attract and retain customers, with primary focus on building and expanding relationships.  The Company continues to focus on establishing a comprehensive relationship with business borrowers, seeking deposits as well as lending relationships.

The following table shows period-end deposits and the concentration of each category of deposits for the past three years:

	2017				2016				2015
(In thousands, except percentages)	Amount		% of total		Amount		% of total		Amount		% of total
Ending balance:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	256,119	24.6	%	$	215,963	22.8	%	$	185,267	20.7	%
Interest-bearing demand deposits	164,997		15.8		145,654		15.4		130,605		14.6
Savings deposits	396,557		38.0		363,462		38.5		301,447		33.7
Time deposits	225,464		21.6		220,644		23.3		277,174		31.0
Total deposits	$	1,043,137	100.0	%	$	945,723	100.0	%	$	894,493	100.0	%

Total deposits increased $97.4 million to $1.0 billion at December 31, 2017, from $945.7 million at December 31, 2016.  This increase in deposits was due to increases of $40.2 million, $33.1 million, $19.3 million and $4.8 million in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits and time deposits.

The Company’s deposit composition at December 31, 2017, consisted of 38.0 percent savings deposits, 24.6 percent noninterest-bearing demand deposits, 21.6 percent time deposits and 15.8 percent interest-bearing demand deposits. This shift in deposit mix from December 31, 2016 reflects a 1.8 percent increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, and a 0.4 percent increase in interest-bearing demand deposits, offset by a 1.7 percent decrease in time deposits and a 0.5 percent decrease in savings deposits.

The increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits is attributable to growth in commercial customer relationships.

The following table shows average deposits and the concentration of each category of deposits for the past three years:

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017				2016				2015
(In thousands, except percentages)	Amount		% of total		Amount		% of total		Amount		% of total
Average balance:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	237,207	21.6	%	$	199,554	21.6	%	$	172,172	20.7	%
Interest-bearing demand deposits	159,642		14.4		133,212		14.4		126,876		15.3
Savings deposits	397,250		35.7		328,486		35.7		290,848		35.1
Time deposits	219,847		28.3		261,225		28.3		240,132		28.9
Total deposits	$	1,013,946	100.0	%	$	922,477	100.0	%	$	830,028	100.0	%

For additional information on deposits, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Borrowed Funds and Subordinated Debentures

Borrowed funds consist primarily of fixed and adjustable rate advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and repurchase agreements.  These borrowings are used as a source of liquidity or to fund asset growth not supported by deposit generation.  Residential mortgages and commercial loans collateralize the borrowings from the FHLB, while investment securities are pledged against the repurchase agreements.

Borrowed funds and subordinated debentures totaled $285.3 million and $131.3 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and are broken down in the following table:

(In thousands)	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
FHLB borrowings:
Fixed rate advances	$	40,000	$	50,000
Adjustable rate advances	50,000		50,000
Overnight advances	170,000		6,000
Other repurchase agreements	15,000		15,000
Subordinated debentures	10,310		10,310
Total borrowed funds and subordinated debentures	$	285,310	$	131,310

Borrowed funds increased $154.0 million from prior year-end due to a $164.0 million increase in overnight borrowings, partially offset by a $10.0 million decrease in fixed rate advances during the year ended December 31, 2017. The following transactions impacted borrowed funds and subordinated debentures:

• A $170.0 million FHLB overnight line of credit advance issued on December 29, 2017 was at a rate of 1.53% and was repaid on January 2, 2018.

• A $20.0 million ARC FHLB borrowing with a rate of 1.880% that matured on December 7, 2017. This $20.0 million FHLB advance was renewed for an additional six months at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.15%. A swap instrument was implemented which modified the borrowing to a 5 year fixed rate borrowing at 1.875% that matures on December 7, 2020.

• A $10.0 million ARC FHLB borrowing with a rate of 0.943% that matured on August 16, 2017. This $10.0 million FHLB advance was renewed for an additional six months at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.07%. A swap instrument was implemented which modified the borrowing to a 5 year fixed rate borrowing at 1.173% that matures on February 16, 2021.

• A $10.0 million FHLB borrowing with a rate of 4.234% that matured on August 10, 2017.

• A $20.0 million ARC FHLB borrowing with a rate of 0.958% that matured on July 5, 2017. This $20.0 million FHLB advance was renewed for an additional six months at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.11%. A swap instrument was implemented which modified the borrowing to a 5 year fixed rate borrowing at 1.158% that matures on July 5, 2021.

In December 2017, the FHLB issued a $12.0 million municipal deposit letter of credit in the name of Unity Bank naming the NJ Department of Banking and Insurance as beneficiary. The letter of credit took the place of securities previously pledged to the state as collateral for the Bank's municipal deposits.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had $128.7 million of additional credit available at the FHLB.  Pledging additional collateral in the form of 1 to 4 family residential mortgages, commercial loans and investment securities can increase the line with the FHLB.

For additional information on borrowed funds and subordinated debentures, see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Market Risk

Based on the Company’s business, the two largest risks facing the Company are market risk and credit risk.  Market risk for the Company is primarily limited to interest rate risk, which is the impact that changes in interest rates would have on future earnings.  The Company’s Risk Management Committee (“RMC”) manages this risk.  The principal objectives of RMC are to establish prudent risk management guidelines, evaluate and control the level of interest rate risk in balance sheet accounts, determine the level of appropriate risk given the business focus, operating environment, capital, and liquidity requirements, and actively manage risk within Board-approved guidelines.  The RMC reviews the maturities and repricing of loans, investments, deposits and borrowings, cash flow needs, current market conditions, and interest rate levels.

The Company uses various techniques to evaluate risk levels on both a short and long-term basis.  One of the monitoring tools is the “gap” ratio.  A gap ratio, as a percentage of assets, is calculated to determine the maturity and repricing mismatch between interest rate-sensitive assets and interest rate-sensitive liabilities.  A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets repricing exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities repricing in a designated time period.  A positive gap should result in higher net interest income with rising interest rates, as the amount of the assets repricing exceeds the amount of liabilities repricing.  Conversely, a gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds interest rate-sensitive assets, and lower rates should result in higher net interest income.

Repricing of mortgage-related securities is shown by contractual amortization and estimated prepayments based on the most recent 3-month constant prepayment rate.  Callable agency securities are shown based upon their option-adjusted spread modified duration date (“OAS”), rather than the next call date or maturity date.  The OAS date considers the coupon on the security, the time to the next call date, the maturity date, market volatility and current rate levels.  Fixed rate loans are allocated based on expected amortization.

The following table sets forth the gap ratio at December 31, 2017.  Assumptions regarding the repricing characteristics of certain assets and liabilities are critical in determining the projected level of rate sensitivity.  Certain savings and interest checking accounts are less sensitive to market interest rate changes than other interest-bearing sources of funds.  Core deposits such as interest-bearing demand, savings and money market deposits are allocated based on their expected repricing in relation to changes in market interest rates. 

(In thousands, except percentages)	Under six months			Six months through one year			More than one year through three years			More than three years through five years			More than five years through ten years			More than ten years and not repricing			Total
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	23,701		$	23,701
Federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and repos	126,553			—			—			—			—			—			126,553
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	—			—			—			—			—			12,863			12,863
Securities	6,639			3,689			18,028			20,827			12,202			8,415			69,800
Loans	362,840			104,664			330,856			260,189			87,915			24,210			1,170,674
Allowance for loan losses	—			—			—			—			—			(13,556		)	(13,556		)
Other assets	—			—			—			—			—			65,461			65,461
Total assets	$	496,032		$	108,353		$	348,884		$	281,016		$	100,117		$	121,094		$	1,455,496
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	256,119		$	256,119
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits	273,972			—			71,674			108,189			107,719			—			561,554
Time deposits	37,893			73,892			97,442			15,641			395			201			225,464
Borrowed funds and subordinated debentures	185,000			—			70,000			30,000			—			310			285,310
Other liabilities	—			—			—			—			—			8,944			8,944
Shareholders' equity	—			—			—			—			—			118,105			118,105
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	496,865		$	73,892		$	239,116		$	153,830		$	108,114		$	383,679		$	1,455,496
Gap	(833		)	34,461			109,768			127,186			(7,997		)	(262,585		)
Cumulative gap	(833		)	33,628			143,396			270,582			262,585			—
Cumulative gap to total assets	(0.1		)%	2.3		%	9.9		%	18.6		%	18.0		%	—

At December 31, 2017, there was a six-month liability-sensitive gap of $833 thousand and a one-year asset-sensitive gap of $33.6 million, as compared to asset-sensitive gaps of $63.4 million and $130.0 million at December 31, 2016.  The six-month and one-year cumulative gap to total assets ratios were within the Board-approved guidelines of +/- 20 percent.

Other models are also used in conjunction with the static gap table, which is not able to capture the risk of changing spread relationships over time, the effects of projected growth in the balance sheet or dynamic decisions such as the modification of investment maturities as a rate environment unfolds.  For these reasons, a simulation model is used, where numerous interest rate scenarios and balance sheets are combined to produce a range of potential income results.  Net interest income is managed within guideline ranges for interest rates rising or falling by 200 basis points.  Results outside of guidelines require action by the RMC to correct the imbalance.  Simulations are typically created over a 12 to 24 month time horizon.  At December 31, 2017, these simulations show that with a 200 basis point rate increase over a 12 month period, net interest income would decrease by approximately $833 thousand, or 1.6 percent.  A 200 basis point rate decline over a 12 month period would decrease net interest income by approximately $2.2 million or 4.3 percent.  These variances in net interest income are within the Board-approved guidelines of +/- 10 percent.

Finally, to measure the impact of longer-term asset and liability mismatches beyond two years, the Company utilizes Modified Duration of Equity and Economic Value of Portfolio Equity (“EVPE”) models.  The modified duration of equity measures the potential price risk of equity to changes in interest rates.  A longer modified duration of equity indicates a greater degree of risk to rising interest rates.  Because of balance sheet optionality, an EVPE analysis is also used to dynamically model the present value of asset and liability cash flows, with rate shocks of 200 basis points.  The economic value of equity is likely to be different as interest rates change.  Results falling outside prescribed ranges require action by the RMC.  The Company’s variance in the economic value of equity with rate shocks of 200 basis points is a decline of 7.2 percent in a rising rate environment and a decrease of 1.4 percent in a falling rate environment at December 31, 2017.  At December 31, 2016, the Company’s variance in the economic value of equity with rate shocks of 200 basis points is a decline of 1.9 percent in a rising rate environment and a decrease of 7.4 percent in a falling rate environment.  The variance in the EVPE at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were within the Board-approved guidelines in place at the time of +/- 20 percent.

Liquidity

Consolidated Bank Liquidity

Liquidity measures the ability to satisfy current and future cash flow needs as they become due.  A bank’s liquidity reflects its ability to meet loan demand, to accommodate possible outflows in deposits and to take advantage of interest rate opportunities in the marketplace.  The Company’s liquidity is monitored by management and the Board of Directors through the RMC, which reviews historical funding requirements, the current liquidity position, sources and stability of funding, marketability of assets, options for attracting additional funds, and anticipated future funding needs, including the level of unfunded commitments.  The goal is to maintain sufficient asset-based liquidity to cover potential funding requirements in order to minimize dependence on volatile and potentially unstable funding markets.

The principal sources of funds at the Bank are deposits, scheduled amortization and prepayments of investment and loan principal, sales and maturities of investment securities, additional borrowings and funds provided by operations.  While scheduled loan payments and maturing investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.  The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows provides detail on the Company’s sources and uses of cash, as well as an indication of the Company’s ability to maintain an adequate level of liquidity.  As the Consolidated Bank comprises the majority of the assets of the Company, this Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows is indicative of the Consolidated Bank’s activity.  At December 31, 2017, the balance of cash and cash equivalents was $150.3 million, an increase of $44.4 million from December 31, 2016.  A discussion of the cash provided by and used in operating, investing and financing activities follows. 

Operating activities provided $14.4 million and $8.8 million in net cash for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.  The primary sources of funds were net income from operations and adjustments to net income, such as the proceeds from the sale of mortgage and SBA loans held for sale, partially offset by originations of mortgage and SBA loans held for sale.

Investing activities used $219.6 million and $81.8 million in net cash for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  Cash was primarily used to fund new loans, purchase securities, FHLB stock and premises and equipment, partially offset by cash inflows from proceeds from the maturities and pay downs on securities, redemption of FHLB stock and sales of securities.    

• Securities.  The Consolidated Bank’s available for sale investment portfolio amounted to $53.5 million and $40.6 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  This excludes the Parent Company’s securities discussed under the heading “Parent Company Liquidity” below.  Projected cash flows from securities over the next twelve months are $8.2 million.

• Loans.  The SBA loans held for sale portfolio amounted to $22.8 million and $14.8 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  Sales of these loans provide an additional source of liquidity for the Company. 

• Outstanding Commitments.  The Company was committed to advance approximately $291.9 million to its borrowers as of December 31, 2017, compared to $181.1 million at December 31, 2016.  At December 31, 2017, $209.3 million of these commitments expire within one year, compared to $86.4 million at December 31, 2016.  The Company had $5.6 million and $4.1 million in standby letters of credit at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, which are included in the commitments amount noted above.  The estimated fair value of these guarantees is not significant.  The Company believes it has the necessary liquidity to honor all commitments.  Many of these commitments will expire and never be funded.

Financing activities provided $249.5 million and $90.8 million in net cash for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, primarily due to an increase in the Company’s borrowings and deposits, partially offset by the Company’s repayment of borrowings.

• Deposits.  As of December 31, 2017, deposits included $99.6 million of Government deposits, as compared to $87.0 million at year end 2016. These deposits are generally short in duration and are very sensitive to price competition.  The Company believes that the current level of these types of deposits is appropriate.  Included in the portfolio were $94.6 million of deposits from thirteen municipalities.  The withdrawal of these deposits, in whole or in part, would not create a liquidity shortfall for the Company.

• Borrowed Funds.  Total FHLB borrowings amounted to $260.0 million and $106.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  Third party repurchase agreements totaled $15.0 million as of both December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.  As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, the Company can borrow additional funds based on the market value of collateral pledged.  At December 31, 2017, pledging provided an additional $128.7 million in borrowing potential from the FHLB.  In addition, the Company can pledge additional collateral in the form of 1 to 4 family residential mortgages, commercial loans or investment securities to increase this line with the FHLB. 

Parent Company Liquidity

The Parent Company’s cash needs are funded by dividends paid by the Bank.  Other than its investment in the Bank and Unity Statutory Trust II, the Parent Company does not actively engage in other transactions or business.  Only expenses specifically for the benefit of the Parent Company are paid using its cash, which typically includes the payment of operating expenses.

At December 31, 2017, the Parent Company had $1.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and $278 thousand in investment securities valued at fair market value, compared to $1.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and $1 thousand in investment securities at December 31, 2016.  

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The following table shows the amounts and expected maturities or payment periods of off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017:

(In thousands)	One year or less		One to three years		Three to five years		Over five years		Total
Off-balance sheet arrangements:
Standby letters of credit	$	2,542	$	1,064	$	—	$	1,975	$	5,581
Contractual obligations:
Time deposits	111,785		97,442		15,641		596		225,464
Borrowed funds and subordinated debentures	235,000		30,000		10,000		10,310		285,310
Operating lease obligations	307		551		375		—		1,233
Purchase obligations	1,635		3,270		1,771		—		6,676
Total off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations	$	351,269	$	132,327	$	27,787	$	12,881	$	524,264

Standby letters of credit represent guarantees of payment issued by the Bank on behalf of a client that is used as "payment of last resort" should the client fail to fulfill a contractual commitment with a third party.  Standby letters of credit are typically short-term in duration, maturing in one year or less.

Time deposits have stated maturity dates.  For additional information on time deposits, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Borrowed funds and subordinated debentures include fixed and adjustable rate borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, repurchase agreements and subordinated debentures.  The borrowings have defined terms and under certain circumstances are callable at the option of the lender. For additional information on borrowed funds and subordinated debentures, see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Operating leases represent obligations entered into by the Company for the use of land and premises.  The leases generally have escalation terms based upon certain defined indexes. For additional information on the Company’s operating leases, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Purchase obligations represent legally binding and enforceable agreements to purchase goods and services from third parties and consist primarily of contractual obligations under data processing and ATM service agreements.

Capital Adequacy

A significant measure of the strength of a financial institution is its capital base. Shareholders’ equity increased $11.8 million to $118.1 million at December 31, 2017 compared to $106.3 million at December 31, 2016, primarily due to net income of $12.9 million. Other items impacting shareholders’ equity included $2.4 million in dividends paid on common stock, $174 thousand in unrealized losses net of tax on available for sale securities, $1.2 million from the issuance of common stock under employee benefit plans, $170 thousand in unrealized gains net of tax on cash flow hedges and $50 thousand in adjustments related to the defined benefit plan. The issuance of common stock under employee benefit plans includes nonqualified stock options and restricted stock expense related entries, employee option exercises and the tax benefit of options exercised.

For additional information on shareholders’ equity, see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Federal regulators have classified and defined capital into the following components: (1) tier 1 capital, which includes tangible shareholders’ equity for common stock, qualifying preferred stock and certain qualifying hybrid instruments, and (2) tier 2 capital, which includes a portion of the allowance for loan losses, certain qualifying long-term debt,  preferred stock and hybrid instruments which do not qualify as tier 1 capital.  Minimum capital levels are regulated by risk-based capital adequacy guidelines, which require the Company and the Bank to maintain certain capital as a percent of assets and certain off-balance sheet items adjusted for predefined credit risk factors (risk-weighted assets).  A bank is required to maintain, at a minimum, tier 1 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets of 4 percent and combined tier 1 and tier 2 capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets of 8 percent.  In addition, banks are required to meet a leverage capital requirement, which measures tier 1 capital against average assets.  Banks which are highly rated and not experiencing significant growth are required to maintain a leverage ratio of 3 percent while all other banks are expected to maintain a leverage ratio 1 to 2 percentage points higher.  Finally, the Bank is required to maintain a ratio of common equity tier 1 capital, consisting solely of common equity, to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%. The Company is subject to similar requirements on a consolidated basis.

The following table summarizes the Company’s and the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios at December 31, 2017 and 2016, as well as the minimum regulatory capital ratios required for the Bank to be deemed “well-capitalized.”  The Company’s capital amounts and ratios reflect the capital decreases described above.

	At December 31, 2017				Required for capital adequacy purposes effective								To be well-capitalized under prompt corrective action regulations
	Company		Bank		January 1, 2017				January 1, 2019				Bank
Leverage ratio	9.37	%	9.03	%	4.000	%			4.00	%			5.00	%
CET1	10.81	%	11.33	%	5.750	%	(1	)	7.00	%	(2	)	6.50	%
Tier I risk-based capital ratio	11.75	%	11.33	%	7.250	%	(1	)	8.50	%	(2	)	8.00	%
Total risk-based capital ratio	12.87	%	12.50	%	9.250	%	(1	)	10.50	%	(2	)	10.00	%
(1) Includes 1.25% capital conservation buffer.
(2) Includes 2.5% capital conservation buffer.

	At December 31, 2016				Required for capital adequacy purposes effective								To be well-capitalized under prompt corrective action regulations
	Company		Bank		January 1, 2016				January 1, 2019				Bank
Leverage ratio	9.73	%	9.50	%	4.000	%			4.00	%			5.00	%
CET1	11.49	%	12.23	%	5.125	%	(3	)	7.00	%	(4	)	6.50	%
Tier I risk-based capital ratio	12.58	%	12.23	%	6.625	%	(3	)	8.50	%	(4	)	8.00	%
Total risk-based capital ratio	13.84	%	13.48	%	8.625	%	(3	)	10.50	%	(4	)	10.00	%
(3) Includes 0.625% capital conservation buffer.
(4) Includes 2.5% capital conservation buffer.

For additional information on regulatory capital, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains certain forward-looking statements, either expressed or implied, which are provided to assist the reader in understanding anticipated future financial performance.  These statements involve certain risks, uncertainties, estimates and assumptions by management.

Factors that may cause actual results to differ from those results expressed or implied, include, but are not limited to those listed under “Item 1A - Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K; the overall economy and the interest rate environment; the ability of customers to repay their obligations; the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; competition; significant changes in tax, accounting or regulatory practices and requirements; and technological changes.  Although management has taken certain steps to mitigate the negative effect of the aforementioned items, significant unfavorable changes could severely impact the assumptions used and have an adverse effect on future profitability.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is based upon the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).  The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.  Note 1 to the Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, contains a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies.  Management believes the Company’s policies with respect to the methodology for the determination of the other-than-temporary impairment on securities, servicing assets, allowance for loan losses, and income taxes involve a higher degree of complexity and require management to make difficult and subjective judgments, which often require assumptions or estimates about highly uncertain matters.  Changes in these judgments, assumptions or estimates could materially impact results of operations.  These critical policies are periodically reviewed with the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

The Company has a process in place to identify debt securities that could potentially incur credit impairment that is other-than-temporary. This process involves monitoring late payments, pricing levels, downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements, revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues.  Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concern warrants such evaluation.  This evaluation considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether a credit or interest rate-related impairment of a security is other-than-temporary.  Relevant facts and circumstances considered include: (1) the extent and length of time the fair value has been below cost; (2) the reasons for the decline in value; (3) the financial position and access to capital of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events and (4) for fixed maturity securities, the intent to sell a security or whether it is more likely than not the security will be required to be sold before the recovery of its amortized cost which, in some cases, may extend to maturity and for equity securities, the ability and intent to hold the security for a forecasted period of time that allows for the recovery in value.

Management assesses its intent to sell or whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit losses.  For debt securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired with no intent to sell and no requirement to sell prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis, the amount of the impairment is separated into the amount that is credit related (credit loss component) and the amount due to all other factors.  The credit loss component is recognized in earnings and is the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows.  The remaining difference between the security’s fair value and the present value of future expected cash flows is due to factors that are not credit related and is recognized in other comprehensive income.  For debt securities where management has the intent to sell, the amount of the impairment is reflected in earnings as realized losses.

The present value of expected future cash flows is determined using the best estimate cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit to the security at the date of purchase or the current yield to accrete an asset-backed or floating rate security.  The methodology and assumptions for establishing the best estimate cash flows vary depending on the type of security.  The asset-backed securities cash flow estimates are based on bond specific facts and circumstances that may include collateral characteristics, expectations of delinquency and default rates, loss severity and prepayment speeds and structural support, including subordination and guarantees.  The corporate bond cash flow estimates are derived from scenario-based outcomes of expected corporate restructurings or the disposition of assets using bond specific facts and circumstances including timing, security interests and loss severity.

For additional information on other-than-temporary impairment, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Servicing Assets

Servicing assets represent the estimated fair value of retained servicing rights, net of servicing costs, at the time loans are sold. Servicing assets are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues.  Impairment is evaluated based on stratifying the underlying financial assets by date of origination and term.  Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions.  Any impairment, if temporary, would be reported as a valuation allowance.

For additional information on servicing assets, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level management considers adequate to provide for probable loan losses as of the balance sheet date.  The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and is reduced by net charge-offs.

The level of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of probable losses in the loan portfolio, after consideration of prevailing economic conditions in the Company’s market area, the volume and composition of the loan portfolio, and historical loan loss experience.  The allowance for loan losses consists of specific reserves for individually impaired credits and TDRs and reserves for nonimpaired loans based on historical loss factors and reserves based on general economic factors and other qualitative risk factors such as changes in delinquency trends, industry concentrations or local/national economic trends.  This risk assessment process is performed at least quarterly, and, as adjustments become necessary, they are realized in the periods in which they become known.

Although management attempts to maintain the allowance at a level deemed adequate to provide for probable losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based upon certain factors including changes in market conditions and underlying collateral values.  In addition, various regulatory agencies periodically review the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for loan losses.  These agencies may require the Company to make additional provisions based on judgments about information available at the time of the examination.

The Company maintains an allowance for unfunded loan commitments that is maintained at a level that management believes is adequate to absorb estimated probable losses.  Adjustments to the allowance are made through other expenses and applied to the allowance which is maintained in other liabilities.

For additional information on the allowance for loan losses and unfunded loan commitments, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes according to the asset and liability method.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates applicable to taxable income for the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. If tax reform results in a decline in the corporate tax rates the Company would have to write-down its deferred tax asset.

Valuation reserves are established against certain deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  Increases or decreases in the valuation reserve are charged or credited to the income tax provision.

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that ultimately would be sustained.  The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any.  The evaluation of a tax position taken is considered by itself and not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority.  The portion of benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits would be recognized in income tax expense on the income statement.

For additional information on income taxes, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Management’s Report on Internal Control

Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our control over financial reporting based on the 2013 framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).  Based on our evaluation under the framework, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

RSM US LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company's December 31, 2017 consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an audit report expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. The report is included in this item under the heading "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm."

/s/ James A. Hughes           

James A. Hughes

President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Alan J. Bedner              

Alan J. Bedner

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Report of Independent Registered Public

Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Unity Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Unity Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 2, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ RSM US LLP

Blue Bell, Pennsylvania

March 2, 2018

Report of Independent Registered Public

Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Unity Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Unity Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 2, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ RSM US LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2007.

Blue Bell, Pennsylvania

March 2, 2018

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	23,701		$	22,105
Federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and repos	126,553			83,790
Cash and cash equivalents	150,254			105,895
Securities:
Securities available for sale (amortized cost of $54,025 and $40,839 in 2017 and 2016, respectively)	53,493			40,568
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $16,346 and $20,968 in 2017 and 2016, respectively)	16,307			20,979
Total securities	69,800			61,547
Loans:
SBA loans held for sale	22,810			14,773
SBA loans held for investment	43,999			42,492
SBA 504 loans	21,871			26,344
Commercial loans	606,994			509,171
Residential mortgage loans	365,145			289,093
Consumer loans	109,855			91,541
Total loans	1,170,674			973,414
Allowance for loan losses	(13,556		)	(12,579		)
Net loans	1,157,118			960,835
Premises and equipment, net	23,470			23,398
Bank owned life insurance ("BOLI")	24,227			13,758
Deferred tax assets	4,017			5,512
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock	12,863			6,037
Accrued interest receivable	5,447			4,462
Other real estate owned ("OREO")	426			1,050
Goodwill	1,516			1,516
Other assets	6,358			5,896
Total assets	$	1,455,496		$	1,189,906
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	256,119		$	215,963
Interest-bearing demand	164,997			145,654
Savings	396,557			363,462
Time, under $100,000	133,881			123,724
Time, $100,000 to $250,000	71,480			75,567
Time, $250,000 and over	20,103			21,353
Total deposits	1,043,137			945,723
Borrowed funds	275,000			121,000
Subordinated debentures	10,310			10,310
Accrued interest payable	436			430
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	8,508			6,152
Total liabilities	1,337,391			1,083,615
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock, no par value, 12,500 shares authorized, 10,615 shares issued and outstanding in 2017; 10,477 shares issued and outstanding in 2016	86,782			85,383
Retained earnings	31,117			20,748
Accumulated other comprehensive income	206			160
Total shareholders' equity	118,105			106,291
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,455,496		$	1,189,906

The accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Consolidated Statements of Income

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2017		2016
INTEREST INCOME
Federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and repos	$	851	$	214
FHLB stock	370		245
Securities:
Taxable	2,029		1,698
Tax-exempt	159		204
Total securities	2,188		1,902
Loans:
SBA loans	3,805		3,181
SBA 504 loans	1,177		1,356
Commercial loans	26,973		23,900
Residential mortgage loans	14,650		12,205
Consumer loans	5,296		4,021
Total loans	51,901		44,663
Total interest income	55,310		47,024
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest-bearing demand deposits	665		537
Savings deposits	2,738		1,742
Time deposits	3,278		3,670
Borrowed funds and subordinated debentures	2,772		2,818
Total interest expense	9,453		8,767
Net interest income	45,857		38,257
Provision for loan losses	1,650		1,220
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	44,207		37,037
NONINTEREST INCOME
Branch fee income	1,384		1,269
Service and loan fee income	2,100		1,020
Gain on sale of SBA loans held for sale, net	1,617		2,099
Gain on sale of mortgage loans, net	1,530		2,621
BOLI income	469		378
Net security gains	62		424
Gain on repurchase of subordinated debt	—		2,264
Other income	1,108		985
Total noninterest income	8,270		11,060
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Compensation and benefits	17,117		14,952
Occupancy	2,381		2,360
Processing and communications	2,551		2,628
Furniture and equipment	2,079		1,700
Professional services	1,022		976
Loan collection and OREO expenses	463		654
Other loan expenses	186		152
Deposit insurance	546		713
Advertising	1,179		1,095
Director fees	637		559
Other expenses	1,883		1,842
Total noninterest expense	30,044		27,631
Income before provision for income taxes	22,433		20,466
Provision for income taxes	9,540		7,257
Net income	$	12,893	$	13,209
Net income per common share - Basic	$	1.22	$	1.40
Net income per common share - Diluted	$	1.20	$	1.38
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic	10,558		9,416
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted	10,749		9,572

The accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017									2016
(In thousands)	Before tax amount			Income tax expense (benefit)			Net of tax amount			Before tax amount			Income tax expense (benefit)			Net of tax amount
Net income	$	22,433		$	9,540		$	12,893		$	20,466		$	7,257		$	13,209
Other comprehensive income
Investment securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities arising during the period	(152		)	(18		)	(134		)	157			41			116
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains on securities included in net income	62			22			40			424			149			275
Total unrealized losses on securities available for sale	(214		)	(40		)	(174		)	(267		)	(108		)	(159		)
Adjustments related to defined benefit plan:
Amortization of prior service cost	83			33			50			83			26			57
Total adjustments related to defined benefit plan	83			33			50			83			26			57
Net unrealized gains from cash flow hedges:
Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedges arising during the period	204			34			170			1,232			503			729
Total unrealized gains on cash flow hedges	204			34			170			1,232			503			729
Total other comprehensive income	73			27			46			1,048			421			627
Total comprehensive income	$	22,506		$	9,567		$	12,939		$	21,514		$	7,678		$	13,836

The accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

	Common stock			Retained earnings (deficit) (3)			Accumulated other comprehensive income(loss)			Total Shareholders' equity
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Shares	Amount
Balance, December 31, 2015	9,279	$	59,371	$	19,566		$	(467	)	$	78,470
Net income				13,209						13,209
Other comprehensive income, net of tax							627			627
Dividends on common stock ($0.18 per share)		109		(1,633		)				(1,524		)
10% stock dividend payable September 30, 2016		10,394		(10.394		)				—
Common stock issued and related tax effects (1)	130	1,097								1,097
Proceeds from rights offering (2)	1,068	14,412								14,412
Balance at December 31, 2016	10,477	85,383		20,748			160			106,291
Net income				12,893						12,893
Other comprehensive income, net of tax							46			46
Dividends on common stock ($0.23 per share)		144		(2,524		)				(2,380		)
Common stock issued and related tax effects (1)	138	1,255								1,255
Balance, December 31, 2017	10,615	$	86,782	$	31,117		$	206		$	118,105

(1) Includes the issuance of common stock under employee benefit plans, which includes nonqualified stock options and restricted stock expense related entries, employee option exercises and the tax benefit of options exercised.

(2) Represents gross proceeds of $14.6 million reduced by legal, accounting and other filing fees of approximately $213 thousand.

(3) 2017 includes the impact of implementing ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718),” which resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment of $498 thousand to retained earnings.

The accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	For the twelve months ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017			2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	12,893		$	13,209
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	1,650			1,220
Net amortization of purchase premiums and discounts on securities	290			346
Depreciation and amortization	1,238			734
Deferred income tax expense	1,546			110
Net security gains	(62		)	(424		)
Gains on repurchase of subordinated debentures	—			(2,264		)
Stock compensation expense	746			545
Loss (gain) on sale of OREO	245			(71		)
Valuation writedowns on OREO	151			300
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale, net	(1,699		)	(1,610		)
Gain on sale of SBA loans held for sale, net	(1,617		)	(2,099		)
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale	(82,088		)	(108,120		)
Origination of SBA loans held for sale	(24,394		)	(29,916		)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale, net	83,787			109,730
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans held for sale, net	20,998			26,837
BOLI income	(469		)	(378		)
Net change in other assets and liabilities	1,234			639
Net cash provided by operating activities	14,449			8,788
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of securities held to maturity	(163		)	(11,322		)
Purchases of securities available for sale	(29,382		)	(9,339		)
Purchases of FHLB stock, at cost	(17,408		)	(4,182		)
Maturities and principal payments on securities held to maturity	4,278			2,201
Maturities and principal payments on securities available for sale	13,220			8,927
Proceeds from sales of securities held to maturity	529			6,661
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale	2,777			12,472
Proceeds from redemption of FHLB stock	10,583			2,745
Proceeds from sale of OREO	1,034			2,302
Net increase in loans	(193,592		)	(82,697		)
Purchase of BOLI	(10,000		)	—
Purchases of premises and equipment	(1,509		)	(9,595		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(219,633		)	(81,827		)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposits	97,414			51,230
Proceeds from new borrowings	220,000			76,000
Repayments of borrowings	(66,000		)	(47,000		)
Repurchase of subordinated debentures	—			(2,891		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	509			550
Dividends on common stock	(2,380		)	(1,524		)
Proceeds from capital offering	—			14,412
Net cash provided by financing activities	249,543			90,777
Increase in cash and cash equivalents	44,359			17,738
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year	105,895			88,157

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	150,254	$	105,895
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Cash:
Interest paid	$	9,447	$	8,798
Income taxes paid	7,002		7,592
Noncash investing activities:
Transfer of SBA loans held for sale to held to maturity	13		—
Capitalization of servicing rights	172		1,472
Transfer of loans to OREO	872		1,990

The accompanying notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Overview

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Unity Bancorp, Inc. (the “Parent Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Unity Bank (the “Bank” or when consolidated with the Parent Company, the “Company”).  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Unity Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company incorporated in New Jersey and registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended.  Its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank, is chartered by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance.  The Bank provides a full range of commercial and retail banking services through eighteen branch offices located in Bergen, Hunterdon, Middlesex, Somerset, Union and Warren counties in New Jersey and Northampton County in Pennsylvania.  These services include the acceptance of demand, savings, and time deposits and the extension of consumer, real estate, Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and other commercial credits.

Unity Bank has nine wholly-owned subsidiaries: Unity Investment Services, Inc., AJB Residential Realty Enterprises, Inc., AJB Commercial Realty, Inc., MKCD Commercial, Inc., JAH Commercial, Inc., UB Commercial LLC, ASBC Holdings LLC, Unity Property Holdings 1, Inc., and Unity Property Holdings 2, Inc.  Unity Investment Services, Inc. is used to hold and administer part of the Bank’s investment portfolio.  The other subsidiaries hold, administer and maintain the Bank’s other real estate owned (“OREO”) properties. Unity Investment Services, Inc. has one subsidiary, Unity Delaware Investment 2, Inc., which has one subsidiary, Unity NJ REIT, Inc.  Unity NJ REIT, Inc. was formed in 2013 to hold loans.

The Company has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: Unity (NJ) Statutory Trust II and Unity Risk Management, Inc. For additional information on Unity (NJ) Statutory Trust II, see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Unity Risk Management, Inc. is the Company's captive insurance company that insures risks to the bank not insured by the traditional commercial insurance market.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Amounts requiring the use of significant estimates include the allowance for loan losses, valuation of deferred tax and servicing assets, the carrying value of loans held for sale and other real estate owned, the valuation of securities and the determination of other-than-temporary impairment for securities and fair value disclosures.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

10 Percent Stock Dividend Paid

On September 30, 2016 a 10 percent stock dividend was paid to all shareholders of record as of September 15, 2016. All share information has been adjusted as necessary to account for this dividend.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits.

Securities

The Company classifies its securities into two categories, available for sale and held to maturity.

Securities that are classified as available for sale are stated at fair value.  Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale are generally excluded from results of operations and are reported as other comprehensive income, a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of taxes.  Securities classified as available for sale include securities that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risks or for asset/liability management purposes.  The cost of securities sold is determined on a specific identification basis.  Gains and losses on sales of securities are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income on the date of sale.

Securities are classified as held to maturity based on management’s intent and ability to hold them to maturity.  Such securities are stated at cost, adjusted for unamortized purchase premiums and discounts using the level yield method.

If transfers between the available for sale and held to maturity portfolios occur, they are accounted for at fair value and unrealized holding gains and losses are accounted for at the date of transfer.  For securities transferred to available for sale from held to maturity, unrealized gains or losses as of the date of the transfer are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity.  For securities transferred into the held to maturity portfolio from the available for sale portfolio, unrealized gains or losses as of the date of transfer continue to be reported in other comprehensive income (loss), and are amortized over the remaining life of the security as an adjustment to its yield, consistent with amortization of the premium or accretion of the discount.

For additional information on securities, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

The Company has a process in place to identify debt securities that could potentially incur credit impairment that is other-than-temporary.  This process involves monitoring late payments, pricing levels, downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements, revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues.  Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concern warrants such evaluation.  This evaluation considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether a credit or interest rate-related impairment of a security is other-than-temporary.  Relevant facts and circumstances considered include: (1) the extent and length of time the fair value has been below cost; (2) the reasons for the decline in value; (3) the financial position and access to capital of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events and (4) for fixed maturity securities, the intent to sell a security or whether it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost which, in some cases, may extend to maturity.

For debt securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired where management has no intent to sell and the Company has no requirement to sell prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis, the amount of the impairment is separated into the amount that is credit related (credit loss component) and the amount due to all other factors.  The credit loss component is recognized in earnings and is the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows.  The remaining difference between the security’s fair value and the present value of future expected cash flows is due to factors that are not credit related and is recognized in other comprehensive income.  For debt securities where management has the intent to sell, the amount of the impairment is reflected in earnings as realized losses.

The present value of expected future cash flows is determined using the best estimate cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit to the security at the date of purchase or the current yield to accrete an asset-backed or floating rate security.  The methodology and assumptions for establishing the best estimate cash flows vary depending on the type of security.  The asset-backed securities cash flow estimates are based on bond specific facts and circumstances that may include collateral characteristics, expectations of delinquency and default rates, loss severity and prepayment speeds and structural support, including subordination and guarantees.  The corporate bond cash flow estimates are derived from scenario-based outcomes of expected corporate restructurings or the disposition of assets using bond specific facts and circumstances including timing, security interests and loss severity.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered.  Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

Loans

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale represent the guaranteed portion of SBA loans and are reflected at the lower of aggregate cost or market value.  The Company originates loans to customers under an SBA program that historically has provided for SBA guarantees of up to 90 percent of each loan.  The Company generally sells the guaranteed portion of its SBA loans to a third party and retains the servicing, holding the nonguaranteed portion in its portfolio.  The net amount of loan origination fees on loans sold is included in the carrying value and in the gain or loss on the sale.  When sales of SBA loans do occur, the premium received on the sale and the present value of future cash flows of the servicing assets are recognized in income.  All criteria for sale accounting must be met in order for the loan sales to occur; see details under the “Transfers of Financial Assets” heading above.

Servicing assets represent the estimated fair value of retained servicing rights, net of servicing costs, at the time loans are sold.  Servicing assets are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues.  Impairment is evaluated based on stratifying the underlying financial assets by date of origination and term.  Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions.  Any impairment, if temporary, would generally be reported as a valuation allowance.

Serviced loans sold to others are not included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Income and fees collected for loan servicing are credited to noninterest income when earned, net of amortization on the related servicing assets.

For additional information on servicing assets, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loans Held for Investment

Loans held for investment are stated at the unpaid principal balance, net of unearned discounts and deferred loan origination fees and costs.  In accordance with the level yield method, loan origination fees, net of direct loan origination costs, are deferred and recognized over the estimated life of the related loans as an adjustment to the loan yield.  Interest is credited to operations primarily based upon the principal balance outstanding. 

Loans are reported as past due when either interest or principal is unpaid in the following circumstances: fixed payment loans when the borrower is in arrears for two or more monthly payments; open end credit for two or more billing cycles; and single payment notes if interest or principal remains unpaid for 30 days or more.

Nonperforming loans consist of loans that are not accruing interest as a result of principal or interest being delinquent for a period of 90 days or more or when the ability to collect principal and interest according to the contractual terms is in doubt (nonaccrual loans).  When a loan is classified as nonaccrual, interest accruals are discontinued and all past due interest previously recognized as income is reversed and charged against current period earnings.  Generally, until the loan becomes current, any payments received from the borrower are applied to outstanding principal until such time as management determines that the financial condition of the borrower and other factors merit recognition of a portion of such payments as interest income.  Loans may be returned to an accrual status when the ability to collect is reasonably assured and when the loan is brought current as to principal and interest.

Loans are charged off when collection is sufficiently questionable and when the Company can no longer justify maintaining the loan as an asset on the balance sheet.  Loans qualify for charge-off when, after thorough analysis, all possible sources of repayment are insufficient.  These include: 1) potential future cash flows, 2) value of collateral, and/or 3) strength of co-makers and guarantors.  All unsecured loans are charged off upon the establishment of the loan’s nonaccrual status.  Additionally, all loans classified as a loss or that portion of the loan classified as a loss is charged off.  All loan charge-offs are approved by the Board of Directors.

Troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") occur when a creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to a debtor’s financial condition, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.  These concessions typically include reductions in interest rate, extending the maturity of a loan, or a combination of both. Interest income on accruing TDRs is credited to operations primarily based upon the principal amount outstanding, as stated in the paragraphs above. 

The Company evaluates its loans for impairment.  A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  The Company has defined impaired loans to be all TDRs and nonperforming loans.  Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of a similar nature (consumer and residential mortgage loans), and on an individual basis for all other loans.  Impairment of a loan is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, or as a practical expedient, based on a loan’s observable market price or the fair value of collateral, net of estimated costs to sell, if the loan is collateral-dependent.  If the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the Company establishes a valuation allowance, or adjusts existing valuation allowances, with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses.

For additional information on loans, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Loan Commitments

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level management considers adequate to provide for probable loan losses as of the balance sheet date.  The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and is reduced by net charge-offs.  

The level of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of probable losses in the loan portfolio, after consideration of prevailing economic conditions in the Company’s market area, the volume and composition of the loan portfolio, and historical loan loss experience.  The allowance for loan losses consists of specific reserves for individually impaired credits and TDRs, reserves for nonimpaired loans based on historical loss factors adjusted for general economic factors and other qualitative risk factors such as changes in delinquency trends, industry concentrations or local/national economic trends.  This risk assessment process is performed at least quarterly, and, as adjustments become necessary, they are realized in the periods in which they become known.   

Although management attempts to maintain the allowance at a level deemed adequate to provide for probable losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based upon certain factors including changes in market conditions and underlying collateral values.  In addition, various regulatory agencies periodically review the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for loan losses.  These agencies may require the Company to make additional provisions based on judgments about information available at the time of the examination.

The Company maintains a reserve for unfunded loan commitments at a level that management believes is adequate to absorb estimated probable losses.  Adjustments to the reserve are made through other expenses and applied to the reserve which is classified as other liabilities.

For additional information on the allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded loan commitments, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost.  All other fixed assets are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The useful life of buildings is not to exceed 30 years; furniture and fixtures is generally 10 years or less, and equipment is 3 to 5 years.  Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the life of the underlying lease. 

For additional information on premises and equipment, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Bank Owned Life Insurance

The Company purchased life insurance policies on certain members of management.  Bank owned life insurance is recorded at its cash surrender value or the amount that can be realized.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank system to hold stock of its district FHLB according to a predetermined formula.  The stock is carried at cost.  Management reviews the stock for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the cost basis in the stock.  The stock’s value is determined by the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines.  Management considers such criteria as the significance of the decline in net assets, if any, of the FHLB, the length of time this situation has persisted, commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation, the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the customer base of the FHLB and the liquidity position of the FHLB.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned is recorded at the fair value, less estimated costs to sell at the date of acquisition, with a charge to the allowance for loan losses for any excess of the loan carrying value over such amount.  Subsequently, OREO is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, as determined by current appraisals.  Certain costs that increase the value or extend the useful life in preparing properties for sale are capitalized to the extent that the appraisal amount exceeds the carry value, and expenses of holding foreclosed properties are charged to operations as incurred.

Appraisals

The Company requires current real estate appraisals on all loans that become OREO or in-substance foreclosure, loans that are classified substandard, doubtful or loss, or loans that are over $100,000 and nonperforming.  Prior to each balance sheet date, the Company values impaired collateral-dependent loans and OREO based upon a third party appraisal, broker's price opinion, drive by appraisal, automated valuation model, updated market evaluation, or a combination of these methods.  The amount is discounted for the decline in market real estate values (for original appraisals), for any known damage or repair costs, and for selling and closing costs.  The amount of the discount is dependent upon the method used to determine the original value.  The original appraisal is generally used when a loan is first determined to be impaired.  When applying the discount, the Company takes into consideration when the appraisal was performed, the collateral’s location, the type of collateral, any known damage to the property and the type of business.  Subsequent to entering impaired status and the Company determining that there is a collateral shortfall, the Company will generally, depending on the type of collateral, order a third party appraisal, broker's price opinion, automated valuation model or updated market evaluation.  Subsequent to receiving the third party results, the Company will discount the value 6 to 10 percent for selling and closing costs.

Income Taxes

The Company follows Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification ("FASB ASC") Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” which prescribes a threshold for the financial statement recognition of income taxes and provides criteria for the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  ASC 740 also includes guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition of income taxes.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates applicable to taxable income for the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.  Valuation reserves are established against certain deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  Increases or decreases in the valuation reserve are charged or credited to the income tax provision.

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that ultimately would be sustained.  The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any.  The evaluation of a tax position taken is considered by itself and not offset or aggregated with other positions.  Tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority.  The portion of benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.

Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are recognized in income tax expense on the income statement.

For additional information on income taxes, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per common share is calculated as net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the reporting period. 

Diluted net income per common share is computed similarly to that of basic net income per common share, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common shares, principally stock options, were issued during the reporting period utilizing the Treasury stock method.  However, when a net loss rather than net income is recognized, diluted earnings per share equals basic earnings per share.

For additional information on net income per share, see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation awards in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” which requires recognition of compensation expense related to stock-based compensation awards over the period during which an employee is required to provide service for the award.  Compensation expense is equal to the fair value of the award, net of estimated forfeitures, and is recognized over the vesting period of such awards.

For additional information on the Company’s stock-based compensation, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fair Value

The Company follows FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” which provides a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles.

For additional information on the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other Comprehensive Income

Other comprehensive income consists of the change in unrealized gains (losses) on SERP, securities available for sale and swap related items that were reported as a component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax.

For additional information on other comprehensive income, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Advertising

The Company expenses the costs of advertising in the period incurred.

Dividend Restrictions

Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels that may limit the dividends paid by the Bank to the holding company or by the holding company to the shareholders.

Operating Segments

While management monitors the revenue streams of its various products and services, operating results and financial performance are evaluated on a company-wide basis.  The Company’s management uses consolidated results to make operating and strategic decisions.  Accordingly, there is only one reportable segment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” ASU 2014-09 replaced almost all existing revenue recognition guidance in current U.S. GAAP. The Company’s main source of revenue is comprised of net interest income on interest earning assets and liabilities and non-interest income. The scope of the guidance explicitly excludes net interest income as well as many other revenues for financial assets and liabilities including loans, leases, securities, and derivatives. As such, the Company does not expect the guidance to have a material impact on its financial statements.

Under current U.S. GAAP, when full consideration is not expected and financing is required by the buyer to purchase the property, there are very prescriptive requirements in determining when foreclosed real estate property sold by an institution should be derecognized and a gain or loss be recognized. The new guidance that will be applied to these sales is more principles based. For example, as it pertains to the criteria for determining how a contract should be accounted for under the new guidance, judgment will need to be exercised in evaluating if: (a) a commitment on the buyer’s part exists, (b) collection is probable in circumstances where the initial investment is minimal and (c) the buyer has obtained control of the asset, including the significant risks and rewards of the ownership. If there is no commitment on the buyer’s part, collection is not probable or the buyer has not obtained control of the asset, then a gain cannot be recognized under the new guidance. The initial investment requirement for the buyer along with the various methods for profit recognition are no longer applicable when the new guidance goes into effect. The Company will revise its current policy on the recognition and measurement of gain on sale of other real estate owned to be consistent with the new guidance, but does not expect the new guidance to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company when adopted.

For deposit-related fees, considering the straightforward nature of the arrangements with the Company’s deposits customers, the Company does not expect the recognition and measurement outcomes of deposit-related fees to be significant differently under the new guidance compared to current U.S. GAAP.

ASU 2014-09 was to be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and was to be applied on either a modified retrospective or full retrospective basis. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which defers the original effective date for all entities by one year. Public business entities should apply the guidance in ASU 2015-14 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements when adopted on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective basis.

ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.”  ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments.  This eliminates the available for sale classification of accounting for equity securities and adjusts the fair value disclosures for financial instruments carried at amortized cost such that the disclosed fair values represent an exit price as opposed to an entry price.  This update requires that equity securities be carried at fair value on the balance sheet and any periodic changes in value will be adjusted through the income statement.  A practical expedient is provided for equity securities without a readily determinable fair value, such that these securities can be carried at cost less any impairment.  For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has formed a committee to evaluate the fair value measurements of financial instruments for disclosure purposes.

ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. ASU 2016-02 was issued in three parts: (a) Section A, “Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®,” (b) Section B, “Conforming Amendments Related to Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®,” and (c) Section C, “Background Information and Basis for Conclusions.” While both lessees and lessors are affected by the new guidance, the effects on lessees are much more significant.  The update states that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from all leases with a term greater than 12 months. The core principle requires the lessee to recognize a liability to make lease payments and a "right-of-use" asset. The accounting applied by the lessor is relatively unchanged as the majority of operating leases should remain classified as operating leases and the income from them recognized, generally, on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The standards update also requires expanded qualitative and quantitative disclosures. For public business entities, ASC 2016-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. ASC 2016-02 mandates a modified retrospective transition for all entities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASC 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had minimum noncancelable net operating lease payments of $1.2 million that are being evaluated. The implementation team is working on gathering all key lease data elements to meet the requirements of the new guidance.

ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments." ASU 2016-13 was issued to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with an expected credit loss methodology and requires consideration of a broader range of information to determine credit loss estimates. Financial assets measured at amortized cost will be presented at the net amount expected to be collected by using an allowance for credit losses. Purchased credit impaired loans will receive an allowance account at the acquisition date that represents a component of the purchase price allocation. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will be recorded through an allowance for credit losses, with such allowance limited to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost. For public business entities, ASU 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments." ASU 2016-15 was issued to address diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. This update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The amendments in this update provide guidance on the following eight specific cash flow issues:

• Debt Prepayment or Debt Extinguishment Costs

• Settlement of Zero-Coupon Debt Instruments or Other Debt Instruments with Coupon Interest Rates That Are Insignificant in Relation to the Effective Interest Rate of the Borrowing

• Contingent Consideration Payments Made after a Business Combination

• Proceeds from the Settlement of Insurance Claims

• Proceeds from the Settlement of Corporate-Owned Life Insurance Policies, include Bank-Owned Life Insurance Policies

• Distributions Received from Equity Method Investees

• Beneficial Interest in Securitization Transactions

• Separately Identifiable Cash Flows and Application of the Predominance Principle

The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a significant impact on the presentation of the consolidated statement of cash flows.

ASU 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash." ASU 2016-18 was issued to address divergence in the way restricted cash is classified and presented. The amendments in the update require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during a reporting period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The amendments in this update apply to entities that have restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents and are required to present a statement of cash flows under Topic 230. The amendment says that transfers between cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents are not part of the entity's operating, investing, and financing activities. For public business entities, ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2016-18 is not expected to have a significant impact on the presentation of the consolidated statement of cash flows.

ASU 2017-04, "Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment." ASU 2017-04 was issued in an effort to simplify accounting in a new standard. The amendments in this update require that an entity perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The amendment states that an entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, but the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. For public business entities, ASU 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performing on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements since the fair values of our reporting units were not lower than their respective carrying amounts at the time of our goodwill impairment analysis for 2017.

ASU 2017-07, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost" ASU 2017-07 was issued to provide guidance on the presentation of defined benefit costs in the income statement. The amendments in this update requires that an entity report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The amendment states that other components of net benefit cost be separate from the service cost component in the income statement. For public business entities, ASU 2017-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2017-07 is not expected to have a significant impact on the presentation of the Company's consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2017-08, "Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities." ASU 2017-08 was issued to enhance the accounting for the amortization of premiums for purchased callable debt securities. This amendment requires that the amortization premium be shortened to the earliest call date. For public business entities, ASU 2017-08 is effective for fiscal years after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements, but we will continue to monitor its impact as we move closer to implementation.

ASU 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities." ASU 2017-12 was issued to ease the burden associated with assessing hedge effectiveness and to promote better financial statement alignment of the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item. This guidance requires entities to present the earnings effect of the hedging instrument in the same income statement line item with the earnings effect on the hedged item. For public business entities, ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2017-12 is not expected to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2018-02, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income." ASU 2018-02 was issued as a result of stakeholder concern about the financial reporting consequences of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The amendments in this Update allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Consequently, the amendments eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and will improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users. However, because the amendments only relate to the reclassification of the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not affected. The amendments in this Update also require certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. The amendments in this Update affect any entity that is required to apply the provisions of Topic 220, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income, and has items of other comprehensive income for which the related tax effects are presented in other comprehensive income as required by GAAP. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this Update is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, (1) for public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) for all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The amendments in this Update should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. In February 2018, The Company reclassed $66 thousand from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings as a result of the amendments in this Update.

Goodwill

The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,” which allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test.  Based on a qualitative assessment, management determined that the Company’s recorded goodwill totaling $1.5 million, which resulted from the 2005 acquisition of its Phillipsburg, New Jersey branch, is not impaired as of December 31, 2017.

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events or transactions that occurred through the date the Company issued these financial statements. During this period, the Company did not have any material recognizable or non-recognizable subsequent events.

2.  Restrictions on Cash

Federal law requires depository institutions to hold reserves in the form of vault cash or, if vault cash is insufficient, in the form of a deposit maintained with a Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”).  The dollar amount of a depository institution's reserve requirement is determined by applying the reserve ratios specified in the FRB’s Regulation D to an institution's reservable liabilities.  As of December 31, 2017, the Company required $23 thousand of additional reserves to meet its reserve requirements. As of December 31, 2016, the Company required $15 thousand of additional reserves to meet its reserve requirements.

In addition, the Company’s contract with its current electronic funds transfer (“EFT”) provider requires a predetermined balance be maintained in a settlement account controlled by the provider equal to the Company’s average daily net settlement position multiplied by four days.  The required balance was $156 thousand as of December 31, 2017and 2016.  This balance can be adjusted periodically to reflect actual transaction volume and seasonal factors.

As of December 31, 2017, Unity Risk Management, Inc. had a total cash balance of $1.3 million, compared to $1.2 million at December 31, 2016.

3.  Securities

This table provides the major components of securities available for sale (“AFS”) and held to maturity (“HTM”) at amortized cost and estimated fair value at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

	December 31, 2017									December 31, 2016
(In thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Estimated fair value		Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Estimated fair value
Available for sale:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	$	5,765	$	—	$	(74	)	$	5,691	$	3,744	$	2	$	(30	)	$	3,716
State and political subdivisions	5,227		21		(56		)	5,192		5,545		19		(62		)	5,502
Residential mortgage-backed securities	32,111		153		(386		)	31,878		21,547		339		(255		)	21,631
Corporate and other securities	10,922		31		(221		)	10,732		10,003		—		(284		)	9,719
Total securities available for sale	$	54,025	$	205	$	(737	)	$	53,493	$	40,839	$	360	$	(631	)	$	40,568
Held to maturity:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	$	3,026	$	—	$	(93	)	$	2,933	$	3,530	$	—	$	(128	)	$	3,402
State and political subdivisions	1,113		144		—			1,257		2,306		181		(1		)	2,486
Residential mortgage-backed securities	3,958		59		(18		)	3,999		4,799		98		(25		)	4,872
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	3,685		—		(142		)	3,543		3,796		—		(148		)	3,648
Corporate and other securities	4,525		89		—			4,614		6,548		12		—			6,560
Total securities held to maturity	$	16,307	$	292	$	(253	)	$	16,346	$	20,979	$	291	$	(302	)	$	20,968

This table provides the remaining contractual maturities and yields of securities within the investment portfolios. The carrying value of securities at December 31, 2017 is distributed by contractual maturity. Mortgage-backed securities and other securities, which may have principal prepayment provisions, are distributed based on contractual maturity. Expected maturities will differ materially from contractual maturities as a result of early prepayments and calls.

	Within one year				After one through five years				After five through ten years				After ten years				Total carrying value
(In thousands, except percentages)	Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield
Available for sale at fair value:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	$	—	—	%	$	3,699	1.61	%	$	1,992	2.16	%	$	—	—	%	$	5,691	1.80	%
State and political subdivisions	—		—		963		3.30		1,962		2.57		2,267		2.69		5,192		2.76
Residential mortgage-backed securities	168		2.55		718		1.57		2,745		2.55		28,247		2.75		31,878		2.71
Corporate and other securities	—		—		2,182		3.17		6,453		4.37		2,097		2.01		10,732		3.66
Total securities available for sale	$	168	2.55	%	$	7,562	2.27	%	$	13,152	3.39	%	$	32,611	2.70	%	$	53,493	2.81	%
Held to maturity at cost:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	3,026	1.98	%	$	3,026	1.98	%
State and political subdivisions	162		1.49		—		—		493		5.07		458		5.84		1,113		4.86
Residential mortgage-backed securities	7		4.71		22		5.48		539		2.72		3,390		3.54		3,958		3.44
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	—		—		—		—		—		—		3,685		2.76		3,685		2.76
Corporate and other securities	—		—		—		—		4,525		5.73		—		—		4,525		5.73
Total securities held to maturity	$	169	1.62	%	$	22	5.48	%	$	5,557	5.38	%	$	10,559	2.92	%	$	16,307	3.75	%

The fair value of securities with unrealized losses by length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:

	December 31, 2017
		Less than 12 months					12 months and greater					Total
(In thousands, except number in a loss position)	Total number in a loss position	Estimated fair value		Unrealized loss			Estimated fair value		Unrealized loss			Estimated fair value		Unrealized loss
Available for sale:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	5	$	3,732	$	(40	)	$	1,958	$	(34	)	$	5,690	$	(74	)
State and political subdivisions	2	476		(6		)	1,792		(50		)	2,268		(56		)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	22	20,646		(218		)	4,028		(168		)	24,674		(386		)
Corporate and other securities	7	4,563		(37		)	2,803		(184		)	7,366		(221		)
Total temporarily impaired securities	36	$	29,417	$	(301	)	$	10,581	$	(436	)	$	39,998	$	(737	)
Held to maturity:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	2	$	—	$	—		$	2,933	$	(93	)	$	2,933	$	(93	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	2	—		—			979		(18		)	979		(18		)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	2	—		—			3,543		(142		)	3,543		(142		)
Total temporarily impaired securities	6	$	—	$	—		$	7,455	$	(253	)	$	7,455	$	(253	)

	December 31, 2016
		Less than 12 months					12 months and greater					Total
(In thousands, except number in a loss position)	Total number in a loss position	Estimated fair value		Unrealized loss			Estimated fair value		Unrealized loss			Estimated fair value		Unrealized loss
Available for sale:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	1	$	1,962	$	(30	)	$	—	$	—		$	1,962	$	(30	)
State and political subdivisions	4	3,833		(62		)	—		—			3,833		(62		)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	13	7,813		(139		)	2,983		(116		)	10,796		(255		)
Corporate and other securities	6	822		(67		)	5,376		(217		)	6,198		(284		)
Total temporarily impaired securities	24	$	14,430	$	(298	)	$	8,359	$	(333	)	$	22,789	$	(631	)
Held to maturity:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	2	$	3,402	$	(128	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,402	$	(128	)
State and political subdivisions	1	212		(1		)	—		—			212		(1		)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	2	776		(15		)	441		(10		)	1,217		(25		)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	2	3,648		(148		)	—		—			3,648		(148		)
Total temporarily impaired securities	7	$	8,038	$	(292	)	$	441	$	(10	)	$	8,479	$	(302	)

The Company sold one held to maturity security due to a significant deterioration in the creditworthiness of the bond. Investments in debt securities may be classified as held-to-maturity and measured at amortized cost in the statement of financial position only if the reporting enterprise has the positive intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity. Evidence of a significant deterioration in the issuer's creditworthiness is a circumstance in which the enterprise may change its intent to hold a certain security to maturity without calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity in the future. This event was isolated, nonrecurring, and unusual for the Company.

Unrealized Losses

The unrealized losses in each of the categories presented in the tables above are discussed in the paragraphs that follow:

U.S. government sponsored entities and state and political subdivision securities: The unrealized losses on investments in these types of securities were caused by the increase in interest rate spreads or the increase in interest rates at the long end of the Treasury curve. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the par value of the investments.  Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity, the Company did not consider these investments to be other-than temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2017.  There was no other-than-temporary impairment on these securities at December 31, 2016.

Residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities:  The unrealized losses on investments in mortgage-backed securities were caused by increases in interest rate spreads or the increase in interest rates at the long end of the Treasury curve.  The majority of contractual cash flows of these securities are guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC).  It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price significantly less than the par value of the investment.  Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity, the Company did not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

Corporate and other securities: Included in this category are corporate debt securities, Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) investments, asset-backed securities, and one trust preferred security.  The unrealized losses on corporate debt securities were due to widening credit spreads or the increase in interest rates at the long end of the Treasury curve and the unrealized losses on CRA investments were caused by decreases in the market prices of the shares.  The Company evaluated the prospects of the issuers and forecasted a recovery period; and as a result determined it did not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.  The unrealized loss on the trust preferred security was caused by an inactive trading market and changes in market credit spreads.  At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, this category consisted of one single-issuer trust preferred security.  The contractual terms do not allow the security to be settled at a price less than the par value.  Because the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity, the Company did not consider this security to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

Realized Gains and Losses

Gross realized gains and losses on securities for the past two years are detailed in the table below:

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017			2016
Available for sale:
Realized gains	$	89		$	302
Realized losses	(61		)	(1		)
Total securities available for sale	28			301
Held to maturity:
Realized gains	38			123
Realized losses	(4		)	—
Total securities held to maturity	34			123
Net gains on sales of securities	$	62		$	424

The net realized gains are included in noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income as net security gains.  For 2017 and 2016, gross realized gains on sales of securities amounted to $127 thousand and $425 thousand, respectively.  There were $65 thousand of gross realized losses in 2017, compared to a $1 thousand loss in 2016. 

• The net gains during 2017 are attributed to the sale of three mortgage-backed securities with a total book value of $1.2 million and resulting gains of $71 thousand, the sale of one taxable municipal security with a book value of $529 thousand and resulting gains of $38 thousand, the call of two asset-backed securities totaling $3.5 million in book value, resulting in gains of $3 thousand, and the call of four municipal tax-exempt securites with a total book value of $500 thousand and resulting gains of $15 thousand, partially offset by the sale of two mortgage-backed securities with a book value of $1.6 million which resulted in a loss of $58 thousand, and the call of two corporate bonds with a book value of $3.0 million and resulting losses of $7 thousand.

• The net gains during 2016 are attributed to the sale of fifteen municipal securities with a total book value of $6.4 million and resulting gains of $112 thousand, the sale of two SBA securities with a book value of $2.5 million and resulting gains of $12 thousand, the sale of thirteen equity securities totaling $515 thousand in book value, resulting in pre-tax gains of approximately $177 thousand, and the sale of five corporate bonds with a total book value of $8.5 million and resulting gains of $124 thousand, partially offset by the sale of one SBA security with a book value of $753 thousand which resulting in a loss of $1 thousand.

Pledged Securities

Securities with a carrying value of $20.8 million and $17.7 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, were pledged to secure Government deposits, secure other borrowings and for other purposes required or permitted by law.  

4.  Loans

The following table sets forth the classification of loans by class, including unearned fees, deferred costs and excluding the allowance for loan losses for the past two years:

(In thousands)	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
SBA loans held for investment	$	43,999	$	42,492
SBA 504 loans	21,871		26,344
Commercial loans
Commercial other	82,825		58,447
Commercial real estate	469,696		422,418
Commercial real estate construction	54,473		28,306
Residential mortgage loans	365,145		289,093
Consumer loans
Home equity	55,817		47,411
Consumer other	54,038		44,130
Total loans held for investment	$	1,147,864	$	958,641
SBA loans held for sale	22,810		14,773
Total loans	$	1,170,674	$	973,414

Loans are made to individuals as well as commercial entities.  Specific loan terms vary as to interest rate, repayment, and collateral requirements based on the type of loan requested and the credit worthiness of the prospective borrower.  Credit risk, excluding SBA loans, tends to be geographically concentrated in that a majority of the loan customers are located in the markets serviced by the Bank.  As a preferred SBA lender, a portion of the SBA portfolio is to borrowers outside the Company’s lending area.  However, during late 2008, the Company withdrew from SBA lending outside of its primary trade area, but continues to offer SBA loan products as an additional credit product within its primary trade area.  Loan performance may be adversely affected by factors impacting the general economy or conditions specific to the real estate market such as geographic location and/or property type.  A description of the Company's different loan segments follows:

SBA Loans:  SBA 7(a) loans, on which the SBA has historically provided guarantees of up to 90 percent of the principal balance, are considered a higher risk loan product for the Company than its other loan products.  The guaranteed portion of the Company’s SBA loans is generally sold in the secondary market with the nonguaranteed portion held in the portfolio as a loan held for investment.  SBA loans are for the purpose of providing working capital, financing the purchase of equipment, inventory or commercial real estate and for other business purposes.  Loans are guaranteed by the businesses' major owners.  SBA loans are made based primarily on the historical and projected cash flow of the business and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided.

SBA 504 Loans:  The SBA 504 program consists of real estate backed commercial mortgages where the Company has the first mortgage and the SBA has the second mortgage on the property.  SBA 504 loans are made based primarily on the historical and projected cash flow of the business and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided.  Generally, the Company has a 50 percent loan to value ratio on SBA 504 program loans at origination.

Commercial Loans:  Commercial credit is extended primarily to middle market and small business customers.  Commercial loans are generally made in the Company’s market place for the purpose of providing working capital, financing the purchase of equipment, inventory or commercial real estate and for other business purposes.  Loans will generally be guaranteed in full or for a meaningful amount by the businesses' major owners.  Commercial loans are made based primarily on the historical and projected cash flow of the business and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided.

ResidentialMortgage and Consumer Loans:  The Company originates mortgage and consumer loans including principally residential real estate, home equity lines and loans and consumer construction lines.  Each loan type is evaluated on debt to income, type of collateral and loan to collateral value, credit history and Company relationship with the borrower.

Inherent in the lending function is credit risk, which is the possibility a borrower may not perform in accordance with the contractual terms of their loan.  A borrower’s inability to pay their obligations according to the contractual terms can create the risk of past due loans and, ultimately, credit losses, especially on collateral deficient loans.  The Company minimizes its credit risk by loan diversification and adhering to credit administration policies and procedures.  Due diligence on loans begins when the Company initiates contact regarding a loan with a borrower.  Documentation, including a borrower’s credit history, materials establishing the value and liquidity of potential collateral, the purpose of the loan, the source of funds for repayment of the loan, and other factors, are analyzed before a loan is submitted for approval.  The loan portfolio is then subject to on-going internal reviews for credit quality, as well as independent credit reviews by an outside firm.

The Company's extension of credit is governed by the Credit Risk Policy which was established to control the quality of the Company's loans.  These policies and procedures are reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors on a regular basis.

Credit Ratings

For SBA 7(a), SBA 504 and commercial loans, management uses internally assigned risk ratings as the best indicator of credit quality.  A loan’s internal risk rating is updated at least annually and more frequently if circumstances warrant a change in risk rating.  The Company uses a 1 through 10 loan grading system that follows regulatory accepted definitions.

Pass:  Risk ratings of 1 through 6 are used for loans that are performing, as they meet, and are expected to continue to meet, all of the terms and conditions set forth in the original loan documentation, and are generally current on principal and interest payments.  These performing loans are termed “Pass”.

Special Mention:  Criticized loans are assigned a risk rating of 7 and termed “Special Mention”, as the borrowers exhibit potential credit weaknesses or downward trends deserving management’s close attention.  If not checked or corrected, these trends will weaken the Bank’s collateral and position.  While potentially weak, these borrowers are currently marginally acceptable and no loss of interest or principal is anticipated.  As a result, special mention assets do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.  Included in “Special Mention” could be turnaround situations, such as borrowers with deteriorating trends beyond one year, borrowers in start up or deteriorating industries, or borrowers with a poor market share in an average industry.  "Special Mention" loans may include an element of asset quality, financial flexibility, or below average management.  Management and ownership may have limited depth or experience.  Regulatory agencies have agreed on a consistent definition of “Special Mention” as an asset with potential weaknesses which, if left uncorrected, may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Bank’s credit position at some future date.  This definition is intended to ensure that the “Special Mention” category is not used to identify assets that have as their sole weakness credit data exceptions or collateral documentation exceptions that are not material to the repayment of the asset.

Substandard:  Classified loans are assigned a risk rating of an 8 or 9, depending upon the prospect for collection, and deemed “Substandard”.  A risk rating of 8 is used for borrowers with well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly liquidation of debt.  The loan is inadequately protected by the current paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any.  Normal repayment from the borrower is in jeopardy, although no loss of principal is envisioned.  There is a distinct possibility that a partial loss of interest and/or principal will occur if the deficiencies are not corrected.  Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard assets, does not have to exist in individual assets classified “Substandard”.  

A risk rating of 9 is used for borrowers that have all the weaknesses inherent in a loan with a risk rating of 8, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection of debt in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.  Serious problems exist to the point where partial loss of principal is likely.  The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important, reasonably specific pending factors that may work to strengthen the assets, the loans’ classification as estimated losses is deferred until a more exact status may be determined.  Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, or liquidation procedures; capital injection; perfecting liens on additional collateral; and refinancing plans.  Partial charge-offs are likely.

Loss:  Once a borrower is deemed incapable of repayment of unsecured debt, the risk rating becomes a 10, the loan is termed a “Loss”, and charged-off immediately.  Loans to such borrowers are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as active assets of the Bank is not warranted.  This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off these basically worthless assets even though partial recovery may be affected in the future.

For residential mortgage and consumer loans, management uses performing versus nonperforming as the best indicator of credit quality.  Nonperforming loans consist of loans that are not accruing interest (nonaccrual loans) as a result of principal or interest being delinquent for a period of 90 days or more or when the ability to collect principal and interest according to the contractual terms is in doubt.  These credit quality indicators are updated on an ongoing basis, as a loan is placed on nonaccrual status as soon as management believes there is sufficient doubt as to the ultimate ability to collect interest on a loan.

The tables below detail the Company’s loan portfolio by class according to their credit quality indicators discussed in the paragraphs above as of December 31, 2017:

	December 31, 2017
	SBA, SBA 504 & Commercial loans - Internal risk ratings
(In thousands)	Pass		Special mention		Substandard		Total
SBA loans held for investment	$	42,415	$	373	$	1,211	$	43,999
SBA 504 loans	20,751		1,024		96		21,871
Commercial loans
Commercial other	82,201		599		25		82,825
Commercial real estate	464,589		3,047		2,060		469,696
Commercial real estate construction	54,473		—		—		54,473
Total commercial loans	601,263		3,646		2,085		606,994
Total SBA, SBA 504 and commercial loans	$	664,429	$	5,043	$	3,392	$	672,864
	Residential mortgage & Consumer loans - Performing/Nonperforming
(In thousands)			Performing		Nonperforming		Total
Residential mortgage loans			$	363,476	$	1,669	$	365,145
Consumer loans
Home equity			55,192		625		55,817
Consumer other			54,038		—		54,038
Total consumer loans			109,230		625		109,855
Total residential mortgage and consumer loans			$	472,706	$	2,294	$	475,000

The tables below detail the Company’s loan portfolio by class according to their credit quality indicators discussed in the paragraphs above as of December 31, 2016: 

	December 31, 2016
	SBA, SBA 504 & Commercial loans - Internal risk ratings
(In thousands)	Pass		Special mention		Substandard		Total
SBA loans held for investment	$	38,990	$	2,023	$	1,479	$	42,492
SBA 504 loans	24,635		1,073		636		26,344
Commercial loans
Commercial other	57,000		1,422		25		58,447
Commercial real estate	408,288		13,729		401		422,418
Commercial real estate construction	27,556		750		—		28,306
Total commercial loans	492,844		15,901		426		509,171
Total SBA, SBA 504 and commercial loans	$	556,469	$	18,997	$	2,541	$	578,007
	Residential mortgage & Consumer loans - Performing/Nonperforming
(In thousands)			Performing		Nonperforming		Total
Residential mortgage loans			$	286,421	$	2,672	$	289,093
Consumer loans
Home equity			46,929		482		47,411
Consumer other			42,154		1,976		44,130
Total consumer loans			890,833		2,458		91,541
Total residential mortgage and consumer loans			$	375,504	$	5,130	$	380,634

Nonperforming and Past Due Loans

Nonperforming loans consist of loans that are not accruing interest (nonaccrual loans) as a result of principal or interest being delinquent for a period of 90 days or more or when the ability to collect principal and interest according to the contractual terms is in doubt.  Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest are not included in nonperforming loans and generally represent loans that are well collateralized and in a continuing process expected to result in repayment or restoration to current status.  The risk of loss is difficult to quantify and is subject to fluctuations in collateral values, general economic conditions and other factors.  The improved state of the economy has resulted in a substantial reduction in nonperforming loans and loan delinquencies.  The Company values its collateral through the use of appraisals, broker price opinions, and knowledge of its local market.  In response to the credit risk in its portfolio, the Company has increased staffing in its credit monitoring department and increased efforts in the collection and analysis of borrowers’ financial statements and tax returns. 

The following tables set forth an aging analysis of past due and nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

	December 31, 2017
(In thousands)	30-59 days past due		60-89 days past due		90+ days and still accruing		Nonaccrual (1)		Total past due		Current		Total loans
SBA loans held for investment	$	240	$	313	$	—	$	632	$	1,185	$	42,814	$	43,999
SBA 504 loans	—		—		—		—		—		21,871		21,871
Commercial loans
Commercial other	23		—		60		25		108		82,717		82,825
Commercial real estate	558		1,073		—		43		1,674		468,022		469,696
Commercial real estate construction	—		—		—		—		—		54,473		54,473
Residential mortgage loans	1,830		958		—		1,669		4,457		360,688		365,145
Consumer loans
Home equity	51		205		—		625		881		54,936		55,817
Consumer other	3		—		—		—		3		54,035		54,038
Total loans held for investment	$	2,705	$	2,549	$	60	$	2,994	$	8,308	$	1,139,556	$	1,147,864
SBA loans held for sale	—		—		—		—		—		22,810		22,810
Total loans	$	2,705	$	2,549	$	60	$	2,994	$	8,308	$	1,162,366	$	1,170,674

(1) At December 31, 2017, nonaccrual loans included $27 thousand of loans guaranteed by the SBA.

	December 31, 2016
(In thousands)	30-59 days past due		60-89 days past due		90+ days and still accruing		Nonaccrual (1)		Total past due		Current		Total loans
SBA loans held for investment	$	491	$	397	$	—	$	1,168	$	2,056	$	40,436	$	42,492
SBA 504 loans	—		—		—		513		513		25,831		26,344
Commercial loans
Commercial other	50		—		—		25		75		58,372		58,447
Commercial real estate	1,108		574		—		401		2,083		420,335		422,418
Commercial real estate construction	—		—		—		—		—		28,306		28,306
Residential mortgage loans	2,932		263		—		2,672		5,867		283,226		289,093
Consumer loans
Home equity	227		—		—		482		709		46,702		47,411
Consumer other	—		—		—		1,976		1,976		42,154		44,130
Total loans held for investment	$	4,808	$	1,234	$	—	$	7,237	$	13,279	$	945,362	$	958,641
SBA loans held for sale	—		—		—		—		—		14,773		14,773
Total loans	$	4,808	$	1,234	$	—	$	7,237	$	13,279	$	960,135	$	973,414

(1) At December 31, 2016, nonaccrual loans included $153 thousand of TDRs and $60 thousand of loans guaranteed by the SBA. 

Impaired Loans

The Company has defined impaired loans to be all nonperforming loans and troubled debt restructurings.  Management considers a loan impaired when, based on current information and events, it is determined that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan contract.

The following tables provide detail on the Company’s loans individually evaluated for impairment with the associated allowance amount, if applicable, as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016: 

	December 31, 2017
(In thousands)	Unpaid principal balance		Recorded investment		Specific reserves
With no related allowance:
SBA loans held for investment (1)	$	135	$	52	$	—
SBA 504 loans	—		—		—
Commercial loans
Commercial other	25		25		—
Commercial real estate	43		43		—
Total commercial loans	68		68		—
Total impaired loans with no related allowance	203		120		—
With an allowance:
SBA loans held for investment (1)	748		553		194
SBA 504 loans	—		—		—
Commercial loans
Commercial other	—		—		—
Commercial real estate	786		786		138
Total commercial loans	786		786		138
Total impaired loans with a related allowance	1,534		1,339		332
Total individually evaluated impaired loans:
SBA loans held for investment (1)	883		605		194
SBA 504 loans	—		—		—
Commercial loans
Commercial other	25		25		—
Commercial real estate	829		829		138
Total commercial loans	854		854		138
Total individually evaluated impaired loans	$	1,737	$	1,459	$	332

(1) Balances are reduced by amount guaranteed by the SBA of $27 thousand at December 31, 2017.

	December 31, 2016
(In thousands)	Unpaid principal balance		Recorded investment		Specific reserves
With no related allowance:
SBA loans held for investment (1)	$	1,235	$	653	$	—
SBA 504 loans	513		513		—
Commercial loans
Commercial other	25		25		—
Commercial real estate	42		43		—
Total commercial loans	67		68		—
Total impaired loans with no related allowance	1,815		1,234		—
With an allowance:
SBA loans held for investment (1)	975		455		246
SBA 504 loans	—		—		—
Commercial loans
Commercial other	13		1		1
Commercial real estate	358		357		33
Total commercial loans	371		358		34
Total impaired loans with a related allowance	1,346		813		280
Total individually evaluated impaired loans:
SBA loans held for investment (1)	2,210		1,108		246
SBA 504 loans	513		513		—
Commercial loans
Commercial other	38		26		1
Commercial real estate	400		400		33
Total commercial loans	438		426		34
Total individually evaluated impaired loans	$	3,161	$	2,047	$	280

(1) Balances are reduced by amount guaranteed by the SBA of $60 thousand at December 31, 2016.

The following table presents the average recorded investments in impaired loans and the related amount of interest recognized during the time period in which the loans were impaired for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.  The average balances are calculated based on the month-end balances of impaired loans.  When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of an impaired loan is in doubt and the loan is on nonaccrual status, all payments are applied to principal under the cost recovery method, therefore no interest income is recognized.  The interest recognized on impaired loans noted below represents accruing troubled debt restructurings only and nominal amounts of income recognized on a cash basis for well-collateralized impaired loans. 

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017				2016
(In thousands)	Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized on impaired loans		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized on impaired loans
SBA loans held for investment (1)	$	668	$	47	$	1,535	$	14
SBA 504 loans	82		—		798		—
Commercial loans
Commercial other	25		—		607		38
Commercial real estate	685		43		1,198		59
Commercial real estate construction	—		—		272		—
Total	$	1,460	$	90	$	4,410	$	111

(1) Balances are reduced by the average amount guaranteed by the SBA of $318 thousand and $246 thousand for years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company's loan portfolio includes certain loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”).  TDRs occur when a creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to a debtor’s financial condition, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider, unless it results in a delay in payment that is insignificant.  These concessions typically include reductions in interest rate, extending the maturity of a loan, other modifications of payment terms, or a combination of modifications.  When the Company modifies a loan, management evaluates for any possible impairment using either the discounted cash flows method, where the value of the modified loan is based on the present value of expected cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, or by using the fair value of the collateral less selling costs if the loan is collateral-dependent.  If management determines that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, impairment is recognized by segment or class of loan, as applicable, through an allowance estimate or charge-off to the allowance.  This process is used, regardless of loan type, and for loans modified as TDRs that subsequently default on their modified terms.

TDRs of $786 thousand and $153 thousand are included in the impaired loan numbers as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The increase was due to the addition of one loan, partially offset by the removal of one loan. There is $138 thousand in specific reserves on the performing TDR as of December 31, 2017, compared to $34 thousand on the nonperforming TDR as of December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017, the $786 thousand TDR is in accrual status since it continues to perform in accordance with its restructured terms. At December 31, 2016, the $153 thousand TDR was in nonaccrual status.

There was one loan modified as a TDR with a principal balance reduction during the year ended December 31, 2017. To date, the Company’s TDRs consisted of interest rate reductions, interest only periods, and maturity extensions.  There were no loans modified as a TDR within the previous 12 months that subsequently defaulted at some point during the years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016. In this case, the subsequent default is defined as 90 days past due or transferred to nonaccrual status.

Other Loan Information

Servicing Assets:

Loans sold to others and serviced by the Company are not included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The total amount of such loans serviced, but owned by outside investors, amounted to approximately $132.1 million and $137.8 millionat December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the carrying value, which approximates fair value, of servicing assets was $1.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and is included in Other Assets.  The fair value of SBA servicing assets was determined using a discount rate of 15%, constant prepayment speeds ranging from 15% to 18%, and interest strip multiples ranging from 2.08% to 3.80%, depending on each individual credit.  The fair value of mortgage servicing assets was determined using a discount rate of 12% and the present value of excess servicing over 7 years.  A summary of the changes in the related servicing assets for the past two years follows:

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017			2016
Balance, beginning of year	$	2,086		$	1,389
Servicing assets capitalized	172			1,472
Amortization of expense	(458		)	(775		)
Provision for loss in fair value	—			—
Balance, end of year	$	1,800		$	2,086

In addition, the Company had a $1.4 million and $1.3 million discount related to the retained portion of the unsold SBA loans at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Officer and Director Loans:

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may extend credit to officers, directors or their associates.  These loans are subject to the Company’s normal lending policy.  An analysis of such loans, all of which are current as to principal and interest payments, is as follows: 

(In thousands)	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Balance, beginning of year	$	29,256		$	37,394
New loans and advances	6,121			31
Loan repayments	(2,268		)	(8,169		)
Balance, end of year	$	33,109		$	29,256

Loan Portfolio Collateral:

The majority of the Company’s loans are secured by real estate.  Declines in the market values of real estate in the Company’s trade area impact the value of the collateral securing its loans.  This could lead to greater losses in the event of defaults on loans secured by real estate.  At December 31, 2017 approximately 94% of the Company’s loan portfolio was secured by real estate, compared to 96% at December 31, 2016.

5. Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Loan Commitments

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company has an established methodology to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses that assesses the risks and losses inherent in the loan portfolio.  At a minimum, the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is reviewed by management on a quarterly basis.  For purposes of determining the allowance for loan losses, the Company has segmented the loans in its portfolio by loan type.  Loans are segmented into the following pools: SBA 7(a), SBA 504, commercial, residential mortgages, and consumer loans.  Certain portfolio segments are further broken down into classes based on the associated risks within those segments and the type of collateral underlying each loan.  Commercial loans are divided into the following three classes: commercial real estate, commercial real estate construction and commercial other.  Consumer loans are divided into two classes as follows:  home equity and other.

The standardized methodology used to assess the adequacy of the allowance includes the allocation of specific and general reserves.  The same standard methodology is used, regardless of loan type.  Specific reserves are made to individual impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings (see Note 1 for additional information on this term).  The general reserve is set based upon a representative average historical net charge-off rate adjusted for the following environmental factors: delinquency and impairment trends, charge-off and recovery trends, changes in the volume of restructured loans, volume and loan term trends, changes in risk and underwriting policy trends, staffing and experience changes, national and local economic trends, industry conditions and credit concentration changes.  Within the five-year historical net charge-off rate, the Company weights the past three years more because it believes they are more indicative of future losses.  All of the environmental factors are ranked and assigned a basis points value based on the following scale: low, low moderate, moderate, high moderate and high risk.  Each environmental factor is evaluated separately for each class of loans and risk weighted based on its individual characteristics. 

• For SBA 7(a), SBA 504 and commercial loans, the estimate of loss based on pools of loans with similar characteristics is made through the use of a standardized loan grading system that is applied on an individual loan level and updated on a continuous basis.  The loan grading system incorporates reviews of the financial performance of the borrower, including cash flow, debt-service coverage ratio, earnings power, debt level and equity position, in conjunction with an assessment of the borrower's industry and future prospects.  It also incorporates analysis of the type of collateral and the relative loan to value ratio.

• For residential mortgage and consumer loans, the estimate of loss is based on pools of loans with similar characteristics.  Factors such as credit score, delinquency status and type of collateral are evaluated.  Factors are updated frequently to capture the recent behavioral characteristics of the subject portfolios, as well as any changes in loss mitigation or credit origination strategies, and adjustments to the reserve factors are made as needed. 

According to the Company’s policy, a loss (“charge-off”) is to be recognized and charged to the allowance for loan losses as soon as a loan is recognized as uncollectable.  All credits which are 90 days past due must be analyzed for the Company’s ability to collect on the credit.  Once a loss is known to exist, the charge-off approval process is immediately expedited.  This charge-off policy is followed for all loan types.

The allocated allowance is the total of identified specific and general reserves by loan category.  The allocation is not necessarily indicative of the categories in which future losses may occur.  The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of the portfolio.  An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses.

The following tables detail the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the past two years:

	For the year ended December 31, 2017
(In thousands)	SBA held for investment			SBA 504			Commercial			Residential			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,576		$	573		$	6,729		$	2,593		$	925		$	183		$	12,579
Charge-offs	(293		)	(76		)	(151		)	(55		)	(336		)	—			(911		)
Recoveries	121			2			100			12			3			—			238
Net charge-offs	(172		)	(74		)	(51		)	(43		)	(333		)	—			(673		)
Provision for loan losses charged to expense	67			(69		)	717			580			538			(183		)	1,650
Balance, end of period	$	1,471		$	430		$	7,395		$	3,130		$	1,130		$	—		$	13,556

	For the year ended December 31, 2016
(In thousands)	SBA held for investment			SBA 504			Commercial			Residential			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,961		$	741		$	6,309		$	2,769		$	817		$	162	$	12,759
Charge-offs	(557		)	—			(775		)	(101		)	(30		)	—		(1,463		)
Recoveries	33			—			29			—			1			—		63
Net charge-offs	(524		)	—			(746		)	(101		)	(29		)	—		(1,400		)
Provision for loan losses charged to expense	139			(168		)	1,166			(75		)	137			21		1,220
Balance, end of period	$	1,576		$	573		$	6,729		$	2,593		$	925		$	183	$	12,579

The following tables present loans and their related allowance for loan losses, by portfolio segment, as of December 31^st for the past two years:

	December 31, 2017
(In thousands)	SBA held for investment		SBA 504		Commercial		Residential		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	194	$	—	$	138	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	332
Collectively evaluated for impairment	1,277		430		7,257		3,130		1,130		—		13,224
Total	$	1,471	$	430	$	7,395	$	3,130	$	1,130	$	—	$	13,556
Loan ending balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	605	$	—	$	854	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,459
Collectively evaluated for impairment	43,394		21,871		606,140		365,145		109,855		—		1,146,405
Total	$	43,999	$	21,871	$	606,994	$	365,145	$	109,855	$	—	$	1,147,864

	December 31, 2016
(In thousands)	SBA held for investment		SBA 504		Commercial		Residential		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	246	$	—	$	34	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	280
Collectively evaluated for impairment	1,330		573		6,695		2,593		925		183		12,299
Total	$	1,576	$	573	$	6,729	$	2,593	$	925	$	183	$	12,579
Loan ending balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,108	$	513	$	426	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,047
Collectively evaluated for impairment	41,384		25,831		508,745		289,093		91,541		—		956,594
Total	$	42,492	$	26,344	$	509,171	$	289,093	$	91,541	$	—	$	958,641

Changes in Methodology:

The Company did not make any changes to its allowance for loan losses methodology in the current period.

Reserve for Unfunded Loan Commitments

In addition to the allowance for loan losses, the Company maintains a reserve for unfunded loan commitments at a level that management believes is adequate to absorb estimated probable losses.  Adjustments to the reserve are made through other expense and applied to the reserve which is classified as other liabilities.  At December 31, 2017, a $292 thousand commitment reserve was reported on the balance sheet as an “other liability”, compared to a $181 thousand commitment reserve at December 31, 2016, due to a larger loan portfolio requiring a larger general reserve.  There were no losses on unfunded loan commitments during 2017 or 2016.

6.  Premises and Equipment

The detail of premises and equipment as of December 31^st for the past two years is as follows: 

(In thousands)	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Land and buildings	$	25,155		$	24,896
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	10,074			9,194
Leasehold improvements	1,823			1,458
Gross premises and equipment	37,052			35,548
Less: Accumulated depreciation	(13,582		)	(12,150		)
Net premises and equipment	$	23,470		$	23,398

The increase in fixed assets over the past year was due to the addition of new branch sites in Emerson, Somerville and Ramsey, New Jersey.

Amounts charged to noninterest expense for depreciation of premises and equipment amounted to $1.4 million and $1.1 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

7.  Other Assets

The detail of other assets as of December 31^st for the past two years is as follows:

(In thousands)	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Prepaid expenses	$	587	$	479
Servicing assets:
SBA servicing asset	893		779
Mortgage servicing asset	907		1,307
Net receivable due from SBA	45		236
Unrealized gains on interest rate swap agreements	1,407		1,204
Prepaid insurance	1,633		1,514
Other	886		377
Total other assets	$	6,358	$	5,896

8.  Deposits

The following table details the maturity distribution of time deposits as of December 31^st for the past two years: 

(In thousands)	Three months or less		More than three months through six months		More than six months through twelve months		More than twelve months		Total
At December 31, 2017:
Less than $100,000	$	13,079	$	12,407	$	34,810	$	73,585	$	133,881
$100,000 or more	2,986		9,421		39,082		40,094		91,583
At December 31, 2016:
Less than $100,000	$	5,931	$	7,906	$	9,300	$	100,587	$	123,724
$100,000 or more	4,332		9,855		12,535		70,198		96,920

The following table presents the expected maturities of time deposits over the next five years:

(In thousands)	2018		2019		2020		2021		2022		Thereafter		Total
Balance maturing	$	111,785	$	57,487	$	39,955	$	12,178	$	3,463	$	596	$	225,464

Time deposits with balances of $250 thousand or more totaled $20.1 million and $21.4 million at December 31,2017 and 2016, respectively.

9.  Borrowed Funds and Subordinated Debentures

The following table presents the period-end and average balances of borrowed funds and subordinated debentures for the past three years with resultant rates:

	2017				2016				2015
(In thousands)	Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate
FHLB borrowings and repurchase agreements:
At December 31,	$	260,000	1.59	%	$	106,000	1.83	%	$	77,000	2.66	%
Year-to-date average	110,420		1.75		88,754		2.21		57,187		3.72
Maximum outstanding	260,000				106,000				140,000
Repurchase agreements:
At December 31,	$	15,000	3.67	%	$	15,000	3.67	%	$	15,000	3.67	%
Year-to-date average	15,000		3.67		15,000		3.67		15,000		3.67
Maximum outstanding	15,000				15,000				15,000
Subordinated debentures:
At December 31,	$	10,310	2.40	%	$	10,310	2.40	%	$	15,465	1.98	%
Year-to-date average	10,310		2.40		11,099		2.35		15,465		1.87
Maximum outstanding	10,310				15,465				15,465

The following table presents the expected maturities of borrowed funds and subordinated debentures over the next five years: 

(In thousands)	2018		2019		2020		2021		2022		Thereafter		Total
FHLB borrowings and repurchase agreements	$	220,000	$	—	$	30,000	$	10,000	$	—	$	—	$	260,000
Other repurchase agreements	15,000		—		—		—		—		—		15,000
Subordinated debentures	—		—		—		—		—		10,310		10,310
Total borrowings	$	235,000	$	—	$	30,000	$	10,000	$	—	$	10,310	$	285,310

FHLB Borrowings

FHLB borrowings at December 31, 2017 included a $170.0 million overnight line of credit advance, compared to $6.0 million at December 31, 2016.  FHLB borrowings at December 31, 2017 also consisted of five$10 million advances,and two$20 million advances.  Comparatively, FHLB borrowings at December 31, 2016 consisted of six$10 million advances and two$20 million advances. The terms of these transactions at year end 2017 are as follows:

• The $170.0 million FHLB overnight line of credit advance issued on December 29, 2017 was at a rate of 1.53% and was repaid on January 2, 2018.

• The $10.0 million FHLB advance that was issued on December 7, 2017 has an adjustable interest rate equal to 3 month LIBOR plus 14.5 basis points and matures on June 7, 2018. This borrowing was swapped to a 5 year fixed rate borrowing at 1.730%.

• The $10.0 million FHLB advance that was issued on August 16, 2017 has an adjustable interest rate equal to 3 month LIBOR plus 7.0 basis points and matures on February 16, 2018. This borrowing was swapped to a 5 year fixed rate borrowing at 1.103%.

• The $20.0 million FHLB advance that was issued on July 5, 2017 has an adjustable interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 11.0 basis points and matures on January 5, 2018. This borrowing was swapped to a 5 year fixed rate borrowing at 1.048%.

• The $10.0 million FHLB advance that was issued on July 7, 2016 has a fixed rate of 1.80% and matures on July 7, 2021.

• The $10.0 million FHLB advance that was issued on March 23, 2016 has a fixed rate of 2.10% and matures on December 23, 2020.

• The $10.0 million FHLB advance that was issued on October 27, 2015 has a fixed rate of 2.02% and matures on October 27, 2020.

• The $10.0 million FHLB advance that was modified on October 27, 2015 has a fixed rate of 2.15% and matures on October 27, 2020.

Repurchase Agreements

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company was a party to a $15.0 million repurchase agreement that was entered into in February 2008, has a term of 10 years expiring on February 28, 2018, and a rate of 3.67%.  The borrowing was callable by the issuer on the repurchase date of May 29, 2008 and quarterly thereafter. 

Due to the call provisions of this advance, the expected maturity could differ from the contractual maturity.

Subordinated Debentures

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company was a party in the following subordinated debenture transactions:

• On July 24, 2006, Unity (NJ) Statutory Trust II, a statutory business trust and wholly-owned subsidiary of Unity Bancorp, Inc., issued $10.0 million of floating rate capital trust pass through securities to investors due on July 24, 2036.  The subordinated debentures are redeemable in whole or part, prior to maturity but after July 24, 2011.  The floating interest rate on the subordinated debentures is the three-month LIBOR plus 159 basis points and reprices quarterly.  The floating interest rate was 3.26% at December 31, 2017 and 2.59% at December 31, 2016. This has been swapped to a 3 year fixed rate borrowing at 0.885%.

• On December 19, 2006, Unity (NJ) Statutory Trust III, a statutory business trust and wholly-owned subsidiary of Unity Bancorp, Inc., issued $5.0 million of floating rate capital trust pass through securities to investors due on December 19, 2036.  On February 26, 2016, Unity (NJ) Statutory Trust III, repurchased the $5.0 million of floating rate securities, and redeemed $155 thousand of the related common equity securities described below.  The subordinated debentures were repurchased at a price of $0.5475 per dollar, which resulted in a gain of $2.3 million.

• In connection with the formation of the statutory business trusts, the trusts also issued $465 thousand of common equity securities to the Company, which together with the proceeds stated above were used to purchase the subordinated debentures, under the same terms and conditions. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, $310 thousand of the common equity securities remained.

The capital securities in each of the above transactions have preference over the common securities with respect to liquidation and other distributions and qualify as Tier I capital.  Under the terms of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, these securities will continue to qualify as Tier 1 capital as the Company has less than $10 billion in assets.  In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” the Company does not consolidate the accounts and related activity of Unity (NJ) Statutory Trust II and Unity (NJ) Statutory Trust III because it is not the primary beneficiary.  The additional capital from each of these transactions was used to bolster the Company’s capital ratios and for general corporate purposes, including among other things, capital contributions to the Bank.

The Company has the ability to defer interest payments on the subordinated debentures for up to 5 years without being in default.  Due to the redemption provisions of these securities, the expected maturity could differ from the contractual maturity.

Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company has a stand alone derivative financial instrument in the form of an interest rate swap agreement, which derives its value from underlying interest rates.  This transaction involves both credit and market risk.  The notional amounts are amounts on which calculations, payments, and the value of the derivative is based.  Notional amounts do not represent direct credit exposures.  Direct credit exposure is limited to the net difference between the calculated amounts to be received and paid, if any.  Such difference, which represents the fair value of the derivative instrument, is reflected on the Company’s balance sheet as other assets or other liabilities.

The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to this agreement.  The Company controls the credit risk of its financial contracts through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures, and does not expect any counterparties to fail their obligations.  The Company deals only with primary dealers.

Derivative instruments are generally either negotiated OTC contracts or standardized contracts executed on a recognized exchange.  Negotiated OTC derivative contracts are generally entered into between two counterparties that negotiate specific agreement terms, including the underlying instrument, amount, exercise prices and maturity.

Risk Management Policies – Hedging Instruments

The primary focus of the Company’s asset/liability management program is to monitor the sensitivity of the Company’s net portfolio value and net income under varying interest rate scenarios to take steps to control its risks.  On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the effectiveness of entering into any derivative agreement by measuring the cost of such an agreement in relation to the reduction in net portfolio value and net income volatility within an assumed range of interest rates.

Interest Rate Risk Management – Cash Flow Hedging Instruments

The Company has FHLB Adjustable Rate Credit (“ARC”) variable rate debt as a source of funds for use in the Company’s lending and investment activities and for other general business purposes.  These debt obligations expose the Company to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates.  If interest rates increase, interest expense increases.  Conversely, if interest rates decrease, interest expense decreases.  Management believes it is prudent to limit the variability of a portion of its interest payments and, therefore hedges its variable-rate interest payments.  To meet this objective, management enters into interest rate swap agreements whereby the Company receives variable interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate payments during the contract period.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company received variable rate Libor payments from and paid fixed rates in accordance with its interest rate swap agreements.  A summary of the Company’s outstanding interest rate swap agreements used to hedge variable rate debt at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively is as follows:

(In thousands, except %ages and years)	2017			2016
Notional amount	$	60,000		$	60,000
Weighted average pay rate	1.26		%	1.43		%
Weighted average receive rate	1.03		%	0.67		%
Weighted average maturity in years	3.36			4.24
Unrealized gains relating to interest rate swaps	$	1,407		$	1,204

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the unrealized gains relating to interest rate swaps were recorded as an other asset. Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments of the variability of cash flows associated with long-term debt are reported in other comprehensive income.

10.  Commitments and Contingencies

Facility Lease Obligations

The Company operates eighteen branches, four branches are under operating leases and fourteen branches are owned. The contractual expiration range on the four leases is between the years 2018 and 2022. 

The following table summarizes the contractual rent payments expected in future years: 

(In thousands)	2018		2019		2020		2021		2022		Thereafter		Total
Operating lease rental payments	$	307	$	293	$	258	$	259	$	116	$	—	$	1,233

The annual rent, included above, is increased each year beginning January 1, 2018 by the increase in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) for the New York Metropolitan area (not to exceed 3.0 percent). Rent expense totaled $346 thousand for 2017 and $417 thousand for 2016.  The decrease was due to the Company purchasing its headquarters in March 2016. The Company currently accounts for all of its leases as operating leases.  

Litigation

The Company may, in the ordinary course of business, become a party to litigation involving collection matters, contract claims and other legal proceedings relating to the conduct of its business.  In the best judgment of management, based upon consultation with counsel, the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Company will not be affected materially by the final outcome of any pending legal proceedings or other contingent liabilities and commitments.

Commitments to Borrowers

Commitments to extend credit are legally binding loan commitments with set expiration dates.  They are intended to be disbursed, subject to certain conditions, upon the request of the borrower.  The Company was committed to advance approximately $291.9 million to its borrowers as of December 31, 2017, compared to $181.1 million at December 31, 2016.  At December 31, 2017, $66.5 million of these commitments expire within one year, compared to $23.5 million a year earlier.  At December 31, 2017, the Company had $5.6 million in standby letters of credit compared to $4.1 million at December 31, 2016.  The estimated fair value of these guarantees is not significant.  The Company believes it has the necessary liquidity to honor all commitments.

11.  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)^(a) 

The following table shows the changes in other comprehensive income (loss) for the past two years:

	For the year ended December 31, 2017
(In thousands)	Net unrealized (losses) gains on securities			Adjustments related to defined benefit plan			Net unrealized gains from cash flow hedges:		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, beginning of period	$	(161	)	$	(391	)	$	712	$	160
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications	(134		)	—			170		36
Less amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	40			(50		)	—		(10		)
Period change	(174		)	50			170		46
Balance, end of period	$	(335	)	$	(341	)	$	882	$	206

	For the year ended December 31, 2016
(In thousands)	Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities			Adjustments related to defined benefit plan			Net unrealized gains (losses) from cash flow hedges:			Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, beginning of period	$	(2	)	$	(448	)	$	(17	)	$	(467	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	116			—			729			845
Less amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss	275			(57		)	—			218
Period change	(159		)	57			729			627
Balance, end of period	$	(161	)	$	(391	)	$	712		$	160

(a) All amounts are net of tax.

12.  Shareholders’ Equity

Shareholders’ equity increased$11.8 million to $118.1 million at December 31, 2017 compared to $106.3 million at December 31, 2016, primarily due to net income of $12.9 million. Other items impacting shareholders’ equity included $2.4 million in dividends paid on common stock, $1.3 million from the issuance of common stock under employee benefit plans and $46 thousand in accumulated other comprehensive income net of tax. The issuance of common stock under employee benefit plans includes nonqualified stock options and restricted stock expense related entries, employee option exercises and the tax benefit of options exercised.

Repurchase Plan

On October 21, 2002, the Company authorized the repurchase of up to 10 percent of its outstanding common stock.  The amount and timing of purchases is dependent upon a number of factors, including the price and availability of the Company’s shares, general market conditions and competing alternate uses of funds.  As of December 31, 2017, the Company had repurchased a total of 556 thousand shares, of which 131 thousand shares have been retired, leaving 153 thousand shares remaining to be repurchased under the plan.  There were no shares repurchased during 2017 or 2016.

13. Other Income

The components of other income for the past two years are as follows:

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017		2016
ATM and check card fees	$	721	$	614
Wire transfer fees	104		106
Safe deposit box fees	92		92
Other	191		173
Total other income	$	1,108	$	985

14. Other Expenses

The components of other expenses for the past two years are as follows:

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017		2016
Travel, entertainment, training and recruiting	$	761	$	825
Insurance	347		343
Stationery and supplies	249		222
Retail losses	37		79
Other	489		373
Total other expenses	$	1,883	$	1,842

15.  Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017 the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (TCJA) was signed into law, lowering the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, which will provide a significant tax benefit in 2018 and beyond. However, net income for 2017 was adversely impacted. Under ASC 740, Income Taxes, Unity was required to adjust its deferred income tax balances as of the enactment date to reflect a rate of 21%. This adjustment resulted in a $1.7 million increase in income tax expense and is included in the line "Federal - deferred provision" in the table below.

The components of the provision for income taxes for the past two years are as follows: 

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017			2016
Federal - current provision	$	7,003		$	6,352
Federal - deferred provision	1,702			73
Total federal provision	8,705			6,425
State - current provision	991			795
State - deferred (benefit) provision	(156		)	37
Total state provision	835			832
Total provision for income taxes	$	9,540		$	7,257

Reconciliation between the reported income tax provision and the amount computed by multiplying income before taxes by the statutory Federal income tax rate for the past two years is as follows:

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands, except percentages)	2017			2016
Federal income tax provision at statutory rate	$	7,852		$	7,162
Increases (Decreases) resulting from:
Stock option and restricted stock	(428		)	—
Bank owned life insurance	(164		)	(132		)
Tax-exempt interest	(56		)	(71		)
Meals and entertainment	22			21
Captive insurance premium	(295		)	—
State income taxes, net of federal income tax effect	543			541
Impact of rate change on deferred tax assets	1,733			—
Other, net	333			(264		)
Provision for income taxes	$	9,540		$	7,257
Effective tax rate	42.5		%	35.5		%

Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities.  The components of the net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows: 

(In thousands)	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	3,782		$	5,115
Stock-based compensation	434			565
SERP	334			418
State net operating loss	296			123
Deferred compensation	274			324
Depreciation	237			345
Net unrealized security gains	150			110
Commitment reserve	81			74
Lost interest on nonaccrual loans	30			58
OREO Writedowns	14			420
Other	331			85
Gross deferred tax assets	5,963			7,637
Valuation allowance	(296		)	(123		)
Total deferred tax assets	5,667			7,514
Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred loan costs	502			624
Interest rate swaps	396			492
Goodwill	341			456
Prepaid Insurance	298			—
Deferred servicing fees	100			327
Bond accretion	13			103
Total deferred tax liabilities	1,650			2,002
Net deferred tax asset	$	4,017		$	5,512

The Company computes deferred income taxes under the asset and liability method.  Deferred income taxes are recognized for tax consequences of “temporary differences” by applying enacted statutory tax rates to differences between the financial reporting and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities.  A deferred tax liability is recognized for all temporary differences that will result in future taxable income.  A deferred tax asset is recognized for all temporary differences that will result in future tax deductions subject to reduction of the asset by a valuation allowance.

The Company had a $296 thousand and $123 thousand valuation allowance for deferred tax assets related to its state net operating loss carry-forward deferred tax asset at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The Company’s state net operating loss carry-forwards totaled approximately $4.2 million at December 31, 2017 and expire between 2030 and 2036.

Included as a component of deferred tax assets is an income tax expense (benefit) related to unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, a supplemental retirement plan (SERP) and interest rate swaps.  The after-tax component of each of these is included in other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity.  The after-tax component related to securities available for sale was an unrealized loss of $335 thousand and $161 thousand for 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The after-tax component related to the SERP was an unrealized loss of $341 thousand for 2017, compared to $391 thousand in 2016. The after-tax component related to the interest rate swaps was an unrealized gain of $882 thousand for 2017, compared to an unrealized gain of $712 thousand in the prior year.

The Company follows FASB ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” which prescribes a threshold for the financial statement recognition of income taxes and provides criteria for the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  ASC 740 also includes guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition of income taxes.  The Company did not recognize or accrue any interest or penalties related to income taxes during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.  The Company does not have an accrual for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2017 or 2016, as deductions taken and benefits accrued are based on widely understood administrative practices and procedures and are based on clear and unambiguous tax law.  Tax returns for all years 2013 and thereafter are subject to future examination by tax authorities.

16.  Net Income per Share

The following is a reconciliation of the calculation of basic and diluted net income per share for the past two years: 

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2017		2016
Net income	$	12,893	$	13,209
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic	10,558		9,416
Plus: Potential dilutive common stock equivalents	191		156
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted	10,749		9,572
Net income per common share - Basic	$	1.22	$	1.40
Net income per common share - Diluted	1.20		1.38
Stock options and common stock excluded from the income per share calculation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive	$	71	$	73

17.  Regulatory Capital

A significant measure of the strength of a financial institution is its capital base. Federal regulators have classified and defined capital into the following components: (1) tier 1 capital, which includes tangible shareholders’ equity for common stock, qualifying preferred stock and certain qualifying hybrid instruments, and (2) tier 2 capital, which includes a portion of the allowance for loan losses, subject to limitations, certain qualifying long-term debt, preferred stock and hybrid instruments, which do not qualify for tier 1 capital. The Parent Company and its subsidiary Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by banking regulators. Quantitative measures of capital adequacy include the leverage ratio (tier 1 capital as a percentage of tangible assets), tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (tier 1 capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets), total risk-based capital ratio (total risk-based capital as a percent of total risk-weighted assets), and common equity tier 1 capital ratio.

Minimum capital levels are regulated by risk-based capital adequacy guidelines, which require the Company and the Bank to maintain certain capital as a percentage of assets and certain off-balance sheet items adjusted for predefined credit risk factors (risk-weighted assets). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action applicable to banks, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.

In September 2010, the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision, the oversight body of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, adopted Basel III, which constitutes a set of capital reform measures designed to strengthen the regulation, supervision and risk management of banking organizations worldwide. In order to implement Basel III and certain additional capital changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC approved, as an interim final rule in July 2013, the regulatory capital requirements substantially similar to final rules issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) for U.S. state nonmember banks and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for national banks.

The interim final rule includes new risk-based capital and leverage ratios that will be phased-in from 2015 to 2019 for most state nonmember banks. The rule includes a new common equity Tier 1 capital (“CET1”) to risk-weighted assets ratio of 4.5% and a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, which is in addition to the Tier 1 and Total risk-based capital requirements. The interim final rule also raises the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% and requires a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. The required minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets will remain 8.0%. The new risk-based capital requirements (except for the capital conservation buffer) became effective for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015.

The new rules also include a one-time opportunity to opt-out of the changes to treatment of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) components. By making the election to opt-out, the institution may continue treating AOCI items in a manner consistent with risk-based capital rules in place prior to January 2015. The Bank and the Company have made the election to opt out of the treatment of AOCI on the appropriate March 31, 2015 filings.

The following table summarizes the Company's and the Bank's regulatory capital ratios at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, as well as the minimum regulatory capital ratios required for the Bank to be deemed "well-capitalized".

	At December 31, 2017				Required for capital adequacy purposes effective								To be well-capitalized under prompt corrective action regulations
	Company		Bank		January 1, 2017				January 1, 2019				Bank
Leverage ratio	9.37	%	9.03	%	4.000	%			4.00	%			5.00	%
CET1	10.81	%	11.33	%	5.750	%	(1	)	7.00	%	(2	)	6.50	%
Tier I risk-based capital ratio	11.75	%	11.33	%	7.250	%	(1	)	8.50	%	(2	)	8.00	%
Total risk-based capital ratio	12.87	%	12.50	%	9.250	%	(1	)	10.50	%	(2	)	10.00	%
(1) Includes 1.25% capital conservation buffer.
(2) Includes 2.5% capital conservation buffer.

	At December 31, 2016				Required for capital adequacy purposes effective								To be well-capitalized under prompt corrective action regulations
	Company		Bank		January 1, 2016				January 1, 2019				Bank
Leverage ratio	9.73	%	9.50	%	4.000	%			4.00	%			5.00	%
CET1	11.49	%	12.23	%	5.125	%	(3	)	7.00	%	(4	)	6.50	%
Tier I risk-based capital ratio	12.58	%	12.23	%	6.625	%	(3	)	8.50	%	(4	)	8.00	%
Total risk-based capital ratio	13.84	%	13.48	%	8.625	%	(3	)	10.50	%	(4	)	10.00	%
(3) Includes 0.625% capital conservation buffer.
(4) Includes 2.5% capital conservation buffer..

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, Unity Bank is “well-capitalized” under the applicable regulatory capital adequacy guidelines.

18.  Employee Benefit Plans

Stock Transactions

On August 26, 2016, the Company declared a 10% stock dividend to shareholders' of record as of September 15, 2016. The 10% stock dividend was paid on September 30, 2016. All share amounts in the following tables have been restated to include the effect of the 10% stock dividend distribution.

Stock Option Plans

The Company has incentive and nonqualified option plans, which allow for the grant of options to officers, employees and members of the Board of Directors.  Transactions under the Company’s stock option plans for 2017 and 2016 are summarized in the following table: 

	Shares		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual life in years	Aggregate intrinsic value
Outstanding at December 31, 2015	522,338		$	6.45	5.1	$	2,561,095
Options granted	127,400		11.11
Options exercised	(90,871	)	7.97
Options forfeited	(1,833	)	7.00
Options expired	(4,275	)	7.64
Outstanding at December 31, 2016	552,759		$	7.26	5.7	$	4,663,432
Options granted	47,100		16.37
Options exercised	(94,679	)	6.19
Options forfeited	—		—
Options expired	(607	)	11.48
Outstanding at December 31, 2017	504,573		$	8.31	5.7	$	5,772,843
Exercisable at December 31, 2017	351,648		$	6.53	4.6	$	4,648,981

Grants under the Company’s incentive and nonqualified option plans generally vest over 3 years and must be exercised within 10 years of the date of grant.  The exercise price of each option is the market price on the date of grant.  As of December 31, 2017, 2,462,585 shares have been reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options, 504,573 option grants are outstanding, and 1,575,640 option grants have been exercised, forfeited or expired, leaving 382,372 shares available for grant.

The fair values of the options granted during 2017 and 2016 were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: 

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017			2016
Number of options granted	47,100			127,400
Weighted average exercise price	$	16.37		$	11.11
Weighted average fair value of options	$	4.64		$	3.49
Expected life in years (1)	6.57			6.79
Expected volatility (2)	28.12		%	31.02		%
Risk-free interest rate (3)	2.18		%	1.94		%
Dividend yield (4)	1.15		%	1.38		%

(1) The expected life of the options was estimated based on historical employee behavior and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.

(2) The expected volatility of the Company’s stock price was based on the historical volatility over the period commensurate with the expected life of the options. 

(3) The risk-free interest rate is the U.S Treasury rate commensurate with the expected life of the options on the date of grant.

(4) The expected dividend yield is the projected annual yield based on the grant date stock price.

Upon exercise, the Company issues shares from its authorized but unissued common stock to satisfy the options.  The following table presents information about options exercised during 2017 and 2016: 

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017		2016
Number of options exercised	94,679		90,871
Total intrinsic value of options exercised	$	1,073,474	$	451,288
Cash received from options exercised	509,047		549,918
Tax deduction realized from options exercised	438,514		184,351

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2017: 

	Options outstanding				Options exercisable
Range of exercise prices	Options outstanding	Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years)	Weighted average exercise price		Options exercisable	Weighted average exercise price
0.00 - 4.00	77,000	1.1	$	3.51	77,000	$	3.51
4.01 - 8.00	186,340	4.5	6.20		186,340	6.20
8.01 - 12.00	164,633	7.8	9.51		78,471	9.27
12.01 - 16.00	46,600	9.0	15.00		9,837	14.60
16.01 - 20.00	30,000	9.2	$	16.75	—	$	—
Total	504,573	5.7	$	8.31	351,648	$	6.53

FASBASC Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation,” requires an entity to recognize the fair value of equity awards as compensation expense over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for such an award (vesting period).  Compensation expense related to stock options and the related income tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are detailed in the following table:

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017		2016
Compensation expense	$	283,823	$	218,013
Income tax benefit	115,942		89,058

As of December 31, 2017, unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s stock option plans totaled approximately $357 thousand.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock is issued under the stock bonus program to reward employees and directors and to retain them by distributing stock over a period of time.  The following table summarizes nonvested restricted stock activity for the year ended December 31, 2017:

	Shares		Average grant date fair value
Nonvested restricted stock at December 31, 2016	97,203		$	9.47
Granted	38,400		16.36
Canceled	—		—
Vested	(41,600	)	8.92
Nonvested restricted stock at December 31, 2017	94,003		$	12.53

Restricted stock awards granted to date vest over a period of 4 years and are recognized as compensation to the recipient over the vesting period.  Unless the recipient makes an election to recognize all compensation on the grant date, the awards are recorded at fair market value at the time of grant and amortized into salary expense on a straight line basis over the vesting period.  As of December 31, 2017, 518,157 shares of restricted stock were reserved for issuance, of which 111,404 shares are available for grant.

Restricted stock awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows: 

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017		2016
Number of shares granted	38,400		44,016
Average grant date fair value	$	16.36	$	11.21

Compensation expense related to the restricted stock for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is detailed in the following table: 

	For the years ended December 31,
	2017		2016
Compensation expense	$	462,470	$	327,151
Income tax benefit	188,919		133,644

As of December 31, 2017, there was approximately $850 thousand of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards granted under the Company’s stock incentive plans.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.6 years.

401(k) Savings Plan

The Bank has a 401(k) savings plan covering substantially all employees.  Under the Plan, an employee can contribute up to 80 percent of their salary on a tax deferred basis.  The Bank may also make discretionary contributions to the Plan.  The Bank contributed $492 thousand and $388 thousand to the Plan in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Deferred Fee Plan

The Company has a deferred fee plan for Directors and executive management.  Directors of the Company have the option to elect to defer up to 100 percent of their respective retainer and Board of Director fees, and each member of executive management has the option to elect to defer 100 percent of their year end cash bonuses.  Director and executive deferred fees totaled $149 thousand in 2017 and $120 thousand in 2016, and the interest paid on deferred balances totaled $44 thousand in 2017 and $34 thousand in 2016. The fees distributed on the deferred balances totaled $8 thousand in 2017. No fees were distributed in 2016.

Benefit Plans

In addition to the 401(k) savings plan which covers substantially all employees in 2015, the Company established an unfunded supplemental defined benefit plan to provide additional retirement benefits for the President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and certain key executives.

On June 4, 2015, the Company approved the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) pursuant to which the President and CEO is entitled to receive certain supplemental nonqualified retirement benefits. On November 21, 2016 the Company approved a change in calculation of the Retirement Benefit payable under the Plan so that the Retirement Benefit shall be an amount equal to forty (40%) percent of the average of the Executive's base salary for the thirty-six (36) months immediately preceding executive's separation from service after age 66, adjusted annually thereafter by 2 percent. The total benefit is to be made payable in fifteen annual installments.  The future payments are estimated to total $3.4 million.  A discount rate of 4.00 percent was used to calculate the present value of the benefit obligation.

The President and CEO commenced vesting to this retirement benefit on January 1, 2014, and it will vest an additional 3 percent each year until fully vested on January 1, 2024. In the event that the President and CEO’s separation from service from the company were to occur prior to full vesting, the President and CEO would be entitled to and shall be paid the vested portion of the retirement benefit calculated as of the date of separation from service. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon a Change in Control, and provided that within 6 months following the Change in Control the President and CEO is involuntarily terminated for reasons other than “cause” or the President and CEO resigns for “good reason”, as such is defined in the SERP, or the President and CEO voluntarily terminates his employment after being offered continued employment in a position that is not a “Comparable Position”, as such is also defined in the SERP, the President and CEO shall become 100 percent vested in the full retirement benefit.

No contributions or payments have been made for the year 2017 or 2016. The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic pension cost of the defined benefit plan recognized during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017		2016
Service cost	$	121	$	62
Interest cost	43		38
Amortization of prior service cost	83		83
Net periodic benefit cost	$	247	$	183

The following table summarizes the changes in benefit obligations of the defined benefit plan recognized during the years ended December 31, 2017: 

	For the years ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017		2016
Benefit obligation, beginning of year	$	1,023	$	923
Service cost	121		62
Interest cost	43		38
Benefit obligation, end of year	$	1,187	$	1,023

On October 22, 2015, the Company entered into an Executive Incentive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) with key executive officers. The Plan has an effective date of January 1, 2015.

The Plan is an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan.  For any Plan Year, a guaranteed annual Deferral Award percentage of seven and one half percent (7.5%) of the participant’s annual base salary shall be credited to each Participant’s Deferred Benefit Account. A discretionary annual Deferral Award equal to seven and one half percent (7.5%) of the participant’s annual base salary may be credited to the Participant’s account in addition to the guaranteed Deferral Award, if the Bank exceeds the benchmarks set forth in the Annual Executive Bonus Matrix. The total Deferral Award shall never exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the participant's base salary for any given Plan Year. Each Participant shall be one hundred percent (100%) vested in all Deferral Awards as of the date they are awarded.

As of December 31, 2017, the company had total expenses of $90 thousand, compared to $30 thousand for the prior year.  The Plan is reflected on the Company’s balance sheet as accrued expenses.

Certain members of management are also enrolled in a split-dollar life insurance plan with a post retirement death benefit of $250 thousand.  Total expenses related to this plan were $5 thousand in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

19.  Fair Value

Fair Value Measurement

The Company follows FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” which requires additional disclosures about the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value.  Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including market, income and cost approaches.  Based on these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique.  These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable inputs.  The Company utilizes techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values.  Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed as follows:

Level 1 Inputs

• Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

• Generally, this includes debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market (i.e. New York Stock Exchange), as well as certain U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government and sponsored entity agency mortgage-backed securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

Level 2 Inputs

• Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets. 

• Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets.

• Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for the term of the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds or volatilities) or “market corroborated inputs.”

• Generally, this includes U.S. Government and sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt securities and derivative contracts.

Level 3 Inputs

• Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market activity) and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

• These assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Securities Available for Sale

As of December 31, 2017, the fair value of the Company's AFS securities portfolio was $53.5 million.  Approximately60 percent of the portfolio was made up of residential mortgage-backed securities, which had a fair value of $31.9 million at December 31, 2017.  Approximately $31.3 million of the residential mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA"), the Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC").  The underlying loans for these securities are residential mortgages that are geographically dispersed throughout the United States. 

All of the Company’s AFS securities were classified as Level 2 assets at December 31, 2017.  The valuation of AFS securities using Level 2 inputs was primarily determined using the market approach, which uses quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and all other relevant information.  It includes model pricing, defined as valuing securities based upon their relationship with other benchmark securities. 

Derivative Assets and Liabilities

The Company's derivative assets and liabilities consist of transactions as part of management's strategy to manage interest rate risk. The valuation of the Company's interest rate swaps is obtained from a third-party pricing service and is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. The pricing analysis is based on observable inputs for the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity and interest rate curves. The Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its interest rate derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

There were no changes in the inputs or methodologies used to determine fair value during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.  

The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31^st for the past two years: 

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 Using
(In thousands)	Assets/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Measured on a recurring basis:
Assets:
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	$	5,691	$	—	$	5,691	$	—
State and political subdivisions	5,192		—		5,192		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	31,878		—		31,878		—
Corporate and other securities	10,732		—		10,732		—
Total securities available for sale	$	53,493	$	—	$	53,493	$	—
Interest rate swap agreements	1,407		—		1,407		—
Total	$	1,407	$	—	$	1,407	$	—
	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using
(In thousands)	Assets/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Measured on a recurring basis:
Assets:
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government sponsored entities	$	3,716	$	—	$	3,716	$	—
State and political subdivisions	5,502		—		5,502		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities	21,631		—		21,631		—
Corporate and other securities	9,719		—		9,719		—
Total securities available for sale	$	40,568	$	—	$	40,568	$	—
Interest rate swap agreements	1,204		—		1,204		—
Total	$	1,204	$	—	$	1,204	$	—

Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).  The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:

Appraisal Policy

All appraisals must be performed in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (“USPAP”).  Appraisals are certified to the Company and performed by appraisers on the Company’s approved list of appraisers.  Evaluations are completed by a person independent of Company management.  The content of the appraisal depends on the complexity of the property.  Appraisals are completed on a “retail value” and an “as is value”.

The Company requires current real estate appraisals on all loans that become OREO or in-substance foreclosure, loans that are classified substandard, doubtful or loss, or loans that are over $100,000 and nonperforming.  Prior to each balance sheet date, the Company values impaired collateral-dependent loans and OREO based upon a third party appraisal, broker's price opinion, drive by appraisal, automated valuation model, updated market evaluation, or a combination of these methods.  The amount is discounted for the decline in market real estate values (for original appraisals), for any known damage or repair costs, and for selling and closing costs.  The amount of the discount ranges from 10 to 15 percent and is dependent upon the method used to determine the original value.  The original appraisal is generally used when a loan is first determined to be impaired.  When applying the discount, the Company takes into consideration when the appraisal was performed, the collateral’s location, the type of collateral, any known damage to the property and the type of business.  Subsequent to entering impaired status and the Company determining that there is a collateral shortfall, the Company will generally, depending on the type of collateral, order a third party appraisal, broker's price opinion, automated valuation model or updated market evaluation.  Subsequent to receiving the third party results, the Company will discount the value 6% to 10% percent for selling and closing costs.

OREO

The fair value was determined using appraisals, which may be discounted based on management’s review and changes in market conditions (Level 3 Inputs).  

Impaired Collateral-Dependent Loans

The Company's assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are limited to impaired loans and other real estate owned. Impaired loans are classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The fair value of impaired collateral-dependent loans is derived in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310, “Receivables.”  Fair value is determined based on the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, as determined through either an appraisal or evaluation process. The basis for the Company's appraisal and appraisal review process is based on regulatory guidelines and strives to comply with all regulatory appraisal laws, regulations and the Uniform Standard of Professional Appraisal Practice. All appraisals are "as is" (the property's highest and best use) valuations based on the net realizable value, which is the appraised value less any closing costs, when applicable. Partially charged-off loans are measured for impairment based upon an appraisal for collateral-dependent loans.  When an updated appraisal is received for a nonperforming loan, the value on the appraisal is discounted in the manner discussed above.  If there is a deficiency in the value after the Company applies these discounts, management applies a specific reserve and the loan remains in nonaccrual status.  The receipt of an updated appraisal would not qualify as a reason to put a loan back into accruing status.  The Company removes loans from nonaccrual status when the borrower makes six months of contractual payments and demonstrates the ability to service the debt going forward.  Charge-offs are determined based upon the loss that management believes the Company will incur after evaluating collateral for impairment based upon the valuation methods described above and the ability of the borrower to pay any deficiency.

Other real estate owned is comprised of real estate acquired by foreclosure and deeds in lieu of foreclosure. Other real estate owned is carried at the lower of the recorded investment in the property or its fair value less estimated costs to sell such property (as determined by independent appraisal) within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Prior to foreclosure, the value of the underlying loan is written down to the fair value of the real estate to be acquired by a charge to the allowance for loan losses, if necessary. The fair value is reviewed periodically and subsequent write downs are made accordingly through a charge to operations. The valuation allowance for impaired loans is included in the allowance for loan losses in the consolidated balance sheets.  At December 31, 2017, the valuation allowance for impaired loans was $332 thousand, an increase of $53 thousand from $280 thousand at December 31, 2016.

The following tables present the assets and liabilities subject to fair value adjustments (impairment) on a non-recurring basis carried on the balance sheet by caption and by level within the hierarchy (as described above):

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 Using
(In thousands)	Assets/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Net Provision (Credit) During Period
Measured on a non-recurring basis:
Financial assets:
OREO	$	426	$	—	$	—	$	426	$	(299	)
Impaired collateral-dependent loans	1,126		—		—		1,126		(86		)
	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using
(In thousands)	Assets/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Net Provision (Credit) During Period
Measured on a non-recurring basis:
Financial assets:
OREO	$	1,050	$	—	$	—	$	1,050	$	(1,110	)
Impaired collateral-dependent loans	1,767		—		—		1,767		(665		)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires the disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including those financial instruments for which the Company did not elect the fair value option.  These estimated fair values as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.  Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop estimates of fair value.  The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange.  The use of alternative market assumptions and estimation methodologies could have had a material effect on these estimates of fair value.  The methodology for estimating the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are discussed above.  

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of other financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For these short-term instruments, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities

The fair value of securities is based upon quoted market prices for similar or identical assets or other observable inputs (Level 2) or externally developed models that use unobservable inputs due to limited or no market activity of the instrument (Level 3).

SBA Loans Held for Sale

The fair value of SBA loans held for sale is estimated by using a market approach that includes significant other observable inputs.

Loans

The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current market rates that reflect the interest rate risk inherent in the loan, except for previously discussed impaired loans.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

Federal Home Loan Bank stock is carried at cost.  Carrying value approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the issues.

Servicing Assets

Servicing assets do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices.  The Company estimates the fair value of servicing assets using discounted cash flow models incorporating numerous assumptions from the perspective of a market participant including market discount rates and prepayment speeds. The Company uses the carrying value of the servicing assets to approximate the fair value.

Accrued Interest

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e. carrying value).  The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current market rates.

Borrowed Funds and Subordinated Debentures

The fair value of borrowings is estimated by discounting the projected future cash flows using current market rates.

Standby Letters of Credit

At December 31, 2017, the Bank had standby letters of credit outstanding of $5.6 million, as compared to $4.1 million at December 31, 2016.  The fair value of these commitments is nominal.

The table below presents the carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments not previously presented as of December 31^st for the past two years:

		December 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
(In thousands)	Fair value level	Carrying amount		Estimated fair value		Carrying amount		Estimated fair value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Level 1	$	150,254	$	150,254	$	105,895	$	105,895
Securities (1)	Level 2	69,800		69,839		61,547		61,536
SBA loans held for sale	Level 2	22,810		25,568		14,773		16,440
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses (2)	Level 2	1,134,308		1,133,739		946,062		944,772
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	Level 2	12,863		12,863		6,037		6,037
Servicing assets	Level 3	1,800		1,800		2,086		2,086
Accrued interest receivable	Level 2	5,447		5,447		4,462		4,462
OREO	Level 3	426		426		1,050		1,050
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	Level 2	1,043,137		1,041,111		945,723		944,886
Borrowed funds and subordinated debentures	Level 2	285,310		284,117		131,310		130,319
Accrued interest payable	Level 2	436		436		430		430

(1) Includes held to maturity commercial mortgage-backed securities that are considered Level 3 at December 31, 2016.  There were no HTM corporate securities that are considered Level 3 at December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2016, these securities had a book value of $3.8 million and a market value of $3.6 million.

(2) Includes impaired loans that are considered Level 3 and reported separately in the tables under the “Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis” heading.  Collateral-dependent impaired loans, net of specific reserves totaled $1.8 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

20.  Condensed Financial Statements of Unity Bancorp, Inc.

(Parent Company Only)

Balance Sheets
(In thousands)	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,632	$	1,606
Securities available for sale	278		1
Investment in subsidiaries	124,634		113,327
Premises and equipment, net	3,999		4,048
Other assets	369		185
Total assets	$	130,912	$	119,167
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Loan due to subsidiary bank	$	2,483	$	2,566
Other liabilities	14		—
Subordinated debentures	10,310		10,310
Shareholders' equity	118,105		106,291
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	130,912	$	119,167

Statements of Income	For the year ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017			2016
Total interest income	$	2,456		$	6,964
Total interest expense	251			265
Net interest income	2,205			6,699
Gains on sales of securities	—			177
Gain on repurchase of subordinated debenture	—			994
Rental income	409			326
Other expenses	251			245
Income before provision for income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary	2,363			7,951
(Benefit) Provision for income taxes	(15		)	550
Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary	2,378			7,401
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary	10,515			5,808
Net income	$	12,893		$	13,209

Statements of Cash Flows	For the year ended December 31,
(In thousands)	2017			2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	12,893		$	13,209
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary	(10,515		)	(5,808		)
Gains on sales of securities	—			(177		)
Gain on repurchase of subordinated debenture	—			(994		)
Net change in other assets and other liabilities	(80		)	118
Net cash provided by operating activities	2,298			6,348
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of land and building	(55		)	(4,375		)
Purchases of securities	(262		)	(445		)
Repayment of advances to subsidiary	—			7,230
Proceeds from sales of securities	—			769
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(317		)	3,179
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	509			550
Proceeds from capital offering	—			14,412
Proceeds from advances from subsidiaries	—			2,625
Repayment of advances from subsidiaries	(83		)	(59		)
Repayment of long term debt	—			(2,891		)
Investment in Bank	—			(21,500		)
Cash dividends paid on common stock	(2,380		)	(1,524		)
Net cash provided used in financing activities	(1,954		)	(8,387		)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents	27			1,140
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	1,606			466
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	1,633		$	1,606
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Interest paid	$	374		$	273

Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is unaudited.  However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the results of operations for the periods, are reflected.

	2017
(In thousands, except per share data)	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
Total interest income	$	12,594	$	13,477	$	14,195	$	15,044
Total interest expense	2,204		2,327		2,378		2,544
Net interest income	10,390		11,150		11,817		12,500
Provision for loan losses	250		400		500		500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	10,140		10,750		11,317		12,000
Total noninterest income	2,204		2,021		2,008		2,037
Total noninterest expense	7,440		7,421		7,554		7,629
Income before provision for income taxes	4,904		5,350		5,771		6,408
Provision for income taxes	1,712		1,906		2,014		3,908
Net income	$	3,192	$	3,444	$	3,757	$	2,500
Net income per common share - Basic	$	0.30	$	0.33	$	0.36	$	0.23
Net income per common share - Diluted	0.30		0.32		0.35		0.23

	2016
(In thousands, except per share data)	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
Total interest income	$	11,176	$	11,487	$	12,081	$	12,280
Total interest expense	2,189		2,145		2,208		2,225
Net interest income	8,987		9,342		9,873		10,055
Provision for loan losses	200		400		420		200
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	8,787		8,942		9,453		9,855
Total noninterest income	4,280		2,234		2,173		2,373
Total noninterest expense	6,607		6,728		6,993		7,303
Income before provision for income taxes	6,460		4,448		4,633		4,925
Provision for income taxes	2,255		1,624		1,613		1,765
Net income	$	4,205	$	2,824	$	3,020	$	3,160
Net income per common share - Basic	$	0.45	$	0.30	$	0.32	$	0.33
Net income per common share - Diluted	0.44		0.30		0.32		0.32

All net income per share figures shown above have been adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid September 30, 2016.

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

	At or for the years ended December 31,
(In thousands, except percentages)	2017			2016			2015			2014			2013
Selected Results of Operations
Interest income	$	55,310		$	47,024		$	41,651		$	37,418		$	33,954
Interest expense	9,453			8,767			7,660			7,306			6,529
Net interest income	45,857			38,257			33,991			30,112			27,425
Provision for loan losses	1,650			1,220			500			2,550			2,350
Noninterest income	8,270			11,060			7,729			6,679			6,604
Noninterest expense	30,044			27,631			26,852			24,688			23,997
Provision for income taxes	9,540			7,257			4,811			3,145			2,567
Net income	12,893			13,209			9,557			6,408			5,115
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion	—			—			—			—			988
Income available to common shareholders	12,893			13,209			9,557			6,408			4,127
Per Share Data
Net income per common share - Basic	$	1.22		$	1.40		$	1.03		$	0.75		$	0.50
Net income per common share - Diluted	1.20			1.38			1.02			0.74			0.48
Book value per common share	11.13			10.14			8.45			7.60			6.86
Market value per common share	19.75			15.70			11.34			8.57			6.96
Cash dividends declared on common shares	0.23			0.18			0.13			0.09			0.03
Selected Balance Sheet Data
Assets	$	1,455,496		$	1,189,906		$	1,084,866		$	1,008,788		$	921,118
Loans	1,170,674			973,414			888,958			761,825			678,701
Allowance for loan losses	(13,556		)	(12,579		)	(12,759		)	(12,551		)	(13,141		)
Securities	69,800			61,547			71,336			80,082			107,514
Deposits	1,043,137			945,723			894,493			794,341			738,698
Borrowed funds and subordinated debentures	285,310			131,310			107,465			140,465			122,465
Shareholders' equity	118,105			106,291			78,470			70,123			57,173
Common shares outstanding	10,615			10,477			9,279			9,227			8,335
Performance Ratios
Return on average assets	1.02		%	1.17		%	0.96		%	0.70		%	0.61		%
Return on average equity	11.47			15.37			12.92			10.28			7.22
Average equity to average assets	8.85			7.59			7.42			6.80			7.91
Efficiency ratio	55.57			56.51			64.41			67.90			71.34
Dividend payout	18.33			13.04			12.50			12.35			5.66
Net interest spread	3.57			3.36			3.42			3.35			3.34
Net interest margin	3.83			3.58			3.63			3.53			3.53
Asset Quality Ratios
Allowance for loan losses to loans	1.16		%	1.29		%	1.44		%	1.65		%	1.94		%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans	452.77			173.82			175.74			110.41			85.98
Nonperforming loans to total loans	0.26			0.74			0.82			1.49			2.25
Nonperforming assets to total loans and OREO	0.29			0.85			0.99			1.64			2.34
Nonperforming assets to total assets	0.23			0.70			0.82			1.24			1.73
Net charge-offs to average loans	0.06			0.15			0.04			0.44			0.63
Capital Ratios - Company
Leverage Ratio	9.37		%	9.73		%	8.82		%	8.71		%	8.08		%
Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio	10.81			11.49			9.37			n/a			n/a
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio	11.75			12.58			11.18			11.57			10.74
Total risk-based capital ratio	12.87			13.84			12.43			12.83			11.99
Capital Ratios - Bank
Leverage Ratio	9.03		%	9.50		%	7.95		%	7.80		%	7.02		%
Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio	11.33			12.23			10.08			n/a			n/a
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio	11.33			12.23			10.08			10.37			9.33
Total risk-based capital ratio	12.50			13.48			12.36			12.80			11.88